Some Excavations on the Line of the Antonine Wall, 1957-80

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Some Excavations on the Line of the Antonine Wall, 1957-80 Proc Antiqc So Scot, 111, 1981, 229-247 Some excavations on the line of the Antonine Wall, 1957-80 L J F Keppie* and D J Breezef with contributions by James Barber, G Finlayson, N McCord, I Maclvor FranceJ , s MurrayScobieH J H WalkeJ J J ,C , d an r Wilkes ABSTRACT Repor smal5 1 f lto excavation foud san r watching brief definitioe sth whicWale o t th d f lhn o le lin e in thre informatioew placene d san n concernin structuree gth , buildin histor d Wale gan th f ly o elsewhere . seee particularn b I applo nt w no y fuln onle th ca :l y, ditche widt ovem th centrae 2 f h1 th r,o l sector; a demarcation line in the stone base has been detected; the rampart at Tollpark underwent major repair an duniquea inexplicabled an , , stone platfor attaches m basewa e th d.o t INTRODUCTION Parts i and ii are numbered separately, each list running in geographical order from E to W, as in an earlier paper published in these Proceedings, which reported on similar work carried out between 197 197d 3an 6 (Keppie 1976, 61-80) orden .I helo rt p differentiat separate eth e entrien so numbere th (fi p , g1) ma se relatinth placee pargo t ar circla i t n di e whila en thosi e parn ear i i i t square. Copieoriginae th f o s l reports, together with supportingd documentationan 7 1- , i s no f o , ii, 3-12 are held in the Hunterian Museum, University of Glasgow, together with the small finds from Garnhall, Westerwood and Carleith, with copies of the documentation in the National Monuments Record for Scotland. The records and finds from nos ii, 1 and 2 are in Falkirk Museum. This paper completes the publication of all such excavations on the line of the Antonine Wall sponsore Scottise th y db h Development Department Ancient Monuments Branchs it r o , predecessors, up to 1980. (i) 1957-69 Edite Daviy db dBreezJ e followine Th g seven excavations were carrie t betweedou n 195reques e 196d th 7 an t 9a f o t Inspectorate th Ancienf eo t Monuments, actin Ministrbehale n go th f o f Workf y succeso s it r so - sorsreporte Th . s wer producel eal d promptl havd yan e since lai departmentan no l files. However, t seemi s appropriat publiso et reporte hth thes s a l includ yal e evidence relatin linee th , o gstruct - ture or history of the Antonine Wall. The reports have been edited to exclude extraneous matter, Hunteria* n Museum, Universit f Glasgowyo . (AncienD SD t t Monuments), 3-11 Melvill Edinburgh, eSt . 230 | PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY, 1981 E ANTONINTH E WALL Antonine Th FI G1 e Wall: locatio excavationf no watchind san g briefs numbere Th . circlen si s refe paro t r , i t thos squaren ei paro st . ii t such as the cost of the week's work at Bar Hill (23 shillings). A note in brackets at the end of each entry directs attentio lateno t r relevant materia provider lo s informatio latee th rn nhistoro e th f yo site. 1 BeancrosslDollhouse (NGR NS 925795 and 929794) McCorN d Earl Antonin e 196n vicinitye i th line th f 5 maith a eo n i f yo t n e cu draiWal s nlwa (Macdonald 1934, 116; Robertson 1979,46-7 vallew lo yPolmonte f juso th n )tW i . Although these work t inte scu o th accepted line of the Wall, the contractors did not detect any trace of ditch or wall. The area was further roadaffectew cuttine ne th , a whicy f db go h destroye dstretc a suppose e th f ho e Walde th th lin n f i l eo Beancross/Dollhouse area shorA . t excavatio undertakes nwa tracee y Aprith n nan i f f so i le 196se o 5t Wall could be found in the areas which remained unaffected by the digging of the drain but which would t throug proposee cu th e b y hb d roadpossiblo Tw . e areas were available, which include supposee dth d Walle betweeline th f eon ,o n Beancros Polmone th d san othe te Dollhousef Burno th d rE an , , where eth ground begin riso st Cadger' o et s Brae botn I . h case aree sth a availabl restrictes ewa narroa o dt w strip drainw draie ne th betwee,e nth line f havin th eo roa e d nth dan g encroached upo acceptee nth d linf eo the Wall particularly in the eastern of the two areas. In both areas trenches were