The Greatest Dinosaur Ever

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Children's Book and Media Review Volume 36 Issue 7 November 2015 Article 21 2015 The Greatest Dinosaur Ever Liz Kazandzhy Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cbmr BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Kazandzhy, Liz (2015) "The Greatest Dinosaur Ever," Children's Book and Media Review: Vol. 36 : Iss. 7 , Article 21. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cbmr/vol36/iss7/21 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Children's Book and Media Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Kazandzhy: The Greatest Dinosaur Ever Book Review Title: The Greatest Dinosaur Ever Author: Brenda Z. Guiberson Illustrator: Gennady Spirin Reviewer: Liz Kazandzhy Publisher: Henry Holt and Co. (BYR) Publication Year: 2013 ISBN: 9780805096255 Number of Pages: 32 Interest Level: Preschool, Primary Rating: Excellent Review Which was the greatest dinosaur of them all? Page by page, this book takes you through all the greatest dinosaurs—the fastest, tallest, smartest, and even weirdest dinosaurs, and dinosaurs with other unique and fascinating characteristics. From the well-known Tyrannosaurus Rex and Stegosaurus to the unfamiliar Therizinosaurus and Troodon, you’ll learn about all sorts of remarkable creatures and what they were capable of when they lived on the earth. The best part of this book is the vast variety of dinosaurs featured, and the traits and abilities that are mentioned fill the reader with a sense of awe and admiration for these prehistoric animals. The book’s text is informative and fun (complete with a very helpful pronunciation guide for the dinosaur’s names), and the illustrations are definitely eye-catching, taking up the majority of the page and highlighting both the features of the dinosaur and the environment in which it lived. Lastly, this book can provide a valuable teaching moment by prompting a conversation about what makes people (or things) great. Adults and children can discuss the talents and characteristics that make every individual unique and great in their own way, and children can learn that comparing yourself to others, for better or for worse, can often be unproductive. For dinosaur-lovers or simply those who enjoy learning, this book would be very much enjoyed. Published by BYU ScholarsArchive, 2015 1.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

A New Troodontid Theropod, Talos Sampsoni Gen. Et Sp. Nov., from the Upper Cretaceous Western Interior Basin of North America
A New Troodontid Theropod, Talos sampsoni gen. et sp. nov., from the Upper Cretaceous Western Interior Basin of North America Lindsay E. Zanno1,2*, David J. Varricchio3, Patrick M. O’Connor4,5, Alan L. Titus6, Michael J. Knell3 1 Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America, 2 Biological Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Kenosha, Wisconsin, United States of America, 3 Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United States of America, 4 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, Ohio, United States of America, 5 Ohio Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Studies, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, United States of America, 6 Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Bureau of Land Management, Kanab, Utah, United States of America Abstract Background: Troodontids are a predominantly small-bodied group of feathered theropod dinosaurs notable for their close evolutionary relationship with Avialae. Despite a diverse Asian representation with remarkable growth in recent years, the North American record of the clade remains poor, with only one controversial species—Troodon formosus—presently known from substantial skeletal remains. Methodology/Principal Findings: Here we report a gracile new troodontid theropod—Talos sampsoni gen. et sp. nov.— from the Upper Cretaceous Kaiparowits Formation, Utah, USA, representing one of the most complete troodontid skeletons described from North America to date. Histological assessment of the holotype specimen indicates that the adult body size of Talos was notably smaller than that of the contemporary genus Troodon. Phylogenetic analysis recovers Talos as a member of a derived, latest Cretaceous subclade, minimally containing Troodon, Saurornithoides, and Zanabazar.
