DOCSLIB.ORG

Broadcast and on Demand Bulletin Issue Number

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Issue number 369 20 December 2018 Issue 369 of Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin 20 December 2018 Contents Introduction 3 Broadcast Standards cases In Breach/Not in breach Various programmes RT, 17 March to 4 May 2018 Introduction and Summary 4 Background 5 Licensee’s Responses – General Factors 8 Decision – Ofcom’s Response to General Factors 19 Decision – Sputnik, 17 March 2018, 19:30 25 Decision – Sputnik, 7 April 2018, 19:30 41 Decision – Worlds Apart, 1 April 2018, 23:30 56 Decision – Crosstalk, 13 April 2018, 20:30 77 Decision – Crosstalk, 16 April 2018, 20:30 100 Decision – Crosstalk, 20 April 2018, 08:30 123 Decision – News, 18 March 2018, 08:00 145 Decision – News, 30 March 2018, 18:00 160 Decision – News, 26 April 2018, 08:00 170 Decision – News, 4 May 2018, 08:00 181 Next Steps – Minded to consider for sanction 190 2 Issue 369 of Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin 20 December 2018 Introduction Under the Communications Act 2003 (“the Act”), Ofcom has a duty to set standards for broadcast content to secure the standards objectives1. Ofcom also has a duty to ensure that On Demand Programme Services (“ODPS”) comply with certain standards requirements set out in the Act2. Ofcom reflects these requirements in its codes and rules. The Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin reports on the outcome of Ofcom’s investigations into alleged breaches of its codes and rules, as well as conditions with which broadcasters licensed by Ofcom are required to comply. The codes and rules include: a) Ofcom’s Broadcasting Code (“the Code”) for content broadcast on television and radio services licensed by Ofcom, and for content on the BBC’s licence fee funded television, radio and on demand services. b) the Code on the Scheduling of Television Advertising (“COSTA”), containing rules on how much advertising and teleshopping may be scheduled on commercial television, how many breaks are allowed and when they may be taken. c) certain sections of the BCAP Code: the UK Code of Broadcast Advertising, for which Ofcom retains regulatory responsibility for television and radio services. These include: • the prohibition on ‘political’ advertising; • ‘participation TV’ advertising, e.g. long-form advertising predicated on premium rate telephone services – notably chat (including ‘adult’ chat), ‘psychic’ readings and dedicated quiz TV (Call TV quiz services); and • gambling, dating and ‘message board’ material where these are broadcast as advertising3. d) other conditions with which Ofcom licensed services must comply, such as requirements to pay fees and submit information required for Ofcom to carry out its statutory duties. Further information can be found on Ofcom’s website for television and radio licences. e) Ofcom’s Statutory Rules and Non-Binding Guidance for Providers of On-Demand Programme Services for editorial content on ODPS (apart from BBC ODPS). Ofcom considers sanctions for advertising content on ODPS referred to it by the Advertising Standards Authority (“ASA”), the co-regulator of ODPS for advertising, or may do so as a concurrent regulator. Other codes and requirements may also apply to broadcasters, depending on their circumstances. These include the requirements in the BBC Agreement, the Code on Television Access Services (which sets out how much subtitling, signing and audio description relevant licensees must provide), the Code on Electronic Programme Guides, the Code on Listed Events, and the Cross Promotion Code. It is Ofcom’s policy to describe fully television, radio and on demand content. Some of the language and descriptions used in Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin may therefore cause offence. 1 The relevant legislation is set out in detail in Annex 1 of the Code. 2 The relevant legislation can be found at Part 4A of the Act. 3 BCAP and ASA continue to regulate conventional teleshopping content and spot advertising for these types of services where it is permitted. Ofcom remains responsible for statutory sanctions in all advertising cases. 3 Issue 369 of Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin 20 December 2018 In Breach/Not in Breach Various programmes Sputnik, RT, 17 March 2018, 19:30 Sputnik, RT, 7 April 2018, 19:30 Worlds Apart, RT, 1 April 2018, 23:30 Crosstalk, RT, 13 April 2018, 20:30 Crosstalk, RT 16 April 2018, 20:30 Crosstalk, RT, 20 April 2018, 08:30 News, RT, 18 March 2018, 08:00 News, RT, 30 March 2018, 18:00 News, RT, 26 April 2018, 08:00 News, RT, 4 May 2018, 08:00 Introduction and Summary This document sets out Ofcom’s Decisions in relation to the above ten programmes, which were broadcast on RT over a period of approximately seven weeks between 17 March 2018 and 4 May 2018, in the wake of the poisoning of Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in Salisbury on 4 March 2018. The licence for the RT service is held by