DOCSLIB.ORG

Drought Continues Final Column from Water Supply Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Drought Continues Final Column from Water Supply Update UPDATEUPDATE PLACER COUNTY WATER AGENCY VOL 30 NO 1 FEBRUARY-MARCH 2015 IN THIS ISSUE: Drought Continues Final Column From Water Supply Update... Retiring GM... Story Below Page 2 Water Supply Update Early Season Storms Help, But Drought is Not Over s a wet December evolved into a dry January - in much the same pattern as a year ago - PCWA AwaterA planners remained hopeful that late winter and spring precipitation will ease local drought conditions. PCWA drought project manager Tony Firenzi said that December's significant storms put a dent in the drought, at least in Placer County, but that it appears likely the region may be headed into a fourth consecutive dry year. The 2014 calendar year brought 60 percent of average precipitation to local mountain watershed but last winter's snowpack was measured at just 10 percent of average. PCWA's allocation of water Pump Station and Restored River Channel from PG&E mountain reservoirs was PCWA’s American River Pump Station includes the pumphouse reduced to 71 percent of average. building, left, diversion channel along the river bank, center, and PCWA water users responded well to adjacent whitewater channel. the dry year challenge, Firenzi said. Treated water users reduced use by 17 per- cent and raw water users cut their use by A New Pump at the American River 33 percent. The reductions allowed more (Please See Drought, P. 3) nstallation of a powerful new pump is under way at the PCWA American River Pump Station near Auburn. The new pump has a capacity of 41 cubic feet of water per second (cfs) and will boost the station's capacity to 189 cfs. Drought Continues It is the sixth pump in the station, which was built with five pumps and By mid-January, Gov. Brown's designed for future expansion. statewide drought declaration and the The installation is budgeted at $3.5 million and is expected to be complete by this drought emergency declared last year summer. by the PCWA Board of Directors IIThe American River Pump Station opened in 2008. It diverts water from the river remained in effect. up the steep canyon wall and into the three-mile-long Auburn Tunnel to Ophir, where it PCWA water users are being can supply wide areas of Placer County. The station has proved to be especially valu- asked to reduce water use by 10 per- able in recent drought years. cent, with a goal of 20 percent, until River Channel Restoration the drought is over. The pump station included a restoration of the river to its natural channel after it For helpful water conservation had been diverted through a tunnel for 30 years (for the unbuilt Auburn Dam). Today's information, please see www.pcwa.net river includes PCWA's modern diversion structure that parallels a recreated whitewater or www.BeWaterSmart.info. channel suitable for rafting. General Manager’s Report Protecting Ralston By David A. Breninger PCWA Geared Up to Capture Storm Debris Last year's massive King Fire charred 97,000 acres of forest lands Retiring Manager Says in Placer and El Dorado counties, including about 40,000 acres of Thank You and Best Regards watershed on PCWA's Middle Fork American River Project. s my retirement date approaches, I've been The intensity of the fire on steep reflecting upon my 23 years of service as terrain along the Rubicon River left your general manager and my 48-year career in service to the pub- scars, barren hillsides and the poten- lic. I can honestly say my tenure here at PCWA has been the high- tial for massive runoff of fire debris light of my professional career. into the river. PCWA officials deter- I have had the privilege to work with 15 different community leaders from mined that action must be taken across Placer County who have served on your Board of Directors. I have been before winter rains moved in. The PCWA Board of Directors Aimpressed with their personal dedication to you and their constituents countywide. A declared an emergency in September I'm proud to be associated with these high performance policy leaders. and contracted with Syblon Reid I have also had the pleasure to work with 19 different department heads, sev- Contractors of Folsom to activate an eral hundred employees and innumerable consultants and contractors. Both indi- emergency management project that vidually and collectively, all of these dedicated men and women have contributed would limit debris and damage at to the success and advancement of the agency. PCWA's Ralston Afterbay Reservoir. Highlights Listed Here are a few highlights of the things we have accomplished over the years: • We built the PCWA Business Center (in Auburn), a Power Division Facilities Center (in Foresthill), and established a Water Division Facilities Center (in Auburn). Each of these assures the agency's ability to centralize services and enhance efficiencies. • We constructed the American River and Ophir Log booms are in place at The PCWA Business Center pump station projects, enabling PCWA