Strategic Computing : DARPA and the Quest for Machine Intelligence, 1983–1993 / Alex Roland with Philip Shiman

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Strategic Computing : DARPA and the Quest for Machine Intelligence, 1983–1993 / Alex Roland with Philip Shiman Strategic Computing History of Computing I. Bernard Cohen and William Aspray, editors William Aspray, John von Neumann and the Origins of Modern Computing Charles J. Bashe, Lyle R. Johnson, John H. Palmer, and Emerson W. Pugh, IBM’s Early Computers Paul E. Ceruzzi, A History of Modern Computing I. Bernard Cohen, Howard Aiken: Portrait of a Computer Pioneer I. Bernard Cohen and Gregory W. Welch, editors, Makin’ Numbers: Howard Aiken and the Computer John Hendry, Innovating for Failure: Government Policy and the Early British Com- puter Industry Michael Lindgren, Glory and Failure: The Difference Engines of Johann Mu¨ller, Charles Babbage, and Georg and Edvard Scheutz David E. Lundstrom, A Few Good Men from Univac R. Moreau, The Computer Comes of Age: The People, the Hardware, and the Software Emerson W. Pugh, Building IBM: Shaping an Industry and Its Technology Emerson W. Pugh, Memories That Shaped an Industry Emerson W. Pugh, Lyle R. Johnson, and John H. Palmer, IBM’s 360 and Early 370 Systems Kent C. Redmond and Thomas M. Smith, From Whirlwind to MITRE: The R&D Story of the SAGE Air Defense Computer Alex Roland with Philip Shiman, Strategic Computing: DARPA and the Quest for Machine Intelligence, 1983–1993 Rau´l Rojas and Ulf Hashagen, editors, The First Computers—History and Architectures Dorothy Stein, Ada: A Life and a Legacy John Vardalas, The Computer Revolution in Canada: Building National Technologi- cal Competence, 1945–1980 Maurice V. Wilkes, Memoirs of a Computer Pioneer Strategic Computing DARPA and the Quest for Machine Intelligence, 1983–1993 Alex Roland with Philip Shiman The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England 2002 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. This book was set in New Baskerville by Achorn Graphic Services, Inc., and printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Roland, Alex, 1944– Strategic computing : DARPA and the quest for machine intelligence, 1983–1993 / Alex Roland with Philip Shiman. p. cm. — (History of computing) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-262-18226-2 (hc. : alk. paper) 1. High performance computing. 2. Artificial intelligence. I. Shiman, Philip. II. Title. III. Series. QA76.88 .R65 2002 004.3—dc21 2001056252 Contents List of Illustrations ix Preface xi Acknowledgments xv Chronology: Key DARPA Personnel during the Strategic Computing Program xix List of Acronyms xxi Introduction 1 Part I 1 Robert Kahn: Visionary 13 Switching and Connecting 14 The Information Processing Techniques Office (IPTO) 21 AI Autumn 26 An Agent of Restoration 32 2 Robert Cooper: Salesman 39 The Pull of Robert Cooper 39 The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) 42 An Agent of Transition 46 Testing the Market 56 vi Contents The Pyramid as Conceptual Icon 63 Of Time Lines and Applications 71 3 Lynn Conway: Executor 83 Connecting with the Customer 83 The Divorce of the Dynamic Duo 95 Process and Personality 102 The Plight of the Program Manager 109 Part II 4 Invisible Infrastructure: MOSIS 117 The Transformation of Microelectronics 117 From VLSI to MOSIS 119 The Value Added 130 Public Good, Political Liability 136 Other Infrastructure 140 5 Over the Wall: The SC Architectures Program 149 The Connection Machine 149 The Wall 154 Stephen Squires, Human Agent 158 Defining the First Generation 165 Applying the Gray Code 174 6 Artificial Intelligence: The Search for the Generic Expert System 185 Artificial Intelligence (AI) 185 Expert Systems 190 Contents vii IntelliCorp and Teknowledge 196 Managing Innovation 201 The Failure to Connect 206 The Rest of AI 208 7 Putting SC to Work: The Autonomous Land Vehicle 215 Crazy Walking War Machines 215 Working with Industry 222 The Tyranny of the Demonstration 229 The New Generation System 237 The ALV and Its Shadow 243 Part III 8 ISTO: The Middle Years of Strategic Computing, 1985–1989 251 Reconciling Form and Function 251 Reconciling Vision and Budget 261 Strategic Computing at Age Four 264 Waiting for the Wave 272 Strategic Computing 2 279 9 The Disappearance of Strategic Computing 285 The FCCSET Initiative 286 Connecting the Supercomputers 293 The Gap between Conception and Legislation 296 Fields and Boehm in the Last Ditch 302 The Politics of Change 310 Disconnecting the Last Veteran 314 viii Contents 10 Conclusion 319 Why? 320 How? 321 What? 325 Notes 333 Note on Sources 397 Index 405 Illustrations 2.1 DARPA organizational chart, June 1980 47 2.2 Dertouzos seating chart 59 2.3 “Program Structure and Logic,” the SC pyramid before it be- 68 came a pyramid 2.4 Time