Sa G Es 2 0 0 6 Sages Lunches

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1222257889
SAGES Corporate Supporters Hotel Contact Information General Information about the Meeting Registration Hours & Information Exhibits and Exhibit Only Registration SAGES Meeting Leaders SAGES Accreditation & CME Worksheet Forde Tribute Dinner Hilton Anatole Floor Plan

THANKS TO OUR CORPORATE SUPPORTERS:

PLATINUM LEVEL DONORS

AUTOSUTURE & VALLEYLAB –

DIVISIONS OF TYCO HEALTHCARE

SAGES Schedule at a Glance

ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, INC. KARL STORZ ENDOSCOPY-AMERICA, INC.

OLYMPUS AMERICA

SAGES 2006 Postgraduate Courses

15 Bariatric Postgraduate Course

16 Joint SAGES-MIRA Symposium–Robotics

35 Colon Postgraduate Course 55 SAGES Allied Health Professionals Course

SAGES 2006 Hands-On Courses
12 Joint IPEG/SAGES Pediatric Fellows
Advanced Techniques Hands-On Course

20 Surgeon in the Digital Age 27 Advanced Skills & Laparoscopic Techniques
Hands-On Course
28 SAGES/SLS Simulator Hands-on Course 31 SAGES Endoluminal Surgery Hands-on Course

18 Joint SAGES/ACS Sessions

GOLD LEVEL DONORS

Inamed Health Stryker Endoscopy

SILVER LEVEL DONORS

Boston Scientific Endoscopy Davol, Inc. General Surgery News Gore & Associates, Inc.

18 Inflammatory Bowel Disease 18 The Changing Face of Surgical Education
20 Ethicon Patient Safety Lunch 22 International Video Session: Teleconferenced to Asia 23 SAGES Technology Pavillion

27 SAGES/IPEG Combined Video Breakfast Session

32 SAGES/Fellowship Council Lunch 37 SAGES Hernia Symposium

BRONZE LEVEL DONORS

Adolor Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline Aesculap B-K Medical Systems Cook Surgical Medtronic SurgRX
37 SAGES Bariatric Symposium

39 SAGES 2006 Scientific Session

41 SAGES Presidential Address
Synovis Surgical Innovations Taut, Inc.
43 Gerald Marks Lecture 53 Karl Storz Lecture
Tissue Science Laboratories SAGES recognizes TATRC as a Meeting Supporter.
44 SAGES/IPEG Panel, SAGES/ASGE Panel, Hernia Panel

48 SAGES/ASCRS Panel–Shortening the Learning Curve:
How to Do Laparoscopic Colectomy
49 SAGES GERD Panel 47 SAGES Resident & Fellows Scientific Session 52 International Video Session: Teleconferenced to Europe 54 SAGES ReOperative Panel

SAGES MESSAGE CENTER
& INTERNET MODULE

3
SAGES is pleased to again offer OLC , the most technologically

advanced trade show communication solution through the SAGES Message Center. OLC is an internet based, virtual conference
56 SAGES Awards Ceremony 62 SAGES Complications Video Session 63 SAGES Solid Organ Panel 64 SAGES Learning Center 66 SAGES Lunches
3offering solutions for exhibitor and product location, national and international matchmaking and messaging. Designed to improve the trade show experience by fostering communication between
3attendees, exhibitors and association, OLC assists participants in
68 SAGES Faculty & Presenters

finding one another and reducing wasted time.
71 SAGES Faculty & Presenter Disclosures

79 Social Programs & Accompanying Guest Tours 80 Guide To SAGES Resources 83 Resident & Fellow Scientific Session Abstracts 87 Oral Presentation Abstracts
115 Video Presentation Abstracts 121 Poster Listing 133 Poster Abstracts 258 Emerging Technology Oral Abstracts 262 Emerging Technology Poster Abstracts 275 Trinity Exhibit Hall Floor Plan 276 Exhibitor Profiles
Attendees benefit by being able to anonymously contact exhibitors with inquiries as well as communicate with other attendees and non-attending members with similar interests from their geographic region. For more information please contact the OLC3 representative at the SAGES Message Center. To leave messages, go to http://messagecenter.sages.org.

In addition to the Message Center, please leave the following numbers with your offices and families:

SAGES On-Site Office Phone: 214-757-2100 SAGES On-Site Office Fax: 214-757-2101

288 Faculty & Presenter Index

http://www.sages.org/

1

GENERAL INFORMATION

SAGES MEETING

(PART OF SURGICAL SPRING WEEK) HOTEL CONTACT INFORMATION:

SAGES REGISTRATION

11300 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite 600, Los Angeles, CA 90064 Phone: (310) 437-0581 Fax: (310) 437-0585

Email: [email protected]

Hilton Anatole Hotel (Headquarters and Meeting Location)

2201 Stemmons Freeway, Dallas, TX 75207 Phone: (214) 748-1200

Register On-Site outside the Chantilly Ballroom Foyer

Wyndham Dallas Market Center

2015 Market Center Blvd., Dallas, TX 75207 Phone: (214) 741-7481

EXHIBIT ONLY REGISTRATION:

For those participants interested in only attending the technical exhibits, we offer a special “Exhibits Only Pass.” This option is available on-site. You may register for an Exhibit Only Pass beginning the morning of Wedmesday, April 26, 2006.

