Whip-Poor-Wills and Project MOON

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Whip-Poor-Wills and Project MOON Monitoring of Owls and Nightjars in Illinois “MOON” Presented by: Tara Beveroth S.O.S. for our Flying Bug Eaters Ingleside Hotel, Waukesha WI September 7th 2018 Outline: • Nightjar Natural History • Nightjar challenges • MOON program • Future Outlook Eastern Whip-poor-will The Myth of the Goatsucker aka “Nightjars” Nightjar Distribution Nearly 100 species of nightjars in the world with 2 main subfamilies: Caprimulginae (80 species) and Chordeilinae (19 species) Common Nighthawk Nightjar Facts Large-tailed Nightjar • Very short legs and bills with large eyes. • Long wings • Forward facing whiskers • Sensory • Facilitate prey capture • Nightjars usually nest on the ground and time their chicks hatching around 10 days before a full moon. Chuck-will’s-widow nesting • Unlike other birds that perch across branches nightjars usually perch along a branch, better concealing them during the day. They excel at blending in with their environment. Eastern Whip-poor-will European Nightjar John Audubon – Birds of North America • Their mouths open wide vertically and horizontally, which allows them to have a large gaping mouth to easily scoop insects up during flight. Diet • Primarily Insects • Moths • Beetles • Spiders • Crane Flies • Swarming insects • They drink while flying low over water surface and scooping water with large bill. Illinois Nightjars Chuck-will’s-widow - threatened Eastern Whip-poor-will Common Nighthawk Habitat • Chuck-will’s-widow • Deciduous, pine, oak-hickory and mixed forests • Openings or gaps in forests are very important for foraging • Eastern Whip-poor-will • Open Woodland, dry deciduous or mixed forests • Herbaceous understory • In Illinois, where they have been found to nest in the same area, CWWI prefer more open habitat on forest edge, while EAWP prefer more wooded , or pine groves or upland areas. Nightjar Challenges • Food Availability • Pesticide use • Inclement Weather • Habitat Loss • Change in forest composition • Wintering habitat • Collisions/Run over • Predation • Climate Change • Very hard to maintain in captivity Lack of management CTAP data – David Zaya INHS How are nightjar populations? Average # of CWWI/Party Hour Average # of EAWP/Party Hour 0.005 0.015 0.025 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.01 0.02 0.03 0 0 1975 1975 1978 1978 1981 1981 1984 1984 1987 1987 1990 1990 Whip Eastern Chuck 1993 1993 Year Year 1996 1996 - 1999 will’s 1999 2002 2002 2005 - - poor widow 2005 2008 2008 2011 - will 2011 2014 2014 Average # of CONI/Party Hour2017 0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 0.45 2017 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 count data are not reliable for estimating estimating notfor reliable are data count and Count, Spring bird Bird Christmas BBS, population in nocturnal population trends species. 1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 CommonNighthawk Year 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 Project MOON - 2008 Objectives: • Track trends in abundance and distribution over broad scales • Investigate causes of declines • Develop suitability models and best management practices for nightjars and owls Methods • Roadside point counts • 10 stops, ≥ 1 mile apart • Listen passively for 6 minutes while recording detections in 1 minute blocks. • Optional playback of EASO and BAOW. • 2 surveys run each year in May and June based on lunar cycle. MOON Routes eBird Basic Dataset. Version: EBD_relMay-2013. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. May 2013. Eastern Whip-poor-will and Chuck-will’s-widow MOON occurrences eBird Basic Dataset. Version: EBD_relMay-2013. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. May 2013. eBird Basic Dataset. Version: EBD_relMay-2013. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. May 2013. Importance of Route Consistency 18 16 14 12 10 8 of of routes monitored # 6 4 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 # of surveys over 10 years Average # of EAWP/route 6 5 4 3 2 Average Average of EAWP/route# 1 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Future Outlook • Continued long-term monitoring • Continue to collaborate with partners. • Use LiDAR to assist in analysis of habitat use of Illinois nightjars. • Work with partners and private landowners to try different management techniques. • Prescribed Fire • Removal of invasive plants/clearcutting • Graduate projects • Incentive Programs • MOON Volunteers • United States Nightjar Survey Network • Western Great Lakes Owl Monitoring • Illinois Audubon Society • Cornell Lab of Ornithology • Critical Trends Assessment Program • Jen Mui • Loren Merrill • Terry Esker • Kelsay Shaw • David Bohlen Tara Beveroth [email protected] 217-265-7303.