Autonomous Non-profit Organisation TV-Novosti (“TV Novosti” or “the Licensee”). Ofcom was alerted to these programmes by a combination of complaints from viewers and Ofcom’s own monitoring. Ofcom considered that the programmes raised issues warranting investigation under the due impartiality rules set out in Section Five of the Ofcom Broadcasting Code (“the Code”). As required under our published procedures4, we wrote to the Licensee on 18 April 2018 and 14 May 2018, requesting its comments under the relevant rules of the Code. TV Novosti provided its written representations on 6 and 20 June 2018. Ofcom prepared Preliminary Views in relation to each of the ten programmes, which we sent to the Licensee on 13 September 2018. The Licensee provided its written representations on 22 November 2018 and its oral representations on 5 December 2018. In accordance with our published procedures, having watched all the programmes and taken careful account of all the relevant information, including the individual facts of each case and the various representations made by TV Novosti, Ofcom has decided that the following programmes are in breach of the Code for the reasons set out in full in each corresponding decision: • Sputnik, RT, 17 March 2018, 19:30; • Sputnik, RT, 7 April 2018, 19:30; • Crosstalk, RT, 13 April 2018, 20:30; • Crosstalk, RT, 16 April 2018, 20:30; • Crosstalk, RT, 20 April 2018, 08:30; 4 See https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/55109/breaches-content-standards.pdf 4 Issue 369 of Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin 20 December 2018 • News, RT, 18 March 2018, 08:00; and • News, RT, 26 April 2018, 08:00. In addition, and for the reasons set out in full in each case, we have decided that the following three programmes are not in breach of the Code: • Worlds Apart, RT, 1 April 2018, 23:30; • News, RT, 30 March 2018, 18:00; and • News, RT, 4 May 2018, 08:00. At the Preliminary View stage, Ofcom considered that one (News, 30 March 2018) of the ten programmes was not in breach of Section Five of the Code. However, following careful consideration of the Licensee’s written and oral representations, we decided that a further two programmes (Worlds Apart, 1 April 2018 and News, 4 May 2018) were also not in breach of Section Five of the Code. Background Background to our investigations RT is a global news and current affairs channel produced in Russia and funded by the Federal Agency for Press and Media Communications of the Russian Federation. The channel is made for UK audiences, providing a Russian perspective on UK and global news and current affairs related programming. In the UK, the channel broadcasts on satellite and terrestrial platforms. The licence for RT is held by TV Novosti. The ten programmes were broadcast in a period of approximately seven weeks between 17 March 2018 and 4 May 2018, in the wake of the poisoning of the former FSB secret service officer, Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in Salisbury on 4 March 2018. Since the events in Salisbury, we had observed5 a significant increase in the number of programmes broadcast that we considered warranted investigation as potential breaches of the Code. On 18 April 2018 we announced the opening of investigations into the following seven programmes. • Sputnik, RT, 17 March 2018, 19:30; • Sputnik, RT, 7 April 2018, 19:30; • Worlds Apart, RT, 1 April 2018, 23:30; • Crosstalk, RT, 13 April 2018, 20:30; • Crosstalk, RT, 16 April 2018, 20:30; 5 As well as receiving a number of complaints about programmes broadcast on RT, we had monitored the RT service in the past as part of our overall monitoring programme and had been doing so intensively following the events in Salisbury. 5 Issue 369 of Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin 20 December 2018 • News, RT, 18 March 2018, 08:00; and • News, RT, 30 March 2018, 18:00. On 14 May 2018, we launched investigations into the following three programmes: • Crosstalk, RT, 20 April 2018, 08:30; • News, RT, 26 April 2018, 08:00; and • News, RT, 4 May 2018, 08:00. Background to Ofcom’s due impartiality rules Reflecting our duties under the Communications Act 20036 (“the Act”), Section Five of the Code requires that news in television and radio services is presented with due impartiality and that the special impartiality requirements set out in section 320 of the Act are met. The special impartiality requirements include the preservation, in the case of every television service, of due impartiality on matters of political or industrial controversy and matters relating to current public policy. Section 320 of the Act requires Ofcom, for the purposes of setting the due impartiality rules in the Code, to take account, in particular, of the need to ensure the preservation of impartiality in relation to: matters of major political or industrial controversy; and major matters relating to current public policy.
Recommended publications
  • Letter from Dame Melanie Dawes to Rt Hon Damian Green MP on The