Courtyard Market Center

2150 Market Center Blvd., Dallas, TX 75207 Phone: (214) 653-1166
For additional information, please contact the Registrar.

Fairfield Inn & Suites Market Center

2110 Market Center Blvd., Dallas, TX 75207 Phone: (214) 760-8800

Sheraton Suites Market Center

2101 Stemmons Freeway, Dallas, TX 75207 Phone: (214) 747-3000

REGISTRATION HOURS:

Tuesday, April 25, 2006: Wednesday, April 26, 2006: Thursday, April 27, 2006: Friday, April 28, 2006:
12:00 - 5:00 PM

SAGES:

Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES)

11300 W. Olympic Blvd., Suite 600, Los Angeles, CA 90064

6:30 AM - 6:00 PM 6:30 AM - 6:00 PM 7:00 AM - 5:00 PM 6:30 AM - 3:00 PM

  • Phone: (310) 437-0544
  • Fax: (310) 437-0585

Saturday, April 29, 2006:

Email: [email protected] Website: www.sages.org

SAGES PAST PRESIDENTS
EXHIBIT DATES & TIMES:

  • Gerald Marks, MD
  • 1981 - 1983

1983 - 1984 1984 - 1985 1985 - 1986 1986 - 1987 1987 - 1988 1988 - 1989 1989 - 1990 1990 - 1992 1992 - 1993 1993 - 1994 1994 - 1995 1995 - 1996 1996 - 1997 1997 - 1998 1998 - 1999 1999 - 2000 2000 - 2001 2001 - 2002 2002 - 2003 2003 - 2004 2004 - 2005

WEDNESDAY, APRIL 26, 2006

Kenneth Forde, MD Thomas L. Dent, MD James A. Lind, MD

SAGES & IPEG Opening Reception 5:00 PM - 6:30 PM

THURSDAY, APRIL 27, 2006

  • Hall Open
  • 10:00 AM - 2:30 PM

10:00 AM - 2:30 PM 10:00 AM - 1:00 PM

John A. Coller, MD

FRIDAY, APRIL 28, 2006

Hall Open

Theodore R. Schrock, MD Talmadge A. Bowden, MD Lee E. Smith, MD

SATURDAY, APRIL 29, 2006

Hall Open

Jeffrey Ponsky, MD Frederick L. Greene, MD George Berci, MD

A GENTLE REMINDER: We have taken every precaution to assure the safety and security of our guests and their possessions. However, we urge you to be aware and take simple steps to guard your possessions.

Bruce V. MacFadyen, Jr., MD Col. Richard M. Satava, MD Greg Stiegmann, MD Desmond Birkett, MD John Hunter, MD Jeffrey H. Peters, MD Nathaniel J. Soper, MD L. William Traverso, MD Bruce D. Schirmer, MD Lee Swanstrom, MD David Rattner, MD

• Do not leave your purse or briefcase unattended.
• Do not leave your laptop, phone or
PDAS on the floor or out of your sight in a darkened room
• Be aware of your surroundings.

HAVE A SAFE & SECURE MEETING!

http://www.sages.org/

2

SAGES GENERAL INFORMATION

SAGES 2006 MEETING LEADERS

SAGES BOARD

OF GOVERNORS

Program Chair: C. Daniel Smith, MD

Adv. Techniques HO Course Chair: Adv. Techniques HO Course Co-Chair: Endoluminal HO Course Chair:
Daniel Jones, MD David Provost, MD Nathaniel Soper, MD

  • Edward Lin, DO
  • Endoluminal HO Course Co-Chair:

Digital Video Editing HO Course Chair: SAGES/SLS Simulation HO Course Chair:

President: Daniel J. Deziel, MD

Steven Schwaitzberg, MD Randy Haluck, MD

President-Elect: Steven D. Wexner, MD 1st Vice President: C. Daniel Smith, MD

SAGES/SLS Simulation HO Course Co-Chair: Richard Satava, MD

2nd Vice President:

Steven D. Schwaitzberg, MD

  • Bariatric PG Course Chairs:
  • Ninh Nguyen, MD & Eric DeMaria, MD

  • Scott Melvin, MD
  • SAGES/MIRA Robotics PG Course Chair:

Secretary: Jo Buyske, MD

SAGES/MIRA Robotics PG Course Co-Chair: Santiago Horgan, MD

Treasurer: Mark A. Talamini, MD

  • Colon PG Course Chair:
  • Michael Holzman, MD

  • Thadeus Trus, MD
  • Allied Health Course Chair:

International Video Symposium Chair: Evening Hernia Symposium Chair: Evening Bariatric Symposium Chair: Poster Chair:

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD

Robert Bailey, MD
Plato Esartia, MD B. Todd Heniford, MD Matthew Hutter, MD Steven Bowers, MD Timothy Farrell, MD Horacio Asbun, MD Daniel Scott, MD
Mark Callery, MD John Coller, MD, AMA HOD Representative David Easter, MD
Poster Co-Chair:
Steve Eubanks, MD
Video Chair:

Dennis Fowler, MD
Learning Center Chair:

Gerald Fried, MD
Learning Center Co-Chair:

Educator’s Lunch Coordinator: Emerging Technology Forum Coordinator: Fellowship Council Lunch Coordinator: Resident’s Day Coordinators:
Gretchen Purcell, MD, PhD Raymond Onders, MD Daniel Herron, MD Lee Swanstrom, MD Emily Winslow, MD & Benjamin Poulose, MD
Frederick Greene, MD B. Todd Heniford, MD Daniel Herron, MD Michael Holzman, MD Karen Horvath, MD John Hunter, MD Daniel Jones, MD

SAGES PROGRAM COMMITTEE

Namir Katkhouda, MD Bruce MacFadyen, MD Jeffrey Marks, MD

  • Reid B. Adams, MD
  • W. Scott Melvin, MD

Horacio J. Asbun, MD, Co-Chair

Fredrick J. Brody, MD L. Michael Brunt, MD Luis E. Burbano, MD
Adrian E. Park, MD Edward H. Phillips, MD Gretchen P. Purcell, MD, PhD Bruce J. Ramshaw, MD David W. Rattner, MD William O. Richards, MD Steven S. Rothenberg, MD Steven D. Schwaitzberg, MD Paul A. Severson, MD
W. Scott Melvin, MD Michael Nussbaum, MD Adrian Park, MD
Jo Buyske, MD

Jeffrey Peters, MD
Jorge Cervantes, MD

Paul Thomas Cirangle, MD Ricardo V. Cohen, MD Manolo Cortez, MD
Jeffrey Ponsky, MD, ABS Representative David W. Rattner, MD William Richards, MD Steven Rothenberg, MD Philip Schauer, MD
Jorge Cueto, MD

W. Stephen Eubanks, MD, Chair

Edward L. Felix, MD Abe L. Fingerhut, MD Jack Jakimowicz, MD Goro Kaneda, MD Demetrius E. M. Litwin, MD Jeffrey M. Marks, MD John H. Marks, MD
Phillip P. Shadduck, MD C. Daniel Smith, MD Blayne A. Standage, MD Lee L. Swanstrom, MD Mark A. Talamini, MD Tehemton E. Udwadia, MD Steven D. Wexner, MD Sherry M. Wren, MD
Bruce Schirmer, MD C. Daniel Smith, MD Nathaniel Soper, MD Steven Stain, MD Greg Stiegmann, MD, ACS Representative Lee Swanstrom, MD
Manabu Yamamoto, MD

  • Tonia M. Young-Fadok, MD
  • Michael R. Marohn, MD

Marian P. McDonald, MD
L. William Traverso, MD

http://www.sages.org/

5

SAGES GENERAL INFORMATION

SAGES ACCREDITATION

The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (A.C.C.M.E.) to sponsor Continuing Medical Education for physicians. The Society of American and Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons designates this educational activity for a maximum of 35.5 credits in AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

CME WORKSHEET FOR SAGES 2006 MEETING: This is not your CME credit form. SAGES has a new system this

year. Please use the worksheet below to track the number of CME hours you attend for each activity. Your CME credit form can be found inside your registrant bag. You may turn in your CME form at registration to have your CME certificate mailed to you. Or, new this year, you may print your CME certificate on-site at special CME kiosks near the registration area.

CME WORKSHEET FOR SAGES 2006 MEETING

Fill in the number of hours you attend each activity in the chart below to track your CME credits.

WEDNESDAY

  • Activity
  • Credits Available
  • Hours Attended

Bariatric Postgraduate Course Robotics Postgraduate Course Inflammatory Bowel Disease Session Surgical Education Session Surgeons in the Digital Age Workshop Evening Teleconferenced Video Session
7.00 4.50 2.00 2.00 4.00 1.50

THURSDAY

  • Activity
  • Credits Available
  • Hours Attended

  • Video Breakfast Session w/IPEG
  • 1.00

3.00 7.00 3.50 7.00 3.50 3.50
Endoluminal Surgery Hands-On Course Lecture Endoluminal Surgery Hands-On Course Lecture+Lab Simulator Hands-On Course Lecture Simulator Hands-On Course Lecture+Lab Advance Techniques Hands-On Lab Colon Postgraduate Course

