DOCSLIB.ORG

Tyranny Revisited Groups, Psychological Well-Being and the Health of Societies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tyranny Revisited Groups, Psychological Well-Being and the Health of Societies Tyranny revisited Groups, psychological well-being and the health of societies VIL acts, we like to think, are the preserve of psychopaths. Yet 30 to E 40 years ago, a series of classic STEPHEN REICHER and psychology experiments showed that the behaviour of ordinary people can be S.ALEXANDER HASLAM discuss transformed in groups and that the most decent of individuals can be led to behave results from their BBC Prison Study. in the most indecent ways. These studies raise critical questions about the processes In this, ordinary young men were divided agency and hence to become helpless to through which groups can transform us, randomly into prisoners and guards and resist antisocial impulses. Groups are and whether such transformations are placed in a prison-like setting. Very inevitably bad for you. Groups with power always for the worse. Yet for decades it has inevitably abuse it. Or, in the researchers’ been impossible to conduct studies with the own words, the aggression of the guards same power as the classic studies and to ‘Can collaborations between ‘was emitted simply as a “natural” interrogate their conclusions. The BBC the media and academia ever consequence of being in the uniform of Prison Study has broken this impasse and be of scientific value?’ a “guard” and asserting the power inherent provides a surprising new set of answers in that role’ (Haney et al., 1973, p.12). with important social, clinical and organisational ramifications. quickly, some of the guards began to act A powerful phenomenon… brutally. They set out to humiliate the but a questionable explanation Are groups ‘naturally’ bad prisoners and to deprive them of their Although few doubt what happened at for us? rights. Within days, some prisoners began Stanford, there are in fact good reasons Of all the demonstrations that groups can to develop psychological disorders. So to doubt Zimbardo’s explanation of the change us, perhaps the most extreme was severe were the consequences that a study events. If it is ‘natural’ to abuse power in conducted by Philip Zimbardo and scheduled to last a fortnight had to be groups, why did only some guards behave colleagues at the University of Stanford in terminated after only six days. this way? And if only some guards were 1971 (Haney, Banks & Zimbardo, 1973). The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) brutal, was this ‘natural’ or was it a product provided a grimly compelling portrait of of Zimbardo’s leadership? After all, in his the power of circumstances to shape briefing, Zimbardo instructed his guards by WEBLINKS behaviour. This is the main reason why its telling them: ‘You can create in the findings are well-known even beyond the prisoners…a notion of arbitrariness, that BBC Prison Study official website: boundaries of academia. But the SPE their life is totally controlled by us, by the www.theexperiment.org.uk didn’t just show the depths that people system, you, me – and they’ll have no Stanford Prison Experiment official website: can descend to in groups, it also sought to privacy… We’re going to take away their www.prisonexp.org explain exactly what caused this descent. individuality in various ways. In general Social science commentary on Abu Ghraib: To those who ran the study, it illustrated what all this leads to is a sense of tinyurl.com/8m2bx a general tendency for people in groups powerlessness.’ to lose their capacity for judgement and There are also moral reasons to doubt 146 The Psychologist Vol 19 No 3 March 2006 BBC Prison Study a piece of reality television with no serious judgement of those who read our work. implications? Can collaborations between However, for us, one of the contributions of the media and academia ever be of the study is already implied in the range of scientific value? Can broadcasting outputs it has led to. Characteristically, in psychological research be ethical? our everyday studies, psychologists tend to focus on a narrow set of phenomena and Scientific output collect a limited range of data. We thereby These were valid fears. That is why we perpetuate arbitrary disciplinary divisions negotiated a unique contract with the BBC between domains that one might expect to whereby we, the scientists, would design, be interrelated. In nearly 10 days of run and analyse the research (as we would constant data collection – which in any other study) while the broadcaster incorporated observational, psychometric recorded and transmitted key elements of and physiological measures – we were able the research. The television documentaries to examine how relations within and themselves were not the full scientific between groups developed and impacted story, but rather were designed to provide upon each other. We also had space to ‘a window on the science’: something that investigate clinical and organisational as might get people interested and motivate well as social psychological issues. We them to find out more for themselves. were thereby able to see how phenomena However, the process of producing that are of core concern to us as social television documentaries moves much psychologists (notably, the presence or more quickly than that of performing absence of a shared sense of social the ‘role’ explanation. It suggests that all scientific analysis and securing scientific identity) are related to the mental well- of us would mindlessly abuse others if we publication. So, for a long time these being of individuals