DOCSLIB.ORG

THE PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS of SOFT-SHELLED TURTLES (FAMILY Trionychidae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS of SOFT-SHELLED TURTLES (FAMILY Trionychidae) THE PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF SOFT-SHELLED TURTLES (FAMILY TRIONYCHiDAE) PETER ANDRE MEYLAN BULLETIN OF THE AMIERICAN.MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY.i VOLUME~1,86: ARTICLE 1. NEW YORK:0 1987 Recent issues of the Bulletin may be purchased from the Museum. Lists of back issues of the Bulletin, Novitates, and Anthropological Papers published during the last five years are avatlable fiee of charge. Address orders to: American Museum of Natural History Library, Department D, Central Park West at 79th St., New York, New York 10024. i THE PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF SOFT-SHELLED TURTLES (FAMILY TRIONYCHIDAE) PETER ANDRE MEYLAN Thorne Fellow Department of Vertebrate Paleontology American Museum of Natural History BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Volume 186, article 1, pages 1-101, figures 1-34, tables 1-22 Issued June 26, 1987 Price: $9.00 a copy Copyright © American Museum of Natural History 1987 ISSN 0003-0090 CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................... 4 Methods .................................................................... 7 The Phylogenetic Method ............... ..................................... 7 Basic Taxa ................................................................. 10 Terminology ............................................................... 10 Results ..................................................................... I 1 Variation in Shell Morphology ............................................... 11 Carapace Size and Shape ............. ..................................... 13 Nuchal Region ........................................................... 15 The Neural Series ......................................................... 19 Shell Periphery ........................................................... 21 Posterior End of Carapace ............ ..................................... 23 Plastron ................................................................. 23 Variation in SkuH Morphology ............................................... 26 Nasal Region ............................................................. 27 Orbital Region ........................................................... 29 Skull Emargination ................. ...................................... 29 Stapedial Foramen ................... ..................................... 34 Processus Trochlearis Oticum and Quadrate ................................. 34 Trigeminal Region ................... ..................................... 37 Occipital Region ........................................................... 38 Palate ................................................................... 40 Variation in the Visceral Skeleton and Nonshell Postcrania ...................... 43 Mandible ................................................................. 43 Hyoid ................................................................... 46 Cervical and Body Vertebrae ........... .................................... 48 Pelvis ................................................................... 50 Pectoral Girdle ............................................................ 53 Appendicular Skeleton ............... ..................................... 53 Discussion ................................................................... 54 Higher Relationships of the Trionychidae ..................................... 54 Monophyly of the Trionychoidea ........................................... 54 Monophyly of the Kinostemidae, Carettochelyidae, and Trionychidae ................. ...................................... 58 Monophyly of the Staurotypinae, Carettochelyidae, and Trionychidae ................. ...................................... 61 Monophyly of the Carettochelyidae and the Trionychidae ..... ................ 61 Monophyly of the Trionychidae ............................................ 62 Relationships Among the Recent Trionychidae ................................ 62 Evidence from Shell Morphology ........................................... 63 Evidence from Skull Morphology ........................................... 65 Evidence from Nonshell Postcrania and Lower Jaw ........................... 69 Formulation of a General Hypothesis of Relationships for the Trionychidae ............... ..................................... 