Going Through the Ginnels Northbound
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Map and Directions to DFC 2012 V1
Directions to the City of Leeds Conference Annex Bus Routes From the centre of Leeds - Take the carriageway onto Rampart Road (this is A660 Otley Road towards Headingley, before the lights at high park corner the All buses go from Infirmary (Signposted for Skipton or the University). main junction is no entry). Turn left at the Street or the bus stop outside Proceed past the University building and junction onto Woodhouse Street. Take the Bar Risa on Albion Street through the lights, move into the right next right turn up Woodhouse cliff (not Cliff (across the road from St Johns McDonald's). hand lane and keep going straight up Road) Sign posted for City of Leeds High Woodhouse Lane. Go straight through the School. Continue to the top of the hill, 1,1b, 1c, 28,92, 93, 95, 96, second set of lights and pass the 'Firkin through the school gates, straight on to 97, 655, 729, 731, 755, 780, Public House' on your left. Take the first park anywhere in the school car park. x82 all of these go up past turning on the right, crossing the dual the university towards Hyde Park. We are here From the north of Leeds - A6120 outer on the same site as ring road, at the Lawnswood School City of Leeds School f Headingley f roundabout, take the A660, Otley Road i l C towards Headingley. Proceed through the e H Hyde Park s lights in the centre of Headingley, for ea u Bus stop to o di Pub C n h city centre around 1.5 km to the next set of lights at g l l i d e f y f L o Hyde Park Corner. -
This Meanwood Valley Walk Download
An introduction to the The Meanwood Valley has long been celebrated as a ‘green artery’ in Leeds, bringing rural countryside into the heart of the city. In this green corridor is a rich mosaic of habitats, including woodland, lowland heath, meadow, watercourses and ponds. Though much of the valley is readily accessible from local urban areas, it provides an excellent opportunity to experience and enjoy wildlife in often seemingly-remote surroundings. The valley is centred on two watercourses, the topmost being Adel Beck which rises in Bramhope, but which gives way to Meanwood Beck just south of the Outer Ring Road. The becks are home to fish, such as stone loach and bullhead, as well as the native white-clawed crayfish, which is sadly now threatened. Keep your eyes open when walking near the becks and you may be lucky to spot one of our resident kingfishers or otters. Where the becks flow between boulders and within the woodland, the cool, moist conditions provide the perfect habitat for ferns, liverworts and mosses. In contrast, the poor, free-drain - ing soils and open and exposed conditions at Adel Moor are ideal for heather and if you’re particularly lucky, you may spot the com - mon lizards which live here. Small ponds along the valley are also the breeding grounds of frogs, toads and newts, including the protected great crested newt. The woodlands that cover much of the green space in the valley provide wonderful scenes of carpets of ground flora in spring and rich colours in the autumn. Mammals such as roe deer, stoats and several species of bats make the woodland their home, together with a wide variety of bird species, from house sparrows and long-tailed tits to jays, red kites and all three native woodpecker – the great spotted, lesser spotted and green woodpecker. -
Public Parks and the Differentiation of Space in Leeds, 1850–1914
Urban History (2021), 48, 552–571 doi:10.1017/S0963926820000449 RESEARCH ARTICLE Spaces apart: public parks and the differentiation of space in Leeds, 1850–1914 Nathan Booth1, David Churchill2* , Anna Barker3 and Adam Crawford4† 1Independent Scholar 2Centre for Criminal Justice Studies, School of Law, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT 3Centre for Criminal Justice Studies, School of Law, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT 4Centre for Criminal Justice Studies, School of Law, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract While the Victorian ideal of the public park is well understood, we know less of how local governors sought to realize this ideal in practice. This article is concerned with park-making as a process – contingent, unstable, open – rather than with parks as outcomes – determined, settled, closed. It details how local governors bounded, designed and regulated park spaces to differentiate them as ‘spaces apart’ within the city, and how this programme of spatial governance was obstructed, frustrated and diverted by political, environmental and social forces. The article also uses this historical analysis to provide a new perspective on the future prospects of urban parks today. Introduction How might an urban historian approach the Victorian municipal park? It was both an ideal space – a jewel in the civilized and harmonious city of the future – and an actual space in which people met, played, rowed and rallied.1 This immediately sug- gests two broad modes of investigation: first, a cultural history of how the park was represented, and how it imaginatively constituted collective identities and attach- ments; second, a social history of how the park was experienced in everyday life, and how it functioned as a crucible of wider social relations. -