line 70 2.5 SCI pyramid 77 2.6 Visualizing and interpreting the program’s compartments, 78 elements, and time line 3.1 DARPA organizational chart, November 1984 101 3.2 “Going Away” gift picture for Lynn Conway 105 3.3 The fully articulated SC pyramid 108 4.1 Junction transistor 121 4.2 NPN transistor 122 4.3 Schematic of a field effect (FET) or metal-oxide semiconduc- 122 tor (MOS) transistor 4.4 Field effect or metal-oxide semiconductor (MOS) chip 123 4.5 The MOSIS system 125 4.6 λ rules 128 4.7 A wafer with multiple chips 140 5.1 The Connection Machine 178 7.1 Pilot’s Associate 217 7.2 The Autonomous Land Vehicle 227 8.1 DARPA organizational chart, September 1987 257 9.1 FCCSET “Advanced Computer Research Program Structure 292 and Goals” 9.2 “The Scalable Parallel Computing Spiral” 299 9.3 DARPA-ISTO Technology Maturity Model 304 9.4 DARPA organizational chart, July 1991 312 9.5 Pyramid of High Performance Computing environments 317 This page intentionally left blank Preface This story has its own story. Philip Shiman and I were commissioned by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to prepare this study. Most of the research and writing were done under subcontract between the Naval Warfare Systems Center (NWSC), an agent of DARPA, and Duke University, which employed Shiman and me. Execu- tion of this contract was fraught with difficulty, and the contract was terminated short of completion. The book that follows is best under- stood in the light of this relationship between the historians and the object of their study. On the recommendation of I. Bernard Cohen and Merritt Roe Smith, members of a DARPA panel overseeing this book project, Keith Un- capher contacted me in March of 1992. I then submitted a proposal to serve as principal investigator, with Research Associate Philip Shiman, to prepare a 400-page history of the Strategic Computing Program (SCP). The three-year project would be funded by the Information Sci- ence and Technology Office (ISTO) of DARPA. On 11 November 1992, Shiman, Uncapher, and I met with Steven Squires, director of ISTO. At that meeting Squires displayed a remarkable intelligence, a boyish enthusiasm for computers, a petulant imperiousness, a passion for Isaac Asimov and Star Trek, and a permanent membership card to Disney- world, which he wore on a chain around his neck. Prudence dictated that Shiman and I walk away from this undertaking, but we succumbed to a siren song of curiosity. Squires claimed that the world was in a Seldon crisis, a reference to the Asimov Foundation trilogy. This classic of science fiction, which may be seen as a rumination on the collapse of the Roman empire or a metaphor for the Cold War, envi- sioned two “foundations” chartered at opposite ends of a galactic em- pire, which visionary Hari Seldon knew was coming to an end. Seldon tells one of the foundations, analogous to the United States or the free xii Preface world, that it must survive a series of crises. Only then will it endure the millennium of chaos before the birth of galactic civilization. Squires clearly implied that he and his colleagues in computer research were solving critical problems, thereby ushering in a new era of civilization. Shiman and I both wanted to know more about Squires and the strange world he inhabited. We sparred with Squires over the terms of the contract and our method of operation. He wanted us to work primar- ily from interviews with him and his colleagues and to write up the story as they saw it. We insisted that we would need other sources of evidence to validate whatever interpretation we settled on. We left the inter- view, I now think, each believing that the other had agreed to do it his way. As we set about our work, it quickly became apparent that working with DARPA would prove more difficult than we had anticipated. It took eight months just to get the terms of the contract settled. The authoriza- tion chain led from Squires as director of ISTO, through a contracting officer at DARPA, the NWSC, a subcontracting agent (at first, Meridian Corporation, then Applied Ordnance Technology [AOT], and then Me- ridian again [now a subsidiary of Dyncorp]), through Duke University, and finally to the historians. The main issue in dispute was intellectual control over the findings of the study. Duke insisted that the historians function as researchers, delivering in the final report their “best effort” to understand and explicate SCP. DARPA, through its agents, insisted that the historians deliver an acceptable manuscript. When no resolu- tion was achieved after months of negotiation, AOT replaced Meridian as the contracting agent and a contract was quickly signed along the lines proposed by Duke. Eighteen months later, however, when the con- tract came to be renewed, DynCorp replaced AOT and the same dispute resumed.
