233 South Wacker Drive Suite 800, Willis Tower Chicago, IL 60606

312-454-0400 (voice) 312-454-0411 (fax) www.cmap.illinois.gov

MPO Policy Committee Agenda October 8, 2009—10:00 a.m.

Cook County Conference Room CMAP Offices Chicago, Illinois

1.0 Call to Order and Introductions 10:00 a.m.

2.0 Agenda Changes and Announcements

3.0 Approval of Minutes – June 10, 2009 ACTION REQUESTED: Approval

4.0 Agency Reports 4.1 Council of Mayors’ Report 4.2 CMAP Report

5.0 Approval of RTP/TIP Conformity and TIP Amendments The public comment period for the semiannual RTP/TIP conformity analysis and TIP amendments closed August 30, 2009. No comments were received. The Transportation Committee recommends that the MPO Policy Committee approve the RTP/TIP conformity analysis and TIP amendments. In addition, Metra has requested approval of a TIP amendment to include an ARRA-funded project. The project (TIP ID18-09-9110) programs $6.3 million for operating assistance in FFY 2010.

ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of the TIP/RTP Conformity Determination and TIP Amendments

6.0 Approval of multi-year FFY 2010-2011 CMAQ Program and MYB list The public comment period for the proposed FFY 2010-2011 CMAQ Multi-Year program has ended. The Transportation Committee has concurred with the staff responses to the comments received has recommended MPO Policy Committee approval of the proposed program and MYB list. The proposed multi-year CMAQ program with an explanatory

cover memo and the MYB list are attached. A link to the comments and responses is included in the cover memo. ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of multi-year FFY 2010-2011 CMAQ Program and MYB list

7.0 Naming of Transportation Committee Chair and Vice Chair The Policy Committee bylaws state that the committee will appoint one of its members or alternates as the Chair and one of its members or alternates as the Vice-Chair of the CMAP Transportation Committee. ACTION REQUESTED: Appoint Chair and Vice-Chair of the Transportation Committee for calendar year 2010

8.0 Nominating Committee for the office of MPO Policy Committee Vice-chairman The report from the Nominating Committee appointed at the last meeting will be given and an election of a Vice-chairman will be conducted. ACTION REQUESTED: Election of a Vice-chairman

9.0 GO TO 2040 Update Work has continued on schedule developing the region’s long-range comprehensive plan, GO TO 2040, which will include the federally required transportation plan. The Transportation Committee, along with numerous other committees, has been closely involved in this effort. Items currently being worked on include developing the list of capital transportation projects that will be tested within the preferred scenario, finalizing the financial plan which is necessary to constrain the list of capital projects supporting the preferred scenario, the development of the preferred scenario itself, and a significant public engagement process.

The final plan is due to be considered by the Policy Committee at its October 2010 meeting. Staff will brief the committee on the timeline for this last year of the plan development process indicating key input points for Transportation and Policy Committee member agencies. Staff will also describe the results of the public engagement process that was conducted during summer 2009 and recently completed. The timeline and a draft report on the public engagement process are attached. ACTION REQUESTED: Discussion

10.0 Legislative Outlook A number of legislative initiatives are being discussed at the national level that would have an impact on transportation planning and programming. The current transportation authorization legislation, SAFETEA-LU will expire on September 30th. It is now clear that new authorizing legislation will not be enacted before SAFETEA-LU expires. At this time, more than one course of action is being considered by Congress to keep the transportation program operating. A transportation policy brief including the policy goals endorsed by the CMAP Board is attached.

MPO Policy Committee Agenda Page 2 of 5 October 8, 2009

In the area of environmental concerns, Congress’ approach to dealing with climate change and USEPA’s decision to review the ozone standard could also have a significant impact on transportation. Staff will update the committee on the latest developments in legislative activity. ACTION REQUESTED: Discussion

11.0 Rescissions Despite last minute efforts Congress failed to pass legislation that would have repealed the end of SAFETEA-LU rescission of $8.708 billion. The rescission took effect October 1. Attached is a table listing the amount rescinded from each program category along with a document from FHWA answering frequently asked questions about the rescission.

Of particular note to northeastern Illinois is the $83.6 million to be rescinded from the CMAQ program, $25.5 million rescinded from the Enhancement program, $20.3 million from the local STP program, and $37.0 million from the Highway Safety Improvement program. The Policy Committee will need to determine exactly how these rescissions should be applied to the STP and CMAQ programs. ACTION REQUESTED: Discussion and direction to staff on dealing with the rescission

12.0 ARRA Update

12.1 ARRA Formula Programs - Transportation The Council of Mayors Executive Committee approved a policy to ensure that all available ARRA funds are used by the mandated deadline. The Council’s Executive Committee also approved revised ARRA marks at its September meeting. The policy and revised marks are attached. Staff will update the Policy Committee on the status of the ARRA formula programs. ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of revised ARRA marks and discussion

12.2 ARRA Discretionary Programs - Transportation Submittal deadlines have passed for a number of ARRA discretionary programs including the TIGER Program and several tracks of the High Speed rail program. Staff will update the Committee on the status of state and local applications. A summary of the high speed rail applications and an overview of the TIGER applications received by USDOT are attached. ACTION REQUESTED: Discussion

12.3 ARRA Formula Programs – Non -Transportation A report on the implementation of the various ARRA initiatives outside of direct transportation programs will be provided. A summary report is attached. ACTION REQUESTED: Discussion

MPO Policy Committee Agenda Page 3 of 5 October 8, 2009

13.0 Greenways and Trails Plan The Transportation Committee has recommended approval of the 2009 Update to the region’s Greenways and Trails Plan. Subsequent to the meeting, issues raised by the Regional Transportation Authority at the Programming Coordinating Committee were successfully addressed with new draft text developed by the Transportation Committee Chairman and the RTA. Concerned stakeholders have agreed to the revised text. Staff is presenting the plan as passed by the Transportation Committee along with a recommendation to insert the clarifying language. The Executive Summary of the plan, the recommended text revision, and process documentation are included in the mailing. The maps and plan as recommended by the Transportation Committee are posted here: http://www.cmap.illinois.gov/greenwaysandtrails.aspx ACTION REQUESTED: Approval, with the change recommended by staff, of the Northeastern Illinois Regional Greenways and Trails Plan - 2009 Update

14.0 Other Business

15.0 Public Comment This is an opportunity for comments from members of the audience. The amount of time available to speak will be at the chair’s discretion. The exact time for the public comment period will immediately follow the last item on the agenda.

15.0 Next Meeting – January 14, 2010

16.0 Adjournment

MPO Policy Committee Agenda Page 4 of 5 October 8, 2009

MPO Policy Committee Members:

Martin G. Buehler R. A. Kwasneski Richard Rodriguez Tom Cuculich John McCarthy Steve Schlickman Bob Davidson Karen McConnaughay Jeffery Schielke Joseph Deal Joseph Moreno Marisol Simon Gary Hannig Philip A. Pagano Norman R. Stoner Elliott Hartstein Michael Payette Larry Walsh Kenneth Koehler Thomas Powers Rocco Zucchero

MPO Policy Committee Agenda Page 5 of 5 October 8, 2009 Agenda Item No. 3.0

233 South Wacker Drive Suite 800, Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606

312-454-0400 (voice) 312-454-0411 (fax) www.cmap.illinois.gov

Special Joint Meeting Minutes Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning MPO Policy Committee

June 10, 2009

Offices of the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) Cook County Conference Room Suite 800, 233 S. Wacker Drive, Sears Tower, Chicago, Illinois

CMAP Board Members Frank H. Beal-representing the City of Chicago, Alan Bennett Present: representing Cook County, Gerald Bennett-representing southwest Cook County, Roger Claar-representing Will County, Joe Deal-representing the City of Chicago, Russell Hartigan- representing west Cook County, Elliott Hartstein-representing Lake County, Al Larson-representing suburban Cook County, Raul Raymundo-representing the City of Chicago, Andre Rice- representing the City of Chicago (via tele-conference), Rae Rupp Srch-representing DuPage County, Dan Shea-representing McHenry County, and non-voting member Stephen Schlickman- representing the Policy Committee.

Policy Committee John Beissel-representing Cook County, Martin G. Buehler- Members Present: representing Lake County, Tom Cuculich-representing DuPage County, Joe Deal-representing CMAP, Jack Groner-representing Metra, Luann Hamilton-representing City of Chicago DOT, Elliott Hartstein-representing CMAP, Joe Korpalski-representing McHenry County, John McCarthy-representing Private Providers, Michael Payette-representing Class I Railroads, Tom Rickert- representing Kane County, T.J. Ross-representing PACE, Jeffery Schielke-representing Council of Mayors, Steve Schlickman- representing RTA, David Simmons-representing CTA, Norm Stoner-representing FHWA, Larry Walsh-representing Will County, and Rocco Zucchero-representing ISTHA.

Others Present: Tina Dalman-Daspin & Aument LLP/ ULI, Stacy Meyers-Glen- Openlands, Joe McElroy-McElroy Associates, Jim Stack- IDOT/UPP, Andy Plummer-RTA, Chris Staron-NWMC, Chalen Daigle-McHenry County Council, Len Cannata-WCMC, Mike Walczak-NWMC, Vicky Smith-SWC, Bruce Christensen-Lake County, Ed Paesel-SSMMA, Damon Lee-Sustainable Transitions, Doug Willett-Energy & Environment, Andrea Nair-CM 2020, Jeffrey Rissman-CM2020, Justine Johnson-CM 2020, Mike King- ISTHA, Thomas Snyder, Kama Dobbs-DMMC, Paul Heltne- citizen, John Bechl-CCHD, Jan Ward-Kane/Kendall Council of Mayors, Catherine Kannenberg-Meta, David Werner-FTA, Victor Austin-FTA Washington, Jon-Paul Kohler and J.D. Stevenson- Federal Highway Administration,Springfield, Jason Osborn- McHenry DOT, Hugh O’Hara-WCMC, Tammy Wierciak-WCMC, Mike Sullivan-Kane/Kendall Council of Mayors, Colin Murphy- CNT and John Fortmann-IDOT.

Staff Present: Randy Blankenhorn, Jill Leary, Dolores Dowdle, Don Kopec, Gordon Smith, Matt Maloney, Bob Dean, Patricia Berry, Tom Garritano, Andrew Williams-Clark and Sherry Kane.

1.0 Call to Order and Introductions CMAP Board Chair, Mayor Gerald R. Bennett called the meeting to order at 9:35 a.m. Larry Walsh, Vice Chair represented the MPO Policy Committee. Board members and Policy Committee members introduced themselves.

2.0 Agenda Changes and Announcements There were no agenda changes.

3.0 Approval of CMAP Board Meeting Minutes – May 13, 2009 A motion to approve the minutes of the May 13, 2009 CMAP Board meeting, as presented, was made by Rae Rupp Srch and seconded by Dan Shea. All in favor, the motion carried.

4.0 Approval of MPO Policy Committee Minutes – March 12, 2009 A motion to approve the minutes of the March 12, 2009 MPO Policy committee meeting, as presented, was made by Dick Smith and seconded by Steve Schlickman. All in favor, the motion carried.

5.0 Executive Director’s Report Meant as a reminder, Executive Director Randy Blankenhorn reported that CMAP has entered its public engagement phase of GO TO 2040, asking that board and committee members attend and help spread the word about workshops in the region. Additionally, the newly designed website, www.goto2040.org that contains interactive software for inventing scenarios, kiosks located throughout the region and postcards and promotional posters to take and distribute was noted.

CMAP Board Meeting June 10, 2009 Further, Blankenhorn reported that CMAP is taking the lead on the regional application and strategy for the Neighborhood Stabilization Program that is being funded by ARRA. A consortium of local governments and non-profits will be working together to develop the regional plan that will make northeastern Illinois a stronger contender for the nationally competitive grant that is due on July 17, 2009. Additional details are included in the Staff Memo, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Implementation, marked as agenda item No. 17.0.

6.0 Contract Approvals The following procurements were recommended for approval: a contract award to Northridge in the amount of $73,650 for implementation of agency intranet (pending resolution with funding) and a subgrantee contract award to the Fox River Study Group in the amount of $100,000 under the IEPA financial assistance agreement that is part of a pass through of stimulus funds. A motion by Alan Bennett was seconded by Russell Hartigan to approve the procurements as presented. All in favor, the motion carried.

7.0 Committee Reports From its meeting earlier in the morning, Planning Coordinating Committee Chair Elliott Hartstein reported the following:

 The committee discussed the GO TO 2040 treatment of major transportation capital projects that significantly impact the region’s transportation system that generally include additions, expansions or entirely new expressway or rail projects. A later item on the Board agenda that the Planning Coordinating Committee will recommend approval of, is a list of major capital project evaluation measures which will be used to evaluate these projects.

 The Center for Neighborhood Technology gave a presentation describing their work creating an index that measure housing and transportation costs. Known as H+T, the index may be relevant to CMAP’s long-range planning work.

 Regional snapshots, Hartstein continued, on industry clusters (describing industries that could be important elements of the future economy) and air quality (describes air quality conditions and trends in the region) were presented.

 Finally, the committee also viewed the new GO TO 2040 website that will be used heavily as part of the summer’s public engagement activities.

8.0 Council of Mayors’ Report From its meeting on June 9, 2009 Mayor Jeffery Schielke, Chair of the Council of Mayors’ Executive Committee reported the following:

 The committee had been briefed by the U. S. Department of Transportation on the MPO certification review process and had informed US DOT staff that the process in northeastern Illinois works well, that the guidance from CMAP and the Planning

CMAP Board Meeting June 10, 2009 Liaisons allows the local councils to program STP dollars effectively and that they would like to see this process unchanged.

 The committee also discussed the possibility of rescissions to all federal funding programs (including CMAQ, STP and Enhancement Funds) at the end of SAFETEA-LU. In order to avoid rescissions to unobligated balances, the committee approved advanced funding requests in the amount of $916,000 to spend down unobligated balances for the suburban councils.

 The status and programming of local projects using funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) was discussed, as well as options regarding reprogramming funds if councils are unable to spend funds by the March 2010 deadline. The committee directed the Planning Liaisons to develop a policy that would allow for the redistribution of funds to councils that are able to use ARRA funds while not requiring payback by councils that were unable to spend the funds to be considered at the next committee meeting in early fall. The City of Chicago introduced the Congress Parkway project, a regional project using ARRA funds per the city/suburban STP funding-split agreement.

 Staff gave an update on the Invent the Future Workshops that will be held throughout the region and asked that committee members visit the CMAP website, www.goto2040.org for locations and registrations.

 Finally, the committee approved the nomination of Mayor Leon Rockingham as the new 2nd Vice Chair and gave recognition to outgoing Mayors Podgorski, Churnovic, Pritchett, Wiaduck, Lynch, Piazza and Guzdziol and thanked them for service to the Council of Mayors’ Executive Committee.

Regarding the topic of ARRA funds, Marty Buehler made a motion that was seconded by Tom Rickert to direct staff to set a firm date for obligated funds and redistribute the balance. All in favor, the motion carried.

9.0 CMAP Board Election of Officers CMAP Board and nominating committee member Russell Hartigan reported that after due consideration, the nominating committee submits the following names for consideration as officers and members of the Executive Committee of the Chicago Metropolitan Agency Planning (CMAP) Board:

Chair Gerald Bennett, Mayor-City of Palos Hill Vice Chair Joe Deal, Mayor’s Office-City of Chciago Vice Chair Elliott Hartstein, Mayor-Village of Buffalo Grove At Large Nigel Telman, Partner-Sidley Austin At Large Al Larson, Mayor-Village of Schaumburg At Large Rae Rupp Srch, DuPage County

CMAP Board Meeting June 10, 2009 Hartigan continued that the nominating committee believes the slate continues to represent the desired geographical balance while providing a good mix of position and experience.

A motion made by Russell Hartigan naming the above slate as officers and members of the Executive Committee of the Chicago Metropolitan Agency Planning (CMAP) was seconded by Mayor Roger Claar and with all in favor, carried.

10.0 MPO Policy Committee Nominating Committee for Office of Vice Chair Vice chair of the MPO Policy Committee, Lawrence Walsh announced the following to act as nominating committee to deliberate, name and report back to the Policy Committee at its October 8, 2009 meeting, a member to fill the position of Vice Chair: Mayor Jeffrey Schielke (representing the municipalities), Marty Buehler (representing the Highway Dept.), Jack Groner (representing public transportation agencies), Joe Deal (representing regional agencies) and Tom Cuculich (representing the counties).

11.0 Developments of Regional Importance (DRI) Regarding the Developments of Regional Importance process, Executive Director Randy Blankenhorn reported that slight changes, after approval of the document was tabled at last month’s meeting, had been addressed in the FAQ portion of that document (specifically: What is the DRI threshold for projects near a critical stream and/or natural area? and Who defines the critical streams and natural areas?). A motion by Mayor Roger Claar was seconded by Mayor Al Larson to approve the change as reported. All in favor, the motion carried.

Policy Committee Vice-chair Larry Walsh thanked Blankenhorn for CMAP’s commitment to regional consensus, for meeting with Will County to address their issues, for a willingness to listen and finishing with a compromise that worked for all concerned.

12.0 Major Transportation Capital Project Evaluation Measures CMAP staff Bob Dean explained that the GO TO 2040 Plan must include a financially- constrained list of major transportation capital projects. Since there will be more potential projects than available funding, a set of proposed evaluation measures was presented and approved by both CMAP’s Transportation working committee and the Planning Coordinating Committee. The Planning Coordinating Committee recommended and staff requested that the CMAP Board and the MPO Policy Committee also approve the measures. A motion, made by Alan Bennett was seconded by Rae Rupp Srch and with all in favor carried, approving the capital project evaluation measures as presented. On behalf of the MPO Policy Committee, a motion made by Marty Buehler was seconded by Mayor Jeffery Schielke and with all in favor carried, approving the capital project evaluation measure as presented.

CMAP Board Meeting June 10, 2009 13.0 State Legislative Update CMAP Executive Director Randy Blankenhorn reported that the General Assembly did pass a capital plan and that CMAP will stay diligent promoting projects that benefit the region while assuring that northeastern Illinois gets the amount of funding that it should out of the program.

Other CMAP Board priorities, Blankenhorn continued, including ensuring funding of the Comprehensive Regional Planning Fund, restoring funding for Water Supply Planning, and funding local planning through the Technical Assistance Act have not occurred. IDOT Chief Dick Smith reported that the department is still sorting through multiple bills that were passed. IDOT’s operating budget having been stripped of all general revenue funding, did come back in an amendment on the last day. Work continues sorting through several pieces of legislation analyzing over $3 billion in highway projects across the state and still evaluating that list to determine implementation schedules, which will have to be completed before the result will be made public.

CMAP Board Chair, Mayor Jerry Bennett also reported that there is a wish list being circulated among the General Assembly from the agencies that are out there that should or could be funded as a vote of the members of the General Assembly. Bennett asked that outreach continue to members of the General Assembly and the Governor to make sure that CMAP remains on that list as far as funding is concerned. Bennett also reported, for the record, that it was the Speaker of the House that last year had “gone to bat” for CMAP in setting up what was intended to be a permanent funding source.

Board and Policy Committee members also weighed in on the discussion.

14.0 Fiscal Year 2010 Unified Work Program CMAP staff Matt Maloney stated that the Unified Work Program (UWP) lists the various projects that CMAP and other agencies undertake each year to enhance transportation in the region. The FY 2010 UWP totals just over $19.5 million including just over $15.5 in FHWA and FTA regional planning funds and about $4.1 in local match funds. CMAP’s Transportation working committee released the program for a period of public comment, from April 25-May 20, 2009, during which no comments were received. The Executive Summary that was included in the Board packet details the allocation of funding and awarded projects. Staff is requesting a Board and MPO Policy Committee approval of the Fiscal Year 2010 UWP. A motion by Alan Bennett was seconded by Rae Rupp Srch to approve the Fiscal Year 2010 UWP as presented, and with all in favor, carried. On behalf of the Policy Committee, a motion by Steve Schlickman was seconded by Marty Buehler to approve the Fiscal Year 2010 UWP as presented, and with all in favor, carried.

15.0 Comprehensive Regional Planning Fund Options This item was included on the Agenda in the event additional information would have been available regarding CMAP’s funding status. Executive Director Randy Blankenhorn

CMAP Board Meeting June 10, 2009 reported that CMAP’s executive staff is looking at a number of options, if the state does not come up with funding of $3.5 million. Blankenhorn, unable to report any details at this time, stated that if the state cannot come up with the money CMAP will have serious issues to face and will want to have a wider-ranging conversation not only with the CMAP Board but also with the MPO Policy Committee, since this has significant impacts on our ability to meet federal requirements and suggested that CMAP may be looking at a number of serious measures to try to raise revenue for the agency. Blankenhorn also suggested that a special meeting of the CMAP Board may be convened prior to the start of the fiscal year that begins on July 1. At this time, no action is being sought.

Steve Schlickman reported that one issue is how dependant CMAP is on federal transportation funding, about 75% of revenues, given the lack of alternative resources. Supporting the importance of the CMAP planning process, especially as it relates to transit, RTA is committed to finding a solution to the CMAP funding problem. By way of a motion, Schlickman indicated that the MPO Policy Committee and the CMAP Board include on its Federal agenda a priority for funding non-transportation related or general purpose planning activities for urban areas. The motion was seconded by Tom Cuculich and with all in favor, carried. On behalf of the CMAP Board, a similar motion was made by Alan Bennett, seconded by Mayor Al Larson and with all in favor, carried.

16.0 Fiscal Year 2010 Budget & Work Plan CMAP’s fiscal year 2010 budget and work plan that was presented at last month’s meeting, Executive Director Randy Blankenhorn reported, had not been amended and asked that the Board approve the budget as presented. If the Comprehensive Regional Planning Fund is not funded, Blankenhorn continued, generally amendments to the work plan and budget would be considered by the Executive Committee, but in this case it would be brought before the full Board for consideration. In order to start operations on July 1, 2009, staff is seeking approval today of the Fiscal Year 2010 Work Plan and Budget. A motion so made by Rae Rupp Srch was seconded by Mayor Roger Claar. Mayor Elliott Hartstein stated concern about approving a budget predicated on a revenue source that may not be forthcoming. The motion was amended to indicate the adoption of the Fiscal Year 2010 Work Plan and Budget contingent upon restoration of the Comprehensive Regional Planning Fund or other identified funding.

When queried, Blankenhorn responded that the total budget shortfall is $3.35 million, of which $2.7 million is needed to match federal funding.

Finally, all in favor the amended motion carried.

17.0 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Implementation A staff memo, included in the Board packet, offered a brief description of the non- transportation elements of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) that CMAP has assisted in coordination or implementation of in the areas of housing, energy

CMAP Board Meeting June 10, 2009 and environmental issues, adding value by providing our communities with information to access funding and convening relevant stakeholders to assist in coordination as necessary. A handout entitled “CMAP Region ARRA Expenditure Report” covering transportation funding was further explained by Patricia Berry. Berry reported that the lack of a capital program in Illinois had resulted in a backlog of projects and that agencies had been able to move expeditiously in getting the funding spent. Each of the following agencies reported on funding awarded and status of projects: John Fortmann-IDOT- District 1, Luann Hamilton-City of Chicago Department of Transportation, Jack Groner- Metra, David Simmons-CTA and T.J. Ross-PACE Transit.

The 55/45 split as well as the transit and highway split was discussed briefly with CMAP Board Chair Jerry Bennett commenting on the press conference Senator Sandoval recently had on the issue.

As part of the ARRA, the TIGER program, $1.5 billion, is available through a discretionary program that is under application right now Blankenhorn reported. The region’s application is CREATE and Blankenhorn asked that both the CMAP Board and the MPO Policy Committee see this as a priority that solves not only local and regional problems, but also national problems and that they offer support publicly for the $300 million program.

Jack Groner reported there is another discretionary ARRA program referred to TIGGER, under which Metra had submitted $20 million in applications for green locomotives. The program has up to $100 million in discretionary funds and support was being sought to see the funding comes to this region.

Mayor Jeffery Schielke reported that several mayors have received outstanding support from IDOT and from the CMAP staff as they have tried to implement the various stimulus programs in their local communities and for a system that seems to be having a terrible time being funded right now, is working at the local level. Some projects are really getting on the street, things done very quickly and without this great support from these staffs, this would not have been accomplished.

18.0 Federal Certification Executive Director Blankenhorn reported that the quadrennial certification process of the MPO is underway this week with USDOT. Overall, it involves going through the regional planning processes and demonstrating and discussing how the planning regulations in SAFETEA-LU are addressed and implemented. He added, as part of this review, USDOT wanted the opportunity to give a brief presentation and to hear directly from the region’s policy makers.

Norm Stoner from USDOT reported that at one level the USDOT team is here to assure compliance with federal regulations, a pre-requisite for receiving federal aid

CMAP Board Meeting June 10, 2009 transportation dollars for a program that is due to expire in 82 days. More importantly, Stoner continued, the purpose of those regulations, which are multi-varied and detailed, all lead to the federal/state/ local agency partnership that we have enjoyed for the past 50 years. The partnership relies on decision-making for project selection that is at the state and local level, the federal aid partnership that we have enjoyed and to assure that the Chicago area’s MPO is in conformance with those regulations. It is also an opportunity to validate the comprehensive, continued, cooperative planning process that exists here.

Stoner introduced John Donovan, from USDOT’s Springfield office, who has been leading the team and who provided more detail regarding the process. Donovan introduced co- coordinator with Region 5 David Werner, Victor Austin from Federal Transit Administration headquarters, Jon Paul Kohler and J.D. Stevenson also with the federal highways office in Springfield and acknowledged some technical expertise from Federal Highways headquarters as well as technical resource center. Donovan provided a presentation of the details of what the review process entails, acknowledging also the participation and assistance provided by the CMAP staff, IDOT, other implementing agencies and interested parties. The process will close tomorrow, a review report will be issued in September and the findings (full or conditional certification) will be reported to the MPO Policy Committee in October. There is a June 26, 2009 deadline on this particular review for comments. Blankenhorn reported too that staff is looking at this in a broader context to identify areas for improvement and ways to improve processes as a staff, as a Board, and as an MPO Policy Committee.

19.0 FLIP Final Presentation Andrew Williams-Clark gave a brief background of the FLIP program for the benefit of the Policy Committee and reported that 40 students had been in the pilot program, from all 7 counties and the diversity of the group very much reflected the diversity of the region. The program was considered a huge success due in large part to the support of the CMAP Board. Williams-Clark also used this opportunity to thank the various agencies that had been involved: Mayor Daley’s office-the O’Hare Modernization Project, the MWRD of Greater Chicago, Tom Zapler and the Railroad Companies, interviews of regional decision makers, including Mayor Zenovia Evans, T.J. Ross, Steve Schlickman and about half of the CMAP board that came for the final presentation at Adler. Williams- Clark concluded the presentation showing video clips from that final presentation. The 2010 session will be renewed with applications being due by June 26, 2006.

20.0 Other Business There was no other business before the CMAP Board or the MPO Policy Committee.

21.0 Public Comment Paul Heltne distributed a hand-out regarding impending shortages in strategic metals, suggesting that if we maintain the current sustained global economic growth, we will soon run out of cheap and plentiful metal minerals of most types.

CMAP Board Meeting June 10, 2009 22.0 Next Meeting The CMAP Board will meet again on July 8, 2009. The MPO Policy Committee will meet again on October 8, 2009

14.0 Adjournment A motion to adjourn made by Dan Shea was seconded by Rae Rupp Srch at approximately 11:05 a.m. All in favor the motion carried. On behalf of the MPO Policy Committee, a motion to adjourn was made by Tom Rickert, and seconded by Jack Groner. All in favor, the motion carried.

Respectfully submitted,

Jill Leary, Chief of Staff

06-23-09 /stk

Approved, with minor correction, by unanimous vote July 8, 2009.

CMAP Board Meeting June 10, 2009 233 South Wacker Drive Suite 800, Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606

312-454-0400 (voice) 312-454-0411 (fax) www.cmap.illinois.gov

MEMORANDUM

To: MPO Policy Committee

Date: September 29, 2009

From: CMAP Staff

Re: Semiannual RTP/TIP Conformity Analysis and TIP Amendments

In accordance with the semiannual conformity analysis policy adopted in 2007, CMAP staff asked programmers to submit changes to non-exempt and exempt tested projects within the TIP. Staff received change requests for 98 projects; less than 10% of the projects had more than one action requested.

There were three changes requested that included adding, changing, or removing worktypes. Worktypes describe the work being completed in a project. Worktypes also determine if a project is exempt, exempt tested, or non-exempt. An exempt worktype does not require an air quality conformity analysis. Examples of exempt projects include road resurfacing and bus rehabilitation. Exempt tested worktypes do not require a conformity analysis, but the region has chosen to include their impacts in the travel demand model. Exempt tested projects include lane widening and new commuter parking lots. Non-exempt projects have an effect on air quality and must be tested for conformity. Non- exempt projects include adding lanes to a road or extending a rail line.

Other changes include six new projects and six deleted projects. Also, there were two limit changes. Limits are the cross-streets, mileposts or other boundaries which define the extent of a project.

In total, seventy six projects had new completion years that required conformity analysis. Completion years indicate when a project is anticipated to be in service to users. The conformity analysis looks at certain years (currently 2010, 2020 and 2030). When a completion year change crosses one of these years, the conformity analysis must be redone. Almost half of the new completion years fall between 2009 and 2012. Most of the other completion years fall between 2013 and 2017 and a small number of the projects are for 2020 and beyond. semiannual conformity cover memo to Policy Committee 1

Chart 1 shows a breakdown of the type of project changes requested. The table below Chart 1 shows a comparison of project changes requested in July 2009 vs. March 2009. Chart 1: Type of Project Change Delete or New Completion Year New Limit Change in Work Type Award File Conformity 1% 4% 2% 3% 12%

78%

Summary Comparison 2009 Type Mar-09 Jul-09 Change Delete or New 31% 12% -19% Completion Year 39% 76% 37% New Limit 20% 2% -18% Change in worktype 1% 3% 2% Award File 0% 1% 1% Conformity 9% 4% -5%

All programmers were contacted and requested to submit any changes. CMAP staff did receive a response from all programmers and specific changes are listed in the attached reports. For a break down of changes submitted by programmer please see Chart 2. The table following Chart 2 is a summary comparison of changes by programmers in comparison to March 2009.

semiannual conformity cover memo to Policy Committee 2 Chart 2: Project Changes by Programmers Service Providers 10% City of Chicago 6% IDOT Counties 14% 43%

Councils 27%

Summary Comparison 2009 Agency Type Mar-09 Jul-09 Change Counties 25% 43% 18% Councils 49% 27% -22% City of Chicago 1% 6% 5% IDOT 19% 14% -5% Service Providers 5% 10% 5% Tollway 1% 0% -1%

The 2010, 2020 and 2030 highway networks were coded to include the changes listed in the attachments. The regional travel demand model was run using the updated networks. The resultant VMT by speed and facility type for eight vehicle classes was expanded to twenty-eight vehicle types for multiplication by regional emission rates developed using USEPA’s MOBILE model. The on-road emission estimates are the sum of those calculations for each precursor or direct pollutant in each scenario year. Reductions from the National Energy Policy Act Credit and Clean Fuel Fleet Program have not been claimed. For ozone precursors, the resulting emissions estimates fell below the applicable attainment demonstration SIP budgets.

