1 Introduction This Is Not, in Any Consistent Sense, a Study of Herbert Eimert’S Life, Times, Or Music

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Introduction This Is Not, in Any Consistent Sense, a Study of Herbert Eimert’S Life, Times, Or Music Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-79971-3 — Herbert Eimert and the Darmstadt School Max Erwin Excerpt More Information Herbert Eimert and the Darmstadt School 1 1 Introduction This is not, in any consistent sense, a study of Herbert Eimert’s life, times, or music. Nor is it concerned with presenting a particularly detailed reading of his thought and writings about music. In fact, it argues that these writings enunciate a largely unaltered understanding of New Music over the course of almost half a century. Rather, it is expressly concerned with the relatively brief period of time at the beginning of the 1950s when Eimert’s understanding of New Music became the institutional discourse of New Music, which, more importantly and more to the point, in turn became the discourse which historians continue to deploy to explicate the development of the musical avant-garde in Europe after World War II – an avant-garde invariantly clustered in discursive formations of ‘post-Webern music’, ‘punctual music’, and the ‘Darmstadt School’. This study does not propose to account for how or why Eimert devised these concepts, but it does demonstrate definitively that they came from him. I do not give this demonstration as a sort of conspiratorial revelation; the prominence of cultural gatekeepers in the professional development of young composers is surely not a new and unexpected subject for scholarship. What is new and unexpected is (1) that Eimert’s blueprint for a ‘punctual’ avant-garde predates the ‘punctual’ works by Stockhausen by nearly thirty years; (2) that Eimert used the practices of now-obscure composers to explicate the practices of now-prominent ones, rendering explanations of what ‘Darmstadt composers’ were doing fundamentally confused and skewed; and (3) that this discourse is still deployed to explain New Music in the 1950s. The point here is that the discourse precedes the practice. As such, the explication for these musical practices under the Darmstadt banner – practices which, as a very large quantity of very thorough research has demonstrated, are far from uniform and in fact are quite nearly incommensurable under a single label – only deals with the music itself in a cursory, epiphenomenal manner.1 Consequently, the practice of music historiography has hitherto not dealt with this music at all. It has only dealt with the discourse Eimert made for it. 1 I am referring specifically to Martin Iddon, New Music at Darmstadt: Nono, Stockhausen, Cage, and Boulez (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013); M. J. Grant, Serial Music, Serial Aesthetics: Compositional Theory in Post-War Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001); Mark Delaere, ‘Olivier Messiaen’s Analysis Seminar and the Development of Post-War Serial Music’, trans. Richard Evans, Music Analysis, 21.1 (2002), 35–51; Inge Kovács, Wege zum musikalischen Strukturalismus: René Leibowitz, Pierre Boulez, John Cage und die Webern- Rezeption in Paris um 1950 (Schliengen: Argus, 2004); Christopher Fox, ‘Darmstadt and the Institutionalisation of Modernism’, Contemporary Music Review, 26.1 (2007), 115–23; Björn Heile, ‘Darmstadt as Other: British and American Responses to Musical Modernism’, Twentieth-Century Music, 1.2 (2004), 161–78; Paul Attinello, ‘Postmodern or Modern: A Different Approach to Darmstadt’, Contemporary Music Review, 26.1 (2007), 25–37, in addition to others cited passim. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-79971-3 — Herbert Eimert and the Darmstadt School Max Erwin Excerpt More Information 2 Elements in Music Since 1945 A certain amount of historical scene-setting is necessary to appreciate Eimert’s interventions, and I hope to accomplish it quickly and relatively elegantly with a brief summary of the institution of Darmstadt and its key players from its inception in 1946 until 1951, when Eimert comes to the fore as a distinct cultural force. Karel Goeyvaerts, a Belgian composer who had recently completed his studies in Paris with Olivier Messiaen and Darius Milhaud, arrived at the 1951 courses after a series of early career successes, including a performance at the