to pump our Opened in 1994 area-of-origin water from the river to benefit the land, Ralston Afterbay Reservoir people, and prosperity of western Placer County. Particularly noteworthy is that our American River Pump Station Project included the Log booms and grappling equip- restoration of the North Fork American River to return to flowing in its natural channel ment were placed across the reservoir (after nearly a half-mile of the river had been diverted by federal officials for decades to contain and remove logs that might through a bypass tunnel where they one day envisioned an Auburn Dam). wash down the river. Equipment was • We successfully completed the federal relicensing process of our Middle Fork installed to pass logs over or around American River Hydroelectric Project (which was built under an original 50-year license Ralston Dam without damaging it. issued to the agency in 1963). Soil erosion on the hillsides has • We formed the Middle Fork Project Finance Authority, a joint venture of PCWA caused a continued problem with sed- with our partners at the County of Placer, to manage energy sales of PCWA’s Middle Fork imentation washing down the river American River Project. and entering the reservoir. Plans are • We improved reliability and operational efficiencies of our Power System and Water now being finalized for a sediment System; constructed new water plants, tanks, and pipelines; and conducted extensive removal project later this year. renewal and replacement of aging infrastructure of our canal and treated water systems. The big early December storms, • We supported stewardship of our county's watersheds (and especially in the although powerful, caused erosion but American River watershed severely burned in the recent disastrous King Fire and earlier by no significant tree movement. With the Star Fire). potential for more storms, the emer- • We managed years of drought in partnership with our customers to achieve signifi- gency remediation project is planned cant water use reduction and conservation. to continue through the current rain- • We established an organizational team culture dedicated to effective and efficient fall season. public service. Agency officials said the potential I thank the Board of Directors for allowing me the opportunity to work for them, to for erosion and debris from the heavi- lead our team, and to serve our customers. It has been my pleasure to serve. I extend my ly burned area will continue for sever- best regards to all and for the continued success of the Placer County Water Agency. al years. PAGE 2 • PCWA UPDATE Talking Canals A Hand Up Heads and Tails Linked Electronically PCWA Employees Pitch In for Foster Students Operation of canals has always been a balancing act for oing to college can be tough for young people who PCWA canal operators. Enough water has to flow through canals have grown up as foster children and are now out on to meet the needs of customers at the very ends, while keeping their own, with no families to rely on. unused water to a minimum. GGOver the holidays, PCWA employees Now in a pilot project planned for the Upper Greeley Canal pitched in to make education a little more in Newcastle, electronic communication will let the head of the affordable to young people who are part of canal know how the tail is doing, so that flows can be automati- a Sierra College program that helps former cally adjusted. foster youths. The technology has been used in the water industry, espe- Under the leadership of Diane Ott, a cially in large agricultural areas, but is new to the water agency, customer services representative, employees says PCWA Water Management Specialist Randy Cox. contributed more than $1500, which Ott “We feel it is going and co-worker Carrie Sahol used to pur- to allow us to maintain chase gift cards and computer flash drives Diane Ott good customer service for the students. while reducing unused PCWA employees have supported numerous causes and water at the end of the programs over the years; this their second contribution to the canal,” said Cox, who foster youth program, after raising $1000 a year earlier. added that the technolo- In a thank-you note, Bill Halldin, president of the Sierra gy could be added to College Board of Trustees, wrote, “Because of you and so other PCWA canals in many in our community, Sierra College is well-known among the future. foster youth as a great place to go to college.” PCWA already uses Said Ott, “We have great people here and they really came 13 electronic monitoring through.” stations on ends of canals around the East Loomis Basin.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Great New Year's Flood of 1997 in Northern California
