DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparison of Arcgis and QGIS for Applications in Sustainable Spatial Planning“

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparison of Arcgis and QGIS for Applications in Sustainable Spatial Planning“ MASTERARBEIT Titel der Masterarbeit „Comparison of ArcGIS and QGIS for Applications in Sustainable Spatial Planning“ Verfasserin Corinna Friedrich MA angestrebter akademischer Grad Master of Science (MSc) Wien, 2014 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 066 856 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Kartographie und Geoinformation Betreuer: Ass.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Andreas Riedl Universität Wien Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................... II List of Figures ......................................................................................................................... IV List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... VI List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... VII Abstract ................................................................................................................................... VIII Kurzfassung .......................................................................................................................... VIII Preface ........................................................................................................................................ IX 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Aim of the Thesis and Research Question .......................................................................1 1.2 Structure and Research Design ........................................................................................2 2 Use of GIS Applications in Sustainable Spatial Planning ........................... 3 2.1 Sustainable Development .................................................................................................3 2.2 Tasks of Sustainable Spatial Planning ............................................................................4 2.3 GIS and Sustainable Spatial Planning .......................................................................... 11 3 Proprietary and Open Source Software ............................................................. 13 3.1 The History of Software Development .......................................................................... 13 3.2 Open Source and Open Source Data Formats .............................................................. 15 3.3 Advantages and Challenges of OSS and PCSS ............................................................. 15 4 Software Quality and Evaluation Methods ...................................................... 18 4.1 Software Quality Attributes ........................................................................................... 18 4.2 Defects and Software Testing ........................................................................................ 20 4.3 Design Principles for Cartographic Applications ......................................................... 21 4.4 Goal-Question-Metric Method [GQM] ......................................................................... 22 4.5 Analytical Hierarchy Process [AHP] ............................................................................. 23 4.6 CartoEvaluation Method ............................................................................................... 25 5 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 27 5.1 Discourse Analysis .......................................................................................................... 28 5.2 Expert Interview ............................................................................................................ 31 5.3 CartoEvaluation Method ............................................................................................... 31 5.4 Test Analyses .................................................................................................................. 32 5.5 Goal-Question-Metric Method Application ................................................................. 35 5.6 Analytical Hierarchy Process [AHP] Application ........................................................ 36 6 Parameters of ArcGIS and QGIS .......................................................................... 40 6.1 Development and Distribution ..................................................................................... 40 #II ArcGIS and QGIS in Sustainable Spatial Planning Universität Wien #Table of Contents 6.2 Costs and Licenses ......................................................................................................... 44 6.3 Training and Support .................................................................................................... 45 7 Software Structure and Functionality ................................................................ 48 7.1 Installation and Graphic User Interface ....................................................................... 48 7.2 Data Formats and Data Management ........................................................................... 51 7.3 Raster and Vector Analysis Tools .................................................................................. 54 7.4 Scripting and Automation ............................................................................................ 57 7.5 Visualization and Mapping ........................................................................................... 59 8 Test Analyses .................................................................................................................. 65 8.1 Catchment Area Analysis for Green Space ................................................................... 65 8.2 Density Analysis with Time Enabled Maps .................................................................. 70 8.3 Network Analysis for Sustainable Transport ............................................................... 75 8.4 Visibility Analysis for Wind Mills ................................................................................. 84 8.5 Site Location Analysis for Solar Panels ........................................................................ 93 8.6 Findings for Georeferencing and Editing ................................................................... 101 9 Discussion of the Findings .................................................................................... 104 9.1 Parameters and Personal Preference .......................................................................... 104 9.2 Functionality ................................................................................................................ 107 9.3 Reliability ...................................................................................................................... 110 9.4 Usability ........................................................................................................................ 113 9.5 Efficiency ...................................................................................................................... 116 9.6 Maintainability and Portability ................................................................................... 118 10 Summary ....................................................................................................................... 