69 2 Comparison of Results to the Prevailing Hypotheses of Trionychid Relationships .......................74........................ 74 Trends and Mechanisms in Soft-Shelled Turtle Evolution ..... ..... 78 Classification of the Living Trionychidae .... ...... 88 Acknowledgments .......... 94 Appendix 1. Specimens Examined .......... 95 Literature Cited ............ 96 3 ABSTRACT Phylogenetic analysis of 113 characters of the ticus, T. swinhoei, T. ferox, T. spiniferus, and T. osteology of the 22 living species of trionychid muticus, and can be recognized by the presence of turtles and representatives of all other living turtle eight or fewer neurals (first and second are fused), families, provides abundant evidence on the re- deeply emarginate prefrontals, and a large contri- lationships of soft-shelled turtles to other turtles bution by the parietal to the processus trochlearis and on the interrelationships within the family. oticum. The Indian group includes four species: These data suggest that the family Trionychidae T. gangeticus, T. hurum, T. leithii, and T. ni- shares a unique common ancestor with the Der- gricans; all exhibit a free first neural, five plastral matemydidae, Kinosternidae, and Carettochelyi- callosities, and intermediately extended epiplas- dae, and that the Kinosternidae share a unique tra. Lastly, the T. steindachneri group, which in- common ancestor with the Trionychidae and Ca- cludes T. steindachneri, T. sinensis, and T. sub- rettochelyidae. Furthermore, it appears that the planus, is diagnosed by a descending spine of the staurotypine kinosternids are most closely related opisthotic that divides the fenestra postotica in to the Trionychidae and Carettochelyidae. Ca- most specimens. rettochelyids and trionychids share numerous Two equally parsimonious arrangements of the unique features and clearly constitute a mono- Trionychinae differ in the placement of the North phyletic group. American clade. In one, this clade is the sister Within the Trionychidae, the subfamilies Cyc- group of the T. cartilagineus clade; in the other, it lanorbinae and Trionychinae are recognized as is the sister group of the T. steindachneri clade. In monophyletic clades. Recognition of three cyclan- both, the Indian group is paraphyletic and gives orbine genera, Cycloderma, Cyclanorbis, and rise to the T. steindachneri clade. Lissemys, is warranted. Within the Trionychinae, A revised classification of the family Trionych- four distinct clades are recognized. The Trionyx idae is provided. The use of 2 subfamilies, 6 tribes, cartilagineus group includes Chitra indica and Pe- and 14 genera is recommended. This expanded lochelys bibroni, on the basis ofthe unique location taxonomy will more completely reflect the hier- of the foramen posterior canalis carotici interni, archical relationships that reflect recency of com- and features of the trigeminal region. The North mon ancestry as determined by the cladistic anal- American group includes T. triunguis, T. euphra- yses. INTRODUCTION Within recent years a fundamental revision summarized by Gaffney (1984). The largest of the systematic relationships of turtles has remaining family for which a complete cla- begun. This revision was precipitated by distic study does not exist is that comprising Gaffhiey (1975), who presented a reorgani- the soft-shelled turtles, the Trionychidae. zation of the Testudines using the cladistic This gap is significant, considering the large method (as outlined in Gaffney, 1979a; Wi- size, abundance, and great age of the family. ley, 1981). Other authors have followed Gaff- The Trionychidae includes more than 250 ney's lead in applying this method to prob- named species (ca. 230 fossil and 22 extant) lems in chelonian systematics, resulting in a and occurs on every continent except Ant- much clearer understanding of the phyloge- arctica. It is a very old family, with definite netic relationships among turtle taxa. Con- representatives from the Cretaceous (Romer, cise hypotheses of the relationships within 1956). Representation of this family in the most families are now available (Progano- fossil record is considerable, although diffi- chelyidae, Gaffniey and Meeker, 1983; Chel- cult to document because few authors treat idae, Gaffihey, 1977; Baenidae, Gaffney, 1972; the fossils of this troublesome group. The best Meiolaniidae, Gaffhey, 1983; Chelonioidea, evidence of its ubiquity is reported by Gaffhey, 1976; Kinosternidae, Hutchison and Hutchison (1982), who showed that the Bramble, 1981; Trionychidae [shell only], Trionychidae has the most continuous record Meylan, 1985; Emydidae, Hirayama, 1985; of 11 reptile families examined from the Ce- Testudinidae, Crumly, 1982, 1985) and are nozoic of western North America. 