Identification and Characterization of Adhesive Proteins in Freshwater Mussels Towards the Development of Novel Bioadhesives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Identification and Characterization of Adhesive Proteins in Freshwater Mussels Towards the Development of Novel Bioadhesives Identification and characterization of adhesive proteins in freshwater mussels towards the development of novel bioadhesives by Judith Ng A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering University of Toronto c Copyright 2018 by Judith Ng Abstract Identification and characterization of adhesive proteins in freshwater mussels towards the development of novel bioadhesives Judith Ng Master of Applied Science Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering University of Toronto 2018 The European freshwater mollusk Dreissena bugensis (quagga mussel) adheres to a variety of underwater surfaces via the byssus, a proteinaceous anchor, from which threads are secreted. The threads terminate in small, disc-shaped adhesive plaques which have adapted to turbu- lent conditions with remarkable adhesive strength for their size. Top adhesive candidates that demonstrated evidence for an adhesive role were identified via LC-MS/MS and relative quan- tification of proteins between the mussel plaque and adhesive interface. For the first time, a top candidate for adhesive activity (Dbfp7) was isolated directly from the quagga mussel. We aim to incorporate relevant protein motifs from these proteins into peptide mimics and to recombi- nantly express Dbfp7, leading to the development of novel bioadhesives for medical and dental applications. Understanding the molecular mechanisms and proteins responsible for adhesion in freshwater mussels will provide a paradigm for medical adhesives which function reliably on wet tissue surfaces with minimal inflammation. ii Acknowledgements There are several individuals whom I would like to thank. First and foremost, I would like thank my mentor and supervisor, Prof. Eli Sone. It has been an absolute joy to work under his tutelage for the past three years. His ability to empathize with students, to guide and encourage both their strengths and shortcomings, and to be present during every crest and trough of their project has made my personal journey as a graduate student in his group an unparalleled learning experience. I am very grateful to my committee members, Prof. Kevin Truong and Prof. Jonathan Roche- leau for their valuable feedback and thorough insight during the project. I would also like to thank Prof. Jayachandran Kizhakkedathu who welcomed me into a wonderfully productive and informative learning environment in his laboratory at UBC. I would like to thank all my colleagues in the Sone Lab who have been instrumental to the success of my project. Thank you to Magdalena Wojtas for her unique expertise in protein purification and for helping me every step of the way in experiments that have made almost an entire chapter of my thesis possible. Thank you to David Rees for his patience, diligence, and excellent research abilities that have made my transition to carrying forth his work well- facilitated and seamless. Endless thanks to Alex Lausch and Bryan Quan for always being willing to advise, troubleshoot, and along with all members of the Sone Lab, making the lab environment an incredible place to be. Thank you to Kenny Kimmins, Kate Li, Denise Yap, Bryan James, Minh-Tam Nguyen and Angelico Obille for their dedication and hours put into maintaining our well-oiled mussel aquarium system and for helping collect the mussels that have made this work possible. I would also like to acknowledge the labs that allowed access to their equipment and for their expertise, including Prof. Ben Ganss, Prof. Rocheleau, Prof. Radisic, Prof. Houry, and Prof. Master. I would also like to thank Paul Taylor of the SickKids Proteomics, Analytics, Robotics, & Chemical Biology Centre (SPARC BioCentre) for trypsin digestion, LC-MS/MS analysis and analysis guidance. Thank you to Reynaldo Interior for extensive amino acid analysis assistance and guidance. Last but not least, I would like to thank my family - my parents and my sister - for their unwavering support of all my goals, no matter how lofty, and for their constant and reassuring belief in my capabilities. The patience, love, and excitement they have always shown for my successes and lessons learned has made every hardship worthwhile. iii Contents Contents iv List of Tables vii List of Figures viii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background.......................................1 1.1.1 Mussel Biology and Adhesion.........................1 1.1.2 Marine Mussel Attachment..........................3 1.1.3 Recombinant and Peptide Mimic Experiments...............5 1.1.4 Animals as Models of Adhesion........................5 1.1.5 Mussels as Models for Adhesion........................6 1.1.6 Existing Freshwater Mussel Byssal Proteins.................7 1.2 Rationale and Motivation............................... 