The Russian Orthodox Church As a Symbol of Right Order: a Voegelinian Analysis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 2001 The Russian Orthodox Church as a Symbol of Right Order: a Voegelinian Analysis. Lee David Trepanier Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Trepanier, Lee David, "The Russian Orthodox Church as a Symbol of Right Order: a Voegelinian Analysis." (2001). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 366. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/366 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy subm itted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH AS A SYMBOL OF RIGHT ORDER: A VOEGELINIAN ANALYSIS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Political Science by Lee Trepanier B.A., Marquette University 1995 M.A., Louisiana State University 2000 August 2001 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 3021455 ___ _® UMI UMI Microform 3021455 Copyright 2001 by Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Like most works, this one is not written by a single author but with the love, support, and advice of his colleagues, friends, and family. I would like to acknowledge them, particularly my dissertation committee at Louisiana State University: William Clark, Cecil Eubanks, James Garand, Keith Sandiford, Ellis Sandoz, Leonard Stanton, and James Stoner. It has been a pleasure to work under their supervision and guidance in the course of completing this project. I would also like to thank James Rhodes of Marquette University for his advice in the organization of this study; Alan Ball of Marquette University, Peter Quimby of the University of Wisconsin at Madison, and Nikolas Gvosdev of Baylor University for their help in my research of the sources for this project; Chris Marsh of Baylor University for his invitation to a symposium where I could see whether my theoretical model would work; William Campbell of Louisiana State University for his generous time and support; Pat Nurse and Colleen O'Connor of the Eric Voegelin Institute and Tara Montelaro of the Department of Political Science at Louisiana State University for their help in my workings with the administration and graduate school at Louisiana State University. I also want to thank the Intercollegiate Studies Institute for the 2000-2001 Weaver Fellowship that provided me another year to finish the dissertation and the Eric Voegelin Institute for furnishing me an ideal place to study and to work as well as for its assistantships that permitted me to concentrate on my dissertation over the summers. Finally, I would like to particularly thank Richard Ardnt, Nicole Bauer, Karen DeVries, Steve Diebold, Sarnia Harb, Melissa Hobbs, Asha Luthra, Morgan Knuil, James ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. MacDonald, Kimi Nishi, Catherine Plum, Anthony and Michelle Procopi, and John Ruplinger. Their love, friendship, and support was the substance that sustained me the past four years at Louisiana State University. And it goes almost without saying that I would like to express my love and gratitude to my family, especially to my mother and father, for their indulgence, love, and kindness during these past lean years. This work is dedicated to them. Responsibility for errors and omissions remain my own. Corrections and additions to this work are welcome at any time. iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS........................................................................................ii ABSTRACT................................................................................................................viii CHAPTER 1: SYMBOLS OF ORDER AND DISORDER......................................1 1.1 Introduction............................................................................................ 1 1.2 Voegelin's Theory of Consciousness...................................................... 2 1.3 The "New Science" of Politics..................................................................6 1.4 The Experience of Disorder: Gnosticism............................................... 11 1.5 Voegelin's Revisions on Christianity...................................................... 15 1.6 Scope and Method of the S tudy............................................................ 19 1.7 The Forthcoming Chapters ................................................................... 24 1.8 The Sources ............................................................................................ 27 1.9 End N otes..................................................................................................28 CHAPTER 2: KIEVAN RUS (c.860-c. 1240 A .D .) ............................................... 34 2.1 The Heritage of Byzantium: Symphonia ............................................... 34 2.2 Paganism: Cosmological Symbols............................................................ 40 2.3 Pre-Christian Kievan Rus (c.860-c.988 A.D.)..........................................42 2.4 Vladimir's Baptism (c.988 A.D.)...............................................................46 2.5 Kievan Christian Rus (c.988-c. 1240 A.D.)............................................. 48 2.6 Constantinople (c.988-c. 1240 A.D.)...................................................... 53 2.7 Conclusion............................................................................................... 57 2.8 End N otes................................................................................................. 58 CHAPTER 3: MUSCOVITE RUSSIA (c. 1240-c. 1448 A.D.) ................................65 3.1 The Tatar Yoke (c. 1240-c. 1480 A .D .) ............................................... 65 3.2 Muscovite Russia (c. 1240-c. 1380 A.D.) ............................................... 67 3 .3 Consolidation of Order (c. 1380-c. 1430 A.D.).......................................72 3.4 The Rejection of Rome (c. 1438-c. 1448 A.D.) ..................................... 78 3.5 The Autocephalous Church (1448 A .D .) ............................................. 82 3.6 Conclusion................................................................................................. 84 3.7 End N otes.................................................................................................85 iv Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHAPTER 4: SYMBOLS OF DISORDER (c,1448-c.l563 A .D .) ..........................95 4.1 Symbol of the T sar ..................................................................................... 95 4.2 The Possessors (c. 1503-1505 A .D .) .......................................................97 4.3 Joseph of Volsk (c. 1439-c. 1507 A.D.) .................................................. 100 4.4 The Third Rome (c.1499-c.1524 A.D.) ................................................... 103 4.5 The Ideology of Tsardom(c.l 505-c. 1563 A.D.) .....................................108 4.6 The Universal Church