DOCSLIB.ORG

SB 743 Plan Overview, and a Meeting Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SB 743 Plan Overview, and a Meeting Summary REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS for SB 743 Implementation Plan for the Del Norte Local Transportation Commission Prepared for: Del Norte Local Transportation Commission Prepared by: Tamera Leighton, Executive Director 900 Northcrest Drive, PMB 16 Crescent City, CA 95531 Posted: August 29, 2019 Page 1 of 7 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE SB 743 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE DEL NORTE LOCAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION A. BACKGROUND The Region The region served by the Del Norte Local Transportation Commission, the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) for Del Norte County exists totally within the boundaries of Del Norte County. Del Norte County is California’s northernmost coastal county, with a land area of approximately 1,070 square miles. The County is bounded by Curry County, Oregon, to the north, mountainous Siskiyou County to the east, Humboldt County to the south, and by the Pacific Ocean to the west. Crescent City, the county seat, is located roughly halfway between Portland, Oregon (330 miles north) and San Francisco, California, (350 miles south). Regionally, Crescent City is located approximately 85 miles north of Eureka, Humboldt County, about 26 miles south of Brookings, Oregon and 83 miles west of Grants Pass, Oregon and Interstate 5. Four federally recognized Tribes are located in the Del Norte region: Elk Valley Rancheria, Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation, Resighini Rancheria and the Yurok Tribe. They are partners and leaders in advancing regional transportation. The principal north-south route through Del Norte County is US Highway 101, which provides access to coastal towns and cities to the north and south. Crescent City is located on US Highway 101. Del Norte County has two main routes providing access to inland communities: State Route, or SR 197/US Highway 199 to Hiouchi and Gasquet, and Route 169 to Klamath Glen. SR 197/US Highway 199 connects US Highway 101 to the Interstate 5 in Oregon. The county's diverse geography includes inland mountain ranges of coniferous forests, low coastal mountain ranges with temperate forests and the Redwood State and National Parks, and rugged coastlines with gray sand beaches on the Pacific coast. The climate of Del Norte County is consistently mild along the coast, becoming more variable inland. In Crescent City and along the coastal fringe, there is minimal temperature fluctuation. Coastal daytime temperatures average 45-55 degrees during winter months. Temperatures increase to 55-65 degrees during mid-summer and early fall months, with higher temperatures when coastal fog disperses. Inland, temperatures differences are more marked. Del Norte County/Crescent City area’s annual rainfall generally ranges between 70 - 80 inches, with the heaviest rainfall occurring from November through March. Population The California Department of Finance estimated the Del Norte County population at 27,221 in January 2018. This includes a population of 20,631 within the unincorporated area of the County and 6,590 within the City of Crescent City. The projected population for 2035 is 27,857. Page 2 of 7 Organization and Management The Del Norte Local Transportation Commission (DNLTC) is the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) for the Del Norte County region. The DNLTC consists of six members—three members of the Del Norte County Board of Supervisors and three members from the City of Crescent City. With the addition of a representative of the Caltrans District 1 Director, the DNLTC Board becomes the Policy Advisory Committee. A Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) advises the DNLTC on various transportation matters. The TAC is comprised of two representatives from the Planning and Public Works staff of the City and the County, and one representative from the Harbor District, Yurok Tribe, California Highway Patrol, Redwood Coast Transit Authority, and Caltrans. B. SCOPE OF WORK The Del Norte Local Transportation Commission (DNLTC) is soliciting proposals from qualified consulting firms to prepare the SB 743 Implementation Plan (743 Plan). The passage of Senate Bill 743 in September 2013 changed the way in which local jurisdictions must perform transportation impact analysis under the requirements set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The new approach requires that jurisdictions move away from auto delay and level of service (LOS) as measures used to establish impacts and mitigation strategies and instead utilize Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as a preferred measure for determining those impacts. Jurisdictions will have to analyze impacts to transportation network performance with a focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, providing for a multi-modal system, and a diversity of land use patterns, which promote active transportation and improve air quality through a more comprehensive transportation system. While DNLTC is obligated to outline the scope of work for the 743 Plan, it is interested in a consultant’s