Making Nuclear Physics Industrial Engineering Science: Talented Soviet Physicist with Troublesome Character and Career

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Making Nuclear Physics Industrial Engineering Science: Talented Soviet Physicist with Troublesome Character and Career American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering 2017; 2(3): 144-149 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ajmie doi: 10.11648/j.ajmie.20170203.15 Making Nuclear Physics Industrial Engineering Science: Talented Soviet Physicist with Troublesome Character and Career Nurgaliev Ildus S. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Chair in Renewable Energy and Rural Electrification, All-Russian Research Institute for Electrification of Agriculture, Moscow, Russian Federation Email address: [email protected] To cite this article: Nurgaliev Ildus S. Making Nuclear Physics Industrial Engineering Science: Talented Soviet Physicist with Troublesome Character and Career. American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. Vol. 2, No. 3, 2017, pp. 144-149. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmie.20170203.15 Received: November 1, 2016; Accepted: January 6, 2017; Published: March 6, 2017 Abstract: The biography and scientific results of the prominent Soviet-Russian physicist Dmitry Ivanenko are presented. Dramatic career of the talented physicist is described on the historic background of dramatic period of Soviet Union. Professor Ivanenko appears as an figure of Novel level by his talent of Physicist not get recognized by part of colleagues because of his personal troublesome character and historic circumstances. The purpose of the article is to bring attention of the community to necessity of closer collaboration between scientists and state governments in front of the coming global challenges. Keywords: Industrial Engineering, Biography of D. Ivanenko, History of Theoretical Physics, Mechanical Engineering, Cosmological Term, Theory of Gravitation character and refers to the scientific results of the author only 1. Introduction in the list of references. Every period of science history has its heroes and, sometimes, anti-heroes. Sometimes they change their status in 2. Biography of Dmitri Ivanenko accordance with further scientific development, with relationships with colleagues and with power. The decades Dmitri Dmitrievich Ivanenko (1904—1994) was one of the after the Russian Revolution, called Great October Socialistic prominent theoreticians and actively contributed into Revolution in the Soviet Union those years, were such kind of gravitational and nuclear research as well as to the period for “Jazz Band”: Lev Landau, Geore Gamov, Matvei institutional development of this branches of Physics in the Bronstein and Dmitri Ivanenko, young talented Physicists in former Soviet Union. Leningrad in the mid-1920s who were passionately studying He was born on July 29, 1904 in Poltava (Russian Empire), cutting edge dynamic theoretical Physics of those years. The currently Ukraine Republic, in a family of well educated name “Jazz Band” means that American Jazz for a short period, parents. His father was editor and publisher of the city before getting banned, symbolized for the quartet freedom, newspaper, his mother was a school teacher. In 1920 he upbeat lifestyle and optimism. All members of the cheerful graduated from high school in Poltava. From 1920 to 1923 he “band” experienced harsh repressive character of the regime. worked as a teacher of physics and mathematics at a school Landau and Ivanenko were repressed, Gamov defeated, of Poltava, while he studied and graduated from the Poltava Bronstein was shot. In 1980s once when Dmitry Ivanenko Pedagogical Institute and worked part time at the Poltava called his group “our band” in our converstion Gennady Astronomical Observatory. He was enrolled in Kharkov Sardanashvili reacted “Dmitri Dmitrievich the term “band” is