City of Chamblee
Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study
Report | August 2016 Heath & Lineback Engineers, 2016
2390 Canton Rd #200, Marietta, GA 30066 www.heath-lineback.com
T: (770) 424-1668
This document has been prepared by Heath & Lineback Engineers, Inc. in a strategic partnership with:
• Perez Planning + Design, LLC • Signature Design
Reproduction or distribution of this document and its contents is prohibited without the approval of the City of Chamblee
Client(s): City of Chamblee Client Contact: Gary Cornell, AICP + Jim Summerbell, AICP Project Manager: Mark Holmberg, P.E.
Acknowledgments
City of Chamblee City Council R. Eric Clarkson - Mayor John Mesa - District One Leslie C. Robson - District Two Thomas S. Hogan, II - District Three Brian Mock - At Large Seat Darron Kusman - At Large Seat
City of Chamblee Administration Jon Walker - City Administrator
City of Chamblee Staff Gary A. Cornell, FAICP - Director of Development Jim Summberbell, AICP - Deputy Development Director
Heath & Lineback Engineers, Inc. John Heath, P.E - President | Principal Mark Holmberg, P.E. - Vice President | Project Manager Patrick Peters, P.E. - Project Engineer
Perez Planning + Design, LLC Carlos F. Perez, PLA - President | Urban Designer Allison Bustin - Project Planner
Table of Contents
6 Section 1: Existing Conditions 64 3.3 Focus Area 2 - Restaurant Row + Analysis 66 3.4 Focus Area 3 - Mercy Care + Walmart 70 3.5 Focus Area 4 - Rail-Trail Park 8 1.1 Introduction 80 3.6 Focus Area 5 - Chamblee Senior 8 1.2 Design Study Process Residences 10 1.3 B enefits of the Chamblee Rail-Trail 84 3.7 Focus Area 6 - Guardian Storage 16 1.4 Review of Existing Plans and Studies 88 3.8 Focus Area 7 - Townpark and Azalea 28 1.5 Review of Existing Conditions Place Apartments 32 1.6 Environmental Screening Survey 89 3.9 Rail-Trail Public Realm System 36 Section 2: Public Engagement 90 3.10 Historical + Cultural Trail Elements 38 2.1 Mayor and Council Member Interviews 98 Section 4: Implementation Plan 39 2.2 Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting #1 100 4.1 Cost Estimate 41 2.3 Trail Neighbor Interviews 104 4.2 Phased Implementation 47 2.4 Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting #2 106 4.3 Funding Sources 50 2.5 Public Workshop #1 109 4.4 Implementation Timeline Alternatives 51 2.6 Online Survey 110 4.5 Action Plan 55 2.7 Summary of Public Engagement Findings 113 4.6 Management 56 Section 3: Concept Plan 115 4.7 Return on Investment 58 3.1 Introduction 116 Appendix 60 3.2 Focus Area 1 - Whole Foods + Georgia Power 1.0 Existing Conditions 1.0 + Analysis 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 8 the City limits, the Roswell Roswell the limits, City the tocontinues operate within Railroad Southern Norfolk the While Railroad. Roswell the and Railroad Southern Norfolk now the is what of junction was at the of Chamblee City The 1.1 Introduction abandoned railcorridorasapossiblemulti-usetrailforCityofChamblee residents. A 2012 LivableCentersInitiative(LCI)StudyidentifiedtheextensionofKeswick Trail alongan 1.0 ExistingConditions+ Analysis Extension and MARTA stormwater detention pond facility. facility. detention MARTA stormwater pond and Extension Rail-Trail the for to develop aconceptual vision stakeholders and residents City with was to work study of the purpose The greenspace and park. apotential as identified been had and facility pond detention astormwater as byowned MARTA serves that to adjacent aparcel is Way. corridor the At location, one at Peachtree Dunwoody Road to Drive Chamblee McGaw 1.1a, Figure in illustrated from extends As area study the LCI study. asupplemental as corridor of the section long mile Team) Study 0.86 the for aConceptual to Design prepare LLC (Design +Design, Perez and Inc. Planning Engineers, &Lineback Heath 2015, hired June In of Chamblee City the trail. rail- of the expansion the LCI update recommend that study 2012, completed an In to Park. of Keswick Chamblee City the was completed to Walmart study connect the after shortly was built trail of this segment LCI study. first The City’s 2000 the during emerged corridor abandoned this along trail use 1921. in operation ceased Railroad to idea create The amulti- CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study Roswell RailroadCompany Figure 1.1a-Study Area design development drawings, and construction documents. survey, include would which of implementation phase next to move to project the the necessary information the with of Chamblee City the provide would study the from Findings project. the for strategy implementation and cost estimate to used be develop then a would conceptual vision The Park Keswick Legend Pond Facility MARTA StormwaterDetention Proposed Rail-Trail Extension Existing Keswick Trail Study Area 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 9 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Based Plan, on the the Concept
Armed with an understanding the of One-on-one interviews with elected officials Trail neighbor and resident interviews Advisory Group Stakeholder workshopsPublic Online survey
Design an developed Implementation Team Plan for the Chamblee Rail-Trail that establishes estimate a cost for the project and identifies phases implementation, of funding, of sources potential and proposes an action plan for the project. • • • • • Plan.Concept existing conditions the of corridor and the thoughts, ideas, and concerns property of owners and future trail users, Plan the for Design a Concept developed Team the corridor. This phase detailed the proposed Concept Plan and included existing and proposed condition sketches, perspectives alternatives, perspective-section and plans show impact the potential to the of corridor on the future build-out the of study area. Plan. Implementation residents, property owners, and agencies that guided the Design through Team the twelve-month study process. Public engagement techniques included:
City of Chamblee 3. 4. The Design worked Team Critical trail any the of success to
project is actively listening the of future the voices trail to users. This phase detailed the techniques and strategies the gatherused Design by to and actively Team listen to these techniques to Central these voices. and strategies Advisory a Stakeholder the of was development Group comprised a diverse of group and vested interested of Public Engagement. with the City Chamblee of and the Metropolitan Rapid an Authority Transit develop Atlanta to (MARTA) understanding the of existing and planned conditions theof corridor. This phase began with an overview of the benefits trails of and parks and emphasized the importance this of project within a broader economic, environmental, and social sustainability context. This phase previously of then provided a review studiescompleted the and study to plans relevant conditions planned and existing an developed area, base map the of corridor, a corridor completed visit site document andto understand the opportunities and constraints the of corridor, and provided a technical analysis pond thestormwater of MARTA detention facility. Existing Conditions + Analysis.
2. 1. The Chamblee Rail-Trail Extension Design Conceptual Study in developed was the four phases course over twelve of These four phases through August 2016). months 2015 (August are in documented this report as follows: 1.2 Design Study Process Overview Process Study Design 1.2 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 10 illustrates some of these regional trail connections and how how and connections trail regional of these some illustrates 1.3a Metro Figure the Area. within connections trail regional creating on placed focus been recent agreater has In years, connections. these with visitors to and hard residents provide have working been organizations non-profit and agencies, different. no Many cities, are Area Metro-Atlanta the in Cities top the priority. as emerged connectivity pedestrian and bicycle and Assessment Needs Recreation and recently completed aParks fact, of Chamblee City the In atop as priority. emerge consistently connectivity bicycle and pedestrian cities, their of in life to improve quality the how asking citizens their survey nation-wide cities When Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity benefits. environmental and social, economic, Atlanta regional and have Metro that local provided Area the from case studies two discusses and benefits of these of some overview an provides section following The tenants. and owners property commercial Downtown and residents, of Chamblee, City forthe benefits environmental and social, of economic, to amultitude lead could transformation this country, the across projects trail and park to linear other town. Similar small intoarea livable avibrant, walkable,and way, the the dotted along transform could parks and trail amulti-use with park, into alinear corridor rail abandoned redevelopment and of Trail the Keswick of the extension The projects. transformative most potential of to their one be the has what on embarking is of Chamblee City The 1.3 the of Benefits Chamblee Rail-Trail CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study PATH 400 Silver CometTrail 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 11 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail City of Chamblee City of Chamblee Rail-Trail Chamblee Figure 1.3a – Regional Trail Connectivity – Regional Trail Figure 1.3a 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 12 property values. property on impact have asimilar trails that suggested study One A recent study was completed by the Northwest Georgia Georgia A recent was completed by Northwest the study Trail Comet Silver the of Benefits The below. described Atlanta are the Comet and BetlLine, Trail Silver the projects, These well. as benefits environmental and social the but of trails, impacts economic abundant the only not Atlanta the Metro illustrate Area within projects Two major by trail. the afforded values property increased from benefit would area study entire the figure, the in depicted As corridor. Rail-Trail to adjacent Chamblee the and along values property on potential the impact 1.3b illustrates Figure erty Values. UniversityofCincinnati,2008 2 Karadeniz,Duygu,2008. The ImpactoftheLittleMiamiScenic Trail onSingleFamilyResidential Prop Recreation andParks Association Features onResidentialPropertyValues andtheProperty Tax Base. Ashburn, Virginia. National 1 Crompton,JohnL.,2004. The ProximatePrinciple: The ImpactofParks,OpenSpaceandWater insignificant. is feet, impact 1,300 economic the After greenspace. located the is from property the further the decreasing impact the value, in with percent increase a22 from feet benefit 100 may of agreenspace within properties that shown Research area. has surrounding their located within of value properties the potential to increase have the parks that have shown of studies A multitude Trails and Parks of Impact Economic Peachtree Atlanta the and Trail, Creek BeltLine. Fork to connect PATH North the Loop,will DeKalb which 400, North to to connect able the be will Rail-Trail Chamblee the near living residents time, In Rail-Trail. they relate to Chamblee the CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study 2 Based on the distances noted distances previously, the on Based 1
- Legend Chamblee Rail-Trail Corridor Figure 1.3b–PotentialImpactsonPropertyValues forPropertiesalongthe Distance from Greenspace +1,300’ 1,300’ 600’ 300’ 100’
No Increase +1-5% +5% +15% +22% Property Values Increase in Trail Corridor Study Area Clairmont Road Clairmont
Peachtree Boulevard
Peachtree Road Chamblee Dunwoody Way Dunwoody Chamblee 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 13
4 T. & Mills, T.
5 – Recreational Recreational –
Value $47 Million $10 Million $98 Million Million $118 $4 Million $182 Million $2 Million $461 Million Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Reduces airReduces pollution air and improves quality
amenities such as trails are playing an important role in determining where people live and choose work. to Employer and Employee Attraction andIncreased Mobility Access – Trails access improve and mobility providing by residents with an alternative business complete to way and leisure trips. Trips along a trail cars off take the which road provide the following three benefits: •
Economic Benefit Recreational Spending Spending Tourism Regional Spillover State Spillover Impact Statewide Fiscal Impact Increases Property Value Gains Tax Property TOTAL Source: Econsult Solutions, Inc. (2013) City of Chamblee K. (2008). Active transportation for America. Rails-to-Trails Conservancy. America. Rails-to-Trails transportation for Active K. (2008). 4 “Quality of Life in the Planning Literature,” Dissart and Deller (2000) and “Amenities as an Economic 4 “Quality of Life in the Planning Literature,” Dissart is there Enough Evidence?” Gottlieb (1994). Tool: Development (1992). Benefits of bicycling and walking to health. Gotchi, Administration. 5 Federal Highway In addition economic to benefits, trails provide a number of quality life benefits. of These include: • • Figure 1.3c - Economic Value of the Silver Comet Trail of the Silver Comet Figure 1.3c - Economic Value
3 - increased household wealth - bicycle rentals, food & drink, - bicycle food rentals, - benefiting municipalities and - additional jobs and worker spending - sales tax revenue generated - sales revenue tax
- spending out-of-state users by on lodging, near the Silver Trail Comet Increased property values Property tax revenue districts school Tourism dining transportation, Spillover impacts Fiscal impacts Recreational spending sporting equipment
The study noted that now more than ever, trailsThe that more study are now seen than as noted ever, regional economic tools development that generate values though: The spent on study the Silver also that for every $1 notes Trail expansion,Comet Georgians gain an estimated $4.64 in direct and indirect economic benefits. This translates over to 400% return for local on communities, investment the region, and the state. Figure is a summary 1.3c the of economic the valueof Trail. Comet Silver existing . Rome, GA Planning Study. 3 Northwest Georgia Regional Commission, 2013. Silver Comet Trail Economic Impact Analysis and Economic Impact Trail 3 Northwest Georgia Regional Commission, 2013. Silver Comet • • • • • • Regional Commission that comprehensively reports the economic benefits the mile of existing Silver Trail 61 Comet and its proposed 66 mile expansion. 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 14 • • CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study
features, natural processes, and ecological integrity by integrity ecological and processes, features, natural protect habitat and natural provide sensitive trails as such Environmental Stewardship • • • • categories: major four in care costs to health lower appears activity physical that notes study Commission Regional Georgia Northwest The costs of increased the healthcare. considering especially residents’ health, improving and active lifestyles fostering in having are trails that impact positive the seeing are more, governments and More problems. health minimize which facilitate active lifestyles, Benefits Health • •
impaired ability to perform ability impaired or sickness from productivity of workplace loss in - costs “presenteeism” and Absenteeism claims compensation worker in paid - costs compensation worker indirect and Direct outcomes health negative ofavoidance chronic - care costs health Indirect care needs health - care costs health Direct vehicles and roads on tear Reduces and wear energy consumption and time saving drivers, for Reduces congestion – Recreational amenities such as trails trails as such amenities –Recreational – Linear green space corridors corridors space green –Linear Costs paid for immediate forimmediate paid Costs Costs paid for long-term forlong-term paid Costs Costs paid paid Costs Costs • • Some of these benefits include: benefits of these Some benefits. recreational and social, cultural, environmental, of facilitated avariety achieved. also has Trail Ithas Eastside the that results not only are the impacts Economic trail. of the ½mile estatereal redevelopment within of private to worth led over has Trail $775 Eastside million the into corridor rail of abandoned an transformation the Inc., According to a2013 completed by Atlanta study BeltLine, redeveloped. are properties adjacent and completed is corridor the when like look could it what and was built, trail the after was built, before trail the corridor the of of aportion 1.3f images shows Figure 1.3d through Figures lines. rail abandoned on was it built Rail-Trail, to Chamblee the Similar 1.9 length. in approximately is miles Trail Eastside of the portion built-out The Trail. Eastside BeltLine Atlanta the is of trails impacts economic of the validity the demonstrated has that project metro area Another Trail Eastside BeltLine Atlanta the of Benefits The
species invasive other and Removal of acres kudzu of 100+ Removal of 1,700 tons of contaminated soil air. to cleaner contribute corridors space green linear these pollutants, forair filters as serve and create oxygen that flora By preserving of land. tracts fragmented linking 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 15 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Source: Perkins + Will and Field Operations Figure 1.3f – Atlanta BeltLine Eastside Trail Proposed Conditions BeltLine Eastside Trail Atlanta Figure 1.3f – Development of a multitude of Development health of and fitness programs including in the Parkattended Yoga weekly by hundreds people of Increased volunteerism along the corridor Planting600+ of trees as part BeltLine the of Atlanta Arboretum Planting grass acres native 109,000 of plugs along 11 largest temporaryCreation theof City Atlanta’s of art exhibit numerous of Development such as cultural the events whichLantern Parade 10,000 attracts over spectators
City of Chamblee • • • • • • Source: Perkins + Will and Field Operations Source: Perkins + Will and Field Operations Figure 1.3e – Atlanta BeltLine Eastside Trail Existing Conditions Trail Atlanta BeltLine Eastside Figure 1.3e – Figure 1.3d – Atlanta BeltLine Eastside Trail Before Construction Atlanta BeltLine Eastside Trail Figure 1.3d – 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 16 • • • • • • • reviewed: were documents following Study, the Design the To completing for afoundation provide efforts. planning of previous of anumber off Study) builds (Design Study Conceptual Design Extension Rail-Trail Chamblee The Studies 1.4 Review of Plans Existing and stormwater detention pond facility. These projects include: projects facility. detention These stormwater pond MARTA the and to Rail-Trail the relation in projects these locations the 1.4a illustrates map. Figure base area a study into plans the incorporated and properties these of all plans Team obtained Design The construction. and permitting, design, planning, redevelopment,development or including of stages various in are corridor the along Properties CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study
Traffic Impact Study for Chamblee Gateway 2014 South, Study forChamblee Impact Traffic 215/15 Report, As-Built Stormwater Management Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) Documentation Lofts at PeachtreeEasement Malone Streetscape, 2015 (UDO) 3.0 Addendum Development Ordinance Unified 2015 Development Ordinance, Unified of Chamblee City Comprehensive Plan, 2015 of Chamblee Track, Right City the on A City Centers Initiative, 2014 Town Center Chamblee Update Livable the for 10-year and studies. studies. and plans review from existing study, ofTrail the determined as relate that to Rail- the of findings overview an is following The 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Construction Peachtree on use)- (mixed Under Parkview Permitting -Under (residential) Townpark Residence Chamblee Design/Permitting (office)- Under Chamblee Parkside (government) Construction -Under Center Community Senior County DeKalb Permitting Peachtree on Design/ use) (mixed -Under Malone The Permitting Atlanta Design/ use)- (mixed Under Chamblee Construction use)- (mixed Under Olmsted The Design/Permitting Development (office),Trackside MARTA Lot 1- Under Construction office)- Under Care (medical Mercy (retail)- Under Construction Peachtree Foods Center -Whole Station Shopping 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 17 Study Area Trail Existing Keswick Proposed Rail-Trail Extension Stormwater MARTA Detention Pond Facility Redevelopment Lot Legend 9 8 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail 6 7 City of Chamblee 5 4 3 2 10 1 Figure 1.4a –Developments along the Chamblee Rail-Trail Corridor along the Chamblee Rail-Trail Figure 1.4a –Developments 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 18 • • • • • of: inclusive Downtown, for vision community’s focuses that the on plan action year afive- Town includes Plan Center Chamblee Master The vision. of this components were integral extension rail-trail proposed the located along facility detention pond aMARTA on stormwater park apotential public and Rail-Trail The workshops. of public aseries during owners property and residents, leaders, community from input included that process planning month asix through was determined vision This Rand Drive. to Ingersoll north line MARTA rail the to east, and the Drive Tucker Burk Boulevard and Chamblee Peachtreebetween Boulevard (SR 141) to west, the Chamblee in area foran avision details Centers Initiative Town Center Chamblee Update Livable forthe 10-year The Centers Initiative, 2014 Livable Town Center Chamblee the for 10-year Update development, transportation facilities, and of analysis area use/ land of conditions, market updated assessment an on based be will initiatives and projects These efforts. planning providing transportation options that upon build past development,high-quality increasing connectivity, and at spurring aimed initiatives and projects includes plan The CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study
Adding more places to work, shop, and have shop, and fun to places work, more Adding of life quality ahigher Providing area station MARTA rail Chamblee the Improving Increasing walkability Chamblee’s of place sense Enhancing • • • • • • • • were organized into six categories: into six were organized recommendations Specific opportunities. and challenges relate to and influence the Chamblee Rail-Trail include: Rail-Trail Chamblee the relate to influence and that categories these within recommendations Specific
• Urban Design Priorities • • • Comprehensive Plan Update and Land Use Policy Zoning Considerations Strategy Community Lifelong Market/Economic Development Resources Historic Priorities Design Urban Comprehensive Plan Update and Land Use Policy
• • Development (TOD )Subarea Transit-oriented into redevelopment efforts redevelopment into space open and Rail-Trail Chamblee the Incorporate types of housing avariety Support key locations development in mixed-use to encourage Continue
Malone Drive Malone Drive Tucker Roadlocated Chamblee and between property MARTA owned the on space community detention and area Develop aregional walkable is station MARTA rail existing the development around that to ensure developers with to work Continue 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 19 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Section 407 – Consider removing the requirement that mixed-use developments include between 20 and 80 percent residential uses Section 908 – Consider requiring that development justwith non-residential use (not any with more than 600 along frontage of a single feet be divided street) blocksinto having a minimum 600 of feet
Zoning Considerations • •
City of Chamblee Source: 10 Year LCI Update for Chamblee Town Center Livable Centers Initiative Center Livable Centers Town LCI Update for Chamblee Year Source: 10 Figure 1.4b – Chamblee Five Year Action Plan Recommendations Year Figure 1.4b – Chamblee Five • Extend historic architectural “look and of feel” downtown Chamblee the Chamblee Integrate Rail-Trail extension through the Downtown subarea Seek opportunities for alternative fuel source stations in public or semi-public places in a civicInvest green space Provide safe and convenient access to future to access and convenient safe Provide extensions Rail-Trail Chamblee a long-rangeAdopt maintenance plan for parks and green space
Create a UtilityCreate Relocation Fund Focus additional senior housing and services around infrastructureMARTA Focus additional senior housing near and other retail services Create architectural standardsCreate for historically designated areas, such as and Antique the Row Downtown Subarea transportation for mechanisms funding Identify infrastructure listed improvements in this report • • • Downtown Subarea • • •
• Lifelong Community Strategy • • • Development Market/Economic • Historic Resources •
• • • 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 20 Five goals and a mission statement follows: as are amission and goals Five follows: as plan stated comprehensive the is in vision This vision. of acity-wide to realization the lead collectively that capital investment and rezoning decisions guides and sets policies plan the effort, engagement public extensive by an development. forfuture City’s Underpinned guide the as serves Plan Comprehensive of Chamblee City The 2015 Plan, Comprehensive Chamblee of City Track, Right the on A City CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study Goals Goals city. of our qualities historic the respecting neighbors, and families valuing community adiverse in grow and play live, work, residents where safe environment to ahealthy, be vibrant, aspires of Chamblee City The 4. 3. 2. 1. • •
connections Develop and maintain strong multi-modal environment Promote safe and living ahealthy environment business athriving Support identity ofCreate community sense agreater 1.4b). (See Figure study rail-trail of this completion to led the which projects, short-term of the one as Trail development Rail- of the the recommended study The uses nonresidential located be uses above residential multi-family that requirement the removing 1007 –Consider Section Source: CityofChambleeComprehensive Plan Figure 1.4c–CommunityVision Map 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 21 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Improve pedestrianImprove connections theMARTA to station through and the maintenance investment of streetscape elements such as sidewalks, and fountains, parks/greenspace Undertake a parking study for the district and additional of the potential investigate public parking a regionalDevelop area and detention community space on MARTA-owned property between located andChamblee Road Malone Tucker Drive Work incorporate with to MARTA mapping and wayfinding within the station and bus at stops, bus prototype sheltersand create enhance to the thecharacter of area future to access and convenient safe Provide Chamblee Rail-Trail Extension Seek high quality the adjacent to development MARTA station a blueprintCreate for streetscape improvements.