International Society for Contemporary Music (ISCM) World Music Days of 1950. Goeyvaerts, who had previously incorpor- ated elements of his Roman Catholic faith into his compositions (his Tre lieder per sonare a venti-sei, for example, calls for an altar bell, typically rung when the celebrant gives the Eucharistic Prayer), now developed a sophisticated metaphysical method of composition in conjunction with fellow student Jean Barraqué.2 Both devout Catholics, Barraqué and Goeyvaerts expanded on several compositional techniques of their teacher Messiaen, who himself described his compositional practice as a method of expressing ‘the theology and the truths of our Catholic faith’.3 The result was a series of structural devices – crosses, mirror-symmetries, ciphers based on holy numbers – that largely eliminated the sorts of subjective decision-making that might normally be considered to be part of compositional craft. Indeed, Goeyvaerts termed this new ideal ‘selfless music’, the end result being a purified sound world that approximated a Neo-Platonic higher divine order removed from human experi- ence. Karlheinz Stockhausen, a composition student four years younger than Goeyvaerts and himself a devout Roman Catholic, encountered Goeyvaerts at the 1951 Darmstädter Ferienkurse and was deeply impressed with the older composer’s new method of composition, adopting it himself in Kreuzspiel, which he began immediately after the 1951 courses and completed in early 1952, with advice from Goeyvaerts. During the same period, Herbert Eimert was beginning to enlarge his sphere of influence as a cultural gatekeeper at the NWDR (Nordwestdeutscher Rundfunk; later Westdeutscherrundfunk, WDR), and had made the acquaintance of both Goeyvaerts and Stockhausen, taking the latter tightly under his wing.4 The consequences of this relationship are the 2 See Max Erwin, ‘Who Is Buried in Webern’s Tomb? Orientations in the Reception of Serial Music from Messiaen to Stockhausen’, Perspectives of New Music, in press. 3 Olivier Messiaen, The Technique of My Musical Language, trans. John Satterfield (Paris: Alphonse Leduc, 1956), I.13. 4 Goeyvaerts had met Eimert at the 1950 ISCM New Music Days; Eimert was particularly impressed that Goeyvaerts had a score of Webern’s Second Cantata, which had not been published yet, and the two followed this score during the performance of the piece. See Karel Goeyvaerts, ‘Paris – Darmstadt: 1947–1956: Excerpt from the Autobiographical Portrait’, trans. Mark Delaere, Revue belge de Musicologie/Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Muziekwetenschap,48 (1994), 39. Helmut Kirchmeyer suggests that Eimert’s relationship to the young Stockhausen was © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-79971-3 — Herbert Eimert and the Darmstadt School Max Erwin Excerpt More Information Herbert Eimert and the Darmstadt School 3 focus of this study, and its central purpose is to demonstrate how Eimert deployed the compositional techniques used by Goeyvaerts and Stockhausen as a universal technical programme for New Music. Largely through Eimert’s influence, the early practice of Goeyvaerts and Stockhausen became the house style of the Darmstadt School, even though virtually no other composers – and certainly not their prominent peers Luigi Nono, Bruno Maderna, and Pierre Boulez – adopted these techniques or their attendant metaphysical ideology. On to Darmstadt. At the outset of the 1946 courses, director Wolfgang Steinecke described their objective in negative terms, as a necessary corrective to ‘a criminal cultural politics that robbed German musical life of its leading personalities and its connection with the world’.5 The primary rhetorical object- ive of the courses at their inception, then, was one of internationalisation and ‘catching up’ to the outside world (Nachholbedarf). It was uncertain, as the press response to the 1947 courses makes clear, whether a coherent avant-garde, let alone a modernist New Music, was to play any part in their proceedings. In retrospect, then, the courses are hardly recognisable as the historical Darmstadt at this stage; Iddon’s thorough prehistory describes them as ‘ramshackle affairs in most respects’, to the extent that they primarily functioned ‘as experiments in finding out what the courses could be and how they might function’.6 Such a confusion of purpose in retrospect problematises the usual historiographical demarcations and conceptual vocabulary deployed to explicate the post-war avant-garde, especially the ‘zero hour’ myth. Contrary to Steinecke’s inaugural address, the first courses extensively programmed the work of composers implicated in the Nazi regime, and numerous works by such composers were heavily represented in the two following iterations.7 While many of the more compromised of these composers were dropped from the programmes of later close enough to be that of a foster father; see below and Kirchmeyer, Kleine Monographie über Herbert Eimert (Leipzig: Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1998), 9. 