DOCSLIB.ORG

Banksia Rufa Subsp. Pumila

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Banksia Rufa Subsp. Pumila Short form Threatened species nomination form (Version Mar 2016) Abridged Threatened Species Nomination Form For nominations/assessments under the Common Assessment Method (CAM) where supporting information is available, but not in a format suitable for demonstrating compliance with the CAM, and assessment against the IUCN Red List threat status. Cover Page (Office use only for Assessment) Species name (scientific and common name): Banksia rufa subsp. pumila Nomination for (addition, deletion, change): Addition Nominated conservation category and criteria: EN: B1ab(ii,iii,iv,v)+2ab(ii,iii,iv,v) Scientific committee assessment of eligibility against the criteria: This assessment is consistent with the standards set out in Schedule 1, item 2.7 (h) and Yes No 2.8 of the Common Assessment Method Memorandum of Understanding. A. Population size reduction B. Geographic range C. Small population size and decline D. Very small or restricted population E. Quantitative analysis Outcome: Scientific committee Meeting date: Scientific committee comments: Recommendation: Ministerial approval: Date of Gazettal/ Legislative effect: Page 1 of 8 Nomination/Proposal summary (to be completed by nominator) Current conservation status Scientific name: Banksia rufa subsp. pumila Common name: None Family name: Proteaceae Fauna Flora Nomination for: Listing Change of status/criteria Delisting 1. Is the species currently on any conservation list, either in a State or Territory, Australia or Internationally? Provide details of the occurrence and listing status for each jurisdiction in the following table 2. Is it present in an Australian jurisdiction, but not listed? Listing category i.e. State / Territory in Date listed critically Listing criteria i.e. Jurisdiction which the species or assessed endangered or B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii) occurs (or N/A) ‘none’ International (IUCN Red List) National (EPBC Act) State / Territory 1. WA 2010 Endangered B1ab(ii,iii,iv,v)+B2ab(ii,iii,iv,v) 5/4/2017 Endangered B1ab(ii,iii,iv,v)+B2ab(ii,iii,iv,v) 2. Consistent with Schedule 1, item 2.7 (h) and 2.8 of the Common Assessment Method Memorandum of Understanding, it is confirmed that: this assessment meets the standard of evidence required by the Common Assessment Yes No Method to document the eligibility of the species under the IUCN criteria; Comments: surveys of the species were adequate to inform the assessment; Yes No Comments: Further survey showed an increase in the number of mature individuals from approximately 7,000 prior to 2009, to >15,000 individuals from 2011 to 2014. the conclusion of the assessment remains current and that any further information Yes No that may have become available since the assessment was completed supports or is consistent with the conclusion of the assessment. Comments: Since the assessment in 2010, the number of mature individuals has increased from 7,000 prior to 2009, to >15,000 from 2011 to 2014 as a result of further survey. However the habitat of the subpopulations is highly threatened by dieback disease and fire with all subpopulations infested with the disease. Testing of the species susceptibility has found that the species is highly susceptible with a number of plant deaths observed in all subpopulations. Without ongoing management a projected decline is expected. Meets criteria Endangered B1ab(ii,iii,iv,v)+B2ab(ii,iii,iv,v). Page 2 of 8 Nominated national conservation status: category and criteria Presumed extinct (EX) Critically endangered (CR) Endangered (EN) Vulnerable (VU) None (least concern) Data Deficient Conservation Dependent What are the IUCN Red List criteria that support the recommended EN: B1ab(ii,iii,iv,v)+B2ab(ii,iii,iv,v) conservation status category? Eligibility against the IUCN Red List criteria (A, B, C, D and E) Provide justification for the nominated conservation status; is the species eligible or ineligible for listing against the five criteria. For delisting, provide details for why the species no longer meets the requirements of the current conservation status. A. Population size reduction The total number of recorded mature individuals increased from (evidence of decline) 7,000 prior to 2009, to approximately 15,840 from 2011 to 2014 (extrapolated figure) due to further survey. However there has been a decline in individuals within some subpopulations due to Phytophthora cinnamomi and fire. It is likely the subspecies will decline in the future without ongoing management. Does not meet criterion B. Geographic range (B1) EOO <100 km2. Using Minimum Convex Polygon (MCP) the