RECOVERY TEAM Annual Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Small-Flowered Snottygobble (Personia Micranthera) 2003-2008
INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN NO. 145 SMALL-FLOWERED SNOTTYGOBBLE (PERSONIA MICRANTHERA) INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN 2003-2008 Gillian Stack & Andrew Brown Photograph: S. Barrett June 2003 Department of Conservation and Land Management Western Australian Threatened Species and Communities Unit (WATSCU) PO Box 51, Wanneroo, WA 6946 Interim Recovery Plan for Persoonia micranthera FOREWORD Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Conservation and Land Management (DCLM) Policy Statements Nos. 44 and 50. IRPs outline the recovery actions that are required to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. DCLM is committed to ensuring that Critically Endangered taxa are conserved through the preparation and implementation of Recovery Plans or Interim Recovery Plans and by ensuring that conservation action commences as soon as possible and always within one year of endorsement of that rank by the Minister. This Interim Recovery Plan, which replaces IRP 46 (1999-2002), will operate from June 2003 to May 2008 but will remain in force until withdrawn or replaced. It is intended that, if the taxon is still ranked Critically Endangered, this IRP will be reviewed after five years and the need for a full Recovery Plan will be assessed. This IRP was approved by the Director of Nature Conservation 21 September 2003. The provision of funds identified in this Interim Recovery Plan is dependent on budgetary and other constraints affecting DCLM, as well as the need to address other priorities. Information in this IRP was accurate at June 2003. -
Montane Heath and Thicket of the South West Botanical Province Interim Recovery Plan 1999-2002
INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN NO. 52 Montane Heath and Thicket of the South West Botanical Province, above approximately 900 m above sea level (Eastern Stirling Range Montane Heath and Thicket Community) INTERIM RECOVERY PLAN 1999-2002 by S. Barrett February 2000 Department of Conservation and Land Management Department of Conservation and Land Management Western Australian Threatened Species and Communities Unit PO Box 51, Wanneroo, WA 6946 FOREWORD Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM) Policy Statements Nos 44 and 50 IRPs outline the recovery actions that are required to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. CALM is committed to ensuring that Critically Endangered ecological communities are conserved through the preparation and implementation of Recovery Plans or Interim Recovery Plans and by ensuring that conservation action commences as soon as possible and always within one year of endorsement of that rank by CALM's Director of Nature Conservation. This Interim Recovery Plan will operate from 13 February 2000 but will remain in force until withdrawn or replaced. It is intended that, if the ecological community is still ranked Critically Endangered after three years, this IRP will be replaced by a full Recovery Plan. The provision of funds identified in this Interim Recovery Plan is dependent on budgetary and other constraints affecting CALM, as well as the need to address other priorities. Information in this IRP was accurate at February 2000. 2 SUMMARY Name: Montane Heath and Thicket of the South West Botanical Province, above approximately 900 m above sea level, hereafter called the Eastern Stirling Range Montane Heath and Thicket Community CALM Region: South Coast CALM District: Albany Shire (s): Gnowangerup, Plantagenet Current Status: Assessed April 1996 as Critically Endangered. -
Shire of Jerramungup Local Planning Strategy
Prepared by Gray & Lewis Landuse Planners for Shire of Jerramungup SHIRE OF JERRAMUNGUP LOCAL PLANNING STRATEGY 2010 Limited Review Modified June 2011 Modified December 2011 Finalised December 2012 Modified 25 January 2018 Acknowledgement A Local Planning Strategy for the Shire of Jerramungup was endorsed by the Western Australian Planning Commission on 13 June 2006. Preparation of the 2006 Local Planning Strategy was finalised by Gray & Lewis Landuse Planners however it was largely based a draft Local Planning Strategy prepared for the Shire by SJB Planners (with mapping provided by Harley Global). The Strategy was prepared to support Draft Local Planning Scheme 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Strategy Review ................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Role and Purpose ................................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Relevant Considerations .................................................................................................... 3 2.0 STATE AND REGIONAL PLANNING CONTEXT ....................................................................... 3 2.1 State Planning Framework ................................................................................................ -
