DOCSLIB.ORG

Buildbps Phase II Proposed Facility Plan 2018 - 2027

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Buildbps Phase II Proposed Facility Plan 2018 - 2027 BuildBPS Phase II Proposed Facility Plan 2018 - 2027 A Message from Interim Superintendent Perille Dear Parents, Guardians, Students, Staff, and Community Members: As the Boston Public Schools enters Phase II of the BuildBPS 10-year educational and facilities planning process, the district is pleased to release a proposed plan for public discussion and continued review. Significant work has been done over the last three years to develop a plan that allows the district to strategically, equitably, and responsibly transform its facilities landscape to benefit our students. This proposed plan encompasses stakeholders’ feedback, aspirations, and goals, along with the data and ideas needed to bring them to fruition. Thanks to the commitment of Mayor Martin J. Walsh and leadership from the Boston School Committee, BuildBPS represents an important leap and historic opportunity to provide 21st-century learning environments to BPS students. This proposed plan outlines a framework to expand equity, access to quality learning environments, and predictability of school pathways for more students and families. Our guiding principles include: • Expanding access to quality learning environments for more students • Locating new or expanded buildings in neighborhoods with high student need and low current access • Creating more equitable program placement and learning opportunities for our most vulnerable students, including students with special needs and English learners • Reducing pre-K-12 transitions by creating clear pathways for more students By 2027, the Boston Public Schools hopes to have up to twelve new school buildings or major transformations of buildings completed or under construction. The district also plans to increase the number of students making one transition during their K-12 experience by reconfiguring up to twenty more pre-K-6 elementary schools and seven more 6/7-12 secondary schools, while preserving strong K-8/9-12 options for families. The proposed plan will be the subject matter of our public conversations over the next few months and years. While the plan is technical, at times, and focused on facilities, it is designed to improve the overall educational experience for all children. This report is meant to establish a common understanding of what the district proposes to do, the underlying data and rationale for these actions, and the areas for public dialogue and feedback. This and future reports will serve as a continuous blueprint reflecting our collective agreements and a record of each phase of BuildBPS implementation. On behalf of the BuildBPS planning team and colleagues across the district who have contributed to this effort, we are honored to work with you to improve our city’s educational landscape. In partnership, Laura Perille Interim Superintendent, Boston Public Schools TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 7 Introduction 19 The Build BPS Proposed 10-Year Plan 10 A Look Back: BuildBPS History and Background 22 The BuildBPS Proposed Plan: A Neighborhood View 11 BuildBPS Goals 25 An Explanation of the Maps 13 BuildBPS Educational Vision 28 Dorchester 16 BuildBPS Community Engagement 36 Roxbury 43 Mattapan Background and Goals Proposed 10-Year Plan Proposed 10-Year 50 East Boston 57 Hyde Park 65 Back Bay/Beacon Hill/ Fenway/South End 72 Roslindale 80 West Roxbury 88 Jamaica Plain/Mission Hill 95 Allston-Brighton 102 Charlestown/Downtown 108 South Boston 3 4 116 Conclusion 118 Appendix A The Internal BuildBPS Team 119 Appendix B Fact Base, Key Facts Conclusion Appendices 138 Appendix C BuildBPS Fiscal Planning and Recent Investments 141 Appendix D BuildBPS Projects by Category 1. New Builds & Expansions 2. Renovations and Reconfigurations 3. System-wide Initiatives 4. Capital Repairs 5. Real Estate Management 165 Appendix E Bibliography of Grade Reconfig- urations and Transitions Research 6 1 1 BACKGROUND AND GOALS 1 BACKGROUND AND GOALS BACKGROUND — BUILDBPS 7 Introduction BuildBPS was designed to be the strategic ° Predictable and transparent building frame for long-term facilities investment and capital planning processes that will in support of the district’s educational allow the district to continue opening vision. Although learning can and does new school buildings or conducting occur anywhere, the