cut across the available traco spacen t e bu ,whateve founds negative wa r Th . e naturresulte th especialls f eo swa ye cleath n i r western area, wher etrenca t righmh2 cu dee s t mapacros S pWalwa e O linth showe s ;e f a lsth e th o n no sectioe th n herconsistentls ewa y barre structuralf no wentt cu e traces dowth d nan , into quite clean heavy clay. Althoug positivo hn e conclusion drawe b n nsca from these results t migh,i regardee tb distinca s da t possibility that the accepted line of the Antonine Wall is not entirely accurate in the stretch between Polmont hill and Mumrills. (Th Antonine linth f eo e Wall immediatel Beancrosf o yS confirmes swa d durin gwatchina g brief in June 1973 (Keppie 1976Wale th line f l,th e o betwee63) t shouldebu , W e nth f Cadger' hero rd ean s Brae, where Macdonald foun stone dth e bas 191n ei 3 (Macdonald 1915, 135) wliicd confirmes an , hwa d by excavation in the next field to the E in 1960 (Steer 1961, 323), remains uncertain. DJB). 2 Tollpark 770777S (N ) I Maclvor lande Th Tollpar f owneCumbernaulse o w th no y de b kar d Development Corporation aree s .aTh i zoned by the Corporation for industry, and in order to lay out their sites the Corporation desired to know KEPPIE AND BREEZE: ANTONINE WALL, 1957-80 | 231 Romae limite th th f so n antiquities Corporatioe Th . n wishe establiso dt supplha coolinf yo g water rfo the industrial zone, and to erect a water tower on the high ground known as Hag Knowe. The Corporation's proposals required excavation to establish the line of the Military Way and to determine the nature of remaine Knowg th Ha n eso itself. Military Way Sections were taken across the presumed line of the Military Way as shown in aerial photographs in the possession of the Ordnance Survey. These sections were made on each of the hedge lines in the lands of Tollpark, where the line of the Military Way is seen on the aerial photographs to be dissociated from the line of present tracks. In the two easterly trenches a scatter of stones was observed at a depth of about 15 cm below the surface firmo N . cobblin sees gnwa here onld an ,yligh a t scatte stonef supposee ro seeth s n snwa o d line further to the W. The supposition must be that the Military Way has been scattered by ploughing, and thastone-scattee th t r appears more clearlaeriae th n ly o photograph s tha t doeni excavationsn si . Rampart sectio A acrosg du rampar e wid -n3s 1 m sth ewa t nea tentative th r watee eth sitr refo tower kerbe cobblind Th . san rampare th f go t were found, traverse culverta y db cobbline Th . s gwa covered by about 60 cm of turfwork in good preservation. The turfwork showed the same marked colour distinctions that were found in 1957-9 on the rampart at Rough Castle (Maclvor et al 1979, 100). There were only abou f plougo t 1m 5c h soil abov distince eth t line f turfso . But the section also revealed a feature which had not hitherto been noted on the line of the Wall. ramparkerbe e th Th f so t were about 4-4 apart2m standare ,th d ramparwidte th f ho t foundatione th o T . S of the kerbs was a line of large undressed stones forming a face 76 cm to the S of the S face of the rampart blockind an , culverte entre th g th southerl e o yt Th . y lin f stoneeo places m levec a swa t 0 da 3 l higher than the level of the setting of the S kerb and stood on top of a mass of tumbled turfwork which in turn lay above a black turf line presumably contemporary with the laying of the kerbs. The turfwork of the rampart ran up to the southerly line. The southerly line of kerbs indicates a drastic rebuilding of the turfwork of the Wall. The continuity of turf lines from the southerly line northwards over the body of the rampart cobbling suggests a major demolition of the rampart structure. The tumbled turfwork on which the southerly line of stones stands suggests destruction or at least collapse of the rampart turfwork, and argues against the incompletion of turfwore th rampare th firse f th ko t n stagi t f buildingeo . 3 Tollpark 770777S (N ) J J Wilkes Trial excavations were undertake Septemben ni r 196 discoveo 4t r further information aboue th t additional ker bAntonine alonsidth S f e o gth e Wall locate earlien a n di r section (abov 231)ep .