Inventory of Taxa for the Fitzgerald River National Park
Flora Survey of the Coastal Catchments and Ranges of the Fitzgerald River National Park 2013 Damien Rathbone Department of Environment and Conservation, South Coast Region, 120 Albany Hwy, Albany, 6330. USE OF THIS REPORT Information used in this report may be copied or reproduced for study, research or educational purposed, subject to inclusion of acknowledgement of the source. DISCLAIMER The author has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information used. However, the author and participating bodies take no responsibiliy for how this informrion is used subsequently by other and accepts no liability for a third parties use or reliance upon this report. CITATION Rathbone, DA. (2013) Flora Survey of the Coastal Catchments and Ranges of the Fitzgerald River National Park. Unpublished report. Department of Environment and Conservation, Western Australia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to thank many people that provided valable assistance and input into the project. Sarah Barrett, Anita Barnett, Karen Rusten, Deon Utber, Sarah Comer, Charlotte Mueller, Jason Peters, Roger Cunningham, Chris Rathbone, Carol Ebbett and Janet Newell provided assisstance with fieldwork. Carol Wilkins, Rachel Meissner, Juliet Wege, Barbara Rye, Mike Hislop, Cate Tauss, Rob Davis, Greg Keighery, Nathan McQuoid and Marco Rossetto assissted with plant identification. Coralie Hortin, Karin Baker and many other members of the Albany Wildflower society helped with vouchering of plant specimens. 2 Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................. -
Threat Abatement Plan for Disease in Natural Ecosystems Caused by Phytophthora Cinnamomi
Threat abatement plan for disease in natural ecosystems caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi March 2017 DRAFT FOR COMMENT © Copyright Commonwealth of Australia, 2017 The Threat abatement plan for disease in natural ecosystems caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons By Attribution 3.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/. This DRAFT report should be attributed as ‘Threat abatement plan for disease in natural ecosystems caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi, Commonwealth of Australia, 2017’. The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and are valid as at March 2017. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. Table of Contents Threat abatement plan for disease in natural ecosystems caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi .......................................................................................................................... 1 Table of Contents.............................................................................................................. -
Threatened Plant Translocations Project Summary Project 4.3
Threatened plant translocations Project Summary Project 4.3 Grevillea batrachioides Lesueur grevillea. Photo: Andrew Crawford B. brownii. Photo: D. Coates Lambertia orbifolia. Photo: Anne Cochrane Research in Brief Why is the There has been insufficient synthesis of information about translocation Translocations are being research needed? generally, and evaluating and increasingly used in threatened Translocations of threatened plants synthesising the current knowledge plant recovery programs. The have been carried out over the past will provide a critical resource for outcomes of past translocation three decades across southern improving the success and status programs have often been poorly Australia. This has included at least trajectory of threatened plant documented or unpublished. This 1000 separate translocations, translocation. In particular, guidance makes it hard to learn from the involving around 380 plant species. criteria for establishment, resilience past experiences, to adapt and and persistence are needed. improve techniques in response However, despite the increasing to outcomes or to determine if focus on translocation, there has Further, developing criteria for investments have been worthwhile. been little monitoring or assessment translocation success that are of whether these projects are adequate and measurable will allow As the number of plant achieving long-term success in change in a species’ conservation translocation projects increases, it terms of population persistence. status to be assessed and provide is becoming increasingly important a more rigorous foundation for to evaluate the success of these At the same time threats to plants recommending the down-listing or translocations with meaningful and plant communities are becoming de-listing of a species. and measurable criteria. -
Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project
