Pond Conservation in Europe Developments in Hydrobiology 210
Series editor K. Martens Pond Conservation in Europe
Editors Beat Oertli1,Re´gis Ce´re´ghino2, Jeremy Biggs3, Steven Declerck4, Andrew Hull5 & Maria Rosa Miracle6
1University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland 2University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France 3Pond Conservation, Oxford, United Kingdom 4Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium 5Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom 6University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Previously published in Hydrobiologia, Volume 597, 2008 and 634, 2009
123 Editors Beat Oertli Steven Declerck University of Applied Sciences of Western Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Switzerland, Geneva, Belgium Switzerland Andrew Hull Régis Céréghino Liverpool John Moores University, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, Liverpool, United Kingdom France Maria Rosa Miracle Jeremy Biggs University of Valencia, Valencia, Pond Conservation, Oxford, Spain United Kingdom
ISBN 978-90-481-9087-4
Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York
Library of Congress Control Number: 2010923484
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work.
Cover illustration: Lowland pond in Western Switzerland (Les Grangettes Nature Reserve). Photograph: Nicola Indermuehle.
Printed on acid-free paper.
Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Contents
The ecology of European ponds: defining the characteristics of a neglected freshwater habitat R. Céréghino · J. Biggs · B. Oertli · S. Declerck 1 A comparison of the catchment sizes of rivers, streams, ponds, ditches and lakes: implications for protecting aquatic biodiversity in an agricultural landscape B.R. Davies · J. Biggs · P.J. Williams · J.T. Lee · S. Thompson 7 A comparative analysis of cladoceran communities from different water body types: patterns in community composition and diversity T. De Bie · S. Declerck · K. Martens · L. De Meester · L. Brendonck 19 Macroinvertebrate assemblages in 25 high alpine ponds of the Swiss National Park (Cirque of Macun) and relation to environmental variables B. Oertli · N. Indermuehle · S. Angélibert · H. Hinden · A. Stoll 29 Biodiversity and distribution patterns of freshwater invertebrates in farm ponds of a south-western French agricultural landscape R. Céréghino · A. Ruggiero · P. Marty · S. Angélibert 43 Patterns of composition and species richness of crustaceans and aquatic insects along environmental gradients in Mediterranean water bodies D. Boix · S. Gascón · J. Sala · A. Badosa · S. Brucet · R. López-Flores · M. Martinoy · J. Gifre · X.D. Quintana 53 Relation between macroinvertebrate life strategies and habitat traits in Mediterranean salt marsh ponds (Empordà wetlands, NE Iberian Peninsula) S. Gascón · D. Boix · J. Sala · X.D. Quintana 71 Macrophyte diversity and physico-chemical characteristics of Tyrrhenian coast ponds in central Italy: implications for conservation V. Della Bella · M. Bazzanti · M.G. Dowgiallo · M. Iberite 85 Evaluation of sampling methods for macroinvertebrate biodiversity estimation in heavily vegetated ponds G. Becerra Jurado · M. Masterson · R. Harrington · M. Kelly-Quinn 97 Developing a multimetric index of ecological integrity based on macroinvertebrates of mountain ponds in central Italy A.G. Solimini · M. Bazzanti · A. Ruggiero · G. Carchini 109 Eutrophication: are mayflies (Ephemeroptera) good bioindicators for ponds? N. Menetrey · B. Oertli · M. Sartori · A. Wagner · J.B. Lachavanne 125 How can we make new ponds biodiverse? A case study monitored over 7 years P. Williams · M. Whitfield · J. Biggs 137 Management of an ornamental pond as a conservation site for a threatened native fish species, crucian carp Carassius carassius G.H. Copp · S. Warrington · K.J. Wesley 149 Pond conservation: from science to practice B. Oertli · R. Céréghino · A. Hull · R. Miracle 157 Plant communities as a tool in temporary ponds conservation in SW Portugal C. Pinto-Cruz · J.A. Molina · M. Barbour · V. Silva · M.D. Espírito-Santo 167 Freshwater diatom and macroinvertebrate diversity of coastal permanent ponds along a gradient of human impact in a Mediterranean eco-region V. Della Bella · L. Mancini 181 The M-NIP: a macrophyte-based Nutrient Index for Ponds L. Sager · J.