    The Great New Year's Flood of 1997 in Northern California by Maurice Roos' The New Year's flood of 1997 was probably the largest in the 90-year Northern California record which begins in 1906. It was notable in the intensity, volume of flood water, and the areal extent from the Oregon border down to the southern end of the Sierra. Many new flood records were set. This was a classic orographic event with warm moist winds from the southwest blowing over the Sierra Nevada and dumping amazing amounts of rain at the middle and high elevations, especially over a 3 day period centered on New Year's Day. The sheer volume of runoff exceeded the flood control capacity of Don Pedro Dam on the Tuolumne River and Millerton Reservoir on the upper San Joaquin River with large spills of excess water. Most of the other large dams in northern California were full or nearly full at the end of the storms. Amounts of rain at lower elevations were not unusual. For example, downtown Sacramento in the middle of the Central Valley had 3.7 inches during the week from December 26 through January 2. But Blue Canyon, at the one-mile elevation between Sacramento and Reno, had over 30 inches, an orographic ratio of over 8, far more than the usual 3 to 4 for most storms. Many Valley folks could not understand that there was a problem because they were not seeing a lot of rain. Meanwhile, the entire northern Sierra was observing 20 inches, some 40 percent of average annual precipitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7: Alternative Evaluation
    Chapter 7 Alternative Evaluation The potential for water quality improvements in the Delta was evaluated in terms of the position of X2 and the resulting Delta outflows. Shifting X2 downstream improves the habitat for Delta smelt and reduces water quality stress for other species, including salmonids. X2 is a Delta management tool; it is defined as the distance in kilometers from the Golden Gate Bridge to the location where the tidally averaged near-bottom salinity in the Delta measures 2 parts per thousand (ppt). East of X2, water becomes progressively fresher, and west of X2 the water becomes more saline, until it reaches the ocean, which has a salinity of approximately 35 ppt. Habitat quality in the Delta is degraded when the salinity in the Delta increases. The highest salinities occur during the fall and early winter, when Delta outflow is at its lowest. Water quality degradation is most pronounced in Dry and Critical years. Figure 7-8 shows the change in the average X2 positions during September and October in Dry and Critical years for each of the alternatives. Alternative C performs best in terms of the shift in the location of X2 by 0.3 to 1.0 kilometer (km) seaward, followed by Alternative B and then Alternative A. Alternative D provides the least water quality benefit, with an average shift of 1 km to the east in July through August, and a 0.3 km shift in September through November. Shifting X2 requires a significant quantity of water. Releases from Sites Reservoir to improve Delta environmental water quality range from 174 TAF/yr under Alternative D up to 242 TAF/yr under Alternative C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genesis of the Placer County Water Agency
    a Heritage of Water: The Golden Anniversary of the Placer County Water Agency 1957-2007 Prepared by the Water Education Foundation Placer County History Book WEB1 9/10/2007, 3:08 PM Credits This book was prepared and published by the Water Education Foundation in conjunction with the Placer County Water Agency. The book tells the story of Placer County water from its role in the Gold Rush to the formation of the Placer County Water Agency, which has managed the county’s water resources for 50 years. Editor: Sue McClurg Authors: Ryan McCarthy, Janet Dunbar Fonseca, Ed Tiedemann, Ed Horton, Cheri Sprunck, Dave Breninger and Einar L. Maisch Design and Layout: Graphic Communications Printing: Paul Baker Printing Photos: Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley • William Briner • California State Archives (F3757:3) • California State Library • California State Parks – Auburn State Recreation Area Collection • Dave Carter • City of Rocklin • Placer County Water Agency • Ryan Salm/Sierra Sun • Special Collections, University of California, Davis • U.S. Bureau of Reclamation • USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service) • U.S. National Forest Campground Guide • Karina Williams/Lincoln News Messenger • Bill Wilson On the cover: Hell Hole Reservoir (top) and building the Middle Fork Project PLACER COUNTY WATER AGENCY P.O. Box 6570 717 K Street, Suite 317 144 Ferguson Road Sacramento, CA 95814 Auburn, CA 95604 (916) 444-6240 (530) 823-4850 www.watereducation.org www.pcwa.net Copyright 2007 by Water Education Foundation • All rights reserved ISBN 1-893246-97-3 2 Placer County History Book WEB2 9/10/2007, 3:09 PM Foreword by David A.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FOLSOM POWERHOUSE NO. 1 1895 National Historic Mechanical