and the health of were given roles that appeared to demand documentaries were the primary form of social systems. Although it has been this. This denies the capacity for human information about the study that was in the hypothesised that there is a link between agency and choice (Reicher & Haslam, in public domain. It is only now that, in the these elements (e.g. Ellemers et al., 1999; press). And it suggests that – whatever words of The Guardian’s John Sutherland Haslam, 2001), no single study had position they occupy in the social hierarchy (2005), The Experiment has ‘crossed back demonstrated that the phenomena are – bullies and tyrants are passive victims of into academia’. So it is only now that is it interrelated, elucidated how they are psychology who cannot be held possible to assess the scientific merits of interrelated, or explored how their accountable for their actions. In this way, the exercise. Did it provide any worthwhile relationship unfolds over time. psychological analysis easily ends up insights into the psychology of group excusing the inexcusable (Haslam & behaviour and misbehaviour? And did it do Procedure, ethics and rationale Reicher, 2006). so with a rigour that meets the standards In what ways, then, did the design of our required for scientific publication? This is study differ from the SPE? The study used Beyond Stanford – The BBC a particularly pertinent question in light of the same basic set-up as Zimbardo’s study Prison Study the fact that the findings of the SPE were and divided people randomly into prisoners We have been stuck with this questionable never published in a peer-reviewed and guards. However, unlike Zimbardo, we explanation for a whole generation, psychology journal. did not act as prison superintendents who because the behaviour that lent the SPE The answer to the latter question is instructed the guards how to act. We impact made it unethical to repeat. How clear. The study’s key findings were first simply set up a situation in which the can we advance understanding of the summarised in Scientific American Mind guards had authority, had the tools of psychology of tyranny without ourselves (Haslam & Reicher, 2005) and in a more power and had better conditions (food, being tyrannical? detailed exploration of tyranny in the living quarters, etc.) than the prisoners. Our This was the dilemma that confronted British Journal of Social Psychology intention was to create a situation that was us when we set to work on a new ‘prison (Reicher & Haslam, 2006). Additional harsh and testing, but not harmful. In order study’ in 2001. This ended up being one of publications also explore a broad range of to make sure we got the balance right, our the largest experiments in social social, clinical and organisational issues study was also overseen by clinical psychology since the 1970s. The study we including agency (Reicher & Haslam, in psychologists and an independent ethics conducted – referred to as the BBC Prison press), stress (Haslam & Reicher, in press- committee chaired by an MP. Study – was a collaboration between b), leadership (Reicher et al., 2005) and On the basis of social identity theory ourselves and the broadcaster. It was filmed organisational behaviour (Haslam & (Tajfel & Turner, 1979), we also planned by the BBC and televised in four hour-long Reicher, in press-a). Indeed, to our a series of interventions designed to impact documentaries in May 2002. knowledge, the study has generated more on the level of shared social identity among Yet even before the study was run, and peer-reviewed publications than any the prisoners and thereby to increase their certainly after the documentaries were previous social psychological field study. willingness to resist the guards’ regime and aired, the BBC Prison Study attracted As to the former question – did the any tyranny associated with it. Using considerable controversy – much of which study provide any worthwhile insights? – systematic observation (aided by was aired in The Psychologist. Was it just the answer obviously depends upon the unobtrusive filming) and daily 147 March 2006 www.thepsychologist.org.uk BBC Prison Study administration of psychometric and oppression or reject and resist it? And what prisoners than to punish them. Our physiological measures, we then observed is the role of the group in these processes? participants showed no ‘natural’ tendencies how both groups reacted.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Psychology of Tyranny: the BBC Prison Study
    TYRANNYTHE PSYCHOLOGY OF POWER CORRUPTS, AND ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY—OR DOES IT? BY S. ALEXANDER HASLAM AND STEPHEN D. REICHER Images of inhumanity and atrocity are burned into our memories. Jewish men, women and children being herded into gas chambers. Entire villages destroyed by rampaging gangs in Rwanda. The systematic use of rape and the destruction of communities as part of “ethnic cleansing” in the Balkans. The massacre at My Lai in South Vietnam, the abuse of Iraqi prisoners in Abu Ghraib, and most re- cently, the carnage wrought by suicide bombers in Baghdad, Jerusalem, London and Madrid. Refl ecting on these events, we inevitably ask: What makes people so brutal? Are they mentally ill? Are they the products of dysfunctional families or cultures? Or, more disturbingly, is anyone capable of taking part in collective ruthlessness given the right—or rather, the wrong—circumstances? Now the latest research, including possibly the largest social-psychology experiment in three CREDIT CREDIT decades, is providing a new window on these conundrums. 44 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN MIND COPYRIGHT 2005 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. COPYRIGHT 2005 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. Joseph Stalin, Questions about why groups can behave bad- early 1960s by Stanley Milgram. Ordinary, well- Adolf Hitler, ly have driven some of the most signifi cant devel- adjusted males who took part in a bogus memo- Idi Amin and opments in social psychology in the 60 years ry experiment were told to deliver electric shocks Saddam Hussein since World War II ended. Starting with the need of increasing magnitude to another person who had powerful to understand the psychological processes that posed as the learner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stanford Prison Experiment 1992, a Documentary Written by Zimbardo