Recommended publications
  • Belarus Tour Report 2015
    Aquatic Warbler, Sporovo Reserve (all photos taken on the 2015 tour by Mike Watson) BELARUS 13 – 21 May 2015 Northern Belarus Extension from 10 May LEADERS: MIKE WATSON and DIMA SHAMOVICH I was wondering how we could follow our successful first visit to Belarus in 2014... I need not have worried. New for 2015 on our expanded itinerary were: Hazel Grouse (both in the north and the south, including a fe- male on its nest); Western Capercaillie, Black Grouse and Ural and Tengmalm’s Owls on our Northern Belarus pre-tour extension, to the wonderful Krasny Bor reserve on the Russian border and we also enjoyed some great encounters with old favourites, including: point blank views of Corn Crakes; lekking Great Snipes on meadows by the Pripyat River; 46(!) Terek Sandpipers; hundreds of ‘marsh’ terns (White-winged, Black and Whiskered); Great Grey Owl (an even better close encounter than last time!); Eurasian Pygmy Owl; nine spe- cies of woodpecker including White-backed (three) and Eurasian Three-toed (five); Azure Tits at five different sites including our best views yet; Aquatic Warblers buzzing away in an ancient sedge fen (again our best views yet of this rapidly declining bird). With the benefit of the new pre-tour extension to the boreal zone of northern Belarus as well as some good fortune on the main tour we recorded a new high total of 184 bird spe- cies and other avian highlights included: Smew; Black Stork; Greater Spotted, Lesser Spotted and White-tailed Eagles; Northern Goshawk; Wood Sandpipers and Temminck’s Stints on passage in the south and breeding Whimbrels and Common Greenshanks on raised bogs in the north; Eurasian Nightjar; a profusion of song- 1 BirdQuest Tour Report: Belarus www.birdquest-tours.com WWII memorial at Sosnovy sters mostly only known to western birders as scarce drift migrants including Wrynecks, Red-backed Shrikes, Marsh, Icterine and River Warblers as well as gaudy Citrine Wagtails and Common Rosefinches and lovely old forests full of Wood Warblers and Red-breasted Flycatchers.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Nest and Nestling of Great Eared Nightjar Eurostopodus Macrotis from Luzon, Philippines
    128 SHORT NOTES Forktail 20 (2004) Kennedy, R. S. and Ruedas, L. S. (1992) Centers of biological diver- Mittermeier, R. A., Myers, N. and Mittermeier, C. G. (1999) sity in the Philippines: surveys, training, and museum Hotspots: earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial modernization. Unpublished. ecosystems. Mexico City: CEMEX. Magsalay, P., Brooks, T., Dutson, G. and Timmins, R. (1995) Swedish Space Corporation [SSC] (1988) Mapping of the natural Extinction and conservation on Cebu. Nature 373: 294. conditions of the Philippines. Final Report. 30 April 1988. Mallari, N. A. D., Tabaranza, B. R. and Crosby, M. J. (2001) Key Unpublished. conservation sites in the Philippines: a Haribon Foundation and BirdLife International directory of Important Bird Areas. Makati City: Bookmark, Inc. N. A. D. Mallari, Haribon Foundation for the Conservation of Natural Resources, 4/F Fil Garcia Tower, 140 Kalayaan Avenue and corner of Mayaman Street, Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Philippines. Email: [email protected] M. J. Crosby, BirdLife International,Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge CB3 0NA, U.K. Email: [email protected] N. J. Collar, Conservation Biology Group, Department of Zoology, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ and BirdLife International,Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge CB3 0NA, U.K. Email: [email protected] Description of the nest and nestling of Great Eared Nightjar Eurostopodus macrotis from Luzon, Philippines J. S. STRIJK During March and April 2002, I conducted fieldwork and Nurney 1998, Kennedy et al. 2000). However, its 6–7 km north-east of Masipi-East, Barangay Masipi- nest, eggs and chicks had not been previously East, Cabagan municipality, Isabela province, on described.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Ecology of the European Nightjar (Caprimulgus Europaeus) in a Complex Heathland-Plantation Landscape
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of East Anglia digital repository The conservation ecology of the European nightjar (Caprimulgus europaeus) in a complex heathland-plantation landscape. Katrina Sharps A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. May 2013 © This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank my primary supervisor Paul Dolman for his constant advice, support and enthusiasm throughout this PhD. I am also grateful to the other members of my supervisory team: Ian Henderson of the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO) and Andrew Lovett of UEA, for their useful guidance. Special thanks also go to Neal Armour-Chelu of the Forestry Commission and Greg Conway of the BTO for practical advice for the fieldwork and their invaluable experience and knowledge of forest management and working with nightjars respectively. Next, I would like to thank the other members of my radio-tracking and moth trapping teams – Vivien Hartwell, Laura Wilkinson, Elwyn Sharps, Alastair Feather, Kirsten Miller and Isobel Winney. Their efforts were tireless and they showed dedication to the project throughout. Additional thanks to all radio-tracking and nest finding volunteers, including Forestry Commission, RSPB and Wildlife Trust staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Nocturnal Survey Guidelines Owls, Nighthawks and Whip-Poor-Wills Present Atlas Surveyors with Several Challenges