FRIDAY

  • Activity
  • Credits Available
  • Hours Attended

Learning Center (open Friday & Saturday) 6:30 - 7:30 am Video Session or Basic Science (SS) 7:30 - 9:00 am Plenary Session (SS) 9:00 - 9:30 am Presidential Lecture (SS) 9:30 - 10:00 am Marks Lecture (SS)
3.00 1.00 1.50 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.00 3.50
10:00 - 11:00 am Panels (SS) 2:00 - 3:00 pm Panel or Concurrent Session (SS) 3:00 - 4:30 pm Panel or Concurrent Session (SS) 4:30 - 5:30 pm Concurrent Session or Video Session (SS) 2:00 - 5:30 pm Resident and Fellow Session

SATURDAY

  • Activity
  • Credits Available
  • Hours Attended

Morning Teleconferenced Video Session 8:00 - 9:30 am Plenary Session (SS) 9:30 - 10:00 am Storz Lecture (SS) 10:00 - 11:00 am Panel or Foregut Session (SS) Allied Health Professionals Course
1.50 1.50 0.50 1.00 3.50 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00
Educator’s Lunch 2:00 - 3:00 pm Concurrent Session (SS) 3:00 - 4:00 pm Video or Concurrent Session (SS) 4:00 - 5:00 pm Panel or Concurrent Session (SS)

TOTAL NUMBER OF HOURS ATTENDED (max 35.5)

  • (SS) indicates a portion of the Scientific Session.
  • If a SAGES activity is not listed here, it is NOT accredited for CME credits.

http://www.sages.org/

7

HILTON ANATOLE HOTEL FLOOR PLAN FIRST SAGES FOUNDATION TRIBUTE DINNER TO HONOR KEN & KAY FORDE

TH

AND CELEBRATE SAGES 25 ANNIVERSARY Kay & Dr. Kenneth Forde4

ACS Governor, and now as an officer of the SAGES Foundation.
The SAGES Education & Research Foundation will host its first annual Tribute Dinner during the 2006 Annual Meeting in Dallas. The dinner will take place on Thursday Evening, April 27th. Kenneth and Kay Forde are, in many respects, two of the parents of SAGES. The Foundation, in establishing the annual event, wanted to salute the luminaries who have provided the framework on which SAGES and endoscopic surgery have been built.
He is currently Jose M. Ferrer Professor, Department of Surgery, College of Physicians & Surgeons of Columbia University, Vice Chairman, Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Columbia Campus, New York, NY.

Recommended publications
  • Large Animal Surgical Procedures As-Of December 1, 2020 Abdominal

    Large Animal Surgical Procedures As-Of December 1, 2020 Abdominal

    Large Animal Surgical Procedures as-of December 1, 2020 Core Curriculum Category Surgical Category Surgical Procedure Diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy Exploratory celiotomy - left flank Exploratory celiotomy - right flank Abdominal cavity/wall Exploratory celiotomy - ventral midline Exploratory celiotomy - ventral paramedian Exploratory laparotomy - death / euthanasia on table Peritoneal lavage via celiotomy Cecocolostomy Ileo-/Jejunocolostomy Cecum Jejunocecostomy Typhlectomy, partial Typhlotomy Abomasopexy, laparoscopic Abomasopexy, left flank Abdominal - LA Abomasopexy, paramedian Food animal GI: Abomasum Abomasotomy Omentopexy Pyloropexy, flank Reduction of volvulus Typhlectomy Food animal GI: Cecum Typhlotomy Food animal GI: Descending colon, Rectal prolapse, amputation/anastomosis rectum Rectal prolapse, submucosal reduction Food animal GI: Rumen Rumenotomy Decompression/emptying (no enterotomy) Food animal GI: Small intestine Enterotomy Reduction w/o resection (incarceration, volvulus, etc.) Resection/anastomosis Enterotomy Reduction of displacement Food animal GI: Spiral colon Reduction of volvulus Resection/anastomosis (inc. atresia coli) Side-side anastomosis, no resection Colopexy, hand-sutured Colopexy, laparoscopic Colostomy Large colon Enterotomy Reduction of displacement Reduction of volvulus Resection/anastomosis Biopsy Liver Cholelith removal Liver lobectomy Laceration repair Rectum Rectal prolapse repair Resection/anastomosis Enterotomy Impaction resolution via celiotomy Small colon Resection/anastomosis Taeniotomy Decompression/emptying
  • Comparison of Laparoscopic-Guided Abomasopexy Versus Omentopexy Via Right Flank Laparotomy for the Treatment of Left Abomasal Displacement in Dairy Cows

    Comparison of Laparoscopic-Guided Abomasopexy Versus Omentopexy Via Right Flank Laparotomy for the Treatment of Left Abomasal Displacement in Dairy Cows

