DOCSLIB.ORG

Astronomy 300 HOMEWORK #3 Spring 2020 Due Date

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Astronomy 300 HOMEWORK #3 Spring 2020 Due Date Astronomy 300 HOMEWORK #3 Spring 2020 Due date: Thu, Feb. 20 1. Order-of-magnitude estimate (no calculators!!) Show all your steps in detail. As a result of the interaction between the Moon and the tidal bulges on Earth, the Earth’s spin rate is slowing by about 2 milliseconds per century and the Moon is receding from Earth by about 3.8 cm/year. (i) How long will it be before we can get an extra hour of sleep per night (25 hr days)? (ii) When the Moon is about 8% farther away than it currently is, total Solar eclipses will no longer be possible. How long do you have to catch a total eclipse before it’s too late? Calculators may now be used. Watch those significant figures J 2. Orbiting the Moon In 2013-14 NASA’s LADEE mission sent a spacecraft to the moon to study the structure and composition of the thin lunar atmosphere (dust in particular). For details, see: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/ladee/main/ LADEE orbited the Moon at an altitude of only about 40 km. How fast must the LADEE spacecraft be going to maintain a circular orbit at this altitude? 3. Moons of Jupiter Take a look the Solar System data in Appendix C of Carroll and Ostlie. Notice the information it provides about Jupiter and four largest its moons (the ones discovered by Galileo back in 1610). Assume the moons all have circular orbits. (i) Considering Jupiter’s mass and Io’s distance from Jupiter, make a prediction of what Io’s circular velocity should be. (ii) Considering Io’s orbital period, and the distance it has to travel in its orbit around Jupiter, compute Io’s velocity. Compare the result you get to the prediction you made in (i). How well do the two values agree? Do they match within the uncertainties? (iii) Using ratios, predict circular velocities for the remaining 3 “Galilean” satellites of Jupiter. (Do NOT recompute these values from scratch; start from your result in part (i) and use ratios to compute the vcirc values for the other three large moons. (iv) As you did in part (ii), compute the circular velocities for the remaining Galilean satellites and compare their values to your predictions from (iii). 4. Mass of the Milky Way (i) Compute the velocity of the Sun’s orbit around the Milky Way. Assume a circular orbit. Use the values given in Ch. 1 of Croswell for the Sun’s distance from the Galactic center and its orbital period around the Galaxy. (ii) Using the velocity in part (i), compute the mass of the Milky Way interior to the Sun’s orbit. Express your result first in kg and in then in solar masses. (iii) The mass of the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way is measured to be 4.1 +/− 0.6 million solar masses. What fraction of all the mass interior to the Sun’s orbit is this? (iv) Considering your result in part (iii), would it affect the Sun’s orbit in the Galaxy much if no central black hole were not present? Explain. 5. Oumuamua In 2017 an object was discovered moving quickly through the solar system. At perihelion, this object was 0.255 AU from the Sun and moving at a speed of 87.7 km/s. (i) Compute the velocity of an object that would execute a circular orbit 0.255 AU from the Sun. (ii) Compute the escape speed for an object (0.255 AU from the Sun) (speed required to leave the solar system and never come back). (iii) Compare your result in (ii) to the speed that Oumuamua had at perihelion and comment. (iv) Would you expect Oumuamua to be on an elliptical, parabolic, or hyperbolic orbit? Explain. How Oumuamua Got its Name: The object was officially named 1I/2017 U1 by the International Astronomical Union (IAU), which is responsible for granting official names to bodies in the solar system and beyond. In addition to the technical name, the Pan-STARRS team in Hawaii who discovered it dubbed it ‘Oumuamua (pronounced oh MOO-uh MOO-uh), which is Hawaiian for “a messenger from afar arriving first.” 