DOCSLIB.ORG

AFTINET Bulletin No. 48, 22 November 2002 If You Would Like to Contribute to the Bulletin, Please Contact Pat Ranald Via Email A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AFTINET Bulletin No. 48, 22 November 2002 If You Would Like to Contribute to the Bulletin, Please Contact Pat Ranald Via Email A AFTINET Ltd Level 1, 46-48 York Street Sydney NSW 2000 Phone: 02 9299 7833 Fax: 02 9299 7855 Email: [email protected] Website: www.aftinet.org.au ABN 83 659 681 462 ACN 097 603 131 AFTINET Bulletin No. 48, 22 November 2002 If you would like to contribute to the Bulletin, please contact Pat Ranald via email at [email protected]. Our website is www.aftinet.org.au. Contents 1. Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement: Call for Submissions by 15 January 2003 2. Points for Submissions 3. All the Way with the USA: Sydney Morning Herald article, 15 November 2002 1. Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement: Call for Submissions by 15 January 2003 The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade's Office of Trade Negotiations has called for public submissions on the proposed Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between Australia and the United States. The proposed FTA has met with widespread criticism from community groups, including AFTINET, because of the unequal bargaining situation for Australia, in economic terms we are a mouse bargaining with an elephant. The US has targeted important Australian social policies as barriers to trade. The US wants abolition of the Foreign Investment Review Board, an end to Australian content rules in film and television, the abolition of the pharmaceutical benefits scheme and reductions in quarantine standards. The National Farmers' Federation has criticised this agenda and said that they are doubtful that any gains would be made in access to US agricultural markets. All the Opposition Parties, including the Australian Labor Party, have also been strongly critical of the proposed agreement. Commentators have also made the point that, while trade and security issues have traditionally not been officially linked, the US government is linking the FTA with the US security alliance. Please consider doing a short submission if you can. Below is a summary of some of the issues to assist with submissions, and an article which has some useful quotes. The deadline for receiving submissions is 15 January 2003. A background paper on the Australia-United States FTA proposal, including information on issues that might be covered in an agreement, and studies on the benefits and implications of an Australia-US FTA, is available via DFAT's website at: www.dfat.gov.au/tr de/negotiations/us.html Submission enquiries: Ph: (02) 6261 2019/ 1811 Fax: (02) 6261 3514 Submissions may be lodged electronically at [email protected] or by post at the following address: US FTA Task Force Office of Trade Negotiations Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade BARTON ACT 0221 2. Points for Submissions Such a bilateral trade negotiation places Australia in a very weak bargaining position given the relative sizes of the US and Australian economies. Australian negotiators want greater access to the massive US economy, which is Australia’s second largest market after Japan, in return for entry for U.S goods to Australia's comparatively tiny market of 19 million people, the 15th largest destination for US exports. The US has little need for such an agreement, Australia would have to make concessions The National Farmers’ Federation has expressed doubt about Australia’s bargaining position in such a bilateral negotiation and is sceptical that the US government would concede access to US agricultural markets . The US list of "barriers to trade" include the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, Australia’s local content rules in film and television, our quarantine law and the Foreign Investment Review Board. Such vital social policies should not be traded away. The Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme makes medicines more affordable to most Australians. It should not be targeted as a trade barrier. The local content rules are a vital pillar of Australia’s cultural identity which ensures that Australian stories are told on film and television. These rules ensure a local skills base which enables quality films and television programs to be made here. Australia has relatively high quarantine standards because as an island country we are disease-free in some areas, and the impact of such diseases would be devastating. We should not compromise these standards. Australia has specific investment restrictions through legislation in only a few strategic industries like the media, telecommunications and airlines. The Foreign