Hyde Park Statistical Profile Vers 4 For
Enquiries and Manchester site: Real Life Methods Sociology A node of the ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Roscoe Building School of Social Sciences Manchester M13 9PL +44 (0)161 275 0265 [email protected] c.uk Leeds site: Leeds Social Sciences Institute Beech Grove House University of Leeds Leeds LS2 9JT +44 (0)113 343 7332 www.reallifemethods.ac.uk An Overview of Hyde Park / Burley Road, Leeds Andrew Clark April 2007 (Appendix 1 updated December 2007) A Work in Progress Contact: [email protected] 0113 343 7338 1 An Overview of Hyde Park / Burley Road, Leeds Introduction This document presents an overview of the Hyde Park / Burley Road area of Leeds. It consists of five sections: 1. An outline of the different ‘representational spaces’ the field site falls within. 2. A description of the economic and social geographies of the field site based on readily accessible public datasets. 3. Brief comments on some issues that may pose particular challenges to the area covered by the field site. 4. An Appendix listing ‘community’ orientated venues, facilities and voluntary organisations that operate within and close to the field site. 5. An overview of Dan Vickers’ Output area classification for northwest Leeds (included as Appendix). This document is updated regularly. Feedback, information on inaccuracies, or additional data is always appreciated. Please contact me at [email protected] , or at the Leeds Social Sciences Institute, The University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT. 2 About the Connected Lives Strand of the NCRM Real Life Methods Node This document provides a context for the Connected Lives strand of the Real Life Methods Node of the NCRM. -
River Basin Management Plan Humber River Basin District Annex C
River Basin Management Plan Humber River Basin District Annex C: Actions to deliver objectives Contents C.1 Introduction 2 C. 2 Actions we can all take 8 C.3 All sectors 10 C.4 Agriculture and rural land management 16 C.5 Angling and conservation 39 C.6 Central government 50 C.7 Environment Agency 60 C.8 Industry, manufacturing and other business 83 C.9 Local and regional government 83 C.10 Mining and quarrying 98 C.11 Navigation 103 C.12 Urban and transport 110 C.13 Water industry 116 C.1 Introduction This annex sets out tables of the actions (the programmes of measures) that are proposed for each sector. Actions are the on the ground activities that will implemented to manage the pressures on the water environment and achieve the objectives of this plan. Further information relating to these actions and how they have been developed is given in: • Annex B Objectives for waters in the Humber River Basin District This gives information on the current status and environmental objectives that have been set and when it is planned to achieve these • Annex D Protected area objectives (including programmes for Natura 2000) This gives details of the location of protected areas, the monitoring networks for these, the environmental objectives and additional information on programmes of work for Natura 2000 sites. • Annex E Actions appraisal This gives information about how we have set the water body objectives for this plan and how we have selected the actions • Annex F Mechanisms for action This sets out the mechanisms - that is, the policy, legal, financial and voluntary arrangements - that allow actions to be put in place The actions are set out in tables for each sector. -
Part 1 Rea Ch Classifica Tion
RIVER QUALITY SURVEY NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY NORTHUMBRIA & YORKSHIRE REGION GQA ASSESSMENT 1994 PART 1 REA CH CLASSIFICA TION FRESHWATER RIVERS AND CANALS VERSION 1: AUGUST 1995 GQA ASSESSMENT 1994 \ NORTHUMBRIA & YORKSHIRE REGION To allow the development of a National method of evaluating water quality, the rivers in all the NRA regions of England and Wales have been divided into reaches, which are numbered using a coding system based on the hydrological reference for each river basin. Each classified reach then has a chemistry sample point assigned to it and these sample points are regularly monitored for Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Dissolved oxygen (DO) and Total Ammonia. The summary statistics calculated from the results of this sampling are sent to a National Centre where the GQA Grades are calculated. A National report is produced and each region can then produce more detailed reports on the quality of their own rivers. For Northumbria and Yorkshire Region, this Regional Report has been divided into two parts. PARTI: REACH CLASSIFICATION This report contains a listing of the river reaches within the region, with their start and finish grid reference, approximate length, and the 1990 and 1994 GQA class for each reach. The reference code of the chemistry sample point used to classify the reach is also included. A sample point may classify several reaches if there are no major discharges or tributaries dividing those reaches. The sample point used to classify a reach may change and the classification is therefore calculated using the summary statistics for each sample point that has been used over the past three years. -