    THE FOLSOM POWERHOUSE NO. 1 1895 National Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmark The American Society of Mechanical Engineers September 12, 1976 FACTUAL DATA ON AMERICAN RIVER DIVISION The American River Division, a part of the Central Valley Project, provides water for irrigation, municipal and industrial use, hydroelectric power, recreation, and flood control through a system of dams, canals, and powerplants. The Division includes Folsom and Sly Park Units, both in operation, and Auburn-Folsom South Unit in construction stage. FOLSOM UNIT consists of Folsom Dam, Lake, AUBURN-FOLSOM SOUTH UNIT, authorized in and Powerplant, Nimbus Dam, Lake Natoma, and 1986, will provide agricultural and municipal and Nimbus Powerplant on the American River. The industrial water supplies for Placer, El Dorado, Folsom Unit was added to the Central Valley Project Sacramento, and San Joaquin Counties, together with by Congressional authorization in 1949. hydroelectric power, flood control, fish protection, and new recreational facilities. Principal features of the Unit will be Auburn Dam, Powerplant and Reservoir, FOLSOM DAM AND FOLSOM LAKE. Folsom Dam, the Folsom South Canal, and Sugar Pine and County below a drainage area of 1,875 square miles, was Line Dams and Reservoirs. constructed by the Corps of Engineers and upon completion was transferred to the Bureau of AUBURN DAM presently under construction will Reclamation for coordinated operation as an integral be a 700-foot-high, concrete thin arch structure, with part of the Central Valley Project. The dam has a a crest length of 4,000 feet. The dam will create the concrete main river section with a height of 340 feet 2.4 million acre-foot Auburn Reservoir.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW of SEISMIC HAZARD ISSUES ASSOCIATED with the AUBURN DAM PROJECT, SIERRA NEVADA FOOTHILLS, CALIFORNIA USGS Auburn Project Review Team: D.P
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Review of seismic-hazard issues associated with the Auburn Dam project, Sierra Nevada foothills, California By USGS Auburn Project Review Team1 Open File Report 96-0011 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. JD.P. Schwartz, W.B. Joyner, R.S. Stein, R.D. Brown, A.F. McGarr, S.H. Hickman, and W.H. Bakun, all at 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 1996 REVIEW OF SEISMIC HAZARD ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE AUBURN DAM PROJECT, SIERRA NEVADA FOOTHILLS, CALIFORNIA USGS Auburn Project Review Team: D.P. Schwartz, W.B. Joyner, R.S. Stein, R.D. Brown, A.F. McGarr, S.H. Hickman, and W.H. Bakun SUMMARY The U.S. Geological Survey was requested by the U.S. Department of the Interior to review the design values and the issue of reservoir-induced seismicity for a concrete gravity dam near the site of the previously-proposed Auburn Dam in the western foothills of the Sierra Nevada, central California. The dam is being planned as a flood-control-only dam with the possibility of conversion to a permanent water-storage facility. As a basis for planning studies the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is using the same design values approved by the Secretary of the Interior in 1979 for the original Auburn Dam.
    [Show full text]
  • The Uneasy Relationship Between Folsom Dam and the City of Sacramento
    The Uneasy Relationship between Folsom Dam and the City of Sacramento Terry M. Sullivan, P.E. Geotechnical/Structural Branch Chief, Eastern Division Risk Management Center U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Purdue Geotechnical Society Workshop 26 April 2019 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® The Story • Folsom Dam is located about 20 miles upstream of Sacramento, California. • Folsom Dam in its current configuration provides robust flood risk reduction for frequent to infrequent hydrologic events. But not rare events. • Another dam, Auburn Dam, was partially constructed upstream of Folsom Dam, and it would have greatly increased flood storage capacity upstream of Sacramento on the American River. But it was never completed. • The primary vulnerability for Sacramento’s levees is overtopping. • Pressure from California public and agricultural interests to increase water supply and irrigation is considerable. They want to pass as little water as possible from dams. This pressure is opposed by the need to maintain flood storage capacity. • An overtopping of the levees in Sacramento by river floods may be expected to result in hundreds to thousands of deaths. Such a flood would be a 1 in a 300 event. • As a result, Sacramento has had to develop highly detailed flood warning and evacuation plans. PGS-2 BUILDING STRONG® Presentation Overview . The geography of the dam, the rivers and the city . Folsom Dam . Auburn Dam . Overview of Sacramento’s flood protection system . H&H Hazard Forecasting . Risk Assessment – with a focus on one Potential Failure Mode (PFM) . Sacramento’s Emergency Plans (Evacuation) PGS-3 BUILDING STRONG® Sacramento Location PGS-4 BUILDING STRONG® Folsom Dam Location Relative to Sacramento Flood Control Features PGS-5 BUILDING STRONG® North Fork American River Planned Flood Control Features PGS-6 BUILDING STRONG® Folsom Dam and Auxiliary Spillway • Completed in 1955 by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Trinity Dam Operating Criteria Trinity River Division Central Valley Project-California
