Global Monetarism and the Monetary Approach to the Balance of Payments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Global Monetarism and the Monetary Approach to the Balance of Payments MARINA V. N. WHITMAN University of Pittsburgh Global Mone tar/sn and the Monetary Approach to the Balance of Payments A DECADE OR SO ago, when the twin concerns about the balance of pay- ments of the United States and the functioningof the internationalmone- tary system began to impingeon the consciousnessof a public theretofore indifferentto such esoterica,the opinions of those who werealready paying attention fell into a neat dichotomy. Governmentofficials and "men of affairs," on the one hand, insisted that the continued health of interna- tional trade, investment,and the world economy requiredthe maintenance of the Bretton Woods system of pegged exchange rates, under which changes in rates were made infrequentlyand as a last resort. Academic experts,on the other hand, were nearly unanimousin pressingthe advan- tages of greaterflexibility of exchangerates, with many urging that gov- ernmentsabstain altogetherfrom interventionand allow exchange rates to be determinedby the interplayof supply and demand in the market- This paper was supported partially by financial assistance from the Departments of State, Treasury,and Labor under Contract No. 1722-520176.However, the views con- tained herein are solely the author's and do not necessarilyrepresent the official position of the U.S. government. I am grateful to Edmond Alphandery, Rudiger Dornbusch, Jacob A. Frenkel, Peter B. Kenen, Norman C. Miller, and to the discussants and members of the Brookings panel for their helpful suggestions. 491 492 BrookingsPapers on EconomicActivity, 3:1975 place, just like any other price.' The specter of competitive depreciation left over from the 1930s was replaced by concern about the rigidity of mechanismsfor payments adjustmentunder the Bretton Woods system. Furthermore,the postwarwave of "elasticitypessimism" had given way to "elasticityoptimism" as new empiricalstudies, better specifiedand using more sophisticatedstatistical techniques than their predecessors,indicated that demandelasticities were indeedhigh enough to ensureexchange-mar- ket stability and thus the effectivenessof exchange-ratechanges as an instrumentof balance-of-paymentsadj-ustment. A number of assumptions,explicit or implicit, underlaythe economic analysis of paymentsadjustment in the fifties and sixties and the resulting implicationsfor balance-of-paymentspolicies. To begin with, althoughthe problem was ostensiblyto restore equilibrium,or reduce disequilibrium, in the balance of payments,Keynesian analysis, with its emphasis on the components of aggregatedemand, focused on the balance of trade (net exports of goods and services), which is one of those components. Net exportswere assumedto be a functionof aggregatedemand and of relative prices at home and abroad;in the face of downwardrigidity of wages and prices in the domesticmarket, changes in the exchangerate were the most effective means of altering those relative prices-hence the stress on the elasticitiesof home demandfor importsand of foreigndemand for exports. Although some analysts explored the effect on the capital account of changes in the relativeprofitability of investing at home and abroad, the main body of analysis assumed that, whatever effects particularpolicies mighthave on the otheraccounts in the balanceof payments,the impacton the goods and servicesaccount would be dominant.2 One implicationof this approachis that, in a world of fixed exchange rates and Keynesian downward rigidity in wages and prices, the price- 1. For two of the best-known academicbriefs for flexible rates, see Milton Friedman, "The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates," in Richard E. Caves and Harry G. Johnson, eds., Readingsin IniternationalEconomics (Irwin, 1968), pp. 413-37, and Egon Sohmen, Flexible Exchange Rates, rev. ed. (University of Chicago Press, 1969). These essays were first published in 1953 and 1961, respectively. 2. This is true in particularof the classic work by J. E. Meade, The Thleoryof Iiter- national EconomicPolicy, vol. 1: The Balance of Payments(London: Oxford University Press, 1951). Surveyingthe literaturein the late 1960s, Krueger noted that "there is no widely accepted theory incorporatingboth current and capital account items. The most thoroughly explored models in payments theory are those which consider only current account transactions and a means of payment." Anne 0. Krueger, "Balance-of-Pay- ments Theory," Journalof EconomicLiterature, vol. 7 (March 1969), p. 2. Marinav. N. Whitman 493 adjustmentmechanism will not operate, at least in the deficit country, to restorepayments equilibrium automatically and painlesslyafter a distur- bance; rather,the restorationor maintenanceof such externalequilibrium must be an explicittarget of economic policy. In the absence of exchange- rate flexibilityto alter relative prices, the most obvious mechanism for eliminatingexternal imbalance is the Keynesianone: if exportsare a func- tion of foreign income (taken to be exogenouslydetermined) and imports a function of domestic income, then a reductionof domestic income will lead to an improvementin the tradebalance and thus in the balanceof pay- ments. Such a resolutionof externalpayments problems is, however,likely to be unacceptableto governmentscommitted to full employmentas the primarydomestic economic objective.3And so a vast literature,incorpo- rating capital mobility, quickly