November-December-2014
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Delaware House Bill 140 (2015)
DELAWARE HOUSE BILL 140 (2015) Title of Bill: HB 140 Purpose: To increase state Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) fees in order to generate new revenue for transportation funding. Status of Amendment: Signed into law July 1, 2015. House Bill 140 (2015) Signed into law: July 1, 2015 House Senate May 14, 2015 June 30, 2015 FOR 25 15 AGAINST 16 6 History Transportation Funding A 2011 reporti from the legislatively-commissioned Transportation Trust Fund (TTF) Task Force found for the Fiscal Year 2010- excluding federal apportionment- the Transportation Trust Fund resources consisted of: Table 4 from the TTF Task Force 2011 Report 28% from Interstate 95 tolls and concessions ($119.4); 27% from the state’s 23 cents-per-gallon gas tax and 22 cents-per-gallon special fuels tax ($112.9); 14% from motor vehicle document fees ($58.4); 11% from State Route 1 toll revenue ($45.5); 11% from motor vehicle registration fees ($44.5); and 9% from miscellaneous pledged and non-pledged revenues, as well as investment earnings ($38.7). Need A 2015 analysis by the Road Information Programii, TRIP— a nonprofit organization that “researches, evaluates and distributes economic and technical data on surface transportation issues”—found: 21 percent of Delaware’s major urban roads ranked in poor condition; 20 percent of the state’s bridges are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete; 34 percent of Delaware’s major urban highways are considered congested; and Motor vehicle travel on the state’s highways increased 42 percent between 1990-2013. The TRIP analysis stated that poor roads cost Delaware drivers $256 million per year, or $355 annually per motorist. -
Delaware Elections Roadmap
DELAWARE ELECTIONS ROADMAP September 28, 2018 REGISTERED VOTERS 2018 v. 2010 COUNTY DEMOCRATS REPUBLICANS OTHERS TOTAL KENT 52,794 36,735 33,129 122,658 NEW CASTLE 213,679 92,335 100,261 406,275 2018 SUSSEX 60,525 64,050 39,397 163,972 STATEWIDE 326,998 193,120 172,787 692,905 KENT 46,243 33,005 25,554 105,763 NEW CASTLE 196,665 101,895 88,232 391,654 2010 SUSSEX 51,936 49,106 26,761 128,723 STATEWIDE 294,844 184,006 140,547 626,140 September 28, 2018 Source: elections.delaware.gov FEDERAL RACES U.S. SENATE U.S. HOUSE Democrat Democrat Thomas R. Carper Lisa Blunt Rochester (Incumbent) (Incumbent) Republican Republican Robert B. Arlett Scott Walker September 28, 2018 STATE RACES TREASURER AUDITOR ATTORNEY GENERAL Republican Democrat Democrat Kenneth A. Simpler Kathleen K. McGuiness Kathy Jennings (Incumbent) Democrat Republican Republican Colleen Davis James Spadola Bernard Pepukayi September 28, 2018 2016 – 2018 GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE HOUSE 11 – 10 25 – 16 Democrat Majority Democrat Majority September 28, 2018 KEY VOTES FOR DSCC DSCC Identified 4 Key Bill Votes in the 149th General Assembly (2016-2018) that were priorities for the business community. HB226-Created the Delaware Prosperity Partnership (DPP), to attract new business to Delaware (DSCC Supported) HB190-Modernized Delaware’s Coastal Zone Act (CZA) to allow for redevelopment of 14 underutilized/abandoned properties (DSCC Supported) HB170-Created a tax credit for investment in small tech startups (DSCC Supported) SB170-Increased Delaware’s Minimum Wage (DSCC Opposed) September 28, 2018 2018 ISSUES TO WATCH Impacting Federal and State Races • What, if any, fallout from proposed gun legislation will impact fundraising and voter turnout • How will the Carper U.S. -
Nicole Theis Position Statements for Non-Responding Candidates Are Based on President Voting Records, Public Statements, And/Or Campaign Literature
2012 General Election Values Voter Guide An affiliate of Delaware Family Policy Council A printable version of the Voter Guide is available on our website 10 11 12 13 14 Delaware Strong Families (DSF) is pleased to present the 2012 Values Voter Guide. DSF, an affiliate of Delaware Family Policy www.delawarestrong.org. Please Facebook and share the Voter Council, is a 501c3 non-profit organization. DSF does not endorse or Guide and encourage your friends and family to vote on oppose candidates for elective office. November 6th. All candidates were provided a questionnaire and given an equal Remember, this Voter Guide does not address a candidate’s opportunity to respond and to provide explanations or comments character, only their position on issues. It should not take the concerning each question. Any additional explanations or place of your effort to personally evaluate a candidate. comments that were made by candidates are noted with an The stakes couldn’t be higher this election. Our hope is that on asterisk (*) next to the answer and can be found our website. November 6th, this Voter Guide will help you choose candidates who best represent your values. For your convenience, the Voter Guide includes phone numbers for all candidates if you wish to call those who failed to respond. Nicole Theis Position statements for non-responding candidates are based on President voting records, public statements, and/or campaign literature. Delaware Strong Families An affiliate of Delaware Family Policy Council FEDERAL QUESTIONS: Do you Support or Oppose? 1. Taxpayer funding of abortions. 9. A marriage protection amendment to the U.S. -
