UN Agenda 21 Sustainable Development by Debra K

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UN Agenda 21 Sustainable Development by Debra K Disguised as Quality of Life initiatives: UN Agenda 21 sustainable development By Debra K. Niwa • Aug. 7, 2012. Updated 12/2012. Presented at the “Exposing the Global Road to Ruin” conference, August 11-12, 2012, Maine. Quality of Life initiatives have allowed United Na- Seventeen Livable Tucson goals were identified tions’ Agenda 21 to slip in at local levels. An ex- — all in sync with global agendas. The goals fo- ample is the Livable Tucson Vision Program. cus on transportation, community, government, youth, families, public education, neighborhoods, In the spring of 1997, the City of Tucson (Arizona) infill, reinvestment, urban green space, recreation initiated its “quality of life” project “to identify a areas, environment, jobs, air, water, historic and long-term, community-driven vision” — one that cultural resources, job training, poverty, oppor- would help “shape the city’s budget and provide a tunity, local businesses, natural resources, and framework for developing programs and services.”1 downtown.2 The Livable Tucson objectives were later incorpo- What is U.N. Agenda 21? rated into the city’s 2001 General Plan update.3 A (Underline emphasis added) Vision for Sustainable Living for the City of Tucson says the plan was “infused with principles of smart “Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action growth and sustainability to further the goals.” It to be taken globally, nationally and locally by also “provides a framework for promoting more liv- organizations of the United Nations System, able and sustainable development.”4 Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment.” Currently, a new long-range general plan is in the works — called Plan Tucson. A “Core Team of plan- — United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (Division for Sustainable Development) website. Accessed ning staff from the City’s Housing & Community 11/4/11. http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/ Development Department”5, 6, 7 is working on the proposal. The goal is to present the new plan to “ . Agenda 21 . provided the framework for voters on November 5, 2013. action for achieving sustainable development.” — U.S. Senate Resolution 311 — “Expressing the sense of the What’s the problem? For starters, this is not about Senate regarding the policy of the United States at the what we want or need. As the City of Tucson has World Summit on Sustainable Development . .” — was stated, “The Livable Tucson Vision Program closely introduced by Senator John Kerry (MA) on July 30, 2002. Bill cosponsors: Daniel K. Akaka (HI), Jeff Bingaman (NM), aligns our community with the federal Livability Barbara Boxer (CA), Maria Cantwell (WA), Richard Durbin (IL), Agenda for the 21st Century.”8 Russell D. Feingold (WI), James M. Jeffords (VT), Patrick J. Leahy (VT), Joseph I. Lieberman (CT), Patty Murray (WA), Next, related planning initiatives to solicit com- Robert G. Torricelli (NJ), Ron Wyden (OR). http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:S.RES.311: ments are often nothing more than forums to pres- ent controlled choices. Substantial time, effort, “ Agenda 21 is a 300-page, 40-chapter, and money is spent on group processing activities ‘soft-law’ policy document adopted by the and creating the illusion of local effort, buy-in, and delegates to the United Nations Conference consensus for pre-set global plans. on Environment and Development in Rio de This is about building and maintaining a global Janeiro in 1992. The document is not legally system that requires ongoing data collection, binding; it is a set of policy recommenda- evaluation, and monitoring. It’s a system that uses tions designed to reorganize global society surveys, assessments, trained facilitators, public around the principles of environmental forums, workshops, (neighborhood) associations, protection, social equity, and what is called partnerships, and other mechanisms. ‘sustainable’ economic development. At the heart of the concept of sustainable develop- U.N.-defined sustainable development policies are ment, is the assumption that government cloaked in hype that lulls the uninformed. But after must manage society to ensure that human global “livability” and “sustainability” become driv- activity conforms to these principles.” ers of city, county, and state operations, it doesn’t —Henry Lamb, “Agenda 21 and the United Nations,” take long for the dark underbelly to appear. The ills The Eco•logic Powerhouse, September 2006. that surface include: new and higher taxes, fees and http://www.freedom.org/board/articles/lamb-906.html fines; maintenance and operations budget deficits; general fund money diverted to special interest; 1 growing municipal debt, and costly, unnecessary 3. End public-private partnerships as well as redevelopment and transportation projects — e.g., other government ties to entities that promote light rail, modern street cars, corridor initiatives, global agendas and financially enrich their orga- sports complexes, high density housing, and ques- nizations in the process by feeding at the pub- tionable water and energy plans, to name a few. lic trough. This includes ending ties with ICLEI — an “international environmental agency for There are also new and