5 ‘[E]ine verbrecherische Kulturpolitik das deutsche Musikleben seiner führenden Persönlichkeiten und seines Zusammenhanges mit der Welt beraubt.’ Wolfgang Steinecke, reproduced in Gianmario Borio and Hermann Danuser, eds., Im Zenit der Moderne: Die Internationalen Ferienkurse für Neue Musik Darmstadt 1946–1966 (Freiburg: Rombach,
Recommended publications
  • Programmheft Und Die Konzerteinführung Gehören Zu Den Ergebnissen Dieser Arbeit
    © Stockhausen-Archiv Ensemble Earquake Oboe..................................Margarita Souka Violoncello.........................Claudia Cecchinato Klarinette...........................Man-Chi Chan Fagott................................Berenike Mosler Violine.................................Anna Teigelack Tuba...................................Sandro Hartung Flöte...................................Samantha Arbogast Posaune.............................Daniil Gorokhov (a.G.) Viola...................................Tom Congdon Trompete...........................Jonas Heinzelmann Kontrabass.........................Marian Kushniryk Horn...................................Lukas Kuhn Schlagzeug........................Nadine Baert Klangregie.........................Selim M’rad Caspar Ernst Ernst-Lukas Kuhlmann Tutor...................................Orlando Boeck Musikalische Leitung.........Kathinka Pasveer Gesamtleitung...................Merve Kazokoğlu Was bedeutete „Neue Musik“ für Karlheinz Stockhausen? Ganz und gar optimistisch, neugierig und kosmopolitisch scheint Stockhausens Musik – und nicht mehr in den engen Grenzen europä- ischer Musikästhetik verstehbar. Zwar war Stockhausen selbst ein Teil der westdeutschen musikalischen Avantgarde nach 1945 und prägte daher zahlreiche Neuerungen der hiesigen damaligen Musikgeschich- te, – hier sind serielle Techniken ebenso wie die künstliche Tonerzeu- gung mit Studiotechnik erwähnenswert, – endgültig verpflichtet bliebt er jedoch keinem der dort erprobten Ansätze und verband die gewon- nenen Anregungen
    [Show full text]
  • A Perspective of New Simplicity in Contemporary Composition: Song of Songs As a Case Study Isabel Maria Pereira Barata Da Rocha
    MESTRADO COMPOSIÇÃO E TEORIA MUSICAL A perspective of New Simplicity in contemporary composition: Song of Songs as a case study Isabel Maria Pereira Barata da Rocha 06/2017 A perspective of New Simplicity in contemporary composition: Song of Songs as a case study. Isabel Maria Pereira Barata da Rocha MESTRADO M COMPOSIÇÃO E TEORIA MUSICAL A perspective of New Simplicity in contemporary composition: Song of Songs as a case study Isabel Maria Pereira Barata da Rocha Dissertação apresentada à Escola Superior de Música e Artes do Espetáculo como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de Mestre em Composição e Teoria Musical Professor Orientador Professor Doutor Eugénio Amorim Professora Coorientadora Professora Doutora Daniela Coimbra 06/2017 A perspective of New Simplicity in contemporary composition: Song of Songs as a case study. Isabel Maria Pereira Barata da Rocha Dedico este trabalho a todos os homens e todas as mulheres de boa vontade. A perspective of New Simplicity in contemporary composition: Song of Songs as a case study. Isabel Maria Pereira Barata da Rocha A perspective of New Simplicity in contemporary composition: Song of Songs as a case study. Isabel Maria Pereira Barata da Rocha Agradecimentos À minha filha Luz, que me dá a felicidade de ser sua mãe, pelo incentivo. Aos meus pais Ana e Luís, pelo apoio incondicional. A Ermelinda de Jesus, pela ajuda sempre disponível. À Fátima, à Joana e à Mariana, pela amizade profunda. Ao José Bernardo e aos avós Teresa e António José, pelo auxílio. Ao Pedro Fesch, pela compreensão e pela aposta na formação dos professores em quem confia.
