DOCSLIB.ORG

NEWS Letter SPRING 2015 'SEEK the COMMON GOOD' Parish Councillors on Page

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NEWS Letter SPRING 2015 'SEEK the COMMON GOOD' Parish Councillors on Page Rushmere St Andrew Parish Council NEWS LETTER SPRING 2015 'SEEK THE COMMON GOOD' Parish Councillors On page . 2 Bus routes around Bixley Farm and Wards 4 Ipswich School Centre facilities This year, the Parish Council four-yearly former Parish Councillors returning – electoral process took place and due Mirabel Brown, Dennis Francis, Mark 7 Explaining precepts and to a shortfall in candidates applying, Newton, Philip Richings, Peter Tarling, budgets no elections were needed. Changes Brian Ward and James Wright. 8 History Project for in the Suffolk Coastal District Council With 12 seats available in the Tower Year 3 at school boundaries meant the Parish Council Ward, this left five vacancies. The Parish was split into two wards, one north and Council is mandated to fill such vacancies 10 Police action on matters the other south of the A1214 Woodbridge by co-option as soon as possible. of concern Road – the number of Councillors A number of people offered themselves 14 The Street flooding allocated to each ward being based on for consideration, but for personal or resolved? the relative sizes of the ward electorate. eligibility reasons, some dropped out of The northern 'Village' ward was the running. However, seeing a significant 15 Play areas to get a allocated three Councillors with existing void in the Council’s membership, three make over Councillors Ann Cracknell and Robert 'retirees' – Julie Clarke, Mark Sones and Whiting returning and a warm welcome John Withey – were co-opted back at the Would you like to be involved in your goes to Barbara Richardson-Todd, who May meeting of the Parish Council. community and decisions taken on your becomes a new Councillor for the Parish. This still leaves two vacancies to fill. Are behalf? If you are interested, please The southern 'Tower' ward saw seven you interested in becoming a Councillor? contact the Clerk as soon as possible. After years of dedication serving the community . Several Councillors decided not to seek with Council’s being far more open to table at the Clerk’s house – the final item re-election. In so doing, the opportunity scrutiny by the electorate. In days gone on the agenda always being 'Whisky or existed for some new faces to participate by, Gordon tells us that Parish Council Sherry'! Have a very happy retirement, as Councillors and serve the Community. Planning meetings were held round the Gordon, you’ve served us brilliantly. Ron Nunn called time a little earlier and the Council decided to run 'one short' for a few months prior to the formal Dig it, sow it, grow it and eat it election date. Gordon Laing, Stuart Skinner, Julie Clarke, Mark Sones and John Withey all decided not to stand for re-election, although Julie, Mark and John have since been co-opted back onto the council. John also called it a day as one of your Suffolk Coastal District Council Members. To our retirees we must put on record our thanks for the commitment, wisdom, help and assistance you have given to the Parish Council in your varying roles as Councillors. Best wishes for the enjoyment of your next challenges! Allotment holder Mandy working on her patch However, a really special mention As many parishioners are already aware the Parish Council owns allotment gardens must be made of Gordon Laing. The in The Street adjacent to Chestnut Pond. In the last couple of years we have carried 'father' of the Parish Council, Gordon out refurbishment work to improve some areas of the site. We now offer a total of 20 became a member of the Parish Council full size plots and 23 half size plots for cultivation. We currently have some half plots in May 1983 and has given 32 years of his available for rent at £25 for a full year. What better combination than healthy exercise life to the Parish he loves. Not only that, tending the plot and then picking your own fresh garden produce. Interested in he served as your Councillor for Suffolk taking the tenancy on a half-plot? Please contact the Clerk 711509, Assistant Clerk Coastal District Council for many years. 723409 or the Allotment Manager John Westrup 272257 for further details. Times have changed over the years www.rushmerestandrew.onesuffolk.net Bus routes around Bixley Farm Not all that long ago, Bixley Farm District of providing a public service but, like any a small number of early morning/ Centre was served by no fewer than business, are there to at least break even evening services). three bus routes all traversing the arterial – otherwise the business would fold. • The service has a significant number Broadlands Way corridor – First’s route The status of Concessionary Pass (47%) of Concessionary Pass Holder 55 to Ipswich via Foxhall Road, Ipswich Holders was discussed. Under this Passengers – no income would be Buses route 4 to Ipswich via