    Comparison of laparoscopic-guided abomasopexy versus omentopexy via right flank laparotomy for the treatment of left abomasal displacement in dairy cows Torsten Seeger, Dr Med Vet; Harald Kümper, Dr Med Vet; Klaus Failing, Dr Rer Nat; Klaus Doll, Dr Med Vet Habil mean lactation incidence is approximately 1% to 5% Objective—To compare results obtained by use of 3–7 laparoscopy-assisted abomasopexy versus omen- but is > 10% in some herds. Various surgical proce- topexy via right flank laparotomy for the treatment of dures have been used, all of which have specific advan- dairy cows with left displaced abomasum (LDA). tages and disadvantages. Open surgical techniques Animals—120 dairy cows with an LDA. include abomasopexy via the ventral paramedian approach8; laparotomy via the left paralumbar fossa for Procedure—In a prospective clinical trial, cows were omentopexy9 and abomasopexy,10 respectively; and randomly allocated to the abomasopexy group omentopexy via laparotomy in the right paralumbar (laparoscopy-assisted abomasopexy) or to the control 11 group (omentopexy via right flank). Data were fossa. Omentopexy via laparotomy in the right obtained during the first 5 days after surgery and 6 paralumbar fossa is considered the standard procedure weeks and 6 months after surgery. for the treatment of cattle with an LDA in Germany. Results—59 of 60 cows in the abomasopexy group Because of financial and time constraints, percuta- and all 60 cows in the control group were treated suc- neous fixation techniques, such as the blind-tack cessfully. Median duration was shorter for the laparo- suture procedure12 or toggle-pin method,13 have scopic procedure (27.5 minutes), compared with that become more commonly used by practitioners, even for the control group (38 minutes).
  • OMENTAL TRANSPLANTATION and CELL CULTURE. By: ROSENDO

    OMENTAL TRANSPLANTATION and CELL CULTURE. By: ROSENDO

    OMENTAL TRANSPLANTATION and CELL CULTURE. by: ROSENDO CRIOLLOS, M.D. A thesis submitted to the faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Science Degree. Department of Experimental Surgery, McGill University, MONTREAL. APRIL 1964. (i) P R E F A C E. The tremendous progress in medicine, especially in cardiovascular surgery during the pBst few decades bas promoted development of measures for the control and cure of various anomalies and diseases by surgical means. While the controversy over the different procedures of revascularization for an ischaemic heart still continues, the rate of surgery in the management of the occlusive coronary artery disease is widely accepted; as James Bryce so ably said, WMedicine is the only profession that labours incessantly to destroy the reason for its own existence". If this be true allow me to thank Dr. Arthur Vineberg for letting me be one of the labourera in his investigations on free omental grafts as a method to revascularize the ischaemic heart. For the 1~ years that I have expended in the field of research under his supervision I wish to extend my appreciation of his thought provoking discussions on the problems encountered throughout this investigation that lead me to develop a method of scientific thinking. These studies afforded me the opportunity to explore more fully the vascularization activities of the omental tissue in re-establishing itself while set free in ectopie environments which resulted in the finding of a (ii) three day minimum of such free omental grafts to become revascularized. The work certainly has roused my interest and enthusiasm in the importance of experimental medicine, enabling me to complete the training in general surgery with better perspective and understanding.
  • Colorectal Cancer

    Colorectal Cancer

    Colorectal Cancer Your Care and Recovery It is normal to feel overwhelmed by a cancer diagnosis. Mount Carmel’s team of expert healthcare professionals are here to support you during this difficult time. You and your doctor have determined that surgery is the next step in your treatment. This book has been provided to help you understand the different aspects of your care and the resources that are available to help you through your diagnosis, treatment, and recovery. Keep these suggestions in mind: Don’t be afraid to ask questions. Keep a written list of your questions to take with you to your doctor's appointments. To make an informed choice, ask about your treatment options, including the pros and cons of each and potential side effects. Bring someone with you to your appointments to help you listen, ask questions, and take notes. It is hard to absorb everything by yourself. Keep a log of your healthcare journey as you go along. Express your feelings — talk with friends and family members and ask for help. For your continued health education, this booklet and others are available on mountcarmelhealth.com. 2 Table of Contents Diagnosis ....................................................... 4 Going Home ............................................... 20 Building and Working with Guidelines for Home ...................................... 20 Your Healthcare Team ..................................... 4 Common Diet Problems ................................ 23 Cancer Patient Navigator Program ................ 4 Follow-up Care ...............................................
  • Giant Peptic Ulcer Perforation- Omentopexy Versus Omental Plugging: a Comparative Study

    Giant Peptic Ulcer Perforation- Omentopexy Versus Omental Plugging: a Comparative Study