    Stanford Prison Experiment What happens when experiments are misplanned Giovanni Viviani Stanford Prison Experiment Why do we need ethics standards in research Giovanni Viviani Stanford Prison Experiment Study of psychological efect of becoming a prisoner or a prison guard Conducted at Stanford University, August 1971, by professor Philip Zimbardo One of the most criticised experiment of history Often related to Abu Ghraib prison scandal Stanford Prison Experiment 24 males participants, chosen to exclude those with a criminal background Participants were divided in 2 groups, prisoners and prison guards, arbitrarily assigned by Zimbardo The experiment was planned to last for 2 weeks More than 50 researchers observed the experiment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYtX2sEaeFE Real policemen were involved to arrest the prisoners Prisoners were brought to the police station to take fngerprints and mug shots Prisoners were then transferred to a mockup prison in the basement of Jordan Hall Prisoners were strip searched, chained, assigned a number and closed in their cells Guards were given wooden batons, a uniform and mirrored sunglasses https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3wxEmHqVCY "… the guards were told to routinely performs counts…" "…it provided a regular occasion for the guards to interact with and exercise control over the prisoners…" The second morning a rebellion started when the prisoner of one cell barricaded themselves inside After putting the rebellion down guard started using psychological and physical punishment to keep prisoners
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Understanding the Stanford Prison Experiment
    GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING THE STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT MR. CLINE- PSYCHOLOGY A Quiet Sunday Morning... On a quiet Sunday morning in August, a Palo Alto, California, police car swept through the town picking up college students as part of a mass arrest for violation of Penal Codes 211, Armed Robbery, and Burglary, a 459 PC. The suspect was picked up at his home, charged, warned of his legal rights, spread-eagled against the police car, searched, and handcuffed -- often as surprised and curious neighbors looked on. The suspect was then put in the rear of the police car and carried off to the police station, the sirens wailing. The car arrived at the station, the suspect was brought inside, formally booked, again warned of his Miranda rights, finger printed, and a complete identification was made. The suspect was then taken to a holding cell where he was left blindfolded to ponder his fate and wonder what he had done to get himself into this mess. Volunteers What suspects had done was to answer a local newspaper ad calling for volunteers in a study of the psychological effects of prison life. We wanted to see what the psychological effects were of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. To do this, we decided to set up a simulated prison and then carefully note the effects of this institution on the behavior of all those within its walls. More than 70 applicants answered our ad and were given diagnostic interviews and personality tests to eliminate candidates with psychological problems, medical disabilities, or a history of crime or drug abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcdermott, M (2002) the Experiment.Pdf
    University of East London Institutional Repository: http://roar.uel.ac.uk This paper is made available online by permission of the authors. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item and our policy information available from the repository home page for further information. Author(s): McDermott, Mark; Öpik, Lembit; Smith, Stephen; Taylor, Steve; Wills, Andrea. Article title: BBC Television ‘The Experiment’ – Report of the Independent Ethics Panel Year of publication: 2002 Citation: McDermott, M. et al (2002) BBC Television ‘The Experiment’ – Report of the Independent Ethics Panel London: University of East London. Background: Report by the six-person ‘Independent Ethics Panel’ as Chaired by MP Lembik Opik on the BBC Prison Experiment, conducted by Professor Alex Haslam (Exeter University) and Professor Steve Reicher (St Andrews University) to oversee the day- to-day running of the experiment and safeguard participant interests and wellbeing. BBC (October 2001 to May 2002). BBC Television ‘The Experiment’ Report of the Independent Ethics Panel April 2002 This report can be viewed also at: www.uel.ac.uk/psychology/news/panel-report.pdf Photograph © BBC 2002 BBC Television ‘The Experiment – Report of the Ethics Panel Contents The Independent Ethics Panel - - 3 Background to ‘The Experiment’ - 4 Background to the Independent Ethics Panel 8 Filming - - - - - 10 The Post-Film Stage - - - 14 Participant Welfare - - - 16 Appendix 1: ‘Prison Rules’ - - 19 Appendix 2: Punishments - - 20 Appendix 3: Protocol for Intervention 21 Contact Information - - - 22 Report This report has been written and published by the Independent Ethics Panel for submission to the BBC production team and for public information.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanford Prison Experiment Under Criticism