unique approach and a right- sized product for the Del Norte region. The City of Crescent City, the County of Del Norte and DNLTC are now required to comply with the new VMT metric, establish VMT thresholds, and implement SB 743 through local and regional plans, including the Regional Transportation Plan. Upon implementation of SB 743, LOS will no longer serve as a transportation impact to be considered through the CEQA process. Therefore, local agencies now have additional analysis and reporting requirements for the CEQA process. The SB 743 Implementation Plan will provide the necessary framework to comply with SB 743 and ensure the appropriate analytical tools, metrics, and processes are followed. Page 3 of 7 The following tasks are required: Task Product 1 Kickoff: Document plan and information needs, project Meeting summary meeting schedule, provide SB 743 plan overview, and a meeting summary. 2 Review and assess existing planning and travel demand Plan and policy tools. Identify issues/opportunities with existing plans and review summary policies for each jurisdiction memoranda and presentations 3 Develop VMT threshold setting, process and policy Memoranda and recommendations, including recommendations for areas of presentations the county not covered. 4 Local and regional plan and policy integration. Meeting summary 5 Update General Plan policy process, Travel Demand Memoranda and Model, including agency specific mitigation measures for presentations the City of Crescent City and County of Del Norte. 6 Develop VMT Analysis Logic Model and review process Logic model and guidance. guidance 7 Complete Draft and Final SB 743 Implementation Plan: Draft and final plans. Assemble and distribute draft plans, present draft plans to DNLTC, incorporate comments, finalize plans for adoption, distribute final documents, and identify next steps for plan implementation, evaluation and review. 8 Hold a training session for local agency staff responsible Training materials for implementing the plan. C. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION, EVALUATION AND RANKING CRITERIA A review committee of City, County, and Caltrans employees will evaluate those proposals that meet the stated requirements and will make a recommendation to the Del Norte Local Transportation Commission. Evaluation will be based on knowledge of local conditions, responsiveness and comprehensiveness of the RFP response, qualifications of individuals or firm, experience/performance, and proposal contents/methodology. Proposals will be evaluated based on the following point values: Page 4 of 7 Company Overview: 0 points 1. Firm name and business address including phone number, email address and website. 2. Type of ownership and parent company if applicable. 3. The name of the proposed project manager for this project. Key Personnel and Job Planning: 15 points 4. Resumes of key personnel to be assigned to the project. Include length of service with the firm, professional education and years of experience. 5. If any part of the project cannot or is not planned to be performed in-house, describe the portion that would be subcontracted along with a profile of said subcontractor. 6. If you have multiple company offices, please identify the location where the majority of the work will be performed. Relevant Experience and Capabilities: 10 points 7. Please provide a list of three (3) relevant projects, including year completed, project duration, cost, and client contact information. Statement of Interest and Methodology: 50 points 8. A narrative describing the firm’s interest, unique approach, and value added benefits your firm is able to bring to this project. Value and Cost: 15 points 9. Value and Cost proposal shall be broken down into labor, subcontractor fees (if any) and expenses. Fee shall also be broken down by subtask. Fee shall include all tax, mark- ups, overhead and profit. Note: The current budgeted amount for consultant services is $63,500. Schedule of Work: 10 points 10. The project schedule must be clearly stated with intermittent milestones. Because the project requires public input and local coordination for public input, specific benchmarks are preferred. The total project must be completed by June 30, 2020. Ranking Criteria Weight Max Criteria Score Factor Subtot Key personnel and job 1 2 3 4 5 3 al:15 Experienceplanning and capability 1 2 3 4 5 2 10 Interest and methodology 1 2 3 4 5 5 50 Value and cost 1 2 3 4 5 3 15 Schedule of work 1 2 3 4 5 2 10 Max Total: 100 Page 5 of 7 D. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL All proposals must include the following: 1. Introductory Letter - The letter shall be on Consultant letterhead and include the Consultant’s contact name, mailing address, telephone number, and email address. The letter will address the Consultant’s understanding of the services being requested and any other pertinent information the Consultant believes should be included, including the project start date. All addendums received must be acknowledged in the transmittal letter. The letter shall be wet-signed in blue ink by the individual authorized to bind the Consultant to the proposal. 2. Proposals must not exceed 30 pages including appendices. 3. Five identical unbound copies of proposal. 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Engineering Specification for Construction of Truck Only and Vehicle Only Travelways in Missouri Phase 1