University, and at the first course was transferred to the not acceptable for scientific group and sounds very strange”. Leningrad State University, from which he graduated in 1927. He was right because in Russian context this term sounds as His attempt to transfer from Kharkov University into “gang” for those who does not know the English connotation Moscow State University was not successful, though, he, of the Russian word “band”. This report has memorial much later, became famous as a professor of the Moscow American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering 2017; 2(3): 144-149 145 State University. accused in participation in anti-soviet activity in connection In 1927-1929 he was student of the Leningrad branch of with defeated George Gamow. Exile to Tomsk followed after the Physics and Mathematics Institute of the USSR awarded Karaganda forced labor camp. D. Ivanenko was a professor the scholarship named after Steklov, and a research fellow of at Tomsk and Sverdlovsk Universities until the beginning of the same institute. In 1929 he moved to Kharkov, to lead the the World War II. From 1943 and until the last days of his life, theoretical department of Ukrainian Physico-Technical he was closely associated with the Physics Faculty of M. V. Institute. Lomonosov Moscow State University. Dmitri Ivanenko worked at the Kharkov Institute of Dmitri Ivanenko made the fundamental contribution to Physics and Technology in 1929 – 31, being the first Director many areas of nuclear physics, field theory and theory of of its theoretical department; Lev Landau, Nobel Laureate, gravitation. Here are the details in short. In 1928, Ivanenko and student-years friend and later rival, became his successor, and Landau developed the theory of fermions as 1932 – 37. Paskual Jordan, Victor Wieskopf, Felix Bloch skew-symmetric tensors in contrast with the Dirac spinor (Nobel laureate in 1952) and Paul Dirac (Nobel Laureate in model. Their theory, widely known as the Ivanenko -- 1933) visited D. Ivanenko in Kharkov. Ivanenko very often Landau – Kahler theory, is not equivalent to Dirac's one in used to mention with well-deserved pride his role in the presence of a gravitational field, and only one describing organizing the 1st Soviet theoretical conference (1929) in fermions in contemporary lattice field theory. Kharkov, and founding the journal "Physikalische Zeitschrift In 1929, Ivanenko and Fock generalized the Dirac der Sowjetunion" first Soviet journal in foreign language equation and described parallel transport of spinors in a (1932). In February 1931, his rank of professor was approved curved space-time (the famous Fock – Ivanenko coefficients). by the Presidium of the Supreme Economic Council of the Nobel laureate Abdus Salam called it the first gauge field Ukrainian SSR. He became a head of the Department of theory. Theoretical Physics of the Kharkov Mechanical Engineering In 1930, Victor Ambartsumian and Dmitri Ivanenko (former Technology) Institute of Kharkov University. suggested the hypothesis of creation and annihilation of Since 1931 again in Leningrad, he became senior massive particles which became the corner stone of researcher at the Leningrad Physico-Technical Institute contemporary quantum field theory. named after Abraam Ioffe, as well as the head of the seminar Dmitri Ivanenko and Igor Tamm (Nobel Laureate in 1958) on nuclear physics. He served as the editor of the theoretical suggested the first non-phenomenological theory of paired department of the Leningrad branch of the State technical electron-neutrinor nuclear forces in 1934. They made the and theoretical publishing house in 1932-1935. Eight significant assumption that interaction can be undergone by collections of classical works and books of modern physics an exchange of massive particles. Based on their model, were published under his editorship the first time in Russian Nobel laureate Hideki Yukawa developed his meson