Martin Haspelmath, List of Publications

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Martin Haspelmath, List of Publications Martin Haspelmath - List of publications To appear 2010: [Andrej L. Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie] 2010. Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. "The Behaviour-before-Coding Principle in syntactic change." To appear in: Floricic, Franck (ed.) Mélanges Denis Creissels. Paris: Presses de L'École Normale Supérieure. [Uri Tadmor, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor] "Borrowability and the notion of basic vocabulary." Diachronica 2010 "Framework-free grammatical theory." In: Heine, Bernd & Narrog, Heiko (eds.) The Oxford handbook of grammatical analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 341-365. 2009 [Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor] (eds.) 2009. Loanwords in the World's Languages: A Comparative Handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 1081 pp. [Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor] (eds.) 2009. World Loanword Database. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. Online resource, <http://wold.livingsources.org/> [Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor]. 2009. "The Loanword Typology project and the World Loanword Database." In: [Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor] (eds.) 2009. Loanwords in the World's Languages: A Comparative Handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 1-34. "Lexical borrowing: Concepts and issues." In: Martin Haspelmath & Uri Tadmor (eds.) 2009. Loanwords in the World's Languages: A Comparative Handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 35-54. "Terminology of case." In: Malchukov, Andrej & Spencer, Andrew (eds.) 2009. The Oxford handbook of case. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 505-517. "An empirical test of the Agglutination Hypothesis." Scalise, Sergio & Magni, Elisabetta & Bisetto, Antonietta (eds.) 2009. Universals of language today. (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 76.) Dordrecht: Springer, 13-29. "The typological database of the World Atlas of Language Structures." In: Everaert, Martin & Musgrave, Simon (eds.) 2009. The use of databases in cross- linguistic studies. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, 41.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 283-299. 2008 [Martin Haspelmath & Matthew S. Dryer & David Gil & Bernard Comrie, eds.] The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. "A frequentist explanation of some universals of reflexive marking." Linguistic Discovery 6.1: 40-63 (free online journal, Dartmouth College) "Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries." Cognitive Linguistics 19.1:1-33. "Creating economical morphosyntactic patterns in language change." In: Good, Jeff (ed.) 2008. Language universals and language change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 185-214. "Loanword typology: Steps toward a systematic cross-linguistic study of lexical borrowability". In: Thomas Stolz, Dik Bakker & Rosa Salas Palomo (eds.) 2008. Aspects of language contact: New theoretical, methodological and empirical findings with special focus on Romancisation processes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 43-62. "Parametric versus functional explanations of syntactic universals." In: Theresa Biberauer (ed.) 2008. The limits of syntactic variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 75-107. "Ditransitive constructions: towards a new Role and Reference Grammar account?". In: Van Valin, Jr., Robert D. (ed.) Investigations of the Syntax– Semantics–Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 75–100. [Martin Haspelmath & Susanne Michaelis] "Leipzig fourmille de typologues: Genitive objects in comparison." In: Corbett, Greville G. & Noonan, Michael (eds.) Case and grammatical relations: Studies in honor of Bernard Comrie. (Typological Studies in Language, 81.) Amsterdam: Benjamins, 149-166. "Descriptive scales versus comparative scales." In: Marc Richards & Andrej L. Malchukov (eds.) Scales. (Linguistische Arbeitsberichte, 86.) Leipzig: Universität Leipzig, 39-53. 2007 "Further remarks on reciprocal constructions." In: Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. (ed.) Reciprocal constructions. 5 vols. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2087-2115. "Coordination." In: Shopen, Timothy (ed.) Language typology and syntactic description, vol. II: Complex constructions. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-51. "Pre-established categories don't exist: consequences for language description and typology." Linguistic Typology 11.1:119-132 "Ditransitive alignment splits and inverse alignment". Functions of Language 14.1:79-102 (special issue on ditransitives, guest edited by Anna Siewierska) 2006 "Against markedness (and what to replace it with)." Journal of Linguistics 42.1: 25-70 [Martin Haspelmath & Sven Siegmund] "Simulating the replication of some of Greenberg’s word order generalizations." Linguistic Typology 10.1:74-82. 