EOO is estimated as 12 km2, which was calculated by drawing a polygon (EOO and AOO, number of 2 locations and evidence of around the subpopulations (5.4 km ) and rectifying to be no less than decline) the estimated AOO. (B2) AOO >10 km2 and <100 km2. The area of mapped subpopulations is 0.487 km2 or 48.7 hectares and 12 km2 using the 2km x 2km grid method. (a) Known from four locations within the Stirling Range National Park, as while threatening processes are the same, the four subpopulations are quite separate and the threats are operating independently. (b) Continuing decline observed and projected: (ii) An increase in the area of occupancy from 40 ha when surveyed prior to 2009, to 48.7 ha in 2011 to 2014, is due to the discovery of new individuals located in Subpopulation 4. A projected decline in the area of occupied habitat is expected due to the impact of disease and fire. With projected loss of subpopulations, there is a corresponding projected decline in the AOO. (iii) Subpopulations 1, 3 and 4 occur within the Montane Mallee Thicket Threatened Ecological Community (TEC). This TEC is highly threatened by Phytophthora cinnamomi and fire. Plant deaths in association with the disease have been observed and it is suspected that infestations may directly and indirectly contribute to a decline in the area, extent and/or quality of habitat in each subpopulation. (iv) There has been an historic reduction in the number of known subpopulations. A herbarium collection from 1987 “Northwest slopes of Little Mondurup” (SRNP) was not relocated during targeted surveys in 2006 and 2007. It is suspected that Phytophthora cinnamomi has caused the loss of this subpopulation after wildfire in 2000. There is the potential for further loss of subpopulations if Phytophthora and Page 3 of 8 fire management fail to protect the subpopulations. (v) Decline in the number of mature individuals was noted in 2000 in Subpopulations 1 and 2 (10% of Subpopulation 2 recorded as dead in 2009; and 10% of Subpopulation 4 dead in 2007) due to Phytophthora cinnamomi. It is likely that inappropriate fire intervals and Phytophthora cinnamomi infestation will lead to further reduction in the total population size. Meets criteria for EN: B1ab(ii,iii,iv,v) +B2ab(ii,iii,iv,v) C. Small population size and Known from approximately 15,840 mature individuals. decline Does not meet criterion (population size, distribution and evidence of decline) D. Very small or restricted (D) The species is known from approximately 15,840 mature population individuals in total. (population size) Does not meet criterion E. Quantitative analysis No information to assess. (statistical probability of extinction) Summary of assessment information EOO 5.4 km2 (MCP), AOO 12 km2 (2 km x 2 km Generation Juvenile period recalculated to 12 km2 so grid). Extrapolated length approximately 5 as not to be less than the area of subpopulations years AOO. 0.487 km2 No. locations 4 Severely fragmented Yes No Unknown No. subpopulations 4 No. mature individuals ~15,840 Percentage global population within Australia 100 Percentage population decline over 10 years or 3 generations Unknown Threats (detail how the species is being impacted) Threat Extent Impact (describe the threat and how it impacts on the species. (give details of impact on (what is the level of threat to Specify if the threat is past, current or potential) whole species or specific the conservation of the subpopulations) species) Phytophthora dieback Whole population Catastrophic Phytophthora cinnamomi kills plants and degrades associated habitat. The species has been tested and found to be highly susceptible to dieback disease with a very high risk of extinction. All subpopulations are infested and plant deaths have been observed. Past, current and future Page 4 of 8 Small population size Whole population Catastrophic The species is only known from four subpopulations, all subject to threatening processes, placing it under serious threat from those process. Current, future Altered fire regimes Whole population Severe Increased fire intervals may cause a decline in the number of individuals with fires in short succession capable of killing live plants before canopy-stored seed has been replenished. Past, current and future Drought Whole population Severe This is a threat to the subspecies if it occurs over a number of years. Climate change modelling for the south west predicts a decline in rainfall, and some seasonal shift to summer rainfall events, which is likely to increase the potential impact of drought on the subspecies. Future Management and Recovery Is there a Recovery Plan (RP) or Conservation Management Plan operational for the Yes No species? List all relevant recovery or management plans (including draft, in-preparation, out-of-date, national and State/Territory recovery plans, recovery plans for other species or ecological communities, or other management plans that may benefit or be relevant to the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guide for the Conservation of Flora in the Shire Of