Leeds City Council and B¡Ll Mckinnon
Statement of Gommon and Uncommon Ground between Leeds City Council and B¡ll McKinnon Reference -Green Space Background Paper (CDL/321 HMCA: lnner (and reference to l site in North) Ward: Hyde Park and Woodhouse (and L site in Chapel Allerton) Name of Representor: Bill McKinnon Representation number(s): PDEO2546 (Publication Draft stage) & PSE00599 (Pre Submission Change stage) Site Allocat¡ons Plan Examination Leeds Local Plan Leeds ffi CITY COUNCIL I 1 Introduction 1.1 This statement of common and uncommon ground has been prepared jointly between Leeds City Council and Bill McKinnon (the parties). 1.2 It sets out matters which Mr McKinnon and Leeds City Council agree on and also identifies specific issues raised by My McKinnon in his oral representation presented atthe Matter4: green space hearing session on24th October 2017 which the Council disagrees with. 2 Background 2.1 Mr McKinnon has expressed a number of concerns about the contents of the various versions of the Green Space Background Paper ln relation to green spacê identification in Hyde Park and Woodhouse Ward and the subsequent calculation of surpluses and deficiencies against the standards set out in Core Strategy Policy G3. He submitted representations at Publication Draft stage (PDE02546) and to the proposed pre-submission changes (PSE00599). The details contained in his representation to the Publication Draft SAP were considered carefully by the City Council and some changes were made (as identified at paragraph 3.1 below). Nevertheless, there remain facts and issues over which the parties disagree which are set out below in paragraph 4.1 3 Areas of Gommon Ground 3.1 The parties are in agreement in respect of the following: Statement Statement from Mr McKinnon Statement from Leeds City of Common Council Ground Number 1) Mr McKinnon promotes the designation The Council agrees with Mr and protection of the open space McKinnon and has proposed adjacent to the former sorting office off pre-submission change number Cliff Road as green space. -
Upper Aire Flood Risk Management Strategy Summary Consultation Document May 2009 \
Environment Agency tackling flood risk where you live Upper Aire Flood Risk Management Strategy Summary Consultation Document May 2009 \ We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look after your environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. We build and maintain the majority of flood defences in low- lying areas of England and Wales to reduce the risk to homes and businesses. We are also responsible for warning the public about flooding from rivers and the sea in England and Wales and raising awareness of flood risk. Published by: Helen Tattersdale National Capital Programme Management Service Environment Agency Phoenix House Global Avenue Leeds LS11 8PG Tel: 0113 2134682 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Climate change means that we are going to get wetter winters, frequent stormy weather conditions and rising sea levels. We cannot afford to ignore the threat of flooding. We all have a role to play in dealing with the causes and effects of climate change. We consider climate change in everything we do and have a major role in limiting its impact by addressing its causes and adapting to change. As part of this role we look at the causes of flooding and decide if anything can be done to reduce the risk to people and property. But it’s not just about building walls and embankments along rivers to hold back the water in times of heavy rain. -
Annual Meeting 2014
The Palaeontological Association 58th Annual Meeting 16th–19th December 2014 University of Leeds PROGRAMME abstracts and AGM papers Public transport to the University of Leeds BY TRAIN: FROM TRAIN STATION ON FOOT: Leeds Train Station links regularly to all major UK cities. You The University campus is a 20 minute walk from the train can get from the station to the campus on foot, by taxi or by station. The map below will help you find your way. bus. A taxi ride will take about 10 minutes and it will cost Leave the station through the exit facing the main concourse. approximately £5. Turn left past the bus stops and walk down towards City Square. Keeping City Square on your left, walk straight up FROM TRAIN STATION BY BUS: Park Row. At the top of the road turn right onto The Headrow, We advise you to take bus number 1 which departs from passing The Light shopping centre on your left. After The Light Infirmary Street. The bus runs approximately every 10 minutes turn left onto Woodhouse Lane to continue uphill. Keep going, and the journey takes 10 minutes. passing Morrisons, Leeds Metropolitan and the Dry Dock You should get off the bus just outside the Parkinson Building. boat pub heading for the large white clock tower. This is the (There is also the £1 Leeds City Bus which takes you from the Parkinson building. train station to the lower end of campus but the journey time is much longer). BY COACH: If you arrive by coach you can catch bus numbers 6,28 or 97 to the University (Parkinson Building). -