6. Croswell essay (1 page, please type, hand in on separate sheet with name at top): On p.19, in discussing the work of Jacobus Kapteyn, Ken Croswell says: “Yet to no other astronomer was the Galaxy more cruel.” What does Croswell mean by this? Describe the methods that Kapteyn used to construct a model of the Milky Way. What assumptions did he make, and on what basis did he make these assumptions? What results did he obtain, and how did they compare to the results of William Herschel? How do they differ from what we now know about the shape of the Milky Way, and why? 7. Extra-credit problem Please separate this from other problems and turn this in with your essay. Example 2.2.1 in Carroll and Ostlie shows the steps involved in demonstrating that the gravitational effect of a spherically symmetric mass distribution is identical to that of a point mass at the center of the sphere. (i) Read this example carefully and then do the problem for yourself, start to finish, filling in all the steps. Be sure to show all the details of the integration over the angle theta, which C&O leave out! (But do use their suggested change of variables.) Be sure to include a picture that clearly identifies relevant distances and angles. (ii) Redo this calculation for the case where r < R, i.e. where small m is inside the sphere. Consider a single shell of material at radius R, and show that the net force at r due to that shell is zero. Again, be sure to include a drawing. Hint: exactly the same approach may be taken for this problem as for (i)… the only thing that will change is a limit on the integrand. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NASA's Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE)
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 13, EGU2011-5107-2, 2011 EGU General Assembly 2011 © Author(s) 2011 NASA’s Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) Richard Elphic (1), Gregory Delory (1,2), Anthony Colaprete (1), Mihaly Horanyi (3), Paul Mahaffy (4), Butler Hine (1), Steven McClard (5), Joan Salute (6), Edwin Grayzeck (6), and Don Boroson (7) (1) NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA USA ([email protected]), (2) Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA USA, (3) Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO USA, (4) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD USA, (5) LunarQuest Program Office, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL USA, (6) Planetary Science Division, Science Mission Directorate, NASA, Washington, DC USA, (7) Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington MA USA Nearly 40 years have passed since the last Apollo missions investigated the mysteries of the lunar atmosphere and the question of levitated lunar dust. The most important questions remain: what is the composition, structure and variability of the tenuous lunar exosphere? What are its origins, transport mechanisms, and loss processes? Is lofted lunar dust the cause of the horizon glow observed by the Surveyor missions and Apollo astronauts? How does such levitated dust arise and move, what is its density, and what is its ultimate fate? The US National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council decadal surveys and the recent “Scientific Context for Exploration of the Moon” (SCEM) reports have identified studies of the pristine state of the lunar atmosphere and dust environment as among the leading priorities for future lunar science missions.
    [Show full text]
  • MARS SCIENCE LABORATORY ORBIT DETERMINATION Gerhard L. Kruizinga(1)
    MARS SCIENCE LABORATORY ORBIT DETERMINATION Gerhard L. Kruizinga(1), Eric D. Gustafson(2), Paul F. Thompson(3), David C. Jefferson(4), Tomas J. Martin-Mur(5), Neil A. Mottinger(6), Frederic J. Pelletier(7), and Mark S. Ryne(8) (1-8)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109, +1-818-354-7060, fGerhard.L.Kruizinga, edg, Paul.F.Thompson, David.C.Jefferson, tmur, Neil.A.Mottinger, Fred.Pelletier, [email protected] Abstract: This paper describes the orbit determination process, results and filter strategies used by the Mars Science Laboratory Navigation Team during cruise from Earth to Mars. The new atmospheric entry guidance system resulted in an orbit determination paradigm shift during final approach when compared to previous Mars lander missions. The evolving orbit determination filter strategies during cruise are presented. Furthermore, results of calibration activities of dynamical models are presented. The atmospheric entry interface trajectory knowledge was significantly better than the original requirements, which enabled the very precise landing in Gale Crater. Keywords: Mars Science Laboratory, Curiosity, Mars, Navigation, Orbit Determination 1. Introduction On August 6, 2012, the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) and the Curiosity rover successful performed a precision landing in Gale Crater on Mars. A crucial part of the success was orbit determination (OD) during the cruise from Earth to Mars. The OD process involves determining the spacecraft state, predicting the future trajectory and characterizing the uncertainty associated with the predicted trajectory. This paper describes the orbit determination process, results, and unique challenges during the final approach phase.