2005 "Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types." Linguistic Discovery 3.1:1-21 (free online journal, Dartmouth College) [Martin Haspelmath & Matthew S. Dryer & David Gil & Bernard Comrie, eds.] The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 695 pp. [Bernard Comrie, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil and Martin Haspelmath]. 2005. "Introduction." In: Martin Haspelmath & Matthew S. Dryer & David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1-8. "Occurrence of Nominal Plurality." In: Martin Haspelmath & Matthew S. Dryer & David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 142-145. Nominal and Verbal Conjunction." In: Martin Haspelmath & Matthew S. Dryer & David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 262-265. "Indefinite Pronouns." In: Martin Haspelmath & Matthew S. Dryer & David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 190-193. "Ditransitive Constructions: The Verb ‘Give’." In: Martin Haspelmath & Matthew S. Dryer & David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 426-429. "Negative Indefinite Pronouns and Predicate Negation." In: Martin Haspelmath & Matthew S. Dryer & David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 466-469. " ‘Want’ Complement Subjects." In: Martin Haspelmath & Matthew S. Dryer & David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 502-509. 2004 [Martin Haspelmath, ed.] Coordinating constructions. (Typological Studies in Language, 58.) Amsterdam: Benjamins, 576 pp. "Coordinating constructions: an overview." In: Haspelmath, Martin (ed.) Coordinating constructions. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 3-39. "Explaining the Ditransitive Person-Role Constraint: a usage-based account." Constructions 2/2004, 49 pp. (free online journal, University of Düsseldorf) "Does linguistic explanation presuppose linguistic description?" Studies in Language 28.3: 554-579 (special issue on linguistic evidence, guest edited by Martina Penke and Anette Rosenbach) "On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization." In: Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde and Harry Perridon (eds). Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization. (Typological Studies in Language, 59.) Amsterdam: Benjamins, 17-44. [Martin Haspelmath & Thomas Müller-Bardey] "Valency change". In: Booij, Geert & Lehmann, Christian & Mugdan, Joachim (eds.) Morphology: A Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation. Vol. 2. (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft) Berlin: de Gruyter, 1130-1145. "How hopeless is genealogical linguistics, and how advanced is areal linguistics?" A review article of [Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, R.M.W. (ed.) 2001. Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.] Studies in Language 28.1: 209-223. 2003 “The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison.” In: Tomasello, Michael (ed.) The new psychology of language, vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 211-242. [Michaelis, Susanne & Haspelmath, Martin] "Ditransitive constructions: Creole languages in a cross-linguistic perspective." Creolica 2003-04-23 (www.creolica.net, open-access online journal). 2002 Understanding morphology. London: Arnold, 290 pp. "Warum ist Grammatik so, wie sie ist?" In: Horst M. Müller (Hrsg.). Arbeitsbuch Linguistik. (UTB, 2169.) Paderborn: Schöningh, 210-19. "Grammatikalisierung: von der Performanz zur Kompetenz ohne angeborene Grammatik." In: Krämer, Sybille & König, Ekkehard (eds.) Gibt es eine Sprache hinter dem Sprechen? (Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, 1592.), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 262-286. "On understanding word order asymmetries" (Comments on John A. Hawkins, "Symmetries and asymmetries: their grammar, typology and parsing"). Theoretical Linguistics 28, 159-170. 2001 [Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König & Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible] (eds.) Language typology and language universals: An international handbook. (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft) Vol. 1-2. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1856 pp. "The European linguistic area: Standard Average European." In: Haspelmath, Martin & König, Ekkehard & Oesterreicher, Wulf & Raible, Wolfgang (eds.) Language typology and language universals. (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft) Berlin: de Gruyter, 1492-1510. “Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages.” In: Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, R.M.W & Onishi, Masayuki (eds.) Non- canonical marking of subjects and objects. (Typological Studies in Language, 46.) Amsterdam: Benjamins, 53-83. "Word classes/parts of speech." In: Baltes, Paul B.
