DOCSLIB.ORG

Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Final Report February 2010 Minnesota Department of Transportation Transportation Building 395 John Ireland Boulevard Saint Paul, MN 55155 February 9, 2010 Dear Citizens of Minnesota, I am pleased to share with you this adopted Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan. This plan is the result of extensive collaboration during the past year between the Minnesota Department of Transportation and citizens, stakeholders and partners throughout Minnesota. I want to thank everyone who took the time to participate in our outreach meetings and provide comments and suggestions on the draft plan. The Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan establishes a vision for rail in Minnesota. A vibrant freight rail system, together with a comprehensive passenger rail system, will help ensure Minnesota economic competitiveness and quality of life. As the state's transportation leader, Mn/DOT embraces its responsibility to uphold the vision and policies presented in this plan. The success of Minnesota's transportation system depends on the coordinated efforts of many public and private providers, and the policies and strategies outlined in this plan provide the framework for our joint efforts. Mn/DOT will continue to look for opportunities to involve citizens, stakeholders and partners in the implementation of this plan and in future investment and policy decisions. Together, we can realize the shared vision of a safe, efficient and sustainable transportation system. Sincerely, Thomas K. Sorel Commissioner An Equal Opportunity Employer Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan final report Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc. TKDA, Inc. January 2010 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... ES-1 Vision for Rail...................................................................................................................... ES-2 System Costs ..................................................................................................................... ES-5 Passenger Rail Performance and Benefits ......................................................................... ES-6 Rail System Development and Funding Responsibilities .................................................... ES-7 Other Societal Benefits .................................................................................................... ES-10 1 Overview and Vision ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background and Purpose of Study .......................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Freight Rail System Vision ......................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Passenger Rail Vision ............................................................................................... 1-5 1.4 Categories of Passenger Rail .................................................................................. 1-6 1.5 Investment Needs ................................................................................................... 1-6 1.6 Management Approach ...................................................................................... 1-17 1.7 Financing .............................................................................................................. 1-18 1.8 Stakeholder and Public Outreach ......................................................................... 1-23 2 Existing Rail System ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Railroad Industry Organization and Investment Strategies ....................................... 2-1 2.2 Composition of Minnesota’s Freight Railroad Industry ............................................. 2-1 2.3 Freight Rail Industry Environment ............................................................................. 2-8 2.4 What’s Next for the Freight Rail Industry? ............................................................... 2-13 2.5 Freight Rail Investment and Financing Practices ................................................... 2-16 2.6 Value of Rail Industry to Minnesota ........................................................................ 2-16 2.7 Passenger Rail ....................................................................................................... 2-18 3 Forecasts ............................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Minnesota Economic Overview .............................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Freight Demand in Minnesota ................................................................................. 3-8 3.3 Passenger Demand .............................................................................................. 3-24 4 Investment Needs .............................................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Methodology .......................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Freight-Only Corridor Needs .................................................................................. 4-10 4.3 Shared Freight and Passenger Rail Corridors ......................................................... 4-25 4.4 High-Speed Rail Passenger Service Needs ............................................................ 4-36 4.5 Cost of Project Implementation ............................................................................ 4-41 5 Performance Assessment ................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Passenger Evaluation .............................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Freight Evaluation .................................................................................................. 5-13 5.3 Benefits and Costs of the Program ........................................................................ 