    [Show full text]
  • The Son of Lamoraal Ulbo De Sitter, a Judge, and Catharine Theodore Wilhelmine Bertling
    558 BIOGRAPHIES v.i WiLLEM DE SITTER viT 1872-1934 De Sitter was bom on 6 May 1872 in Sneek (province of Friesland), the son of Lamoraal Ulbo de Sitter, a judge, and Catharine Theodore Wilhelmine Bertling. His father became presiding judge of the court in Arnhem, and that is where De Sitter attended gymna­ sium. At the University of Groniiigen he first studied mathematics and physics and then switched to astronomy under Jacobus Kapteyn. De Sitter spent two years observing and studying under David Gill at the Cape Obsen'atory, the obseivatory with which Kapteyn was co­ operating on the Cape Photographic Durchmusterung. De Sitter participated in the program to make precise measurements of the positions of the Galilean moons of Jupiter, using a heliometer. In 1901 he received his doctorate under Kapteyn on a dissertation on Jupiter's satellites: Discussion of Heliometer Observations of Jupiter's Satel­ lites. De Sitter remained at Groningen as an assistant to Kapteyn in the astronomical laboratory, until 1909, when he was appointed to the chair of astronomy at the University of Leiden. In 1919 he be­ came director of the Leiden Observatory. He remained in these posts until his death in 1934. De Sitter's work was highly mathematical. With his work on Jupi­ ter's satellites, De Sitter pursued the new methods of celestial me­ chanics of Poincare and Tisserand. His earlier heliometer meas­ urements were later supplemented by photographic measurements made at the Cape, Johannesburg, Pulkowa, Greenwich, and Leiden. De Sitter's final results on this subject were published as 'New Math­ ematical Theory of Jupiter's Satellites' in 1925.
    [Show full text]
  • LADEE PDS Mission Description Center Document Document No: DES-12.LADEE.LPMD Rev.: 1.5 Effective Date: 05-13-2014
    Ames Research Title: LADEE PDS Mission Description Center Document Document No: DES-12.LADEE.LPMD Rev.: 1.5 Effective Date: 05-13-2014 Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) LADEE PDS Mission Description th May 13 , 2014 Ames Research Center Moffett Field, California National Aeronautics and Space Administration i Ames Research Title: LADEE PDS Mission Description Center Document Document No: DES-12.LADEE.LPMD Rev.: 1.5 Effective Date: 05-13-2014 This document is approved in accordance with LADEE Configuration Management Plan, C04.LADEE.CM, paragraph 3.6.1.1 Document Release Routing Approval Process. Page three of this document contains the approved routed release of this document. Approval Signatures _______________________________________ ___________ Butler Hine Date LADEE Project Manager _______________________________________ ___________ Gregory T. Delory Date LADEE Deputy Project Scientist _______________________________________ ___________ Date _______________________________________ ___________ Date ii Ames Research Title: LADEE PDS Mission Description Center Document Document No: DES-12.LADEE.LPMD Rev.: 1.5 Effective Date: 05-13-2014 This page is reserved for routing approval document iii Ames Research Title: LADEE PDS Mission Description Center Document Document No: DES-12.LADEE.LPMD Rev.: 1.5 Effective Date: 05-13-2014 REVISION HISTORY Rev. Description of Change Author(s) Effective Date 1.0 Initial draft G. Delory Nov 1, 2012 1.1 Resolved several TBDs G. Delory Nov 29, 2012 Updated TOC and prepared for conversion to PDF March 21, 1.2 G. Delory 2012 Baseline March 21, NC G. Delory 2012 Edited mission objective #2 as per PDS peer review 1.3 G. Delory April 4, 2013 results Updated mission timeline and orbit plots to reflect as- 1.4 G.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomer Explores Universe Through Remote-Controlled Telescope 24 May 2016