• • • • • • • City of Chamblee City of Chamblee Unified Development Ordinance, 2015 Unified the Plan, Comprehensive the by Guided OrdinanceDevelopment provides detailed direction (UDO) the and of built development layout, on the environment use, within City limits. Sections in the UDO associated with future properties of development within the study area were understand to the trail. might to they reviewed how relate It Provide qualityProvide government service through partnership cooperation and
Centered around the Chamblee MARTA Station, this around Station, the Chamblee Centered MARTA area will support transit oriented lifestyles with associated housing, services, and employment. It is zoned as Village Commercial and Transit-Oriented policies Key and implementationDevelopment. measures the rail-trail to related project include: Mission Statement Mission Statement The City Chamblee of is committed through excellence to leadership, qualityexceptional services, community activities, planning and innovative in partnership with our residents and businesses. 5. The Rail-Trail project within is located the Mid-City character area. The vision for the Mid-City characterarea states: Twenty uniqueTwenty character areas within the City further define the community’s vision. these Each of characterareas itscontains own subarea vision, policies, and implementation measures. Figure shows a community 1.4c vision map that illustrates the vision and aspirations the of comprehensive plan. An integral component the of vision is the Rail-Trail project that connects the existing the Keswick future Trail to location the of town green. 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 22 • • development Rail-Trail. of the the influence will sections following the that anticipated is CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study
the Chamblee MARTA Station. This district provides a a provides district MARTA Station. This Chamblee the of distance walking development within density higher development promotes that mixed-use to support intended is district intent.(a) and zoning This Purpose district. 210-11. Section development oriented -TOD, transit VC zoning district: to the apply shall regulations additional (b) following The and pedestrians. vehicles between conflicts the limit will which pedestrians, to oriented form, urban traditional a pedestrian-friendly to encourage parameters design and standards design with area Chamblee greater core and commercial city’s of the needs frequent and common the satisfy to offices and services and retail,residences, goods for alocation provides district density. This at ahigher related development uses and formixed-use primarily intended is district intent.(a) and zoning This Purpose district. 210-10. commercial Section -VC, village Design Guidelines, Figure DG.1. Figure Guidelines, Design 1.0 Addendum See structure. same of the part as uses above located if nonresidential directly permitted be only shall and floor ground the on permitted be not shall (1) structures and uses residential Multifamily are met: met: are criteria following the when only district this in permitted FAR allowable to up total the FAR maximum maximum to exceed the respective residential and nonresidential permitted be shall district TOD(c) the zoning in Densities TOD zoning district: to the apply shall regulations additional (b) following The city. the access within pedestrian and bicycle transportation, of use public the maximize and use automobile minimize to intended is pathways to MARTA Station. the district The bicycle and of pedestrian to anetwork oriented form, urban traditional apedestrian-friendly to encourage parameters design and standards design with offices and services and retail, forresidences, goods location excess of the minimum open space requirements, an an requirements, space open excess minimum of the approved in provided space open foot of additional square one (1) every For bonus: density space Open DG.1. Figure 1.0 Guidelines, Addendum Design in shown as network a connected pedestrian provide shall (2) TOD the district in Developments DG.1. Figure Guidelines, Design 1.0 Addendum See structure. same of the part as uses above located if nonresidential directly permitted be only shall and floor ground the on permitted be not shall (1) structures and uses residential Multifamily 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 23 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Chamblee Rail-Trail City of Chamblee Figure 1.4d – City of Chamblee Street Designation Figure 1.4d – City of As shown in Figure most the of streets that 1.4d, cross the trail are designated as secondary streets. Figure details 1.4e specific considerations for secondary streets. Source: City of Chamblee UDO Addendum 3.0 Streetscape Guidelines Source: City of Chamblee UDO additional shall development of square ten be feet permitted. See Section 230-2, Dimensional Standards Zoningof Districts, for open space standards. streets New and on-street new (2) parking bonus: For streetsnew every approved one of square foot newly on-streetand approved created parking spaces provided, an additional of square ten feet shalldevelopment be permitted. Side yard: None or 7.5’ deep. NoneSide or yard: 7.5’ Front yard: Varies based Varies type, on development yard: Front size, height, etc.
Unified Development Ordinance Addendum 3.0 (UDO) – Streetscape Guidelines In order assist to with the administration of and enforcement Ordinances Code of the City as relate Chamblee’s they of streetscape within improvements to the public right-of-way, the City Chamblee Guidelines. of Streetscape adopted Guidelines the Rail-Trail to study relevant are the designation streets withinof the study area and amenity specifications. Figure shows a map 1.4d with the designation. street • • Also important understand to are the setbacks development required the Section zoning by Per 230-2 code. Dimensional Zoning of Standards District, dimensions and required for VC Districts are: TOD 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 24 Figure 1.4e–CityofChambleeSecondaryStreetRequirements CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study (b)
Source: CityofChambleeUDO Addendum 3.0StreetscapeGuidelines Primary, Secondary, andFeeder Streets
spaces. compactor, parking trash visitor easement, and run, dog Rail-Trail existing of the location the 1.4f identifies Figure spaces. compactor, parking visitor and atrash run, dog the include easement. the These within exist improvements that to the repair, move, all reconstruct or have would City the trail, the to build decides City the once states agreement that The Rail-Trail. of the implementation future forthe to east the Drive Road Malone to west and the Tucker Chamblee between property of the edge northern of the length entire the along easement a10-foot-wide with of Chamblee LLC Lofts, City Peachtree the provided Malone 13, December On 2012, recorded County, at as DeKalb the Easement at Peachtree Documentation Malone Lofts 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis
25 Malone Drive Malone Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail 3400 Malone Condominiums Peachtree Malone Lofts (PML) MARTA Pond MARTA City of Chamblee PML 40 Visitor Parking Spaces 40 Visitor PML PML Trash Trash PML Compactor Olmsted PML Dog Run PML 10’ Easement 10’
Trackside MARTA Development MARTA Trackside Chamblee Tucker Road Tucker Chamblee Figure 1.4f – Peachtree Malone Lofts Easement – Peachtree Malone Figure 1.4f 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 26 it met the old requirements.” metit old the because However, compliance in is pond the pollution. stream reducing nor frequency in events 100-year of 1through flooding to reduce any new requirements of meeting not capable is conditions current its under states “pond the that further report The to today’s standards.” comparison in volumes required of their fourth one approximately were at time that werethat designed aresult, ponds for water As the quality. provisions no with facilities such design/size under- to “drastically tending methodology 1980s, MARTA a followed the in was built states that, pond the report since The form. current its in downstream and reduce pollution in-stream potential topond’s reduce flooding existing the to determine was performed analysis The station. rail MARTA Chamblee the near Rail-Trail the located along facility pond detention MARTA stormwater existing of the characteristics water and quality hydraulic, evaluates hydrologic, the Report As-Built Development, the Stormwater Management by & Prepared MARTA’s of Engineering Office 215/15 Report, As-Built (MARTA) Management Stormwater Rapid Atlanta TransitMetropolitan Authority CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study Figure 1.4g–MARTA DetentionPondSurvey grants. federal of state and types various for eligible be would to pond the modifications facility, stormwater aregional As to pond. allocated the be resources could that of amount the on depend would level The of modification requirements. these potential the to has it meet modified, if requirements, watercontrol and quality flood cannot meet pond current the form current its in that,concludes while study The owners. property multiple from receives it because drainage facility a as However, functions notes pond the that report the regional stormwater 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 27 Trackside Trackside Partners TOD MARTA Development
Rail-Trail Easement 06/24/2014 SITE PLAN SITE Trail and Trail Driveway Chamblee Village Driveway Intersection C C C C C C Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail RETA Chamblee Tucker Road Chamblee Tucker Source: Cocke Finkelstein, Inc. Figure 1.4h – Olmsted Development Driveway Recommendation Figure 1.4h – Olmsted City of Chamblee RESTA RA T C C C C C C C EAS C A E T T ESS A D C C The proposed driveway on will Chamblee Road Tucker the Olmsted both to provide access and Development the Theproposed Rail-Trail Trackside TOD. MARTA would traverse the driveway. Trackside TOD MARTA Figure shows the recommended 1.4h driveway design in relation the existing to Rail-Trail easement. Traffic Impact Study forChamblee Gateway South The Traffic Impact the for Chamblee Study South Gateway presents the analysis the of anticipated Service traffic of Level impacts the proposed to Olmsted(LOS) Development driveways. the Rail-Trail Elements to study relevant are the proposed recommendations for the design the of driveways, particularlydevelopment’s the driveway located theat intersection and Chamblee Road of Chamblee Tucker Village Driveway. C
C C C C la CHAMBLEE GATEWAY SOUTH - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHAMBLEE GATEWAY SOUTH - PLANNED 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 28 along the corridor on Figure 1.5a. Figure on corridor the along they were captured where to locations correspond images on Team’s Numbers notes Design the from observations. and images include pages following The area. study of the conditions existing to the document facility detention pond MARTA stormwater and corridor Team the visited Design The 1.5 Review of Conditions Existing CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study 1 2 these materialsanddetails. The Rail-Trail shouldcontinuethe useof public realmbrandandmaterials pallet. foundation fortheCityofChamblee’s construction detailsthatprovidea great comprised ofhigh-qualitymaterialsand Road bridge. The trailandpublic spaceis underutilized spaceundertheClairmont exemplary useofwhatwouldotherwisebe designed publicspacethatmakes The existingKeswick Trail isawell- 3 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 29 12 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail 10 11 The Rail-Trail corridor provides great potential for direct connectivity through the corridor provides great potential The Rail-Trail it does present some challenges. Mid-City character area. However, Downtown’s in public ownership or has an Approximately two-thirds of the corridor is either property will require The easement along the Peachtree Malone Lofts easement. The and a dog run. compactor, the relocation of visitor parking spaces, a trash While most of these private remainder of the corridor is in private ownership. a variety of built improvements parcels remain undeveloped, some contain These improvements include along the future potential route of the Rail-Trail. and concrete and asphalt surfaces. fences, decorative columns, retaining walls, or border utilities that cross the corridor has a varied topography, Additionally, and adjacent development that in certain cases, is built within close the corridor, proximity of the potential route of the Rail-Trail. City of Chamblee 9 8 7 6 5 4 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 30 Figure 1.5a–ChambleeRail-Trail ExtensionCorridor CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study 1 3 2 4 5 6
Match Line Figure 1.5a-1 7 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 31 Study Area Trail Existing Keswick Proposed Rail-Trail Extension in Parcels Rail-Trail Public Ownership Legend Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail City of Chamblee 12 11 10 9 8
7 Match Line Figure 1.5a-2 1.5a-2 Figure Line Match 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 32 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study • Appendix. the can found in be Complete results key of the findings. asummary is following sites. The noise, and underground storage tanks/hazardous materials quality/ ecology, uses, land air archeology, history, general surveyed screening facility. detention The stormwater pond MARTA the including corridor, Rail-Trail of the survey Team screening environmental completed an Design The 1.6 Survey Environmental Screening
not create value to the property owners. owners. not create to value property the would and costly very be would systems these Modifying systems. treatment water and quality stormwater own their redeveloped been with have already facility stormwater to connect regional the would that properties of the most that appears it detention facility. Furthermore, aregional as site’s to the function impacts This ability 25’ stream. of the located within areas to modify difficult makes it very it as significant, is facility detention pond MARTA stormwater the within of presence astream The of Chamblee. City the Resources (GADNR) of Natural and Department Georgia of the requirement buffer to stream the subject is and State abuffered also is water, stream The permit. wetlands 404 asection require would to stream the any impacts (USACE) and of Engineers Corps water Army US of the ajurisdictional considered is stream The astream. and wetland jurisdictional small one identified facility pond detention MARTA of stormwater the -Survey Ecology • •
with FAA’s Airports District Office (ADO). Office FAA’s District with Airports coordination require theyacceptable uses, would land be may detention retention and facilities While Airport. feet DeKalb-Peachtree the from 2,000 approximately located is facility detention MARTA stormwater pond The Airport. operate,jets Dekalb-Peachtree as such where feet forairports 10,000 is distance recommended FAA The area. ramp, parking or movement loading area, recommendations for distance aircraft from an airport (FAA) has Aviation Administration Federal the wildlife, attract that detention stormwater facilities For (Phase II) will be required. be will II) (Phase investigations Blvd., #B, subsurface Peachtree Industrial RSAutomotive or Blvd at 5105 Peachtreeat 5347 Industrial - UST/Haz Mat required. is event permit the in required a404 be would (SHPO) concurrence Office Preservation Stateand Historic to need analyzed be would action this with associated impacts the to trails, corridors spur rail of the conversion involve would project proposed the Because eligibility. Place (NRHP) of Historic Register potential National to district’s the element acontributing considered are BoulevardIndustrial District-Peachtree Park Industrial Peachtree the with associated lines spur -The History If right-of-way is required from the QuikTrip QuikTrip the from required is right-of-way If 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 33 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail 1 2 3 STREAM City of Chamblee Buffer Location of 25’ State Stream State Stream of 25’ Approximate Stream Approximate location of Area Wetland Detention Pond MARTA Stormwater MARTA Facility Property Line Approximate location Figure 1.6a – Key Findings from MARTA Stormwater Detention Pond Facility Environmental Screening Survey Screening Pond Facility Environmental Stormwater Detention MARTA – Key Findings from Figure 1.6a 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 34 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study 1 1.0 | Existing Conditions + Analysis 35 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail The MARTA stormwater detention pond facility’s central location pond facility’s stormwater detention The MARTA an District offers corridor and the Mid-City along the Rail-Trail an amenity for the area. Ideally located, ideal location for creating unique challenges and opportunities. the site presents some around the site currently backs-onto the Existing development of adjacent development parcels suggest space. Proposed plans This will also back-onto the space. that future developments limit natural surveillance and “eyes on development pattern will much access as possible to the space will the park.” Providing as and safe function of the park. be important for the use deep and contains steep slopes. The site is approximately 25’ slopes also While presenting construction challenges, these to create present an opportunity to use topography creatively uses. a variety of terraced spaces for social and recreational designed in such These spaces could be built incrementally and as a stormwater a way as to allow the site to continue to function detention pond facility. City of Chamblee 3 2 2.0 Public 2.0 Engagement 2.0 | Public Engagement 38 the success of any project trail toActively critical is to users the listening thoughts, concerns of and ideas, park and future trail 2.0 PublicEngagement CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study • • • • included: interviews these from emerged that comments and themes facility. detention MARTA Common stormwater the pond and Rail-Trail forthe potential findings and ideas, vision, their about were interviewed Commissioners City and Mayor The Interviews 2.1 Mayor and Council Member below. outlined is techniques engagement public various the from findings of the summary representatives. agency and A owners, property residents, of interestedvested and group of adiverse comprised Group by 12-month aStakeholder Advisory The was guided process survey. online an and workshops, public meetings, group focus small interviews, in participated residents Over 350 Trail. Rail- of the users trail to future the listen actively and to gather strategies and of techniques Team avariety used Design The
open open and lit well be must Rail-Trail The important. very Safety is concrete trail amulti-purpose be should Rail-Trail The of Brookhaven City and to GM redevelopment the site connection direct with City the throughout of trails network toconnect abroader Regional connectivity is important. The project should park alinear as designed be should Rail-Trail The . • • • •
• • • include: project forthe considered be should sources that Funding designation this with associated opportunities educational provide could facility detentionMARTA stormwater pond the habitat and awildlife is of Chamblee City The butterfly garden events, and forspecial playground, amphitheater afountain, gazebo, benches, as such amenities include and greenspace apassive developedbe as should facility detention MARTA stormwater pond The measure asecurity as trail the along provided be should Cameras
Partnerships: Borrowing: Pay you as go: • • • • • • • • • •
Non-profit OrganizationsNon-profit Developers Agencies Businesses Bonds Revenue General Bond Obligation (CID) Improvement District Community Assessments Special Grants Fund/CIP General 2.0 | Public Engagement 39 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail City of Chamblee Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting #1 Discussions Stakeholder Peachtree Malone Loft representatives noted that noted MalonePeachtree representatives Loft residents from the buildings are concerned about losing amenities any the due Rail-Trail to They project. see minimalwould to prefer impact their to property, Advisory Group members envisioned that they noted the Rail-Trail as a green corridor that welcoming was and beautiful with shops and along stores theway. The pond stormwater MARTA detention facility would be better utilized as a park. The park would have spaces for residents and visitors hang to out and enjoy amenities and such as art dog exercise/amenities along the trail.
• What is your vision for the Rail-Trail? see it do How you impacting the surrounding area? • What concernsWhat or issues potential that you foresee do you underwould take consideration? like us to support? you would funding source(s) What What isWhat your vision for the Rail-Trail? see do How it you impacting the surrounding area?
The following is a summary the of findings from the discussion. 1. 2. 3. 1. Meeting #1 The Advisory Stakeholder Group interviewed was about their vision, ideas, and concerns for the Rail-Trail and the MARTA pondstormwater were Specifically, they detention facility. threeasked questions: 2.2 Advisory Group Stakeholder 2.0 | Public Engagement 40 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study 2.
• consideration? take under to us like would you that you do foresee issues potential or concerns What • • •
should be taken to ensure that the trail is safe, is taken be trail the that to ensure should Measures were concerns. maintenance and Security space. cyclist and to aseparated pedestrian see preferred others whereas trail to amulti-use see preferred Group Advisory of the members of the Some cyclists. and pedestrians for separate allocated spaces with trail space, a separated same versus the sharing bicyclists and pedestrians acenterline, with trail a multi-use as to trail option the treat the discussed group The identified as being critical. was also City of the to side MARTA south station the the through feel unsafe. Connectivity trail makes the and use its limits which not todoes connect anything, currently Trail Keswick project. The forthe important very being as was identified connectivity Regional park. dog private to need a be would park dog ofreplacement the Loft representativesPeachtree Malone noted any that by City. the replaced have to would fully be easement the along by caused Rail-Trail the to amenities the any impacts agreement, legal easement noted the per that City easement. The trail the located are that spaces within compactor, trash parking and run, dog the namely 3.
• source(s) funding you would support? What • •
strategy. apotential as identified was also forparking Charging • • • sources: funding following the of all were supportive members Group Advisory where appropriate, controlled intersection crossings. and, markings through addressed be should segments trail between streets through points Safe crossing by homeless. used the being park facility pond detention MARTA stormwater and Rail-Trail the about were concerned members Group Advisory Some installing better lighting along the Keswick Trail Tunnel. Tunnel. Trail Keswick the along lighting better installing include also would This trail. the lighting including
• • • • Partnerships: • • Borrowing: • • • Pay you as go:
Non-profit OrganizationsNon-profit Developers Agencies Businesses Bonds Revenue General Bond Obligation (CID) Improvement District Community Grants Fund/CIP General 2.0 | Public Engagement 41 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail City of Chamblee using address pond the detention to the development’s needs. stormwater OlmstedThe Chamblee The Design with met the the developer Team of mixed- use Olmsted discuss to development the how Rail-Trail withmay Since integrate the the proposed development. begin about was development to construction, there was nothing that could the trail be done better integrate to into the development. However, the developer was supportivethe Rail-Trail of project. Malone LoftsPeachtree Malone from the Peachtree Lofts (PML) Representatives Homeowners Association Board with met the Design (HOA) from the City and Chamblee representatives of Team to discuss possible options build to theRail-Trail in the existing 10’ easement while minimizing impacts their to existing dog run, and visitortrash parking compactor, on the spaces located the Per easementeasement. agreement between the City of dog run, trash Chamblee impacts and any the PML, PML’s to compactor or parking spaces will be repaired/replaced by the City. The Design will Team provide a high-level plan conceptual of pondthe stormwater MARTA detention facility to for MARTA The plan will be in completed review. coordination to have who partner development will 1, be for Lot with MARTA’s MARTA’s primary concernMARTA’s is the security users and of safety theof trail within and located 1 development the Lot MARTA pond the stormwaterat MARTA MARTA detention facility. would that they likelynoted provide aneasement for the City use pond the stormwater MARTA to detention facility or sell the property The final the City. to easement or sale would be managersmade MARTA by and the Board. MARTA MARTA is typically required charge to 100% market value of the for sale the of property and 50% up to market value of for an easement. The from various Design with met representatives Team internal departments within MARTA, including Civil Engineering, Facilities, The and purpose Safety, Estate. Real theof discuss meeting to was future the potential the use of pond stormwaterMARTA detention facility as an amenity greenspace for City Chamblee of residents. MARTA Property owners the trail adjacent to also were interviewed about their thoughts, vision, ideas, and concerns for the Rail-Trail and pond the stormwater MARTA detention facility. Following are comments from specific property owners. For locations,development please see the base map (Figure provided in the first1.4a) chapter. 2.3 Trail Neighbor Interviews Neighbor 2.3 Trail 2.0 | Public Engagement 42 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study Figure 2.3a–Rail-Trail andPML DogRun+ParkingRe-LocationStudy-Option1
The Olmsted
Spaces PML Visitor Parking Development with Trackside MARTA
Potential Location
for Dog
Run
P o t e n t i a
l
R
a
i
l -
Potential Locationfor T
r
a
i
l
A
Dog Run
MARTA Stormwater
l
i
g
n Detention Pond
m
e
n t Facility PML
Potential Combined Dog Run Condominiums 3400 Malone • Team. Design by the investigation further tor alternates concept three discussed group The
• • • • 1 Option
impacted. not be would dumpster The lot (or acombination). PML the parking in spaces parallel some adding or deck, parking MARTA TOD the within facility, or pond detention stormwater MARTA the relocated within be could spaces Parking Condominiums. Malone 3400 with combined or spaces, toadjacent parking the toadjacent dumpster, the relocated be could park dog The lot. PML the parking in spaces parking existing ±20 through Then Malone Condominiums. the 3400 reaching until MARTA property onto spaces the parking existing and dumpster the around trail the Tucker Road, Chamblee From run 2.0 | Public Engagement 43 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail The dog park could be relocated adjacent to adjacent dumpster, the the parkingto spaces, or combined with 3400 Malone Condominiums. Parking would be impacted. not The dumpster would be not impacted. From Chamblee Road, Tucker run the trail north, parallel the to Olmsted within development the propertyMARTA and then east Maloneto Drive just the south of Nissan dealership property, then south on Malone Drive along the east side connect the to of street the proposedback to trail easement.
• • • Option 2 •
• City of Chamblee 3400 Malone
Condominiums Potential Combined Dog Run Dog Combined Potential PML Facility Detention Pond
MARTA Stormwater MARTA
Dog Run
t
n
e
m Potential Location for
n
g
i l
A
l i
a
r
T
- l i
a
R
l
a
i t
n
e t
o
P
Run
for Dog
Location
Potential
Trackside MARTA MARTA Trackside Development with Parking Visitor PML Spaces
The Olmsted
Figure 2.3b – Rail-Trail and PML Dog Run + Parking Re-Location Study - Option 2 Dog Run + Parking Re-Location and PML Figure 2.3b – Rail-Trail 2.0 | Public Engagement 44
CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study Figure 2.3c–Rail-Trail andPML DogRun+ParkingRe-LocationStudy-Option3
The Olmsted
Spaces PML Visitor Parking Development with Trackside MARTA
Potential Location
for Dog
Run
P
o
e t
n
i t
Potential Locationfor
a
l
R a
Dog Run
l i
MARTA Stormwater
-
T r
Detention Pond
a
l i
A
l
g i
Facility n
m
e
n t PML
Potential Combined Dog Run Condominiums 3400 Malone project’s goals and objectives. objectives. and project’s goals the and engagement public additional context the of within and detail more concepts three in the explore would Team Design The not as ideal. members by PML the HOA determined Board but discussed was further park dog a to share Condominiums Malone both for PML 3400 the option and The •
• • • • 3 Option
impacted. not be would dumpster The not impacted. be would Parking Condominiums. Malone 3400 with combined or spaces, toadjacent parking the toadjacent dumpster, the relocated be could park dog The Malone Drive. to east then and Condominiums Malone 3400 the paralleling ThenCondominiums. north Malone 3400 the reaching until onto property MARTA pond the spaces parking existing and dumpster the around trail the run Tucker Road, Chamblee From 2.0 | Public Engagement 45 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail City of Chamblee adjacent property owner the of Azalea Apartments Place thewould other half integrate need the to of trail their onto property for this work. strategy to The trail would then straddle properties.both TownparkThe developers Peachtree concerned were about that thethe safety trail of perception could potentially townhome for new owners.create proposed They keep to their in allow with fenced provided development to gate a townhome the trail. access residents to The integration of the trail would potentially impact some the of common greenspace designed, per Councils the City Chamblee’s of requests, for the future Townpark residents the of Peachtree workcommunity. requested to They with the City explore to counting of the the potential the space allocated trail by greenspace. common community’s the towards Apartments Azalea Place After speaking with the developers the of Peachtree Townpark developers, the Design with spoke the Team property managers the of Azalea Apartments Place Townpark. Peachtree Similar adjacent to located the to the Azalea Townpark development, Peachtree Place Apartments’ property managers supportive were the of trail and expressed in interest allowing half the of trail to be on their property with the other half on the Peachtree Townpark property. that there might noted They be some challengessetback since the buildings close are located to the property line. The wouldCity that they work noted with the property owners address to these challenges in order to the trailfacilitate connection. If possible, the existing the point MARTA access to MARTA pondstormwater detention facility should be relocated. The pond stormwater MARTA detention facility should asbe developed a passive greenspace and include amenities such as a playground, benches, to a fountain and the discourage water aerate the of concentration mosquitoes a that currently stagnant occur due water, to andgazebo, small amphitheater similar the one to that builtwas in Historic Fourth Park in Ward Atlanta. Safety isSafety important for 3400 Malone Condominiums residents. The Rail-Trail must Residents be should lit. have and allowa fence the trail access residents to through a controlled gate.
