1 Difficulties in the Management of Bile Duct
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sa G Es 2 0 0 6 Sages Lunches
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SAGES Corporate Supporters S 2 Hotel Contact Information THANKS TO OUR 2 General Information about the Meeting A 2 Registration Hours & Information CORPORATE SUPPORTERS: 2 Exhibits and Exhibit Only Registration G 5 SAGES Meeting Leaders PLATINUM LEVEL DONORS 7 SAGES Accreditation & CME Worksheet AUTOSUTURE & VALLEYLAB – E 8 Forde Tribute Dinner DIVISIONS OF TYCO HEALTHCARE 8 Hilton Anatole Floor Plan S 9 SAGES Schedule at a Glance ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC. SAGES 2006 Postgraduate Courses 15 Bariatric Postgraduate Course KARL STORZ ENDOSCOPY-AMERICA, INC. 2 16 Joint SAGES-MIRA Symposium–Robotics 0 35 Colon Postgraduate Course OLYMPUS AMERICA 55 SAGES Allied Health Professionals Course GOLD LEVEL DONORS 0 SAGES 2006 Hands-On Courses 12 Joint IPEG/SAGES Pediatric Fellows Inamed Health 6 Advanced Techniques Hands-On Course Stryker Endoscopy 20 Surgeon in the Digital Age 27 Advanced Skills & Laparoscopic Techniques SILVER LEVEL DONORS Hands-On Course Boston Scientific Endoscopy 28 SAGES/SLS Simulator Hands-on Course Davol, Inc. 31 SAGES Endoluminal Surgery Hands-on Course General Surgery News 18 Joint SAGES/ACS Sessions Gore & Associates, Inc. 18 Inflammatory Bowel Disease 18 The Changing Face of Surgical Education BRONZE LEVEL DONORS 20 Ethicon Patient Safety Lunch Adolor Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline 22 International Video Session: Teleconferenced to Asia Aesculap 23 SAGES Technology Pavillion B-K Medical Systems 27 SAGES/IPEG Combined Video Breakfast Session Cook Surgical 32 SAGES/Fellowship Council Lunch 37 SAGES Hernia Symposium Medtronic 37 SAGES Bariatric Symposium SurgRX 39 SAGES 2006 Scientific Session Synovis Surgical Innovations 41 SAGES Presidential Address Taut, Inc. 43 Gerald Marks Lecture Tissue Science Laboratories 53 Karl Storz Lecture 44 SAGES/IPEG Panel, SAGES/ASGE Panel, Hernia Panel SAGES recognizes TATRC as a Meeting Supporter. -
Diagnosis and Treatment of Perianal Crohn Disease: NASPGHAN Clinical Report and Consensus Statement
CLINICAL REPORT Diagnosis and Treatment of Perianal Crohn Disease: NASPGHAN Clinical Report and Consensus Statement ÃEdwin F. de Zoeten, zBrad A. Pasternak, §Peter Mattei, ÃRobert E. Kramer, and yHoward A. Kader ABSTRACT disease. The first description connecting regional enteritis with Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the perianal disease was by Bissell et al in 1934 (2), and since that time gastrointestinal tract that includes both Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative perianal disease has become a recognized entity and an important colitis. Abdominal pain, rectal bleeding, diarrhea, and weight loss consideration in the diagnosis and treatment of CD. Perianal characterize both CD and ulcerative colitis. The incidence of IBD in the Crohn disease (PCD) is defined as inflammation at or near the United States is 70 to 150 cases per 100,000 individuals and, as with other anus, including tags, fissures, fistulae, abscesses, or stenosis. autoimmune diseases, is on the rise. CD can affect any part of the The symptoms of PCD include pain, itching, bleeding, purulent gastrointestinal tract from the mouth to the anus and frequently will include discharge, and incontinence of stool. perianal disease. The first description connecting regional enteritis with perianal disease was by Bissell et al in 1934, and since that time perianal INCIDENCE AND NATURAL HISTORY disease has become a recognized entity and an important consideration in the Limited pediatric data describe the incidence and prevalence diagnosis and treatment of CD. Perianal Crohn disease (PCD) is defined as of PCD. The incidence of PCD in the pediatric age group has been inflammation at or near the anus, including tags, fissures, fistulae, abscesses, estimated to be between 13.6% and 62% (3). -
Rectal Free Perforation After Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: a Case Report