theory. including books of Lui deBroile, Heisenberg, Dirac, Ivanenko proposed a non-linear generalization of Dirac's Schrödinger, Brilluen, Sommerfield, Eddington. D. Ivanenko equation in 1938. Based on this generalization, W. was professor, head of the Department of Physics of the Heisenberg and he developed the unified nonlinear field Leningrad Pedagogical Institute named after Pokrovsky. theory in 50ths. In 1944, Dmitri Ivanenko and Isaak After returning to Leningrad at the Physical-Technical Pomeranchuk predicted the phenomenon of synchrotron Institute, D. Ivanenko concentrated his interest in nuclear radiation from relativistic electrons in a betatron. This physics. In May 1932, Ivanenko published the radiation was soon discovered experimentally by American proton-neutron model of the atomic nucleus in journal experimenters D. Bluitt (1946) and H. Pollock (1947). “Nature”, and two months later Werner Heisenberg (Nobel Synchrotron radiation possesses a number of very specific laureate in 1932) referred to his work. In August 1932, D. properties which provide its wide applications. In particular, Ivanenko and E. Gapon proposed a pioneer nuclear shell neutron stars also are sources of this type of radiation. model describing the energy level arrangement of protons Classical theory of synchrotron radiation was developed by and neutrons in the nucleus in terms of energy levels. Later Dmitri Ivanenko in collaboration with Arseny Sokolov in this model was developed by Eugene Paul Wigner, Maria 1948, and independently by Julian Schwinger (Nobel Goeppert-Mayer and J. Hans D. Jensen who shared the 1963 Laureate, 1965). For their work on synchrotron radiation, D. Nobel Prize for their contributions. Ivanenko, A. Sokolov and I. Pomeranchuk were awarded the Ivanenko’s success pushed forward the nuclear physics Stalin Prize in 1950. progress in the former USSR. In 1933 on the initiative of Two of D. Ivanenko's and A. Sokolov's monographs Dmitri Ivanenko and Igor Kurchatov,
Recommended publications
  • Scriptures of Ancient Israel in Historical Perspective (Youth
    January 29th, Sunday Time/room Program 10:30–11:15 Registration of the participants 11:30–13:00 Opening ceremony. 1st Plenary Session conference-hall Sochi 1–2 Chairs: Victoria Mochalova, Mikhail Chlenov Presentations of the Sefer programs, projects and publications Prof. Eugene Weiner’s Fellowships Award 13:00–14:00 Lunch (restaurant on 2nd floor) 14:00–19:00 Sessions (simultaneously) 14:00–19:00 Scriptures of Ancient Israel in Historical room Moscow –1 Perspective (youth section) Chairs: Sergey Tischenko, Mikhail Seleznev Discussants: Sergey Tischenko, Alexey Lyavdansky Michail Shachmuradyan (Rostov-on-Don) Halah, Habor, River of Gozan and Hara: Source Analyses Leonid Dzhalilov (Moscow) Psalm 82 in the Light of Ugaritic Texts Anna Dyagel (Minsk) Construction of the Jewish Community Boundaries in the Persian Period (VI–IV BCE) Dmitry Melnik (Moscow) Second Temple Judaism in the Works of R.Y. Wipper’ Anna Luneva (St. Petersburg) Tertullian and Jews of Carthage Vera Duerrschnabel (Bern) The Poetics of Ancient Jewish Curse Texts Elena Novoselova (Moscow) Old Testament Allusions in Spanish Chronicles of the Colonial period Alexey Volchkov (St. Petersburg) Is Jonah among the Prophets? Deconstructivist’s Approach to the Reading of Book of Jonah 14:00 – 19:00 Jews in Diaspora: Contacts and Conflicts room Moscow –2 Chairs: Maxim Khizhy, Victor Shnirelman 1 Victoria Mochalova (Moscow) Image of a Jew in the Polemic Literature in Polish-Lithuania Commonwealth: 17th Century Victoria Gerasimova (Omsk) Blood in the Jewish- Christian Relations in Smolensk Province in the 18th–19th Centuries Maxim Khizhy (Vladimir) Rabbi Schneerson and Russian Authorities in the 1840-1850s: an Attempt at Dialogue Tatiana Khizhaya (Vladimir) Children of Judaizers in Russia in the 19th Century: Victims, Heirs of the Tra- dition, “Instruments” of Influence and Resistance Dmitry Bratkin (St.