The Design with met the developers Team from Peachtree Townpark discuss to integration the the potential of Rail- the proposed WhileTrail to townhome development. the plandevelopment for the property already was approved the developers supportive the were City, by the of trail and exploringopen to half the integrate of trail to a way onto their as long as development, the integration did result not in a reduction the of number proposed of townhomes. The Peachtree Townpark Townpark Peachtree • • • Representatives from the 3400Representatives Malone Condominiums HOA Boardwith met from the the Design and representatives Team City Chamblee of input obtain to regarding the Rail-Trail and pondthe stormwater MARTA detention facility greespace. Common themes that emerged from the discussion included: 3400 Malone Condominiums 2.0 | Public Engagement 46 and suggested that a portion of the space could become a park. Figure 2.3d shows the alignment discussed. discussed. alignment the shows 2.3d Figure apark. become could space of the aportion that suggested and with they that felt comfortable corridor forthe Team sketched and Design alignment the an out with worked owners property The to height. density, and setbacks, relating rights current retain their buildable area as possible and and possible as area buildable to like retainthey much would as development. such, As mixed-use take of a may form the program development the redevelopment, of time at the bear will market the what on Depending 10-years. next the within property the to like redevelopthey would years, coming the for form current its in remain will property Storage Guardian the While property.their on had has it impact positive the have and seen Atlanta BeltLine the along property own currently they as of Rail-Trail supportive They were property. the acquired recently had owners property The Storage property. Guardian of the Team owners met with Design The Storage Property Guardian CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study Figure 2.3d–PotentialRail-Trail Alignment throughGuardianStorage 2.0 | Public Engagement 47 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Stakeholder Advisory Stakeholder Group are Trail Edge Condition Trail City of Chamblee Trail Amenities Trail T T T
captured on pagescaptured 50-52. Following are copies the of boards from the public workshop. Responses collected from the Trail Type Trail 2. 3. rail Amenities rail Edge Condition 1. rail Type The based was exercise on the three primary elements a trail that create experience: Based on findings from the Existing Conditions and Analysis Technical and interviews with completed the Mayor and City Council members, and Trail Neighbors, Advisory Stakeholder the GroupDesign a public developed Meeting #1, Team engagement designedexercise collect to specific information associated with the vision for theRail-Trail and stormwater MARTA detention pond The facility. Advisory Stakeholder Group on Meeting presenting focused #2 the collecting group, the to exercise input regarding input. and the using the effectiveness of exercise, the group’s get the to exercise 2.4 Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting2.4 Advisory #2 Group Stakeholder 2.0 | Public Engagement 48 Figure 2.4a–PublicEngagementExampleExerciseBoards CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study 2.0 | Public Engagement 49 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail City of Chamblee Figure 2.4a – Public Engagement Example Exercise Boards - Continued Engagement Example Exercise Boards Figure 2.4a – Public 2.0 | Public Engagement 50 Figure 2.4a–PublicEngagementExampleExerciseBoards-Continued CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study Additional comments can be found in the Appendix. the can found in be comments Additional meeting. the in participated members Group Advisory #1 survey. Atotal Workshop Stakeholder online the of and six Public from findings the with them combines or compares that presented amatrix are in results The meeting. Group Advisory Stakeholder the from exercise results contains the 2.6a Figure survey. #1 online an Workshop through and Public during public the with exercise to auseful share be would it that agreed approved exercise and Group the Stakeholder Advisory The would support. residents that strategies funding the about aquestion as well as facility, detention MARTA stormwater pond and Rail-Trail the with associated ideas or any potential concerns trail, the along areas specific to like in see would participants that treatment edge of type the with associated questions exercise included The results from Public Workshop #1. Workshop Public from results exercise ranking highest contains the 2.6a Figure boards. the on were asked to them and place comments their to write which notes were Post-It on given input. Participants provide and view to room participants for the around were placed boards 36”x48” on questions Exercise Workshop. Public the attended people two facility. detention MARTA Thirty- stormwater the pond and Trail Rail- forthe vision the Team regarding to Design obtain input the exercise developed by engagement public the use and public to general was to project the the introduce workshop of the #1 Concept Workshop Study. Rail-Trail the for Public purpose The 18, 2016, Team facilitated Design the February Thursday, On Public2.5 Workshop #1
2.0 | Public Engagement 51 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail City of Chamblee Public Workshop #1 Public Workshop Figure 2.6a the contains highest ranking results exercise from the online survey. The Design an developed online Team survey the of publicengagement collect to exercise additional The input. hyperlink to the survey distributed was the City by via email and left open for response during the February month of Two and March 2016. hundred ninety-five responses received. were 2.6 Online Survey 2.0 | Public Engagement 52 Figure 2.6a–PublicEngagementExerciseFindings CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study Exercise Question 2 Trail EdgeConditions Fix-It Stations,Public Art, Other. Cameras, EmergencyPhones,Bicycle Lighting, Water Fountains,Security Recycling Receptacles,BikeRacks, SEE onthe Trail: Benches, Trash/ amenities thatyouwouldprefer along trails.Pleasetellusifthereare list ofamenitiesthatyoutypicallysee 1B Trail Amenities -Followingisa Separated Space? Multi-Use SharedSpaceor trail youwouldliketoseedeveloped: 1A Trail Type - Tell uswhattypeof 2D Industrial 2C Commercial|Office 2B Commercial|Retail 2A Residential - Tell uswhattypeoftrailedgeconditionyouwouldprefertoseealongthefollowinglanduses: NOT 60% 75% 50% 83% deemed acceptable. All presentedamenitieswere 100% -Multi-UseSeparated Stakeholder Advisory Group Stakeholder Advisory Results (%ofParticipants) emergency phones,publicart grass thathastobemowed, deemed acceptable;consider All presentedamenitieswere 69% -Multi-UseSeparated 50% 93% 50% 56% Public Workshop Results (% ofParticipants) 14%-public art 28%-bicycle fix-itstations, 30%-All soundsgood, 59% -Multi-UseSeparated 37% 70% 34% 35% Online SurveyResults (% ofParticipants) 2.0 | Public Engagement 53 Online Survey Results Online Survey Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Picnic tables, Public art, Dog Public art, Picnic tables, garden, park, Community Amphitheater, Playground, Fitness course City of Chamblee Public Workshop Results Public Workshop Public art, Dog park, Public art, tables, Amphitheatre, Picnic course, Playground, Fitness Community garden Results Stakeholder Advisory Stakeholder Group “Drivin’ N Cryin’”; “I can take MARTA to work”; “I left a bad neighborhood and moved here;” “The great to work”; “I left a bad neighborhood N Cryin’”; “I can take MARTA “Drivin’ and in the summer and a train pulling in and stopping, both kids community;” “Going to Frosty Caboose in that area, even took family pictures along there;” around down adults are always drawn to it. Walking a private pilot and we always loved he our kids to PDK since they were toddlers. My husband is “Taking together for dinner at Now they’re young adults and we get PDK Day. playground next to the taxi way and the Downwind pretty regularly.” That it’s not only an industrial suburb; “Chambodia”; That we’re not a bunch of “rubes” (uneducated an industrial suburb; “Chambodia”; That we’re not a bunch of “rubes” not only That it’s along with; country people); Not hard to get High Crime. All car dealerships; Unsafe; are not progressive or innovative; Poor; Industrial; We Dog park, Playground, Dog park, detention area as through Trail of PML. opposed to the parking military history, heritage, rail history, A/A early residents, early institutions, history, History - Farming/dairy Chamblee weird;” Great but we are getting there;” “Keep taking a while, history; “It’s factory/industrial Small town feel. Diversity; Multicultural; of a train stop more commercial/industrial; restaurants; Less 4C Historical + Cultural Narratives - What is one of your fondest memories of Chamblee? 4B Historical + Cultural Narratives - What are myths and misconceptions that you would like to see corrected about Chamblee? 4A Historical + Cultural Narratives Historical 4A like people - What would you most Please to know about Chamblee? (3) of the most name one (1) to three messages for important take-home visitors about residents as well as Chamblee? 3 MARTA Detention Area - The Detention 3 MARTA detention stormwater existing MARTA potential to serve pond facility has the amenity. as a community greenspace what way, If it is developed that you like to amenities/facilities would see in the space? Exercise Question Exercise Figure 2.6a – Public Engagement Exercise Findings- Continued Exercise Findings- – Public Engagement Figure 2.6a 2.0 | Public Engagement 54 Figure 2.6a–PublicEngagementExerciseFindings-Continued CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study Exercise Question build thetrail? source(s) wouldyou Opportunities - Funding +Implementation considerations? that youwouldlikeustotakeunder concerns andideasdoyouhave Potential Concerns+Ideas- history andcultureofthearea? Chamblee Rail-Trail tointerpretthe envision beingincorporatedinthe - Whatphysicalapplicationscanyou 4D Historical+CulturalNarratives • • • • Partnerships: • • Borrowing: • • • • Pay asyouGo:
Non-profit Organizations Developers Agencies Businesses Revenue Bonds General ObligationBond Community ImprovementDistrict Special Assessment Grants General Fund/CIP What funding NOT supportto What “City ontherighttrack” theme, Keepinmindblindpeoplewithfootandbiketraffic,Benches,Modernindustrial mash up, Historic maps,Etiquettesignage,“Keepright”,markerse.g.“Formersiteof:”,Rail Interpretive signage,ThemedtrailPublicartincludingmonuments No specialassessments • • • • • • • • •
Stakeholder Advisory Group Stakeholder Advisory Visitor parking Not enoughresidentialownership spots park, dumpster, 40visitorparking Peachtree Malone(PML):privatedog Police bikepatrol Cleanliness Lighting Connectivity Security Safety Results No specialassessments Public Workshop Results • • • • • •
to southeastsideofChamblee(Dresden) Want plantoincludelongtermconnection park Erosion, homelesspeoplesleepinginthe Push outoverClairmontbridge Connection toMARTA entrances Need trafficcalmingmeasuresneartrail McGraw DrivetoWholeFoodsdevelopment Protected sidewalkfromtrailheadat • •
Borrowing Pay asyougo Online SurveyResults 2.0 | Public Engagement 55 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Be an amenity for Mid-City and the Rail-Trail Be passive a SAFE, greenspace Include greenspace amenities such as picnic tables, publicgazebo, art, dog park, community garden, playground, fitness amphitheater, course, and butterfly garden
City of Chamblee • • • The Detention MARTA Facility SHOULD: Celebrate the history, and environment, culture, memories Chamblee of Provide localProvide connectivity the the of rest City to and regional connectivity trail to network the north to of the andKeswick east, Park, to Redevelopment GM Brookhaven the southwest to allBe at SAFE times, open, well no fencing lit, parallel the trailto from for ease access adjacent properties of (unless existing fencing is already and well in place), maintained Be welcoming and beautiful featuring shops and stores along its length with better the stormwater use of MARTA ponddetention facility Be a linear park with a multi-use trail concrete separated and include landscape buffers between the trail and land uses
• • • • • The Rail-Trail SHOULD: Rail-Trail The Findings Following is a summary themes and the ideas of key that emerged from the public engagement the of Rail-Trail and pondthe stormwater MARTA detention facility: 2.7 Summary of Public Engagement Engagement Summary2.7 Public of 3.0 Concept PlanConcept 3.0 Plan 3.0 | Concept Plan 58 3.0 ConceptPlan CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study to illustrate proposed conceptual conditions. condition perspective-sections, and two perspective images proposed and existing views, plan proposed and existing 3.1a. Figure in focus includes Each identified focus area areas into seven organized is plan proposed The concept plan. proposed of the adescription provide pages following The use, the safety, Rail-Trail. of the bolster vibrancy and and support standards, design and guidelines, use, design land through and, front onto that - developments trail the (TrODs) Developments redevelop Trail-Oriented potentially as have that not redeveloped could corridor the along how properties to is suggest vision of this purpose The time. over become could area study of the build-out the what for vision afuture suggests concept the Additionally, plan Park). (Rail-Trail park stormwater into a facility detention MARTAof stormwater the pond concept transformation the way. this is the in along Included dotted parks with separated trail amulti-use include would into a corridor rail Chamblee historic abandoned of the transformation potential near-term the considers that aconceptual plan illustrates section This 3.1 Introduction engagement phase. the public collected users during trail future and owners thoughts, with combined concerns of and ideas, property analysis conditions from the existing ConceptThe based findings on is for Plan Rail-Trail Extension the Chamblee linear park. This linear park park linear This park. linear Rail-Trail Extension +RailTrail ParkConceptPlan Development
3.0 | Concept Plan 59
N Chamblee Dunwoody Way Dunwoody Chamblee 7
Not to Scale Pierce Drive Pierce Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail
6 Miller Drive Miller
5
Malone Drive Malone Peachtree Boulevard Peachtree City of Chamblee
4 Chamblee Tucker Road Tucker Chamblee
3 Peachtree Road Clairmont Road Clairmont 2
1 McGaw Drive McGaw Proposed Building Conceptual Building Conceptual Plaza Proposed Trail Connection Legend Figure 3.1a – Rail-Trail Extension + Rail-Trail Park Concept Plan Focus Areas Plan Focus Park Concept Extension + Rail-Trail Figure 3.1a – Rail-Trail 3.0 | Concept Plan 60 Figure 3.2b–ProposedConditions Figure 3.2a–ExistingConditions CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study Legend Whole Foods Whole Foods Peachtree Road Peachtree Road Plaza Conceptual Building Conceptual Building Proposed
McGaw Drive McGaw Drive Property Property 1 Georgia Georgia 1 Power Power A’ A A’ A B B 2 2 Ceramic Ceramic Davens Davens Center Center B’ B’ N N which would enable the site to redevelop into a more suitable, trail-friendly use. site to the redevelop trail-friendly into suitable, enable amore would which substation forthe location alternative Power an to Georgia find with working consider should City The apower substation. as planned Power currently site is Georgia The TrODs. as corridor Rail-Trail the along properties other and Power property potential the redevelopment show Georgia of the also conditions proposed The Road overpass. way to the Clairmont on the towards northeast the shifts alignment the where corridor rail historic abandoned reaches the it Road until of Peachtree side north the along continuing lot Drive, to west of McGaw the parking Foods Whole to proposed the connecting Rail-Trail the shows image The Area. Focus Power +Georgia Foods Whole of the conditions proposed the illustrates 3.2b Figure 3.2g. and 3.2c Figure in depicted perspective-sections conditions existing of two location the with along area of the conditions existing the illustrates 3.2a Figure Road overpass. to Clairmont the corridor Peachtree Rail-Trail the Road and along east Drive McGaw from Itextends area. study of the edge western located Power the is on Area Focus +Georgia Foods Whole The Focus3.2 Area 1-Whole Foods +Georgia Power Figure 3.2c–Section-ExistingConditions A 1 A’ 3.0 | Concept Plan 61 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Figure 3.2c illustrates the existing conditions along the illustrates the existing Figure 3.2c Georgia Power property. Road and the edge of Peachtree (ROW) is approximately Road right-of-way The Peachtree along lanes and powerlines travel three 13’ wide with 50’ the ROW. the edge of the potential alignment of the Figure 3.2d illustrates Road and the Georgia Power along Peachtree Rail-Trail public Informed by the findings from the Property. wide, a 16’ is proposed as engagement, the Rail-Trail trail. Figure 3.2e shows an concrete, multi-use separated trail. example of the proposed Rail-Trail Figure 3.2e - Proposed will be and 8’ of the trail will be dedicated to pedestrians 8’ with baby dedicated to cyclists, roller bladders, runners The City should consider requiring Whole carriages, etc. wide, 16’ Foods to develop their segment of the trail as multi-use separated trail. of the The proposed conditions consider the narrowing to allow 11’ to traffic lanes along Peachtree Road from 13’ to separate trail users from vegetative buffer space for a 6’ along the moving traffic and the burying of powerlines be required to address small retaining wall would A road. the the sloped grade between Peachtree Road and trail section would be of the 16’ 5’ Georgia Power property. would 11’ located along the Peachtree Road ROW while be located on the Georgia Power property. Figure 3.2f illustrates the potential future redevelopment It suggests a TrOD. of the Georgia Power property as a edge of the setback from the edge of the trail to the 20’ between the buffer a 6’ setback includes This 20’ building. and a potential plaza space activated by first Rail-Trail floor retail/commercial uses and the Rail-Trail. A’ A’ City of Chamblee 1 1 A A Figure 3.2f – Section Proposed Rail-Trail + Trail-Oriented Development + Trail-Oriented Figure 3.2f – Section Proposed Rail-Trail Figure 3.2d – Section Proposed Rail-Trail Alignment Rail-Trail – Section Proposed Figure 3.2d 3.0 | Concept Plan 62 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study corridor. Portions oftheoriginalrailroadtracksstillremainalong below amixtureofmaturepineandhardwoodtrees. The corridoriscurrentlywoodedwithadenseunderstory is locatedonthewestside. is locatedontheeastsideofcorridorandawarehouse industrial landusesonbothsides.DavensCeramicCenter The corridorisapproximately50’ wideandisborderedby Clairmont Roadoverpass. abandoned historicrailcorridorasitapproachesthe Figure 3.2gillustratestheexistingconditionsof landscaping. the trail”whilestillallowingviewstobeframedby natural surveillanceofthecorridorandenable“eyeson allow forviewsthroughtherailcorridorbuffer toencourage plantings orpermeablehardscape/pavers. This would buffer thatincludescanopytreesandlowgroundcover A minimumof6’ shouldbepreserved foravegetative trail toallowforavegetativebuffer. be preservedbetweentheedgeofrailcorridorand treatments alongcommercialuses,sufficientspaceshould with thepublicengagementfindingsregardingtrailedge be locatedwithinthecorridor. Additionally, andconsistent to weavethetrailaroundanyspecimentreesthatmay There issufficientspacewithintheabandonedcorridor Trail withintheabandonedhistoricrailcorridor. Figure 3.2hillustratesthepotentialalignmentofRail- Figure 3.2g–SectionExistingConditions Figure 3.2h–SectionProposedRail-Trail Alignment B B 2 2 B’ B’ 3.0 | Concept Plan 63 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail TrOD Building Facade TrOD Figure 3.2i illustrates the potential future enhancement or future enhancement illustrates the potential Figure 3.2i the Rail-Trail. of the properties bordering redevelopment change from industrial could potentially These properties commercial or retail uses such as uses to trail-friendly uses. facade enhancements to The proposed image suggests these buildings to face onto adjacent buildings enabling natural surveillance and and encourage the Rail-Trail the buildings Spaces between activation of the corridor. be converted to pedestrian corridor could and the Rail-Trail or plaza spaces that are activated by friendly green spaces the trail and the land uses. be used to install public these spaces could Additionally, public engagement findings, these art. Consistent with the the local history and art installations could reference culture of Chamblee. C B’ City of Chamblee C B TrOD Plaza TrOD B A 2 Environmental Public Art B A Figure 3.2i – Section Proposed Rail-Trail + Trail-Oriented Development + Trail-Oriented Rail-Trail – Section Proposed Figure 3.2i 3.0 | Concept Plan 64 Figure 3.3b–ProposedConditions Figure 3.3a–ExistingConditions CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study
Peachtree Boulevard Peachtree Boulevard Restaurant Proposed Row 1 1
Clairmont Road Clairmont Road Legend Walmart Connection Proposed Trail Plaza Conceptual Building Conceptual Building Proposed Walmart N N Bridge, which would connect the Rail-Trail to the southern portion of the City of of City of the portion to southern the Rail-Trail the connect would which Bridge, Road Clairmont the on trail to Trail Keswick amulti-purpose the from a connection provide street could shared-use This harmoniously. and safely can coexist travel and pedestrians and vehicles street where into ashared-use to transformed be proposed is drive redeveloped to service face restaurants that The Trail. to on Keswick the reused or adaptively being Trail Keswick the located along buildings industrial the shows image phase, the engagement public the from findings the on Based Restaurant of the Row Area. Focus conditions proposed the illustrates 3.3b Figure drive. accessed uses by aservice land of industrial comprised is area The 3.3d. Figure in depicted image perspective conditions existing of an locations the with along area, of the conditions existing the illustrates 3.3a Figure drive. service Walmart the along towards east the runs Trail Keswick existing the of where of south Peachtree Road overpass, north Boulevard and Clairmont the to west of the just Trail Keswick the Restaurant locatedThe Row is along Area Focus 3.3 Focus Area 2-Restaurant Row Figure 3.3c–RestaurantRowPark
Clairmont Road Bridge with a Multi-purpose Trail on the west side of the bridge Plan to confirm the uses for this space. Uses for this uses the toPlan confirm Master Recreation and Parks of Chamblee City the from findings the consider should space. City The park proposed of the view acloser provides 3.3c east. Figure to the forks Rail-Trail proposed the where street and Restaurant Row shared-use the between park of asmall location the proposes image the Additionally, trail. purpose multi- the and travel lanes the between 6’from to a4’ 8’ vegetated with buffer Road Bridge Clairmont of the west side the 10’ 11’ or on sidewalk the expanding and 12’ Road from 13’ and Clairmont to down on travel lanes the narrowing require would Road Bridge Clairmont the on Chamblee. Implementing this connection 3.0 | Concept Plan 65 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Figure 3.3e illustrates the proposed potential conditions Figure 3.3e illustrates the proposed potential Informed by the public engagement of Restaurant Row. reused process, the area is shown being adaptively or redeveloped as restaurants or other trail-friendly Keswick commercial and retail uses that face onto the Trail. to be portion of the service drive is proposed A vehicles transformed into a shared-use street where and pedestrians can coexist safely and harmoniously. This allows the buildings to be serviced by deliveries allowing and visited by customers in vehicles while still the pedestrians to walk along the space to access Page 63 provides restaurants and stores along the way. additional information about shared-use streets. buildings The portion of the service drive closest to the movable could be transformed into outdoor plazas with such as tables, umbrellas, and chairs. Movable furnishings could be planters, as well as varying hardscape materials, used to further demarcate the space between the plazas and the shared-use street. Figure 3.3d depicts the existing conditions of the depicts the existing conditions Figure 3.3d the As noted previously, Row Focus area. Restaurant of industrial land uses comprised area is predominantly through a service Peachtree Boulevard accessed from and the tunnel Trail just west of the Keswick drive located Clairmont Road overpass. in width and ranges from about The service drive varies functions as a two-way drive with to 40’. It currently 25’ located throughout the service angled and parallel parking drive. City of Chamblee 1 1 Figure 3.3e – Restaurant Row Perspective Proposed Conditions Figure 3.3e – Restaurant Row Perspective Figure 3.3d – Restaurant Row Perspective Existing Conditions Perspective Existing – Restaurant Row Figure 3.3d 3.0 | Concept Plan 66 Figure 3.3f–RestaurantRowProposedVehicular Circulation CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study
Georgia PowerProperty Peachtree Boulevard
One-Way Drive Isle Potential Parking Potential Area Parking Potential Area Parking Restaurant Area Row
Shared Use-Space Restaurant Row Park Keswick Trail Legend Clairmont Road N Plaza Conceptual Building Conceptual Building Proposed Connection Proposed Trail