    Astronomer explores universe through remote-controlled telescope 24 May 2016 and bring his students into his research. The telescope is in the Western Europe time zone, which is six hours head of U.S. Central Time. "Because of the time difference, students can see in the afternoon what they'd have to wait until midnight to see here," Keel said. "This opens up new possibilities for classroom experiences in our daytime, as well as making it easier to use the telescope without changing a whole day's schedule." In April and May, Keel took some photos using the reopened telescope, including shots of the globular star cluster M3 in Canes Venatici (the constellation of the Hunting Dogs just south of the Big Dipper) and the planetary nebula M27 (the Dumbbell Nebula) in Vulpecula (the Fox, in the summer Milky Way). Eagle Nebula M16. Taken by Dr. William Keel with the Jacobus Kapteyn Telescope. Access by the astronomers at The University of Alabama to the Jacobus Kapteyn Telescope in the Canary Islands will benefit both research and students at UA. Dr. William Keel, UA professor of astronomy and astrophysics, represents UA on the managing board of a 12-institution consortium called the Southeastern Association for Research in Astronomy. He recently obtained some of the first data with the recently reopened Jacobus Kapteyn Telescope through SARA, which operates the telescope. The 1.0-meter telescope is at an altitude of 2,360 meters at the Observatorio del Roque de los Spiral galaxy M83. Taken by Dr. William Keel with the Muchachos on the Spanish Canary Island of La Jacobus Kapteyn Telescope.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Aerojet Boosters Set to Lift New Horizons Spacecraft
    January 15, 2006 Five Aerojet Boosters Set to Lift New Horizons Spacecraft Aerojet Propulsion Will Support Both Launch Vehicle and Spacecraft for Mission to Pluto SACRAMENTO, Calif., Jan. 15 /PRNewswire/ -- Aerojet, a GenCorp Inc. (NYSE: GY) company, will provide five solid rocket boosters for the launch vehicle and a propulsion system for the spacecraft when a Lockheed Martin Atlas® V launches the Pluto New Horizons spacecraft January 17 from Cape Canaveral, AFB. The launch window opens at 1:24 p.m. EST on January 17 and extends through February 14. The New Horizons mission, dubbed by NASA as the "first mission to the last planet," will study Pluto and its moon, Charon, in detail during a five-month- long flyby encounter. Pluto is the solar system's most distant planet, averaging 3.6 billion miles from the sun. Aerojet's solid rocket boosters (SRBs), each 67-feet long and providing an average of 250,000 pounds of thrust, will provide the necessary added thrust for the New Horizons mission. The SRBs have flown in previous vehicle configurations using two and three boosters; this is the first flight utilizing the five boosters. Additionally, 12 Aerojet monopropellant (hydrazine) thrusters on the Atlas V Centaur upper stage will provide roll, pitch, and yaw control settling burns for the launch vehicle main engines. Aerojet also supplies 8 retro rockets for Atlas Centaur separation. Aerojet also provided the spacecraft propulsion system, comprised of a propellant tank, 16 thrusters and various other components, which will control pointing and navigation for the spacecraft on its journey and during encounters with Pluto- Charon and, as part of a possible extended mission, to more distant, smaller objects in the Kuiper Belt.
