IPP220 v.2 39640
Public Disclosure Authorized World Bank Financed
Guiyang Transportation Project Social Assessment Report
Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized
Chinese Cross-Culture Consulting Center (CCCCC), Sun Yat-sen
University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
Februray 2007
Public Disclosure Authorized
1 Foreword
From Feb. to Jun. 2006, the China Cross-Cultural Consulting Center (CCCCC) at the Sun Yat-sen University was consigned by Guiyang Transportation Project Management Office of World Bank Loan to conduct an independent social assessment on Guiyang Transportation Project.
The social assessment was separated into 2 steps. At the first step, the SA team focused on the rural traffic project and did the investigation in the 23 villages along 18 rural roads of project. Guangzhong, Yantang and Pantong Villages in Kaiyang County; Qinshan, Zifang, Hekan and Zhuhua Villages in Xifeng County; Hongxing, Wugongqiao, Damu, Sanzhai and Dazhai Villages in Xiuwen County; Chetian, Xinmin, Luguan Village in Huaxi District; Dagu, Qinshan and Panzhai Villages in Qinzhen City; Wanggang and Pianpo village in Wudang District; Jinjia and Heishitou Village in Baiyun District totally 23 villages were selected as the investigated villages for the social assessment on the rural project, 16 of which are the key investigated villages.
At the second step, the SA team went to 10 communities/villages affected by the urban road in Xiaobi Xiang of Huaxi District, Yunguan Xiang of Naming District, Longdongbao Street Office and Youza Street Office; and did the investigation in Mutou villages of Yunguan Xiang; Youza Village, Youza Community, Dongbao Community, Yugaoqiao Community of Youza Street office; Shuilonglu Community, Jichanglu Community, Jianlong Coummunity and Dadongpo Community of Londongbao Street Office in Nanming District.
The siting for this social assessment has fully taken into account: a) the areas along or closed to project roads; b) the areas with inconvenient traffic; c) ethnic minorities compact or mixed villages or communities; d) economic underdevelopment region.
2 The objects of this SA are: a). to learn the basic ecological, social, economic, cultural and nationality situation in the affected areas, to demonstrate the feasibility of this project on the cultural and social levels; b). to learn the expectations and attitudes of the directly and indirectly stakeholders to ensure this project is accepted by them; c). to learn the rural poverty in the affected areas, to assess the project’s anti-poverty function for the rural areas; d).to learn the social, economic and cultural background of the minorities in the affected areas, to assess the project’s impacts on the local minorities’ development, to determine whether it is necessary to make a special development plan for the minorities in the affected areas; e). to assess the project’s social impacts, so as to ensure the potential social problems can be fully understood and valued, and to propose specific measures to avoid and abate such negative impacts.
The social assessment team composed of 11 experts gave the PRA training to county/district/city officials and professionals involved in the SA from Feb 19 to 20, and went to the 22 investigated villages in the 6 counties/districts on Feb 21 for a 16- day PRA investigation. From May 30 to June 15, SA team conducted the key investigation on the ethnic minorities’ compact villages again and urban road affected communities. Though these 2 investigations, SA team have collected the following data: a). Present natural, geographic, traffic, ecological environment and social/economic development situations of the project affected region; b). detail materials on the investigated villages/communities’ land resource, demographic, livelihood, family economy, traffic situation, religion and so on. c). the information on education, medical treatment and health service in the affected region; d) the gender, ethnic minorities issues in project affected region.
The SA team conducted semi-structured questionnaire survey on 814 families from 16 villages in rural roads affected region, and 301 families from 10 villages/communities along the urban road. The main issues of questionnaires covered personal information of family members, economic income and expenditures, production structure, means
3 of communications, migrant labors, medical treatment, education, opinions on Guiyang Transportation Project, attitudes to and expectations for land acquisition, relocation and ressetlement led by the Project. And SA team also did the intensive interviews with 76 families/individuals.
From Mar. 11 to 30, we classified and reviewed the above data and analysis the questionnaires by the SPSS software. Each team prepared its own sub-report and then held a discussion meeting, based on which the first report of social assessment was completed. From June 20 to Oct. 10, the SA team revised the SA report according to the suggestions from World Bank and the complementary investigating data.
This social assessment was conducted successfully thanks to the support from the officials at the Guiyang World Bank Project Management Office, including Mr. He Jun, Mr. Peng Kejiang, Ms. Li Wanzhu and Mr. Deng Huajun; the county/district traffic authorities in the project affected region, which are Kaiyang County, Xifeng County, Xiuwen County, Qinzhen City, Huaxi District, Wudang District, Nanming District and Baiyun District; the local cadres and people in the investigated villages/communities. During the SA preparing and conducting stage, Ms. Zou Youlan Mr. Liu Zhefu and Mr. Zengjun from the World Bank gave us valuable suggestions and instructions. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to them here.
4 Abstract
1. From Feb. to Mar. 2006, the China Cross-Cultural Center Consulting (CCCCC) at the Sun Yat-sen University was consigned by Guiyang World Bank financial Traffic Project management office to conduct an independent social assessment on Guiyang Traffic Project. This SA aimed a). to learn the basic ecological, social, economic, cultural and ethinc situation in the affected areas, to demonstrate the feasibility of this project on the cultural and social levels; b). to learn the project stakeholders’ expectations and attitudes to ensure this project is accepted by them; c). To learn the rural poverty in the affected areas, to assess the project’s anti- poverty function for the rural areas; d).to learn the social, economic and cultural background of the minorities in the affected areas, to assess the project’s impacts on the local minorities’ development, to determine whether it is necessary to make a special development plan for the minorities in the affected areas; e). to assess the project’s social impacts, so as to ensure the potential social problems can be fully understood and valued, and to propose specific measures to avoid and abate such negative impacts. 2. Diversified landforms exist in the affected areas, mainly in hills and mountain lands. The economy of the affected areas is beyond the average of Guiyang Province, and only Xifeng County is the key State Poverty Reduction County. 3. The overall economic development of the villages and ethnic minorities’ compact region in the project affected area is low; the economic structure is mainly composed of agriculture including the cultivation and breeding. And industry and township businesses are shortage. Migrant work is prevalent and has become a key source of the household income. 4. Most residents in the communities affected by the urban road are workers, and the population of speasants and enterprise employees takes the second place.
5 Compared to the villages affected by the project, the family economy in the city is better. 5. The most rural roads in project affected region are muddy or sand road, and the reality of “a road in the sunny, but no road in the rainy” is common. And local people cry for changing the bad traffic around their villages. They have expressed a huge enthusiasm for participating in the road building, even though most of them didn’t know the WB’s project. 6. The commercial proportion of farm products in rural road project affected area is low, mainly because of the bad local traffic. 7. The ethnic minorities in the project affected areas are the Miao and Bouyei people. Miao people still keep the intact indigenous culture, and are with the lowest economic development compared to the Han and Bouyei people in the project affected area. And Bouyei people’s culture has been similar to Han people, but they still have a specific sense of identification. 8. There are no popular strong religions in the affected region. Actually the people here have a weak belief in religion. 9. There are some revolutionary relics in project affected region, and a few natural and cultural tourist resources. 10. The direct beneficiaries of the project are the ethnic minorities’ villagers and Han ordinary villagers along the project roads, especially the specialized transporters, the villagers working on food and cash crops and animal husbandry. The local children and women are the indirect beneficiaries. 11. Based on our investigation and analysis, the SA team thinks that the Guiyang Transportation Project is help to improve the rural and urban traffic condition in Guiyang; accelerate local economic development and poverty reduction; advance the minorities’ development and keep the good ethinc relations; increase local people’s income and relief the employment difficulty of rural surplus labor. 12. As for the potential involuntary resettlement issues, most villagers affected by rural road project tend to get compensated in cash and housing, just a minority of people want to get compensated by land reallocation and job arrangement. The
6 city residents affected by the urban road project tend to a compound compensation which mainly includes the cash and other compensations. 13. Some local government officials suggest giving enough attention on the sub-road building, and establishing a valid rural road maintaining institution. 14. Some minority people suggest that the road builders should protect the local soil, not disturb the local residents’ living, and the government should be responsible for the social security during the road building. 15. Some women suggest strengthening the taffic security education and institutions to make sure the taffic security. 16. It should do some relevant arrangements to conduct local people’s enthusiasm on participating to the project, which will also be useful to reduce the local difficulties of rural labor employment and income improvement. 17. Set up a participation mechanism for the affected target groups; encourage villagers to take part in the course of project decision-making, execution and supervision; and set up the channels of complaint and feedback, and a consultation system. 18. It needs to focus on the living situation of ethnic minorities in project affected area and do the indigenous people plan respectively for Miao and Bouyei people in project affected area. 19. In the project design and execution, pay attention to the protection, restoration and reconstruction of important means of production and livelihood (fields, houses, etc) and water facilities (slope ponds, reservoirs, canals, etc), lest any inconvenience should be caused to the production and life of the local masses. 20. Compound compensation including cash and other compensations may be useful to deal with the resettlement issues involved in urban road project. 21. Establish the institution of collecting and dealing with complaints and suggestions, and provide the legal aid to the affected people.
7 Content
Foreword………………………………………………………………………………………… ...2
Abstract ………………………………………………………………………………………...... 5
Chapter 1: Project and Social Assessment Summary...... 10
1.1 Project overview ...... 10
1.2 Social assessment overview...... 20
Chapter 2: Guiyang City Overview...... 33
2.1 Geographic location and landform ...... 33
2.2 Climatic features...... 34
2.3 History ...... 34
2.4 Regionalism...... 35
2.5 Narural resources and products...... 36
2.6 Population and ethnic groups...... 37
2.7 National economy development ...... 39
2.8 Traffic situation...... 43
Chapter 3: Social and Economic Development Overview of project affected area ...... 45
3.1 The overview of project affected area ...... 45
3.2 The population and ethnic groups...... 51
3.3 The economic development...... 56
3.4 The women issue ...... 70
3.5 The local ethnic minorities ...... 74
3.6 The poverty issue...... 78
3.7 The local education, medical treatment and health...... 81
Chapter 4.Highway Development in the Affected Area and Target Groups’ Opinions about the
Project 87
4.1 Highway establishment in the affected area ...... 87
4.2 Target groups’ opinions about the project...... 92
Chapter 5: the project’s social impacts...... 105
8 5.1 The social impacts of rural roads construction...... 105
5.2 The social impacts of rural passenger transport stations ...... 112
5.3 The social impacts of urban road construction...... 113
Chapter 6: conlusion and suggestions ...... 115
6.1 Conlusion...... 115
6.2 Suggestions...... 116
Appendix 1: ……………………………………………………………………………………126
Appendix 2: ……………………………………………………………………………………127
Appendix 3: ……………………………………………………………………………………127
Appendix 4: ……………………………………………………………………………………130
Appendix 5: ……………………………………………………………………………………130
Appendix 6: ……………………………………………………………………………………132
Appendix 7: ……………………………………………………………………………………138
Appendix 9: ……………………………………………………………………………………145
Apendix 10: ……………………………………………………………………………………146
Apendix 11: ……………………………………………………………………………………148
Appendix 12: ……………………………………………………………………………………149
9 Chapter 1: Project and Social Assessment
Summary
1.1 Project overview
1.1.1 The project background
To achieve the development strategy of “Great Guiyang”, and promote the huge development of Guiyang traffic, Guiyang city community of CPC and municipal government approved “Decision on Implementation of Great Guiyang Strategy”. Based on this strategy, Guiyang municipal government created the “Guiyang Road Net Planning: 2002-2020”, in which planed to build and reconstruct: a). 500 kilometers county and town roads each year; b). 1000 kilometers indurated roads; c). 3000 kilometers class road connected to poor villages in 3 years to realize each poor village have the class entry road; d). keep managing and maintaining the county/ town/village roads.