4 1 987 MEYLAN: TRIONYCHIDAE 5 Although authors do not agree on the re- and other osteological characters and has been lationships of trionychids to other turtles, I followed by Romer (1956), Pritchard (1967, have never seen a single reference doubting 1979a, 1979b), Mlynarski (1976), and others. the monophyly of the family. It is so dis- Karyotypic data have recently been cited tinctive that some authors have placed the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A New Xinjiangchelyid Turtle from the Middle Jurassic of Xinjiang, China and the Evolution of the Basipterygoid Process in Mesozoic Turtles Rabi Et Al
    A new xinjiangchelyid turtle from the Middle Jurassic of Xinjiang, China and the evolution of the basipterygoid process in Mesozoic turtles Rabi et al. Rabi et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:203 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/203 Rabi et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:203 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/203 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access A new xinjiangchelyid turtle from the Middle Jurassic of Xinjiang, China and the evolution of the basipterygoid process in Mesozoic turtles Márton Rabi1,2*, Chang-Fu Zhou3, Oliver Wings4, Sun Ge3 and Walter G Joyce1,5 Abstract Background: Most turtles from the Middle and Late Jurassic of Asia are referred to the newly defined clade Xinjiangchelyidae, a group of mostly shell-based, generalized, small to mid-sized aquatic froms that are widely considered to represent the stem lineage of Cryptodira. Xinjiangchelyids provide us with great insights into the plesiomorphic anatomy of crown-cryptodires, the most diverse group of living turtles, and they are particularly relevant for understanding the origin and early divergence of the primary clades of extant turtles. Results: Exceptionally complete new xinjiangchelyid material from the ?Qigu Formation of the Turpan Basin (Xinjiang Autonomous Province, China) provides new insights into the anatomy of this group and is assigned to Xinjiangchelys wusu n. sp. A phylogenetic analysis places Xinjiangchelys wusu n. sp. in a monophyletic polytomy with other xinjiangchelyids, including Xinjiangchelys junggarensis, X. radiplicatoides, X. levensis and X. latiens. However, the analysis supports the unorthodox, though tentative placement of xinjiangchelyids and sinemydids outside of crown-group Testudines. A particularly interesting new observation is that the skull of this xinjiangchelyid retains such primitive features as a reduced interpterygoid vacuity and basipterygoid processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Zur Ökologie Von Cycloderma Aubryi (Dumeril, 1856) in Gabun
    Zur Ökologie von Cycloderma aubryi (DuMERIL, 1856) in Gabun DIETER GRAMENTZ Abstract On the ecology of Cycloderma aubryi (DuMERTL, 1856) in Gabon. Subadult and adult turtles preferably inhabit areas with reed and bays with emersed vegetation. However, they avoid these areas when the water level is below 100 cm. Juvenile turtles inhabit temporarily inundated areas in the forest. The turtles bury themselves into the soil when their water habitats dry out. The average water depth in reed areas is 127 cm, in bays of land spits 135 cm, andin the forest 50 cm. Of 51 turtles examined, only one individual had a bite mark on one femoral flap caused by another softshell turtle. The pH-value varies from 5.0 in the forest to 6.0 in the other habitats. Eggs are laid in the minor dry season from December to January. The turtles feed on fish. The average body temperature of the turtles was 30,0 °C. The body temperatures were always above water temperature. The lowest average water tem­ perature was measured in the forest and the highest in the bays. Endoparasitic tapeworms were found in the intestines, a nematode in the body cavity, and leeches may occur on practically all parts of the body. Key words: Testudines: Trionychidae: Cyclanorbinae: Cycloderma aubryi; distribution; habitat; movements; diet; competition; predators; parasites; body temperature; physical and chemical data of the environment. Zusammenfassung Subadulte und adulte Schildkröten bewohnen bevorzugt Schilfgebiete und Gewässereinbuch­ tungen mit emerser Vegetation, in denen sie aber nicht mehr vorkommen, wenn die Wassertiefe unter lOO cm sinkt. Juvenile Schildkröten bewohnen temporär überschwemmte Waldgebiete.
