DOCSLIB.ORG

Southwest Regional Climate Hub and California Subsidiary Hub Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southwest Regional Climate Hub and California Subsidiary Hub Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies Southwest Regional Climate Hub and California Subsidiary Hub Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies Authors: Jeanne Chambers, U.S. Forest Service; Helena Deswood, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Southwest (SW) Hub Coordinator; Emile Elias, USDA SW Hub Deputy Director; Kris Havstad, USDA-Agricultural Research Service Jornada Experimental Range Research Leader; Amber Kerr, California (CA) Sub Hub Coordinator; Albert Rango, Hub Director; Mark Schwartz, John Muir Institute of the Environment Director; Kerri Steenwerth, CA Sub Hub Co-Director; Caiti Steele, USDA SW Hub Deputy Director; Peter Stine, CA Sub Hub Co-Director; and Rachel Steele, National Climate Hubs Coordinator. Southwest Regional Climate Hub, 2995 Knox Street, Las Cruces, NM 88003. California Subsidiary Hub, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616. August 2015 Contributors: Our thanks to Shaun McKinney, NRCS; Luana Kiger, NRCS; Robert Tse, RD; Wendy Hall, APHIS; Marlene Cole, APHIS; Ricardo Lopez, USFS; Sharon Hestvik, RMA; Oscar Gonzales, FSA; and Molly Manzanares, FSA. We acknowledge ICF International for its contributions to the Greenhouse Gas Profile. Acknowledgments: We thank John Abatzoglou, Ruben Baca, Carolyn Cook, Dave DeWalt, Peg Gronemeyer, Amrith Gunasekara, Russ Henly, Estrella Herrera, Andrew Holguin, Ryann Smith, Scott Schrader, Jim Thorne, and Derrick Vinson. We appreciate the assistance of the following experts who reviewed selected crops: Malli Aradhya (stone fruit), Paul Brown (cotton), Greg Browne (almonds), Eli Carlisle (tomatoes), David Crowley (avocadoes), Oleg Daugovish (strawberries and broccoli), Louise Ferguson (citrus and pistachios), Tim Hartz (melons and carrots), Jim Hill (rice), Lee Jackson (small grains: wheat, barley and oats), Dan Kluepfel (almonds and stone fruit), Bruce Lampinen (walnuts), Bruce Linquist (rice), Joe Nuñez (carrots), Richard Percy (cotton), Carol Shennan (strawberries), Richard Smith (lettuce and onions/garlic), Scott Stoddard (tomatoes), Dianne Velasco (almonds), and Larry Williams (grapes). Any errors or omissions in this document remain the responsibility of the authors. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme's Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP, and we thank the climate modeling groups for producing and making available their model output. For CMIP the U.S. Department of Energy's Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals. Edited by: Terry Anderson, ARS Suggested Citation: Elias, E., C. Steele, K. Havstad, K. Steenwerth, Chambers, J., H. Deswood, , A. Kerr, A. Rango, M. Schwartz , P. Stine, R. Steele, 2015: Southwest Regional Climate Hub and California Subsidiary Hub Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies, T. Anderson, Ed., United States Department of Agriculture, 76 pp. Contributors: S. McKinney, L. Kiger, R. Tse, W. Hall, M. Cole, R. Lopez, S. Hestvik, O. Gonzales, M. Manzanares Contents Letter from the Regional Leads .................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1. Description of the Region and Key Resources ............................................................................. 6 1.2. Demographics and Land Uses ....................................................................................................... 7 1.3. General Climate Conditions, Extremes, and Past Effects ............................................................. 7 Mainland States ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Hawai‘i .................................................................................................................................................. 9 1.4. Summary of Regional Climate Scenarios ..................................................................................... 9 Mainland States ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Hawai‘i ................................................................................................................................................ 11 2. Regional Agriculture’s Sensitivity to Climate Change and Adaptation Strategies ............................. 13 2.1. Cropping Systems Overview of Risks, Vulnerabilities, and General Adaptation Strategies ...... 13 Regional Issues for Southwest Cropping Systems .............................................................................. 13 Crop-Specific Vulnerabilities and Adaptation Strategies: California Specialty Crops ....................... 15 Crop-Specific Vulnerabilities and Adaptation Strategies: Southwest Field Crops ............................. 22 Crop-Specific Vulnerabilities and Adaptation Strategies: Hawai‘i .................................................... 