The urban and rural traffic status in Guiyang can’t fit to the development needs of “Great Guiyang” strategy since the limitations from the geographic conditions and the low economic and social development. Even if Guiyang has come into being the traffic nets in small separate regions after the long time establishment, it hasn’t resovled the bottlenecks of Guiyang traffic. That is on one hand the shortage of circle connections among the trunk lines and a whole Guiyang traffic net, which leads to the urban radiative impacts can not be in good functions; on the other hand, rural roads are in low class, even under the class, which limit the rural social and economic development, and the labor and materials circulation along the road.
The government of P.R. China applied for the World Bank’s loan to resolve the above problems in Guiyang urban and rural traffic. In view of the urgent needs to change the
10 present traffic situation, the World Bank has promised to list the Guiyang Transportation Project into 2007 WB loan plan. This project was approved on Feb. 22, 2005 by Guizhou Provincial Development and Reform Commission. And the total investment will be RMB 16 billion yuan, in which 1 billion US dollar ( about RMB 8 bilion yuan) will be from the WB, the surplus will be raised by Chinese government.
1.1.2 The project contents
Guiyang Transportation Project is consisted of the following three sub-projects:
1. Urban road(Youzhajie~Xiaobi): It is class 1 urban arterial road whose length is about 6.59km. Its origination is Youzha Street in Nanming District and its destination is inside the bounder of Xiaobi Township, Huaxi District. 2. Rural road: There are 44 rural roads and the total length is about 916.03km. This sub-project will involved 7 Counties/districts/cities, 36 towns and 279 administrative villages. The technical standard is class 3 & 4 road issued by the Ministry of Communications of P. R. China. 3. rural passenger transport stations: The sub-project mainly including 46 rural passenger transport stations.
This project will build a platform of development for the “Greater Guiyang” strategy, reduce the disparity between urban and rural areas, drive the urban-rural integration process, and promote the economic growth of Guiyang and the sustainable social, economic development.
Table 1-1: The list of rural roads
Lenth of Investment Length access Road Estimation No Name location road class 10 thousand KM KM Yuan 1 Damu-xinchang Xiuwen/Wudang IV 4160.371 26.259 20 2 Xinzhong-Xinmin Xiuwen IV 2434.089 17.107 10 3 Nanlong–Lewanghe Kaiyang IV 2312.517 15.64 6
11 4 Liwo-Qibai Qingzhen IV 2475.277 18.082 13 Yongwen- 5 Kaiyang IV 2107.468 17.639 Â Lianglukou 6 Liming-Chashan Qingzhen IV 1907.481 13.747 7 7 Guangtian-Hejiadong Xiuwen III 3058.833 14.16 10 8 Qingshan-Xiaoqing Xifeng/Xiuwen III 4041.113 18.929 12 9 Maoping-Xinshan Kaiyang IV 3314.978 15.774 7 10 Maolishan-Qingshan Qingzhen IV 885.6633 4.486 10 11 Zhuhua-Xinyang Xifeng IV 2597.311 17.185 14 12 Xiaohegou-Shuikou Xiuwen III 5345.211 28.622 10 IV 4918.69 21.2 21 13 Xinshan-Zhaiji Kaiyang III 6.015 14 Maiping-Machang Huaxi IV 1603.711 13.819 Â 15 Gaojiaba-Jingjiang Xifeng IV 2530.767 26.034 Â 16 Liutong-Baimao Xiuwen IV 2276.088 10.766 19 17 Longgang-Guaijiu Kaiyang IV 2194.642 16.82 4 Xianshuimiao- 18 Qingzhen IV 1373.208 9.132 16 Datucun 19 Gaiyong-Tianhetan Huaxi IV 803.7461 3.763 3 20 Dagu-Laiping Wudang III 3874.657 24.294 Â 21 Baiyan-Longjing Qingzhen IV 3070.71 16.42 10 22 Longgang-Maoyun Kaiyang IV 2762.063 21.311 Â 23 G210-Nanji Xifeng IV 2083.846 15.384 5 24 Daqiao-Hefeng Wudang/Kaiyang IV 2890.192 26.465 Â Gaozhai- 25 Kaiyang IV 2367.157 17.076 Â Guangzhong Wangchengpo- 26 Qingzhen IV 2136.033 17.112 6 Xiaoshanbian 27 Fengsan-Yongwen Kaiyang IV 1944.299 10.464 5 Weicheng- 28 Qingzhen IV 2718.027 19.513 10 Liujidianzhan Guantianba- 29 Xifeng IV 1248.159 9.433 Â Fenghuangchi 30 Shetian-Xiaba Xiuwen IV 2797.443 18.825 10 Tiaozichang- 31 Qingzhen IV 1480.455 10.889 3 Chayuan 32 Yanglongsi-Pingshan Xifeng IV 951.1234 7.102 Â 33 Shuitian-Dingpa Wudang IV 1990.708 9.224 5 34 Shian-Lufang Xiuwen IV 1464.415 10.886 Â 35 Shuitang-Siyiba Xiuwen III 1586.506 10.985 4 Pingyuanshao- 36 Qingzhen IV 960.4246 5.85 6 Qingzhendianchang 37 Wenquan-Shangzhai Xifeng IV 3018.987 20.39 Â Liangshuijing- 38 Baiyun IV 801.3708 6.219 Â Dashanjiao Guyang-Wengzhen- 39 Kaiyang IV 1447.07 11.43 Â Jiangshan 40 Yongle-Guanba Qingzhen IV 1369.669 10.47 Â 41 Xiaba-Gujin Wudang IV 797.5365 5.871 2 Anliu-Shatian- 42 Qingzhen IV 2312.968 20.813 Â Xindian 43 Tiantai-Jinzhong Xifeng/Kaiyang IV 1760.843 13.194 Â
12 Nanlong-Gujin- 44 Kaiyang IV 1941.325 13.231 Â Shuikou total 44 7 counties/districts/city 100117.2 668.03 248
Table 1-2: The list of rural passenger transport stations
Investment Estimation No name Location class (10 thousand Yuan) Jiuchang Town of 1 Jiuchang bus station V 150 Xiuwen County Gubao Xiang of Xiuwen 2 Gubao bus station V 150 County Saping Xiang of Xiuwen 3 Saping bus station V 150 County Dashi Xiang of Xiuwen 4 Dashi bus station V 150 County Liutun Xiang of Xiuwen 5 Liutun bus station V 150 County Fengsan Town of 6 Fengsan bus station V 150 Kaiyang County Huali Xiang of Kaiyang 7 Huali bus station V 150 County Zhaiji passenger Zhaiji Xiang of Kaiyang 8 V 150 transport station County Yongwen passenger Yongwen Xiang of 9 V 150 transport station Kaiyang County Maoyun passenger Maoyun Xiang of 10 V 150 transport station Kaiyang County Gaozhai passenger Maoyun Xiang of 11 V 150 transport station Kaiyang County Longshui passenger Xiang of Kaiyang 12 V 150 transport station County Miping passenger Miping Xiang of 13 V 150 transport station Kaiyang County Hefeng passenger Hefeng Xiang of 14 V 150 transport station Kaiyang County Baihuahu Xiang of 15 Baihuahu bus station V 150 Qingzhen City Xindian Town of 150passenger transport 16 Xindian bus station V Qingzhen City station Miaoershan passenger Miaoershan Xiang of 17 V 150 transport station Qingzhen City Wangzhuang passenger Wangzhuang Xiang of 18 V 150 transport station Qingzhen City Liwo passenger Liwo Xiang of Qingzhen 19 V 150 transport station City Anliu passenger Anliu Xiang of 20 V 150 transport station Qingzhen City Maige passenger Maige Xiang of 21 V 150 transport station Qingzhen City Zhongba passenger Zhongba Xiang of 22 V 150 transport station Qingzhen City Zhanjie passenger Zhanjie Town of 23 V 150 transport station Qingzhen City Gaopo passenger Gaopo Xiang of Huaxi 24 V 150 transport station District Maling passenger Maling Xiang of Huaxi 25 V 150 transport station District 26 Maiping passenger Maiping Xiang of Huaxi V 150
13 Investment Estimation No name Location class (10 thousand Yuan) transport station District Dangwu passenger Dangwu Xiang of Huaxi 27 V 150 transport station District Yiyaoyuanqu passenger Huchao Xiang of Huaxi 28 V 150 transport station District Shiban passenger Shiban Town of Huaxi 29 V 150 transport station District Xiaobi passenger Xiaobi Xiang of Huaxi 30 V 150 transport station District Jiuan passenger Jiuan Xiang of Huaxi 31 V 150 transport station District Huchao passenger Huchao Xiang of Huaxi 32 V 150 transport station District Qiantao passenger Qiantao Xiang of Huaxi 33 V 150 transport station District Yanlou passenger Yanlou Xiang of Huaxi 34 V 150 transport station District Yanglongsi passenger Yanglongsi Xiang of 35 V 150 transport station Xifeng County Qingshan passenger Qingshan Xiang of 36 V 150 transport station Xifeng County Xishan passenger Xishan Xiang of Xifeng 37 V 150 transport station County Luwo passenger Luwo Xiang of Xifeng 38 V 150 transport station County Jinhua passenger Jinhua Town of Wudang 39 V 150 transport station District Yangchang passenger Yangchang Town of 40 V 150 transport station Wudang District Yongle passenger Yongle Xiang of 41 V 150 transport station Wudang District Baiyi passenger Baiyi Town of Wudang 42 V 150 transport station District Xiaba passenger Xiaba Town of Wudang 43 V 150 transport station District Xinchang passenger Xinchang Town of 44 V 150 transport station Wudang District Xinbao passenger Xinbao Town of 45 V 150 transport station Wudang District Pianpo passenger Pianpo Town of 46 V 150 transport station Wudang District
1.1.3 The project affected area
The Guiyang Transportation Project will involve urban and rural area of Guiyang City. In the affected directly area, the local will be faced with the project building and involuntary resettlement. The affected indirectly area mainly includes the area along or closes to the project roads or stations. The SA team conducted the investigation in the affected directly and indirectly areas. Guiyang Transportation project involves 3 counties, 1 city and 4 districts affiliated to Guiyang Cinty, that is Kaiyang County, Xifeng County, Qinzhen County; Huaxi District, Wudang District, Naming District and Qinzhen City. The affected population
14 is 2.8281 million, in which the minority’s population is 467 thousand.The project include 44 rural roads, 46 rural passenger transport stations and 1 urban road. The 44 rural roads will affect 231 administrative villages of 41 towns (Xiangs) in 8 Counties (city/districts) of Guiynag City directly. The regions affected directly by the 46 rural passenger transport stations include 41 administrative villages,3 foodstuff management stations, 1 transportation management station and 1 state tea farm in Guiyang City’s 6 Counties (city/districts). The urban road construction will affect directly 4 administrative villages in 2 Xiangs, and 1 residents committee. The total stakeholders led directly by this projector are 5103 households 20850 persons, 66 shops 12companies/factories(in which 5 companies’ buildings are involved to be backout), and 253 workers. Table 1-3: the affected regions list