    ·rRlNITY ~IVER BASIN us RESOURCE LIBRARY BR TRINITY COUNTY LIBRARY T7 WEAVERVILLE, CALIFORNIA 1979 (c.l) Trinity Dam Operating Criteria Trinity River Division Central Valley Project-California TRINITY COUNTY JULY 1979 TRINITY RIVER BASIN RESOURC E LIBRARY TRINITY RIVER DIVISION CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT CALIFORNIA Trinity Dam Operating Criteria Prepared for the Trinity River Basin Fish and Wildlife Task Force July 1979 United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region 1 ~ 7 5 122 R 1 W R 1 E 2 23° \ R 10 W ( T 38 N ----- ·-----]r------------r-CANADA ' I • I WA r NORTH ~ J SHINGTON ' \ ' DAKOTA ) ___ 1 • \.-.. ..-- .. J, ': M 0 N TAN A !___ - ----\ ' \ souTH : i ,----- - ~ ~~ ,o. 0 R EGON ( ,_---, : DAKOTA I : IOAHo 1 I __ __ \ \~' I W YOMING ·----- ~ -- -----, ___ , ,I \ ~ ~u I ~ 0 ; ------1 , NEBRASKA ', 1\ ~ I I ·--------'--, ~ I NEVA 1' 1: 0 ~1 : t------- -'.) I I J \_ DA UTAH COLORADO: ANSAS ' ~,J t -+- ---1--- .. - ', : : I K .\ ~ I . ---- .... ~ ' I 4!< l o ' ------·------ -- -~----- ', ~ -r' "::: rJ A ~ '!> ','\_r) i t---! OKLAHOMA\ -:- . I , , r/ / ;' ARIZONA I' NEW MEXICO. L ______ 1_ MALIN-ROUND MOUNTAIN 500 KV ~ . ' ,... 36 : , I l PACIFIC NW-PAC/FIC SW INTERTIE ---, ' ' ', I, ---~-E~~'-;:--·;;::<_-'r EX A_(S ---i- - ~ ~ - t \. .. _;··-....., ~ CLAIR ENGLE LAKE IN 0 EX M A P '._\_ ~.:.. (__j ~ ) I I / \ I - BUREAU OF RECLAMATION HASTAL~l WHISKEYTOWN-SHASTA( rr TRINITY [NAT . lj r COMPLETED OR AUTHORIZED WORKS 34 TRINITY DAM & POWERP~LANT~- ? ) RECrATION AREAS (~ ,- DAM AND RESERVOIR LEWISTON LAKE TRIINir/cARR 230 KV ? 0 I <=::? r ~-~~- _./ TUNNEL ~<";:1 r ~ -+ ---< - .r') d,):3_ -}N , ··- •J?:y,--.___ N CONDUIT - ~~ wcAv~~VIL' 7 __r~\.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Valley Project, Folsom and Sly Park Unit, California
    The Central Valley Project The American River Division The Folsom and Sly Park Units The Auburn-Folsom South Unit Wm. Joe Simonds Bureau of Reclamation History Program Denver, Colorado 1994 Reformatted, Edited, and Reprinted: January 2010 by Brit Storey Table of Contents Table of Contents..............................................................1 The American River Division ....................................................2 The Folsom and Sly Park Units.............................................2 The Auburn-Folsom South Unit ............................................3 Project Location.........................................................3 Historic Setting .........................................................4 Project Authorization.....................................................7 Construction History .....................................................8 Folsom and Sly Park Units ..........................................8 Auburn Folsom South Unit .........................................16 Post Construction History ................................................20 Settlement of Project Lands ...............................................22 Uses of Project Water ...................................................23 Conclusion............................................................25 About the Author .............................................................26 Bibliography ................................................................27 Manuscript and Archival Collections .......................................27
    [Show full text]
  • Cvp Overview
    Central Valley Project Overview Eric A. Stene Bureau of Reclamation Table Of Contents The Central Valley Project ......................................................2 About the Author .............................................................15 Bibliography ................................................................16 Archival and Manuscript Collections .......................................16 Government Documents .................................................16 Books ................................................................17 Articles...............................................................17 Interviews.............................................................17 Dissertations...........................................................17 Other ................................................................17 Index ......................................................................18 1 The Central Valley Project Throughout his political life, Thomas Jefferson contended the United States was an agriculturally based society. Agriculture may be king, but compared to the queen, Mother Nature, it is a weak monarch. Nature consistently proves to mankind who really controls the realm. The Central Valley of California is a magnificent example of this. The Sacramento River watershed receives two-thirds to three-quarters of northern California's precipitation though it only has one-third to one-quarter of the land. The San Joaquin River watershed occupies two- thirds to three-quarter of northern California's land,
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Nevada, California
    ffiOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 85 December 1950 SIERRA NEVADA, CALIFORNIA By F. A. Johnson UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director WASHINGTON, D. C. SOME RESERVOIR SITES IN THE SIERRA NEVADA, CALIFORNIA By F. A. Johnson CONTENTS Page Page Introduction............................................... 3 Bear River drainage basin............................ 15 feather River drainage basin........................ 3 Rollins reservoir site, Bear River.............. 15 Greenville (Indian Valley) reservoir site, Garden Bar reservoir site, Bear River........ 16 Indian Creek.......................................... Waldo reservoir site, Dry Creek (Bear River American Valley reservoir site, Spanish drainage)............................................... 16 Creek................................................... American River drainage basin...................... 17 Grizzly Valley reservoir site, Grizzly French Meadows reservoir site, Middle Creek................................................... Fork American River.............................. 17 Clio reservoir site, Middle Fork Feather Rock Bound diversion and Buck Island Lake River................................................... reservoir sites, Rubicon River drainage Nelson Point reservoir site, Middle Fork basin.................................................... 18 Feather River........................................ Loon Lake Reservoir site, Gerle Creek........ 19 Bidwell Bar reservoir site, Middle Fork Gerle Creek reservoir
    [Show full text]
  • Auburn-Folsom South Unit Central Valley Project
    Auburn-Folsom South Unit Central Valley Project Technical Memorandum Project Description Review March 2006 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region AUBURN-FOLSOM SOUTH UNIT CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM PROJECT DESCRIPTION Conducted by: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region Division of Planning Technical Memorandum prepared by: March 2006 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND The Auburn-Folsom South Unit was authorized in September 1965 by Public Law 89-161 as an operationally and financially integrated part of the Central Valley Project (CVP). Authorized features of the Auburn-Folsom South Unit include in the following: • Auburn Dam, Reservoir, and Powerplant on the North Fork of the American River • Folsom South Canal • Sugar Pine Dam, Reservoir, and conveyance • County Line Dam, Reservoir, and conveyance Construction on the Auburn-Folsom South Unit was initiated in 1967. Sugar Pine Dam, Reservoir, and conveyance have been completed. Construction of the first two reaches of the Folsom South Canal, about 27 miles, was completed in 1973 but further construction has been suspended. Construction has not been initiated on the County Line Dam and associated features. Construction of the Auburn Dam portion of the Auburn-Folsom South Unit was deferred following an earthquake in 1975 near Oroville. In Section 209 of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 2005, the Secretary of the Interior was directed to complete a Special Report to update the costs and associated benefits of the Auburn-Folsom South Unit. PURPOSE AND SCOPE The primary purpose of this Technical Memorandum (TM) is to identify those project features included in the authorized Auburn-Folsom South Unit that would be applicable today if it were decided to continue with implementation of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Pump Station Project Public Access
    California Department of Parks and Recreation Gold Fields District Auburn SRA Public Access, Use and Facilities associated with the American River Pump Station/River Restoration Project The American River Pump Station Project is located on the North Fork of the American River at the Auburn Dam site within Auburn State Recreation Area. The project has three objectives: 1.) To provide permanent facilities for the Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) to convey its water entitlement to the Auburn Ravine Tunnel; 2.) To eliminate the safety issue with the Auburn Dam bypass tunnel; and 3.) To restore the river to its pre-construction channel to allow all of the beneficial uses of the river in what is now a de-watered channel, including recreation, navigation, fish passage and other beneficial uses. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) are the lead agencies for this project. This project was analyzed and approved through the American River Pump Station Project Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report which was completed in June 2002. Project Background Prior to the initiation of the construction of Auburn Dam, PCWA built a pump station on the NF American River to deliver water to the Auburn Ravine Tunnel and the PCWA service area. As part of the Dam construction the Reclamation entered into an agreement with PCWA to provide an interim pumping facility until the Dam was completed and PCWA could divert their water entitlements by gravity from the proposed Auburn Reservoir. Seasonal pumps (removed in the winter) were installed in the Canyon by Reclamation to allow PCWA to take water.
    [Show full text]