Since there are not SIP budgets for annual direct PM2.5 and NOx emissions, these estimates were combined with estimates from northwest Indiana, which is also part of the nonattainment area. The combine direct PM2.5 and NOx emissions remain below emissions estimates for 2002, the baseline year.

semiannual conformity cover memo to Policy Committee 3

semiannual conformity cover memo to Policy Committee 4 Conformity Amendments Released for Public Comment Projects in ID order July 31, 2009

Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 01-00-0030 Chicago Department of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $32,839 $32,839 $0 0.00% Limits Changed 130TH ST FROM TORRENCE (COOK) TO BRAINARD (COOK) AND 130TH W/O TORRENCE AND TORRENCE S/O 130TH Project Work Types Before Revision: BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - NEW MISCELLANEOUS - PROJECT TYPES NOT LISTED HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION Project Work Types After Revision: BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - NEW MISCELLANEOUS - PROJECT TYPES NOT LISTED HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded CMAQ IMPLEMENTATION 09 $4,149 $3,300 ENG/ROW/CONST; INTERSECTI HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $9,000 $7,200 ILL CONSTRUCTION 09 $6,810 $0 STP-L CONSTRUCTION 09 $27,924 $22,339 Financial Data After Revision CMAQ IMPLEMENTATION 09 $4,149 $3,300 ENG/ROW/CONST; INTERSECTI HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $9,000 $7,200 ILL CONSTRUCTION 09 $6,810 $0 STP-L CONSTRUCTION 09 $27,924 $22,339

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 1 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 01-03-0004 Chicago Department of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $4,912 $4,912 $0 0.00% Limits Changed ROOSEVELT RD FROM WESTERN AVE (COOK/CHICAGO) TO US 41 LAKE SHORE DR (COOK/CHICAGO) Project Work Types Before Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING Project Work Types After Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded CMAQ ENGINEERING 09 $430 $344 CMAQ CONSTRUCTION 10 $5,710 $4,568

Financial Data After Revision CMAQ ENGINEERING 09 $430 $344 CMAQ CONSTRUCTION 10 $5,710 $4,568

01-06-0010 Chicago Department of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $10,560 $10,560 $0 0.00% Limits Changed CHICAGO AVE AT CHICAGO RIVER (NO BRANCH) (COOK/CHICAGO) Project Work Types Before Revision: BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - RECONST/REHAB CHNG IN LANE USE/WIDTHS Project Work Types After Revision: BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - RECONST/REHAB CHNG IN LANE USE/WIDTHS

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded BRR CONSTRUCTION 11 $9,000 $7,200 1200170000; MATCHED WITH L STP-L ENGINEERING-II 09 $1,000 $800 STP-L CONSTRUCTION 11 $3,200 $2,560 Financial Data After Revision STP-L ENGINEERING-II 09 $1,000 $800 BRR CONSTRUCTION 11 $9,000 $7,200 1200170000; MATCHED WITH L STP-L CONSTRUCTION 11 $3,200 $2,560

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 2 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 01-94-0016 Chicago Department of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $15,120 $15,120 $0 0.00% Limits Changed HALSTED ST FROM NORTH BRANCH ST (COOK/CHICAGO) TO CHICAGO AVE (COOK/CHICAGO) AT NORTH BRANCH CANAL BRIDGE ONLY Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - RECONST/REHAB CHNG IN LANE USE/WIDTHS Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - RECONST/REHAB CHNG IN LANE USE/WIDTHS

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $600 $480 STP-L CONSTRUCTION 09 $17,400 $13,920 STP-L ENGINEERING-II 09 $900 $720 Financial Data After Revision HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $600 $480 STP-L CONSTRUCTION 09 $17,400 $13,920 STP-L ENGINEERING-II 09 $900 $720

01-96-0001 Chicago Department of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $14,033 $14,033 $0 0.00% Limits Changed WELLS ST BRIDGE AT CHICAGO RIVER (COOK) BETWEEN MERCHANDISE MART AND WACKER DR Project Work Types Before Revision: BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - RECONST/REHAB CHNG IN LANE USE/WIDTHS Project Work Types After Revision: BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - RECONST/REHAB CHNG IN LANE USE/WIDTHS

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded STP-L ENGINEERING-II 09 $1,000 $800 STP-L CONSTRUCTION 11 $16,541 $13,233 Financial Data After Revision STP-L ENGINEERING-II 09 $1,000 $800 STP-L CONSTRUCTION 11 $16,541 $13,233

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 3 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 01-98-0069 Chicago Department of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $1,660 $1,660 $0 0.00% Limits Changed 63RD ST FROM WESTERN AVE (COOK/CHICAGO) TO WALLACE (COOK/CHICAGO) AND HALSTED FROM 59TH TO 67TH; HALSTED PKWY AND 63RD ST PKWY Project Work Types Before Revision: MISCELLANEOUS - PROJECT TYPES NOT LISTED SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT Project Work Types After Revision: MISCELLANEOUS - PROJECT TYPES NOT LISTED SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $2,000 $1,600 STP-L ENGINEERING 09 $75 $60 Financial Data After Revision HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $2,000 $1,600 STP-L ENGINEERING 09 $75 $60

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 4 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 02-08-0005 North Shore Council of Mayors CHANGE PROJECT $4,145 $4,145 $0 0.00% Limits Changed SHERIDAN RD FROM ISABELLA AVE (COOK) TO SOUTH BLVD (COOK) FOREST AVENUE: MAIN STREET TO SHERIDAN ROAD Project Work Types Before Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING SIGNALS - MODERNIZATION HIGHWAY/ROAD - RESURFACE ( WITH NO LANE WIDENING) Project Work Types After Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING SIGNALS - MODERNIZATION HIGHWAY/ROAD - RESURFACE ( WITH NO LANE WIDENING)

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $1,996 $1,597 ILL CONSTRUCTION 09 $650 $0 ILL CONSTRUCTION 09 $2,350 $0 1771480300 LRA CONSTRUCTION 09 $1,650 $1,320 Main St. to South Blvd. SEC115 CONSTRUCTION 09 $800 $800 SEC117 CONSTRUCTION 09 $428 $428 Financial Data After Revision HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $1,996 $1,597 ILL CONSTRUCTION 09 $650 $0 ILL CONSTRUCTION 09 $2,350 $0 1771480300 LRA CONSTRUCTION 09 $1,650 $1,320 Main St. to South Blvd. SEC115 CONSTRUCTION 09 $800 $800 SEC117 CONSTRUCTION 09 $428 $428

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 5 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 02-97-0006 Cook County Highway Department CHANGE PROJECT $1,440 $1,440 $0 0.00% Limits Changed OLD ORCHARD RD FROM EAST OF EDENS EXPWAY (I-94) (COOK/SKOKIE) TO US 41 WEST OF SKOKIE BLVD (COOK/SKOKIE) Project Work Types Before Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE Project Work Types After Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded CMAQ IMPLEMENTATION 09 $1,000 $800 HPP IMPLEMENTATION 11 $800 $640 MFT-ALL IMPLEMENTATION 11 $5,700 $0

Financial Data After Revision CMAQ IMPLEMENTATION 09 $1,000 $800 HPP IMPLEMENTATION 11 $800 $640 MFT-ALL IMPLEMENTATION 11 $5,700 $0

03-03-0101 Northwest Council of Mayors CHANGE PROJECT $2,500 $2,500 $0 0.00% Limits Changed MEACHAM RD FROM KIRCHOFF RD (COOK/ROLLING MEADOWS) TO IL 62 ALGONQUIN RD (COOK/SCHAUMBURG) ROLLING MEADOWS IS SPONSOR Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded STP-L CONSTRUCTION 11 $4,650 $2,500

Financial Data After Revision STP-L CONSTRUCTION 11 $4,650 $2,500

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 6 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 03-08-0009 Northwest Council of Mayors CHANGE PROJECT $4,299 $4,299 $0 0.00% Limits Changed WRIGHT BLVD FROM WISE ROAD (COOK) TO IL 19 IRVING PARK ROAD (COOK) Project Work Types Before Revision: BICYCLE FACILITY HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE Project Work Types After Revision: BICYCLE FACILITY HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded LRA CONSTRUCTION 10 $799 $799 STP-L CONSTRUCTION 10 $5,804 $3,500 Financial Data After Revision LRA CONSTRUCTION 10 $799 $799 STP-L CONSTRUCTION 10 $5,804 $3,500

03-09-0014 IDOT District 1 Division of Highways CHANGE PROJECT $675 $675 $0 0.00% Limits Changed US 20 FROM OAK AVENUE (COOK/BARTLETT) TO PARK BLVD (COOK/STREAMWOOD) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - WIDEN LANES AND RESURFACE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - WIDEN LANES AND RESURFACE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded HSIP CONSTRUCTION 12 $750 $675 1780600000 Financial Data After Revision HSIP CONSTRUCTION 12 $750 $675 1780600000

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 7 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 03-09-0054 Northwest Council of Mayors CHANGE PROJECT $1,320 $1,320 $0 0.00% Limits Changed Palatine Rd FROM Huntington Rd (COOK/Hoffman Estates) TO Thornbark Dr (COOK/Hoffman Estates) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - RESURFACE ( WITH NO LANE WIDENING) HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - RESURFACE ( WITH NO LANE WIDENING) HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded STP-L CONSTRUCTION 10 $1,892 $1,320

Financial Data After Revision STP-L CONSTRUCTION 10 $1,892 $1,320

03-09-0057 Northwest Council of Mayors CHANGE PROJECT $1,309 $1,309 $0 0.00% Limits Changed Kensington Rd FROM Forest Ave (COOK/Mount Prospect) TO IL 83 (COOK/Mount Prospect) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONSTRUCT IN KIND HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONSTRUCT IN KIND HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded STP-L CONSTRUCTION 11 $1,870 $1,309 Financial Data After Revision STP-L CONSTRUCTION 11 $1,870 $1,309

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 8 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 03-99-0018 Cook County Highway Department CHANGE PROJECT $3,680 $3,680 $0 0.00% Limits Changed QUENTIN RD FROM IL 68 DUNDEE RD (COOK/PALATINE) TO LAKE COOK RD (COOK/PALATINE) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - REPLACE HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - REPLACE HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded BRR CONSTRUCTION 10 $4,600 $3,680 MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 10 $3,820 $0 Financial Data After Revision BRR CONSTRUCTION 10 $4,600 $3,680 MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 10 $3,820 $0

06-00-0047 Cook County Highway Department CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed 88TH AVE FROM 87TH ST (COOK/HICKORY HILLS) TO 103RD ST (COOK/PALOS HILLS) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - PAVEMENT PATCHING HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - PAVEMENT PATCHING HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 09 $6,000 $0 103RD TO 87TH ST Financial Data After Revision MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 09 $6,000 $0 103RD TO 87TH ST

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 9 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 06-08-0024 Cook County Highway Department CHANGE PROJECT $3,200 $3,200 $0 0.00% Limits Changed NARRAGANSETT AVE FROM 79TH ST (COOK/BURBANK) TO 87TH ST (COOK/BURBANK) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $4,000 $3,200 HPP #318

Financial Data After Revision HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $4,000 $3,200 HPP #318

06-09-0022 Southwest Council of Mayors CHANGE PROJECT $500 $500 $0 0.00% Limits Changed Central Ave FROM 70th Place (COOK/Bedford Park) TO 73rd St (COOK/Bedford Park) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded LRA CONSTRUCTION 10 $630 $500 Financial Data After Revision LRA CONSTRUCTION 10 $630 $500

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 10 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 06-09-0047 IDOT District 1 Division of Highways CHANGE PROJECT $180 $180 $0 0.00% Limits Changed 143RD ST AT AT CREEK CROSSING DR (COOK/Orland Park) Project Work Types Before Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING SIGNALS - ADD SIGNALS AT SINGLE INTERSECTION Project Work Types After Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING SIGNALS - ADD SIGNALS AT SINGLE INTERSECTION

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded STP-U CONSTRUCTION 12 $225 $180 1767730000

Financial Data After Revision STP-U CONSTRUCTION 12 $225 $180 1767730000

06-09-0056 Southwest Council of Mayors NEW PROJECT $0 $0 0.00% New Project US 45 LaGrange Rd FROM 179th St (COOK/Orland Park) TO 131st St (COOK/Orland Park) Project Work Types Before Revision: Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES

Financial Data Before Revision Financial Data After Revision ILL ROW ACQUISITION 11 $23,000 $0 ILL CONSTRUCTION 12 $76,000 $0

07-00-0036 Cook County Highway Department CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed CENTER ST FROM CH 159th Street (COOK/Palos Hills) TO IL 6 171st Street (COOK/Palos Hills) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 09 $6,000 $0 Financial Data After Revision MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 09 $6,000 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 11 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 07-03-0008 Cook County Highway Department CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed HARLEM AVE FROM US 30 LINCOLN HWY (COOK/RICH TWP) TO SAUK TRAIL (COOK/RICH TWP) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 10 $6,000 $0

Financial Data After Revision MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 10 $6,000 $0

07-08-0045 IDOT District 1 Division of Highways CHANGE PROJECT $450 $450 $0 0.00% Limits Changed IL 83 IL 83 AT WALLACE STREET (COOK) Project Work Types Before Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING SIGNALS - ADD SIGNALS AT SINGLE INTERSECTION Project Work Types After Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING SIGNALS - ADD SIGNALS AT SINGLE INTERSECTION

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded HSIP ROW ACQUISITION 11 $200 $180 1775810001 HSIP CONSTRUCTION 12 $300 $270 1775810000 Financial Data After Revision HSIP ROW ACQUISITION 11 $200 $180 1775810001 HSIP CONSTRUCTION 12 $300 $270 1775810000

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 12 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 07-09-0001 IDOT District 1 Division of Highways CHANGE PROJECT $2,268 $2,268 $0 0.00% Limits Changed US 30 LINCOLN HWY (1) & CHICAGO RD (2) FROM (1) US 30 (LINCOLN HWY): ILL 1 (CHICAGO RD) TO STATE ST (COOK) TO (2) ILL 1 (CHICAGO RD): 16TH ST TO DIXIE Project Work Types Before Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING MISCELLANEOUS - EXEMPT PROJECTS Project Work Types After Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING MISCELLANEOUS - EXEMPT PROJECTS

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded HSIP CONSTRUCTION 09 $2,520 $2,268 1-78103-0000

Financial Data After Revision HSIP CONSTRUCTION 09 $2,520 $2,268 1-78103-0000

07-09-0023 Cook County Highway Department CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed 167TH STREET FROM CENTRAL AVENUE (COOK) TO CICERO AVENUE (COOK/OAK FOREST) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 09 $6,000 $0 Financial Data After Revision MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 09 $6,000 $0

07-09-0024 Cook County Highway Department CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed 136TH / THORNTON AVENUE FROM DIXIE HWY (COOK/BLUE ISLAND) TO WOOD STREET (COOK/DIXMOOR) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 09 $3,400 $0 Financial Data After Revision MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 09 $3,400 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 13 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 07-96-0003 South Council of Mayors CHANGE PROJECT $4,003 $4,003 $0 0.00% Limits Changed UNIVERSITY PKWY FROM CRAWFORD (WILL/UNIVERSITY PARK) TO CENTRAL (WILL/UNIVERSITY PARK) Project Work Types Before Revision: BICYCLE FACILITY HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES Project Work Types After Revision: BICYCLE FACILITY HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded CMAQ IMPLEMENTATION 09 $688 $550 UNIVERSITY PKWY AT GOVER CMAQ IMPLEMENTATION 09 $688 $528 BIKE FACILITY CENTRAL TO CR STP-L CONSTRUCTION 11 $1,634 $1,307 GSU TO GOVERNOR'S HWY. STP-L CONSTRUCTION 11 $1,420 $1,136 CICERO TO CENTRAL STP-L CONSTRUCTION 11 $603 $482 GOVERNOR'S HWY TO CICERO

Financial Data After Revision CMAQ IMPLEMENTATION 09 $688 $550 UNIVERSITY PKWY AT GOVER CMAQ IMPLEMENTATION 09 $688 $528 BIKE FACILITY CENTRAL TO CR STP-L CONSTRUCTION 11 $1,634 $1,307 GSU TO GOVERNOR'S HWY. STP-L CONSTRUCTION 11 $1,420 $1,136 CICERO TO CENTRAL STP-L CONSTRUCTION 11 $603 $482 GOVERNOR'S HWY TO CICERO These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP STP-L ROW ACQUISITION MYB $688 $550

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 14 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 07-96-0013 South Council of Mayors CHANGE PROJECT $742 $742 $0 0.00% Limits Changed JOE ORR RD MAIN ST EXTENSION FROM BURNHAM AVE (COOK/LYNWOOD) TO SHEFFIELD/COLUMBIA AVE (COOK/LYNWOOD) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - NEW ROAD Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - NEW ROAD

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded STP-L ENGINEERING-I 09 $225 $180 STP-L ROW ACQUISITION 09 $320 $256 STP-L CONSTRUCTION 12 $2,042 $163 STP-L ENGINEERING-II 09 $203 $143 Financial Data After Revision STP-L ENGINEERING-I 09 $225 $180 STP-L ROW ACQUISITION 09 $320 $256 STP-L ENGINEERING-II 09 $203 $143 STP-L CONSTRUCTION 12 $2,042 $163

07-97-0005 Cook County Highway Department CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed WENTWORTH AVENUE FROM GLENWOOD LANSING ROAD (COOK/LANSING) TO RIDGE ROAD (COOK/LANSING) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - CURB AND GUTTER HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONSTRUCT IN KIND HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - CURB AND GUTTER HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONSTRUCT IN KIND HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 09 $5,000 $0 Financial Data After Revision MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 09 $5,000 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 15 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 07-97-0025 South Council of Mayors CHANGE PROJECT $2,670 $2,670 $0 0.00% Limits Changed CLAIRE BOULEVARD (REXFORD RD) FROM I- 294 (COOK/ROBBINS) TO FRANCISCO (COOK/ROBBINS) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - WIDEN LANES AND RESURFACE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - WIDEN LANES AND RESURFACE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded STP-L CONSTRUCTION 10 $4,863 $2,670 Financial Data After Revision STP-L CONSTRUCTION 10 $4,863 $2,670

07-99-0020 Cook County Highway Department CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed HARLEM AVENUE FROM STEGER RD (COOK/RICH TOWNSHIP) TO SAUK TRAIL (COOK/RICH TOWNSIP) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - VERTICAL/HORIZONTAL ALGNMENT (E.G. CLEARANCE) HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - VERTICAL/HORIZONTAL ALGNMENT (E.G. CLEARANCE) HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 11 $6,100 $0 Financial Data After Revision MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 11 $6,100 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 16 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 08-00-0056 DuPage Council of Mayors DELETE PROJECT $0 $0 0.00% Project Deleted 103RD ST FROM 248TH AVE (WILL/NAPERVILLE) TO IL 59 (WILL/NAPERVILLE) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES SAFETY - LIGHTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITY Project Work Types After Revision:

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded OTH ENGINEERING 10 $203 $0 NAPERVILLE CIP OTH ROW ACQUISITION 11 $310 $0 Financial Data After Revision

08-00-0057 DuPage Council of Mayors DELETE PROJECT $0 $0 0.00% Project Deleted 248TH AVE FROM 95TH ST (WILL/NAPERVILLE) TO 103RD ST (WILL/NAPERVILLE) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES SIGNALS - ADD SIGNALS AT SINGLE INTERSECTION HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES Project Work Types After Revision:

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded OTH CONSTRUCTION 11 $3,957 $0 NAPERVILLE CIP Financial Data After Revision

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 17 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 08-00-0058 DuPage Council of Mayors DELETE PROJECT $0 $0 0.00% Project Deleted BOOK RD FROM 111TH ST (WILL/NAPERVILLE) TO 117TH ST (WILL/NAPERVILLE) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - EXTEND ROAD SAFETY - LIGHTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITY Project Work Types After Revision:

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded OTH CONSTRUCTION 10 $1,557 $0 NAPERVILLE CIP OTH ENGINEERING 09 $235 $0 NAPERVILLE CIP Financial Data After Revision

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 18 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 08-00-0060 IDOT District 1 Division of Highways CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed IL 59 FROM FERRY RD (DUPAGE/NAPERVILLE) TO AURORA AVE (DUPAGE/NAPERVILLE) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES SIGNALS - MODERNIZATION HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES SIGNALS - MODERNIZATION HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 12 $1 $0 OTH ENGINEERING-II 12 $100 $0 NAPERVILLE CIP OTH ENGINEERING-I 09 $100 $0 NAPERVILLE CIP

Financial Data After Revision GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 12 $1 $0

These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP OTH CONSTRUCTION MYB $281 $0 NAPERVILLE CIP OTH ENGINEERING-I 09 $100 $0 NAPERVILLE CIP OTH ENGINEERING-II 12 $100 $0 NAPERVILLE CIP

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 19 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 08-00-0077 DuPage County Division of Transportation LINE ITEM $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed CH 33 75TH ST FROM CH 56 WOODWARD AVE (DUPAGE/Woodridge) TO LYMAN AVE (DUPAGE/Darien) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - WIDEN LANES AND RESURFACE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - WIDEN LANES AND RESURFACE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-ALL ENGINEERING 10 $750 $0 MFT-LO CONSTRUCTION 10 $7,500 $0 Financial Data After Revision MFT-ALL ENGINEERING 10 $750 $0 MFT-LO CONSTRUCTION 10 $7,500 $0

08-03-0105 DuPage Council of Mayors CHANGE PROJECT $1,669 $1,669 $0 0.00% Scenario Year Change RIFORD RD FROM ST CHARLES RD (DUPAGE) TO CRESCENT BLVD (DUPAGE) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded STP-L CONSTRUCTION 09 $3,919 $1,669 Financial Data After Revision STP-L CONSTRUCTION 09 $3,919 $1,669

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 20 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 08-06-0043 DuPage Council of Mayors DELETE PROJECT $0 $0 0.00% Project Deleted BOOK RD FROM RICKERT DR (DUPAGE) TO 75TH ST (DUPAGE) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES Project Work Types After Revision:

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded GEN-OP ENGINEERING 11 $72 $0 Financial Data After Revision

08-09-0016 DuPage County Division of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed CH 33 75th St FROM Adams St (DUPAGE/Darien) TO Plainfield Rd (DUPAGE/Darien) ADD TO JULY CONFORMITY Project Work Types Before Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE Project Work Types After Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-ALL ENGINEERING-I 09 $350 $0

Financial Data After Revision MFT-ALL ENGINEERING-I 09 $350 $0

These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP MFT-ALL ENGINEERING-II MYB $750 $0 FFY10 MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION MYB $11,000 $0 FFY10

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 21 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 08-09-0034 DuPage Council of Mayors CHANGE PROJECT $310 $310 $0 0.00% Limits Changed FAU 1392 First St. FROM N. Myrtle Ave. (DUPAGE) TO N. Clara Pl. (DUPAGE) On-street commuter parking spaces from N. Myrtle to N. Evergreen, N. Elm to N Project Work Types Before Revision: PARKING - NEW LOT OR GARAGE Project Work Types After Revision: PARKING - NEW LOT OR GARAGE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded LRA CONSTRUCTION 10 $310 $310

Financial Data After Revision LRA CONSTRUCTION 10 $310 $310

08-09-0057 DuPage Council of Mayors DELETE PROJECT $966 ($966) -100.00% Project Deleted First St. Parking Deck AT NW corner of First and Larch Project Work Types Before Revision: PARKING - NEW LOT OR GARAGE Project Work Types After Revision:

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded LRA CONSTRUCTION 10 $6,800 $966 Financial Data After Revision

08-09-0065 IDOT District 1 Division of Highways CHANGE PROJECT $0 0.00% Limits Changed I- 290 I-290 AT IL 83 ILL 83 (DUPAGE/Addison) Project Work Types Before Revision: BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - RECONST/REHAB CHNG IN LANE USE/WIDTHS Project Work Types After Revision: BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - RECONST/REHAB CHNG IN LANE USE/WIDTHS

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded ILL CONSTRUCTION 09 $100 1783160000 Financial Data After Revision ILL CONSTRUCTION 09 $100 1783160000

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 22 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 08-97-0016 DuPage County Division of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $1,198 $1,198 $0 0.00% Limits Changed 55TH STREET FROM HOLMES AVE (DUPAGE/CLARENDON HILLS) TO WILLIAMS (DUPAGE/WESTMONT) Project Work Types Before Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONSTRUCT IN KIND Project Work Types After Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $1,497 $1,198 120104 MFT-LO CONSTRUCTION 09 $3,300 $0 Financial Data After Revision HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $1,497 $1,198 120104 MFT-LO CONSTRUCTION 09 $3,300 $0

08-99-0028 DuPage County Division of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed 55TH ST FROM DUNHAM RD (DUPAGE/DOWNERS GROVE) TO WILLIAMS AVE (DUPAGE/WESTMONT) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-LO CONSTRUCTION 09 $4,000 $0 MFT-LO CONSTRUCTION 11 $100 $0 Financial Data After Revision MFT-LO CONSTRUCTION 09 $4,000 $0 MFT-LO CONSTRUCTION 11 $100 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 23 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 09-00-0029 DuPage County Division of Transportation DELETE PROJECT $0 $0 0.00% Project Deleted FABYAN PKWY FROM IL 38 ROOSEVELT RD (DUPAGE/WEST CHICAGO) TO KANE COUNTY LINE (DUPAGE/WEST CHICAGO) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES Project Work Types After Revision:

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-ALL ENGINEERING 09 $100 $0 DUPAGE COUNTY MFT-LO CONSTRUCTION 11 $6,000 $0 DUPAGE COUNTY, INCLUDES G Financial Data After Revision

09-03-0001 Kane County Division of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $2,683 $2,683 $0 0.00% Work Types Changed RANDALL RD AT FABYAN PKWY (KANE) INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES BICYCLE FACILITY HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT Project Work Types After Revision: BICYCLE FACILITY HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded CMAQ CONSTRUCTION 11 $2,800 $2,240 E3 INCLUDED CMAQ ROW ACQUISITION 09 $300 $240 CMAQ ENGINEERING-II 09 $254 $203 GEN-OP ENGINEERING-I 09 $500 $0 Financial Data After Revision CMAQ ROW ACQUISITION 09 $300 $240 CMAQ ENGINEERING-II 09 $254 $203 GEN-OP ENGINEERING-I 09 $500 $0 CMAQ CONSTRUCTION 11 $2,800 $2,240 E3 INCLUDED

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 24 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 09-03-0002 Kane County Division of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $91 $91 $0 0.00% Limits Changed HUNTLEY RD FROM RANDALL RD (KANE) TO IL 31 (KANE/Carpentersville) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded STP-L ENGINEERING-II 09 $700 $91

Financial Data After Revision STP-L ENGINEERING-II 09 $700 $91

These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP GEN-OP ROW ACQUISITION MYB $2,000 $0 GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION MYB $13,000 $0

09-03-0003 Metra CHANGE PROJECT $903 $903 $0 0.00% Limits Changed GENEVA STATION PARKING ON UPR FROM BATAVIA AVENUE (KANE/Geneva) TO THIRD STREET (KANE/Geneva) Project Work Types Before Revision: PARKING - NEW LOT OR GARAGE Project Work Types After Revision: PARKING - NEW LOT OR GARAGE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded 5309C IMPLEMENTATION 09 $903 $903 3864,P-550 Financial Data After Revision 5309C IMPLEMENTATION 09 $903 $903 3864,P-550

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 25 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 09-06-0012 Kane County Division of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed I- 90 I-90 AT IL 47 IL Route 47 (KANE/Huntley) Project Work Types Before Revision: INTERCHANGE - EXPAND (NEW MOVEMENTS ADDED TO INTERCHANGE) Project Work Types After Revision: INTERCHANGE - EXPAND (NEW MOVEMENTS ADDED TO INTERCHANGE)

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded GEN-OP ENGINEERING-II 09 $2,600 $0 GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 10 $66,200 $0

Financial Data After Revision GEN-OP ENGINEERING-II 09 $2,600 $0 GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 10 $66,200 $0

09-06-0066 CMAP CHANGE PROJECT $757 $757 $0 0.00% Scenario Year Change IL 25 BROADWAY AVE FROM NORTH AVE (KANE) TO ILLINOIS AVE (KANE) Project Work Types Before Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING Project Work Types After Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded CMAQ IMPLEMENTATION 09 $947 $757 E3/CONST Financial Data After Revision CMAQ IMPLEMENTATION 09 $947 $757 E3/CONST

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 26 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 09-08-0007 Kendall County Highway Department CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed CH 7 ELDAMAIN RD FROM CH 9 GALENA (KENDALL/PLANO) TO MENARDS (2,640' S. OF CORNELIUS RD) (KENDALL/PLANO) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-LO CONSTRUCTION 12 $5,000 $0 MFT-LO ROW ACQUISITION 09 $750 $0

Financial Data After Revision MFT-LO ROW ACQUISITION 09 $750 $0 MFT-LO CONSTRUCTION 12 $5,000 $0

09-09-0028 IDOT District 3 Division of Highways CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed US 34 US 34 AT FAU 3791 Cannonball Trail Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - REPLACE HIGHWAY/ROAD - CURB AND GUTTER HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONSTRUCT IN KIND Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - REPLACE HIGHWAY/ROAD - CURB AND GUTTER HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONSTRUCT IN KIND

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded ILL ENGINEERING-I 10 $400 $0 Financial Data After Revision ILL ENGINEERING-I 10 $400 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 27 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 09-09-0039 IDOT District 3 Division of Highways CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed IL 47 IL 47 FROM IL 71 IL 71 (KENDALL/Yorkville) TO CH 23 Caton Farm Road (KENDALL) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded ILL ENGINEERING-I 10 $600 $0

Financial Data After Revision ILL ENGINEERING-I 10 $600 $0

These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP ILL ENGINEERING-II MYB $600 $0

09-09-0040 IDOT District 3 Division of Highways CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed IL 47 IL 47 FROM Kane County Line (KENDALL) TO Kennedy Road (KENDALL) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - REPLACE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - REPLACE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded ILL ENGINEERING-I 10 $900 $0 Financial Data After Revision ILL ENGINEERING-I 10 $900 $0

These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP ILL ENGINEERING-II MYB $500 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 28 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 09-96-0017 Kane County Division of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $4,518 $4,518 $0 0.00% Limits Changed LONGMEADOW PKWY BRIDGE CORRIDOR FROM HUNTLEY RD (KANE) TO IL 62 (KANE) AND OVER FOX RIVER. AKA BOLZ RD EXTENSION Project Work Types Before Revision: BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - NEW HIGHWAY/ROAD - NEW ROAD Project Work Types After Revision: BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - NEW HIGHWAY/ROAD - NEW ROAD

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded DEM ENGINEERING-I 09 $586 $468 GEN-OP ENGINEERING-II 11 $2,376 $0 HPP ROW ACQUISITION 09 $5,000 $4,050 Financial Data After Revision DEM ENGINEERING-I 09 $586 $468 HPP ROW ACQUISITION 09 $5,000 $4,050 GEN-OP ENGINEERING-II 11 $2,376 $0 These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP GEN-OP ENGINEERING MYB $8,000 $0 E3 STP-L CONSTRUCTION MYB $117,000 $2,500