Recommended publications
  • SCLA Book of Abstracts
    Aleksandrs Berdicevskis & Alexander Piperski WHAT DO WE REGULARIZE AND WHAT IS REGULAR: RUSSIAN VERBS THROUGH THE CENTURIES One of the most notable and widespread long-term processes in language change is the regularization of morphological forms. It has been studied from various aspects, and questions that have been addressed include, for instance, who is most likely to eliminate irregularities, children or adults (Hudson Kam & Newport 2009), when irregularities are most likely to be eliminated, in what social circumstances (Berdichevskij 2012), which irregularities are most likely to be eliminated (Lieberman et al 2007, Carroll et al. 2012). In this paper, we deal with the latter question. We also show, however, that in order to get a reliable answer a more fundamental question has to be addressed first: What is regular for the speakers’ minds? The answer is not always obvious. In a well-known study where a neat correlation between the rate of regularization of irregular English verbs and the frequency of word usage was found, Lieberman et al. (2007) classify the -ed verbs as regular and all other verbs as irregular, which seems a logical thing to do. Studying the same process in German strong verbs, Carroll et al. (2012) also use a binary opposition, noting though that for German this decision presents certain problems. We perform a similar study on Russian verbs, which cannot be divided into two classes (“regular” and “irregular”). Of the 16 basic inflectional classes (Zaliznjak 1977), 5 are sometimes labelled “regular” and 11 “irregular”, but they are in fact irregular to a different extent. Since binary notation is not an option, an understanding of what regularity actually is and how it should be operationalized is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining Morphosyntactic Feature Values: the Case of Case1 Greville G
    To appear in: Greville G. Corbett and Michael Noonan (eds) Case and grammatical relations: papers in honour of Bernard Comrie. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Determining morphosyntactic feature values: the case of case1 Greville G. Corbett Surrey Morphology Group A long-running and still vital debate concerns the way in which we can determine the number of cases (case values) in a given language. This matters both for the description of particular languages, and even more for typology, given the imperative for the typologist to compare like with like. Within this debate special attention has been devoted to Russian. And rightly so, since Russian exhibits a whole set of difficult analytic problems with respect to case. As a result it has been claimed to have as few as six case values or as many as eleven. This contribution continues the debate, again giving Russian a central place. Our concern with case is partly with case as a feature (comparable to gender, number and person), but mainly with the values of the feature (nominative, accusative and so on).2 What is novel about it is first the adoption of a canonical approach, in which we construct a logical scheme against which to evaluate the different case values (see §1 below), and second the fact that the criteria we discuss are shown to be relevant to morphosyntactic features more generally, rather then being restricted to case. The debate on case has a distinguished earlier history, including among others Hjelmslev (1935-37), Jakobson (1936, 1958),3 de Groot (1939) and Kuryłowicz 1 This is an issue to which Bernard Comrie has made important contributions (1986, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • The Languages of Amazonia Patience Epps University of Texas at Austin
    Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America Volume 11 Article 1 Issue 1 Volume 11, Issue 1 6-2013 The Languages of Amazonia Patience Epps University of Texas at Austin Andrés Pablo Salanova University of Ottawa Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/tipiti Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Epps, Patience and Salanova, Andrés Pablo (2013). "The Languages of Amazonia," Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America: Vol. 11: Iss. 1, Article 1, 1-28. Available at: http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/tipiti/vol11/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Trinity. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Trinity. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Epps and Salanova: The Languages of Amazonia ARTICLE The Languages of Amazonia Patience Epps University of Texas at Austin Andrés Pablo Salanova University of Ottawa Introduction Amazonia is a linguistic treasure-trove. In this region, defined roughly as the area of the Amazon and Orinoco basins, the diversity of languages is immense, with some 300 indigenous languages corresponding to over 50 distinct ‘genealogical’ units (see Rodrigues 2000) – language families or language isolates for which no relationship to any other has yet been conclusively demonstrated; as distinct, for example, as Japanese and Spanish, or German and Basque (see section 12 below). Yet our knowledge of these languages has long been minimal, so much so that the region was described only a decade ago as a “linguistic black box" (Grinevald 1998:127).