    International Surgery Journal Kumar R et al. Int Surg J. 2020 Mar;7(3):787-790 http://www.ijsurgery.com pISSN 2349-3305 | eISSN 2349-2902 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20200823 Original Research Article Giant peptic ulcer perforation- omentopexy versus omental plugging: a comparative study Rakesh Kumar1, Sneh Kiran2*, H. N. Singh Hariaudh1 1Department of General Surgery, NMCH, Patna, Bihar, India 2Department of Obstretics and Gynaecology, IGIMS, Patna, Bihar, India Received: 31 December 2019 Revised: 12 February 2020 Accepted: 13 February 2020 *Correspondence: Dr. Sneh Kiran, E-mail: [email protected] Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ABSTRACT Background: Giant peptic ulcer perforation is a life-threatening surgical emergency with high mortality rate. This study compares two different surgical techniques omentopexy and omental plugging for the treatment of giant peptic perforation. Methods: This study was a prospective study comparing the efficacy of omental plugging and omentopexy. The study was done at Emergency Department of General Surgery in Nalanda Medical College and Hospital, Patna over one-year period from October 2017 to September 2018. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups: one for omental plugging (cases) and other for omentopexy (controls). Results: A prospective non-randomized study of 12 patients with giant peptic perforation (≥2 cm in diameter) was carried out over a period of 24 months.
  • Subject Index

    Subject Index

    Subject Index A – – complete 411 Abcarian, Herand 445 ––etiology 411 abdominal – – partial 411 – aortic aneuryms (AAA) 19, 46, 329 – – prevention 412 – aortic emergency 329 – – treatment 412 – – incision 331 – X-ray 21, 28, 33 – – infra-renal aortic control 332 abnormal – – operation 331 – gas pattern 33 – – preparation 331 – opacity 37 – – proximal control 332 abscess – – subdiaphragmatic aortic control 332 – complex form 382 – apoplexy 19, 88 – intra-abdominal 101, 211, 377 – bleeding – – conservative treatment 381 – – life-threatening 436 – perianal 258, 261 – closure 334, 337, 340 achalasia 113 – – high risk 340 acidosis – compartment syndrome 155, 319, 321 – lactic 56 – contamination 96, 97 – metabolic 56 – CT 372 acquired biliary strictures 173 – – reviewing 42 active bleeding 87 – decompression 326 acute – emergency – abdomen 10, 17 – – non-traumatic 441 – abdominal pain – exploration 87 – – in the fertile woman 276 – imaging 33 – anal fissure 263 – pain 19, 292 – appendicitis 21, 29, 44, 68, 210, 230, 245, – re-entry 85 281, 285, 293, – sepsis 96 – cholangitis 173 – trauma 9 – cholecystitis 21, 29, 163, 236, 281, 295 – – laparoscopy 442 – colitis 208 – ultrasound (US) 28 – diverticulitis 21, 229 – wall 53 – gastric mucosal lesion 125 ––defect 390 – gastroenteritis 37 ––hernia 191 – incarcerated full-thickness rectal – wall dehiscence 411 prolapse 261 458 Subject Index acute apoplexy 88 – mesenteric ischemia 19, 30, 197 appendectomy 250 – pancreatitis 19, 27, 95, 144, 175 appendiceal – perianal hematomy 263 – abscess 252 adhesion
  • Diverting Stoma Versus No Diversion in Laparoscopic Low

    Diverting Stoma Versus No Diversion in Laparoscopic Low

    in vivo 33 : 2125-2131 (2019) doi:10.21873/invivo.11713 Diverting Stoma Versus No Diversion in Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection: A Single-center Retrospective Study in Japan LIMING WANG, YASUMITSU HIRANO, TOSHIMASA ISHII, HIROKA KONDO, KIYOKA HARA, NAO OBARA, PAULEON TAN and SHIGEKI YAMAGUCHI Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan Abstract. Background/Aim: The purpose of this retrospective anastomotic leakage (5, 6). Therefore, a diverting stoma (DS) study was to describe the benefits and risks of a diverting is recommended for such high-risk patients (7). Although a stoma (DS) in laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR) for DS may be of potential benefit to patients undergoing an rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 140 and 167 anterior resection, stoma-related complications can also occur. patients without and with DS, respectively, were included in These range from mild to devastating, with some patients this study in a high-volume cancer center of Japan within an requiring reoperation and long-term inpatient care, meaning a 8-year period. Results: Small bowel obstruction occurred DS remains a controversial procedure (8-12). more frequently in patients with DS (2.86% vs. 16.17%, A double stapler technique (DST) combined with a p<0.001). The difference in anastomotic leakage rate was not circular stapler is currently the most commonly feasible statistically significant (11.43% vs. 10.18%, p=0.72). In method for LAR anastomosis. However, anastomotic leakage multivariate analysis, the operating time was associated with often occurs at the overlap of the anastomotic staples (13).
  • Asian Journal of Medical Research Original Article Abstract

