DOCSLIB.ORG

National Top 100 (As of October 29, 2018) the National Top 100 List Represents the Largest Green Power Users Within the Green Power Partnership

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

National Top 100 (as of October 29, 2018) The National Top 100 list represents the largest green power users within the Green Power Partnership. The combined green power usage of these Top 100 Partners amount to nearly 46 billion kilowatt-hours annually, which represents approximately 86 percent of the green power commitments made by all EPA Green Power Partners. Partner Name Annual GP % of Organization Providers (listed in Green Green Total Type descending order by Power Power Electricity kWh supplied to Resources Usage Use* Partner) (kWh) 1. Microsoft 4,557,278,000 100% Technology & Sterling Planet°, Enbridge Solar, Wind Corporation Telecom LLC, EDF Renewable Energy, Black Hills Corp., Renewable Choice Energy°, Self-supply 2. Intel 4,152,034,623 100% Technology & Renewable Choice Various Corporation Telecom Energy°, 3Degrees°, Unknown, PNM, Self- supply 3. Google Inc. 2,409,051,735 53% Technology & MidAmerican Energy°, Biogas, Small- Telecom NextEra Energy hydro, Solar, Resources°, Grand River Wind Dam Authority°, Northern Wasco County PUD, Enel Green Power North America, Exelon Generation, EDF Renewable Energy, Self- supply, Duke Energy, Unknown 4. Apple Inc. 1,650,398,166 107% Technology & Self-supply, 3 Phases Various Telecom Renewables°, Avangrid Renewables°, 3Degrees°, Cypress Creek Partner Name Annual GP % of Organization Providers (listed in Green Green Total Type descending order by Power Power Electricity kWh supplied to Resources Usage Use* Partner) (kWh) Renewables, SunPower, Silicon Valley Power°, NC GreenPower°, Austin Energy°, Duke Energy, Sacramento Municipal Utility District°, Salt River Project°, Carbon Solutions Group°, Homefield Energy, Silicon Valley Clean Energy°, Dynegy°, Xcel Energy°, Memphis Light, Gas and Water°, City of Palo Alto Utilities°, Louisville Gas & Electric Company, Capital Dynamics, Dominion Virginia Power°, Central Electric Cooperative, Huntsville Utilities°, Tampa Electric, Dominion Energy, City of Naperville, Avista Utilities, PNM°, Omaha Public Power District, Pacific Power°, NSTAR 5. Bank of America 1,619,459,537 89% Banking & Fin. 3Degrees°, Carbon Solar, Wind Srvcs. Solutions Group°, Schneider Electric°, Self- supply 6. Equinix, Inc. 1,475,479,000 105% Technology & 3Degrees°, NextEra Energy Various Telecom Resources, Southern Power Partner Name Annual GP % of Organization Providers (listed in Green Green Total Type descending order by Power Power Electricity kWh supplied to Resources Usage Use* Partner) (kWh) 7. Samsung 1,151,663,000 100% Technology & Schneider Electric°, Austin Wind Electronics and Telecom Energy° Semiconductors 8. Cisco Systems, 1,106,969,859 100% Technology & Renewable Choice Various Inc. Telecom Energy°, 3Degrees°, NRG Energy, Duke Energy, Austin Energy°, Self-supply 9. U.S. General 1,075,655,941 47% Govt. (Federal) Various, Self-supply Biogas, Services Biomass, Administration Geothermal, Solar, Wind 10. City of 1,072,149,000 92% Govt. (Local, Reliant Energy°, Engie Solar, Wind Houston, TX Municipal) 11. Starbucks 1,056,763,000 103% Restaurants & 3Degrees°, VivoRex LLC°, Solar, Wind (company-owned Cafes Greenlight Energy° cafe retail stores) 12. Walmart Inc. 1,037,330,534 5% Retail Pattern Energy, Unknown, Various Alabama Power, Akuo Energy, Bloom Energy, AES°, Foundation Windpower, LLC, Cowetta Fayette EMC, Habersham EMC, Amicalola EMC° 13. IKEA 933,257,102 391% Retail IKEA, Self-supply Biogas, Solar, Wind 14. U.S. 838,831,202 16% Govt. (Federal) Various, Self-supply Various Department of Energy Partner Name Annual GP % of Organization Providers (listed in Green Green Total Type descending order by Power Power Electricity kWh supplied to Resources Usage Use* Partner) (kWh) 15. Kimberly-Clark 750,000,000 30% Consumer EDF Renewable Energy°, Wind Corporation Products Invenergy° 16. Procter & 743,063,310 20% Consumer Tyler Bluff Wind Project Biomass, Solar, Gamble Products LLC, Constellation, Wind 3Degrees°, Albany Green Energy, SunEdison 17. Anheuser- 727,000,109 55% Wineries & Tradewind Energy°, Enel Solar, Wind Busch Companies, Breweries Green Power North LLC America°, Self-supply 18. Digital Realty 719,761,000 25% Technology & E.On Climate and Wind Telecom Renewables, Renewable Choice Energy° 19. City of Dallas, 718,271,850 100% Govt. (Local, TXU Energy° Wind TX Municipal) 20. Mars, 693,592,000 72% Food & Beverage Mesquite Creek Wind, Solar, Wind Incorporated LLC°, Juwi Solar, Ahana Renewable 21. T-Mobile 625,600,000 27% Technology & Red Dirt Wind Project, Wind Telecom LLC° 22. District of 603,279,000 122% Govt. (Local, WGL Energy°, Avangrid Wind Columbia Municipal) Renewables° 23. BD 558,700,386 100% Health Care NextEra Energy Solar, Wind Resources°, Nebraska Public Power District, Self- supply Partner