arose, directedtoward developinga com- bination of policy instrumentsthat would enable governmentsto achieve simultaneouslythe targets of internal balance (full employment)and ex- ternalbalance (payments equilibrium).4 But the proliferationof models of internal-externalbalance reinforcedrather than weakenedthe conviction that governmentswould have greatersuccess in achievingtheir domestic economictargets if they were able eitherto use exchange-ratechanges as an additionalpolicy tool (managedflexibility) or to exerciseother policy in- strumentsfree of the balance-of-paymentsconstraint imposed by pegged exchangerates (freelyflexible rates). Furthermore,some argued,while, un- der fixed rates, changes in foreign income and expenditurewould affect aggregatedomestic income by altering the level of exports and thus the trade balance, freely flexible rates would insulate the domestic economy from foreign demand shifts and ensure that such disturbanceswould be bottledup where they originated,rather than spreadingfrom one country to anothervia the Keynesiantransmission belt. 3. Furthermore,if the domestic economy is stable in isolation (that is, the marginal propensityto save exceeds zero), the Keynesian income-adjustmentmechanism will fall short of an automatic full restoration of external equilibriumin the wake of a balance- of-paymentsdisturbance, as long as the feedback effects of the resulting disequilibrium in the money market are either disregarded or assumed to be neutralized by policy actions. 4. See Marina v. N. Whitman, Policies for Internal and External Balance, Special Papers in InternationalEconomics 9 (Princeton University, InternationalFinance Sec- tion, 1970) for a survey of that literature.One practicalapplication in the United States was "OperationTwist" of the early 1960s, which sought to attract capital inflows with high short-terminterest rates while keeping long-term rates low to stimulate domestic expansion. 494 BrookingsPapers on EconomicActivity, 3:1975 Today, most major industrializedcountries are no longer bound to pegged exchange rates. But a funny thing happened on the way to this flexible-ratenirvana. The post-BrettonWoods world of managedflexibility has produced surprisesundreamed of in the analyses of the 1950s and 1960s;moreover, a small but influentialgroup of internationaleconomists has stood traditional balance-of-paymentsanalysis on its head. I have termed this group the "global monetarists"-"monetarists" because of their belief that macroeconomicphenomena can be analyzedbest in terms of the relationshipbetween the demandfor and the supply of money, and "global" because of their conviction that, as a first approximation,the world consists, not of separablenational economies, but of a single, inte- grated, closed economy. From these two fundamentaltenets arise a number of startlingpropo- sitions. Put in their most extreme form, they include the following: A change in the exchangerate will not systematicallyalter the relativeprices of domestic and foreign goods and it will have only a transitoryeffect on the balance of payments.Any exercise of monetarypolicy to change the domesticcomponent of the monetarybase will, underfixed exchangerates, be offsetby an equal and opposite changein the foreigncomponent of that base. Thus, exchange-ratepolicy cannot permanentlyalter the balance of payments and monetarypolicy cannot lastingly affect the domestic econ- omy, but a change in the exchange rate will have a direct impact on the domesticprice level, and monetarypolicy will have a direct effect on the country'spayments position (measuredby the change in its reservesunder a fixed-rate system, by the movement in its exchange rate under freely flexiblerates, and by a combinationof the two undermanaged flexibility). Not only are exchange-ratechanges ineffective as an instrumentof balance- of-paymentspolicy for the long run, they are also unnecessary;indeed, there is no need to make external balance an explicit target of national economicpolicy, since an automaticadjustment mechanism can be counted on to restore such balance in the wake of an exogenous disturbancethat moves a nation'sbalance of paymentstemporarily away from
Recommended publications
  • Monica Prasad Northwestern University Department of Sociology
    SPRING 2016 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW COLLOQUIUM ON TAX POLICY AND PUBLIC FINANCE “The Popular Origins of Neoliberalism in the Reagan Tax Cut of 1981” Monica Prasad Northwestern University Department of Sociology May 3, 2016 Vanderbilt-208 Time: 4:00-5:50 pm Number 14 SCHEDULE FOR 2016 NYU TAX POLICY COLLOQUIUM (All sessions meet on Tuesdays from 4-5:50 pm in Vanderbilt 208, NYU Law School) 1. January 19 – Eric Talley, Columbia Law School. “Corporate Inversions and the unbundling of Regulatory Competition.” 2. January 26 – Michael Simkovic, Seton Hall Law School. “The Knowledge Tax.” 3. February 2 – Lucy Martin, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Political Science. “The Structure of American Income Tax Policy Preferences.” 4. February 9 – Donald Marron, Urban Institute. “Should Governments Tax Unhealthy Foods and Drinks?" 5. February 23 – Reuven S. Avi-Yonah, University of Michigan Law School. “Evaluating BEPS” 6. March 1 – Kevin Markle, University of Iowa Business School. “The Effect of Financial Constraints on Income Shifting by U.S. Multinationals.” 7. March 8 – Theodore P. Seto, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles. “Preference-Shifting and the Non-Falsifiability of Optimal Tax Theory.” 8. March 22 – James Kwak, University of Connecticut School of Law. “Reducing Inequality With a Retrospective Tax on Capital.” 9. March 29 – Miranda Stewart, The Australian National University. “Transnational Tax Law: Fiction or Reality, Future or Now?” 10. April 5 – Richard Prisinzano, U.S. Treasury Department, and Danny Yagan, University of California at Berkeley Economics Department, et al. “Business In The United States: Who Owns It And How Much Tax Do They Pay?” 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Microeconomics Exam Review Chapters 8 Through 12, 16, 17 and 19