-B. Lachavanne 199 Vegetation recolonisation of a Mediterranean temporary pool in Morocco following small-scale experimental disturbance B. Amami · L. Rhazi · S. Bouahim · M. Rhazi · P. Grillas 221 Experimental study of the effect of hydrology and mechanical soil disturbance on plant communities in Mediterranean temporary pools in Western Morocco N. Sahib · L. Rhazi · M. Rhazi · P. Grillas 233 Restoring ponds for amphibians: a success story R. Rannap · A. Lõhmus · L. Briggs 243 High diversity of Ruppia meadows in saline ponds and lakes of the western Mediterranean L. Triest · T. Sierens 253 Gravel pits support waterbird diversity in an urban landscape F. Santoul · A. Gaujard · S. Angélibert · S. Mastrorillo · R. Céréghino 263 Competition in microcosm between a clonal plant species (Bolboschoenus maritimus) and a rare quillwort (Isoetes setacea) from Mediterranean temporary pools of southern France M. Rhazi · P. Grillas · L. Rhazi · A. Charpentier · F. Médail 271 Restoration potential of biomanipulation for eutrophic peri-urban ponds: the role of zooplankton size and submerged macrophyte cover A. Peretyatko · S. Teissier · S. De Backer · L. Triest 281 Spatial and temporal patterns of pioneer macrofauna in recently created ponds: taxonomic and functional approaches A. Ruhí · D. Boix · J. Sala · S. Gascón · X.D. Quintana 293 Comparison of macroinvertebrate community structure and driving environmental factors in natural and wastewater treatment ponds G. Becerra Jurado · M. Callanan · M. Gioria · J.-R. Baars · R. Harrington · M. Kelly-Quinn 309 Inter- and intra-annual variations of macroinvertebrate assemblages are related to the hydroperiod in Mediterranean temporary ponds M. Florencio · L. Serrano · C. Gómez-Rodríguez · A. Millán · C. Díaz-Paniagua 323 Ten-year dynamics of vegetation in a Mediterranean temporary pool in western Morocco L. Rhazi · P. Grillas · M. Rhazi · J.-C. Aznar 341 Modelling hydrological characteristics of Mediterranean Temporary Ponds and potential impacts from climate change E. Dimitriou · E. Moussoulis · F. Stamati · N. Nikolaidis 351 Monitoring the invasion of the aquatic bug Trichocorixa verticalis verticalis (Hemiptera: Corixidae) in the wetlands of Doñana National Park (SW Spain) H. Rodríguez-Pérez · M. Florencio · C. Gómez-Rodríguez · A.J. Green · C. Díaz-Paniagua · L. Serrano 365 Copepods and branchiopods of temporary ponds in the Doñana Natural Area (SW Spain): a four-decade record (1964–2007) K. Fahd · A. Arechederra · M. Florencio · D. León · L. Serrano 375 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:1–6 DOI 10.1007/s10750-007-9225-8
ECOLOGY OF EUROPEAN PONDS
The ecology of European ponds: defining the characteristics of a neglected freshwater habitat
R. Ce´re´ghino Æ J. Biggs Æ B. Oertli Æ S. Declerck
Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007
Abstract There is growing awareness in Europe of evolutionary biology and conservation biology, and the importance of ponds, and increasing understand- can be used as sentinel systems in the monitoring of ing of the contribution they make to aquatic global change. Ponds have begun to receive greater biodiversity and catchment functions. Collectively, protection, particularly in the Mediterranean regions they support considerably more species, and specif- of Europe, as a result of the identification of Medi- ically more scarce species, than other freshwater terranean temporary ponds as a priority in the EU waterbody types. Ponds create links (or stepping Habitats Directive. Despite this, they remain excluded stones) between existing aquatic habitats, but also from the provisions of the Water Framework Direc- provide ecosystem services such as nutrient intercep- tive, even though this is intended to ensure the good tion, hydrological regulation, etc. In addition, ponds status of all waters. There is now a need to strengthen, are powerful model systems for studies in ecology, develop and coordinate existing initiatives, and to build a common framework in order to establish a sound scientific and practical basis for pond conser- Guest editors: R. Ce´re´ghino, J. Biggs, B. Oertli and S. Declerck The ecology of European ponds: defining the characteristics of vation in Europe. The articles presented in this issue a neglected freshwater habitat are intended to explore scientific problems to be solved in order to increase the understanding and the & R. Ce´re´ghino ( ) protection of ponds, to highlight those aspects of pond EcoLab, Laboratoire d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle, UMR 5245, Universite´ Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, ecology that are relevant to freshwater science, and to 31062 Toulouse cedex 9, France bring out research areas which are likely to prove e-mail: [email protected] fruitful for further investigation.