Name Annual GP % of Organization Providers (listed in Green Green Total Type descending order by Power Power Electricity kWh supplied to Resources Usage Use* Partner) (kWh) 24. Iron Mountain 508,077,000 87% Technology & Leeward, Lincoln Clean Wind Information Telecom Energy, NJR, Renewable Management, LLC Power Direct, Direct Energy, Schneider Electric° 25. Kaiser 493,781,608 32% Health Care Constellation°, Unknown, Various Permanente Portland General Electric°, Self-supply 26. Capital One 467,587,957 114% Banking & Fin. Renewable Choice Various Srvcs. Energy°, Direct Energy°, Green Mountain Energy 27. Montgomery 452,112,000 71% Govt. (Local, Renewable Choice Energy° Wind County Clean Municipal) Energy Buyers Group 28. Dallas Fort 440,215,000 100% Transportation Texas General Land Office, Solar, Wind Worth Self-supply International Airport 29. JPMorgan 433,874,876 28% Banking & Fin. NRG Energy, 3Degrees°, Solar, Wind Chase & Co. Srvcs. Self-supply 30. Johnson & 430,753,360 66% Health Care E.On Climate and Biogas, Solar, Johnson Renewables, Wind Constellation°, Self-supply 31. Unilever 408,378,775 100% Consumer Langford Wind Power Solar, Wind Products LLC°, 3Degrees°, Unknown 32. General Mills 375,000,000 39% Food & Beverage Southern Power° Wind Partner Name Annual GP % of Organization Providers (listed in Green Green Total Type descending order by Power Power Electricity kWh supplied to Resources Usage Use* Partner) (kWh) 33. Danone North 362,428,000 100% Food & Beverage Bonneville Environmental Wind America Foundation° 34. Ahold USA 358,748,135 20% Retail 3Degrees°, Self-supply Solar, Wind 35. The Boeing 346,402,639 16% Industrial Goods South Carolina Electric & Biomass, Company & Srvcs. Gas°, Shell Energy North Small-hydro, America, Puget Sound Solar, Wind Energy°, Self-supply 36. City of Austin, 328,857,856 100% Govt. (Local, Austin Energy° Wind TX Municipal) 37. Lockheed 303,745,823 20% Industrial Goods Renewable Choice Biomass, Solar, Martin & Srvcs. Energy°, Pattern Energy°, Wind Self-supply, City of Palo Alto Utilities°, Unknown 38. Goldman 298,739,000 100% Banking & Fin. 3Degrees° Wind Sachs Group, Inc. Srvcs. 39. Best Buy 282,103,000 31% Retail 3Degrees° Various 40. HP Inc. 275,346,832 96% Technology & Renewable Choice Various Telecom Energy°, Pacific Power°, Idaho Power°, Self-supply 41. BNY Mellon 257,000,000 107% Banking & Fin. NextEra Energy Wind Srvcs. Resources° 42. Dell Inc. 254,365,095 34% Technology & TXU Energy°, Schneider Solar, Wind Telecom Electric°, Austin Energy°, Oklahoma Gas & Electric, Partner Name Annual GP % of Organization Providers (listed in Green Green Total Type descending order by Power Power Electricity kWh supplied to Resources Usage Use* Partner) (kWh) Rocky Mountain Power°, Self-supply 43. University of 250,070,000 94% Education Renewable Choice Solar, Wind Tennessee, (Higher) Energy°, Tennessee Valley Knoxville Authority°, Self-supply 44. 243,733,000 30% Govt. (State) WGL Energy° Wind Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 45. DHL 239,340,353 100% Shipping Renewable Choice Energy° Wind 46. TD Bank 236,197,091 101% Banking & Fin. Renewable Choice Solar, Wind Srvcs. Energy°, Self-supply 47. State of 232,580,402 18% Govt. (State) Sacramento Municipal Biomass, Solar, California Utility District°, Unknown, Wind Self-supply 48. Johnson 225,871,989 22% Industrial Goods Sterling Planet°, Schneider Solar, Wind Controls, Inc. & Srvcs. Electric°, NextEra Energy Resources°, Constellation°, Self-supply 49. H&M 223,383,286 100% Clothing & Natural Capital Partner° Wind Textile 50. Colgate- 220,000,000 96% Consumer 3Degrees° Wind Palmolive Products Company 51. University at 219,284,258 100% Education 3Degrees°, Steel Sun, Self- Biomass, Solar Buffalo, the State (Higher) supply Partner Name Annual GP % of Organization Providers (listed in Green Green Total Type descending order by Power Power Electricity kWh supplied to Resources Usage Use* Partner) (kWh) University of New York 52. salesforce.com 218,250,985 53% Technology & Enbridge LLC°, Southern Wind Telecom Power°, Indianapolis Power & Light° 53. University of 200,000,000 71% Education Renewable Choice Energy° Wind Pennsylvania (Higher) 54. Citi 193,194,785 27% Banking & Fin. 3Degrees°, MP2 Energy°, Wind Srvcs. Engie°, TransCanada° 55. State Street 189,106,200 112% Banking & Fin. Blue Delta Energy°, Self- Solar, Wind Corporation Srvcs. supply 56. University of 182,762,683 15% Education UC ESP, SunPower, Five Biogas, Solar, California (Higher) Points Solar Park, FuelCell Wind Energy, Sacramento Municipal Utility District°, Griffen Solar Park, Self- supply, DG Irvine 1, Solar Power Partners, Longroad Energy, Main Street Power Company, NRG DG University Village LLC, EDF Renewable Services, MMA Renewable Ventures, Terraform Solar VII, LLC, SunEdison, Constellation°, Riverside Public Utilities
Recommended publications
  • Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas Insights Report

    Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas Insights Report

    Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas Insights Report Partners XxxxContents Introduction 3 Five key findings 5 Key finding 1: Staying within 1.5°C means companies must 6 keep oil and gas in the ground Key finding 2: Smoke and mirrors: companies are deflecting 8 attention from their inaction and ineffective climate strategies Key finding 3: Greatest contributors to climate change show 11 limited recognition of emissions responsibility through targets and planning Key finding 4: Empty promises: companies’ capital 12 expenditure in low-carbon technologies not nearly enough Key finding 5:National oil companies: big emissions, 16 little transparency, virtually no accountability Ranking 19 Module Summaries 25 Module 1: Targets 25 Module 2: Material Investment 28 Module 3: Intangible Investment 31 Module 4: Sold Products 32 Module 5: Management 34 Module 6: Supplier Engagement 37 Module 7: Client Engagement 39 Module 8: Policy Engagement 41 Module 9: Business Model 43 CLIMATE AND ENERGY BENCHMARK IN OIL AND GAS - INSIGHTS REPORT 2 Introduction Our world needs a major decarbonisation and energy transformation to WBA’s Climate and Energy Benchmark measures and ranks the world’s prevent the climate crisis we’re facing and meet the Paris Agreement goal 100 most influential oil and gas companies on their low-carbon transition. of limiting global warming to 1.5°C. Without urgent climate action, we will The Oil and Gas Benchmark is the first comprehensive assessment experience more extreme weather events, rising sea levels and immense of companies in the oil and gas sector using the International Energy negative impacts on ecosystems.
  • Residential Customer Attrition at TXU Accelerates Duke Energy Says It Is