fact is that buildings major renovations on existing buildings matter. Students must be prepared to every 1-2 years after 2027. innovate, design, leverage technology, engage, and work collaboratively, in The proposed plan was designed first using person and remotely. BPS building spaces the district’s educational vision and then must be designed to support the shifts with a focus on increasing equity and to classroom learning that have and will access to quality, and reducing school continue to evolve. The environments in transitions for students. The new and which teaching and learning take place improved facilities this plan details aim to contribute to the overall student learning ensure high quality learning environments experience and performance of schools. for all students, which will contribute to closing opportunity gaps for our learners. The proposed BuildBPS plan reflects The proposed plan calls for new and a significant shift from a reactive and expanded buildings to prioritize space isolated approach to addressing the for specialized programs serving students district’s building needs to a predictable, with special needs and English learners. strategic and transparent capital planning This will increase equitable placement of process. This report outlines the proposed students in these programs and increase 10-year arc of BuildBPS Phase II for student access to a broad array of schools community comment. This proposal for our most vulnerable populations. BPS represents Boston’s largest school building will leverage this opportunity to reduce plan in 40 years and will result in: school transitions for K-12 students and families by creating up to 20 additional 1 ° Up to 12 new schools or major schools serving grades K-6 and seven more transformations completed or school buildings serving grades 7-12, while under construction by 2027 preserving strong K-8 and 9-12 options. ° New or expanded buildings in BPS will implement a new approach neighborhoods with high student to identifying existing schools for new need and low current access buildings based on ensuring a diverse range ° Increased investments district-wide of programs focused on student needs, including ongoing maintenance beginning with programs for our most and repairs for all school valuable learners. Individual schools or buildings and communities teams of schools that are willing to meet the program expectations may submit a 8 1 proposal for consideration to move into Of equal impact is the work that will a new school facility. A team will review take place to transition middle grades the proposed plans and recommend (6 to 8) from stand-alone schools to moving forward with the proposal that primarily schools serving grades K-6/7-12 best meets the needs of all students. or K-8/9-12 over time. By reconfiguring Family and community engagement will the grade composition, BPS will create be included in every step of the process. stronger feeder patterns and reduce school transitions for students. This While the proposed BuildBPS Phase II work is critical as BPS middle schools (6 plan is full of opportunity and will provide remaining in district, down from 16 in a strategic path forward to an improved 2009) have struggled with sustainability educational experience in our schools, in the face of significant declining it will not be accomplished without enrollment, which often results in limited making difficult decisions. Most notably, programming and enrichment activities. BuildBPS is addressing long-standing issues with maintaining school facilities The transition toward a primary K-6/7- (deferred maintenance), beginning with 12 and K-8/9-12 district will begin with critical facility issues at the West Roxbury the McCormack building in June 2020. Education Complex (WREC). The building The building will be renovated and is in such a state of disrepair that we become the home of a school serving recommend it be closed at the end of grades 7-12. The district will collaborate June 2019. In order to maximize the with McCormack staff - with input from investments the building requires, WREC families, students and partners - to will undergo a complete rebuild to reopen identify a high school partner to develop as a BPS secondary school (7-12 or 9-12). a 7-12 school plan for the new building. Other middle schools will transition over The closure of the building, along with a longer time frame dependent on school longstanding enrollment and academic