Divinely Inspired by Shyler Hendrickson 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Divinely Inspired by Shyler Hendrickson 1 0 Divinely Inspired By Shyler Hendrickson 1 Introduction Traditionally, scholarship on Alexander the Great has centered on the imperial and political motivations for his conquest, though modern scholars have done much to expand upon the previously ignored influence spirituality had on his actions. The importance of Alexander’s spirituality can be observed in his venture to Siwah, and though the political ramifications of this excursion should not be understated, his true intentions behind the trip and what occurs afterward were entirely indicative of his intense religiosity. In order to expand upon the spiritual motivations of Alexander the Great and his successive adoption of personal divinity, and in an effort to prove that these desires surfaced long before Siwah, the following study will consider two key factors. First, the formative events of Alexander’s early life and his developing religiosity will be addressed. Second, his efforts in Asia and the near east surrounding his visit to Siwah. In short, this paper will work to join other scholars in enhancing the impact of Alexander’s religiosity upon his actions and challenge those that state his motivations as entirely political. I: Early Influences While we can attribute Alexander’s distinctly Greek intellect to Aristotle, we can also assume that Alexander’s fascination with his perceived heroic ancestors took root under his tutelage.1 Later in his life, Alexander’s fascination and identification with Achilles and Heracles would inspire depictions of him as such, serving to reinforce his image as a divine being. Perhaps even more importantly, Alexander’s rumored Heracleid descent was proof that Alexander was Greek and not a barbarian, as many southern Greeks assumed of Macedonians.2 Alexander’s fascination with his heroic and divine heritage was an exceedingly important aspect of his politicking.3 As such Alexander would put the image of Heracles to political use in the first years of his career. Following Isokrates’ advice to his father, he used the common Heracleid origin between himself and the Thessalians to win them over.4 While the ideas of Isokrates and Aristotle may have fueled the fascination with heroes that would define Alexander’s adult life, it is possible that, even before his time with Aristotle, the seeds of his divine inheritance were sown within his psyche by his own mother, Olympias. 1 Ulrich Wilken, Alexander the Great (London: Chatto & Windus, 1932),56; We know that Alexander received an annotated copy of the Iliad from Aristotle himself, which contributes to this suggestion - It is also possible that the copy of the Iliad in question was a gift received from Callisthenes, rather than Aristotle (Strabo, Geography 13.1.27 C594). But given the timeline of events and Alexanders demonstrable attraction to Achilles from an early age, it is more likely that the account given by Plutarch (Plut, Alex. 8.2) Is more accurate. 2 Ory Amitay, From Alexander to Jesus (London: University of California Press, 2010), 9. 3 Amitay, From Alexander to Jesus, 10. 4 Here Amitay makes the astute point of saying that Alexander did not rely on myth alone, as evidenced by the minor military clash between himself and the anti-Macedonian Thessalian faction at Tempe. Additionally, after Thebes fell, Kleadas attempts to play on Alexanders religious sensibilities, begging him to recall the actions of his heroic ancestor and spare the city. Alexanders refusal illustrates the futility of relying on myth alone. 2 Scholarship, both ancient and modern, discusses another thread of divine heritage for Alexander in his mother Olympias’ rumored sexual union with Zeus or Dionysus.5 Plutarch states that on the eve of Olympias’ consummation with Philip, she had a dream where her womb was struck by a bolt of lightning.6 In another passage, Plutarch cites Eratosthenes as proof that, before Alexander left Greece on campaign, Olympias confided in him the truth of his birth and that he should present himself in a way that honored his divine father.7 Plutarch suggests that the rumors of Alexander’s divinity may have been adopted by Philip II. Regardless, it is clear that Alexander was well aware of his rumored divine parentage well before his campaign. It is likely that while Philip was alive the rumors about Alexander’s birth circulated privately, opposed to the public endorsement of his later years.8 This was for the best, as Alexander would become increasingly estranged from his father as he got older. Alexander, as this essay has already mentioned, was headstrong from an early age. While this pleased Philip at first, as the boy matured, it became clear to Philip that Alexander’s ambitions and talents might outstrip his own.9 