Wal-Mart such as trash collection, deliveries, cleaning, and storage. and cleaning, deliveries, collection, trash as such services back-of-house forother space additional provide could lots parking These buildings. the located behind lots access provide to parking also could aisle drive The Boulevard. Peachtree access could they where aisle drive the along travelVehicles north would buildings. the behind and around circle would that aisle drive to aone-way transition street would shared-use the where buildings, of to south the end the drive Boulevard and Peachtree from enter space Vehicles way the drive. would aone- as function street would shared-use proposed The Restaurant Row. proposed the in function could parking and circulation how vehicular illustrates further 3.3f Figure chairs. and tables movable with pavilion picnic asmall include also could space The pickleball. and tennis, basketball, as such games of court access to with avariety residents provide could court This court. sports development of active an multi-use the be could park forthe potential program One acanopy park. as the for function would and Road overpass Clairmont the located be under would space of the park.” Aportion “eyes and trail the to on bring space of the programming and activation foster the should 3.0 | Concept Plan 67 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Kungsgatan + Bredgatan Intersection | Switzerland City of Chamblee Shared-Use Street Shared-use streets are urban spacesthat are designed allow to vehicles and pedestrians coexist to and in travel the same This that specifically removing features any by is achieved vehiclespace safely. traffic to cater such as curbs, lane travel surface markings, traffic signs, and traffic lights. these of familiar The removal vehicular-oriented a degree creates of features uncertainty regarding the primary user the of space. Shared-use streets are typically designed as plazas with hardscape materials and furnishings traditionally in found pedestrian spaces suchas pavers, tables movable and chairs, planters, bicycle racks, trash and receptacles, benches. These urban spaces, designed like feel a pedestrian to plaza but allowing vehicular through traffic, encourage drivers their reduce to speeds in a manner and “behave” that is compatible with pedestrians. This ultimately leads an urban to space that is safer for pedestriansboth and vehicles. It allows businesses that require vehicular remain to access viable while also providing for pedestrainaccess business. Following are examples shared-use of streets. Exhibition Road | England 3.0 | Concept Plan 68 Figure 3.4b–ExistingConditions Figure 3.4a–ExistingConditions CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study Legend Plaza Conceptual Building Conceptual Building Proposed Mercy Mercy Care Care 3 3 Walmart Walmart A A A’ A’ Peachtree Road Peachtree Road
Chamblee Tucker Road Chamblee Tucker Road N N used for all the Rail-Trail crosswalks. crosswalks. Rail-Trail the forall used be could that crosswalks of branded contains examples 3.4f Figure crosswalks. Rail-Trail of the branding the through crosswalks pedestrian the on contrast greater providing including enhancements, of these some illustrates 3.4c Figure enhancements. with but Trail, Keswick existing of the alignment the along to remain proposed is Rail-Trail The development Care property. Mercy of the proposed includes also into image aTrOD. The Care property Mercy of the conceptual west redevelopment the site of just the Itsuggests Area. Focus Care +Walmart Mercy of the conditions proposed the illustrates 3.4b Figure 3.4d. Figure in depicted section perspective- conditions existing of the location the with along area, of the conditions existing the illustrates 3.4a easement. Figure rail abandoned an within a6’ focus as sidewalk area this in wide exists currently Trail Keswick of the portion A drive. service Tucker Walmart the Road Chamblee along and overpass Road Clairmont located the is between Area Focus Care +Walmart Mercy The Focus3.4 Area 3-Mercy Care +Walmart turning radiusto15’ or20’ toreduce pedestrian crossingdistancealong Relocated curbandreductionin Chamblee TuckerChamblee Road Figure 3.4c–ChambleeTucker RoadProposedIntersectionImprovements Keswick Trailto Expanded 16’ wide existing
Chamblee Tucker Road Road TuckerChamblee crossing distancealong to reducepedestrian lane widthsto10’ or11’ Reduction intraffic See Figure3.4f. branded crosswalks. crosswalks through Greater contraston 3.0 | Concept Plan 69 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Figure 3.4d depicts the existing conditions of the Figure 3.4d depicts the existing conditions of Area where the Keswick Focus Mercy Care + Walmart wide with The trail is currently 6’ currently exists. Trail landscaping on the south side (right) and a Walmart service drive on the north side (left). varies in width and is The south side landscape buffer The a ditch. separated from the Mercy Care property by two travel drive on the north side (left) is comprised of wide. lanes, each 10’ of the Rail- Figure 3.4e depicts the proposed conditions Area. Focus alignment in the Mercy Care + Walmart Trail wide to 6’ is proposed to be expanded from The Rail-Trail This would be achieved by expanding towards wide. 16’ retaining the Mercy Care property and building a small The expansion wall to allow for the trail to be implemented. rail corridor would happen within the existing abandoned from and would not require any acquisition or easements or the Mercy Care property. Walmart pedestrian crossing Branded crosswalks increase a safety by providing excellent contrast and highlighting is “different” crossing such that drivers see that something approaching and slow down and look. Figure 3.4f – Branded Crosswalks Figure 3.4f A’ A’ Mercy Care Mercy Care City of Chamblee 3 3 A A Figure 3.4e – Section Proposed Rail-Trail Alignment Figure 3.4e – Section Proposed Rail-Trail Figure 3.4d – Section Existing Conditions – Section Existing Figure 3.4d 3.0 | Concept Plan 70 Figure 3.5b–ProposedConditions Figure 3.5a–ExistingConditions CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study
Chamblee Tucker Road Legend Chamblee Tucker Road Plaza Conceptual Building Conceptual Building Proposed Development Development Olmsted Olmsted Trackside Trackside MARTA MARTA detention pond detention pond stormwater stormwater MARTA facility MARTA facility Malone Lofts Malone Lofts Peachtree Residences Dealership Dealership) Chamblee Peachtree Nissan (Nissan 2 2 Malone Malone A A A’ A’ 3400 3400 Lofts Lofts 4 4 C C B B 6 6 5 5 C’ C’
B’ Malone Drive B’ Malone Drive N N required to understand the extent of flooding for specific storm events. storm forspecific extent the of flooding to understand required be would analysis additional design, into detailed more progresses park the As not. may others while usable be may park the in amenities and spaces some event, storm of the size the on events. storm Depending larger during flooding areas events higher storm and regular during flooding park of the areas lower with park, astormwater as to intended is function Park Rail-Trail proposed The space.the in they wanted to facilities and experience activities what indicated participants where process engagement public the from by findings the informed is plan The Rail-Trail. and park proposed the for conceptual plan detailed a more illustrates 3.5d Figure Residences. Chamblee proposed of the side south the along and Park of Rail-Trail west side the along spur development of atrail (PML) Easement. Lofts Itproposes Rail-Trail Peacthree Malone the within partially and Park Rail-Trail within partially Rail-Trail, of the alignment proposed the includes Italso Park. into Rail-Trail facility detentionMARTA stormwater pond of the transformation proposed the includes site. image The Dealership Nissan Development Residences existing located the on Chamblee the and Development, MARTA Development, Trackside Olmsted proposed the includes It Area. Focus Park Rail-Trail of the conditions proposed the illustrates 3.5b Figure opportunities. these identifies 3.5c Figure opportunities. and potential that challenges comes With Rail-Trail. Chamblee of the potential the heart to the has become Area Focus Park Rail-Trail The 3.5e. Figure found in facility detention MARTA of stormwater the pond image conditions existing the and 3.5k, and 3.5g Figures in depicted perspective-sections of the location the 3.5c, Figure in depicted facility detentionMARTA stormwater pond the include These section. this in included images conditions existing various of location the with along area of the conditions existing the illustrates 3.5a east. Figure the on Tucker Drive west to Road the on Malone Chamblee- from Itextends area. center located the is study of in Area the Focus Park Rail-Trail The 3.5 Focus Area 4-Rail-Trail Park 3.0 | Concept Plan 71
Maximizing Maximizing access to the MARTA stormwater detention pond facility will be important for the successful use of the space as a park Maximizing access to the MARTA stormwater detention pond facility will be important for the successful use of the space as a park Malone Drive Malone Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Chamblee Residences
3400 Malone Condominiums Steep slopes around the edges of the park allow for the creative use of topography to create a variety of usable social and recreational spaces area Wetland will have to be mitigated if impacted Dog Run Dog PML dog run, trash compactor, and dog run, trash compactor, PML visitor parking spaces would have to be relocated if impacted by the implementation of the trail along the easement Rail-Trail PML Peachtree Malone Lofts (PML)
facility MARTA MARTA 25’ State stream buffer stream State 25’ stormwater detention pond City of Chamblee PML 40 Visitor Parking Spaces 40 Visitor PML MARTA MARTA detention stormwater pond facility the 25’ state the 25’ are limited to stream buffer areas outside improvements PML Trash Trash PML Compactor Olmsted PML Dog Run PML 10’ Easement 10’
Trackside MARTA Development MARTA Trackside Chamblee Tucker Road Tucker Chamblee Site Figure 3.5c – Existing Conditions and Opportunities of the MARTA Stormwater Detention Pond Facility + Peacthree Malone Lofts Rail-Trail Easement Malone Lofts Rail-Trail Facility + Peacthree Detention Pond Stormwater of the MARTA and Opportunities – Existing Conditions Figure 3.5c stormwater stormwater Tucker Road Tucker to the MARTA to the MARTA facility to treat detention pond space as a park important for the through Olmsted need the MARTA need the MARTA Development will Development will Trackside MARTA MARTA Trackside Trackside MARTA MARTA Trackside access Chamblee pond facility will be Maximizing access stormwater detention successful use of the 3.0 | Concept Plan 72 Figure 3.5d–ProposedConditionsofRail-Trail Park+Rail-Trail CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study
Chamblee Tucker Road Trackside MARTA Development +1010 Olmsted 13. +1008 +1004 11. 14. +1006 6. 1010+ +998 17 Visitor ParkingSpaces +986 +1000 1. +1000 +1002 5% slope 1010+ +984 10. +982 +996 3. +998 +990 9. +990
5% slope +990 979+ 4. 7. 8. +1000 +992 +980 2. +1000 +980 Peachtree MaloneLofts(PML) 7. +990 +1000 980+ 9. +984 5% slope 7. +986 Chamblee Residences +998 +988 +990
Dog Run +988 5. 12.
A 1. 14. 13. 12. 11. 10. 9. 8. 7. 6. 5. 4. 3. 2.
PML trashcompactor parking spaces PML 15relocated parking space PML 8parallelvisitor access PML privatedogrun private dogrun PML relocated5,700sf Sloped pathways around theplayground exercise equipment playground with Railroad themed charging stations access tofreeWi-Fiand movable tables,chairs, Plaza spaceswith pavilion Railroad themedpicnic Community garden Chamblee Rail-Trail amphitheater stage Cantilevered Butterfly garden ramp with ADA Amphitheater visitor
N Malone Drive 3.0 | Concept Plan 73 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail 5. City of Chamblee 7. 9. 6. 2. 8. 1. Rail-Trail Park Imagery Rail-Trail 3.0 | Concept Plan 74 Figure 3.5f–MARTA Stormwater Water DetentionPondFacilityPerspectiveProposedConditions Figure 3.5e–MARTA StormwaterWater DetentionPondFacilityPerspectiveExistingConditions CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study 2 2 understand theextentofflooding forspecificstormevents. detailed design,additionalanalysis wouldberequiredto while othersmaynot. As theparkprogressesintomore some spacesandamenitiesintheparkmaybeusable noted previously, dependingontheamountofrain, to functionasastormwaterdetentionpondfacility. As park. The terraceddesignalsoallowstheparktocontinue design allowsfortheincrementalimplementationof in sizefrom1’ toover16’ inheight. The site’s terraced terraces oftheparkformedbyretainingwallsthatrange Sloped ADA walkwaysallowaccesstothedifferent proposed asabutterflygardenwithnaturetrails. topography. The areawithinthe25’ streambuffer is uses, includinganamphitheaterfacilitatedbythesite’s of aseriesterracedspacesforsocialandrecreational transformed intoRail-Trail Park. The parkiscomprised of theMARTA stormwaterdetentionpondfacility Figure 3.5fillustratestheproposedconceptualconditions greenspace. topography creativelytotransformthespaceintoausable the site’s slopesalsopresentanopportunitytouse While presentingaccessandconstructionchallenges, 25’ Statestreambuffer. improvements tothesitearelimitedareasoutside in thecenterofproperty. As discussed previously, site isapproximately25’ deepandcontainsastream a mixtureofmaturepineandhardwoodtrees. The pond thatarewoodedwithadenseunderstorybelow characterized bysteepslopesalongtheedgesof MARTA stormwaterdetentionpond facility. The siteis Figure 3.5edepictstheexistingconditionsof 3.0 | Concept Plan 75 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Figure 3.5h illustrates the proposed conditions of the Rail- Figure 3.5h illustrates the proposed conditions easement. Due Rail-Trail alignment through the PML Trail is proposed to the limited width of the easement, the trail wide multi-use trail through this space with 1’ as an 8’ Flowering clearance and fencing on either side of the trail. screen vines could be planted along the fence to help views into the adjacent properties. of the As illustrated in Figure 3.5d, the implementation Easement would impact 23 parking in the PML Rail-Trail as spaces. Eight of these spaces could be re-located Easement parallel parking spaces along the Rail-Trail The remaining 15 spaces as illustrated in Figure 3.5h. MARTA Trackside would be located to the proposed Figure 3.5d. Development parking garage as identified in being PML Figure 3.5h also shows the entrance gate to As depicted in the image, the width of the modified. egress and gate would be reduced to facilitate vehicular The pedestrian gate is proposed to be ingress into the site. relocated to open onto the Rail-Trail. Maximizing access to Rail-Trail Park will be important to will be important to Park access to Rail-Trail Maximizing The primary access to success of the park. the overall illustrated As proposed along the Rail-Trail. the park is partially is proposed to be the Rail-Trail in Figure 3.5d, and partially in easement Rail-Trail PML located in the PML in the the Rail-Trail Park. Implementing Rail-Trail that various elements along the easement will require easement be relocated. of the existing conditions of Figure 3.5g depicts a portion property along the Rail-Trail PML the northern edge of the entrance gate in the image are the easement. Visible parking spaces located in the and a few of the 40 visitor easement. A’ A’ City of Chamblee 4 4 A A Figure 3.5h – Section Proposed Rail-Trail Conditions Figure 3.5h – Section Proposed Rail-Trail Figure 3.5g – Section Existing Conditions – Section Existing Figure 3.5g 3.0 | Concept Plan 76 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study Figure 3.5i– Alternative Alignment oftheRail-Trail throughthePML Easement Visitor Parking Visitor Parking Relocated Relocated Spaces PML 8 30 Visitor ParkingSpaces Rail-Trail alongMalone 3400 Condominium 3400 Condominium Property Property 2 ParallelParkingSpaces Access for Malone 3400 Access forMalone3400 Relocated Parking Relocated Parking Condominium Condominium Easement Easement Rail-Trail alongPML 3.0 | Concept Plan 77 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail City of Chamblee 3400 Condominium residents and with PML secure access from the Rail-Trail their to buildings. The strength this is the of that number it reduces concept visitor PML of parking The spaces impacted 10. from 23 to challenges include coordination with another Condominium along trees located of Board, the the property removal line andbetween Malone PML 3400 Condominium shown in Figure 3.5j, and less a aesthetically pleasing connection to Park. Rail-Trail Figure 3.5j - View of PML Easement and Alternative Location of the Rail-Trail Alignment Alternative Location of the Rail-Trail Easement and of PML Figure 3.5j - View The existing sidewalk would be expanded wide 8’ to and a parkingnew sidewalk lot connection would be provided for Malone 3400 Condominium. Fencing with would a gate be alonglocated sides both the of Rail-Trail provide Malone to Figure 3.5i shows an alternative alignment for the Rail-Trail through It considers easement. the PML using less the of PML Easement using by an existing sidewalk and space around it on the Malone 3400 Condominium property for the Rail-Trail. The sidewalk currently the condominium to provides access parking lot. 3.0 | Concept Plan 78 Figure 3.5l–SectionProposedConditions Figure 3.5k–SectionExistingConditions CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study B B 5 5 B’ B’ various amenitiesintheMid-Citycharacterarea. connection andshouldbedevelopedtodirectusers Signage andwayfindingwillbeimportantforthis cyclists. to createacomfortablemicro-climateforpedestriansand Canopy treeswouldbeplantedonbothsideofthestreet vegetative buffer alongthewestside(left)ofstreet. space tocreatea10’ widemulti-usetrailwitha6’-2” Drive from15’ wideto10’ wideandusingtheexcess This isachievedbyreducingthetravellanesalongMalone station totheRail-Trail andRail-Trail Park. that woulddirectlyconnecttheChambleeMARTA rail street tofacilitatethedevelopmentofa10’ multi-usetrail Figure 3.5lillustratestheproposedmodificationof seen frequentlyparkingalongthestreet. street parkingalongthissegmentofthestreet,carscanbe east side(right)ofthestreet.Whilethereisnoformalon- 15’ travellanes,sidewalks,andavegetativebuffer onthe right-of-way (ROW)isapproximately48’-9”widewithtwo Drive, southofthePML entrancegate. The MaloneDrive Figure 3.5kdepictstheexistingconditionsofMalone Trail Park. Chamblee MARTA railstationtotheRail-Trail andRail- to createadirectandenhancedconnectionfromthe Park. MaloneDriveprovidesanimportantopportunity for theregionalconnectivityofRail-Trail andRail-Trail is importanttotheMid-CityChambleecharacterareaand Convenient accesstotheChambleeMARTA railstation 3.0 | Concept Plan 79 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Access from Rail-Trail Park to the Peachtree Boulevard to the Peachtree Boulevard Park Rail-Trail Access from for increasing access is also important sidewalk network 3.5m illustrates the Figure connectivity. and regional north of the 3400 of Malone Drive proposed conditions Chamblee Residences along the Malone Condominiums the existing Nissan Dealership site. proposed to be built on wide will implement a 12’ The proposed development front of the development on multi-use trail along the Park to the connect Rail-Trail Malone Drive that will Additionally, network. Peachtree Boulevard sidewalk on- with canopy trees and formal a vegetative buffer to the west side (left) of the street parking will be added by setting the development This will be achieved street. space for these elements to be back to allow sufficient implemented. C’ City of Chamblee 6 B C Figure 3.5m – Section Proposed Conditions – Section Proposed Figure 3.5m 3.0 | Concept Plan 80 Figure 3.6b–ProposedConditions Figure 3.6a–ExistingConditions CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study
Malone Drive Legend Malone Drive Plaza Conceptual Building Conceptual Building Proposed 7 7 County Senior County Senior North DeKalb North DeKalb A’ A’ A A Comcast Center Center Chamblee Senior Chamblee Senior Residences Residences 8 8 B’ B’ B B N N Miller Drive Miller Drive future redevelopment of industrial land uses in the focus area as aTrOD. focus as the area in uses land redevelopment offuture industrial the suggest also images The to Peachtree system. the connection Boulevard sidewalk Peachtree on to Development image) (not the create on Malone the atrail shown to connect development and residential and Comcast the between north continue would trail spur The Rail-Trail. the from to north the forks that corridor rail historic abandoned the along proposed is spur aRail-Trail Additionally, corridor. rail the focus along the area through extending Rail-Trail the shows image The Area. Focus Residences Senior Chamblee of the conditions proposed the illustrates 3.6b Figure building. Comcast by existing the interrupted is corridor The block. Drive Miller and center the Malone of the through to north extends the partially corridor rail historic below. photographs the abandoned in can The seen be conditions of these Images corridor. of the edge southern the located is Residences along Senior Chamblee existing The corridor. Rail-Trail of the edge northern the Center located is along Senior County DeKalb North proposed The uses. land of industrial predominantly comprised is area The 3.6e. and 3.6c Figure in depicted perspective-sections conditions existing of two location the with along area, of the conditions existing the illustrates 3.6a east. Figure the on Drive west to the on Miller Drive Malone from extending Park of Rail-Trail east located is just Area Focus Residences Senior Chamblee The 3.6 Focus Area 5-Chamblee Senior Residences Rail-Trail CorridorBehindChambleeSeniorResidences 3.0 | Concept Plan 81 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Figure 3.6d illustrates the proposed conditions of the Figure 3.6d illustrates the proposed conditions Senior alignment adjacent to the Chamblee Rail-Trail Residences. below the is proposed to be built away and The Rail-Trail vegetative A Chamblee Senior Residences patio area. from the leading down to the Rail-Trail with steps buffer patio area will help separate the spaces. the Building the trail at a lower level will also enhance 6’ floor. privacy of senior residents who live on the first wide multi-use separated trail will be of the proposed 16’ property. located on North DeKalb County Senior Center Building the Rail-Trail in the existing rail corridor while in the existing Rail-Trail Building the will be very to the existing residents being sensitive along the this focus area, particularly important in on As illustrated Residences propoerty. Chamblee Senior Senior Residences on of the Chamblee the photographs area includes a patio with amenities the previous page, the There currently used by residents. and furnishings that are wall built along the development to is also a small retaining grade change. Figure 3.6c depicts help with a topographic of this area. the existing conditions wide along is approximately 30’ corridor The Rail-Trail by the proposed North this segment and is bordered The area Center on the north (left). DeKalb County Senior a dense understory beneath a is partially wooded with trees. mixture of pine and hardwood A’ A’ City of Chamblee 7 7 A A Figure 3.6d – Section Proposed Rail-Trail Alignment Figure 3.6d – Section Proposed Rail-Trail Figure 3.6c – Section Existing Conditions – Section Existing Figure 3.6c 3.0 | Concept Plan 82 Figure 3.6e–SectionExistingConditions CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study B 8 B’ The railcorridorisapproximately50’ wideinthisarea. south (right)andindustriallandusesonthenorth(left). The areaisborderedbycommerciallandusesonthe the existingconditionsofthisarea. and topographicallydepressedarea.Figure3.6edepicts towards MillerDrive,ittransitionsintoaheavilywooded As theRail-Trail continueseastalongtherailcorridor 3.0 | Concept Plan 83 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Concrete Boardwalk System C The heavily wooded nature of this area presents a wooded nature of this The heavily trail segment in an to create a natural unique opportunity corridor. otherwise urban conditions of the Rail- depicts the proposed Figure 3.6f alignment through this area. Trail are minimized to the greatest Environmental impacts a boardwalk trail through extent possible by implementing the rail- There is sufficient space within this natural area. the trail around specimen corridor to potentially weave even incorporate the trees into the trees that may exist, or City may consider The using a concrete boardwalk system. is much more durable than typical boardwalk system that wooden boardwalk systems. B’ City of Chamblee B Trees Incorporated into Boardwalk Trees B C A 8 Boardwalk Trail through Natural Area through Natural Boardwalk Trail B A Figure 3.6f – Section Proposed Rail-Trail Alignment Rail-Trail – Section Proposed Figure 3.6f 3.0 | Concept Plan 84 Figure 3.7b–ExistingConditions Figure 3.7a–ExistingConditions CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study Legend Plaza Conceptual Building Conceptual Building Proposed
Miller Drive Miller Drive Lofts at Lofts at 5300 5300 The The 9 9 A’ A A’ A Guardian Guardian Storage Storage B B 10 10