Delaware General Assembly Final Report of the Task Force to Study And
Delaware General Assembly final report of the task force to study and make findings and recommendations to improve fairness and compliance in delaware’s unclaimed property program Established under the Provisions of Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 59, Passed by the State Senate and The House of Representatives of the 147th General Assembly, June, 2014 1 Table of Contents Introduction Page3 Copy of Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 59 Page 4 Task Force Members and Staff Page 6 Task Force Findings and Recommendations Page 8 Minutes of Task Force Meeting of July 24, 2014 Page 12 Minutes of Task Force Meeting of August 12, 2014 Page 20 Minutes of Task Force Meeting of September 10, 2014 Page 32 Minutes of Task Force Meeting of October 2, 2014 Page 46 Minutes of Task Force Meeting of December 2, 2014 Page 62 Meeting of the Unclaimed Property Task Force in the Buck Library of the Buena Vista State Conference Center, New Castle, on October 2, 2014. 2 Introduction The Unclaimed Property Task Force (the “Task Force”) was established by the 147th General Assembly via Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 59. In authorizing the Task Force, the General Assembly instructed it to inquire into, examine, study, and make findings and recommendations related to improving fairness and compliance in Delaware’s unclaimed property program. This Report summarizes the work of the Task Force, which was comprised of members of the General Assembly, Cabinet-level members of the Governor’s administration, representatives on behalf of the Delaware public, and representatives of several private organizations. The members of the Task Force discharged their duties over the course of five meetings, and worked diligently, in good faith, and with the goal of identifying ways to improve fairness and compliance in Delaware’s unclaimed property program. -
2017-18 Monoblogue Accountability Project Delaware Edition
2017-18 monoblogue Accountability Project Delaware Edition A voting summary for the Delaware General Assembly ©2018 Michael Swartz. Reprint permission is granted with credit to “Michael Swartz at monoblogue” (with link) Introduction I began the monoblogue Accountability Project in 2008 to grade all 188 members of the Maryland General Assembly on whether they voted in what the author considered a conservative manner or not. But I decided in 2017 to add a Delaware edition which would grade the First State's 62 legislators in a similar manner to how I rate the Maryland General Assembly because I was working in the state at the time. Now that we are contemplating a move to the First State, I felt it was important to carry on that work. Over the last couple years in Maryland I departed from a tradition I had of using a few committee votes to compile each legislator's record, but for Delaware this didn't work anyway because legislative committees have radically uneven numbers and members belong to multiple committees. So like my previous Delaware edition, I will do floor votes on 25 separate bills of interest that had both House and Senate votes. As I have done in recent years with the Maryland General Assembly tallies, the legislators are listed in alphabetical order, which makes it easy to compile votes because the tally sheets are somewhat (as I'll explain later) alphabetical in Delaware. Thus far there has not been turnover in the Delaware General Assembly. There are a handful of members (three in the Senate, one in the House) who replaced members that died or did not seek re-election. -
2015-16 Monoblogue Accountability Project Delaware Edition