At the age of 16, Alexander was given command of his first army, which he led to victory against an Illyrian uprising. Following this, he expressed designs of Asiatic conquest; this being at the same time that Philip was requesting peace with the Persians, which must have damaged Philip’s ego.10 This mutual jealousy and estrangement may have reinforced Alexander’s perception that Philip was not his true father, bringing the notion of his true paternity into question. We know that following Philip’s marriage to Attalus’ niece Cleopatra ,the already poor relationship between Philip and Olympias disintegrated rapidly.11 Amid such a fractured household, it is likely that Olympias wished to inspire Alexander, the one who would succeed her husband, with ideas of his father in fact being a divine being. More than that, this new marriage threatened 5 Elizabeth Carney, Olympias: Mother of Alexander the Great (London: Routledge, 2006), 102. 6 See Plutarch, The Life of Alexander 2.2. 7 Plut, Alex. 3.2; That said, other sources claim that Olympias rejected the idea of Alexander’s divine roots entirely, see Carney, Olympias, 102. 8 Andrew Collins, “Alexander’s Visit to Siwah: A new analysis,” Phoenix-The Journal of The Classical Association of Canada 68, no. 1-2 (2014): 67. 9 Peter Green, Alexander of Macedon, 356-323 B.C. A Historical Biography (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2012), 43-4; One of the most popular examples of this is Alexander’s famed taming of his horse Bucephalus. According to Plutarch, Alexander was able to tame a wild horse which previously no one, not even Philip himself, had been able to tame. While this pleased Philip, Plutarch informs us that this also would have sparked some envy in the king. 10 David G. Hogarth, Phillip and Alexander of Macedon (London: John Murray, 1897), 118. 11 Hogarth, Phillip and Alexander of Macedon, 138. 3 Alexander’s right to succession.12 This idea is especially compelling when we consider the fact that it is entirely possible that Alexander was involved in his father’s assassination.13 Philip’s death came at a very convenient time for both Alexander and Olympias.14 Philip had determined by this time that Olympias was enough of a problem that he couldn’t leave her behind during a prolonged excursion into Asia. He therefore sought to render her impotent by detaching her from her mighty brother, Leonidas, by marrying him to Alexander’s sister.15 This wedding would mark the event at which Philip would meet his end, being stabbed by an assassin during his entrance ceremony. There is little doubt as to who the conductor of this murder was, as the assassin himself, a disgruntled member of the court, would not have acted in such a way of his own accord.16 The man in question, Pausanias, according to Arrian in the Anabasis and in other ancient sources as well, was seeking revenge for a violent sexual assault he had suffered by the will of Attalus, who had remained unpunished. However, Martin and Blackwell question the legitimacy of this claim. In essence, they ask: If the murder had been committed as an act of revenge, why did Pausanias not assault Attalus?17 Whatever the reason was, the deed was done, and in the wake of his father’s death, Alexander ascended the Macedonian throne. While we can safely assume that Olympias was responsible for the murder, Alexander’s involvement has always been a source of debate for historians. If we assume that Alexander already suspected himself to be the son of a deity rather than the son of Philip, then it becomes easier to believe that even if Alexander wasn’t involved in the murder directly, he had no reason, practical or familial, to stop it from occurring. The ramifications of this must be considered, as later in life when his divinity is made official by the Oracle at Siwah, it relieves him of the guilt 12 Plut, Alex. 9. 7. Plutarch states as much and goes further to explain that at the wedding party, Attalus got drunk and prayed out loud that Philip produce a rightful heir, much to the chagrin of Alexander who flung his drinking cup into Attalus’ face. These events served to estrange Alexander farther from Philip, and indeed following this event, he absconded with his mother, establishing her in Epirus while going himself to Illyria. 13 Green, Alexander of Macedon, 356-323 B.C. A Historical Biography, 273. 14 Green, 106-8; Shortly after Alexander and Olympias’ relocation, an immensely wealthy Satrap by the name of Pixodorus sent word to Philip proposing the marriage of his daughter, to one of Philips other natural heirs. To Olympias’ mind this jeopardized Alexanders succession, although it should be noted that while Philip and Alexander were not on good terms at this time, Alexander was never dispossessed of his position as Philips successor. 15 Hogarth, Phillip and Alexander of Macedon, 140.