amended land use and local governments” with “official status to rep- building codes to restrict property rights; rezoning resent local governments at U.N. meetings.”9 that affects real estate values; increased private property takings (eminent domain); giveaways 4. Scrutinize candidates for elected office. and sales of taxpayer-funded public assets, and Aware or not, many elected officials at local, local needs taking a back seat to comprehensive county, state, and federal levels are serving as regional plans. foot soldiers for unsustainable global “sustain- able development.” Support those who are un- Additionally, communities will see governance compromising about protecting individual liber- troubles, such as: unbridled use of unaccount- ty, private property, and unalienable rights. able public-private partnerships; an administrative culture of deceit, graft, and conflicts of interest; 5. Arm yourself with knowledge. Understand and elected representation displaced by appointed the issues so you will not be misled and de- representation to agencies, boards, commissions, ceived. Learn the jargon of sustainable devel- councils, and committees. opment. Refer to source documents. Menacing international agendas are stripping away Should we keep our planet in decent living condition our ability to live as free people and have a life of for future generations? Yes, of course! Agenda 21 quality. What can we do to reverse course? A few ideologuess and profiteers want us to believe that is suggestions: their aim. But the fact is: many past results of sus- tainable development policies and practices reveal 1. Stop public funding of the oppressive global a growing international racket that lowers living plans — e.g., defeat tax increase proposals that standards, reduces life opportunities, decreases in- fund the implementation and maintenance of dividual wealth, and cultivates a social order where U.N. Agenda 21. Remember: Agenda 21 covers clearly “some are ‘more equal’ than others.” a gamut of economic, natural resource, institu- tional, and social aspects (fig. 1). And the finan- Those are not the conditions I want to leave for cial needs are substantial and ongoing. future generations. What about you? Figure 1: ©Debra K. Niwa, Aug. 7, 2012. Four aspects of sustainable development* All rights reserved. Updated 12/2012. ECONOMIC NATURAL RESOURCE International Agriculture Endnotes Cooperation Atmosphere Trade Biodiversity 1. The Livable Tucson Vision Program, City of Tucson website, Changing Consump- Desertification & Drought 2012. http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/livable2.html tion Patterns Energy 2. Beyond Statistics, Using Quality of Life Indicators for Strategic Financing Forests Management in Local Government, Vol. 1, Hermann Hill and Alexander Wegener 2002, p. 34-35. http://www.bertelsmann- Technology Freshwater stiftung.de/bst/en/media/xcms_bst_dms_15264_15265_2.pdf Industry Land Management 3. “Case Study — Livable Tucson Vision Program”, Project Learn- Transport Mountains ing Tree, Exploring Environmental Issues: Places We Live, Sustainable Tourism Oceans and Coastal Areas American Forest Foundation. http://www.plt.org/stuff/content- Toxic Chemicals mgr/files/1/f1e63ab150f34a365494a91fc32545ad/files/r62_ac- Waste & Hazardous Materials tivity_6_tuscon.pdf INSTITUTIONAL SOCIAL 4. A Vision for Sustainable Living, City of Tucson website. Integrated Poverty http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/ocsd/sustainability/ Decision-Making Demographics 5. Plan Tucson – Overview, City of Tucson website. Major Groups Health http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/plantucson/faq Science Education 6. Plan Tucson - Smart Growth, City of Tucson website. Information Human Settlements http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/plantucson/smartgrowth International Law 7. Video: “Planning Tucson’s Future” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YHAcLQxQ5Y *Reference: Sustainable Development in the United States of America: Economic Aspects: http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/countr/usa/eco.htm 8. Livable Tucson Vision Program, 2000, City of Tucson website. Natural Resource Aspects: http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/countr/usa/natur.htm http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/livable.pdf Institutional Aspects: http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/countr/usa/inst.htm 9. “ICLEI Acts in response to UNCED”, Judy Walker, Implementing Social Aspects: http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/countr/usa/social.htm
Recommended publications
  • Harris Sobin Collection
    ARIZONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 949 East Second Street Library & Archives Tucson, AZ 85719 (520) 617-1157 [email protected] MS 1451 Sobin, Harris J. Manuscript Collection, 1876 - 2008 DESCRIPTION The Harris J. Sobin Collection contains drawings, maps, posters, and notes created during the thirty years Sobin was associated with the University of Arizona Architecture Department and community historical preservation work in southern Arizona. There are many historic property, structure, and community studies and surveys present in the collection. Many of these surveys were orchestrated by Sobin but not all. Most significant are the materials in conjunction with activities in Tucson and Florence, Arizona, where Sobin’s work had a decisive impact. Activities in Tucson are highlighted by work in attempting to document and record the architecture, history, and cultural significance of the historic Barrio Historico and historic homes in the area. Florence Arizona has representation with many drawings, posters, and correspondence highlighting the preservation work on the Chapel of the Gila, Church of the Assumption, construction planning for the New Parish Center, and historic homes in the community. 95 Boxes, 60 linear feet ACQUISITION Donated by Isabelle (Sobin) Burkhart on August 6, 2010. ACCESS There are no restrictions on access to this collection. COPYRIGHT Requests for permission to publish material from this collection should be addressed to the Arizona Historical Society, Tucson, Archives Department. PROCESSING The collection was processed by Dave Tackenberg in May 2012. ARRANGEMENT The collection is arranged into six topical series: 1. Biographical & Historic Preservation Publication, 1973-2002; 2. Historical Preservation Activities at Florence, Arizona, 1876-2002; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Is There a Future for Education Consistent with Agenda 21? John Smyth, University of Stirling, Scotland
    Is there a Future for Education Consistent with Agenda 21? John Smyth, University of Stirling, Scotland Abstract This paper is largely based on recent experiences in developing and implementing strategies for education consistent with the concept of sustainable development at two different levels, the international level characterised by Agenda 21 along with the efforts of the UN Commission on Sustainable Development to foster its progress, and at the level of a small country— Scotland—with its own individual problems and interpreta- tions. There are, however, parallels between the difficulties and approaches, which these different levels present. Tensions have developed, and need to be resolved, particularly around the dif- ferential rates of change to which society is being subjected and the stresses, which these generate. Further sources of tension arise from the scope of the word “environment,” the interpreta- tions given to other critical words used to describe what is being attempted and their implications, the poor preparation of people even in high and critical positions, to deal with complex sys- tems, and the status accorded to education as a part of the natu- ral dynamics of the systems in which policy makers are operat- ing. There may be little prospect, as yet, of simple treatments to reduce these conditions, but it is at least important that they should now be part of the thinking of educators and their man- agers at every level, and that some basic principles be developed for future progress. Résumé Cette communication est principalement basée sur de récentes expériences dans l’élaboration et la mise en œuvre de stratégies d’éducation conformes au concept du développement durable à deux niveaux : le niveau international caractérisé par Action 21 ainsi que les efforts de la Commission des Nations Unies sur le développement durable en vue d’en favoriser les progrès; et au niveau d’un petit pays, l’Écosse, qui a ses propres problèmes et Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 4, Summer 1999 69 interprétations.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism and Sustainable Development
    Department of Economic and Social Affairs Commission on Sustainable Development Seventh Session 19-30 April 1999, New York TOURISM AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT THE GLOBAL IMPORTANCE OF TOURISM Background Paper #1 Prepared by the World Travel and Tourism Organization and International Hotel and Restaurant Association The Global Importance of Tourism prepared by the World Travel & Tourism Council and International Hotel & Restaurant Association A. Introduction Creating jobs and wealth 1. Travel & Tourism is the world’s largest industry and creator of jobs across national and regional economies. WTTC/WEFA research show that in 2000, Travel & Tourism will generate, directly and indirectly, 11.7% of GDP and nearly 200 million jobs in the world-wide economy. These figures are forecasted to total 11.7% and 255 million respectively in 2010. 2. Jobs generated by Travel & Tourism are spread across the economy - in retail, construction, manufacturing and telecommunications, as well as directly in Travel & Tourism companies. These jobs employ a large proportion of women, minorities and young people; are predominantly in small and medium sized companies; and offer good training and transferability. Tourism can also be one of the most effective drivers for the development of regional economies. These patterns apply to both developed and emerging economies. Contributing to sustainable development 3. The 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), the Rio Earth Summit, identified Travel & Tourism as one of the key sectors of the economy which could make a positive contribution to achieving sustainable development. The Earth Summit lead to the adoption of Agenda 21, a comprehensive program of action adopted by 182 governments to provide a global blueprint for achieving sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance on Integrating the Environment and Climate Change