B’ Pierce Drive B’ Pierce Drive N N property as aTrOD. as property Storage redevelopment Guardian of future the possible the suggests also image The to north. the turns Rail-Trail the as Pierce Drive along park of asmall inclusion the and Trail Rail of the alignment proposed the illustrates 3.7b Figure Engagement, Public 2.0 Section in discussed owners property the with conversations on Based owners. Storage property by Guardian owned the is parcel the lines, property the through visible still is corridor rail historic abandoned the While side. south the along corridor the development bordering multi-family aresidential with uses land industrial of predominantly comprised is 3.7c area The 3.7h. Figure and in depicted sections perspective- conditions existing of two location the with along area of the conditions existing 3.7a the to Figure illustrates Pierce east Drive. Drive Miller from extends and area study of the edge eastern Storage the located focus is near area Guardian The 3.7 Focus Area 6-Guardian Storage Figure 3.7c–SectionExistingConditions A 9 A’ 3.0 | Concept Plan 85 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Transitional Outdoor Private Residential Space Transitional Figure 3.7c depicts the existing conditions of the rail depicts the existing conditions Figure 3.7c Storage Focus portion of the Guardian corridor in a segment is, for the privately owned, the Area. While of sufficient width to allow flat, and most part, clear, wide multi-use 16’ of the proposed the implementation separates the corridor from the fence A separated trail. development to the south. adjacent multi-family residential the northern edge of the corridor. No fence is located along alignment the proposed Rail-Trail Figure 3.7d illustrates towards the is aligned The Rail-Trail through the corridor. sufficient space on both sides center of the corridor leaving and future landscaping along the of the trail for clearance when the property redevelops. nothern edge of the corridor is proposed along the northern For the short term, a fence keep children and users from edge of the corridor to land uses that currently includes entering the industrial large truck traffic. Figure 3.7e illustrates the potential future redevelopment It suggests TrOD. of the Guardian Storage property as a setback a 15’ the removal of the fence and the inclusion of edge of the corridor to the from the edge of the Rail-Trail would allow the implementation of plaza This 15’ building. retail/ spaces that are either activated by ground floor commercial uses, or act as private outdoor transitional and potential residential space between the Rail-Trail The image land uses that could occur along the first floor. outdoor below shows an example of a transitional private residential trail-oriented space. A’ A’ City of Chamblee 9 9 A A Figure 3.7e – Section Proposed Rail-Trail Alignment + Trail-Oriented Development Alignment + Trail-Oriented Figure 3.7e – Section Proposed Rail-Trail Figure 3.7d – Section Proposed Rail-Trail Alignment Rail-Trail – Section Proposed Figure 3.7d 3.0 | Concept Plan 86 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study Figure 3.7g–SectionProposedSetbackConditions Figure 3.7f–SectionExistingSideSetbackConditionsperCityCode 9 9 Trail and potential residential land uses. uses. land potential residential and Trail Rail- the between space transitional outdoor forprivate provide to provided be setback should sufficient uses, land residential floor case of the first In uses. land commercial adjacent and trail the activated are that spaces outdoor by transitional trail-oriented semi-public, for depth to allow of be sufficient should Setbacks eyes “encourage trail”. and the on corridor of the surveillance natural face to that uses encourage onto with yards Rail-Trail the front become should corridor Rail-Trail the border that yards Side setback setback. no or a7.5’ require (VC) Commercial TOD and district Village the within 3.7f, yards side Figure in illustrated As corridor. the front on that yards have side corridor Rail-Trail the along Many parcels of the uses. non-residential located be uses above residential multi-family that requirement the removing 2014, consider completed in Initiative should City the Town Centers Center Chamblee Update Livable the for 10-year the found in recommendations proposed the with Consistent corridor. development of the avibrant impact they may Rail-Trail, the located are along these If store fronts. blank and unoccupied vacant to lead remain and may uses non-residential these space, commercial retail for to or create demand the density residential sufficient floor. Without first the on allowed are uses transit-oriented development district), non-residential only land 210-11. (Section Ordinance Zoning City’sPer the existing -TOD, setback. required the and to adjacent trail use the of land by both type the influenced is interaction This trail. the developmenthow adjacent interacts with by influenced to partially be going is success Rail-Trail of the The Setbacks Rail-Trail Development + Uses Land 3.0 | Concept Plan 87 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Figure 3.7i illustrates the proposed alignment of the Rail- Figure 3.7i illustrates the proposed alignment wide multi-use separated along Pierce Drive as a 16’ Trail with canopy trees a vegetative buffer Additionally, trail. the west side and formal on-street parking will be added to achieved by narrowing the This will be (left) of the street. space 11’, which creates additional to traffic lanes from 15’ for on-street parking and the vegetative buffer. The image also suggests the potential future into a redevelopment of the Guardian Storage property The development is proposed to be set back 20’ TrOD. and a potential between the Rail-Trail to allow for a buffer uses. plaza space activated by first floor retail/commercial As the Rail-Trail exits the Guardian Storage property, it Storage property, exits the Guardian As the Rail-Trail before turning towards along Pierce Drive continues north historic rail corridor. connect to the abandoned the east to of Piece Drive. depicts the existing conditions Figure 3.7h (ROW) is approximately 60’ The Pierce Drive right-of-way along the west travel lanes and utilities wide with two 15’ side (left) of the road. B’ B’ City of Chamblee 30’ 10 10 B B Figure 3.7i – Section Proposed Rail-Trail Alignment + Trail-Oriented Development Alignment + Trail-Oriented Figure 3.7i – Section Proposed Rail-Trail Figure 3.7h – Section Existing Conditions – Section Existing Figure 3.7h 3.0 | Concept Plan 88 illustrated in Figure 3.8c. 3.8c. Figure in illustrated into as aTrOD Place Apartments to redevelopment the lead Azalea of the also may Cemetery. this OverAtlanta time, Oakland of to City the space, similar apark as into Rail-Trail the Cemetery Church Zion Mount the potential the of integrating explore and space this accommodated through is Rail-Trail the that to ensure owners properties’ these with to continue work should City The 3.8b. Figure in illustrated is condition This property. to their on be trail of the half other the allowing interest in expressed and trail of the supportive were also managers property Place Apartments Azalea The property. their to straddle trail of the half to allow site plan their to adjust agreed They have also Rail-Trail. of the forimplementation corridor rail historic abandoned to the use City the to have allow agreed developers Townpark the Engagement, Public 2.0 Way. Section in discussed As Dunwoody to Chamblee Pierce Drive from extends that corridor rail historic abandoned the Development owns Townpark The redevelopment. of process Way. the in Dunwoody also located development is are Chamblee on Townpark The Place Apartments Azalea the Development and Townpark Residences of redevelopment. phase Chamblee The design the in currently is and Pierce Drive along AV The of process redeveloping. the located in Development is are Group of which two properties, of three comprised is area The area. of the conditions existing the Way. illustrates Dunwoody to 3.8a Chamblee east Figure Pierce Drive from extends and area study of the edge eastern located the is on Area Focus Apartments +Azalea Townpark The 3.8 Focus Area 7-Townpark Place Apartments +Azalea Figure 3.8a–ExistingConditions CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study
Pierce Drive Group Mount Zion Cemetery AV AV Church Residence Chamblee Townpark
Azalea Place
Apartments Chamblee Dunwoody Way Dunwoody Chamblee N Figure 3.8b–ProposedRail-Trail Alignment Residence Chamblee Townpark
ProposedRail-Trail Alignment Azalea Place Apartments N Figure 3.8c–ProposedConditions Legend Pierce Drive Plaza Conceptual Building Conceptual Building Proposed Mount Zion Cemetery Church Group AV AV Residence Chamblee Townpark
Azalea Place
Apartments Chamblee Dunwoody Way Dunwoody Chamblee N 3.0 | Concept Plan 89
N Chamblee Dunwoody Way Dunwoody Chamblee
Not to Scale Pierce Drive Pierce
Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail
Miller Drive Miller
Malone Drive Malone Peachtree Boulevard Peachtree
City of Chamblee
When the system is as completed planned andillustrated miles) trails of it will (1.4 above, add feet approximately 7,600 greenspace acres of in theand Mid-City approximately 7.7 character area, 3.4 which acres of are park spaces and approximately 4.3 are trail space. Chamblee Tucker Road Tucker Chamblee
Peachtree Road
Clairmont Road Clairmont McGaw Drive McGaw Figure 3.9a – Rail-Trail Extension + Rail-Trail Park Concept Plan Focus Areas Focus Park Concept Plan + Rail-Trail Extension – Rail-Trail Figure 3.9a 3.9 Rail-Trail Public Realm System System Realm Public Rail-Trail 3.9 Figure illustrates 3.9a the Rail-Trail complete system within the study area. This system transform has to the potential the Mid-CityCity Chamblee’s of character a vibrant, area into walkable, and livable small while town providing multiple economic, social, and environmental benefits. 3.0 | Concept Plan 90 along the Rail-Trail. Rail-Trail. the along art to source public using consider should of Chamblee City the that Program Art foraPublic forQualifications a Request of example an is Following process. selection artist defined a with program art public astrong having is art public quality to implementing Critical of Chamblee. City of the narratives cultural and historical the for expressing desirable as identified residents that strategy was another art Public Art Public by residents. identified themes industrial/factory and rail historical the on based are custom elements These corridor. the integrated be throughout could that kiosks and signage, furnishings, as Team such of custom elements Design developed by the contain imagery pages Subsequent art. public and monuments, historic maps, historic signage, thematic identifiedparticipants elements such as interpretive signage, corridor, Rail-Trail the celebrated throughout and applied being narratives these asked how theyWhen envisioned of Chamblee. City of the history industrial/factory were and related to rail the narratives popular most The Park. Rail-Trail in and corridor Rail-Trail the celebrated throughout be could that narratives cultural and of historical a variety identified participants Engagement, Public 2.0 section In Elements 3.10 Historical +Cultural Trail CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study • • • • Chamblee as it developed. Featured comments are: comments developed. it Featured as Chamblee of have memories residents proud Chamblee THEME ONE: MEMORIES of Chamblee. to storylines themed and site-specific, original, be must pieces art The community. create excitement afocal of interest and point forthe shall program art (TBD). public locations The select at new Rail-Trail the to located be program along art apublic to build desires of Chamblee City The INTENT ENTRIES CALL FOR ART PUBLIC TRAIL: RAIL CHAMBLEE (RFQ) QUALIFICATIONS FOR REQUEST
Chamblee Putt Putt Putt Chamblee Caboose, Taco Frosty as such Tico, businesses Visiting Row Antique along Shopping planes and Watching trains events, &festivals music community Attending 3.0 | Concept Plan 91 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Proposals should enough be developed provide a to good understanding the how art of will look within the the of location. Finalistscontext will present be to asked their proposals the committee. to BUDGET Established budget ±$60,000 permanent cover to art(Number per A variety TBD) site. Sites of media of including concrete, stone, limited but not metal, to ceramic, glass and composite will be considered. includeCost to design, fabrication, materials, labor, art the of installation and insurance transportation, feature. City of Chamblee Near the City Chamblee of are various local artists that could participate to be invited in public the City’s art program. The following pages the namescontain and samples some of theof works from these local artists that the City should Further,consider. show examples how figures of 3.10a-3.10c historic and cultural themes couldbe incorporated trail into amenities information such as gateways, kiosks, and bike racks. THEME TWO: MULTI-CULTURALISM Chamblee is proud its of diversity. With a remarkable number foreign-born of (43%) residents, the community is a broad mix people of with multi-cultural American, African including Hispanic, backgrounds, Vietnamese, Chinese, and many others. THEME THREE: OLD TRACKS Chamblee formedas a transportation hub from a railroad has How this city. progressive City changed with the times? Shifts air and (like toward PDK) travel traffic bike & foot now on the proposed Rail-Trail keep Chamblee on the Right Track. RFQ SELECTION PROCESS Project(TBD) team will and research identify a pool of qualified candidates. From this pool, no more than 15 artists will continue in to be invited the selection process. committeeThe review will submissions then evaluate and finalists. recommend three up (3) to Forecast Public Art will with subcontract the finalists to prepare proposals for committee along review with facilitating interviews with the finalists. An honorarium of $500.00 will each finalist be provided to one develop to or more preliminary for the art concepts the at feature site. 3.0 | Concept Plan 92 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study 3.0 | Concept Plan 93 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail City of Chamblee 3.0 | Concept Plan 94 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study 3.0 | Concept Plan 95 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail City of Chamblee Figure 3.10a – Gateway to Rail-Trail - Main Entry Gate - Main – Gateway to Rail-Trail Figure 3.10a 3.0 | Concept Plan 96 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study Interpretive BridgeTheme Figure 3.10b–InterpretiveKiosks Interpretive PlatformTheme 3.0 | Concept Plan 97 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail City of Chamblee Cow Catcher Style Train Wheel Style Train Figure 3.10c – Themed Bike Racks Figure 3.10c 4.0 Implementation PlanConcept 4.0 Plan 4.0 | Implementation Plan 100 4.0 ImplementationPlan CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study 4.1a.references Figure of costs a10 percentinclude contingency. summary The They also costs. engineering and design and counters, bike/ped furnishings, boxes, cameras, call railings, lighting, control, erosion drainage markings, and signage hardscapes, landscaping, testing, control devices, utilities, crosswalks control, traffic grading, as such amenities and elements park and trail consider that estimates conceptual costs are These Rail-Trail. the for 4.1b of costs Figure asummary provides 4.1 Cost Estimate proposes and action an plan. funding, a cost estimate for the project phases identifies of and implementation, potential sources of Based the Concept on Plan, the Implementation for Plan Rail-Trail establishes the Chamblee 4.0 | Implementation Plan 101
N Chamblee Dunwoody Way Dunwoody Chamblee Not to Scale
T7
P7 Pierce Drive Pierce P6 S2 T8 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail
T6 Miller Drive Miller T8 S1
T5 Malone Drive Malone
T8
S3 Peachtree Boulevard Peachtree City of Chamblee P3 P4 P2 P1
T4 Chamblee Tucker Road Tucker Chamblee T8 Peachtree Road
T3 Clairmont Road Clairmont P5 T2
T1 McGaw Drive McGaw Figure 4.1a – Rail-Trail Extension + Rail-Trail Park Segments Extension + Rail-Trail Figure 4.1a – Rail-Trail 4.0 | Implementation Plan 102 Figure 4.1b–Rail-Trail ProjectCostEstimate CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study Project S4 S3 S2 S1 T8 T9 T7 T6 T5 T4 T3 T2 T1 ID Connection Clairmont RoadBridge Rail-Trail Spur5- MARTA Connection Rail-Trail Spur3- Walks Rail-Trail BrandedCross Drive Rail-Trail Spur2-Pierce sculptures Rail-Trial Artwork/ Miller Drives Between Maloneand Rail-Trail Spur1- Trail Segment 7-MainRail- Trail Segment 6-MainRail- Trail Segment 5-MainRail- Trail Segment 4-MainRail- Trail Segment 3-MainRail- Trail Segment 2-MainRail- Project Name Trail Segment 1-MainRail- New PeachtreeRoad. wide vegetatedbuffer betweenroadwayandtrailfrom PeachtreeBoulevardto lanes, widensidewalkonthe west sideofthebridgeto8'andimplementa4' lane widthsontheClairmont Road bridgefrom12'and13'lanesdownto10' existing Keswick Trail to PeacthreeBoulevard/ClairmontRoad.Reducetravel Implement a12'path,landscaping, signage,lighting,andamenitiesfromthe MARTA Station. Drive fromtheMainRail-Trail southacrossPeachtreeRoadtotheChamblee Implement 10'path,landscaping,signing,lighting,andamenities alongMalone Drive fromtheMainRail-Trail northtoPeachtreeBlvd. Implement 16'path,landscaping,signing,lighting,andamenities alongPierce Rail-Trail Corridor. Implement 3historicalandculturallyappropriatepublicartwork piecesalongthe Tucker Rd,MaloneDr, MillerDr, andPierceDr. Implement brandedcrosswalksatRail-Trail crossings:McGawDr, Chamblee Center northtoPeachtreeBlvd. Implement 12'path,landscaping,signing,lighting,andamenities fromtheSenior Drive toChambleeDunwoodyWay. Implement 16'path,landscaping,signing,lighting,andamenitiesfromPierce Drive toPierceDrive. Implement 16'path,landscaping,signing,lighting,andamenitiesfromMiller Drive toMillerDrive. Implement 16'path,landscaping,signing,lighting,andamenitiesfromMalone Chamblee Tucker Roadtoincreasepedestriansafety. Chamblee Tucker RoadtoMaloneDrive.Reducetravellanesandreduceradiion Implement 8'-16'path,landscaping,signing,lighting,andamenitiesfrom existing Keswick Trail underClairmontRoadtoChamblee Tucker Road. Implement 16'path,landscaping,signing,lighting,andamenitiesfromthe under ClairmontRoad. Georgia Powerproperty/frontageonPeachtreeRoadtotheexistingKeswick Trail Implement 16'path,landscaping,signing,lighting,andamenitiesfromthe Description Georgia Powerproperty/frontage. Implement 16'path,landscaping,signing,lighting,andamenitiesalongthe Engineering $63,248 $20,580 $43,680 $28,000 $41,000 $31,000 $41,000 $81,000 $36,000 $16,000 $14,000 $1,500 Costs $0 Required ROW Anticipated Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Construction $1,344,242 $1,752,252 $790,600 $273,420 $580,320 $604,390 $557,453 $180,000 $686,238 $316,756 $265,182 $511,527 $61,000 Costs 4.0 | Implementation Plan 103 Costs $63,130 $38,400 $287,830 $336,000 $1,149,342 $3,383,295 $1,491,008 $14,672,385 Construction No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Anticipated Required ROW Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Costs $4,750 $2,800 $20,000 $56,000 $26,880 $250,000 $100,000 $877,438 Engineering City of Chamblee Implement the relocated Peachtree Malone Loft Dog Park on the Rail-Trail Park on the Rail-Trail Peachtree Malone Loft Dog Park Implement the relocated site. Implement 12' path, landscaping, signing, lighting, and amenities from Main Rail- landscaping, signing, lighting, and amenities Implement 12' path, Atlanta development. to Chamblee Park, Rail-Trail north, through the Trail Description Implement 12' path, landscaping, signing, lighting, butterfly garden, playground, landscaping, signing, lighting, butterfly Implement 12' path, amenities, and pavilion, plaza spaces, exercise equipment, community garden, Park. for the Rail-Trail required pond retrofitting Implement the amphitheater, stairs, ADA ramp, and the cantilevered stage in the ramp, and the cantilevered stage ADA stairs, Implement the amphitheater, Park. Rail-Trail Implement park improvements such as the multi-use sports court, pavilion, Implement park improvements such as park amenities for the Row Park. hardscaping, landscaping, lighting, and hardscaping, landscaping, lighting, and Implement park improvements such as Park. park amenities for the Guardian Storage Implement park improvements such as hardsaping, landscaping, lighting, Implement park improvements such as Zion Church Cemetery Park shelters, and park amenities for the Mount Total Rail-Trail Park - Dog Rail-Trail Park Rail-Trail Park - Spur 4 Rail-Trail Project Name Rail-Trail Park Rail-Trail Rail-Trail Park - Rail-Trail Amphitheater Rail-Trail - Row Park Rail-Trail Guardian Rail-Trail Storage Park Mount Zion Church Cemetery Park ID P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 Project Figure 4.1b – Rail-Trail Project Cost Estimate (Cont’d) Project Cost Figure 4.1b – Rail-Trail 4.0 | Implementation Plan 104 based on the assumption that just under $1 million may be available per year for implementation. forimplementation. year per available be may $1 under million just that assumption the on based is strategy implementation phased This Rail-Trail. of the phases forthree strategy implementation a5-year suggests 4.2a Figure 5-Year4.2 Plan Phased Implementation CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study Phase 2 Add Alternate Phase 1 Project Project P6 P1 T2 T1 T4 T9 T6 ID ID Trail Segment 2-MainRail- Trail Segment 1-MainRail- Project Name Trail Segment 4-MainRail- Project Name Storage Park Rail-Trail Guardian sculptures Rail-Trial Artwork/ Trail Segment 6-MainRail- Park Rail-Trail Park-Dog Total Total under ClairmontRoad. Georgia Powerproperty/frontage onPeachtreeRoadtotheexistingKeswick Trail Implement 16'path,landscaping, signing,lighting,andamenitiesfromthe Georgia Powerproperty/frontage. Implement 16'path,landscaping,signing,lighting,andamenities alongthe park amenitiesfortheGuardianStoragePark. Implement parkimprovementssuchashardscaping,landscaping, lighting,and Description Chamblee Tucker Roadtoincreasepedestriansafety. Chamblee Tucker RoadtoMaloneDrive.Reducetravellanesandreduceradiion Implement 8'-16'path,landscaping,signing,lighting,andamenitiesfrom Description Rail-Trail Corridor. Implement 1historicalandculturallyappropriatepublicartwork piecesalongthe Drive toPierceDrive. Implement 16'path,landscaping,signing,lighting,andamenities fromMiller site. Implement therelocatedPeachtreeMaloneLoftDogParkonRail-Trail Park Engineering Engineering $16,000 $14,000 $81,000 $31,000 $20,000 $2,800 Costs Costs $0 Required ROW Required ROW Anticipated Anticipated Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Construction Construction $1,131,865 $2,040,082 $1,752,252 $316,756 $265,182 $287,830 $511,527 $38,400 $60,000 Costs Costs 4.0 | Implementation Plan 105 Costs $60,000 $63,130 $24,400 $686,238 $273,420 $1,107,188 Construction No No No No Yes Anticipated Required ROW Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail $0 Costs $4,750 $2,400 $36,000 $20,580 Engineering City of Chamblee Description lighting, and amenities from the Implement 16' path, landscaping, signing, Road. Tucker Road to Chamblee under Clairmont Trail existing Keswick Implement park improvements such as the multi-use sports court, pavilion, Implement park improvements such as park amenities for the Row Park. hardscaping, landscaping, lighting, and lighting, and amenities along Malone Implement 10' path, landscaping, signing, to the Chamblee south across Peachtree Road Drive from the Main Rail-Trail Station. MARTA Implement branded crosswalks at Rail-Trail crossings: McGaw Dr, Chamblee crossings: McGaw Dr, Implement branded crosswalks at Rail-Trail Rd. and Tucker public artwork pieces along the Implement 1 historical and culturally appropriate Corridor. Rail-Trail Total Segment 3 - Main Rail- Trail Project Name Rail-Trail - Row Park Rail-Trail Spur 3 - Rail-Trail Connection MARTA Rail-Trail Branded Cross Rail-Trail Walks Artwork/ Rail-Trial sculptures ID T3 T8 T9 P5 S3 Project Phase 3 4.0 | Implementation Plan 106 • • • • • • • • • Pay you as Go: sources: fundings following of the to supportive be appear Residents Rail-Trail. the to implement support sources they would of funding types were asked what residents process, engagement public the During of years. sources over anumber of funding a variety require typically Rail-Trail, the as such projects Implementing Funding4.3 Sources are also included in the figure. figure. the in included also are requirements, elements, eligible and application deadlines for. match amounts, Grant applying considering should City the that of grants avariety identifies 4.3b Figure Additionally, budget. project of the relative size the as well as of implementation frame by time the categorized projects biking and walking sources for funding of typical contains alist 4.3a Figure Partnerships: Borrowing: CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study
Non-profit OrganizationsNon-profit Developers Agencies Businesses Bonds Revenue General Bond Obligation Improvement District Community Grants Fund/CIP General Figure 4.3b– Available Grants+GrantSpecifics amount to obtained. amount be maximum the determine ultimately will cost of elements The possible. award maximum the on based are amounts grant Additionally, grants. to listed obtain the City of the ability affect the may projects current or awards grant Prior opportunities. funding listed forthe to apply City’s eligibility the on based are 4.3b Figure in identified options funding The Source: Atlanta RegionalCommission,Walk Bike Thrive!: Atlanta RegionalBicycle&PedestrianPlan(2016) Big Budget Small Budget • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Short Term Project<2years Local taxes Infrastructure Bonds Public-Private Partnerships Community ImprovementDistricts Individual donors Foundation grants Individual donors Foundation grants Local healthdepartments Local taxes Safety OfficeofHighway Governor’s Infrastructure Bonds Impact Fees Non-Profit Grants Crowd sourcing Community ImprovementDistrict Association Neighborhood • • • • • State Programs: Funds Capital ImprovementBudget Federal TransportationFunds
Congressional Earmarks Federal TransportationFunds Grant (CDBG) Community DevelopmentBlock Resources) (Department ofNatural TrailsRecreational Program Transportation Georgia Departmentof Long termproject>2years 4.0 | Implementation Plan 107 TBD TBD March October October February Fall 2016 Deadline November November December Anticipated Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Types of Eligible Elements Types City of Chamblee indoor facility as act a shelter such to as a recreation center public andand/or after before outreach a disaster. center applyingBefore the City for the grant, should schedule an appointment with discuss the granter to the project and direction itsreceive eligibility to related and specific any requirements that the granter might for the grant. have Stormwater including open space, and hardening Stormwater including open space, and Trails and facilities that support trails such as restrooms, shelters, signage, support trails such as restrooms, shelters, and facilities that Trails and design support facilities, infrastructure, facilities, restrooms, shelters, signage, support trailhead facilities, Trails, infrastructure, and design Shade structures Landscaping (tree planting) Innovative public art projects and traffic calming Bicycle/pedestrian facilities, landscaping, projects and education water quality, Stormwater, water quality projects Signage, public education, and innovative Environmental education related facilities and programming Environmental education related facilities 0% 0% 5% 25% 20% 40% 25% 100% 100% 100% Match Requirements $8,000 $20,000 $60,000 $91,000 $100,000 $200,000 $200,000 $400,000 $7,200,000 $3,000,000 Grant Amount Funding Program Recreational Trails Program (RTP) Trails Recreational Greenway & Trail Development Greenway & Trail Fund Conservation Land & Water (LWCF) of Dermatology Academy American (AAD) Urban & Community Forestry (U&CF) Grant Our Town Alternative Transportation Program Quality/Environmental Education Stormwater/Water Section 319(h) Grants Pre-Disaster Mitigation Grant Urban Waters Environmental Education Grants Figure 4.3b – Available Grants + Grant Specifics Available Figure 4.3b – The integration stormwater of and other emergency management projects into features such as a recreation or recreationcenter trail significantly can increase the grant funding opportunities available Examples the City. to designof that would features introduce additional grant opportunities would include the construction parking of asareas act drainage to basins weather events, for severe pondsstormwater that alleviate retention localized flooding as part park of or trail and project, the hardening an of 4.0 | Implementation Plan 108 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Rail-Trail. of the implementation the in to assist available Atlanta the be may in Metro that Area of foundations variety of a alist is Below Parks. for Rail-Trail and Rail-Trial Chamblee a501c3 to residents establish with forthe to need work would City the funding, forphilanthropic to apply order In Rail-Trail. to Chamblee the similar projects park linear and trail fund year. every organizations of these Some givings philanthropic of Million over from $500 Atlanta benefits The Region Sources Funding Philanthropic CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study