    [Show full text]
  • Ferienkurse Für Internationale Neue Musik, 25.8.-29.9. 1946
    Ferienkurse für internationale neue Musik, 25.8.-29.9. 1946 Seminare der Fachgruppen: Dirigieren Carl Mathieu Lange Komposition Wolfgang Fortner (Hauptkurs) Hermann Heiß (Zusatzkurs) Kammermusik Fritz Straub (Hauptkurs) Kurt Redel (Zusatzkurs) Klavier Georg Kuhlmann (auch Zusatzkurs Kammermusik) Gesang Elisabeth Delseit Henny Wolff (Zusatzkurs) Violine Günter Kehr Opernregie Bruno Heyn Walter Jockisch Musikkritik Fred Hamel Gemeinsame Veranstaltungen und Vorträge: Den zweiten Teil dieser Übersicht bilden die Veranstaltungen der „Internationalen zeitgenössischen Musiktage“ (22.9.-29.9.), die zum Abschluß der Ferienkurse von der Stadt Darmstadt in Verbindung mit dem Landestheater Darmstadt, der „Neuen Darmstädter Sezession“ und dem Süddeutschen Rundfunk, Radio Frankfurt, durchgeführt wurden. Datum Veranstaltungstitel und Programm Interpreten Ort u. Zeit So., 25.8. Erste Schloßhof-Serenade Kst., 11.00 Ansprache: Bürgermeister Julius Reiber Conrad Beck Serenade für Flöte, Klarinette und Streichorchester des Landes- Streichorchester (1935) theaters Darmstadt, Ltg.: Carl Wolfgang Fortner Konzert für Streichorchester Mathieu Lange (1933) Solisten: Kurt Redel (Fl.), Michael Mayer (Klar.) Kst., 16.00 Erstes Schloß-Konzert mit neuer Kammermusik Ansprachen: Kultusminister F. Schramm, Oberbürger- meister Ludwig Metzger Lehrkräfte der Ferienkurse: Paul Hindemith Sonate für Klavier vierhändig Heinz Schröter, Georg Kuhl- (1938) mann (Kl.) Datum Veranstaltungstitel und Programm Interpreten Ort u. Zeit Hermann Heiß Sonate für Flöte und Klavier Kurt Redel (Fl.), Hermann Heiß (1944-45) (Kl.) Heinz Schröter Altdeutsches Liederspiel , II. Teil, Elisabeth Delseit (Sopr.), Heinz op. 4 Nr. 4-6 (1936-37) Schröter (Kl.) Wolfgang Fortner Sonatina für Klavier (1934) Georg Kuhlmann (Kl.) Igor Strawinsky Duo concertant für Violine und Günter Kehr (Vl.), Heinz Schrö- Klavier (1931-32) ter (Kl.) Mo., 26.8. Komponisten-Selbstporträts I: Helmut Degen Kst., 16.00 Kst., 19.00 Einführung zum Klavierabend Georg Kuhlmann Di., 27.8.
    [Show full text]
  • Holmes Electronic and Experimental Music
    C H A P T E R 2 Early Electronic Music in Europe I noticed without surprise by recording the noise of things that one could perceive beyond sounds, the daily metaphors that they suggest to us. —Pierre Schaeffer Before the Tape Recorder Musique Concrète in France L’Objet Sonore—The Sound Object Origins of Musique Concrète Listen: Early Electronic Music in Europe Elektronische Musik in Germany Stockhausen’s Early Work Other Early European Studios Innovation: Electronic Music Equipment of the Studio di Fonologia Musicale (Milan, c.1960) Summary Milestones: Early Electronic Music of Europe Plate 2.1 Pierre Schaeffer operating the Pupitre d’espace (1951), the four rings of which could be used during a live performance to control the spatial distribution of electronically produced sounds using two front channels: one channel in the rear, and one overhead. (1951 © Ina/Maurice Lecardent, Ina GRM Archives) 42 EARLY HISTORY – PREDECESSORS AND PIONEERS A convergence of new technologies and a general cultural backlash against Old World arts and values made conditions favorable for the rise of electronic music in the years following World War II. Musical ideas that met with punishing repression and indiffer- ence prior to the war became less odious to a new generation of listeners who embraced futuristic advances of the atomic age. Prior to World War II, electronic music was anchored down by a reliance on live performance. Only a few composers—Varèse and Cage among them—anticipated the importance of the recording medium to the growth of electronic music. This chapter traces a technological transition from the turntable to the magnetic tape recorder as well as the transformation of electronic music from a medium of live performance to that of recorded media.