Felixstowe scheme, passengers travel for free and gained from these passengers to Road and a short-lived Ipswich Buses the bus companies receive compensation diminish potential losses to move route 17 service to Ipswich via Ipswich for travel via Suffolk County Council. towards a profitable situation. Hospital. For whatever reason, remuneration is Ipswich Buses gave examples of their This seemed a rather excessive not paid on a ‘per passenger’ basis, but successes in providing services with provision for the limited number of via a block grant – in Ipswich Buses an ‘express’ psychological intimation. prospective passengers! Unsurprisingly, case around £2m. In consequence, Bizarre as it might seem, it might be that route 17 disappeared first – passengers there is no incentive for bus a route number of ‘X4’ might on the double decker bus were noticeable operators to provide Saga generate additional by their absence! In autumn 2014, additional services passengers! They Ipswich Buses decided to extend route 4 for this group of of disappearing have had great at both ends to provide links to Ipswich passengers – indeed success with X3 and Station and the business and retail areas it simply reduces buses – Parish Council X5, so much so that at Martlesham Heath. the ‘per passenger’ contacts Ipswich people wait for them However, a consequence of this was to amount received by the as opposed to getting on divert the service away from the District bus company should this Buses an earlier bus. Centre via the rather shorter Bladen category’s numbers increase. Ipswich Buses were willing to reroute Drive corridor. After a period of ‘cost- Indeed, for Ipswich Buses, this has the service over the longer distance cutting’ service reductions, First decided already decreased from a high of around District Centre corridor but at a cost of to withdraw their route 55 service at £1.20 to its current approximation of £8985 per annum. Christmas 2014 to leave the District 90p. It is actually contrary to Primary Suffolk County Council had already Centre and Broadlands Way corridor a Legislation for this group of passenger ‘bus-free’ zone. confirmed they were unable to provide to pay. The thought of a ‘collection any funding, under their subsidy powers, At the January Parish Council meeting, bucket’ has already been challenged, and on the basis of competition rules and the a considerable number of Parishioners frowned upon, elsewhere in the country. proximity of the existing route 4 and the turned up to express their disquiet to the The current route 4 service is nearby First route 66. Parish Council and see whether anything experimental and it is anticipated that could be done to get a service re-instated. its viability will be reviewed in autumn In order to provide the necessary funding, the Parish Council would A significant area of concern was the 2015. With any new service, it takes time seem to have been the only potential fact that people had actually moved to to establish itself and this is why a one benefactor. Bixley Farm because of the good bus year trial period has been given. service – indeed many had moved into However there are a number of In consequence, at the February the newly-built retirement bungalows concerns looming already at the half meeting, the Parish Council considered, adjacent to the District Centre. way point. and were willing, to make a ‘one off’ The Parish Council had also identified • The service is losing money at the rate contribution of approximately £173 per that approximately 60% of Bixley Farm of around £4,000 per annum. This week to cover the period up until the households were associated with the figure may decrease if fare paying planned route 4 review due in August District Centre/Broadlands Way corridor. passenger patronage increases. 2015. It was agreed that the Parish Council • The well-known traffic woes in However, having taken legal advice, would contact Ipswich Buses to see Ipswich, under the Travel Ipswich making such a contribution was whether route 4 could be re-routed scheme, are causing significant robustly thwarted in legalistic terms ‘I back to the District Centre corridor. We delays to services. In consequence, confirm that the Council may not incur can now report what we learnt from it is planned for the Ipswich Railway expenditure under s.137 of the Local our meeting with the Ipswich Buses Station link to be removed in the Government Act 1972 to get around the management and subsequent follow-up. near future (daytime services are limitations and conditions expressed set It was acknowledged that bus now advertised as being withdrawn out in 106A(1) of the Transport Act 1985’. companies run services with the objective from this section after 24 May leaving So to our Parishioners, sorry – we tried to get round your problem but sadly we’ve reached the end of the road for the It's time to think about Summer time being.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1. Parish: Rushmere St Andrews
