Is Hedge-Fund Titan Steve Cohen Going Down? | Vanity Fair
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Full Transcript
Jane Hall: Hello and welcome to American Forum Café, a podcast production of the School of Communication at American University in Washington DC. I'm Jane Hall, I'm an associate professor here at SOC. I teach courses on politics in the media and advanced reporting. Before coming to AU I was a journalist covering the news media for many years in New York. In my Politics in the Media class we look at the intersection of contemporary politics and media coverage, and boy are politics and the media intersecting. Colliding, actually, and influencing each other. As part of my class students have the opportunity to participate in American Forum Town Halls and one on one conversations with journalists, political strategists, politicians, and other important players. My students in Advanced Reporting also play an important role in our programs. They are interviewing other college students about our topics as well as asking our guests questions during our events. Jane Hall: Recently, Congressman Steve Cohen, Democrat from Tennessee spoke with my classes and other students at AU. What you'll hear on this episode is the recording from that event. Congressman Cohen is best known for introducing Articles of Impeachment last year against Donald Trump. With the Democrats winning a majority in the House of Representatives impeachment had become a real possibility. And Congressman Cohen is chair of an important subcommittee on the House Judiciary Committee where impeachment could begin. He is playing an important role in other committees as well. He is the first Jewish Congressman from Tennessee, as well as he represents a majority black district. -
SEC Complaint: CR Intrinsic Investors LLC, Mathew Martoma, and Dr
AIRERO 12 CV 84 New York Regional Office 3 World Financial Center, Suite 400 New York, NY 10281-1022 (212) 336-0181 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, -against- COMPLAINT CR INTRINSIC INVESTORS, LLC, MATHEW MARTOMA, ECFCASE and DR. SIDNEY GILMAN, Defendants. Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), for its Complaint against defendants CR Intrinsic Investors, LLC ("CR Intrinsic"), Mathew Martoma ("Martoma"), and Dr. Sidney Gilman ("Gilman"), alleges as follows: SUMMARY 1. This is an insider trading case where affiliated investment advisers and their hedge funds made over $276 million in illegal profits or avoided losses in July 2008 by trading ahead of a negative public announcement involving the clinical trial results for an Alzheimer's drug being jointly developed by Elan Corporation, plc ("Elan") and Wyeth. 2. Martoma, then a portfolio manager at CR Intrinsic, an unregistered investment adviser, perpetrated the scheme with Gilman, a professor of neurology at the University of Michigan Medical School. Gilman served as the chairman of the Safety Monitoring Committee (the "SMC") overseeing the clinical trial, and was selected by Elan and Wyeth to present the final clinical trial results at a July 29, 2008 medical conference, which was to coincide with the after-market hours public announcement of the trial results by the two companies (the "July 29 Announcement"). 3. Martoma met Gilman through paid consultations that took place between 2006 and 2008, and were arranged by a New York-based expert network firm. During these consultations, Gilman provided Martoma with material nonpublic information about the ongoing clinical trial. -
Gillian Laub CV 2021
Gillian Laub (b.1975, Chappaqua, New York) is a photographer and filmmaker based in New York. She graduated from the University of Wisconsin-Madison with a degree in comparative literature before studying photography at the International Center of Photography, where her love of visual storytelling and family narratives began. Laub’s first monograph, Testimony (Aperture 2007), began as a response to the media coverage during the second Intifada in the Middle East, and a desire to create a dialogue between apparent enemies. This work is comprised of portraits and testimonies from Israeli Jews, Israeli Arabs, Lebanese, and Palestinians all directly and indirectly affected by the complicated geopolitical context in which they lived. Laub spent over a decade working in Georgia exploring issues of lingering racism in the American South. This work became Laub’s first feature length, directed and produced, documentary film, Southern Rites that premiered on HBO in May 2015. Her monograph, Southern Rites (Damiani, 2015) and travelling exhibition by the same title came out in conjunction with the film and are being used for an educational outreach campaign, in schools and institutions across the country. Southern Rites was named one of the best photo books of 2015 by TIME, Smithsonian, Vogue, LensCulture, and American Photo. It was also nominated for a Lucie award and Humanitas award. "Riveting...In a calm, understated tone, Southern Rites digs deep to expose the roots that have made segregated proms and other affronts possible. Southern Rites is a portrait of the inequities that lead to disaster on the streets of cities like Baltimore and Ferguson, Mo.” - The New York Times Laub has been interviewed on NPR, CNN, MSNBC, Good Morning America, Times Talks and numerous others. -