    [Show full text]
  • Minimalism and New Complexity in Solo Flute Repertoire by Twila Dawn Bakker Bachelor of Arts, Univer
    Two Responses to Modernism: Minimalism and New Complexity in Solo Flute Repertoire by Twila Dawn Bakker Bachelor of Arts, University of Alberta, 2008 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the School of Music Twila Dawn Bakker, 2011 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee Two Responses to Modernism: Minimalism and New Complexity in Solo Flute Repertoire by Twila Dawn Bakker Bachelor of Arts, University of Alberta, 2008 Supervisory Committee Dr. Jonathan Goldman, School of Music Supervisor Dr. Michelle Fillion, School of Music Departmental Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. Jonathan Goldman, School of Music Supervisor Dr. Michelle Fillion, School of Music Departmental Member Wind repertoire, especially for flute, has received little focused attention in the musicological world especially when compared with other instruments. This gap in scholarship is further exacerbated when the scope of time is narrowed to the last quarter of the twentieth century. Although Minimalism and New Complexity are – at least superficially – highly divergent styles of composition, they both exhibit aspects of a response to modernism. An examination of emblematic examples from the repertoire for solo flute (or recorder), specifically focusing on: Louis Andriessen’s Ende (1981); James Dillon’s Sgothan (1984), Brian Ferneyhough’s Carceri d’Invenzione IIb (1984), Superscripto (1981), and Unity Capsule (1975); Philip Glass’s Arabesque in Memoriam (1988); Henryk Górecki’s Valentine Piece (1996); and Steve Reich’s Vermont Counterpoint (1982), allows for the similarities in both genre’s response to modernism to be highlighted.
    [Show full text]
  • Karlheinz Stockhausen Left to Inspire
    tms_6-2_p10_stockhausen.qxd 3/21/08 11:39 AM Page 10 KARLHEINZ STOCKHAUSEN LEFT TO INSPIRE Michael Vincent n December 5th, 2007, the world of twentieth-century classical music œuvre. Through his patron Eimert, Stockhausen was given access to the Cologne was hit with the news that one of its brightest stars had passed away Radio studio, which led to the creation of his first masterpiece, famous for its mix- O at the age of 79. Reaction was swift, with blogs popping up in droves ture of electronic music and the human voice: Gesang der Jünglinge (1954). voicing tributes, odes and eloquent memories. One need only read one or two of Stockhausen works can best be described as genre defying and groundbreak- the hundreds of tributes to understand the legacy that this 20th-century master ing. He was one of the first composers to create both electronic and instrumental has left behind. works. His early electronic works included his Electronic Studies 1 & 2 (1953 & 1954) Karlheinz Stockhausen composed more than 300 individual works during his and his Hymnen (1966-67), the latter of which uses electronically manipulated lifetime and was best known for his pioneering work with electronic music in national anthems. He also composed his famous Tele-musik (1968), in many ways the 1960s and 70s. His bold approach to composition helped earn him reverence perfecting his grander epic vision affecting many works yet to come. Stockhausen among some of the most significant 20th-century composers such as John Cage, described the process used to compose this work as the “…intermodulation Wolfgang Rihm, Miles Davis, Herbie Hancock and Frank Zappa.