The affected reions No name District/ Town/xiang village county ,à 8UEDQÃURDGà à à à à 8UEDQÃURDGà 1DQPLQJà Ãà à à à ,,à 5XUDOÃURDGVà à à à ;LXZHQà /LXWXQà 'DPXÃ;LDRPXÃ6DQ]KDLÃ'D]KDLÃ&KDQJWLDQà à 'DPX;LQFKDQJà .DL\DQJà +HIHQJà +RQJ\DQà :XGDQJà ;LQFKDQJà 5DRVKDQJÃ;LQFKDQJà ;LXZHQà ;LDRTLQJà 4XDQ[LQJÃ;LDREDÃ'D[LQJÃà )HQJVKDQà 0DRSLQJÃ-LQORQJÃ+XLTLDQà à 0DRSLQJ;LQVKDQà .DL\DQJà +XDOLà ;LQVKDQà 15 The affected reions No name District/ Town/xiang village county à 0DROLVKDQ4LQVKDQà 4LQ]KHQà 4LQORQJà 4LQVKDQÃ0DROLVKDQÃ/LDQJVKXLMLQà -LX]KXDQJà =KXKXDÃ=LIDQJÃ6KDQOLQà à =KXKXD;LQFKDQJà ;LIHQJà /XZRà +XJXDQJà 0DLSLQJà &KDQJEDà à 0DLSLQJ0DFKDQJà +XD[Là +XFKDRà ;LDR]KDLEDà *DRMLDRED6KLTLDRà à *DRMLDEDMLQMLDQJà ;LIHQJà à ;LDQVKXLPLDR'DWXFXQà 4LQ]KHQà :HLFKHQJà 'DWXÃ/DEDLÃ6KVXDQJVKDQà à *DLURQJ5RDG7LDQKHWDQà +XD[LÃà +XD[Là *DLURQJÃ/XGLÃ&KHWLDQÃ+XDMLHà ;LQFKDQJà 'DJXà à 'DJX/DSLQJà :XGDQJà ;LQSXà 0DWRX'D]KDLÃ/DSLQJÃ/RQJMLDRÃ/RQJVKDQJÃ:DQJJDQJà %DL\DQà :XGDQJà ;LQFKDQJà 'DTLDRÃ*X[Là à *DR]DL*XDQJ]KRQJà .DL\DQJà *DR]KDLà *DR]KDLÃ*XIHQJÃ3LQJ]KDLà +RQJKXÃ7DQVKDQÃ'D[LQJÃ6DQ[LQJÃ+HWLÃ/L\Xà :DQJFKHQJSR 4LQORQJà à 4L]KHQà 4LQVKDQà ;LDRVKDQELDQà %DLKXDKXà 6KLFKDRà )HQJVKDQà 0DRMLDQJÃ;LQKXDÃ6LSLQJà à )HQJVDQ à 7LDR]LFKDQJFD\XDQà 4LQ]KHQà =KDQMLHà 7LDR]LFKDQJÃ+XDQJVKLÃ=+DRZXÃ6KLPHQÃ3R\DQà à à 6KXLWLDQà 'LQJSDà :XGDQJà 6KXLWLDQà 6KXLWLDQÃ3HLHÃ'LQJSDÃ/L]Là à 6KLDQ/YIDQJà ;LXZHQà -LXFKDQJà 6KLDQÃ6KDQJSXÃ;LDSXÃ-LQTLDRà à 6KXLWDQJ6L\LEDà ;LXZHQà /RQJFKDQJà ;LDR\LQJÃ6KXLWDQJà 16 The affected reions No name District/ Town/xiang village county 3LQJ\XDQVKDR 4LQORQJà *DQKHEDÃ:DQJHU]KDLÃ3LQ\XDQVKDRÃ/DQKXDÃ%LDQSRà à 4LQ]KHQà TLQ]KHQGLDQFKDQJà +RQJIHQJKXà %DLQLÃ+XDQJWXà à :HQTXDQVKDQJ]KDLà ;LIHQJà :HQTXDQà :HQTXDQÃ*DQJ]LÃ6DQMLDRÃ-LDQVKDQà /LDQJVKXLMLQ à %DL\XQà 6KDZHQà ;LQ]KDLà 'DVKDQMLDRà à *X\DQJ-LDQJVKDQà .DL\DQJà 1DQPXGXà 6KHQOLÃ*X\DQJà 6KXQKHà à 7LDQWDL-LQ]KRQJà -LQ]KRQJà -LQ]KRQJÃ&KD\XDQà .DL\DQJà à 1DQORQJ6KXLNRXà .DL\DQJà /RQJJDQJà 6KDQJ]KDL1DQJRQJÃ)DQJMLD]KDL6KXLWRXVKDQJà Ãà à à à 5XUDOÃ3DVVHQJHUà ,,,à ÃÃà WUDQVSRUWÃVWDWLRQVà -LXFKDQJÃ7RZQÃEXVà à ;LXZHQà -LXFKDQJà -LXFKDQJà VWDWLRQà *XEDRÃ;LDQJÃEXVà à ;LXZHQà *XEDRà )X\Xà VWDWLRQà à 6DSLQJÃEXVÃVWDWLRQà ;LXZHQà 6KDSLQJà ;LDREDà à 'DVKLÃEXVÃVWDWLRQà ;LXZHQÃà 'DVKLà 'DVKLà à /LXWXQÃEXVÃVWDWLRQà ;LXZHQÃà /LXWXQà 'XSXà )HQJVDQÃ7RZQÃEXVà à .DL\DQJà )HQJVKDQà 0DMLDQJà VWDWLRQà +XDOLÃ;LDQJÃEXVà à .DL\DQJà +XDOLà )RRGVWXIIÃPDQDJHPHQWÃVWDWLRQÃRIÃ+XDOLÃ;LDQJà VWDWLRQà =DLMLÃSDVVHQJHUà à .DL\DQJà =DLMLà 17 The affected reions No name District/ Town/xiang village county 3LDQSRÃSDVVHQJHUà à :XGDQJà 3LDQSRà 3LDQSRà WUDQVSRUWÃVWDWLRQà à %DLKXDKXÃEXVÃVWDWLRQà 4LQ]KHQà %DLKXDKXà %DLKXDKXà ;LQGLDQÃ7RZQÃEXVà à 4LQ]KHQà ;LQGLDQà à VWDWLRQà 0LDRHUVKDQÃEXVà à 4LQ]KHQà 4LQORQJà 'D[LQJà VWDWLRQà :DQJ]KXDQJÃSDVVHQJHUà à 4LQ]KHQà :DQJ]KXDQJà +XDZHLà WUDQVSRUWÃVWDWLRQà /LZRÃSDVVHQJHUà à 4LQ]KHQà /LZRà )RRGVWXIIÃPDQDJHPHQWÃVWDWLRQÃRIÃ/LZRÃ;LDQJà WUDQVSRUWÃVWDWLRQà $QOLXÃSDVVHQJHUà à 4LQ]KHQà $QOLXà -LHVKDQJà WUDQVSRUWÃVWDWLRQà 0DLJHÃSDVVHQJHUà à 4LQ]KHQà 0DLJHà 0DLJHà WUDQVSRUWÃVWDWLRQà =KRQJEDÃSDVVHQJHUà à 4LQ]KHQà =KRQJEDà =+RQJEDà WUDQVSRUWÃVWDWLRQà =KDQMLHÃSDVVHQJHUà à 4LQ]KHQà =KDQMLHà à WUDQVSRUWÃVWDWLRQà 1.1.4 The project selection 1 The selection principles Based on the suggestions and needs of 8 counties (districts/ city), Guiyang MPO held the discussion on the principles of project selection. The selected projects should: 18 (1) Protrude the poverty-elimination effect and extend beneficiary; (2)In consideration of economic benefit and social benefit of project investment; (3) Optimize and integrate the road network structure; (4) Reduce the land expropriation and the negative effects to environment led by project. 2. Evaluation Index System of Project Selection Table1-4 Classification Evaluation Indices of Project Selection Selection principle Classification evaluation indices Protrude the poverty-elimination effect zPer capita income 1 and extend beneficiary zMinority nationality zAADT (average annual daily traffic volume) zResources (agriculture) In consideration of economic benefit zForestry and mining 2 and social benefit of project investment zTourism zAttitude of relevant beneficiary zEducation zMedical treatment Optimize and integrate the road zDecollation road 3 network structure zBring into play of road network zRequisition & resettlement influence zConstruction conditional & present 4 Environment effect status of road zInfluence to environmental sensitiveness The concrete valuation indices corresponding to various classification indices will have different sub-value in accordance with the important extent. The whole evaluation system adopts 100-score system and the specific detail is shown in Table 1-5. Table 1-5: the Classification standards of projct selection Sort Indices Full score Per capita income 15-score 1 Poverty-elimination effect Minority nationality 10-score Economic benefit and AADT (average annual daily traffic 2 10-score social benefit volume) 19 Resources (agriculture) 5-score Forestry and mining 3-score Tourism 2-score Relevant benefit 5-score Education 5-score Medical treatment 5-score Optimize and integrate the Decollation road 5-score 3 road network structure Road net function 10-score Acquisition 5-score Construction conditional & present status 4 Environment effect 10-score of road Environment sensitive spot 10-score 3. The Process of Project Selection The whole process of project selection included (1)According to the Great Guiyang strategies and Guiyang transportation development planning, decided the selection principles and classification standards with the relative government departments and experts. (2)The local transportation bureaus raised the candidate projects (3)The experts from the relative professional institutions did the investigations on the economic and social effects of the candidate projects. (4)Classification (5)The project decision.The preset project includes 1 urban road, 44 rural roads and 46 rural pannsenger transport stations. 1.2 Social assessment overview The social assessment of Guiyang Traffic Project is an important part of the project feasibility study report. Guiyang Transportation Project Management Office of World Bank Loan consigned CCCCC at the Sun Yat-sen University to perform the social assessment of the project as an independent consulting agency on May, 2005. CCCCC did a lot preparing work of SA from Jul. 2005 to Jan. 2006, and conducted field investigation in project affected areas from Feb. to Jun. 2006. 20 1.2.1 Significances and purposes of social assessment Significances of social assessment: Social assessment is a method/technique to incorporate social analysis and public participation into a development project’s design and execution, and a supplement to the economic, financial, technical and environmental analysis. The Significances of this social assessment are: a. To let the project dicision maker know more abut the social and cultural situation of the affected region through the SA investigation and analysis; b. To give the different stakeholders in affected area a chance to express their needs and suggestions; c. To give the suggestions on how to decrearse or avoid the potential negnitive social impacts of project. 2. The purposes of social assesement This social assessment aims: a). to learn the basic ecological, social, economic, cultural and nationality situation in the affected areas, to demonstrate the feasibility of this project from the cultural and social points of view; b).to learn the expectations and attitudes of the directly and indirectly the interested parties of the project to ensure this project is accepted by them; c).to learn the rural poverty in the affected areas, to assess the project’s anti-poverty function for the rural areas; d). to learn the social, economic and cultural background of the minorities in the affected areas, to assess the project’s impacts on the local minorities’ development, to determine whether it is necessary to make a special development plan for the minorities in the affected areas; e).To assess the project’s social impacts, so as to ensure the potential social problems can be fully understood and valued, and to propose specific measures to avoid and abate such negative impacts. 21 1.2.2 Methodology of social assessment The fieldwork of this social assessment used a combination of the PRA (participatory rural assessment), anthropological participatory observation and questionnaire. PRA is a method which collects the information by the cooperation with the residents at rural communities within the affected areas. This is also a community development method that relies completely on local knowledge, leadership, organizations and resources to promote the rural development. The investigators may suggest or request local residents to provide community maps, social maps, resource transition maps, seasonal charts, as well as data related to the local historical evolution or current social, economic situations, etc. Another useful tool in PRA is ranking, which can be conducted in the group discussion of villagers or government officials, and through which the SA team can collect the each participators’ opinions quickly.Every villagers’ group disscusion were held at lest 8 participators, who are from different groups i.e. the rich, the poor, village cadars, women and so on. Fieldwork is a basic research method in anthropology, in which researchers visit the community concerned, live along with natives for a period and directly participate in and observe the local life, production and ceremonies, etc. It is a method combining emic/etic study organically that is good to understanding the practical living conditions and real ideas of study objects. Meanwhile, the method of questionnaire survey is also used in this social assessment based on the “Semi-structured Investigation Questionnaire of Social Assessment for Guiyang Transportation Project” designed by CCCCC in advance. The questionnaire analysis helps complement the data collected via PRA and fieldwork. 