    Nocturnal Survey Guidelines Owls, nighthawks and Whip-poor-wills present atlas surveyors with several challenges. Although many Minnesota species, including thrushes and marsh birds, may vocalize at sunset, pre-dawn, or even at night, most can be detected during early morning and daytime surveys. The surveyor’s chances of detecting most owls, however, as well as the common nighthawk and whip-poor-will, will be considerably enhanced by adding nocturnal surveys. Owls Minnesota’s 11 owl species are a mix of permanent, non-migratory residents (Eastern Screech Owl, Great Horned Owl and Barred Owl); summer residents (Long-eared Owl, Short-eared Owl, and Saw-whet Owl) and three species whose summer populations probably include both permanent residents and migratory invaders (Boreal Owl, Northern Hawk Owl and Great Gray Owl). The Burrowing Owl is an extremely rare summer resident in the western grassland region and the Barn Owl has been an erratic species whose status as a permanent resident or migratory invader is unknown. Three of these species tend to be more diurnal and the chances of seeing them during the day are relatively good. They include two open habitat species, the Short-eared Owl and Burrowing Owl, and one forest species, the Northern Hawk Owl. Like marsh hawks, Short- eared Owls can often be seen flying low over wet grasslands and marshes hunting for prey during the morning and early evening hours. The Burrowing Owl, a very rare nesting species in the state, is prominent as it stands as a sentinel atop its nesting burrow, just inches above the surrounding grassland.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Nighthawk Chordeiles Minor
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2018 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2018. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 50 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Previous report(s): COSEWIC 2007. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 25 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Andrew Gregg Horn for writing the status report on Common Nighthawk, Chordeiles minor, prepared under contract with Environment and Climate Change Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Richard Elliot, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Birds Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur L’engoulevent d’Amérique (Chordeiles minor) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Common Nighthawk, copyright by Ronnie d'Entremont. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2018. Catalogue No. CW69-14/515-2018E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-27850-6 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – April 2018 Common name Common Nighthawk Scientific name Chordeiles minor Status Special Concern Reason for designation This aerial insectivore is a widespread breeding bird across southern and boreal Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of Polyterritorial Polygyny in European Nightjar Caprimulgus Europaeus
    A case of polyterritorial polygyny in European Nightjar Caprimulgus europaeus NIELS ODDER JENSEN ✝ (Med et dansk resumé: Et tilfælde af polyterritorial polygyni hos Natravn) Abstract A case of polyterritorial polygyny among European Nightjars was observed in the summer of 2011 in a breeding population in Thy National Park in NW Jutland, Denmark. A male was found to have two ter- ritories with a female in each, and with a distance of c. 5 km between them. Polyterritorial polygyny is not previously reported from European Nightjars. Polygyny is known in particular from a number of passerines, raptors, waders and from three other nightjar species. The reason for this behavior is considered to be a combination of several factors, with the main objective of maximizing the production of chicks within the short breeding period available. Introduction and methods with an area between the two territories which the During a study of behavior and habitat use in a Euro- male does not defend. This area may contain terri- pean Nightjar breeding population, we discovered tories of other males, or it may be clearly unsuitable a case of polyterritorial polygyny, a behavior not as breeding habitat. Polyterritoriality is seen only in previously described among European Nightjars. a minor part of polygynous species (Møller 1986). Earlier observations indicate rare cases of monoter- The study was carried out during the summers ritorial polygyny, and double-brooding and female of 2011 and 2012 in a Nightjar population in Thy Na- mate-switching between broods are known as well tional Park in NW Jutland. The breeding population (Cramp 1985, Cleere & Nurney 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Nesting Golden Eagles for the Farmington Field Office, and Nesting Raptors for the Taos Field Office, BLM Resource Areas, New Mexico