    [Show full text]
  • Darmstadt As Other: British and American Responses to Musical Modernism. Twentieth-Century Music, 1 (2)
    Heile, B. (2004) Darmstadt as other: British and American responses to musical modernism. Twentieth-Century Music, 1 (2). pp. 161-178. ISSN 1478-5722 Copyright © 2004 Cambridge University Press A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge The content must not be changed in any way or reproduced in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder(s) When referring to this work, full bibliographic details must be given http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/52652/ Deposited on: 03 April 2013 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk twentieth century music http://journals.cambridge.org/TCM Additional services for twentieth century music: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Darmstadt as Other: British and American Responses to Musical Modernism BJÖRN HEILE twentieth century music / Volume 1 / Issue 02 / September 2004, pp 161 ­ 178 DOI: 10.1017/S1478572205000162, Published online: 22 April 2005 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1478572205000162 How to cite this article: BJÖRN HEILE (2004). Darmstadt as Other: British and American Responses to Musical Modernism. twentieth century music, 1, pp 161­178 doi:10.1017/S1478572205000162 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/TCM, IP address: 130.209.6.42 on 03 Apr 2013 twentieth-century music 1/2, 161–178 © 2004 Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/S1478572205000162 Printed in the United Kingdom Darmstadt as Other: British and American Responses to Musical Modernism BJO}RN HEILE Abstract There is currently a backlash against modernism in English-language music studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Furchtlos Weiter: the Written Legacy of Stockhausen
    Music & Letters,Vol.97No.2, ß The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. doi:10.1093/ml/gcw045, available online at www.ml.oxfordjournals.org Review-Article ‘FURCHTLOS WEITER’ : STOCKHAUSEN’S WRITTEN LEGACY Ã BY PAUL V. M ILLER Stockhausen thought big. In outdoor parks, underneath the earth in caverns, in heli- Downloaded from copters buzzing overhead, at La Scala, within a football stadium, a spherical auditor- ium, or a former factory, he sought out places in which his music would make a lasting impression on listeners. This was true until the end of his life: for his colossal Licht project (1977^2003), he fantasized about building seven opera houses, one for each opera. These dreams were part of a career that spanned nearly sixty years. His http://ml.oxfordjournals.org/ official catalogue contains 376 works in all. The Stockhausen Foundation’s CD edition now numbers over 100 items, a number that increases if one counts the so-called ‘Text-CDs’, which include audio recordings of many key lectures. Surely, few com- posers of the modern era have documented their careers as thoroughly. Central elements of Stockhausen’s thinking appear in Texte zur Musik, a series of seventeen volumes containing essays, sketches, interviews, correspondence, and miscel- lanea, published in instalments since 1963. The seven new volumes cover the years 1991^2007.1 Continuing the seven-year cycle of grouping material, the latest set spans by guest on August 26, 2016 two periods. Volumes 11^14 centre on the compositions written during 1991^8, and volumes 15^17 deal primarily with the composer’s activity from 1999 until his death in 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Negotiating Cultural Allies: American Music in Darmstadt, 1946-1956 Author(S): Amy C
    American Musicological Society Negotiating Cultural Allies: American Music in Darmstadt, 1946-1956 Author(s): Amy C. Beal Source: Journal of the American Musicological Society, Vol. 53, No. 1 (Spring, 2000), pp. 105- 139 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the American Musicological Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/831871 Accessed: 22/11/2010 15:41 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ucal. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press and American Musicological Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the American Musicological Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneers of Electronic Music/ World Centers
    Pioneers of Electronic Music/ World Centers Musique Concrète (Paris) Elektronische Musik (Cologne) The Origins of Musique Concrète • In 1942, Pierre Schaeffer, an electrical engineer working for Radiodiffusion Télévision Française (RTF), convinces RTF to initiate new research into musical acoustics with himself as director. • Schaeffer focused on the use of recording techniques as a means of isolating naturally produced sound events. • By 1948, Schaeffer begins to consider how recorded material could be used as a basis for composition. • 1948 - Étude aux chemins de fer (Railroad Study), his first piece of Musique Concrète, uses sounds recorded at a railroad station in Paris. - primarily used successive rather than overlaid sounds, making overt the repetitive characteristics of the sounds • In 1949, RTF hires composer Pierre Henry to join Pierre Schaeffer in his research. • Collaboration between Henry and Schaeffer results in the composition Symphony pour un homme seul. (1949) Sounds selected included: Human sounds Extra-human sounds breathing footsteps vocal fragments knocking on doors shouting percussion humming prepared piano whistling orchestral instruments • Disc Cutters were used to record sounds • Turntables, mixing units, and loudspeakers used for live performance Aesthetic Goals of Musique Concrète • To isolate sounds from their original source via recording • To treat these individual sounds as “sound objects” or objects sonores • To create new sounds through manipulation, processing, and mixing the sound objects Special concerns: • Schaeffer was concerned with codifying a syntax or scientific language for Musique Concrète. • Henry was concerned with creating written scores for his tape pieces. Magnetic Tape • In 1949, Magnecord introduced the first stereo tape machine. The first commercial splicing block was introduced the same year.