Recommended publications
  • Massive Retaliation Charles Wilson, Neil Mcelroy, and Thomas Gates 1953-1961
    Evolution of the Secretary of Defense in the Era of MassiveSEPTEMBER Retaliation 2012 Evolution of the Secretary OF Defense IN THE ERA OF Massive Retaliation Charles Wilson, Neil McElroy, and Thomas Gates 1953-1961 Special Study 3 Historical Office Office of the Secretary of Defense Cold War Foreign Policy Series • Special Study 3 Evolution of the Secretary of Defense in the Era of Massive Retaliation Evolution of the Secretary of Defense in the Era of Massive Retaliation Charles Wilson, Neil McElroy, and Thomas Gates 1953-1961 Cover Photos: Charles Wilson, Neil McElroy, Thomas Gates, Jr. Source: Official DoD Photo Library, used with permission. Cover Design: OSD Graphics, Pentagon. Cold War Foreign Policy Series • Special Study 3 Evolution of the Secretary of Defense in the Era of Massive Retaliation Evolution of the Secretary OF Defense IN THE ERA OF Massive Retaliation Charles Wilson, Neil McElroy, and Thomas Gates 1953-1961 Special Study 3 Series Editors Erin R. Mahan, Ph.D. Chief Historian, Office of the Secretary of Defense Jeffrey A. Larsen, Ph.D. President, Larsen Consulting Group Historical Office Office of the Secretary of Defense September 2012 ii iii Cold War Foreign Policy Series • Special Study 3 Evolution of the Secretary of Defense in the Era of Massive Retaliation Contents Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Defense, the Historical Office of the Office of Foreword..........................................vii the Secretary of Defense, Larsen Consulting Group, or any other agency of the Federal Government. Executive Summary...................................ix Cleared for public release; distribution unlimited.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanley: the Robot That Won the DARPA Grand Challenge
    STANLEY Winning the DARPA Grand Challenge with an AI Robot_ Michael Montemerlo, Sebastian Thrun, Hendrik Dahlkamp, David Stavens Stanford AI Lab, Stanford University 353 Serra Mall Stanford, CA 94305-9010 fmmde,thrun,dahlkamp,[email protected] Sven Strohband Volkswagen of America, Inc. Electronics Research Laboratory 4009 Miranda Avenue, Suite 150 Palo Alto, California 94304 [email protected] http://www.cs.stanford.edu/people/dstavens/aaai06/montemerlo_etal_aaai06.pdf Stanley: The Robot that Won the DARPA Grand Challenge Sebastian Thrun, Mike Montemerlo, Hendrik Dahlkamp, David Stavens, Andrei Aron, James Diebel, Philip Fong, John Gale, Morgan Halpenny, Gabriel Hoffmann, Kenny Lau, Celia Oakley, Mark Palatucci, Vaughan Pratt, and Pascal Stang Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Stanford University Stanford, California 94305 http://robots.stanford.edu/papers/thrun.stanley05.pdf DARPA Grand Challenge: Final Part 1 Stanley from Stanford 10.54 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2AcMnfzpNg Sebastian Thrun helped build Google's amazing driverless car, powered by a very personal quest to save lives and reduce traffic accidents. 4 minutes https://www.ted.com/talks/sebastian_thrun_google_s_driverless_car THE GREAT ROBOT RACE – documentary Published on Jan 21, 2016 DARPA Grand Challenge—a raucous race for robotic, driverless vehicles sponsored by the Pentagon, which awards a $2 million purse to the winning team. Armed with artificial intelligence, laser-guided vision, GPS navigation, and 3-D mapping systems, the contenders are some of the world's most advanced robots. Yet even their formidable technology and mechanical prowess may not be enough to overcome the grueling 130-mile course through Nevada's desert terrain. From concept to construction to the final competition, "The Great Robot Race" delivers the absorbing inside story of clever engineers and their unyielding drive to create a champion, capturing the only aerial footage that exists of the Grand Challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf and SANS '99 ( Are Worth a Read
