Let’s Define ‘BEST’
Camera should be relatively easy to use, almost obvious & familiar
Camera should be versatile and able to do it all, providing opportunities to explore all types of astro-imaging…& more
Software to control camera and process images should be relatively inexpensive and, where possible, multi-platform compatible: Windows & Mac
Canon EOS Digital Single Lens Reflex Camera
Full Frame (36 x 24 mm) & APS-C (22.5 x 15mm)
Full frame great for wide-angle, expansive images (Milky Way & meteor showers)
APS-C less sensitive to optical aberrations at edge of field; less than ‘perfect’ optics will yield great images
APS-C pixel size is smaller and more optimal for common amateur optical systems
APS-C cost less than full frame cameras
Crop 640x480 video mode or equivalent
Takes 640x480 pixel center of image chip and treats as full-resolution video/webcam
Great for high-resolution lunar, solar and planetary imaging
EOS Utility
Powerful camera control software - Windows and Mac
My Cameras
2004 to 2013 Canon EOS 20D/20Da
Canon EOS 6D Canon EOS 60Da Full Frame APS-C 5472 x 3648 (20 Mpixel) 5184 x 3456 (17.9 Mpixel) 6.54 µm 4.3 µm Nyquist optimum = f/24 Nyquist optimum = f/16 ISO 100 - 25,600 ISO 100 - 6,400 JPEG (8-bit) & CR2 (14-bit) JPEG (8-bit) & CR2 (14-bit)
Crop 640 x 480 video mode Extended IR filter for enhanced H-α
Wide-angle imaging only All other imaging
Timer Remote Controller
Single shot remote release - prevents camera vibration and image blurring
Full camera control programmer (intervalometer) controls time between exposures, exposure length and number of exposures - without a computer
Self-timer to delay sequence after activation
Exposures saved onto camera storage card
Cost < $100
For 7 years used as only means to control camera for all deep-sky imaging - no computer in field
Still using it after 14 years
Does not control video mode
Highly recommended
Image Processing Software
Adobe Photoshop (expensive), Ver. 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 5.5, CS, CS2, CS6 (OK, I’m addicted)
MUST BE ABLE TO PROCESS 16-BIT IMAGES
Single Shot Star/Constellation Image
Non-trailed stars images
Mount camera with wide-angle lens on tripod
6D, EF 17-40mm f/4L set at 17mm, ISO 3200, 15 sec
Star Trails
Intervalometer, 60 1-min exposures, ISO 800, blended in Photoshop
Deep-Sky (Stage 1)
Wide-angle, long exposure (1-2 mins) - No star trails
Requires polar-aligned, motorized star tracker - Several commercially available
iOptron SkyTracker system
Tracker, polar alignment scope, ball head & tripod
4 AA batteries or 9V DC AC adapter
Smartphone app available to show where to put Polaris on alignment scope reticle
7.7 lb capacity - ($450)
Very portable
Image Stacking Program
Windows only Cost = $0.00 (Free)
S/N = SQRT(Number of Exposures Stacked)
Canon 60Da, EF 17-40mm f/4L set at 17mm, ISO 3200, 30 1-minute exposures
Meteor Showers
Deep-Sky (Stage 2)
Long exposure (1-2 min), medium focal length (100 - 500 mm) - No star trails
Requires quality, motor-driven, polar-aligned equatorial mount - not auto-guided
Mount should have maximum carrying capacity double the heaviest optical system planned
Perfect optics on a garbage mount will give garbage images
Vixen GP/DX (on wheels) & Paramount MX (semi-permanent)
Good polar alignment will yield sharp star images with 1-2 min exposures without auto-guiding
30 1-minute exposures ISO 3200 DSS Photoshop
Supernova
Asteroids
Comets
Comet Johnson C/2015 V2 - May 25, 2017
DeepSkyStacker Nebulosity
Nebulosity - Stark Labs
Camera control, stack exposures, process images & more
Windows & Mac - $95
Deep-Sky (Stage 3)
Long exposure (1-2 min), long focal length (500 & higher mm)
Requires quality, motor-driven, polar-aligned equatorial mount with auto-guiding
Guidescope or off-axis guider and guide camera
Guider control software compatible with mount & its control software
Must learn how to make all this work together
I have not achieved this yet and have no experiences to report
Canon EOS DSLRs should work just fine
Full Disk Lunar & Solar
800 to 1500 mm FL (depending on full frame or APS-C), very fast shutter speeds
Takahashi Sky 90 + TV 2x PM 60Da Celestron C5+ (1250 mm f/10) 20Da (1000 mm f/11.2) ISO 250 1/2000 sec ISO 800 1/1250 sec
Partial Solar Eclipse
Takahashi Sky 90 + TV 2x PM (1000 mm f/11.2), 60Da ISO 250, 1/2000 sec, 10-min interval, Canon EOS Utility
Lunar Eclipse
Stellarvue SV115 (800 mm f/7), 60Da ISO unk, 1/2000 to 2 sec, 5-min interval, Canon EOS Utility
High-Resolution Lunar, Planetary & Solar
“Lucky Imaging” - Jerry Lodriguss
Take a ‘bizillion’ images, stack the best few thousand to obtain great final image
Video allows capture of thousands of sub-images in just minutes
Stacking & powerful Wavelet processing
Windows only, Cost $0.00 (Free)
Stacking only
Windows only, Cost $0.00 (Free)
Stack in AutoStakkert, Wavelet process in Registax
Canon 60Da in Crop 640 x 480 video mode, 8-bit MOV format video
Camera control using EOS Utility
First issue: RegiStax & AutoStakkert cannot read MOV format video
Must convert MOV video to AVI video
Second issue: Several AVI video codices; Windows cannot read all of them
Solution: VirtualDub
Windows - Cost $0.00 (Free)
5-minute video, 60 fps (18,000 frames), adjust image intensity with ISO
Convert MOV to AVI, correct AVI in VirtualDub
Open AVI in AutoStakkert, stack 1000-6000 frames, wavelet process in RegiStax
Example - Jupiter
Celestron C6 SCT, 150 mm dia, 1,500 mm FL, 1.6x ScopeTronix amplifier, Canon 60Da
2,400 mm FL, f/16 equivalent
Single frame Stack of 1500 Wavelet Process
August 6, 2018 - Celestron EdgeHD 9.25 + 1.6x ScopeTronix amplifier 3759mm FL, f/16
DSLR Shortcomings
1) The imaging chip is not cooled, limiting the maximum exposure length. During exposures, chip warms up and increases thermal noise. I have never seen DSLR image utilizing exposures greater than 5 minutes. Stacking multiple exposures is critical to achieve good signal to noise and image intensity.
2) DSLRs are one-shot-color (OSC) cameras with a Bayer filter covering the chip. Algorithms are used to ‘estimate’ the actual color in each pixel, resulting in a slight reduction in resolution. Light intensity hitting each pixel is about 1/3 that for a monochrome chip, so stacking multiple images required.
3) OSC cameras are not ‘good’ for solar H-α imaging. Bayer filter blocks large amount of light and significantly decrease resolution. Detail on solar disk is ‘muddled’. Monochrome camera would be better choice for solar H-α imaging.
4) Video mode limited to 60 fps as slowest frame rate; can be faster. For dim objects like Saturn, acceptable image intensity can only be achieved be increasing ISO, resulting in noisier sub-frames, so… stacking multiple images required.
November 7, 2018