10 1.2.1 Limitations of Current Adhesives....................... 10 1.2.2 Weaknesses of Current Mussel-Inspired Adhesives.............. 11 1.2.3 Current Progress: Candidate Spatial Verification and Molecular Weight. 12 1.3 Project Objectives and Goals............................. 13 1.3.1 Objective 1: Identify quagga mussel adhesive protein candidates and se- lect the top candidate............................. 13 1.3.2 Objective 2: Purify and characterize the top quagga mussel adhesive protein candidate................................ 14 1.4 Document Overview.................................. 15 2 Quagga Mussel Adhesive Protein Identification 16 2.1 Abstract......................................... 16 2.2 Introduction....................................... 17 2.3 Methods......................................... 19 2.3.1 Mussel Thread/Plaque and Footprint Collection.............. 19 2.3.2 SDS-PAGE and Staining............................ 19 iv 2.3.3 Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectroscopy (LC-MS/MS).... 19 2.3.4 Protein Identification, Selection, and Analysis................ 20 2.4 Results & Discussion.................................. 20 2.4.1 Quagga Mussel Protein Distribution..................... 21 2.4.2 Determination of Putative Protein Roles................... 22 2.4.3 Byssal Proteins: All Sectors.......................... 24 2.4.4 Relative Protein Quantification of Footprint+Plaque Proteins....... 26 2.4.5 Relative Protein Quantification: Candidate Selection............ 28 2.4.6 Caveats of Experimental Design....................... 35 2.5 Conclusion....................................... 37 2.6 Acknowledgements................................... 37 2.A All Venn Diagram Sectors: Other Protein Roles................... 38 2.A.1 Structural Proteins............................... 38 2.A.2 Mucin-like Proteins............................... 38 2.A.3 Redox Proteins................................. 40 2.A.4 Mussel Proteins................................. 40 2.A.5 Protease Inhibitors............................... 41 2.A.6 Tyrosinase................................... 41 2.A.7 Cellular..................................... 42 2.B Relative Protein Quantification: Proteins of Interest................ 42 2.B.1 Rhinophore Proteins.............................. 42 2.B.2 Structural Proteins............................... 42 2.B.3 Mucus-like proteins............................... 43 2.B.4 Redox proteins................................. 43 2.B.5 Plasminogen-like Proteins........................... 44 2.C Justification for Targeted Footprint+Plaque Overlap Search............ 44 3 Dbfp7 Purification and Characterization 48 3.1 Abstract......................................... 48 3.2 Introduction....................................... 49 3.3 Methods......................................... 50 3.3.1 Protein Extraction............................... 50 3.3.2 Amino Acid Analysis.............................. 51 3.3.3 MALDI-TOF MS Spectrometry........................ 51 3.3.4 Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectroscopy (LC-MS/MS).... 51 3.3.5 Protein Identification, Selection, and Analysis................ 52 3.3.6 Circular Dichroism............................... 52 3.3.7 Quartz Crystal Microbalance......................... 52 3.3.8 Atomic Force Microscopy........................... 53 3.4 Results & Discussion.................................. 53 v 3.4.1 Phenol gland purification of mussel adhesive proteins............ 54 3.4.2 Seasonal Purification.............................. 55 3.4.3 Size and secondary structure of native Dbfp's................ 57 3.4.4 Adsorption studies of Dbfp's on SiO2, TiO2 and Au............ 62 3.5 Conclusion....................................... 67 3.6 Acknowledgements................................... 68 4 Discussion, Future Work & Conclusion 69 4.1 Future Work & Recommendations.......................... 69 4.1.1 Dbfp7 Structural Characterization Optimization.............. 69 4.1.2 Dbfp7 Surface-Sensitive Characterization Optimization.......... 71 4.1.3 Recombinant Expression of Dbfp7...................... 73 4.1.4 Expansion of Quagga Mussel Byssal Protein Knowledge.......... 73 4.2 Significance & Conclusions............................... 73 References 74 vi List of Tables 2.1 Quagga mussel Dbfp proteins found enriched and abundant at the adhesive in- terface........................................... 30 2.2 Large and abundant proteins identified by LC-MS/MS by Rees et al.[81] that did not originally meet acceptance criteria to be listed as a novel quagga mussel byssal protein, but were re-classified as potential byssal candidates due to the presence of Dopa within peptides. Bolded transcripts are both highly enriched and abundant at the footprint-plaque interface...................