    Organizational Results Research Report September 2009 OR10.008 Engineering Specification for Construction of Truck Only and Vehicle Only Travelways in Missouri Phase 1 Prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates and Missouri Department of Transportation FINAL REPORT RI08-030 Engineering Specifications for Construction of Truck Only and Passenger Vehicle Only Travelways in Missouri Phase 1 Prepared for the Missouri Department of Transportation Organizational Results Division By: September 2009 The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this report are those of the principal investigator and the Missouri Department of Transportation. They are not necessarily those of the U.S. Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession 3. Recipient's Catalog No. OR10-008 No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Engineering Specifications for Construction of Truck Only and Passenger Vehicle Only Travelways in Missouri – Phase I 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Wilbur Smith Associates RI08-030 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Wilbur Smith Associates 10401 Holmes Road, Suite 210 11. Contract or Grant No. Kansas City, MO 64131 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Missouri Department of Transportation Final Report Organizational Results 14. Sponsoring Agency Code P. O. Box 270-Jefferson City, MO 65102 MoDOT 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract The objective of this study is to provide information detailing the safety consideration specifications for the truck only and passenger only facilities for I-70 and I-44.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Evaluation of Cable Median Barriers in Combination with Rumble Strips on the Inside Shoulder of Divided Roads
    Safety Evaluation of Cable Median Barriers in Combination with Rumble Strips on the Inside Shoulder of Divided Roads PUBLICATION NO. FHWA-HRT-17-070 AUGUST 2017 Research, Development, and Technology Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center 6300 Georgetown Pike McLean, VA 22101-2296 FOREWORD The research documented in this report was conducted as part of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study (ELCSI-PFS). FHWA established this pooled fund study in 2005 to conduct research on the effectiveness of the safety improvements identified by the National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 500 guides as part of implementation of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Strategic Highway Safety Plan. The ELCSI-PFS research provides a crash modification factor and benefit-cost (B/C) economic analysis for each of the targeted safety strategies identified as priorities by the pooled fund member States. This study evaluated application of cable median barriers in combination with rumble strips on the inside shoulder of divided roads. This strategy is intended to reduce the frequency of cross-median crashes, which tend to be very severe. Data were obtained in Illinois, Kentucky, and Missouri. In Illinois and Kentucky, cable median barriers were introduced many years after the inside shoulder rumble strips were installed; therefore, the evaluation determined the safety effect of implementing cable barriers along sections that already had rumble strips. Conversely, in Missouri, the inside shoulder rumble strips and cable barrier were implemented around the same time. The evaluation in Missouri determined the combined safety effect of both strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Quilt Book for WEB 2015.Pdf
    Dear Friends, We are pleased to present Donate Life Northwest’s 2015 Threads of Life Quilt. Each square represents a personal and touching sto- ry of love, hope, compassion and courage, and serves as a reminder each and every day of the precious gift of life, sight and mobili- ty given by donors throughout the region. For transplant recipients, quilt squares allow them to express their gratitude to their donors. Rod, a grateful liver recipient, has been given the gift of the last five years (and counting!) with his wife, made possible by his donor, Shannon. Tiffany has alifetime of memories to create with her sister Nicole now that Nicole’s life has been saved by an anonymous kidney donor. For donor families, their squares not only recognize the loss of their loved ones, but provide an avenue for healing and inspiration for others. Mary, who was a quilter herself, is honored with a quilt square after helping restore sight and mobility to 22 people through her cornea and tissue donation. Daniel, who always gave of himself and helped every- one who needed it, is living on through the organs and tissues he donat- ed, providing great comfort to his family and friends. We hope that you will take the time to learn about each individual rep- resented in this year’s quilt, and be inspired by their stories included in this book. Organ, eye and tissue donation and transplantation trans- forms lives every day. We would like to express our strong appreciation for those who have made the commitment to register as organ, eye and tissue donors.