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 29 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 09-96-0018 Kane County Division of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $81,405 $81,405 $0 0.00% Limits Changed STEARNS ROAD BRIDGE CORRIDOR FROM RANDALL RD (KANE) TO EAST OF DUNHAM RD (KANE) AND OVER FOX RIVER AND ADDING LANES 1000 NORTH AND SOUTH OF RANDALL RO Project Work Types Before Revision: BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - NEW HIGHWAY/ROAD - NEW ROAD Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - NEW HIGHWAY/ROAD - NEW ROAD

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded CMAQ CONSTRUCTION 09 $2,779 $2,223 CONTRACT 3 / INTERSECTION I DEM CONSTRUCTION 09 $5,625 $4,500 CONTRACT 4 DEM CONSTRUCTION 09 $552 $442 CONTRACT 2 EQB CONSTRUCTION 09 $10,115 $8,092 CONTRACT 4 GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 09 $1,930 $0 CONTRACT 5 / INCLUDES E3 GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 10 $896 $0 CONTRACT 5B - LANDSCAPING GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 12 $55 $0 CONTACT 5A - MCLEAN FEN GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 09 $1,095 $0 CONTRACT 2 / INCLUDES E3 GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 09 $3,104 $0 CONTRACT 4 / INCLUDES E3 GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 09 $2,621 $0 CONTRACT 3 / INCLUDES E3 GEN-OP ROW ACQUISITION 09 $250 $0 AMENDMENT #5 GEN-OP ROW ACQUISITION 12 $1,961 $0 CONTRACT 5A GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 09 $365 $0 CONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR M GEN-OP ROW ACQUISITION 12 $504 $0 CONTRACT 5A HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $19,297 $15,437 CONTRACT 5 / INCLUDES E3 HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $3,654 $2,924 CONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR M HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $23,125 $18,500 CONTRACT 3 / INCLUDES E3 HPP CONSTRUCTION 10 $4,479 $3,583 CONTRACT 5B - LANDSCAPING HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $9,940 $7,952 CONTRACT 4 / INCLUDES E3 HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $9,299 $7,439 CONTRACT 2 / INCLUDES E3 HPP ROW ACQUISITION 12 $5,039 $4,031 CONTRACT 5A HPP CONSTRUCTION 12 $550 $440 CONTACT 5A - MCLEAN FEN

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 30 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement HPP ROW ACQUISITION 09 $2,500 $2,000 AMENDMENT #5 ILL ROW ACQUISITION 09 $14,575 $0 AMENDMENT #5 ILL CONSTRUCTION 09 $6,095 $0 CONTRACT 2 / INCLUDES E3 ILL CONSTRUCTION 09 $3,104 $0 CONTRACT 4 / INCLUDES E3 ILL CONSTRUCTION 09 $7,621 $0 CONTRACT 3 / INCLUDES E3 ILL CONSTRUCTION 09 $365 $0 CONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR M ILL CONSTRUCTION 10 $448 $0 CONTRACT 5B - LANDSCAPING ILL ROW ACQUISITION 12 $504 $0 CONTRACT 5A ILL CONSTRUCTION 12 $55 $0 CONTACT 5A - MCLEAN FEN ILL CONSTRUCTION 09 $1,930 $0 CONTRACT 5 / INCLUDES E3 LRA CONSTRUCTION 09 $1,100 $1,100 CONTRACT 3 STP-E CONSTRUCTION 09 $303 $242 CONTRACT 3 / ITEP #102182 STP-L CONSTRUCTION 09 $3,167 $2,500 CONTRACT 4

Financial Data After Revision CMAQ CONSTRUCTION 09 $2,779 $2,223 CONTRACT 3 / INTERSECTION I DEM CONSTRUCTION 09 $5,625 $4,500 CONTRACT 4 DEM CONSTRUCTION 09 $552 $442 CONTRACT 2 EQB CONSTRUCTION 09 $10,115 $8,092 CONTRACT 4 GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 09 $3,104 $0 CONTRACT 4 / INCLUDES E3 GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 09 $1,095 $0 CONTRACT 2 / INCLUDES E3 GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 09 $2,621 $0 CONTRACT 3 / INCLUDES E3 GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 09 $1,930 $0 CONTRACT 5 / INCLUDES E3 GEN-OP ROW ACQUISITION 09 $250 $0 AMENDMENT #5 GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 09 $365 $0 CONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR M HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $19,297 $15,437 CONTRACT 5 / INCLUDES E3 HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $9,940 $7,952 CONTRACT 4 / INCLUDES E3 HPP ROW ACQUISITION 09 $2,500 $2,000 AMENDMENT #5 HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $23,125 $18,500 CONTRACT 3 / INCLUDES E3 HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $9,299 $7,439 CONTRACT 2 / INCLUDES E3 HPP CONSTRUCTION 09 $3,654 $2,924 CONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR M ILL CONSTRUCTION 09 $3,104 $0 CONTRACT 4 / INCLUDES E3 ILL CONSTRUCTION 09 $6,095 $0 CONTRACT 2 / INCLUDES E3 ILL ROW ACQUISITION 09 $14,575 $0 AMENDMENT #5

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 31 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement ILL CONSTRUCTION 09 $365 $0 CONSTRUCTION CORRIDOR M ILL CONSTRUCTION 09 $7,621 $0 CONTRACT 3 / INCLUDES E3 ILL CONSTRUCTION 09 $1,930 $0 CONTRACT 5 / INCLUDES E3 LRA CONSTRUCTION 09 $1,100 $1,100 CONTRACT 3 STP-E CONSTRUCTION 09 $303 $242 CONTRACT 3 / ITEP #102182 STP-L CONSTRUCTION 09 $3,167 $2,500 CONTRACT 4 GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 10 $896 $0 CONTRACT 5B - LANDSCAPING HPP CONSTRUCTION 10 $4,479 $3,583 CONTRACT 5B - LANDSCAPING ILL CONSTRUCTION 10 $448 $0 CONTRACT 5B - LANDSCAPING GEN-OP ROW ACQUISITION 12 $504 $0 CONTRACT 5A GEN-OP ROW ACQUISITION 12 $1,961 $0 CONTRACT 5A GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 12 $55 $0 CONTACT 5A - MCLEAN FEN HPP CONSTRUCTION 12 $550 $440 CONTACT 5A - MCLEAN FEN HPP ROW ACQUISITION 12 $5,039 $4,031 CONTRACT 5A ILL ROW ACQUISITION 12 $504 $0 CONTRACT 5A ILL CONSTRUCTION 12 $55 $0 CONTACT 5A - MCLEAN FEN

09-96-0019 Kane County Division of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed RED GATE RD EXTENSION FROM IL 31 AT RED GATE RD (KANE/St. Charles) TO IL 25 S/O ARMY TRAIL RD (KANE/St. Charles) OVER FOX RIVER Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - NEW ROAD BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - NEW Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - NEW ROAD BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - NEW

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 10 $18,000 $0 Financial Data After Revision MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 10 $18,000 $0

These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP STP-L CONSTRUCTION MYB $27,500 $2,800

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 32 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 09-99-0102 Kane County Division of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed LA FOX RD BYPASS TO BUNKER RD Project Work Types Before Revision: BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - NEW HIGHWAY/ROAD - NEW ROAD Project Work Types After Revision: BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - NEW HIGHWAY/ROAD - NEW ROAD

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 09 $500 $0 3783 GEN-OP ENGINEERING-II 09 $300 $0 GEN-OP ROW ACQUISITION 09 $400 $0 GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 10 $5,000 $0 3783 ILL CONSTRUCTION 10 $6,500 $0 3783

Financial Data After Revision GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 09 $500 $0 3783 GEN-OP ENGINEERING-II 09 $300 $0 GEN-OP ROW ACQUISITION 09 $400 $0 GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 10 $5,000 $0 3783 ILL CONSTRUCTION 10 $6,500 $0 3783

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 33 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 10-00-0109 Lake County Department of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed DELANY ROAD FROM WADSWORTH (LAKE/WAUKEGAN) TO SUNSET AVENUE (LAKE/WAUKEGAN) Project Work Types Before Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES SIGNALS - MODERNIZATION Project Work Types After Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES SIGNALS - MODERNIZATION

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded CTEF CONSTRUCTION 10 $13,750 $0 MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 11 $9,145 $0 Financial Data After Revision CTEF CONSTRUCTION 10 $13,750 $0 MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 11 $9,145 $0

10-00-0119 Lake County Department of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed CEDAR LAKE ROAD FROM HART ROAD (LAKE/ROUND LAKE) TO BACON ROAD (LAKE/ROUND LAKE) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - EXTEND ROAD SIGNALS - ADD SIGNALS AT SINGLE INTERSECTION HIGHWAY/ROAD - VERTICAL/HORIZONTAL ALGNMENT (E.G. CLEARANCE) Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - EXTEND ROAD SIGNALS - ADD SIGNALS AT SINGLE INTERSECTION HIGHWAY/ROAD - VERTICAL/HORIZONTAL ALGNMENT (E.G. CLEARANCE)

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 11 $3,955 $0 Financial Data After Revision MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 11 $3,955 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 34 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 10-00-0120 Lake County Department of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed CEDAR LAKE RD FROM IL 120 (LAKE/ROUND LAKE) TO IL 60 (LAKE/ROUND LAKE PARK) Project Work Types Before Revision: SIGNALS - NEW SIGNALS FOR MULTIPLE INTERSECTIONS HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - VERTICAL/HORIZONTAL ALGNMENT (E.G. CLEARANCE) Project Work Types After Revision: SIGNALS - NEW SIGNALS FOR MULTIPLE INTERSECTIONS HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - VERTICAL/HORIZONTAL ALGNMENT (E.G. CLEARANCE)

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded CTEF CONSTRUCTION 11 $8,000 $0

Financial Data After Revision CTEF CONSTRUCTION 11 $8,000 $0

These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION MYB $4,970 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 35 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 10-00-0123 Lake County Department of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed CASE ROAD FROM DARRELL ROAD (LAKE/WAUCONDA) TO US 12 RAND ROAD (LAKE/WAUCONDA) Project Work Types Before Revision: SIGNALS - ADD SIGNALS AT SINGLE INTERSECTION HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE Project Work Types After Revision: SIGNALS - ADD SIGNALS AT SINGLE INTERSECTION HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-ALL ENGINEERING-II 09 $150 $0 Financial Data After Revision MFT-ALL ENGINEERING-II 09 $150 $0

These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION MYB $2,000 $0

10-02-0013 IDOT District 1 Division of Highways CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed US 45 FROM IL 60 (LAKE/INDIANA CREEK) TO IL 22 (LAKE/MUNDELEIN) LINCOLNSHIRE, RIVERWOODS, VERNON HILLS Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES

Financial Data Before Revision Financial Data After Revision ILL ENGINEERING-II 10 $3,850 $0 1-88490-1101 ILL ENGINEERING-II 11 $5,250 $0 1-88490-0101 These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP ILL CONSTRUCTION MYB $35,000 $0 1884900100 ILL ROW ACQUISITION MYB $6,000 $0 1884900102

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 36 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 10-03-0007 Lake County Department of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed DOWELL RD/FISHER RD AT DARRELL RD (LAKE/ISLAND LAKE) Project Work Types Before Revision: MISCELLANEOUS - EXEMPT TESTED PROJECTS HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - VERTICAL/HORIZONTAL ALGNMENT (E.G. CLEARANCE) Project Work Types After Revision: MISCELLANEOUS - EXEMPT TESTED PROJECTS HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - VERTICAL/HORIZONTAL ALGNMENT (E.G. CLEARANCE)

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-ALL ENGINEERING-II 10 $1,000 $0 MFT-ALL ENGINEERING-I 09 $750 $0 Financial Data After Revision MFT-ALL ENGINEERING-I 09 $750 $0 MFT-ALL ENGINEERING-II 10 $1,000 $0 These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION MYB $7,200 $0

10-08-0024 Lake County Department of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed 20 Project Work Types Before Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING Project Work Types After Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded CTEF CONSTRUCTION 09 $2,100 $0 E3 CTEF ENGINEERING-II 09 $560 $0 Financial Data After Revision CTEF CONSTRUCTION 09 $2,100 $0 E3 CTEF ENGINEERING-II 09 $560 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 37 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 10-08-0025 Lake County Department of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed LAKE COUNTY PASSAGE 2010 ACTIVITIES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS (LAKE) Project Work Types Before Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING Project Work Types After Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded CTEF CONSTRUCTION 10 $2,400 $0

Financial Data After Revision CTEF CONSTRUCTION 10 $2,400 $0

10-08-0026 Lake County Department of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed MIDLOTHIAN ROAD FROM IL 137 (LAKE/LIBERTYVILLE) TO CANADIAN NATIONAL RR (LAKE/LIBERTYVILLE) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded CTEF CONSTRUCTION 09 $1,433 $0 CTEF ROW ACQUISITION 09 $160 $0 CTEF ENGINEERING-II 09 $37 $0 CTEF ENGINEERING-I 09 $32 $0

Financial Data After Revision CTEF CONSTRUCTION 09 $1,433 $0 CTEF ROW ACQUISITION 09 $160 $0 CTEF ENGINEERING-II 09 $37 $0 CTEF ENGINEERING-I 09 $32 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 38 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 10-08-0027 Lake County Department of Transportation NEW PROJECT $0 $0 0.00% New Project ROLLINS RD AT IL 83 CANADIAN NATIONAL RR (LAKE/ROUND LAKE BEACH) Project Work Types Before Revision: Project Work Types After Revision: BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - NEW

Financial Data Before Revision Financial Data After Revision CTEF ENGINEERING-II 10 $2,700 $0 CTEF ENGINEERING-II 11 $2,000 $0 These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP CTEF CONSTRUCTION MYB $40,000 $0

10-08-0029 Lake County Department of Transportation NEW PROJECT $0 $0 0.00% New Project WASHINGTON STREET FROM SHERIDAN ROAD (LAKE/WAUKEGAN) TO PERSHING ROAD (LAKE/WAUKEGAN) Project Work Types Before Revision: Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - EXTEND ROAD

Financial Data Before Revision Financial Data After Revision CTEF ENGINEERING-I 09 $621 $0 CTEF ENGINEERING-II 12 $582 $0 CTEF ROW ACQUISITION 12 $543 $0 These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP CTEF CONSTRUCTION MYB $7,762 $0 CTEF ENGINEERING MYB $776 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 39 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 10-08-0030 Lake County Department of Transportation NEW PROJECT $0 $0 0.00% New Project WASHINGTON STREET FROM HAINESVILLE ROAD (LAKE/HAINESVILLE) TO LAKE STREET (LAKE/GRAYSLAKE) Project Work Types Before Revision: Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES

Financial Data Before Revision Financial Data After Revision CTEF ENGINEERING-I 09 $1,000 $0 CTEF CONSTRUCTION 11 $6,009 $0 CTEF ROW ACQUISITION 11 $1,500 $0 CTEF ENGINEERING-II 11 $803 $0

10-08-0031 Lake County Department of Transportation NEW PROJECT $0 $0 0.00% New Project WASHINGTON STREET AT AT THE CANADIAN NATIONAL RR (LAKE/GRAYSLAKE) Project Work Types Before Revision: Project Work Types After Revision: BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - NEW

Financial Data Before Revision Financial Data After Revision CTEF ENGINEERING-I 09 $1,672 $0 CTEF ENGINEERING-II 11 $1,600 $0 These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP CTEF CONSTRUCTION MYB $40,000 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 40 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 10-09-0015 IDOT District 1 Local Roads CHANGE PROJECT $100 $100 $0 0.00% Limits Changed BELVIDERE STREET (FAU 1225) FROM SHERIDAN ROAD (LAKE/WAUKEGAN) TO PERSHING ROAD (LAKE/WAUKEGAN) OVER IL 137 Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - EXTEND ROAD BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - RECONST/REHAB NO CHNG IN #, WDTH, OR LANE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - EXTEND ROAD BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - RECONST/REHAB NO CHNG IN #, WDTH, OR LANE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded BRR ENGINEERING-I 09 $125 $100

Financial Data After Revision BRR ENGINEERING-I 09 $125 $100

10-09-0039 Lake County Department of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed CH V61 Fairfield Road AT IL 176 Liberty Street (LAKE/Wauconda) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT Project Work Types After Revision: INTERCHANGE - NEW HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT

Financial Data Before Revision Financial Data After Revision CTEF ENGINEERING-I 09 $1,500 $0 A CTEF ROW ACQUISITION 11 $1,000 $0 CTEF ENGINEERING-II 11 $500 $0 These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP CTEF CONSTRUCTION MYB $1,700 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 41 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 10-09-0109 IDOT District 1 Division of Highways CHANGE PROJECT $810 $810 $0 0.00% Limits Changed IL 120 ILL 120 FROM RIVER RD (LAKE/Gurnee) TO ALMOND RD (LAKE/Gurnee) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded HSIP CONSTRUCTION 11 $900 $810 1782940000

Financial Data After Revision HSIP CONSTRUCTION 11 $900 $810 1782940000

10-94-0007 IDOT District 1 Division of Highways LINE ITEM $3,380 $3,380 999.99% Limits Changed US 45 LAKE AVE FROM WASHINGTON ST (LAKE/THIRD LAKE) TO IL 120 (LAKE/GRAYSLAKE) PHASE 1 STUDY IL 132 TO IL 176. Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES

Financial Data Before Revision Financial Data After Revision NHS ROW ACQUISITION 10 $3,000 $2,400 NHS ROW ACQUISITION 10 $1,000 $800 NHS CONSTRUCTION 10 $200 $180 These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP NHS CONSTRUCTION MYB $9,985 $7,988 1710970300

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 42 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 10-94-0017 Lake County Department of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Scenario Year Change MIDLOTHIAN RD FROM PETERSON RD (LAKE/LIBERTYVILLE) TO HARRIS RD (LAKE/LIBERTYVILLE) EXTENDING MIDLOTHIAN RD (NORTH) AND CONNECT WITH HARRIS RD Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - EXTEND ROAD SIGNALS - NEW SIGNALS FOR MULTIPLE INTERSECTIONS HIGHWAY/ROAD - CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - EXTEND ROAD SIGNALS - NEW SIGNALS FOR MULTIPLE INTERSECTIONS HIGHWAY/ROAD - CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 09 $4,900 $0 Financial Data After Revision MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION 09 $4,900 $0

10-95-0001 IDOT District 1 Division of Highways NEW PROJECT $0 $0 0.00% New Project Project Work Types Before Revision: Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - REPLACE HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION RECONSTRUCTION HIGHWAY/ROAD - CURB AND GUTTER

Financial Data Before Revision Financial Data After Revision ILL ROW ACQUISITION 11 $2,000 $0 ILL CONSTRUCTION 12 $30,300 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 43 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 11-00-0200 McHenry County Division of Transportation CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Scenario Year Change IL 31 FROM IL 120 (MCHENRY/RINGWOOD) TO NORTH OF GRACY RD (MCHENRY/MCHENRY) Project Work Types Before Revision: SIGNALS - NEW SIGNALS FOR MULTIPLE INTERSECTIONS HIGHWAY/ROAD - NEW ROAD BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - NEW Project Work Types After Revision: SIGNALS - NEW SIGNALS FOR MULTIPLE INTERSECTIONS HIGHWAY/ROAD - NEW ROAD BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - NEW

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded OTH ENGINEERING-I 10 $800 $0 OTH ROW ACQUISITION 11 $14,000 $0 OTH ENGINEERING-II 11 $270 $0

Financial Data After Revision

These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP OTH ENGINEERING-II 11 $270 $0 OTH ROW ACQUISITION 11 $14,000 $0 OTH CONSTRUCTION MYB $31,400 $0 FY 13 OTH ENGINEERING-I 10 $800 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 44 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 11-03-0016 McHenry County Council of Mayors CHANGE PROJECT $1,756 $1,756 $0 0.00% Limits Changed RICHMOND WEST BYPASS FROM US 12 (MCHENRY/RICHMOND) TO IL 31 (MCHENRY/RICHMOND) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - NEW ROAD Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - NEW ROAD

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded HPP ENGINEERING-I 09 $2,367 $1,756

Financial Data After Revision HPP ENGINEERING-I 09 $2,367 $1,756

These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP OTH CONSTRUCTION MYB $0 $0

11-07-0010 McHenry County Council of Mayors CHANGE PROJECT $1,644 $1,644 $0 0.00% Scenario Year Change HANSON RD FROM HUNTINGTON DRIVE (MCHENRY) TO EDGEWOOD DRIVE (MCHENRY) Project Work Types Before Revision: BICYCLE FACILITY PEDESTRIAN FACILITY HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE Project Work Types After Revision: BICYCLE FACILITY PEDESTRIAN FACILITY HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded CMAQ CONSTRUCTION 09 $180 $144 PRV ENGINEERING-II 10 $100 $0 PRV ENGINEERING-I 09 $100 $0 STP-L CONSTRUCTION 09 $2,900 $1,500 Financial Data After Revision CMAQ CONSTRUCTION 09 $180 $144 PRV ENGINEERING-I 09 $100 $0 STP-L CONSTRUCTION 09 $2,900 $1,500 PRV ENGINEERING-II 10 $100 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 45 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 11-07-0011 McHenry County Council of Mayors CHANGE PROJECT $1,000 $1,000 $0 0.00% Limits Changed PINGREE RD FROM US 14 PHI STDY LMT (MCHENRY/CRYSTAL LAKE) TO TEK DR (MCHENRY/CRYSTAL LAKE) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-LO ROW ACQUISITION 11 $54 $0 MFT-LO ENGINEERING-II 11 $82 $0 MFT-LO ENGINEERING-I 10 $115 $0 STP-L CONSTRUCTION 12 $2,007 $1,000

Financial Data After Revision MFT-LO ENGINEERING-I 10 $115 $0 MFT-LO ROW ACQUISITION 11 $54 $0 MFT-LO ENGINEERING-II 11 $82 $0 STP-L CONSTRUCTION 12 $2,007 $1,000

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 46 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 11-08-0018 McHenry County Council of Mayors CHANGE PROJECT $1,027 $1,027 $0 0.00% Limits Changed HALIGUS ROAD (FAU 3869) FROM MILLER ROAD (FAU 4039) (MCHENRY) TO REED ROAD (FAU 4075) (MCHENRY) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded STP-L CONSTRUCTION 09 $1,284 $1,027 Financial Data After Revision STP-L CONSTRUCTION 09 $1,284 $1,027

11-09-0015 McHenry County Council of Mayors CHANGE PROJECT $262 $262 $0 0.00% Limits Changed US 14 Virginia Street FROM FAU 119 Dole Avenue (MCHENRY) TO Keith Avenue (MCHENRY) Project Work Types Before Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING SIGNALS - MODERNIZATION Project Work Types After Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING SIGNALS - MODERNIZATION

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded LRA CONSTRUCTION 10 $665 $262 Financial Data After Revision LRA CONSTRUCTION 10 $665 $262

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 47 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 11-09-0028 McHenry County Council of Mayors CHANGE PROJECT $262 $262 $0 0.00% Limits Changed FAU 41 Raffel Road AT Banford Road (MCHENRY/Woodstock) The intersection of IL Route 120 is not within the project limits. The improvements begin north Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - RECONST WITH CHANGE IN USE OR WIDTH OF LANE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded LRA CONSTRUCTION 10 $550 $262

Financial Data After Revision LRA CONSTRUCTION 10 $550 $262

12-07-0007 Will County Highway Department CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Scenario Year Change GOUGAR RD FROM LARAWAY ROAD (WILL/NEW LENOX) TO US 52 (WILL/MANHATTAN) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - NEW ROAD HIGHWAY/ROAD - CURB AND GUTTER HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - NEW ROAD HIGHWAY/ROAD - CURB AND GUTTER HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-ALL ENGINEERING-I 10 $850 $0

Financial Data After Revision MFT-ALL ENGINEERING-I 10 $850 $0

These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP STP-L CONSTRUCTION MYB $12,000 $9,600 MFT-ALL ROW ACQUISITION MYB $4,000 $0 MFT-ALL ENGINEERING-II MYB $1,800 $0 MFT-ALL CONSTRUCTION MYB $1,200 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 48 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 12-07-0021 Grundy County Highway Department CHANGE PROJECT $150 $150 $0 0.00% Limits Changed RIDGE ROAD AT (1/4 MI. SOUTH OF) RIDGE RD (GRUNDY) EXISTING RAIL STRUCTURE AND WIDENING OF THE CN RAIL STRUCTURE Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - REPLACE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - ADD LANES BRIDGE/STRUCTURE - REPLACE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 12 $1 $0 GEN-OP ENGINEERING-II 10 $300 $0 FY09 HPP ENGINEERING-I 09 $300 $150 Financial Data After Revision HPP ENGINEERING-I 09 $300 $150 GEN-OP ENGINEERING-II 10 $300 $0 FY09 GEN-OP CONSTRUCTION 12 $1 $0 These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP HPP ROW ACQUISITION MYB $100 $50 HPP CONSTRUCTION MYB $4,500 $4,500

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 49 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 12-08-0032 Will County Highway Department CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed HOUBOLT ROAD AT OLYMPIC BLVD (N OF) (WILL/JOLIET) Project Work Types Before Revision: INTERCHANGE - RECONSTRUCTION HIGHWAY/ROAD - WIDEN LANES AND RESURFACE Project Work Types After Revision: INTERCHANGE - RECONSTRUCTION HIGHWAY/ROAD - WIDEN LANES AND RESURFACE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded MFT-LO CONSTRUCTION 10 $3,577 $0 FY 11; ROCK CREEK BLVD(S OF MFT-LO ROW ACQUISITION 09 $55 $0 ROCK CREEK BLVD(S OF) TO I- MFT-LO ENGINEERING-II 09 $219 $0 ROCK CREEK BLVD(S OF) TO I- MFT-LO CONSTRUCTION 10 $4,859 $0 FY 11; OLYMPIC BLVD (N OF) T MFT-LO ROW ACQUISITION 09 $461 $0 OLYMPIC BLVD (N OF) TO ROC MFT-LO ENGINEERING-II 09 $14 $0 OLYMPIC BLVD (N OF) TO ROC

Financial Data After Revision MFT-LO ROW ACQUISITION 09 $55 $0 ROCK CREEK BLVD(S OF) TO I- MFT-LO ENGINEERING-II 09 $219 $0 ROCK CREEK BLVD(S OF) TO I- MFT-LO ROW ACQUISITION 09 $461 $0 OLYMPIC BLVD (N OF) TO ROC MFT-LO ENGINEERING-II 09 $14 $0 OLYMPIC BLVD (N OF) TO ROC MFT-LO CONSTRUCTION 10 $3,577 $0 FY 11; ROCK CREEK BLVD(S OF MFT-LO CONSTRUCTION 10 $4,859 $0 FY 11; OLYMPIC BLVD (N OF) T

12-09-0011 CMAP CHANGE PROJECT $128 $128 $0 0.00% Limits Changed IL 53 BALTIMORE ST FROM FIRST ST (WILL/WILMINGTON) TO Water St (WILL/WILMINGTON) AND IL102 from Baltimore to Kahler Project Work Types Before Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING Project Work Types After Revision: SIGNALS - INTERCONNECTS AND TIMING

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded CMAQ CONSTRUCTION 09 $160 $128 1780870000 Financial Data After Revision CMAQ CONSTRUCTION 09 $160 $128 1780870000

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 50 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 12-09-0028 IDOT District 1 Division of Highways CHANGE PROJECT $284 $284 $0 0.00% Limits Changed IL 53 ILL 53 AT MIDEWIN NATIONAL TALLGRASS PRAIRIE (0.8 MI S OF PRAIRIE CREEK (WILL) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - CONTINUOUS BI-DIRECTIONAL TURN LANES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded PLH CONSTRUCTION 10 $284 $284 1772720000

Financial Data After Revision PLH CONSTRUCTION 10 $284 $284 1772720000

12-09-0037 Will County Council of Mayors CHANGE PROJECT $75 $75 $0 0.00% Limits Changed IL 288 Broadway FROM North Street (GRUNDY/Coal City) TO IL 113 Division Street (GRUNDY/Coal City) Project Work Types Before Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - WIDEN LANES AND RESURFACE Project Work Types After Revision: HIGHWAY/ROAD - WIDEN LANES AND RESURFACE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded LRA CONSTRUCTION 09 $75 $75

Financial Data After Revision LRA CONSTRUCTION 09 $75 $75

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 51 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 16-96-0061 CTA CHANGE PROJECT $181,231 $181,231 $0 0.00% Limits Changed CTA - 031.054 REPLACE BUSES Project Work Types Before Revision: ROLLING STOCK - REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES Project Work Types After Revision: ROLLING STOCK - REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 09 $2,528 $2,528 FTA 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 11 $15,189 $15,189 FTA 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 10 $15,189 $15,189 FTA 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 12 $15,189 $15,189 FTA 5309A IMPLEMENTATION 09 $52,236 $52,236 08 MONIES 5309C IMPLEMENTATION 09 $30,900 $30,900 08 MONIES ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 12 $90,000 $0 NEW STATE FUNDING ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 11 $35,000 $0 NEW STATE FUNDING SB IMPLEMENTATION 12 $6,718 $0 CTA OPERATING SB IMPLEMENTATION 11 $6,718 $0 CTA OPERATING SB IMPLEMENTATION 10 $6,718 $0 CTA OPERATING SB IMPLEMENTATION 09 $6,718 $0 CTA OPERATING SB IMPLEMENTATION 09 $7,064 $0 CTA BOND, 08 MONIES TRA IMPLEMENTATION 09 $50,000 $50,000 Economic Recovery

Financial Data After Revision 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 09 $2,528 $2,528 FTA 5309A IMPLEMENTATION 09 $52,236 $52,236 08 MONIES 5309C IMPLEMENTATION 09 $30,900 $30,900 08 MONIES SB IMPLEMENTATION 09 $6,718 $0 CTA OPERATING SB IMPLEMENTATION 09 $7,064 $0 CTA BOND, 08 MONIES TRA IMPLEMENTATION 09 $50,000 $50,000 Economic Recovery 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 10 $15,189 $15,189 FTA SB IMPLEMENTATION 10 $6,718 $0 CTA OPERATING 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 11 $15,189 $15,189 FTA ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 11 $35,000 $0 NEW STATE FUNDING SB IMPLEMENTATION 11 $6,718 $0 CTA OPERATING

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 52 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 12 $15,189 $15,189 FTA ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 12 $90,000 $0 NEW STATE FUNDING SB IMPLEMENTATION 12 $6,718 $0 CTA OPERATING These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP OTH IMPLEMENTATION MYB $75,000 $0 OTHER ILLT IMPLEMENTATION MYB $90,000 $0 NEW STATE FUNDING FY13 SB IMPLEMENTATION MYB $6,718 $0 CTA OPERATING FY13 5307 IMPLEMENTATION MYB $15,189 $15,189 FTA FY13

17-08-0039 Pace CHANGE PROJECT $495 $495 $0 0.00% Limits Changed PACE - PLAINFIELD PARK & RIDE 143RD ST AMD VAN DYKE RD Project Work Types Before Revision: PARKING - NEW LOT OR GARAGE Project Work Types After Revision: PARKING - NEW LOT OR GARAGE