1.2.3 Standards of the investigated villages Selection 22 In the selection of villages, the economic condition, geographic location, traffic condition, ethnic minorities, social genders and other factors of the affected groups in the affected areas were considered. The detail criteria of selection are: D The villages along the project road and in the obvious affected region. In this SA, all investigated villages are within this range, and most of them are along the project road. For example Panzhai village in Qinzhen City, Luguan Village in Huaxi District, Jinjia village in Baiyun District are the villages along the road; Guangzhong Village in Kaiyang County and Chetian Village in Huaix District are in the main affected region. E The villages with inconvenient traffic, for example Wugongqiao, Damuzhai and Shanzhai Village in Xiuwen County; Qinshan and Zifang Village in Xifeng County. F The ethnic minorities’ compact and mixed region. This SA paid special attention to the ethni minorities in the project affected region and tried to select the minority villages along the road as the key investigation sites. The main minorities involved in this project are Miao and Bouyei people, and most of the investigated villages are the Miao or Bouyei people’s compact or scattered villages. Only Pantong Village in Kaiyang County, Xinzhai Village in Xifeng County, Shanzhai Village and dazhai Village in Xiuwen County are the Han villages. G Impoverished villages. Another focus of this SA is rural poor group. Except Panzhai Village in Qinzhen City, Luguan Village in Huaxi District and Jinjia Village in Baiyun district, which are a little bit richer since they have more migrant workers, more convenient traffic and rich mine resource, the rest villages are poor and most of them are the provincial impoverish villages. 1.2.4 Operations of social assessment CCCCC at Zhongshan University organized a social assessment team in late Nov. 2005 and designed the “Investigation Outline for Social Assessment of Guiyang Transportation Project ”, “Investigation Questionnaire of Guiyang Transportaion 23 Project” and flow chart of investigation for social assessment based on the World Bank’s requirements and practical situations at the affected areas. Prior to the investigation, the literatures on the affected areas had been collected and analyzed. The field investigation was separated into 2 steps. The first step was from Feb. 21 to Mar. 8. A SA team including 11 members went to the 16 villages at Kaiyang County, Xifeng Counety, Xiuwen County, Qinzhen City, Huaxi District, Wudang District and Baiyun District, for a 16-day social investigation. In each county/city/district, the SA procedure is: discussion with county/city/district, township/town and village cadres, villagers (include females)Æ drawing maps (community map, social map, seasonal activity chart, daily life & product chart in busy and slack seasons, resource distribution map, resource change map and outgoing frequency chart, etc.)Æranking (including ranking of favorable and unfavorable influences from the project, ranking of factors affecting the local economic development, ranking of beneficiary groups and labor productivity, etc.) Æquestionnaire surveyÆintensive interview. The second step was from May 30 to Jun. 15, the SA team investigated the ethnic minorities’ compact regions again and also the city communities affected by the urban road project. The key issues of this step are to know the living situations of ethnic minorities and urban residents, and their opions and suggestions on the project. During the door-to-door interview, the SA team refused to be accompanied by local government officials but retained some local villagers as guides and interpreters instead to dispel peasants’ misgiving and understand their true ideas, requirements to the greatest extent. In villagers’ group discussion and ranking, the form of anonymous meeting was adopted as an international practice. During the investigation, all levels of government concerned and the local people offered the great support and aid, enabling this social investigation to be successfully completed on schedule. Though these 2 investigations, 1113 effective questionnaires (812 from the villages in rural road project affected area, 301 from 24 the residents along the urban road), 32 maps/charts of all kinds and 76 cases of in- depth interview were collected in total. 1.2.5 Sampling The Guiyang Transportation Project involves a huge region. In this SA, we tried best to give consideration to people with different genders, occupations, age groups, economic conditions, religious faiths and so on to make the sample representative in each investigated village. The questionnaire was completed by the members of the SA team to ensure high effectiveness. In view of questionnaire that may not cover all important information, SA team also adopted qualitative intensive interview as compensation. And the valuable objects of intensive interview were always found during the questionnaire interview. In the rural questionnaire investigation, the door- to-door random sampling method was used, and all the respondents were above 16 years old with normal thinking and language. (1) The distribution of urban and rural informants This investigation involved 1113 informants in whom there are 812 rural informants and 301 urban informants. The respective percentages of rural and urban informants are 72.96% and 27.04%. (2) Sex distribution: In valid 812 rural questionares, there are 71.4% quetiongares with 580 from the male interviewees, and 28.6% with 232 from the female. In 301 urban qustionares, there are 54.8% questionares with 165 from the male, and 45.2% with 136 from the female. The male interviewees are more than the female mainly because most householders in villages are male, and we can’t control sex distribution in the random sampling method. 25 Table 1-6 Interviewees’ sex distribution (the rural) Cumulative sex distribution Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent male 580 71.3 71.4 71.4 Valid female 232 28.5 28.6 100.0 Total 812 99.8 100.0 812 valid questionairs Data source: Guiyang Transportation Project questionnaire (for the rural project) Table 1-7 Interviewees’ sex distribution (the urban) sex distribution Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Male 165 54.8 54.8 54.8 Female 136 45.2 45.2 100.0 Total 301 100.0 100.0 Data source: Guiyang Transportation Project questionnaire (for urban project) (3) Age distribution: Most informants age from 31 to 60 without reference to the rural or urban. In detail 77.2% rural informants and 68.5% urban informants are in this age stage. And a few interwees age under 30 or up 60. 26 Table 1-8 Interviewees’ age distribution (the rural) age distribution Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 16 20 2 .2 .2 .2 21 30 102 12.5 12.6 12.8 31 40 282 34.6 34.8 47.7 41 50 176 21.6 21.7 69.4 51 60 168 20.6 20.7 90.1 61 70 72 8.8 8.9 99.0 71 8 1.0 1.0 100.0 Total 810 99.5 100.0 Missing System 4 .5 Total 814 100.0 Data source: Guiyang Transportation Project questionnaire (for the rural project) Table 1-9 Interviewees’ age distribution (the urban) Age distribution Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 16 20 4 1.3 1.5 1.5 21 30 17 5.6 6.5 8.0 31 40 59 19.6 22.7 30.7 41 50 45 15.0 17.3 48.0 51 60 74 24.6 28.5 76.5 61 70 41 13.6 15.8 92.3 71 20 6.6 7.7 100.0 Total 260 86.4 100.0 missing System 41 13.6 Total 301 100.0 Data source: Guiyang Transportation Project questionnaire (for urban project) (4) Ethnic distribution: The main ethnic groups involved in this project are Han, Miao and Bouyei. In rural, 57.6% interviewees are Han people, 25.1% are Bouyei people and 16.7% are Miao people. In urban, 81.9% informants are Han people, 10.7% are Bouyei people and 1.3% are Miao people. 27 Table 1-10 Interviewees’ ethnic distribution (the rural) Cumulative Ethnic distribution Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Han 468 57.5 57.6 57.6 Miao 136 16.7 16.7 74.4 Bouyei 204 25.1 25.1 99.5 others 4 .5 .5 100.0 Total 812 99.8 100.0 Missing System 2 .2 Total 814 100.0 Data source: Guiyang Transportation Project questionnaire (for the rural project) Table 1-11 Interviewees’ ethnic distribution (the urban) Ethnic distribution Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Han 245 81.4 81.9 81.9 Miao 4 1.3 1.3 83.3 Bouyei 32 10.6 10.7 94.0 Dong 4 1.3 1.3 95.3 Hui 1 .3 .3 95.7 others 13 4.3 4.3 100.0 Total 299 99.3 100.0 Missing System 2 .7 Total 301 100.0 Data source: Guiyang Transportation Project questionnaire (for urban project) (5) Religions: Non-religion intervewees are the most. The proportion is 85.7% in rural and 96.5% in urban. Fewer than 15% rural interviewees and 2.4% urban interviewees believe Buddhism, Christianism or other religions. It is also suggested though the in-depth interview that the folk religions also have some impacts in the affected region. Table 1-12 Interviewees’ religions (the rural) religions Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Buddhism 5.2 5.2 5.2 Christianism 1.2 1.2 6.4 Folk religions .7 .7 7.2 Non-religion 85.3 85.7 92.8 other 7.1 7.2 100.0 Total 99.5 100.0 Missing System .5 28 Total 100.0 Data source: Guiyang Transportation Project questionnaire (for the rural project) Table 1-13 Interviewees’ religions (the urban) Religions Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Buddhism 1.0 1.2 1.2 Christianism 1.0 1.2 2.3 others 1.0 1.2 3.5 Non-religion 83.1 96.5 100.0 total 86.0 100.0 Missing System 14.0 Total 100.0 Data source: Guiyang Transportation Project questionnaire (for urban project) (6) Interviewee’s marriage: In rural, 89.7% interviewees are married. In urban, 84.8% interviewees are married. Table1-14 Interviewees’ marriage (the rural) maggiage Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Married 89.4 89.7 89.7 unmarried 4.9 4.9 94.6 divorce .7 .7 95.3 bereft spouse 4.7 4.7 100.0 Total 99.8 100.0 Missing System .2 Total 100.0 Data source: Guiyang Transportation Project questionnaire (for the rural project) Table1-15 Interviewees’ marriage (the urban marriage Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid Married 74.4 84.8 84.8 Unmarried 5.3 6.1 90.9 Divorce 1.3 1.5 92.4 Bereft spouse 6.6 7.6 100.0 Total 87.7 100.0 Missing System 12.3 Total 100.0 Data source: Guiyang Transportation Project questionnaire (for urban project) 29 (7) Interviewees’ employment: The investigation of SA team was conducted after the spring festival. Some villagers have left for working, and some didn’t return in the festival holiday. Based on those, our survey suggests that most interviewees with 81% are working on agriculture at home; 3.9% are doing non-agriculture such as transporters, village doctors at home. Some migrant workers still stay at home, 9.6% of interviewees are the domiciliary migrant workers. In urban, the main employment is worker. 