[Show full text]
Theropod Teeth from the Upper Maastrichtian Hell Creek Formation “Sue” Quarry: New Morphotypes and Faunal Comparisons
Theropod teeth from the upper Maastrichtian Hell Creek Formation “Sue” Quarry: New morphotypes and faunal comparisons TERRY A. GATES, LINDSAY E. ZANNO, and PETER J. MAKOVICKY Gates, T.A., Zanno, L.E., and Makovicky, P.J. 2015. Theropod teeth from the upper Maastrichtian Hell Creek Formation “Sue” Quarry: New morphotypes and faunal comparisons. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 60 (1): 131–139. Isolated teeth from vertebrate microfossil localities often provide unique information on the biodiversity of ancient ecosystems that might otherwise remain unrecognized. Microfossil sampling is a particularly valuable tool for doc- umenting taxa that are poorly represented in macrofossil surveys due to small body size, fragile skeletal structure, or relatively low ecosystem abundance. Because biodiversity patterns in the late Maastrichtian of North American are the primary data for a broad array of studies regarding non-avian dinosaur extinction in the terminal Cretaceous, intensive sampling on multiple scales is critical to understanding the nature of this event. We address theropod biodiversity in the Maastrichtian by examining teeth collected from the Hell Creek Formation locality that yielded FMNH PR 2081 (the Tyrannosaurus rex specimen “Sue”). Eight morphotypes (three previously undocumented) are identified in the sample, representing Tyrannosauridae, Dromaeosauridae, Troodontidae, and Avialae. Noticeably absent are teeth attributed to the morphotypes Richardoestesia and Paronychodon. Morphometric comparison to dromaeosaurid teeth from multiple Hell Creek and Lance formations microsites reveals two unique dromaeosaurid morphotypes bearing finer distal denticles than present on teeth of similar size, and also differences in crown shape in at least one of these. These findings suggest more dromaeosaurid taxa, and a higher Maastrichtian biodiversity, than previously appreciated.
[Show full text]
Lyons SCIENCE 2021 the Influence of Juvenile Dinosaurs SUPPL.Pdf
science.sciencemag.org/content/371/6532/941/suppl/DC1 Supplementary Materials for The influence of juvenile dinosaurs on community structure and diversity Katlin Schroeder*, S. Kathleen Lyons, Felisa A. Smith *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Published 26 February 2021, Science 371, 941 (2021) DOI: 10.1126/science.abd9220 This PDF file includes: Materials and Methods Supplementary Text Figs. S1 and S2 Tables S1 to S7 References Other Supplementary Material for this manuscript includes the following: (available at science.sciencemag.org/content/371/6532/941/suppl/DC1) MDAR Reproducibility Checklist (PDF) Materials and Methods Data Dinosaur assemblages were identified by downloading all vertebrate occurrences known to species or genus level between 200Ma and 65MA from the Paleobiology Database (PaleoDB 30 https://paleobiodb.org/#/ download 6 August, 2018). Using associated depositional environment and taxonomic information, the vertebrate database was limited to only terrestrial organisms, excluding amphibians, pseudosuchians, champsosaurs and ichnotaxa. Taxa present in formations were confirmed against the most recent available literature, as of November, 2020. Synonymous taxa or otherwise duplicated taxa were removed. Taxa that could not be identified to genus level 35 were included as “Taxon X”. GPS locality data for all formations between 200MA and 65MA was downloaded from PaleoDB to create a minimally convex polygon for each possible formation. Any attempt to recreate local assemblages must include all potentially interacting species, while excluding those that would have been separated by either space or time. We argue it is 40 acceptable to substitute formation for home range in the case of non-avian dinosaurs, as range increases with body size.
[Show full text]
Hierarchical Clustering Analysis Suppcdr.Cdr