Recommended publications
  • DOWNFIELD GOLF CLUB Competition Result Senior Mens Open 2021 (03/06/2021)
    DOWNFIELD GOLF CLUB Competition Result Senior Mens Open 2021 (03/06/2021) Score Type: Stableford Course/Tee: Downfield GC (Yellow) Division 1 Pos Name Home Club Hcp Points Comments 1 Harry Keith 20 42 Best Nett score - £180 2 Jim Miller Bathgate Golf Club 18 40 2nd Nett Score - £160 3 Colin Miller Westerwood Golf 17 38 3rd Nett Score - Club £140 4 Don Stark 12 37 4th Nett Score - £120 5 Stewart Clark Hirsel Golf Club 11 37 5th Nett Score - £100 6 John Shields 19 36 6th Nett Score - £80 7 Stewart Gray 15 36 7th Nett Score - £60 8 Gary Brady 18 36 8th Nett Score - £40 9 Graeme Squire 17 36 9th Nett Score - £20 10 David Halkerston New Golf Club St 10 36 Andrews 11 James Duncan Ladybank Golf Club 2 36 Best Scratch - £180 12 Dave McKay Dullatur Golf Club 21 36 13 Steve Herron Scotscraig Golf 12 36 Club 14 Andy Patrick 14 36 15 Jeremy Murphy Craigmillar Park 17 36 Golf Club 16 GORDON BLACK Bishopbriggs Golf 11 35 Club 17 Robert Patrick Glenbervie Golf 12 35 Club 18 David DOIG Swanston Golf Club 10 35 Ltd 19 Fraser Stewart Deeside Golf Club 14 35 20 Ed White Leven Golfing 6 35 Society 21 Ian Cunningham 18 35 22 Paul Johnson Dunfermline Golf 21 35 Club 23 Graeme Brown Scotscraig Golf 16 35 Club 24 Eric Richardson Alva Golf Club 7 35 Register with HowDidiDo.com to view all your golfing statistics and competition results. It's FREE and over 500,000 golfers like you have done so already! 1 ClubV1 - Printed on 03/06/2021 Score Type: Stableford Course/Tee: Downfield GC (Yellow) Division 1 Pos Name Home Club Hcp Points Comments 25 William Barclay 4 34 26 Ramsay Howarth Dumbarton Golf 21 34 Club 27 James Murray Cowdenbeath Golf 10 34 Club 28 David Eardley Broomieknowe Golf 10 34 Club 29 George McNairney Falkirk Tryst Golf 5 34 Club 30 Ian J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antonine Wall, the Roman Frontier in Scotland, Was the Most and Northerly Frontier of the Roman Empire for a Generation from AD 142
    Breeze The Antonine Wall, the Roman frontier in Scotland, was the most and northerly frontier of the Roman Empire for a generation from AD 142. Hanson It is a World Heritage Site and Scotland’s largest ancient monument. The Antonine Wall Today, it cuts across the densely populated central belt between Forth (eds) and Clyde. In The Antonine Wall: Papers in Honour of Professor Lawrence Keppie, Papers in honour of nearly 40 archaeologists, historians and heritage managers present their researches on the Antonine Wall in recognition of the work Professor Lawrence Keppie of Lawrence Keppie, formerly Professor of Roman History and Wall Antonine The Archaeology at the Hunterian Museum, Glasgow University, who spent edited by much of his academic career recording and studying the Wall. The 32 papers cover a wide variety of aspects, embracing the environmental and prehistoric background to the Wall, its structure, planning and David J. Breeze and William S. Hanson construction, military deployment on its line, associated artefacts and inscriptions, the logistics of its supply, as well as new insights into the study of its history. Due attention is paid to the people of the Wall, not just the ofcers and soldiers, but their womenfolk and children. Important aspects of the book are new developments in the recording, interpretation and presentation of the Antonine Wall to today’s visitors. Considerable use is also made of modern scientifc techniques, from pollen, soil and spectrographic analysis to geophysical survey and airborne laser scanning. In short, the papers embody present- day cutting edge research on, and summarise the most up-to-date understanding of, Rome’s shortest-lived frontier.