    motd by Rob Kolstad Dr. Rob Kolstad has long served as editor of ;login:. He is also head coach of the USENIX- sponsored USA Computing Olympiad. <[email protected]> Needs In the late 1960s, when the psychological world embraced behaviorism and psychoanalysis as its twin grails, Abraham Maslow proposed a hierarchy of needs. This hierarchy was brought to mind because I am hosting the Polish computing champion for a short visit, and he often asks questions of the sort, "Why would anyone need such a large car?" Maslow listed, in order: • Physiological needs, including air, food, water, warmth, shelter, etc. Lack of these things can cause death. • Safety needs, for coping with emergencies, chaos (e.g., rioting), and other periods of disorganization. • Needs for giving and receiving love, affection, and belonging, as well as the ability to escape loneliness/alienation. • Esteem needs, centering on a stable, high level of self-respect and respect from others, in order to gain satisfaction and self-confidence. Lack of esteem causes feelings of inferiority, weakness, helplessness, and worthlessness. "Self-actualization" needs were the big gun of the thesis. They exemplified the behavior of non-selfish adults and are, regrettably, beyond the scope of this short article. As I think about the context of "needs" vs. "wants" or "desires" in our culture, economy, and particularly among the group of readers of this publication, it seems that we're doing quite well for the easy needs (physiological needs and safety). I know many of my acquaintances (and myself!) are doing just super in their quest for better gadgetry, toys, and "stuff" ("whoever dies with the most toys wins").
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Planetary Caves with an Autonomous, Heterogeneous Robot Team
    Mapping Planetary Caves with an Autonomous, Heterogeneous Robot Team Ammar Husain Heather Jones Balajee Kannan Robotics Institute Robotics Institute GE Global Research Carnegie Mellon University Carnegie Mellon University Schenectady, NY 12309 Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Pittsburgh, PA 15213 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Uland Wong Tiago Pimentel Martins da Silva Sarah Tang Robotics Institute Mechatronics Engineering Dept. Mechanical and Aerospace Eng. Dept. Carnegie Mellon University University of Brasilia Princeton University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Brasilia, DF, Brazil Princeton, NJ 08544 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Shreyansh Daftry Steven Huber William L. “Red” Whittaker Electronics and Communication Dept. Astrobotic Technology, Inc. Robotics Institute Manipal Institute of Technology Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Carnegie Mellon University Manipal, Karnataka, India [email protected] Pittsburgh, PA 15213 [email protected] [email protected] Abstract— d Caves on other planetary bodies offer sheltered habitat for future human explorers and numerous clues to a planet’s past for scientists. While recent orbital imagery pro- vides exciting new details about cave entrances on the Moon and Mars, the interiors of these caves are still unknown and not observable from orbit. Multi-robot teams offer unique solutions for exploration and modeling subsurface voids during precursor missions. Robot teams that are diverse in terms of size, mobility, sensing, and capability can provide great advantages, but this diversity, coupled with inherently distinct low-level behavior (a) Lunar skylight (b) Skylight in a funnel- architectures, makes coordination a challenge. This paper shaped pit on Mars presents a framework that consists of an autonomous frontier and capability-based task generator, a distributed market-based Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Microkernel Mechanisms for Improving the Trustworthiness of Commodity Hardware
    Microkernel Mechanisms for Improving the Trustworthiness of Commodity Hardware Yanyan Shen Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Computer Science and Engineering Faculty of Engineering March 2019 Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname/Family Name : Shen Given Name/s : Yanyan Abbreviation for degree as give in the University calendar : PhD Faculty : Faculty of Engineering School : School of Computer Science and Engineering Microkernel Mechanisms for Improving the Trustworthiness of Commodity Thesis Title : Hardware Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASE TYPE) The thesis presents microkernel-based software-implemented mechanisms for improving the trustworthiness of computer systems based on commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) hardware that can malfunction when the hardware is impacted by transient hardware faults. The hardware anomalies, if undetected, can cause data corruptions, system