Program Index
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fact Sheet: Designation of Election Infrastructure As Critical Infrastructure
Fact Sheet: Designation of Election Infrastructure as Critical Infrastructure Consistent with Presidential Policy Directive (PPD) 21, the Secretary of Homeland Security has established Election Infrastructure as a critical infrastructure subsector within the Government Facilities Sector. Election infrastructure includes a diverse set of assets, systems, and networks critical to the administration of the election process. When we use the term “election infrastrucure,” we mean the key parts of the assets, systems, and networks most critical to the security and resilience of the election process, both physical locations and information and communication technology. Specficially, we mean at least the information, capabilities, physical assets, and technologies which enable the registration and validation of voters; the casting, transmission, tabulation, and reporting of votes; and the certification, auditing, and verification of elections. Components of election infrastructure include, but are not limited to: • Physical locations: o Storage facilities, which may be located on public or private property that may be used to store election and voting system infrastructure before Election Day. o Polling places (including early voting locations), which may be physically located on public or private property, and may face physical and cyber threats to their normal operations on Election Day. o Centralized vote tabulation locations, which are used by some states and localities to process absentee and Election Day voting materials. • Information -
View Whitepaper
INFRAREPORT Top M&A Trends in Infrastructure Software EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1 EVOLUTION OF CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE 7 1.1 Size of the Prize 7 1.2 The Evolution of the Infrastructure (Public) Cloud Market and Technology 7 1.2.1 Original 2006 Public Cloud - Hardware as a Service 8 1.2.2 2016 - 2010 - Platform as a Service 9 1.2.3 2016 - 2019 - Containers as a Service 10 1.2.4 Container Orchestration 11 1.2.5 Standardization of Container Orchestration 11 1.2.6 Hybrid Cloud & Multi-Cloud 12 1.2.7 Edge Computing and 5G 12 1.2.8 APIs, Cloud Components and AI 13 1.2.9 Service Mesh 14 1.2.10 Serverless 15 1.2.11 Zero Code 15 1.2.12 Cloud as a Service 16 2 STATE OF THE MARKET 18 2.1 Investment Trend Summary -Summary of Funding Activity in Cloud Infrastructure 18 3 MARKET FOCUS – TRENDS & COMPANIES 20 3.1 Cloud Providers Provide Enhanced Security, Including AI/ML and Zero Trust Security 20 3.2 Cloud Management and Cost Containment Becomes a Challenge for Customers 21 3.3 The Container Market is Just Starting to Heat Up 23 3.4 Kubernetes 24 3.5 APIs Have Become the Dominant Information Sharing Paradigm 27 3.6 DevOps is the Answer to Increasing Competition From Emerging Digital Disruptors. 30 3.7 Serverless 32 3.8 Zero Code 38 3.9 Hybrid, Multi and Edge Clouds 43 4 LARGE PUBLIC/PRIVATE ACQUIRERS 57 4.1 Amazon Web Services | Private Company Profile 57 4.2 Cloudera (NYS: CLDR) | Public Company Profile 59 4.3 Hortonworks | Private Company Profile 61 Infrastructure Software Report l Woodside Capital Partners l Confidential l October 2020 Page | 2 INFRAREPORT -
Gartner Magic Quadrant for Integrated Systems
(http://www.gartner.com/home) LICENSED FOR DISTRIBUTION Magic Quadrant for Integrated Systems Published: 10 October 2016 ID: G00291000 Analyst(s): Andrew Butler, Philip Dawson, Julia Palmer, George J. Weiss, Kiyomi Yamada Summary Hyperconvergence is disrupting the integrated system market, with major system vendors joining the growing number of startups (some of which are now mature). I&O leaders should still recognize a role for solutions based on SANs and either blades or rack servers, depending on workload requirements. Strategic Planning Assumptions By 2019, approximately 30% of the global storage array capacity installed in enterprise data centers will be deployed on software-defined storage (SDS) or hyperconverged integrated system (HCIS) architectures based on x86 hardware systems, up from less than 5% today. Twenty percent of mission-critical applications currently deployed on three-tier IT infrastructure will transition to HCISs by 2020. Market Definition/Description This document was revised on 9 November 2016. The document you are viewing is the corrected version. For more information, see the Corrections page on gartner.com. Gartner's view of the integrated system market is focused on transformational technologies or approaches delivering on the future needs of end users. It is not focused purely on the market as it is today. Integrated systems are combinations of server, storage and network infrastructure, sold with management software that facilitates the provisioning and management of the combined unit. As organizations seek to modernize and consolidate legacy data center infrastructure, the appeal of integrated systems is high, as these technologies are able to coexist with existing systems and integrate increasingly with the use of external cloud services. -