Investment Review Board is the only general restriction, and its discretion is very seldom exercised. If these few remaining restrictions were to be weakened, all of these industries would be vulnerable to US takeover. All of these trade-offs would be unacceptable in terms of Australian culture, health and safety, public interest and economic independence. The Minister for Trade has said that Australia does not want to rule out any of these areas in the negotiations (Sydney Morning Herald 15/11/02). While trade and security issues have traditionally not been officially linked, both the US government and commentators are linking the FTA with the US security alliance. This is a serious mistake and could be detrimental to Australia's independence in both foreign policy and trade policy. 3. All the way with USA on trade By Tom Allard and John Garnaut, Sydney Morning Herald, 15 November 2002 Australia is willing to consider United States demands for unfettered investment access and relaxed labelling for genetically modified food in exchange for opening new markets for Australian farmers under a free trade deal. The Minister for Trade, Mark Vaile, said yesterday there were no areas off-limits as the US President, George Bush, notified Congress of a start to negotiations on a free trade agreement. In an eight-page letter to Congress from Mr Bush's trade representative, Bob Zoellick, the Administration listed a range of demands for the FTA that will anger farm, industry and lobby groups in Australia. They include an end to Australian Government screening of US investment proposals, a relaxation of quarantine laws and changes to Australia's "single desk" grain marketing bodies. "Technical barriers" to trade like GM food labelling and greater access to Australian markets for US telecommunications, airlines and banking services are also in the sights of the US. Despite claims from both nations that the trade talks had nothing to do with Australia's strong support of US military and security strategy, Congress was told a trade deal with Australia would "strengthen the foundation of our security alliance". The US call for unfettered investment access has implications for the pharmaceutical benefits scheme, which it has argued restricts investment by keeping prices low. Labor attacked the Government's apparent willingness to consider changes to the PBS, which was "one of the cornerstones of Medicare and a guarantee for every Australian that essential medicines will be available and affordable". The ambit claim of investment access may also undermine the Government's promise to keep Telstra and Qantas in majority Australian ownership. Relaxing Australia's local content rules for television and radio could also be of interest to the US. Asked if Australia had nominated any no-go areas, Mr Vaile said: "We can't do that. We want to move ahead and we don't want to talk about things negatively or rule anything out. There may be no-go areas that emerge but we want to go into this with everything on the table." The Government wants to pursue the FTA with the US because it will increase Australia's links to the world's biggest economy and, according to its modelling, eventually be worth $4 billion a year if completed successfully. The key to an economic boost is substantial gains in access to the US for Australian farmers, who are generally much more price competitive. Mr Zoellick, who briefed federal cabinet in Canberra yesterday on the US approach to a free trade deal, heartened the Government when he said the US wanted an FTA "as absolutely broad as possible, and that includes agriculture, manufacturing, services". The Prime Minister, John Howard, told Parliament: "This is, by any measure, an historical development in the bilateral relationship; it is unambiguously good news for Australia." He acknowledged that negotiations would be difficult, and a successful conclusion was by no means assured, especially as politically powerful US farm groups had expressed reluctance about a deal. To placate its farmers, the US has demanded changes to quarantine and Australia's single- desk marketing bodies for key grains commodities - to the ire of Australian farmers. The National Farmers Federation's trade expert, Lyall Howard, said: "We're not going to let products in that have diseases. They find that frustrating, because they've got diseases we don't want. We're not watering down our standards for anyone." A Melbourne University trade expert, Ann Capling, said she was shocked at the link made between of security and trade. "It's been a cornerstone of both Australian and US foreign policy since World War II that security and trade issues are kept in separate boxes. To see them linked now has major implications for the Australia-US security alliance.".