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Modern Languages UPPSALA UNIVERSITY
    SLOVO Journal of Slavic Languages, Literatures and Cultures Volume 59, 2018 Department of Modern Languages UPPSALA UNIVERSITY Slovo Journal of Slavic Languages, Literatures and Cultures No. 59, 2018 Editors: Mattias Ågren, Julie Hansen, Jussi Nuorluoto, Jelena Spasenić Department of Modern Languages UPPSALA UNIVERSITET Department of Modern Languages Slovo. Journal of Slavic Languages, Literatures and Cultures No. 59, 2018 Front cover: Uppsala University Library Carolina Rediviva with marching students in the foreground. Johan Way, 1842 (UUB). ISSN: 2001–7395 CONTENTS ”RURIKS STAMTRÄD” – EN AV DE RYSKA SKATTERNA PÅ CAROLINA REDIVIVA 7 OLENA JANSSON, INGRID MAIER ЛЕКСИЧЕСКИЕ СРЕДСТВА ЭКСПРЕССИВНОГО И ЭМОЦИОНАЛЬНОГО ВОЗДЕЙСТВИЯ В ПОВЕСТИ АСТРИД ЛИНДГРЕН «ЭМИЛЬ ИЗ ЛЁННЕБЕРГИ» И ЕЁ ПЕРЕВОДАХ НА РУССКИЙ ЯЗЫК 40 ELENA KAPUSTINA, MARTINA BJÖRKLUND WHEN A SINGLE WORD IS ENOUGH: NORWEGIAN COMPOUNDS AND THEIR RUSSIAN COUNTERPARTS 61 TORE NESSET I MÖRKRETS SKUGGA… OM EDITH SÖDERGRANS OCH HALINA POŚWIATOWSKAS POETISKA VÄRLDAR 73 MAŁGORZATA ANNA PACKALÉN PARKMAN REVIEW. ANDREA GULLOTTA. INTELLECTUAL LIFE AND LITERATURE AT SOLOVKI 1923-1930: THE PARIS OF THE NORTHERN CONCENTRATION CAMPS. CAMBRIDGE: LEGENDA 2018. X + 370 PP. 93 IRINA KARLSOHN NEWS FROM UPPSALA 95 OLENA JANSSON IN MEMORIAM: PROFESSOR ANDREI ZALIZNIAK 99 KARINE ÅKERMAN SARKISIAN BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR 2017 102 JOHAN MUSKALA Slovo. Journal of Slavic Languages, Literatures and Cultures ISSN 2001–7395 No. 59, 2018, pp. 7–39 ”Ruriks stamträd” – en av de ryska skatterna på Carolina Rediviva1 Olena Jansson och Ingrid Maier Institutionen för moderna språk, Uppsala universitet [email protected] [email protected] Abstract. “Rurik’s genealogical tree” – one of the Russian treasures at Carolina Rediviva Among the treasures in the university library in Uppsala (Sweden) is an extraordinary genealogical tree of Russia’s Rurikid rulers, beginning with the legendary Rurik and ending with Tsar Fedor Ivanovič, who died in 1598.
    [Show full text]
  • Semantic Differences in Translation Exploring the Field of Inchoativity
    Semantic differences in translation Exploring the field of inchoativity Lore Vandevoorde language Translation and Multilingual Natural science press Language Processing 13 Translation and Multilingual Natural Language Processing Editors: Oliver Czulo (Universität Leipzig), Silvia Hansen-Schirra (Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz), Reinhard Rapp (Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz) In this series: 1. Fantinuoli, Claudio & Federico Zanettin (eds.). New directions in corpus-based translation studies. 2. Hansen-Schirra, Silvia & Sambor Grucza (eds.). Eyetracking and Applied Linguistics. 3. Neumann, Stella, Oliver Čulo & Silvia Hansen-Schirra (eds.). Annotation, exploitation and evaluation of parallel corpora: TC3 I. 4. Czulo, Oliver & Silvia Hansen-Schirra (eds.). Crossroads between Contrastive Linguistics, Translation Studies and Machine Translation: TC3 II. 5. Rehm, Georg, Felix Sasaki, Daniel Stein & Andreas Witt (eds.). Language technologies for a multilingual Europe: TC3 III. 6. Menzel, Katrin, Ekaterina Lapshinova-Koltunski & Kerstin Anna Kunz (eds.). New perspectives on cohesion and coherence: Implications for translation. 7. Hansen-Schirra, Silvia, Oliver Czulo & Sascha Hofmann (eds). Empirical modelling of translation and interpreting. 8. Svoboda, Tomáš, Łucja Biel & Krzysztof Łoboda (eds.). Quality aspects in institutional translation. 9. Fox, Wendy. Can integrated titles improve the viewing experience? Investigating the impact of subtitling on the reception and enjoyment of film using eye tracking and questionnaire data. 10. Moran, Steven & Michael Cysouw. The Unicode cookbook for linguists: Managing writing systems using orthography profiles. 11. Fantinuoli, Claudio (ed.). Interpreting and technology. 12. Nitzke, Jean. Problem solving activities in post-editing and translation from scratch: A multi-method study. 13. Vandevoorde, Lore. Semantic differences in translation. ISSN: 2364-8899 Semantic differences in translation Exploring the field of inchoativity Lore Vandevoorde language science press Vandevoorde, Lore.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Alexandra Yurievna Aikhenvald