    [Show full text]
  • Ivanenko. Biography
    The People of Physics Faculty Selected papers of the Journal “Soviet Physicist” 1998-2006 Dmitri Ivanenko. Scientific Biography 226 Dmitri Ivanenko (29.07.1904 - 30.12.1994), professor of Moscow State University (since 1943) , was one of the great theoreticians of XX century. He made the fundamental contribution to many areas of nuclear physics, field theory and gravitation theory. His outstanding achievements include: • The Fock - Ivanenko coefficients of parallel displacement of spinors in a curved space-time (1929) 1 . Nobel laureate Abdus Salam called it the first gauge theory. • The Ambartsumian - Ivanenko hypothesis of creation of massive particles which is a corner stone of contemporary quantum field theory (1930) 2 . • The proton-neutron model of atomic nuclei (1932) 3 . • The first shell model of nuclei (in collaboration with E. Gapon) (1932) 4 . • The first model of exchange nuclear forces by means of massive particles (in collaboration with I. Tamm) (1934) 5 . Based on this model, Nobel laureate H. Yukawa developed his meson theory. • The prediction of synchrotron radiation (in collaboration with I. Pomeranchuk) (1944) 6 and its classical theory (in collaboration with A. Sokolov). • Theory of hypernucleus (1956) 7 . • The hypothesis of quark stars (in collaboration with D. Kurdgelaidze) (1965) 8 . • The gauge gravitation theory (in collaboration with G. Sardanashvily), where gravity is treated as a Higgs field responsible for spontaneous breaking of space- 9 time symmetries (1983) . References 1. Fock V., Iwanenko D., Géometrie quantique linéaire et déplacement paralléle, Compt. Rend. Acad Sci. Paris 188 (1929) 1470. 2. Ambarzumian V., Iwanenko D., Les électrons inobservables et les rayons, Compt.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Tunneling – TRIUMF Saturday Morning Lecture – March 28Th, 2008
    Quantum Tunneling – TRIUMF Saturday Morning Lecture – March 28th, 2008 Patrick Bruskiewich Department of Physics and Astronomy, UBC & TRIUMF What we will look at ... The “Big Picture” behind the very small ... Feynman and “Room at the Bottom” – Think Small! Nanotechnology George Gamow and Quantum Tunneling I will be unconventional ! In talking about Quantum Tunneling I will talk about applications before I talk in any detail about the theory of Quantum Tunneling. Tunneling is a quantum effect and is only seen in structures nanometer or smaller in scale! The “Big Picture” behind the very small world of QM Why are we interested in Quantum Mechanics? Is it just because it is Weird and Interesting? How big a role does Quantum Mechanics play in our lives? How much wealth created in the past century draws from QM? A) 5 per cent B) 15 per cent C) 25 percent? A Surprising Answer! During the last 100 years, about 25 % of new wealth draws from Quantum Mechanics. st In this, the 21 century, we can expect upwards of 50% of new wealth to come from Quantum Mechanics! ... In Them hills ... In the past ... Today ... “there’s Silicon in them “there’s Gold in them Computer Chips!” hills!” CPU $ 300,000 /Troy Ounce! Au $ 800 / Troy Ounce. Nanotechnology in near future $ 30,000,000 / Troy Ounce Then and now ... Twenty years ago, 80% of computer chips used The recent economic in North America were down-turn is tied to made here (... 20% changes in international were imported). trade that can just as well be measured in the Today 20% of computer flow of computer chips.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Science As Cultural Diplomacy During the Tbilisi Conference on General Relativity Jean-Philippe Martinez
    Soviet Science as Cultural Diplomacy during the Tbilisi Conference on General Relativity Jean-Philippe Martinez To cite this version: Jean-Philippe Martinez. Soviet Science as Cultural Diplomacy during the Tbilisi Conference on General Relativity. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2019, 64 (1), pp.120-135. 10.21638/11701/spbu02.2019.107. halshs-02145239 HAL Id: halshs-02145239 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02145239 Submitted on 2 Jun 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Вестник СПбГУ. История. 2019. Т. 64. Вып. 1 Soviet Science as Cultural Diplomacy during the Tbilisi Conference on General Relativity J.-P. Martinez For citation: Martinez J.-P. Soviet Science as Cultural Diplomacy during the Tbilisi Conference on General Relativity. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2019, vol. 64, issue 1, рp. 120–135. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2019.107 Scientific research — in particular, military and nuclear — had proven during the Second World War to have the potential to demonstrate the superiority of a country. Then, its inter- nationalization in the post-war period led to its being considered a key element of cultural diplomacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue 176
    C A T A L O G U E – 1 7 6 JEFF WEBER RARE BOOKS Catalogue 176 Revolutions in Science THE CURRENT catalogue continues the alphabet started with cat. #174. Lots of new books are being offered here, including books on astronomy, mathematics, and related fields. While there are many inexpensive books offered there are also a few special pieces, highlighted with the extraordinary LUBIENIECKI, this copy being entirely handcolored in a contemporary hand. Among the books are the mathematic libraries of Dr. Harold Levine of Stanford University and Father Barnabas Hughes of the Franciscan order in California. Additional material is offered from the libraries of David Lindberg and L. Pearce Williams. Normally I highlight the books being offered, but today’s bookselling world is changing rapidly. Many books are only sold on-line and thus many retailers have become abscent from city streets. If they stay in the trade, they deal on-line. I have come from a tradition of old style bookselling and hope to continue binging fine books available at reasonable prices as I have in the past. I have been blessed with being able to represent many collections over the years. No one could predict where we are all now today. What is your view of today’s book world? How can I serve you better? Let me know. www.WeberRareBooks.com On the site are more than 10,000 antiquarian books in the fields of science, medicine, Americana, classics, books on books and fore-edge paintings. The books in current catalogues are not listed on-line until mail-order clients have priority.