    [Show full text]
  • Schriftenreihe Des Sophie Drinker Instituts Band 4
    Schriftenreihe des Sophie Drinker Instituts Herausgegeben von Freia Hoffmann Band 4 Marion Gerards, Freia Hoffmann (Hrsg.) Musik – Frauen – Gender Bücherverzeichnis 1780–2004 BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg 2006 Das Werk ist einschließlich aller seiner Teile urheberrechtlich ge- schützt. Jede Verwertung außerhalb der Grenzen des Urheberrechts bedarf der Zustimmung der Autorinnen. Dies gilt insbesondere für Vervielfältigungen, Übersetzungen, Mikroverfilmungen und die Einspeicherung und Verarbeitung in elektronischen Medien. © BIS-Verlag, Oldenburg 2006 Umschlaggestaltung: Marta Daul Layout und Satz: BIS-Verlag Verlag / Druck / BIS-Verlag Vertrieb: der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg Postfach 25 41, 26015 Oldenburg Tel.: 0441/798 2261, Telefax: 0441/798 4040 e-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.bis.uni-oldenburg.de ISBN 3-8142-0966-4 Inhaltsverzeichnis Vorwort 3 Hinweise zur Benutzung 5 1 Nachschlagewerke 9 1.1 Lexika und biographische Nachschlagewerke 9 1.2 Bibliographien 14 1.3 Notenverzeichnisse 17 1.4 Diskographien 22 2 Einführende Literatur 24 2.1 Kunstmusik 24 2.2 Populäre Musik (Jazz, Rock, Pop, Volksmusik, Chansons, Weltmusik u. ä.) 42 2.3 Stilübergreifend und Sonstige 50 3 Personenbezogene Darstellungen 54 3.1 Kunstmusik 54 3.2 Populäre Musik (Jazz, Rock, Pop, Volksmusik, Chansons, Weltmusik u. ä.) 320 3.3 Stilübergreifend und Sonstige 433 4 Spezielle Literatur 446 4.1 Kunstmusik 446 4.2 Populäre Musik (Jazz, Rock, Pop, Volksmusik, Chansons, Weltmusik u. ä.) 462 4.3 Stilübergreifend
    [Show full text]
  • Generative Processes in Stockhausen's Lichter
    Generative processes in Stockhausen's Lichter - Wasser Oscar Bianchi Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Musical Arts in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2013 © 2013 Oscar Bianchi All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Generative processes in Stockhausen's Lichter - Wasser Oscar Bianchi An overview on a highly intertwined generative system through Stockhausen's late piece Lichter - Wasser (1998-1999). Lichter - Wasser is a work that constantly attempts to conjugate the contemplation and the paroxism of an ur-element, the so called super formula, with the long sought utopia of the infinite progress of perception faculties (a journey formally began in 1955 with Stockhausen’s composition Gruppen, for three orchestral groups). Table of Contents I!Introduction !!!!!!!!!!!!!2 ! I.1 Why Lichter - Wasser? . .!2 1!Chapter 1!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! 3 !1.1!Licht!. !3 !1.2 !Sonntag aus Licht. .!4 2!Chapter 2!! !!!!!!!!!!! ! 5 !2.1!Generative processes in the opera cycle Licht . .! 5 !2.2!The nuclear formula . .!6 !2.3!Nuclear formula / super formula relationships . .!8 !2.4!The super formula . .. .!13 3!Chapter 3! ! !!!!!!!!!!! ! 19 !3.1!The super formula defines the cycle LICHT. .!. .!19 !3.2!The super formula defines Lichter - Wasser. !20 ! 3.3!Notes about durations and tempi in Lichter - Wasser. !22 !3.4!Super formula developments for Sonntag aus Licht. .!23 4!Chapter 4!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! 26 !4.1!Super imposed projections in Lichter - Wasser: waves and bridges. .!26 !4.2!Lichter - Wasser form. .!30 i !4.3!Formulas in Lichter - Wasser's score . .!32 5!Chapter 5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!3 7 !5.1!Spatial performance.
    [Show full text]