    G U I D A N C E ON INTEGRATING THE ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE IN PROCESSES FOR UNITED NATIONS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORKS Issue-based Coalition on Environment and Climate Change June 2021 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Henrieta Martonakova, a Consultant, is the main author of this report. Jonathan Baker, Francesca Bampa and Jing Fang of UNESCO gave overall guidance, with inputs from colleagues in UNECE (Sarangoo Radnaaragchaa and Nicholas Bonvoisin), UNEP (Marika Palosaari, Marianna Bolshakova and Matthew Billot) and UN DCO. Members of the United Nations interagency Issue-Based Coalition on Environment and Climate Change provided suggestions and comments on the draft document. The development of this document was supported by funding from the United Nations Development Coordination Office. The Guidance is provided “As Is”, without warranty of any kind. Cover image and logo credit: Depositphotos.com TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS .....................................................................................................................4 RELEVANT TERMS AND DEFINITIONS ........................................................................5 1. CONTEXT, PURPOSE AND STRUCTURE OF THE MAINSTREAMING GUIDANCE ..........................................................................................................................................5 2. RATIONALE FOR MAINSTREAMING .........................................................................8 3. MAINSTREAMING CONCEPT, GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND SCOPE OF APPLICATION ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study for the SANTA CRUZ VALLEY NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA
    Feasibility Study for the SANTA CRUZ VALLEY NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA FINAL Prepared by the Center for Desert Archaeology April 2005 CREDITS Assembled and edited by: Jonathan Mabry, Center for Desert Archaeology Contributions by (in alphabetical order): Linnea Caproni, Preservation Studies Program, University of Arizona William Doelle, Center for Desert Archaeology Anne Goldberg, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona Andrew Gorski, Preservation Studies Program, University of Arizona Kendall Kroesen, Tucson Audubon Society Larry Marshall, Environmental Education Exchange Linda Mayro, Pima County Cultural Resources Office Bill Robinson, Center for Desert Archaeology Carl Russell, CBV Group J. Homer Thiel, Desert Archaeology, Inc. Photographs contributed by: Adriel Heisey Bob Sharp Gordon Simmons Tucson Citizen Newspaper Tumacácori National Historical Park Maps created by: Catherine Gilman, Desert Archaeology, Inc. Brett Hill, Center for Desert Archaeology James Holmlund, Western Mapping Company Resource information provided by: Arizona Game and Fish Department Center for Desert Archaeology Metropolitan Tucson Convention and Visitors Bureau Pima County Staff Pimería Alta Historical Society Preservation Studies Program, University of Arizona Sky Island Alliance Sonoran Desert Network The Arizona Nature Conservancy Tucson Audubon Society Water Resources Research Center, University of Arizona PREFACE The proposed Santa Cruz Valley National Heritage Area is a big land filled with small details. One’s first impression may be of size and distance—broad valleys rimmed by mountain ranges, with a huge sky arching over all. However, a closer look reveals that, beneath the broad brush strokes, this is a land of astonishing variety. For example, it is comprised of several kinds of desert, year-round flowing streams, and sky island mountain ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Village Project
    PARTNERSHIP INITIATIVES INFORMATION SHEET Name of the Initiative: Global Village Project Expected date of initiation: January 2003 Expected date of completion: Initiative runs in perpetuity Partners Involved: GOVERNMENTS: • Host Country: Dominican Republic • Additional Governments that will be specifically invited: Brazil, China, Haiti, Jamaica, Kenya, South Africa, Thailand, and Turkey • Potential Governments: Any country with extreme poverty. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS that will be invited: • United Nations at large. Specifically: UNDP, UNEP, FAO, UN-UNIVERSITY, UN- FOUNDATION, UN-Habitat, etc. • World Bank • International Monetary Fund • USAID • World Health Organization • World Resources Institute • All interested ODA organizations will be invited to participate. MAJOR GROUPS as likely partners: • Hewlett-Packard • Ford Motor Company • Habitat for Humanity • Doctors without Boarders/Medecins Frontiers • GE Wind Energy • Global Vision Trust & Corporation • All interested major groups will be invited to participate. PARTICIPATING PARTNERS: • Global Village of Humanity • Insitituto Interamericano De Cooperacion Para La Agricultura • Centro Para El Desarrollo Agropecuario Y Forestal, Inc. • Micro Trust Enterprises • Micro Artisans Fair e-Marketing • Maslandapur Sarada Sevasram Organization • Dr. Francis Serio • Dr. Joseph Mayes (Mayes International) 2 Leading Partner: Global Village of Humanity Name of the contact person/focal point: Ken Fowler, Executive Director Address: 611 Highland Drive, Columbus, Ohio, USA 43214 Phone: 614-442-1441 Fax: 614-442-1441 E-mail: [email protected] Main objectives of the Partnership/Initiative Please provide a brief description: POVERTY ERADICATION via SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: This initiative, the GLOBAL VILLAGE PROJECT, is an innovative sustainable community, which utilizes Social Architecture to simultaneously solve the two most pressing problems in the developing world . imbedded poverty and environmental degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Changes in Perspective: the Global Response to Challenges