    Letter from Dame Melanie Dawes to Rt Hon Damian Green MP on The

    Dame Melanie Dawes Chief Executive [email protected] Rt Hon Damian Green MP House of Commons London SW1A OAA 30 July 2021 Dear Damian, Thank you for your email about BBC coverage of the Olympics, the deal with Discovery, and how these arrangements fit with our code on listed events. There has been significant press coverage of the issues, and the BBC have commented on them too, so I thought it would be helpful to outline the current arrangements, how the code applies in this case and some of the implications for the future. As you may know, the broadcasting arrangements applying to the Tokyo Games are the result of deals done some years ago. In 2012 the BBC acquired the exclusive UK broadcast rights for live coverage of both summer and winter Olympics up to and including the current Games. However, in 2015 Discovery reached an agreement with the IOC for a multimedia rights package encompassing fifty countries in Europe. That deal included the UK broadcast and on-demand rights for live coverage of the 2022 and 2024 Games. Subsequently, in 2016, the BBC agreed to sub-licence pay-TV rights to the current Games, in return for free-to-air rights to the 2022 and 2024 Games. As part of this sub-licencing deal, during the current Games the BBC is allowed to show two live streams at any one time from whichever events it chooses. The reason for concentrating on the rights is that they, rather than the actual coverage provided by a broadcaster of a listed event, are the focus of the current legislative regime.
  • “The Voice of the Voiceless” News Production and Journalistic Practice at Al Jazeera English

    “The Voice of the Voiceless” News Production and Journalistic Practice at Al Jazeera English

    STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY Department of Social Anthropology “The Voice of the Voiceless” News production and journalistic practice at Al Jazeera English Emma Nyrén i Master’s thesis Spring 2014 Supervisor: Paula Uimonen Abstract This thesis explores how the cultural and social media environments surrounding the journalism of Al Jazeera English are shaped by and shape the channel’s news practices. Al Jazeera English has been described as a contra-flow news organization in the global media landscape and this thesis discusses the different reasons why the channel is described in this way by looking at its origins, aims, characteristics and ideals. Based on interviews with Al Jazeera English journalists, news observations and two field observations in London, I argue that Al Jazeera English brings cultural and social sensitivity to its news reports by engaging with multiple in-depth perspectives, using local reporters and integrating citizen generated material. The channel’s early adoption of online technologies and citizen journalism also contributes to a more democratic news direction and gives the channel a wider spectrum of opinions and perspectives to choose between. By applying a comparative analysis built on similar studies within anthropology of news journalism differences and similarities within the journalistic practices can be detected, comparing Al Jazeera English’s journalism with journalism at other places and news organizations. These comparisons and discussions enables new understandings for how news is produced and negotiated within the global media landscape, and this gives the global citizen an improved comprehension of why the news, which shapes our appreciation of the world, looks like it does.
  • Signature Redacted Certified By: William Fjricchio Professor of Compa Ive Media Studies Thesis Supervisor Signature Redacted Accepted By