    A Guide to Threatened and Priority Listed Flora in the Shire of Wickepin Prepared by Ecoedge for the Shire of Wickepin. January 2019. Cover photo sources (L‐R): Acacia deflexa, Department of Biodiversity, Conservaon and Aracons (DBCA) Narrogin Office; Calectasia pignaana, DBCA Narrogin Office; Banksia meganoa, hps://davesgarden.com (Lyn Alcock). List of Species Acacia deflexa Page 3 Daviesia crassa Page 19 Acacia insolita subsp. recurva Page 4 Desmocladus eludens Page 20 Acacia newbeyi Page 5 Eucalyptus exilis Page 21 Andersonia carinata Page 6 Eucalyptus loxophleba x wandoo Page 22 Austroparmelina macrospora Page 7 Grevillea sp. Harrismith Babingtonia maleyae Page 8 (G.J. Keighery & N. Gibson 7094) Page 23 Banksia cynaroides Page 9 Lasiopetalum cardiophyllum Page 24 Banksia erythrocephala var. Lechenaula pulvinaris Page 25 inopinata Page 10 Leucopogon audax Page 26 Banksia fasciculata Page 11 Microcorys cephalantha Page 27 Banksia meganoa Page 12 Oxymyrrhine cordata Page 28 Banksia oligantha Page 13 Polianthion biloculare Page 29 Banksia rufa subsp. magna Page 14 Pultenaea indira subsp. pudoides Page 30 Banksia seneciifolia Page 15 Rinzia affinis Page 31 Calectasia pignaana Page 16 Stylidium tenuicarpum Page 32 Conospermum scaposum Page 17 Synaphea drummondii Page 33 Conostylis seorsiflora subsp. Synaphea platyphylla Page 34 trichophylla Page 18 Tetratheca exasperata Page 35 Thysanotus tenuis Page 36 Acacia deflexa (Priority 3) Descripon Prostrate to straggling or erect shrub, 0.15‐2 m high. Flowers yellow, August to September. Yellow & gravelly lateric sand, gravelly sandy loam. Plains. Distribuon (Shires) Bruce Rock, Corrigin, Cuballing, Dowerin, Kondinin, Narrogin, Wickepin, Williams. Page 3. Photo source: DBCA Narrogin Office Acacia insolita subsp. recurva (Threatened (Crically Endangered)) Common name: Yornaning Wale Descripon Spindly shrub, 0.6‐1.2 m high.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitzgerald Biosphere Recovery Plan
    FITZGERALD BIOSPHERE RECOVERY PLAN A landscape approach to threatened species and ecological communities for recovery and biodiversity conservation South Coast Region Department of Environment and Conservation This Fitzgerald Biosphere Recovery Plan has been prepared by Janet Newell, Sarah Comer and Deon Utber for the Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation. This Plan should be cited as follows: Department of Environment and Conservation, (2012). Fitzgerald Biosphere Recovery Plan: A Landscape Approach to Threatened Species and Ecological Communities Recovery and Biodiversity Conservation, Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation, Albany. Cover photos: top left – Eucalyptus nutans (Sarah Barrett) top middle – Western Ground Parrot (Brent Barrett) top right – Eucalyptus burdettiana (Sarah Barrett) bottom – Fitzgerald River National Park (Sarah Comer) Department of Environment and Conservation South Coast Region 120 Albany Highway Albany WA 6330. FORWARD This Fitzgerald Biosphere Recovery Plan constitutes the formal national regional recovery plan for 11 flora species and provides recovery guidance for the remaining species and ecological communities largely endemic to the Fitzgerald Biosphere on the south coast of Western Australia that are listed under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). The Fitzgerald River National Park (FRNP) was designated a Biosphere Reserve under the UNESCO Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme in 1978, and is recognised for its relatively pristine state and high biological diversity, especially its flora. For the purpose of this plan, the term ‘Fitzgerald Biosphere’ or ‘Biosphere’ refers to the combination of the core Biosphere area as recognised by MAB and the buffer and transition zones as defined by catchment boundaries as shown in figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Australian Natives Susceptible to Phytophthora Cinnamomi