    [Show full text]
  • Antonine Wall - Castlecary Fort
    Property in Care (PIC) ID: PIC170 Designations: Scheduled Monument (SM90009) Taken into State care: 1961 (Guardianship) Last reviewed: 2005 HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE ANTONINE WALL - CASTLECARY FORT We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH ANTONINE WALL – CASTLECARY FORT BRIEF DESCRIPTION The property is part of the Antonine Wall and contains the remains of a Roman fort and annexe with a stretch of Antonine Wall to the north-east of the fort. The Edinburgh-Glasgow railway cuts across the south section of the fort while modern buildings disturb the north-east corner of the fort and ditch. The Antonine Wall is a linear Roman frontier system of wall and ditch accompanied at stages by forts and fortlets, linked by a road system, stretching for 60km from Bo’ness on the Forth to Old Kilpatrick on the Clyde. It is one of only three linear barriers along the 2000km European frontier of the Roman Empire. These systems are unique to Britain and Germany. CHARACTER OF THE MONUMENT Historical Overview Archaeological finds indicate the site was used during the Flavian period (AD 79- 87/88). Antonine Wall construction initiated by Emperor Antoninus Pius (AD 138-161) after a successful campaign in AD 139/142 by the Governor of Britain, Lollius Urbicus.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Inscriptions from Scotland: Some Additions and Corrections to RIB I L J F Keppie*
    Proc Antigc So Scot, (1983)3 11 , 391-404 Roman inscriptions from Scotland: some additions and corrections to RIB I L J F Keppie* Nearl year0 y2 s have elapsed sinc completioe th e WrighP R firse f wory th o tn tb n ko volum Romane Th f eo Inscriptions f Britain,o which provide detaileda d descriptio drawd nan - more in f eacth go f eho than 2000 inscribed stones foun Britai n di 195o t p 4nu (Collingwoo d & Wright 1965). Of these about 125 derived from Scotland. Since then a further 19 stones (some complete, others fragmentary) have come to light within Scotland's modern political boundaries. Most have already received definitiv t leasa r eto preliminary publicatio varieta n i y of journals, but it may be of use, since the appearance of supplements to RIB remains a distant prospect havo t , e these collecte singla n i d e place additionn I . numbea , f improveo r d read- ings to published inscriptions have followed upon the cleaning of stones in the National Museum of Antiquities of Scotland, Edinburgh (hereafter NMAS), and the Hunterian Museum, Universit f Glasgoyo w (hereafter HM) preparation i , re-displayr nfo mord an , e recently during preparatory work for the Scottish Fascicule of the Corpus of Roman Sculpture (Keppie & Arnold 1984). The following report is divided into three sections: I, improvements to the readings of inscriptions already publishe RIB;description da i , II stonef no s lont g helbu , NMAy db HM r So only recently perceive inscribede b o dt ; III resumdiscoveriea ,w ne f eo s made since 1954.
    [Show full text]
  • Antonine Wall Rough Castle Statement of Significance
    Property in Care (PIC) ID: PIC175 Designations: Scheduled Monument (SM90013) Taken into State care: 1953 (Guardianship) Last Reviewed: 2019 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE ANTONINE WALL – ROUGH CASTLE We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH © Historic Environment Scotland 2019 You may re-use this information (excluding logos and images) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit http://nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this document should be sent to us at: Historic Environment Scotland Longmore House Salisbury Place Edinburgh EH9 1SH +44 (0) 131 668 8600 www.historicenvironment.scot Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE ANTONINE WALL – ROUGH CASTLE CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • The Antonine Wall in the Context of Spatial Analysis
    STUDIA HERCYNIA XX/2, 40–66 To See and to be Seen – the Antonine Wall in the Context of Spatial Analysis Michal Dyčka ABSTRACT How did frontiers actually work? This essential question has been discussed over the last centuries through and through and the presented paper tries to offer a new perspective – this time by means of a landscape study and gaining an understanding of the positioning of individual forts on one of the short­‑lived Roman frontiers, the Antonine Wall. In the spotlight of this study is the spatial positioning of individual forts and fortlets on the above­‑mentioned frontier in terms of what could have been seen from them (visibility to the landscape and intervisibility with other Roman military installations) and how unique their locations were in terms of general accessibility (could they serve as natural blocking points?). A new approach is presented by using the Viewshed and Cost path analyses of the digital elevation model of the broader area around the Antonine Wall. KEYWORDS Antonine Wall; Viewshed analysis; Cost path analysis. INTRODUCTION Whenever we study the theme of Roman frontiers, we should always try to answer the fun- damental question: how did Roman frontiers actually work? This paper offers some new ideas about this subject, primarily on the basis of evidence collected by the use of the spatial analyses performed in the programs ArcGIS 10.3 and QGIS 1.8.0 Lisboa of one particular part of the Roman frontier system, the Antonine Wall. Two major issues are discussed in this paper: the visibility and intervisibility on the limes and questions concerning the accessibility of individual sites on the Antonine Wall.