    [Show full text]
  • Zur Morphologie Und Merkmalsvariation Von Cycloderma Aubryi (DUMERIL, 1856)
    Zur Morphologie und Merkmalsvariation von Cycloderma aubryi (DUMERIL, 1856) DIETER GR AMENTZ Abstract On the morphology and the variation of the pattern l!f Cycloderma aubryi ( DuMERIL, 1856). The relationships of carapace width, plastron length, lip width, tail flap length, femoral flap width, tail length, and mass to carapace length were calculated. The carapace stretches during growth in relation to the carapace width. Males have longer tails than females and in mature males, it reaches always beyond the edge of the carapace. Females grow !arger than males. The colouration of the turtles changes considerably during ontogeny and practically all parts of the body are affected. The tuberculation on the dorsal side of juvenils disappears with increasing age. The number of antebrachial scutes on the fore legs can be symmetrical or asymmetrical and varies from 5-8. The species presumably matures at a carapace length of 30-32 cm. Key words: Testudines: Trionychidae: Cyclanorbinae: Cycloderma aubryi; sexual dimorphism, colouration, external characteristics, maturity. Zusammenfassung Es wurden die Verhältnisse der Carapaxbreite, Plastronlänge, Lippenbreite, Schwanz­ klappenlänge, Femoralklappenbreite, Schwanzlänge und Masse zur Carapaxlänge berech­ net. Die Carapaxlänge streckt sich während des Wachstums im Verhältnis zur Carapaxbreite. Die Männchen haben längere Schwänze als die Weibchen. Der Schwanz reicht bei erwachsenen Männchen immer über den Carapaxrand hinaus. Die Weibchen werden größer als die Männchen. Die Färbung der Schildkröten verändert sich sehr stark während der Ontogenese; es si nd praktisch alle Körperteile davon betroffen. Die Tuberkulation auf der Oberseite der Jungtiere verschwindet mit fortschreitendem Alter. Die Anzahl der Ante­ brachialschuppen auf den Vorderbeinen kann symmetrisch oder unsymmetrisch vorliegen und variiert vo n 5-8.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogenomic Analysis of Turtles ⇑ Nicholas G
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 83 (2015) 250–257 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A phylogenomic analysis of turtles ⇑ Nicholas G. Crawford a,b,1, James F. Parham c, ,1, Anna B. Sellas a, Brant C. Faircloth d, Travis C. Glenn e, Theodore J. Papenfuss f, James B. Henderson a, Madison H. Hansen a,g, W. Brian Simison a a Center for Comparative Genomics, California Academy of Sciences, 55 Music Concourse Drive, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA b Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA c John D. Cooper Archaeological and Paleontological Center, Department of Geological Sciences, California State University, Fullerton, CA 92834, USA d Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA e Department of Environmental Health Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA f Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA g Mathematical and Computational Biology Department, Harvey Mudd College, 301 Platt Boulevard, Claremont, CA 9171, USA article info abstract Article history: Molecular analyses of turtle relationships have overturned prevailing morphological hypotheses and Received 11 July 2014 prompted the development of a new taxonomy. Here we provide the first genome-scale analysis of turtle Revised 16 October 2014 phylogeny. We sequenced 2381 ultraconserved element (UCE) loci representing a total of 1,718,154 bp of Accepted 28 October 2014 aligned sequence. Our sampling includes 32 turtle taxa representing all 14 recognized turtle families and Available online 4 November 2014 an additional six outgroups. Maximum likelihood, Bayesian, and species tree methods produce a single resolved phylogeny.
    [Show full text]
  • A New European Albian Turtle That Extends the Known Stratigraphic Range of the Pleurosternidae (Paracryptodira)
    Cretaceous Research 55 (2015) 74e83 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cretaceous Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes A new European Albian turtle that extends the known stratigraphic range of the Pleurosternidae (Paracryptodira) * A. Perez-García a, b, , E. Espílez c, L. Mampel c, L. Alcala c a Centro de Geologia, Faculdade de Ci^encias da Universidade de Lisboa (FCUL), Edificio C6, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal b Grupo de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, UNED, Paseo Senda del Rey, 9, 28040 Madrid, Spain c Fundacion Conjunto Paleontologico de Teruel-Dinopolis (Museo Aragones de Paleontología), Avda. Sagunto s/n, E-44002 Teruel, Spain article info abstract Article history: Postcranial material corresponding to three specimens of freshwater turtles, from the lower Albian Received 23 December 2014 (upper Lower Cretaceous) of Arino~ (Teruel Province, Spain), is analysed in this paper. This study allows us Accepted in revised form 18 February 2015 to identify the presence of Pleurosternidae (Paracryptodira) outside its known stratigraphic range, from Available online Kimmeridgian to Barremian, and extends its distribution to the Albian. The species from Arino~ represents a new taxon, Toremys cassiopeia gen. et sp. nov., which is the only pleurosternid described so far in post- Keywords: Berriasian levels. Toremys cassiopeia is closely related to other taxa from Europe, to which the Cretaceous Pleurosternidae pleurosternids are restricted. Knowledge about the European freshwater turtle faunas distributed be- Toremys cassiopeia, gen. et sp. nov. fi Lower Cretaceous tween the Barremian and the uppermost Cretaceous is very limited. The new nding provides relevant Albian data on these poorly understood faunas.