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded 5309C CONSTRUCTION 12 $250 $250 5309C ENGINEERING 09 $245 $245 Financial Data After Revision 5309C ENGINEERING 09 $245 $245 5309C CONSTRUCTION 12 $250 $250 These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP 5309C IMPLEMENTATION MYB $100 $100

17-09-0033 Pace CHANGE PROJECT $500 $500 $0 0.00% Limits Changed Park-n-Ride in Homewood AT Halsted St & Ridge Road (COOK/Homewood) Project Work Types Before Revision: PARKING - EXPAND NUMBER OF SPACES Project Work Types After Revision: PARKING - EXPAND NUMBER OF SPACES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 09 $500 $500 Financial Data After Revision 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 09 $500 $500

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 53 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 17-09-2002 Pace CHANGE PROJECT $1,907 $1,907 $0 0.00% Limits Changed Pace - Non Revenue Vehicles Project Work Types Before Revision: ROLLING STOCK - REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES Project Work Types After Revision: ROLLING STOCK - REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded TRA IMPLEMENTATION 09 $1,907 $1,907 ARRA

Financial Data After Revision TRA IMPLEMENTATION 09 $1,907 $1,907 ARRA

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 54 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 17-94-0002 Pace CHANGE PROJECT $22,680 $22,680 $0 0.00% Limits Changed PACE-PURCHASE REPLACEMENT AND EXPANSION VANS AT (REGIONWIDE) SYSTEMWIDE- PURCHASE VANS; MINOR EXPANSION OF FLEET Project Work Types Before Revision: ROLLING STOCK - REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES Project Work Types After Revision: ROLLING STOCK - REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 12 $2,840 $2,840 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 11 $5,200 $5,200 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 10 $5,840 $5,840 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 09 $5,950 $5,950 CMAQ IMPLEMENTATION 09 $2,850 $2,850 RTA IMPLEMENTATION 09 $5,400 $0 INTEND TO APPLY FOR CMAQ RTA IMPLEMENTATION 10 $5,400 $0 INTEND TO APPLY FOR CMAQ RTA IMPLEMENTATION 12 $5,400 $0 INTEND TO APPLY FOR CMAQ RTA IMPLEMENTATION 11 $5,400 $0 INTEND TO APPLY FOR CMAQ

Financial Data After Revision 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 09 $5,950 $5,950 CMAQ IMPLEMENTATION 09 $2,850 $2,850 RTA IMPLEMENTATION 09 $5,400 $0 INTEND TO APPLY FOR CMAQ 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 10 $5,840 $5,840 RTA IMPLEMENTATION 10 $5,400 $0 INTEND TO APPLY FOR CMAQ 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 11 $5,200 $5,200 RTA IMPLEMENTATION 11 $5,400 $0 INTEND TO APPLY FOR CMAQ 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 12 $2,840 $2,840 RTA IMPLEMENTATION 12 $5,400 $0 INTEND TO APPLY FOR CMAQ These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP 5307 IMPLEMENTATION MYB $4,400 $4,400

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 55 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 17-94-0008 Pace CHANGE PROJECT $25,454 $25,454 $0 0.00% Limits Changed Pace - Purchase/Replace Fixed Rte Buses Project Work Types Before Revision: ROLLING STOCK - REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES Project Work Types After Revision: ROLLING STOCK - REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 09 $7,474 $7,474 ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 12 $13,100 $0 ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 10 $13,930 $0 ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 11 $10,300 $0 TRA IMPLEMENTATION 09 $17,980 $17,980 ARRA Financial Data After Revision 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 09 $7,474 $7,474 TRA IMPLEMENTATION 09 $17,980 $17,980 ARRA ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 10 $13,930 $0 ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 11 $10,300 $0 ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 12 $13,100 $0 These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP 5307 IMPLEMENTATION MYB $16,519 $13,215 5307 IMPLEMENTATION MYB $7,500 $7,500

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 56 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 17-94-0009 Pace CHANGE PROJECT $26,950 $26,950 $0 0.00% Limits Changed PACE-PURCHASE/REPLACE PARATRANSIT V Project Work Types Before Revision: ROLLING STOCK - REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES Project Work Types After Revision: ROLLING STOCK - REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 12 $12,325 $12,325 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 09 $1,377 $1,377 TRA IMPLEMENTATION 09 $13,248 $13,248 ARRA

Financial Data After Revision 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 09 $1,377 $1,377 TRA IMPLEMENTATION 09 $13,248 $13,248 ARRA 5307 IMPLEMENTATION 12 $12,325 $12,325 These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP 5307 IMPLEMENTATION MYB $3,000 $3,000

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 57 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 18-08-1700 Metra CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed PURCHASE BI-LEVEL COMMUTER CARS REGIONWIDE Project Work Types Before Revision: ROLLING STOCK - REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES Project Work Types After Revision: ROLLING STOCK - REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 09 $290,700 $0 3913 ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 12 $148,340 $0 3913 ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 11 $147,540 $0 3913 ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 10 $79,140 $0 3913 Financial Data After Revision ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 09 $290,700 $0 3913 ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 10 $79,140 $0 3913 ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 11 $147,540 $0 3913 ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 12 $148,340 $0 3913 These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP 5307 IMPLEMENTATION MYB $1,000 $800 ILLT IMPLEMENTATION MYB $1 $0 3913

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 58 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) Pre-Revision Post-Revision Change in Federal Funds Federal Funds Federal Percent Conformity Project: Action (000) (000) Funds (000) Change Requirement 18-09-1410 Metra CHANGE PROJECT $0 $0 $0 0.00% Limits Changed Purchase Bi-Level Cars Project Work Types Before Revision: ROLLING STOCK - REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES Project Work Types After Revision: ROLLING STOCK - REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES

Financial Data Before Revision Fund Source Project Phase FFY Total Cost Federal Cost Segment Awarded ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 12 $15,000 $0 ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 11 $15,000 $0 ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 10 $30,000 $0

Financial Data After Revision ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 10 $30,000 $0 ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 11 $15,000 $0 ILLT IMPLEMENTATION 12 $15,000 $0 These Line Items are Illustrative Only -- They Are NOT Part of the TIP ILLT IMPLEMENTATION MYB $40,000 $0

Totals for 98 Projects $473,720 $476,134 $2,414 0.5%

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Page 59 of 59 Conformity Amendments Released for Public September 24, 2009 Comment This public notice of the revisions being made to CMAP’s Transportation Improvement Program satisfies the Program of Projects requirements of Title 49, U.S. Code Section 5307 ( c ) (1) through (7) 233 South Wacker Drive Suite 800 Chicago, IL 60606

312-454-0400 (voice) 312-454-0411 (fax) www.cmap.illinois.gov MEMORANDUM

To: MPO Policy Committee

Date: October 8, 2009

From: CMAP Staff

Re: Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) 2010-2011 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Proposed Program

The CMAQ program provides federal funds to air quality non-attainment areas for projects that mitigate congestion or improve air quality. Northeastern Illinois has been and continues to be an air quality non-attainment area, so the region has received and programmed $1.2 billion dollars in CMAQ funds since the program began in 1992. Staff evaluates projects based on cost/benefit ratios, regional priorities, and project readiness. During this year’s cycle, CMAP staff evaluated 200 applications requesting over $450 million in federal funds, each competing for combined FY2010 and FY2011 funds of only $94 million. The proposed program fully commits 2010 and 2011 funds, and also commits about $25.5 million in FFY 12, a little over $7 million in FFY 13, and $1.6 million in FFY 14. To complete the process, the committee also identified projects for the “MYB” list. These projects showed a reasonable cost/benefit ratio or were already partially funded and can be brought into the program if other projects drop out. CMAP’s Transportation Committee has concurred in the responses to public comments (see http://www.cmap.illinois.gov/FFY1011PublicComment.aspx for additional information), and recommend the attached proposed FFY10-11 CMAQ Program and the multi-year B (MYB) list for your consideration. Be aware that the 2007 switch to multi-year programming has not resulted in faster project delivery and there is still $287 million in unobligated CMAQ projects. The CMAQ Project Selection Committee and staff developed the two year (FFY10/FFY11) program this cycle to provide additional time for active program management, getting lagging projects moving or removed from the program. Sponsors of funded projects which have been determined eligible by USDOT will attend a CMAP-sponsored meeting on November 18, 2009. This mandatory meeting will explain CMAP’s CMAQ programming policies and the federal process for implementing CMAQ projects.

Total CMAQ Program By Project Type Bicycle Transit Transfer, Encouragement, Bicycle Facilities, $13,444,000 Bicycle Parking, Bottleneck $4,106,664 $142,197,508 Transit Service and $10,281,447 Elimination, Equipment, $72,108,700 $129,199,785 Commuter Parking, $58,837,350 Transit Facility Demonstration, Improvement, $41,355,725 $300,439,154

Diesel Emissions Reduction, Signal Interconnect, $64,575,191 $160,434,165 Other, $244,443,060 Intersection Improvement, $119,318,177

Pedestrian, $27,097,904 Parking Deck, $7,156,000

9/23/2009 Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning CMAQ Multi-Year Program for Northeastern Illinois - FY 2010,2011,2012 Proposed Program $/Kilogram Daily VOC Phase/ Project VOC Eliminated Fiscal CMAQ ID Sponsor Description Eliminated (Kilograms) Year Funding

Bicycle Encouragement BP01103378 CDOT Chicago Bikes Marketing Campaign-Phase III $6,152 0.339 Total Funding: $400,000 IMP 2010 $400,000 Bicycle Facilities BP01103325 CDOT Lakefront Trail-Navy Pier Flyover $5,754 0.513 Total Funding: $13,696,000 CONST 2010 $6,496,000 CONST 2011 $7,200,000 BP02103255 Lincolnwood Lincolnwood Union Pacific (UP) Rail Line/Weber Spur Bike/Multiuse Trail $5,553 0.129 Total Funding: $4,908,000 CONST $0 ENG-1 2010 $36,000 ROW 2011 $4,800,000 ENG-2 2011 $72,000 BP02103256 Lincolnwood Lincolnwood Commonwealth Edison (ComEd) Utility ROW / Skokie Valley $686 0.155 Total Funding: $816,000 Bike/Multiuse Trail ENG-1 2010 $28,000 ENG-2 2011 $84,000 CONST 2012 $704,000 BP03103250 Arlington Heights McDonald Creek Bike Path Improvements (sidepath and park path) $318 0.105 Total Funding: $242,000 CONST 2010 $242,000 BP04103258 Oak Park Division St from IL 43/Harlem Ave to Austin Blv -- on-street facility $49 0.102 Total Funding: $38,400 ENG-1 2010 $1,600 ENG-2 2010 $4,800 CONST 2010 $32,000 BP04103259 Oak Park Chicago Ave bike lane from IL 43/Harlem Ave to Austin Blv $75 0.115 Total Funding: $65,900 CONST 2010 $54,700 ENG-1 2010 $3,200 ENG-2 2010 $8,000

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning CMAQ Multi-Year Program for Wednesday, September 30, 2009 Page 1 of 7 Northeastern Illinois - FY $/Kilogram Daily VOC Phase/ Project VOC Eliminated Fiscal CMAQ ID Sponsor Description Eliminated (Kilograms) Year Funding

BP04103260 Oak Park Augusta St bike lane from IL 43/Harlem Ave to Austin Blv $13 0.426 Total Funding: $43,200 ENG-2 2010 $5,600 ENG-1 2010 $1,600 CONST 2010 $36,000 BP06103232 Orland Park Commuter & Bicycle Bridge over LaGrange Rd/US 45 at IL 7/Southwest Hwy $4,340 0.035 Total Funding: $664,000 CONST 2011 $664,000 BP09103257 Sleepy Hollow Bike Path (multiuse sidepath) Parallel to Sleepy Hollow Rd south to Township $653 0.018 Total Funding: $91,200 Property ENG-1 2010 $9,600 ENG-2 2011 $9,600 CONST 2011 $72,000 BP10103245 Lake County Prairie Crossing Bike Path/Midlothian Rd sidepath $4,466 0.061 Total Funding: $2,044,800 ENG-2 2010 $134,400 CONST 2011 $1,910,400 BP10103292 Grayslake Washington St Bike Path (sidepath) $1,203 0.082 Total Funding: $760,480 ENG-1 2010 $59,200 ENG-2 2012 $40,000 CONST 2013 $661,280 BP11103286 McHenry County Conservation District Oak St to Veterans Acres Park Bikepath (multi-use) $4,599 0.032 Total Funding: $440,960 CONST 2010 $440,960 Bicycle Parking BP03103375 Arlington Heights Green Bike Facility $7,293 0.009 Total Funding: $112,000 CONST 2010 $112,000 BP05103374 Berwyn Berwyn and Riverside Bicycle Parking and Marketing $2,358 0.006 Total Funding: $25,840 IMP 2010 $25,840 BP13103373 CTA Suburban Station Bike Parking Improvements $581 0.017 Total Funding: $19,200 IMP 2010 $19,200 Bottleneck Elimination BE09103270 Kane County Fabyan Pwy from Nagle Blv to IL 25 $10,468 0.016 Total Funding: $2,060,700 ENG-1 2010 $100,000 ENG-2, ROW 2011 $332,000 CONST 2012 $1,628,700

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning CMAQ Multi-Year Program for Wednesday, September 30, 2009 Page 2 of 7 Northeastern Illinois - FY $/Kilogram Daily VOC Phase/ Project VOC Eliminated Fiscal CMAQ ID Sponsor Description Eliminated (Kilograms) Year Funding

Commuter Parking CP12103230 Romeoville 135th St Metra Parking Lot $431 1.945 Total Funding: $3,420,000 ENG-1 2010 $260,000 ENG-2 2011 $320,000 CONST 2012 $2,840,000 Diesel Emissions Reduction DR01103208 CTA Diesel Particulate Filter Retrofit for CTA Buses $252 10.796 Total Funding: $11,920,000 ENG 2010 $0 ENG 2011 $800,000 IMP 2012 $5,560,000 IMP 2013 $5,560,000 DR01103209 IEPA Retofit of Amtrak Switcher Engines $131 3.132 Total Funding: $1,200,000 IMP 2010 $1,200,000 DR03103210 Hoffman Estates Diesel Fleet Emissions Reduction Project $413 0.131 Total Funding: $221,600 IMP 2010 $221,600 DR04103212 Berkeley Union Pacific Proviso Railyard Switcher Engine Retrofit $168 20.927 Total Funding: $5,200,000 IMP 2010 $0 IMP 2011 $5,200,000 DR06103213 Bedford Park BRC Clearing Yard Switcher Retrofit $183 6.462 Total Funding: $2,798,250 IMP 2010 $0 IMP 2011 $2,798,250 DR07103216 Riverdale CSXT Barr Rail Yard Switch Engine Retrofit $133 12.377 Total Funding: $3,900,000 IMP 2010 $2,925,000 IMP 2011 $975,000 DR10103218 Lake County Diesel Retrofit Project $71 0.107 Total Funding: $23,400 IMP 2010 $23,400 DR13103211 Franklin Park Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Switcher Engine Retrofit $145 2.784 Total Funding: $958,100 IMP 2010 $958,100 DR13103215 Riverdale Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Retrofit $176 11.110 Total Funding: $4,641,000 IMP 2010 $0 IMP 2011 $4,641,000 DR13103219 Cook County Dept of Environmental Control Cook County DPF Diesel Retrofit $110 5.176 Total Funding: $582,738 IMP 2010 $582,738 Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning CMAQ Multi-Year Program for Wednesday, September 30, 2009 Page 3 of 7 Northeastern Illinois - FY $/Kilogram Daily VOC Phase/ Project VOC Eliminated Fiscal CMAQ ID Sponsor Description Eliminated (Kilograms) Year Funding

DR13103220 Pace Diesel Engine Retrofits $539 2.126 Total Funding: $4,680,000 IMP 2010 $2,340,000 IMP 2011 $2,340,000 DR13103221 IEPA Norfolk Southern Railway Co Switchyard Diesel Locomotive Retrofit Project $230 15.459 Total Funding: $3,380,000 IMP 2010 $0 IMP 2011 $3,380,000 DR13103381 Metra Installation of GenSets on Two Metra Switch Engines $857 1.118 Total Funding: $2,800,000 IMP 2010 $0 IMP 2011 $2,800,000 Intersection Improvement II02103274 Glenview Patriot Blv at Independence Ave $1,087 0.070 Total Funding: $256,000 CONST 2010 $256,000 II03103265 Hoffman Estates IL 59 at Shoe Factory Rd $1,967 0.128 Total Funding: $1,024,000 ENG-1 2010 $64,000 ENG-2, ROW 2011 $160,000 CONST 2012 $800,000 II07103282 Tinley Park 183rd St at Oak Park Ave $1,897 0.285 Total Funding: $2,208,000 ENG-1 2011 $144,000 ENG-2 2012 $144,000 ROW 2013 $320,000 CONST 2014 $1,600,000 Other OT13103354 IDOT I-55 from Naperville Rd to Lorenzo Rd Expansion of Congestion Monitoring, $378 6.484 Total Funding: $2,760,000 Incidence Detection and Traveler Information CONST 2010 $0 IMP 2011 $0 IMP 2012 $2,760,000 OT13103355 CDOE Metropolitan Mayors Caucus Idling Reduction Program-Year 1 $22 53.513 Total Funding: $140,600 IMP 2010 $140,600 OT13103356 RTA Clean Air Commuter Challenge $813 2.090 Total Funding: $326,400 IMP 2010 $326,400

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning CMAQ Multi-Year Program for Wednesday, September 30, 2009 Page 4 of 7 Northeastern Illinois - FY $/Kilogram Daily VOC Phase/ Project VOC Eliminated Fiscal CMAQ ID Sponsor Description Eliminated (Kilograms) Year Funding

OT13103357 IEPA Northeastern Illinois Public Information and Education Campaign for Clean Air $162 470.284 Total Funding: $1,100,000 IMP 2010 $550,000 IMP 2011 $550,000 Pedestrian BP01103324 CDOT "Safe Routes to HIGH SCHOOLS" - Citywide $114 0.901 Total Funding: $984,000 ENG-2 2010 $192,000 IMP 2010 $100,000 CONST 2011 $692,000 BP01103327 CDOT "Walk-to-Transit" Series 2 (Ped improvements near 5 CTA Stations) $93 1.087 Total Funding: $848,000 ENG-2 2011 $160,000 IMP 2011 $0 CONST 2012 $688,000 BP02103337 Glenview South Greenwood Rd sidewalks from Linneman St to Glenview Rd $447 0.027 Total Funding: $107,680 CONST 2010 $107,680 BP06103323 Worth Southwest Highway/IL 7 Sidewalks - 76th Ave to IL 43/Harlem Ave $1,354 0.021 Total Funding: $275,000 ENG-2 2010 $22,200 CONST 2010 $252,800 BP07103343 Oak Forest 158th St and 155th St Sidewalk Project between Laramie Ave and Cicero Ave $1,085 0.019 Total Funding: $138,400 CONST 2010 $138,400 BP08103342 Bensenville Jefferson St Sidewalk Improvements Evergreen St to York Rd $981 0.028 Total Funding: $259,200 ENG-2 2010 $21,600 CONST 2011 $237,600 BP10103333 Round Lake Park IL 134/Main Street Sidewalk Project from west village limit to east village limit $1,534 0.019 Total Funding: $268,000 ENG-1 2009 $7,000 ENG-2 2010 $0 CONST 2011 $261,000 Signal Interconnect SI02103385 Evanston Sheridan Rd from Central St to Chicago Ave $1,305 0.135 Total Funding: $674,000 CONST 2011 $674,000 SI07103407 IDOT Lincoln Highway from Chicago Rd to State St $485 0.221 Total Funding: $408,000 CONST 2010 $408,000

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning CMAQ Multi-Year Program for Wednesday, September 30, 2009 Page 5 of 7 Northeastern Illinois - FY $/Kilogram Daily VOC Phase/ Project VOC Eliminated Fiscal CMAQ ID Sponsor Description Eliminated (Kilograms) Year Funding

SI08103387 DuPage County DOT Geneva Rd from President St to Swift Rd $606 0.196 Total Funding: $484,000 ENG-2 2010 $32,000 CONST 2011 $452,000 SI08103388 DuPage County DOT Glen Ellyn Rd from Army Trail Rd to Armitage Ave $550 0.196 Total Funding: $440,000 ENG-2 2010 $32,000 CONST 2011 $408,000 SI09103383 Aurora Farnsworth Ave from Molitor/Diehl Rd to E New York St $665 0.396 Total Funding: $1,076,000 CONST 2010 $0 ENG-2 2010 $80,000 CONST 2011 $996,000 SI09103386 St. Charles IL 64 from Tyler Rd to 7th Ave $143 0.192 Total Funding: $112,000 ENG-2 2010 $12,800 CONST 2011 $99,200 SI09103391 Kane County DOT Dunham Rd/Kirk Rd from Stearns Rd to IL 56/Butterfield Rd $387 1.100 Total Funding: $1,736,800 ENG-2 2010 $120,000 CONST 2011 $1,616,800 SI10103406 Lake County DOT Highland Park Interconnect $1,227 0.576 Total Funding: $2,723,000 CONST 2011 $2,723,000 Transit Facility Improvement TI01103362 CDOT Clark/Division Station Improvement - Red Line $7,492 0.860 Total Funding: $31,360,000 CONST 2010 $0 CONST 2011 $20,000,000 CONST 2012 $11,360,000 TI04103360 Oak Park Village Wide Bus Shelters $677 0.116 Total Funding: $79,700 ENG-1, ENG-2, CONST 2010 $79,700 TI12103365 Romeoville New Romeoville Metra Station and Parking $65 1.509 Total Funding: $1,012,000 ENG-1 2010 $80,000 ENG-2 2011 $120,000 CONST 2013 $812,000 Transit Service and Equipment TI01103366 CTA University Pass Program $508 2.059 Total Funding: $640,000 IMP 2010 $640,000

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning CMAQ Multi-Year Program for Wednesday, September 30, 2009 Page 6 of 7 Northeastern Illinois - FY $/Kilogram Daily VOC Phase/ Project VOC Eliminated Fiscal CMAQ ID Sponsor Description Eliminated (Kilograms) Year Funding

TI01103370 CTA Purple Line Weekend Express Service $236 9.789 Total Funding: $361,708 IMP 2010 $361,708 TI02103371 CTA CTA Yellow Line Rail Branch-Weekend Service Year 3 $183 6.987 Total Funding: $223,374 IMP 2010 $223,374 TI13103372 Pace Vans for the Pace Vanpool Program $934 10.888 Total Funding: $5,439,148 IMP 2010 $0 IMP 2011 $5,439,148

80 total projects CMAQ Program Total (FFY 201020112012 program items only): 0.000 $0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning CMAQ Multi-Year Program for Wednesday, September 30, 2009 Page 7 of 7 Northeastern Illinois - FY Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning FY 2010 - 2011 CMAQ Multi-Year B List

SubType Council Group CMAQ ID Sponsor Facility to be Improved Project Total Application Federal Proposed MYB Total Bicycle Facilities Northwest Mayors/Other Local BP03103261 Des Plaines Des Plaines River Trail Improvements from Touhy Ave to Algonquin Rd $994,600 $712,500 $712,500 Bicycle Facilities Northwest Mayors/Other Local BP03103304 Hoffman Estates Harmon Blv / Huntington ROW / Huntington Blv from Bode Rd to Hassell Rd $402,000 $280,000 $280,000 Bicycle Facilities Northwest Mayors/Other Local BP03103248 Schaumburg Martingale Road Bikeway $1,567,000 $1,254,000 $1,254,000 Bicycle Facilities DuPage Mayors/Other Local BP08103297 Carol Stream Fair Oaks Rd Sidepath from St Charles Rd to Oxford St $1,939,250 $386,500 $386,500 Bicycle Facilities Northwest Mayors/Other Local BP03103302 Rolling Meadows Rolling Meadows-Euclid Ave Bike Path From Plum Grove Road to Hicks Road $442,000 $32,000 $32,000 Bicycle Facilities Lake Mayors/Other Local BP10103253 Mundelein Mudelein Bike (Multiuse) Trail System sidepath (Butterfield Rd) $417,400 $333,900 $333,900 Bicycle Facilities McHenry Mayors/Other Local BP11103291 Lakewood Huntley Rd Bikepath Improvements (on-street bike lanes) $939,000 $751,200 $751,200 Bicycle Facilities Will Mayors/Other Local BP12103294 Lockport Division St / Farrell Rd Bicycle and Pedestrian facilty Improvement Project (from Briggs St w to Farrell, then north to 7th st) $341,500 $265,200 $265,200 Bicycle Facilities Northwest Mayors/Other Local BP03103300 Rolling Meadows Quentin Rd Bike Path from Silentbrook Ln to Hartung Rd $730,000 $72,000 $72,000 Bicycle Facilities Will Mayors/Other Local BP12103243 Homer Glen Homer Glen Community Trail - South Extension $1,521,000 $1,216,800 $1,216,800 Bicycle Facilities North Shore Mayors/Other Local BP02103298 Wilmette Skokie Valley Trail from Lake Cook Rd to Old Orchard Rd $4,727,000 $321,000 $321,000 Bicycle Facilities Northwest Mayors/Other Local BP03103301 Rolling Meadows Euclid Ave Bike Path from Rohlwing Rd to Salt Creek Ln $597,000 $72,000 $72,000 Bicycle Facilities Kane Mayors/Other Local BP09103241 Yorkville IL 47/Bridge St sidepath from IL 71 to Kennedy Rd $909,120 $727,296 $727,296 Bicycle Facilities Northwest Mayors/Other Local BP03103303 Hoffman Estates I-90 Bicycle/Pedestrian Underpass at CN Railroad ROW $437,000 $334,400 $668,800 Bicycle Facilities DuPage Mayors/Other Local BP08103237 Bensenville Redmond Park Bike-Ped Path Improvements $551,200 $440,960 $881,920 Bicycle Facilities Northwest Mayors/Other Local BP03103254 Mount Prospect Bike/Ped Bridge across US 14 (Northwest Highway) and Union Pacific RR tracks $2,909,500 $2,327,600 $2,327,600 Commuter Parking Kane Mayors/Other Local CP09103229 Aurora Route 59 Commuter Station Parking Lot Addition at Meridian Dr $1,928,000 $1,382,000 $1,382,000 Diesel Emissions Reduction Regionwide Other DR13103221 IEPA Norfolk Southern Railway Co Switchyard Diesel Locomotive Retrofit Project $13,000,000 $8,450,000 $5,070,000 Intersection Improvement North Shore IDOT II02103313 IDOT Golf Rd at Harms Rd $828,000 $576,000 $576,000 Intersection Improvement Kane IDOT II09103335 IDOT IL 31 at Big Timber Rd $1,380,000 $960,000 $960,000 Intersection Improvement Northwest IDOT II03103317 IDOT IL 59 at W Bartlett Rd $828,000 $576,000 $576,000 Intersection Improvement South IDOT II07103320 IDOT IL 394 at Sauk Trail $932,000 $648,000 $648,000 Intersection Improvement Lake IDOT II10103341 IDOT IL 176 at Roberts Rd $690,000 $480,000 $480,000 Intersection Improvement Kane IDOT II09103336 IDOT IL 56 at Hart Rd/Mitchell Rd $828,000 $576,000 $576,000 Intersection Improvement North Shore IDOT II02103312 IDOT Willow Rd at Pfingsten Rd $828,000 $576,000 $576,000 Intersection Improvement Northwest IDOT II03103314 IDOT US 20 from Bartlett Rd to Oak Ave $1,104,000 $768,000 $768,000 Intersection Improvement Northwest IDOT II03103316 IDOT IL 62 at New Wilke Rd $888,000 $576,000 $576,000 Intersection Improvement DuPage Counties II08103277 DuPage County DOT 75th St from Cass Ave to Plainfield Rd $12,642,085 $9,729,600 $9,729,600 Other Regionwide IDOT OT13103354 IDOT I-55 from Naperville Rd to Lorenzo Rd Expansion of Congestion Monitoring, Incidence Detection and Traveler Information $6,250,000 $5,000,000 $2,240,000 Pedestrian Southwest Mayors/Other Local BP06103322 Worth 111th St sidewalks -- 76th Ave to Octavio Ave $313,000 $219,000 $219,000 Signal Interconnect Kane Counties SI09103390 Kane County DOT IL 25 from New Stearns Rd to Stearns/Dunham Rd $205,700 $156,700 $156,700 Signal Interconnect Northwest IDOT SI03103382 IDOT Greenwood from Ballard Rd to Dempster St $200,000 $160,000 $160,000 Signal Interconnect Lake Counties SI10103394 Lake County DOT Sheridan Rd from Wadsworth Rd to Grand Ave $2,747,800 $2,198,200 $2,198,200 Signal Interconnect Lake Counties SI10103392 Lake County DOT Cedar Lake Rd from Rollins Rd to S Rosedale Ct $867,140 $693,700 $693,700 Signal Interconnect Lake Counties SI10103395 Lake County DOT Quentin Rd from Old McHenry to Ensell Rd $580,100 $464,100 $464,100 Signal Interconnect Lake Counties SI10103393 Lake County DOT Waukegan Rd from Casimir Pulaski Dr to Norman Dr South $1,107,900 $886,300 $886,300 Transit Service and EquipmentChicago CTA TI01103369 CTA 79th Street/87th St Corridor Express Bus Service $2,420,000 $1,936,000 $1,936,000 Transit Service and EquipmentChicago CTA TI01103368 CTA North Ave/Chicago Ave Corridor Express Bus Service 2200000 1760000 1760000 Transit Service and EquipmentChicago CTA TI01103367 CTA Bus Route Improvements-#47 47th, #50 Damen, #52 Kedzie/California, #59 59th/61st, #73 Armitage and #152 -Year 2 $1,315,000 $1,052,000 $1,052,000 $73,507,295 $49,350,956 $43,986,316

S:\AdminGroups\PlanningProgramming\TIP\CMAQ\FY 2010 Program Development\documents\Program\proposed B list 2010 09-08-13 9/23/2009 233 South Wacker Drive Suite 800, Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606

312-454-0400 (voice) 312-454-0411 (fax) www.cmap.illinois.gov

MEMORANDUM

To: MPO Policy Committee

Date: October 1, 2009

From: Bob Dean, Principal Regional Planner

Re: GO TO 2040 Endorsement Schedule

Below is the anticipated schedule for the approval of the GO TO 2040 plan and the endorsement of interim products including the preferred scenario, major capital project selection, and the draft plan. This schedule is a draft and is subject to change if needed. Please note that the approval of the final plan in October 2010 is required by federal law and cannot be postponed.

Transportation Planning MPO Board

Preferred scenario Oct. 2009 Oct. 2009 Introduce and discuss Sept. 2009 Oct. 2009 (special mtg.) (special mtg.) Nov. 2009 or Nov. 2009 or Endorse Jan. 2010 Jan. 2010 Jan. 2010 Jan. 2010

Major capital project evaluation finance and results Introduce Sept. 2009 Nov. 2009 Oct. 2009 Nov. 2009 Discuss, including draft Nov. 2009 and Jan. 2010 Jan. 2010 Jan. 2010 recommendation Jan. 2010 Endorse Mar. 2010 Mar. 2010 Mar. 2010 Apr. 2010

Draft plan Mar. and Apr. Apr. 2010 Introduce and discuss Mar. 2010 Mar. 2010 2010 (special mtg.) Endorse for release May 2010

Final plan Approve Sept. 2010 Sept. 2010 Oct. 2010 Oct. 2010

ACTION REQUESTED: Information.