Georgia-Pacific Foundation, Inc. Foundation, Georgia-Pacific of Central Georgia Foundation Community Georgia Community FoundationNorth Inc. Foundation, Courts The Bradley-Turner Foundation, Inc. Inc. Foundation, AFLAC The Foundation CDC UPS Foundation Turner Foundation, Inc. W. Foundation Robert Woodruff Foundation O. Wayne Rollins Inc. PateLettie Foundation, Whitehead J.Bulow Campbell Foundation Inc. of Cox Georgia, M. foundation James Home Depot Foundation Inc. Foundation, Power Georgia Inc. Foundation, Coca-Cola The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Foundation Family Blank M. Arthur minimum of 75% of the project funding. of 75% funding. project of the minimum sector to a provide public Ideally, theysources. the expect funding other with dollars to leverage look their typically organizations to note philanthropic that important It is • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Williams Family Foundation Family ofWilliams Georgia, Inc. Georgia of Northwest Foundation Community The AGL Resources Private Foundation Foundation Tull Charitable The Healthcare Georgia Foundation Anncox Foundation, Inc. The Savannah Community Foundation Inc. Foundation, Harrison Susie and Luther Callaway Foundation, Inc. Dorothy V. Inc. Foundation, Lewis Logan and Katz Foundation Phyllis J. and Abraham The Foundation Pitts E. Lula and H. I. William Georgia forNortheast Foundation Community The Peyton Foundation, Anderson Inc. LoveGay and Erskine Foundation Inc. Foundation, Family Lanier Sartain The Trust Mason Marguerite and Carlos 4.0 | Implementation Plan 109 16 Year 15 Year 14 Year 13 Year Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail 12 Year 11 Year 10 Year Year 9 City of Chamblee Year 8 Year 7 Incremental Design, Bid, Build Timeline Will Vary Depending on Grants Received Will Vary Timeline Year 6 Year 5 Year 4 Design, Bid,Build Year 3 Year 2 Secure Funding Year 1 Funding Strategy Extraordinary Funding Source Pay As You Go + Grants Pay As You Go ($1.1 M per year) A third scenario considers Go and a combination Grants. The As timeline Pay You of for this strategy may vary between three years the at short sixteen over end years to the at long end depending on the amount funding of that is obtained. On the opposite end the of spectrum, if the City consider to were an extraordinary funding that source would pay for the design, bid, and build the of project one at time, the project could be in completed approximately five-and-half years. This assumes two- and-half years secure the funding to and three years design, to bid, and build the project. Figure 4.4a illustrates three different implementation timeline scenarios based on different funding strategies. The first strategy considers incrementallydesigning, biding, and building the Rail-Trail and associated greenspaces. If design and construction happens it would increase incrementally, This the the of cost project about 20 by is the percent. due start-up to design costs visits, site construction(survey, mobilization and document organization, contractor etc.) costs that would be incurred every time phasea new begins. If the design for the entire project is once and at completed construction it is incrementally, completed millionwould increase Assuming may be available the the of cost project about percent. 18.5 by pay each for that year $1.1 to the design and construction approximately it would the of project, take sixteen years the complete project. to 4.4 Implementation Alternatives Timeline Figure 4.4a – Implementation Timeline Alternatives Figure 4.4a – Implementation Timeline 4.0 | Implementation Plan 110 • • • • • include: that frames time specific around organized are Strategic actions Parks. Trail Rail- and Rail-Trail take the to should implement Chamblee of City the that actions focuses strategic on section This Plan Action 4.5 100-Day Action Plan Action 100-Day frames. time these with associated actions of specific descriptions are Following CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study
phase of the MARTA Rail-Trail Park. Park. MARTA Rail-Trail the of phase first the as PML Run Dog the of construction and design FY2017 the for complete funds to allocate should City The • Study. Design Conceptual Extension Rail-Trail the adopt approve and should to City The YearFive Action Plan YearOne Action Plan plan’s forthe success responsibility involved sharing and keep and stakeholders going to keep needed steps momentum organizational and actions low-cost very or forno-cost Action Plan Day A 100
(TAP). (TAP). Specifically, the Transportation Alternative Program 4.3b. Figure in sources identified funding federal the of forsome to eligible project be the enable will This • • • One Year Action Plan YearOne Action
• Chamblee Rail-Trail and Rail-Trail Park the for grants pursuing in City the assist to consultant grants or writer grants afull-time hire should City The Park. MARTA Rail-Trail the of phase first the as PML Run Dog the design the begin to MARTA’s MARTA and with work developer should City The • • • (PML) to: Lofts Malone Peachtree MARTA’s MARTA, with work developer, and should City The
depending on the size of the grant. of the size the on depending amount, grant total the of percent 3 to percent equates to 0.05 about This application. grant of the complexity the on depending application grant per to $4,000 $3,000 between can that vary application grant afee per charges consultant typically grants consultant. agrants A versus writer grants a full-time of hiring evaluate cost-benefit the should City The garage. parking MARTA Trackside the in spaces parking PML visitor of relocation the with associated negations Finalize facility. detention MARTA stormwater the pond in run dog the of relocation the with associated negations Finalize site. Olmsted the from and PML property MARTA Development through Trackside access to with the associated negations Finalize . 4.0 | Implementation Plan 111 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Hickman Property (Nissan Dealership site) Storage Guardian Townpark Azalea Apartments Allowing residential land uses on the ground floor in appropriate areas and adjusting building setbacks to TrOD spaces alongcreate the Rail-Trail corridor Density bonus local abatement tax and/or State Expedited permitting permitting / waiver of fees Discounted transit passes and implementation of individual Rider for pre-tax accounts income and payroll savings tax minimum parkingrequirements Reduced minimumReduced open space / community space requirements
• • • • • • • • • • • The City should continue to work with property owners to forsecure the access Rail-Trail via donation, easements, or fee simple acquisition for the Rail-Trail and associated Specific greenspaces. property owners/developments that the City should coordinate with include: (TrOD) that(TrOD) will fosterthe development of vibrant a rail corridor. Incentives toconsider include:
City of Chamblee • This will enable the Citypursue to philanthropic funds that the City would otherwise beeligible not pursue. to could also functionThe 501c3 as the champion the of project and work continue to with stakeholders and continueresidents the to momentum for the project the design by created and implementation the of PML dog run as the first phase Rail-Trail of Park.
The City should complete the design for the first phase of the Rail-Trail through the Chamblee PML Rail-Trail Easement. The City should consider implementing incentives for development areas along the Rail-Trial and Rail-Trail Parks. This will enable the Cityto establish policies that incentivize developers to assist in the implementation of the Rail create Trail Trail and/or Oriented Developments The City should developer work with and MARTA MARTA’s to construct the Dog Run PML as the first phase of the MARTA Rail-Trail Park. The City should work with to MARTA establish a strategy viato secure easement access or fee simple acquisition of the stormwater MARTA detention pond facility for the future development of Rail-Trail Park. • • The City should coordinate with to apply ARC forRail-Trail funding through TAP. The City should work with residents to establish for a 501c3 the Chamblee Rail-Trial and forRail-Trail Park.
• • • • • • 4.0 | Implementation Plan 112 • • • • • • Five Year Action Plan YearFive Action CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study
Peachtree Road. on Power property/frontage Georgia the through Rail-Trail the build and bid, design, should City The use. friendly trail suitable, amore redevelop into to site the enable substsation, the for location alternative an Power find to Georgia with work should City The • • • include: with coordinate should City the that owners/developments property greenspaces. Specific associated and Rail-Trail the for acquisition simple fee or easements, donation, via Rail-Trail access the secure for to owners property with work to continue should City The Drive. Pierce near pocket park the including Pierce Drive, to Drive Miller between property Storage Guardian the through Rail-Trail the build and bid, design, should City The Easement. Rail-Trail PML Chamblee the through Rail-Trail the of construction the complete should City The Corridor. Rail-Trail the along piece artwork public appropriate culturally and historically one complete should City The
Comcast DeKalb County Power Georgia • • • • • • • •
money becomes available. as Rail-Trail the implement to continue should City The Corridor. Rail-Trail the along piece artwork public appropriate culturally and historically one complete should City The Station. MARTA the to Rail-Trail the from Drive Malone along Spur Rail-Trail the build and bid, design, should City The crosswalks. branded visible, more with striping crosswalk replace and radii, Tucker turning Road, reduce curb Chamblee on lanes traffic of width reduce to the Transportation of Department Georgia the with work should City The Tucker Road. Chamblee to Road Clairmont Under Keswick Trail existing the from Rail-Trail the build and bid, design, should City The RoadClairmont overpass the beneath apocket create park should City The Road. Clairmont under Keswick Trail existing the to Road Peachtree on Power property/frontage Georgia the from through Rail-Trail the build and bid, design, should City The Drive. McGaw on crosswalk abranded implement should City The
4.0 | Implementation Plan 113 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail City of Chamblee Maintenance Trail and greenspace maintenance may include landscape, and facility, amenityhardscape, emptying upkeep; trash periodicreceptacles, surfacepressure washing, cleaning the trail especially in the area, MATRA which Pond is subject flooding,to and possible repair vandalism. of Landscaping should be designed require to little watering, once established. service Water lines should bedesigned along Rail-Trail. the Maintenance costs for the Rail-Trailand Rail-Trail Park may vary depending on the final design as well as the City’s desired service. of maintenance level Based on national benchmarks, trail and greenspace maintenance costs permay a lower acre at quartile very between $4,163 per an acre at upper quartile costs. $17,597 to cost quartileLower benchmarks may municipalities represent with service of a lower maintenance level while upper quartile benchmarks municipalities represent with a higher service. of maintenance level The national median maintenance costs are $8,884 per Based on acre. these benchmarks and the Rail-Trail and Park Rail-Trail’s total acres, maintenance costs may range acreage 7.7 of between $32,000 per $135,500 year. to Consistent with typically programmed park operating hours, the Rail-Trail and Rail-Trail Park could remain open until 10:00pm. While specific operating hours not were identified through the public engagement process, as the trail and greenspace more enter detailed design, final operating hours should be established be consistent to with resident desires ability andthe City’s police to the corridor. Additionally, thedesign the of final Rail-Trail lighting may include lighting timers that turn off Rail-Trail lightsa at time. designated Most trails and greenspaces in the area metropolitan Atlanta fromoperate dawn dusk. to This means that during the times that the trail and greenspace are closed, activity any that occurs in the trail or greenspace is illegal and could lead to the Advisory Stakeholder prosecution. Group However, and citizens expressed the desire for trail lighting and extended hoursoperation of later in to the This evening. could mean keeping the Rail-Trail and Rail-Trail Park open hours 24 per or closingday, them a specific at time in the evening. Operations The following section provides on overview trail of operations, andmaintenance, security considerations that the City of Chamblee should bemindful as of the Rail-Trail and Rail-Trail morePark detailed into enter design. 4.6 Management 4.0 | Implementation Plan 114 problems security Rail-Trail minimize should “eyes-on-the-trail” citizens encourage that (CPTED) principles Design Environmental Prevention through Crime with greenspace and trail the designing with along elements of these combination The deterrence. crime asignificant provide would Rail-Trail the patrolling bicycles on officers police Finally, trail. the along boxes call emergency and Department Police Chamblee by the can monitored that be system acamera include Rail-Trail Chamblee forthe cost estimates Construction Road bridge. Clairmont the under Rail-Trail existing the on to due problems especially concerns security expressed all Council City and Group, citizens, Stakeholder Advisory The Security and Safety CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study . 4.0 | Implementation Plan 115 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail City of Chamblee Reduction in local congestion for drivers Reduction in wear and tear on roads and vehicles healthReduced costs care for residents the due to increasepotential lifestyle active of Increase in social and capital volunteerism Reduction in air pollution and an increased air quality Increased possible due to occupational revenue tax increases in the number businesses of within the Mid-City area character Increased tax revenue for the CityIncreased as revenue tax increases a result of in property values for properties the Rail-Trail adjacent to as well as increases properties of in redevelopment into higher density mixeduse developments. Property values within the of trail 1,300 feet may increase anywhere from current twenty values over over percent to one percent
• • • • • • • Implementing the Rail-Trail and associated parks is an in economic, theinvestment social, City’s and environmental Specificfuture. Return that the On (ROI) City Investments of include: experience may Chamblee 4.7 Return on Investment on Return 4.7
Appendix Appendix 118 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study ae December30, 2015 (Revised) DescriptionSite Date: December30, 2015 photograph below. approximate limits ofsurvey this area (asprovided by Heath & Lineback Engineers) are provided on theaerial Dunwoodyeast, WayIndustrial Peachtree the to Boulevardnorth, the to Peachtree and Roadtosouth. the roadways that form the approximate boundaries of the study areainclude McGaw Driveto west, the Chamblee (LCI) for effort Atlanta the Regional Commission’s (ARC’s) City Chamblee of Downtown L Chamblee DeKalb DeKalb in County, Georgia. Theproject is part ofmore a comprehensive Livable Centers Initiatives Consultant Firm County: Project D ChambleeRail Trail The landwithin screening the area Drive OneDr.). additional land note of use is the Mount Zion Churchcemetery, locatedon east the side Pierceof MaloneDr.), Malone3400 Condominiums MaloneSenior andDr.), (3400 Residences Chamblee (3381 Malone includearea MillerStation on Peachtree Miller (3450 Peachtree Dr.), Malone Lofts (corner Peachtree of Rd. and Peachtree Blvd.), and Eckardt Elec Chamblee(1871 Tucker Rd.), Nalley(5211 Nissan PeachtreeIndustrial Blvd.), Guardian Self Storage(5305 uses.land General Land Use Description:
eKalb andnorth Eckardt of Electric. County Name: Commercial land theof study uses area (butinclude arelimitednot Wal a to) Chamblee Rail Trail Extension : : Edwards- s: Theproposed Extension
project wouldextension involvethe ofexisting an withincity the trail limitsof Environmental Screening Survey Pitman Environmental,Pitman Inc.
tric tric (3467 Pierce Dr.). Multi is is highlydiversifiedincludecommercial,to residential light and Study Area
for Heath & Lineback EngineersLineback Heath & for - family residential complexes within thestudy Page9 1 of - Mart SuperstoreMart CI area.
industrial The The The
Date Surveyed: Author D ChambleeRail Trail Ecology: December30, 2015 EcologicalResources Identified to theto screening was conducted area On Streams/Wetlands JurisdictionalAny Water StateAny Buffered Water limits of the study area as presented in the figure below. Additionalopen waters.or desktop survey identified efforts streams andfloodplains that are located beyond the eKalb Novemberscreening a 2015, 9, survey environmental for resources withinlocated and immediately adjacent : Charlotte: Estes/David Pearce County Resource Type:
November 2015/December 9, 2,2015/December17, 2015 :
Extension Wetland ☒ Stream ☒ s? s?
: Yes : Yes Yes
.
The The screening survey identify not did any jurisdictional wetlands,streams, ☒ ☒
☒ No No
Unknown Unknown ☐ ☐ No
☐ Open Water ☐ ☐ ☐ T&E/Habitat Page9 2 of ☐
Appendix 119
as on are stream (jurisdictional) (jurisdictional) Page 4 of 9 4 of 9 Page e wetland and he wetland of t s s it was determined that a portion a portion that determined was it , with with site that visit Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail
aerial photography of the site, as shown below. shown below. site, as the of photography aerial
associated associated April 2002
Detention Area potentially subject to Section 404 permitting regulations regulations 404 permitting subject to Section potentially Detention Area: 1954 USGS Topo Map Map Topo USGS 1954 Area: Detention Detention Area: 2002 Google Earth Aerial Aerial Earth Google 2002 Area: Detention
Detention Area wetland wetland fication and guidance regarding this site, an additional field survey was conducted conducted was survey field additional site, thisan regarding guidance and fication Extension Extension
North County County (Not to Scale) eKalb well as a stream that would be considered a buffered state water. The location state water. a buffered be considered that would a wellstream as intheprovided figure. following of the site a contained small Trail Rail Chamblee D December 30, 2015 30, 2015 December
clari To further provide water little had very time the at that, property the on ditch a be to appeared what identify did survey Field in appear does This ditch it. through running efforts on the survey 17, 2015. Based December City of Chamblee
Page 3 of 9 3 of 9 Page environmental hurdles you can think of of think you can hurdles environmental is there any any there is
facility,
located in the area shown in the below aerial photograph. photograph. aerial the below in shown the area in located additional survey was conducted on December 2, 2015 in the area area the in 2, 2015 December on conducted was survey additional area , an Detention Area: 2015 Google Earth Aerial Aerial Earth Google 2015 Area: Detention
Detention Area Extension Extension a wetland and/or spring what would be the required permitting (404, SBV, ect.)? SBV, (404, permitting required the be would what spring and/or a wetland a spring. In addition, a survey of historic USGS topographic mapping does not show a water water a show does not mapping topographic of USGS historic addition, a survey In a spring.
(pet waste getting in the pond)? the pond)? in getting waste (pet If there is to dogs allowed we If site. pond the to relocated park dog a be will there chance good a is there Finally, use the pond as oftype a recreational water We have heard from the City/MARTA that the pond may be spring feed. Please confirm that there are no no are there that confirm Please feed. be spring pond may the that have the heard from City/MARTA We the pond. at or wetlands springs, waters, NPDES? would be required permitting the only that correct we are or wetlands no waters are there If North County County
(Not to Scale) eKalb site the of reconnaissance visual however, parcel; the to issues access to due limited site was of the survey Field failed to identify is Mapping Quad USGS GA Chamblee, the 1954 of for reproduction this A parcel. line” stream orsource “blue intheprovided figure. following Chamblee Trail Rail Chamblee D December 30, 2015 30, 2015 December At the request of Heath & Lineback & Heath request of theAt associated with the MARTA detention detention MARTA the with associated The purpose of this request to address specific questions associated with the The toquestions site with and useits specific associated as of a request purpose this potential address questions/concerns: following the noted request Lineback The & Heath park. passive Appendix 120 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study December 201530, D ChambleeRail Trail eKalb County Extension
Page9 5 of Dwarf Sumac Sumac Dwarf development. project during concern sp a be would amphianthus little that appear not does it survey screening onthe based however, species; this for habitat may identify surveys field intensive More area. screening the within observed were outcrops granite No usually contain soil at least 1 Archaeology: development. project during concern of species a be would sumac dwarf that appear not does survey it screening the however,on based species; this for habitat suitable of pockets identify collectswater after a rain. depressionsThese are less 1 than Black Spored Quillwort development. project during concern of species a be would amphianthus County list identifies the federally little If this stream is spring December30, 2015 D ChambleeRail Trail Archaeological Surveyed: Date Author more intensive are that Surveys sumac. dwarf the for habitat suitable provide not would and lawns maintained The wooded bluffs. river and onridges often iron; or magnesium, calcium, of level high with bedrock mafic over woodlands sandy or rocky, open, dry, in found are sumac Dwarf The black field surveysmay identify habitat winter and soils Little amph pusillus Little Amphianthus need for the in result and water any impacts the to stream section woulda require 404wetlands permittingThis permit. process could list identifies three species of concern within DeKalb County, including the little Chamblee- Services, Inc.performed survey pedestrian for corridor improvements Peachtreeto Industrial Boulevard and surveysintersect or align with project the corridor. In 2004,archaeologistswith Southeastern Archeological In archaeologicalto addition sites recordedin the GeorgiaArchaeological SiteFile database, two previous addition, nopreviously recorded sites withinfall Areathe of Potenti No previously recordedarchaeological sitesare located within 1 a project at the University of Georgia in Athens. On November 10,2015, a check the of Georgia Archaeological SiteFile was conducted potential impacts to federally protected species related to implementation of the proposed project. proposed the of implementation to related species protected federally to impacts potential System (IPaC) Conservation and Planning, Additionallypart a as of theenvironmental screening, t Protected Species: areWe unaware of any permitting requirements associated with the use of the area a as dog park. Natural Resources (GADNR) and Citythe Chamblee. of state eKalb - mandatedstream it would buffer, subject be theto requirementstream buffer : ), black spored quillwort ( quillwort black spored ), County With One Within Kilometer: Joseph Roberts - spored quillworthabitat restricted spored is t Tucker RoadTucker (Patton 2004). The reconnaissancesurvey included several non ianthus occurs on shallow, flat bottomed depressions (vernal pools) on granite outcrops with thin, gravelly gravelly thin, with outcrops granite on pools) (vernal depressions bottomed flat shallow, on occurs ianthus in –
Survey Boundary: Federally Endangered Federally - Resources Identified spring inundation. No granite outcrops were observed within the screening area. More intensive intensive More area. screening the within observed were outcrops granite No inundation. spring November 11,2015 –
Federally Threatened Federally Extension mitigation - fed as as fed reported by MARTA/city officials, then it – Federally Endangered - inch deep. inch They maydry be much of the summer,
associated with these impacts. In if addition,
for this species; however, based on the screening survey it does not appear that little little that appear not does survey it screening onthe based however, species; for this Isoetes melanospora Isoetes
:
a mphianthus and the black spored quillwort. spored black the and mphianthus Yes Yes
and the GADNR websites were websites GADNR the and
o shallow,flat ☐ ☐ ), and dwarf sumac dwarf and ( ),
he US Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) Information, Information, (USFWS) Service’s Wildlife and Fish US he No No
- - foot in depth, and entirely depth, in are foot rock bottomed depressionson granite outcrops,where areas observed within the screening area are within within screening the observed within are areas area Number Sites: of 0 ☒ Number Sites: of 0 ☒ al Effectal (APE). - kilometer radiusof project the corridor.In
Rhus michauxii Rhus could
consulted for information regarding regarding information for consulted th e
project results impactsin to the be consideredbe ajurisdictional s s
except during rainy periods.
of Georgia’sof Department of a mphianthus ( mphianthus ).
electronically thisfor The GADNR DeKalb DeKalb GADNR The The USFWS IPaC IPaC USFWS The - contiguous linear Page9 6 of - rimmed, and Amphianthus Amphianthus ecies of of ecies
may may Appendix 121 in
USGS topographic topographic USGS
Potential MSAT MSAT Potential
Page 8 of 9 8 of 9 Page No concurrence would be required concurrence would SHPO) SHPO) corridors to trails, the impacts associated with with associated the impacts totrails, corridors
. Office ( e spur lines appear in the 1954 in lines appear e spur Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Preservation Preservation
corridor. corridor. Thes ☒ te Historic Historic te
Sta meets the definition of a Type III project and does not require a noise a noise require not does projectand III Type a of the definition meets Historic Resource Locations Locations Resource Historic , when evaluated by an interagency group consisting of FHWA, EPA, EPA, of FHWA, consisting group interagency an by evaluated , when No ), it is not anticipated that this project would significantly impact significantly would project this that not), is anticipated it is identified in the conforming TIP inthe conforming is identified trail hotspots without a qualitative analysis. analysis. qualitative a without hotspots ☐ 2.5 he proposed project would be classified as a project with a project as be classified would project he proposed his project his , 2015 , 2015
Yes Extension Extension
page 4 and are considered a contributing element to the overall district’s potential NRHP eligibility. eligibility. NRHP potential district’s to the element overall 4 a contributing page and are considered n November 12 November Anticipated: It is anticipated that t that is anticipated It It is anticipated that t that anticipated is It Russ Danser, AICP AICP Danser, Russ County County . .
