DOCSLIB.ORG

Intricate Identities Cochlear Implant Users Negotiating Lives Between D/Deaf and Hearing Worlds

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intricate Identities Cochlear Implant Users Negotiating Lives Between D/Deaf and Hearing Worlds CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by ResearchArchive at Victoria University of Wellington Intricate Identities Cochlear Implant Users Negotiating Lives Between d/Deaf and Hearing Worlds Hayley Bathard A thesis submitted to Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in Cultural Anthropology. Victoria University of Wellington 2014 i ABSTRACT The cochlear implant (CI), a device that “provides hearing sensations for severely and profoundly deaf individuals” (NZ Audiological Society), initially emerged for public use in the 1980s, but was met with strong opposition from Deaf communities in many countries (Lane et al 1996, Edwards 2005). However, since the beginning of the 21st century, hostility towards implants has lessened and they are increasingly accepted as an option in a range of possibilities for deaf children and adults. Despite increasing numbers of the Deaf community considering implants themselves, however, the continuing task of the Deaf community is to counter the conception of implants as ‘miracle cures’ for deafness (Lane et al 1996, Edwards 2005). Furthermore, the Deaf community needs to communicate to parents of deaf children that those with implants may still be perceived as d/Deaf, by both the community and themselves (Christiansen and Leigh 2002). This thesis explores the identities of a small group of cochlear implant users in New Zealand, and examines their involvement in both d/Deaf and hearing worlds. The narratives of my participants demonstrate some of the everyday difficulties that d/Deaf individuals, and their families, encounter in medical and health-care settings, along with educational and workplace settings. I draw on participants’ narratives that explain their relationship with both medicalised and cultural models of deafness, and with Deaf culture, decisions about implants, and perceptions of the effects and limits of cochlear implants. I argue that the identities of CI users in modern New Zealand society are influenced by a multiplicity of factors, including medicalised understandings of deafness, familial pressures, the embodied experiences of CI technology, and personal identity trajectories. Given that these individuals are navigating these multiple threads in the formation of their identities, I argue that, at this stage in their lives, the CI users in this study occupy a liminal position in regards to d/Deaf and hearing worlds. Furthermore, I posit that the medical model of deafness needs to be tempered with social and cultural views of both deafness and CIs, and that the voices of CI users themselves should be prominent in such debates. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, acknowledgements must go to my participants, to whom I am so grateful for their time, thoughts, and invaluable contributions. I continue to be blown away by their insightful reflexivity and their openness. I hope that this thesis honours them and honestly represents their experiences. I sincerely thank my primary supervisor, Catherine Trundle, for her constant support and guidance. I thank her for always pushing me to do my best work, and for her invaluable suggestions and input into my research. This thesis would not be quite the same without her recommendations and knowledge. Huge thanks also to my secondary supervisor, Rachel McKee. I thank her for her invaluable reading suggestions, discussions, useful inputs, and I am indebted to her extensive knowledge of the d/Deaf world. Lastly, I must also thank both Catherine and Rachel for their abilities to, without exception, make me feel more relaxed and confident in my work after each and every meeting. I could not have asked for better supervisors. Thanks must also go to my proof-readers – my mum, who has always been there to help. And to Jared, for his dedication in the last hour. I also must thank my dad for his willingness to print and bind this thesis on the last day, despite it being an unreasonable request. To Sam, for your never ending support, love and encouragement, and for your belief in me. This thesis, in all honesty, could not have happened without you – thank you for your social, emotional, and financial support, for enduring the emotional rollercoaster, and for making sure I was fed over the last weeks. For putting up with me unconditionally, I cannot thank you enough. Lastly, to my parents, I would not be where I am today if it were not for you. Thank you for always being my biggest supporters and encouragers, no matter what my decision or direction. I must thank you especially for the numerous ways you have backed me over the last five years throughout my university education – it wouldn’t have been possible without you. I am forever grateful for your belief in me, for always knowing what to say, and for your love. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................... iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................... iv CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTIONS ...................................................................................................... 