J. Biggs Pond Conservation: The Water Habitats Trust, Oxford Keywords Biodiversity Á Conservation Á Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, Headington, Oxford Ecosystem services Á European Pond OX3 0BP, UK Conservation Network Á Small water bodies Á Temporary pools Á Water policy Á Wetlands B. Oertli Department of Nature Management, University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland – EIL, 1254 Jussy-Geneva, Switzerland Introduction
S. Declerck 2 Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Katholieke Universiteit Ponds are small (1 m to about 5 ha), man-made or Leuven, Ch. Deberiotstraat 32, 3000 Leuven, Belgium natural shallow waterbodies which permanently or
Reprinted from the journal 1 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:1–6 temporarily hold water (De Meester et al., 2005). rules (Warren & Spencer, 1996) to diversity–produc- They are numerous, typically outnumbering larger tivity relationships (Chase & Ryberg, 2004). In this lakes by a ratio of about 100 to 1 (Oertli et al., 2005), special issue, therefore, we aim to bring together a set and occur in virtually all terrestrial environments, of articles which provide an overview of the devel- from polar deserts to tropical rainforests. Despite this oping science describing the ecology of ponds with they have, until recently, been mostly ignored by the objective of (i) exploring the major scientific freshwater biologists or regarded simply as smaller problems which will need to be solved in order to versions of larger lakes. In contrast, practitioners increase understanding and protection of these vul- spend considerable amount of effort on the manage- nerable and neglected habitats, (ii) exploring those ment and creation of ponds, largely without a aspects of pond ecology that are of relevance to rigorous scientific framework for their actions (Wil- freshwater science generally and (iii) highlighting liams et al., 1999; Pyke, 2005). However, recent research areas which are likely to prove fruitful for research, driven both by the need to improve pond further investigation. conservation strategies and by increasing interest in fundamental aspects of pond ecology (Biggs et al., 2005; McAbendroth et al., 2005), has started to shed The second European Pond Workshop interesting new light on pond ecosystem structure and function. As a result, there is growing evidence that In October 2004, the first European Pond Workshop ponds are functionally different from larger lakes devoted to the ‘‘Conservation and Monitoring of (Oertli et al., 2002; Sondergaard et al., 2005) and Pond Biodiversity’’ (Geneva, Switzerland) launched a that, despite their small size, they are collectively European network of people and institutions involved exceptionally rich in biodiversity terms (Williams in fundamental scientific issues and practical appli- et al., 2004). Thus, ponds often constitute biodiver- cations needed to protect ponds, the European Pond sity ‘‘hot spots’’ within a region or a landscape, Conservation Network (EPCN, http://campus.hesge. challenging conventional applications of species-area ch/epcn/, see also Oertli et al., 2005). The second models (‘big is best’) in practical nature conservation EPCN Workshop was held in Toulouse (France, (see also Scheffer et al., 2006). Ponds also show 23–25 February 2006), under the topic ‘‘Conservation greater biotic and environmental amplitudes than of Pond Biodiversity in a Changing European Land- rivers and lakes (Davies, 2005). Thus they pose scape’’. The aim of this second workshop was to yield interesting questions about the relationships between a multi-disciplinary framework on how to maintain waterbody size, the heterogeneity of catchments, the ponds and the biodiversity they host, in a landscape role of small water bodies as refugia, and the subjected to a wide array of potential stressors such existence of networks of aquatic. Ponds also provide as intensification or abandonment of agriculture, an ideal model for investigating metapopulation and socio-economical pressures, climate change. The metacommunity processes in aquatic systems and the workshop was divided into plenary sessions and importance of between-waterbody movements, com- working group meetings. The 55 communications pared to better known within-waterbody movements (oral and poster) were related to three sub-topics: (i) (Jeffries, 2005). They fit nicely into the basic scheme Understanding pond ecology (biodiversity, spatial of metapopulation and metacommunity theory: for and temporal patterns and ponds as research tools for obligatory aquatic organisms, ponds are suitable hypothesis testing), (ii) Added value of ponds (bio- patches in an unsuitable habitat matrix. This in turn logical indicators, ecosystem services) and (iii) plays a significant role in understanding population Management of ponds (practical tools for manage- persistence and recovery from disturbance. Finally, in ment and monitoring, pond conservation). Three addition to their inherent biological importance, the working group meetings were devoted to ‘‘The Pond small size of ponds and the ease with which they may Manifesto’’ (a publication aiming at presenting the be manipulated experimentally, makes them ideal background and the motivations for the EPCN), models for controlled studies of many basic ecosys- EPCN management and activities, and joint research tem processes (Blaustein & Schwartz, 2001;De programs. The meeting brought together 60 partici- Meester et al., 2005), from community assembly pants from Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France,