    Residential Customer Attrition at TXU Accelerates Duke Energy Says It Is

    August 5, 2009 Residential Customer Attrition at TXU Accelerates TXU Energy continued to lose residential customers in the second quarter, which eventually prompted a price reduction last week, parent Energy Futures Holdings said during an earnings call. While margins remain in TXU's 5-10% target, the retailer had seen in the second quarter a temporary expansion in margins from lower wholesale pricing, followed by pressure on margins as retail prices across the market fell. As of June 30, 2009, TXU served 1.911 million residential meters. While up from 1.880 million a year ago, the total is down from 1.930 million as of March 31, 2009. Although TXU said the second quarter represented the first net attrition in residential customers in seven quarters, the numbers of residential meters reported in its 10K/Q's show the decline began in the first quarter. The rate of residential churn increased from a loss of 2,000 meters from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009, to a loss of 19,000 residential meters from March 31, 2009 to June 30, 2009. Small business customer meters (< 1 MW) continued to grow, ending the quarter at 279,000 versus 275,000 as of March 31, 2009. Large commercial meters fell to 21,000 from 24,000 as of March 31, 2009. Total retail sales were up 1.3% at 12,543 GWh, driven by year-over-year residential and small commercial customer growth. Year-over-year residential sales were up 2.1% at 7,084 GWh and small commercial sales were up 2.2% at 1,908 GWh.
  • Nuclear Hvac

    Nuclear Hvac

    NUCLEAR HVAC ENGIE Axima, your key partner ENGIE Axima your local partner for engineering, procurement, construction and operation maintenance of your nuclear HVAC projects. Gravelines With a network of GravelinesDunkerque Lille Boulogne-sur-Mer Dunkerque Lille Boulogne-sur-MerPenly St-Omer Dieppe Chooz Cherbourg Penly St-Omer Amiens Paluel Dieppe Chooz FlamanvilleCherbourg Amiens Compiègne Cattenom officies Paluel Rouen Flamanville Compiègne Cattenom Phalsbourg Engineering Procurement Construction Rouen PARIS Saint-Brieuc Caen Reims Metz ENGIE_axima RÉFÉRENCES COULEUR Brest Phalsbourg Haguenau • Design of HVAC & air treatment systems, • Qualification of the equipment (either • Installation of HVAC systems in in France ChartresPARIS Nogent/Seine gradient_MONO_WHITE Saint-Brieuc MontaubanCaen Reims Metz 22/10/2015 Brest Nancy HaguenauSTRASBOURG Landivisiau de Bretagne LeChartres Mans Nogent/Seine Troyes 24, rue Salomon de Rothschild - 92288 Suresnes - FRANCE of process fluids, process vacuum, and by analysis or testing). coordination with other work packages. Montauban Tél. : +33 (0)1 57 32 87 00 / Fax : +33 (0)1 57 32 87 87 Quimper Web : www.carrenoir.com WHITE cooling systems, including the preparation Landivisiau de BretagneRennesLe Mans Orléans Troyes Nancy Epinal STRASBOURGColmar Lorient Chaumont • Long-term partnership with reputable • Testing, commissioning, acceptance, Quimper Angers Fessenheim of the technical specifications for the VannesRennes St-LaurentOrléans Epinal MulhouseColmar suppliers for the procurement of all operation
  • The Royal Institution for the Advancement