    ALEXANDRA Y. AIKHENVALD CURRICULUM VITAE Current address: work: home: The Cairns Institute 21 Anne Street, James Cook University Smithfield, Cairns, Qld 4870 Qld 4878 Australia e-mail: [email protected] [email protected] phone: 61-(0)7-4240117 (work); 0400 305315 Citizenship: Australian Educated • Department of Structural and Applied Linguistics, Philological Faculty, Moscow State University: BA in Linguistics 1978; MA in Linguistics 1979 (thesis topic: 'Relative Clause in Anatolian Languages') • Institute of Oriental Studies of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow: PhD in Linguistics, 1984 (thesis topic 'Structural and Typological Classification of Berber Languages') • La Trobe University, 2006: Doctor of Letters by examination of four books and 14 papers. Positions held • Research Fellow, Department of Linguistics, Institute of Oriental Studies of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, January 1980 - September 1988 • Senior Research Fellow, ibidem, September 1988 - July 1989 • Visiting Professor, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil, August 1989 - December 1991 • Associate Professor, ibidem, December 1991 - December 1992 • Full Professor with tenure, ibidem, December 1992 - February 1994 • Visiting Professor, State University of Campinas, Brazil, April 1992 - June 1992 • Visiting Professor, University of São Paulo, Brazil, July 1992 - December 1992 • Visiting Fellow, Australian National University, January - February 1993 • ARC Senior Research Fellow (with rank of Professor), Australian National University, February 1994 - 1999, Second Term: February 1999 - 2004 • Professor of Linguistics, Research Centre for Linguistic Typology, La Trobe University, from 2004 - 2008 • Associate Director of the Research Centre for Linguistic Typology, Australian National University, 1996-1999 • Associate Director of the Research Centre for Linguistic Typology, La Trobe University, 2000-2008 • Professor and Research Leader (People and Societies of the Tropics), Cairns Institute, James Cook University, 2009-present.
    [Show full text]
  • Participle-Converbs in Iron Ossetic: Syntactic and Semantic Properties1
    Participle-Converbs in Iron Ossetic: 1 Syntactic and Semantic Properties Oleg Belyaev, Arseniy Vydrin This paper concerns the use of forms in -gɐ and -gɐjɐ in contemporary Ossetic. Our aim is to produce a typologically informed and fine-grained account of both the syntax and semantics of these two formatives. As we will show, the main difference is that while the form in -gɐ is a participle-converb (with a wide range of uses), the form in -gɐjɐ is a converb proper. At the same time, there are a number of surprising syntactic effects and subtle semantic differences. We will provide a general description of the uses of the two forms and of some of the typologically interesting facts associated with them, and an explanation of the facts observed. 1. Introduction The two deverbal Ossetic2 forms under discussion are derived from the present stem via the affixes -gɐ and -gɐjɐ (formally the ablative of -gɐ), e.g. kɐn-ən "to do" → kɐn-gɐ(jɐ) žɐʁ-ən "to say" → žɐʁ-gɐ(jɐ) According to the main reference grammars (ABAEV 1970, AXVLEDIANI 1963, BAGAEV 1965), the form in -gɐ can be used both as a participle (1) and as a converb (2), while the form in -gɐjɐ can only be used as a converb (2). Word order in Ossetic NPs is fairly rigid, and attributes must always be preposed to the noun they modify. Therefore, the form in -gɐ(jɐ) in (2) is unambiguously converbal. (1) wəsə lɐppu-jə ɐldar xɐd-tul-gɐ(*-jɐ) wɐrdon-ə š-bad-ən kod-t-a that boy-GEN landlord self-roll-PART-ABL cart-IN PV-sit-INF do-TR-PST.3SG 3 "the landlord made that boy sit on a "self-going"cart"(ABAEV 1970: 612) (2) lɐppu kɐw-gɐ(-jɐ) ba-səd jɐ=xɐzar-mɐ boy cry-PART(-ABL) PV-go.PST.3SG POSS.3SG=house-ALL 4 "the boy, crying, came to his house" 1 The research was carried out with the financial support of RGNF, grant No.