1 THE IMPORTANCE OF WORDS: THE DIFFERENCE bETWEEN DEAF AND DEAF ........................................................ 4 THE POLITICS OF DEAFNESS ........................................................................................................................ 5 DIFFERENTIATING bETWEEN TWO WORLDS: THE SOCIAL SPACES OF D/DEAF AND HEARING WORLDS ...................... 7 COCHLEAR IMPLANTS ................................................................................................................................ 8 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................ 12 CHAPTER OUTLINES ................................................................................................................................ 17 CHAPTER TWO: THEORISING DEAF EXPERIENCES, BODIES AND SUBJECTIVITIES .............................. 19 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 19 UNDERLYING QUESTIONS AND DISCIPLINARY APPROACH ............................................................................... 19 THEORISING IDENTITY ............................................................................................................................. 21 NARRATIVES OF IDENTITY ........................................................................................................................ 23 LIMINAL IDENTITIES ................................................................................................................................ 26 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................................... 28 CHAPTER THREE: DECISIONS ........................................................................................................... 29 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 29 TECHNOLOGY AND NORMALITY: DECISIONS ABOUT COCHLEAR IMPLANTS ......................................................... 30 ‘THE LIMITS OF MY LANGUAGE MEAN THE LIMITS OF MY WORLD’: THE IMPORTANCE OF (SPOKEN) LANGUAGE ....... 36 MAINSTREAM DESIRABILITY: DECISIONS ABOUT EDUCATION .......................................................................... 41 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................................... 44 CHAPTER FOUR: NEGOTIATING LIFE WITH A COCHLEAR IMPLANT – THE EMBODIMENT OF TECHNOLOGY ................................................................................................................................. 45 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 45 THE TECHNICAL FRAGILITY OF COCHLEAR IMPLANTS ...................................................................................... 46 ‘IT’S SO HARD THIS HEARING THING’ ........................................................................................................ 48 THE SOCIAL WORLDS OF COCHLEAR IMPLANT USERS .................................................................................... 51 iv ‘I CAN’T QUITE IMAGINE LIFE WITHOUT IT’ ................................................................................................ 53 (MIS)UNDERSTANDINGS OF COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND DEAFNESS IN MAINSTREAM SOCIETY ................................ 54 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................................... 56 CHAPTER FIVE: NARRATIVES OF “CHOICE”: PROBLEMATISING THE IDEAL ....................................... 57 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 57 THEORISING CHOICE AND ITS VALUE IN MODERNITY ....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Exploration of the Word Deaf Rachel Fearon (Linguistics)
    Diffusion: the UCLan Journal of Undergraduate Research Volume 6 Issue 1 (June 2013) PEJORISED OR AMELIORATED? AN EXPLORATION OF THE WORD DEAF RACHEL FEARON (LINGUISTICS) Abstract: Since the recognition of British Sign Language in 2003 and the denunciation in 2010 of the 1880 decision to ban sign language in deaf education, the Deaf community has taken a positive move forward as a linguistic minority. This study explores the sense relations of the word deaf through a consideration of (a) quantitative data from a questionnaire study, (b) interviews and correspondence with academics in the field of deaf studies. The paper aims to demonstrate how the concept of the term deaf has changed and proposes that the cultural definition of deafness, Deaf (with capital ‘D’), representing a culture and linguistic minority rather than a disability (in essence Deafhood), needs to be included in the dictionary. This addition would serve to ameliorate the word deaf and provide a permanent, mainstream reminder of the positive sense relations of the word d/Deaf. For the purpose of this article, d/Deaf refers to both audiologically and culturally deaf people. Pejorisation is the process in which over time a word acquires negative meaning and amelioration is a process in which a word regains a positive meaning. Keywords: Pejoration, Amelioration, d/Deaf, H/hearing, Deafhood, Social Model, Medical Model, Cultro-linguistic model. Introduction In Milan in 1880, at the International Congress on Education of the Deaf, a pivotal decision was made to introduce an oral education system, in which signing was forbidden. This resulted in a negative semantic prosody of the word deaf, oppressing d/Deaf people and their freedom to communicate with sign language.