123 2 Reprinted from the journal Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:1–6
Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Spain, In Mediterranean regions, temporary wet habitats are Switzerland and the UK. This special issue presents a important for conservation. Nevertheless, both tem- selection of 12 contributions. porary and permanent ponds are important for the conservation of regional biodiversity: in Central Italy, both type of ponds present high dissimilarity in the Special issue content taxonomic composition of aquatic plants (Della Bella et al., 2007), the former containing more annual fast- Recent studies, mainly in Europe (Williams et al., growing species while in the latter, species with long 2004; Ange´libert et al., 2007), have indicated that life-cycles are abundant. Some aquatic species are ponds harbour a significant portion of aquatic biodi- exclusively found in each pond type. versity at the landscape scale. Several contributions in Essential for the conservation of pond biodiversity this issue have confirmed and reinforced this idea. For is a good knowledge of its threats. Land use practices instance, in their comparative study on zooplankton in the surroundings of ponds may, to an important diversity in different freshwater water body types extent, affect pond characteristics through a diversity (lakes, rivers, ditches, ponds and wheel tracks), De of processes that play at the scale of the pond Bie et al. (2007) found that ponds may disproportion- catchment (e.g. nutrient loading, increased erosion, ately contribute to total zooplankton species richness pesticide contamination; Declerck et al., (2006)). at the landscape scale. Ponds also often contain rare, Davies et al. (2007) contrasted catchment character- endemic and/or Red Data List species (Oertli et al., istics among different water body types within a 2007) and may as such form an irreplaceable type of landscape and noted that the small scale of pond habitat for a variety of freshwater biota (Ce´re´ghino catchments combined with their relatively high et al., 2007; Williams et al., 2007). contribution to landscape scale biodiversity offers a Owing to their important contribution to aquatic lot of opportunities for cost-efficient conservation biodiversity, ponds should be considered as an strategies. An important reason for this is that important target system in strategic plans that aim deintensification of agriculture at the scale of pond at conserving or developing aquatic biodiversity at catchments is far more feasible and effective than it is the landscape scale. Such plans can only be effective on the catchment scale of larger aquatic systems, such if based on a solid knowledge of the factors that as rivers or lakes. It means that efforts on the pond affect pond community structure and diversity. In this scale can be, relatively, easily implemented and have issue, several studies document clear associations the potentiality to yield visible biodiversity benefits between the communities of organism groups (mac- on a relatively short term, even in areas where large rophytes, zooplankton, macroinvertebrates and scale deintensification is not an option. waterbirds) and a variety of ecologically relevant Due to their small scale, ponds can also be easily gradients, such as hydroperiod (Boix et al., 2007; created. Pond creation has a lot of potential for nature Della Bella et al., 2007), surface area (Ce´re´ghino development plans: new ponds are rapidly colonised et al., 2007), salinity (Boix et al., 2007) and among- by a variety of organisms and well designed and pond connectivity (Boix et al., 2007; Gasco´n et al., located, pond complexes could be used to signifi- 2007; Oertli et al., 2007). If these associations are cantly enhance freshwater biodiversity within causal, it is clear that the conservation of such catchments (Williams et al., 2007). Furthermore, environmental gradients at the landscape scale is pond density in the landscape can be an important essential for the conservation of among-pond vari- factor determining the persistence of metapopulations ability (beta diversity) and total landscape of rare species. In such development plans, one may biodiversity (gamma diversity). There is a clear also take advantage of the opportunities offered by differentiation among communities of macroinverte- ponds that are not necessarily created as a part of brates (and to a lesser extent of macrophytes) between nature conservation programmes such as ponds that temporary and permanent ponds. Although temporary aim at supporting agricultural activities (Ce´re´ghino ponds tend to have lower species richness than et al., 2007; Williams et al., 2007). permanent ponds, temporary ponds are at least as Owing to their small sizes and simple community important as a habitat for uncommon and rare species. structure, small aquatic ecosystems may also function