    [Show full text]
  • The Provision of Fort-Annexes on the Antonine Wall Geoff B Bailey*
    Proc SocAntiq Scot, 124 (1994), 299-314 The provision of fort-annexes on the Antonine Wall Geoff B Bailey* ABSTRACT This paper suggests that temporary bathhouses were provided Antoninethe in Wall forts until such time as a planned Vallum could be completed behind the Wall. The protracted construction period caused many theseof bathhouses modifiedbe to provideto utilitiesthe required during this prolonged interval. The Wall had been built to Bearsden before the concept of a Vallum was abandoned and consequently annexes were attached to each fort. At this stage it was then possible to demolish the internal bathhouses and to build larger bathing complexes in these enclosures. INTRODUCTION This papeattempn a s i r provido t explanatioea severaf no l perplexing phenomena connected with Antonine th e Wall: Antonine Wall fort extremele sar y unusua westere th n li n Empir possessinn ei g internal bathhouses (Johnson 1983, 194); they have annexes rather than a Vallum like that of Hadrian's Wall (Salway 1965, 158); most of them apparently had their defences 'slighted' c AD 155 (Steer 1964); and they have different ways of attaching the annexes according to their location along the Wall (Breeze 1984, 61). THE BUILDING SEQUENCE ON THE WALL Antonine forte th f Th o s e Wall vary considerabl individuan ow s it sizeacn d yi s elan h ha interna l layout. Yet, ther significana s i e t degre f consistenco e y in their planning, enoug indicato ht a e unified scheme. Of the 16 known forts all appear to face north with the exception of Cadder (which faces east owing to the local topography) and the two terminal forts which both face away from the Wall.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antonine Wall in the Context of Spatial Analysis
    STUDIA HERCYNIA XX/2, 40–66 To See and to be Seen – the Antonine Wall in the Context of Spatial Analysis Michal Dyčka ABSTRACT How did frontiers actually work? This essential question has been discussed over the last centuries through and through and the presented paper tries to offer a new perspective – this time by means of a landscape study and gaining an understanding of the positioning of individual forts on one of the short­‑lived Roman frontiers, the Antonine Wall. In the spotlight of this study is the spatial positioning of individual forts and fortlets on the above­‑mentioned frontier in terms of what could have been seen from them (visibility to the landscape and intervisibility with other Roman military installations) and how unique their locations were in terms of general accessibility (could they serve as natural blocking points?). A new approach is presented by using the Viewshed and Cost path analyses of the digital elevation model of the broader area around the Antonine Wall. KEYWORDS Antonine Wall; Viewshed analysis; Cost path analysis. INTRODUCTION Whenever we study the theme of Roman frontiers, we should always try to answer the fun- damental question: how did Roman frontiers actually work? This paper offers some new ideas about this subject, primarily on the basis of evidence collected by the use of the spatial analyses performed in the programs ArcGIS 10.3 and QGIS 1.8.0 Lisboa of one particular part of the Roman frontier system, the Antonine Wall. Two major issues are discussed in this paper: the visibility and intervisibility on the limes and questions concerning the accessibility of individual sites on the Antonine Wall.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antonine Wall, the Roman Frontier in Scotland, Was the Most and Northerly Frontier of the Roman Empire for a Generation from AD 142
    Breeze The Antonine Wall, the Roman frontier in Scotland, was the most and northerly frontier of the Roman Empire for a generation from AD 142. Hanson It is a World Heritage Site and Scotland’s largest ancient monument. The Antonine Wall Today, it cuts across the densely populated central belt between Forth (eds) and Clyde. In The Antonine Wall: Papers in Honour of Professor Lawrence Keppie, Papers in honour of nearly 40 archaeologists, historians and heritage managers present their researches on the Antonine Wall in recognition of the work Professor Lawrence Keppie of Lawrence Keppie, formerly Professor of Roman History and Wall Antonine The Archaeology at the Hunterian Museum, Glasgow University, who spent edited by much of his academic career recording and studying the Wall. The 32 papers cover a wide variety of aspects, embracing the environmental and prehistoric background to the Wall, its structure, planning and David J. Breeze and William S. Hanson construction, military deployment on its line, associated artefacts and inscriptions, the logistics of its supply, as well as new insights into the study of its history. Due attention is paid to the people of the Wall, not just the ofcers and soldiers, but their womenfolk and children. Important aspects of the book are new developments in the recording, interpretation and presentation of the Antonine Wall to today’s visitors. Considerable use is also made of modern scientifc techniques, from pollen, soil and spectrographic analysis to geophysical survey and airborne laser scanning. In short, the papers embody present- day cutting edge research on, and summarise the most up-to-date understanding of, Rome’s shortest-lived frontier.