    [Show full text]
  • Solitary Waves in the Nonlinear Dirac Equation
    Solitary waves in the Nonlinear Dirac Equation Jesus´ Cuevas-Maraver, Nabile Boussa¨ıd, Andrew Comech, Ruomeng Lan, Panayotis G. Kevrekidis, and Avadh Saxena Abstract In the present work, we consider the existence, stability, and dynamics of solitary waves in the nonlinear Dirac equation. We start by introducing the Soler model of self-interacting spinors, and discuss its localized waveforms in one, two, and three spatial dimensions and the equations they satisfy. We present the associ- ated explicit solutions in one dimension and numerically obtain their analogues in higher dimensions. The stability is subsequently discussed from a theoretical per- spective and then complemented with numerical computations. Finally, the dynam- ics of the solutions is explored and compared to its non-relativistic analogue, which is the nonlinear Schrodinger¨ equation. Jesus´ Cuevas-Maraver Grupo de F´ısica No Lineal, Universidad de Sevilla, Departamento de F´ısica Aplicada I, Escuela Politecnica´ Superior. C/ Virgen de Africa,´ 7, 41011-Sevilla, Spain, Instituto de Matematicas´ de la Universidad de Sevilla (IMUS). Edificio Celestino Mutis. Avda. Reina Mercedes s/n, 41012-Sevilla, Spain e-mail: [email protected] Nabile Boussa¨ıd Universite´ de Franche-Comte,´ 25030 Besanc¸on CEDEX, France Andrew Comech St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg 199178, Russia Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3368, USA IITP, Moscow 127994, Russia Roumeng Lan Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3368, USA Panayotis G. Kevrekidis Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003- 4515, USA Avadh Saxena Center for Nonlinear Studies and Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA 1 2 J.
    [Show full text]
  • DOMAIN of NUCLEAR PHYSICS Aryan Singh Lather, M.Sc (Hons.) Physics, Panjab University, Chandigarh
    © UNIVERSAL RESEARCH REPORTS | REFEREED | PEER REVIEWED ISSN : 2348 - 5612 | Volume : 05 , Issue : 03 | January – March 2018 DOMAIN OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS Aryan Singh Lather, M.Sc (Hons.) Physics, Panjab University, Chandigarh Abstract: Nuclear physics is the field of physics that studies the building blocks and interactions of atomic nuclei. The most commonly known applications of nuclear physics are nuclear power and nuclear weapons, but the research has provided wider applications, including those in medicine (nuclear medicine, magnetic resonance imaging), materials engineering (ion implantation) and archaeology (radiocarbon dating). The field of particle physics evolved out of nuclear physics and, for this reason, has been included under the same term in earlier times. Keywords: Archaeology, MRI, Radiocarbon dating, Resonance, weapons Introduction: The discovery of the electron by J. J. Thomson was the first indication that the atom had internal structure. At the turn of the 20th century the accepted model of the atom was J. J. Thomson's "plum pudding" model in which the atom was a large positively charged ball with small negatively charged electrons embedded inside of it. By the turn of the century physicists had also discovered three types of radiation coming from atoms, which they named alpha, beta, and gamma radiation. Experiments in 1911 by Lise Meitner and Otto Hahn, and by James Chadwick in 1914 discovered that the beta decay spectrum was continuous rather than discrete. That is, electrons were ejected from the atom with a range of energies, rather than the discrete amounts of energies that were observed in gamma and alpha decays. This was a problem for nuclear physics at the time, because it indicated that energy was not conserved in these decays.