    [Show full text]
  • A Divergence Dating Analysis of Turtles Using Fossil Calibrations: an Example of Best Practices Walter G
    Journal of Paleontology, 87(4), 2013, p. 612–634 Copyright Ó 2013, The Paleontological Society 0022-3360/13/0087-612$03.00 DOI: 10.1666/12-149 A DIVERGENCE DATING ANALYSIS OF TURTLES USING FOSSIL CALIBRATIONS: AN EXAMPLE OF BEST PRACTICES WALTER G. JOYCE,1,2 JAMES F. PARHAM,3 TYLER R. LYSON,2,4,5 RACHEL C. M. WARNOCK,6,7 7 AND PHILIP C. J. DONOGHUE 1Institut fu¨r Geowissenschaften, University of Tu¨bingen, 72076 Tu¨bingen, Germany, ,[email protected].; 2Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; 3John D. Cooper Archaeological and Paleontological Center, Department of Geological Sciences, California State University at Fullerton, Fullerton, CA 92834, USA; 4Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC 20013, USA; 5Marmarth Research Foundation, Marmarth, ND 58643, USA; 6National Evolutionary Synthesis Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA; and 7Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK ABSTRACT—Turtles have served as a model system for molecular divergence dating studies using fossil calibrations. However, because some parts of the fossil record of turtles are very well known, divergence age estimates from molecular phylogenies often do not differ greatly from those observed directly from the fossil record alone. Also, the phylogenetic position and age of turtle fossil calibrations used in previous studies have not been adequately justified. We provide the first explicitly justified minimum and soft maximum age constraints on 22 clades of turtles following best practice protocols. Using these data we undertook a Bayesian relaxed molecular clock analysis establishing a timescale for the evolution of crown Testudines that we exploit in attempting to address evolutionary questions that cannot be resolved with fossils alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Spiny Softshell
    Eastern Spiny Softshell The Eastern Spiny Softshell Turtle, an introduced species, is unlike any other species of turtle in New Jersey, with its leathery, flattened shell, and its long narrow snout. Eastern Spiny Softshell Introduced Species - Pl.7 (Apalone spinifera spinifera) Identification: Adult females 6 1/2" - 18", males 5" - 9 1/4". The Eastern Spiny Softshell is almost perfectly round with a very flattened, leathery carapace that lacks scutes. Also note the characteristic long, narrow, tubular snout. Three characteristics that distinguish this from other softshells (which are not found in New Jersey) are streaked and spotted feet, a horizontal ridge in each nostril, and small spiny projections on the carapace. The carapace is light tan, like wet sand; a thin dark line encircles the carapace near the rim. The carapace of the male is marked with dark, round spots, while the female may be somewhat darker and more mottled. Where to find them: The Eastern Spiny Softshell is typically limited to rivers; however, it can also be found in lakes where mud bars are available. It is sometimes seen floating at the surface, where the shape is easily identifiable. Be careful if handling this species: it can claw and bite fiercely. When to find them: Active May through September. Range: An introduced and well-established population in the Maurice River system, Cumberland County and in the Raritan River Watershed. Eastern Spiny Softshell (Apalone spinifera spinifera) - text pg. 16 Key Features - Long, narrow, and tubular snout. - Carapace: flattened, leathery, and lacking scutes. - Light tan or brown in color. New Jersey Division of Fish and Wildlife ~ 2003 Excerpt from: Schwartz, V.
