Plate 5. Relation of Lithostratigraphic Units to Hydrogeologic Units, Overthrust Belt and Fossil Basin, Including Bear River Basin, Wyoming

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plate 5. Relation of Lithostratigraphic Units to Hydrogeologic Units, Overthrust Belt and Fossil Basin, Including Bear River Basin, Wyoming Hydrogeologic unit of Wyoming Hydrogeologic role/unit inferred from Hydrogeologic role/unit inferred from Hydrogeologic divisions of Hydrogeologic role/unit of Ahern et al. Hydrogeologic unit of Glover (1990) Hydrogeologic unit of TriHydro Corporation Lithostratigraphic units of Framework Water Plan Hydrogeologic unit used in this report SYSTEM AND SERIES Berry (1955) Robinove and Berry (1963) Lines and Glass (1975, Sheet 1)3 (1981, Figure II-7, Table IV-1, and text) [Bear River valley in Cokeville and (2002) Love et al. (1993)1 (WWC Engineering et al., 2007, Figure 4-9) for Bear River Basin [Cokeville area] [Bear River valley] [Overthrust Belt] [Overthrust Belt and Green River Basin] Evanston areas] [Cokeville area] ERATHEM [All of Wyoming] Holocene QUATERNARY Alluvium and terrace deposits1 Local aquifers Aquifers/local aquifers 8 – Quaternary sand and gravel Major aquifers – Quaternary aquifers Alluvial aquifer Major aquifer–alluvial Quaternary unconsolidated-deposit aquifers Pleistocene Pliocene Salt Lake Major aquifer– Major aquifer Salt Lake aquifer Formation sandstone 7 – Tertiary conglomerate and tuffs Miocene Not discussed/not defined or hydrogeologic characteristics unknown in investigators’ study area at time of study Not discussed or not present Oligocene in investigator’s study area CENOZOIC Intrusive igneous rocks Not discussed Marginal aquifer Major aquifer– Fowkes Formation Aquifer Major aquifer Fowkes aquifer sandstone 1 – Igneous and metamorphic rocks TERTIARY Eocene Hydrogeologic role/unit Green Confining not defined for study area Not discussed Not Green River River unit with aquifer and discontinuous discussed Formation confing unit Conglo- 6 – Tertiary siltstones and sandstones aquifers Not merate 2 Aquifer Major aquifer Wasatch Formation defined Not Not Major aquifer–sandstone Wasatch aquifer of Potential aquifer Wasatch aquifer at time discussed discussed Sublette of study Range Paleocene Minor aquifer (Hams Fork Evanston Formation Probable aquifer Minor aquifer Minor aquifer Evanston aquifer Conglomerate Member) Adaville Formation Not discussed Aquifer–Adaville aquifer4 Major aquifer–sandstone Adaville aquifer Discontinuous local Major aquitard Hilliard confining unit Upper Hilliard Shale Not discussed/not defined/not present or Probable confining unit Major aquitard aquifers or locally Cretaceous utilized aquifer Frontier Formation hydrogeologic characteristics unknown Potential aquifer Minor aquifer–Frontier aquifer Minor aquifer Frontier aquifer at time of study Sage Junction Formation Hydrogeologic role/unit not defined Probable Not discussed or not present Aspen Aspen Major confining 5 – Cretaceous shales and sandstones in investigator’s study area confining Shale aquitard Hydrogeologic Quealy Formation Not defined in unit Not discussed/not defined role/unit not defined unit CRETACEOUS investigators’ study area in investigators’ study area Thomas Fork Formation–aquifer Not discussed Cokeville Formation defined Hydrogeologic role/unit not defined at time of study at time of study role/unit not Bear Bear River Hydrogeologic Wayan Formation Wayan Potential Potential Marginal Thomas Fork Formation Thomas Fork aquifer River Formation aquifer aquifer aquifer aquifer Smiths Formation Minor aquifer Hydrogeologic role/unit not defined Lower Smoot Formation Cretaceous Draney Limestone Discontinuous aquifers Not defined Bechler Conglomerate Potential aquifer Marginal aquifer Gannett aquifer and confining unit with local confining units Peterson Limestone Gannett Group MESOZOIC Upper Jurassic–lower Cretaceous aquifers Ephraim Conglomerate