    [Show full text]
  • Edoardo Amaldi and Guido Pizzella
    The Origins of Gravitational Wave Research in Italy Adele La Rana (speaker) TERA Foundation & Sapienza University of Rome Luisa Bonolis Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin ‘A Century of General Relativity’ , MPIWG Conference – 2-5 December 2015, Berlin 1 GWs in Rome: birth of an experimental activity Sapienza University of Rome The first place in Italy where a research activity expressly devoted to GWs starts is Rome. 2 1970: the birth of the gravitational wave group in Rome Key figures: Edoardo Amaldi and Guido Pizzella The group was born between september 1970 and 1971, on the initiative of Edoardo Amaldi and his young assistant Guido Pizzella Guido Pizzella and Edoardo Amaldi at the General Relativity Conference in Padua in 1983. Photo shot by Emilio Segrè. 3 The beginning of GW activity in Amaldi’s words The idea of starting an experiment aiming to detect GW in Rome was stimulated by the Course on Experimental Tests of Gravitational Theories held in summer 1961 at the Scuola Internazionale E.Fermi in Varenna , where the problem was discussed by J.Weber . The program remained rather vague for practical reasons until 1968 ,when W. Fairbank spent a few months in Rome at G.Careri 's low temperature laboratory. When Fairbank mentioned his intention of starting the development of a low temperature gravitational antenna, Careri who was informed for long time of the interest of E. Amaldi in the subject, suggested a first direct contact. This was the beginning of the collaborations between the groups of Stanford (W. Fairbank), Louisiana State University (W.
    [Show full text]
  • Dirac's Quantum Electrodynamics
    Dirac’s Quantum Electrodynamics Alexei Kojevnikov Dirac’s relationship with quantum electrodynamics was not an easy one. On the one hand, the theory owes to him much more than to anybody else, especially if one considers the years crucial for its emergence, the late 1920s and early 1930s, when practically all its main concepts, except for that of renormalization, were developed. After this period Dirac also wrote a number of important papers, specifically, on indefinite metrics and quantum dynamics with constraints. On the other hand, since the early 1930s he was an active critic of the theory and tried to develop alternative schemes. He did not become satisfied with the later method of re- normalization and regarded it as a mathematical trick rather than a fundamental solution, and died unreconciled with what, to a large extent, was his own brainchild.1 In the present paper I examine Dirac’s contribution to quantum electrodynamics during the years 1926 to 1933, paying attention to the importance and the specificity of his approach and also tracing the roots of his dissatisfaction with the theory, which goes back to the same time and which, as I see it, in many ways influenced his attitude to its subsequent development. Some of Dirac’s crucial accomplishments of that period, in particular his theory of the relativistic electron, have already been studied by historians in much detail. I will describe them more briefly, placing them in the context of Dirac’s other works and of the general situation in quantum theory and leaving more room for other, less studied works, such as the 1932 Dirac–Fock–Podolsky theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Binding Energy From
    Introduction to Nuclear Physics (see MIT Introduction to Applied Nuclear Physics 22.02 http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/nuclear-engineering/22-101-applied-nuclear-physics-fall- 2006/lecture-notes/ and Hyperphysics http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html) Nuclear physics describes nuclear properties, structure and characteristics of nuclei and radiations, radiation sources and interaction with matter. To understand nuclear structure and radiation we study nuclei, nucleons and electrons, as well as miroscopic processes. We apply quantum echanics and special relativity. 