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Official Hansard No
    COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SENATE Official Hansard No. 3, 2002 WEDNESDAY, 20 MARCH 2002 FORTIETH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION—FIRST PERIOD BY AUTHORITY OF THE SENATE INTERNET The Journals for the Senate are available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/work/journals/index.htm Proof and Official Hansards for the House of Representatives, the Senate and committee hearings are available at: http://www.aph.gov.au/hansard SITTING DAYS—2002 Month Date February 12, 13, 14 March 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 20, 21 May 14, 15, 16 June 17, 18, 19, 20, 24, 25, 26, 27 August 19, 20, 21, 22, 26, 27, 28, 29 September 16, 17, 18, 19, 23, 24, 25, 26 October 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24 November 11, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 21 December 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12 RADIO BROADCASTS Broadcasts of proceedings of the Parliament can be heard on the following Parliamentary and News Network radio stations, in the areas identified. CANBERRA 1440 AM SYDNEY 630 AM NEWCASTLE 1458 AM BRISBANE 936 AM MELBOURNE 1026 AM ADELAIDE 972 AM PERTH 585 AM HOBART 729 AM DARWIN 102.5 FM SENATE CONTENTS WEDNESDAY, 20 MARCH Migration Legislation Amendment (Transitional Movement) Bill 2002— First Reading ................................................................................................. 1031 Second Reading............................................................................................. 1031 Business— Rearrangement............................................................................................... 1032 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Australia Dossier: CEC Launches Federal Campaign
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 31, Number 22, June 4, 2004 Australia Dossier by Allen Douglas CEC Launches Federal Campaign portunity Commission’s (HREOC) on LaRouche’s associates have shaken up the country. “Immigration Detention Centers” (IDCs) around Australia (see EIR, May 28, 2004). To clarify the last point, the candidates released infor- mation—for the first time publicly in Australia—that the father of current At a dozen press conferences all page ads in another 15 newspapers PM John Howard had been a member over the country on May 19, the Aus- covering all major population centers of the 1930s Synarchist/fascist army tralian associates of Lyndonin Australia. All of the ads featured known as the New Guard. “Like fa- LaRouche in the Citizens Electoral a toll-free phone number at the CEC ther, like son,” the candidates Council (CEC) launched their cam-national office in Melbourne, and a charged. paigns for the Federal elections ex- clip-out coupon to send for a free copy Although most major media pected in October. Numerous mediaof the New Citizen; over the following blacked out the conferences, some attended the conferences, along with week, the CEC received 600 calls and good coverage was garnered on local well over 200 Australian citizens sup-300 coupons, and 1,300 people down- radio and regional papers and televi- porting the CEC. Some of these latter loaded the entire 72-page paper from sion. Notwithstanding the blackout, were members of the CEC, but manythe CEC website; 16,000 others read the establishment was stung, as re- were not, reflecting the widespread part of the issue on the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Pandering to the Government Surveys Have Shown That Voters Trust Non-Government Organisations Much More Than They Trust Politicians and Businesses
    Pandering to the Government Surveys have shown that voters trust non-government organisations much more than they trust politicians and businesses. With the election upon us, political parties need the support of environment groups to win over key constituencies. But all is not what it seems in the environment movement. Clive Hamilton reports. No. 40 September 2004 On 7th September, the Federal organisations, most of which have Environment Minister Senator Ian been campaigning on the issue for Pandering to the Government Campbell issued a media release years, wrote an excoriating letter to Clive Hamilton announcing some new Commonwealth WWF directors. It declared of WWF’s grants for projects to protect threatened Blueprint for Tasmanian Forests: species. While the announcement was a Making private schools dull affair, the remarkable feature of the “The document is incredibly accountable media release was that it included the damaging to the cause of forest Deb Wilkinson panda logo of the World Wide Fund for conservation in Tasmania. We Nature and quotes from the acting CEO believe it will do irreparable harm of WWF praising the Government’s to the reputation of WWF in The next gender wars program. Australia and internationally.” Barbara Pocock The fact that WWF is actively promoting The environment groups were not the Pets and foreign aid the Howard Government’s only ones to feel betrayed. The Age Richard Denniss environmental policies in the middle of reported that some wildlife an election campaign is difficult to square photographers whose work is due to with its angry reaction to the Australia be published in a new WWF book on Quotes from the Tenth Institute’s July report which concluded the Tarkine have withdrawn Anniversary Dinner that the relationship between WWF and permission to use their photos.