Minor aquifer 4 – Jurassic and Cretaceous Upper Jurassic sandstones and limestones Stump Formation Potential aquifer Not discussed or not present Minor aquifer Hydrogeologic role/unit not defined JURASSIC Middle Aquitard (Figure II-7)/poor aquifer (Table IV-1) Preuss Sandstone or Redbeds Potential aquifer in investigator’s study area Minor aquifer Hydrogeologic role/unit not defined Jurassic Twin Creek Limestone Potential aquifer Minor aquifer Minor aquifer Twin Creek aquifer JURASSIC (?) AND TRIASSIC (?) Nugget Sandstone Potential aquifer Major aquifer Minor aquifer Major aquifer–sandstone Nugget aquifer Ankareh Formation Minor aquifer/minor regional aquifer, Potential aquifer locally confining Not discussed Ankareh aquifer Upper Triassic Thaynes Limestone Potential aquifer Major aquifer/regional aquifer Minor aquifer Thaynes aquifer TRIASSIC Nugget aquifer system 3 – Triassic and Permian Not discussed or not present siltstones and limestones in investigator’s study area Marginal aquifer Lower Woodside Shale Potential aquifer Aquitard Woodside confining unit Triassic Dinwoody Formation Probable confining unit Aquitard with locally productive zones Marginal aquifer Dinwoody aquifer and confining unit Phosphoria Formation and related rocks Potential aquifer Minor aquifer-locally confining Minor aquifer Phosphoria aquifer PERMIAN Upper Potential aquifer/good aquifer Major aquifer (identified as Tensleep Sandstone Major aquifer (identified as Wells Formation Potential aquifer Minor aquifer Not discussed Wells aquifer Pennsylvanian (identified as Tensleep Sandstone) on Figure II-7 and Wells Formation in text) Tensleep Sandstone)–limestone PENNSYLVANIAN Middle Pennsylvanian Lower Pennsylvanian Amsden Formation Potential aquifer Minor aquifer-locally confining Marginal aquifer Amsden aquifer Upper Mississippian MISSISSIPPIAN Madison Limestone Potential aquifer/good aquifer Major aquifer Major aquifer–limestone Madison aquifer Lower Mississippian Upper Darby Formation Major aquifer Major aquifer–limestone Darby aquifer Devonian DEVONIAN 2 – Paleozoic limestones Not discussed/not defined Hydrogeologic role/unit not defined PALEOZOIC Lower and sandstones in investigators’ study area Paleozoic aquifer system Devonian for study area Not discussed/not defined at time of study SILURIAN Upper and Laketown Dolomite or hydrogeologic characteristics Not discussed or not present Not discussed Middle Silurian unknown in investigators’ study area in investigator’s study area Upper Bighorn Dolomite at time of study Major aquifer Major aquifer–limestone Bighorn aquifer Ordovician Middle Not discussed/not defined/not present or ORDOVICIAN Ordovician hydrogeologic characteristics unknown Lower at time of study Ordovician Upper Gallatin Limestone Minor aquifer Minor aquifer Gallatin aquifer Cambrian CAMBRIAN Gros Ventre Formation Aquitard/regional aquitard Minor aquifer Gros Ventre confining unit Middle Cambrian Flathead Sandstone Minor aquifer–Flathead aquifer Major aquifer–limestone5 Flathead aquifer PRECAMBRIAN Precambrian rocks 1 – Igneous and metamorphic rocks Minor aquifer–Precambrian aquifer Major aquitard Precambrian basal confining unit 1Alluvium and terrace deposits of Quaternary age not included in Love at al. (1993). 2Includes main body Wasatch Formation, diamictite and sandstone, and Bullpen and Tunp Members. 3Lithostratigraphic units grouped into eight hydrogeologic divisions based on “somewhat similar origins, lithologies, and water-bearing properties” (Lines and Glass, 1975, Sheet 1). 4Adaville Formation defined as “major aquifer” in Figure II-7 and “minor aquifer” in Table IV-1 of Ahern et al. (1981). 5Predominant lithology is sandstone, and it is unknown why formation is defined as “Major aquifer–limestone” in WWC Engineering et al. (2007, Figure 4-9). Plate 5. Relation of lithostratigraphic units to hydrogeologic units, Overthrust Belt and Fossil Basin, including Bear River Basin, Wyoming..