CASE REPORT – OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 30 (2017) 40–42 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Contents lists available at ScienceDirect provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector International Journal of Surgery Case Reports journal homepage: www.casereports.com Rectal free perforation after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: A case report ଝ of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and repair without stoma a b,∗ Seokyong Ryu , Byung-Noe Bae a Department of Emergency Medicine, Inje University Snaggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea b Department of General Surgery, Inje University Snaggye Paik Hospital, Seoul,Republic of Korea a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: INTRODUCTION: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is widely performed for treatment of prolapsed hemorrhoids Received 30 August 2016 because of advantages, including shorter hospital stay and less discomfort, compared with conventional Received in revised form hemorrhoidectomy. However, it can have severe adverse effects, such as rectal bleeding, perforation, and 18 November 2016 sepsis. Accepted 18 November 2016 PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report the case of a healthy 28-year-old man who presented to the emer- Available online 21 November 2016 gency department with sudden-onset diffuse abdominal pain and hematochezia. He had undergone stapled hemorrhoidopexy 5 days earlier and was discharged after an uneventful postoperative course. For Keywords: the present condition, after immediate evaluation, we successfully performed emergency laparoscopic Rectal perforation repair of the rectal perforation without any stoma. His postoperative course was uneventful, and he was Stapled hemorrhoidopexy Laparoscopic surgery discharged on postoperative day 16. -
Plugs for Anal Fistula Repair Original Policy Date: November 26, 2014 Effective Date: January 1, 2021 Section: 7.0 Surgery Page: Page 1 of 12
Medical Policy 7.01.123 Plugs for Anal Fistula Repair Original Policy Date: November 26, 2014 Effective Date: January 1, 2021 Section: 7.0 Surgery Page: Page 1 of 12 Policy Statement Biosynthetic fistula plugs, including plugs made of porcine small intestine submucosa or of synthetic material, are considered investigational for the repair of anal fistulas. NOTE: Refer to Appendix A to see the policy statement changes (if any) from the previous version. Policy Guidelines There is a specific CPT code for the use of these plugs in the repair of an anorectal fistula: • 46707: Repair of anorectal fistula with plug (e.g., porcine small intestine submucosa [SIS]) Description Anal fistula plugs (AFPs) are biosynthetic devices used to promote healing and prevent the recurrence of anal fistulas. They are proposed as an alternative to procedures including fistulotomy, endorectal advancement flaps, seton drain placement, and use of fibrin glue in the treatment of anal fistulas. Related Policies • N/A Benefit Application Benefit determinations should be based in all cases on the applicable contract language. To the extent there are any conflicts between these guidelines and the contract language, the contract language will control. Please refer to the member's contract benefits in effect at the time of service to determine coverage or non-coverage of these services as it applies to an individual member. Some state or federal mandates (e.g., Federal Employee Program [FEP]) prohibits plans from denying Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved technologies as investigational. In these instances, plans may have to consider the coverage eligibility of FDA-approved technologies on the basis of medical necessity alone. -
A 20-Year Experience of Rectovaginal Fistula Management in a Tertiary University Hospital in Thailand
A 20-year Experience of Rectovaginal Fistula Management in a Tertiary University Hospital in Thailand Varut Lohsiriwat MD, PhD*, Danupon Arsapanom MD*, Siriluck Prapasrivorakul MD*, Cherdsak Iramaneerat MD*, Woramin Riansuwan MD*, Wiroon Boonnuch MD*, Darin Lohsiriwat MD* * Colorectal Surgery Unit, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine etiology, treatment and outcome of patients with rectovaginal fistula (RVF) who were treated in a tertiary university hospital in Thailand. Material and Method: The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with RVF treating from 1994 to 2013 at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital. Data were recorded including patient’s demographics, etiology, treatment and outcome. Results: This study included 108 patients with median age of 55 years (range 24 to 81). Radiation injury was the