Recommended publications
  • Educators' Resource Guide
    EDUCATORS' RESOURCE GUIDE Produced and published by 3D Entertainment Distribution Written by Dr. Elisabeth Mantello In collaboration with Jean-Michel Cousteau’s Ocean Futures Society TABLE OF CONTENTS TO EDUCATORS .................................................................................................p 3 III. PART 3. ACTIVITIES FOR STUDENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................p 4 ACTIVITY 1. DO YOU Know ME? ................................................................. p 20 PLANKton, SOURCE OF LIFE .....................................................................p 4 ACTIVITY 2. discoVER THE ANIMALS OF "SECRET OCEAN" ......... p 21-24 ACTIVITY 3. A. SECRET OCEAN word FIND ......................................... p 25 PART 1. SCENES FROM "SECRET OCEAN" ACTIVITY 3. B. ADD color to THE octoPUS! .................................... p 25 1. CHristmas TREE WORMS .........................................................................p 5 ACTIVITY 4. A. WHERE IS MY MOUTH? ..................................................... p 26 2. GIANT BasKET Star ..................................................................................p 6 ACTIVITY 4. B. WHat DO I USE to eat? .................................................. p 26 3. SEA ANEMONE AND Clown FISH ......................................................p 6 ACTIVITY 5. A. WHO eats WHat? .............................................................. p 27 4. GIANT CLAM AND ZOOXANTHELLAE ................................................p
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Morphology of the Nudibranchiate Mollusc Melibe (Syn. Chioraera) Leonina (Gould) by H
    The Morphology of the Nudibranchiate Mollusc Melibe (syn. Chioraera) leonina (Gould) By H. P, Kjerschow Agersborg, B.S., M.S., M.A., Ph.D., Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts. With Plates 27 to 37. CONTENTS. PAGE I. INTRODUCTION ......-• 508 II. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....... 509 III. ON THE STATUS OP CHIORAERA GOULD . • 509 IV. MELIBE LEONINA (S. CHIORAERA LEONINA GOUI-D) 512 1. The Head or Veil • .514 (1) The Cirrhi 515 (2) The Dorsal Tentacles or ' Rhinophores ' . 516 2. The Papillae or Epinotidia 521 3. The Foot 524 4. The Body-wall 528 (1) The Odoriferous Glands 528 (2) The Muscular System 520 5. The Visceral Cavity 531 6. The Alimentary Canal ...... 533 (1) The Buccal Cavity 533 a. Mandibles and Radula ..... 534 b. Buccal and Salivary Glands .... 535 (2) The Oesophagus 536 (3) The Stomach 537 a. Proventriculus ...... 537 6. Gizzard ....... 537 c. Pyloric Diverticulum ..... 541 (4) The Intestine 542 (5) The Liver 544 7. The Circulatory System 550 (1) The Pericardium ...... 551 (2) The Heart and the Arteries .... 553 (3) The Venous System 555 8. The Organs of Excretion ...... 555 (1) The Kidney 555 (2) The Ureter 556 (3) The Renal Syrinx 556 9. The Organs of Reproduction . .561 (1) The Hermaphrodite Gland, a New Type . 562 50S H. P. KJBRSCHOW AGEKSBORG PAGE (2) The Hermaphrodite Duct ..... 567 (3) The Oviduct 567 (4) The Ovispermatotheca ..... 568 (5) The Male Genital Duct 569 (6) The Mucous Gland 570 V. SUMMARY ......... 573 VI. LITERATI'HE CITED ........ 577 VII. NOTE TO EXPLANATION OF FIGURES .... 586 VIII. EXPLANATION OF PLATES 27-37 ..... 586 I. IXXUODUCTIOX.