1

233 South Wacker Drive Suite 800, Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606

312-454-0400 (voice) 312-454-0411 (fax) www.cmap.illinois.gov

MEMORANDUM

To: MPO Policy Committee

Date: October 1, 2009

From: Erin Aleman, Senior Regional Planner

Re: GO TO 2040 Public Engagement Results

The main public engagement phase of GO TO 2040, termed ‚Invent the Future,‛ was kicked off in June and is now reaching a conclusion. This memo describes:

Public engagement activities and participation levels Promotion methods and media coverage Results of public engagement Several attachments listing workshops, fairs and festivals attended, kiosk locations, and media coverage are included at the end of the memo

The contents of this memo will be reformatted as a report on the ‚Invent the Future‛ public engagement work which will be included as an appendix of the preferred scenario, one of the interim products of GO TO 2040.

ACTION REQUESTED: Information.

1 Public Engagement Activities and Participation Levels

The GO TO 2040 public engagement activities provided a variety of opportunities for involvement. Participants could choose their depth of participation, with options ranging from taking a two-question survey to exploring CMAP’s scenario evaluation results in detail. Opportunities were available for face-to-face contact at workshops or online participation that did not require direct interaction.

Public engagement activities were widely distributed across the region, as shown in the map below.

2 The primary public engagement tool used during the summer was an interactive software, called MetroQuest, that let users experiment with different types of transportation investments and development patterns and view the outcomes of these decisions. The software visually illustrates the relationships between land use and transportation and depicts the impact of these choices on the region. This software was used at public meetings, on the web, and also in stand-alone kiosks.

Public engagement activities during summer 2009 included the following, each of which is described in more detail below: Public workshops Fairs and festivals Kiosks Online participation Other activities

Public workshops Over fifty workshops have been held since the beginning of the ‚Invent the Future‛ process, with three more scheduled in early September. A full list of these workshops is attached. In addition, several abbreviated presentations were done as part of larger conferences or events; these included the Illinois Humanities Council on June 30, the Illinois Development Council’s annual conference on July 16, at the Will County Center for Economic Development Board meeting on August 21, and at several CMAP committee meetings.

In total, over 1,300 people attended a full workshop, and several hundred others were reached through the abbreviated presentations. Average workshop attendance was 25, with attendance exceeding 50 at workshops in Oak Park, Joliet, and Chicago’s south side. A full list of workshops and attendance at each is attached.

At each workshop, attendees used keypad polling devices to answer several questions concerning development patterns, transportation investments, and environmental programs, and then used the MetroQuest software to view the impact of their choices on key outcomes such as economic performance, land consumption, and traffic congestion. The workshop format allowed participants to set priorities and then explore alternative future scenarios to see which policy choices could meet their goals. After each meeting, workshop attendees were sent

3 a link to the group's scenario that could be forwarded to friends, family, and co-workers. A video describing the purpose and format of the workshops is available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xt1MyZJkza4

Fairs and festivals Staff attended numerous county fairs and other public events over summer; a full list of these is attached. At each, CMAP had a booth with information about GO TO 2040 and other CMAP initiatives. Brief, two-question surveys were distributed to interested passers-by, and more than 2,800 completed surveys were received. Also, many people stopped by the CMAP booth to ask questions or discuss CMAP’s activities but did not complete surveys.

Kiosks To encourage broad participation in the GO TO 2040 process, kiosks were installed in several locations around the region. A list of locations and dates is attached. Following a short introductory video (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56FW_iu0Qz4&NR), the kiosks introduced participants to the idea of long-range regional planning and asked them to answer two questions concerning development patterns and transportation investment (the questions were identical to the brief survey distributed at festivals). The kiosk then described the results of the choices made on congestion, air quality, and fiscal health, and promoted the GO TO 2040 website as an opportunity for deeper involvement.

Based on usage data periodically collected from the kiosks, it is estimated that over 20,000 individuals began kiosk sessions, and approximately 12,000 answered both survey questions and completed the kiosk session. The kiosks were primarily meant for educational purposes, but the responses to the survey questions were also collected.

4

Online participation During the public engagement phase, CMAP also had several online public engagement opportunities. An online version of the MetroQuest software used in the public workshops was available, and additional analysis of the scenario evaluation process was also available on the GO TO 2040 website during this period.

MetroQuest online software The primary mode of online participation was the web version of the MetroQuest software. It provides the same options as the software used in the public workshops, but is designed for individual unfacilitated use. Visitors can explore the impacts that development patterns, transportation investments, and environmental policies have on key outcomes, and can compare scenarios that they develop to some sample scenarios created by CMAP.

Since its launch in late May, this website has received around 2,200 visitors (excluding visitors who do not go beyond the introductory screen). Over 300 of these visitors have submitted ratings for scenarios that they created; other visitors appear to be exploring the software but not submitting input.

Distinct ‚spikes‛ in the use of MetroQuest were observed on July 2, August 5, and August 19; these corresponded directly to media coverage of the GO TO 2040 process and the online software in particular. The most common locations from which this website has been visited were Chicago, Elmhurst, Naperville, and Evanston.

GO TO 2040 website During the summer, the GO TO 2040 website, www.goto2040.org, was used to provide more information about CMAP’s public engagement activities. Approximately 10,000 unique visitors are estimated to have visited this website since June, with a total of over 50,000 pageviews (a common metric to evaluate website usage) during this period. The most popular content included the ‚Invent the Future‛ workshop schedule and the results of the design workshops, described later in this memo.

A technical website was launched on June 10 to provide more detail about CMAP’s scenario analysis work. This website, www.goto2040.org/scenarios, describes each of the alternative scenarios created by CMAP, provides the results of internal evaluation of these scenarios’ effects, and also identifies major capital projects that will be evaluated as a later phase in the process. This part of the GO TO 2040 website has attracted 10,000 pageviews since June 10.

5

The website seems to have attracted attention from other parts of the country; the most common locations from which it was visited are Chicago, New York, Naperville, and Washington DC.

Other activities A series of design workshops occurred in the spring and summer to ‚translate‛ how regional scenarios might affect local communities. With the help of several architecture and design firms, illustrations were created for a number of communities across the region to show how alternative scenarios would affect particular sites within these communities. Several of the resulting illustrations are shown on the following page, and the full results of these workshops are available online at http://www.goto2040.org/scenarios/des ignworkshops/main/.

6

Additionally, a series of six posters was created to drive interest in the GO TO 2040 process. These were displayed on several Pace bus routes and also distributed to partner organizations for their use. In total, approximately 10,000 posters are estimated to have been displayed this summer. These posters can be viewed at: http://www.goto2040.org/blogs/blog.aspx?id=15338&blogid=618

7 Promotion Methods and Media Coverage

A concerted effort was made to promote Invent the Future using "old" and new media. On June 1, CMAP issued a press release (http://bit.ly/7rymy) announcing the new outreach effort. On June 4, CMAP Board chairman Gerald Bennett was on WTTW's Chicago Tonight (http://bit.ly/T00YL). On that same date, the Chicago Tribune also ran a story (http://bit.ly/h5Ksg) that eventually appeared in most local suburban sections of the paper.

TimeOut Chicago ran an illustrated story in the first week of July (http://bit.ly/1V18q2 and at right) that featured comments by average residents who had tried CMAP's MetroQuest software. Other coverage included the Sun-Times News Group, the Sun newspapers, Daily Herald, Northwest Herald, the Pioneer Press newspapers, the Suburban Life newspapers, the Business Ledger, the Drive 97.1 FM, and WCPT-820AM (Mike Nowak interview with Randy at http://bit.ly/2ZsQ0q).

ABC-7 (see http://bit.ly/11Q5OJ and image below, at right) aired a Frank Mathie interview with Randy Blankenhorn and CMAP summer intern Daniel Burnham V. In addition to news coverage, numerous routine calendar listings appeared regularly in local newspapers and websites across the region. For links and other details, see the attached list of Invent the Future media coverage

Special emphasis on getting coverage from bloggers and partners sites yield coverage at "new media" sites such as Chicago Now's "On Ramp," Chicago Content, Chicago Now, Chi-Town Daily News, Community Media Workshop, Evanston Now, Explore Chicago, Gapers Block, Hyde Park Progress, Next American City, the Urbanophile, and the Woodstock Advocate and the Windy Citizen.

Many partners helped get the word out, including the Active Transportation Alliance, Alliance for Public Transportation, Car Free Chicago, Chicago Wilderness, DevCorp North, Environmental Defenders of McHenry County, Metropolitan Mayor's Caucus, and the Metropolitan Planning Council. Former Tribune reporter Pat Reardon wrote extensively about CMAP and GO TO 2040 in multiple entries at the Burnham Centennial blog (http://bit.ly/kxvbG).

8

Among the non-traditional mechanisms for getting the word out, staff have created GO TO 2040 pages on YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/goto2040), Facebook (http://bit.ly/Vq2xJ), Twitter (http://twitter.com/goto2040), Flickr (http://www.flickr.com/photos/go_to_2040/) and the CMAP and GO TO 2040 blogs. In addition to promoting Invent the Future in Randy Blankenhorn's weekly email updates, staff used Constant Contact "e- blast" software to send many dozens of targeted email announcements for the workshops and on-line tools.

To stimulate coverage midway through the input phase, CMAP issued a summary (http://bit.ly/f8Mj7) of input to date, which prompted another Tribune story (see image at right and http://bit.ly/4sqxP) that featured a large color photo from a workshop on the front page of Chicagoland Extra north editions and on the web.

9 Feedback Received through Public Involvement

At the workshops and through the online software, participants are asked to make choices concerning future development density and location, roadway and transit investment, support for alternative transportation, and environmental policy. It should be noted that the responses collected and shown here are not meant to be used as statistically valid survey results, because participants cannot be assumed to be representative of the region.

Common themes in workshop discussions Each workshop began by asking participants to be proactive and think about what 2040 should look like, keeping in mind the projected growth of the region’s population. Several themes arose in discussions at every workshop no matter where the workshop was held. People wanted more transit options (even if it cost more), safer communities, effective schools, and a reduction in energy and water use.

One theme was increased transit options across the region. Participants expressed a desire for faster public transportation options that are clean, ‚green‛, and safe. In addition to more public transportation there was also a desire for more walkable and bike-friendly communities. Participants told us that if there were faster, seamless, and more accessible transportation options they would take them.

Another theme that was brought up at almost every workshop was the desire to have better educational opportunities across the board. Participants wanted 21st century educational facilities as well as better quality school systems. Conversations ranged from K- 12 school systems to workforce development opportunities.

Energy, air quality and water consumption were also major players in workshop conversations. Participants expressed that there is a need for greater conservation with an increasing population. As a solution to the current trend projections participants discussed implementing ‚green‛ building standards, increase alternative energy sources, and the pros and cons of paying the true cost of using water.

Workshop and online results The most surprising outcome of the workshops has been the similarities in results across the region. At the public workshops, regardless of where in the region they were held, most respondents selected a future with moderately higher densities than today and with development focused in community and metropolitan centers. There has been consistent support for high levels of transit investment and support for alternative modes. Mixed results were received on road investment. Maximizing environmental policies received strong support at the workshops. On the whole, workshop participants were intrigued to see that compact development had an impact on almost every indicator. Conversations resulting from this observation led to greater compromise as to which future development choice was ultimately made.

10 The following charts show the responses gathered at workshops and online to the six questions asked within the MetroQuest software. These are based on approximately 1,600 responses.

The first question asked what type of development is preferred in planning for the projected growth of the region. Participants had four answer choices: low density, current patterns of growth, moderately compact growth, or highly compact growth. Fifty-five percent of workshop and online respondents preferred a future with moderately higher densities than today.

The second question involved the location of new development. The first answer choice, unfocused, would allow development to occur all across the region from rural to urban areas. The second choice was to focus development in existing communities, both large and small. And the third option was to only focus new development in major metropolitan centers. Sixty- nine percent of respondents preferred to focus new development in both community and metropolitan centers.

11

Participants were then asked how much we should invest in the existing road network. Choices ranged from minimum spending which would support basic maintenance to maximizing spending. This question received the most varied results. At workshops some participants voiced that if we invest in transit perhaps we should spend less on roads. Other participants wanted to maximize spending on roads because they wanted to reduce congestion on the existing road network.

Overwhelmingly participants we engaged wanted to maximize spending on transit across the region. Only five percent of participants wanted to keep transit spending at a minimum.

12

The fifth question asked about support for policies that encourage alternative transportation, rather than driving. Participants favored a variety of transportation options, from driving, to trains and buses, to cycling and walking. Forty percent of participants wanted to increase alternative transportation policies and fifty percent of respondents expressed a desire to maximize alternatives and actively de-emphasize driving.

The final question that was asked addressed our air quality, water quality, energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Participants were very supportive of maximizing policies to become more sustainable and reduce the consumption of our natural resources.

13 Participants at several workshops were also asked to identify which of several evaluation measures was most important to them. 1 The results of this choice are shown below.

For this question participants were allowed to select a total of two indicators out of the ten that were discussed at each workshop. The top four indicators chosen at workshops were regional economy (212), land consumption (207), transportation choice (172), and energy reduction (160).

1 Eleven out of the fifty-seven workshops did not answer this question due to time constraints at the workshop.

14 Kiosk and festival survey results Input was also collected through the kiosks and surveys distributed at fairs and festivals. Two questions are asked through the kiosks and surveys. The first concerns development location, and asks whether development should be focused in metropolitan centers, community centers, or unfocused; and one asks whether transportation investment should be focused on roads, transit, or combined roads and transit.

The chart below shows the responses to these questions. The most common response involves development in community centers and a focus on investment in both roads and transit. Overall, most respondents selected development in community or metropolitan centers, as well as prioritization of transportation investment on either transit or combined roads and transit. These results are based on over 10,000 responses.

3500

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000 Combined focus 500 Transit focus 0 Automobile focus Unfocused Community centers Metropolitan centers

15 Attachments

Workshop Locations

Date Location Attendance Thursday, June 04, 2009 Oak Park 58 Tuesday, June 09, 2009 Vernon Hills 34 Wednesday, June 10, 2009 Logan Square, Chicago 44 Monday, June 15, 2009 Northbrook 30 Tuesday, June 16, 2009 Glenview 13 Thursday, June 18, 2009 Carol Stream 9 Tuesday, June 23, 2009 Beecher 26 Tuesday, June 23, 2009 Wheaton 11 Wednesday, June 24, 2009 Naperville 28 Thursday, June 25, 2009 Crystal Lake 32 Saturday, July 11, 2009 Brainerd, Chicago 52 Wednesday, July 15, 2009 Avalon Park 27 Wednesday, July 15, 2009 Sugar Grove 22 Thursday, July 16, 2009 Riverside 22 Friday, July 17, 2009 Loop, Chicago 16 Thursday, July 16, 2009 Lisle 22 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 Elgin 29 Wednesday, July 22, 2009 Pullman, Chicago 22 Thursday, July 23, 2009 East Hazel Crest 22 Thursday, July 23, 2009 Back of the Yards, Chicago 21 Tuesday, July 28, 2009 Rogers Park, Chicago 15 Wednesday, July 29, 2009 Loop, Chicago 14 Wednesday, July 29, 2009 West Chicago 9 Thursday, July 30, 2009 Village of Bartlett 11 Thursday, July 30, 2009 Tinley Park 14 Tuesday, August 04, 2009 Bronzeville, Chicago 9 Wednesday, August 05, 2009 Harvard 22 Thursday, August 06, 2009 Schaumburg 15 Tuesday, August 11, 2009 Chatham, Chicago 37 Tuesday, August 11, 2009 Joliet 55 Tuesday, August 11, 2009 Geneva 27 Wednesday, August 12, 2009 Yorkville 49 Thursday, August 13, 2009 Barrington 22 Thursday, August 13, 2009 Garfield Park, Chicago 18 Friday, August 14, 2009 Loop, Chicago 25 Tuesday, August 18, 2009 Berkeley 10 Tuesday, August 18, 2009 Arlington Heights 22 Elmwood Park Wednesday, August 19, 2009 12

16

Workshop Locations (continued)

Date Location Attendance Thursday, August 20, 2009 Lansing 13 Thursday, August 20, 2009 Roseland, Chicago 36 Thursday, August 20, 2009 Fox Lake 22 Thursday, August 20, 2009 Evanston Civic Center 39 Friday, August 21, 2009 Joliet 42 Saturday, August 22, 2009 Loop, Chicago 10 Monday, August 24, 2009 Downtown Chicago 16 Tuesday, August 25, 2009 Grayslake 20 Tuesday, August 25, 2009 Downtown Chicago 16 Tuesday, August 25, 2009 Downtown Chicago 32 Wednesday, August 26, 2009 Montgomery 36 Wednesday, August 26, 2009 Palos Hills 10 Thursday, August 27, 2009 Hegewisch, Chicago 17 Thursday, August 27, 2009 Lisle 46 Monday, August 31, 2009 Cicero 25 Tuesday, September 1, 2009 Aurora 16 Thursday, September 3, 2009 UIC/Greektown, Chicago Thursday, September 3, 2009 Little Village/Pilsen, Chicago Thursday, September 10, 2009 Chicago, 6th Ward Total 1322

17 Fairs and Festivals

JUNE Event Date Location Matteson Festival June 12-14 Memorial Park Villa Park SummerFest 2009 June 20th Ardmore Business District Downers Grove Heritage Festival June 26th Downtown Downers Grove JULY/AUG Event Date Location Kane County Fair July 15-19 Kane County Fairgrounds Streamwood Celebration July 24-26 Hoosier Grove Park Kendall County Fair July 30-Aug. 2 Kendall County Fairgrounds DuPage County Fair July 22-26 DuPage County Fairgrounds Lake County Fair July 28-Aug. 2 Lake County Fairgrounds AUGUST Event Date Location Joliet JackHammers Aug. 1 Silver Cross Field Community Days North Chicago Aug. 1 North Chicago Joliet JackHammers Aug. 10 Silver Cross Field McHenry County Fair Aug. 5-9 McHenryCounty Fairgrounds Will County Fair Aug 26-30 Will County Fairgrounds SEPTEMBER Event Date Location Logan Square Farmers Market Sept 6 Logan/Diversey Aurora Hispanic Heritage Advisory Board: Fiesta de Luces Sept. 19 Aurora

18 Kiosk Locations

Arrival Date End Date Location City 6/8/2009 6/26/2009 Naperville City Hall Naperville 6/8/2009 6/26/2009 Blue Island Library Blue Island 6/26/2009 7/17/2009 Governors State University University Park 7/6/2009 7/10/2009 Lansing Public Library Lansing 7/14/2009 7/24/2009 Warren-Newport Library Gurnee 7/20/2009 7/24/2009 Gail Borden Public Library Elgin 7/27/2009 7/31/2009 Lake Forest Public Library Lake Forest 7/27/2009 8/3/2009 Arlington Heights Public Library Arlington Heights 8/3/2009 8/7/2009 Prairie Center for the Arts Schaumburg 8/3/2009 8/14/2009 Woodstock Library Woodstock 8/10/2009 8/14/2009 Yorkville Library Yorkville 8/17/2009 8/21/2009 Antioch Public Library Antioch 8/17/2009 8/31/2009 Kaneville Public Library Kaneville 8/24/2009 8/31/2009 Village of Montgomery Montgomery 9/1/2009 10/4/2009 Chicago Tourism Center Gallery Chicago 9/1/2009 9/14/2009* Beverly/99th Street Metra Station Chicago 9/4/2009 9/11/2009 Lewis University Romeoville 5/29/2009 9/1/2009 Sears Tower Lobby Chicago 6/5/2009 11/23/2009 Chicago Architecture Foundation Chicago 5/29/2009 9/30/2009 Millennium Park Pavillions Chicago

19 Media Coverage

Date Name Specific URL Title Fox River Ecosystem 3/10 Partnership http://www.foxriverecosystem.org/Downstream2-27-09.htm FREP Newsletter Sun-Times News http://www.pioneerlocal.com/oakpark/business/1586066,oak-park- "Business Briefs: Public input needed June 4 at 5/28 Group bizbriefs-052809-s1.article Unity" 6/1 The Drive 97.1 http://www.wdrv.com/events.php/drivein/golf.php "CMAP 'Invent the Future' Workshops" Community 6/3 Media Workshop http://communitymediaworkshop.org/newstips/?p=624 "GO TO 2040" http://www.triblocal.com/Wheaton/List_View/view.html?type=storie "Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning 6/4 Chicago Tribune s&action=detail&sub_id=72286 asks residents to help plan for the future" WTTW Chanel 11 "Metro Agency for Planning: Preparing for the 6/4 News http://www.wttw.com/main.taf?p=42,8,8&vid=060409b Increasing Population" Sun-Times News http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/beaconnews/news/1608440, "Yorkville ponders its future as a 21st-century 6/5 Group 2_1_AU05_YORKVILLE_S1-090605.article river town" Sun-Times News http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/1610571, "Yorkville ponders its future as a 21st-century 6/7 Group 4_1_JO07_YORKFUTURE_S1-090607.article river town" Sun-Times News http://www.pioneerlocal.com/oakpark/lifestyles/currents/1613232,o "Oak Park & River Forest Community Calendar 6/8 Group ak-park-calendar-060409-s1.article " Wednesday Journal of Oak Park and River http://wednesdayjournalonline.com/main.asp?Search=1&ArticleID=1 6/9 Forest 4787&SectionID=1&SubSectionID=1&S=1 "Oak Parkers asked to 'picture the future'" Chi-Town Daily http://www.chitowndailynews.org/Chicago_news/Residents_invited_ 6/9 News to_help_plan_citys_future,28296 "Residents invited to help plan city's future" "Website and kiosks allow Chicagoans to help 6/9 Chicago Content http://www.chicagocontent.com/?p=21916 plan the city’s future" "City of Naperville and CMAP Invite the Public 6/9 City of Naperville http://www.naperville.il.us/dynamic_content.aspx?id=12470 to Help Invent the Future" The Windy http://www.windycitizen.com/chicago/local/2009/06/09/website- "Website and kiosks allow Chicagoans to help 6/10 Citizen and-kiosks-allow-chicagoans-to-help-plan-the-citys-future plan the city's future" Next American 6/10 City http://americancity.org/daily/entry/1645/ "My Space" 6/10 Sun-Times News http://www.pioneerlocal.com/vernonhills/news/1616408,lake- "Planning group warns of explosive growth"

20 Group county-cmapmeeting-061109-s1.article Sun-Times News http://www.pioneerlocal.com/lakeforest/news/1616408,lake-county- 6/10 Group cmapmeeting-061109-s1.article "Planning group warns of explosive growth" Sun-Times News http://www.pioneerlocal.com/lakevilla/news/1616408,lake-county- 6/10 Group cmapmeeting-061109-s1.article "Planning group warns of explosive growth" Sun-Times News http://www.pioneerlocal.com/libertyville/news/1616408,lake- 6/10 Group county-cmapmeeting-061109-s1.article "Planning group warns of explosive growth" Sun-Times News http://www.pioneerlocal.com/highlandpark/news/1616408,lake- 6/10 Group county-cmapmeeting-061109-s1.article "Planning group warns of explosive growth" Sun-Times News http://www.pioneerlocal.com/grayslake/news/1616408,lake-county- 6/10 Group cmapmeeting-061109-s1.article "Planning group warns of explosive growth" http://gapersblock.com/mechanics/2009/06/11/the-chicago- "The Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning 6/11 Gapers Block metropolitan-agenc/ Wants Me To Design Our Future" http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/napervillesun/news/161877 6/12 Naperville Sun 4,naperville-city-briefs_na061209.article Local News Briefs DuPage Library http://dls.typepad.com/news/2009/06/libraries-invited-to-help- 6/12 System invent-the-future.html "Libraries Invited to Help Invent the Future" http://theurbanophile.blogspot.com/2009/06/midwest- 6/12 The Urbanophile miscellany.html "Help Shape the Future of Chicago" http://www.triblocal.com/West_Chicago/Detail_View/view.html?typ "Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning 6/16 Chicago Tribune e=events&action=detail&sub_id=74966 interactive workshop" Burnham Plan http://burnhamplan100.uchicago.edu/about/newsroom/the_burnha 6/16 Centennial m_blog/article/1293 "Future Leaders of Illinois" http://www.triblocal.com/West_Chicago/Detail_View/view.html?typ "Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning 6/16 Triblocal e=events&action=detail&sub_id=74966 interactive workshop" Sun-Times News http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/napervillesun/news/162648 6/18 Group 5,6_9_2_NA18_WEBNAPCAL_S1-090618.article "Things to Do" http://www.villageoflisle.org/home/index.asp?page=10&recordid=44 6/18 Village of Lisle 9 "2040 Chicago Area Regional Plan Workshop" http://www.triblocal.com/Palos_Heights/Detail_View/view.html?typ 6/18 Triblocal e=events&action=detail&sub_id=75646 GO TO 2040 "Invent the Future" Workshops http://www.triblocal.com/Palos_Heights/Detail_View/view.html?typ 6/18 Triblocal e=events&action=detail&sub_id=75668 "GO TO 2040 Invent the Future Workshop" 6/21 Daily Herald http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=301885

21 Rey Colon, 3th 6/22 Ward Alderman http://www.reycolon.org/blogDetail.asp?id=263 "Invent The Future With GO TO 2040" Sun-Times News http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/napervillesun/news/163396 6/23 Group 0,Naperville-things-to-do-briefs_na062309.article " Burnham Plan "CMAP'S GO TO 2040 comprehensive regional 6/23 Centennial http://burnhamplan100.uchicago.edu/events/id/301 plan" http://www.nwherald.com/articles/2009/06/23/r_s78vwjtdsu2a9ykz 6/24 Northwest Herald slop2q/index.xml "Chicago-area planning agency seeks input" Burnham Plan http://burnhamplan100.uchicago.edu/about/newsroom/the_burnha "Planning for the future --- by those who will 6/24 Centennial m_blog/article/1325 live it" Naperville Area Homeowners "City of Naperville and CMAP Invite the Public 6/24 Confederation http://www.napervillehomeowners.com/Webpage.asp?PN=About to Help Invent the Future" "City of Naperville and CMAP Invite the Public 6/24 City of Naperville http://www.naperville.il.us/dynamic_content.aspx?id=12470 to Help Invent the Future" Burnham Plan "CMAP'S GO TO 2040 comprehensive regional 6/24 Centennial http://burnhamplan100.uchicago.edu/events/id/301 plan" Woodstock http://woodstockadvocate.blogspot.com/2009/06/who-me-invent- 6/24 Advocate future.html "Who, me? Invent the Future?" "Burnham's great, great grandson helps plan 6/24 WLS-TV http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=6882616 Chicago" http://towncriercl.blogspot.com/2009/06/public-input-on-planning- 6/25 Town Crier requested.html "Public Input On Planning Requested " WCPT-AM Mike http://www.cmap.illinois.gov/WorkArea/downloadasset.aspx?id=161 6/28 Nowak Show 41 Interview with Randy Blankenhorn http://chicago.timeout.com/articles/museums- 7/1 Time Out Chicago culture/76023/chicagos-go-to-2040-plans-the-citys-future "Track to the future" Burnham Plan http://burnhamplan100.uchicago.edu/about/newsroom/the_burnha Q&A with Randy Blankenhorn --- "As bold as 7/1 Centennial m_blog/article/1343 Daniel Burnham" Active Transportation http://www.activetrans.org/event/2009-07-29t000000/go-2040- 7/2 Alliance workshop "Calendar of Events" Burnham Plan http://burnhamplan100.uchicago.edu/about/newsroom/the_burnha Q&A with Randy Blankenhorn --- "People live 7/6 Centennial m_blog/article/1344 regional lives"

22 Environmental Defenders of Environmental Defenders of McHenry County 7/7 McHenry County http://www.mcdef.org/ Homepage 7/7 Chicago Matters http://www.chicagomatters.org/content/GO TO-2040-plan Regional Planning Forum Lansing Public "News & Information from Lansing Public 7/7 Library http://www.lansing.lib.il.us/ Library" Oak Brook Public 7/7 Library http://www.oak-brook.lib.il.us/ "Have your say!" Burnham Plan http://burnhamplan100.uchicago.edu/about/newsroom/the_burnha Q&A with Randy Blankenhorn --- "Not going to 7/8 Centennial m_blog/article/1362 get a second chance" http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/couriernews/news/1662005, 7/12 The Courier News CMAP-planning-meeting-Fox-Valley_el071209.article "Like ‘SimCity’ for grown-ups" http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/on-ramp/2009/07/next- 7/13 Chicago Now stop.html "Next Stop: Cokie Roberts, Invent the Future" Metropolitan 7/13 Mayor's Caucus http://www.mayorscaucus.org/ "Metropolitan Mayor's Caucus News Room" 7/13 Daily Herald http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=306285&src=110 "Get in your two cents on plans for the future" http://www.rogers-park.com/2009/07/go-to-2040-invent-the-future- 7/13 DevCorp North workshop.html "GO TO 2040 Invent the Future Workshop" Riverside/Brookfie http://www.rblandmark.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&SubSectionID=1 "Mapping the future: Riverside hosts regional 7/14 ld Landmark &ArticleID=5165&TM=83074.2 planning workshop" Sun-Times News http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/beaconnews/news/1664356, "What should our cities look like? Valley of the 7/14 Group 2_1_AU14_PLANNING_S1-090714.article future: Workshops offer imaginary trip to 2040" Burnham Plan http://burnhamplan100.uchicago.edu/about/newsroom/the_burnha 7/16 Centennial m_blog/article/1396 "Being Daniel Burnham" http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/on-ramp/2009/07/next-stop- "Next Stop: Suburban Mayors & Managers 7/20 Chicago Now 1.html Invent the Future, Bughouse Square Debates" Burnham Plan http://burnhamplan100.uchicago.edu/about/newsroom/the_burnha "What would Daniel Burnham do? 7/20 Centennial m_blog/article/1401 Forgetaboutit!" http://golf.aurora- 7/21 City of Aurora il.org/communitydevelopment/planning/burnham_plan.php "Burnham Plan Centennial" Sun-Times News http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/beaconnews/news/1675680, 7/21 Group Yorkville-imagine-this_au072109.article "Yorkville ... imagine this" 7/24 REJournals.com http://www.rejournals.com/news/212905-the-big-sell "The Big Sell"