Recommended publications
  • The Geologic History of Fossil Butte National Monument and Fossil Basin
    The Geologic History of Fossil Butte National Monument and Fossil Basin FOSSIL BUTTE The Geologic History of Fossil Butte National Monument and Fossil Basin NPS Occasional Paper No. 3 THE GEOLOGIC HISTORY OF FOSSIL BUTTE NATIONAL MONUMENT AND FOSSIL BASIN Paul O. McGrew Michael Casilliano Department of Geology, University of Wyoming National Park Service Occasional Paper Number Three 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS index.htm Last Updated: 01-Mar-2005 http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/fobu/index.htm[6/17/2013 12:42:49 PM] The Geologic History of Fossil Butte National Monument and Fossil Basin (Tables of Contents) FOSSIL BUTTE The Geologic History of Fossil Butte National Monument and Fossil Basin NPS Occasional Paper No. 3 CONTENTS COVER INTRODUCTION LOCATION HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF RESEARCH STRATIGRAPHY Thaynes Limestone Evanston Formation Wasatch Formation Basal Conglomerate Member Lower Member Main Body Sandstone Tongue Mudstone Tongue Bullpen Member Tunp Member Age of the Wasatch Formation Depositional Environment Green River Formation Fossil Butte Member Angelo Member Age of the Green River Formation Depositional Environment Fowkes Formation Sillem Member Bulldog Hollow Member Gooseberry Member Age of the Fowkes Formation Depositional Environment QUATERNARY THE GEOLOGIC STRUCTURE OF FOSSIL BASIN PALEONTOLOGY Flora Invertebrates http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/fobu/contents.htm[6/17/2013 12:42:58 PM] The Geologic History of Fossil Butte National Monument and Fossil Basin (Tables of Contents) Vertebrates Fish Amphibians Reptiles Birds Mammals PALEOECOLOGY AND TAPHONOMY ACKNOWLEDGMENTS GLOSSARY REFERENCES BIBLIOGRAPHY Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data McGrew, Paul Orman, 1909- The geological history of Fossil Butte National Monument and Fossil Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Uppermost Cretaceous and Tertiary Stratigraphy of Fossil Basin, Southwestern Wyoming
    Uppermost Cretaceous and Tertiary Stratigraphy of Fossil Basin, Southwestern Wyoming By STEVEN S. ORIEL and JOSHUA I. TRACEY, JR. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 635 New subdivisions of the J,ooo-Joot-thick continental Evanston, Wasatch, Green River, and Fowkes Formations facilitate understanding of sediment genesis and Jl7yoming thrust-belt tectonic events UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1970 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 70-604646 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 65 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Wasatch Formation-Continued Abstract __________________________________________ _ 1 Fossils and age-Continued· Page Introduction ______________________________________ _ 2 Tunp Member______________________________ 28 Purpose ______________________________________ _ 2 Origin--------~-------------------------------- 28 Earlier work_ .. __ - __ - ___________________ - _-- _- __ 2 Tectonic implications ____________ -_-------------- 29 Acknowledgments __ . ___________________________ _ 2 Green River Formation ___ .. _______ ------------------ 30 General relations ___ -- _________________________ _ 5 Name and usage __________________ -------------- 30 Evanston Formation _______________________________ _ 5 Definition __________________ -_-------------- 30 N arne and usage _______________________________ _ 5 Lithologic heterogeneity.