    Appendix 2 Western Australian Natives Susceptible to Phytophthora cinnamomi. Compiled by E. Groves, P. Hollick, G. Hardy & J. McComb, Murdoch University Information used to determine susceptibility to P. cinnamomi: 1a- field observations, 1b- field observation and recovery of P.cinnamomi. 2a- glasshouse inoculation of P. cinnamomi and recovery, 2b- field inoculation with P. cinnamomi and recovery. NP- no information was given in the reference . RARE NURSERY PLANT SPECIES COMMON NAME ASSESSMENT SPECIES AVAILABILITY REFERENCES (R) (A) Acacia campylophylla Benth. 1b 27 Acacia myrtifolia (Sm) wild. 1b A 14 Acacia stenoptera Maslin. Narrow Winged Wattle 1b 28 Actinostrobus pyramidalis Miq. Swamp Cypress 2a 31 Adenanthos barbiger Lindl. 1a A 1, 18, 28 Adenanthos cumminghamii Meisn. Albany Woolly Bush NP A 8, 12 Adenanthos cuneatus Labill. Coastal Jugflower 1a A 1, 10 Adenanthos cygnorum Diels. Common Woolly Bush 1a 1, 11 Adenanthos detmoldii F. Muell. Scott River Jugflower 1a 1 Adenanthos dobagii E.C. Nelson Fitzgerald Jugflower NP R 8, 12 Adenanthos ellipticus A.S. George Oval Leafed Adenanthos NP 12 Adenanthos filifolius Benth. 1a 33 Adenanthos ileticos E.C. George Club Leafed Adenanthos NP 12 Adenanthos meisneri Lehm. 1a A 1 Adenanthos obovatus Labill. Basket Flower 1b A 1, 11, 22, 28 Adenanthos oreophilus E.C. Nelson 1a 33 Adenanthos pungens ssp. effussus Spiky Adenanthos NP R 8 Adenanthos pungens ssp. pungens NP R 8 Adenanthos sericeus Labill. Woolly Bush 1a A 1 Agonis linearifolia (D.C.) Sweet Swamp Peppermint 1b 10 Agrostocrinum scabrum (R. Br) Baill. Bluegrass 1a 17 Allocasuarina fraseriana (Miq) L.A.S. Sheoak 1b A 1, 10, 22 Johnson Allocasuarina humilis (Otto & F.
    [Show full text]
  • PERTH, TUESDAY, 5 AUGUST 2008 No. 134
    !200800134GG! WESTERN 3469 AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT ISSN 1448-949X PRINT POST APPROVED PP665002/00041 PERTH, TUESDAY, 5 AUGUST 2008 No. 134 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY JOHN A. STRIJK, GOVERNMENT PRINTER AT 3.30 PM © STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA CONTENTS PART 1 Page Local Government Act 1995—Town of Vincent—Parking and Parking Facilities Amendment Local Law 2008.................................................................................................. 3485 Wildlife Conservation Act 1950— Wildlife Conservation (Rare Flora) Notice 2008(2) ........................................................... 3471 Wildlife Conservation (Specially Protected Fauna) Notice 2008(2).................................. 3477 ——— PART 2 Consumer and Employment Protection.................................................................................... 3487 Deceased Estates ....................................................................................................................... 3493 Fisheries..................................................................................................................................... 3487 Justice......................................................................................................................................... 3488 Local Government...................................................................................................................... 3488 Minerals and Petroleum ............................................................................................................ 3489 Planning
    [Show full text]
  • LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Question on Notice Tuesday, 8 May 2018
    27JUN2M3 6 tabled LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Question On Notice Tuesday, 8 May 2018 1220. Hon Robin Chappie to the Minister for Environment I refer to the Auditor-General's Rich and Rare: Conservation of Threatened Species follow- up audit, released in September 2017, and ask: (a) will the Minister please provide a list of the names of all existing recovery plans for: (i) plant species; (ii) animal species; and (iii) ecological communities; (b) in relation to (a), for each plan, will the Minister please list: (i) the date the plan was approved; (ii) whether it is an interim or 'full' plan; (iii) the period of time in years that the plan is to cover; and (iv) the amount of funding currently allocated to the plan including by item, funding derived from: (A) Commonwealth Government; (B) State Government; and (C) offsets; (c) what action does the Minister propose to take regarding out of date recovery plans for threatened species and ecological communities; (d) what is the date of the last time that an addition was made to the list of Threatened Ecological Communities in Western Australia; (e) how many ecological communities have been recommended for listing as 'threatened' by the Threatened Ecological Communities Scientific Committee but have yet to have had their status listed as such; (f) will the Minister please list the names of all the threatened: (i) plant species; (ii) animal species; and (iii) ecological communities; and (g) for which there is no recovery plan, and for each item, please list the threat status? Answer (a)(i)-(iii) See tabled paper X.