5-18 6 Institutional Relationships .................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Minnesota Agency Organization and Rail Program ................................................ 6-2 6.2 Minnesota Public Rail Programs .............................................................................. 6-8 6.3 Rail Agency Organization and Programs in Other States ....................................... 6-17 6.4 Management Plan for Minnesota ......................................................................... 6-27 i Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan 7 Financial Program .............................................................................................................. 7-1 7.1 Federal Funding ...................................................................................................... 7-1 7.2 Financial Plan ......................................................................................................... 7-4 A List of Outreach Activities and Committees ....................................................................... A-1 ii Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan List of Tables Table ES.1 Annual Passenger Rail Systemwide Performance Measures ................................... ES-8 Table 1.1 Ridership Forecasts Results 2030 Annual Trips with Most Favorable Variables Tested ...................................................................................................... 1-9 Table 1.2 Annual Passenger Rail Systemwide Performance Measures (Annual) – Phase I ..... 1-16 Table 1.3 Freight System Costs, Public and Private Shares Including Contingencies ($millions) ...................................................................... 1-21 Table 1.4 Total Possible Annual Costs, State Rail Plan ($millions) ........................................... 1-23 Table 2.1 Freight Railroads Operating in Minnesota ................................................................ 2-3 Table 2.2 Typical Sources of Funding of Rail Operations and Infrastructure .......................... 2-16 Table 3.1 Estimated Annual Demand from/to Twin Cities for 2005........................................ 3-27 Table 3.2 Projected 2030 Rail Demand to/from Twin Cities and Selected Cities – Base Case ................................................................................. 3-28 Table 3.3 Projected 2030 Rail Demand to/from Twin Cities and Selected Cities – Best Case ................................................................................... 3-29 Table 3.4 Forecast Rail Mode Share Other City Pairs – 15 Trains/Day ................................... 3-30 Table 4.1 Initial Screening, Data Evaluation ............................................................................ 4-3 Table 4.2 Cost Assumptions for Freight Rail ............................................................................. 4-8 Table 4.3 Cost Assumptions for Passenger Rail ......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State Variation in Railroad Wheat Rates
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OJS at Oregondigital.org (Oregon State University / University of Oregon) JTRF Volume 53 No. 3, Fall 2014 State Variation in Railroad Wheat Rates by Michael W. Babcock, Matthew McKamey, and Phillip Gayle Wheat shippers in the Central Plains states have no cost effective transportation alternative to railroads. Wheat produced in these areas moves long distances to domestic processing and consumption locations or to ports for export. Wheat shippers in the Great Plains don’t have direct access to barge loading locations and trucks provide no intermodal competition for these movements. Wheat shippers in Montana and North Dakota are highly dependent on rail transport because they are distant from barge loading locations and intra-railroad competition is limited. In North Dakota, the BNSF controls 78% of the Class I rail mileage, and in Montana, the BNSF controls 94%. Montana ships nearly 100% of its wheat by rail. Unlike Montana and North Dakota, the BNSF and UP have roughly equal track mileage in Kansas. The BNSF has 44% of the Class I rail mileage and the UP, 55%. Also, both railroads serve the major Kansas grain storage and market centers. A 2010 USDA study found that in 1988, Montana and North Dakota had the highest rail grain revenue per ton-mile of the 10 major grain producing states. By 2007 this was no longer the case. The overall objective of the paper is to investigate railroad pricing behavior for the shipment of North Dakota, Kansas, and Montana wheat.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation on the Minneapolis Riverfront
    RAPIDS, REINS, RAILS: TRANSPORTATION ON THE MINNEAPOLIS RIVERFRONT Mississippi River near Stone Arch Bridge, July 1, 1925 Minnesota Historical Society Collections Prepared by Prepared for The Saint Anthony Falls Marjorie Pearson, Ph.D. Heritage Board Principal Investigator Minnesota Historical Society Penny A. Petersen 704 South Second Street Researcher Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Hess, Roise and Company 100 North First Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 May 2009 612-338-1987 Table of Contents PROJECT BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 1 RAPID, REINS, RAILS: A SUMMARY OF RIVERFRONT TRANSPORTATION ......................................... 3 THE RAPIDS: WATER TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS .............................................. 8 THE REINS: ANIMAL-POWERED TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ............................ 25 THE RAILS: RAILROADS BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ..................................................................... 42 The Early Period of Railroads—1850 to 1880 ......................................................................... 42 The First Railroad: the Saint Paul and Pacific ...................................................................... 44 Minnesota Central, later the Chicago, Milwaukee and Saint Paul Railroad (CM and StP), also called The Milwaukee Road .......................................................................................... 55 Minneapolis and Saint Louis Railway .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia Service Locations