120 11 Literature ....................................................................................................................... 122 Printed Resources .............................................................................................................. 122 Online Resources ................................................................................................................ 126 Data Sources ....................................................................................................................... 132 Annex ....................................................................................................................................... XIV Interview Guideline ............................................................................................................ XIV Discourse Analysis Comments ........................................................................................... XV AHP Matrices ...................................................................................................................... XVI Supported Data Formats ....................................................................................................XXI Carto Evaluation Method ...................................................................................................XXII Testing Schema ................................................................................................................... XLI Models .............................................................................................................................. XLVIII Lebenslauf ............................................................................................................................... L ArcGIS and QGIS in Sustainable Spatial Planning #III Universität Wien List of Figures List of Figures Figure 1 Planners Triangle, Source: ABUKHATER 2011 ............................................................. 5 Figure 2 Solar Radiation during the year, Source: DR. NIEBUHR
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Open Source Projects As Incubators of Innovation
    RESEARCH CONTRIBUTIONS TO ORGANIZATIONAL SOCIOLOGY AND INNOVATION STUDIES / STUTTGARTER BEITRÄGE ZUR ORGANISATIONS- UND INNOVATIONSSOZIOLOGIE SOI Discussion Paper 2017-03 Open Source Projects as Incubators of Innovation From Niche Phenomenon to Integral Part of the Software Industry Jan-Felix Schrape Institute for Social Sciences Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies Jan-Felix Schrape Open Source Projects as Incubators of Innovation. From Niche Phenomenon to Integral Part of the Software Industry. SOI Discussion Paper 2017-03 University of Stuttgart Institute for Social Sciences Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies Seidenstr. 36 D-70174 Stuttgart Editor Prof. Dr. Ulrich Dolata Tel.: +49 711 / 685-81001 [email protected] Managing Editor Dr. Jan-Felix Schrape Tel.: +49 711 / 685-81004 [email protected] Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies Discussion Paper 2017-03 (May 2017) ISSN 2191-4990 © 2017 by the author(s) Jan-Felix Schrape is senior researcher at the Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies, University of Stuttgart (Germany). [email protected] Additional downloads from the Department of Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies at the Institute for Social Sciences (University of Stuttgart) are filed under: http://www.uni-stuttgart.de/soz/oi/publikationen/ Abstract Over the last 20 years, open source development has become an integral part of the software industry and a key component of the innovation strategies of all major IT providers. Against this backdrop, this paper seeks to develop a systematic overview of open source communities and their socio-economic contexts. I begin with a recon- struction of the genesis of open source software projects and their changing relation- ships to established IT companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Exam Review History of Science 150
    Final Exam Review History of Science 150 1. Format of the Exam 90 minutes, on canvas 12:25pm December 18. You are welcome to bring notes to the exam, so you could start by filling out this sheet with notes from lectures and the readings! Like the mid-term, the final exam will have two kinds of questions. 1) Multiple choice questions examining your knowledge of key concepts, terms, historical developments, and contexts 2) Short answer questions in which ask you to draw on things you’ve learned in the course (from lecture, readings, videos) to craft a short argument in a brief essay expressing your informed issue on a historical question 2. Sample Questions Multiple Choice: Mina Rees was involved in (and wrote about) which of the following computing projects? A) Silicon Valley start-ups in the dot-com period B) Charles Babbage’s Difference Engine C) Works Projects Administration Tables Project D) Federal funding for computing research after WWII Short Answer: (Your answers should be between 100-200 words, and keep to specifics (events, machines, developments, people) that demonstrate your knowledge of materials covered from the course) A) What are two historical factors important to the development of Silicon Valley’s technology industry after World War II? B) In what ways did the field of programming change (in terms of its status and workers) between World War II and the late 1960s? 3. Topics to Review: Below, is a list of ideas to review for the final exam, which covers material through the entire course. You should review in particular, lecture notes, O’Mara’s The Code and other course readings provided on Canvas.
    [Show full text]
  • FOSS Philosophy 6 the FOSS Development Method 7
    1 Published by the United Nations Development Programme’s Asia-Pacific Development Information Programme (UNDP-APDIP) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia www.apdip.net Email: [email protected] © UNDP-APDIP 2004 The material in this book may be reproduced, republished and incorporated into further works provided acknowledgement is given to UNDP-APDIP. For full details on the license governing this publication, please see the relevant Annex. ISBN: 983-3094-00-7 Design, layout and cover illustrations by: Rezonanze www.rezonanze.com PREFACE 6 INTRODUCTION 6 What is Free/Open Source Software? 6 The FOSS philosophy 6 The FOSS development method 7 What is the history of FOSS? 8 A Brief History of Free/Open Source Software Movement 8 WHY FOSS? 10 Is FOSS free? 10 How large are the savings from FOSS? 10 Direct Cost Savings - An Example 11 What are the benefits of using FOSS? 12 Security 13 Reliability/Stability 14 Open standards and vendor independence 14 Reduced reliance on imports 15 Developing local software capacity 15 Piracy, IPR, and the WTO 16 Localization 16 What are the shortcomings of FOSS? 17 Lack of business applications 17 Interoperability with proprietary systems 17 Documentation and “polish” 18 FOSS SUCCESS STORIES 19 What are governments doing with FOSS? 19 Europe 19 Americas 20 Brazil 21 Asia Pacific 22 Other Regions 24 What are some successful FOSS projects? 25 BIND (DNS Server) 25 Apache (Web Server) 25 Sendmail (Email Server) 25 OpenSSH (Secure Network Administration Tool) 26 Open Office (Office Productivity Suite) 26 LINUX 27 What is Linux?