    [Show full text]
  • Banksia Pseudoplumosa)
    WA INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN NO. 318 FALSE PLUMED-BANKSIA (Banksia pseudoplumosa) INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN 2011-2016 September 2011 Department of Environment and Conservation Kensington Interim Recovery Plan for Banksia pseudoplumosa Interim Recovery Plan for Banksia pseudoplumosa FOREWORD Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM) Policy Statements Nos. 44 and 50. Note: CALM formally became the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) in July 2006. DEC will continue to adhere to these Policy Statements until they are revised and reissued. These plans outline the recovery actions that are required to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. DEC is committed to ensuring that Threatened taxa are conserved through the preparation and implementation of Recovery Plans (RPs) or IRPs by ensuring that conservation action commences as soon as possible. This plan will operate from August 2011 to July 2016 but will remain in force until withdrawn or replaced. It is intended that, if the taxon is still ranked as Endangered (EN) in WA, this plan will be reviewed after five years and the need for further recovery actions assessed. This plan was given regional approval on 9 September 2011 and was approved by the Director of Nature Conservation on 20 September 2011. The provision of funds identified in this plan is dependent on budgetary and other constraints affecting DEC, as well as the need to address other priorities. This plan was prepared with financial support from the Australian Government to be adopted as a National Recovery Plan under the provisions of the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act).
    [Show full text]
  • 4482 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA 2 December 2014
    4482 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA 2 December 2014 CO402* WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ACT 1950 WILDLIFE CONSERVATION (RARE FLORA) NOTICE 2014 Made by the Minister for the Environment under section 23F(2) of the Act. 1. Citation This notice may be cited as the Wildlife Conservation (Rare Flora) Notice 2014. 2. Interpretation In this notice— “extant” means known to be living in a wild state; “protected flora” means any flora belonging to the classes of flora declared by the Minister under section 6 of the Act to be protected flora by notice published in the Gazette 9 October 1987, at p. 3855; “taxon” includes any taxon that is described by a genus name and any other name or description. Note: The plural form of “taxon” is “taxa”. 3. Rare flora Subject to clause 4, protected flora— (a) specified in Schedule 1, being taxa that are extant and considered likely to become extinct or rare and therefore in need of special protection; and (b) specified in Schedule 2, being taxa that are presumed to be extinct in the wild and therefore in need of special protection, are declared to be rare flora for the purposes of section 23F of the Act throughout the State. 4. Application Clause 3 does not apply to those plants of a taxon of protected flora specified in Schedule 1 or 2 that have been planted for any purpose other than such plants that have been planted for the purpose of conservation of that taxon and in accordance with approval given by the Director General. 5. Revocation The Wildlife Conservation (Rare Flora) Notice 2013 is revoked.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadside Vegetation and Conservation Values in the Shire Of