    1. Parish: Rushmere St Andrews Meaning: Rushy Lake (Ekwall) 2. Hundred: Carlford Deanery: Carlford (-1920), Ipswich (1920-) Union: Woodbridge, part of Ipswich Borough RDC/UDC: (E. Suffolk) Woodbridge RD (1894-1934), Deben (1934- 1974) Suffolk Costal DC (1974-) Other administrative details: Created civil parish from part of Rushmere not within Ipswich (18%) Civil boundary change (1894) Part transferred to Ipswich (1934) Ecclesiastical boundary change to create Ipswich St Augustine of Hippo (1928) Ecclesiastical boundary change to create Ipswich St Andrew (1958) Woodbridge Petty Sessional Division Ipswich County Court District 3. Area: 1,523 acres (1912) 4. Soils: Mixed: a) Deep well drained sandy often ferruginous soils, risk wind and water erosion b) Deep fine loam soils with slowly permeable subsoils and slight seasonal waterlogging. Some fine loam over clay. Some deep well drained coarse loam over clay, fine loam and sandy soils c) Deep well drained fine loam over clay, coarse loam over clay and fine loams some with olacareous subsoils. 5. Types of farming: 1086 17 ½ acres meadow 1500–1640 Thirsk: Wood-pasture region, mainly pasture, meadow, engaged in rearing and dairying with some pig-keeping, horse breeding and poultry. Crops mainly barley with some wheat, rye, oats, peas, vetches, hops and occasionally hemp. Also has similarities with sheep-corn region where sheep are main fertilizing agent, bred for fattening barley main cash crop. 1 1818 Marshall: Wide variations of crop and management techniques including summer fallow in preparation for corn and rotation of turnip, barley, clover, weat on lighter land. 1937 Main crops: Wheat, barley, beans, peas 1969 Trist: More intensive cereal growing and sugar beet 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Draft Report Rushmere St Andrew
    RUSHMERE ST ANDREW Design Guidelines and Codes FINAL DRAFT REPORT March 2021 RUSHMERE ST ANDREW | Neighbourhood Plan Design Guidelines Quality information Prepared by Checked by Jimmy Lu Ben Castell Senior Urban Director Designer Revision History Revision Revision date Details Name Position 3 - - - - 2 19-03-2021 Review Jimmy Lu Senior Urban Designer 1 18-01-2021 Report preparation Jimmy Lu Senior Urban and review Designer 0 15-01-2021 Report preparation Hoorieh Morshedi Graduate Urban Designer This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) in accordance with its contract with Locality (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. AECOM shall have no liability to any third party that makes use of or relies upon this document. 2 AECOM RUSHMERE ST ANDREW | Neighbourhood Plan Design Guidelines Contents 1. Introduction ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������6 1.1. Overview 6 1.2. Objective 6 1.3. Process 6 1.4. Area of study 8 2. Local character analysis �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������12 2.1. Introduction 12 2.2. Character areas 12 2.3. Settlement patterns and built forms 14 2.4. Streets and public realm 16 2.5. Open space 17 2.6. Building heights and roofline 18 2.7. Car parking 19 3. Design guidelines and codes ..........................................................................................................22 3.1. Introduction 22 3.2. Rushmere St Andrew design principles 22 3.3. Checklists 56 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mattin Family of Campsea Ashe
    The Mattin Family of Campsea Ashe Research by Sheila Holmes July 2014 © Sheila Holmes Mattin Family The Mattin families lived in Campsea Ashe from at least 1803 until the early part of the 20th century. Thomas Mattin and his wife Elizabeth nee Curtis, lived in the neighbouring village of Hacheston. Their son Thomas, married a girl from Campsea Ashe, where they settled for the rest of their married lives. They brought up their children and some of whom continued to live in the village. The Mattin family, were connected to several other Campsea Ashe families through marriage, such as the Youngmans , Mays, Lings, Curtis’s, Townrows and Knights. It is possible that one branch of the family lived in Little Glemham but so far no definite connection has been found, In 1881, there were there were 6 Mattin families living in the village at same time. Connection with the Youngman family. John Youngman, born 15th December 1791 and died on 15th March 1874, Campsea Ashe, married Elizabeth Ling on 25th May 1813. Their daughter, Charlotte, born 1817, married Charles Mattin,. Charles and Charlotte had a son, Charles, born 1839. Young Charles Mattin lived with his grand parents, John and Elizabeth Youngman from the age of 2 in Campsea Ashe. Charged with Actual Bodily Harm. An entry in the records of the Quarter Sessions at Ipswich on 1st July 1870 states, Charles Mattin and James Mattin, the younger, were charged with causing actual bodily harm, were sentenced to 12 calendar months imprisonment with hard labour. It is not known who these two men were or indeed whether they were members of our Mattin family.