    [Show full text]
  • On a New Genus and Some New Species of Opisthobranchiate Gastropods of the Family Eubranchidae from the Gulf of Mannar^
    ON A NEW GENUS AND SOME NEW SPECIES OF OPISTHOBRANCHIATE GASTROPODS OF THE FAMILY EUBRANCHIDAE FROM THE GULF OF MANNAR^ K. PRABHAKARA RAO* Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Mandapam Camp, India ABSTRACT A new genus Annulorhina based on the type species A.mandapamensis and three new species mmely Eubranchus mannaremis, Capellinia fuscanmdata, and Eubranchopsis indicus of the ftmily EtbKr.chidae are <lNaJbed from the Indian Ocean. The present record of the genera Capellinia end Eubianihopsis extend OTBjr ^stribution to the Indian Ocean. The detailed structure and specific characters of each species have been given and their •<. fiinities discussed. fHJE family Eubranchidae, according to Baba (1960), consists of six genera namely, Eubranchus fotb^s, 1838; Ca/>e//wte Trinchese, 1929; Eubranchopsis li&h&, 1929; Galvinella Eliot, 1907; ^gljilyina Odhner, 1929, and Cumanotus Odhner, 1907. During the course of study of the nudi- ^H'fauna of Gulf of Mannar and Palk Bay around Mandapam from the intertidal Mon near the jetty of Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, certain specimens representing ^ wew species under the known genera Eubranchus, Capellinia, and Eubranchopsis and a fourth \nt under a genus not hitherto known have been collected and described in the present communi- itjiOD. i 1. Genus Eubranchus Forbes (1838) ; Synonyms : Amphorina Quatrefiages (1844), Galvina Alder and Hancock (1855) j ; Acldo^oct Eolidacea with triseriate radula; a single row of denticles on the masticatory boijders; anal opening about the middle of the body, in front of the right post-anal row; rhino- pjhOres smooth; cerata simple; foot comers round, angulate or tentaculiform; ptyaline glands present; penis unarmed with a separate preputial sac.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Marshall Islands, Including 57 New Records 1
    Pacific Science (1983), vol. 37, no. 3 © 1984 by the University of Hawaii Press. All rights reserved Notes on Some Opisthobranchia (Mollusca: Gastropoda) from the Marshall Islands, Including 57 New Records 1 SCOTT JOHNSON2 and LISA M. BOUCHER2 ABSTRACT: The rich opisthobranch fauna of the Marshall Islands has re­ mained largely unstudied because of the geographic remoteness of these Pacific islands. We report on a long-term collection ofOpisthobranchia assembled from the atolls of Bikini, Enewetak, Kwajalein, Rongelap, and Ujelang . Fifty-seven new records for the Marshall Islands are recorded, raising to 103 the number of species reported from these islands. Aspects ofthe morphology, ecology, devel­ opment, and systematics of 76 of these species are discussed. THE OPISTHOBRANCH FAUNA OF THE Marshall viously named species are discussed, 57 of Islands, a group of 29 atolls and five single which are new records for the Marshall islands situated 3500 to 4400 km west south­ Islands (Table 1). west of Honolulu, Hawaii, is rich and varied but has not been reported on in any detail. Pre­ vious records of Marshall Islands' Opistho­ METHODS branchia record only 36 species and are largely restricted to three studies. Opisthobranchs The present collections were made on inter­ collected in the northern Marshalls during the tidal reefs and in shallow water by snorkeling period of nuclear testing (1946 to 1958) and and by scuba diving to depths of 25 m, both now in the U.S. National Museum, along with by day and night. additional material from Micronesia, were Descriptions, measurements, and color studied by Marcus (1965).