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Property
    Intellectual Property Adam Goode Computer Ethics December 6, 2000 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Traditional Ideas About Property 1 3 Ideas as Property 2 4 Traditional Property Notions Applied To Intellectual Items 3 5 Software Should Be Free 5 6 Conclusion 5 1 Introduction Intellectual property is a controversial topic. The term itself is often ill-defined and confusing. According to one definition, intellectual property is “The own- ership of ideas and control over the tangible or virtual representation of those ideas (Howe, 2000).” But can ideas really have owners and control? Some (no- tably those like Richard Stallman) would advocate “no.” And of course, most software business leaders would give a powerful “yes.” The author of this paper is under the persuasion that intellectual property does not make sense (at least in software) and that control over one’s ideas is something that one gives up the moment he releases them to the world. This notion will be examined, as well as the notions of traditional property, ideas as property, where intellectual property seems to fit in with software, and why it really cannot. 2 Traditional Ideas About Property The word “property” brings out certain specific mental images. Ideas that spring to mind with the mention of property include things like “house” (dwelling as 1 property), “car” (machine as property), “yard” (land as property), or even “pet” (animal as property). Not many people initially think of “idea” or “notion” as a thing which might have property. Property has generally been restricted to things in the physical realm. Cer- tainly a person’s house or car can be considered property.
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporating the Commons: a Political Economic Analysis
    INCORPORATING THE COMMONS: A POLITICAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CORPORATE INVOLVEMENT IN FREE AND OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE by BENJAMIN J. BIRKINBINE A DISSERTATION Presented to the School of Journalism and Communication and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2014 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Benjamin J. Birkinbine Title: Incorporating the Commons: A Political Economic Analysis of Corporate Involvement in Free and Open Source Software This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the School of Journalism and Communication by: Dr. Janet Wasko Chairperson Dr. Biswarup Sen Core Member Dr. Gabriela Martinez Core Member Eric Priest, J.D. Institutional Representative and J. Andrew Berglund Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded September 2014 ii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Benjamin J. Birkinbine Doctor of Philosophy School of Journalism and Communication September 2014 Title: Incorporating the Commons: A Political Economic Analysis of Corporate Involvement in Free and Open Source Software Free (libre) and open source software (FLOSS) emerged in the 1980s as a radical alternative to proprietary software. Fighting back against what FLOSS enthusiasts viewed as overly restrictive intellectual property protections placed on proprietary software, FLOSS was designed with the intent of granting users the right to study, modify, adapt, or otherwise tinker with the source code of software. As such, FLOSS users were able to collaborate in producing software that could be distributed freely and widely to others, who could, in turn, make changes to the software.