most common cause of RVF (44%) followed by direct invasion of rectal or gynecologic malignancies (20%), postoperative complication (16%) (notably from 10 low anterior resections, 5 transabdominal hysterectomies, 1 stapled hemorrhoidopexy and 1 injection sclerotherapy for hemorrhoid) and obstetric injury (11%). Diverting colostomy was the most frequent operation performed for both radiation-related RVF and malignancy-related RVF. Most operation-related RVF were healed after fecal diversion with or without either local repair or major resection. All obstetric-related RVFs were successfully treated by local tissue repair with or without anal sphincteroplasty. Conclusion: Radiation injury and advanced pelvic malignancies were two most common causes of RVF in this study. Fecal diversion can be either initial operation or definite treatment in most patients with RVF. -
Surgery for Colon and Rectal Cancer
Colon and Rectal Surgery Mohammed Bayasi, MD Department of Surgery Colon and Rectal Surgery What is a Colon and Rectal Surgeon? • Fully trained General Surgeon. • Has done additional training in the diseases of colon and rectum. Why Colon and Rectal Surgery? • Surgical and non surgical therapy for multiple diseases. • Chance to help cancer patients by removing tumor, potentially curing them. • Variety of cases, ages and patient populations. • Specialized area. Colorectal Diseases • Colon • Rectum/Anus – Cancer – Hemorrhoids – Diverticulitis – Anal fistula and – Inflammatory Bowel abscess Disease (Crohn, UC) – Anal fissure – Polyps – Prolapse Symptoms/Signs • Pain • Itching • Discharge • Bleeding • Lump Anatomy Lesson Colon • Extracts water and nutrients. • Helps to form and excrete waste. • Stores important bacteria flora. • Length: 1.5 meters long = 4.9 feet = 59 inches Colon Rectum/Anus • The final portion of the colon. • Area contains muscles important in controlling defecation and flatulence. Rectum/Anus When to see a Colon and Rectal Surgeon • Referral from another physician (Gastroenterology, PCP). • Treatment of anorectal diseases. • Blood with stool, abdominal pain, rectal pain. Hemorrhoids • Internal and external. • Cushions of blood vessels. • When enlarged, they cause bleeding and pain. Treatment • Treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids is directed by the symptoms themselves. It can broadly be categorized into four groups: − Medical therapy − Office-based procedure − Operative therapies − Emergent interventions Anorectal Abscess • It is a collection of pus in the perianal area. Normal • Causes pain and rectal gland drainage, and if it progresses, fever and systemic Abscess infection. • Treated with incision and drainage. Anorectal Fistula • A tunnel between the inside of the anus and the skin. • Causes discharge, pain, and formation of abscess. -
Common Anorectal Conditions
TurkJMedSci 34(2004)285-293 ©TÜB‹TAK PERSPECTIVESINMEDICALSCIENCES CommonAnorectalConditions PravinJ.GUPTA ConsultingProctologistGuptaNursingHome,D/9,Laxminagar,NAGPUR-440022INDIA Received:July12,2004 Anorectaldisordersincludeadiversegroupof dentateorpectinatelinedividesthesquamousepithelium pathologicdisordersthatgeneratesignificantpatient fromthemucosalorcolumnarepithelium.Fourtoeight discomfortanddisability.Althoughthesearefrequently analglandsdrainintothecryptsofMorgagniatthelevel encounteredingeneralmedicalpractice,theyoften ofthedentateline.Mostrectalabscessesandfistulae receiveonlycasualattentionandtemporaryrelief . originateintheseglands.Thedentatelinealsodelineates Diseasesoftherectumandanusarecommon theareawheresensoryfibersend.Abovethedentate phenomena.Theirprevalenceinthegeneralpopulationis line,therectumissuppliedbystretchnervefibers,and probablymuchhigherthanthatseeninclinicalpractice, notpainnervefibers.Thisallowsmanysurgical sincemostpatientswithsymptomsreferabletothe procedurestobeperformedwithoutanesthesiaabovethe anorectumdonotseekmedicalattention. dentateline.Conversely,belowthedentateline,thereis extremesensitivity,andtheperianalareaisoneofthe Asdoctorsoffirstcontact,general(family) mostsensitiveareasofthebody.Theevacuationofbowel practitioners(GPs)frequentlyfacedifficultquestions contentsdependsonactionbythemusclesofboththe concerningtheoptimummanagementofanorectal involuntaryinternalsphincterandthevoluntaryexternal symptoms.Whiletheexaminationanddiagnosisof sphincter. certainanorectaldisorderscanbechallenging,itisa -
Large Animal Surgical Procedures As-Of December 1, 2020 Abdominal