27.1% informants are the worker, and 20.8% are retired workers. There are 18.2% interviewees who live in the urban villages and still work on agiriculture. 30 Table1-16 Interviewees’ employment (the rural) Cumulative Employment Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Doing agriculuture 80.8 81.0 81.0 Doing non-agriculture 3.9 3.9 85.0 Migrant worker 9.6 9.6 94.6 Student .2 .2 94.8 Teacher .7 .7 95.6 Cadre 2.7 2.7 98.3 Non-emloment .7 .7 99.0 Other 1.0 1.0 100.0 Total 99.8 100.0 Missing System .2 Total 100.0 Data source: Guiyang Transportation Project questionnaire (for the rural project) Table1-17 Interviewees’ employment (the urban) employment Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid worker 64 21.3 27.1 27.1 Commercial boss 13 4.3 5.5 32.6 Commercial employee 10 3.3 4.2 36.9 civil servant 10 3.3 4.2 41.1 Enterprise employee 22 7.3 9.3 50.4 Unemployment worker 5 1.7 2.1 52.5 Retired worker 49 16.3 20.8 73.3 peasant 43 14.3 18.2 91.5 Non-employment 20 6.6 8.5 100.0 total 236 78.4 100.0 Missing System 65 21.6 Total 301 100.0 Data source: Guiyang Transportation Project questionnaire (for urban project) 1.2.6 Data sources The data used as reference for this report falls into the following categories: 1. Official statistical data: e.g., statistical and traffic yearbooks of the affected areas; national economic statistics; statistical statements compiled by investigated counties/city/district, towns and villages; 2. Local literatures: local annals and historic records of the affected areas; 3. Fieldwork data: e.g., oral interviews, participatory observations and 31 questionnaires. We use the above references in strict accordance with the following principles: (1) use statistical data as up-to-date as possible; (2) at the village level, try to use firsthand statistical data from fieldwork to ensure the objectiveness and accuracy; and (3) for the analysis and discussion of any issue, opinions and views from peasants and all levels of local government and organizations are integrated to provide comprehensive and essential information. 32 Chapter 2: Guiyang City Overview Guiyang City is named for its situation at the sun side of the Gui Mountain within its boundaries. In ancient times, Guiyang abounded in bamboo and many places are named by “bamboo”. For this reason, Guiyang is also known briefly as “Zhu”. Guiyang City is situated in the east of the Yun-Gui Plateau and is a central city in Southwest China, presently being the capital and the political, economic, cultural and educational center of Guizhou Province. The city has a land area of 8034km2, a total population of 3.5085 million at the end of 2004. Since 1978, the national economy of Guiyang City has been growing rapidly. In 2004, the GDP of Guiyang City reached RMB 44.363 billion Yuan, which is ranked 23 in total countrywide 27 provincial capitals, and 8 in western 11 provincial capitals. The per capita GDP is RMB 12683 Yuan, which is ranked 25 in countrywide provincial capitals and 9 in western provincial capitals. Highway is the key means of transportation for Guiyang City; National Highways G321, G210, GZ065 and GZ050 and several provincial highways within its boundaries intersect each other, forming a pivot of highway traffic. By now, Guiyang City has got a traffic network that combines railway, highway and civil aviation. à 2.1 Geographic location and landform Guiyang City is located in the east slope of the Yun-Gui Plateau in the central north of Guizhou Province, between EL106°07’ to 107°07’, NL26°11’ to 27°22’, with an altitude of 1659m, being the transition zone between the east and west parts of China. Guiyang City borders on Wenan, Longli, Huishui and Changshun Counties, Qiannan Bouyei Autonomous Prefecture to the east and south, on Pingba County, Anshun 33 Region and Zhijin County, Bijie Region to the west, on Qianxi, Jinsha Counties, Beijie Region and Zunyi County, Zunyi City to the north. The landform extends roughly from the east to the west, and fluctuates greatly, high in the south and north, low in the center. The unique karst landform is widespread, including highlands, hills, basins, valleys and terraces, with altitude ranging from 872m to 1659m. Climatic features Guiyang City is highly characterized by the subtropical warm, wet highland monsoon climate with plenty of rainfall, averaging at 1200mm per annum. In the history, the city has been renowned as raininess. In recent year, the rainfall has reduced with the warming of the globe, and heavy rains are mostly found in June and July. The annual average temperature is 15.3 , the average temperature of the hottest month (July) is 24 and that of the coldest month (January) 4.6 . The historically lowest temperature was -9.5 ; the extreme high temperature 39.5 . In spring and autumn, there would be frequent temperature and weather changes, with high relative humidity. The frost-free period is about 270 days. Northeaster is dominant in Guiyang City all the year round; southeaster dominant in summer; there is south wind in most sunny days and north wind in most rainy days. The annual average wind speed is 2.2m/s, the highest wind speed over a short period 20m/s. The annual average atmospheric pressure is 8935mPa. The atmospheric pressure is high in winter and low in summer. The key disasters include abnormal coldness during spring, autumn rain and low temperature, hailstone, rainstorm, gale, and acid rain. 2.3 History In the Spring and Autumn Period, Guiyang fell into the jurisdiction of Zangke State. In the Warring States Period, it belonged to Yelang State. In the Han dynasty, it was 34 governed by Zangke Prefecture. In the Tang dynasty, Jimi Prefecture was set up to the south of the Wujiang River, and Guiyang belonged to Ju Prefecture. In the Song dynasty, Guiyang was known as “Guizhou”. In the Yuan dynasty, two administrations were set up in this area and later merged into a marshal government at Guiyang, known as “Shunyuan” city. In 1413 (Ming dynasty), Guizhou became the 13th administrative province of the Ming government and the office of the local civil administrative minister was set up in Guiyang. In 1568, Chengfan Office (Huishui County today) was moved to Guizhou City (the urban area of Guiyang today). In 1569, Chengfan Office was renamed as Guiyang Office, and “Guiyang” was used as the name of an administrative region. In 1601, Guiyang Office was upgraded to Guiyang Army’s and People’s Office. In 1659, Guizhou Governor’s Guizhou Army’s and People’s Office was set up. In 1687, Guiyang Army’s and People’s Office was changed to Guiyang Office. In 1914, Guiyang Office was replaced by Guiyang County. In 1920, Guiyang County was under the direct jurisdiction of Guizhou Governor’s Office. On 1 July 1941, Guiyang City was formally established. On 23 Nov 1949, the Guiyang City People’s Government was set up. In spring 1955, the Guiyang City People’s Government was renamed as the Guiyang City People’s Committee. In Aug 1982, the Guiyang City Revolutionary Committee restored its name as the Guiyang City People’s Government. On 1 Jan 1996, Qingzhen City, Xiuwen County, Xifeng County and Kaiyang County, formerly under Anshun Region was put under the governance of Guiyang City with the State Council’s approval. 2.4 Regionalism Guiyang City now governs one city (Qingzhen City), 3 counties (Xiuwen County, Kaiyang County, Xifeng County), 6 districts (Yunyan District, Nanming District, 35 Baiyun District, Wudang District, Huaxi District, Xiaohe District), with a total area of 8034km2, an urban area of 2403km2. The urban area starts from Longdongbao on the east, ends at the Baihua Mountains and Aha Reservoir on the west, starts from Tongmuling on the south and ends at Luowan on the northeast and Maijia on the northwest, including the central district and peripheral Longdongbao, Ergezhai, Xiaohe, Huaxi, Xintian, Baiyun, Sanqiao and Jinyang Districts, with an area of about 495km2. Figure 2-1: the regionalism of Guiyang City 2.5 Narural resources and products There are over key mineral products in Guiyang City, including coal, bauxite, phosphate ore, sulfur iron ore, crystal, quartz sandstone, limestone, dolomite, barite, gypsum and lead-zinc ore, of which bauxite and phosphate ore play an important role at home. The water resources of Guiyang City are mainly from natural rain, the annual natural runoff of the city is 546-640mm, and each square kilometer produces 563,000 cubic meters of water on average; the total amount of water resources is 5.34 billion cubic meters. There are 98 rivers longer than 10km within the city, including 90 rivers in 36 the Yangtze River Basin and 8 in the Pearl River Basin. The main rivers include the Wujiang River, Nanming River, Maotiao River, Yachi River, Anliu River, Yuliang River, Gusa River, Xifeng River, Yangshui River in the Yangtze River System and Mengjiang River in the Pearl River System. The artificial lakes include the Hongfeng Lake, Baihua Lake, Aha Reservoir and Huaxi Reservoir. The grain crops in the rural areas of Guiyang City include paddy, wheat, corn, soybean, miscellaneous beans, sweet potato and potato. With little land for many people, the local grain production cannot fully meet the urban demand. In addition to domestic animals and eggs, the farm and sideline products, such as, grass knitting, earth products and potteries, high-grade tealeaves, primary traditional Chinese medicines, play a very important role in rural economy. 