    [Show full text]
  • Predictors of Depressive Symptoms in Persons with Deafness and Hearing Loss Jill Friedman, M.S
    Predictors of Depression 1 PREDICTORS OF DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS IN PERSONS WITH DEAFNESS AND HEARING LOSS A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Drexel University by Jill Friedman In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Drexel University April 2008 Predictors of Depression 2 ABSTRACT Predictors of Depressive Symptoms in Persons with Deafness and Hearing Loss Jill Friedman, M.S. Arthur M. Nezu, Ph.D., ABPP To date, there are very few studies that that have assessed predictors of depression in persons with deafness and hearing loss. The present study addressed this fundamental gap in the literature by predicting depressive symptoms with the following two constructs: loneliness and problem-solving coping. Just as loneliness and problem solving are thought to be important in predicting depressive symptoms in the hearing, it was hypothesized that these constructs would also be important predictors of depressive symptoms in the deaf and hard-of-hearing. The literature, while inconsistent, suggests that objective severity of one’s disability, speech discrimination, and the number of years one is deaf or hard-of-hearing, is related to psychopathology. This study included these factors as covariates. One hundred and twenty six women from the Drexel University Department of Otolaryngology completed a series of self-report questionnaires. The results indicated that loneliness was a significant, positive predictor of depressive symptoms. Additionally, the results indicated that problem solving was a significant, inverse predictor of depressive symptoms. A series of correlations designed to deconstruct the relationship between problem-solving and depression revealed a significant relationship between depressive symptoms and negative problem orientation, impulsiveness/carelessness style, and avoidance style.
    [Show full text]
  • Deaf, Diverse, and Distinct Enhancing Diversity at Gallaudet University Through Strategic Change: Implications for Higher Education
    Deaf, Diverse, and Distinct Enhancing Diversity at Gallaudet University Through Strategic Change: Implications for Higher Education I. King Jordan, Ph.D. President's and Provost's Diversity Lecture and Cultural Arts Series Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio January 26, 2006 Good afternoon. First, I want to thank President Holbrook and Provost Snyder for inviting me to speak as part of this year's Diversity Lecture and Cultural Arts Series. I am deeply honored to be included among the distinguished men and women who have given addresses during this wonderful series. It is a great pleasure to be here. I am also pleased to be here because I know that Ohio State University has long recognized disability as an aspect of human diversity. While preparing my presentation, I visited OSU's diversity website and saw that the link to disability identifies the intent "to remove physical and attitudinal barriers." I also found on the ADA coordinator's site that "…the office was created to guide the university's efforts to move beyond compliance and toward seamless access." These proactive commitments fit perfectly with what I will talk about this afternoon. I have chosen five themes as the focus of my remarks: 1. Disability from a diversity perspective 2. Diversity within the deaf community 3. The intersection of disability and other areas of diversity 4. Strategic change as the key to enhancing diversity-and the unique challenges involved in achieving this change 5. Gallaudet as a "case study" - how we are addressing these four areas, progress made, work remaining to be done, and thoughts about implications for higher education and for our nation Most of you know that throughout our history, people with disabilities have been viewed primarily from the perspective of their limitations-what they…or we… cannot do.