crashes, and security vulnerabilities, significantly undermining system dependability. Specifically, we adopt the single event upset (SEU) fault model and address transient CPU or memory faults. We take advantage of the functional correctness and isolation guarantee provided by the formally verified seL4 microkernel and hardware redundancy provided by multicore processors, design the redundant co-execution (RCoE) architecture that replicates a whole software system (including the microkernel) onto different CPU cores, and implement two variants, loosely-coupled redundant co-execution (LC-RCoE) and closely-coupled redundant co-execution (CC-RCoE), for the ARM and x86 architectures. RCoE treats each replica of the software system as a state machine and ensures that the replicas start from the same initial state, observe consistent inputs, perform equivalent state transitions, and thus produce consistent outputs during error-free executions.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Tribute to George Low –“The Ultimate Engineer”
    Book Tribute to George Low –“The Ultimate Engineer” The Ultimate Engineer: The Remarkable Life of NASA's Visionary Leader George M. Low by Richard Jurek Foreword by Gerald D. Griffin From the late 1950s to 1976 the U.S. manned spaceflight program advanced as it did largely due to the extraordinary efforts of Austrian immigrant George M. Low. Described as the "ultimate engineer" during his career at NASA, Low was a visionary architect and leader from the agency's inception in 1958 to his retirement in 1976. As chief of manned spaceflight at NASA, Low was instrumental in the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programs. Low's pioneering work paved the way for President Kennedy's decision to make a lunar landing NASA's primary goal in the 1960s. After the tragic 1967 Apollo I fire that took the lives of three astronauts and almost crippled the program, Low took charge of the redesign of the Apollo spacecraft, and helped lead the program from disaster and toward the moon. In 1968, Low made the bold decision to go for lunar orbit on Apollo 8 before the lunar module was ready for flight and after only one Earth orbit test flight of the Command and Service modules. Under Low there were five manned missions, including Apollo 11, the first manned lunar landing. Low's clandestine negotiations with the Soviet Union resulted in a historic joint mission in 1975 that was the precursor to the Shuttle-MIR and International Space Station programs. At the end of his NASA career, Low was one of the leading figures in the development of the Space Shuttle in the early1970s, and was instrumental in NASA's transition into a post-Apollo world.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Bibliography of Machine Learning
    COMPREHENSIVE BIBLIOGRAPHY OF MACHINE LEARNING Paul E. Utgoff Bernard Nudel Rutgers University This chapter consists of a bibliography of the field of machine learning. The sources of the references include bibliographies compiled by Saul Amarel, Dana Angluin, Ryszard S. Michalski, Tom M. Mitchell, Carl Smith, and Bruce G. Buchanan, as well as our own additions. We define fourteen categories to classify the machine learning literature. For each category, there is a list of reference numbers indicating which references belong within that category. In addition, to the left of each reference is a list of category code letters indicating the categories to which the reference belongs. CATEGORIES Category a. Analogy: Investigation of analogical reasoning in problem solving, and the use of analogy as a learning method. {92, 93, 94, 97, 100, 157,274,332,333,374,472,533,563,564, 565} Category b. Background material: General background reading in areas of artifi­ cial intelligence, cognitive science, and related disciplines that lay the framework for many of the machine learning methods. For overviews of work on machine learning in particular, see category o. {3, 4,5, 16,24,29,35,38,40,51,60,61,71,75,84,90, 107, Ill, 119, 129, 131, 132, 142, 148, 149, 153, 158, 160, 161, 166, 170, 171, 175, 176, 179, 180, 185, 205, 234, 237, 239, 252, 261, 270, 289, 292, 294, 320, 329, 330, 331, 334, 355, 358, 359, 362, 363, 369, 374, 391, 392, 393, 396, 397, 398, 400, 403, 413, 416, 429, 430, 441, 447, 448, 450, 463, 464, 467, 473, 486, 513, 523, 524, 525, 526, 544, 545, 546, 547, 559, 568} 512 COMPREHENSIVE BIBLIOGRAPHY OF MACHINE LEARNING Category c.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6.Qxd