Recommended publications
  • Artaxerxes II
    Artaxerxes II John Shannahan BAncHist (Hons) (Macquarie University) Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Ancient History, Macquarie University. May, 2015. ii Contents List of Illustrations v Abstract ix Declaration xi Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations and Conventions xv Introduction 1 CHAPTER 1 THE EARLY REIGN OF ARTAXERXES II The Birth of Artaxerxes to Cyrus’ Challenge 15 The Revolt of Cyrus 41 Observations on the Egyptians at Cunaxa 53 Royal Tactics at Cunaxa 61 The Repercussions of the Revolt 78 CHAPTER 2 399-390: COMBATING THE GREEKS Responses to Thibron, Dercylidas, and Agesilaus 87 The Role of Athens and the Persian Fleet 116 Evagoras the Opportunist and Carian Commanders 135 Artaxerxes’ First Invasion of Egypt: 392/1-390/89? 144 CHAPTER 3 389-380: THE KING’S PEACE AND CYPRUS The King’s Peace (387/6): Purpose and Influence 161 The Chronology of the 380s 172 CHAPTER 4 NUMISMATIC EXPRESSIONS OF SOLIDARITY Coinage in the Reign of Artaxerxes 197 The Baal/Figure in the Winged Disc Staters of Tiribazus 202 Catalogue 203 Date 212 Interpretation 214 Significance 223 Numismatic Iconography and Egyptian Independence 225 Four Comments on Achaemenid Motifs in 227 Philistian Coins iii The Figure in the Winged Disc in Samaria 232 The Pertinence of the Political Situation 241 CHAPTER 5 379-370: EGYPT Planning for the Second Invasion of Egypt 245 Pharnabazus’ Invasion of Egypt and Aftermath 259 CHAPTER 6 THE END OF THE REIGN Destabilisation in the West 267 The Nature of the Evidence 267 Summary of Current Analyses 268 Reconciliation 269 Court Intrigue and the End of Artaxerxes’ Reign 295 Conclusion: Artaxerxes the Diplomat 301 Bibliography 309 Dies 333 Issus 333 Mallus 335 Soli 337 Tarsus 338 Unknown 339 Figures 341 iv List of Illustrations MAP Map 1 Map of the Persian Empire xviii-xix Brosius, The Persians, 54-55 DIES Issus O1 Künker 174 (2010) 403 333 O2 Lanz 125 (2005) 426 333 O3 CNG 200 (2008) 63 333 O4 Künker 143 (2008) 233 333 R1 Babelon, Traité 2, pl.
    [Show full text]
  • The Outbreak of the Rebellion of Cyrus the Younger Jeffrey Rop
    The Outbreak of the Rebellion of Cyrus the Younger Jeffrey Rop N THE ANABASIS, Xenophon asserts that the Persian prince Cyrus the Younger was falsely accused of plotting a coup I d’état against King Artaxerxes II shortly after his accession to the throne in 404 BCE. Spared from execution by the Queen Mother Parysatis, Cyrus returned to Lydia determined to seize the throne for himself. He secretly prepared his rebellion by securing access to thousands of Greek hoplites, winning over Persian officials and most of the Greek cities of Ionia, and continuing to send tribute and assurances of his loyalty to the unsuspecting King (1.1).1 In Xenophon’s timeline, the rebellion was not official until sometime between the muster of his army at Sardis in spring 401, which spurred his rival Tissaphernes to warn Artaxerxes (1.2.4–5), and his arrival several months later at Thapsacus on the Euphrates, where Cyrus first openly an- nounced his true intentions (1.4.11). Questioning the “strange blindness” of Artaxerxes in light of Cyrus’ seemingly obvious preparations for revolt, Pierre Briant proposed an alternative timeline placing the outbreak of the rebellion almost immediately after Cyrus’ return to Sardis in late 404 or early 403.2 In his reconstruction, the King allowed Cyrus 1 See also Ctesias FGrHist 688 F 16.59, Diod. 14.19, Plut. Artax. 3–4. 2 Pierre Briant, From Cyrus to Alexander (Winona Lake 2002) 617–620. J. K. Anderson, Xenophon (New York 1974) 80, expresses a similar skepticism. Briant concludes his discussion by stating that the rebellion officially (Briant does not define “official,” but I take it to mean when either the King or Cyrus declared it publicly) began in 401 with the muster of Cyrus’ army at Sardis, but it is nonetheless appropriate to characterize Briant’s position as dating the official outbreak of the revolt to 404/3.