26 2.2. Livestock Systems Overview of Risks, Vulnerabilities, and General Adaptation Strategies ..... 28 Effects of Climate Change on Southwestern Animal Agriculture ...................................................... 28 Regional Issues for Southwest Animal Agriculture and Rangeland Ecosystems ............................... 29 Adaptive Capacities ............................................................................................................................ 32 3. Forest Systems Overview of Risks, Vulnerabilities, and General Adaptation Strategies ................... 34 3.1. Effects of Climate Change on Southwestern Forests .................................................................. 34 Future Outlook for Southwest Forests ................................................................................................ 35 Regional Issues for Southwest Forest Systems ................................................................................... 36 Adaptation Strategies .......................................................................................................................... 37 Restoring Sustainable Forest Structure ............................................................................................... 38 3.2. Effects of Climate Change on Hawai‘i’s Forests ........................................................................ 39 4. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Profile from Agriculture and Forests, and Mitigation Opportunities within the Southwest Region ...................................................................................................................... 42 4.1. Soil Carbon Stock Changes......................................................................................................... 42 4.2. Nitrous Oxide Emissions in the Southwest Region .................................................................... 42 4.3. Livestock GHG Profile ............................................................................................................... 43 Enteric fermentation ............................................................................................................................ 44 Emissions from manure management systems ................................................................................... 44 4.4. Forest Carbon Stocks and Stock Changes ................................................................................... 45 4.5. Mitigation Opportunities ............................................................................................................. 46 Agricultural Soils ................................................................................................................................ 47 Land Retirement .................................................................................................................................. 47 Manure Management .......................................................................................................................... 47 Enteric Fermentation ........................................................................................................................... 48 5. USDA Programs ................................................................................................................................. 48 5.1. Natural Resources Conservation Service .................................................................................... 48 Role of NRCS in the Southwest .......................................................................................................... 49 NRCS California ................................................................................................................................. 50 5.2. U.S. Forest Service ..................................................................................................................... 51 National Forest System ....................................................................................................................... 51 Research and Development ................................................................................................................. 51 Regional Stations ...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Latin America and Caribbean Region LIST of ACRONYMS
    Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development in Latin America and Caribbean Region LIST OF ACRONYMS ALBA Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas IPs Industrial Parks BIDC Barbados Investment and Development INTI National Institute of Industrial Corperation Technologies (Argentina) BRICS Brazil, Russian Federation, India, China ISID Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial and South Africa („emerging economies“) Development CAF Development Bank for Latin America ITPOs Investment and Technology Promotion CAIME High Level Centre for Research, Offices Training and Certification of Production LATU Technological Laboratory of Uruguay (Uruguayan Project) MERCOSUR Southern Common Market CAN Andean Community MoU Memorandum of Understanding CARICOM Caribbean Community ODS Ozone Depleting Substances CELAC Community of Latin American and OESC Organization of Eastern Caribbean States Caribbean States OFID OPEC Fund for International Development CFCs Chloro-Fluoro-Carbons PCBs Poly-Chlorinated Biphenyls CIU Uruguayan Chamber of Industries POPs Persistent Organic Pollutants CNI National Confederation of Brazil PPPs Public Private Partnerships COPEI Peruvian Committee on Small Industry RO Regional Office ECLAC Economic Commission for Latin America SDGs Sustainable Development Goals EU European Union SELA Latin American Economic System FAO Food and Agriculture Organization (UN SEZs Special Economic Zones System) SICA Central American Integration System GEF Global Environmental Facility SMEs Small and Medium-sized Enterprises GNIC Great Nicaraguan Interoceanic
    [Show full text]
  • Reigniting Growth in Central and Eastern Europe Eastern and Central in Growth Dawn:A New Reigniting
    McKinsey Global Institute McKinsey Global Institute A new dawn: ReignitingA new dawn: growth in Central and Eastern Europe December 2013 A new dawn: Reigniting growth in Central and Eastern Europe The McKinsey Global Institute The McKinsey Global Institute (MGI), the business and economics research arm of McKinsey & Company, was established in 1990 to develop a deeper understanding of the evolving global economy. MGI’s mission is to provide leaders in the commercial, public, and social sectors with the facts and insights on which to base management and policy decisions. MGI research combines the disciplines of economics and management, employing the analytical tools of economics with the insights of business leaders. Its “micro-to-macro” methodology examines microeconomic industry trends to better understand the broad macroeconomic forces affecting business strategy and public policy. MGI’s in-depth reports have covered more than 20 countries and 30 industries. Current research focuses on six themes: productivity and growth; the evolution of global financial markets; the economic impact of technology and innovation; natural resources; the future of work; and urbanisation. Recent reports have assessed job creation, resource productivity, cities of the future, and the impact of the Internet. The partners of McKinsey fund MGI’s research; it is not commissioned by any business, government, or other institution. For further information about MGI and to download reports, please visit www.mckinsey.com/mgi. McKinsey in Central and Eastern Europe McKinsey & Company opened its first offices in Central and Eastern Europe in the early 1990s, soon after the momentous democratic changes in the region. McKinsey played an active role in the region’s economic rebirth, working with governments, nonprofits, and cultural institutions, as well as leading business organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • African Traditional Plant Knowledge in the Circum-Caribbean Region
    Journal of Ethnobiology 23(2): 167-185 Fall/Winter 2003 AFRICAN TRADITIONAL PLANT KNOWLEDGE IN THE CIRCUM-CARIBBEAN REGION JUDITH A. CARNEY Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 ABSTRACT.—The African diaspora to the Americas was one of plants as well as people. European slavers provisioned their human cargoes with African and other Old World useful plants, which enabled their enslaved work force and free ma- roons to establish them in their gardens. Africans were additionally familiar with many Asian plants from earlier crop exchanges with the Indian subcontinent. Their efforts established these plants in the contemporary Caribbean plant corpus. The recognition of pantropical genera of value for food, medicine, and in the practice of syncretic religions also appears to have played an important role in survival, as they share similar uses among black populations in the Caribbean as well as tropical Africa. This paper, which focuses on the plants of the Old World tropics that became established with slavery in the Caribbean, seeks to illuminate the botanical legacy of Africans in the circum-Caribbean region. Key words: African diaspora, Caribbean, ethnobotany, slaves, plant introductions. RESUME.—La diaspora africaine aux Ameriques ne s'est pas limitee aux person- nes, elle a egalement affecte les plantes. Les traiteurs d'esclaves ajoutaient a leur cargaison humaine des plantes exploitables dAfrique et du vieux monde pour les faire cultiver dans leurs jardins par les esclaves ou les marrons libres. En outre les Africains connaissaient beaucoup de plantes dAsie grace a de precedents echanges de cultures avec le sous-continent indien.