Submission to Senate Inquiry: Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project: Potential Impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance within Modelled Oil Spill Impact Areas (Summer and Winter 2A Model Scenarios) Prepared by Dr David Ellis (BSc Hons PhD; Ecologist, Environmental Consultant and Founder at Stepping Stones Ecological Services) March 27, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Summer Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................. 5 Winter Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................... 7 Threatened Species Conservation Status Summary ........................................... 8 International Migratory Bird Agreements ............................................................. 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Matters Search Tool Database Search and Criteria for Oil-Spill Model Selection ............................................................................................................. 12 Criteria for Inclusion/Exclusion of Threatened, Migratory and Marine -
Ne Wsletter No . 92
AssociationAustralian of NativeSocieties Plants for Growing Society (Australia)Australian IncPlants Ref No. ISSN 0725-8755 Newsletter No. 92 – August 2012 GSG Vic Programme 2012 GSG SE Qld Programme 2012 Leader: Neil Marriott Morning tea at 9.30am, meetings commence at 693 Panrock Reservoir Rd, Stawell, Vic. 3380 10.00am. For more information contact Bryson Phone: 03 5356 2404 or 0458 177 989 Easton on (07) 3121 4480 or 0402242180. Email: [email protected] Sunday, 26 August Contact Neil for queries about program for the year. This meeting has been cancelled as many members Any members who would like to visit the official have another function to attend over the weekend. collection, obtain cutting material or seed, assist in its maintenance, and stay in our cottage for a few days The October 2012 meeting – has been are invited to contact Neil. After the massive rains at replaced by a joint excursion through SEQ & the end of 2010 and the start of 2011 the conditions northern NSW commencing on Wednesday, 7 are perfect for large scale replanting of the collection. November 2012. GSG members planning to attend Offers of assistance would be most welcome. are asked to contact Jan Glazebrook & Dennis Cox Newsletter No. 92 No. Newsletter on Ph (07) 5546 8590 for full details closer to this Friday, 29 September to Monday, 1 October event. See also page 3 for more details. SUBJECT: Spring Grevillea Crawl Sunday, 25 November FRI ARVO: Meet at Neil and Wendy Marriott’s Panrock VENUE: Home of Robyn Wieck Ridge, 693 Panrock Reservoir Rd, Stawell Lot 4 Ajuga Court, Brookvale Park Oakey for welcome and wander around the HONE (07) 4691 2940 gardens. -
Newsletter No. 304 – February 2015
Newsletter No. 304 – February 2015 WELCOME TO 2015 botanical terminology, plant structures and identification tips. We’ve had a very interesting summer so far. It’s been Most of the speakers for the 2015 year have been relatively cool and quite wet, which has encouraged finalised and we’ll bring you a comprehensive list next lots of growth in the garden – especially weeds! – and issue. a few of my spring-flowering plants have had a little burst of extra summer flowers. Very unusual. KING’S PARK, PERTH. Ade Foster The year, for me, as editor, has started out Penny and I spent a delightful weekend in Perth extremely well. I’ve had several contributions of during January, ostensibly to attend a birthday party. articles already, with short one from Liz Wells Really it was an excuse to spend another day at King’s appearing in this edition, and a series by Roger Park, which is truly one of the must visit places in Wileman starting next issue. I am very grateful to Western Australia. While the summer is not the ideal those who have taken the time to contribute, and time to visit, and it was really quite hot on the day we look forward to receiving articles from many more of were there, it is still a treasure-trove of Australian you in future. plants. Our December Christmas BBQ was a great night. We usually visit in late winter, or early spring, when Thanks to all the members who helped with the the park is a riot of colour. -
RECOVERY TEAM Annual Report