    [Show full text]
  • Rushmere St Andrew, Ipswich
    RUSHMER E S T ANDR EW, IPSWI CH CHOOSE FROM OF THE MOST LUXURIOUS HOMES IN THE HEART OF 10RURAL SUFFOLK An enviable mix of location, quality and style, a Rose home is luxury redefined – a truly enviable place to live. With just 5, five bedroom homes and 5 four bedroom homes this is a rare opportunity to own a signature property from Rose that boasts indulgent luxury. Just 7* minutes from Ipswich town centre, with its eclectic mix of independent and high street shops, and a host of places to eat, as well as being just a short drive from the coast, this is truly a premium location. *All times and distances are an approximation only. N W E S SITE 8 PLAN 5 6 7 Each of the 10 properties at Eaton Place is perfectly proportioned and truly make the most of their stunning 9 setting on the edge of the Suffolk countryside, with an abundance of surrounding space. Each property combines 4 a perfect blend of style and functionality, making Eaton Place the ideal location for your new home. 3 2 10 1 Whilst this development plan has been prepared with all due care for the convenience of the intending purchaser, the information contained herein is a preliminary guide only. Ground levels and other variances have not been shown. THE APPROACH SETS THE STANDARD FOR THE NEW HOMES; A SOLID, PANELLED, BESPOKE ‘BRICK’ WALLED ENTRANCE CREATES A SENSE OF SECURITY AND EXCLUSIVITY, THAT YOU HAVE ARRIVED... AT EATON PLACE. The homes are individually designed to an exacting detail, in a traditional format yet meeting the demand for modern WHITE contemporary layouts.
    [Show full text]
  • Martlesham Monthly August
    Park and Ride site is expected very soon and we have been told that there will be a consultation period of 16 weeks. That should give sufficient MARTLESHAM time to seek parishioners’ views and make a proper response; please keep MONTHLY a look out for further details in the Monthly and/or on the notice boards. MARTLESHAM PARISH If you have any comments please let the Clerk know, preferably in COUNCIL writing or by e-mail. AUGUST Vacancy for a Parish Councillor Overhanging Branches There is a vacancy for a Parish Many footways and pathways have Councillor which provides an low overhanging branches or 2002 opportunity for someone to help and encroaching shrubs which are a contribute to the Martlesham Editors: nuisance to pedestrians and could community cause injuries. Please check your own Brian Lillistone The role of a parish councillor is frontage and trim any branches so 17 Lark Rise (622424) varied and interesting as it involves that there is plenty of headroom many aspects of the community; it underneath and the path has its Fred Hunter is a voluntary position involving proper width. You could be liable for 2 Ravens Way(624935) usually only two meetings per month any injury caused by branch that is and the amount of any other time too low. Paul Firman needed is as little or as much as you Website (Advertising) may wish to make of the role. If you There is now a Martlesham Parish are interested in helping to improve Council website with lots of 45 Lark Rise (622874) your community, perhaps you information about the parish, the disagree with some of the things that parish council and parish activities; Latest copy date is the 18th of the parish council does, or maybe we welcome any comments or you feel that your part of the parish suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk Chamber's Manifesto for Business Is Launched!