    Monitoring Nesting Golden Eagles for the Farmington Field Office, and Nesting Raptors for the Taos Field Office, BLM Resource Areas, New Mexico. 2006 Annual Report Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management Farmington and Taos Field Offices New Mexico Prepared by: Hawks Aloft, Inc. P.O. Box 10028 Albuquerque, NM 87184 (505) 828-9455 E-mail: [email protected] Golden Eagle and Raptor Surveys, Farmington and Taos Field Offices, 2005 20 December 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... iii Chapter 1: Distribution and reproductive success for Golden Eagles on BLM Administered Land in San Juan, McKinley, Rio Arriba, and Sandoval Counties, New Mexico. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................2 Study areas .......................................................................................................................................3 Methods ...........................................................................................................................................3 Results ..............................................................................................................................................5 Discussion ........................................................................................................................................7 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Highland Lakes Steward
    Highland Lakes Steward HIGHLAND LAKES CHAPTER July 2015 Volume 6, Issue 7 MISSION by Cris Faught The Texas Master PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Naturalist program is come and go many times instead of stay- a natural resource- Can you identify this animal? ing for an extended time. My feeder is based volunteer train- 1. Omnivore. ing and development within easy sight and sound of the front 2. Lives in close proximity to you. program sponsored porch, and they never seemed to mind 3. Range up to 4500 acres in rural statewide by Texas us looking at or talking about them. A&M AgriLife Exten- areas. These are wild though, so they know sion and the Texas 4. Has a reputation for being very Parks and Wildlife what boundaries are and closely smart. Department. watched us to monitor any infractions of 5. Has an average of six siblings and The mission of the their safety lines. They can make over program is to develop lives up to 12 years. 40 sounds including yips, howls and a corps of well- 6. Can't fly but can climb. informed volunteers growls. The one I heard sounded who provide educa- Ok, no big surprise, but the fox is an enough like a scream or a raven call that tion, outreach, and amazing animal to have around, as you I knew I was being warned to come no service dedicated to know, if you have ever had the oppor- the beneficial manage- closer. I didn't. tunity to watch them. I had the pleasure ment of natural re- The next time you see their boundary of watching a pair of red foxes feed at my sources and natural marker or their playful antics, I hope you areas within their sunflower seed feeder on several occa- will stay long enough to observe them in communities for the sions and they are amazing! state of Texas action.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hobby 137 – Published January 2015
    Website: www.bedsbirdclub.org.uk Issue 137: Published January 2015 Editor: Andy Grimsey 61 Wychwood Avenue Luton LU2 7HT Tel: 07402 429 312 E-mail: [email protected] EDITORIAL Welcome to another New Year ! Time to start a new list, maybe implement a new birding resolution or two, but certainly to look forward to longer hours of daylight and maybe a cold spell to move some good birds our way. Included in this bulletin, Barry reviews last year’s results for the summer garden feeding survey and Graham presents the latest Red List of Breeding birds in a Bedfordshire context Andy Grimsey NOVEMBER - DECEMBER 2014 BIRD NEWS Contributors: please phone Steve Blain on 07979 606300 or email [email protected] with any news or records. Records are preferred via the online system BirdTrack, using the Excel file found on the Bird Club Website, singly using the online form ( http://tinyurl.com/2v6oweh ), or on paper. November 2014 Red-crested Pochard - Up to eight were in Quest ClP. Ferruginous Duck - A drake was at Brogborough Lake on 11th-20th (SE) but went missing for long periods. Greater Scaup - A female spent much of the month at Brogborough Lake Red-breasted Merganser - A drake was on Brogborough Lake on 27th (MJP) Northern Gannet - A juvenile flew over a Sandy garden on 21st (PN) Merlin - One flew over Tempsford on 26th. 1 Mediterranean Gull - An adult was near Potton and a second-winter at Grovebury SP on 2nd. An adult was at Broom GP On 28th. Common Tern - The latest ever record in Beds was at Stewartby Lake on 3rd (PS) Short-eared Owl - One was at Knotting Green on 5th, with others at Henlow Grange and Folly Wood, Lidlington both on 6th.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles Minor)