Large Animal Surgical Procedures as-of December 1, 2020 Core Curriculum Category Surgical Category Surgical Procedure Diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy Exploratory celiotomy - left flank Exploratory celiotomy - right flank Abdominal cavity/wall Exploratory celiotomy - ventral midline Exploratory celiotomy - ventral paramedian Exploratory laparotomy - death / euthanasia on table Peritoneal lavage via celiotomy Cecocolostomy Ileo-/Jejunocolostomy Cecum Jejunocecostomy Typhlectomy, partial Typhlotomy Abomasopexy, laparoscopic Abomasopexy, left flank Abdominal - LA Abomasopexy, paramedian Food animal GI: Abomasum Abomasotomy Omentopexy Pyloropexy, flank Reduction of volvulus Typhlectomy Food animal GI: Cecum Typhlotomy Food animal GI: Descending colon, Rectal prolapse, amputation/anastomosis rectum Rectal prolapse, submucosal reduction Food animal GI: Rumen Rumenotomy Decompression/emptying (no enterotomy) Food animal GI: Small intestine Enterotomy Reduction w/o resection (incarceration, volvulus, etc.) Resection/anastomosis Enterotomy Reduction of displacement Food animal GI: Spiral colon Reduction of volvulus Resection/anastomosis (inc. atresia coli) Side-side anastomosis, no resection Colopexy, hand-sutured Colopexy, laparoscopic Colostomy Large colon Enterotomy Reduction of displacement Reduction of volvulus Resection/anastomosis Biopsy Liver Cholelith removal Liver lobectomy Laceration repair Rectum Rectal prolapse repair Resection/anastomosis Enterotomy Impaction resolution via celiotomy Small colon Resection/anastomosis Taeniotomy Decompression/emptying -
About Liver Resection
ABOUT LIVER RESECTION Surgical removal of part of the liver A guide for patients and relatives This booklet has been written to provide information about the operation called a liver resection. This is a major operation and involves removal of a part of the liver. Information about the benefits and risks will help you make an informed decision about the operation. It is important to remember that each person is different. This booklet cannot replace the professional advice and expertise of a doctor who is familiar with your condition. If you have questions that this booklet does not cover, please discuss them with your surgeon or cancer nurse specialist. page 2 What is the liver? The liver is a large organ which lies on the right side of the upper abdomen, under the rib cage. It has many functions related to body metabolism (chemical processes within the body) and is very important to health. One of its functions is to produce yellow-green fluid called bile. Bile flows down a tube called the bile duct to the intestine, where it mixes with food and helps digestion. The gall bladder is a small sac attached to the side of the bile duct. The gall bladder stores excess bile and pushes it down the bile duct in to the intestine, ready for when it is needed for digestion. The liver has right and left lobes (sections). An artery (hepatic artery) and a vein (portal vein) carry blood to the liver. Blood from the liver flows through the hepatic veins back to the heart. -
Risk Factors of Biliary Peritonitis Following T-Tube Removal- the Unsolved Problem
Jemds.com Original Research Article Risk Factors of Biliary Peritonitis following T-Tube Removal- The Unsolved Problem Partha Pratim Barua1, Devid Hazarika2, Khorshid Alom Hussain3 1Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed Medical College, Barpeta, Assam, India. 2Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Assam Medical College, Dibrugarh, Assam, India. 3Registrar, Department of Surgery, Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed Medical College, Barpeta, Assam, India. ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Gall stone disease remains one of the most common problems leading to surgical Corresponding Author: intervention. About 15% of all gall stone disease patients have stones in the common Devid Hazarika, Gunjan’s Aparna Enclave, bile duct (choledocholithiasis). Open choledocholithotomy is still widely performed, Hatigarh Chariali, Geetanagar, particularly in centres without ERCP facilities. Though primary repair of the common Guwahati-781021, Assam, India. bile duct is possible, most surgeons prefer to drain the common bile duct with T-tube. E-mail: [email protected] This avoids pressure build up in the CBD in case of oedema around the ampulla of Vater in the immediate post-operative period. Normally, the T-tube is left for 14–20 DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2019/546 days in order to allow a fibrous tract to form around it. In absences of any distal obstruction, the T-tube is removed by gentle traction in the horizontal limb. In Financial or Other Competing Interests: None. majority of the cases no complications occur after tube removal. However, in some patients, biliary peritonitis occurs with varying severity. The aim of this study is to How to Cite This Article: find out if there are yet unrecognized factors that increases the risk of biliary Barua PP, Hazarika D, Hussain KA. -