    MICROECONOMICS EXAM REVIEW CHAPTERS 8 THROUGH 12, 16, 17 AND 19 Key Terms and Concepts to Know CHAPTER 8 - PERFECT COMPETITION I. An Introduction to Perfect Competition A. Perfectly Competitive Market Structure: • Has many buyers and sellers. • Sells a commodity or standardized product. • Has buyers and sellers who are fully informed. • Has firms and resources that are freely mobile. • Perfectly competitive firm is a price taker; one firm has no control over price. B. Demand Under Perfect Competition: Horizontal line at the market price II. Short-Run Profit Maximization A. Total Revenue Minus Total Cost: The firm maximizes economic profit by finding the quantity at which total revenue exceeds total cost by the greatest amount. B. Marginal Revenue Equals Marginal Cost in Equilibrium • Marginal Revenue: The change in total revenue from selling another unit of output: • MR = ΔTR/Δq • In perfect competition, marginal revenue equals market price. • Market price = Marginal revenue = Average revenue • The firm increases output as long as marginal revenue exceeds marginal cost. • Golden rule of profit maximization. The firm maximizes profit by producing where marginal cost equals marginal revenue. C. Economic Profit in Short-Run: Because the marginal revenue curve is horizontal at the market price, it is also the firm’s demand curve. The firm can sell any quantity at this price. III. Minimizing Short-Run Losses The short run is defined as a period too short to allow existing firms to leave the industry. The following is a summary of short-run behavior: A. Fixed Costs and Minimizing Losses: If a firm shuts down, it must still pay fixed costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Monetary Policy in Economies with Little Or No Money
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES MONETARY POLICY IN ECONOMIES WITH LITTLE OR NO MONEY Bennett T. McCallum Working Paper 9838 http://www.nber.org/papers/w9838 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 July 2003 This paper was prepared for presentation at the December 16-17, 2002, meeting of the Hong Kong Economic Association. I am indebted to Marvin Goodfriend, Lok Sang Ho, Allan Meltzer, and Edward Nelson for helpful comments and suggestions. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Bureau of Economic Research ©2003 by Bennett T. McCallum. All rights reserved. Short sections of text not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit including © notice, is given to the source. Monetary Policy in Economies with Little or No Money Bennett T. McCallum NBER Working Paper No. 9838 July 2003 JEL No. E3, E4, E5 ABSTRACT The paper's arguments include: (1) Medium-of-exchange money will not disappear in the foreseeable future, although the quantity of base money may continue to decline. (2) In economies with very little money (e.g., no currency but bank settlement balances at the central bank), monetary policy will be conducted much as at present by activist adjustment of overnight interest rates. Operating procedures will be different, however, with payment of interest on reserves likely to become the norm. (3) In economies without any money there can be no monetary policy. The relevant notion of a general price level concerns some index of prices in terms of a medium of account.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Paul A. Samuelson's Economics
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. A Study of Paul A. Samuelson's Econol11ics: Making Economics Accessible to Students A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Economics at Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand. Leanne Marie Smith July 2000 Abstract Paul A. Samuelson is the founder of the modem introductory economics textbook. His textbook Economics has become a classic, and the yardstick of introductory economics textbooks. What is said to distinguish economics from the other social sciences is the development of a textbook tradition. The textbook presents the fundamental paradigms of the discipline, these gradually evolve over time as puzzles emerge, and solutions are found or suggested. The textbook is central to the dissemination of the principles of a discipline. Economics has, and does contribute to the education of students, and advances economic literacy and understanding in society. It provided a common economic language for students. Systematic analysis and research into introductory textbooks is relatively recent. The contribution that textbooks play in portraying a discipline and its evolution has been undervalued and under-researched. Specifically, applying bibliographical and textual analysis to textbook writing in economics, examining a single introductory economics textbook and its successive editions through time is new. When it is considered that an economics textbook is more than a disseminator of information, but a physical object with specific content, presented in a particular way, it changes the way a researcher looks at that textbook.