23 http://www.mysuburbanlife.com/lemont/homepage/x2141120724/C 7/24 My Suburban Life ommunity-calendar-for-week-of-July-24 "Community Calendar for the Week of July 24" http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/on-ramp/2009/07/next-stop- "Next Stop: Inventing the Future at Argonne 7/28 On Ramp inventing-the-future-at-argonne-national-lab-open-strees.html National Lab, Bioethics and Society" http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/genevasun/news/1687390,2 "CMAP planning workshop in Geneva on Aug. 7/29 Geneva Sun _6_4_GE29_BRIEFS_S1-090729.article 11" Active Transportation http://www.activetrans.org/event/2009-07-29t000000/go-2040- 7/29 Alliance workshop "Calendar of Events" Burnham Plan http://burnhamplan100.uchicago.edu/about/newsroom/the_burnha "Q&A with George Ranney: "A great map of 7/29 Centennial m_blog/article/1433 what you want"" Hyde Park http://hydeparkprogress.blogspot.com/2009/08/go-to-2040- 8/3 Progress regional-planning-initiative.html "GO TO 2040 Regional Planning Initiative" http://www.nwherald.com/articles/2009/08/03/r_kjm8cxts0wz5jdlm "Residents invited to discuss issues on city 8/4 Northwest Herald 3h2qw/index.xml growth." http://www.thebusinessledger.com/Home/Archives/CommentaryVie The Business wpoints/tabid/86/newsid415/764/Growing-industry-clusters-cited- "Growing industry clusters cited by regional 8/6 Ledger by-regional-planning-agency/Default.aspx planning agency" Sun-Times News http://www.pioneerlocal.com/elmwoodpark/news/1700632,elmwoo "Regional planning agency seeks public input 8/6 Group d-park-transport-080609-s1.article for future projects " Art Knowledge http://www.artknowledgenews.com/2009-08-04-21-56-41-zaha- "Zaha Hadid's Burnham Pavilion opens in 8/7 News hadids-burnham-pavilion-opens-in-chicagos-millenium-park.html Chicago's Millenium Park" "Zaha Hadid's Much Anticipated Burnham 8/7 Art Daily http://www.artdaily.org/index.asp?int_sec=2&int_new=32473 Pavilion in Chicago's Millennium Park Opens" http://www.evanstonnow.com/story/news/bill-smith/2009-08- 8/10 Evanston Now 10/35-percent-more-of-us "35 percent more of us?" 8/11 Car Free Chicago http://carfreechicago.com/node/904 "Help Invent a Carfree Future for Chicago!" Burnham Plan http://burnhamplan100.uchicago.edu/about/newsroom/the_burnha "Inventing the future....in a small group" (Part 1 8/12 Centennial m_blog/article/1473 of 2) http://www.explorechicago.org/city/en/things_see_do/event_landin "Big. Bold. Visionary: Chicago Considers the 8/13 Explore Chicago g/events/tourism/big__bold__visionary.html Next Century" Sun-Times News http://www.pioneerlocal.com/elmwoodpark/lifestyles/currents/1709 8/13 Group 954,elmwood-park-calendar-081309-s1.article "Community Calendar" 8/13 Sun-Times News http://www.pioneerlocal.com/franklinpark/news/1711410,franklin- "CMAP workshops 'Go To 2040' Aug. 18-19 "

24 Group park-newsbriefs-081309-s1.article Burnham Plan http://burnhamplan100.uchicago.edu/about/newsroom/the_burnha 8/14 Centennial m_blog/article/1482 "You invent the future. Yeah, you!" (Part 2 of 2) http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-invent-the-future- "Residents weighing in on transit plans for 8/19 Chicago Tribune 19-aug19,0,2843601.story 2040" Evanston http://www.evanstonroundtable.com/main.asp?SectionID=15&SubSe 8/14 RoundTable ctionID=26&ArticleID=694&TM=31324.06 "Invent The Future With GO TO 2040" Sun-Times News http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/newssun/news/1727436,5_1 "Regional planning workshop to be held 8/21 Group _WA21_GRAYPLANS_S1-090821.article Tuesday in Grayslake‛ http://www.thebusinessledger.com/Home/Archives/CommentaryVie The Business wpoints/tabid/86/newsid415/780/Waters-journey-from-Lake- 8/20 Ledger Michigan-to-tap/Default.aspx "Water's journey from Lake Michigan to tap" Aurora Hispanic "Aurora residents can "invent the future" with 8/20 Advisory Board http://aurorahispanicheritage.com/wordpress/?p=153. GO TO 2040 workshop and web tools" Sun-Times News http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/beaconnews/news/1729151, 8/22 Group 2_1_AU22_VALLEYBRIEFS_S1-090822.article "CMAP Workshop" http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi- 8/24 Chicago Tribune oped0824mccarronaug24,0,6916047.story "Burnham not alone in urban planning" http://www.mysuburbanlife.com/berwyn/homepage/x1528811361/ 8/26 My Suburban Life Community-calendar-for-week-of-Aug-26 "Community calendar for week of Aug. 26" http://mfinegan.featuredblog.com/?p=115 8/27 Maggie Finegan "Green Greene Architecture" Alliance for Public http://allianceforpublictransportation.org/2009/08/27/chicago-looks- "Chicago Looks to Public for Guidance on 8/21 Transportation to-public-for-guidance-on-future-transportation/ Future Transportation" http://www.mysuburbanlife.com/forestview/homepage/x152881136 8/26 My Suburban Life 1/Community-calendar-for-week-of-Aug-26 "Community calendar for week of Aug. 26" Sun-Times News http://www.southtownstar.com/news/1743757,083109workshop.art 8/31 Group icle "Agency: Planning for 2040 starts now"

25 233 South Wacker Drive Suite 800 Chicago, IL 60606

voice 312-454-0400 fax 312-454-0411 www.cmap.illinois.gov

CMAP Legislative Policy Brief: Federal Surface Transportation Reauthorization Bill

Policy Goals Endorsed by CMAP Board September 9, 2009

The current federal transportation authorization act, known as Safe, Accountable, Flexible and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), is due to expire on September 30, 2009. As the U.S. Congress continues to debate reauthorization, the Chicago region has the chance to provide policy guidance that could help shape this bill to the benefit of metropolitan areas such as ours. The Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) encourages the administration and Congress to address, influence, and support the role that major metropolitan areas have in the nation’s transportation network and help transportation to improve the quality of life for the citizens of northeastern Illinois.

CMAP’s Reauthorization Policy Goals

Leaders in Washington should give highest priority to the following overall policy objectives in crafting and implementing a new federal transportation bill.

Provide transportation investments based on regional priorities using performance-driven criteria that lead to decisions that are transparent, outcome-based, and mode-agnostic.

Evaluate and prioritize infrastructure investments in a comprehensive way that looks beyond transportation benefits to include land use, economy, environment, and other quality-of-life factors.

Provide adequate federal investments in the nation’s transportation systems.

Reform the transportation funding system by placing a new emphasis on sustainable revenue sources.

Establish a national transportation vision that includes the movement of goods and the development of a national high-speed rail network.

Page 1 of 12 September 2009 Transportation Trends and Challenges

To assert that our nation’s transportation infrastructure is broken would be an overstatement, but there is much that needs to be done to bring it into a good state of repair. According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, 27 percent of the bridges across the country as of December 2008 were listed as structurally deficient or functionally obsolete. Congestion in the major metropolitan areas is costing the nation $87 billion a year in wasted fuel, lost time, and vehicle costs as reported in the Texas Transportation Institute’s 2009 Urban Mobility Report.

The current federal motor fuel tax is not able to replenish the Highway Trust Fund at adequate levels to meet the demand for transportation investments. The National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Finance Commission estimated that the average annual capital needs for the country’s highway and transit systems between 2008 and 2035 will be $96 billion per year, but the current revenue levels will only meet 33 percent of that need at $32 billion per year.

According to U.S. Census Bureau estimates, by the year 2040 there will be an additional 95 million people who require transportation services. By 2055, vehicle miles traveled are estimated to increase by 4 trillion to a total of 7 trillion. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials estimates that the movement of freight will increase from 15 billion tons per year to 29 billion tons per year by 2035.

Congestion problems in metropolitan Chicago are severe, with the region holding the unflattering national ranking of third worst congestion. Metropolitan regions drive the economy of the U.S. They are home to 80 percent of the nation's population, and they generate 85 percent of the gross domestic product. As the population centers and economic engines of our country, metropolitan areas must be a focus for the mobility of people and goods.

Priorities and Recommendations

Accountability Institute national goals and objectives for all the federal transportation programs and establish accountability to them through specific performance measures. Metropolitan planning organizations that are inclusive of all stakeholders should be given the responsibility for setting the performance targets and indentify the strategies to reach those targets. Funding commitment levels should be tied into the ability of MPOs to meet the targets.

Regional Comprehensive Programming and Planning Transportation does not operate in a vacuum so the prioritization of projects necessitates a regional perspective that takes into consideration economic development, housing, land use and the environment including climate change. Dedicate funds to the planning and programming of transportation infrastructure that are inclusive of these different objectives.

Funding Commitments Set funding levels that can meet the demands for preservation and renewal of the current

Page 2 of 12 September 2009 transportation system and allow for capacity increases on all modes. The nation’s ability to do so will determine our position in the global economy, to improve the environment, to reduce our energy dependence on fossil fuels and to improve our quality of life.

Sustainable Revenues Indentify new revenue streams that will supplement the current motor fuel tax or replace it. Any new revenue sources should be constructed in a manner that gives them flexibility to adapt to shifts in market forces.

National Vision Establish a method to formulate a national freight plan that can guide regional and state efforts to improve the freight systems. Create a systematic funding program for freight improvements. Establish a national plan for the development of inter-metro passenger rail service considering both high-speed rail along with standard services that link our nation’s economic engines. This will help alleviate interstate highway and airport congestion and provide redundancy for the times when other parts of the national transportation system are overburdened.

Included below are two attachments: Current Status of the Surface Transportation Authorization Bill (prepared by CMAP staff), and a Summary of Surface Transportation Bill Reauthorization Positions by the Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (AMPO), Transportation for America (T4America), the National Association of Regional Councils (NARC), the Urban Land Institute (ULI), and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).

Page 3 of 12 September 2009 Current Status of the Surface Transportation Authorization Bill (CMAP Staff Analysis)

The U.S. House of Representatives, Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, chaired by Representative James Oberstar, released a draft bill on June 18, 2009, titled Surface Transportation Authorization Act (STAA) of 2009. A brief overview of the draft bill is presented below. Chairman Oberstar is planning on a full committee mark-up of the draft bill as soon as Congress returns from the August recess. Chances that the bill will reach the House floor by the expiration date of the current bill are remote. The financing of the bill is the responsibility of the congressional revenue committees. To date no significant progress has been made on financing and without the revenue side worked out, the draft bill cannot move forward.

The Obama Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation and the U.S. Senate are currently pushing an 18-month extension of the current SAFETEA-LU bill with minor revisions. They believe that the reauthorization needs to have more rigorous debate concerning many of the changes and reforms being proposed. This avenue does not have the support of Rep. Oberstar and in all likelihood a compromise will need to be reached by the end of September for the extension’s length and the continuation of funding during the extension. Something in the 12 to 24 month time frame is the likely outcome.

Key Points of Surface Transportation Authorization Act of 2009

The STAA draft bill being proposed by the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee calls for six years of federal highway, public transit and highway safety programs totaling $450 billion. This is $164 billion more than the 2005 SAFETEA-LU bill, a 57 percent increase. The STAA also includes a $50 billion program for high speed passenger rail that would bring the total of the bill to $500 billion.

$337 billion for highway investments, which represents an approximate 35 percent increase over SAFETEA-LU (75% of $450 billion)

$100 billion for public transit investments, which represents an approximate 61 percent increase over SAFETEA-LU (22% of $450 billion)

Consolidates or terminates more than 75 programs

Four core highway funding formula categories – state of good repair, safety, capacity improvements and congestion, air quality and climate change

Four core transit funding categories – state of good repair, restore transit rail, mobility and access for transit-dependent, line and intermodal facility expansion

Creates a National Transportation Strategic Plan to coordinate planning efforts of States and metropolitan regions to foster intermodal connectivity and identify projects of national significance

Page 4 of 12 September 2009 Reforms the U.S. Department of Transportation adding three new offices – Intermodalism, Expedited Project Delivery and Livability

Requires specific performance standards for State and regional plans

Creates a Metropolitan Mobility and Access program with $50 billion to unlock the congestion that chokes major metropolitan regions o $20 billion will be awarded to a maximum of 10 metropolitan regions (MPOs) over a million population

Creates a National Infrastructure Bank and enables metropolitan infrastructure banks o Metropolitan regions awarded a Metropolitan Mobility and Access program are eligible to institute a regional infrastructure bank

Creates a Projects of National Significance program with $25 billion to enhance U.S. global competitiveness by focusing on goods movement and freight mobility

Establishes a new program for high-speed rail including the $50 billion for the development of 11 corridors between major regions.

Amends the metropolitan planning process to address transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions and the Waxman-Markey bill on climate change

Page 5 of 12 September 2009 Summary of Surface Transportation Bill Reauthorization Positions

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (AMPO)

Issued in July 2008, AMPO's position on federal surface transportation authorization (http://www.ampo.org/assets/685_finalampopdfoverviewappro.pdf) stresses a new national vision that is supported by four key areas.

1. Improve international and interstate commerce by creating a national program for freight mobility and transparent boarders. Improve movement through ports of entry Increase capacity and efficiency of both rail and highway corridors Address needs of border communities Address metro freight congestion Ensure agricultural and rural industries have access to markets Study feasibility of National Truck Network, including truck-only highways Improve nation’s rail capacity for movement of goods and people

2. Improve Metropolitan Mobility Create a metropolitan mobility program o Focused on largest metro regions o Allocated by formula o Performance based Re-invent Metropolitan Institutions (MPOs) to more effectively Improve Mobility o Raising the minimum population threshold for new MPOs to 100,000 o Areas above 200,000 gain project selection authority in cooperation with states over all federal transportation funds in region o MPOs over 1 million could choose to designate themselves as Metropolitan Mobility Authority . Provide incentive for states and regions to invest in mobility . Regions would have project selection authority . Eligible to receive new federal funds for congestion relief and energy conservation . Designation would be by state statute

3. Achieve Energy Independence by 2050 Set national goals for energy independence and reducing fuel use and emissions Establish market Incentive for energy conservation (cap and trade) Create an energy independence fund to address reduction in petroleum use

4. Rebuild America Smarter Increase federal funding to ensure base system preservation o Immediately boost federal funding o Establish an independent Transportation Revenue Adjustment Commission o Focus on ITS and research on new building materials and construction techniques o Upgrade national and regional data collection to assist with planning

Page 6 of 12 September 2009

Transportation for America (T4America)

In its May 11, 2009, report titled "The Route to Reform-Blueprint for a 21st Century Federal Transportation Program" (http://t4america.org/blueprint/), T4America calls for reforms that center around four main recommendations.

1. Develop a New National Transportation Vision with Objectives and Accountability for Meeting Performance Targets.

Establish and prioritize national transportation outcomes. Set national transportation performance targets and methods. Provide guidance and technical assistance in the development and monitoring of progress. Integrate goals and accountability in the legislation and decision-making processes. Objectives o Improve Economic Competitiveness, Transportation System Efficiency and Workforce Development Opportunities o Improve Transportation System Conditions and Connectivity o Promote Energy Efficiency and Achieved Energy Security o Ensure Environmental Protection, Restore Climate Stability and Resolve Persistent Environmental Justice Issues o Ensure Safety for All Transportation Users and Improve Public Health Outcomes o Provide Equal and Equitable Access to Transportation Options in Urban, Suburban and Rural Communities

Performance Targets o Reduce per capita vehicle miles traveled by 16% o Triple walking, biking and public transportation usage o Reduce transportation-generated carbon dioxide levels by 40% o Reduce delay per capita by 10% o Increase proportion of freight transportation provided by railroad and intermodal services by 20% o Achieve zero percent population exposure to at-risk levels of air pollution o Improve public safety and lower congestion costs by reducing traffic crashes by 50% o Increase share of major highways, regional transit fleets and facilities, and bicycling/pedestrian infrastructure in good state of condition by 20% o Reduce average household combined housing + transportation costs 25% (use 2000 as base year) o Increase by 50% essential destinations accessible within 30 min. by public transit, or 15 min. walk for low-income, senior and disabled populations

2. Restructure Federal Transportation Programs and Funding to Support the New National Transportation Vision and Objectives.

National Transportation Priority Programs o Planning and Research o Transportation System Preservation and Renewal o Access, Independence and Mobility Management o Energy Security for Clean Communities

Page 7 of 12 September 2009 Geographically Tiered Multimodal Access Program Three areas focused on meeting the mobility needs of the inter-regional, metropolitan and small town/rural levels. Complete National Transportation System Expanding options through intercity passenger transportation, major transit capital projects, projects of national significance and green freights and ports. Innovation Incentive Programs Utilize state-of-the-art transportation policies that incorporate system management technologies, low cost solutions and anticipate future needs and demands.

3. Reform Transportation Agencies and the Decision-making Process.

Empower large metropolitan regions with direct funding and authority to select projects through a Blueprint Program. Recognizing that most Americans live in metropolitan areas, there needs to be a focus on the mobility within cities and their suburbs rather that between regions. State DOTs would be required to create a statewide blueprint program in partnership with smaller metropolitan regions, rural areas and cities. This would be the framework for intercity and interstate investment decisions.

4. Revise Transportation Finance So We Can Pay for Needed Investments. Increase revenues for transportation investment at a level of $500 billion over 6 six years. Create a unified transportation trust fund that incorporates investments in rail, freight, highways, bus and non-motorized.

National Association of Regional Councils (NARC)

Draft recommendations by NARC on May 27, 2009, are based on ten focal points.

1. Federal Role – refocus a strong federal role in shaping the nation’s surface transportation policy Promote, support and strengthen comprehensive planning in regions of all size that looks at benefits in land use, economic growth and environmental impacts; Promote interstate commerce; Employ strategies to lessen the transportation sectors influence on global warming; Promote linkages between modes to create an integrated intermodal system; and, Preserve and maintain the current transportation network to ensure adequate performance and the safety and security of the traveling public.

2. Role of Elected Officials Reinvigorate the intergovernmental partnership to establish national transportation goals and priorities that meet our country's challenges; Reaffirm the role of the local elected officials, the closest unit of government to the people, as a partner in maintaining and improving the national surface transportation network; Ensure the composition of MPO and RTPO boards retain their function as voices of local governments; Work with local elected officials to ensure transparency and accountability in decision making.

Page 8 of 12 September 2009

3. Comprehensive Planning (meaning geographically) Maintain the current threshold for MPO size at 50,000 population; Extend planning and implementation authority to all regions over all surface transportation assets within their geographic jurisdiction; Create a formalized consultation process (RTPOs) for non-metropolitan regions in transportation planning. FHWA and FTA (with a corresponding GAO oversight report) should submit a report to Congress on the form, function and cooperative decision-making processes adopted in state transportation plans for RTPOs; Create a mechanism to establish regional transportation planning organizations where they currently do not currently exist in order to meet the needs of contiguous local jurisdictions; and, Increase federal financial support for transportation planning in both metropolitan and non- metropolitan regions.

4. Metropolitan Mobility Empower metropolitan regions to work in cooperation with the state Departments of Transportation (DOTs) by defining the relationship, changing the language to state “MPOs shall work in cooperation with the State;” Direct an allocation of federal transportation funding to metropolitan regions over one million population; Consider delegating National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review authority to these regions; Allow these regions the option to construct projects in consultation with their state DOTs.

5. Safety Direct safety money to regions and localities through a mechanism similar to the Surface Transportation Program (STP) (23, sect. 133); Authorize project selection authority in safety programs to regions, which inherently ties funding more directly to safety needs; Promote strategies to integrate safety into statewide and metropolitan planning; Support the federal collection and dissemination of safety data among states and regions, as well as provide funding to regions to collect and utilize this data; and, Support the rural roads safety program.

6. Finance Implement a program that increases the federal gas tax in the short-term, but reduces gas taxes over a multi-year period while concurrently transitioning to revenue sources that are predictable, diversified and diffuse; Support the increase of the federal fuel tax indexed to inflation; Support a revenue generating shift to a system that combines Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMTs) plus vehicle weight, while respecting the public’s right to privacy; Collapse current funding streams into a mechanism that fully funds and establishes regions and their local constituencies as primary recipients of current and future federal resources; Maintain the firewalls that protect the HTF; and, Enact legislation to create Regional Infrastructure Improvement Zones.

7. Streamlining Adopt a “transportation account” that collapses all surface transportation related funding into one funding stream – directed to states, regions and localities – to develop the most appropriate and

Page 9 of 12 September 2009 flexible transportation solutions possible. A mechanism should also be created to allow regions and their local constituencies as primary recipients of current and future federal resources; Consider requiring Federal Management Teams to facilitate efficient environmental review of projects of national and regional significance. These teams will be comprised of all related federal agencies and will have authority project-by-project to facilitate efficient environmental review; Consider authorizing one environmental review by one federal agency per project and allow federal agencies the flexibility to determine how to implement this provision of concurrent rather than sequential reviews; and, Support delegating power to States on 4(f) review. o The States must adopt requirements equal to or stricter than the current federal statute for delegation to occur. o U.S. DOT will report to Congress on 4(f) practices by States if delegation occurs. o Congress and the U.S. DOT will reserve the right to rescind delegation authority of 4(f) authority.

8. Freight Work with regional planning organizations to establish proactive transportation policies that efficiently move goods to improve regional, state and local economies; Consider the creation of a national strategic freight mobility program and dedicated revenue stream with budgetary firewalls to ensure a continuous stream of funding to meet current and future goods movement needs; Reinforce the importance of funding for intermodal connectors within the freight mobility program; Provide a direct allocation of money to regional transportation planning organizations to plan for goods movement through their regions; and, Provide additional funds to MPOs for expert staff positions dedicated to freight issues (commensurate to the volumes of freight moving in and through their areas).

9. Livability Work with regional planning organizations to establish proactive transportation policies that efficiently move goods to improve regional, state and local economies; Consider the creation of a national strategic freight mobility program and dedicated revenue stream with budgetary firewalls to ensure a continuous stream of funding to meet current and future goods movement needs; Reinforce the importance of funding for intermodal connectors within the freight mobility program; Provide a direct allocation of money to regional transportation planning organizations to plan for goods movement through their regions; and, Provide additional funds to MPOs for expert staff positions dedicated to freight issues (commensurate to the volumes of freight moving in and through their areas).

10. Climate Change Recognize the role regions play in aligning transportation networks with economic development, housing and environmental protection and their potential to reduce transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions (see Livability); Work with regions on establishing baselines, methodologies and tools to affect a reduction in GHG emissions; and, Avoid creating unfunded mandates on regions and local governments.

Page 10 of 12 September 2009 Urban Land Institute (ULI)

Issued on April 20, 2009, ULI's "Infrastructure 2009: Pivot Point" (http://bit.ly/53M4P) details four primary strategies.

1. Set a National Strategy The U.S. has not had a national infrastructure plan since the 1950’s beginning with the interstate highway construction. New transportation networks must interconnect more efficiently to move goods and people through congested global pathway cities.

2. Plan Holistically In order to reduce congestion, address climate change, and reducing foreign oil dependence requires the integration of transportation, energy and environment programs with land use and housing policy.

3. Revamp Government Restructure transportation, housing, water and energy agencies to manage and execute infrastructure policy in concert.

4. Change Funding Approaches To be able to fund the necessary infrastructure repairs and new networks, the U.S. needs to establish new financing mechanism, attract more private capital, and advance PPPs. Revenues need to come from user fees and more attention paid to new approaches in which to collect them.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)

AASHTO's 2009 report "Reform of the Federal Surface Transportation Program" (http://www.transportation1.org/policy_reform/) emphasizes seven recommendations.

1. Refocus the Federal Program on National Objectives Involves six areas of interest: Preservation and Renewal; Interstate Commerce; Safety; Congestion Reduction and Connectivity for both Urban and Rural Areas; System Operations; and Environment.

2. Establish Goals through which the National Objectives can be Achieved Help to ensure accountability. USDOT would promulgate as guidance.

3. Plan and Select Projects Based on a State-driven Performance Management Approach Performance targets related to national goals would be adopted by each state.

4. Develop State-Driven Performance Measures Process To improve accountability for achieving national objectives, each state will be called on to develop specific measures through which they can track and report on results.

5. Restructure Transportation Programs to Focus on the National Objectives Reduce the number of highway and transit programs down to the basics giving states and MPOs the flexibility to meet their needs. To meet a multi-modal approach, continue to allow the flexing of highway and transit funds to each other.

Page 11 of 12 September 2009

6. Speed Project Delivery Cut the federal obstacles to project delivery so that completion time is cut in half.

7. Eliminate or Limit Earmarking in the Federal Transportation Program No more than five percent of the overall program should be designated through Congressional earmarks. Any HPP projects should come out of approved TIPs or STIPs.

Page 12 of 12 September 2009 FHWA, HCFB-1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

ESTIMATED AMOUNTS OF UNOBLIGATED BALANCES TO BE RESCINDED ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 UNDER THE PROVISIONS IN TITLE XI, SUBTITLE D, SECTION 1132 OF THE ENERGY INDEPENDENCE AND SECURITY ACT OF 2007 AND SECTION 10212 OF SAFETEA-LU, AS AMENDED 30-Sep-09 Inclusive of additional rescission amounts due to shortfall in unobligated balances 7:00 AM

Coordinated National Surface Transportation Program Highway Bridge Program Congestion Highway Safety Railway-Highway Crossings High Safe Routes to School Program Border Appalachian Interstate Highway Transportation Areas Areas Areas Available for 15% Mandatory 85% Optional Mitigation & Air Improvement Protective Elimination Risk Rural Recreational Metro Equity Bonus 10% Minimum for 70% Minimum for 20% for Infrastructure Infrastructure Development State Maintenance System Enhancements > 200K < 200K < 5K Any Area Off-System On/Off-System Quality Improvement Program Devices of Hazards Roads Trails Planning Exempt Special Non-Infrastructure Intrastructure or Non-Infrastructure Program Highway System Total