    [Show full text]
  • Evangelisch-Lutherische Kirchengemeinde Puschendorf
    August / September2019 GEMEINDE BRIEF Evangelisch-Lutherische Kirchengemeinde St.Wolfgang Puschendorf Die Kirchengemeinde Gott hab Dank wünscht allen für diesen großen Sonntag eine gesegnete und erholsame des Jahres! Ferien- und Urlaubszeit! 2 Garten der Hoffnung Puschendorf Am 23.Juni wurde der „Garten der Hoffnung“ Station 2: Aufbruch (gehen – suchen – los- auf dem Gelände der Diakoniegemeinschaft lassen) eröffnet und eingeweiht. Vier Stationen geben Den Aufbruch wagen heißt, sich von Enge, die Möglichkeit, still zu werden, nachzuden- Sorgen und Nöten zu lösen. Das Statische ken, zu sehen und zu hören, zu beten. (Zugang gerät in Bewegung. Das ist immer mit einem über Engeleinsgraben) Kraftaufwand verbunden. Station 1: Sehnsucht (hoffen – Frieden – Station 3: Loslassen (Mut – erkennen – gehal- Wahrheit) ten werden) Aus dem Käfig der Sehnsüchte kann man nach Die untere Hand hat bereits losgelassen, um außen in die Weite schauen. Bunte Glasschei- die haltende, schützende, helfende, rettende ben stehen für Seifenblasen unserer ersehnten Hand Gottes anzunehmen. Um gehalten zu Träume. werden, muß man loslassen können. Station 4: Ankommen (Umkehr – Frieden – Station 1 Kraft) Was zunächst zusammenhangslos erscheint, fügt sich zusammen, wenn man den richtigen Blickwinkel einnimmt. Erst dann erkennt man das Ganze und kann Frieden finden. Gemeinschaftsplatz: In der gepflasterten Fläche sieht man die Sym- bole Kreuz, Bibel, Christusmonogramm und Leuchter. Sie erinnern an wichtige Grundsätze des Glaubens. Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 AugustAndacht / September 2019 3 Der typische Christ im Alltag bekennen. Aber zuallererst hört ein Christ auf Gott und sein Wort und stellt In einer Schulklasse sollten die Kinder einen es in die Mitte seines Lebens. „typischen Christen“ zeichnen. Mit Eifer Der Prophet Jesaja drückte es einst so aus: machten sie sich ans Werk und es entstan- „Gott, der Herr, hat mir das Ohr geöffnet.
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporating the Digital Commons:Corporate Involvement in Free and Open Source Software
    INCORPORATING THE DIGITAL COMMONS DIGITAL THE INCORPORATING INCORPORATING THE CDSMS DIGITAL COMMONS he concept of ‘the commons’ has been used as a framework to understand resources shared by a community rather than a private BENJAMIN J. BIRKINBINE T entity, and it has also inspired social movements working against the enclosure of public goods and resources. One such resource is free (libre) and open source software (FLOSS). FLOSS emerged as an alternative to proprietary software in the 1980s. However, both the products and production processes of FLOSS have become incorporated into capitalist INCORPORATING THE production. For example, Red Hat, Inc. is a large publicly traded company whose business model relies entirely on free software, and IBM, Intel, Cisco, Samsung, Google are some of the largest contributors to Linux, the DIGITAL COMMONS open-source operating system. This book explores the ways in which FLOSS has been incorporated into digital capitalism. Just as the commons have been used as a motivational frame for radical social movements, it has also Corporate Involvement in Free served the interests of free-marketeers, corporate libertarians, and states to expand their reach by dragging the shared resources of social life onto and Open Source Software digital platforms so they can be integrated into the global capitalist system. The book concludes by asserting the need for a critical political economic understanding of the commons that foregrounds (digital) labour, class struggle, and uneven power distribution within the digital commons as well as between FLOSS communities and their corporate sponsors. BENJAMIN J. BIRKINBINE J. BENJAMIN COMMUNICATION STUDIES | POLITICAL ECONOMY | MEDIA INDUSTRIES CDSMS CRITICAL DIGITAL AND SOCIAL MEDIA STUDIES THE AUTHOR Benjamin J.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced BASIC VCFE9.Pdf