    West Virginia | Service Location Report 2020 YEAR IN REVIEW AmeriCorps City Service Locations Project Name Program Type Completed* Current Sponsor Organization Participants Participants Accoville BUFFALO ELEMENTARY Energy Express AmeriCorps AmeriCorps State 3 - SCHOOL West Virginia University Research Corp Addison (Webster Catholic Charities Weston LifeBridge AmeriCorps AmeriCorps State 1 - Springs) Region - Webster United Way of Central West Virginia Addison (Webster Webster County Energy Express AmeriCorps AmeriCorps State 6 - Springs) West Virginia University Research Corp Addison (Webster WEBSTER SPRINGS Energy Express AmeriCorps AmeriCorps State 3 - Springs) ELEMENTARY SCHOOL West Virginia University Research Corp Bartow Wildlife Intern - Greenbrier Monongahela National Forest AmeriCorps National - 1 Mt. Adams Institute Basye Hardy County Convention and WV Community Development Hub AmeriCorps VISTA 1 - Visitors' Bureau WV Community Development Hub Bath (Berkeley Springs) Morgan County Starting Points West Virginia's Promise AmeriCorps VISTA 8 - WV Commission for National and Community Service Bath (Berkeley Springs) Wind Dance Farm & Earth West Virginia's Promise AmeriCorps VISTA 4 1 Education Center WV Commission for National and Community Service Beaver New River Community & AmeriCorps on the Frontline of School Success AmeriCorps State 1 1 Technical College The Education Alliance Beckley Active Southern West Virginia National Coal Heritage Area Authority AmeriCorps VISTA 1 1 National Coal Heritage Area Authority Beckley BECKLEY
    [Show full text]
  • North Dakota Rail Fast Facts for 2019 Freight Railroads …
    Freight Railroads in North Dakota Rail Fast Facts For 2019 Freight railroads …............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Freight railroad mileage …..........................................................................................................................................3,223 Freight rail employees …...............................................................................................................................................1,760 Average wages & benefits per employee …...................................................................................................$134,630 Railroad retirement beneficiaries …......................................................................................................................3,000 Railroad retirement benefits paid ….....................................................................................................................$83 million U.S. Economy: According to a Towson University study, in 2017, America's Class I railroads supported: Sustainability: Railroads are the most fuel efficient way to move freight over land. It would have taken approximately 8.1 million additional trucks to handle the 145.8 million tons of freight that moved by rail in North Dakota in 2019. Rail Traffic Originated in 2019 Total Tons: 48.5 million Total Carloads: 497,200 Commodity Tons (mil) Carloads Farm Products 19.1 184,600 Crude Oil 15.7 168,100 Food Products
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail System
    Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Passenger Rail System draft technical memorandum 3 prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. TKDA, Inc. July 17, 2009 www.camsys.com technical memorandum 3 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Passenger Rail System prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 100 CambridgePark Drive, Suite 400 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140 July 17, 2009 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Passenger Rail System Technical Memorandum Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 1.0 Objective ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 Methodology ................................................................................................................. 2-1 3.0 Overview of Findings .................................................................................................. 3-1 4.0 Operating and Capacity Conditions and Existing Ridership Forecasts for Potential Passenger Rail Corridors ........................................................................... 4-1 4.1 CP: Rochester-Winona......................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 CP: St. Paul-Red
    [Show full text]
  • Belt and Road Transport Corridors: Barriers and Investments
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Belt and Road Transport Corridors: Barriers and Investments Lobyrev, Vitaly and Tikhomirov, Andrey and Tsukarev, Taras and Vinokurov, Evgeny Eurasian Development Bank, Institute of Economy and Transport Development 10 May 2018 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/86705/ MPRA Paper No. 86705, posted 18 May 2018 16:33 UTC BELT AND ROAD TRANSPORT CORRIDORS: BARRIERS AND INVESTMENTS Authors: Vitaly Lobyrev; Andrey Tikhomirov (Institute of Economy and Transport Development); Taras Tsukarev, PhD (Econ); Evgeny Vinokurov, PhD (Econ) (EDB Centre for Integration Studies). This report presents the results of an analysis of the impact that international freight traffic barriers have on logistics, transit potential, and development of transport corridors traversing EAEU member states. The authors of EDB Centre for Integration Studies