    [Show full text]
  • 71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT
    ISSN 1937-2809 online Journal of Supplement to the November 2011 Vertebrate Paleontology Vertebrate Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Society of Vertebrate 71st Annual Meeting Paleontology Society of Vertebrate Las Vegas Paris Nevada, USA Las Vegas, November 2 – 5, 2011 Program and Abstracts Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts COMMITTEE MEETING ROOM POSTER SESSION/ CONCURRENT CONCURRENT SESSION EXHIBITS SESSION COMMITTEE MEETING ROOMS AUCTION EVENT REGISTRATION, CONCURRENT MERCHANDISE SESSION LOUNGE, EDUCATION & OUTREACH SPEAKER READY COMMITTEE MEETING POSTER SESSION ROOM ROOM SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS SEVENTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PARIS LAS VEGAS HOTEL LAS VEGAS, NV, USA NOVEMBER 2–5, 2011 HOST COMMITTEE Stephen Rowland, Co-Chair; Aubrey Bonde, Co-Chair; Joshua Bonde; David Elliott; Lee Hall; Jerry Harris; Andrew Milner; Eric Roberts EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Philip Currie, President; Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Past President; Catherine Forster, Vice President; Christopher Bell, Secretary; Ted Vlamis, Treasurer; Julia Clarke, Member at Large; Kristina Curry Rogers, Member at Large; Lars Werdelin, Member at Large SYMPOSIUM CONVENORS Roger B.J. Benson, Richard J. Butler, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Hans C.E. Larsson, Mark A. Loewen, Philip D. Mannion, Jim I. Mead, Eric M. Roberts, Scott D. Sampson, Eric D. Scott, Kathleen Springer PROGRAM COMMITTEE Jonathan Bloch, Co-Chair; Anjali Goswami, Co-Chair; Jason Anderson; Paul Barrett; Brian Beatty; Kerin Claeson; Kristina Curry Rogers; Ted Daeschler; David Evans; David Fox; Nadia B. Fröbisch; Christian Kammerer; Johannes Müller; Emily Rayfield; William Sanders; Bruce Shockey; Mary Silcox; Michelle Stocker; Rebecca Terry November 2011—PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 1 Members and Friends of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, The Host Committee cordially welcomes you to the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Las Vegas.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing the Late Cretaceous Haţeg Palaeoecosystem
    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 293 (2010) 265–270 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Preface An island of dwarfs — Reconstructing the Late Cretaceous Haţeg palaeoecosystem Zoltan Csiki a,⁎, Michael J. Benton b a Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Bucharest, Bd. N. Bălcescu 1, RO-010041 Bucharest, Romania b Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, UK article info abstract Article history: The Cretaceous was a special time in the evolution of terrestrial ecosystems, and yet the record from Europe Received 3 February 2010 in particular is patchy. This special issue brings together results of multidisciplinary investigations on the Received in revised form 4 May 2010 Late Cretaceous Haţeg area in southwestern Romania, and its continental fossil assemblage, with the aim of Accepted 25 May 2010 exploring an exceptional palaeoecosystem from the European Late Cretaceous. The Haţeg dinosaurs, which Available online 1 June 2010 seem unusually small, have become especially well known as some of the few latest Cretaceous dinosaurs from Europe, comparable with faunas from the south of France and Spain, and preserved at a time when Keywords: Cretaceous most of Europe was under the Chalk Seas. Eastern Europe then, at a time of exceptionally high sea level, was Tetrapods an archipelago of islands, some of them inhabited, but none so extraordinary as Haţeg. If Haţeg truly was an Dinosaurs island (and this is debated), the apparently small dinosaurs might well be dwarfs, as enunciated over Island dwarfing 100 years ago by the colourful Baron Franz Nopcsa, discoverer of the faunas.
    [Show full text]
  • Apalone Spinifera Atra (Webb and Legler 1960) – Black Spiny Softshell Turtle, Cuatrociénegas Softshell, Tortuga Concha Blanda, Tortuga Negra De Cuatrociénegas
    Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation ProjectTrionychidae of the IUCN/SSC — ApaloneTortoise and spinifera Freshwater atra Turtle Specialist Group 021.1 A.G.J. Rhodin, P.C.H. Pritchard, P.P. van Dijk, R.A. Saumure, K.A. Buhlmann, and J.B. Iverson, Eds. Chelonian Research Monographs (ISSN 1088-7105) No. 5, doi:10.3854/crm.5.021.atra.v1.2008 © 2008 by Chelonian Research Foundation • Published 9 August 2008 Apalone spinifera atra (Webb and Legler 1960) – Black Spiny Softshell Turtle, Cuatrociénegas Softshell, Tortuga Concha Blanda, Tortuga Negra de Cuatrociénegas ADRIÁN CERDÁ -ARDUR A 1, FR A N C IS C O SOBERÓN -MOB A R A K 2, SUZ A NNE E. MCGA U G H 3, A ND RI C H A RD C. VO G T 4 1Romero 93 Col. Niños Heroes, C.P. 03440, Mexico D.F. Mexico [[email protected]]; 2Xavier Sorondo 210 Col. Iztaccihuatl, C.P. 03520, Mexico D.F. Mexico [[email protected]]; 3Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 USA [[email protected]]; 4CPBA/INPA, Caixa Postal 478, Petropolis, Manaus, Amazonas 69011-970 Brazil [[email protected]] SU mma RY . – Apalone spinifera atra (Family Trionychidae), endemic to the Cuatrociénegas Basin of Coahuila, Mexico, is an enigmatic and severely threatened softshell turtle. On the basis of mor- phology, it has been regarded as a full species (Apalone ater), but by phylogenetic molecular analyses it is currently considered a subspecies of A. spinifera. The discovery of color morphs correlated to substrate coloration in different localities and the recognition of hybridization between A.