Alabama 62,149,467.68 7,577,646.56 843,236.78 15,200,387.09 12,923,591.54 1,952,099.38 32,568,386.94 7,351,111.92 1,172,235.66 99,394.76 8,406,045.20 1,357,875.43 1,357,875.43 1,282,133.04 0.00 1,821,829.10 2,165,211.37 4,623,690.11 63,238.00 2,627,495.00 210,738.00 0.00 10,337,305.00 176,090,993.99 Alaska 17,317,262.00 20,420,199.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,885,842.98 1,163,048.00 3,009,363.38 4,770,074.00 3,090,235.00 65,471.97 155,030.00 126,842.00 494,301.68 428,398.00 3,763,889.53 11,780,561.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 468,932.00 0.00 80,939,451.18 Arizona 35,925,808.61 43,700,914.03 4,990,004.27 16,502,679.73 4,318,570.11 2,812,248.01 9,954,165.88 1,085,589.37 6,151,674.09 12,613,214.20 9,304,933.17 351,769.44 351,769.44 539,054.30 425,253.83 0.03 4,728,266.17 14,798,953.69 37,674.00 739,084.00 123,781.00 1,390,080.00 0.00 170,845,487.37 Arkansas 23,472,015.21 26,836,628.40 3,074,804.72 2,545,148.70 5,905,461.34 3,286,405.74 10,250,068.47 2,901,398.65 16,441,257.71 3,030,826.83 5,296,765.95 257,926.00 521,523.15 378,451.20 385,232.94 117,478.00 2,071,938.91 2,360,010.74 27,788.00 118,090.00 118,082.00 0.00 0.00 109,397,302.66 California 89,177,819.16 10,394,666.23 42,352,426.98 182,942,848.83 8,221,070.56 2,844,204.31 138,768,701.50 42,587,243.09 4,160,973.70 175,552,102.53 64,308,727.42 3,159,142.30 4,438,040.07 4,990,875.56 2,660,083.36 11,339,587.00 0.00 0.56 3,137.00 4,848,420.00 487,940.00 2,381,584.00 0.00 795,619,594.16 Colorado 0.00 0.92 13,996,152.37 48,646,595.12 0.97 0.86 1.00 0.00 0.00 45,494,456.55 2,305,194.25 1,799,728.87 1,814,854.16 0.00 541,609.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 566.00 334,887.00 51,951.00 0.00 0.00 114,985,998.93 Connecticut 0.00 622,636.83 4,113,277.55 12,387,968.20 1,217,667.54 2,071,158.35 3,716,579.88 9,887,925.93 63,905,974.01 15,587,830.77 4,929,218.19 302,745.51 302,745.51 349,721.34 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.00 13,848.00 269,131.00 26,715.00 0.00 0.00 119,705,144.35 Delaware 1,681,581.85 14,504,987.35 929,872.48 3,410,125.33 1,455,583.85 806,097.03 823,389.13 511,801.43 2,900,206.41 2,784,257.34 1,582,402.99 152,379.44 152,379.44 124,674.00 245,126.88 421,073.84 483,961.66 1,514,746.74 22,186.00 155,299.00 44,372.00 0.00 0.00 34,706,504.19 Dist. of Col. 0.00 12,538,660.55 1,302,349.64 130,465.30 0.00 0.00 2,823,338.00 1,580,849.17 8,958,144.60 3,530,353.55 1,982,722.87 222,197.85 222,197.85 181,798.33 333,336.39 289,859.02 87,682.92 274,437.91 0.00 124,907.00 96,950.00 0.00 0.00 34,680,250.95 Florida 5.54 45,190,147.60 24,734,424.00 163,096,911.11 48,864,591.26 13,200,583.67 13,027.09 16,651,468.98 54,486,367.45 2.32 64,774,501.38 2,956,891.00 3,404,786.42 3,725,311.69 1,610,047.11 1.00 0.04 0.00 857.00 1,031,025.00 262,640.00 0.00 0.00 444,003,589.66 Georgia 5,321,679.99 0.00 32,994,076.54 91,517,832.78 1,645,411.51 16,982,405.87 0.00 12,307,551.26 60,343,564.95 65,616,981.37 3,515,580.76 3,939,373.77 3,939,373.77 3,092,565.19 1,666,984.24 7,426,568.27 160,063.43 1,106,425.50 12,052.00 267,820.00 90,181.00 0.00 5,039,089.00 316,985,581.20 Hawaii 2,635,880.98 12,517,198.70 1,097,185.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,951,883.16 1,206,342.51 6,835,944.53 2,697,582.89 1,520,449.11 162,977.27 162,977.27 121,317.76 252,335.00 450,538.72 196,869.14 616,178.24 5,318.00 185,760.00 30,779.00 0.00 0.00 38,647,517.38 Idaho 20,931,702.61 1,121,728.65 4,592,229.50 8,589.60 6,311,091.59 1,354,762.93 412,006.24 333,561.29 18,283,117.18 972,139.07 8,584,260.09 720,076.32 720,076.32 551,810.64 126,515.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,240.00 153,018.00 27,548.00 282,884.00 0.00 65,490,357.03 Illinois 0.00 0.00 25,475,571.89 20,345,505.45 680,508.10 31,101.19 98,678.07 5,429,923.44 12,427,881.43 83,578,010.02 37,017,655.67 4,430,127.61 2,241,779.34 2,638,207.08 1,543,217.36 12,824,146.23 19,575,746.91 61,269,943.98 75,950.00 698,637.00 259,887.00 0.00 0.00 290,642,477.77 Indiana 42,993,804.41 35,980,258.22 15,060,452.12 22,410,534.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 759,867.89 48,237,966.65 30,892,156.60 19,371,396.86 164,711.52 101,743.59 1,159,019.00 929,940.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,510.00 375,408.00 121,952.00 0.00 0.00 218,595,722.08 Iowa 16,200,686.48 26,690,788.08 3,655,522.69 3,977,791.38 11,935,438.04 1,390,758.09 12,337,390.67 747,579.50 9,802,632.66 3,353,024.49 5,640,369.36 10,696.78 873,553.84 462,589.53 452,950.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,520.00 208,219.00 49,839.00 0.00 0.00 97,803,350.21 Kansas 18,975,897.07 26,489,715.54 2,846,975.15 4,767,852.41 6,825,385.96 3,704,819.69 9,970,120.95 1,953,916.95 6,136,132.25 2,643,922.29 5,211,320.66 904,198.71 904,197.71 462,497.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,250.58 30,610.00 92,260.00 144,536.00 0.00 0.00 92,067,609.54 Kentucky 731,006.73 1,525,865.64 10,718,784.15 19,371,142.68 1,359,271.04 6,083,088.01 1,203,218.31 1,024,793.00 53,187,342.08 10,432,923.98 16,734,291.30 1,453,441.45 550,747.98 852,537.66 1,171,947.99 1,835,813.23 5,293,960.95 1,203,966.05 21,731.00 93,420.00 113,015.00 0.00 16,132,373.00 151,094,681.23 Louisiana 3,952,052.51 1,621,963.47 5,215,266.61 11,576,309.65 13,163,470.32 69,214.07 1,711,846.59 13,024,802.51 73,807,215.16 4,427,350.80 3,935,867.50 229,937.90 213,604.09 663,251.85 331,251.00 0.00 807,565.85 143,738.84 55,641.00 185,465.00 157,424.00 0.00 0.00 135,293,238.72 Maine 2,083,742.31 223,136.97 1,178,056.00 0.00 5,580,488.39 2,845,831.75 5,481,274.36 1,798,833.82 12,341,805.10 4,385,724.59 2,224.19 308,042.02 308,043.25 229,969.90 713,992.34 373,055.25 0.00 0.00 74,437.00 463,650.00 156,647.00 1,807,417.00 0.00 40,356,371.24 Maryland 23,979,951.11 30,098,584.45 3,517,693.15 11,552,095.22 3,811,191.38 1,812,429.53 8,853,614.08 5,027,319.72 28,488,141.74 14,517,892.01 4,685,572.36 323,409.12 323,409.12 380,754.05 331,244.41 491,921.00 7,154.45 22,392.65 13,206.00 32,700.00 0.00 0.00 2,538,806.00 140,809,481.55 Massachusetts 23,831,424.50 24,145,792.92 8,626.54 13,992,318.31 772,518.90 1,922,824.10 10,014,404.89 8,249,021.92 46,744,460.88 6,358,442.67 3,754,264.99 340,199.44 340,199.44 329,564.89 358,849.01 2,466,273.01 822,826.47 2,575,355.00 24,398.00 372,721.00 104,110.00 0.00 0.00 147,528,596.88 Michigan 1,495,857.55 39,117,950.73 21,081,083.50 62,136,656.37 37,021,428.29 724,399.27 34,243,629.96 762,533.94 28,933,719.34 14,270,507.31 199,907.79 2,956,115.55 1,211,949.36 2,299,746.86 3,071,457.82 7,806,045.24 3,899.76 0.00 0.00 477,640.00 106,882.00 5,432,934.00 0.00 263,354,344.64 Minnesota 30,473,305.26 31,221,095.32 6,008,644.73 16,410,512.03 11,814,373.47 104,684.53 6,732,006.47 2,074,170.62 3,030,596.24 10,318,964.42 8,837,972.59 1,063,082.33 1,063,082.33 641,420.17 676,398.06 1,450,757.34 0.00 0.00 29,506.00 243,378.00 78,261.00 847,283.00 0.00 133,119,493.91 Mississippi 15,514,631.53 4,136,324.34 11,133,388.55 12,422,502.37 38,178,531.65 3,835,407.00 4,495,703.91 295,599.00 2,729,122.00 228,489.00 143,818.00 207,722.00 1,758,278.95 0.00 1,352,589.21 37,852.00 52,048.37 4,729,534.00 4,765.00 700,228.00 144,727.00 0.00 865,374.00 102,966,635.88 Missouri 0.00 0.00 16,275,264.62 44,742,766.52 0.00 0.00 0.85 17,349,281.67 98,312,598.38 17,477,402.49 94,320.06 2,373,688.12 1,993,501.31 1,903,644.08 1,262,963.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,154.00 329,467.00 130,512.00 0.00 0.00 202,262,565.00 Montana 23,163,130.09 29,111,828.00 1,738,303.68 0.00 6,024,300.00 3,213,808.00 5,542,865.00 735,516.00 4,411,488.14 3,689,815.83 3,291,761.79 259,214.52 259,214.51 201,617.52 379,384.00 440,974.73 0.00 0.00 6,447.00 135,988.00 50,913.00 1,327,620.00 0.00 83,984,189.81 Nebraska 1,908,713.30 358,712.82 6,063,061.59 15,730,064.89 9,577,085.83 8,289,784.71 795,335.23 3,116,428.42 6,319,144.08 0.00 9,909,959.27 1,519,868.15 0.00 826,417.52 174,822.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 904.00 166,427.00 55,590.00 0.00 0.00 64,812,319.67 Nevada 0.00 0.26 6,156,186.67 14,457,206.90 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 4,374,394.33 6,973,132.42 192,940.00 1,100,000.00 931,379.00 0.00 1,000,000.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,763,212.00 44,844.00 0.00 0.00 38,993,296.50 New Hampshire 5,239,525.94 247,119.93 2,680,895.80 0.01 0.00 1,993,246.40 1,438,503.37 2,532,599.12 14,351,395.90 6,930,576.58 3,938,668.53 379,608.95 379,608.95 310,588.87 387,592.99 0.00 0.00 119,562.75 11,483.00 157,899.00 45,474.00 65,372.00 0.00 41,209,722.09 New Jersey 34,616,131.70 45,710,314.82 5,078,756.71 25,608,083.58 1,307,061.32 1,652,862.82 15,586,287.63 8,294,588.13 47,002,669.05 25,236,948.07 5,961,403.18 4,454.81 92,060.81 467,800.14 359,079.00 3,285,760.74 4,395,737.95 8,027,947.07 9,793.00 534,478.00 161,914.00 0.00 0.00 233,394,132.53 New Mexico 16,142,575.99 29,858,473.22 2,190,625.53 4,230,562.78 4,982,817.44 365,671.75 6,164,526.09 268,651.02 3,540,869.35 3,205,157.00 3,843,507.07 233,725.72 233,725.74 277,656.86 6,294.60 447,161.80 643,934.25 5,371,215.74 19,341.00 224,245.00 46,806.00 236,972.00 0.00 82,534,515.95 New York 18,751,139.22 0.48 34,760,624.37 142,707,939.51 8,002,856.00 0.00 0.00 86,150,855.43 0.94 49,228,477.77 45,698,723.21 59,642.00 3,810,741.45 3,720,492.48 3,471,086.57 412,707.64 0.00 0.00 204,520.00 1,640,678.00 494,009.00 7,668,732.00 1,217,248.00 408,000,474.07 North Carolina 26,926,364.99 1,191,614.89 25,851,463.70 47,497,921.60 18,433,993.00 22,039.00 13,025.00 4,004,768.00 14,339,339.24 55,083,064.83 38,157,660.92 34,998.00 40.00 2,576,155.07 0.00 5,419,747.00 0.33 0.00 53,787.00 509,145.00 137,452.00 0.00 9,595,732.00 249,848,311.57 North Dakota 7,667,953.08 34,323,630.68 1,685,010.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 196,534.59 23,156.67 3,868,627.13 0.00 2,939,282.63 671,523.96 671,523.82 242,746.60 0.01 226,056.54 0.00 0.00 57,022.00 364,519.00 126,339.00 1,462,997.00 0.00 54,526,922.93 Ohio 70,634,776.72 63,013,545.49 8,503,735.81 27,518,730.67 0.00 0.00 28,700,107.21 8,000,624.00 48,963,784.07 27,542,670.91 11,742,033.66 1,185,134.00 1,185,134.00 824,140.90 561,940.86 3,054,296.00 0.00 0.00 112,275.00 902,078.00 295,072.00 0.00 5,312,833.00 308,052,912.30 Oklahoma 31,766,398.31 11,187,919.67 5,181,744.63 11,647,072.52 12,733,334.91 4,495,673.65 10,968,947.78 2,935,385.33 24,855,637.34 3,673,727.96 8,829,408.05 913,872.77 913,872.77 8,280.00 372,542.53 799,385.51 2,767,760.38 1,803,765.61 45,522.00 148,897.00 121,436.00 0.00 0.00 136,170,584.72 Oregon 24,026.12 952,361.89 6,867,708.47 19,533,070.36 10,678,374.51 8,142,306.38 7,367,258.69 2,122,661.77 15,411,609.04 12,004,165.20 10,958,314.48 1,148,562.23 1,148,561.74 906,587.29 1,150,424.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 233,736.00 65,890.00 0.00 0.00 98,715,618.29 Pennsylvania 59,564,076.98 54,743,490.61 7,895,229.24 25,415,573.59 4,229,306.61 283,888.17 23,693,984.75 20,809,133.48 114,446,964.69 24,970,429.13 11,273,005.63 1,090,194.95 1,090,194.97 889,513.70 682,168.90 3,495,843.65 5,088,310.78 15,925,854.83 129,519.00 1,783,073.00 542,054.00 0.00 27,708,043.00 405,749,853.66 Rhode Island 2,744,833.10 12,437,730.05 931,648.26 121,012.06 0.00 588,219.50 2,803,882.88 2,488,920.48 17,192,198.84 2,489,525.49 1,389,141.02 158,784.91 158,784.91 129,915.74 252,523.51 438,777.15 0.00 0.00 13,491.00 175,179.00 33,187.00 0.00 0.00 44,547,754.90 South Carolina 0.00 30,831,955.60 7,026,349.36 12,371,862.61 22,641,505.42 895,915.11 23,713,929.37 1,462,819.08 23,824,048.58 5,202,916.39 13,360,585.03 102,922.01 510,134.27 879,353.99 355,909.23 1,238,386.34 0.00 0.00 93,687.00 630,642.00 160,331.00 0.00 422,949.00 145,726,201.39 South Dakota 0.00 22,631,272.50 2,538,641.36 0.00 10,401,150.68 3,878,710.23 7,721,968.03 356,333.04 2,900,951.66 0.00 4,809,758.80 540,546.48 540,546.48 355,601.83 266,579.50 712,485.42 0.00 36,367.32 10,588.00 157,810.00 53,459.00 0.00 0.00 57,912,770.33 Tennessee 0.00 0.00 19,941,279.49 45,657,872.93 31,376,403.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37,104,928.12 23,902,255.92 510,597.46 2,463,933.56 2,261,672.56 0.54 3,596,982.51 13,350,475.03 18.27 36,498.00 226,973.00 77,973.00 0.00 10,111,810.00 190,619,674.15 Texas 229,948,137.38 0.00 35,804,470.63 117,499,474.40 0.00 0.00 120,840,087.61 0.00 7.98 67,737,547.66 52,844,857.60 0.00 0.08 3,250,618.01 0.00 0.00 35,776,040.57 66,933,323.00 143,468.00 1,628,751.00 595,865.00 9,237,766.00 0.00 742,240,414.92 Utah 21,969,827.98 15,136,168.35 0.01 6,617,544.07 820,964.61 1,744,635.53 5,273,784.53 481,970.05 2,731,162.64 2,621,971.40 2,213,786.09 494.07 494.07 164,210.97 392,553.47 188,559.00 1,073,557.02 3,360,116.63 76,093.00 114,163.00 82,637.00 0.00 0.00 65,064,693.49 Vermont 542,368.21 15,175,345.01 1,342,309.60 0.00 2,942,168.69 1,343,369.58 1,162,436.45 1,821,453.68 6,287,906.39 472,053.67 2,042,683.97 230,911.38 230,911.38 188,926.85 449,573.13 402,351.24 51,104.85 159,953.71 293.00 243,272.00 37,321.00 1,472,796.00 0.00 36,599,509.79 Virginia 53,941,238.94 3,914,365.84 15,916,386.07 58,550,787.34 12,831,042.30 2,435,468.00 0.11 15,616,089.61 7,539,073.20 217,770.26 26,911,444.93 1,854,731.03 1,854,730.45 1,843,467.22 0.00 743,916.00 15,449,045.62 2,151,894.00 0.00 0.00 22,463.00 0.00 8,678,476.00 230,472,389.92 Washington 598.72 27,214,650.17 10,628,875.89 13,284,022.36 933,254.15 471,553.09 0.00 5,035,191.59 38,882,895.79 28,539,199.23 15,568,536.66 1,732,754.15 1,732,754.73 1,314,590.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 85,567.00 372,689.00 263,631.00 2,001,232.00 0.00 148,061,996.59 West Virginia 15,851,152.14 15,977,420.27 1,782,394.76 0.00 7,680,454.10 998,692.00 5,480,862.91 1,880,048.74 15,727,171.99 3,263,208.53 3,378,527.63 249,403.95 249,403.94 203,482.11 323,278.65 383,860.00 34,811.41 0.23 26,801.00 215,744.00 205,261.00 0.00 19,909,804.00 93,821,783.36 Wisconsin 32,421,545.90 55,266,329.36 5,289,302.06 9,198,219.61 16,537,222.36 4,016,884.49 17,851,396.07 1,104,802.59 6,260,550.35 7,130,905.68 8,438,773.27 184,610.72 746,723.83 513,126.60 766,946.33 1,178,758.96 1,105,180.41 3,461,658.01 39,448.00 337,537.00 75,398.00 0.00 0.00 171,925,319.60 Wyoming 15,657,479.81 23,950,045.31 922,959.09 0.00 3,597,423.13 2,111,799.12 3,114,985.55 202,341.53 2,882,518.72 2,776,711.64 513,959.33 137,184.27 137,184.27 113,217.20 303,542.46 379,086.83 0.48 0.03 30,351.00 118,291.00 73,215.00 0.00 0.00 57,022,295.77

Total 1,108,327,577.71 909,911,185.72 473,973,332.63 1,377,742,560.70 407,736,364.63 114,779,050.91 604,739,988.24 325,509,873.34 1,092,568,452.69 909,130,192.53 604,121,188.80 43,610,608.21 48,937,999.87 50,889,317.14 31,593,871.76 77,426,294.99 119,957,045.01 214,374,864.12 1,794,230.00 29,913,555.00 7,008,003.00 36,084,601.00 117,869,842.00 8,708,000,000.00

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING THE RESCISSION OF UNOBLIGATED BALANCES OF CONTRACT AUTHORITY

As Required by Section 10212 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), Public Law (Pub. L.) 109-59, as amended by Section 1302 of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, Pub. L. 109-280 and Section 112 of the SAFETEA-LU Technical Corrections Act of 2008, Pub. L. 110-244, as Affected by Title IX, Subtitle D, Section 1132(a) of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA), Pub. L. 110-140

1. Why is the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) rescinding $8.708 billion in un-obligated contract authority? The FHWA is required, pursuant to section 10212 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), Public Law (Pub. L.) 109-59, as amended1, to rescind $8.708 billion.

2. In FY 2008, the Energy Independence Security Act of 2007 (EISA), Pub. L. 110- 140, was enacted. What, if any, effect do the EISA provisions have on the SAFETEA-LU rescission? The SAFETEA-LU rescission language applies to a specific list of apportioned programs, both codified and non-codified. The EISA language provides instructions as to how a rescission should be implemented in both fiscal years 2008 and 2009 and limits the programs subject to be rescinded to those apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code (U.S.C.). It is important to note that the provisions for distributing rescissions under Section 1132 of EISA are, at times, in contradiction of the provisions for determining the amounts to be rescinded under Section 10212 of SAFETEA-LU. A side-by-side comparison of the conflicting provisos is shown below:

Side-by-Side Comparison of Conflicting Provisos in the SAFETEA-LU and EISA Rescission Language

SAFETEA-LU ENERGY ACT (EISA) Applies to programs apportioned under Addresses rescissions only of funds apportioned Coverage of chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code Provision and some programs that are not codified. Distributes the “pain” of the rescission The EISA provision is silent on how the Distribution among the states based on the amount rescission is to be distributed among the States, Among apportioned for FYs 2004-2009 for the so the SAFETEA-LU methodology will be used States programs subject to the rescission. Distribution SAFETEA-LU determines the amount EISA determines the amount based on the Among based on un-obligated balances. amount apportioned for the current fiscal year. Programs None A State may adjust the rescission distribution Flexibility among eligible programs so long as no program’s Proviso rescission increases by more than 10%.

Table 1

FAQs - SAFETEA-LU Rescission Page 2 of 6

3. How was the total amount to be rescinded by State2 determined? Section 10212(b) of SAFETEA-LU, as amended1, provides specific instructions as to how the total amount to be rescinded by State is to be determined. The total amount to be rescinded by State was determined using the following formula:

Amount to ∑ Amount Apportioned to a State for FYs 2004 - 2009 = $8,708,000,000 Rescind By State x ∑ Amount Apportioned to all States for FYs 2004 - 2009 Figure 1

4. Which programs are subject to the EISA provisions and which programs are subject to the SAFETEA-LU provisions? . Highway Bridge Program . Interstate Maintenance . Highway Bridge Replacement & Rehabilitation Program . National Highway . Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement System . Surface Transportation Program . Metropolitan Planning . Mandatory Safety Set-asides (Pre-SAFETEA-LU) . Minimum Guarantee . Railway-Highway Crossings (RHX) . Equity Bonus . Protective Devices at RHX . Recreational Trails . Elimination of Hazards at RHX . Railway-Highway . Hazard Elimination of Railway-Highway Crossings Crossings . Optional Safety . Transportation Enhancements . Highway Safety . Distribution to Areas by Population: Improvement Program . Areas with a Population ≥ 200K . High Risk Rural Roads EISA Rescission Provisions Provisions EISA Rescission Chapter 1 of Title 23, U.S.C.) U.S.C.) 23, of Title 1 Chapter

(Programs Apportioned under under Apportioned (Programs . Areas with a Population ≤ 200K Program . Areas with a Population < 5K . Funds Available For Use In Any Area

. Appalachian Development Highway System . Safe Routes to School . Coordinated Border Infrastructure Rescission Provisions SAFETEA-LU SAFETEA-LU

Table 2

5. By State, how was the amount to be rescinded based on the EISA and SAFETEA-LU provisions determined? Section 1132(a) of EISA only addresses the rescission of funds apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, U.S.C. The total amount to be rescinded from chapter 1 programs within a State was determined by:

a. First, determining the ratio that the total amount apportioned to the State under chapter 1 of title 23 U.S.C. for FYs 2004 through 2009 bears to the total amount apportioned to the State for FYs 2004 through 2009;

FAQs - SAFETEA-LU Rescission Page 3 of 6

Chapter 1 ∑ Amount Apportioned to a State Under chapter 1 of title 23 U.S.C. for FYs 2004 - 2009 Ratio = ∑ Amount Apportioned to a State for FYs 2004 - 2009

Chapter 1 Ratio for $3,653,212,387 the State = = 92.46% of $3,950,979,004 Alabama Figure 2

b. Second, determining the amount to be rescinded from EISA programs by multiplying each State’s share of the rescission (see Figure 1) by each State’s chapter 1 ratio (see Figure 2);

EISA Share of Total Amount to be Rescinded for the = $175,661,481 x 92.46% = $162,422,705 State of Alabama Figure 3

c. Lastly, determining the amount to be rescinded from that State based on the provisions outlined in section 10212(c) of SAFETEA-LU, as amended1, by subtracting a State’s EISA share of the total amount to be rescinded (see Figure 3) from the total amount to be rescinded from that State (see Figure 1);.

SAFETEA-LU Share of Total Amount to be = $175,661,481 $162,422,705 = $13,238,776 Rescinded for the State - of Alabama Figure 4

6. Paragraph 5(a) of FHWA Notice N4510.710 states that information on how the SAFETEA-LU share of the total amount to be rescinded from a State will be provided in a future Notice. When does FHWA anticipate issuing the Notice? FHWA plans to issue the Notice providing information on how the SAFETEA-LU share of the total amount to be rescinded from a State on September 27, 2009.

7. Why is the FHWA waiting until September 27, 2009 to inform the States of how their SAFETEA-LU share of the total amount to be rescinded from their State will be spread among the non-Chapter 1 programs? The amounts to be rescinded by program under the SAFETEA-LU provisions are based on the un-obligated balances for those programs as of September 30, 2009. Administratively, it is implausible to wait until the last day of the fiscal year to implement the language of the rescission.

In order to allow ample time to implement the rescission and close out the fiscal year, FHWA will close the accounting systems to obligations on September 25, 2009. The un-obligated balance reports required to make the final

FAQs - SAFETEA-LU Rescission Page 4 of 6

calculations to determine the amounts to be rescinded by program cannot be made until the systems are closed.

8. Must FHWA rescind funds from each of the EISA programs subject to the rescission? Yes. The EISA language provides specific instructions as to how the amount to be rescinded from a State is to be distributed among the programs subject to the rescission.

9. In previous rescissions, States have had discretion as to which program funds can be used to cover the amounts being rescinded from their State. Do the States have that same discretion for the SAFETEA-LU rescission? If not, why? Both EISA and SAFETEA-LU provide specific instructions as to what program funds are subject to be rescinded and how the amount to be rescinded by State is spread among those programs. For Chapter 1 programs, States must rescind the amounts by program as reflected in Table 23. However, a State may choose to rescind up to 110% of the amounts to be rescinded from any individual program (see Table 3)3. For non-Chapter 1 programs, the amount to be rescinded by program will be detailed in a September 27, 2009 Notice.

10. What options does a State have to cover the total amount required to be rescinded from a program if upon calculating the amounts to be rescinded by program under Section 1132(a) of EISA, it is determined that they have insufficient un-obligated balances in a particular program to cover the total amount to be rescinded from said program? Option 1: A State may choose to invoke the 110% adjustment/flexibility provision in Section 1132(b) of EISA. In doing so, a State may submit Table 43 instructing the Fiscal Management Information System (FMIS) Team from which program codes un-obligated balances may be withdrawn/rescinded to cover the amounts remaining to be rescinded. Should a State choose to follow Option 1, Table 43 must be submitted to the official mailbox for the Office of Budget, “FHWA, BudgetDivision” no later than September 4, 2009. Option 2: A State may choose to use the uniform transferability provision in section 126(a) of title 23 U.S.C. Should a State choose to follow Option 2, the standard FHWA Transfer Request form used to transfer funds between apportioned programs and other Federal Agencies must be submitted to mailbox “HCF-10” no later than September 17, 2009. Option 3: A State may choose to de-obligate funding within a program in order to free-up funds to cover the remaining amounts to be rescinded.

FAQs - SAFETEA-LU Rescission Page 5 of 6

11. What is the 110% flexibility provision and how does it work? Section 1132(b) of EISA provides that a State may adjust the distribution of the rescission within the State so long as the final amount rescinded from an EISA program does not exceed 110% of the original rescission amount. The total amount that a State can rescind from any one program is reflected in Table 33.

12. What procedures will FHWA follow to rescind funds from a State if it is determined after September 25, 2009 that a State has insufficient un-obligated balances within a particular EISA program to cover the calculated rescission amount? Step 1: To the extent that balances remain available, FHWA will programmatically distribute the remaining rescission balance to the State’s other EISA programs. Step 2: To the extent that balances remain available, FHWA will distribute the remaining rescission balance among the State’s other Chapter 1 programs that were listed in SAFETEA-LU but did not receive an apportionment in FY2009. Step 3: FHWA will proportionately distribute the State’s remaining rescission balance to the States’ non-EISA programs.

13. What procedures will FHWA follow to ensure that the total amount to be rescinded from a State is covered if it is determined that the total amount to be rescinded from a State exceeds its total un-obligated balances in both the SAFETEA-LU and EISA categories? FHWA will proportionately distribute the amount to be rescinded from the State with insufficient un-obligated balances among the other States. If distributed in this manner, the amount to be rescinded will be distributed among the applicable EISA or non-EISA category.

14. Can a State choose not to transfer funds based on the “covered programs” provision in section 10212(d) of SAFETEA-LU? No. The language in section 10212(d) of SAFETEA-LU specifically requires that a State immediately restore funds to the covered program from the un-obligated balances of the other programs that are subject to the rescission, so long as the restoration is not being made from the un-obligated balances of another covered program.

1 Since the enactment of SAFETEA-LU, the total amount of un-obligated contract authority to be rescinded as been amended twice. The original amount to be rescinded pursuant to section 10212 was $8.573 billion. Section 1302 of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (Pub. L. 109-280) increased the amount to be rescinded to $8.593 billion. Section 112 of the SAFETEA-LU Technical Corrections Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-244) later increased the amount to be rescinded to the current level of $8.708 billion. 2 As reflected in Table 1 of FHWA Notice N4510.710 3 FHWA Notice N4510.710

FAQs - SAFETEA-LU Rescission Page 6 of 6

CMAP Region ARRA Expenditure Report

The Suburban Councils received $94 million in ARRA formula Funding; Chicago received $85.9 million. About $74.2 million is scheduled to be let by the end of September, 2009. Local Share: Mark and Expenditures (Thru the September Letting)

Spending Progress $20.00 Mark Expenditures $15.00 ARRA Spent $10.00 $74.2 M* Remaining $5.00 Mark $105.7 M* $- CHI NS NW NC CE SW SO DU KA/K LK MC WI Total Mark $85.9 $5.9 $12.5 $5.7 $4.6 $6.5 $9.3 $16.3 $8.9 $11.6 $4.7 $7.9 $179.9 Expenditures $45.5 $3.9 $3.5 $1.9 $1.3 $0.6 0 $3.4 $3.7 $7.1 $1.8 $1.6 $74.2 *Includes Chicago

ARRA Transit Expenditures Total Local Programmed and Expenditures

Millions Mark $300 $240 $240 Expenditures $200 $141 $141 $100 $33 $33 $- CTA Metra Pace (Thru the end of CTA received an additional $1.5 million and Pace $1.3 million September) in competitive stimulus funds. The CMAP Council of Mayors Executive Committee adopted a policy at its September 15, 2009 meeting to ensure all ARRA funds are spent.

State Share: Program and Expenditures (Thru the September Letting)

$50 Program Expenditures $40 $30 $20 $10 $- CHI NS NW NC CE SW SO DU KA/K LK MC WI RE Total Program $50 $9 $15 $9 $12 $27 $77 $16 $9 $45 $7 $30 $14 $321 Expenditures $49 $6.9 $12 $7.6 $7.9 $14 $74 $6.9 $8.0 $36 $5.2 $19 $14 $260

September, 2009 For more information contact Shana Alford at (312) 386-8619or [email protected] All figures are in millions and represent the federal amount. www.cmap.illinois.gov

Council of Mayors American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009 (ARRA) Spending Policy Approved by Council of Mayors Executive on September 15, 2009

Using direction from the Executive Committee that 1) one hundred percent of the ARRA funds allocated to the suburban Councils are to be obligated; 2) there will be no pay-back of ARRA funds among the Councils as is done with STP funds; and 3) recognizing the urgency associated with obligating the ARRA funds, the Planning Liaisons with input from IDOT BLRS staff and CMAP are recommending certain guidelines to be observed through the March 5, 2010 letting.

IDOT has indicated the last letting to use ARRA funds will be March 5, 2010. Using the IDOT letting schedule (revised June 2009), pre-final plans for the March 5, 2010 letting are due to IDOT on October 16, 2009.

Any Council that does not have their ARRA funds allocated (pre-final plans submitted to IDOT) by September 25, 2009 will have until October 2, 2009 to reallocate funds to projects that have submitted pre-final plans or projects that can clearly demonstrate the ability to have pre-final plans submitted by the October 16, 2009 IDOT deadline. Any Council unable to reallocate funds by October 2 will have their funds rescinded for re-distribution to those Councils that have fully allocated their funding. IDOT will be requested to verify pre-final plans submittal status on October 2, 2009. On September 25, CMAP will announce the total funds available for re-distribution to ready to go projects in the region.

On October 2, each Council will submit a final list of eligible ready to go projects that could receive re- distributed funds. Ready to go projects are defined as those that have Design Approval and have submitted or can clearly demonstrate the ability to submit pre-final plans by October 16, 2009, and must be let by March 5, 2010. Ready to go projects may be ARRA “B-List” projects, STP projects1, or “new” (not previously federally funded) projects that meet all federal criteria, as long as the pre-final plans submittal deadline has or can be met. In the case of Councils that required local match for ARRA projects, or have “partially” funded projects, re-distributed funds may be used to reduce the local match and/or provide full funding to a project scheduled for the January 2010 or March 2010 lettings. Re-distribution of available ARRA funds shall be offered, on an equal basis, to those Councils that have met the submittal deadlines, and programmed their entire allotment of ARRA funds. If a Council has programmed their entire allotment of ARRA funds, but has no projects available to accept additional funds, they will be excluded from the re-distribution calculation. Any Council eligible to receive redistributed ARRA funds may decline their share of the redistribution. On October 6, 2009 by Noon, each Council will report to Chalen Daigle (815-334-4970 or [email protected]) if they are able to use any redistributed ARRA funding. If a Council does not respond by Noon on October 6, they will be considered ineligible to receive any redistributed funding.

If a project is delayed in October or later and cannot make the March letting, the funding will be reallocated to an existing eligible and ready to go project from the final list developed on October 2, 2009. Councils will not be permitted to substitute another project from their Council that was not identified as eligible and ready to go. Councils that miss submittal deadlines after receiving re- distributed funds will not be eligible to receive any additional re-distributed funds.

The use of unobligated ARRA funds will not require a “payback” from one Council to another. No funding increases for fully funded projects will be allowed unless funding is available in January. Local match may be reduced, but the total cost of a project cannot be increased.

Notes 1. Under no circumstances should the use of ARRA funds contribute to the unobligated balance of STP funds in the region. If an STP project is changed to ARRA funding, that project must be replaced and the STP funds spent within FFY 2010.

Deadlines:

Friday, September 4, 2009 – Deadline for Councils to submit a preliminary list of eligible ready to go projects that could receive redistributed funds to Chalen Daigle. List will include minimum amount of funding needed per project.

Friday, September 25, 2009 – Programmed ARRA projects that have not submitted pre-final plans identified by Planning Liaisons and CMAP estimates amount of funds potentially available for re- distribution to the Planning Liaisons.

Friday, October 2, 2009 – IDOT confirmation of pre-final plans submittals for programmed projects and projects identified as eligible to receive re-distributed funds.

Deadline for internal re-allocation of funds. Deadline for Councils to submit a final list of eligible, ready to go projects that could receive redistributed funds due to Chalen Daigle

Tuesday, October 6, 2009 by Noon – Deadline for Councils to notify Chalen Daigle if they will be using redistributed ARRA funding. If a Council does not respond by Noon, they will not be able to access redistributed funds.

Wednesday, October 7, 2009 October – Redistribution of funds becomes final.

Thursday October 8, 2009 – MPO Policy Committee meeting.