    [Show full text]
  • Intercultural Intervention in Bi-Cultural Family Contexts with Deaf and Hearing Members: A
    Intercultural Intervention in Bi-Cultural Family Contexts with Deaf and Hearing Members: A Thematic Analysis of Deaf Cultural Identity by Anita-Hosanna Kangabe Memoir submitted to the School of Social Work as part of the Master of Social Work Program Under the supervision of Marjorie Silverman University of Ottawa August 2019 Acknowledgements I wouldn’t have been able to complete this long journey without the endless support, encouragement and guidance of those closest to me. There are a few people I’d like to thank, for I couldn’t have done this without you. Dr. Marjorie Silverman, I appreciate all of the constant guidance, the time and the remarkable supervision you’ve given me. You’ve taught me so much, have helped me to believe in myself and to challenge myself. To my beloved parents, thank you for your unconditional love. Knowing that I’ve made you proud is everything to me. My fiancé, Romeo, you have been by my side every step of the way. I am forever grateful to you for your loving support. And to my sister Jocy, brothers Benjamin, Gilbert, Adelin and Orchide; I dedicate this work to you. You all hold a special place in my heart. Thank you to my maker, my God. i Abstract This exploratory research aims to analyse the applicability of intercultural approaches in family contexts with both hearing and deaf members. The study examines different perspectives of deafness, challenging the over-medicalization of deafness and seeking to review accessibility in practice. We discover alternatives through the innovative use of intercultural intervention outside of its usual ethno-cultural context where, instead, Deaf culture is concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Aesthetics, Culture, Power Critical Deaf Pedagogy and ASL Video-Publications As Resistance-To-Audism in Deaf Education and Research
    Critical Education Volume 11 Number 15 October 1, 2020 ISSN 1920-4175 Aesthetics, Culture, Power Critical Deaf Pedagogy and ASL Video-publications as Resistance-to-Audism in Deaf Education and Research Michael Skyer Laura Cochell University of Rochester Citation: Skyer, M., & Cochell, L. (2020). Aesthetics, culture, power: Critical deaf pedagogy and ASL video-publications as resistance-to-audism in deaf education and research. Critical Education, 11(15), 1-25. Retrieved from: http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/criticaled/article/view/186497 Abstract From a critical pedagogy standpoint, we examined a bilingual (American Sign Language [ASL] and English) video-publication titled “Seizing Academic Power.” The video-publication explores interactions of power and Knowledge in deaf education and research and proposes tools to subvert ableism and deficit ideologies within them. By centralizing multiple visuospatial modalities, the video-publication’s medium is also its message. Qualitative data were produced and analyzed via structured coding cycles then interpreted through two theoretical frameworKs focused on culture and aesthetics in critical pedagogy. Our analysis highlights conflicts at the nexus of ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology of deaf education and research. Findings reveal how deaf students gain and develop critical consciousness within the classroom, depending on their teachers’ conceptions of marginalized cultures, use of signed languages, and multimodal Knowledge, all of which modulate power and ethics in deaf pedagogy and research about it. Our study concludes with implications for ASL video-publications for teacher-training in deaf higher education and in research production and dissemination. Readers are free to copy, display, and distribute this article, as long as the work is attributed to the author(s) and Critical Education, it is distributed for non-commercial purposes only, and no alteration or transformation is made in the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Cochlear Implants – Ethics and Choices∗ 1
    CULTURE – SOCIETY – EDUCATION NO. 2 (14) 2018 POZNAŃ Piotr Tomaszewski University of Warsaw Cochlear implants – ethics and choices∗ 1 KEYWORDS ABSTRACT cochlear implants, sign language, This study discusses the ethical issue of the development spoken language, deaf culture, of hearing technology in the form of cochlear implants that identity, bimodal bilingual are used by an ever-growing number of deaf and hard of hearing people. The development of this kind of technol- ogy has progressed so quickly all over the world, includ- ing Poland, that the deafness paradigms have drastically changed. This may affect, to a greater or lesser degree, not only the implementation of early support programmes, but also the image of the Deaf communities using their respec- tive sign languages on a daily basis. It is therefore neces- sary to create an eclectic model of education for deaf and hard of hearing people which would allow for the ethi- cal option to integrate the conflicting approaches on the proper procedure for deciding on the language (spoken or signed) and the culture (the hearing or the Deaf one) for the development of deaf and hard of hearing students with cochlear implants or hearing aids. Adam Mickiewicz University Press, pp. 145-170 ISSN 2300-0422. DOI 10.14746/kse.2018.14.13 (...) a fascination with new technologies should not replace sound educational or psychological princi- ples, ethical practice, or socially agreeable and peaceful human interaction. Hintermair, Albertini (2005: 190) ∗ This work was subsidized from the funds for the Statutory Research of the Faculty of Psycho- logy. UW (BST 186800-43/2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Cochlear Implant Services: Reflections from Parents and (Re)Habilitation Professionals
    University of Northern Colorado Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC Dissertations Student Research 12-2020 Rural Cochlear Implant Services: Reflections rF om Parents and (Re)Habilitation Professionals Natalie J. Austin Follow this and additional works at: https://digscholarship.unco.edu/dissertations Recommended Citation Austin, Natalie J., "Rural Cochlear Implant Services: Reflections rF om Parents and (Re)Habilitation Professionals" (2020). Dissertations. 729. https://digscholarship.unco.edu/dissertations/729 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO Greeley, Colorado The Graduate School RURAL COCHLEAR IMPLANT SERVICES: REFLECTIONS FROM PARENTS AND (RE)HABILITATION PROFESSIONALS A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Natalie J. Austin College of Education and Behavioral Sciences School of Special Education December 2020 This Dissertation by: Natalie J. Austin Entitled: Rural Cochlear Implant Services: Reflections from Parents and (Re)Habilitation Professionals has been approved as meeting the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the College of Education and Behavioral Sciences in the School of Special Education. Accepted by the Doctoral Committee John L. Luckner, Ed.D., Co-Research Advisor Sandy K. Bowen, Ph.D., Co-Research Advisor Jackie Davis, Ph.D., Committee Member Julie A. Hanks, Ed.D., CCC-SLP, Faculty Representative Date of Dissertation Defense Accepted by the Graduate School Jeri-Anne Lyons, PhD Associate Vice President for Research Dean Graduate School ABSTRACT Austin, Natalie J.