    [Show full text]
  • Across the Western Landscape: Priority Issues and Strategies for Western Forests
    Across the Western Landscape: Priority Issues and Strategies for Western Forests EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The forests of the West contain an incredible assemblage of resources. They cover approximately 365 million acres, 49 percent of the nation’s total forested area, and are managed by a diverse set of owners. Threats facing western forests affect all lands and all people, compromising the basic assets we need and often take for granted such as: clean air, abundant water, safe communities, open spaces, and economic opportunities. Cooperation and coordination across jurisdictional boundaries are needed to address these threats. The Western Forestry Leadership Coalition (WFLC) represents a unique partnership between state and federal government forestry leaders and supports a collaborative approach to sustainable forest management. All U.S. states and Affiliated Islands have completed assessments of their forest resources and developed strategies for the conservation, protection, About the Western Forestry and enhancement of those resources. These Statewide Forest Resource Leadership Coalition Assessments and Strategies (Forest Action Plans) provide a long-term roadmap The Western Forestry Leadership for forest restoration and management. Across the Western Landscape: Priority Coalition (WFLC) is a State and Issues and Strategies for Western Forests is a 23-page publication providing the Federal government partnership. highlights from a synthesis of the western states’ and Pacific Islands’ Forest The members of the coalition Action Plans. These highlights — summarized here — include priority issues, include: the 23 State and Pacific strategies to address them, and a Six-Point Plan for the future. Island Foresters of the West and the 7 western Regional Foresters, Wildland Fire and the Wildland-Urban Interface: reduce 3 western Research Station Directors, wildfire risk to communities and mitigate wildfire impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects for Regional Cooperation Between Latin America and the Caribbean Region and the Asia and Pacific Region: Perspective from East Asia
    ADBI Working Paper Series Prospects for Regional Cooperation between Latin America and the Caribbean Region and the Asia and Pacific Region: Perspective from East Asia Erlinda M. Medalla and Jenny D. Balboa No. 217 May 2010 Asian Development Bank Institute Erlinda M. Medalla is a senior research fellow at the Philippine Institute for Development Studies in Makati, Philippines. Jenny D. Balboa is a research associate at the Philippine Institute for Development Studies. The authors acknowledge the excellent research assistance of Melalyn Mantaring, Susan Pizaro, and Mildred Belizario. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each working paper (given in the citation below). Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. Suggested citation: Medalla, E. M., and J. D. Balboa. 2010. Prospects for Regional Cooperation between Latin America and the Caribbean Region and the Asia and Pacific Region: Perspective from East Asia. ADBI Working Paper 217.
    [Show full text]
  • CARIBBEAN BLACKS and WEST AFRICAN BLACKS: a STUDY in ATTITUDE SIMILARITY and CHANGE HELEN BAGENSTOSE GREEN Wesleyan University
    Interameriean Journal of Psychology, 1970, u, 3-4. CARIBBEAN BLACKS AND WEST AFRICAN BLACKS: A STUDY IN ATTITUDE SIMILARITY AND CHANGE HELEN BAGENSTOSE GREEN Wesleyan University U.S.A. A bstract. Attitudinal responses from a sample of Caribbean Black school students in Trinidad are compared with responses from West African Black students in English-speaking Gambia and with matched East Indian students from the other co-culture in Trinidad. Findings from open-ended questionnaires show the two Black samples to differ from the East Indian sample in the greater priority given to social concerns. Responses related to their initiative and goals in manipulating the environment show the Carib­ bean Black sample to exceed both the West African Black sample and the East Indian sample. Responses related to personality expansion show both the Caribbean Black sample and the East Indian sample to be more out­ going, secure, and realistic than the West African sample. The discussion attributes some of these findings to the continuity of at­ titudes by culture of origin, and others to change induced by the richer physical and psychological opportunities of the Caribbean. Resumen. Se comparan las respuestas actitudinales de dos muestras de estudiantes negros, en Trinidad y en Gambia, y de una tercer muestra de estudiantes Indio-orientales de Trinidad. Los resultados obtenidos indican que las dos muestras difieren de la muestra Indio-oriental en cuanto a la mayor prioridad otorgada a preocupaciones sociales. Las respuestas relacionadas con su iniciativa y objetivos al manipular el ambiente indican que la muestra de negros del Caribe excede tanto a la muestra de negros de Africa occidental (Gambia), como a la muestra Indio-oriental.