    Signature Redacted Certified By: William Fjricchio Professor of Compa Ive Media Studies Thesis Supervisor Signature Redacted Accepted By

    Manufacturing Dissent: Assessing the Methods and Impact of RT (Russia Today) by Matthew G. Graydon B.A. Film University of California, Berkeley, 2008 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMPARATIVE MEDIA STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN COMPARATIVE MEDIA STUDIES AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUNE 2019 C2019 Matthew G. Graydon. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. S~ri' t A Signature red acted Department of Comparative 6/ledia Studies May 10, 2019 _____Signature redacted Certified by: William fJricchio Professor of Compa ive Media Studies Thesis Supervisor Signature redacted Accepted by: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE Professor of Comparative Media Studies _OF TECHNOLOGY Director of Graduate Studies JUN 1 12019 LIBRARIES ARCHIVES I I Manufacturing Dissent: Assessing the Methods and Impact of RT (Russia Today) by Matthew G. Graydon Submitted to the Department of Comparative Media Studies on May 10, 2019 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Comparative Media Studies ABSTRACT The state-sponsored news network RT (formerly Russia Today) was launched in 2005 as a platform for improving Russia's global image. Fourteen years later, RT has become a self- described tool for information warfare and is under increasing scrutiny from the United States government for allegedly fomenting unrest and undermining democracy. It has also grown far beyond its television roots, achieving a broad diffusion across a variety of digital platforms.
  • Annual-Report-2018 Eng.Pdf

    Annual-Report-2018 Eng.Pdf

    Russian International Affairs Council CONTENTS /01 GENERAL INFORMATION 4 /02 RIAC PROGRAM ACTIVITIES 16 /03 RIAC IN THE MEDIA 58 /04 RIAC WEBSITE 60 /05 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 62 3 Russian International ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Affairs Council The General Meeting of RIAC members is the The main task of the RIAC Scientific Council is to ABOUT THE COUNCIL supreme governing body of the Partnership. The formulate sound recommendations for strategic key function of the General Meeting is to ensure decisions in RIAC expert, research, and publishing The non-profit partnership Russian compliance with the goals of the Partnership. The activities. General Meeting includes 160 members of the International Affairs Council (NP RIAC) is Council. The Vice-Presidency was introduced to achieve 01 the goals of the Partnership in cooperation with a Russian membership-based non-profit The RIAC Board of Trustees is a supervisory body government bodies and local authorities of the organization. The partnership was established of the Partnership that monitors the activities of Russian Federation and foreign states, the Partnership and their compliance with the international organizations, and Russian and by the resolution of its founders pursuant statutory goals. foreign legal entities. The candidate for Vice- President is approved by the RIAC Presidium for a to Decree No. 59-rp of the President of the The Presidium of the Partnership is a permanent one-year term. Russian Federation “On the Establishment collegial governing body of the Partnership that consists of not less than five and no more than RIAC Corporate Members of the Non-Profit Partnership Russian fifteen members, including the President and According to the Charter, legal citizens of the the Director General of the Partnership, who Russian Federation or entities established in International Affairs Council” dated February 2, have a vote in the decision-making process.
  • Scotland's Digital Media Company