    [Show full text]
  • Farrakhan Talks to the Jews
    JEWISH WORLD COVER STORY Farrakhan Talks to the Jews For three hours, over colfee in his home, Nation oj Islam leader Louis Farrakhan spoke to the Jewish people through The Jerusalem Report. The anti-Semitism he repeatedly spouts was no less virulent at his dining room table, but his message "is Jor the Jews' own good." VINCE BEISER Chicago HATEVER ELSE WUIS White House, he has called it. have publicly called for the community to Farrakhan may be, let "I want you to feel at home, and ask any take Farrakhan up on his repeated ap­ no one say he is not a questions you feel your readers would be peals for a meeting with Jewish leaders. gracious host - even interested in," says Farrakhan, his voice Last year, at the urging of Jewish "60 to a Jewish j ournalist. as honey-smooth as a Motown Singer. One Minutes" journalist Mike Wallace, World Before beginning our reason he has become perhaps the na­ Jewish Congress head Edgar Bronfman interview at his palatial residence in an tion's most important African-American hosted Farrakhan and his wife at a dinner affluent, integrated South Chicago neigh­ leader is immediately obvious: The man in his New York home (although Bronf­ borhood, the leader of the Nation of Islam practically glows with charisma and man soon cut off contact with the minis- ter). And in April Edward Rendell, Philadelphia's Jew­ ish mayor, invited the minis­ 'I PLEDGE THIS to you. I have no intention whatsoever ter to speak at a rally to promote racial healing.
    [Show full text]
  • REP21 December 1974
    World Bank Reprint Series: Number Twenty-one REP21 December 1974 Public Disclosure Authorized V.V. Bhatt Some Aspects of Financial Policies and Central Banking in Developing Countries Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Reprinted from World Development 2 (October-December 1974) World Development Vol.2, No.10-12, October-Deceinber 1974, pp. 59-67 59 Some Aspects of Financial Policies and Central Banking in Developing Countries V. V. BHATT Economic Development Institute of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development mechanism and agency as provided by the existence of a Central Bank. What needs special emphasis at an international level is the rationale and urgency of evolving a sound financial structure through the efficient performance of the twin interrelated functions-as promoters and as regulators of the financial system-by Central Banks. 1. SOME ASPECTS OF FINANCIAL POLICIES .. ~~~The main object of this Section is to show the Economic development is not only facilitated but its . pace is quickened by the appropriate development of the significance of saving and flow-of-funds analysis as an financial system--structure of financial institutions, indicator of a set of financial policies-policies relating instruments and interest rates.1 to the structure of financial institutions, instruments and Instrumentsand interest rates.r interest rates-essential for resource mobilization and In any strategy of development, therefore, it is allocation consistent with a country's development essential to emphasize the evolution of a sound and . 6 c well-integrated financial system from the point of view objectives. In a large number of developing countries, the only both of resource mobilization and efficient allocation.2 reliable data available for understanding the trends in the In Section I of this paper, an attempt is made to economy and for policy purposes relate to monetary delineate the broad contours of a set of financial policies flows and the balance of payments.