    [Show full text]
  • Speleothem Paleoclimatology for the Caribbean, Central America, and North America
    quaternary Review Speleothem Paleoclimatology for the Caribbean, Central America, and North America Jessica L. Oster 1,* , Sophie F. Warken 2,3 , Natasha Sekhon 4, Monica M. Arienzo 5 and Matthew Lachniet 6 1 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, USA 2 Department of Geosciences, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; [email protected] 3 Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany 4 Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA; [email protected] 5 Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV 89512, USA; [email protected] 6 Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 December 2018; Accepted: 21 January 2019; Published: 28 January 2019 Abstract: Speleothem oxygen isotope records from the Caribbean, Central, and North America reveal climatic controls that include orbital variation, deglacial forcing related to ocean circulation and ice sheet retreat, and the influence of local and remote sea surface temperature variations. Here, we review these records and the global climate teleconnections they suggest following the recent publication of the Speleothem Isotopes Synthesis and Analysis (SISAL) database. We find that low-latitude records generally reflect changes in precipitation, whereas higher latitude records are sensitive to temperature and moisture source variability. Tropical records suggest precipitation variability is forced by orbital precession and North Atlantic Ocean circulation driven changes in atmospheric convection on long timescales, and tropical sea surface temperature variations on short timescales. On millennial timescales, precipitation seasonality in southwestern North America is related to North Atlantic climate variability.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Progress Report 2002: Pacific Southwest Region
    EPA Progress Report 2002 Pacific Southwest Region U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Pacific Southwest / Region 9 EPA–909–R–02–001 Dear Readers, Growing up in Southern California, I learned early in life about the human cost of an unhealthy environment. The brown cloud that covered the Los Angeles Basin for too many days each summer affected everyone who worked and played there. But over the years I’ve also watched the skies grow clearer and smog alerts become a thing of the past. In 2001, the Los Angeles area met national health standards nine out of every ten days — the cleanest year since smog measurements began over 40 years ago. While there is much more work to be done, we’ve come a long way. I am honored to introduce this EPA Progress Report, the first that we have issued since I joined EPA as Regional Administrator in October 2001. The past year’s accomplishments are full of promise for meeting the public health and environmental chal­ lenges we face in the Pacific Southwest, and I am eager to to continue our progress in this important mission. EPA’s Pacific Southwest Region is truly diverse, encompassing the states of Arizona, California, Hawaii and Nevada; 147 tribal nations and communities; and Pacific islands such as American Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. The problems we confront here are complex, interconnected, and resistant to traditional solutions. As we move to meet these challenges, we are fortunate both in our own strengths and in the capacity and will of our partners — the states, tribes, industry and the environmental advocacy communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin America and the Caribbean Hub Source: Globocan 2020
    Latin America and the Caribbean Hub Source: Globocan 2020 Number of new cases in 2020, both sexes, all ages Geography Prostate 206 447 (14.4%) Breast 204 944 (14.3%) Other cancers Colorectum 729 831 (50.9%) 131 394 (9.2%) Lung 95 314 (6.6%) Stomach 65 589 (4.6%) Total: 1 433 519 Number of new cases in 2020, males, all ages Numbers at a glance Total population Prostate 206 447 (29.4%) 633392345 Other cancers 310 245 (44.2%) Number of new cases Colorectum 65 411 (9.3%) Lung 55 965 (8%) 1433519 Number of deaths Bladder Stomach 24 027 (3.4%) 39 299 (5.6%) Total: 701 394 690671 Number of new cases in 2020, females, all ages Number of prevalent cases (5-year) Breast 3760911 204 944 (28%) Other cancers Data source and methods 312 995 (42.8%) Colorectum 65 983 (9%) Incidence Cervix uteri Population weighted average of the rates of the group- 57 748 (7.9%) specific countries included in GLOBOCAN 2020. Mortality Lung Thyroid 39 349 (5.4%) 51 106 (7%) Population weighted average of the rates of the group- specific countries included in GLOBOCAN 2020. Total: 732 125 Prevalence Summary statistic 2020 Sum of group-specific prevalent cases. Males Females Both sexes Populations included Population 311 494 138 321 898 202 633 392 345 Number of new cancer cases 701 394 732 125 1 433 519 Argentina, Bolivia, Plurinational State of, Brazil, Chile, Age-standardized incidence rate (World) 199.5 179.5 187.0 Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Risk of developing cancer before the age of 75 years (%) 20.5 17.7 18.9 El Salvador, Guatemala,