2.6 Population and ethnic groups According the Guiyang Municipal Public Security Bureau’s statistics, at the end of 2004, Guiyang City has a total of 934023 households, a total population of 350.85 million, including 178.65 million males, accounting for 50.92%, and 172.20million females, accounting for 49.08%, the male and female sex propotion is 103.75:100; a nonagricultural population of 165.07million, accounting for 47.05%, an agricultural population of 185.78million, accounting for 52.95%; city and town population is 221.83 million, accounting for 63.23%, rural population is 129.02 million, accounting for 36.77%. In 2004, the birthrate is 12.07‰, the death rate is 5.92‰, and the natural growth rate is 6.15‰. Table 2-1 Residential Population of Districts (Counties, Cities) of Guiyang City in 2004 Unit: 10,000 the density of Year-end total Annual average District/county/city population(per population population KM2) Total of the city 350.85 349.78 436.71 37 Nanming District 50.59 50.46 5677.89 Yunyan District 55.23 55.09 8182.22 Huaxi District 32.36 32.26 336.59 Wudang District 30.73 30.63 319.31 Baiyun District 17.38 17.32 669.49 Xiaohe District 11.93 11.9 1890.65 Kaiyang County 43.84 43.69 216.37 Xifeng County 26.05 25.97 251.33 Xiuwen County 30.77 30.67 286.05 Qingzhen City 51.97 51.81 348.23 Data source: Guiyang statistical bureau.2005.“2005 Guiyang Statistical Yearbook”. Beijing: Chinese Statistical Press. The urban and rural areas of Guiyang City are inhabited by multiple ethnic groups and in some areas, traditional national cultures are quite characteristic. According to the data of the 5th National Census in 2000, the minority population of Guiyang City was 573,900, accounting for 15.43% of the total population. At present, there are 13 aboriginal minorities in Guiyang City, such as Bouyei and Miao, of which the minorities with a population of above 10,000 include Miao, Bouyei, Tujia, Yi, Dong, Gelao, with a total population of 504,900. There are 19 national Xiangs and 353 minority villages in the city. In some Miao and Bouyei habitats, such as Pingzhai Village, Gaozhai Xiang, Kaiyang County and the Miao people around Guangzhong Village, the national cultures are well kept, where traditional festivals, traditional dresses, ornaments, music and dances have become a highlight these years. At present, the nationalities get along with each other generally and there is no major conflict between them. However, the minorities are economically backward. Table 2-2: The ethnic minorities’ structure of Guiyang City in 2001 No Name Population(10thousand) remark 1 Miao 23.64 2 Bouyei 20.20 3 Tujia 2.13 4 Yi 2.76 5 Dong 1.49 6 Gelao 1.66 38 7 Bai 0.59 8 Hui 0.63 9 Man 0.31 10 Zhuang 0.38 11 Shui 0.25 12 Mongol 0.20 13 Li 0.13 Including the people 14 Others 3.02 unconfirmed ethnic identity. 15 Total 57.39 Data resource: The Ethnic Minority and Religion Bureau of Guiyang City. The economic and social development planning of ethnic minority and ethnic region(2002-2020). 2005. Table 2-3: The ethnic minorities’ distribution of Guiyang City in 2000 No. County/city/district Population(10000) Proportion(%) 1 Xiuwen County 2.21 3.85 2 Kaiyang County 4.27 7.44 3 Xifeng County 1.19 2.07 4 Qinzhen City 11.8 20.56 5 Huaxi District 11.59 20.2 6 Wudang District 5.63 9.81 7 Baiyun District 3.14 5.47 8 Naming District 8.57 14.93 9 Xiaohe District 2.29 3.99 10 Yunyan District 6.7 11.67 Total 57.39 100 Data resource: The Ethnic Minority and Religion Bureau of Guiyang City. The economic and social development planning of ethnic minority and ethnic region(2002-2020). 2005. 2.7 National economy development 1. Overview of Guiyang national economi development In 2004, the gross output value of Guiyang City was RMB44.63 billion, an increase of 13.7% over the year before. The added value of the primary industry was RMB3.177 1 Data source: Guiyang statistical bureau.2005. 2005 Guiyang Statistical Yearbook”. Beijing: Chinese Statistical Press. 39 billion, an increase of 7.6% over the year before, that of the secondary industry RMB233.24 billion, an increase of 15.6%, that of the tertiary industry RMB178.62 billion yuan, an increase of 12.3%. Table 2-4: The Guiyang City’s main economic indexes in 2004 The place in The place in Numerical countrywide western Economic index value provincial provincial capital capital population(100 thousand) 350.85 19 5 Gross Domestic Prooduct (100 443.63 23 8 million yuan) The increase speed (%) 13.7 18 5 average per-capita GDP (yuan) 12683 25 9 The ermanent assets investment of 292.78 19 5 whole social (RMB 100 million yuan) urban citizen’s per capita available 8989 16 6 income(Yuan) Farmer’s per capita net 2809 23 7 income(Yuan) Data source: Guiyang statistical bureau.2005. 2005 Guiyang Statistical Yearbook”. Beijing: Chinese Statistical Press. The economic development of Guiyang City is better compared to other regions in Guizhou Province, but is lower compared to other provincial capitals in China. In 2004, the population of Guiyang City accounted for 1.51% of the total population lived in provincial capitals, but the GDP was 44.365 billion yuan, accouting for less than 0.74% of the total GDP of provincial capitals, and ranked 23 in total 27 provincial capitals. Guiyang’s economic development is still lower compared other provincial capitals in the Western China. In 2004, the per capita GDP of Guiyang accounted for 77.84% of the average of western provincial capitals. Table2-5: the Guiyang City’s main economic indexes in 2004 Population Per capita GDP Region GDP(100 million yuan) (10thousand) (Yuan) Nation 129988.00 136875.90 10561.00 Countrywide 23067.10 60217.27 26105.26 provincial capital Western provincial 4391.85 16385.30 16385.30 capital 40 Guizhou Province 3903.70 1591.90 4215.00 Guiyang city 347.81 443.63 12754.93 Data source: 1.National bureau of statistics of China 2005 China Statistical Yearbook”. Beijing: Chinese Statistical Press.2.Guiyang statistical bureau.2005. 2005 Guiyang Statistical Yearbook”. Beijing: Chinese Statistical Press. 2. Industry In 2004, the production value of all industries in Guiyang City was RMB561.02 billion, an increase of 16.8% over the year before. That of large-scale industrial enterprises was RMB491.498 billion, an increase of 19.0%, that of the heavy industry was RMB346.33 billion, that of the light industry RMB144.95 billion, an increase of 17.9% and 21.7% over the year before respectively; that of state-owned and state-held enterprises RMB455.93 billion, an increase of 19.1%; that of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan funded enterprises RMB7.28 billion, an increase of 45.5%; that of foreign funded enterprises RMB 28.08 billion, an increase of 13.6%. 3. Agriculture The paddy field of 2004 was 41809 ha., and dry land was 15753 ha.. The crops cultivation area of the year was 233825 ha, in which food crop area was 131606 ha., cash crops area was 51453 ha., other crops area was 50766 ha. In 2004, the food crop output was 596,500 tons, the rapeseed output 61700 tons, the vegetable output 868,700 tons. The agricultural gross value of the year is RMB 288665 million. The forestation area of the year was 9,105ha, the area of returning land for farming to forestry 2,523ha. The output of the stock raising of the yeare included 156.54 million pigs, 63600 cattles and 49800 sheep. The gross value of fishery in 2004 was RMB 91.17million Yuan. 4. Transportation 41 The freight volume by all means of transport of the year was 57.3981 million tons, an increase of 7.9% over the last year, of which 12.6333 million tons by railway, an increase of 16.1%; 44.69 million tons by highway, an increase of 5.8%; 18,800 tons by air, an increase of 21.1%. The passenger traffic volume was 192.7283 million men-times, an increase of 4.1%, including 6.0268 million men-times by railway, an increase of 5.6%; 185.01 million men-times by highway, 0.3465 million men-times by air, an increase of 3.9% and 36.3% over the year before respectively. 5. Residents’ income In 2004, the per capita pay of employeed workers in Guiyang Citywas RMB 14099 yuan, an increase of 15.7% over the year before. The farmers’ per capita net income was RMB2809, an increase of 11.9% over the year before, the actual increase was 7.4% if the price factors are considered. Table 2-6: Farmers’ Per Capita Net Income of Districts (Counties, Cities) of Guiyang City in 2004 District (county, city) Per capita net income of Increase over 2003 (%) farmers (RMB) Nanming District 4276 10.3 Yunyan District 4293 10.0 Huaxi District 2906 12.0 Wudang District 3144 12.1 Baiyun District 3488 10.0 Xiaohe District 3672 11.4 Kaiyang County 2627 10.6 Xifeng County 2092 12.0 Xiuwen County 2390 10.8 Qingzhen City 2538 11.8 Data source: Guiyang statistical bureau.2005.“2005 Guiyang Statistical Yearbook”. Beijing: Chinese Statistical Press. Table 2-3: Per Capita Disposable Income of Town Dwellers of Districts (Counties, Cities) of Guiyang City in 2004 42 District (county, city) Per capita disposable Increase over 2003 (%) income of town dwellers (RMB) Nanming District 8861 12.9 Yunyan District 9113 12.3 Huaxi District 8186 14.5 Wudang District 8227 13.7 Baiyun District 8373 11.3 Xiaohe District 8790 12.8 Kaiyang County 7884 11.3 Xifeng County 7243 14.9 Xiuwen County 7395 14.5 Qingzhen City 7741 15.2 Data source: Guiyang statistical bureau.2005.“2005 Guiyang Statistical Yearbook”. Beijing: Chinese Statistical Press. 