    [Show full text]
  • Antonine Wall – Castlecary Fort
    Property in Care (PIC) ID: PIC170 Designations: Scheduled Monument (SM90009) Taken into State care: 1961 (Guardianship) Last Reviewed: 2020 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE ANTONINE WALL – CASTLECARY FORT We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH © Historic Environment Scotland 2020 You may re-use this information (excluding logos and images) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit http://nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this document should be sent to us at: Historic Environment Scotland Longmore House Salisbury Place Edinburgh EH9 1SH +44 (0) 131 668 8600 www.historicenvironment.scot You can download this publication from our website at www.historicenvironment.scot Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH HISTORIC
    [Show full text]
  • Carrickstone CARRICKSTONE, CUMBERNAULD, G68 OHN
    Cumbernauld Retail Park Broadwood Stadium M80 Craigmarloch Tesco St Andrews & Cumbernauld Primary School Dullatur Golf Course Dullatur Village CARRICKSTONE CARRICKSTONE, CUMBERNAULD, G68 OHN DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY - 0.54 acres (0.22 hectares) SUITABLE FOR A VARIETY OF USES, SUBJECT TO PLANNING Carrickstone Cumbernauld, G68 OHN 2 vp THE Opportunity AMENDMENTS • Prime neighbourhood convenience opportunity (subject to planning). • Highly prominent site located on major arterial route Location The site is located at Carrickstone in Cumbernauld. Cumbernauld is one of the largest towns within the local authority of North Lanarkshire and is one of Scotland’s six ‘New Towns’ created in 1956. Cumbernauld is well situated for commuters lying Issue Date Detail approximately 15 miles north west of Glasgow City Centre, approximately 16 miles south of Stirling and approximately 40 miles west of Edinburgh City Centre. The site is in the Carrickstone area of the town on the north side of the M80 motorway. It’s a predominantly residential area having been built out over the last 20 years. The development site within which the subjects Hamilton Business Park are located is the last site to be developed within this Caird Street Hamilton ML3 0QA area having previously been held as a potential site for Telephone 01698 477440 economic development. The houses within the locale Fax 01698 477441 are generally private for sale with some social housing www.bellway.co.uk on the opposite side of Eastfield Road. Project There is no convenience / neighbourhood provision vp vp Eastfield Road within 500 meters of the site. The closest retail vp Carrickstone destination is the Craigmarloch Tesco Superstore vp which is approximately 1.5 miles (2.4 km) from the site.
    [Show full text]
  • A Walk Along the Antonine Wall in 1825: the Travel Journal of the Rev John Skinner
    Proc Soc Antiq Scot, 133 (2003), 205–244 A walk along the Antonine Wall in 1825: the travel journal of the Rev John Skinner Lawrence Keppie* ABSTRACT In 1825 the Rev John Skinner, an Anglican clergyman from Camerton in Somerset, walked the length of the Antonine Wall from east to west, as part of an extensive Scottish tour. He recorded his observations at length in a journal and prepared daily a series of pencil sketches which constitute an invaluable record of the monument at a fixed date. His sketches include sculptures and inscriptions subsequently lost, and a few sites otherwise unrecorded. He also visited the Hunterian Museum in Glasgow in order to view its collection of Roman stones. INTRODUCTION After his return to Camerton, the journals were transcribed by his brother, in a neat hand Over a five-day period in September 1825 the that can be easily read today (in contrast to Rev John Skinner of Camerton in Somerset, Skinner’s own handwriting which can be near Bath, traversed the Antonine Wall on ffi foot from east to west, as part of an extensive di cult to decipher). Sometimes the seeming ‘northern tour’ which took him as far north as peculiarities of punctuation result from clauses Inverness. Skinner had travelled from the being associated with the wrong sentence, south-west of England with his son Owen, perhaps by his brother when the journals were whom he left in Edinburgh owing to illness. transcribed. His brother mistranscribed indi- On completing his Highland peregrination, he vidual words, especially proper names, or left was reunited with his son, now restored to gaps where the handwriting had defeated him.
    [Show full text]