    Asian Journal of Medical Research Original Article Abstract

    Asian Journal of Medical Research Original Article Peptic perforation: epidemiology, etiology and management at tertiary care hospital in Gujarat Hiren Parmar 1, Asit Patel 1 1Department of Surgery,Smt N.H.L.Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad,India. Abstract Objectives: The aims and objectives of the present study are as follows: (1) to assess value of clinical features and radiological investigations in cases of perforated peptic perforation (2) to study the relationship between tobacco, alcohol consumption and perforated peptic ulcer (3) to study the different operative methods (4) to study the histopathological diagnosis of ulcer margin (5) to study the mortality and post-operative complications (6) to assess complains in follow-up and study endoscopic findings. Methods: This was the prospective study consist of 50 cases of peptic perforation studied at general hospital during the period of 2003 to 2005. Results: 60% of patients were in age group of 21-50 years. 40% of patients were tobacco chewer. Abdominal pain was the commonest symptom of all patients. The surgical treatment in form of simple closure with omentopexy gives excellent results. Discussion: In this study the highest no of patients were in 5th decade of life. Male female ratio indicated male preponderance but decrease in the ratio as compare to previous study. Still plain x ray abdomen is the gold standard investigation in diagnosis. With better anaesthesia, higher antibiotics, and aggressive chest physiotherapy post-operative complications were reduced. Conclusion: The increasing incidence in female may be due to increasing tendency for women to take on the responsibilities and occupations traditionally associated with men.
  • Code Procedure Cpt Price University Physicians Group

    Code Procedure Cpt Price University Physicians Group

    UNIVERSITY PHYSICIANS GROUP (UPG) PRICES OF PROVIDER SERVICES CODE PROCEDURE MOD CPT PRICE 0001A IMM ADMN SARSCOV2 30MCG/0.3ML DIL RECON 1ST DOSE 0001A $40.00 0002A IMM ADMN SARSCOV2 30MCG/0.3ML DIL RECON 2ND DOSE 0002A $40.00 0011A IMM ADMN SARSCOV2 100 MCG/0.5 ML 1ST DOSE 0011A $40.00 0012A IMM ADMN SARSCOV2 100 MCG/0.5 ML 2ND DOSE 0012A $40.00 0021A IMM ADMN SARSCOV2 5X1010 VP/0.5 ML 1ST DOSE 0021A $40.00 0022A IMM ADMN SARSCOV2 5X1010 VP/0.5 ML 2ND DOSE 0022A $40.00 0031A IMM ADMN SARSCOV2 AD26 5X10^10 VP/0.5 ML 1 DOSE 0031A $40.00 0042T CEREBRAL PERFUS ANALYSIS, CT W/CONTRAST 0042T $954.00 0054T BONE SURGERY USING COMPUTER ASSIST, FLURO GUIDED 0054T $640.00 0055T BONE SURGERY USING COMPUTER ASSIST, CT/ MRI GUIDED 0055T $1,188.00 0071T U/S LEIOMYOMATA ABLATE <200 CC 0071T $2,500.00 0075T 0075T PR TCAT PLMT XTRC VRT CRTD STENT RS&I PRQ 1ST VSL 26 26 $2,208.00 0126T CAROTID INT-MEDIA THICKNESS EVAL FOR ATHERSCLER 0126T $55.00 0159T 0159T COMPUTER AIDED BREAST MRI 26 26 $314.00 PR RECTAL TUMOR EXCISION, TRANSANAL ENDOSCOPIC 0184T MICROSURGICAL, FULL THICK 0184T $2,315.00 0191T PR ANT SEGMENT INSERTION DRAINAGE W/O RESERVOIR INT 0191T $2,396.00 01967 ANESTH, NEURAXIAL LABOR, PLAN VAG DEL 01967 $2,500.00 01996 PR DAILY MGMT,EPIDUR/SUBARACH CONT DRUG ADM 01996 $285.00 PR PERQ SAC AGMNTJ UNI W/WO BALO/MCHNL DEV 1/> 0200T NDL 0200T $5,106.00 PR PERQ SAC AGMNTJ BI W/WO BALO/MCHNL DEV 2/> 0201T NDLS 0201T $9,446.00 PR INJECT PLATELET RICH PLASMA W/IMG 0232T HARVEST/PREPARATOIN 0232T $1,509.00 0234T PR TRANSLUMINAL PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY, RENAL
  • ORAL PRESENTATIONS Turk J Surg 2017; 33 (Suppl.-1): 1-92 DOI: 10.5152/Turkjsurg.2018.011018 13Th Turkish Congress of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery

    ORAL PRESENTATIONS Turk J Surg 2017; 33 (Suppl.-1): 1-92 DOI: 10.5152/Turkjsurg.2018.011018 13Th Turkish Congress of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery

    13th TURKISH CONGRESS OF HEPATO-PANCREATO-BILIARY SURGERY 1-4 NOVEMBER 2017 / Antalya www.hpb2017.org ORAL PRESENTATIONS Turk J Surg 2017; 33 (Suppl.-1): 1-92 DOI: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2018.011018 13th Turkish Congress of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery SS-01 Patients with malignant liver tumors who consulted after the diagnosis of hemangioma İbrahim Tayfun Şahiner1, Arzu Poyanlı1, Bülent Acunaş2, Mine Güllüoğlu3, Cem İbiş4, Yaman Tekant4, İlgin Özden4 1Department of General Surgery, İstanbul University İstanbul School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey; Department of General Surgery, Medical Faculty, Hitit University, Çorum, Turkey 2Department of Radiology, İstanbul University İstanbul School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey 3Department of Pathology, İstanbul University İstanbul School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey 4Department of General Surgery, İstanbul University İstanbul School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey Introduction: Taking lessons from the experiences gained from patients who had been followed up due to the diagnosis of hemangioma in other health institutions but were found to have malignant tumors in our institution. Method: The recordings of 15 patients treated between January 2003 and May 2016 were examined retrospectively. Results: The median age of patients, 8 of whom were male, was 56 years (35-80 years). Ultrasonography (n:6), MR (n:6), and CT (n:3) had been used for the final diagnosis in another center. In our department, 13 of patients had MR and 2 of them were diagnosed with malignant tumor based on CT taken in the other center. In other words, ultrasonography findings of the other center were not confirmed by MR examination performed in our department and it was seen that CT and MR images of other patients were inadequate and/or misinterpreted.
  • Research Article the Role of Perioperative Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Biliary Drainage in Large Liver Hydatid Cysts

    Research Article the Role of Perioperative Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Biliary Drainage in Large Liver Hydatid Cysts

    Hindawi Publishing Corporation e Scientific World Journal Volume 2014, Article ID 301891, 6 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/301891 Research Article The Role of Perioperative Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Biliary Drainage in Large Liver Hydatid Cysts A. Krasniqi,1,2 B. Bicaj,1,2 D. Limani,1,2 M. Maxhuni,1,2 A. Rrusta,2 F. Hoxha,1,2 A. Hamza,1 V. Zejnullahu,2 F. Sada,1 S. Hashani,1,2 R. Musa,2 and R. Latifi3 1 Faculty of Medicine, University of Prishtina, 10000 Prishtina, Kosovo 2 Department of Surgery, University Clinical Centre of Kosova, 10000 Prishtina, Kosovo 3 Department of Surgery, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 87524, USA Correspondence should be addressed to R. Latifi; [email protected] Received 28 June 2014; Revised 15 September 2014; Accepted 16 September 2014; Published 9 November 2014 Academic Editor: Shahzad G. Raja Copyright © 2014 A. Krasniqi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background. The best surgical technique for large liver hydatid cysts (LHCs) has not yet been agreed on. Objectives.Theobjectiveof this study was to examine the role of perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and biliary drainage in patients with large LHCs. Methods. A 20-year retrospective study of patients with LHCs treated surgically at the University Clinical CenterofKosovo(UCCK).Wedividedpatientsinto2groupsbasedontreatmentperiod:1981–1990(GroupI)and2001–2010(Group II). Demographic characteristics (sex, age), the surgical procedure performed, complications rate, and outcomes were compared.
  • PRIVILEGE APPLICATION FORM - [Mercy Medical Center] Zz.Surgery General

    PRIVILEGE APPLICATION FORM - [Mercy Medical Center] Zz.Surgery General

    PRIVILEGE APPLICATION FORM - [Mercy Medical Center] zz.Surgery_General, Current Privilege Status Key Practitioner's Current Privilege status is signified in ( ) preceding each privilege. G = Granted W = Withdrawn T = Temporary P = With Proctor A = Assist with C = With Consult E = Emergency Only RQ = Requested L = Leave of Absence R = Resigned S = Suspended Staff Category - Associate Staff Requested Granted () ASSOCIATE MEDICAL STAFF: The associate Medical Staff shall consist of physicians, dentists and podiatrists who are being considered for advancement to membership as active or courtesy members of the Medical Staff. They shall be appointed to a specific department and may be appointed to serve on committees. They shall be ineligible to hold office in this Medical Staff organization. However, candidates for active staff status shall have voting privileges and shall accept emergency department coverage assignments. All associate Medical Staff memberships shall be provisional for a period of one year. Associate membership renewal may not exceed an additional year, following which the failure to advance from associate Medical Staff membership shall be deemed a termination of Medical Staff membership. An associate Medical Staff member whose membership is so terminated shall have hearing rights accorded by the Medical Staff bylaws if the termination is an Adverse Action as defined in the Medical Staff bylaws. Associate Medical Staff members shall be assigned to a department where their performance shall be evaluated by the chairperson of the department or the chairperson's representative in order to determine the eligibility of such associate staff members for continued Medical Staff membership and for exercising the clinical privileges provisionally granted to them.