2.8 Traffic situation As the traffic center of Guizhou Province, Guiyang City is the hub of traffic and communication in Southwest China. Highway: Within the boundaries of Guiyang, National Highway 321 runs transversely, National Highway 210 runs longitudinally. The Gui-Huang, Gui-Zun, Gui-Bi and Gui-Xin high-class highways are spread in the city. The counties, cities and districts under Guiyang City are connected by Class-2 or above highways, and most Xiangs and towns by Class-3 highways. The village-level highways are mostly mud and sandstone roads, and only a few rural highways have a cement or asphalt surface. By the end of 2003, the total highway length of Guiyang City was 3309km, including 313km of national highways, 370km of provincial highways, 935km of county highways, 1644km of Xiang highways, 47km of special highways. There were 106km of expressways, 49km of Class-1 highways, 271km of Class-2 highways, 579km of Class-3 highways and 1506km of Class-4 highways and 798km of off-class highways. Railway: The Qian-Gui, Chuan-Qian, Gui-Kun and Xiang-Qian trunk railways join at Guiyang, with access to Hunan, Yunnan, Guangxi and Sichuan Provinces. All trains 43 within the boundaries of the city are electrified, with a railway length of 324km and 27 passenger and freight terminals. At present, there are over 40 starting trains with direct access to Beijing, Shanghai, Chengdu, Chongqing, Guangzhou, Kunming and other central cities of the country. Civil aviation: Guiyang has a Class-4D national airport and a Class-3C military and civil airport. At present, there are 28 airlines; the passenger traffic volume was 987,800 men-times and the freight volume 15,500 tons in 2004. 44 Chapter 3: Social and Economic Development Overview of project affected area 3.1 The overview of project affected area Guiyang Transportation project includes urban road, rural roads and the town passenger transport stations, and involves 3 counties, 1 city and 4 districts of Guiyang City, which are Kaiyang County, Xifeng County, Xiuwen County, Qinzhen City, Huaxi District, Wudang District, Baiyun District and Nanming Distict. The project willl affect 2.8281 million people, in whom 467 thounsand are ethnic minorities. This project aims to build 44 rural roads, 46 rural passenger transport stations and 1 urban road. The rural project (rural roads and town passenger tansport stations) involves 281 administrative villages of 41 towns(Xiangs) in 8 counties/districts/city. The rural passenger stations project involves 41 administrative villages of 46 towns (xiangs) in 6 counites/districs/city. The urban road project involves 2 towns, 1 city commumities and 4 administrative villages.Figure 3-1 shows the detail distribution of sub-projects in project affected area. 45 à Figure 3-1: the distribution of Guiyang Transportation project 46 Table 3-1-1: The villages along the project roads No. County/city/district The number Affected Affected of Road towns administrative village 1 Kaiyang County 14 12 65 Rural road 2 Xifeng County 9 9 56 Rural road 3 Xiuwen County 6 6 108 Rural road 4 Wudang District 4 4 18 Rural road 5 Huaxi District 3 32 17 Rural road 6 Qinzhen City 7 7 98 Rural road 7 Baiyun District 1 1 4 Rural road 8 Nanming District 1 1 2 Urban Road Total 45 43 368 Data source: collect and calculate according to “The basic information of administrative villages along the rural roads”. Table 3-1-2 the distribution of rural passenger transport stations Affected The number Affected No County/city/district administrative of station towns village 1 Kaiyang County 9 9 9 2 Xifeng County 4 4 4 3 Xiuwen County 5 5 5 4 Wudang district 8 8 8 5 Huaxi District 11 11 11 6 Qinzhen city 9 9 7 total 46 46 44 Data source: collect and calculate according to “The basic information of administrative villages along the rural roads”. During Feb. to Jun. 2006, the SA team’s investigation involved 18 rural roads and the urban road (Youzha Street to Xiaobi Xiang). 2 Note: Xiaobi Xiang in Huaxi District is affected by urban road. 47 The SA team did the investigation in the 23 villages along 18 rural roads of project. Guangzhong, Yantang and Pantong Villages in Kaiyang County; Qinshan, Zifang, Hekan and Zhuhua Villages in Xifeng County; Hongxing, Wugongqiao, Damu, Sanzhai and Dazhai Villages in Xiuwen County; Chetian, Xinmin, Luguan Village in Huaxi District; Dagu, Qinshan and Panzhai Villages in Qinzhen City; Wanggang and Pianpo village in Wudang District; Jinjia and Heishitou Village in Baiyun District totally 23 villages were selected as the investigated villages for the social assessment on the rural project, in which 16 villages are the key investigated villages. In the urban road affectd area, the SA team went to 10 communities/villages in Xiaobi Xiang of Huaxi District, Yunguan Xiang of Naming District, Longdongbao Street Office and Youza Street Office; and did the investigation in Mutou villages of Yunguan Xiang; Youza Village, Youza Community, Dongbao Community, Yugaoqiao Community of Youza Street office; Shuilonglu Community, Jichanglu Community, Jianlong Coummunity and Dadongpo Community of Londongbao Street Office in Nanming District. In the selection of villages, the economic condition, geographic location, traffic condition, ethnic minorities, genders and other factors of the affected groups in the affected areas were considered. The table 3-2 shows the roads where the SA investigated villages are along. The table 3-3 shows the key investigated villages and the counties/districts/city where they locate. The figure 3-2 shows the geographic distribution of the investigated villages. Table 3-2 the Investigated Villages along the Roads Road Road Name of the road Length(km) Investigated villages No. class Damu Village of Liutun 1 Damu to Xinchang 12.22 4 Xiang, Xiuwen County Dagu Village of Liwo Xiang, 4 Liwo to Qibai 18.08 4 Qinzhen City Qinshan Village of Qinshan 8 Qinshan to Xiaojin 18.93 3 Miao People’s Autonomous 48 Xiang, Xifeng County Maolishan to Qinshan Village of Longchen 10 4.48 Qinshan 4 Street Office, Qinzhen City Zuhua Village and Zifang Zuhua to Xinyang 11 17.19 Village of Jiuzhuang to Huguang 4 Town, Xifeng County. Xiaohegou to Hongxing Village of Gubao 12 28.62 Shuikou 3 Xiang, Xiuwen County Yantang Village and Pantong 13 Zaiji to Xinshan 27.06 Village of Zaji Xiang, 3 Kaiyang County Chetian Village and Xinmin Maiping to 14 13.82 Village of Huchao Xiang, Machang 4 Huaxi District Huaxi to Tianhetan Gaopo Xiang of Huaxi 19 4.58 to Gairong 4 District Wanggang Village of Xinpu 20 Dagu to Laping 24.29 3 Xiang, Wudang District Baiyan to Minlian Luguan Village of Huchao 21 16.26 to Longjin 4 Xiang, Huaxi District Hekan Village of Yongjing 23 G210 to Nanji 15.38 4 Town, Xifeng County Dazhai Village and Sanzhai 24 Daqiao to Hefeng 26.46 Village of Liutun Xiang, 4 Xiuwen County Guangzhong Village of Gaozhai to 25 17.07 Gaozhai Xiang, Kaiyang Guangzhong 4 County Weicheng to Panzhai Village of Weicheng 28 9.19 Liujidianzhan 4 Town, Qinzhen City Wugongqiao Village of 30 Shetian to Xiaoba 18.31 Saping Xiang, Xiuwen 4 County Jinjia Village of Shawen Liangshuijin to Town and Heishitou Village 38 6.21 Dashanjiao of Dula Xiang, Baiyun 4 District Pianpo Village of Pianpo 41 Xiaoba to Jingu 6.16 4 Xiang,Wudang District Mutou Village, Youza Village, Youza Community, Dongbao Community, Yugaoqiao Community, Urban Youza Street to Longshuilu Community, 6.59 1 road Xiaobi Xiang Jichanglu Community, Jianlong Community,Dapodong Community of Nanming District; Xiaobi Xiang of 49 Huaxi District Table 3-3: the key investigated villages No. Village Town/Xiang 1 Guangzhong Village Gaozhai Xiang, Kaiyang County 2 Yanhe Village Zhaiji Xiang, Kaiyang County 3 Pantong Village Zhaiji Xiang, Kaiyang County Qinshan Miao People’s 4 Qinshan Village Autonomous Xiang, Xifeng County 5 Zhifang Village Jiuzhuang Town, Xifeng County 6 Zhuhua Village Jiuzhuang Town, Xifeng County 7 Wugongqiao Village Jiuping Xiang, Xiuwen County 8 Damuzhai Village Liutun Xiang, Xiuwen County 9 Daizhai Village Liutun Xiang, Xiuwen County 10 Shanzhai Village Liutun Xiang, Xiuwen County Longcheng Street office, Qinzhen 11 Qinshan Village City 12 Panzhai Village Weicheng Xiang, Qinzhen City 13 Luguan Village Huchao Xiang, Huaxi District 14 Chetian Village Huchao Xiang, Huaxi District 15 Xinmin Village Huchao Xiang, Huaxiang Distirict 16 Jinjia Village Shawen Town, Baiyun District Figure 3-2: the Geographic distribution of the investigated villages 50 3.2 The population and ethnic groups 1. Population The Guiyang Transportation Project involves Kaiyang County, Xifeng County, Xiuwen County, Qinzhen City, Nanming District, Baiyun district, Wudang District and Huaxi District totally 8 Counties/districts, and 2.8281 million people in whom ethnic minorities are 467 thousand. The population along the 44 project rural roads and passenger transport stations is 389.3 thousand. The urban road involves 504.6 thousand permanent residents. Table 3-4: the Pupulation Distribution in Project affected area NO. County/City/District Population (10 thousand) 1 Kaiyang County 43.69 2 Xifeng County 25.97 3 Xiuwen County 30.67 4 Qinzhen City 51.81 5 Huaxi District 32.26 6 Wudang District 30.63 7 Baiyun District 17.32 8 Nanming District 50.46 Total 282.81 Data source: collect and calculate according to “The basic information of the project affected area”. 51 Table 3-5-1: the population along the rural roads The The village No County/City/Distri The road affected quantity along the population . ct quantity directly roads population 1 Kaiyang County 10 65 122649 3249 2 Xifeng County 8 56 50509 2177 3 Xiuwen County 8 108 77375 4329 4 Qinzhen County 4 18 92009 4449 5 Huaxi District 2 17 11408 772 6 Wudang District 11 98 30590 1809 7 Baiyun District 1 4 4793 68 Total 44 366 389333 16853 Note: The affected directly population means the population involved into involuntary resettlement. Table 3-5-2 the affected directly population of rural passenger transport stations project affected The NO. of Affected No County/city/district directly Stations towns population 1 Kaiyang County 9 9 182 2 Xifeng County 4 4 38 3 Xiuwen County 5 5 218 4 Qinzhen city 9 9 148 5 Huaxi District 11 11 161 6 Wudang district 8 8 189 total 46 46 936 Data source: collect and calculate according to “The basic information of administrative villages along the rural roads”. 2. The ethnic minorities’ distribution There are 13 original ethnic minorities in project affected area. At the end of 2004, the population of the ethnic minorities is 467013 in the affected area, in which the minorities’ population along the project roads is 79625. Table 3-6 the ethnic minorities’ structure in project affected area 52 The name of No. Population Note ethnic minority 1 Miao 193228 2 Bouyei 155495 3 Tujia 17870 4 Yi 23647 5 Dong 12428 6 Gelao 13471 7 Bai 5441 8 Hui 5785 9 Man 2604 10 Zhuang 2983 11 Shui 2012 12 Mongol 1534 13 Li 780 Including the people 14 Others 29735 unconfirming ethnic identity. 