    EVIDENCE AND STORIES ABOUT EVIDENCE: STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT UNDER CRITICISM POPULAR SCIENCE ARTICLE Kamil Izydorczak∗ Agata Wicher Mała Psychologia Mała Psychologia www.mala-psychologia.eu www.mala-psychologia.eu Wroclaw, Poland Cracow, Poland [email protected] [email protected] September 2, 2019 ABSTRACT The Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo is probably the most recognizable study in the area of social psychology. The summer of 2018 proved to be exceptionally unfavourable to this scientific endeavour. The experiment was showered with strong criticisms to the extent that some voices were raised to withdraw the research from psychology textbooks; the study was no longer described as ‘shocking’, but rather as a ‘sham’ or ‘lie’. At a closer look, it turns out that the whole criticism can be traced back to one source article which contains unevenly distributed arguments. Some of them are relevant and new, but others can be described as hyperbolas, simplifications and repetitions of frequent allegations. An attentive and critical look at Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment and arguments against it helps to develop a more complex, but also more interesting perspective. It could serve as an example of a fierce, fascinating fight for a politically and socially important cause. In this fight, both sides remain faithful to their stance rather than to the facts. It is also a story about the problem of reporting science in a sensational way. Keywords Zimbardo · Stanford Prison Experiment · criticism · Ben Blum · social psychology · scientific scepticism THE FALL OF THE KING Every amateur of scientific psychology must have heard about the Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) conducted by professor Philip Zimbardo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Experiment
    A User’s Guide to The Experiment Exploring the Psychology of Groups and Power Manual to accompany the DVDs B B C ACTIVE Pearson Education ii The Experiment Preamble Cover Photograph The participants (left to right) Guards: Brendan Grennan, Thufayel Ahmed, Tom McElroy, Tom Quarry, Frankie Caruana; Prisoners: Frank Clark, Derek McCabe, Paul Petken, John Edwards, Philip Bimpson, Ian Burnett, Dave Dawson, Kevin Murray, Neil Perry, Glen Payton The experimenters: Steve Reicher, Alex Haslam Second Edition ACTIVE Pearson Education ACTIVE © BBC Active, Pearson Education 2006 80 Strand London WC2R 0RL e-mail: [email protected] First edition published 2002 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted or utilised in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without permission in writing from the Publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0 563 54734 0 Library of Congress catalog card number record available The Experiment Contents iii About this Manual This manual provides material to accompany the BBC DVDs of the four episodes of The Experiment. It is intended to help students, teachers and practitioners reflect on the social and psychological issues that the programmes address and to help people get more out of their viewing experience — whether alone, in class, in a seminar, or in a workshop. On the one hand, the manual allows for a detailed understanding of what happened in The Experiment and of the lessons to be drawn from it.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Psychology of Tyranny: the BBC Prison Study
    Copyright © The British Psychological Society Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society 1 The British Psychological British Journal of Social Psychology (2006), 45, 1–40 Society q 2006 The British Psychological Society www.bpsjournals.co.uk Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: The BBC prison study Stephen Reicher1* and S. Alexander Haslam2** 1University of St. Andrews 2University of Exeter This paper presents findings from the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) prison study – an experimental case study that examined the consequences of randomly dividing men into groups of prisoners and guards within a specially constructed institution over a period of 8 days. Unlike the prisoners, the guards failed to identify with their role. This made the guards reluctant to impose their authority and they were eventually overcome by the prisoners. Participants then established an egalitarian social system. When this proved unsustainable, moves to impose a tyrannical regime met with weakening resistance. Empirical and theoretical analysis addresses the conditions under which people identify with the groups to which they are assigned and the social, organizational, and clinical consequences of either doing so or failing to do so. On the basis of these findings, a new framework for understanding tyranny is outlined. This suggests that it is powerlessness and the failure of groups that makes tyranny psychologically acceptable. In the introduction to his text on The Roots of Evil, Staub writes: ‘the widespread hope and belief that human beings had become increasingly ‘civilized’ was shattered by the events of the Second World War, particularly the systematic, deliberate extermination of six million Jews by Hitler’s Third Reich’ (1989, p.
    [Show full text]