    RRooaaddssiiddee VVeeggeettaattiioonn aanndd CCoonnsseerrvvaattiioonn VVaalluueess iinn tthhee SShhiirree ooff NNaarrrrooggiinn Photo by C. Denton July 2009 Roadside Conservation Commiittee CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY…………………………………………………………………………. 1 PART A: OVERVIEW OF ROADSIDE CONSERVATION................................................... 2 1.0 Why is Roadside Vegetation Important? ……………………………………………… 3 2.0 What are the Threats? …………………………………………………………………. 4 2.1 Lack of Awareness ………………………..………………………………………… 4 2.2 Roadside Clearing ………………………………………………………………….. 4 2.3 Fire …………………………………………………………………………………….5 2.4 Weeds...………………………………………………………………………………. 6 2.5 Salinity…………………………………………………………………………………7 3.0 Legislative Requirements ……………………………………………………………………. 8 4.0 Environmentally Sensitive Areas …………………………………….……………………....9 5.0 Flora Roads……………………………………………………………………………………10 PART B: THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT IN NARROGIN………………………….….…. 11 1.0 Flora………………………………………………………………………………………….…12 2.0 Declared Rare Flora (DRF)…………………………………………………………….…….12 3.0 Fauna………………………………………………………………………………….………..13 4.0 Remnant Vegetation Cover…………………………………………………….…………….15 PART C: ROADSIDE SURVEYS IN THE SHIRE OF NARROGIN ………………………….16 1.0 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………17 1.1 Methods………………………………………………………………………………17 1.2 Mapping Roadside Conservation Values………………………………………....18 1.3 Roadside Conservation Value Categories………………………………………..18 2.0 Using the Roadside Conservation Value Map (RCV) Map……………………………….20 3.0 Results………………………………………………………………………………………….22 PART D:
    [Show full text]
  • 27 Mm Tabled Paper, LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Question on Notice
    27 mm tabled paper, LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Question On Notice Tuesday, 8 May 2018 1220. Hon Robin Chappie to the Minister for Environment I refer to the Auditor-General's Rich and Rare: Conservation of Threatened Species follow- up audit, released in September 2017, and ask: (a) will the Minister please provide a list of the names of all existing recovery plans for: (i) plant species; (ii) animal species; and (iii) ecological communities; (b) in relation to (a), for each plan, will the Minister please list: (i) the date the plan was approved; (ii) whether it is an interim or 'full' plan; (iii) the period of time in years that the plan is to cover; and (iv) the amount of funding currently allocated to the plan including by item, funding derived from: (A) Commonwealth Government; (B) State Government; and (C) offsets; (c) what action does the Minister propose to take regarding out of date recovery plans for threatened species and ecological communities; (d) what is the date of the last time that an addition was made to the list of Threatened Ecological Communities in Western Australia; (e) how many ecological communities have been recommended for listing as 'threatened' by the Threatened Ecological Communities Scientific Committee but have yet to have had their status listed as such; (f) will the Minister please list the names of all the threatened: (i) plant species; (ii) animal species; and (iii) ecological communities; and (g) for which there is no recovery plan, and for each item, please list the threat status? Answer (a)(i)-(iii) See tabled paper X.
    [Show full text]
  • NV-T08 Clearing Permit Template (Purpose Permit) (Pathway 3)
    CLEARING PERMIT Granted under section 51E of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 Purpose Permit number: CPS 8494/1 Permit Holder: Shire of Bruce Rock Duration of Permit: From 9 July 2021 to 9 July 2031 The Permit Holder is authorised to clear native vegetation subject to the following conditions of this Permit. PART I – CLEARING AUTHORISED Clearing authorised (purpose) The Permit Holder is authorised to clear native vegetation for the purpose of road construction. Land on which clearing is to be done Bruce Rock-Narembeen Road reserve (PIN 11650235), Bruce Rock Clearing authorised The Permit Holder must not clear more than 0.19 hectares of native vegetation within the area cross-hatched yellow in Figure 1 of Schedule 1. Type of clearing authorised This Permit authorises the Permit Holder to clear native vegetation for the activities described in condition 1 of this Permit to the extent that the Permit Holder has the power to carry out works involving clearing for those activities under the Local Government Act 1995 or any other written law. Period during which clearing is authorised The Permit Holder must not clear any native vegetation after 9 July 2026. CPS 8494/1, 16 June 2021 Page 1 of 8 PART II – MANAGEMENT CONDITIONS Avoid, minimise, and reduce impacts and extent of clearing In determining the native vegetation authorised to be cleared under this Permit, the Permit Holder must apply the following principles, set out in descending order of preference: (a) avoid the clearing of native vegetation; (b) minimise the amount of native vegetation to be cleared; and (c) reduce the impact of clearing on any environmental value.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Team Annual Report