Distance Hierarchical joiningclustering 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 Sinosauropteryx Caudipteryx Eoraptor Compsognathus Compsognathus Compsognathus Compsognathus Megaraptora basal Coelurosauria Noasauridae Neotheropoda non-averostran T non-tyrannosaurid Dromaeosauridae basalmost Theropoda Oviraptorosauria Compsognathidae Therizinosauria T A yrannosauroidea Compsognathus roodontidae ves Compsognathus Compsognathus Compsognathus Compsognathus Compsognathus Compsognathus Compsognathus Compsognathus Compsognathus Compsognathus Compsognathus Compsognathus Compsognathus Richardoestesia Scipionyx Buitreraptor Compsognathus Troodon Compsognathus Compsognathus Compsognathus Juravenator Sinosauropteryx Juravenator Juravenator Sinosauropteryx Incisivosaurus Coelophysis Scipionyx Richardoestesia Compsognathus Compsognathus Compsognathus Richardoestesia Richardoestesia Richardoestesia Richardoestesia Compsognathus Richardoestesia Juravenator Richardoestesia Richardoestesia Richardoestesia Richardoestesia Buitreraptor Saurornitholestes Ichthyornis Saurornitholestes Ichthyornis Richardoestesia Richardoestesia Richardoestesia Richardoestesia Richardoestesia Juravenator Scipionyx Buitreraptor Coelophysis Richardoestesia Coelophysis Richardoestesia Richardoestesia Richardoestesia Richardoestesia Coelophysis Richardoestesia Bambiraptor Richardoestesia Richardoestesia Velociraptor Juravenator Saurornitholestes Saurornitholestes Buitreraptor Coelophysis Coelophysis Ornitholestes Richardoestesia Richardoestesia Juravenator Saurornitholestes Velociraptor Saurornitholestes
[Show full text]
A Fast-Growing Basal Troodontid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from The
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A fast‑growing basal troodontid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the latest Cretaceous of Europe Albert G. Sellés1,2*, Bernat Vila1,2, Stephen L. Brusatte3, Philip J. Currie4 & Àngel Galobart1,2 A characteristic fauna of dinosaurs and other vertebrates inhabited the end‑Cretaceous European archipelago, some of which were dwarves or had other unusual features likely related to their insular habitats. Little is known, however, about the contemporary theropod dinosaurs, as they are represented mostly by teeth or other fragmentary fossils. A new isolated theropod metatarsal II, from the latest Maastrichtian of Spain (within 200,000 years of the mass extinction) may represent a jinfengopterygine troodontid, the frst reported from Europe. Comparisons with other theropods and phylogenetic analyses reveal an autapomorphic foramen that distinguishes it from all other troodontids, supporting its identifcation as a new genus and species, Tamarro insperatus. Bone histology shows that it was an actively growing subadult when it died but may have had a growth pattern in which it grew rapidly in early ontogeny and attained a subadult size quickly. We hypothesize that it could have migrated from Asia to reach the Ibero‑Armorican island no later than Cenomanian or during the Maastrichtian dispersal events. During the latest Cretaceous (ca. 77–66 million years ago) in the run-up to the end-Cretaceous mass extinc- tion, Europe was a series of islands populated by diverse and distinctive communities of dinosaurs and other vertebrates. Many of these animals exhibited peculiar features that may have been generated by lack of space and resources in their insular habitats.
[Show full text]
Paleontological Contributions
Paleontological Contributions Number 14 The first giant raptor (Theropoda: Dromaeosauridae) from the Hell Creek Formation Robert A. DePalma, David A. Burnham, Larry D. Martin, Peter L. Larson, and Robert T. Bakker October 30, 2015 Lawrence, Kansas, USA ISSN 1946-0279 (online) paleo.ku.edu/contributions Life restoration by Emily Willoughby of Dakotaraptor steini running with the sparrow-sized birds, Cimolopteryx petra while the mammal, Purgatorius, can be seen in the foreground. Paleontological Contributions October 30, 2015 Number 14 THE FIRST GIANT RAPTOR (THEROPODA: DROMAEOSAURIDAE) FROM THE HELL CREEK FORMATION Robert A. DePalma1,2, David A. Burnham2,*, Larry D. Martin2,†, Peter L. Larson3 and Robert T. Bakker4 1 Department of Vertebrate Paleontology, The Palm Beach Museum of Natural History, Fort Lauderdale, Florida; 2 University of Kansas Bio- diversity Institute, Lawrence, Kansas; 3Black Hills Institute of Geological Research, Hill City, South Dakota; 4Houston Museum of Nature and Science, Houston, Texas; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Most dromaeosaurids were small- to medium-sized cursorial, scansorial, and arboreal, sometimes volant predators, but a comparatively small percentage grew to gigantic proportions. Only two such giant “raptors” have been described from North America. Here, we describe a new giant dromaeosaurid, Dakotaraptor steini gen. et sp. nov., from the Hell Creek Formation of South Dakota. The discovery represents the first giant dromaeosaur from the Hell Creek Formation, and the most recent in the fossil record worldwide. A row of prominent ulnar papilli or “quill knobs” on the ulna is our first clear evidence for feather quills on a large dromaeosaurid forearm and impacts evolutionary reconstructions and functional morphology of such derived, typically flight-related features.