2015-16 monoblogue Accountability Project Delaware Edition A voting summary for the Delaware General Assembly ©2017 Michael Swartz. Reprint permission is granted with credit to “Michael Swartz at monoblogue” (with link) Introduction I began the monoblogue Accountability Project in 2008 to grade all 188 members of the Maryland General Assembly on whether they voted in what the author considered a conservative manner or not. But because I now work in Delaware, I decided this year to add a Delaware edition that would grade the First State's 62 legislators in a similar manner to how I rate the Maryland General Assembly. In Maryland I use 22 floor votes and 3 committee votes to compile each legislator's record, but for Delaware this first edition will focus exclusively on floor votes because legislative committees have radically uneven numbers and members belong to multiple committees. I may reconsider this in the future, but for now I will do floor votes on 25 separate bills of interest that had both House and Senate votes. As I have done in recent years with the Maryland General Assembly tallies, the legislators are listed in alphabetical order, which makes it easy to compile votes because the tally sheets are somewhat (as I'll explain later) alphabetical in Delaware. You may notice that some of the legislators listed in the 2015-16 term did not return. District 18 Representative Michael Barbieri left in August, 2015 to take another position with the state and was replaced by Representative David Bentz. Sadly, District 33 Representative Jack Peterman passed away on August 10, 2016, although he was not seeking re-election anyway. -
2018 Delaware Voter Guide General Election November 6, 2018
2018 Delaware Voter Guide General Election November 6, 2018 2018 Delaware Cannabis Voter Guide – Table of Contents Candidate Survey Questions and Summary of Candidate Responses …………... 1 Candidate Profiles – Table of Contents ……………………………………………….... 7 Candidate Profiles (Responses to survey questions, cannabis voting history of incumbent candidates, public comments, candidate contact information) a. 150th General Assembly – State Senate ………………………………... 12 b. 150th General Assembly – House of Representatives ……………….. 30 © Delaware Cannabis Advocacy Network Delaware Cannabis Advocacy Network P.O. Box 1625 Dover, DE 19903 (302) 404-4208 [email protected] The Delaware Cannabis Voter Guide We delivered a five question survey on cannabis policy to Delaware General Assembly candidates on July 20, 2018. The Delaware Cannabis Voter Guide is comprised of candidate responses, along with the cannabis bill voting history of incumbents. The key below includes the survey questioins, available responses, and a key for interpreting the survey summary. We’ve graded candidates (A+ to F) based on incumbent voting history on cannabis bills, sponsorship and opposition of prior cannabis bills, survey responses, and public comments by the candidate. Do you support legislation that would legalize cannabis for adults 21+, and replace the current Question 1 criminal market for cannabis with a safe, legal, taxed and regulated market? Yes, I support Yes, I would be No, I do not this and would willing to No, I do not support this and vote ‘Yes’ on a I am undecided sponsor a bill to support this; would vote bill to end and would like Response end prohibition however I am against a bill to prohibition and more and create a open to research create a create a information. -
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case: 14-1887 Document: 003111636484 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/02/2014 No. 14-1887 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT DELAWARE STRONG FAMILIES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AND COMMISSIONER OF ELECTIONS FOR THE STATE OF DELAWARE, Defendants-Appellants. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, No. 1:13-01746 (Robinson, J.) JOINT APPENDIX VOLUME II (JA34-JA241) A. ANN WOOLFOLK SETH P. WAXMAN JOSEPH C. HANDLON JONATHAN G. CEDARBAUM DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WEILI J. SHAW Carvel State Building, 6th Floor WILMER CUTLER PICKERING 820 North French Street HALE AND DORR LLP Wilmington, DE 19801 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 663-6000 J. GERALD HEBERT PAUL S. RYAN TARA MALLOY MEGAN MCALLEN THE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER 215 E Street NE June 2, 2014 Washington, DC 20002 Case: 14-1887 Document: 003111636484 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/02/2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I (BOUND WITH BRIEF) Notice of Appeal to the Third Circuit, Dkt. No. 39, Apr. 10, 2014 ...................... JA1 Order, Dkt. No. 38, Apr. 8, 2014 .......................................................................... JA4 Order Denying Motion for Protective Order and Setting Briefing Schedule, Dkt. No. 27, Feb. 6, 2014 ........................................................... JA5 Memorandum Opinion, Dkt. No. 35, Mar. 31, 2014 ............................................ JA8 VOLUME II Docket Sheet, D. Del. No. 13-1746 .................................................................... JA34 Complaint, Dkt. No. 1, Oct. 23, 2013 ................................................................. JA41 Exhibit A, Delaware Strong Families 2012 General Election Values Voter Guide .................................................................................. JA60 Exhibits to Defendants’ Brief in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Dkt. No. 30, Mar. 7, 2014 Declaration of Weili Shaw, Dkt.