Views from the Capitals
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Austria (2011)
http://www.freedomhouse.org/inc/content/pubs/fiw/inc_country_detail.cfm?year=2011&country=7988&pf Print Freedom in the World - Austria (2011) Capital: Vienna Political Rights Score: 1 * Civil Liberties Score: 1 * Population: Status: Free 8,374,000 Overview Incumbent president Heinz Fischer of the Social Democratic Party of Austria won a second term in the April 2010 presidential election, but the far-right Austrian Freedom Party’s candidate received a sizeable percentage of the vote. The Freedom Party also picked up a substantial number of legislative seats in Vienna’s state elections in October. The balance between freedom of speech and Austrian hate-speech laws drew increased attention during the year as objectionable statements, mainly against Islam, came under scrutiny. Modern Austria, which emerged from the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in World War I, was annexed to Nazi Germany in 1938 before being restored to independence after World War II. The country remained neutral during the Cold War and joined the European Union in 1995. From 1986 until 2000, the two largest political parties—the center-left Social Democratic Party of Austria (SPÖ) and the center-right People’s Party of Austria (ÖVP)—governed together in a grand coalition. The 1999 elections produced the first government since 1970 that did not include the SPÖ. Instead, the ÖVP formed a coalition with the Freedom Party of Austria (FPÖ), a far-right nationalist party that won 27 percent of the popular vote. Its support had risen steadily as voters became disaffected with the large parties’ power-sharing arrangement and its barriers to major political change. -
State of Populism in Europe
2018 State of Populism in Europe The past few years have seen a surge in the public support of populist, Eurosceptical and radical parties throughout almost the entire European Union. In several countries, their popularity matches or even exceeds the level of public support of the centre-left. Even though the centre-left parties, think tanks and researchers are aware of this challenge, there is still more OF POPULISM IN EUROPE – 2018 STATE that could be done in this fi eld. There is occasional research on individual populist parties in some countries, but there is no regular overview – updated every year – how the popularity of populist parties changes in the EU Member States, where new parties appear and old ones disappear. That is the reason why FEPS and Policy Solutions have launched this series of yearbooks, entitled “State of Populism in Europe”. *** FEPS is the fi rst progressive political foundation established at the European level. Created in 2007 and co-fi nanced by the European Parliament, it aims at establishing an intellectual crossroad between social democracy and the European project. Policy Solutions is a progressive political research institute based in Budapest. Among the pre-eminent areas of its research are the investigation of how the quality of democracy evolves, the analysis of factors driving populism, and election research. Contributors : Tamás BOROS, Maria FREITAS, Gergely LAKI, Ernst STETTER STATE OF POPULISM Tamás BOROS IN EUROPE Maria FREITAS • This book is edited by FEPS with the fi nancial support of the European -
Information Guide Euroscepticism
Information Guide Euroscepticism A guide to information sources on Euroscepticism, with hyperlinks to further sources of information within European Sources Online and on external websites Contents Introduction .................................................................................................. 2 Brief Historical Overview................................................................................. 2 Euro Crisis 2008 ............................................................................................ 3 European Elections 2014 ................................................................................ 5 Euroscepticism in Europe ................................................................................ 8 Eurosceptic organisations ......................................................................... 10 Eurosceptic thinktanks ............................................................................. 10 Transnational Eurosceptic parties and political groups .................................. 11 Eurocritical media ................................................................................... 12 EU Reaction ................................................................................................. 13 Information sources in the ESO database ........................................................ 14 Further information sources on the internet ..................................................... 14 Copyright © 2016 Cardiff EDC. All rights reserved. 1 Cardiff EDC is part of the University Library -