    FEATURES Environmental changes in perspective: The global response to challenges Through Earthwatch and the Agenda 21 action plan, the IAEA is contributing to global efforts addressing environmental problems by Pier Roberto we approach the end of the second millen- a "cosmic clock". (See figure, page 4.) This Danesi and Hadj nium, a series of major problems seems to clock has a dial compressing the entire history of Slimane Cherif threaten the world's rapidly expanding popula- the planet into a 24-hour day. The birth of the tion: the consequences of global warming, the planet is set at 00:00 hours and the present is set hole in the ozone layer, pollution of the Earth's at 24:00 hours. On this scale the appearance of oceans, fresh waters, soil and atmosphere, the homo sapiens occurs only at about two seconds declining biodiversity, and the degradation of before present. The rapidity of the induced land and soil quality. Concerns appear to be changes is even more striking when one consid- justified, at least as long as the world's main ers that our ancestors were hunter-gatherers until development goals continue to be the economic 10,000 years ago when, with the domestication levels of its wealthiest nations and their high of plants and animals, agriculture was invented. consumption and waste production patterns. It is then only at about 0.2 seconds before present How can we better assess and appreciate the in the "cosmic clock", when human communi- impact that anthropogenic environmental ties started to become controllers of the global changes have made to our planet and the magni- ecosystem rather than an integral part of it.
    [Show full text]
  • Olympic Movement's Agenda 21
    OLYMPIC MOVEMENT’S AGENDA 21 Sport for sustainable development Published with the support of Shell International International Olympic Committee Sport and Environment Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD by Juan Antonio Samaranch, President of the International Olympic Committee 7 FOREWORD by Klaus Töpfer, Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) 9 FOREWORD by Pál Schmitt, Chairman of the IOC Sport and Environment Commission 13 1. THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES 17 1.1 Sustainable development 17 1.2 UNCED Agenda 21 19 2. THE OBJECTIVE OF THE OLYMPIC MOVEMENT’S AGENDA 21 21 3. THE OLYMPIC MOVEMENT’S ACTION PROGRAMME FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 23 3.1 Improved socio-economic conditions 23 3.1.1 The values of Olympism and its action on behalf of sustainable development 24 3.1.2 Stronger international cooperation for sustainable development 25 3.1.3 Combating exclusion 26 Internet: http://www.olympic.org 3.1.4 Changing consumer habits 27 E-mail: [email protected] 3.1.5 Health protection 28 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.1.6 Human habitat and institutions 30 4. THE COMMITMENT OF THE VARIOUS MEMBERS 3.1.7 Integrating the concept of sustainable OF THE OLYMPIC MOVEMENT development into sports policies 31 TO THE APPLICATION OF AGENDA 21 46 Rio Statement on Sport and Sustainable Development 47 3.2 Conservation and management of resources for sustainable development 33 3.2.1 Methodology of environmental action for the Olympic Movement 33 3.2.2 Protection of conservation areas and countryside 34 3.2.3 Sports facilities
    [Show full text]
  • Title Author Car Care: How Is Works, How To
    Title Author Car Care: How is Works, How to Look After It Automobile Association Production of wood charcoal in Great Britain Aaron, J R A Sustainable Community in the Egyptian Desert Abouleish, Ibrahim Plants, Seeds, Books & Sundries Agroforestry Research Trust Local environment journal Agyeman, Julian Ed Moving forward; program for a participatory economy Albert, Michael Encyclopedia of social inventions Albery, N. Eds. Soil Fertility & Human and Animal Health . The Albrecht Papers. Volume 8 Albrecht, William, A. Ph.D. A pattern language; towns - buildings - construction Alexander, C et al The Organic Allotment Algar, Anne Home Farm: Complete Food Self Sufficiency Allaby, Michael Growing and Preserving Fruit Allderdyce, Carthew Fresh from the Kitchen Allen, Debbi Off The Grid: Managing Independent Renewable Electricity Systems Allen, Paul Winnie-the-Pooh on management; in which a very important bear and his Allen, Roger E friends are introduced to a very important subject Agroecology: The Scientific Basis for Alternative Agriculture Altieri, Miguel Ecologies of the Heart. Emotion, Belief and the Environment Anderson, E.N Goal Directed Project Management Anderson, Erling.S, Grude, Kristoffer, V, and Haug Tor Growing and Preserving Fruit Allerdyce, Carthew Beekeeping for Beginners Richards, Andrew Creating a Wild Flower Garden Andrews, Jonathan Bike Easy: Top tips and expert advice for the new cyclist Andrews, Peter The Allotment Handbook - A guide to promoting and protecting your site. Andrews, Sophie Edible Cities: Urban Permaculture for Gardens, Yards, Balconies, Rooftops Anger, J, Fiebrig, I and Schynder, M. and Beyond Permaculture Design: A step-by-step guide Aranya The private life of plants Attenborough, David Ecosystem Geography.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of Agenda 21, the Programme for the Further