[Show full text]
American Museum Novitates
AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Number 3899, 44 pp. April 26, 2018 A Second Specimen of Citipati osmolskae Associated with a Nest of Eggs from Ukhaa Tolgod, Omnogov Aimag, Mongolia MARK A. NORELL,1, 2 AMY M. BALANOFF,1, 3 DANIEL E. BARTA,1, 2 AND GREGORY M. ERICKSON1, 4 ABSTRACT Adult dinosaurs preserved attending their nests in brooding positions are among the rarest vertebrate fossils. By far the most common occurrences are members of the dinosaur group Oviraptorosauria. The first finds of these were specimens recovered from the Djadokhta Forma- tion at the Mongolian locality of Ukhaa Tolgod and the Chinese locality of Bayan Mandahu. Since the initial discovery of these specimens, a few more occurrences of nesting oviraptors have been found at other Asian localities. Here we report on a second nesting oviraptorid specimen (IGM 100/1004) sitting in a brooding position atop a nest of eggs from Ukhaa Tolgod, Omnogov, Mongolia. This is a large specimen of the ubiquitous Ukhaa Tolgod taxon Citipati osmolskae. It is approximately 11% larger based on humeral length than the original Ukhaa Tolgod nesting Citipati osmolskae specimen (IGM 100/979), yet eggshell structure and egg arrangement are identical. No evidence for colonial breeding of these animals has been recovered. Reexamination of another “nesting” oviraptorosaur, the holotype of Oviraptor philoceratops (AMNH FARB 6517) indicates that in addition to the numerous partial eggs associated with the original skeleton that originally led to its referral as a protoceratopsian predator, there are the remains of a tiny theropod. This hind limb can be provisionally assigned to Oviraptoridae. It is thus at least possible that some of the eggs associated with the holotype had hatched and the perinates had not left the nest.
[Show full text]
Borogovia Gracilicrus Gen. Et Sp. N., a New Troodontid Dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia
Actn Falaeontologica Polonica -. -. - -- . - Vol. 32 No. 1-2 pp. 133-150, pis. 53, 54 Warszawa, 1987 HALSZKA OSMOLSKA BOROGOVIA GRACILICRUS GEN. ET SP. N., A NEW TROODONTID DINOSAUR FROM THE LATE CRETACEOUS OF MONGOLIA OSMOLSKA, H.: Borogovia gracilicrus gen. et sp. n., a new troodontid dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia. Acta Palaeont. Polonica, 32, 1-2, 133--150, 1987. A new theropod dinosaur Borogovia gracilicrus gen. et sp. n. assigned to Troodon- tidae is described, based on fragmentary hind limbs of one individual from the Upper Cretaceous Nemegt Formation of Gobi Desert, Mongolia. A unique feature of B. gracilicrus is a straight ungual in the second, specialized toe of the pcs. The known skeletal elements of all troodontid species are listed (Table 1). Taxonomic status of Saurornithoides junior is considered. K e y w or d s: Dinosauria, Theropda, Troodontidae, osteology, taxonomy, Cre- taceous, Mongolia. Halszka Osmdlska, Zaktad Paleobiologii, Polska Akademia Nauk, Al. Zwirki i Wtgury 92, 02-089 Warszawa, Poland. Received: October 1986. INTRODUCTION The Cretaceous theropod dinosaur family Troodontidae Gilmore, 1924 is known from very rare and mostly fragmentary remains (Table 1) found in the Upper Cretaceous deposits (?Upper Santonian - ?Lower Maastrich- tian) of Asia and North America. The only Early Cretaceous (?Albian) troodontid specimen known (see: Barsbold et al. 1987) comes from Mon- golian People's Republic, but the preserved fragments do not provide enough diagnostic features for a specific and generic assignement of this specimen. Nevertheless, its troodontid characters are evident. Since 1974, the family name Saurornithoididae Barsbold has been widely accepted. However, recently Currie, (1987) has demonstrated that Stenonychosaurus inequalis Sternberg, 1932 is a junior synonym of Troodon formosus Leidy, 1856 and Troodontidae Gilmore, 1924 is the valid family name, which has priority over the Saurornithoididae Barsbold, 1974.
[Show full text]
Caenagnathids of the Dinosaur Park Formation (Campanian) of Alberta, Canada: Anatomy, Osteo- Histology, Taxonomy, and Evolution Gregory F
Vertebrate Anatomy Morphology Palaeontology 8:105–153 105 ISSN 2292-1389 Caenagnathids of the Dinosaur Park Formation (Campanian) of Alberta, Canada: anatomy, osteo- histology, taxonomy, and evolution Gregory F. Funston School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; [email protected] Abstract: Our understanding of caenagnathid anatomy, diversity, and ecology has improved considerably in the past twenty years, but numerous issues still remain. Among these, the diversity and taxonomy of caenag- nathids from the Dinosaur Park Formation of Alberta, Canada, have remained problematic. Whereas some authors recognize three genera, others suggest only two are present, and there is considerable disagreement about which specimens are referable to which genus. This study aims to resolve this issue by reviewing the known specimens and using osteohistology to establish a testable taxonomic framework of Dinosaur Park Formation caenagnathids. Numerous new specimens from all regions of the skeleton provide insight into morphological variation in caenagnathids, and three morphotypes are recognized based on a combination of morphological features and body size. Osteohistology shows that representatives in each body size class are at skeletal maturity, and therefore supports the delineation of three taxa: the smaller Citipes elegans gen. nov., the intermediate Chirostenotes pergracilis, and the larger Caenagnathus collinsi, new material of which shows it rivalled Anzu wyliei in size. However, these analyses also raise concerns about the referral of isolat- ed material to each taxon in the absence of skeletal overlap between specimens or osteohistological analysis. Caenagnathids are consistently recovered throughout the Dinosaur Park Formation interval, and two geo- graphic clusters of increased abundance probably reflect collection and taphonomic biases.