    [Show full text]
  • Lady Thatcher Celebrated Her 80Th Birthday Last
    LADY THATCHER CELEBRATED HER 80TH BIRTHDAY LAST NIGHT WITH 650 GUESTS Andrew Pierce reports The Times Friday, October 14, 2005 BARONESS THATCHER had the perfect excuse to be a little late last night for her 80th birthday party in the presence of the Queen, Tony Blair and some unlikely names from the show-business world. She was delayed by an unexpected telephone call from President Bush wishing her a happy birthday. The ten- minute call from the White House was the latest in a series of tributes that poured in from around the world. It marked yet another highlight in the life of a woman who still casts a huge shadow over the Conservative Party. The red carpet was rolled out for Lady Thatcher, who was dressed in a navy blue cocktail coat and silk chiffon dress designed by Camilla Milton. Lady Thatcher, who looked frail, made no public comment as a crowd of wellwishers lined the streets to catch a glimpse of Britain's first woman Prime Minister. The 650-strong guest list was a roll call of honour from the 1980s Thatcher heyday. Michael Portillo, who was once seen as her anointed heir, made a surprise appearance. He said: "She was influential in her day but not now." But the former Prime Minister also sprinkled the list with some surprise names from both sides of the political divide. The Queen, in a shimmering silver dress, the Duke of Edinburgh, and the Prime Minister were the principal guests at the drinks party in the gold-embossed ballroom of the Mandarin Oriental Hotel Hyde Park, in Knightsbridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Update October 2013
    NSWIC Monthly Update NEW SOUTH WALES IRRIGATORS’ COUNCIL October 2013 Thank you for agreeing to receive our monthly update. We appreciate you taking the time to keep abreast of what NSWIC is doing to represent Water Access License holders in NSW. This electronic bulletin is a collation of our weekly updates which are sent to our Member organisations. If you would like more details about your local Member of NSWIC, please don't hesitate to contact us. Basin Plan Related Recommitting to Buyback Cap A win! Or, at very least a reaffirmation of a previous win. You'll recall that then Opposition Leader and now Prime Minister, Tony Abbott, wrote to NSWIC last year committing to cap buybacks at 1,500 gigalitres. We distributed that letter far and wide to make certain it couldn't be walked away from. Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for the Environment (the bloke in charge of water), Senator Simon Birmingham, gave his first interview in the role to Lauren Wilson from The Australian. In the article, published on Thursday (10 Oct) and available here, he again committed to the buyback cap. This time, of course, the commitment is from the Government - and hence has practical implications. We issued a media release (here) calling it a "great result". Well done to all who were involved in securing this commitment in the first instance. It's always good to see a real, material outcome after such a prolonged engagement. Constraints Management Strategy The Murray-Darling Basin Authority released its draft Constraints Management Strategy (available here). It doesn't provide solutions (and probably wasn't designed to) but rather identifies both physical and rules-based constraints that need to be "further investigated".
    [Show full text]
  • Social Intelligence and Leadership
    THINKING WITH FEELING : SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LEADERSHIP PhD Submitted by Daphne Freeder 2019 University of Technology Sydney UTS Business School Management Discipline Group Primary supervisor: Distinguished Professor Stewart Clegg Alternate supervisor: Associate Professor Judy Johnston CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINAL AUTHORSHIP I certify that the work in this thesis has not previously been submitted for a degree nor has it been submitted as part of requirements for a degree except as fully acknowledged within the text. I also certify that the thesis has been written by me. Any help that I have received in my research work and the preparation of the thesis itself has been acknowledged. In addition I certify that all information sources and literature used are indicated in the thesis. Signature of Student: Production Note: Signature removed prior to publication. Date: 3rd September, 2019 This research is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship Copyright © Daphne Freeder 2019. All Rights Reserved ii Acknowledgements This thesis is dedicated to my parents Barbara and Neville and grandparents Elle, Elsa, Joachim, Ivy and Henry; and to Žanis; and to Helle. And to my dear Aunty Ira who like my parents always believed in the power and freedom education provides and missed out on such opportunities. Malicious leadership inflicted much cruelty, pain, and upheaval in your lives but your great strength as individuals was in countering evil by being warm, generous, humane, kind and exceptionally intelligent and loving people. The love and memories you all created are still here. Thank you. You are with me every day, Uz redzēšanos. My heartfelt thanks and love are extended to my brothers Uģis and Vidis for the special part they played in the completion of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Dulwich Hill