    Scotland's Digital Media Company

    Annual Report and Accounts 2010 Annual Report and Accounts Scotland’s digital media company 2010 STV Group plc STV Group plc In producing this report we have chosen production Pacific Quay methods which aim to minimise the impact on our Glasgow G51 1PQ environment. The papers chosen – Revive 50:50 Gloss and Revive 100 Uncoated contain 50% and 100% recycled Tel: 0141 300 3000 fibre respectively and are certified in accordance with the www.stv.tv FSC (Forest stewardship Council). Both the paper mill and printer involved in this production are environmentally Company Registration Number SC203873 accredited with ISO 14001. Directors’ Report Business Review 02 Highlights of 2010 04 Chairman’s Statement 06 A conversation with Rob Woodward by journalist and media commentator Ray Snoddy 09 Chief Executive’s Review – Scotland’s Digital Media Company 10 – Broadcasting 14 – Content 18 – Ventures 22 KPIs 2010-2012 24 Performance Review 27 Principal Risks and Uncertainties 29 Corporate Social Responsibility Corporate Governance 34 Board of Directors 36 Corporate Governance Report 44 Remuneration Committee Report Accounts 56 STV Group plc Consolidated Financial Statements – Independent Auditors’ Report 58 Consolidated Income Statement 58 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 59 Consolidated Balance Sheet 60 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 61 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 62 Notes to the Financial Statements 90 STV Group plc Company Financial Statements – Independent Auditors’ Report 92 Company Balance Sheet 93 Statement
  • Iranian Website Seizures: Avoiding a Blanket Approach by Hamdi Malik

    Iranian Website Seizures: Avoiding a Blanket Approach by Hamdi Malik

    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 3507 Iranian Website Seizures: Avoiding a Blanket Approach by Hamdi Malik Jun 29, 2021 Also available in Arabic / Farsi ABOUT THE AUTHORS Hamdi Malik Dr. Hamdi Malik is an Associate Fellow with the Washington Institute, specializing in Shia militias. He is the co-founder of the Militia Spotlight platform, which offers in-depth analysis of developments related to the Iranian-backed militias in Iraq and Syria. He is the coauthor of the Institute's 2020 study "Honored, Not Contained: The Future of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces." Brief Analysis Tehran is increasingly relying on its vast regional propaganda machine to pursue its anti-American objectives, but policymakers need to be simultaneously more precise and more comprehensive in how they counter it. n June 22, the U.S. Department of Justice seized thirty-three website domains of channels affiliated with O Iran’s Islamic Radio and Television Union (IRTVU). Most of the television networks that run these domains are owned and operated by organizations that are part of Tehran’s anti-American “axis of resistance,” and therefore well worth targeting. Yet some non-resistance sites were caught up in the dragnet as well, resulting in a blanket approach that threatens to further Iran’s propaganda narrative while undermining U.S. interests in Iraq and elsewhere. Resistance vs. Non-Resistance Sites A mong the designees are the Arabic-language Al-Alam and the English-language Press TV, both run by the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting World Service. Other domains are owned and run by Iran-backed militias in the region, such as Al-Masirah (belonging to Yemen’s Houthi movement), Palestine Today (controlled by Palestinian Islamic Jihad), and three sites used by the Iraqi militia Kataib Hezbollah.
  • Putin's New Russia

    Putin's New Russia

    PUTIN’S NEW RUSSIA Edited by Jon Hellevig and Alexandre Latsa With an Introduction by Peter Lavelle Contributors: Patrick Armstrong, Mark Chapman, Aleksandr Grishin, Jon Hellevig, Anatoly Karlin, Eric Kraus, Alexandre Latsa, Nils van der Vegte, Craig James Willy Publisher: Kontinent USA September, 2012 First edition published 2012 First edition published 2012 Copyright to Jon Hellevig and Alexander Latsa Publisher: Kontinent USA 1800 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20009 [email protected] www.us-russia.org/kontinent Cover by Alexandra Mozilova on motive of painting by Ilya Komov Printed at Printing house "Citius" ISBN 978-0-9883137-0-5 This is a book authored by independent minded Western observers who have real experience of how Russia has developed after the failed perestroika since Putin first became president in 2000. Common sense warning: The book you are about to read is dangerous. If you are from the English language media sphere, virtually everything you may think you know about contemporary Rus- sia; its political system, leaders, economy, population, so-called opposition, foreign policy and much more is either seriously flawed or just plain wrong. This has not happened by accident. This book explains why. This book is also about gross double standards, hypocrisy, and venal stupidity with western media playing the role of willing accomplice. After reading this interesting tome, you might reconsider everything you “learn” from mainstream media about Russia and the world. Contents PETER LAVELLE ............................................................................................1