and community engagement, as well as challenges, and lagging academic available space for transitioning students. performance at one of the schools, has led to the district recommendation to This second phase of BuildBPS is a close both the Urban Science Academy citywide process that attends to the and West Roxbury Academy at the end interdependence of our schools. The of June 2019. BPS is working with needs of all students across the district, both school communities to conduct and particularly those most at risk, BACKGROUND AND GOALS BACKGROUND the transition in a way that prioritizes must be balanced with the aspirations — students served in substantially separate of any individual school community or special education programs and neighborhood. The proposed plan will maximizes supports for all students. result in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “The Schools Are Killing Our Kids!” the African American Fight for Self- Determination in the Boston Public Schools, 1949-1985
    ABSTRACT Title of dissertation: “THE SCHOOLS ARE KILLING OUR KIDS!” THE AFRICAN AMERICAN FIGHT FOR SELF- DETERMINATION IN THE BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 1949-1985 Lauren Tess Bundy, Doctor of Philosophy, 2014 Dissertation directed by: Associate Professor David Freund, Department of History This dissertation examines a grassroots movement led by black Bostonians to achieve racial justice, quality education, and community empowerment in the Boston Public Schools during the postwar period. From the late 1940s through the early 1980s black parents, teachers, and students employed a wide-range of strategies in pursuit of these goals including staging school boycotts, creating freedom schools, establishing independent alternative schools, lobbying for legislation, forming parent and youth groups, and organizing hundreds of grassroots organizations. At the heart of this movement was a desire to improve the quality of education afforded to black youth and to expand the power of black Bostonians in educational governance. This dissertation demonstrates that desegregation and community control were not mutually exclusive goals or strategies of black educational activism. I examine the evolution of the goals, ideology, and strategy of this movement over the course of more than three decades in response to shifts in the national and local political climate. This work traces the close ties between this local movement in Boston and broader movements for racial and social justice unfolding across the nation in the 1940s, 50s, 60s, and 70s. Most importantly, my dissertation puts this movement in conversation with a broader national project of various marginalized groups in the postwar period to radically transform the institutions of democracy. This dissertation challenges a well-known narrative of civil rights and school desegregation in Boston in this period.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2020 Boston Public Schools Exam School Application Guide
    2019-2020 Boston Public Schools Exam School Application Guide Boston Latin Academy Entrance to Grades 7 and 9 Boston Latin School Entrance to Grades 7 and 9 John D. O’Bryant School of Mathematics and Science Entrance to Grades 7, 9, and 10 REGISTRATION DEADLINE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2019 IN-SCHOOL TESTING (Grade 6 BPS only): THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2019 WEEKEND TEST DATE: SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 2019 Register online at bostonpublicschools.org/exam Exam administered by the Educational Records Bureau under the supervision of the Boston Public Schools Language Assistance Families who need interpretation and/or translation assistance during the application process may call a BPS Welcome Center at 617-635-9010, 617-635-8015, or 617-635-8040. 2 Table of Contents 2019 – 2020 Exam School Application Checklist .......4 Exam School Admissions Process ...............................5 Step 1: Register for the Independent School Entrance Exam .....................................................6 Sunday Test .....................................................6 National Test Option ......................................6 Step 2: Request Test Accommodations for Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners ................................................7 Step 3: Residency Verification Process ................11 Step 4: Take the ISEE .........................................13 The Make-up Test .........................................15 Step 5: Rank Exam School Choices & Submit Grades ....................................................15 Step 6:
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix EE.09 – Cultural Resources
    Appendix EE.09 – Cultural Resources Tier 1 Final EIS Volume 1 NEC FUTURE Appendix EE.09 - Cultural Resources: Data Geography Affected Environment Environmental Consequences Context Area NHL NRHP NRE NHL NRHP NRE NHL NRHP NRE NHL NRHP NRE NHL NRHP NRE NHL NRHP NRE State County Existing NEC including Existing NEC including Existing NEC including Preferred Alternative Preferred Alternative Preferred Alternative Hartford/Springfield Line Hartford/Springfield Line Hartford/Springfield Line DC District of Columbia 10 21 0 10 21 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 49 249 0 54 248 0 MD Prince George's County 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 23 0 1 23 0 MD Anne Arundel County 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 MD Howard County 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 MD Baltimore County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 10 0 MD Baltimore City 3 44 0 3 46 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 25 212 0 26 213 0 MD Harford County 0 5 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 12 0 1 15 0 MD Cecil County 0 6 2 0 8 2 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 11 2 0 11 2 DE New Castle County 3 64 2 3 67 2 0 2 1 0 5 2 3 187 1 4 186 2 PA Delaware County 0 4 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 18 0 1 18 0 PA Philadelphia County 9 85 1 10 87 1 0 2 1 3 4 1 57 368 1 57 370 1 PA Bucks County 3 8 1 3 8 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 3 15 1 3 15 1 NJ Burlington County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17 0 1 17 0 NJ Mercer County 1 9 1 1 10 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 5 40 1 6 40 1 NJ Middlesex County 1 20 2 1 20 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 42 2 1 42 2 NJ Somerset County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 NJ Union County 1 9 1 1 10 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 2 17 1 2 17 1 NJ Essex County 1 24 1 1 26 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 65 1 1 65 1 NJ Hudson County
    [Show full text]
  • African-Americans in Boston : More Than 350 Years
    Boston Public Library REFERENCE BANKOF BOSTON This book has been made possible through the generosity of Bank of Boston \ African-Americans in Boston More Than 350 Years Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/africanamericansOOhayd_0 African-Americans in Boston: More Than 350 Years by Robert C. Hayden Foreword by Joyce Ferriabough Trustees of the Public Library of the City of Boston, 1991 African-Americans in Boston: More Than 350 Years Written by Robert C. Hayden Conceived and coordinated by Joyce Ferriabough Designed by Richard Zonghi, who also coordinated production Edited by Jane Manthome Co-edited by Joyce Ferriabough, Berthe M. Gaines, C. Kelley, assisted by Frances Barna Funded in part by Bank of Boston PubUshed by Trustees of the Boston PubHc Library Typeset by Thomas Todd Company Printed by Mercantile Printing Company Grateful acknowledgment is made to the following individuals and organizations for use of the illustrations on the pages cited: T. J. Anderson (74); Associated Press Wirephoto (42 bottom, 43, 98 left, 117); Fabian Bachrach (24, 116); Bob Backoff (27 left); Banner Photo (137); Charles D. Bonner (147 left); Boston African-American Historic Site, National Park Service (38, 77, 105 right); The Boston Athenaeum (18, 35 top, 47 top, 123, 130); Boston Globe (160); Boston Housing Authority (99); Boston Red Sox (161); Boston University News Service (119 right, 133); Margaret Bumham (110); John Bynoe (26); Julian Carpenter (153); Dance Umbrella (71); Mary Frye (147 right); S. C. Fuller, Jr. (142 right); Robert Gamett (145 left); Artis Graham (86); Calvin Grimes, Jr. (84); James Guilford (83); Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • BPS 5 Year Capital Facilities Master Plan, Phase I Fiscal Years 2014 - 2018