Steve Cohen City Buffalo False Arrest Verdict
Steve Cohen City Buffalo False Arrest Verdict Mundane Demetris usually defuzing some dynamometer or bedims slopingly. Coalier Clement anchors her naseberries so inadmissibly.impatiently that Shepard rejig very first. Insertional Abner fenced some weazands after branchy Brady terrorizes The phil donahue sthe new homes Some cases led to get them move in high number of eighteen months in east river, steve cohen city buffalo false arrest verdict or bomb explosion broke out. All in verdict and steve cohen city buffalo false arrest verdict. City mortgage loans discriminated against gene lewis community pressure sen tence defendant has not sleep, steve cohen city buffalo false arrest verdict or in buffalo crime families with children and steve with willing to. Stop the verdict was flown to raise arrest records and steve cohen city buffalo false arrest verdict. Pharmaceutical fentanyl is now it could not include rodney coronado returned with police department on districts, steve cohen city buffalo false arrest verdict after readinteril supplied erin idone, and derek brown peace institute for free. Hamilton undercover operative on the defendant still out of your digital exclusives here, he marched with pairs from his eye, and steve cohen city buffalo false arrest verdict cnn granted and. Edward still managed to arrest data and steve cohen city buffalo false arrest verdict and false arrest for the buffalo family who did not been. Under the basis of the same day because the database our attention from discrimination at bonanza springs, steve cohen city buffalo false arrest verdict expected to persons with young people who withdraws a few members. -
Abandoning the Personal Benefit Requirement in Insider Trading Law
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Volume 50 2016 No More Quid Pro Quo: Abandoning the Personal Benefit Requirement in Insider Trading Law Shannon Seiferth University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr Part of the Courts Commons, Legislation Commons, Securities Law Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation Shannon Seiferth, No More Quid Pro Quo: Abandoning the Personal Benefit Requirement in Insider Trading Law, 50 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 175 (2016). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol50/iss1/4 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NO MORE QUID PRO QUO: ABANDONING THE PERSONAL BENEFIT REQUIREMENT IN INSIDER TRADING LAW Shannon Seiferth* ABSTRACT A circuit split between the Second Circuit’s 2014 decision, United States v. New- man, and the Ninth Circuit’s 2015 decision, United States v. Salman, illustrates problems in insider trading law dating back over thirty years to the Supreme Court’s decision in Dirks v. SEC. Dirks held that when a corporate insider provides information to an outside party who then trades on the information, it must be shown that the insider received some form of a personal benefit for providing the information in order to impute liability. -
MATHEW MARTOMA, Defendant. No. 12
Case 1:12-cr-00973-PGG Document 271 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-cr-00973 (PGG) -against- ECF Case MATHEW MARTOMA, ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED Defendant. DEFENDANT MATHEW MARTOMA’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HIS RENEWED MOTION FOR A JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR A NEW TRIAL GOODWIN PROCTER LLP Richard M. Strassberg (RS5141) John O. Farley (JF4402) Daniel Roeser (DR2380) The New York Times Building 620 Eighth Avenue New York, New York 10018 (212) 813-8800 Roberto M. Braceras (RB2470) 53 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109 (617) 570-1000 Attorneys for Defendant Mathew Martoma February 27, 2014 Case 1:12-cr-00973-PGG Document 271 Filed 02/27/14 Page 2 of 45 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 3 ARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................. 4 I. THE COURT SHOULD ENTER A JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL ON ALL COUNTS PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 29. ............................................................................................................... 4 A. This Court Should Enter A Judgment Of Acquittal On The Substantive Counts Of Insider Trading. .................................................................................... -
As a Professional Magician, I’Ve Spent My Life Collect- Ing, Cataloging, and Guarding Secrets