    [Show full text]
  • Planets Asteroids Comets the Jacobus Kapteyn Telescope Meteors
    Planets A planet is an astronomical body in orbit The Solar System around the Sun, or another star, which has a mass too small for it to become a star itself (less than about one-twentieth the mass of the Sun) and shines only by reflected light. Planets may be basically rocky objects, such as the The Sun, together with the planets and moons, comets, asteroids, meteoroid inner planets - Mercury, Venus, Earth and streams and interplanetary medium held captive by the Sun’s gravitational Mars - or primarily gaseous, with a small solid attraction. The solar system is presumed to have formed from a rotating disc of core like the outer planets - Jupiter, Saturn, gas and dust created around the Sun as it contracted to form a star, about five Uranus and Neptune. Together with Pluto, billion years ago. The planets and asteroids all travel around the Sun in the these are the major planets of the Solar same direction as the Earth, in orbits close to the plane of the Earth’s orbit and System. the Sun’s equator. The planetary orbits lie within 40 astronomical units (6 thousand million kilometres) of the Sun, though the Sun’s sphere of Asteroids gravitational influence can be considered to be much greater. Comets seen in the inner solar system may originate in the Oort cloud, many thousands of astronomical units away. Comets Comets are icy bodies orbiting in the Solar System, which partially vaporises when it nears the Sun, developing a diffuse envelope of dust and gas and, normally, one or more tails.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacecraft Trajectories in a Sun, Earth, and Moon Ephemeris Model
    SPACECRAFT TRAJECTORIES IN A SUN, EARTH, AND MOON EPHEMERIS MODEL A Project Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Aerospace Engineering San José State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering by Romalyn Mirador i ABSTRACT SPACECRAFT TRAJECTORIES IN A SUN, EARTH, AND MOON EPHEMERIS MODEL by Romalyn Mirador This project details the process of building, testing, and comparing a tool to simulate spacecraft trajectories using an ephemeris N-Body model. Different trajectory models and methods of solving are reviewed. Using the Ephemeris positions of the Earth, Moon and Sun, a code for higher-fidelity numerical modeling is built and tested using MATLAB. Resulting trajectories are compared to NASA’s GMAT for accuracy. Results reveal that the N-Body model can be used to find complex trajectories but would need to include other perturbations like gravity harmonics to model more accurate trajectories. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my family and friends for their continuous encouragement and support throughout all these years. A special thank you to my advisor, Dr. Capdevila, and my friend, Dhathri, for mentoring me as I work on this project. The knowledge and guidance from the both of you has helped me tremendously and I appreciate everything you both have done to help me get here. ii Table of Contents List of Symbols ............................................................................................................................... v 1.0 INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Space Sector Brochure
    SPACE SPACE REVOLUTIONIZING THE WAY TO SPACE SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGIES PROPULSION Moog provides components and subsystems for cold gas, chemical, and electric Moog is a proven leader in components, subsystems, and systems propulsion and designs, develops, and manufactures complete chemical propulsion for spacecraft of all sizes, from smallsats to GEO spacecraft. systems, including tanks, to accelerate the spacecraft for orbit-insertion, station Moog has been successfully providing spacecraft controls, in- keeping, or attitude control. Moog makes thrusters from <1N to 500N to support the space propulsion, and major subsystems for science, military, propulsion requirements for small to large spacecraft. and commercial operations for more than 60 years. AVIONICS Moog is a proven provider of high performance and reliable space-rated avionics hardware and software for command and data handling, power distribution, payload processing, memory, GPS receivers, motor controllers, and onboard computing. POWER SYSTEMS Moog leverages its proven spacecraft avionics and high-power control systems to supply hardware for telemetry, as well as solar array and battery power management and switching. Applications include bus line power to valves, motors, torque rods, and other end effectors. Moog has developed products for Power Management and Distribution (PMAD) Systems, such as high power DC converters, switching, and power stabilization. MECHANISMS Moog has produced spacecraft motion control products for more than 50 years, dating back to the historic Apollo and Pioneer programs. Today, we offer rotary, linear, and specialized mechanisms for spacecraft motion control needs. Moog is a world-class manufacturer of solar array drives, propulsion positioning gimbals, electric propulsion gimbals, antenna positioner mechanisms, docking and release mechanisms, and specialty payload positioners.