    [Show full text]
  • Cantor's Giant Softshell Turtle, Pelochelys Cantorii
    M Cantor’s Giant Softshell turtle, Pelochelys cantorii Compiler: Ayushi Jain Suggested citation: Jain, A., Das, A., V. Deepak., Cavada-Blanco, F. 2021. A Survival Blueprint for the Cantor’s Giant Softshell Turtle Pelochelys cantorii in India. EDGE of Existence programme, Zoological Society of London, UK 1. STATUS REVIEW 1.1 Taxonomy: Class : Reptilia Order : Testudines Family : Trionychidae Genus : Pelochelys Species : Pelocheys cantorii (Gray, 1864) Common Name : Cantor’s Giant softshell turtle/ Asian Giant softshell turtle/ Local name : Bheemanama, Paala poovan (Malayalam) Synonyms: Pelochelys clivepalmeri (Hoser, 2014), P. cumingii (Gray, 1864), P. poljakowii (Strauch, 1890), P. telstraorum (Hoser, 2014), P. cantoris (Boulenger, 1889) Pelochelys cantorii (Gray, 1864) is one of the three species in the genus Pelochelys. The other two species are P. bibroni and P. signifera known only from Papua New Guinea and Indonesia (Papua), respectively. P. cantorii has a large distribution across south and south-east Asia (Das, 2008). It is among the largest freshwater turtles in the world with adults reaching a carapace length of around 100 cm (Das, 2008). Sexual dimorphism is present with males having longer and thicker tales than females; something common for other softshell turtles. Females are also larger in size than males (Das, 2008). According to the last IUCN Red List of threatened species assessment for the species, Pelochelys cantorii might hide a complex of several different species (ATTWG, 2000) A B Figure 1. An adult Pelochelys cantorii on the banks of Chandragiri river caught as by-catch in a fishing line (A), and a close-up head shot showing the keratinized sheath or “teeth” of the species (B).
    [Show full text]
  • Nilssonia Leithii (Gray 1872) – Leith's Softshell Turtle
    Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project ofTrionychidae the IUCN/SSC Tortoise— Nilssonia and Freshwater leithii Turtle Specialist Group 075.1 A.G.J. Rhodin, P.C.H. Pritchard, P.P. van Dijk, R.A. Saumure, K.A. Buhlmann, J.B. Iverson, and R.A. Mittermeier, Eds. Chelonian Research Monographs (ISSN 1088-7105) No. 5, doi:10.3854/crm.5.075.leithii.v1.2014 © 2014 by Chelonian Research Foundation • Published 17 February 2014 Nilssonia leithii (Gray 1872) – Leith’s Softshell Turtle INDRANE I L DAS 1, SHASHWAT SI RS I 2, KARTH ik EYAN VASUDE V AN 3, AND B.H.C.K. MURTHY 4 1Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia [[email protected]]; 2Turtle Survival Alliance-India, D-1/316 Sector F, Janakipuram, Lucknow 226 021, India [[email protected]]; 3Laboratory for Conservation of Endangered Species, Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Pillar 162, PVNR Expressway, Hyderguda, Hyderabad 500 048, India [[email protected]]; 4Zoological Survey of India, J.L. Nehru Road, Kolkata 700 016, India [[email protected]] SU mm ARY . – Leith’s Softshell Turtle, Nilssonia leithii (Family Trionychidae), is a large turtle, known to attain at least 720 mm in carapace length (bony disk plus fibrocartilage flap), and possibly as much as 1000 mm. The species inhabits the rivers and reservoirs of southern peninsular India, replacing the more familiar Indian Softshell Turtle, N. gangetica, of northern India. The turtle is apparently rare within its range, even within protected areas, which is suspected to be due to a past history of exploitation.
    [Show full text]