    Newfoundland & Labrador Species at Risk Status: Threatened Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles minor) A medium-sized bird, with a large flattened head, large eyes and mouth, a small bill, and a long, slightly notched tail. They have dark brown plumage, mottled with black, white, and buff. Their long, slender pointed wings reveal a white bar when in flight. They feed on insects and are active at dawn and dusk. © Vincent Lucas Provincial Distribution Habitat/ Range Common Nighthawks breed on bare ground, such as sand dunes, beaches, forest clearings, burned areas, rocky outcrops and barrens, peatbogs, and agricultural pastures. They are found across Canada, but in Eastern Canada they breed only in the southern part of Labrador and are considered an uncommon visitor in Newfoundland. Common Nighthawks winter throughout South America. Population Trends In Canada, this rare bird is undergoing a significant long-term population decline of 4.2% per year. Population trends within the Province are unknown. Limiting Factors and Threats Common Nighthawks have been affected by a decrease in the abundance of insects and an increase in habitat loss and alteration. They adapted to urbanization by making use of flat, gravel-covered rooftops as nest sites. Unfortunately, along with their traditional open habitats, these nesting sites are being lost. Special Significance It is the only species of insectivorous, crepuscular bird that uses a wide variety of habitats and is widely distributed in Canada. You can help protect the Common Nighthawk: Department of Environment & Conservation Report any sightings to the Wildlife Division. Wildlife Division Participate in bird surveys and counts. Endangered Species & Biodiversity Support habitat protection for all our rare species.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of Smaller Asian Night Birds Based on Voice
    SYSTEMATICS OF SMALLER ASIAN NIGHT BIRDS BASED ON VOICE BY JOE T. MARSHALL ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS NO. 25 PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION 1978 SYSTEMATICS OF SMALLER ASIAN NIGHT BIRDS BASED ON VOICE BY JOE T. MARSHALL ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS NO. 25 PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION 1978 Frontispiece: Otus icterorhynchus?stresemanni of Sumatra, with apologiesto G. M. Sutton and The Birdsof Arizona. The absenceof wings,far from implyingflightlessness, emphasizes the important parts of the plumagefor speciescomparisons--the interscapulars and flanks. These "control" the more variablepatterns of head and wings,which will always be in harmonywith the basicpattern of back and flanks. ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS This series, publishedby the American Ornithologists'Union, has been estab- lished for major papers too long for inclusionin the Union's journal, The Auk. Publication has been subsidizedby funds from the National Fish and Wildlife Laboratory, Washington, D.C. Correspondenceconcerning manuscripts for publicationin this seriesshould be addressedto the Editor-elect, Dr. Mercedes S. Foster, Department of Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620. Copiesof OrnithologicalMonographs may be orderedfrom the Assistantto the Treasurer of the AOU, Glen E. Woolfenden,Department of Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620. (See price list on back and inside back cover.) OrnithologicalMonographs No. 25, viii + 58 pp., separatephonodisc supple- ment. Editor, John William Hardy Special Associate Editors of this issue, Kenneth C. Parkes, Section of Birds, Carnegie Museum, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania15213, and Oliver L. Austin, Jr., Departmentof Natural Sciences,Florida State Museum, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611. Assistant Editor, June B. Gabaldon Author, Joe T. Marshall, Bird Section, National Fish and Wildlife Laboratory, National Museumof Natural History, Washington,D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Lanka: Island Endemics and Wintering Specialties
    SRI LANKA: ISLAND ENDEMICS AND WINTERING SPECIALTIES 12 – 25 JANUARY 2020 Serendib Scops Owl, discovered in 2001, is one of our endemic targets on this trip. www.birdingecotours.com [email protected] 2 | ITINERARY Sri Lanka: Island Endemics & Wintering Specialties Jan 2020 Sri Lanka is a picturesque continental island situated at the southern tip of India and has actually been connected to India for much of its geological past through episodes of lower sea level. Despite these land-bridge connections, faunal exchange between the rainforests found in Southern India and Sri Lanka has been minimal. This lack of exchange of species is probably due to the inability of rainforest organisms to disperse though the interceding areas of dry lowlands. These dry lowlands are still dry today and receive only one major rainy season, whereas Sri Lanka’s ‘wet zone’ experiences two annual monsoons. This long insularity of Sri Lankan biota in a moist tropical environment has led to the emergence of a bewildering variety of endemic biodiversity. This is why southwestern Sri Lanka and the Western Ghats of southern India are jointly regarded as one of the globe’s 34 biodiversity hotspots. Furthermore, Sri Lanka is the westernmost representative of Indo-Malayan flora, and its abundant birdlife also shows many such affinities. Sri Lanka is home to 34 currently recognized IOC endemic species with some of the most impressive ones including the rare Sri Lanka Spurfowl, gaudy Sri Lanka Junglefowl, Sri Lanka Hanging Parrot, and Layard’s Parakeet, the shy, thicket-dwelling Red-faced Malkoha, the tiny Chestnut-backed Owlet, the common Sri Lanka Grey Hornbill, Yellow- fronted Barbet, Crimson-fronted Barbet, Yellow-eared Bulbul, the spectacular Sri Lanka Blue Magpie, the cute Sri Lanka White-eye, and the tricky, but worth-the-effort trio of Sri Lanka Whistling Thrush and Sri Lanka and Spot-winged Thrushes.
    [Show full text]