    CHAPTER 6: The NASA Family The melding of all of the NASA centers, contractors, universities, and often strong personalities associated with each of them into the productive and efficient organization necessary to complete NASA’s space missions became both more critical and more difficult as NASA turned its attention from Gemini to Apollo. The approach and style and, indeed, the personality of each NASA center differed sharply. The Manned Spacecraft Center was distinctive among all the rest. Fortune magazine suggested in 1967 that the scale of NASA’s operation required a whole new approach and style of management: “To master such massively complex and expensive problems, the agency has mobilized some 20,000 individual firms, more than 400,000 workers, and 200 colleges and universities in a combine of the most advanced resources of American civilization.” The author referred to some of the eight NASA centers and assorted field installations as “pockets of sovereignty” which exercised an enormous degree of independence and autonomy.1 An enduring part of the management problem throughout the Mercury and Gemini programs that became compounded under Apollo, because of its greater technical challenges, was the diversity and distinctiveness of each of the NASA centers. The diverse cultures and capabilities represented by each of the centers were at once the space program’s greatest resource and its Achilles’ heel. NASA was a hybrid organization. At its heart was Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory established by Congress in 1917 near Hampton, Virginia, and formally dedicated in 1920. It became the Langley Research Center. Langley created the Ames Aeronautical Laboratory at Moffett Field, California, in 1939.
    [Show full text]
  • Educating the Whole Person? the Case of Athens College, 1940-1990
    Educating the whole person? The case of Athens College, 1940-1990 Polyanthi Giannakopoulou-Tsigkou Institute of Education, University of London A thesis submitted for the Degree of EdD September 2012 Abstract This thesis is a historical study of the growth and development of Athens College, a primary/secondary educational institution in Greece, during the period 1940-1990. Athens College, a private, non-profit institution, was founded in 1925 as a boys' school aiming to offer education for the whole person. The research explores critically the ways in which historical, political, socio-economic and cultural factors affected the evolution of Athens College during the period 1940-1990 and its impact on students' further studies and careers. This case study seeks to unfold aspects of education in a Greek school, and reach a better understanding of education and factors that affect it and interact with it. A mixed methods approach is used: document analysis, interviews with Athens College alumni and former teachers, analysis of student records providing data related to students' achievements, their family socio-economic 'origins' and their post-Athens College 'destinations'. The study focuses in particular on the learners at the School, and the kinds of learning that took place within this institution over half a century. Athens College, although under the control of a centralised educational system, has resisted the weaknesses of Greek schooling. Seeking to establish educational ideals associated with education of the whole person, excellence, meritocracy and equality of opportunity and embracing progressive curricula and pedagogies, it has been successful in taking its students towards university studies and careers.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Started Computing at the Al Lab by Christopher C. Stacy Abstract
    MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ARTIFICIAL INTELLI..IGENCE LABORATORY WORKING PAPER 235 7 September 1982 Getting Started Computing at the Al Lab by Christopher C. Stacy Abstract This document describes the computing facilities at the M.I.T. Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, and explains how to get started using them. It is intended as an orientation document for newcomers to the lab, and will be updated by the author from time to time. A.I. Laboratory Working Papers are produced for internal circulation. and may contain information that is, for example, too preliminary or too detailed for formal publication. It is not intended that they should be considered papers to which reference can be made in the literature. a MASACHUSETS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 1982 Getting Started Table of Contents Page i Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Lisp Machines 2 1.2. Timesharing 3 1.3. Other Computers 3 1.3.1. Field Engineering 3 1.3.2. Vision and Robotics 3 1.3.3. Music 4 1,3.4. Altos 4 1.4. Output Peripherals 4 1.5. Other Machines 5 1.6. Terminals 5 2. Networks 7 2.1. The ARPAnet 7 2.2. The Chaosnet 7 2.3. Services 8 2.3.1. TELNET/SUPDUP 8 2.3.2. FTP 8 2.4. Mail 9 2.4.1. Processing Mail 9 2.4.2. Ettiquette 9 2.5. Mailing Lists 10 2.5.1. BBoards 11 2.6. Finger/Inquire 11 2.7. TIPs and TACs 12 2.7.1. ARPAnet TAC 12 2.7.2. Chaosnet TIP 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • How Should the United States Confront Soviet Communist Expansionism? DWIGHT D
    Advise the President: DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER How Should the United States Confront Soviet Communist Expansionism? DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER Advise the President: DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER Place: The Oval Office, the White House Time: May 1953 The President is in the early months of his first term and he recognizes Soviet military aggression and the How Should the subsequent spread of Communism as the greatest threat to the security of the nation. However, the current costs United States of fighting Communism are skyrocketing, presenting a Confront Soviet significant threat to the nation’s economic well-being. President Eisenhower is concerned that the costs are not Communist sustainable over the long term but he believes that the spread of Communism must be stopped. Expansionism? On May 8, 1953, President Dwight D. Eisenhower has called a meeting in the Solarium of the White House with Secretary of State John Foster Dulles and Treasury Secretary George M. Humphrey. The President believes that the best way to craft a national policy in a democracy is to bring people together to assess the options. In this meeting the President makes a proposal based on his personal decision-making process—one that is grounded in exhaustive fact gathering, an open airing of the full range of viewpoints, and his faith in the clarifying qualities of energetic debate. Why not, he suggests, bring together teams of “bright young fellows,” charged with the mission to fully vet all viable policy alternatives? He envisions a culminating presentation in which each team will vigorously advocate for a particular option before the National Security Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Communication Systems 2.2 Optimal Source Coding
    Digital Communication Systems EES 452 Asst. Prof. Dr. Prapun Suksompong [email protected] 2. Source Coding 2.2 Optimal Source Coding: Huffman Coding: Origin, Recipe, MATLAB Implementation 1 Examples of Prefix Codes Nonsingular Fixed-Length Code Shannon–Fano code Huffman Code 2 Prof. Robert Fano (1917-2016) Shannon Award (1976 ) Shannon–Fano Code Proposed in Shannon’s “A Mathematical Theory of Communication” in 1948 The method was attributed to Fano, who later published it as a technical report. Fano, R.M. (1949). “The transmission of information”. Technical Report No. 65. Cambridge (Mass.), USA: Research Laboratory of Electronics at MIT. Should not be confused with Shannon coding, the coding method used to prove Shannon's noiseless coding theorem, or with Shannon–Fano–Elias coding (also known as Elias coding), the precursor to arithmetic coding. 3 Claude E. Shannon Award Claude E. Shannon (1972) Elwyn R. Berlekamp (1993) Sergio Verdu (2007) David S. Slepian (1974) Aaron D. Wyner (1994) Robert M. Gray (2008) Robert M. Fano (1976) G. David Forney, Jr. (1995) Jorma Rissanen (2009) Peter Elias (1977) Imre Csiszár (1996) Te Sun Han (2010) Mark S. Pinsker (1978) Jacob Ziv (1997) Shlomo Shamai (Shitz) (2011) Jacob Wolfowitz (1979) Neil J. A. Sloane (1998) Abbas El Gamal (2012) W. Wesley Peterson (1981) Tadao Kasami (1999) Katalin Marton (2013) Irving S. Reed (1982) Thomas Kailath (2000) János Körner (2014) Robert G. Gallager (1983) Jack KeilWolf (2001) Arthur Robert Calderbank (2015) Solomon W. Golomb (1985) Toby Berger (2002) Alexander S. Holevo (2016) William L. Root (1986) Lloyd R. Welch (2003) David Tse (2017) James L.
    [Show full text]