    [Show full text]
  • Redwood Coast Transit Authority Prepared By
    Redwood Coast Transit Authority c/o TMTP Consulting LLC 1275 4th Street #733 Santa Rosa, CA 95404 (707) 465-6830 E-mail: [email protected] REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS for Transit Development Plan/Short Range Transit Plan for Redwood Coast Transit Authority Prepared for: Redwood Coast Transit Authority Prepared by: Joseph Rye, General Manager 1275 4th Street #733 Santa Rosa, California 95404 April 22, 2018 Joseph Rye General Manager Redwood Coast Transit Authority Page 2 1. BACKGROUND THE REGION: The region served by the Del Norte Local Transportation Commission transportation planning activities exists totally within the boundaries of Del Norte County. Del Norte County is California’s northernmost coastal county, with a land area of approximately 1,070 square miles. The County is bounded by Curry County, Oregon, to the north, mountainous Siskiyou County to the east, Humboldt County to the south, and by the Pacific Ocean to the west. Crescent City, the county seat, is located roughly halfway between Portland, Oregon (330 miles north) and San Francisco, California, (350 miles south). Regionally, Crescent City is located approximately 85 miles north of Eureka, Humboldt County, about 26 miles south of Brookings, Oregon and 83 miles west of Grants Pass, Oregon and Interstate 5. The principal north-south route through Del Norte County is US Highway 101 (or Highway 101), which provides access to coastal towns and cities to the north and south. Crescent City is located on US Highway 101. Del Norte County has two main routes providing access to inland communities: State Route, or SR 197/US Highway 199 to Hiouchi and Gasquet, and Route 169 to Klamath Glen.
    [Show full text]
  • Christopher Michael Monsere, Ph.D., P.E. Professor and Chair Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Portland State University P.O
    curriculum vitae Christopher Michael Monsere, Ph.D., P.E. Professor and Chair Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Portland State University P.O. Box 751, Portland, Oregon USA 97207-0751 Phone 503 725 9746 • Fax 503 725 5950 • [email protected] • www.cee.pdx.edu/~monserec orcid.org/0000-0002-9044-307X Last update April 30, 2021 EDUCATION Ph.D. 2001 Civil Engineering, Iowa State University, Concentration: Transportation M.S. 1997 Civil Engineering, Iowa State University, Concentration: Transportation B.C.E. 1995 Civil Engineering, University of Detroit Mercy, summa cum laude ADMINISTRATIVE APPOINTMENTS 2015-present Chair, Civil and Environmental Engineering. Portland State University. Portland, Oregon 2014-2015 Acting Chair, Civil and Environmental Engineering. Portland State University. Portland, Oregon 2013-2014 Associate Chair, Civil and Environmental Engineering. Portland State University. Portland, Oregon EMPLOYMENT 2018- present Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering. Portland State University. Portland, Oregon 2005- present Affiliate Faculty, School of Urban Studies and Planning, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon 2012- 2018 Associate Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering. Portland State University. Portland, Oregon 2006- 2012 Assistant Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering. Portland State University. Portland, Oregon 2004-2006 Research Assistant Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering. Portland State University. Portland, Oregon 2003-2003 Adjunct Instructor, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State University. Portland, Oregon 2000-2004 Highway Safety Engineer, Oregon Department of Transportation. Salem, Oregon 1996-2000 Dwight D. Eisenhower Research Fellow, Iowa State University. Ames, Iowa 1995-2000 Research Assistant, Iowa State University. Ames, Iowa 1994-1995 Assistant Project Manager, Angelo Iafrate Construction Company. Warren, Michigan 1993-1994 Assistant Estimator, Albert Kahn Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Traffic Safety Performance Plan