    [Show full text]
  • Clastic Laramide Sediments of the Wasatch Hinterland
    CLASTIC LARAMIDE SEDIMENTS OF THE WASATCH HINTERLAND, NORTHEASTERN UTAH by Daven Craig Mann A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of o • • Master of Science in Geology Department of Geology and Geophysics University of Utah Summer 1974 UNIVERSITY OF UTAH GRADUATE SCHOOL SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by Daven Craig Mann I have read this thesis and have found it to be of satisfactory quality for a master's degree. * /• % Li, /Eugene Call4.ghan [ChairmartySupervisory Committee T have read this thesis and have found it to be of satisfactory quality for a master's j degree. Date rancis W. Christiansen Member, Svipervisory Committee T have read this thesis and have found it to be of satisfactory quality for a master's decree. Jonathan H. Goodwin [ember, Supervisory Committee UNIVERSITY OF UTAH LIBRARIES UNIVERSITY OF UTAH GRADUATE SCHOOL. FINAL READING APPROVAL To the Graduate Council of the University of Utah: I have read the thesis of Daven Craig Mann in its final form and have found that (1) its format, citations, and bibliographic style are consistent and acceptable; (2) its illustrative materials including figures, tables, and charts are in place; and (3) the final manuscript is satisfactory to the Supervisory Committee and is ready - for submission to the Graduate School. Approved for the Major Department Chairman/Dean Approved for the Graduate Counci Sterling M. McMurrin Dean of the Graduate School ACKNOWLEDGMENT Acknowledgment is made to the Utah Geological and Mineral Survey which financially aided the author while doing the field work.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhumation of the North American Cordillera Revealed by Multi-Dating of Upper Jurassic–Upper Cretaceous Foreland Basin Deposits
    Exhumation of the North American Cordillera revealed by multi-dating of Upper Jurassic–Upper Cretaceous foreland basin deposits Clayton S. Painter†, Barbara Carrapa, Peter G. DeCelles, George E. Gehrels, and Stuart N. Thomson Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 E. 4th Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA ABSTRACT AFT and U-Pb) shows that volcanic contami- eroded and later obscured by Basin and Range nation is a signifi cant issue that can, however, extensional tectonics, leaving only the foreland New low-temperature thermochronol- be addressed by double dating. basin deposits as a record of exhumation history. ogy and geochronology data from Upper Despite the great potential of such an approach Jurassic–Upper Cretaceous strata from the INTRODUCTION in North America, to date, no detailed detrital North American Cordilleran foreland ba- thermochronological study had been applied in sin in Utah, Colorado, Wyoming, and South Foreland basin deposits are an impor- the retro arc foreland basin of the North Ameri- Dakota document rapid exhumation rates tant archive of orogenic growth and tectonic can Cordillera. The goal of this study is to deter- of the adjacent Cordilleran orogenic belt to processes (Aubouin, 1965; Dickinson, 1974; mine the timing, pattern, and rates of cooling of the west. Both zircon (U-Th-[Sm])/He (zircon Dickinson and Suczek, 1979; Jordan, 1981; the North American Cordillera in order to better He) and apatite fi ssion track (AFT) thermo- DeCelles and Giles, 1996; DeCelles, 2004; understand the modes of exhumation and con- chronology were applied to proximal and Miall, 2009). Many researchers have used tribute to models of fold- thrust belt and foreland distal synorogenic deposits in order to iden- coarse-grained foreland basin deposits to date basin evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • CORRELATION of the UPPER CRETACEOUS STRATA of WYOMING Stratigraphic Chart Director and State Geologist Upper Cretaceous Laramie, Wyoming by Ranie M