It is anticipated that this project project this that anticipated is It : Given the project type ( type the project Given 2.5 concentrations and would, therefore, not require a CO hot-spot analysis. hot-spot analysis. CO a require not therefore, and would, concentrations railroad spurs located throughout the located throughout railroad project spurs eKalb EPD and the MPO, would be Exempt per the Transportation Conformity Rule and thus meet the statutory and and statutory the thus and meet Rule Conformity Transportation the per be Exempt would MPO, the and EPD PM for requirements regulatory CO: CO PM the event a 404 permit is required. required. is permit a 404 the event Quality/Noise: Air Impacts project this if is unknown Ozone: It Chamblee Trail Rail Chamblee D 30, 2015 December mapping o shown mapping Author: Surveyed: Date Because the proposed project would involve conversion of the rail spur rail of spur the conversion involve would project the proposed Because and analyzed be to need this action would MSAT: One element of note associated with the Peachtree Industrial Boulevard District-Peachtree Industrial Park is the Park network Industrial Boulevard Industrial District-Peachtree the Peachtree with of note element associated One of Effects Noise: noise impacts. of highway or abatement study City of Chamblee
a. ional ional Industrial Industrial Page 7 of 9 7 of 9 Page -Tucker Road, intersects intersects Road, -Tucker 2 appears to have been constructed ca. constructed been have to 2 appears along Chamblee along
☐ 2 of Sites: Number
No
☒ References Cited Cited References Pitman, by Lynn Pietak (2004), also intersects the current survey survey current the intersects also (2004), Pietak Lynn Pitman, by -
ADNR DeKalb County survey. Yes The locations of these resources relative to the study area are provided in in provided are area the to study relative resources these of locations The
consist of industrial and commercial properties that were constructed between between constructed were that properties commercial and industrial of consist : :
Extension Extension Peachtree Industrial Park (Resource 1). This district is roughly bounded by Peachtree bounded by is Thisroughly district 1). (Resource Park Peachtree Industrial - - November 12, 2015 12, 2015 November Pitman Environmental, Inc. Smyrna, Georgia. Prepared for GDOT OE/L, Atlanta, Georgia, P.I. P.I. Georgia, Atlanta, OE/L, GDOT for Prepared Georgia. Smyrna, Inc. Environmental, Pitman Phase I Archaeological Survey of Miller Drive Streetscape Project Area, DeKalb County, Georgi County, DeKalb Area, Project Streetscape Drive Miller of Survey I Archaeological Phase below. below. were found during that survey. that survey. during found were Leslie H. Brown H. Brown Leslie Within Survey Boundary: Boundary: Within Survey County County :
Edwards- 2814. No. Report File Site Archaeological Georgia No.0004479. Southeastern Archeological Services, Inc. Athens, Georgia. Prepared for GDOT OE/L, Atlanta, Georgia, Georgia, Atlanta, OE/L, GDOT for Prepared Athens, Georgia. Inc. Services, Archeological Southeastern 2598. No. Report File Site Archaeological Georgia and 0002853. 0002852, 0002851, Nos. P.I. 2004 eKalb
Structures 50+ year Identified year 50+ Structures the figure M. Lynn Pietak, located are any if determine to consulted was properties historic identified on previously information Existing on The information of existing project. review proposed the of (APE) effects potential of area the within National proposed properties, listed Register no National that revealed properties historic identified previously Nat in the inclusion for eligible determined or bridges Landmarks, Historic National nominations, Register project's the proposed within were identified (GHBS) Survey Bridge Historic Georgia updated inthe Register APE. within identified or were older old 50 years no properties that revealed also information of existing review The G 1997 APE in the project's the proposed History: Chamblee Trail Rail Chamblee D Boulevard District Boulevard 30, 2015 December Industrial Boulevard to the north, Motors Industrial Way to the east, and Peachtree Road to the south. The The south. the to Road Peachtree and east, the to Way Industrial Motors north, the to Boulevard Industrial district this within resources proposed the were within identified survey the GADNR in or not older identified age of 50 years Two properties the are Peachtree These properties survey. desktop resources historic the during APE project's 2. is Resource the survey desktop during trail proposed ofthe the APE within Also identified 1952 and 1965. Resource Road. Dunwoody 3514 Chamblee at located is resource This Date Date Surveyed: 1910. the within identified been have resources historic two efforts, identification desktop of our a result as Therefore, project. trail rail proposed the of APE Author area between Peachtree Boulevard and Peachtree Road. The reconnaissance survey of 400 feet of the east side of of side east the of of 400 feet survey reconnaissance The Road. Peachtree and Boulevard Peachtree between area cultural No improvements. and streetscape for sidewalk undertaken was Road, Peachtree of north Drive, Miller resources B. Robert Patton, Improvements. Corridor Pedestrian Road (PIB)/Chamblee-Tucker Boulevard Industrial 2004 Peachtree with the current survey area between Peachtree Road and Peachtree Boulevard. No cultural resources were were resources cultural No Boulevard. and Peachtree Road Peachtree area between survey current the with survey. that found during Edwards by Drive of Miller survey previous A corridors in downtown Chamblee, Georgia. One corridor of the survey, the of corridor One Georgia. Chamblee, downtown in corridors Appendix 122 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study Standard Specification 107.22 Hazardous and/or Toxic Waste USTsfor be would required. properties (R S Automotive) located 5105Peachtree at Industrial Blvd., #B. T Automotive 5105 at Peachtree Industrial Blvd., subsurface #B, investigations (Phase II) be will required. ofSummary Findings UST/Hax Mat.: be to analyzed SHPO and concurrence would be required a in the 404 permitevent required. is would involveconversion the of spurrail corridorsto trails,the impactsassociated with actionthis would need consideredcontributinga element t History: streamthe bufferrequirement of stream would require section a 404wetlands permit. In addition, could consideredbe a jurisdictional water of the US Army Engineersof Corps (USACE) anyand impacts to the rainwater stormwater retention identifiedone small Ecology: Date Surveyed: Author: Underground Storage Tanks/Hazardous Materials Sites: December30, 2015 D ChambleeRail Trail Sites Identified:Sites here is gasone station ( eKalb County Russ Danser, AICP spurassociated lines The with the Peachtree Industrial Boulevard District-Peachtree Industrial Park are
, subsurfaceinvestigations (Phase II) be will fromrecent a rain event. Ifstream this is spring Visual reconnaissance of the proposed park area on theparcel currently used by MARTA for November 12, 2015
If right Extension : Yes - QuikTrip) locatedat 5347 Peachtree Industrial Blvd andautomotive one of -
way is requiredway is from the ☒ GADNR o district’s the potential NRHP eligibility. Because proposed the project No and Citythe Chamblee.of
jurisdictional Number Sites:2 of ☐
QuikTrip at 5347 PeachtreeIndustrial Blvd or R S wetland wetland required - fed as reportedas fed by MARTA/city officials,then it as a . If contamination as wellas asa ditchthat appeared containto bufferedstate water, wouldit be subject to
If right If - of - way is required from required way is th were
encountered, then Page9 9 of repair facility facility ese
Reco endation or appro al appro al or Reco endation Su itted orappro al o e t a a e tate o am eli e y i ee Co lta t e i e i m e i e Co lta t o al o e me t o o fa ility Chamblee oo y ay a the eatio ofa bli m lti e ath mile alo a aba o e fo me li ef om ea ht ee ail oa at a i e to he Chamblee ail ail te io Co e t al e i t y o i t ofthee te io ofthee i ti tate a o tatio la i mi i t ato i t i t i ee i t i t i ee i ee tilitie tate o e t e ie i ee tate affi i ee i ee affi tate tate i o me tal mi i t ato mi i t ato i o me tal tate ☐ ☒ eea ot b e e al o te mbe a o i i l e a o tatio i the tate m o eme t o am hi al ea o e t i o i te t ith t o a e a o tatio la ea hi o e t i o i te t ith the a o te e io al a o tatio la i t i t ye li e t ath lti e y e o e t TED SC E R ECT C CE T DE RT E T o e t mbe ffi e ea ffi e ha e Co e t e i ST TE ST TE et iea e eath a i eba i ee he oal o tli e i the tate i e a o tatio la TR S RT T TR S RT T E R ame ity tili i the e i ti ete tio e i ti the tili i ame ity tt ot b tate o te mbe
City of Chamblee of City me mbe Co ty e alb RE RT RE RT ate ate ate ate ate ate ate ate ate ate Appendix 123 mbe mbe the the e t y ail oa that e t y ail oa th ☐ ea ht ee to e ea ht ee ill follo a a o e ail li e a a o e ail ill follo eate li f om the mai ail f om the mai eate li tate e tate e Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail ☐
a itio o te alo Chamblee Chamblee alo o te a itio ea i i l e i a o attai me t a ea fo a ea o attai me t i a i l e i ea at a e i ti t affi i al a follo the a follo i al t affi a e i ti at e omme atio fo f t e i e tme t that that i e tme t f t e fo e omme atio y a ea al atio of the e i ti t t e a t t e e i ti of the al atio a ea y ea ht ee t ial f om t ial ea ht ee e C ee ee ay to the o th the the o th the to ee ay e C ee em t em t ☒ o y ay o ail ail ail ail o y ay o e i e ill be i e i ate to to ill be i e i ate i e e he Chamblee ail ail e i t y ill o t the tla ta the tla ta t y ill o t ail e i ail Chamblee he o ☐ he e i ti aba o e ail o i o i the em a t of a i the em a t ail o i o e i ti aba o e he tla ta e io al Commi io C C Commi io e io al tla ta to ea ht ee a f om im o eme t ille alo e at t ea ht ee at i alo e alo lo atio e e al t eet a e ail ba o to ea ht ee f om C ille to ie e Chamblee e f om o timi atio lto li e Co ty f om to Co ty i ett li e li e to C hallo fo lto Co ty f om o e t Co e t e o t a e o e t Co e t m t e io the e i atio of thi e a e of t me me t i the Clea e o o e othe mo e of t a o tatio e i ea e o t that a ti e e elo me t bette to a loo e i eme t ality ai meet a emi io e e hel to ehi le o a t i le tha by e elo i alo e i i to e of alte ati e the i ea e to ee C o am he tili e mi e e e a a e ibility to o am im o e othe a o e t t a o tatio t i the e elo me t f the o t a t a it o e ho l e a io li ely of e elo me t o am itiati e Ce te i able C o t of a e t tole lo ate oo hole a f t e ea be i o e t ail ail Chamblee he of the i te e tio to the o i o ail aba o e a ali ea t e te a oa i e at ea ht ee he i e ay a omme ial alo a b i e oa Clai mo t the e t ail a e i mai ail ail oa e ill o Chamblee Co ty a alb State ent ro ect usti ication oli y i able itiati e e tme t C Ce te beleme t C Commi io e io al C a ea o to of Chamblee ithi the City a o e t t ie C la i a o tatio et o olita he tla ta a i e to ie e i e a ille i e alo e o a the ea t to ail o i o aba o e o Chamblee ea te mi al oi t o le a o ea ht ee i e al o th to e i ti ill a i e alo e oa e tatio Chamblee ail to the t ail Co e to hi e e alb o th la e to the C li i l e ill o e tio t ail t e o th e t the to ail eltli e a tla ta ail to the o e tio ill i l e y tem the ea ht e i l i a ea the oo ha e Chamblee of o th a ea Co ty e alb a ea t to the e e elo me mt Existing conditions o e te the itie of Chamblee a o ell he o e of the ail oa a to mo e oo bet ee the bet ee to mo e oo a he o e of the ail oa o ell a itie of Chamblee the o e te alo e i t a te tile o e a a to a o ell a fa mi a ai y a itie Chamblee ail o i o of the aba o e e tio in t e area pro ects t er T Co ission T Regional District s Congressional ederal ersig t City of Chamblee mbe mbe
R ECT C T R ECT o e t Co e t e o t a e o e t Co e t Co ty a alb Appendix 124 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study a e ent E aluation and Reco endations ba lo al oa ba lo al oa Re a ilitation ro ect R Resur acing s t isa Restoration ba lo al oa ba Co plete Streets- icycle lo al oa edestrian and or Transit Standard arrants ba lo al oa Chmablee oo y ay ba mi o a te ial ie e i e ba mi o a te ial ille i e alo e i e Chamblee e oa a i e ea ht ee oa e i ea unctional Classi ication ainline lti e ath affi o e tio e fo me by C e t ea e ea Tra ic ro ected Co ty a alb o e t Co e t e o t a e ainline Design eatures a or Structures . . . . . . Description o t eproposed pro ect DES DSTR CT R ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Typical Section nside S oulder idt utside S oulderSlope utside S oulderor order rea idt edian idt Type ane idt s u er o anes tutr xsig roposed Structure Existing tial a eme t y e ele tio e o t e i e e o t e i e mma y itial a eme t al atio a a t met ea ible a eme t lte ati e ea ible a eme t lte ati e eature ☐ . o e o e i i x en i n i e ☒ i y le i y le ☐ - ☒ .
xsig Standard roposed Existing e e t ia ☐ e e t ia
☒ ☒ o CC CC . . ut-s a ulti- se at ulti- se at ☒ ☒ o o a it a it ☐ ☐
e CC ☐ ☐ e e mbe Co ty a alb o e t Co e t e o t a e a or nterc anges ntersections o i to e t e i oli y ifa li able -ieDtus tcptd -site Detours nticipated re uired ig ting ie e i e a Chamblee oo y ay Transportation anage ent lan T Re uired Design Exceptions to S T controlling criteria anticipated ‐ ‐ a e ent Type Design e icle ccess axi u rade axi u Superele ation Rate in ori ontal Cur e Radius Design Speed osted Speed ‐ i e t t al Ca a ity ate al ff et to b t tio e ti al Clea a e C o lo e to i i ht i ta e a e li me t e ti al e ele atio o i o tal li me t i e i th ho l e i th a e i th e i ee Side al s uxiliary anes uxiliary anes i e anes ST otoln rtra o S T Controlling Criteria f oet a fe a la ifie o e t f e Control Com o e t ti i ate ☒ o a i e Chamblee e ☒ o ☐ ☐ e C C ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒
☒
☐ ☐ o e e o i ifi a t ndeter- ined es ined es ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
oa alo e i e ille i e alo e i e oa ille i e ocee Concrete Concrete ulti- se at i e ncluded on - T ☐ ☐ eem ete mi e e e ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
☐ ☐ i ifi a t i applica le pp l Date i e ulti- se at ncluded on - T mbe Appendix 125 ☐ mbe mbe e e e ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ot e i e ot e i e o o o ☐ ☐ ☐ t eam etla at o at t eam etla t eam at o a e i t b o e a o e t
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Com lete ate e i e ☐ Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail ☐ ☐ ☐
☒ ☒ ☐ ☒ ☒ ☐ ☒ ☐ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ o es o Re ar s t ents Coordination anticipated anticipated t ents Coordination C 4 . 4 . e ☐ ☐ E o ☒ nticipated nticipated
☐ Ca bo o o i e hot ot a aly i a aly i hot ot Ca bo o o i e the o e t lo ate i a o e o attai me t a ea o attai me t o e i a lo ate the o e t the o e t lo ate i a o attai me t a ea i a o attai me t lo ate the o e t E E . . . . E Ecology . istory . rc eology . uality ir er it ariance Co it ent Coordination Coordination er it ariance Co it ent e mit a Coa t e i e Co a o e t e mit C e tio e i io C e mit tho ity e e ee alley ffe a ia e Coo i atio a a eme t o e Coa tal e mit Cemete y the e mit the Commitme t the Coo i atio En iron ental er its ariances Co i En iron ental S er it Co pliance s t e pro ect located in a S area a S area in located s t e pro ect S er it Co pliance En iron ental Co ents and n or ation n or ation and Co ents En iron ental E R E T ER TS E R E T Docu ent En iron ental nticipated s a R re uired o e t Co e t e o t a e o e t Co e t Co ty a alb Solutions roposed Context Sensiti e . City of Chamblee mbe mbe e pp l Date Date pp l i applica le i applica le ☐
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ the the ☐ o ete mi e ete mi e ☐
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ined es ined tility ndeter- ndeter- the the ete mi e ete mi e Com lete ate e i e ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ ☒ e i e e e i e e ete mi e ete mi e e e e ☒ ☐ ☐ ☒
e ma e t e ma e t o e ☒ otal i la eme t otal i la eme t ice o o ice ☒ ☐ Re ie ing e ot e i e o o e ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ em o a y licy and rocedure reco ended and reco ended licy rocedure o ☒ ☒ ti i ate total mbe of im a te a el a el of im a te mbe ti i ate total o o e o e i la eme t a ti i ate a ti i ate i la eme t i e e ☐ ft i ti i th i th o o e ft ☐
D T Standard Criteria a al t t al i e i e mble t i afety e e ia a e o abo t ll mi atio e el Com lete t eet Co t tio ta a ai a e a al e Co t ol e ia e i te e tio i ta e i ht te e tio le e to b t tio ate al ff et . . Re uired S E u lic nterest Deter ination o R Rig t-o - ay pacts to S CE property anticipated anticipated pacts to S CE property Railroad n ol e ent Railroad n ol e ent a ti i ate a eme t tility n ol e ents n ol e ents tility C TE T SE S T E S T S Concern ssues o . . ocation and Design appro al Design appro al and ocation e i e i ht of ay a ti i ate a ti i ate i ht of ay e i e T T R ERT D needed State Route Te porary E Study anticipated E Study Design ariances to D T Standard Criteria anticipated Standard to D T Design ariances Co ty a alb . o e t Co e t e o t a e o e t Co e t Appendix 126 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study . . a or sta e olders Co ty a alb o e t Co e t e o t a e . Responsi ilities unding Su ary and Esti ate Cost ro ect t er coordination todate Concept eeting . . . nitial Concept eeting . RE CT T ES C RD T ssues potentially a ecting cons C STR CT . . . . . Early Co pletion ncenti es reco ended or consideration . . . o i eto aeil et Co t tio e tio ate ial e ti i o me tal iti atio i o me tal t ie o me t e mit o i i eto ate ial o i i it Co t tio e i io etti toCo t a t tility elo atio C tility Coo i atio e o t tio i ht of ay i itio e i Co e t e elo me t . . . u lic n ol e ent . oise E ects . 0 000 rea do n ro ect cti ity R o E o t tio . . . tructa ility cons nd Rei ursa le S S T ES D C STS S S T ES tility truction sc edule
.
arty Responsi le or er or ing Tas s ☐ CST o En iron ental ☐ iiain Total Cost itigation e mbe tme t a i i C Co t Co t i l e C Co t tio i ee i e tio a Co ti e ie Co ty a alb o e t Co e t e o t a e ST TT C E TS S RT D T ST TT C E TS S RT Co ents . . . lternati e selection TER T ES D SC SS . . . . Rationale . . Rationale Rationale lternati e lternati e o- uild lternati e re erred mo t timate timate e etaile Co t timate timate etaile Co t y i al e tio Co e t ayo t ate of of ate Esti ated roperty pacts Esti ated roperty pacts Esti ated roperty pacts Esti ated roperty y o e t that of ho i te a y o t o meeti e ob e tio the to Esti ated R Cost Esti ated R Cost Esti ated R Cost Esti ated R tilitie b i ht of ay a e tio a i l i i ee i Co t tio a . .
Co ti e ie . . .
. . . . .