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to Western United States Riparian Ecosystems: a Bibliography
    Threats to Western United States Riparian Ecosystems: A Bibliography Boris Poff, Karen A. Koestner, Daniel G. Neary, and David Merritt United States Department of Agriculture / Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-269 December 2012 Poff, Boris; Koestner, Karen A.; Neary, Daniel G.; Merritt, David. 2012. Threats to western United States riparian ecosystems: A bibliography. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-269. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 78 p. Abstract __________________________________________________ This bibliography is a compendium of state-of-knowledge publications about the threats affecting western U.S. riparian ecosystems and is a companion to the website: http://www.rmrs.nau.edu/ awa/ripthreatbib/. The website contains abstracts and access to many of the publications via PDFs, or it directs the readers to websites where PDFs of the publication can be viewed or obtained. The bibliography is ordered alphabetically and the type of threats discussed in each publication is highlighted. These threats include agriculture, climate change, dam construction, disease, drought, invasive species, fire, floods, flow regulation, forest harvesting, grazing, groundwater depletion, insects, mining, recreation, roads, water diversions, urbanization, and water quality. Keywords: ecosystem, riparian, soil, water, watersheds, hydrology, threats, vegetation, wildlife, drought, floods, grazing, invasive plants Authors _____________________________ David Merritt, Riparian Ecologist, U.S. Department of Agri- culture, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forest Service, Boris Poff, District Hydrologist, Bureau of Land Management, Stream Systems Technology Center, Fort Collins, Colorado. Las Vegas, Nevada. Karen A. Koestner, Hydrologic Research Technician, U.S. Acknowledgments ____________________ Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Flagstaff, This effort was funded by a grant from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Hostile Measures in Europe
    Russia’s Hostile Measures in Europe Understanding the Threat Raphael S. Cohen, Andrew Radin C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1793 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0077-2 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report is the collaborative and equal effort of the coauthors, who are listed in alphabetical order. The report documents research and analysis conducted through 2017 as part of a project entitled Russia, European Security, and “Measures Short of War,” sponsored by the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-3/5/7, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Uplift of the Sierra Nevada, Western United States, from GPS and Insar Measurements
    Contemporary uplift of the Sierra Nevada, western United States, from GPS and InSAR measurements William C. Hammond1*, Geoffrey Blewitt1, Zhenhong Li2, Hans-Peter Plag1, and Corné Kreemer1 1Nevada Geodetic Laboratory, Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, and Nevada Seismological Laboratory, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA 2Centre for the Observation and Modelling of Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Tectonics (COMET+), School of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK ABSTRACT particular, the EarthScope Plate Boundary Observatory has provided hun- Modern space geodesy has recently enabled the direct observation dreds of new stations in California and Nevada, including about a dozen of slow geological processes that move and shape Earth’s surface, includ- on the west slope of the Sierra Nevada. We processed all available GPS ing plate tectonics and crustal strain accumulation that leads to earth- data to obtain station height time series, and fi t them with a six-parameter quakes. More elusive has been the direct observation of active moun- empirical model including an epoch position, a velocity, and an amplitude tain growth, because geodetic measurements have larger uncertainties and phase of annual and semiannual harmonic constituents (to model sea- in the vertical direction, while mountain growth is typically very slow. sonal effects). To enhance the signal-to-noise ratio, we used GPS vertical For the Sierra Nevada of California and Nevada, western United States, velocities based on over 3 yr of data with 1σ rate uncertainties ≤1.0 mm/yr, the history of elevation is complex, exhibiting features of both ancient and required that the empirical model adequately fi t the data (Fig.
    [Show full text]