<<

MILESTONESFROM THE SCIENTIFIC IN ADVISORY BOARD

Ian C. Lennon The impact of in Chemistry on fine chemicals

IAN C. LENNON Member of Chimica Oggi/Chemistry Today’s Scientific advisory board

s this is the “2011: International Year of Chemistry” it is opportune to reflect on the impact that the has had on the pharmaceuti- Acal and contract manufacturing industries. Between 1901 and 2010 the Nobel Prize in Chemistry has been awarded 102 times to 160 Nobel Laureates for achieve- ments in a diverse range of chemistry, from polymers to biological chemistry, struc- tural and surface Chemistry, to quantum mechanics. This editorial will focus on those Nobel Prizes that have had the biggest impact in the manufacture of pharmaceuti- cals and fine chemicals.

By the start of the 20th Century chemical manufacturing was well establi- shed in Europe and many new reactions and techniques were being developed. The 1902 No- bel Prize in Chemistry awarded to for his work on and synthesis was hi- ghly significant. Fischer has >8 reactions named after him, including the Fischer synthesis and the Fischer reduction. The 1912 prize was shared between and . 2 We can all appreciate the impact of the to enable the synthesis of alcohols and for- ming new -carbon bonds, but Sabatier’s work on developing methods of hydrogenating organic compounds in the presence of finely disintegrated , was an equally important milestone in organic chemistry. A few industrial would dispute the fundamental importance of ’s work on the synthesis of ammonia, which led to the 1918 prize, though awarded in 1919 as no candidate met the criteria to receive the award in 1918, so it was deferred for one year. Haber’s work led to the manufacture of fertili- zers and explosives, very important during the First World War. He was also known as the “Father of chemical warfare”, not an accolade we would all like to share.

Can you imagine making complex natural products or stereochemically congested rings without the Diels- Alder reaction? Otto Paul Hermann Diels and received their Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1950, followed by in 1954 for his work on the nature of the and its application to the elucidation of the structure of complex substances. In the golden era for synthesis that was to follow new methods for constructing carbon-carbon bonds and elucidating complex structures transformed chemistry from a science to an art. Arguably, the preeminent organic of the twentieth century Robert B. Woodward received his prize in 1965 for outstanding achievements in the art of . Woodward made key contributions to the synthesis and structure determination of complex natural products.

Major advances in were pioneered by and and they shared the Nobel Prize for Chemistry in 1973. Wilkinson was well known for the discovery of the structure of and the invention of Wilkinson’s catalyst, which led to the development of homogeneous catalysts for many reactions, including asymmetric . The most successful and widely used pharmaceuticals of the last 20 years have been single , such as Lipitor, Plavix and Nexium with combined sales of over $30 Billion in 2009. Therefore it is important to acknowledge the contributions of for his research into the of organic and reactions. Of course we all know the Cahn-Ingold-Prelog priority rules. Prelog shared the 1975 prize with , who worked on the stereochemistry of -catalyzed reactions. In the area of chemistry many new drugs could not have been developed without the contributions of , who invented solid phase and the famous Merrifield resin. He received his prize in 1984.

In recognizing the impact of fundamental reactions to form new carbon-carbon bonds and extend the scope of organic synthesis, the Nobel committee gave the 1979 award to Herbert C. Brown and for their work developing new boron reagents and phosphorous containing compounds, respectively.

chimica oggi/Chemistry Today - vol. 29 n. 3 May/June 2011