    RECOVERY TEAM ANNUAL REPORT THREATENED SPECIES AND/OR COMMUNITIES RECOVERY TEAM PROGRAM INFORMATION Recovery Albany Threatened Flora Recovery Team T e a m Reporting Calendar year 2009 Period Current membership Member Representing 1. Chair Sarah Comer DEC 2. Exec Sarah Barrett DEC Officer 3. Sue Oborne Ongerup Wildflower Society 4 Linda Strahan Ongerup Wildflower Society 5. Libby Albany Wildflower Society Sandiford 6 John Tucker Ravensthorpe Wildflower Society 7 Margaret Community Pieroni 8 Karin Baker DEC 9 Merle Bennett Ravensthorpe Wildflower Society 10 Andrew Brown DEC 11 Dave Coates DEC 12 Anne DEC Cochrane 13 Meredith DEC Spencer 14 Greg Freebury DEC Dates meetings 27/5/09; 12/11/09 were held Summary of New populations of the following recovery Actions threatened flora were located: Calectasia cyanea (CR), Banksia brownii (CR), Persoonia micranthera (CR), Andersonia pinaster (EN), Caladenia bryceana subsp. bryceana (EN), Chordifex abortivus (VU) Known numbers of Eucalyptus burdettiana (East Mt Barren) and Verticordia helichrysantha (Vu) (Trigelow Beach) were substantially increased following survey, New translocations was completed for the CR taxa Gastrolobium luteifolium and Latrobea colophona at a new site recently purchased by DEC, while further translocations to existing sites were undertaken for Banksia anatona, Banksia brownii, Lambertia fairallii and Banksia montana. The Albany aerial phosphite program for control of Phytophthora dieback continued in 2009. Monitoring indicates that species decline and disease spread has been reduced particularly at Banksia anatona population 2, Daviesia pseudaphylla Pop 1 and Daviesia glossosema P1. The status of four Priority flora were evaluated following survey for nomination as DRF: Asterolasia sp Kalgan (P1), Calochilus pruinosum (P1), Banksia rufa ssp pumila and (P2) Gastrolobium vestitum (P2).
    [Show full text]
  • The Albany Regional Vegetation Survey Inside This Issue
    Species and Communities Branch newsletter for species and ecological communities conservation December 2010 Volume 16, Issue 2 The Albany Regional Vegetation Survey by Sarah Barrett The Albany Regional Vegetation Survey (ARVS) (Sandiford & Barrett 2010) was undertaken in response to increasing demand for land for urban and peri-urban development in the Albany area. In 2007, funding for the project was provided by the EnviroPlanning project ‘Integrating NRM into Land Use Planning’, State Natural Resource Management (NRM) Program, City of Albany and South Coast Natural Resource Management Inc with the project based at the Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) Albany. The ARVS area encompasses 124,415 hectares that extends some 30 kilometres east and west of Albany and 20 kilometres north. It is situated at the junction of three lines, to estuarine fringes and lakes. Above left Melaleuca striata/Banksia spp. biogeographic regions – the Warren, Jarrah coastal heath, Gull Rock National Park. The project determined that 35% Forest and Esperance Plains regions – and Above Evandra aristata sedgeland, Bornholm includes a variety of landforms from coastal (44,093 hectares) of remnant vegetation Photos – Libby Sandiford dunes, granitic hills, gently undulating remains within the ARVS area of which plains, lowland flats, rivers and drainage 19% occurs within formal conservation reserves and 39% in other Crown reserves. Two thirds (67%) of the vegetation is in excellent–very good condition with 21% Inside this issue in modified, and 12% in transformed states. The Albany Regional Vegetation Survey..................................................... 1 The flora and vegetation was very diverse Protection of rare flora from the impacts of rabbit grazing....................
    [Show full text]