  • A Channel Guide

    Intelsat is the First MEDIA Choice In Africa Are you ready to provide top media services and deliver optimal video experience to your growing audiences? With 552 channels, including 50 in HD and approximately 192 free to air (FTA) channels, Intelsat 20 (IS-20), Africa’s leading direct-to- home (DTH) video neighborhood, can empower you to: Connect with Expand Stay agile with nearly 40 million your digital ever-evolving households broadcasting reach technologies From sub-Saharan Africa to Western Europe, millions of households have been enjoying the superior video distribution from the IS-20 Ku-band video neighborhood situated at 68.5°E orbital location. Intelsat 20 is the enabler for your TV future. Get on board today. IS-20 Channel Guide 2 CHANNEL ENC FR P CHANNEL ENC FR P 947 Irdeto 11170 H Bonang TV FTA 12562 H 1 Magic South Africa Irdeto 11514 H Boomerang EMEA Irdeto 11634 V 1 Magic South Africa Irdeto 11674 H Botswana TV FTA 12634 V 1485 Radio Today Irdeto 11474 H Botswana TV FTA 12657 V 1KZN TV FTA 11474 V Botswana TV Irdeto 11474 H 1KZN TV Irdeto 11594 H Bride TV FTA 12682 H Nagravi- Brother Fire TV FTA 12562 H 1KZN TV sion 11514 V Brother Fire TV FTA 12602 V 5 FM FTA 11514 V Builders Radio FTA 11514 V 5 FM Irdeto 11594 H BusinessDay TV Irdeto 11634 V ABN FTA 12562 H BVN Europa Irdeto 11010 H Access TV FTA 12634 V Canal CVV International FTA 12682 H Ackermans Stores FTA 11514 V Cape Town TV Irdeto 11634 V ACNN FTA 12562 H CapeTalk Irdeto 11474 H Africa Magic Epic Irdeto 11474 H Capricorn FM Irdeto 11170 H Africa Magic Family Irdeto
  • Iran and the Soft Aw R Monroe Price University of Pennsylvania, Mprice@Asc.Upenn.Edu

    Iran and the Soft Aw R Monroe Price University of Pennsylvania, [email protected]

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (ASC) Annenberg School for Communication 2012 Iran and the Soft aW r Monroe Price University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers Part of the Social Influence and Political Communication Commons Recommended Citation Price, M. (2012). Iran and the Soft aW r. International Journal of Communication, 6 2397-2415. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/732 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/732 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Iran and the Soft aW r Disciplines Communication | Social and Behavioral Sciences | Social Influence and Political Communication This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/732 International Journal of Communication 6 (2012), Feature 2397–2415 1932–8036/2012FEA0002 Iran and the Soft War MONROE PRICE University of Pennsylvania The events of the Arab Spring instilled in many authorities the considerable fear that they could too easily lose control over the narratives of legitimacy that undergird their power. 1 This threat to national power was already a part of central thinking in Iran. Their reaction to the Arab Spring was especially marked because of a long-held feeling that strategic communicators from outside the state’s borders were purposely reinforcing domestic discontent. I characterize strategic communications as, most dramatically, investment by an external source in methods to alter basic elements of a societal consensus. In this essay, I want to examine what this process looks like from what might be called the “inside,” the view from the perspective of the target society.
  • Yitzhak Rabin