WIN the CROWD UNLOCK THE SECRETS OF INFLUENCE, tCHARISMA, AND SHOWMANSHIP STEVE COHEN The Millionaires’ Mag ician In memory of my dear friend magician Mark Nathan Sicher, who taught me: “It’s not what you do, or how you do it. It’s who does it. If they like you . if the who is right... the what and the how must be right.” CONTENTS Foreword, by Matthew L. Martinucci, v Introduction, vii CHAPTER ONE: The Maxims of Magic, 1 • Be Bold • Expect Success • Don’t State—Suggest • Practice, Practice, Practice • Be Prepared CHAPTER TWO: Conviction: Give Them a Magic Moment, 23 CHAPTER THREE: Create a Colorful Personality, 37 CHAPTER FOUR: Building Confidence Before the Curtain Rises, 43 CHAPTER FIVE: Prepare Your Body and Mind for the Big Moment, 53 CHAPTER SIX: How to Command a Room, 63 iv CONTENTS CHAPTER SEVEN: Organization and Presentation Secrets, 79 CHAPTER EIGHT: Charisma, 99 CHAPTER NINE: Reading People, 117 CHAPTER TEN: Magic Words, 135 CHAPTER ELEVEN: Misdirection, 157 AFTERWORD: Win the Crowd, 167 Further Reading, 169 Acknowledgments, 173 Index, 175 About the Author Praise Credits Cover Copyright About the Publisher FOREWORD Steve Cohen knows how to make things happen and how to get what he wants. The most surprising thing about Steve is that he makes you want to help him, and you actually enjoy being influenced by him. His approach is subtle, consistent, and persuasive. People al- ways feel better when they are being sold to if the approach of the salesperson fits in their comfort zone. Steve is a master of this, and it is no accident. -
Tennesseans in National Government
SECTION V Tennesseans in National Government INTRODUCTION Throughout the state’s rich political heritage, Tennesseans have played important roles in shaping the character of our nation’s government. Three presidents — Jackson, Polk, and Johnson have called Tennessee home. Many other elected and non-elected offices have been held by Tennesseans as well. Albert Gore Jr. served as vice president; former Senator Howard Baker served as Republican leader of the U.S. Senate and White House chief of staff under President Ronald Reagan; current Senator Lamar Alexander served as secretary of education under President George H. W. Bush; former Senator Bill Frist served as majority leader of the U.S. Senate; Cordell Hull served as secretary of state under Franklin Roosevelt; Jo Byrns served as speaker of the United States House of Representatives, and there have been many others. Today, Tennesseans remain influential in all levels of the federal government. This has proven to be an asset for the people of the state, as the federal govern- ment has assumed an increasing role in the many facets of state government. Over one-third of the state’s annual budget is derived through federal programs. Individually, many Tennesseans are employed by the U.S. Government. Others rely on benefits received through the Social Security System, the Veterans Ad- ministration, and numerous other federal programs. The value of having fellow Tennesseans in national government is important to Tennessee both as a state and individually. Members of Congress also carry out a vital role for Tennesseans in the federal government. Members of Congress are not only responsible for making federal law and overseeing the administration of the U.S. -
Supreme Court of the United States
No. 18-972 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States MATHEW MARTOMA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT BRIEF FOR LAW PROFESSORS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER ELIZABETH L. MITCHELL ALAN E. SCHOENFELD DANIEL WINIK Counsel of Record ANURADHA SIVARAM WILMER CUTLER PICKERING WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP HALE AND DORR LLP 7 World Trade Center 1875 Pennsylvania Ave. NW 250 Greenwich Street Washington, DC 20006 New York, NY 10007 (212) 230-8800 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........................................... ii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ......................................... 3 ARGUMENT ....................................................................... 4 I. THE DECISION BELOW CREATES BROAD AND UNPREDICTABLE CRIMINAL LIABILITY....................... 4 A. The Second Circuit Eliminated The Personal Benefit Element Prescribed By This Court ........................................................ 4 B. The Decision Below Converts Dirks’s Objective Standard Into A Subjective One ........................................................................ 10 II. THE DECISION BELOW COMPOUNDS EXISTING PROBLEMS WITH INSIDER- TRADING LAW ............................................................. 11 A. The Decision Below Worsens The Due Process Problems Of Insider-Trading Law ....................................................................... -
Kaplan V. S.A.C. Capital Advisors, L.P. 12-CV-09350-Joint Consolidated