    The Royal Institution for the Advancement

    THE ROYAL INSTITUTION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING/McGILL UNIVERSITY Non-North American Equities │ As September 30, 2019 Non-North American Equities above $500,000 Publicly Traded and Held in Segregated Accounts (in Cdn $) NESTLE SA 3,136,972 ING GROEP NV 822,665 ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC 2,895,677 ORSTED A/S 813,377 NOVARTIS AG 2,736,152 BNP PARIBAS SA 799,331 DIAGEO PLC 1,984,601 SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROU 796,646 MACQUARIE GROUP LTD 1,881,942 IBERDROLA SA 796,483 AIA GROUP LTD 1,880,954 PARTNERS GROUP HOLDING AG 781,932 LVMH MOET HENNESSY LOUIS VUITT 1,817,469 ASTRAZENECA PLC 781,059 ROCHE HOLDING AG 1,801,008 RELX PLC 777,561 NOVO NORDISK A/S 1,695,931 WOOLWORTHS GROUP LTD 771,262 ASML HOLDING NV 1,633,531 MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 766,553 AIRBUS SE 1,626,620 NESTE OYJ 764,602 KEYENCE CORP 1,557,193 SIEMENS AG 739,857 SANOFI 1,484,014 DANONE SA 733,193 LONZA GROUP AG 1,479,277 VODAFONE GROUP PLC 723,852 COMPASS GROUP PLC 1,339,242 DASSAULT SYSTEMES SE 720,751 SAFRAN SA 1,323,784 THALES SA 716,788 UNILEVER NV 1,319,690 HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 707,830 BP PLC 1,300,498 ALLIANZ SE 693,905 NEWCREST MINING LTD 1,295,783 BASF SE 686,276 SAP SE 1,283,261 MERCK KGAA 686,219 ATLAS COPCO AB 1,264,517 GALAXY ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LTD 683,373 ENEL SPA 1,262,338 TEMENOS AG 670,763 SHISEIDO CO LTD 1,236,827 COLOPLAST A/S 667,640 EXPERIAN PLC 1,177,061 INTESA SANPAOLO SPA 663,622 CSL LTD 1,158,166 CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOG 662,404 WOLTERS KLUWER NV 1,156,397 TELEFONICA SA 652,113 CARDTRONICS PLC 1,143,839 ENI SPA 641,418 AMADEUS IT GROUP SA
  • Vistra Energy Corp

    Vistra Energy Corp

    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q ☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2020 — OR — ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from __ to __ Commission File Number 001-38086 Vistra Energy Corp. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 36-4833255 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 6555 Sierra Drive, Irving, Texas 75039 (214) 812-4600 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Trading Symbol(s) Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered Common stock, par value $0.01 per share VST New York Stock Exchange Warrants VST.WS.A New York Stock Exchange Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
  • CARBON FOOTPRINT – CO2 Emissions (Scope 1, 2 & 3)

    CARBON FOOTPRINT – CO2 Emissions (Scope 1, 2 & 3)

    ENVIRONMENT CARBON FOOTPRINT – CO2 Emissions (Scope 1, 2 & 3) GRI Standards : 402-1: Energy 305-1, 305-2, 305-3,305-4, 305-5: Emissions EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sanofi has committed to limit the impacts linked to its activities on the environment. One of the major challenges of the Sanofi Planet Mobilization program consists in reducing its Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions: • direct emissions related to Scope 1 and 2 (industrial, R&D and tertiary sites, including the medical representative’s fleet) • indirect emissions related to scope 3, associated with the value chain activities (transportation and distribution, purchased goods and services, waste generation, etc.) Carbon Footprint Factsheet 1 Published in April 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................ 3 2. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS RELATED TO SCOPE 1 & 2 ................................ 3 2.1. Dashboard: objectives and progress ...................................................................... 3 2.2. Key figures ................................................................................................................. 3 2.3. Highlights ................................................................................................................... 4 3. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS RELATED TO SCOPE 3 ....................................... 6 3.1. Context ....................................................................................................................... 6 3.2. Key
  • New Settlement on Firstenergy ESP Allows Gov't Aggregators to Be Paid

    New Settlement on Firstenergy ESP Allows Gov't Aggregators to Be Paid

    March 2, 2009 New Settlement on FirstEnergy ESP Allows Gov't Aggregators to be Paid Uncollectibles A revised stipulation which would establish the FirstEnergy Ohio utilities' electric security plan would allow suppliers of governmental aggregations to collect unpaid receivables from the FirstEnergy utilities, if providers elect to provide customers with rate phase-in credits, in a provision which prompted the Northeast Ohio Public Energy Council (NOPEC) and Ohio Consumers' Counsel to sign the settlement (Matters, 2/20/09). The OCC said the amended stipulation will, "remove competitive barriers to aggregation." The revised stipulation amends the original process for governmental aggregators to elect to provide rate phase-in credits to their customers, should PUCO order a phasing-in of Standard Service Offer rates. As before, governmental aggregation suppliers providing the phase-in credit would be entitled to receive such credits on a deferred basis from the FirstEnergy utilities, which would add such credits to the regulatory assets created for Standard Service Offer customers. Such credits would be recovered on a nonbypassable basis. Additionally, the settling parties now agree that any uncollectible government aggregation receivables arising out of supplying generation and transmission to a government aggregation group electing to phase-in prices as approved by the Commission shall be included in the Continued Page 7 WMECO Revises Renewable Access Plan to Remove Limit on Number of Suppliers In response to criticism from REC brokers, Western Massachusetts Electric Company has amended its proposed renewable energy retail access plan at the Massachusetts DPU, removing a previous provision limiting participation to two suppliers (08-54).
  • Ethics Charter • ENGIE