AP II 2012.Pdf
We’re there for you NEW NEWTEC M6100 BROADCAST SATELLITE MODULATOR TECHNOLOGIES THAT HELP YOU GO FURTHER Newtec technologies allow billions of people to connect to the world, their families and each other. You can find our innovations and technologies anywhere. Whether we work for government agencies or private companies, we always see innovation as a way to reduce your costs and optimize your efficiency. Our global experience in multiple markets helps us in achieving our ultimate goal: taking care of your satellite communications while you can focus on your core activities. We’re there for you. Always and everywhere. Visit us at www.newtec.eu BELGIUM – USA – SINGAPORE – DUBAI – CHINA – BRAZIL BROADCAST GOVERNMENT AND DEFENCE IP TRUNKING BUSINESS AND CONSUMER VSAT All articles are available for download at www.connect-world.com CONTENTS Cloud opportunities Improving business fluidity with the Cloud 5 by Andrew Dobbins, Verizon’s vice president of Asia-Pacific 5 7 10 12 From video-communication to machine-to-machine - Cloud turns to business 7 by Karim Taga, managing partner and global practice leader, TIME, Arthur D. Little Enterprise adoption of Cloud computing: The next five years for IT 10 15 17 19 22 by Bernard Golden, CEO, HyperStratus Shore to shore: IT, the fifth utility 12 by Jim Fagan, VP and managing director, Rackspace Asia-Pacific Cloud security 24 26 29 31 Spear phishing in the Cloud 15 by GOH Hock Beng, vice president, Channel Sales Asia, TrustSphere Who Owns Security In The Cloud? 17 by Jim Reavis, founder and executive director, Cloud security Alliance; and Dave 33 36 39 42 Asprey, vice president of Cloud security, Trend Micro Data breach and risk in the Cloud - the legal response 19 by Thomas J. -
Cisco Live 2018
SPONSORS AND EXHIBITORS On behalf of the entire Cisco Live team, thank you for helping us make this year’s event a memorable experience! Preparations are already underway for Cisco Live 2018, and we hope you’ll be joining us at the Orange County Convention Center in Orlando, Florida! Orlando is a very popular destination for attendees and it has been five years since the Cisco Live community has gathered there. As you know, the Cisco Live audience has big expectations for the on-site event, and we will continue to drive innovations within the World of Solutions to create a dynamic, immersive experience for attendees – and a more compelling venue for partners like you to showcase your company and your solutions. The World of Solutions will continue to be the go-to destination for content, networking, and activities happening outside of the classroom. We will also continue developing the activities that drive attendee traffic, space for lounges, cafés and other areas that encourage conversation and connections. We’re always refining the World of Solutions to make it a dynamic platform for exhibitors like you to engage with technology’s best prospect audience. We’re looking forward to working with you again next year on another great event. Please let one of our team members know if you have any questions. Sincerely, The Cisco Live Team CONTACTS FOR COMPANIES BEGINNING WITH: COMPANIES A—G COMPANIES H—Q COMPANIES R—Z Keith Lovitt Lesley Mendoza Hellena O’Dell Sr. Sales and Event Manager Sr. Sales and Event Manager VP Sales and Event Manager -
May 2017 M&A and Investment Summary
May 2017 M&A and Investment Summary Table of Contents 1 Overview of Monthly M&A and Investment Activity 3 2 Monthly M&A and Investment Activity by Industry Segment 8 3 Additional Monthly M&A and Investment Activity Data 42 4 About Petsky Prunier 55 Securities offered through Petsky Prunier Securities, LLC, member of FINRA. This M&A and Investment Summary has been prepared by and is being distributed in the United States by Petsky Prunier, a broker dealer registered with the U.S. SEC and a member of FINRA. 2 | M&A and Investment Summary May 2017 M&A and Investment Summary for All Segments Transaction Distribution . A total of 520 deals were announced in May 2017, of which 323 were worth $44.6 billion in aggregate reported value . Software was the most active segment with 189 deals announced — 123 of these transactions reported $10.0 billion in value . Digital Media/Commerce was also active with 117 transactions announced, of which 94 were worth a reported $14.1 billion in value . Strategic buyers announced 203 deals (49 reported $14.9 billion in value) . VC/Growth Capital investors announced 291 transactions (262 reported $15.7 billion in value) . Private Equity investors announced 26 deals during the month (12 reported $13.9 billion in value) May 2017 BUYER/INVESTOR BREAKDOWN Transactions Reported Value Strategic Buyout Venture/Growth Capital # % $MM % # $MM # $MM # $MM Software 189 36% $9,977.8 22% 59 $2,328.8 10 $4,845.0 120 $2,804.0 Digital Media/Commerce 117 23% 14,126.0 32% 36 2,027.4 2 1,500.0 79 10,598.6 Marketing Technology 85 -
Registry Operator Monthly Report