    ChamberSpring 2018 Voice Suffolk Chamber’s manifesto for business No More Not-SpotS campaign is launched! aims for 100% mobile coverage SaNdy MartiN Mp on the role of business in society Q&a with Norse Group’s sales director Jules Shorrock on workplace www.suffolkchamber.co.uk Tel. 01473 680600 harassment and discriminationChamberVoice 2018 1 Chamber Welcome President’s CEO welcome address These are busy and exciting times for Suffolk Reading through Chamber of Commerce. this issue of Firstly, our signature campaign – No More Chamber Voice, A14 Delays in Suffolk – received a major boost I’m impressed with late last year (see page five for details). After the sheer range of months of evidence gathering and lobbying, different voices Highways England released its Strategic Road represented in it. Network Initial Report and designated the A14 But then, this in Suffolk as a “current, planned and potential accurately reflects expressway”. the growing diversity and agility of our There are still a number of hurdles to jump business community and the county’s over, but the indications at this stage is that this wider society. road of national importance is closer to being There are articles by two of Suffolk’s most upgraded than ever before. prominent businesswomen. On page eight Secondly, we actively supported the launch of Jules Shorrock, chair of Suffolk Chamber in the British Chambers of Commerce’s No More Lowestoft and Waveney, recounts her Not-Spots campaign in March (see page three). own experience of gender discrimination The aim of the campaign is straightforward: by and her wise words to others as to how to 2020 UK phone users will no longer experience deal with such issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk Local History Council Group and Society Members Last Updated 16 June 2016
    Suffolk Local History Council Group and Society Members Last updated 16 June 2016 Alde Valley Family History Group 1 Orchard Road LEISTON Suffolk IP16 4DB Aldeburgh & District Local History Society Berwick House Victoria Road ALDEBURGH Suffolk IP15 5DX Aldeburgh Museum Trust The Moot Hall ALDEBURGH Suffolk IP15 5DS Bacton & Cotton Local History Group Dandy Hall Willow Farm Road Cotton STOWMARKET Suffolk IP14 4QT Badwell Ash Parish Council Chapel House Elmswell Road Great Ashfield BURY St EDMUNDS Suffolk IP31 3HH Barrow & District Local History Society 28 Johnson Road Barrow BURY ST EDMUNDS Suffolk IP29 5DY Bawdsey Radar Trust PO Box 199 FELIXSTOWE Suffolk IP11 1BQ Beccles & District History Society 35 Rectory Lane Worlingham BECCLES Suffolk NR34 7RP Blackbourne Local History Society Mill Corner House Bury Road Stanton BURY ST EDMUNDS Suffolk IP31 2DZ Bramford Local History Group Kirkland The Street Bramford IPSWICH Suffolk IP8 4DY Bures History Society Ropers Hall Farm Assington Road Bures SUDBURY Suffolk CO8 5SX Bury St Edmunds Past & Present Society 3 Canute Court BURY ST EDMUNDS Suffolk IP33 2JY Cavendish Local History Society 14 Peacocks Close Cavendish SUDBURY Suffolk CO10 8DA Clare History & Archaeology Soc. 18 Market Hill Clare SUDBURY Suffolk CO10 8NN Coddenham Voluntary Help Centre 20 Green Hill Coddenham IPSWICH Suffolk IP6 9PU Combs Historical Club West End Farm Mill Lane Combs STOWMARKET Suffolk IP14 2NF Debenham History Society Fir Tree Cottage High Road Witnesham IPSWICH Suffolk IP6 9EX Drinkstone Local History Group Argyle House 2 Cross Street Drinkstone Green BURY ST EDMUNDS Suffolk IP30 9TP Elmswell History Group 6 Little Green Elmswell BURY ST EDMUNDS Suffolk IP30 9FB Felixstowe History & Museum Society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jesus College Record 2013
    RECOR D 2013 CONTENTS FROM THE EDITOR 3 THE PRINCIPAL’S R EPORT 6 FELLOWS & COLLEGE LECTURERS 12 FELLOWS’ NEWS 20 THE DON FOWLER M EMORIAL LECTURE 2013 26 PRIZES, AWARDS, DOCTORATES & ELECTIONS 27 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF GREAT TITS: AN I NTERVIEW WITH L ORD KREBS 39 INTIMATIONS OF MORTALITY BY NORMAN F RISKNEY 46 TRAVEL AWARDS 47 TRAVEL AWARDS REPORTS 49 SIR FRANCIS M ANSELL: THREE TIMES P RINCIPAL OF JESUS C OLLEGE 55 THE SIRENS’ SONG: REDISCOVERING ANCIENT G REEK MUSIC 61 THE WALL PAINTING IN THE JCR 65 THE DAFFODIL’S VERSION BY DAVID CRAM 68 THE BOOKS OF LORD HERBERT OF CHERBURY 69 THE ACCOMMODATION, CATERING AND CONFERENCES TEAM 72 