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    9781405129992_6_ind.qxd 16/06/2009 12:11 Page 203 Index Acanthus, 130 Aetolian League, 162, 163, 166, Acarnanians, 137 178, 179 Achaea/Achaean(s), 31–2, 79, 123, Agamemnon, 51 160, 177 Agasicles (king of Sparta), 95 Achaean League: Agis IV and, agathoergoi, 174 166; as ally of Rome, 178–9; Age grades: see names of individual Cleomenes III and, 175; invasion grades of Laconia by, 177; Nabis and, Agesilaus (ephor), 166 178; as protector of perioecic Agesilaus II (king of Sparta), cities, 179; Sparta’s membership 135–47; at battle of Mantinea in, 15, 111, 179, 181–2 (362 B.C.E.), 146; campaign of, in Achaean War, 182 Asia Minor, 132–3, 136; capture acropolis, 130, 187–8, 192, 193, of Phlius by, 138; citizen training 194; see also Athena Chalcioecus, system and, 135; conspiracies sanctuary of after battle of Leuctra and, 144–5, Acrotatus (king of Sparta), 163, 158; conspiracy of Cinadon 164 and, 135–6; death of, 147; Acrotatus, 161 Epaminondas and, 142–3; Actium, battle of, 184 execution of women by, 168; Aegaleus, Mount, 65 foreign policy of, 132, 139–40, Aegiae (Laconian), 91 146–7; gift of, 101; helots and, Aegimius, 22 84; in Boeotia, 141; in Thessaly, Aegina (island)/Aeginetans: Delian 136; influence of, at Sparta, 142; League and,COPYRIGHTED 117; Lysander and, lameness MATERIAL of, 135; lance of, 189; 127, 129; pro-Persian party on, Life of, by Plutarch, 17; Lysander 59, 60; refugees from, 89 and, 12, 132–3; as mercenary, Aegospotami, battle of, 128, 130 146, 147; Phoebidas affair and, Aeimnestos, 69 102, 139; Spartan politics and, Aeolians,
    [Show full text]
  • The Ancient Greek Civilization
    GRADE 2 Core Knowledge Language Arts® • New York Edition • Listening & Learning™ Strand The Ancient Greek Civilization Greek Ancient The Tell It Again!™ Read-Aloud Anthology Read-Aloud Again!™ It Tell The Ancient Greek Civilization Tell It Again!™ Read-Aloud Anthology Listening & Learning™ Strand GRADE 2 Core Knowledge Language Arts® New York Edition Creative Commons Licensing This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You are free: to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work to Remix — to adapt the work Under the following conditions: Attribution — You must attribute the work in the following manner: This work is based on an original work of the Core Knowledge® Foundation made available through licensing under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. This does not in any way imply that the Core Knowledge Foundation endorses this work. Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. With the understanding that: For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Copyright © 2013 Core Knowledge Foundation www.coreknowledge.org All Rights Reserved. Core Knowledge Language Arts, Listening & Learning, and Tell It Again! are trademarks of the Core Knowledge Foundation. Trademarks and trade names are shown in this book strictly for illustrative and educational purposes and are the property of their respective owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Lives, Volume Ii : Themistocles and Camillus
    LIVES, VOLUME II : THEMISTOCLES AND CAMILLUS. ARISTIDES AND CATO MAJOR. CIMON AND LUCULLUS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Plutarch | 640 pages | 01 Jul 1989 | HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS | 9780674990531 | English | Cambridge, Mass, United States Lives, Volume II : Themistocles and Camillus. Aristides and Cato Major. Cimon and Lucullus PDF Book Plutarch's many other varied extant works, about 60 in number, are known as Moralia or Moral Essays. Vol 2 by Plutarch , Bernadotte Perrin translator 4. Annotation Plutarch Plutarchus , ca. Contact us. Heath , Hardcover 4. Andreas Hofer. Subscribe to E-News. Most popular have always been the 46 "Parallel Lives," biographies planned to be ethical examples in pairs in each pair, one Greek figure and one similar Roman , though the last four lives are single. Explore Departments. Aristides and Cato Major. Enabling JavaScript in your browser will allow you to experience all the features of our site. Online book clubs