    OREGON TRAFFIC SAFETY PERFORMANCE PLAN Fiscal Year 2021 Highway Safety Plan ODOT/TSD is an Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action Employer. We do not discriminate on the basis of disability in admission or access to our programs, services, activities. This publication can be made available in alternate format on request by calling (503) 986-4188 or via the Oregon Relay Service at 7-1-1 or e-mail: [email protected]. OREGON TRAFFIC SAFETY PERFORMANCE PLAN Fiscal Year 2021 Highway Safety Plan Produced: June 2020 Transportation Safety Division Oregon Department of Transportation 4040 Fairview Industrial Dr. SE, MS 3 Salem, Oregon 97302 Table of Contents Forward ......................................................................................................... 1 Document Purpose ........................................................................................ 2 Process Description ....................................................................................... 3 Overview of Highway Safety Planning Process ............................................. 7 Acronyms and Definitions .............................................................................. 9 Performance Goals ...................................................................................... 13 Statewide ..................................................................................................... 23 Aging Road Users ........................................................................................ 27 Bike and Pedestrian
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Vortex GOLDEN COINCIDENCES
    GoldenVortex.com Golden Vortex by Nick Nelson © 2007 Chapter Eight: GOLDEN COINCIDENCES We process our perception to fit a mold. −Don Juan Matus It was twenty-five years later, and this time I was sitting at Fred's living room table, rather than he at mine. There were no pyramids for him to dowse, but I did have my maps spread out, and was showing him where all the best vortexes could be found. He was more interested in where the bad ones might be, though, and asked about a certain town on Vancouver Island that he had recently visited. From his glowing recommendation, I had a hunch he was considering this as a retirement location. I think his first worry was whether the wife could be coaxed into life along a rustic, out-of-the-way Canadian waterway with no roads in or out. After witnessing my impressive map demonstrations, he might have also been concerned about the possibility of an evil vortex making the plumbing break, and his ears ring. Fred left the room, and came back with a big road map of British Columbia, which he opened on the table. I positioned my torus-shaped ring magnet over the mouth of Alberni Inlet, and dangled the little pendulum magnet close to it. He seemed happy with the complete lack of results, signifying no overt vortex nearby. In the last several weeks before this, I'd been so busy hunting vortexes to the south that I'd ignored the North. As we sat comparing stories, the Canadian map remained spread out between us, and this was a good opportunity to check it over.
    [Show full text]
  • Task Force Meeting DATE: Wednesday, April 26, 4-7 P.M
    Meeting Agenda MEETING TITLE: Task Force Meeting DATE: Wednesday, April 26, 4-7 p.m. LOCATION: OAME, Main Conference Room 4134 N. Vancouver Avenue (at N. Skidmore), Portland, Oregon Note: Please turn off all cell phones during the meeting as they can disrupt the audio and recording equipment. Thank you. TIME AGENDA ITEM ACTION 4:00 – 4:10 March 22 Meeting Summary Approval 4:10 – 4:30 Overview of Open House Results Briefing 4:30 – 4:45 Public Comment 4:45 – 5:45 Component Packaging/Background Briefing and Discussion Information 5:45 – 6:45 Component Selection for Further Study Discussion/Action 6:45 – 7:00 Wrap-up/Next Steps Next Meeting – May 17. Focus on initial alternatives. TriMet Route to the Task Force meeting from Portland: From Downtown Portland (SW Salmon Street and 6th Avenue) take TriMet Bus #40 (Mocks Crest to St. Johns) northbound to N Williams and Skidmore. OAME is 1 block west of this bus stop. For route information contact TriMet at 503-238-RIDE or www.trimet.org. C-TRAN Route to the Task Force meeting from Vancouver: From Downtown Vancouver (7th Street Transit Center) take C-Tran Bus #105 (I-5 Express) southbound to Downtown Portland (SW Salmon Street and 6th Avenue). Transfer from Downtown Portland (SW Salmon Street and 6th Avenue) to TriMet Bus #40 (Mocks Crest to St. Johns) northbound to N Williams and Skidmore. OAME is 1 block west of this bus stop. For route information contact C-TRAN at 360-695-0123 or www.c-tran.com and TriMet at 503-238- RIDE or www.trimet.org.