    BPS 5 Year Capital Facilities Master Plan, Phase I Fiscal Years 2014 - 2018 Volume I – Main Report Prepared by Boston Public Schools Capital & Facilities Management, June 2013 Capital Facility Master Plan, Phase I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thomas M. Menino, Mayor City of Boston Dr. Carol R. Johnson, Superintendent Meredith Weenick, Chief Financial Officer Karen Connor, Dir., Office of Budget Mgmt. Boston School Committee Jack Hanlon, Deputy Dir., OBM Capital Budgets Mihael O’Neill, Chair Alfreda Harris, Vice Chair Boston Public Schools John F. Barros John McDonough, Chief Financial Officer Meg Campbell Carleton W. Jones, Ex. Director, Capital & Facilities Management Rev. Gregory C. Groover, Sr. Khadijah Brown, Director, Facilities Management Claudio Martinez Brian Chambers, Asst. Director, Planning & Engineering Mary Tamer Mary Ann Crayton, Ex. Dir., Cmmty. Engagement & Circle of Promise Jordan Cupps, Financial Analyst Boston City Council Laura Dziorny, Assistant Chief of Staff Councilor At-Large Stephen J. Murphy, President Melissa Dodd, Chief Information Officer Councilor At-Large Felix G. Arroyo Susan C. McCann, Dir. Implementation, Capital & Facilities Management Councilor At-Large John R. Connolly Timothy Nicolette, Chief of Staff Councilor At-Large Ayanna Pressley Peter Sloan, Interim Director, Strategic Planning Councilor-D1 Salvatore LaMattina Jocelyn Wright, Senior Director, Operations Councilor-D2 Bill Linehan Councilor-D3 Frank Baker Councilor-D4 Charles C. Yancey Councilor-D5 Robert Consalvo Councilor-D Matt O’Malley Councilor-D7 Tito
    [Show full text]
  • Ocm20718343.Pdf (2.886Mb)
    3120bb D271 3EDM D Report and Recofnmendations ^ of Louis L. Jaffe, Esq., Appointed by the State Board of Education to hold a hearing ordered by the Supreme Judicial Court in a case shortly entitled; The Boston School Committee V. The State Department of Education i 6 I May 28, 1973 L : . 11 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Suffolk, ss. THE BOSTON SCHOOL COMMITTEE and THE CITY OF BOSTON, Petitioners vs THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and THE STATE TASK FORCE ON RACIAL IMBALANCE IN BOSTON, Respondents HEARING OFFICER Professor Louis L. Jaffe, Esq Harvard University Law School Cambridge, Massachusetts APPEARANCES The State Department of Education and the State Task Force on Racial Imbalance [by Dr. Frederick Lewis, Esq.] 178 Tre- mont Street, Boston, Massachusetts. Hale & Dorr [by Stephen H. Olesky, Esq.] 2 8 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts, on behalf of the Boston School Comm.ittee. Angoff, Goldman, Manning, Pyle & Wagner [by John F. McMahon , Esq.) 44 School Street, Boston, Massachusetts, on behalf of the Boston Teachers' Union John Doherty , President, Boston Teachers' Union, Local 66, Boston, Massachusetts. Louise Day Hicks, Esq., representing Rita Brawl of Boston Hom.e and School Association, South Boston Home and School Association, and South Boston Residence Group; and Patricia Ranese of Com- munity School Council; and Virginia Sheyhi of South Boston Education Committee. Mary Welby, representing 21G members of the St. Thomas Aquinas Educational Association and 24 individuals of Jamaica Plain. Ill TABLE OB' CONTENTS General Introduction 1 These Hearings 3 Proposed Plans of the Boston School Committee 4 The Process of Recommendation by the Board of a Plan 5 A Description of the Task Force Plan 9 Elementary Schools 9 Intermediate Schools ...
    [Show full text]
  • Box Locations in 1900
    BOSTON FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE ALARM BOX LOCATIONS January 1, 1900 HENRY S. RUSSELL Fire Commissioner Lewis P. Webber Chief of Department 1 9 Commercial and Foster Sts 10 Clark and Hanover Streets 12 Cooper and Endicott Streets 13 Hanover and Parmenter Streets 14 Commercial St at Union Wharf 15 Richmond and Commercial Streets 16 North Market Street and Merchants Row 17 Hanover and Endicott Streets 18 Brattle Street, opp. Quincy House 19 Charlestown Street near Cross 21 Sudbury and Hawkins Streets 23 Bowdoin Square 24 Cambridge and North Russell Streets 25 Chemical House 11, Grove Street 26 Cambridge and Charles Streets 27 Charles and Mt. Vernon Streets 28 Clinton Street, opp. Blackstone 29 Beacon Street, opp. Spruce 31 Beacon Street, opp. Beaver 32 Pinckney and Anderson Streets 33 Mt. Vernon Street, opp. Hancock 34 Myrtle and Joy Streets 35 Tremont and School Streets 36 State Street, nw cor. Old State House 37 India and Central Streets 38 Atlantic Avenue and Long Wharf 39 Engine House 26, Mason Street 41 Washington and Milk Streets 42 Tremont and Winter Streets 43 Washington and West Streets 44 High Street and High St. Place 45 Federal and Franklin Streets 46 Oliver and Milk Streets 47 Engine House 25, Fort Hill Square 48 Dewey Square 49 Summer and Hawley Streets 51 Purchase and Pearl Streets 52 Summer and Lincoln Streets 53 Washington and Boylston Streets 54 Beach and Oxford Streets 55 Tremont Street and Van Rensselaer Place 56 Kneeland and South Streets 57 Hudson and Oak Streets 58 Dorchester Avenue near Draw Bridge 59 South and East Streets 2 61 Tremont Street, nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Vocational Rehabilitation Statewide High School Coverage Report
    THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS MASSACHUSETTS REHABILITATION COMMISSION Vocational Rehabilitation Statewide High School Coverage Report Academic Year 2016/2017 Updated December 2016 North District Fitchburg, Framingham, Lawrence, Lowell, Malden, Salem, Somerville Fitchburg Area Office High School Town VR Counselor Ayer High School Ayer Abel Pichardo Bay Path (Reg. Tech.) Charlton Amy Cserny Bromfield High School Harvard Jamie Morrissey Clinton High School Clinton Jamie Morrissey Fitchburg High School Fitchburg Jamie Morrissey Gardner High School Gardner Christine Aveyard-Rameau Groton/Dunstable High School Groton/Dunstable Simone Coble Leominster High School Leominster Jamie Morrissey Lunenburg High School Lunenburg Simone Coble Minuteman Tech (Regional) Lexington Jamie Morrissey Montachusett Technical School Fitchburg Abel Pichardo/Christie Aveyard-Rameau Murdock High School Winchendon Amy Cserny Narragansett High School Templeton Abel Pichardo Nashoba Regional Bolton Jamie Morrissey Nashoba Valley Tech High School Bolton Simone Coble North Middlesex High School Townsend Simone Coble Oakmont High School Ashburnham Christie Aveyard-Rameau Quabbin High School Barre Amy Cserny Shirley High School Shirley Abel Pichardo Tahanto Regional Boylston Jamie Morrissey Three Rivers Three Rivers Christie-Aveyard Rameau Wachusett High School Wachusett Amy Cserny Murdock High School Winchendon Amy Cserny **Deaf/Hard of Hearing Students All Schools Heidi Freeman Framingham Area Office High School Town VR Counselor Algonquin Regional Northborough, Southborough
    [Show full text]
  • Citywide Coordinating Council Records 1966-1979 (Bulk 1975-1978) MS.1990.031
    Citywide Coordinating Council Records 1966-1979 (bulk 1975-1978) MS.1990.031 http://hdl.handle.net/2345/2936 Archives and Manuscripts Department John J. Burns Library Boston College 140 Commonwealth Avenue Chestnut Hill 02467 library.bc.edu/burns/contact URL: http://www.bc.edu/burns Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 4 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Historical note ................................................................................................................................................ 6 Scope and Contents ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Arrangement ................................................................................................................................................... 8 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 6 New Street, East Boston, MA, MAG910654
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region 1 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 BOSTON, MA 02109-3912 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED ' JAN 2 2 2015 Patrick Wilde Owner GEGC2 New Street, LL. 1477 NW Everett Street, Portland, Oregon 97209 Re: Authorization to discharge under the Remediation General Permit (RGP)­ MAG9-10000. Building Redevelopment site located at 6 New Street, Boston, MA 02128, Suffolk County; Authorization# MAG910654 Dear Mr. Wilde: Based on the review ofa Notice oflntent (NOI) submitted by Haley & Aldrich from, on behalfofGEGC 2 New Street, for the site referenced above, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) hereby authorizes you, as the named Owner and Operator to discharge in accordance with the provisions ofthe RGP at that site. Your authorization number is listed above. The checklist enclosed with this RGP authorization indicates the pollutants which you are reqUired to monitor. Also indicated on the checklist are the effluent limits, test methods and minimum levels (MLs) for each pollutant. Please note that the checklist does not represent the complete requirements ofthe RGP. Operators must comply with all ofthe applicable requirements ofthis permit, including influent and effluent monitoring, narrative water quality standards, record keeping, and reporting requirements, found in Parts I and II, and Appendices I -VIII ofthe RGP. See EPA's website for the complete RGP and other information at: http://www.epa.gov/regionllnpdes/mass.html#dgp. Please note the enclosed checklist includes parameters that exceeded Appendix III limits. It also includes parameters your consultant has marked " Believed Present. Also, please note that the metals included on the .checklist are dilution dependent pollutants and subject to limitations based on selected dilution ranges and technology­ based ceiling limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Name City State Country Start Date ALABAMA COLLEGE MONTEVALLO AL USA 01/01/67