Report No. 49 maintain that, if current railway freight rates and Chinese railway subsidies remain in place, by 2020 container traffic along the China-EAEU-EU axis may reach 250,000 FEU. At the same time, long-term freight traffic growth is restricted by a number of internal and external factors. The question is: What can be done to fully realise the existing trans-Eurasian transit potential? Removal of non-tariff and technical barriers is one of the key target areas. Restrictions discussed in this report include infrastructural (transport and logistical infrastructure), border/customs-related, and administrative/legal restrictions. The findings of a survey conducted among European consignors is a valuable source of information on these subjects. The authors present their recommendations regarding what can be done to remove the barriers that hamper international freight traffic along the China-EAEU-EU axis.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2008-94
    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2008-94 Canadian Pacific (CP) River JCT, MN December 17, 2008 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT FRA File # HQ-2008-94 FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION 1.Name of Railroad Operating Train #1 1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. SOO Line RR Co. [SOO ] SOO 209549 2.Name of Railroad Operating Train #2 2a. Alphabetic Code 2b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. SOO Line RR Co. [SOO ] SOO 209549 3.Name of Railroad Operating Train #3 3a. Alphabetic Code 3b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. N/A N/A N/A 4.Name of Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance: 4a. Alphabetic Code 4b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. SOO Line RR Co. [SOO ] SOO 209549 5. U.S. DOT_AAR Grade Crossing Identification Number 6. Date of Accident/Incident 7. Time of Accident/Incident Month 12 Day 17 Year 2008 04:48:00 AM PM 8. Type of Accident/Indicent 1. Derailment 4. Side collision 7. Hwy-rail crossing 10. Explosion-detonation 13. Other Code (single entry in code box) 2. Head on collision 5. Raking collision 8. RR grade crossing 11. Fire/violent rupture (describe in narrative) 3. Rear end collision 6. Broken Train collision 9. Obstruction 12. Other impacts 04 9.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for Action: the State Regional Economic Development Strategy Partnership
    A Framework for Action: The State Regional Economic Development Strategy Partnership January 28, 2009 Reform Results Executive Office of Housing & Economic Development COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Deval Patrick Tim Murray Daniel O'Connell Governor Lt. Governor Secretary Introduction Acknowledgements The Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development (EOHED) was tasked by the Governor with development of A Framework for Action. The preparation of the report was led by Eric Nakajima, Senior Policy Advisor at EOHED, under the direction of Secretary Daniel O’Connell and Assistant Secretary for Policy and Planning Stan McGee. The project team included Project Manager Robb Smith and Policy Analysts Jeff Fugate, Bruce McAmis, and Sheila Kamunyori. In EOHED, Diana Salemy, Ted Carr and Susan Saia were particularly helpful in support of this project. The University of Massachusetts Donahue Institute provided maps and data for the project. The project team would like to particularly acknowledge UMass Donahue Institute staff Michael Goodman, John Gaviglio, Rebecca Loveland, Katera Como, Raija Vaisanen, William Proulx, and Kate Modzelewski. A Framework for Action could not have been developed without the support and expertise of the John Adams Innovation Institute of the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative. A financial investment by the John Adams Innovation Institute supported the project; Secretary Daniel O’Connell would like to particularly thank Pat Larkin for his enthusiasm and good counsel. In addition, EOHED thanks Bob Kispert, Bill Ennen and Carlos Martinez-Vela. A Framework for Action is the product of an extensive review of plans and analyses prepared by public agencies and academic and private institutes along with interviews and meetings with municipal officials and staff, regional planning agencies, economic development experts, and business and academic leaders from throughout Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]
  • BARCELONA TRAM SERVICE (SPAIN) PPP for CITIES Specialist Centre on PPP in Smart and Sustainable Cities
    WITH THE SUPPORT OF: PPP for CITIES Specialist Centre on PPP in Smart and Sustainable Cities PPP FOR CITIES CASE STUDIES BARCELONA TRAM SERVICE (SPAIN) PPP for CITIES Specialist Centre on PPP in Smart and Sustainable Cities Josep Navarro, Joan Enric Ricart, Francesc Trillas, Miquel Rodríguez Planas & Jordi Salvador With the collaboration of Barcelona's Autoritat del Transport Metropolità (ATM) September 2017 PPP FOR CITIES CASE STUDIES BARCELONA TRAM SERVICE (SPAIN) Josep Navarro, Joan Enric Ricart, Francesc Trillas, Miquel Rodríguez Planas & Jordi Salvador With the collaboration of Barcelona's Autoritat del Transport Metropolità (ATM) PPP FOR CITIES The Specialist Centre on PPPs in Smart and Sustainable Cities (PPP for Cities) is a research, innovation and advisory center that aims to provide public administrations throughout the world with support in the organization, management and development of projects involving collaboration between the public and private sectors in the smart cities arena. It is also a partnership platform between companies and administrations from all over the world where they can further explore the dynamics of public-private partnerships, create guides to good practices and standards and design solutions to the issues facing cities. The center is led by IESE Business School and is part of the United Nations’ International Centre of Excellence on PPPs program. It has the support and sponsorship of Barcelona City Hall and other public administrations and private companies. This document was prepared by the Public-Private-Sector Research Center as a document of interest for the study of public private partnerships rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Campbell Comprehensive Plan 2021-2040