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Tactics in Mollusca: a Review of the Feeding Behavior of Their Most Obscure Classes (Aplacophora, Polyplacophora, Monoplacophora, Scaphopoda and Cephalopoda)
    Oecologia Australis 17(3): 358-373, Setembro 2013 http://dx.doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2013.1703.04 FORAGING TACTICS IN MOLLUSCA: A REVIEW OF THE FEEDING BEHAVIOR OF THEIR MOST OBSCURE CLASSES (APLACOPHORA, POLYPLACOPHORA, MONOPLACOPHORA, SCAPHOPODA AND CEPHALOPODA) Vanessa Fontoura-da-Silva¹, ², *, Renato Junqueira de Souza Dantas¹ and Carlos Henrique Soares Caetano¹ ¹Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Zoologia, Laboratório de Zoologia de Invertebrados Marinhos, Av. Pasteur, 458, 309, Urca, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil, 22290-240. ²Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciência Biológicas (Biodiversidade Neotropical), Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT Mollusca is regarded as the second most diverse phylum of invertebrate animals. It presents a wide range of geographic distribution patterns, feeding habits and life standards. Despite the impressive fossil record, its evolutionary history is still uncertain. Ancestors adopted a simple way of acquiring food, being called deposit-feeders. Amongst its current representatives, Gastropoda and Bivalvia are two most diversely distributed and scientifically well-known classes. The other classes are restricted to the marine environment and show other limitations that hamper possible researches and make them less frequent. The upcoming article aims at examining the feeding habits of the most obscure classes of Mollusca (Aplacophora, Polyplacophora, Monoplacophora, Scaphoda and Cephalopoda), based on an extense literary research in books, journals of malacology and digital data bases. The review will also discuss the gaps concerning the study of these classes and the perspectives for future analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Neuroanatomy of the Rhinophore of Archidoris Pseudoargus
    Helgol Mar Res (2007) 61:135–142 DOI 10.1007/s10152-007-0061-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Functional neuroanatomy of the rhinophore of Archidoris pseudoargus Adrian Wertz · Wolfgang Rössler · Malu Obermayer · Ulf Bickmeyer Received: 4 December 2006 / Revised: 18 January 2007 / Accepted: 18 January 2007 / Published online: 15 March 2007 © Springer-Verlag and AWI 2007 Abstract For sea slugs, chemosensory information repre- Keywords Serotonin · Chemosensory · Calcium sents an important sensory modality, because optical and imaging · Sea slug · Mollusc acoustical information are limited. In the present study, we focussed on the neuroanatomy of the rhinophores and pro- cessing of olfactory stimuli in the rhinophore ganglion of Introduction Archidoris pseudoargus, belonging to the order of Nudi- branchia in the subclass of Opisthobranchia. Histological Chemical signals play a prominent role in most organ- techniques, Xuorescent markers, and immunohistochemis- isms. Sea slugs, living in shallow waters at the North sea try were used to analyse neuroanatomical features of the should primarily rely on chemical and mechanical rhinophore. A large ganglion and a prominent central lym- senses, as optical information is limited and the sensitiv- phatic channel are surrounded by longitudinal muscles. ity of long-range acoustic stimuli without a swim bladder Many serotonin-immunoreactive (IR) processes were found or a sophisticated ear is probably low. Archidoris around the centre and between the ganglion and the highly belongs to the order of nudibranchia, and its rhinophores folded lobes of the rhinophore, but serotonin-IR cell bodies were shown to be sensitive to mechanical stimulation were absent inside the rhinophore. In contrast to the condi- (Agersborg 1922).