RECOVERY TEAM Annual report THREATENED SPECIES AND/OR COMMUNITIES RECOVERY TEAM PROGRAM INFORMATION Recovery Team Albany Threatened Flora Reporting Period DATE FROM: 1/1/14 DATE TO: 31/12/14 Submission date 31 March Current membership Member Representing Sarah Comer DPAW Chair Sarah Barrett DPAW Exec Officer Members Linda Strahan Albany Wildflower Society Libby Sandiford Albany Wildflower Society John Tucker Community member Margaret Pieroni Community member Merle Bennett Ravensthorpe Wildflower Society Andrew Brown DPAW Dave Coates DPAW Anne Cochrane DPAW Rebecca Dillon DPAW Steve Hopper UWA 9/5/13 &12/11/13 Dates meetings were held Highlights of achievements for the 21 new populations or sub-populations of 11 Threatened flora previous 12 months suitable for were located. Of significance were new populations of Daviesia publication in WATSNU and pseudaphylla (CR), new sub-populations of Banksia brownii contribution to DEC annual report. (CR), Lambertia fairallii (CR) and Boronia clavata; and new Provide 1-2 paragraphs summarising populations of Gastrolobium humile (x4), Eucalyptus nutans total number of new populations and Eremophila denticulata ssp denticulata. located, surveys completed, list major management actions etc 43 new populations of priority flora were located including significant new populations of Allocasuarina sp Boxwood Hill (P1). and two species removed from the Priority flora list due to survey. 5000m2 of fencing (8 x 25x25m enclosures) was completed on Bluff Knoll within the Montane Heath & Thicket TEC . This will be critical for the protection and reproductive success of Critically Endangered Darwinia collina, Leucopogon gnaphalioides, Latrobea colophona and Andersonia axilliflora. The benefits of fencing were already evident by Dec 2014 and has enabled heavily grazed plants of species such as L. -
Banksia Montana Mealybug)
Short form Threatened species nomination form (Version Mar 2016) Abridged Threatened Species Nomination Form For nominations under the Common Assessment Method (CAM) where supporting information is available, but not in a format suitable for demonstrating compliance with the CAM, and assessment against the IUCN Red List threat status. Cover Page (Office use only) Species name (scientific and common name): Pseudococcus markharveyi (Banksia montana mealybug) Nomination for (addition, deletion, change): Addition Nominated conservation category and criteria: Critically Endangered: B1+2ab(iii) Scientific committee assessment of eligibility against the criteria: This assessment is consistent with the standards set out in Schedule 1, item 2.7 (h) and Yes No 2.8 of the Common Assessment Method Memorandum of Understanding. A. Population size reduction B. Geographic range C. Small population size and decline D. Very small or restricted population E. Quantitative analysis Outcome: Scientific committee meeting date: Scientific committee comments: Recommendation: Ministerial approval: Date of Gazettal/ Legislative effect: Page 1 of 10 Nomination summary (to be completed by nominator) Current conservation status Scientific name: Pseudococcus markharveyi Common name: Banksia montana mealybug Family name: Pseudococcidae Fauna Flora Nomination for: Listing Change of status Delisting 1. Is the species currently on any conservation list, either in a State or Territory, Australia or Internationally? Provide details of the occurrence and listing status for each jurisdiction in the following table 2. Is it present in an Australian jurisdiction, but not listed? State / Territory in Listing category i.e. Date listed or Listing criteria i.e. Jurisdiction which the species critically endangered assessed (or N/A) B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii) occurs or ‘none’ International (IUCN 12/03/2014 Critically Endangered B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v) Red List) National (EPBC Act) State / Territory 1. -
Interim Recovery Plan No. 370
Interim Recovery Plan No. 370 Montane Heath and Thicket of the South West Botanical Province, above approximately 900 m above sea level (Eastern Stirling Range Montane Heath and Thicket Community) 2016-2021 October 2016 1 Foreword Interim Recovery Plans (IRPs) are developed within the framework laid down in Department of Parks and Wildlife Policy Statement No. 35 (DPaW 2015a) and Department of Parks and Wildlife Corporate Guideline No. 35 (DPaW 2015b). This Interim Recovery Plan replaces plan number 52 ‘Montane Heath and Thicket of the South West Botanical Province, above approximately 900 m above sea level (Eastern Stirling Range Montane Heath and Thicket Community) 1999-2001’ by S. Barrett. IRPs outline the recovery actions that are required to urgently address the threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. The department is committed to ensuring that threatened ecological communities are conserved through the preparation and implementation of Recovery Plans or Interim Recovery Plans and by ensuring that conservation action commences as soon as possible and always within one year of endorsement of that rank by the department’s Director of Science and Conservation. This IRP will operate from 4 December 2016 but will remain in force until withdrawn or replaced. It is intended that, if the ecological community is still listed as Threatened after five years, this Interim Recovery Plan will be replaced or updated. This IRP was approved by the Director of Science and Conservation on 4 December 2016. The provision of funds identified in this IRP is dependent on budgetary and other constraints affecting the department, as well as the need to address other priorities.