Challenger Party List
Appendix List of Challenger Parties Operationalization of Challenger Parties A party is considered a challenger party if in any given year it has not been a member of a central government after 1930. A party is considered a dominant party if in any given year it has been part of a central government after 1930. Only parties with ministers in cabinet are considered to be members of a central government. A party ceases to be a challenger party once it enters central government (in the election immediately preceding entry into office, it is classified as a challenger party). Participation in a national war/crisis cabinets and national unity governments (e.g., Communists in France’s provisional government) does not in itself qualify a party as a dominant party. A dominant party will continue to be considered a dominant party after merging with a challenger party, but a party will be considered a challenger party if it splits from a dominant party. Using this definition, the following parties were challenger parties in Western Europe in the period under investigation (1950–2017). The parties that became dominant parties during the period are indicated with an asterisk. Last election in dataset Country Party Party name (as abbreviation challenger party) Austria ALÖ Alternative List Austria 1983 DU The Independents—Lugner’s List 1999 FPÖ Freedom Party of Austria 1983 * Fritz The Citizens’ Forum Austria 2008 Grüne The Greens—The Green Alternative 2017 LiF Liberal Forum 2008 Martin Hans-Peter Martin’s List 2006 Nein No—Citizens’ Initiative against -
Exposure to Refugees and Voting for the Far-Right: (Unexpected) Results from Austria
IZA DP No. 9790 Exposure to Refugees and Voting for the Far-Right: (Unexpected) Results from Austria Andreas Steinmayr March 2016 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor Exposure to Refugees and Voting for the Far-Right: (Unexpected) Results from Austria Andreas Steinmayr University of Munich (LMU), IZA and IfW Kiel Discussion Paper No. 9790 March 2016 IZA P.O. Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180 E-mail: [email protected] Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. -
GENERAL ELECTIONS in AUSTRIA 29Th September 2013
GENERAL ELECTIONS IN AUSTRIA 29th September 2013 European Elections monitor The Social Democratic Party’s “grand coalition” re-elected in Austria Corinne Deloy Translated by Helen Levy Like their German neighbours (with whom they share the same satisfactory economic results) the Austrians chose to re-elect their leaders in the general elections on 29th September. Both countries are also due to be governed by grand coalitions rallying the two main political parties – one on the left and the other on the right – during the next legislature. Results As expected the outgoing government coalition formed With 5.8% of the vote (11 seats), the Team Stronach by the Social Democratic Party (SPÖ) of outgoing for Austria, a populist, eurosceptic party founded in Chancellor Werner Faymann and the People’s Party September 2012 by Austro-Canadian businessman (ÖVP) of Vice-Chancellor Michael Spindelegger, came Frank Stronach, will be making its debut in the Natio- out ahead in the election. The SPÖ won 27.1% of the nal Council (Nationalrat), the lower chamber of parlia- vote and 53 seats (five less in comparison with the ment, likewise the Neos-New Austria, a liberal party previous election on 28th September 2008); the ÖVP created on 27th October 2012 by Matthias Strolz, a won 23.8% and 46 seats (- 4). The election illustrates former ÖVP member and supported by the industrialist the continued decline in the electorate of both parties: Hans Peter Haselsteiner, which won 4.8% of the vote together they achieved the lowest score in their his- and 9 seats. tory, mobilizing just half of the electorate (50.9%, i.e. -
Parlamentarische Materialien
Stenographisches Protokoll 54. Sitzung des Nationalrates der Republik Österreich XXII. Gesetzgebungsperiode Dienstag, 16. März 2004 1 Stenographisches Protokoll 54. Sitzung des Nationalrates der Republik Österreich XXII. Gesetzgebungsperiode Dienstag, 16. März 2004 Dauer der Sitzung Dienstag, 16. März 2004: 12.00 – 12.03 Uhr 14.49 – 18.08 Uhr ***** Inhalt Nationalrat Gedenken an die Opfer des Terroranschlags in Madrid ......................................... 10 Trauerkundgebung anlässlich des Ablebens von Kardinal Dr. Franz König ........... 10 Personalien Verhinderungen ...................................................................................................... 8 Geschäftsbehandlung Verlangen auf Durchführung einer kurzen Debatte über die Anfragebeantwor- tung 1253/AB gemäß § 92 Abs. 1 der Geschäftsordnung ...................................... 10 Durchführung einer kurzen Debatte gemäß § 57a Abs. 1 der Geschäftsordnung .... 58 Redner: Michaela Sburny ................................................................................................... 59 Bundesminister Dr. Martin Bartenstein .............................................................. 61 Dr. Reinhold Mitterlehner ..................................................................................... 63 Mag. Hans Moser .................................................................................................. 65 Mag. Dr. Magda Bleckmann ................................................................................. 66 Dr. Kurt Grünewald .............................................................................................. -