Friday, October 16, 2009 – Pre-final plans due to IDOT for March 5, 2010 letting. 233 South Wacker Drive Suite 800, Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606

312-454-0400 (voice) 312-454-0411 (fax) www.cmap.illinois.gov

Regionwide Mark American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) ARRA Mark North Shore 5,944,773 Northwest 12,478,786 North Central 5,719,211 Central 4,565,797 Southwest 6,544,852 South 9,294,620 DuPage 16,304,717 Kane 8,914,701 Lake 11,601,573 McHenry 4,733,434 Will 7,912,522

Suburban Total 94,014,987

City of Chicago Regional Project 8,996,649

City of Chicago Local 76,921,353

City of Chicago Total 85,918,002

Northeastern Illinois Total: 179,932,989

Approved by the Council of Mayors Executive Committee 09/15/09 Summary of Illinois' High-Speed/Intercity Rail Pre-Application Projects Applications

7/15/09 8:48 AM

Track 1. Projects (ARRA) - Full application due 8/24/09 Anticipated Matching No. Project Title Project Description Applicant Project Cost Funds 1 Midwest Train Equipment Fleet New rolling stock for Midwest States of IL, IA, MI, MO, OH, and WI WisDOT - Ron Adams 1,219,000,000 - 2 Chicago Terminal Limits for the Midwest Regional Rail System Studies are needed to address the complex problems within the terminal limits that constrain efficient IDOTfor IL, -IA, George MI, MO, Weber and - TBD 1./ (submitted in two parts - row below) operations of the MWRRS and to identify solutions to ensure efficient passenger rail operations. MWRRI (WI, MI, IN, OH, MO, NE, MN, IA, IL) Track 1 A Project - Final Design/Construction for Quad Cities, Milwaukee and Detroit 172,000,000 Track 1 B Project - St. Louis, Detroit and Milwaukee Corridors 135,000,000 3 Chicago to St. Louis HSR Corridor - Joliet to St. Louis Meet First phase of ground work for HSR corridor project approved by FRA, consisting of final IDOT - George Weber 64,000,000 TBD Resolution Project design/rehabilitation/construction of existing sidings, new sidings and 2nd main to accommodate train meet points associated with HSR corridor and accompanying signal, bridge and crossing work. 4 Amtrak Illinois Zephyr Galesburg Congestion Relief Project Construct 3 new tracks on BNSF in Galesburg for staging freight trains to improve passenger train IDOT - George Weber 45,500,000 9,000,000 service; build 3rd mainline track through Galesburg passenger station for improved efficiencies and install a new connection between Brookfield and Mendota. Subtotal Track 1: 1,635,500,000 9,000,000

Track 2. Programs (ARRA) - Full application due 10/2/09 Anticipated Matching No. Project Title Project Description Applicant Project Cost Funds 5 Chicago-Moline-Iowa City Intercity Rail Re-establishment of passenger rail service between Chicago, the Quad Cities and Iowa City. IDOT- George Weber/ 62,900,000 TBD Requires signals, grade-crossing eq. reconstruction of track and new stations. Joint with IA 6 74th St. Flyover, 75th Flyover (Forest Hill) and Belt CREATE - Metra Southwest Service commuter trains to relocate to LaSalle Street Station. IDOT - George Weber 500,000,000 25,000,000 Junction/Dan Ryan track changes to facilitate construction Construction of two flyover structures along the Belt Junction and Dan Ryan. 7 Chicago to St. Louis HSR Corridor - Station/Platform/Parking 2nd element of ground work for HSR corridor project approved by FRA consisting of preliminary IDOT - George Weber 108,000,000 22,000,000 Improvement Program engineering/NEPA for upgrading existing stations/platforms and providing new stations/platforms/parking to accommodate increased passenger demand associated with Chicago to St. Louis HSR corridor. 8 Chicago to St. Louis HSR Corridor - Double Main/PTC Project Amend the existing HSR corridor pgm. To accommodate 8 round trip HSR frequencies /1 round trip IDOT - George Weber 2,300,000,000 TBD long distance Amtrak train and increased freight traffic as modeled. 9 Chicago-Genoa-Rockford -(Route C) or Chicago-Belvidere- Improvements to rail corridors to re-establish intercity passenger rail service between Chicago and IDOT- George Weber/ 60,000,000 TBD Rockford (Route A) Freeport-Dubuque Intercity Passenger Rail Dubuque, IA - a rail corridor of 183 miles running east-west across the northern portion of Illinois from Joint with Iowa DOT. Chicago through Elgin, Rockford, Freeport, Galena, IL and into Dubuque, IA. Subtotal Track 2: 3,030,900,000 47,000,000

Track 3. Planning (FFY 2008/2009 US DOT Appropriations) - Full applications due 8/24/09 Anticipated Matching No. Project Title Project Description Applicant Project Cost Funds 10 Chicago to St. Louis 220 mph high-speed express feasibility Development of plan to include widening existing ROW and constructing new tracks as well as IDOT - George Weber 10,000,000 5,000,000 study and alternative analysis. moving existing freight tracks, acquiring new rolling stock, adding overhead electrification, grade- Subtotal Track 3: 10,000,000 5,000,000

Grand Total: 4,676,400,000 61,000,000

1./ Englewood - 63rd and State Streets Railroad Improvement Proj. and Grade Separation - approx. 5% has already been committed by IDOT, the CREATE Railroads and other federal funds. Note: All pre-applications were due on 7/10/09. Note: IDOT did not submit an application under Track 4 (FFY 2009 appropriation funded projects) TIGER Discretionary Grants (TDG)

Applications Overview Volume of Applications by Type

Amount Requested by Type

Data presented is preliminary, based on initial review. It is subject to change after further review and analysis. The total number above represents all applications received. Analysis may exclude a small number of applications where information was not complete. In billions

233 South Wacker Drive Suite 800, Sears Tower Chicago, IL 60606

312-454-0400 (voice) 312-454-0411 (fax) www.cmap.illinois.gov

MEMORANDUM

To: MPO Policy Committee

Date: October 8, 2009

From: CMAP Staff

Re: American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Implementation

The following is a brief update of CMAP’s assistance in coordination and implementation of selected non-transportation elements from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) in the region.

Regional ARRA Coordinating Council The Regional ARRA Coordinating Council has been meeting monthly and working on the development of targeted strategies to assist in building initiatives that could maximize and leverage ARRA resources throughout the region. The group recently administered a survey to recipients of housing, workforce development, energy, and weatherization funds. The results of the survey will help inform the actions of this group. Examples of current initiatives the Council is supporting and assisting in the coordination of include: information sharing on specific ARRA programs, workforce development strategy development and collaboration, development of a regional energy efficiency system, and Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) collaboration and implementation. Brief descriptions of the ARRA programs we are providing information on as well as evaluating the potential for collaboration and coordination are provided below:

Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants: Thirty-nine municipalities and six counties in the region are eligible for formula grants from the newly created Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants (EECBG) program. Applications were due to the Department of Energy (DOE) on August 10th and awards have yet to be announced. The total eligible amount to northeastern Illinois local governments is more than $76 million. The Council, and particularly the Center for Neighborhood Technology, is working with municipalities in the development of their strategies, encouraging projects with long-term impact, and coordinating with neighboring jurisdictions. The State of Illinois also submitted an application for EECBG funds; their proposal identified regional planning agencies as having a central role in the allocation of these funds to local governments. This proposal has not yet been approved by DOE.

State Energy Plan: On August 14th, the State of Illinois’ State Energy Plan was approved. Applications for approximately $100 million in funds for local governments, non-profits, and the private sector are now available through eight grant programs. The potential for residential projects is limited, which may constrain the role of the Council for this program beyond information sharing. The applications are due in October.

Workforce Development: Formula grants have been distributed to the nine Workforce Investment Boards serving the seven county region. The funds are flowing through the existing Workforce Investment Act programs for adult training, dislocated worker training, and youth programs. There are several competitive grant programs open, including the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity’s (DCEO) sector based initiative which will allocate 10% of Illinois’ $165 million stimulus Workforce Investment Act funds to programs that focus on either healthcare/healthcare IT, manufacturing, transportation/distribution/logistics, or green initiatives. In addition, $750 million in nationally competitive grants are being administered by the Department of Labor. The focus of these funds is on green jobs, health care, and other high growth and emerging industries. The ARRA Coordinating Council is exploring what types of collaboration may assist applications submitted from the Chicago area as well as the development of strategies to build sustainable programs. In addition, the Council is considering opportunities to connect the populations served by the housing and weatherization ARRA programs to worker training resources.

Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program (HPRP): HPRP will provide financial assistance and services to prevent individuals and families from becoming homeless and help those who are experiencing homelessness to be quickly re-housed and stabilized. Illinois will receive $70 million in funding; an existing formula is used to make direct allocations too county and municipal governments. Grants are approved on an ongoing basis by the federal agency, Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and all are expected to execute in September. Funds may be sub- allocated to local governments and private nonprofit organizations that provide homeless prevention and rapid re-housing services, utilizing either a formula allocation or Request for Proposal process. It is likely ARRA HPRP funds will be used to fill the existing backlog, especially since there were significant cuts in the State budget to homeless prevention funds.

Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP 1 and 2):

CMAP formed a consortium of local governments and non-profits, known as the Chicago Metropolitan Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 Consortium (CMNSPC) for the purposes of implementing the NSP2 Program in partnership with other units of general local government, which include: the municipalities of Aurora, Berwyn, Cicero, Elgin, and Joliet; the counties of Cook, DuPage, Kendall, Lake,

and Will; and the Illinois Housing Development Authority. Additionally, the consortium includes Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago as a non-profit member. The application was submitted July 17th and requests a grant amount of $78.7 million (see full application here: http://www.cmap.illinois.gov/policy/housing.aspx?ekmensel=c580fa7b_8_18_398 _5) December 1st is the last day for HUD to notify selected applicants. The ARRA Coordinating Council will help identify and support coordination between the NSP activities and other resources and programs.

CMAP also continues to coordinate the efforts of recipients of NSP1 program funds. CMAP has created and managed the NSP Coordinating Council and maintains an active NSP listserv. The NSP Coordinating Council includes all of the jurisdictions receiving NSP1 dollars and local HUD Community Planning and Development staff. The NSP Coordinating Council, which meets quarterly, provides a platform to share information, exchange best practices, discuss needed trainings, leverage additional assistance and maximize regional impact. Additionally, CMAP, in partnership with Metropolitan Mayor’s Caucus and Business and Professional People for the Public Interest, is developing a best-practice manual for addressing foreclosures. The manual will include model ordinances and case studies from around the region of communities taking measures to address vacant buildings as a result of foreclosures.

Weatherization: The State of Illinois was awarded $240 million to weatherize homes of households that meet income criteria; the funds are distributed by formula to each county’s Community Action Agency (CAA). The amount provided to CAAs through the stimulus is a significant increase to previous years’ funding. There are numerous opportunities to link these funds to other programs, including NSP and EECBG. The Council is working with the administering entities of these funds to identify how to assist in establishing linkages and coordination to promote the success of this program.

CMAP Recovery Blog CMAP created a recovery blog, “Regional Response to ARRA” (http://www.cmap.illinois.gov/recovery) in February to track major developments relating to stimulus funding coming to the region. The blog is updated two to three times a week with information relevant to grant recipients and residents of the area alike. As an aspect of the Council’s project of information sharing, the blog allows us to post information on new grant opportunities, upcoming deadlines, news items, and the best ways to track stimulus money coming to the region. Updates on the Regional ARRA Coordinating Council’s activities will also be included on this blog, as well as helpful data and analyses. Our blog reaches out to the larger CMAP audience with mentions in CMAP’s Weekly Update emails.

233 South Wacker Drive Suite 800 Chicago, IL 60606

312-454-0400 (voice) 312-454-0411 (fax) www.cmap.illinois.gov

MEMORANDUM

To: MPO Policy Committee

Date: October 1, 2009

From: Don Kopec

Re: Northeastern Illinois Regional Greenways and Trails Plan

CMAP staff requests that the following text be approved as part of the Northeastern Illinois Regional Greenways and Trails Plan – 2009 Update: "Trails development should be coordinated with plans, now and in the future, for other transportation uses in these corridors to avoid conflicts and maximize transportation benefits.”

The recommended text is to be inserted on page 3 of the plan text (posted at http://www.cmap.illinois.gov/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=17445) after the sentence "Transportation, railroad, and utility rights of way may be used for this purpose.” The text was developed by the City of Chicago and the Regional Transportation Authority in response to discussions that originated at the CMAP Programming Coordinating Committee and continued at the Transportation Committee.

###

Northeastern Illinois Regional Greenways and Trails Plan 2009 Update: Planning Process and Public Review October 1, 2009

Planning Process The planning process for the 2009 Update of the Regional Greenways and Trails Plan included: a survey of local governments; creation of a Steering Committee to obtain shape files of trails and greenways for each of the seven counties; meetings and correspondence with the Steering Committee and CMAP Bicycle and Pedestrian Task Force to work on maps and review materials; and presentations to and input from CMAP Committees. (CMAP Board review expected October 14th).

The first step in updating this plan was to develop a local government survey and distribute, along with specially prepared maps, to 282 municipalities and 175 park districts. The survey asked for information on trail and greenway development in their jurisdictions since the 1997 Greenways and Trails Plan. Recipients were asked to describe and map the greenways and trails that they think should be added, mark those that are no longer relevant, and/or identify any changes in status since the previous plan. General comments about the plan were also solicited. The responses from the survey were included in the development of the 2009 map.

Secondly, a steering committee was formed consisting of representatives from each of the seven counties, the forest preserve and conservation districts, the National Park District, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, a local park district and municipality, advocacy organizations, and the Council of Mayors planning liaisons. After a kick–off meeting of the steering committee, communications were conducted primarily through email and meetings with county staff. Shape files were obtained for map development. The Steering Committee met jointly in a workshop with the CMAP Bicycle and Pedestrian Task Force on November 14, 2007 to work on county maps. Follow-ups to that meeting were conducted with counties, forest preserve and conservation districts, and municipalities to address issues relating to the draft maps. During this time, local government and Council of Mayors bicycle plans were examined for potential facilities that could provide important linkages in the plan’s network of greenways and trails. Aerial photographs were used to identify additional facilities that could serve as regional connections to the network. Over the next year, extensive consultation and technical work was undertaken to update the maps, including incorporating the work of six newly adopted county and council of government bikeway plans as well as extensive new open space acquisitions. The last of the subregional plans was adopted at the end of 2008.

The Steering Committee and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Task Force met jointly in a workshop May 27, 2007, where they were presented with the draft plan and maps prior to release for public review. The Plan was endorsed at that meeting and forwarded to the CMAP Transportation Committee for their June 12, 2009 meeting. After the presentation of the Plan, the Transportation Committee released it for a public review period starting June 12th and ending June 26th. The Plan document, executive summary, and maps of the trails, primary regional trail system, and greenways were posted on the CMAP website. Notification of the public review period and link to the plan was included in the CMAP weekly email on June 12th. Upon request, the public review period was extended to July 24th, at which time an additional announcement and web link was distributed in the weekly email. During the public review period, an additional map was created and posted on the web that was a composite of the three maps that had been posted earlier.

1

The CMAP Environmental Committee was presented with the draft plan and maps in July and appropriate comments were incorporated in the plan. The plan was presented to the Programming Coordinating Committee on September 9th, at which time there was a request to add language on abandoned rail lines and trails. The additional language was presented and discussed by the Transportation Committee on September 18th. . Based on that meeting, the language was reduced in length to one sentence. The Environment and Natural Resources Committee will be updated on October 7th; the MPO Policy Committee will be presented with the plan on October 8th and the Coordinating Committee on October 14th. Board approval is anticipated at their meeting later that day.

Public Review Comments and Responses We heard from forest preserve and conservation districts, transportation agencies, township, counties, watershed planning committee, ecosystem partnership, and advocacy organizations. The recommendations were very helpful and will be included in the plan as described below. The list that follows focuses on the major recommended additions or changes on the map and the document and our responses to each of the recommendations.

Recommendations and Comments Relating to the Greenways and Trails Plan Text

Recommendation: Add language relating to the potential future transportation use of abandoned rail lines that have been converted to trails. o Response: the following sentence was added to Page 3 of the text document: . Trails development should b e coordinated with plans, now and in the future, for other transportation uses in these corridors to avoid conflicts and maximize transportation benefits. . The action recommendation 5.5.6 was revised to “Monitor and evaluate rail abandonments and assemble partnerships to preserve those abandoned rights-if-way that are desirable for trail purposes, and, where feasible, additional multi-modal transportation options. . The action recommendation 5.1.1 was revised to: “Coordinate regional greenway and trail planning and local land use and transportation planning in order to encourage the preservation of greenways and the continuity of trails.” . The action recommendation 5.6.4 was revised to “Collaborate with transportation agencies to encourage the planning and development of trails within or adjacent to existing and future right-of-way, including the accommodation of trail and bikeway lanes on new and renovated bridge structures.”

Recommendation: Change the title of the chart, “Trail Mileage by County,” to indicate it only includes regional greenways plan trails. o Response: Clarified title of the table to read: Greenways and Trails Plan Trail Mileage, by County

Recommendation: Note that jurisdictions may have additional miles of trails not in the plan. o Response: Added text: “The following table illustrates the number of miles of trails in each county that are part of the Northeastern Illinois Regional Greenways and Trails Plan. Many jurisdictions have miles of bikeways and trails that are not part of this plan; those miles are not included in the table below.”

Recommendation: The difference between bike trails and bike routes is blurry. Add a brief discussion on this and a working definition of trail. 2

o Response: Added “It should be noted that while many communities have bike plans that include bike routes, which typically refer to signed, on-road facilities, they are not considered regional greenway plan trails unless they are very short connections that provide essential linkages to or between the Primary Regional System.”

Recommendation: Add an action recommendation that encourages building multi-purpose trails along water- based greenways. o Response: Added “Encourage, where appropriate, environmentally sensitive multi-use trails along water-based greenways to increase public access, enjoyment, and stewardship of these resources.”

Recommendation: Add proposed Hebron to Harvard Trail Concept to list of priorities in the text. o Response: Added proposed trail to list of priorities

Recommendation: Add proposed Kishwaukee River Trail Concept to list of priorities in text. o Response: Added proposed trail to list of priorities

Recommendation: Add proposed McHenry County College to Route 47 Trail Concept o Response: Added proposed trail to list of priorities

Recommendation: Add proposed Rakow Road to Prairie Trail Connector Concept to priorities in text. o Response: Added proposed trail to list of priorities

Recommendation: Add The Kishwaukee River to the list of resource rich areas recognized under the programs of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources.

o Response: Added Kishwaukee to the list

Recommendation: Add Openlands, The Conservation Foundation, Sierra Club, local land trusts, and ecological consultants to list of organizations and agencies that provide technical assistance on protection and restoration of stream greenways that are in private ownership.

o Response: The five groups were added to the list

Recommendation: (Metra staff): Change wording of the action recommendation: “collaborate with owners of rail right-of-way and with highway agencies to encourage planning and development of trails within existing and future rights-of way” to “adjacent to” or “alongside” existing and future rights-of-way. o Response: Re-phrased the sentence to read “within or alongside”

Recommendation: Recommend dimensions or scales that constitute effective greenways o Response: Added an action recommendation “Encourage local and subregional agencies and technical assistance providers to identify dimensions and scales that constitute effective greenways for habitat, stormwater quantity and quality management, and other functions.

Recommendation: Do not reference the new state index for bio-integrity; it has been criticized for not including many highly important aquatic habitats, or streams and river segments with high restoration potential.

3

o Response: A note will accompany the maps (we will use the more inclusive, previous IDNR maps in addition to the new one) that states that local surveys have identified high quality stream segments beyond what is included in the map.

Recommendation: Stream quality should be determined by studies that go into more detail about smaller segments not included in state studies. o Response: Added action recommendation “Promote localized stream quality surveys in order to identify high quality stream segments that are not included in state-wide studies.”

Recommendation: There should be a system to measure the quality of headwater streams since the state survey doesn’t include many of the smaller stream segments. o Response: Added action recommendation “Create a biological stream rating system for headwater streams.”

Recommendation: Include as an action recommendation “Provide technical assistance to private property owners and homeowner’s associations that own many greenway segments through-out the region.” o Response: Added recommendation

Recommendation: Incorporate the recommendations and visions in this plan into the strategies for long-range and comprehensive land use and transportation planning for the region. o The Greenways and Trails Plan will be integrated in the 2040 Comprehensive Regional Plan. The plan will be referenced; the map will be included, as will applicable action recommendations.

Recommendation: Add text to clarify what regional trails are and are not. o Response: Added “Many communities have bike plans that include bike routes, which typically refer to signed, on-road bikeways. With very few exceptions, these existing or proposed on-road facilities are not considered regional greenways plan trails. One notable exception is the Grand Illinois Trail (GIT), which utilizes some on-road connections for the purposes of continuity. All segments of the GIT are identified on the regional map and noted as such. “

Recommendation: Include “health benefits” to the list of recreational benefits greenways can provide. o Response: Added to the list

Recommendation: Add language to the Values of Greenways section on air and soil quality. o Response: Added “Greenway vegetation can mitigate the accumulation of greenhouse gases by capturing and storing carbons released in the atmosphere from the burning of fossil fuels. Other pollutants, such as contaminated soil, can also be mitigated through vegetation’s natural processes.”

Recommendation: Add “online mapping tool” to the list of products of “Natural Connections: Green Infrastructure in Wisconsin, Illinois, and Indiana in the green planning chart. o Response: Added to chart

Recommendation: Add “phyto-remediation and “healthy lifestyles” to the goals of the Northeastern Illinois Regional Greenways and Trails Plan column in the green planning chart. 4

o Response: Added to the chart

Recommendation: Add “Off-road segments of the Historic” to the heading “Route 66 Trail” in the Key Map Elements section since it is primarily an on-road route. o Response: Wording will be included

Comment: “Since the proposed greenways map only became available to review one week ago, Openlands had not had sufficient time to assess whether other important greenways might be recommended for inclusion.” o Response: The greenways map was available on CMAP’s website along with the trail element and the primary trail network first posted. Subsequently, CMAP combined those three maps and posted it on the website as a new, composite map.

Recommendations and Comments Relating to the Greenways and Trails Map

Recommendation: Add additional 3-5 mile diameter primary network trails throughout the region in order to attract bicycle and pedestrian use. o Response: Added “Encourage local and subregional agencies and technical assistance providers to identify 10 to 15 mile primary trail loops to increase local access to the regional trail network.”

Comment: McHenry County is generally deficient regarding designated trail corridors and substantially lags the rest of the 7 county region. o Response: Additional trails in McHenry County were added to the map based on information sent subsequent to this comment (see next recommendation)

Recommendation: Add to the map three future primary trails that include crossings on the Fox River: Bull Valley Road/Miller Road, Rt. 176, and Rawson Bridge Road o Response: Added the new primary trail proposals to the map

Recommendation: Add greenway between Wolf and Powderhorn Lakes on the map. o Response: Added greenway to map

Recommendation: Add greenway between Stony Creek and Lake Park in Oak Lawn.

o Response: Added greenway to map.

While additional helpful recommendations were received and appreciated, they may not be represented here because they were not thought to impact the substance or intent of the Plan.

5

Northeastern Illinois Regional Greenways and Trails Plan – 2009 Update: Executive Summary

What Is a Greenway? Greenways may range from narrow corridors of undeveloped landscape that run through urban and suburban development, to wide corridors that incorporate diverse natural and cultural features. A greenway can be land- or water-based. It can incorporate both public and private property, but always provides benefits for the larger community. Some are primarily recreational corridors, while others function almost exclusively for environmental protection and are not necessarily intended for substantial human passage. Some greenways run along stream corridors, shorelines, or wetlands; others follow abandoned railway tracks or other land-based features.

Greenways differ in their location and function, but a greenway network will protect natural and cultural resources, provide recreational opportunities, improve and sustain hydrological functions, and enhance the natural beauty and the quality of life in neighborhoods and communities.

What is a Regional Greenways Plan Trail? In this plan, regional trails are multi-jurisdictional facilities offering recreational opportunities and transportation uses, connecting communities and greenways throughout the region. While on-road bicycling presents many benefits, the emphasis in this plan is primarily existing and planned off-road facilities. The proposed trail alignments in the plan are conceptual and long-range. Regional trails include a variety of facility types, suitable for bicycling, walking, and paddling, but also offer diverse uses such as roller-blading, equestrian uses, and cross-country skiing. This plan emphasizes connectivity between regional trails and with forest preserves and conservation areas. Many of the trails in this plan offer a “green experience” in the midst of a highly urbanized environment. This plan also emphasizes consistency with locally- and county-based trail plans, thus enhancing opportunities to partner in the implementation of this plan.

Why Do We Need a Regional Greenways and Trails Plan? A greenways and trails plan offers a vision of continuous greenway and trail corridors, linked across jurisdictions, providing scenic beauty, natural habitat, or recreational opportunities for our communities. Many jurisdictions govern land use and landscape design in northeastern Illinois, so developing a regionally coordinated and connected vision of greenways and trails across these jurisdictions can inform local land-use decisions, and hopefully inspire decisions about development that are consistent with the greenways and trails identified. In addition, greenways and trails projects, including land acquisition, can enhance our communities. Greenway projects inspired by this plan offer some combination of the following characteristics: - Benefits large populations in multiple communities - Bridges gaps to help complete greenways - Creates new connections between greenways - Provides wildlife migration paths between isolated natural areas - Protects tributary streams to preserve water quality and ecological value in main regional waterways - Protects residential and commercial areas threatened by flood damage - Improves access to recreational trails where it is currently lacking - Protects high quality natural areas threatened by development - Protects important scenic vistas and historic areas from development - Increases access to open space for mature and distressed communities with disadvantaged populations - Offers a variety of recreational uses - Provides alternative transportation routes (walking, bicycling) and improves access to public transportation systems

A Changing Environment for Greenway Planning The Northeastern Illinois Regional Greenways and Trails Plan was first adopted in 1992, and then updated in 1997. Changes in northeastern Illinois have brought on the need to update the plan. For one, the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning was created to insure transportation, land use and other focus areas are addressed in concert to create a comprehensive regional plan that presents a unified vision for the region’s future. That plan, GO TO 2040, integrates this plan, thereby strengthening recommendations and supporting implementation of proposed regional trails and greenways.

In addition, Kendall County has become part of the northeastern Illinois area. Also, the serious clean water supply concerns in this region are beginning to be addressed through the State and Regional Water Supply Planning Initiative. Northeastern Illinois is also facing health concerns related to physical inactivity. More recreational opportunities and more connections to the natural environment can address these issues.

The one-hundredth anniversary of Burnham and Bennett’s 1909 Plan of Chicago also brings to the fore historic initiatives and visionary goals for the region concerning nature, open space, and green corridors, including the establishment of forest preserves, improvement of the lakefront, and efforts to develop and protect a system of connected open spaces. The public’s enthusiasm about this anniversary could have a lasting impact on the realization of Northeastern Illinois Regional Greenways and Trails Plan.

Key Features of the Map This map updates existing and proposed regional greenways and trails, major open space, and connections among them. It includes the locations of Illinois Nature Preserves, and sites on the Illinois and County Natural Areas Inventories. Many of these high quality areas are within designated greenways and existing open space and need to be protected. The regional trail system may, where appropriate, provide opportunities for viewing these areas, but care must be taken to protect fragile Natural Area resources from adverse impacts. Unprotected natural area sites need to be given preservation status through acquisition or other means, as appropriate.

Streams are a vital part of this plan; they are focal points for environmental education and stewardship; they can provide valued opportunities for canoeing and kayaking; they can be rich centers of biodiversity; and they can provide important water quality, water supply, and flood mitigation functions. All streams in this plan are considered existing or proposed greenways.

Greenway corridors shown as existing on the map are in the public domain, and the trails that are shown as existing are completed and open to the public. Proposed trails as illustrated are largely conceptual, and final alignments would be determined by the jurisdiction through its planning and engineering processes. A more detailed map and database are available from CMAP to coordinate such planning. While some of the connecting trail proposals that are fairly close together are shown as one corridor on the map, the greenway plan facilities in the CMAP database reflect both.

The Primary Regional Trail System identified on this map is the “backbone” of the regional trail system. The map also identifies important existing and proposed trails that make critical direct links that interconnect the backbone trails, communities, and greenways. Existing and proposed trails that connect the regional system, forest preserves and conservation areas are also identified as primary; trail loops within forest preserves and conservation areas that don’t provide connections to the regional system are not generally included. Connections that follow more circuitous routes and/or those that would have to depend on development of a number of adjacent trails to connect to the major trails are not included. The Primary Regional System designation does not necessarily indicate priority trails for development, however many coincide with the county priorities listed in the plan document. The intention is that trails will be developed based on opportunities (private land development, public land acquisition, or complementary infrastructure development), the availability of funds and other resources, staff expertise, and policy support from elected officials.

Green Trails, or trails that are shown buffered by a green corridor, offer a “green experience” for most of their length. A path with a relatively large amount of vegetation or scenic vistas would be included. Off- road paths along a highly developed corridor with very little vegetation, for example, do not have a green buffer. With very few exceptions, greenways plan trails do not include on-road signed facilities.

The Route 66 Trail is a plan to give trail users opportunities to explore the sights, cities, towns, and rural areas of Route 66. The vision consists of off-road paths and comfortable roads for bicyclists, equestrians, and hikers. In cases where the route coincides with major backbone trails, it is identified on the map. Certain highly urbanized, long-running, on-road sections of this proposed trail are not included in this plan, owing to the off-road emphasis of this plan. The Trails Element map identifies the Route 66 Trail.

The Grand Illinois Trail is a 475 mile loop trail for hiking and biking that uses existing and planned trails in northern Illinois. Major greenway plan trails are included in this loop, as well as some on-road routes essential to creating the loop. The Trails Element map identifies Grand Illinois Trail routes.

The Plan Document The plan includes actions that would contribute to implementation of the plan. These recommended actions in the plan are not necessarily site specific, but may indicate general priority areas. The seven general objectives identified in the plan are contained in the following list. Objective 1: Preserve Additional Greenway Open Space Objective 2: Preserve and Improve the Quality and Biodiversity of Existing Open Space, including Greenways Objective 3: Improve the Effectiveness and Use of Trails Objective 4: Expand the Existing Regional Trail System and Create Linkages Objective 5: Expand the Region’s Efforts to Protect, Restore and Utilize Water-Based Greenways Objective 6: Improve the Transportation Benefits of Trails Objective 7: Sustain and Strengthen the Funding Base for Trails and Greenways

Implementation of the Regional Greenways and Trails Plan will require a partnership effort among state natural resource and transportation agencies, forest preserve and park districts, county and municipal governments, conservation and recreation advocacy organizations, and private landowners. Specific actions to implement the seven objectives are detailed in the plan document.

An important function of the Regional Greenways and Trails Plan implementation program and the plan map is to support the programs of open space jurisdictions which are working to preserve and manage greenway corridors. Much of the on-the-ground implementation will occur through the initiative of the forest preserve and conservation districts, park districts, municipalities, counties, and state and federal agencies, including the Illinois Department of Natural Resources and the Illinois Department of Transportation. The open space, outdoor recreation, and natural resource advocacy organizations of the region play an invaluable role in plan implementation.

*This summary is intended as an overview of the officially adopted Northeastern Illinois Regional Greenways and Trails Plan. The Plan and map are both on CMAP’s website at http://www.cmap.illinois.gov/greenwaysandtrails.aspx.

For more specific information about regional existing or proposed trails, such as where the proposal originated, contact CMAP at 312-454-0400.