    Site Name City State Country Start Date ALABAMA COLLEGE MONTEVALLO AL USA 01/01/67 ALABAMA COLLEGE MONTEVALL AL USA ALABAMA STATE HOSPITAL AND MT. VERNON AL USA 06/01/61 PARTLOW STATE SCHOOL FOR SEARCY HOSPITAL ALABAMA STATE HOSPITAL AND TUSCALOOSA AL USA 06/01/61 PARTLOW STATE SCHOOL FOR SEARCY HOSPITAL AUBURN UNIVERSITY AUBURN AL USA 01/01/63 AUBURN UNIVERSITY, THACH HALL AUBURN AL USA 01/01/69 General Hospital School of Nursing Mobile AL USA 01/01/67 Holy Family High School Birmingham AL USA 01/01/56 Holy Family High School Birmingham AL USA 01/01/56 Jacksonville State University - Teachers College Jacksonville AL USA 01/01/55 Jacksonville State University - Teachers College Jacksonville AL USA 01/01/55 Maxwell Airfor Force Base (Air University) Montogery AL USA 01/01/54 PARTLOW STATE SCHOOL TUSCALOOSA AL USA 06/01/61 SAMFORD UNIVERSITY BIRMINGHAM AL USA 01/01/63 ST BERNARD COLLEGE CULLMAN AL USA 01/01/68 State Teachers College Florence AL USA 01/01/47 STATE TEACHERS COLLEGE - TREASURER'S FLORENCE AL USA 01/01/58 OFFICE STATE TEACHERS COLLEGE, TREASURER'S FLORENCE AL USA 08/17/45 OFFICE UNIVERSITY OF AL TUSCALOOSA AL USA 01/01/71 University of Alabama Tuscaloosa AL USA UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA TUSCALOOSA AL USA 01/01/71 University of Alabama Tuscaloosa AL USA UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA - CENTRAL BIRMINGHAM AL USA 09/25/70 UTILITIES FACILITY UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA - MEDICAL BIRMINGHAM AL USA 09/23/69 CENTER - LYONS-HARRISON BUILDING UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA - STEAM PLANT TUSCALOOSA AL USA 11/21/70 UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA MED CTR BIRMINGHAM AL USA
    [Show full text]
  • Re: Notice of Intent for the Remediation General Permit Temporary Construction Dewatering for Demolition 776 Summer Street, South Boston, Massachusetts
    1 Technology Park Drive 1 TechnologyWestford, Park MA 01886Drive Westford, MA 01886 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency March 23, 2021 Office of Ecosystem Protection File No. 4867.00 EPA/OEP RGP Applications Coordinator 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 (OEP06-01) Boston, MA 02109-3912 Re: Notice of Intent for the Remediation General Permit Temporary Construction Dewatering for Demolition 776 Summer Street, South Boston, Massachusetts Dear Sir/Madam: On behalf of HRP 776 Summer Street, LLC (HRP), Sanborn, Head & Associates, Inc. (Sanborn Head) is submitting this Notice of Intent (NOI) to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Remediation General Permit (RGP) MAG910000 for 776 Summer Street in South Boston, Massachusetts (the Site). This letter and supporting documentation were prepared in accordance with the USEPA guidance for construction dewatering under the RGP program. HRP is the owner of the Site and will have responsibility for the contractors/subcontractors performing the dewatering activities at the Site. Contractors and subcontractors working for HRP on the project will be required to meet the requirements of this NOI and the RGP. The location of the Site and the discharge locations into the Reserved Channel via private on- Site storm water catch basins are shown on Figure 1 and Figure 2. The Site is approximately 15 acres and was previously operated as the New Boston Generating Station. The first phase of redevelopment activities at the Site include removal of various structures and foundations on the Site, selective demolition of structures that are anticipated to remain and be redeveloped, removal of various infrastructure elements including but not limited to, below grade piping systems, storm water systems, electrical distribution components, and various equipment bases and pads throughout the Site.
    [Show full text]