can be a rewarding way to connect with readers, Lindsay Chervinsky discovered, when she was invited to join one to discuss her book, The Cabinet: George Washington and the Creation of an American Institution. He appears as a man of kindly character and independent thought, studious and learned. Plutarch's Lives by Plutarch , Bernadotte Perrin 4. AD , was born at Chaeronea in Boeotia in central Greece, studied philosophy at Athens, and, after coming to Rome as a teacher in philosophy, was given consular rank by the emperor Trajan and a procuratorship in Greece by Hadrian. They are of high literary value, besides being of great use to people interested in philosophy, ethics and religion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Court of Cyrus the Younger in Anatolia: Some Remarks
    STUDIES IN ANCIENT ART AND CIVILIZATION, VOL. 23 (2019) pp. 95-111, https://doi.org/10.12797/SAAC.23.2019.23.05 Michał Podrazik University of Rzeszów THE COURT OF CYRUS THE YOUNGER IN ANATOLIA: SOME REMARKS Abstract: Cyrus the Younger (born in 424/423 BC, died in 401 BC), son of the Great King Darius II (424/423-404 BC) and Queen Parysatis, is well known from his activity in Anatolia. In 408 BC he took power there as a karanos (Old Persian *kārana-, Greek κάρανος), a governor of high rank with extensive military and political competence reporting directly to the Great King. Holding his power in Anatolia, Cyrus had his own court there, in many respects modeled after the Great King’s court. The aim of this article is to show some aspects of functioning and organization of Cyrus the Younger’s court in Anatolia. Keywords: Cyrus the Younger; court; court’s staff and protocol In 4081, Cyrus, commonly known as the Younger (424/423-401), son of the Great King Darius II (424/423-404), was appointed by his father to rule over an important part of the Achaemenid Empire, Anatolia. Cyrus wielded his power there as karanos (Old Persian *kārana-, Greek κάρανος), a high- ranking governor with extensive military and political competence, reporting directly to the Great King (see Podrazik 2018, 69-83; cf. Barkworth 1993, 150-151; Debord 1999, 122-123; Briant 2002, 19, 321, 340, 600, 625-626, 878, 1002; Hyland 2013, 2-5). Cyrus held his own court while in Anatolia. The court was organized along the lines of the King’s court, but was certainly no match for it 1 All dates in the article pertain to the events before the birth of Christ except where otherwise stated.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan LINDA JANE PIPER 1967
    This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 66-15,122 PIPER, Linda Jane, 1935- A HISTORY OF SPARTA: 323-146 B.C. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1966 History, ancient University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan LINDA JANE PIPER 1967 All Rights Reserved A HISTORY OF SPARTA: 323-1^6 B.C. DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Linda Jane Piper, A.B., M.A. The Ohio State University 1966 Approved by Adviser Department of History PREFACE The history of Sparta from the death of Alexander in 323 B.C; to the destruction of Corinth in 1^6 B.C. is the history of social revolution and Sparta's second rise to military promi­ nence in the Peloponnesus; the history of kings and tyrants; the history of Sparta's struggle to remain autonomous in a period of amalgamation. It is also a period in Sparta's history too often neglected by historians both past and present. There is no monograph directly concerned with Hellenistic Sparta. For the most part, this period is briefly and only inci­ dentally covered in works dealing either with the whole history of ancient Sparta, or simply as a part of Hellenic or Hellenistic 1 2 history in toto. Both Pierre Roussel and Eug&ne Cavaignac, in their respective surveys of Spartan history, have written clear and concise chapters on the Hellenistic period. Because of the scope of their subject, however, they were forced to limit them­ selves to only the most important events and people of this time, and great gaps are left in between.