A Case Study from an Austrian School
Journal of Social Science Education Volume 17, Number 1, Spring 2018 DOI 10.4119/UNIBI/jsse-v17-i1-1820 Isabella Schild, Judith Breitfuss Civic Education under Pressure? A Case Study from an Austrian School 1 When the politician Roman Haider of the party Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ – Freedom Party of Austria) caused the interruption of a lecture about political extremism in an Austrian school in spring 2017, a heated debate erupted over the place of politics in school education. While Haider accused the lecturer of political propaganda, teachers, students and political opponents were upset about this seeming act of censorship. The controversy raises 2 important questions over the aims and principles of civic education, which will continue to engage teachers and educationalists. Keywords: Finanzbildung, Finanzkompetenz, Finanzinklusion, staatsbürgerliche Bildung 1 A lecture causing a stir The 8th of March 2017 should become a day to remember for Wolfgang Oberndorfer, headmaster of the Bundesoberstufenrealgymnasium Honauerstraße (BORG Honauerstraße – an upper secondary school with a special emphasis on music, sports and science, among 3 others) in the Austrian city of Linz. At the invitation of one of the school's philosophy teachers, Thomas Rammerstorfer visited the school to give a lecture about "The extremist challenges" in front of an audience of around seventy pupils between the age of seventeen and One of the PowerPoint slides used by Thomas Rammerstorfer during nineteen years. As teenagers from the age of sixteen his lecture (© Thomas Rammerstorfer). have been eligible to vote in Austria since 2007, a topic such as this one is highly relevant for this age group. -
Percent Threshold Necessary for Parliamentary Representation, Eas Preelection Polls Had Predicted That It Would Fall Short
[NTHE OCTOBER national election, the Social Democratic Party oi austria (SPO) narrowly defeated the ruling People's Party (OVP) by 35.34 percent (68 seats) to 34.33 percent (66 seats), and stoodready to assume power after more than six years in the opposition. Although it wasclear that Social Democratic leader Alfred Gusenbauer would bethe next chancellor, his options for forming a coalition were severely limited. The SPO had ruled out any cooperation with thetwo far-right parties, the Freedom Party (FPO), which received 11.04percent of the vote (21 seats), and the Alliance for the Future of Austria (BZO), whichgarnered 4.11 percent (7 seats). A coalition with the Green Party, whichcame in third with 11.05 percent (21 seats), would not provide theSocial De- mocrats with the necessary majority, and so the new government would likely take the form of a grand coalition between the SocialDemocrats and the People's Party. Several aspects of the election surprised observers. Although the Peo- s Party had been expected to lose ground, few had thought that it ild be defeated. Also, far-right leader Jörg Haider maintained histoe- 1 in national politics: his far-right BZO just managedto finish over -percent threshold necessary for parliamentary representation, eas preelection polls had predicted that it would fall short. The Free- arty, which Haider had led for two decades before quitting it after wer struggle in 2005, did well enough to ensure that it would play a ig opposition role. Lllimigration was a major campaign issue, as many Austrians feared the proposed entry of Turkey into the European Union would flood ountry with cheap labor. -
Contextualising Austria's Commemorative Year 2005 Matthew .P Berg John Carroll University, [email protected]