    Sydney Journal 2(2) June 2010 ISSN 1835-0151 http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/ojs/index.php/sydney_journal/index Dulwich Hill Chrys Meader Dulwich Hill, a suburb of the Marrickville local government area, is located seven kilometres south-west of Sydney. The traditional owners of the land were Cadigal of the Eora nation. The suburb is located on both sides of a ridge, and consists of a number of low hills, which were once heavily timbered. The lower land slopes towards Cooks River and was covered in dense ti-tree scrub. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, Dulwich Hill developed as a desirable residential district with a small village shopping centre and isolated but significant pockets of industry. It is a suburb shaped by twentieth-century subdivisions. Dulwich Hill has retained a village atmosphere, even with the late twentieth and early twenty-first century developments where former factory sites have been redeveloped for large apartment complexes. These complexes are themselves small villages within the suburb of Dulwich Hill. Early European settlement Dulwich Hill was part of the land grant to Thomas Moore, who was the colony’s shipbuilder. In 1799 Moore received a large grant of 700 acres (283.3 hectares). He called it Douglas Farm. It took in the present suburbs of Marrickville and Petersham and parts of Dulwich Hill and Stanmore. It was the highly prized stands of timber on the estate that most interested Moore and a later owner, Dr Robert Wardell. Present-day Dulwich Hill also contained a number of smaller land grants, mainly to emancipated convicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Dynamics in Australian Federal Politics
    Department of the Parliamentary Library Informati nand Research Services For God and Countryo' Religious Dynamics in Australian Federal Politics Dr Marion Maddox 1999Australian Parliamentary Fellow Department of the Parliamentary Library For God and Country Religious Dynamics in Australian Federal Politics Dr Marion Maddox 1999 Australian Parliamentary Fellow ISBN 0-642-52724-5 © Commonwealth of Australia 2001 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. For God and Country: Religious Dynamics in Australian Federal Politics The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and may not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS) or to the Department of the Parliamentary Library. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. Presiding Officers' Foreword Established in 1971, the Australian Parliamentary Fellowship has provided an opportunity for an academic analysis of many aspects of Parliament and the work of Parliamentarians. The work of Dr Marion Maddox, the 1999 Fellow, has been the first to assess and set in context the religious influences felt by current and past Senators and Members as they pursue their parliamentary duties. With two doctorates (in theology and political philosophy) Dr Maddox brought both fields together in her Fellowship project. In for For God and Country: Religious Dynamics in Australian Federal Politics Dr Maddox explores religious influences and debate in and around the Thirty-Eighth and Thirty-Ninth Parliaments.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 PENNY MAGEE LECTURE All in the Family: Women, Religion and the Australian Right
    Volume 15, Number 2 13 2002 PENNY MAGEE LECTURE All in the Family: Women, Religion and the Australian Right Marion Maddox Victoria University, Wellington Perverse Politics Camilla Nelson's novel, Perverse Acts (1998), hypothesizes a Republic of Australia, some time in the early twenty-first century. The date is left vague, though there are various pointers: one MP, Lucretia, who, like many of her present­ day counterparts, decorates her office with photos of herself, has snaps of 'a very young Lucretia' meeting the Clintons in Sydney ari.d her adult self visiting 'a dying Germaine Greer'. The passing of time and transition to a republic have apparently left some aspects the parliamentary structure unchanged: with the best will in the world to implement its Freedom From Government Bill and the associated Get Rich Quick tax scheme, Nelson's unnamed neo-liberal party, like so many crusading governments before it, faces obstruction in the Senate. Its only hope is to secure the balance-of-power votes of a minor party called the Circle of Light. Here is how Nelson's cynical female narrator, Venus, describes the Circle: The Circle of Light was a relatively new phenomenon but its antecedents stretched back a generation of two, back to the end of the 1990s. Some say it started with an independent on the crossbench in the Senate, others as a faction within the ruling Party. (Did I say faction? Excuse me, I meant forum.) It all began with prayer breakfasts, a lot more prayer breakfasts and a giant circle of praise. And then, a lot more giant circles of praise and a really fashionable fad: the Christian men's.