    [Show full text]
  • MOTORISTS' NEEDS and SERVICES on Ipfferstme HIGHWAYS Cs
    RETURN TO: 14Qt Ri—O(c+ HEADQUARTER'S TRAFFIC P. 0. BOX 7129 BOISE, ID 83707 Ii'3 TrAF; _7 ID &7O7 NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM REPORT 64 MOTORISTS' NEEDS AND SERVICES ON IPffERSTME HIGHWAYS cs HIGHWAY RESEARCH BOARD NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES-NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING HIGHWAY RESEARCH BOARD 1969 Officers OSCAR T. MARZKE, Chairman D. GRANT MICKLE, First Vice Chairman CHARLES E. SHUMATE, Second Vice Chairman W. N. CAREY, JR., Executive Director Executive Committee F. C. TURNER, Federal Highway Administrator, U. S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) A. E. JOHNSON, Executive Director, American Association of State Highway Officials (ex officio) S. A. HUTCHESON, Chairman, Division of Engineering, National Research Council (ex officio) EDWA1W G. WETZEL, Associate Consultant, Edwards and Kelcey (ex officio, Past Chairman 1967) DAVID H. STEVENS, Chairman, Maine State Highway Commission (ex officio, Past Chairman 1968) DONALD S. BERRY, Department of Civil Engineering, Northwestern University CHARLES A. BLESSING, Director, Detroit City Planning Commission JAY W. BROWN, Chairman, State Road Department of Florida J. DOUGLAS CARROLL, JR., Executive Director, Tn-State Transportation Commission, New York City HARMER E. DAVIS, Director, Inst. of Transportation and Traffic Engineering, Univ. of California WILLIAM L. GARRISON, Director, Center for Urban Studies, Univ. of Illinois at Chicago SIDNEY GOLDIN, Vice President of Marketing, Asiatic Petroleum Corp. WILLIAM S. HEDLEY, Consultant, Federal Railroad Administration GEORGE B. HOLBROOK, Vice President, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company EUGENE M. JOHNSON, The Asphalt Institute THOMAS F. JONES, JR., President, University of South Carolina LOUIS C. LUNDSTROM, Director, Automotive Safety Engineering, General Motors Technical Center OSCAR T.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 198/Friday, October 14, 2005/Rules
    59996 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 198 / Friday, October 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 2,000-foot contour line to its (12) Proceed straight east along the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: N.A. intersection with the eastern boundary section line, crossing the Eel River, to Sutton, Regulations and Rulings of section 2, T21N, R13W, immediately the northeast corner of section 2, which Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and south of State Route 162 (Dos Rios coincides with the Round Valley Indian Trade Bureau, 925 Lakeville St., No. Quadrangle); then Reservation’s southern boundary, T22N, 158, Petaluma, California 94952; (2) Proceed straight south along the R14W (Iron Peak Quadrangle); then telephone (415) 271–1254. section line, crossing the Middle Fork of (13) Proceed straight south along the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the Eel River, to the southeast corner of section line to the southeast corner of section 11, T21N, R13W (Dos Rios section 2, T22N, R14W (Iron Peak Background on Viticultural Areas Quadrangle); then Quadrangle); then TTB Authority (3) Proceed 0.9 mile straight west (14) Proceed 0.3 mile straight east to Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol along the southern boundary of section the section line’s intersection with the Administration Act (the FAA Act, 27 11 to its intersection with the 2,000-foot 2,000-foot elevation line along the U.S.C. 201 et seq.) requires that alcohol elevation line, T21N, R13W (Dos Rios northern boundary of section 12, T22N, beverage labels provide the consumer Quadrangle); then R14W, west of Eberle Ridge, (Iron Peak with adequate information regarding a (4) Proceed northerly then westerly Quadrangle); and product’s identity and prohibits the use along the meandering 2,000-foot contour (15) Proceed generally southeast along of misleading information on such line, crossing Big Water Canyon, the meandering 2,000-foot elevation, labels.