    [Show full text]
  • Structure & Early Development of an Opisthobranch Mollusc, Caloria
    Indian Journal of Marine Sciences Vol. 2, June 1973,pp. 32-37 Structure & Early Development of an Opisthobranch Mollusc, Caloria militaris (Alder & Hancock) K. VIRABHADRA RAO & L. KRISHNA KUMARI National Institute of Oceanography, Panaji, Goa Received 5 January 1973 The external and internal morphology, the spawn and early development of C. militaris, obtained locally, have been described. It is a facilinid having elongated oral tentacles, smooth rhtnopnores, tentacular anterior angles of the foot and clusters of cerata each with a varying number of oblique rows. The presence of oral and salivary glands, paired jaw plates with cutting edges, uniseriate raduta with teeth having a prominent pointed median cusp and seven lateral cusps On each side, and a c1eioproctic anus opening at about the middle in the second cluster of cerata Onthe right side are the main features of the alimentary system. The mollusc feeds on the hydroid, Gar1lia franciscana (Torrey). The nervous, circulatory and renal systems are typically eolidacean in character. The statocysts have each, numerous statoliths. An enlarged convoluted gonoduct into a seminal ampulla, a distinctly separate lobed prostate gland proximally cormected to the vas deferens and an unarmed conical penis are prc rnfnerrt among the reproductive organs. The mucoatbumtnous glands, the vaginal duct and the spermatneca are normal in character as in most nudtbranchs, The spawn string is a fiat spiral with two rather irregular linear series of eggs and its attachment to substratum leaves gaps where the string forms loops remaining free. The veliger larva is blind when hatched and the shell is smooth On the surface, spirally ovate and bears an operculum.
    [Show full text]
  • Curaçao the Present Report Species of Opisthobranchs Curaçao Thankfully
    STUDIES ON THE FAUNA OF CURAÇAO AND OTHER CARIBBEAN ISLANDS: No. 122. Opisthobranchs from Curaçao and faunistically relatedregions by Ernst Marcus t and Eveline du Bois-Reymond Marcus (Departamento de Zoologiada Universidade de Sao Paulo) The material of the present report — 82 species of opisthobranchs and 2 lamellariids — ranges from western Floridato southern middle with Brazil Curaçao as centre. We thankfully acknowledge the collaboration of several collectors. Professor Dr. DIVA DINIZ CORRÊA, Head of the Department of Zoology of the University of São Paulo, was able to work at the “Caraïbisch Marien-Biologisch Instituut” (Caribbean Marine Biological Institute: Carmabi) at from 1965 March thanks Curaçao December to 1966, to a grant the editor started t) When, as a young student, a correspondence with a professor MARCUS concerning the identification of some animals from the Caribbean, he did not have idea that later he would be moved any thirty-five years profoundly by the news of the death of the same who in the meantime had become of the most professor, one esteemed contributors to these "Studies". ERNST MARCUS was a remarkably versatile scientist, and a prolific but utterly reliable author with for animal that less a preference groups are generally popular among syste- matic zoologists. When, in 1935 German Nazi-laws forced him to leave his country, he was already an admitted and After authority on Bryozoa Tardigrada. arriving in Brazil his publications in these two fields he the of other animal kept appearing. Moreover, began study groups, especially Turbellaria, Oligochaeta, Pycnogonida, and Opisthobranchiata. Dr. ERNST MARCUS born in 1893.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Guide to the Heterobranch Sea Slugs (Mollusca: Gastropoda) from Bocas Del Toro, Panama Jessica A
    Goodheart et al. Marine Biodiversity Records (2016) 9:56 DOI 10.1186/s41200-016-0048-z MARINE RECORD Open Access Identification guide to the heterobranch sea slugs (Mollusca: Gastropoda) from Bocas del Toro, Panama Jessica A. Goodheart1,2, Ryan A. Ellingson3, Xochitl G. Vital4, Hilton C. Galvão Filho5, Jennifer B. McCarthy6, Sabrina M. Medrano6, Vishal J. Bhave7, Kimberly García-Méndez8, Lina M. Jiménez9, Gina López10,11, Craig A. Hoover6, Jaymes D. Awbrey3, Jessika M. De Jesus3, William Gowacki12, Patrick J. Krug3 and Ángel Valdés6* Abstract Background: The Bocas del Toro Archipelago is located off the Caribbean coast of Panama. Until now, only 19 species of heterobranch sea slugs have been formally reported from this area; this number constitutes a fraction of total diversity in the Caribbean region. Results: Based on newly conducted fieldwork, we increase the number of recorded heterobranch sea slug species in Bocas del Toro to 82. Descriptive information for each species is provided, including taxonomic and/or ecological notes for most taxa. The collecting effort is also described and compared with that of other field expeditions in the Caribbean and the tropical Eastern Pacific. Conclusions: This increase in known diversity strongly suggests that the distribution of species within the Caribbean is still poorly known and species ranges may need to be modified as more surveys are conducted. Keywords: Heterobranchia, Nudibranchia, Cephalaspidea, Anaspidea, Sacoglossa, Pleurobranchomorpha Introduction studies. However, this research has often been hampered The Bocas del Toro Archipelago is located on the Carib- by a lack of accurate and updated identification/field bean coast of Panama, near the Costa Rican border.