    WYOMING STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open File Report 2017-3 Thomas A. Drean CORRELATION OF THE UPPER CRETACEOUS STRATA OF WYOMING Stratigraphic Chart Director and State Geologist Upper Cretaceous Laramie, Wyoming by Ranie M. Lynds and Joshua S. Slattery Wyoming Interpreting the past, providing for the future 2017 Western Hanna Laramie Bighorn Denver Greater Green River Basin Wind River Basin Powder River Basin Wyoming Basin Basin Basin Basin A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Age Period Epoch Stage and Stage Polarity U.S. Western Interior U.S. Western Interior U.S. Western Interior North American U.S. Western Interior Southern Jackson Northwestern Southern Eastern Eastern Atlantic Rocky Point Separation Lost Soldier Tully Rawlins Hanna Laramie Western Southern and Eastern Bighorn Northwestern Salt Creek Southwestern Southeastern Central Northwestern Denver (Ma) Boundary Chron Radiometric Ammonite Inoceramid Land Vertebrate Palynostratigraphic Thrust Belt Hole and Rock Springs Rock Springs Rock Springs Washakie Rim Rim Ranch Draw Basin Basin, Wind River Central Wind Wind River Basin Powder Powder Powder River Black Hills Black Hills Basin (Ma) Age (Ma) Biozone Biozone Age Biozone Hoback Basin Uplift Uplift Uplift Basin Rock River Basin River Basin Basin River Basin River Basin Basin (7, 56, 77) (7, 56, 74) (8, 49, 54, 55, 56, 69, 72) (7, 23, 25, 56, 74) (7, 56, 74) (2, 33, 35, 77) (50) (6, 10, 29, 30, 47, 53, (6, 11, 12, 22, 32, 37, (12, 26, 30, 64, 72, (12, 26, 30, 36, 63, 64, (12, 19, 20, 26, 29, 30, (1, 12, 21, 30, 36, 58,
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Study Area
    Chapter 2 Study area Keith Clarey Melissa Thompson 2-1 he Greater Green River Basin (GGRB) forest and alpine tundra on the higher mountains. includes the Green River Basin, the Great At lower elevations in the basin, the vegetation in- Divide Basin, and the Little Snake River cludes abundant sagebrush, saltbush, greasewood, TBasin (Figure 1-1). The project boundary is deter- and desert shrub. Forested areas contain lodgepole mined by the distal river drainage basin divides. pine, spruce, fir, and aspen. The drainage basin boundaries overlap several geo- logic features within the GGRB. The continental GEOLOGIC SETTING: STRUCTURE divide marks the northern and eastern boundaries The GGRB is bounded by the Overthrust Belt to of the GGRB; it bifurcates and reconverges around the west, the Hoback Basin to the northwest, the the Great Divide Basin (Figure 1-1). Figure 2-1 Wind River Range and Granite Mountains to the shows the townships and ranges in the GGRB. north, the Rawlins Uplift to the east, the Sierra Madre to the east-southeast, the southern Sand The Wyoming portion of the GGRB, as delineated Wash Basin in Colorado to the south-southeast, using GIS databases, has an area of 20,792 square and the Uinta Mountains in Utah to the south. miles (13,306,700 acres). The Wyoming GGRB Within the GGRB, the Rock Springs Uplift and covers 21.3 percent of the area of the state. The Bridger Basin are located in the Green River Basin adjacent 3,821 square miles (2,445,900 acres) of proper; the Wamsutter Arch separates the Great the Colorado and Utah GGRB added to the Wyo- Divide Basin from the Washakie Basin; and Chero- ming GGRB area gives a total basin area of 24,613 kee Ridge separates the Washakie Basin from the square miles (15,752,500 acres) (Figures 1-1 and Sand Wash Basin (Figure 2-2).