    [Show full text]
  • A Possible Flyby Anomaly for Juno at Jupiter
    A possible flyby anomaly for Juno at Jupiter L. Acedo,∗ P. Piqueras and J. A. Mora˜no Instituto Universitario de Matem´atica Multidisciplinar, Building 8G, 2o Floor, Camino de Vera, Universitat Polit`ecnica de Val`encia, Valencia, Spain December 14, 2017 Abstract In the last decades there have been an increasing interest in im- proving the accuracy of spacecraft navigation and trajectory data. In the course of this plan some anomalies have been found that cannot, in principle, be explained in the context of the most accurate orbital models including all known effects from classical dynamics and general relativity. Of particular interest for its puzzling nature, and the lack of any accepted explanation for the moment, is the flyby anomaly discov- ered in some spacecraft flybys of the Earth over the course of twenty years. This anomaly manifest itself as the impossibility of matching the pre and post-encounter Doppler tracking and ranging data within a single orbit but, on the contrary, a difference of a few mm/s in the asymptotic velocities is required to perform the fitting. Nevertheless, no dedicated missions have been carried out to eluci- arXiv:1711.08893v2 [astro-ph.EP] 13 Dec 2017 date the origin of this phenomenon with the objective either of revising our understanding of gravity or to improve the accuracy of spacecraft Doppler tracking by revealing a conventional origin. With the occasion of the Juno mission arrival at Jupiter and the close flybys of this planet, that are currently been performed, we have developed an orbital model suited to the time window close to the ∗E-mail: [email protected] 1 perijove.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA-Funded Scientists Interested in Giving Presentations Are Invited to Join the New NASA SMD Scientist Speaker’S Bureau!
    Welcome! Planetary Science E/PO Community Tag-up December 13, 2012 MESSENGER Finds New Evidence for Water Ice at Mercury's Poles Today • Community News and Announcements! • News from HQ – Data Call – Update on NASA Education Plan and Communications Plan • It’s A New Moon Campaign / LADEE Launch Events • AGU Reflections • LPSC Plans Community News & Announcements Science and E/PO Highlights A new episode of active volcanism on Venus? Halfway Between Uranus and Neptune, New Horizons Cruises On Early career scientists compete to convey their science to the public in three minutes … no PowerPoints! AGU, LPSC, and more! Finals: April 2014 at National Geographic Headquarters Winner competes in FameLab International in NASA's GRAIL Creates Most the UK in June 2014 Accurate Moon Gravity Map Science and E/PO Highlights NASA Mars Rover Fully Analyzes First Soil Samples Voyager 1 Encounters New Region in Deep Space What is Creating Gullies on Vesta? Opportunity Rover Finishes Walkabout on Mars Crater Rim Science and E/PO Highlights News from HQ • Data Call! Due … NOW! Really … no point in waiting to see if the world ends … • Recent governance changes: How the new NASA Education Plan and Communication Plan requirements will be implemented It’s A New Moon • Overall Strategy – take advantage of the excitement leading up to and during this mission to continue the successful “It’s A New Moon” public outreach program, highlighting the range of current NASA robotic lunar science missions, Lunar educational and public outreach activities, and building on the success and lessons learned from the GRAIL and LRO missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Science
    Mission Directorate: Science Theme: Planetary Science Theme Overview Planetary Science is a grand human enterprise that seeks to discover the nature and origin of the celestial bodies among which we live, and to explore whether life exists beyond Earth. The scientific imperative for Planetary Science, the quest to understand our origins, is universal. How did we get here? Are we alone? What does the future hold? These overarching questions lead to more focused, fundamental science questions about our solar system: How did the Sun's family of planets, satellites, and minor bodies originate and evolve? What are the characteristics of the solar system that lead to habitable environments? How and where could life begin and evolve in the solar system? What are the characteristics of small bodies and planetary environments and what potential hazards or resources do they hold? To address these science questions, NASA relies on various flight missions, research and analysis (R&A) and technology development. There are seven programs within the Planetary Science Theme: R&A, Lunar Quest, Discovery, New Frontiers, Mars Exploration, Outer Planets, and Technology. R&A supports two operating missions with international partners (Rosetta and Hayabusa), as well as sample curation, data archiving, dissemination and analysis, and Near Earth Object Observations. The Lunar Quest Program consists of small robotic spacecraft missions, Missions of Opportunity, Lunar Science Institute, and R&A. Discovery has two spacecraft in prime mission operations (MESSENGER and Dawn), an instrument operating on an ESA Mars Express mission (ASPERA-3), a mission in its development phase (GRAIL), three Missions of Opportunities (M3, Strofio, and LaRa), and three investigations using re-purposed spacecraft: EPOCh and DIXI hosted on the Deep Impact spacecraft and NExT hosted on the Stardust spacecraft.
    [Show full text]