    [Show full text]
  • Proclamation
    Proclamation Proclamation Declaring the City of Tualatin A Purple Heart City WHEREAS, the City of Tualatin has always supported its military veteran population; and WHEREAS, the Purple Heart Medal is the oldest military decoration in present use and was initially created as a Badge of Military Merit by General George Washington in 1782; and WHEREAS, the Purple Heart Medal was the first award made available to the common soldier and is specifically awarded to members of the United States Armed Forces whom have been wounded in combat or paid the ultimate sacrifice for our freedoms being killed in action against a declared enemy of the United States of America; and WHEREAS, the mission of the Military Order of Purple Heart is to foster an environment of goodwill among combat-wounded veterans and their families, promote patriotism, support legislative initiatives, and most importantly, to make sure that we never forget the sacrifices of our military service men and women; and WHEREAS, Tualatin has a large veteran population with many of its veterans being Purple Heart recipients; and WHEREAS, Oregon is now by law the 15th Purple Heart State and US Interstate 5 in Oregon which services the municipality of Tualatin is now memorialized as part of the National Purple Heart Trail, the city now joins Bend, Albany, Medford, Redmond, La Pine, Prineville, Beaverton, and Forest Grove, Oregon as Purple Heart Cities; and WHEREAS, Tualatin appreciates the sacrifices of all of its military veterans, combat veterans, Purple Heart recipients, and their families for the sacrifices that they have made in defending our freedoms and wants to express and honor them.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Collection RFP V3
    REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS for Data Collection and Baseline Data Preparation for the Del Norte Local Transportation Commission Prepared for: Del Norte Local Transportation Commission Prepared by: Tamera Leighton, Executive Director 900 Northcrest Drive, PMB 16 Crescent City, California 95531 November 21, 2017 RFP for Performance Measures Baseline data Collection in the Regional Transportation Plan Page 2 of 7 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) TO PROVIDE LOCAL AGENCIES AND GOVERNMENTS A COMPREHENSIVE DATA LIBRARY THAT ESTABLISHES A BASELINE FROM WHICH TO MONITOR PERFORMANCE MEASURES ESTABLISHED IN THE 2016 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN BACKGROUND The Region The region served by the Del Norte Local Transportation Commission, the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) for Del Norte County exists totally within the boundaries of Del Norte County. Del Norte County is California’s northernmost coastal county, with a land area of approximately 1,070 square miles. The County is bounded by Curry County, Oregon, to the north, mountainous Siskiyou County to the east, Humboldt County to the south, and by the Pacific Ocean to the west. Crescent City, the county seat, is located roughly halfway between Portland, Oregon (330 miles north) and San Francisco, California, (350 miles south). Regionally, Crescent City is located approximately 85 miles north of Eureka, Humboldt County, about 26 miles south of Brookings, Oregon and 83 miles west of Grants Pass, Oregon and Interstate 5. Four federally recognized Tribes are located in the Del Norte region: Elk Valley Rancheria, Smith River Rancheria, Resighini Rancheria and the Yurok Tribe. They are partners and leaders in advancing regional transportation. The principal north-south route through Del Norte County is US Highway 101, which provides access to coastal towns and cities to the north and south.
    [Show full text]