    [Show full text]
  • Athenian Empire 478To 404B.C. Formation Of
    ATHENIAN EMPIRE 478 TO 404 B.C. FORMATION OF DELIAN LEAGUE TO FALL OF ATHENS ERA SUMMARY – ATHENIAN EMPIRE In the years following the Persian War, Athens was rebuilt and the Greek navy expanded its domination of the Aegean Sea. Further naval victories over Persia resulted in the freeing of several Ionian Greek colonies from the Persian yoke and the increased prestige of Greece as a sea power. Athenian control of the Greek navy was made possible the by creation of the Delian league, a group of Greek colonies located in the Aegean Sea united for defense. Although this league was nominally a confederation, it was dominated by Athens, and eventually became the foundation of the Athenian Empire. Athens became very wealthy due both to its domination of trade in the region and also to the inflow of tribute that had to be paid to Athens in return for protection from Persia. The most important statesmen in Athens in the years immediately after the Persian War, were Cimon, son of Miltiades, and Aristides. Both were involved in the organization of the Delian league and the rebuilding of Athens, including the construction of a fortified wall around the city to protect it from future invasions. Sparta opposed the building of walled cities, lest they fall into enemy hands, but the Athenians insisted and eventually a great wall was built from Athens to the sea, wide enough to drive two Chariots abreast. During the same period, great temples and state houses were built, funded mostly from the Delian league tributes, on a scale never before seen on the continent of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Plutarch's Lysander and Sulla: Integrated Characters in Roman Historical Perspective
    PLUTARCH'S LYSANDER AND SULLA: INTEGRATED CHARACTERS IN ROMAN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE THE TERM ritratto paradossale has been used to describe a formula of character portrayal seen in Latin literature of the first centuries B.C. and A.D. whose basic process consists in combining in one character appar- ently contradictory traits (La Penna 1976). To be precise, the formula produced a type of man who in his moments of action shows energy, diligence, and constancy but exhibits licentious feelings, allows himself to be taken in by indolence, and succumbs to pleasures when his nego­ tia are finished. This model may already have been present in Greek historical literature of the fourth century B.c., as the portrait of Philip I1 that the historian Theopompus delineates seems to bear this stamp. The public image of Maecenas and the Petronius of Tacitus are two clear ex- amples of ritratto paradossale. The figure of Sulla also falls under this influence; in fact, according to La Penna (1976, 284), Plutarch's biogra- phy of Sulla often exhibits these same characteristics. The terms "paradox" and "paradoxical" also occur frequently in works devoted to Plutarch's Life of Lysander. Its paradoxical features are the central point of Pelling's comments (1988a, 268-74) on that bi- ography. Pelling explores aspects of "integration" in the Parallel Lives, a technique of portrayal which he defines as follows: "a man's qualities are brought into some sort of relation with one another, and every trait goes closely with the next."l An almost universal literary habit in the 'Pelling 1988a, 262.
    [Show full text]
  • 5Und for Scientific Research. Flanders (Belgium)
    HUMANITASVOLDI I MM SIMON VERDEGEM 5und for Scientific Research. Flanders (Belgium) FROM MORALIZING BIOGRAPHY TO HISTORICAL NOVEL: THE USE OF PLUTARCH'S LIFE OF ALCIBIADES IN STEVEN PRESSFIELD'S TIDES OF WAI? I. Introduction Several of the protagonists of Plutarch's Vitae Parallelae continue to appeal to the imagination of modern people, including authors of historical fiction1. One of these figures is Alcibiades son of Cleinias. In 2000 Doubieday published a book entitled Tides of War: A Novel of Alcibiades and the Peloponnesian War. In this bestseller written by Steven Pressfield an anonymous Athenian reports the tale that his grandfather Jason told him shortly before his death: when asked whether there was a person to whom his thoughts kept returning (p. 24), the old man related how a certain Polemides, who was in prison on a charge of the murder of Alcibiades, had told him the story of his life, which for a long time had been dominated by his alleged victim. Tides of War is Pressfield's second novel situated in ancient Greece. When working on the first, Gates of Fire: An Epic Novel of the Battle of Thermopylae (Doubieday London, 1998), Pressfield found Plutarch's Spartan * I would like to thank Jeff Beneker for checking my English. 1 See e.g. Ancient Greece in Fiction (http://www2.rhul.ac.uk/Classics/NJL/novels.html) and Fictional Rome (http://www.stockton.edu/~roman/fiction/). 2 All our references to Tides of War are to the Bantam Books paperback edition pub­ lished in 2001 (ISBN: 0-553-81332-3). -JLMUNVERDEGEM THE USE OF PLUTARCH'S LIFE of ALCIBIADES IN STEVEN PRESSFIELD'S TIDES OF WAIL 3 Lives "hugely helpful" .