A YEAR IN THE JCR 75 A YEAR IN THE MCR 76 A YEAR IN DEVELOPMENT 77 A YEAR IN CHAPEL 80 SPORTS REPORTS 82 OLD MEMBERS’ OBITUARIES 88 SELECT PUBLICATIONS 104 HONOURS, AWARDS & QUALIF ICATIONS 112 APPOINTMENTS 115 MARRIAGES & CIVIL PARTNERSHIPS 117 BIRTHS & ADOPTIONS 120 IN MEMORIAM 125 USEFUL INFORMATION 128 MERCHANDISE 134 1 2 FROM THE EDITOR DR ARMAND D’A NGOUR Economy once meant good housekeeping. Then came the political economy, the knowledge economy, and the information economy. Now, it seems, we have the attention economy. The notion, which goes back to the 1990s, is that nowadays people compete for attention as much as for money or knowledge. According to the pundits, attention has become a currency: it has scarcity value and endless attraction. As with money, only the naïve or incapable (or the truly wise) can resist its lure. In the digital age, to be a winner in the attention economy requires constant tweeting, blogging, and updating one’s status on Facebook; a hugely time-consuming business.
    [Show full text]
  • Attn Georgina Hannigan Good Morning with Regards to FMF At
    From: To: SizewellC Subject: Freight Management Terminal Date: 28 May 2021 10:08:06 Attachments: IMG freight management facility.pdf Attn Georgina Hannigan Good Morning With regards to FMF at Levington ,I would like to highlight information that has recently come to my notice and my relevant comments 1) May 14th 2021 East Suffolk Council published their confirmation of the Local Plan including 5500 dwellings to be built at Felixstowe -considerably impacting on local road capacity and inevitably on the A1156 as the domestic connection to the county town. 2) The Innocence Lane project has been cancelled and I understand that SCC and ESC have agreed that the FMF site is the preferred alternative especially considering the close proximity of the Ipswich -Felixstowe rail line - which is designated for dueling with a 50% increase in capacity.- The relevance to the SZC application is that it notes a return to agricultural use when the contact is completed. not evolving into a HGV park and railhead. I attach a rough diagram offering alternative access and exit points and internal road lay out , that does not impinge on the existing domestic road network. The FMF should be accessed as close as possible to the existing trunk road not a convoluted journey through two junctions. In principle the FMF could be sited at numerous places either adjacent to the A14 or A12 to be more appropriate for it's intended use, than the site applied for, giving rise to the possibility of an agenda in place not entirely relevant to the purpose of the application.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffer the Little Children
    Suffer the little children Introduction Suffer the children For this paper I take this quote from the ASV Bible in a different sense to its real meaning. Obviously the real interpretation of Matthew 19:14 is, ‘Let alone’ or ‘permit’. 1 However, this paper regards the real suffering of children in this corrupt society. This Bible verse is one of many that show Jesus’ concern for young children. In this he is manifesting the concern of God in general for children, hence the Lord’s condemnation in the OT of hurting children. 2 The iniquity of hurting children Since God cares for children and commands his people to be good to their children, it is anathema to hurt children; indeed this is ingrained upon the conscience of every rational person. Thus the practice of abusing children is both irrational and worthy of God’s condemnation to hell fire. Any government that presided over abusing children, or knowingly tolerated this abuse, is insane, ungodly and worthy of condemnation. The great sin of Israel One of the key reasons given in the Old Testament for Israel’s judgment and condemnation was that its idolatry from God to idols caused Israelites to sacrifice their children to Molech. Israel’s apostasy was so great that its rulers ritually killed their own children. Ritual killing of children was an evil practised by idolatrous nations and so God commanded Israel, from the beginning, never to do such a thing. Indeed, God judged the previous nations in Canaan for completing their iniquity and making their judgment certain by sacrificing their children in the fulness of their sin.