    Yitzhak Rabin

    YITZHAK RABIN: CHRONICLE OF AN ASSASSINATION FORETOLD Last year, architect-turned-filmmaker Amos Gitaï directed Rabin, the Last EN Day, an investigation into the assassination, on November 4, 1995, of the / Israeli Prime Minister, after a demonstration for peace and against violence in Tel-Aviv. The assassination cast a cold and brutal light on a dark and terrifying world—a world that made murder possible, as it suddenly became apparent to a traumatised public. For the Cour d’honneur of the Palais des papes, using the memories of Leah Rabin, the Prime Minister’s widow, as a springboard, Amos GitaI has created a “fable” devoid of formality and carried by an exceptional cast. Seven voices brought together to create a recitative, “halfway between lament and lullaby,” to travel back through History and explore the incredible violence with which the nationalist forces fought the peace project, tearing Israel apart. Seven voices caught “like in an echo chamber,” between image-documents and excerpts from classic and contemporary literature— that bank of memory that has always informed the filmmaker’s understanding of the world. For us, who let the events of this historic story travel through our minds, reality appears as a juxtaposition of fragments carved into our collective memory. AMOS GITAI In 1973, when the Yom Kippur War breaks out, Amos Gitai is an architecture student. The helicopter that carries him and his unit of emergency medics is shot down by a missile, an episode he will allude to years later in Kippur (2000). After the war, he starts directing short films for the Israeli public television, which has now gone out of business.
  • TV News Channels in Europe: Offer, Establishment and Ownership European Audiovisual Observatory (Council of Europe), Strasbourg, 2018

    TV News Channels in Europe: Offer, Establishment and Ownership European Audiovisual Observatory (Council of Europe), Strasbourg, 2018

    TV news channels in Europe: Offer, establishment and ownership TV news channels in Europe: Offer, establishment and ownership European Audiovisual Observatory (Council of Europe), Strasbourg, 2018 Director of publication Susanne Nikoltchev, Executive Director Editorial supervision Gilles Fontaine, Head of Department for Market Information Author Laura Ene, Analyst European Television and On-demand Audiovisual Market European Audiovisual Observatory Proofreading Anthony A. Mills Translations Sonja Schmidt, Marco Polo Sarl Press and Public Relations – Alison Hindhaugh, [email protected] European Audiovisual Observatory Publisher European Audiovisual Observatory 76 Allée de la Robertsau, 67000 Strasbourg, France Tel.: +33 (0)3 90 21 60 00 Fax. : +33 (0)3 90 21 60 19 [email protected] http://www.obs.coe.int Cover layout – ALTRAN, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France Please quote this publication as Ene L., TV news channels in Europe: Offer, establishment and ownership, European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg, 2018 © European Audiovisual Observatory (Council of Europe), Strasbourg, July 2018 If you wish to reproduce tables or graphs contained in this publication please contact the European Audiovisual Observatory for prior approval. Opinions expressed in this publication are personal and do not necessarily represent the view of the European Audiovisual Observatory, its members or the Council of Europe. TV news channels in Europe: Offer, establishment and ownership Laura Ene Table of contents 1. Key findings ......................................................................................................................
  • Russia and the US in the Middle East: Policies and Contexts

    Russia and the US in the Middle East: Policies and Contexts

    Conflict Studies Research Centre Middl e East Series 06/27 Defence Academy of the United Kingdom Russia and the US in the Middle East: Policies and Contexts Prof Stephen Blank Key Points * Russian Policy in the Middle East is increasingly driven by a determination to check American power and influence there. * This determination is equally driven by a fierce desire for global power status and recogntion, and even though it is couched in the language and ideology of multipolarity, is essentially no less unilateral than is US policy. * Russia’s competition with America is no less a contest over values than one over interests. 06/27 Russia and the US in the Middle East: Policies and Contexts Prof Stephen Blank Introduction America’s invasion of Iraq and efforts to establish a Pax Americana throughout the Middle East have created major difficulties for Russian President Vladimir Putin and his foreign policy. Indeed, America’s actions, in the contexts of contemporary world politics and of Russia's development within that environment, have enmeshed Moscow’s Middle Eastern policy in multiple contradictions. These contradictions are most basically expressed in Russia’s reaction to this Pax Americana, namely its simultaneous efforts to build a structure of international partnerships with other major powers against US unilateralism while also proclaiming that is America’s partner in the war against terrorism and, most importantly, retaining at all costs a free hand in the CIS. Indeed, the three dimensions of foreign policy sum up what Russia means by the concept of multipolarity in its foreign policy, a concept that has resurfaced since the US invasion of Iraq.