Esti ated Total Cost Esti ated Total Cost Esti ated Total Cost Esti ated Total Esti ated CST Ti e Esti ated CST Ti e Esti ated CST Ti e Esti ated CST mbe Appendix 127 Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail ntentionally lan e t ntentionally lan De elop ent rocess City of Chamblee ate ate mbe mbe
i i io mi i t ato i e to of i ee i Chief i ee Include thissignature line for PoDI Projects Only
Concur ppro e ppro e R S o e t Co e t e o t a e o e t Co e t Co ty a alb Appendix 128 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study TRAIL AMENITIES TRAIL BIKE/PED COUNTER WATER FOUNTAIN COMMUNITY GARDEN WORK OUTSTATION BICYCLE RACK BIKE FIX-ITSTATION PET WASTESTATION TRASH CAN BENCH CAMERA CALL BOX BOLLARDS CONCRETE BOARDWALK CLASS BCONCRETE,RETAININGWALL RAILING CONC SIDEWALK,5IN LIGHTING EROSION CONTROL DRAINAGE RAPID FLASHINGBEACONS SIGNING &MARKING LANDSCAPING TESTING UTILITIES TRAFFIC CONTROL GRADING COMPLETE DESIGN COMPLETE Item Description Chamblee Rail-Trail-0.89miles Quantity 5380 1546 1288 7100 720 152 12 12 12 12 33 6 6 4 4 4 4 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Project Total 10% Contingency Sub-total Amenity Total Trail Total Unit EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA CY SY SF SF LF LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS $232,000.00 $100,000.00 $186,000.00 $557,000.00 $260,000.00 $15,000.00 $12,000.00 $83,520.00 $60,320.00 $28,000.00 $34,800.00 $75,000.00 $8,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $1,300.00 $1,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 Unit Cost $500.00 $600.00 $500.00 $125.00 $872.60 $20.00 $45.77 $36.34 $1,349,039.60 $5,693,649.90 $388,400.00 $180,000.00 $672,500.00 $258,014.00 $760,000.00 $232,000.00 $100,000.00 $186,000.00 $557,000.00 $260,000.00 $5,176,045.36 $4,787,645.36 $48,000.00 $30,000.00 $14,400.00 $30,000.00 $15,600.00 $10,000.00 $48,000.00 $16,500.00 $58,951.76 $83,520.00 $60,320.00 $84,000.00 $34,800.00 $75,000.00 $6,000.00 $2,400.00 $4,000.00 $517,604.54 Cost
TRAIL AMENITIES TRAIL - SEGMENT 1 BIKE/PED COUNTER WATER FOUNTAIN COMMUNITY GARDEN WORK OUTSTATION BICYCLE RACK BIKE FIX-ITSTATION PET WASTESTATION TRASH CAN BENCH CAMERA CALL BOX BOLLARDS CONCRETE BOARDWALK CLASS BCONCRETE,RETAININGWALL RAILING CONC SIDEWALK,5IN LIGHTING EROSION CONTROL DRAINAGE RAPID FLASHINGBEACONS SIGNING &MARKING LANDSCAPING TESTING UTILITIES TRAFFIC CONTROL GRADING COMPLETE DESIGN COMPLETE Item Description Chamblee Rail-TrailSegment1:GeorgiaPowerProperty-0.08miles Quantity 688 13 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Segment 1Total 10% Contingency Sub-total Amenity Total Trail SegmentTotal Unit EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA CY SY SF SF LF LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS $15,000.00 $12,000.00 $28,000.00 $20,000.00 $10,000.00 $16,000.00 $48,000.00 $14,000.00 $8,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $1,300.00 $1,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $7,000.00 $5,000.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 Unit Cost $500.00 $600.00 $500.00 $125.00 $872.60 $20.00 $45.77 $36.34 $31,800.00 $30,000.00 $25,001.92 $65,000.00 $20,000.00 $10,000.00 $16,000.00 $48,000.00 $14,000.00 $1,300.00 $3,000.00 $7,000.00 $5,000.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $279,182.11 $253,801.92 $222,001.92 $500.00 $25,380.19 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cost Appendix 129 Cost $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $65,657.95 $617,579.54 $656,579.54 $722,237.49 $2,600.00 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,400.00 $5,000.00 $8,000.00 $5,000.00 $3,000.00 $15,000.00 $39,000.00 $36,000.00 $70,000.00 $30,000.00 $15,000.00 $12,000.00 $37,000.00 $10,000.00 $13,000.00 $46,914.94 $13,731.00 $120,000.00 $205,933.60 $20.00 $36.34 $45.77 $600.00 $500.00 $872.60 $125.00 $500.00 Unit Cost $2,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,300.00 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 $8,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $12,000.00 $15,000.00 $36,000.00 $70,000.00 $30,000.00 $15,000.00 $12,000.00 $37,000.00 $28,000.00 $10,000.00 $13,000.00 LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LF SF SF SY CY EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA Unit Trail Segment Total Amenity Total Sub-total 10% Contingency Segment 3 Total 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 6 24 120 300 236 1291 Quantity Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Item Description Chamblee Rail-Trail Segment 3: Keswick Trail to Chamblee Tucker Road- 0.14 miles Chamblee Rail-Trail Segment 3:
DESIGN COMPLETE GRADING COMPLETE TRAFFIC CONTROL UTILITIES TESTING LANDSCAPING SIGNING & MARKING RAPID FLASHING BEACONS DRAINAGE EROSION CONTROL LIGHTING CONC SIDEWALK, 5 IN RAILING CLASS B CONCRETE, RETAINING WALL CONCRETE BOARDWALK BOLLARDS CALL BOX CAMERA BENCH TRASH CAN PET WASTE STATION BIKE FIX-IT STATION BICYCLE RACK WORK OUT STATION COMMUNITY GARDEN WATER FOUNTAIN BIKE/PED COUNTER
TRAIL - SEGMENT 3 SEGMENT - TRAIL AMENITIES TRAIL City of Chamblee Cost $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $30,250.58 $600.00 $500.00 $234,205.82 $302,505.82 $332,756.40 $6,000.00 $3,000.00 $5,000.00 $7,000.00 $3,203.90 $2,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,300.00 $5,000.00 $2,400.00 $5,000.00 $8,000.00 $16,000.00 $48,000.00 $16,000.00 $15,000.00 $20,000.00 $70,000.00 $25,001.92 $12,000.00 $30,000.00 $68,300.00 $36.34 $45.77 $20.00 $872.60 $125.00 $500.00 $600.00 $500.00 Unit Cost $6,000.00 $3,000.00 $5,000.00 $7,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,300.00 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 $8,000.00 $16,000.00 $48,000.00 $16,000.00 $15,000.00 $20,000.00 $28,000.00 $12,000.00 $15,000.00 LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LF SF SF SY CY EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA Unit Trail Segment Total Amenity Total Sub-total 10% Contingency Segment 2 Total 2 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 70 120 688 Quantity Item Description Chamblee Rail-Trail Segment 2: Georgia Power Property to Keswick Trail- 0.08 miles Chamblee Rail-Trail Segment 2:
TRASH CAN PET WASTE STATION BIKE FIX-IT STATION BICYCLE RACK WORK OUT STATION COMMUNITY GARDEN WATER FOUNTAIN BIKE/PED COUNTER CONC SIDEWALK, 5 IN RAILING CLASS B CONCRETE, RETAINING WALL CONCRETE BOARDWALK BOLLARDS CALL BOX CAMERA BENCH GRADING COMPLETE TRAFFIC CONTROL UTILITIES TESTING LANDSCAPING SIGNING & MARKING RAPID FLASHING BEACONS DRAINAGE EROSION CONTROL LIGHTING DESIGN COMPLETE
TRAIL AMENITIES TRAIL TRAIL - SEGMENT 2 SEGMENT - TRAIL Appendix 130 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study TRAIL AMENITIES TRAIL - SEGMENT 4 BIKE/PED COUNTER WATER FOUNTAIN COMMUNITY GARDEN WORK OUTSTATION BICYCLE RACK BIKE FIX-ITSTATION PET WASTESTATION TRASH CAN BENCH CAMERA CALL BOX BOLLARDS CONCRETE BOARDWALK CLASS BCONCRETE,RETAININGWALL RAILING CONC SIDEWALK,5IN LIGHTING EROSION CONTROL DRAINAGE RAPID FLASHINGBEACONS SIGNING &MARKING LANDSCAPING TESTING UTILITIES TRAFFIC CONTROL GRADING COMPLETE DESIGN COMPLETE Chamblee Rail-TrailSegment4:TuckerRoadtoMaloneDrive-0.14miles Item Description Quantity 1194 1033 120 220 24 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 6 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Segment 4Total 10% Contingency Sub-total Amenity Total Trail SegmentTotal Unit EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA CY SY SF SF LF LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS $150,000.00 $15,000.00 $12,000.00 $14,000.00 $10,000.00 $28,000.00 $38,000.00 $12,000.00 $15,000.00 $30,000.00 $81,000.00 $8,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $1,300.00 $1,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $6,000.00 Unit Cost $500.00 $600.00 $500.00 $125.00 $872.60 $20.00 $45.77 $36.34 $1,041,884.40 $1,833,252.32 $120,000.00 $150,000.00 $1,666,593.02 $1,596,493.02 $70,100.00 $30,000.00 $12,000.00 $10,069.40 $37,539.22 $14,000.00 $10,000.00 $28,000.00 $38,000.00 $12,000.00 $15,000.00 $30,000.00 $81,000.00 $8,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,400.00 $5,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,600.00 $1,000.00 $2,500.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $166,659.30 $600.00 $0.00 Cost
TRAIL AMENITIES TRAIL - SEGMENT 5 BIKE/PED COUNTER WATER FOUNTAIN COMMUNITY GARDEN WORK OUTSTATION BICYCLE RACK BIKE FIX-ITSTATION PET WASTESTATION TRASH CAN BENCH CAMERA CALL BOX BOLLARDS CONCRETE BOARDWALK CLASS BCONCRETE,RETAININGWALL RAILING CONC SIDEWALK,5IN LIGHTING EROSION CONTROL DRAINAGE RAPID FLASHINGBEACONS SIGNING &MARKING LANDSCAPING TESTING UTILITIES TRAFFIC CONTROL GRADING COMPLETE DESIGN COMPLETE Item Description Chamblee Rail-TrailSegment5:MaloneDrivetoMiller-0.13miles Quantity 5380 120 116 238 613 24 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Segment 5Total 10% Contingency Sub-total Amenity Total Trail SegmentTotal Unit EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA CY SY SF SF LF LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS $15,000.00 $12,000.00 $13,000.00 $28,000.00 $35,000.00 $13,000.00 $15,000.00 $29,000.00 $71,000.00 $41,000.00 $8,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $1,300.00 $1,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $9,320.00 $5,000.00 Unit Cost $500.00 $600.00 $500.00 $125.00 $872.60 $20.00 $45.77 $36.34 $1,385,242.41 $672,500.00 $101,221.60 $120,000.00 $1,259,311.28 $1,189,211.28 $70,100.00 $30,000.00 $12,000.00 $10,893.26 $22,276.42 $13,000.00 $28,000.00 $35,000.00 $13,000.00 $15,000.00 $29,000.00 $71,000.00 $41,000.00 $8,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,400.00 $5,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,600.00 $1,000.00 $2,500.00 $3,000.00 $9,320.00 $5,000.00 $125,931.13 $600.00 Cost Appendix 131 Cost $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $54,404.81 $600.00 $488,948.12 $544,048.12 $598,452.93 $2,500.00 $1,000.00 $2,600.00 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,400.00 $5,000.00 $8,000.00 $6,800.00 $1,500.00 $12,000.00 $15,000.00 $55,100.00 $41,000.00 $90,000.00 $35,000.00 $15,000.00 $14,000.00 $44,000.00 $11,000.00 $15,520.00 $54,073.92 $21,054.20 $140,000.00 $20.00 $36.34 $45.77 $600.00 $500.00 $872.60 $125.00 $500.00 Unit Cost $2,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,300.00 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 $8,000.00 $6,800.00 $5,000.00 $12,000.00 $15,000.00 $41,000.00 $90,000.00 $35,000.00 $15,000.00 $14,000.00 $44,000.00 $28,000.00 $11,000.00 $15,520.00 LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LF SF SF SY CY EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA Unit Trail Segment Total Amenity Total Sub-total 10% Contingency Segment 7 Total 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 3 28 120 460 1488 Quantity Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Item Description Chamblee Rail-Trail Segment 7: Pierce Drive to Chamblee Dunwoody Way - 0.18 miles Chamblee Rail-Trail Segment 7:
DESIGN COMPLETE GRADING COMPLETE TRAFFIC CONTROL UTILITIES TESTING LANDSCAPING SIGNING & MARKING RAPID FLASHING BEACONS DRAINAGE EROSION CONTROL LIGHTING CONC SIDEWALK, 5 IN RAILING CLASS B CONCRETE, RETAINING WALL CONCRETE BOARDWALK BOLLARDS CALL BOX CAMERA BENCH TRASH CAN PET WASTE STATION BIKE FIX-IT STATION BICYCLE RACK WORK OUT STATION COMMUNITY GARDEN WATER FOUNTAIN BIKE/PED COUNTER
TRAIL - SEGMENT 7 SEGMENT - TRAIL AMENITIES TRAIL City of Chamblee Cost $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $49,320.57 $439,205.66 $493,205.66 $542,526.23 $6,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,600.00 $1,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,400.00 $5,000.00 $8,000.00 $31,000.00 $80,000.00 $30,000.00 $15,000.00 $12,000.00 $38,000.00 $28,000.00 $10,000.00 $14,000.00 $47,205.66 $30,000.00 $54,000.00 $125,000.00 $36.34 $45.77 $20.00 $872.60 $125.00 $500.00 $600.00 $500.00 Unit Cost $6,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,300.00 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 $8,000.00 $31,000.00 $80,000.00 $30,000.00 $15,000.00 $12,000.00 $38,000.00 $28,000.00 $10,000.00 $14,000.00 $12,000.00 $15,000.00 LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LF SF SF SY CY EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA Unit Trail Segment Total Amenity Total Sub-total 10% Contingency Segment 6 Total 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 120 1299 Quantity Chamblee Rail-Trail Segment 6: Miller Drive to Pierce Drive - 0.14 miles Chamblee Rail-Trail Segment 6: Item Description
TRASH CAN PET WASTE STATION BIKE FIX-IT STATION BICYCLE RACK WORK OUT STATION COMMUNITY GARDEN WATER FOUNTAIN BIKE/PED COUNTER CONC SIDEWALK, 5 IN RAILING CLASS B CONCRETE, RETAINING WALL CONCRETE BOARDWALK BOLLARDS CALL BOX CAMERA BENCH GRADING COMPLETE TRAFFIC CONTROL UTILITIES TESTING LANDSCAPING SIGNING & MARKING RAPID FLASHING BEACONS DRAINAGE EROSION CONTROL LIGHTING DESIGN COMPLETE
TRAIL AMENITIES TRAIL TRAIL - SEGMENT 6 SEGMENT - TRAIL Appendix 132 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study SPUR 1 TRAIL AMENITIES SPUR 1 TRAIL BIKE/PED COUNTER WATER FOUNTAIN COMMUNITY GARDEN WORK OUTSTATION BICYCLE RACK BIKE FIX-ITSTATION PET WASTESTATION TRASH CAN BENCH CAMERA CALL BOX CLASS BCONCRETE,RETAININGWALL RAILING CONC SIDEWALK,5IN LIGHTING EROSION CONTROL DRAINAGE SIGNING &MARKING LANDSCAPING TESTING UTILITIES TRAFFIC CONTROL GRADING COMPLETE DESIGN COMPLETE Item Description Chamblee Rail-Trail-Spur1Trail0.28miles Quantity 120 687 555 529 15 1 2 1 2 4 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Spur 1Total 10% Contingency Spur 1Sub-total Spur 1AmenityTotal Spur 1TrailTotal Unit EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA CY SY SF LF LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS $119,000.00 $15,000.00 $12,000.00 $11,513.00 $22,500.00 $16,000.00 $25,000.00 $40,000.00 $56,000.00 $8,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $1,300.00 $1,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $8,100.00 $5,850.00 Unit Cost $500.00 $600.00 $872.60 $20.00 $45.77 $36.34 $1,023,065.41 $1,205,341.95 $599,476.20 $119,000.00 $1,095,765.41 $72,700.00 $30,000.00 $12,000.00 $25,402.35 $19,223.86 $75,000.00 $11,513.00 $22,500.00 $16,000.00 $25,000.00 $40,000.00 $56,000.00 $8,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,400.00 $5,000.00 $1,000.00 $5,200.00 $1,000.00 $2,500.00 $8,100.00 $5,850.00 $109,576.54 $600.00 Cost
SPUR 2 TRAIL AMENITIES SPUR 2 TRAIL BIKE/PED COUNTER WATER FOUNTAIN COMMUNITY GARDEN WORK OUTSTATION BICYCLE RACK BIKE FIX-ITSTATION PET WASTESTATION TRASH CAN BENCH CAMERA CALL BOX CONC SIDEWALK,5IN LIGHTING EROSION CONTROL DRAINAGE SIGNING &MARKING LANDSCAPING TESTING UTILITIES TRAFFIC CONTROL GRADING COMPLETE DESIGN COMPLETE Item Description Chamblee Rail-Trail-Spur2Trail0.22miles Quantity 1379 120 41 1 2 1 2 4 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Spur 2Total 10% Contingency Spur 2Sub-total Spur 2AmenityTotal Spur 2TrailTotal Unit EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA SY SF LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS $15,000.00 $12,000.00 $21,780.00 $15,730.00 $60,500.00 $25,000.00 $20,000.00 $59,000.00 $28,000.00 $8,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $1,300.00 $1,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $9,075.00 $8,000.00 Unit Cost $500.00 $600.00 $20.00 $36.34 $502,197.86 $205,000.00 $72,700.00 $30,000.00 $12,000.00 $50,112.86 $21,780.00 $15,730.00 $60,500.00 $25,000.00 $20,000.00 $59,000.00 $28,000.00 $8,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,400.00 $5,000.00 $1,000.00 $5,200.00 $1,000.00 $2,500.00 $9,075.00 $8,000.00 $632,387.65 $574,897.86 $600.00 $57,489.79 Cost Appendix 133 Cost 6/17/2016 $870,717.14 $1,800.00 $1,300.00 $3,000.00 $7,600.00 $5,655.00 $2,111.74 $25,000.00 $50,000.00 $81,038.20 $61,102.95 $36,000.00 $90,000.00 $16,000.00 $30,000.00 $15,000.00 $24,000.00 $20,000.00 $75,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $40,500.00 $50,000.00 $4,353,585.69 $125,000.00 $120,000.00 $897,032.80 $258,195.00 $131,250.00 $115,500.00 $5,224,302.83 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 $703,950.00 $126,000.00 $141,550.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $6.50 $36.34 $45.77 $21.00 $20.00 $50.00 $10.00 $19.00 $872.60 $125.00 $600.00 $500.00 Unit Cost $5,000.00 $3,500.00 $1,000.00 $1,300.00 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 $8,000.00 $1,500.00 $5,500.00 $25,000.00 $50,000.00 $12,000.00 $15,000.00 $20,000.00 $75,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $125,000.00 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 LS LS LF LS LS LS LS LS LS LS SF SF SF SF SF SY SY CY CY EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA AC Unit Park Sub-total 20% Contingency Park Total 1 1 1 3 6 3 1 6 6 6 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 24 33 16 84 380 870 0.38 2230 1335 1028 1050 4050 7450 12295 14079 Quantity Rail-Trail Extension Conceptual Design Study Rail-Trail Chamblee Rail-Trail - Pond Park Item Description
DESIGN COMPLETE GRADING COMPLETE EARTHWORK TRAFFIC CONTROL ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION UTILITIES TESTING TREES SOD SHRUBS/GROUND COVER BUTTERFLY GARDEN SEEDING PAVERS SIGNAGE PLAYGROUND PAVILION 1 - WITH RESTROOM PAVILION 2 DRAINAGE EROSION CONTROL LIGHTING CONC SIDEWALK, 5 IN RAILING CLASS B CONCRETE, RETAINING WALL VENEER CONCRETE BOARDWALK CALL BOX CAMERA TABLES AND CHAIRS TRASH CAN PET WASTE STATION BIKE FIX-IT STATION BICYCLE RACK WORK OUT STATION COMMUNITY GARDEN WATER FOUNTAIN BIKE/PED COUNTER PARK City of Chamblee Cost Cost $624,000.00 $294,000.00 $600.00 $600.00 Unit Cost Unit Cost LF LF Unit Unit 490 1040 Length Length Chamblee Rail-Trail - Spur 4 Trail - 0.20 miles Chamblee Rail-Trail - Spur 4 Trail Chamblee Rail-Trail - Spur 3 Trail - 0.20 miles Chamblee Rail-Trail - Spur 3 Trail SPUR 4 TRAIL SPUR 3 TRAIL SPUR 4 - CONNECTION TO MARTA STATION SPUR 4 - CONNECTION TO MARTA LF COST INCLUDES ALL CONSTRUCTION AND LIGHTING LF COST INCLUDES ALL CONSTRUCTION SPUR 3 - PIERCE DRIVE AND LIGHTING LF COST INCLUDES ALL CONSTRUCTION Appendix 134 CityofChamblee Rail-Trail ExtensionConceptualDesign Study PARK - EXCLUDING AMPHITHEATER BIKE/PED COUNTER WATER FOUNTAIN COMMUNITY GARDEN WORK OUTSTATION BICYCLE RACK BIKE FIX-ITSTATION PET WASTESTATION TRASH CAN TABLES ANDCHAIRS CAMERA CALL BOX CONCRETE BOARDWALK VENEER CLASS BCONCRETE,RETAININGWALL RAILING CONC SIDEWALK,5IN LIGHTING EROSION CONTROL DRAINAGE PAVILION 2 PAVILION 1-WITHRESTROOM PLAYGROUND SIGNAGE PAVERS BUTTERFLY GARDENSEEDING SHRUBS/GROUND COVER SOD TREES TESTING UTILITIES ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION TRAFFIC CONTROL EARTHWORK GRADING COMPLETE DESIGN COMPLETE Item Description Chamblee Rail-Trail-PondParkExcludingAmphitheater Quantity 7280 1870 5540 3550 9079 0.38 380 604 812 565 12 23 20 74 3 6 6 6 1 3 6 3 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Park Total 20% Contingency Park Sub-total Unit AC EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA CY CY SY SY SF SF SF SF SF LF LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS $115,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $15,000.00 $12,000.00 $40,000.00 $25,000.00 $40,000.00 $30,000.00 $40,000.00 $25,000.00 $15,000.00 $8,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $1,300.00 $1,000.00 $3,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,500.00 $1,500.00 Unit Cost $500.00 $600.00 $125.00 $872.60 $20.00 $21.00 $45.77 $36.34 $19.00 $10.00 $50.00 $6.50 $3,633,294.82 $152,880.00 $527,050.40 $100,000.00 $115,000.00 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $105,260.00 $111,000.00 $453,950.00 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 $3,027,745.68 $24,000.00 $15,000.00 $30,000.00 $12,000.00 $80,500.00 $90,000.00 $36,000.00 $37,165.24 $67,955.80 $40,000.00 $25,000.00 $40,000.00 $35,500.00 $30,000.00 $40,000.00 $25,000.00 $15,000.00 $7,600.00 $3,000.00 $1,300.00 $1,800.00 $2,111.74 $3,672.50 $605,549.14 $0.00 Cost 8/3/2016
PARK AMPHITHEATER BIKE/PED COUNTER WATER FOUNTAIN COMMUNITY GARDEN WORK OUTSTATION BICYCLE RACK BIKE FIX-ITSTATION PET WASTESTATION TRASH CAN TABLES ANDCHAIRS CAMERA CALL BOX CONCRETE BOARDWALK VENEER CLASS BCONCRETE,RETAININGWALL RAILING CONC SIDEWALK,5IN LIGHTING EROSION CONTROL DRAINAGE PAVILION 2 PAVILION 1-WITHRESTROOM PLAYGROUND SIGNAGE PAVERS BUTTERFLY GARDENSEEDING SHRUBS/GROUND COVER SOD TREES TESTING UTILITIES ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION TRAFFIC CONTROL EARTHWORK GRADING COMPLETE DESIGN COMPLETE Item Description Chamblee Rail-Trail-PondParkAmphitheater Quantity 1050 5015 1910 5000 0.00 424 523 360 500 305 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Amphitheater Total 20% Contingency Sub-total Unit AC EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA CY CY SY SY SF SF SF SF SF LF LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS LS $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $15,000.00 $12,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $25,000.00 $10,000.00 $20,000.00 $10,000.00 $50,000.00 $8,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $1,300.00 $1,000.00 $3,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,500.00 $1,500.00 $5,000.00 Unit Cost $500.00 $600.00 $125.00 $872.60 $20.00 $21.00 $45.77 $36.34 $19.00 $10.00 $50.00 $6.50 $1,591,008.01 $131,250.00 $105,315.00 $369,982.40 $250,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $1,325,840.01 $35,000.00 $23,937.71 $13,082.40 $20,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $36,290.00 $15,000.00 $20,000.00 $10,000.00 $50,000.00 $4,000.00 $5,000.00 $1,982.50 $5,000.00 $265,168.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Cost 8/3/2016
City of Chamblee