    [Show full text]
  • Hickman, Roberts, Larson
    hic09617_ch16.qxd 5/30/00 12:43 PM Page 325 CHAPTER 16 Molluscs Phylum Mollusca Fluted giant clam, Tridacna squamosa. A Significant Space space within the mesoderm, the coelom. This meant that the Long ago in the Precambrian era, the most complex animals space was lined with mesoderm and the organs were sus- populating the seas were acoelomate. They must have been pended by mesodermal membranes, the mesenteries. Not inefficient burrowers, and they were unable to exploit the only could the coelom serve as an efficient hydrostatic rich subsurface ooze. Any that developed fluid-filled spaces skeleton, with circular and longitudinal body-wall muscles within the body would have had a substantial selective acting as antagonists, but a more stable arrangement of advantage because these spaces could serve as a hydro- organs with less crowding resulted. Mesenteries provided an static skeleton and improve burrowing efficiency. ideal location for networks of blood vessels, and the ali- The simplest, and probably the first, mode of achieving mentary canal could become more muscular, more highly a fluid-filled space within the body was retention of the specialized, and more diversified without interfering with embryonic blastocoel, as in pseudocoelomates. This was not other organs. the best evolutionary solution because, for example, the Development of a coelom was a major step in the evo- organs lay loose in the body cavity. lution of larger and more complex forms. All the major Some descendants of Precambrian acoelomate organ- groups in chapters to follow are coelomates. I isms evolved a more elegant arrangement: a fluid-filled 325 hic09617_ch16.qxd 5/30/00 12:45 PM Page 326 326 PART 3 The Diversity of Animal Life Position in Animal common ancestor with annelids 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontiers in Zoology Biomed Central
    Frontiers in Zoology BioMed Central Research Open Access Functional neuroanatomy of the rhinophore of Aplysia punctata Adrian Wertz1,2,3, Wolfgang Rössler2, Malu Obermayer2 and Ulf Bickmeyer*1 Address: 1Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in Helmholtz Society, Kurpromenade 201, 27483 Helgoland, Germany, 2Behavioural Physiology and Sociobiology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany and 3Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Department of Systems and Computational Neurobiology, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany Email: Adrian Wertz - [email protected]; Wolfgang Rössler - [email protected]; Malu Obermayer - [email protected]; Ulf Bickmeyer* - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 06 April 2006 Received: 10 March 2006 Accepted: 06 April 2006 Frontiers in Zoology 2006, 3:6 doi:10.1186/1742-9994-3-6 This article is available from: http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/3/1/6 © 2006 Wertz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: For marine snails, olfaction represents a crucial sensory modality for long-distance reception, as auditory and visual information is limited. The posterior tentacle of Aplysia, the rhinophore, is a chemosensory organ and several behavioural studies showed that the rhinophores can detect pheromones, initiate orientation and locomotion toward food. However the functional neuroanatomy of the rhinophore is not yet clear. Here we apply serotonin-immunohistochemistry and fluorescent markers in combination with confocal microscopy as well as optical recording techniques to elucidate the structure and function of the rhinophore of the sea slug Aplysia punctata.
    [Show full text]