    [Show full text]
  • Ssila Bulletin
    The Society for the Study of the Indigenous Languages of the Americas SSILA BULLETIN An Information Service for SSILA Members Editor - Victor Golla ([email protected]) Associate Editor - Scott DeLancey ([email protected]) Correspondence should be directed to the Editor Number 73: September 16, 1998 73.1 CORRESPONDENCE Books for sale · From Frances Karttunen ([email protected]) 15 Sept 1998: Louise Dale has sent me a list of books (but without prices) from her husband's library that she is offering for sale (SSILA Bulletin #71.1, August 21, 1998). Titles of potential interest to SSILA members include the following: § Benevente, Toribio de (Motolinia). 1914 ed. Historia de los indios de la nueva espana. § Molina, Alonso de. 1880 ed. Vocabulario de la lengua mexicana. § Gonzalez, Rufino. 1913. Aztec grammar and dictionary. § Bennett, Wendell C., and Robert Zingg. 1935. The Tarahumara: An Indian Tribe of Northern Mexico. § Bingham, Hiram. 1948. The Lost City of the Incas. § Prescott, William. 1843. History of the Conquest of Mexico. Col. II. § Radin, Paul. 1937. The Story of the American Indian. § Nida, Eugene. 1974. Understanding Latin Americans. § Coe, Michael. 1962. America's First Civilization: Discovering the Olmec. § Lewis, Oscar. 1963. Life in a Mexican Village: Tepoztlan Restudied. § Garibay K., Angel Maria. 1954. Historia de la literatura nahuatl. § Leon-Portilla, Miguel. 1963. Aztec Thought and Culture. § Codex Fejervart-Mayor. The Liverpool City Museum. Published in Oxford, UK. § Codex Nuttall, edited by Zelia Nuttall. § Codex Laud. The Bodlean Library, Oxford, UK. § Codex Borgia with commentary. The Vatican Library, Rome. § Paso y Troncoso, Francisco del. 1898.
    [Show full text]
  • The Expression of Modality in Logoori
    JALL 2020; 41(2): 195–238 John Gluckman* and Margit Bowler* The expression of modality in Logoori https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2020-2010 Abstract: This study presents a theoretically informed description of the expres- sion of modality in Logoori (Luyia; Bantu). We document verbal and non-verbal modal expressions in Logoori, and show how these expressions fit into proposed typologies of modal systems (Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. The notional category of modality. In Hans-Jurgen Eikmeyer & Hannes Rieser (eds.), Words, worlds, and contexts: New approaches in word semantics,38–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. Modality. In Armin von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, 639–650. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; van der Auwera, Johan & Vladimir Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2. 79–124. https://doi.org/10.1515/ lity.1998.2.1.79; Nauze, Fabrice. 2008. Modality in typological perspective. Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language, and Computation PhD thesis). We show that Logoori’s modal system raises some interesting questions regarding the typology and theoretical analysis of modality and its relationship to other kinds of meaning. Our study contributes to the nascent but growing research on modal systems cross linguistically by adding data from an understudied Bantu language. Keywords: Logoori, modality, Bantu, typology Abstract in Loogori: Kuloma sia linyalika na lidemadema, kya kulanganga “imiima” (“modality”), gavoleka mu Lulogooli. Lulogooli ni lulimi lwa ihiri ya avaluhya, na lumolomwa mu vivala vya imugwi wa Afrika. Ulusuma ilu lunduta kutula ku zisaabu na lilekanya lya uvuhandiki na uvwimiridzu vwa imiima. Kulangama sia livugirirana lya tsingulu (“force”) na lifunya (“flavor”) kutula ku Kratzer, Angelika.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Corpus-Based Grammar of Upper Lozva Mansi: Diachrony and Variation