    Ethics Charter • ENGIE

    Ethics charter 2 INTRODUCTION – ISABELLE KOCHER, CEO A SUSTAINABLE COMPANY IS AN ETHICAL COMPANY ENGIE is a global benchmark player in the energy sector. Responsible growth is central to the Group’s areas of activity (low-carbon electricity generation, networks, customer solutions), which positions itself as a pioneer to address the main challenges of the new energy landscape: reducing and adapting to climate change, access to sustainable energy and reasonable use of resources. To meet these challenges we need a trustworthy and reliable relationship with all our stakeholders: trust of consumers and industrialists, of the public authorities and civil society, of our partners, suppliers, and our customers. Building and preserving this trust is based on two requirements: that of appropriation and uncompromising respect for our values by every Group employee; and that of our own responsibility in the decisions we take or the projects in which we become involved. This daily requirement shapes our identity around a simple and strong conviction: a sustainable company is an ethical company. ENGIE ETHICS CHARTER 3 This ethical ambition, shared by all, requires This Ethics charter, along with the Practical guide every individual to ethics, is the foundation to be exemplary for all of the referentials, internal policies and codes of conduct adopted by We have a very clear policy: zero tolerance, particularly regarding fraud and corruption, the Group, and which each and complete commitment to compliance with and every one of us must ethical rules - those of the countries in which promote and protect, we operate and those we set for ourselves. This requires every employee to take seriously whatever our position their role in building and protecting the Group’s in the hierarchy, our entity, reputation, by acting in full compliance with the or our geographical sphere applicable laws and our values and ethical principles, in all of our activities.
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Danone

    ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Danone

    ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Danone Accelerating the FOOD revolution TOGETHER Celebrating ‘ONE PERSON, BUSiNESS-LED 100 YEARS ONE VOiCE, ONE SHARE’ COALITiONS of pioneering healthy 100,000 employees for inclusive growth innovation co-owning our future & biodiversity Contents #1 Danone in 2019 4 11 Danone Empowering employees at a gIance to co-own our vision 12 2019 Celebrating 100 years of pioneering Key milestones healthy innovation together 8 13 Interview with our Chairman and CEO, Collective action Emmanuel Faber, for greater impact by Danone employees & transformational change 10 Progressing towards our 2030 Goals #2 Performance Creating sustainable & profitable value for all 15 22 3 questions to Essential Dairy Cécile Cabanis, CFO & Plant-Based 1 24 #3 Health & Nutrition Waters performance 2 18 Specialized Nutrition Collaborative Environmental performance innovation 20 Building a healthier Social performance & sustainable food system together 29 34 Boosting Co-creating innovation the future of food 30 3 Growing with purpose A people-powered company 32 Biodiversity: from farm to fork For more information: danone.com/integrated- annual-report-2019 3 Danone at a glance OUR MISSION: ‘BRINGING HEALTH THROUGH FOOD A GLOBAL LEADER WITH A UNIQUE HEALTH-FOCUSED TO AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE’ PORTFOLIO IN FOOD AND BEVERAGES LEADING POSITIONS (1) STRONG PROGRESS ON PROFITABLE GROWTH IN 2019 #1 #1 #2 €25.3 bn 15.21% €3.85 €2.10 Sales Recurring operating Recurring earnings Dividend per share WORLDWiDE EUROPE WORLDWiDE margin per share (EPS) payable in
  • Integrated Reporting in France: a Failure of Reducing the Information Asymmetries About Sustainability Elisabeth Albertini

    Integrated Reporting in France: a Failure of Reducing the Information Asymmetries About Sustainability Elisabeth Albertini