Comparison of Laparoscopic-Guided Abomasopexy Versus Omentopexy Via Right Flank Laparotomy for the Treatment of Left Abomasal Displacement in Dairy Cows
Comparison of laparoscopic-guided abomasopexy versus omentopexy via right flank laparotomy for the treatment of left abomasal displacement in dairy cows Torsten Seeger, Dr Med Vet; Harald Kümper, Dr Med Vet; Klaus Failing, Dr Rer Nat; Klaus Doll, Dr Med Vet Habil mean lactation incidence is approximately 1% to 5% Objective—To compare results obtained by use of 3–7 laparoscopy-assisted abomasopexy versus omen- but is > 10% in some herds. Various surgical proce- topexy via right flank laparotomy for the treatment of dures have been used, all of which have specific advan- dairy cows with left displaced abomasum (LDA). tages and disadvantages. Open surgical techniques Animals—120 dairy cows with an LDA. include abomasopexy via the ventral paramedian approach8; laparotomy via the left paralumbar fossa for Procedure—In a prospective clinical trial, cows were omentopexy9 and abomasopexy,10 respectively; and randomly allocated to the abomasopexy group omentopexy via laparotomy in the right paralumbar (laparoscopy-assisted abomasopexy) or to the control 11 group (omentopexy via right flank). Data were fossa. Omentopexy via laparotomy in the right obtained during the first 5 days after surgery and 6 paralumbar fossa is considered the standard procedure weeks and 6 months after surgery. for the treatment of cattle with an LDA in Germany. Results—59 of 60 cows in the abomasopexy group Because of financial and time constraints, percuta- and all 60 cows in the control group were treated suc- neous fixation techniques, such as the blind-tack cessfully. Median duration was shorter for the laparo- suture procedure12 or toggle-pin method,13 have scopic procedure (27.5 minutes), compared with that become more commonly used by practitioners, even for the control group (38 minutes). -
OMENTAL TRANSPLANTATION and CELL CULTURE. By: ROSENDO
OMENTAL TRANSPLANTATION and CELL CULTURE. by: ROSENDO CRIOLLOS, M.D. A thesis submitted to the faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Science Degree. Department of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, MONTREAL. APRIL 1964. (i) P R E F A C E. The tremendous progress in medicine, especially in cardiovascular surgery during the pBst few decades bas promoted development of measures for the control and cure of various anomalies and diseases by surgical means. While the controversy over the different procedures of revascularization for an ischaemic heart still continues, the rate of surgery in the management of the occlusive coronary artery disease is widely accepted; as James Bryce so ably said, WMedicine is the only profession that labours incessantly to destroy the reason for its own existence". If this be true allow me to thank Dr. Arthur Vineberg for letting me be one of the labourera in his investigations on free omental grafts as a method to revascularize the ischaemic heart. For the 1~ years that I have expended in the field of research under his supervision I wish to extend my appreciation of his thought provoking discussions on the problems encountered throughout this investigation that lead me to develop a method of scientific thinking. These studies afforded me the opportunity to explore more fully the vascularization activities of the omental tissue in re-establishing itself while set free in ectopie environments which resulted in the finding of a (ii) three day minimum of such free omental grafts to become revascularized. The work certainly has roused my interest and enthusiasm in the importance of experimental medicine, enabling me to complete the training in general surgery with better perspective and understanding.