    [Show full text]
  • BRUCE LAFORSE, Praising Agesilaus: the Limits of Panhellenic
    Praising Agesilaus: the Limits of Panhellenic Rhetoric Bruce Laforse Shortly after the death of the Spartan king Agesilaus c. 360, Xenophon wrote an encomium of his old friend and patron. As one of the two kings in the unique Spartan dual kingship, Agesilaus had played a crucial role from 400 to 360 BC, a period which saw Sparta both rise to the pinnacle of power and then collapse. The Agesilaus is one of the earliest surviving examples of a prose work written in praise of an historical figure.1 In such an encomium the object was not to present a strictly accurate portrait of the subject; rather it was to praise his character, glorify his achievements and, on the other hand, to anticipate or defend against any potential detractors.2 Omission, exaggeration and bending of the truth were not only allowed but, indeed, expected. Its purpose, therefore, was far different from that of a modern biography; nor, despite the idealization of the subject’s character, did it attempt primarily to uplift and instruct, as did Plutarch’s later moralizing biographies, by presenting positive and negative models to emulate or avoid.3 It was designed to praise, to put the best possible face on the subject’s life, career, background and character.4 It is not, then, strictly speaking, a work of history, and thus scholars must exercise caution when using it as an historical source.5 Supplying conclusive proof that Xenophon himself regarded the purpose of the Agesilaus as fundamentally different from history is the fact that he wrote a much fuller and (comparatively) more balanced account of Agesilaus’ career in the Hellenica, his history of the years 411 to 362.6 The two works date to the same period, and share, with very minor alterations, a number of passages.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTAXERXES III OCHUS and His Reign
    't\ Class __lil^^-^^ Book_ —A\^ Gopyrightl^"._- COPYRIGHT DEPOSIT. ARTAXERXES III OCHUS AND His Reign WITH SPECIAL CONSIDERATION OF THE OLD TESTAMENT SOURCES BEARING UPON THE PERIOD ^, AN INAUGURAL DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OP BERN IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DOCTOR'S DEGREE BY NOAH CALVIN HIRSCHY OP BERNE, INDIANA ACCEPTED BY THE PHILOSOPHICAL FACULTY UPON THE PROPOSAL OF PROFESSOR DR. K. MARTI PROFESSOR DR. G. TOBLER BERN DEAN JULY 16. 1907 CHICAGO THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS 1909 Copyright igog By The University of Chicago Published May igog Composed and Printed By The University of Chicago Press Chicago, Illinois, U. S. A. LIBRARY Of CONGRESS! Two Copies Received I my ! 9 1809 ( iC'-OiiS lA ^AC. ,'.0. PREFACE In this attempt to gather all the historic data of a dark and weary period of the world's history on which the sources of information are rather indefinite and unsatisfactory, it may at first appear that too much attention is paid to the general historic situation. But when we remember that some of the biblical sources claimed for the reign of Ochus are placed by scholars at different periods from the eighth to the first century, then this objection loses its force. The final solution of the acceptance or rejection of the Old Testament sources for this period seems to the writer to depend very largely on the clearness of our conception of the history of the last seven centuries before the Christian era. The reign of Ochus forms only a fragment of the two and a fourth centuries of Persian suprem- acy.
    [Show full text]