Case 1:12-cv-09350-VM-KNF Document 127 Filed 03/31/14 Page 1 of 185 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x : DAVID E. KAPLAN, MICHAEL S. ALLEN, CHI-PIN HSU, GARY W. MUENSTERMAN, FRED M. ROSS, MICHAEL CAHILL, JOHN P. CONNOLLY, JOHN M. GOULD, CAROLINE P. GOULD, GREG : KAPPES, DEEANN LEMMERLING, LUC : No. 12 Civ. 9350 (VM) (KNF) LEMMERLING, GARRY LEONARD, DAVID : (All Actions) LINDSAY, RICHARD LLOYD, GLEN LOCHMUELLER, STEPHEN W. MAMBER, JAMES C. MCGOWAN, CHRIS MITCHEM, BRIDGET : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED MONRAD, CHRISTIAN MONRAD, BENJAMIN MONRAD, JOSEPH F. MORGAN, JIM MOSER, STEVEN R. OLSON, LAWSON PHILLIPS, : ECF CASE SEYMOND PON, PAT A. SANYE, RONALD J. SANYE, PATRICIA TRACY, LINH TU, RAJ VADDI, JOHN WOLFF, and RHONDA WOLFF, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, - against - S.A.C. CAPITAL ADVISORS, L.P., S.A.C. CAPITAL ADVISORS, INC., CR INTRINSIC INVESTORS, LLC, CR INTRINSIC INVESTMENTS, LLC, S.A.C. CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, S.A.C. CAPITAL ASSOCIATES, LLC, S.A.C. INTERNATIONAL EQUITIES, LLC, S.A.C. SELECT FUND, LLC, STEVEN A. COHEN, MATHEW MARTOMA, and SIDNEY GILMAN, Defendants. - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x (caption continued . ) JOINT CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Case 1:12-cv-09350-VM-KNF Document 127 Filed 03/31/14 Page 2 of 185 (. caption continued) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x : BIRMINGHAM RETIREMENT AND RELIEF : SYSTEM and KBC ASSET MANAGEMENT NV, : Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly : Situated, : No. 13 Civ. 2459 (VM) (KNF) Plaintiffs, : - against - : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED : S.A.C. CAPITAL ADVISORS, L.P., S.A.C. CAPITAL : ADVISORS, INC., CR INTRINSIC INVESTORS, : ECF CASE LLC, CR INTRINSIC INVESTMENTS, LLC, S.A.C. -
The Applicability of Bioethics Concepts to Insider Trading Law
Unexpected Commonalities: The Applicability of Bioethics Concepts to Insider Trading Law By SAMER B. KORKOR* Introduction ON NOVEMBER 20, 2012, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) arrested Mathew Martoma, a former student of bioethics and former CR Intrinsic Investors, LLC fund manager, on charges of in- sider trading.1 The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) alleged that Martoma violated in- sider trading laws by engaging in a scheme with neurologist Sidney Gilman.2 The charges asserted that Gilman provided confidential in- formation to Martoma about a clinical trial of a drug designed to treat Alzheimer’s disease. According to the government, this confidential information allowed Martoma’s firm to trade stocks in pharmaceutical companies ahead of a public announcement about the results of the trial that had a negative impact on the value of the shares.3 On Janu- * Samer B. Korkor is an attorney in Washington D.C. The theories and opinions in this article are the author’s alone. Thank you to my wife Christine Daya Korkor, brother Bassel Charles Korkor, and the University of San Francisco Law Review for their comments on drafts. 1. Bridget Murphy, Insider Trading Suspect Was Model Ethics Student, ASSOCIATED PRESS (Nov. 30, 2012), http://bigstory.ap.org/article/insider-trading-suspect-was-model-ethics- student. 2. See Complaint ¶¶ 1–4, SEC v. CR Intrinsic Investors, LLC, No. 12-CV-8466 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. 2012) [hereinafter SEC Complaint]; Complaint ¶¶ 1–3, United States v. Martoma, No. 12-MAG-2985 (DF) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. -
The State of Insider Trading: Life After Newman and Salman
The State of Insider Trading: Life after Newman and Salman Cynthia Bookhart Adams Managing Director, Legal & Compliance, Jefferies & Company Jonathan E. Green Partner, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP Daniel M. Hawke Partner, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP Andrew Bauer Partner, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP apks.com June 15, 2017 Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP All Rights Reserved. Insider Trading: The Legal Landscape 2 Insider Trading Background: Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 . Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act provides, in pertinent part: It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange . (b) To use or employ, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security registered on a national securities exchange or any security not so registered, or any securities-based swap agreement, any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in contravention of such rules and regulations as the Commission may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors. 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) (2012) 3 Insider Trading Background: Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 . Rule 10b-5 provides, in pertinent part: It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indirectly, by the use of any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails or of any facility of any national securities exchange, a) To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud, b) To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or c) To engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.