    [Show full text]
  • Election of Police and Crime Commissioner Suffolk Police Area
    APPOINTMENT OF ELECTION AGENTS Election of Police and Crime Commissioner The following is a statement of the election agents appointed for the Suffolk Police Area Name of Candidate Name of Agent Address of Agent 33 Silent Street, HUGHES John Cook Ipswich Elizabeth Patricia IP1 1TF WCCA, Heathlands, PASSMORE Mark Bee London Road, Kessingland Tim NR33 7PJ Carr Cottage, PATMORE Nicholas Hardingham Creeting St Mary, Ipswich Andy IP6 8LY 9 Marsh Lane, SANDBACH John Shreeve Somerleyton, Suffolk James Peter Charles NR32 5QX Dated: Thursday, 8 April 2021 Stephen Baker Police Area Returning Officer Printed and Published by the Police Area Returning Officer, East Suffolk Council East Suffolk House, Station Road, Melton, Woodbridge IP12 1RT STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED, NOTICE OF POLL & SITUATION OF POLLING STATIONS Suffolk County Council Election of County Councillors Martlesham Division Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of County Councillors for Martlesham will be held on Thursday 6 May 2021, between the hours of 7am and 10pm. 2. The number of County Councillors to be elected is one. 3. The names, home addresses and descriptions of the candidates remaining validly nominated for election and the names of all persons signing the candidate’s nomination paper are as follows: Description Proposer (P) Name of Candidate Home Address (if any) & Seconder (S) EVANS Raymond M Hollett (P) Address in East Suffolk Liberal Democrats Ski John M Kelso (S) LAWRENCE 24 Woodrush Road, Purdis Farm Pauline Lawrence (P) Labour Party Edward Ipswich IP3 8RD S M Landon (S) MULCAHY 2 Street Farm Barns, Tunstall The Conservative Susan Harvey (P) Patti Woodbridge IP12 2JF Party Candidate Stephen Harvey (S) 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Election of a District Councillor Orwell & Villages Ward
    STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED, NOTICE OF POLL & SITUATION OF POLLING STATIONS East Suffolk Council Election of a District Councillor Orwell & Villages Ward Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of a District Councillor for Orwell & Villages Ward will be held on Thursday 12 August 2021, between the hours of 7am and 10pm. 2. The number of District Councillors to be elected is one. 3. The names, home addresses and descriptions of the candidates remaining validly nominated for election and the names of all persons signing the candidate’s nomination paper are as follows: Description Proposer (P) Name of Candidate Home Address (if any) & Seconder (S) 119 High Road West NINNMEY S G Wrinch (P) Felixstowe Liberal Democrats Michael Robert James Tim Voelcker (S) IP11 9AN 33 Brotherton Avenue RICHARDSON The Conservative Party Michael Sears (P) Trimley St Mary Mick Candidate Sandra Sears (S) IP11 0YL 3 Glenfield Avenue ROWE Edna Rose Stuckey (P) Felixstowe Labour Party David John Neville Charles Mayes (S) IP11 9JG 4. The situation of polling stations and the description of persons entitled to vote thereat are as follows: Station Persons PD Situation of Polling Station Number entitled to vote SOVBU 161 Bucklesham Village Hall 1 – 452 SOVKI 1 – 988 165 Kirton Church Hall SOVFA 1 – 165 SOVHE 1 – 36 166 Newbourne Village Hall SOVNE 1 – 221 SOVLE 1 – 200 167 Levington Village Hall SOVSH 1 – 18 SOVNA 168 Nacton Village Hall 1 – 640 SOVTN 169 Trimley St Martin Memorial Hall 1 – 1702 170 1 – 1664 SOVTY Welcome Hall, High Road, Trimley St Mary 170a 1665 - 2983 SOVWA 171 Waldringfield Village Hall 1 – 384 Dated: Friday 16 July 2021 Stephen Baker Returning Officer Printed and published by the Returning Officer, East Suffolk Council East Suffolk House, Station Road, Melton, Woodbridge IP12 1RT Riverside, 4 Canning Road, Lowestoft NR33 0EQ .
    [Show full text]