[Show full text]
The Origin and Diversification of Birds
Current Biology Review The Origin and Diversification of Birds Stephen L. Brusatte1,*, Jingmai K. O’Connor2,*, and Erich D. Jarvis3,4,* 1School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Grant Institute, King’s Buildings, James Hutton Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, UK 2Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 3Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA 4Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] (S.L.B.), [email protected] (J.K.O.), [email protected] (E.D.J.) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.003 Birds are one of the most recognizable and diverse groups of modern vertebrates. Over the past two de- cades, a wealth of new fossil discoveries and phylogenetic and macroevolutionary studies has transformed our understanding of how birds originated and became so successful. Birds evolved from theropod dino- saurs during the Jurassic (around 165–150 million years ago) and their classic small, lightweight, feathered, and winged body plan was pieced together gradually over tens of millions of years of evolution rather than in one burst of innovation. Early birds diversified throughout the Jurassic and Cretaceous, becoming capable fliers with supercharged growth rates, but were decimated at the end-Cretaceous extinction alongside their close dinosaurian relatives. After the mass extinction, modern birds (members of the avian crown group) explosively diversified, culminating in more than 10,000 species distributed worldwide today. Introduction dinosaurs Dromaeosaurus albertensis or Troodon formosus.This Birds are one of the most conspicuous groups of animals in the clade includes all living birds and extinct taxa, such as Archaeop- modern world.
[Show full text]
Reproduction in Mesozoic Birds and Evolution of the Modern Avian Reproductive Mode Author(S): David J
Reproduction in Mesozoic birds and evolution of the modern avian reproductive mode Author(s): David J. Varricchio and Frankie D. Jackson Source: The Auk, 133(4):654-684. Published By: American Ornithological Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1642/AUK-15-216.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1642/AUK-15-216.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Volume 133, 2016, pp. 654–684 DOI: 10.1642/AUK-15-216.1 REVIEW Reproduction in Mesozoic birds and evolution of the modern avian reproductive mode David J. Varricchio and Frankie D. Jackson Earth Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA [email protected], [email protected] Submitted November 16, 2015; Accepted June 2, 2016; Published August 10, 2016 ABSTRACT The reproductive biology of living birds differs dramatically from that of other extant vertebrates.
[Show full text]
Dinosaurian Growth Rates and Bird Origins
progress Dinosauriangrowthratesandbirdorigins Kevin Padian*, Armand J. de RicqleÁs² & John R. Horner³ * Department of Integrative Biology and Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3140, USA ² EÂquipe Formations Squelettiques, UMR 8570 CNRS, UniversiteÂ Paris VII, 75251 Paris cedex 05, France, and ColleÁge de France, Paris, France ³ Museum of the Rockies, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717-0040, USA ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Dinosaurs, like other tetrapods, grew more quickly just after hatching than later in life. However, they did not grow like most other non-avian reptiles, which grow slowly and gradually through life. Rather, microscopic analyses of the long-bone tissues show that dinosaurs grew to their adult size relatively quickly, much as large birds and mammals do today. The ®rst birds reduced their adult body size by shortening the phase of rapid growth common to their larger theropod dinosaur relatives. These changes in timing were primarily related not to physiological differences but to differences in growth strategy. or most of the 160 years since dinosaurs were named, closely related to those with copious growth lines may show none they have been considered typical, if overgrown, reptiles, at all26. Obviously the whole issue of bone `growth lines' is linked and it was assumed that they grew at rates broadly similar more to organ-speci®c developmental dynamics, species-speci®c life- to those of extant reptiles1. Indeed, there was no par- history strategies, and population-level interactions with their F 11 ticular reason to think otherwise, even though their environments, than to overall patterns of thermometabolic Gestalt . upright stance and parasagittal gait led Richard Owen, in naming them, to put them in a completely new group of Reptilia.
[Show full text]