Leeds PSPO Consultation Overview 17Th July 2017
OFFICIAL - Sensitive Leeds PSPO Consultation Overview 17th July 2017 More about the ASB in this area could have Respondent Have you caused me to had a had a linked to the linked to with a noticed any Support for PSPO Area in a public within the last change where detrimental detrimental linked to use of household connection to ASB in this persistent unreasonable the PSPO space 12 months I went / what I effect on my effect on the alcohol misuse Psychoactive waste left on the area area? did quality of life quality of life Substances street of others Armley 128 97% 90% 87% 78% 73% 57% 59% 76% 84% - 25% 91% Burmantofts 22 91% 90% 85% 70% 50% 45% 60% 70% 65% - - 100% Farsley 25 64% 100% 88% 44% 50% 38% 44% 75% 69% - - 64% Garforth 43 72% 81% 74% 26% 35% 26% 29% 58% 45% - - 84% Gipton 20 90% 89% 94% 56% 50% 39% 28% 67% 67% - - 95% Guiseley 83 90% 93% 91% 65% 69% 47% 51% 72% 57% - - 93% Harehills 87 87% 80% 74% 64% 55% 43% 54% 68% 63% - 53% 83% Headingley 57 70% 83% 75% 55% 58% 45% 53% 63% 75% - - 67% Horsforth 45 64% 83% 79% 38% 45% 21% 14% 66% 45% - - 80% Killingbeck & Seacroft 89 63% 88% 82% 66% 64% 32% 41% 71% 43% - - 67% Kippax & Allerton Bywater 48 81% 87% 72% 41% 62% 18% 38% 59% 56% - - 92% Leeds City Centre 170 81% 83% 90% 58% 62% 43% 47% 77% 67% 45% - 74% Little Woodhouse 16 81% 100% 85% 77% 62% 38% 69% 85% 69% - - 75% Otley 65 52% 88% 82% 50% 68% 38% 35% 71% 71% - - 55% Pudsey 65 82% 94% 89% 51% 60% 36% 43% 75% 57% - - 91% Wetherby 28 82% 91% 96% 61% 83% 35% 39% 78% 74% - - 93% Woodhouse Moor and Little London 86 37% 81% 78% 63% 56% 31% 34% 69% 63% - - 22% Yeadon 40 88% 91% 89% 57% 71% 34% 46% 83% 69% - - 98% Total 1117 72% 87% 84% 60% 62% 40% 46% 72% 65% - - 76% Information for this report has been extracted from SNAP survey systems; absolute numbers may vary compared to other reports relating to data extracted at different dates. -
A New Departure
Leeds City Council LEARNING THE LESSONS: Progress on Enhanced Management of Flood Risk in Leeds An Annual Report by the Water Asset Management Working Group June 2008 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Leeds Flood Alleviation Scheme 3. Land Drainage 4. Bridges 5. Highway Services 6. Environmental Services 7. Parks & Countryside 8. Planning 9. Sustainable Development 10. Asset Management 11. Enforcement 12. Emergency Planning 13. Working in Partnership 14. The Pitt Review 15. Appendices • Appendix 1: WAWMG Terms of Reference • Appendix 2: List of Hot spots 2 1. Introduction In August 2004 and May 2005 several areas of Leeds experienced significant flooding due to unusually intense rainfall and the inability of the drainage infrastructure to cope with the increased volumes of water. The incidents highlighted several areas for improvement in terms of the resources available to maintain our assets and respond to floods. Flooding at Barley Hill Road, West Garforth, in June 2007 In response to the first of these events, the Council set-up a cross-departmental working group - the Water Asset Management Working Group (WAMWG) - of senior officers from services with water or flood risk responsibilities to develop recommendations for improving our management of flood risk. The group developed a 33-point Action Plan which was approved by senior elected members and senior officers in July 2005 and led to an additional £1.1m of revenue funding being provided to implement the Action Plan’s recommendations. Although this work is on-going, the services represented on WAMWG have made consistently good progress in implementing the recommendations towards making the city more resilient to flood risk management. -
Aireborough Baseline Report B.Indd
Aireborough’s Natural and Built Environment Baseline Report October 2015 Image - Darren Sanderson Photography Limitations AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use Aireborough Neighbourhood Development Forum (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by AECOM. Where the conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others it is upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by AECOM has not been independently verifi ed by AECOM, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The methodology adopted and the sources of information used by AECOM in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report was undertaken in the period July 2015 to August 2015, although the evidence base goes wider, and is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time. The scope of this Report and the services are accordingly factually limited by these circumstances. Where assessments of works or costs identifi ed in this Report are made, such assessments are based upon the information available at the time and where appropriate are subject to further investigations or information which may become available. AECOM disclaim any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any matter aff ecting the Report, which may come or be brought to AECOM’s attention after the date of the Report.