    [Show full text]
  • Autoethnography of a Hard of Hearing Traveler Dhruv Jain, Audrey Desjardins, Leah Findlater, Jon E
    Autoethnography of a Hard of Hearing Traveler Dhruv Jain, Audrey Desjardins, Leah Findlater, Jon E. Froehlich University of Washington, Seattle, WA [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT (where external cues such as blindness or a physical Travel experiences offer a diverse view into an individual’s impairment signify a disability)—culminating in travel interactions with different cultures, societies, and places. In guides [20,35,40], policy guidelines [20,35,40], and this paper, we present a 2.5-year autoethnographic travel technology recommendations [33,40]. In contrast, only a few account of a hard of hearing individual—Jain. Through studies have focused on the DHH population [18,27,51], of retrospective journals and field notes, we reveal the tensions which most focuses on social interactions in multinational and nuances in his travel, including the magnified difficulty conferences [18,51]. We found only two examples that of social conversations, issues with navigating unfamiliar examine more varied contexts: Kusters’ [27] field environments and cultural contexts, and changes in the observation of social spaces of DHH travelers in Mumbai relationship to personal assistive technologies. By exploring intercity trains and Zajadacz et al.’s [56] survey of 191 Polish the longitudinal travel experiences of a single individual, we DHH backpackers about their travel activities. These works uncover evocative and personal insights rarely available helped uncover social motivations for travel (e.g., ability to through participant-based research methods. Based on these interact with other DHH people) and infrastructure barriers lived experiences and post hoc reflections, we present two (e.g., lack of visual guides) to travel in specific areas [27,56].
    [Show full text]
  • Deaf Culture & Community
    tm Deaf Culture & Community What is Deaf Culture? The American Deaf community values American Sign Language as the core of a culturally Deaf identity. Through ASL, members are given a unique medium for personal expression, a spatial and visual language that does not require the use of sound and emphasizes hands, faces, bodies and eyes. Members of this community share a common history, values, mor- als and experiences. Deaf individuals come from diverse backgrounds and influences, and as a result that variation is reflected in the community. Different types of sign systems are used to varying degrees, and the Deaf community welcomes this variety. Deaf culture focuses on the stimulation of the eyes and the enhanced vi- sual perceptiveness of Deaf individuals. This has resulted in a great history of rich ASL literature and storytelling. The oral tradition of storytelling has allowed members of the Deaf community to pass down the histories of great Deaf men and women, providing for Deaf children access to role models that enable them to feel rooted in history, while also giving them mentors with common experiences. The American Deaf community is different from many thriving cultural groups around the world because it is not commonly recognized as dis- tinct and discrete. Most people are born within an existing cultural group gaining direct access to their family and community cultural traditions, norms and values that are passed down from parent to child. Most deaf children, on the other hand, are born to hearing parents. For most Deaf children transmission of the culture of the family or that of the deaf com- munity does not automatically occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Deaf Communities and the Culture of Language
    23 Aug 2002 13:1 AR AR169-AN31-04.tex AR169-AN31-04.sgm LaTeX2e(2002/01/18) P1: IBC 10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.020402.101302 Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2002. 