15 Total 467013 Data source: according to “The county/city/district ethnic minorities’ basic information”. Table 3-7 the ethnic minorities’ distribution in project affected area Ethnic minorities No.County/City/District Note populaiton 1 Xiuwen County 21945 2 Kaiyang County 45024 3 Xifeng County 9367 Including the people unconfirming 4 Qinzhen City 120000 ethnic identity. 5 Huaxi District 117021 6 Wudang District 56287 7 Baiyun District 31169 8 Nanming District 66200 Total 467013 Data source: according to “The county/city/district ethnic minorities’ basic information”. Table 3-8-1 the ethnic minorities’ villages along the roads NO. County/City/District The ethnic minorities’Villages Note 1 Kaiyang County 3 Rural road 53 2 Xifeng County 7 Rural road 3 Xiuwen County 3 Rural road 4 Wudang District 3 Rural road 5 Huaxi District 2 Rural road 6 Qinzhen District 28 Rural road 7 Baiyun District 1 Rural road 8 Nanming District 1 Urban road Total 48 Data source: collect and calculate according to “The county/city/district ethnic minorities’ basic information”. Table3-8-2: the ethnic minority population’s distributiong along the project roads The villages The no. of NO. County/City/District along the Monority populaiton roads road 1 Kaiyang County 10 65 21653 2 Xifeng County 8 56 7292 3 Xiuwen County 8 108 13676 4 Qinzhen City 4 18 16329 5 Huaxi District 2 17 2015 6 Wudang District 11 98 4989 7 Baiyun District 1 4 1134 8 Nanming District 1 2 12537 Total 45 368 79625 Data source: collect and calculate according to “The county/city/district ethnic minorities’ basic information”. The SA team investigated 3 Miao people’s compact villages, 4 Bouyei people’s compact village, 8 Han people’s compact villages, and 1 Miao/ Bouyei/Han’s mixed village. The total population of 16 villages is 25562, in which the male is 13354, the female is 12208. The table 3-9 shows the details of population and ethnic groups of 16 villages: Table 3-9: the population and ethnic groups in 16 investigated villages 54 No. Village Town Population Male Female Ethnic grups Gaozhai Guangzhong Xiang, 1 947 543 404 Miao Village Kaiyang County Zhaiji Yantang Xiang, 2 5175 2736 2439 Miao Village Kaiyang County Zhaiji Pantong Xiang, 3 3974 1929 2045 Han Village Kaiyang County Qinshan Miao People’s Qinshan 4 Autonomous 1358 720 638 Miao Village Xiang, Xifeng County Jiuzhuang Zhifang Town, 5 901 451 450 Han Village Xifeng County Jiuzhuang Zhuhua Town, 6 904 485 419 Bouyei Village Xifeng County Jiuping Wugongqiao Xiang, 7 757 414 343 Bouyei Village Xiuwen County Liutun Damu Xiang, 8 747 413 334 Bouyei Village Xiuwen County Liutun Daizhai Xiang, 9 1657 896 761 Han Village Xiuwen County Liutun Shanzhai Xiang, 10 1221 663 558 Han Village Xiuwen County Longcheng Qinshan Street office, 11 1310 678 632 Han Village Qinzhen City Panzhai Weicheng 12 1186 631 555 Miao/Han/Bouyei Village Xiang, 55 Qinzhen City Huchao Luguan Xiang, 13 1596 707 889 Han Village Huaxi District Huchao Chetian Xiang, 14 732 391 341 Han Village Huaxi District Huchao Xinmin Xiang, 15 1484 860 624 Han Village Huaxiang Distirict Xinpu Wanggang Xiang, 16 576 298 278 Bouyei Village Wudang District Data source: Relevant statistical data from the investigatied village government. 3.3 The economic development 3.3.1 The rural economies 1. Overview In the villages along the rural road and town passenger transport stations, the local people’s persistent income resources are food and cash crops planting and family animal husbandry. Since 2000, migrant working has come into being a new families’ income resource. The per capita farmer income of the all villages along the roads in the 8 counties/districts/city involved in project is RMB 2032.20 Yuan. That of Kaiyang Couty and Qinzhen City is RMB 1827.41 yuan and RMB 1866.27 yuan repectively, which are the lowest in the 8 counties/districts/city. And that of Wudang District is RMB 3364.14 Yuan, which is the highest. Table 3-10: The per capita farmer income of the all villages along the roads Villages Road The per capita County/city/distri NO. quatity along population farmer annual ct quatity the roads income(Yuan) 56 1 Kaiyang County 10 65 122649 1827.41 2 Xifeng County 8 56 50509 2110.30 3 Xiuwen County 8 108 77375 2007.48 4 Qinzhen City 4 18 92009 1866.27 5 Huaxi District 2 17 11408 2267.63 6 Wudang District 11 98 30590 3364.14 7 Baiyun District 1 4 4793 3353.28 Total 44 366 389333 2032.20 Data source: according to “The basic information of administrative villages along the rural roads”. Note: this table doesn’t include the relevant statistic of Mutou Village and Youza Village of Nanming District which are affected by urban road. Except Luguan Village in Huaxi District and Jinjia Village in Baiyun District which are a little bit richer since they have more migrant workers, more convenient traffic and rich mine resource, the rest of 16 villages are underdevelopment. The local people’s persistent income resources are food and cash crops planting and family animal husbandry. From 2000, migrated working has come into being a key families’ income resource. The per capita farmer net income of 16 investigated villages is between RMB 540 and RMB 3700 yuan, in which the lowest one is Guangzhong Village of Kaiyang County, only about RMB 540 yuan; the highest one is Wanggang Village of Wudang District and Luguan Village of Huaxi District, has been to RMB 3036 yuan. Table 3-3: the Per Capita farmer Net Income of the Key Investigated Villages Unit: yuan Per Capita farmer Net No. Village Income 1 Guangzhong Village 540 2 Yanhe Village 1200 3 Pantong Village 1200 Qinshan Village 1180 4 (Xifeng County) 5 Zhifang Village 1210 57 6 Zhuhua Village 2210 7 Wugongqiao Village 950 8 Damuzhai Village 1168 9 Daizhai Village 1076 10 Shanzhai Village 1184 Qinshan Village 850 11 (Qinzhen City) 12 Panzhai Village 750 13 Luguan Village 3036 14 Chetian Village 2944 15 Xinmin Village 2343 16 Wanggang Village 3036 Data source: Relevant statistical data from the investigatied village government. 2. Rural economic structure Food and cash crops planting, family animal husbandry and labor export are the three main points of rural economic development of 16 investigated villages. Since the recent 6 years, cash crops planting and labor export have started to replace the absolutely predominance of food crops planting and family animal husbandry, and have been the main force of local economic development. (1) Food and cash crops zcrop land It is said that there is no 1 square meter flat in Guizhou. The crop lands of each investigated villages are shortage more or less. The per capita lands of the all villages along the rural roads are less than 1 mu, in which paddy field are 0.47mu, dry land are 0.56 mu. Table 3-12: the crop lands in the 7 counties/ ditricts/city along the rural road Unit: mu counties/ Crop land area NO. ditricts/city per capita arable land Paddy fieldDry land 1 Kaiyang 1.04 0.37 0.67 2 Xifeng 1.12 0.39 0.73 58 3 Xiuwen 1.31 0.90 0.41 4 Qinzhen 0.79 0.28 0.51 5 Huaxi 1.08 0.49 0.59 6 Wudang 0.93 0.51 0.42 7 Baiyun 0.64 0.41 0.23 mean value 1.03 0.47 0.56 Data source: according to “The basic information of administrative villages along the rural roads”. . Table 3-13: the crop lands in the key investigated villages Unit: mu Total crop paddy Dry per capita arable No. Village land field land land Guangzhong 799 40 759 0.84 1 Village 2 Yantang Village 4303 1106 3197 0.83 3 Pantong Village 3493.5 1143.5 2350 0.88 4 Qinshan Village 2741.5 506 2235.5 2.02 5 Zhifang Village 2979 1820 1159 3.31 6 Zhuhua Village 2271.4 407 1864.4 2.51 Wugongqiao 1018 270 748 1.34 7 Village 8 Damu Village 1127 455 672 1.51 9 Daizhai Village 1804 614 1190 1.09 10 Shanzhai Village 2140 968 1172 1.75 11 Qinshan Village 990 250 740 0.76 12 Panzhai Village 1124 467 657 0.95 13 Luguan Village 1680 990 690 1.05 14 Chetian Village 839 435 404 1.15 15 Xinmin Village 2045 1265 780 0.95 16 Wanggang Village 890 615 275 1.54 Data source: Relevant statistical data from the investigated village government. SA team’s sample investigation suggests that the per capita farm lands of interviewees’ families are less than 1 mu generally. Table 3-14: interviewee families’ crop land Unit: mu Per householder No. Village Paddy field Dry land crop land 1 Guangzhong 3.977 3.544 0.433 59 Village Yanhe 2 4.497 3.353 1.144 Village Pantong 3 5.300 4.195 1.105 Village Qinshan 4 5.077 2.817 2.260 Village Zhifang 5 4.480 3.540 0.940 Village Zhuhua 6 5.500 3.422 2.078 Village Wugongqiao 7 3.760 2.067 1.693 Village Damuzhai 8 5.419 2.806 2.613 Village Daizhai 9 4.389 2.222 2.167 Village Shanzhai 10 3.622 2.194 1.428 Village Qinshan 11 4.775 2.449 2.326 Village Panzhai 12 3.094 1.584 1.510 Village Luguan 13 4.952 2.513 2.439 Village Chetian 14 8.480 4.438 4.042 Village Xinmin 15 5.158 2.390 2.768 Village Wanggang 16 6.541 3.009 3.532 Village Total 4.955 2.736 2.219 average Data source: Guiyang Transportation Project SA Questionnaire (for the rural) analysis. zCrops In 17 investigated villages, the main food crops include paddy, corn and potato; the main cash corps is rape, ginger, garlic, shallot, tobacco, walnut and orange. zLabor resource More the young female and middle age and young male have left hometown to be the migrant workers ; and most of the middle age and married women and old male stay 60 at home to work on the planting and animal breeding, and also foster the offspring whose parents always are migrant workers. The questionnaire suggests that 81% interviewees are working on agriculture at home (The questionnaire survey couldn’t include the out migrant workers), in which 66% are at the age between 31 and 60. 10% interviewees are the migrant workers at home temporarily, 1/3 of which are at the age from 21 to 30. It is suggested that the migrating proportion is higher in the people at the age of 21-30. Table 3-15: the interviewees’ employment and age