    Integrated reporting in France: a failure of reducing the information asymmetries about sustainability Elisabeth Albertini To cite this version: Elisabeth Albertini. Integrated reporting in France: a failure of reducing the information asymmetries about sustainability. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald, 2018. hal-02148574 HAL Id: hal-02148574 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02148574 Submitted on 5 Jun 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Integrated reporting in France: a failure of reducing the information asymmetries about sustainability Elisabeth Albertini Abstract Purpose: This paper aims to determine how integrated reporting (IR) can effectively report on multiple capitals that, when taken together, should create value in a sustainable way, with the objective of reducing information asymmetry. Design/methodology/approach: To answer this research question, a qualitative content analysis was conducted of the IR disclosed by the French companies in the period 2013 –16. Findings: The study reveals that information asymmetry is not reduced since companies mention only some capitals as inputs to their value creation process while almost entirely excluding natural capital. Moreover, companies disclose only positive information, mainly about their financial capital, without mentioning any destruction of capital, especially natural capital.
  • Saputo Dairy Australia Commences Large-Scale Renewable Electricity Agreement with ENGIE

    Saputo Dairy Australia Commences Large-Scale Renewable Electricity Agreement with ENGIE

    Media Release Saputo Dairy Australia commences large-scale renewable electricity agreement with ENGIE (Melbourne, 7 April 2021) – Saputo Dairy Australia (SDA), the operating subsidiary of Saputo Inc. in Australia, is issuing this media release to announce that SDA has commenced a 10 year long-term, large-scale renewable power purchase agreement (PPA) with ENGIE, a global leader in renewable energy. Within two years, this transformational program will ramp up to offset 46% of SDA’s electricity with renewables through ENGIE’s Australian renewable energy generation portfolio. In 2020, Saputo Inc., one of the top 10 dairy processors in the world, pledged to accelerate its global efforts to safeguard the environment and committed clear targets to achieve sustainable progress, including actively sourcing renewables. SDA’s long-term commitment to renewable electricity is a big step towards Saputo achieving its promise to reduce its global greenhouse gas intensity by 20% by 2025. This renewable initiative will be on track to reduce SDA’s carbon dioxide emissions by more than 61,000 tonnes in 2023 - equal to taking more than 13,000 cars off the road and reducing Saputo’s global CO2 footprint by 5.7% (against the FY2020 baseline). SDA’s 10-year renewable PPA with ENGIE commenced on 1 April, following a two-year intensive program with energy and sustainability advisor, Schneider Electric. Partnering with ENGIE is an important step in sourcing clean renewable electricity to reduce SDA’s environmental footprint and play our part as a sustainable dairy manufacturer. ENGIE welcomed the deal with SDA. “We’re delighted to be delivering a long-term renewable solution that will help Saputo Dairy Australia achieve their sustainability goals,” said Andrew Hyland, ENGIE’s Executive General Manager of Energy Management.
  • ENGIE RETAIL, LLC D/B/A Think Energy Environmental Disclosure Label New Hampshire – Residential & Small Commercial

    ENGIE RETAIL, LLC D/B/A Think Energy Environmental Disclosure Label New Hampshire – Residential & Small Commercial

    ENGIE RETAIL, LLC d/b/a Think Energy Environmental Disclosure Label New Hampshire – Residential & Small Commercial Electric providers are required by the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission to provide customers with an environmental disclosure label with information to evaluate services offered by competitive suppliers and electric utilities, and to provide information about the environmental and public health impacts of electric generation. Further information can be obtained by calling Think Energy at (866) 252-0078, or by contacting the Public Utilities Commission at (800) 852-3793. Additional information on disclosure labels is also available at http://www.puc.state.nh.us or on Think Energy’s website at www.mythinkenergy.com. Power Sources Air Emissions January 1, 2017-December 31, 2017 January 1, 2017-December 31, 2017 The supplier provided electricity with the following resources: This table compares air emissions from this supplier’s electricity mix to average emission levels from all New England power sources. Sources of Electricity Supplier Mix NEPOOL Mix Biomass 2.01349 2.01349 Supplier’s Coal 4.60539 4.60539 Mix (lbs/MWh) Hydroelectric/Hydropower 6.96538 6.96538 Carbon Dioxide 910.11 This amount is Imported power 0.00000 0.00000 equal to the New Landfill gas 0.54804 0.54804 (CO2) England Average. Municipal solid waste 0.93008 0.93008 Natural Gas 37.52090 37.52090 This amount is equal to the New Nuclear 28.97897 28.97897 Nitrogen Oxide 0.97 England Average. Oil 7.36443 7.36443 (NOx) Other renewable 5.64496 5.64496 This amount is Solar 2.22725 2.22725 equal to the New Sulfur Dioxide 1.54 Wind 3.08650 3.08650 England Average.