    Advanced BASIC Vintage Computer Festival 9.1 Bill Degnan Course Outline • BASIC Overview • Matricies • BASIC Timing Comparisons 1977 • Micro-Soft vs. Tiny BASIC • Micro-Soft BASIC Breakdown using PEEK BASIC Overview • BASIC has three classes of capabilities: commands, statements, and functions. • Commands “part of the operating system or environment” and manipulate global items, such as programs • Statements are made up of keywords, variables, constants, operators, and functions • Functions - A user-defined and library functions. BASIC Overview • Constants. BASIC programs are made up of statements that contain keywords, variables, operators, and constants • Numeric constants (Floating point and Integer) - Each BASIC version handles numeric constants differently. • Character String constants - signaled by a quote (") • Variables - "names" that may take on different values during a problem. - vintage versions of BASIC required variables to start with a letter. Matricies (1966 Dartmouth BASIC) • A matrix is simply a rectangular array of numbers • An array is a set of numbers arranged in rows and columns • A matrix may also consist of a single row or a single column, also called “row vectors” (lists) and “column vectors”. 10 REM MATRICIES USING DARTMOUTH BASIC 20 DIM S(2,2) 30 MAT READ S ... 240 DATA 30, 50 245 DATA 40, 25 250 FOR K=1 TO 2 260 PRINT S(K,1) 270 NEXT K RUN [What would be the output??] Matricies (Digital PDP 11 BASIC) 10 DIM A(2,3) 20 FOR I=0 TO 2 30 FOR J=0 TO 3: LET A(I,J) = 0 40 NEXT J 50 NEXT I 60 FOR I = 0 TO 2: LET A(I,0) = I 70 FOR J = 0 TO 3: LET A(0,J) = J 80 PRINT A(I,J); 90 NEXT J 100 PRINT 110 NEXT I 120 END RUN 0 1 2 3 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 STOP AT LINE 120 READY What’s different? The Knight’s Tour • Chess is played on a square board having 64 smaller squares, eight on a side.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Computing
    Personal Computing Thomas J. Bergin ©Computer History Museum American University Recap: Context • By 1977, there was a fairly robust but fragmented hobbyist-oriented microcomputer industry: – Micro Instrumentation Telemetry Systems (MITS) – Processor Technology – Cromemco – MicroStuf – Kentucky Fried Computers • Two things were needed for the personal computer revolution: 1) a way to store and retrieve data, and 2) a programming language in which to write applications. Homebrew Computer Club • March 5, 1975: the Amateur Computer Users Group (Lee Felsenstein, Bob Marsh, Steve Dompier, BobAlbrecht and 27 others) met in Gordon French’s garage, Menlo Park, CA • 3rd meeting drew several hundred people and was moved to the Coleman mansion • Stanford Linear Accelerator Center’s auditorium – Steve Wozniak shows off his single board computer – Steve Jobs attends meetings Homebrew-ed • 21 companies formed: – Apcose Apple – Cromemco Morrow – North Star Osborne • West Coast Computer Faire • Byte magazine, September 1975 • Byte Shop Both: images.google.com And then there was Traf-O-Data • October 28, 1955: William H. Gates III born – father: attorney mother: schoolteacher • Lakeside School: Lakeside Programming Group – Mothers Club: access to time-shared system at GE – Students hired by local firm to debug software – First computer program: Tic-Tac-Toe (age 13) – Traf-O-Data to sell traffic mgt. software (age 16) • 1973, Bill Gates enrolls at Harvard in pre-law. • Paul Allen is in his second year. January 1975, Popular Electronics: Altair • Allen shows
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Domain Enclosing the Commons of the Mind by James
    The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind Boyle, James Published: 2008 Categorie(s): Non-Fiction Source: http://yupnet.org/boyle/ 1 About Boyle: James Boyle is the William Neal Reynolds Professor of Law and co- founder of the Center for the Study of the Public Domain at Duke University School of Law in Durham, North Carolina. He was one of the founding board members of Creative Commons, and currently chairs the board. Boyle joined Duke University School of Law in July 2000. He has previously taught at the American University, Yale, Harvard, and the University of Pennsylvania Law School. He is the author of Shamans, Software and Spleens: Law and Construction of the Information Society as well as a novel published under a Creative Commons license, The Shakespeare Chronicles. In 2003, he won the World Technology Award for Law for his work on the intellectual ecology of the public domain, and on the "Second Enclosure Movement" that threatens it. Boyle also contributes a column to the Financial Times New Technology Policy For- um. Source: Wikipedia Copyright: Please read the legal notice included in this e-book and/or check the copyright status in your country. Note: This book is brought to you by Feedbooks http://www.feedbooks.com Strictly for personal use, do not use this file for commercial purposes. 2 Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. 3 Preface Each person has a different breaking point. For one of my students it was United States Patent number 6,004,596 for a “Sealed Crustless Sand- wich.” In the curiously mangled form of English that patent law pro- duces, it was described this way: A sealed crustless sandwich for providing a convenient sandwich without an outer crust which can be stored for long periods of time without a central filling from leaking outwardly.