John Carroll University Carroll Collected History 1-2008 Commemoration versus coping with the past: contextualising Austria's commemorative year 2005 Matthew .P Berg John Carroll University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://collected.jcu.edu/hist-facpub Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Berg, Matthew P., "Commemoration versus coping with the past: contextualising Austria's commemorative year 2005" (2008). History. 19. http://collected.jcu.edu/hist-facpub/19 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carroll Collected. It has been accepted for inclusion in History by an authorized administrator of Carroll Collected. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Commemoration versus Vergangenheitsbewältigung: Contextualizing Austria’s Gedenkjahr 2005* Abstract This essay explores the politics of memory in post-1945 Austrian political culture, focusing on the shift between the fiftieth anniversary of the Anschluss and the sixtieth anniversary of the end of the Second World War. Postwar Austrian society experienced a particular tension associated with the Nazi past, manifested in communicative and cultural forms of memory. On the one hand, the support of many for the Third Reich—expressed through active or passive complicity—threatened to link Austria with the perpetrator status reserved for German society. On the other, the Allies’ Moscow Declaration (1943) created a myth of victimization by Germany that allowed Austrians to avoid confronting difficult questions concerning the Nazi era. Consequently, discussion of Austrian involvement in National Socialism became a taboo subject during the initial decades of the Second Republic. The 2005 commemoration is notable insofar as it marked a significant break with this taboo. -
Parties Now Talk About the EU in National Election Campaigns, but They Still Tend to Talk Past Each Other
Parties now talk about the EU in national election campaigns, but they still tend to talk past each other blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2015/08/27/parties-now-talk-about-the-eu-in-national-election-campaigns-but-they-still-tend-to-talk-past-each-other/ 8/27/2015 How important is the issue of European integration to national election campaigns? Roman Senninger and Markus Wagner write that while the EU previously played only a very small role in national elections, the onset of the Eurozone crisis has resulted in the issue becoming more prominent in campaigns in several countries. However, using an analysis of party press releases in Austria, they illustrate that parties still differ greatly in how they address the issue, with parties exhibiting a tendency to talk past each other rather than genuinely engaging with the subject. For a long time, most political parties in Europe have tended to avoid discussing the EU during national election campaigns. However, recently this has changed, with research showing that parties have increasingly made EU issues a central topic of debate and disagreement in elections. The Eurozone crisis and the subsequent bail-out packages and reforms have meant that the EU has finally entered the limelight of domestic politics. The key question in understanding the role of the EU in national politics is no longer whether parties talk about the EU (and why they often fail to do so). Instead, it is more useful to ask how parties mobilise on European Union issues in national elections. Are parties engaged in real debate and discussion about the EU, or are they simply talking past each other? This question in turn has two key dimensions: first, which parties and actors within parties talk about the European Union? Second, what kinds of EU-related issues are discussed and how are they framed? Everybody is talking: parties and within-party actors First, parties should differ in how much they are likely to talk about EU issues. -
Volkswirtschaftliche Tagung 2007
Die Vortragenden Speakers Die Vortragenden Speakers Joaquín Almunia leave). He also was Vice Rector for Joaquín Almunia was born in Spain Infrastructure at the above mentioned on June 17, 1948. He is married and university (1998–2002). In addition, has to two children. He graduated in Christoph Badelt is the President of Law and Economics at the University the Austrian Rectors’ Conference of Deusto (Bilbao), studied at L’École (since 2005). At an earlier time, he Pratique des Hautes Études de Paris, worked as Visiting Professor at the then followed the “Senior Managers University of Klagenfurt, Austria and in Government” program at the Ken- the University of Wisconsin, Madison, nedy School of Government, Harvard U.S.A. (1981–1982, 1984–1985). His University. He is an Associate Lec- numerous publications include Hand- turer at the University of Alcalá de book of Nonprofit Organizations, So- Henares (Madrid) on Employment cial Policy, The Economic Situation and Social Security Law. Mister of Families in Austria, Evaluation of Almunia started his professional life the System of Care Allowances, Eco- as economist at the Council Bureau of the Spanish Chambers of Commerce in Brussels (1972–1975). He was then chief economist of the UGT, a Span- ish trade union (1976–1979). His first political position was as a Mem- ber of the Spanish Parliament in 1979 (he remained a MP until 2004). From 1982 to 1986, Joaquín Almunia was Minister of Employment and Social Security and Minister of Public nomic Relations between Genera- Administration from 1986 to 1991. tions, Costs of Long Term Care, He was also Spokesperson of the So- Families between Equity and Dis- cialist Parliamentary Group between crimination, The Situation of Handi- 1994 and 1997.