Monthly Report for February 2009 Registry Operator Monthly Report .Jobs February 2009 Employ Media LLC 3029 Prospect Avenue Cleveland, OH 44115 1‐216‐426‐1500 www.goto.jobs 1 Monthly Report for February 2009 This report provides an overview of .jobs TLD activity through the end of the reporting month. The information is primarily presented in table and chart format with text explanations as deemed necessary. Table of Contents 1. Accredited Registrar Status 2. SLA Performance 3. Zone File Activity 4. Major Software Releases 5. WHOIS Service Activity 6. Total Number of Transactions by Sub-Category 7. Daily Transaction Range 8. Per-Registrar Activity 1. Accredited Registrar Status Status No. of Registrars Operational 37 Ramp Up 0 Pre-Ramp Up 0 2. SLA Performance SLR Actual DNS Service Availability 100% Available Name Server Performance Level 100% Available WHOIS Service Availability 100% Available WHOIS Service Performance Level Meets Requirement WHOIS Service Response Time Meets Requirement WHOIS Service Updates At least Daily 3. Zone File Activity This section states the total number of zone file access passwords granted Month-Year Passwords February ‘09 0 2 Monthly Report for February 2009 4. Major Software Releases None 5. WHOIS Service Activity Month-Year Queries February ‘09 89,667 6. Total Number of Transactions By Sub‐Category Transaction Sub-Category February ‘09 Check 1925579 Create 126 Delete 37 Domain Info 6139 Renew 1614 Transfer 15 Update 704 7. Daily Transaction Range Month-Year High Low Average February ‘09 79925 0 69194 3 -
Global Phishing Survey: Period July - Trends and Domain December 2011 Name Use in 2H2011
Global Phishing Survey: Period July - Trends and Domain December 2011 Name Use in 2H2011 Unifying the Global Response To Cybercrime An Published April 2012 APWG Industry An APWG Industry Advisory Advisory1 http://www.apwg.org ● [email protected] PMB 246, 405 Waltham Street, Lexington MA USA 02421 Published April 26, 2012 Authors: Greg Aaron, Afilias <gaaron at afilias.info> and Rod Rasmussen, Internet Identity <rod.rasmussen at internetidentity.com> Research, Analysis Support, and Graphics: Aaron Routt, Internet Identity Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................... 2 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................ 3 BASIC STATISTICS ................................................................................................................ 3 SHIFTING TARGETS .............................................................................................................. 5 PHISHING BY UPTIME ......................................................................................................... 8 PREVALENCE OF PHISHING BY TOP-LEVEL DOMAIN (TLD) ..................................... 10 COMPROMISED DOMAINS VS. MALICIOUS REGISTRATIONS ................................ 12 REGISTRARS USED FOR MALICIOUS DOMAIN REGISTRATIONS ............................. 13 USE OF SUBDOMAIN SERVICES FOR PHISHING ......................................................... 14 SHARED VIRTUAL -
Name June 2008 Monthly Report
ICANN Monthly Report for JUNE 2008 Global Name Registry Limited (Company Number – 4076112) Suite K7, Floor 3, Cumbrian House, Meridian Gate, 217 Marsh Wall, London, E14 9FJ. UK. The Global Name Registry, Limited Monthly Operator Report June 2008 As required by the Registry Agreement between the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (“ICANN”) and The Global Name Registry, Limited (“Global Name Registry”) (the “Registry Agreement”), this report provides an overview of Global Name Registry activity through the end of the reporting month. The information is primarily presented in table and chart format with explanations as deemed necessary. Information is provided in the order as set forth in Appendix 4 of the Registry Agreement. 1 – Accredited Registrar Status: June 2008 Table 1 states the number of registrars for whom Global Name Registry has received accreditation notification from ICANN at the end of the reporting month, grouped into the three categories set forth in Table 1. Status # of Registrars Operational Registrars 137 Registrars in Ramp-Up Period 18 Registrars in pre-Ramp-Up Period 341 Total 496 2 – Service Level Agreement Performance: June 2008 Table 2 compares Service Level Agreement (“SLA”) requirements with actual performance for the reporting month. As required by the Registry Agreement, Global Name Registry is committed to provide service levels as specified in Appendix 7 and to comply with the requirements of the SLA in Appendix 10 of the Registry Agreement. The SLA is incorporated into the Global Name Registry Registry/Registrar Agreement that is executed with all operational registrars. Note: The SLA permits two 12-hour windows per year to perform major upgrades. -
JTOL-Stratoscale Symphony