    [Show full text]
  • Für Puschendorf August 2018 CSU Zeitung Für Puschendorf 2 August 2018 Editorial Inhalt
    ZEITUNG für Puschendorf August 2018 CSU Zeitung für Puschendorf 2 August 2018 Editorial Inhalt 3 Editorial Liebe Puschendorferinnen und 5 CSU-Ortsverband mit neuer Führung Puschendorfer, 7 Politischer Aschermittwoch vor ein paar Wochen habe ich die Aufgabe als CSU-Ortsvorsitzende 8 Jahreshauptversammlung des Heimatvereins übernommen, weil ich mich in meiner Heimat engagieren will. Ich werde in dieser Funktion von den erfahrenen Stellvertretern Karlheinz Auerochs, 9 Subbnessen beim Heimatverein Sandra Behringer, Klaus Madinger und Tobias Eichner unterstützt. Unsere ersten Schritte waren neben der Aktualisierung und Überarbeitung 11/12 SV Puschendorf Jahreshauptversammlung unserer Webseite auch der Facebook-Auftritt der CSU Puschendorf. Folgen Sie uns dort und lesen sie regelmäßig Neuigkeiten aus Puschendorf, dem Landkreis Fürth und aus Bayern. Natürlich informieren wir auf 12 Verkehrsberuhigter Bereich - was heißt das? Facebook. Über bevorstehende Veranstaltungen und wenn Sie mal nicht persönlich dabei sein konnten, natürlich auch danach, finden Sie dort alles 13 Der Schorsch ist an allem Schuld Wissenswerte von unseren Veranstaltungen. 15 Neuwahlen beim Obst- und Gartenbauverein Mit meinem neuen Amt kamen für mich persönlich viele neue Anforderungen und Aufgaben, die mich einiges in meinem Wohnort 17 Ein Landtagskandidat stellt sich vor anders - neu - sehen lassen. Eine spannende Aufgabe. Damit wird mir Der Osterbrunnen von Schwester Elfriede jeden Tag bewusst, wie wichtig es ist, sich zu engagieren. Der Begriff „Heimat“ wird dieser Tage in alle Richtungen gedreht und es zeigt sich, wie unterschiedlich dieser Begriff interpretiert wird. Für jeden von uns ist 18 Neues von der Arbeiterwohlfahrt Heimat etwas anderes. Heimat ist im Kopf und Heimat ist im Herzen. Heimat ist für meine Kinder etwas anderes wie für meine Eltern oder 19 Seniorenwanderer zu Besuch im „Dehnberger Großeltern.
    [Show full text]
  • Is There an Open Source Business Model: YES Or
    Is there an Open Source Business Model: YES or NO? Stephen Walli, Principle Program Manager, Microsoft @stephenrwalli Jeffrey Borek, WW Program Director, IBM @jeffborek Is there an Open Source Business Model? Open Source Software is about Engineering Economics We’ve shared software since we’ve written software USENIX Begins Apache httpd Code Released 1995 IBM “SHARE” 1975 sharing DECUS MIT Project Conf & Library Conf & Library Athena Begins Apache Software At Princeton GCC Begins 1953 Begins 1962 emacs 1983 Foundation 1999 IAS in late 1987 AT&T Shares 1975 1940s Linus Releases OSDL Re-forms as First UNIX OSDL Forms 1BSD Released Linux 1991 Linux Foundation tapes early- 2000 1977 2007 70s 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 st nd Free Software 1 DoJ vs IBM 2 DoJ vs IBM Open Source Foundation Consent Decree begins Definition 1997 Launches 1985 “Hardware Bundling “Software Bundling U.S. Congress is Anti-competitiVe” is Anti-competitiVe” Adds Computer 1956 1969 IBM response is to Software to unbundle HW, SW, Copyright Law & serVices pricing 1980 We’ve shared software since we’ve written software Writing good software is hard work USENIX Begins Apache httpd Code Released 1995 IBM “SHARE” 1975 sharing DECUS MIT Project Conf & Library Conf & Library Athena Begins Apache Software At Princeton GCC Begins 1953 Begins 1962 emacs 1983 Foundation 1999 IAS in late 1987 AT&T Shares 1975 1940s Linus Releases OSDL Re-forms as First UNIX OSDL Forms 1BSD Released Linux 1991 Linux Foundation tapes early- 2000 1977 2007 70s 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 st nd Free Software 1 DoJ vs IBM 2 DoJ vs IBM Open Source Foundation Consent Decree begins Definition 1997 Launches 1985 “Hardware Bundling “Software Bundling U.S.
    [Show full text]