1. Nuclear characteristics From Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_nucleus: De la ►►► pana la ◄◄◄ ►►► “The nucleus is the small, dense region consisting of protons andneutrons at the center of an atom. The atomic nucleus was discovered in 1911 by Ernest Rutherford based on the 1909 Geiger–Marsden gold foil experiment. After the discovery of the neutron in 1932, models for a nucleus composed of protons and neutrons were quickly developed by Dmitri Ivanenko[1]and Werner Heisenberg. Almost all of the mass of an atom is located in the nucleus (99.9%), with a very small contribution from the electron cloud. Protons and neutrons are bound together to form a nucleus by the nuclear force. The diameter of the nucleus is in the range of 1.75 fm (1.75×10−15 m) for hydrogen (the diameter of a single proton)[7] to about 15 fm for the heaviest atoms, such as uranium. These dimensions are much smaller than the diameter of the atom itself (nucleus + electron cloud), by a factor of about 23,000 (uranium) to about 145,000 (hydrogen).] The branch of physics concerned with the study and understanding of the atomic nucleus, including its composition and the forces which bind it together, is called nuclear physics.” History Main article: Rutherford model The nucleus was discovered in 1911, as a result of Ernest Rutherford's efforts to test Thomson's "plum pudding model" of the atom.[8] The electron had already been discovered earlier by J.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic Nucleus - Wikipedia
    Atomic nucleus - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_nucleus#Composition_and_shape Atomic nucleus From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The atomic nucleus is the small, dense region consisting of protons and neutrons at the center of an atom, discovered in 1911 by Ernest Rutherford based on the 1909 Geiger–Marsden gold foil experiment. After the discovery of the neutron in 1932, models for a nucleus composed of protons and neutrons were quickly developed by Dmitri Ivanenko[1] and Werner Heisenberg.[2][3] [4][5][6] Almost all of the mass of an atom is located in the nucleus, with a very small contribution from the electron cloud. Protons and neutrons are bound together to form a nucleus by the nuclear force. The diameter of the nucleus is in the range of 1.75 fm(1.75 × 10−15 m) for hydrogen (the diameter of a single proton)[7] to about 15 fm for the heaviest atoms, such as uranium. These dimensions are much smaller than the diameter of the atom itself (nucleus + electron cloud), by a factor of about 23,000 A model of the atomic nucleus showing (uranium) to about 145,000 (hydrogen). it as a compact bundle of the two types of nucleons: protons (red) and neutrons The branch of physics concerned with the study and understanding of the (blue). In this diagram, protons and atomic nucleus, including its composition and the forces which bind it together, neutrons look like little balls stuck is called nuclear physics. together, but an actual nucleus (as understood by modern nuclear physics) cannot be explained like this, but only Contents by using quantum mechanics.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Theory Meets Gravitation: First Encounters
    Edition Open Sources Sources 10 Dean Rickles: Quantum Theory Meets Gravitation: First Encounters In: Alexander S. Blum and Dean Rickles (eds.): Quantum Gravity in the First Half of the Twentieth Century : A Sourcebook Online version at http://edition-open-sources.org/sources/10/ ISBN 978-3-945561-31-7 First published 2018 by Edition Open Access, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science under Creative Commons by-nc-sa 3.0 Germany Licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/de/ Printed and distributed by: PRO BUSINESS digital printing Deutschland GmbH, Berlin http://www.book-on-demand.de/shop/15544 The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; de- tailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de Chapter 1 Quantum Theory Meets Gravitation: First Encounters Dean Rickles These earliest papers (taken from 1916–1921) suffer from the fact that quantum theory was still in an embryonic state. Quantum mechanics and quantum field theory would have to wait several years before they were even properly formulated, and so could be compared with general relativity (as subsequent parts of this volume will cover). Still, already in these early papers, questions were being posed concerning the proper way to understand the relationship between quantum theory and general relativity. In addition to areas in which there might be modifications brought about by one theory to the other (conflict), or overlaps of some kind (coexistence), there were also “borders” raised between the theories that persisted throughout future changes in physics in the period before 1950.
    [Show full text]