31:69–97 doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.020402.101302 Copyright c 2002 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved First published online! as a Review in Advance on June 26, 2002 SIGNS OF THEIR TIMES: Deaf Communities and the Culture of Language Richard J. Senghas1 and Leila Monaghan2 1Sonoma State University, Department of Anthropology/Linguistics, 1801 East Cotati Avenue, Rohnert Park, California 94928-3609; email: [email protected] 2Temple University, Department of Anthropology, 1115 West Berks Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122; email: [email protected] Key Words sign language, deafness, linguistic communities, Deaf culture ■ Abstract Because of their deafness, deaf people have been marked as different and treated problematically by their hearing societies. Until 25 years ago, academic literature addressing deafness typically described deafness as pathology, focusing on cures or mitigation of the perceived handicap. In ethnographic accounts, interactions involving deaf people are sometimes presented as examples of how communities treat atypical members. Recently, studies of deafness have adopted more complex sociocul- tural perspectives, raising issues of community identity, formation and maintenance, and language ideology. Anthropological researchers have approached the study of d/Deaf communities from at least three useful angles. The first, focusing on the history of these communities, demonstrates that the current issues have roots in the past, including the central role of education in the creation and maintenance of communities. A second approach cen- ters on emic perspectives, drawing on the voices of community members themselves and accounts of ethnographers.
    [Show full text]
  • Quest for a Deaf Child: Ethics and Genetics Teresa Blankmeyer Burke
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of New Mexico University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Philosophy ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 7-2-2011 Quest for a Deaf Child: Ethics and Genetics Teresa Blankmeyer Burke Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/phil_etds Recommended Citation Burke, Teresa Blankmeyer. "Quest for a Deaf Child: Ethics and Genetics." (2011). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/phil_etds/14 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. QUEST FOR A DEAF CHILD: ETHICS AND GENETICS BY TERESA BLANKMEYER BURKE B.A., Biology, Ethics & Society, Mills College, 1993 M.A., Philosophy, The University of New Mexico, 2003 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Philosophy The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico May, 2011 iii Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my family. To my parents, Richard and Carol Blankmeyer, for the love, support, and encouragement they have shown me through the years, and for raising me in a home where books and ideas were central. To my children, Austin Burke and Hypatia Venerable, for waiting SDWLHQWO\VRPDQ\WLPHVZKLOHPRPILQLVKHGWKLV³RQHODVWVHQWHQFH´IRU teaching me about parenting as I was writing about it, and for the questions ± oh the questions! And to Lloyd, who listened, ran errands, cooked, cleaned, hosted visitors, DQGFDUSRROHGGXULQJDOOWKRVHWLPHVZKHQ,QHHGHG³MXVWDIHZPRUHKRXUV´DQG who never complained.
    [Show full text]
  • Empowering the Deaf. Let the Deaf Be Deaf
    Downloaded from jech.bmj.com on 28 October 2008 Empowering the deaf. Let the deaf be deaf Irma M Munoz-Baell and M Teresa Ruiz J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54;40-44 doi:10.1136/jech.54.1.40 Updated information and services can be found at: http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/54/1/40 These include: References This article cites 30 articles, 3 of which can be accessed free at: http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/54/1/40#BIBL 6 online articles that cite this article can be accessed at: http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/54/1/40#otherarticles Rapid responses You can respond to this article at: http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/eletter-submit/54/1/40 Email alerting Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the service top right corner of the article Notes To order reprints of this article go to: http://journals.bmj.com/cgi/reprintform To subscribe to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health go to: http://journals.bmj.com/subscriptions/ Downloaded from jech.bmj.com on 28 October 2008 40 J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:40–44 Empowering the deaf. Let the deaf be deaf Irma M Munoz-Baell, M Teresa Ruiz Abstract quence is, therefore, the rejection of the use of Deafness is often regarded as just a one sign language in schools. and only phenomenon. Accordingly, deaf However, an ever increasing number of deaf people are pictured as a unified body of people do not consider themselves to be handi- people who share a single problem.
    [Show full text]