Stratoscale Symphony The Cloud Infrastructure Company With the transition towards Software-Defined Data Center (SDDC), IT is aiming to achieve multiple benefits for managing infrastruc- ture and meeting modern day applications and business needs, leading towards the adoption of the cloud paradigm. Delivering public cloud experience in the enterprise data center Stratoscale Symphony is a holistic software solution offering IT a software-defined data center, working out-of-the-box with all the functionality and features required to run and operate a cloud environment. Converging compute, storage and networking with built-in management tools and a set of standard APIs, Stratoscale Symphony can be up and running in minutes removing cumbersome integration, long project times, high TCO and risk of failure. With Stratoscale Symphony deploying, managing and scaling cloud infrastructure has never been so achievable. The Challenge: How Can Stratoscale Help Freedom of Choice & • Use any x86 HW, existing or new. Best TCO • Simple deployment with fast & easy installation. • All storage resources are combined into a unified storage pool, eliminating the need for dedicated storage. • Management services are balanced across the cluster, requiring no additional dedicated HW. Pay As You Grow • Start with 3 nodes and scale to hundreds. • HW-heterogeneity to scale only with the resources you need. • Delivered as a subscription model with no upfront commitment. Agility with Ease of • Built-in DR tools, Self-healing and self-balancing mechanisms supporting enterprise grade environments and Use and Openness high-availability. • Smart provisioning and management of all resources move workloads across the data center with no downtime for enterprise-grade performance and resiliency. -
Magic Quadrant for Integrated Systems Published: 11 August 2015
G00266749 Magic Quadrant for Integrated Systems Published: 11 August 2015 Analyst(s): Andrew Butler, George J. Weiss, Philip Dawson, Stanley Zaffos, Errol Rasit, Hiroko Aoyama The integrated system market is in continuous ¯ux. Traditional blade- and SAN-based integrated systems are now being joined by hyperconverged integrated systems, while disaggregated systems and software-de®ned anything are set to transform the market further. Strategic Planning Assumption Hyperconverged integrated systems will represent over 35% of total integrated system market revenue by 2019. Market Definition/Description Integrated systems are combinations of server, storage and network infrastructure, sold with management software that facilitates the provisioning and management of the combined unit. The market for integrated systems can be divided into three broad categories of integrated systems, some of which overlap. These categories are: ■ Integrated stack system (ISS) — Server, storage and network hardware integrated with application software to provide appliance or appliancelike functionality. Examples include IBM PureApplication System, Oracle Exadata Database Machine and Teradata. Note that this research does not evaluate the "stack" components of any solution; therefore, this research should not be used as a primary basis for software selection. ■ Integrated infrastructure system (IIS) — Server, storage and network hardware integrated to provide shared compute infrastructure. Examples include VCE Vblock, HP ConvergedSystem and Lenovo Converged System (formerly PureFlex). ■ Hyperconverged integrated system (HCIS) — Tightly coupled compute, network and storage hardware that dispenses with the need for a regular storage area network (SAN). Storage management functions — plus optional capabilities like backup, recovery, replication, deduplication and compression — are delivered via the management software layer and/or hardware, together with compute provisioning. -
Verisign, Inc. Registry Sensitive Information
Registry Operator’s MONTHLY REPORT .COM/.NET October 2008 Prepared: November 13, 2008 VeriSign, Inc. 21345 Ridgetop Circle Dulles, VA 20166-6503 VeriSign Registry Monthly Report – October 2008 As required by the ICANN/VeriSign Registry Agreements (Section 3.1(c)(iv)), this report provides an overview of VeriSign Registry activity through the end of the reporting month. The information is primarily presented in table and chart format with text explanations as deemed necessary. The information is provided to satisfy requirements listed in Appendix 4 of the .com and .net Registry Agreements. Pursuant to the agreements, “ICANN shall use reasonable commercial efforts to preserve the confidentiality of the information reported until three months after the end of the month to which the report relates". It has been agreed by ICANN that some information required under the .com and .net Registry Agreements, Appendix 4, Item 8 will be provided either quarterly and/or monthly as specified below. Information is organized as follows: 1. Accredited Registrar Status (Appendix 4, Item 1)..................................................................3 Table 1 – Accredited Registrar Status – October 2008.....................................................3 2. Service Level Agreement Performance (Appendix 4, Item 2) ...............................................3 Table 2.1 – .com Service Level Agreement Performance – October 2008 ......................4 Table 2.2 – .net Service Level Agreement Performance – October 2008 ........................4 3.