    Implementation of Agenda 21, the Programme for the Further Implementation of Agenda 21 and the outcomes of the World Summit on Sustainable Development Agenda 21 it is designed as a bridge • between environment and development • between the public and private sectors • between governments and civil society • between global and national goals • between current and future generations • between knowledge and action • between developed and developing countries. The report has been structured in the following way: Introduction – outlines review of the evolution of the concept and practice of sustainable development over the years Outcomes : Refers to the concrete sectoral targets and is further sub- divided into (i) sustainable human development (ii) conservation and management of resources for development (iii) environmentally sound management of toxic chemicals, hazardous wastes, solid wastes and sewage-related issues, and radioactive wastes Institutions and governance : Refers to the evolution of governance capacity, including those of Major groups, to contribute towards the achievement of sustainable development Actions : Lays out the menu of options available to governments and the international system to achieve the goals. Introduction The environmental phase (1948-72) : Specific environmental goals begin to be championed The environment and development phase (1972- 2009) : UN Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm in 1972 UN Conference on Environment and Development The sustainable development proper phase (2009- ): All development actions should be approached through the prism of sustainability. Green New Deal Combination of economic and climate crises have not only made it urgent to find the answers to Rio questions, they have in some sense brought the world closer to the answers.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Implementation of Agenda 21 and the Rio Principles Synthesis
    Sustainable Development in the 21st century (SD21) Review of implementation of Agenda 21 and the Rio Principles Synthesis Study prepared by the Stakeholder Forum for a Sustainable Future January 2012 Design by formatoverde.pt All photographs by © United Nations Acknowledgement This study is part of the Sustainable Development in the 21st century (SD21) project. The project is implemented by the Division for Sustainable Development of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs and funded by the European Commission - Directorate-General for Environment - Thematic Programme for Environment and sustainable management of Natural Resources, including energy (ENRTP). Support from the European Commission is gratefully acknowledged. This report was done by Felix Dodds, Kirsty Schneeberger and Farooq Ullah from Stakeholder Forum for the Future, under the supervision of David Le Blanc (UN-DESA). This report has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Synthesis | Review of Implementation of Agenda 21 and The Rio Principles III Contents Introduction ............................................................ 1 Implementation of Agenda 21 ................................ 1 Implementation of the Rio Principles ..................... 2 Methodology .......................................................... 3 Detailed assessments
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Women's Movement and Sustainable Development
    History of the Women’s Movement and Sustainable Development The women’s movements played a key role in the road to the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, and during the 1992 Earth Summit itself, when women from all over the world gathered in the Women’s Tent: or the 'Planeta Femea'.1 In November 1991 the “Global Assembly of Women and the Environment” in Miami, USA2” was co-organised by UNEP with the participation of 215 women who had undertaken projects to successfully improve the environment in local communities around the world.3 UNEP had already hosted 6 years earlier, in 1985, several meetings during the Third UN Women’s Conference, in Nairobi. During these sessions the linkages between women’s empowerment, gender equality and sustainable development were made explicit on the intergovernmental level.4 Women’s World Congress for a Healthy Planet 1991 Immediately after the Global Assembly in Miami, a “World Women’s Congress for a Healthy Planet” was organized by the Women’s Environment and Development Organisation (WEDO)5 through its International Policy Action Committee (IPAC), also in Miami. 6 More than 1,500 women from 83 countries attended. 7 Together they worked on a strategy towards the Earth Summit (UN Conference on Environment and Development) and adopted a common platform entitled ‘Women’s Action Agenda 21’ (WAA21).8 Agenda 21 recognizes women as a Major Group At the 1992 Rio Earth Summit the combined advocacy of women leaders from government and civil society gained recognition of the importance of “public participation” in the outcome document “Agenda 21”, that resulted from the Earth Summit.
    [Show full text]