    Town of Campbell – Comprehensive Plan 2021 – 2040 Town Board: Terry Schaller Mitch Brohmer Lee Donahue Ralph Thoren Jason Stratman Town Clerk/Treasurer: Cassandra Hanan Plan Commission: Al Macha Steve Hockenbery Joe Weitekamp Mitch Bromer Luke Raymer Justin Kohls Jason Stratman Plan prepared with the assistance of: Mississippi River Regional Planning Commission Mississippi River Regional Planning Commission 1707 Main Street, Suite 435 La Crosse, WI 54601 608.785.9396 [email protected] Staff: Dave Bonifas Abbey Nicewander Bob Gollnik Sarah Ofte RECOMMENDED TO ADOPT BY RESOLUTION 2021-2 – APRIL 7TH, 2021 By the Town of Campbell Plan Commission ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE 2021-2 – APRIL 16TH, 2021 By the Town of Campbell Town Board Vision Statement We foresee the Town of Campbell to be primarily suburban in character, accommodating low density residential, commercial, and industrial development so long as a land use plan and appropriate programs are in place to continually improve the quality of life and safety of the people in the Town of Campbell. Contents Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan ................................................................ 1 Background ............................................................................................. 2 Citizen Participation Plan ............................................................................ 2 Location ................................................................................................ 3 History .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Commuter Rail
    Photo E-2. Snelling CP Site; small park and unimproved area; looking east. Photo E-3. Snelling CP Site; view from Selby Avenue; looking south. Photo F-1. Snelling BNSF Site; terminus of Norris Circle; looking east. Photo F-2. Snelling BNSF Site; commercial parking lot; looking west. Photo F-3. Snelling BNSF Site; commercial parking lot; looking east. Photo G-1. University Site; appear to be grain elevators; looking northeast. Photo G-2. University Site; railroad right-of-way and unimproved area; looking northwest. Photo G-3. University Site; gravel access road and unimproved area; looking east. APPENDIX B Downtown Minneapolis Intermodal Station (Northstar Corridor) APPENDIX C Technology Options and Screening Criteria Detailed Technology Screening – BUS RAPID TRANSIT Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) combines the quality of rail transit and the flexibility of buses. It can operate on exclusive transitways, HOV lanes, expressways, or ordinary streets. The BRT system is based on light rail transit principles, but instead of the required capital investment in trains and track, it utilizes buses in service that is integrated with key components of the existing automobile transportation infrastructure, such as roads, rights-of-way, intersections, and traffic signals. Example Systems: Las Vegas, NV; Orlando, FL; Los Angeles, CA • Fully implemented systems are in existence in many • Metro Transit operates express service from US and International Cities. Cottage Grove to downtown St. Paul and Minneapolis. • Can be run on existing/planned Hwy 61 infrastructure. • Average costs per mile = $13.5 million (Dedicated bus • BRT stops and typical frequency of service is roadway) consistent with travel patterns in the Red Rock • Average costs per mile = $9 million (bus on HOV lane) Corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Railroad Job Vacancies Reported to the RRB 844 North Rush Street TTY: (312) 751-4701 February 27, 2019 Chicago, Illinois 60611-1275 Website
    U.S. Railroad Retirement Board Toll Free: (877) 772-5772 Railroad Job Vacancies Reported to the RRB 844 North Rush Street TTY: (312) 751-4701 February 27, 2019 Chicago, Illinois 60611-1275 Website: https://www.rrb.gov The RRB routinely maintains a job vacancy list as openings are reported by hiring railroad employers. The following list includes job postings (order nos.) that are not expected to be filled locally. The date of the vacancy list reflects RRB records regarding the status of open/closed positions. Individuals interested in a particular vacancy should contact their local RRB field office at (877) 772-5772 for more information. An RRB representative will verify if the job is still open and refer the applicant to the appropriate hiring official. Attendants, On-Board Services Closing Order Occupation Railroad Job Location Date No. No Open Orders Executives, Professionals, Clerks Closing Order Occupation Railroad Job Location Date No. Director - Business 03/20/19 374-8311 Iowa Interstate Railroad, Ltd. Cedar Rapids, IA Development Northeast Illinois Commuter Intern - General Accounting 02/28/19 296-8098 Chicago, IL Railroad Corporation Intern - Grant Management & Northeast Illinois Commuter 02/28/19 296-8097 Chicago, IL Accounting Railroad Corporation Metro-North Commuter Railroad New York, NY Rail Traffic Controller Trainee 03/13/19 201-8739 Company (Manhattan – Midtown) Metro-North Commuter Railroad Trainmaster - Capital 03/05/19 201-8738 Connecticut Company Transportation Coordinator 373-8504 Omnitrax Leasing, LLC Denver, CO Arcelormittal South Chicago & Yardmaster Shift Supervisor 12/31/19 296-8100 Burns Harbor, IN Indiana Harbor Railway Laborers, Maintenance of Way, Others Closing Order Occupation Railroad Job Location Date No.
    [Show full text]