    [Show full text]
  • BIS Working Papers No 136 the Price Level, Relative Prices and Economic Stability: Aspects of the Interwar Debate by David Laidler* Monetary and Economic Department
    BIS Working Papers No 136 The price level, relative prices and economic stability: aspects of the interwar debate by David Laidler* Monetary and Economic Department September 2003 * University of Western Ontario Abstract Recent financial instability has called into question the sufficiency of low inflation as a goal for monetary policy. This paper discusses interwar literature bearing on this question. It begins with theories of the cycle based on the quantity theory, and their policy prescription of price stability supported by lender of last resort activities in the event of crises, arguing that their neglect of fluctuations in investment was a weakness. Other approaches are then taken up, particularly Austrian theory, which stressed the banking system’s capacity to generate relative price distortions and forced saving. This theory was discredited by its association with nihilistic policy prescriptions during the Great Depression. Nevertheless, its core insights were worthwhile, and also played an important part in Robertson’s more eclectic account of the cycle. The latter, however, yielded activist policy prescriptions of a sort that were discredited in the postwar period. Whether these now need re-examination, or whether a low-inflation regime, in which the authorities stand ready to resort to vigorous monetary expansion in the aftermath of asset market problems, is adequate to maintain economic stability is still an open question. BIS Working Papers are written by members of the Monetary and Economic Department of the Bank for International Settlements, and from time to time by other economists, and are published by the Bank. The views expressed in them are those of their authors and not necessarily the views of the BIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Run Supply Curve Is
    Review 1. Production function - Types of production functions - Marginal productivity - Returns to scale 2. The cost minimization problem - Solution: MPL(K,L)/w = MPK(K,L)/r - What happens when price of an input increases? 3. Deriving the cost function - Solution to cost minimization problem - Properties of the cost function (marginal and average costs) 1 Economic Profit Economic profit is the difference between total revenue and the economic costs. Difference between economic costs and accounting costs: The economic costs include the opportunity costs. Example: Suppose you start a business: - the expected revenue is $50,000 per year. - the total costs of supplies and labor are $35,000. - Instead of opening the business you can also work in the bank and earn $25,000 per year. - The opportunity costs are $25,000 - The economic profit is -$10,000 - The accounting profit is $15,000 2 Firm’s supply: how much to produce? A firm chooses Q to maximize profit. The firm’s problem max (Q) TR(Q) TC(Q) Q . Total cost of producing Q units depends on the production function and input costs. Total revenue of is the money that the firm receives from Q units (i.e., price times the quantity sold). It depends on competition and demand 3 Deriving the firm’s supply Def. A firm is a price taker if it can sell any quantity at a given price of p per unit. How much should a price taking firm produce? For a given price, the firm’s problem is to choose quantity to maximize profit. max pQTC(Q) Q s.t.Q 0 Optimality condition: P = MC(Q) Profit Maximization Optimality condition: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving in a Financial Institution
    SAVING IN A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION i Silverback Consultants Ltd acknowledges the contributions of: Somkwe John-Nwosu Chinyere Agwu Nene Williams Temiloluwa Bamigbola The Consumer Protection Department of The Central Bank of Nigeria. Hajiya Khadijah Kasim Edited by Hajiya Umma Dutse Copyright © 2017 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other non-commercial uses permitted by copyright law. ISBN This material was produced by the Consumer Protection Department of the Central Bank of Nigeria in Collaboration with Silverback Consultants Ltd. 1 01 Introduction 02 Importance of Saving 03 Where to Save Saving at Home (Advantages and Disadvantages) Saving in a Bank and Other Financial Institutions Types of Banks and Other Financial Institutions 04 How to Save What to Consider in Choosing a Bank or Other Financial Institutions Types of Accounts Operating Bank Accounts Electronic Payment Channels 05 Managing Accounts Reconciling Account Complaints Protecting Banking Instruments Protecting Electronic Transactions Rights and Responsibilities of a Bank Customer 06 Conclusion 07 Frequently Used Banking Terms 2 01. Introduction Almost everyone has an idea of what is saving and must have saved in one form or another. This could be towards buying something needed or towards a future project such as building a house, paying school fees, marriage, hospital bills, repay loans or simply for a rainy day. People set aside certain amounts or engage in contributions (esusu, adashe).