    Introduction Upper Lozva Mansi Our Documentation Grammar writing Conclusion Towards a corpus-based grammar of Upper Lozva Mansi: diachrony and variation Daria Zhornik, Sophie Pokrovskaya, Vladimir Plungian Lomonosov Moscow State University Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Descriptive Grammars and Typology, Helsinki, 29.03.2019 . Daria Zhornik, Sophie Pokrovskaya, Vladimir Plungian MSU, ILing RAS Upper Lozva Mansi: diachrony and variation Introduction Upper Lozva Mansi Our Documentation Grammar writing Conclusion Overview Introduction Upper Lozva Mansi Our Documentation Grammar writing Conclusion . Daria Zhornik, Sophie Pokrovskaya, Vladimir Plungian MSU, ILing RAS Upper Lozva Mansi: diachrony and variation Introduction Upper Lozva Mansi Our Documentation Grammar writing Conclusion Some background I Mansi < Ob-Ugric < Uralic, EGIDS status: threatened; I Russia, 940 speakers (2010 census) in Western Siberia. Daria Zhornik, Sophie Pokrovskaya, Vladimir Plungian MSU, ILing RAS Upper Lozva Mansi: diachrony and variation Introduction Upper Lozva Mansi Our Documentation Grammar writing Conclusion The Mansi language I Earlier: 4 Mansi dialect branches I Today: only the Northern group survives I Most Northern Mansi speakers: disperse distribution in the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug I Speakers mostly live in Russian villages/towns: I forced shift to Russian; I almost no opportunities for using Mansi; I all education is in Russian I In turns out that much
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Eastern Armenian Verbal Paradigms
    Vladimir Plungian Notes on Eastern Armenian verbal paradigms “Temporal mobility” and perfective stems Abstract: The paper discusses two “hidden” semantic oppositions in the Arme- nian verbal system: both have no specific segmental markers but are manifested in the division of verbal forms into certain formal classes. In the first case, we deal with the the division into synthetic and periphrastic forms, which corresponds to the expression of the so-called "temporal mobility" (or the ability to express the opposition between present and past). In the second case, it is the morphological opposition between the basic verbal stem and the stem with an alternation. The choice of the alternating stem is related to the perfective semantics of the verbal form, so that one can speak of a general aspectual opposition of perfective and imperfective sets of forms in Armenian (not isolated in traditional analysis). Keywords: Armenian, verbal inflection, tense, aspect Introduction The main focus of the present paper will be certain formal properties of verbal paradigms in Armenian, first of all those which may have special cross-linguistic relevance. To the best of our knowledge, these properties have not been dis- cussed in the specialized literature at any length (if at all). The main bulk of our material comes from the standard written language of the Republic of Armenia, i.e., Average East Armenian (cf. Vaux 1998). Hereafter, we will refer to it simply as “Armenian”, unless otherwise stated. Similar properties of other idioms of Modern Armenian (both Eastern and Western dialects) deserve a separate and a more detailed discussion, which is far beyond the scope of the present study.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter M. Arkadiev
    PETER M. ARKADIEV CHAPTER 7 Differential Argument Marking in Two-term Case Systems and its Implications for the General Theory of Case Marking1 1. INTRODUCTION In this paper I present a view of case marking that explicitly rejects a commonly assumed position that its primary function is to merely distinguish arguments from one another (cf. Comrie 1978, 1989; Dixon 1979, 1994), while marking them according to their specific semantic or pragmatic functions is a secondary phenomenon. In order to show that such a view (which has already been challenged by many linguists, see section 2) is untenable, I will investigate data from argument- encoding variations in languages which possess only two cases, and will compare them with similar phenomena from languages with richer case systems. As it will be seen, ‘nondiscriminative’ coding strategies found in two-term case systems, though typologically unusual, can be easily accounted for under the assumption that case marking of a particular argument is subject to ‘local’ ‘indexing’ rules and constraints dealing rather with this particular argument, than with the overall ‘global’ relational structure of the clause. The ‘discriminatory’ function, though retaining its importance, is, in this view, no more than just one of the constraints relevant for argument marking, whose ranking with regards to other such constraints is not always and not necessarily high. Also, I am going to argue that, contrary to some recent Optimality-theoretic proposals (see e.g., Woolford 2001), the case inventory found in a particular language cannot be always derived from a universal set of constraints (see Wunderlich and Lakämper 2001 for a similar proposal).
    [Show full text]