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Contributions and Studies
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY NUMBER 2 c. Lewis Gazin A New Occurrence of Paleocene Mammals in the Evanston Formation, Southwestern Wyoming ISSUED DEC 31 1969 SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS CITY OF WASHINGTON i969 ABSTRACT Gazin, C. Lewis. A New Occurrence of Paleocene Mammals in the Evanston Forma- tion, Southwestern Wyoming. Contributions to Paleobiology, 2: 1-17. 1969. A new fossil horizon and locality for the Evanston formation, near Little Muddy Creek in the Fossil Basin of southwestern Wyoming, has yielded remains of a mammalian faunule of middle Paleocene age. Relationships are shown to the two widely separated classic occurrences: the upper Lebo of the Montana Fort Union and the New Mexico Torre- jon. A correlation is also indicated with the Battle Mountain and Rock Bench occurrences in the more local Wyoming region. The known faunule is comprised of essentially small Mammalia representing the orders Multituberculata, Insectívora, Primates, Creodonta, and Condylarthra. The material consists for the most part of isolated teeth, hence identifications are necessarily tentative in nature. Official publication date is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution's annual report, Smithsonian Year. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1969 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington,, D.C. 20402 Price 45 cents (paper cover) C. Lewis Gazin A New Occurrence of Paleocene Mammals in the Evanston Formation, Southwestern Wyoming Introduction strata understood to be a part of the Evanston forma- tion include remains of a Tiffanian Paleocene fauna While making a study of the Cretaceous and Tertiary encountered (Gazin, 1956b) at the forks of Twin deposits of the Fossil Basin in southwestern Wyoming, Creek near Fossil Station, high in a sequence of beds, during the 1959 field season, Joshua I.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Interior Seaway
    () . Paleogeo.graphy of the Late Cretaceous of the Western Interior otMfddle North America+­ j?'oal .Blstribution anct,Sedimen~cumulation By Laura N. Robinson Roberts and Mark A. Kirschbaum U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1561 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or finn names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Roberts, Laura N. Robinson. Paleogeography of the Late Cretaceous of the western interior of middle North America : coal distribution and sediment accumulation I by Laura N. Robinson Roberts and Mark A. Kirschbaum. p. em.- (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper ; 1561) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.16: 1561 1. Paleogeography-Cretaceous. 2. Paleogeography-West (U.S.). 3. Coal­ Geology-West (U.S.). I. Kirschbaum, Mark A. II. Title. III. Series. QE50 1.4.P3R63 1995 553.2'1'0978-dc20 94-39032 CIP CONTENTS Abstract........................................................................................................................... 1" Introduction ................................................................................................................... Western Interior Seaway ... .. ... ... ... .. .. ..
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Resources Inventory Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fossil Butte National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2012/587 ON THE COVER Fossil Butte looms over Fossil Butte National Monument in southwest Wyoming. Today’s semi- arid climate belies an ancient, warm temperate lake ecosystem that existed 50 million years ago. Photograph by Jason Kenworthy (NPS Geologic Resources Division). THIS PAGE The 50 million year old rocks of the Green River Formation are exposed on Fossil Butte (front cover) and Cundick Ridge (this page) within Fossil Butte National Monument. They contain exceptionally well preserved fossils from within and around ancient Fossil Lake, such as these fossil fish. National Park Service photograph Fossil Butte National Monument Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2012/587 National Park Service Geologic Resources Division PO Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225 October 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochronology of Torrejonian Sediments, Nacimiento Formation, San Juan Basin, New Mexico