    [Show full text]
  • The Howard Family: Stooges for the Synarchy by Gabrielle Peut Unions)
    The New Citizen July/August 2006 Page THE NEW For More Information: CONTACT US 1-800-636-432 PO Box 376 Coburg VIc 3058 Web:www.cecaust.com.au Email:[email protected] Vol 5 No 9 July/August 2006 $2.00 (inc GST) Print Post: 30601/00002 LaRouche Leads Global Fight vs. Synarchist Bankers by Kelly-ann Paull nation states worldwide. The inside the Democratic Party, to unions and lowering the living Synarchists have destroyed that kick out the Synarchists such as standards of most of the popula- July 4—This issue of the New Bretton Woods system, and now Lazard investment banker Felix tion; ripping up and/or selling Citizen is devoted to exposing intend to eliminate nation states Rohatyn, who own a part of the off vital infrastructure in water, the international cabal of finan- themselves, through “privatisa- party because of their financial rail, energy, health and educa- ciers and corporate cartels now tion” (the theft of national infra- power, and return it to the party tion; and attempting to establish pushing for world fascist rule structure) and globalisation. of FDR. a police state. under the rubric of “globalisa- U.S. statesman and physi- On June 9, LaRouche gave an The pillars of the Synar- tion”. Known to U.S. and other cal economist Lyndon H. La- international webcast in which chy, such firms as Rio Tinto, national intelligence agencies Rouche, Jr. is leading a global he outlined a strategy to defeat Royal Dutch Shell, and Felix as the “Synarchy”, this crowd fight to defeat the Synarchy by the Synarchy, the opening por- Rohatyn’s Lazard, have sys- installed the fascist régimes in establishing a “New Bretton tion of which you will see on tematically looted Australia, Europe during the 1920s and Woods” monetary system.
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICS and GOVERNMENT God Under Howard How the Religious
    Bh0946M-PressProofs.QX5 1/12/04 4:02 PM Page i Bookhouse (Simon) ‘God is working for the Liberal Party and this fine, disturbing book arrives just in time to tell us how. Marion Maddox’s world is the political territory that lies neglected beneath the secular radar of this country. God Under Howard breaks the codes and tracks the Bible Belt strategies John Howard has brought from the US to advance his cause. The result is an eye-opening exploration of the real politics of Australia.’ David Marr ‘Marion Maddox rightly says, “We do Australia’s soul no service by forcing religion out of visible public life into unanalysed undercurrents”. She brings us a convincing and disturbing picture of the capacity of John Howard, and some of his friends, to co-opt God for their own political agenda. Perhaps the ultimate irony is that, when mainstream church leaders try to enter the discussion and reclaim the God they represent, Howard in effect tells them to “stop meddling” while at the same time taking advantage of what he sees as their capacity to deliver cheap welfare. This is an academically responsible but very readable book—one which should alert us all to significant dimensions of political cunning.’ Dorothy McRae-McMahon Retired Uniting Church Minister and Co-editor of the South Sydney Herald ‘There is no doubt that your childhood religious instruction underwrites your attitudes and prejudices for much of the rest of your life, but I am staggered at how these values can easily get lost in public life. Marion Maddox has attempted to do the impossible
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Food Regulation Review July 1998
    Food Regulation Review Committee Report of the Food Regulation Review July 1998 © Commonwealth of Australia 1998 ISBN 0 642 34518 X This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from AusInfo. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction rights should be directed to the Manager, Legislative Services, AusInfo, GPO Box 84, Canberra ACT 2601. Food Regulation Review PO Box 7186 Canberra MC ACT 2610 Phone: 02 6271 2233 Fax: 02 6271 2278 Email: [email protected] Website: www.health.gov.au/anzfa/frr 2 Foreword Food is one of the necessities of life. It is therefore not surprising that food regulation attracts wide interest in Australia. Indeed many countries throughout the world are currently coming to grips with the complexities of their food regulatory systems. Australia can be justifiably proud of its international reputation for producing safe food. However, we are aware food-borne illnesses are on the increase in a number of countries and there is evidence of resistant strains of bacteria emerging - both are international phenomena. We are also aware of unwarranted costs to business due to inconsistencies and duplication within the regulatory and enforcement framework. At the same time, there is a need for the agrifood industry to become increasingly competitive to be successful exporters to international markets. It is against this background that the governments of Australia agreed to a comprehensive review of food regulation and the Prime Minister announced the Food Regulation Review in March 1997.
    [Show full text]