    [Show full text]
  • Unemployment Insurance and Macroeconomic Stabilization
    153 Unemployment Insurance and Macroeconomic Stabilization Gabriel Chodorow-Reich, Harvard University and the National Bureau of Economic Research John Coglianese, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Abstract Unemployment insurance (UI) provides an important cushion for workers who lose their jobs. In addition, UI may act as a macroeconomic stabilizer during recessions. This chapter examines UI’s macroeconomic stabilization role, considering both the regular UI program which provides benefits to short-term unemployed workers as well as automatic and emergency extensions of benefits that cover long-term unemployed workers. We make a number of analytic points concerning the macroeconomic stabilization role of UI. First, recipiency rates in the regular UI program are quite low. Second, the automatic component of benefit extensions, Extended Benefits (EB), has played almost no role historically in providing timely, countercyclical stimulus while emergency programs are subject to implementation lags. Additionally, except during an exceptionally high and sustained period of unemployment, large UI extensions have limited scope to act as macroeconomic stabilizers even if they were made automatic because relatively few individuals reach long-term unemployment. Finally, the output effects from increasing the benefit amount for short-term unemployed are constrained by estimated consumption responses of below 1. We propose five changes to the UI system that would increase UI benefits during recessions and improve the macroeconomic stabilization role: (I) Expand eligibility and encourage take-up of regular UI benefits. (II) Make EB fully federally financed. (III) Remove look-back provisions from EB triggers that make automatic extensions turn off during periods of prolonged unemployment. (IV) Add additional automatic extensions to increase benefits during periods of extremely high unemployment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Structural Model of the Unemployment Insurance Take-Up
    A Structural Model of the Unemployment Insurance Take-up Sylvie Blasco∗ Fran¸coisFontainey GAINS, University of Aarhus, BETA-CNRS, CREST and IZA LMDG and IZA. January 2012 - IN PROGRESSz Abstract A large fraction of the eligible workers do not claim the unemployment insurance when they are unemployed. This paper provides a structural framework to identify clearly, through the esti- mates, the economic mechanisms behind take-up. It incorporates take-up in a job search model and accounts for the determinants of claiming, especially the level of the unemployment benefits and the practical difficulties to make a claim. It provides a simple way to model selection into participation and sheds new light on the link between the job search and the claiming efforts. We estimate our model using a unique administrative dataset that matches a linked employer - employee data and the records of the national employment agency. Keywords: Unemployment Insurance Take-up, Job Search JEL Classification numbers: J64, J65, C41 ∗Address : Universit´e du Maine, Av. Olivier Messiaen, 72085 Le Mans Cedex 9, France ; Email: [email protected] yUniversity of Nancy 2, Email: [email protected]. zWe thank Jesper Bagger, Sebastian Buhai, Sam Kortum, David Margolis, Dale Mortensen, Fabien Postel-Vinay, Jean-Marc Robin, Chris Taber and participants at the Tinbergen Institute internal seminar, CREST-INSEE, Nancy and Royal Holloway seminars, the ESEM conference, the AFSE, IZA-Labor Market Policy Evalation, LMDG, T2M workshops for comments and discussions. This is a preliminary version of the paper, the readers are invited to check on the authors' websites for newer versions.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitalist Crisis and the Rise of Monetarism
    CAPITALIST CRISIS AND THE RISE OF MONETARISM Simon Clarke What is the significance of 'monetarism' for an understanding of the relationship between the economy and the capitalist state? Before we can address the question we have to try to define 'monetarism'. In the strictest sense 'monetarism' refers to the advocacy of the quantity theory of money and a policy preoccupation with the growth of the money supply. In this sense monetarism expresses a pre-Keynesian ortho- doxy, that has been perpetuated by a few cranks and that inexplicably grabbed the hearts and minds of economists and politicians for the best part of a decade, between 1975 and 1985. This is the view that has tended to be taken by economists who remain committed to a Keynesian analysis. For these economists monetarism was a combination of huckstering and collective madness that led to mistaken economic policies. The response to monetarism was to keep faith and wait until normal sanity was resumed. Such a view has apparently now been vindicated by the almost universal abandonment of this kind of monetarist orthodoxy, although elements of its rhetoric remain. This is to take much too narrow a view of monetarism. Although this narrow monetarism has been utterly discredited, and the money supply no longer has the fetishistic significance that it briefly enjoyed, the broader contours of the politics and ideology of monetarism remain with us, and have been assimilated by many of those of a Keynesian persuasion. This politics and ideology relates not so much to the narrow technical issues of monetary policy and the control of the money supply as to the broader questions of the relations between the state and the economy.
    [Show full text]