    Geochronology of Torrejonian sediments, Nacimiento Formation, San Juan Basin, New Mexico Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Taylor, Louis Henry, 1944- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 01/10/2021 18:33:30 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/566500 GEOCHRONOLOGY OF TORREJONIAN SEDIMENTS, NACIMIENTO FORMATION, SAN JUAN BASIN, NEW MEXICO by Louis Henry Taylor A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 7 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This th e s is has been subm itted in p a r tia l f u lf illm e n t o f re ­ quirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of th is m anuscript in whole or in p a rt may be granted by the head o f the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judg­ ment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholar­ ship.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil BUTTE
    I PRO w O ' ~ED • I I fOSSIL BUTTE I NATIONAL MONUMENT I I I I I I I I I I NIT 0 STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE •I . .. - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SYNOPSIS OF REPORT --PROPOSED FOSS:U. BU'l'TE NATIONAL MONUMENT PROPOSAL: That Fossil Butte and surroUlld.ing lands and features in W;yOIIIing be established as the Fossil Butte f!ationnl ~!onument e.nd be administered by the National Park Service. !OOATIC»!: Fossil Butte is about 10 miles vest oi' Kemme1•er: Lincolll County • Wy€nning9 adjacen'~ to U, S, 30N-~an au-weather • t:rans­ contineutal higl:lway. DESCRIPTION OF AREA: The proposed monument includes Fossil Butte, a rugged topograPhic feature rising 1:000 feet above the valley floor to au elevation of' over "? ,500 feet, This butte and the associated Ccndick Ridge a:re made up of the 1-/asatch and Green River formations which contain numerous, well-preserved fossils of Eocene age. Fl•om vantage poiuts on the ridge interesting features associated with the geolosic history of '~hese formations and the al1oient inland lake in which the Green River formatiou was deposited can be observed, S:WNIF:ICf..NCE .MID NEED FOR CO.I'ISERVM:!OH: Foosil Butte, from the scientific viewpoint, is of national significance because of its unusual eoncentration of aquatic vertebrate remains. Knovn loca­ tions of fossil f'ieh of any age are rare, but here thousands of :fish f'ossil.G a:ra pre:;ent IW.d fossils :from th;i.s locality are exhibited in museums througllcnrt.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Geologic Map of the Devils Slide Quadrangle
    UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Plate 1 a division of Utah Geological Survey Open-File Report 691 Utah Department of Natural Resources Interim Geologic Map of the Devils Slide Quadrangle Qac 45 Qmc Tw Qmc Qms Qmc/Qao? Qms 9 Qac Qmc/Qao? Qmc Qmc? Tw Qac? Qmc Qmc Tw Qmc Keh Qafy Keh Qac Qmc Qmc Qmc Qmc Qmc Qac Qms Qab? Qc/QTay? Qms Qmc Twc 4 9 Qac Qac Qmc Qat2? PIPwu TRd Qmc Qac Qms Qmc Qmc Qmc Qms?(Tw) Keh 20 Qaf Qmc 1 Qmc Twc Qmc Keh Qmc Qmc Qac Ppm? Ppf Qac Qms Qmc Qmc Qay # Qac 44 12 2 Qms Tw Qaf Qmc Qmc Qmc # 39 Keh Qc Qms ? ? TRw Qms Keh Qms Qmc Ppg? 55 ? ? Qc Qmc Qac # 25 Qms Qac 4 26 Qms Qmc 12 Twc # Qmc Ppf 6 Qmc Qaf Qms Qmc Qmc 3 ? ? 48 Qmc Qac/Qao? Qms Qmc Qc # 70 2 Qac/Qab Qmc Qmc Qmc 2 # Qafo? Qc Qmc ? Qab Qms 6 Qmc 37 Qmc Qmc Qmc Keh Tw Qc # 60 ? Qmc 7 Keh Qc Qmc QTay Qmc # Keh Qms Tw 4 Qmc Qms 42 PIPwu TRw Qc Qmc Qmc Qmc # 30 Qmc Qmc Qmc Qmc TRd Keh 4 Qmc Qmc Tw # Ppg Qmc PIPwu Qms ? Qmc Qmc Qmc/Qa 86 Qms Qmc Qmc # Qmc Tw 18 Qmc Qac Qac Qc 2 # Keh Qmc Qmc Qmc Ppm 37 Ppf Qmc 55 TRw Qac PIPwu Qmc Qmc Keh Tw # 5 Qac Keh Keh 5 Qmc 26 QTay? # TRd Qms? Qmc 4 42 Ppg Qmc 30 44 Qmc Tw Qc Twc # 38 39 TRw Qac # Ppm Qac/Qab 5 Qmc Qmc Keh Qc Qmc PIPwu Qac # Qmc 47 59 65 TRw Qmc Qmc Qac Qmc # 45TRw Qms Qc Qaf Qmc Qac Qac PIPwu 60 Ppm 75 65 Keh Qaoe # Qms Qmc Qmc Qac Qac Qmc 52 Qc Qmc Qmc Qc # TRw Qaoe Qao Qac Qc 34 Qmc TRd Qms Qmc Qmc 60 # Keh Keh Qc 20 Qms Qao? Qmc Qmc Qmc Qac # Qms Qmc Qmc 32 Qaf Qmc Qmc Qmc Keh Qac Tw Qms # Qmc Qac Keh Qc Keh Qc 6 Qms Qac 36 36 24 Qmc # Qmc Qac Qmc Ppg 31 Keh 32 Qc Qc Qmc Ppf TRw Qmc 5 Qmc # 12 37 Qmc Qmc Qmc
    [Show full text]