Reprinted from the journal 3 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:1–6 as early warning systems for long-term effects on Framework Directive (examples include the STAR, larger aquatic systems. For instance, global warming AQEM and ECOFRAME projects), small water may lead to higher local and regional richness in high bodies such as shallow lakes and ponds have not altitude ponds through an increase in the number of been well represented, despite their ecological role at colonisation events resulting from the upward shift of the landscape—regional scales. Active research into geographical ranges of species, while cold stenother- the ecology and conservation of ponds is being mal species may be subject to extinction (Oertli et al., undertaken in many European states, addressing 2007). On the other hand, a survey on crucian carp different areas of relevance. One of the chief body condition in ornamental ponds in the UK problems is the lack of integration between these revealed no correlation with climatic variables (Copp research areas, and a general poor level of under- et al., 2007). More direct threats to ponds include standing of patterns of variation in habitats and biota habitat destruction (in-filling ponds; deepening of across Europe. Some national environment agencies ephemeral pools so that they become permanent) or from countries such as France, the United Kingdom other forms of strong human impact (e.g. urban and Switzerland, have recently developed elements of runoff, acidification, diffuse agricultural pollution, a national strategy for pond conservation, but such introduction of exotic species, excessive trampling by efforts remain in the minority across the rest of livestock). Efficient bioindication metrics based on Europe. Obtaining a typology of small water bodies macroinvertebrate taxa richness and functional feed- at a European scale, should be a first step towards ing groups as well as pollution tolerance are sensitive optimising the design of new surveys and standard- to nutrient enrichment (Solimini et al., 2007). The ising sampling schemes and monitoring applications. species richness of insect and crustacean taxa also Exploration of fundamental ecological patterns and respond well to eutrophication (Menetrey et al., definition of a typology of European small water- 2007, Solimini et al., 2007) or salinity (Boix et al., bodies should cover the range of habitats found along 2007), while the presence of some indicator species broad geographical (North-South, East-West), altitu- can be associated to the trophic state of the ponds in a dinal and environmental gradients. The analyses given area (Menetrey et al., 2007). However, sam- should try to involve the full range of taxonomic pling biodiversity in ponds is still a critical issue, groups (i.e. different trophic levels, keystone taxa, because ponds are rich in microhabitats, often umbrella and flagship species). These analyses, in structured by macrophytes. Therefore, standardised addition to giving a vital understanding of large-scale methods are required. Becerra et al. (2007) present an patterns, are also expected to reveal gaps in existing effective sampling regime to maximise total taxon knowledge. An important issue is the capacity for richness while minimising sampling effort. ponds and pond communities to respond to distur- bance and to global change (early-warning systems). This implies that near-pristine systems should be Perspectives identified as references in the investigated areas, and that long-term monitoring is necessary to assess To understand how the biological diversity sustained temporal responses of ponds to local practices and/or by ponds is maintained and how ponds function, future global changes. Assessments of responses to various research should involve complementary approaches, types and/or intensity and frequency of disturbance and focus on the relevant ranges of temporal and should preferably be hypothesis-based, in order to spatial scales. Several directions can be identified for reduce (and thus better target) the number of relevant research on ponds, ranging from the fields of variables that will be assessed. Experimental work biological monitoring to evolutionary ecology should include the main driving forces of community (reviewed in De Meester et al., 2005). Here, we dynamics in ponds, and should thus include both specifically emphasise those perspectives which call regional (dispersal, external forcing) and local factors for intense collaborative research at a European level. (abiotic conditions, biotic interactions). Suggested Whereas much research has been undertaken at the practical applications should not only be based on the EU level towards developing robust methodologies patterns derived from fundamental research, they and tools for the implementation of the Water must be tested and evaluated in the field.
123 4 Reprinted from the journal Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:1–6
Although there are clear gaps still to fill in our rivers, streams, ponds, ditches and lakes: implications for knowledge on pond ecology, this special issue of protecting aquatic biodiversity in an agricultural land- scape. Hydrobiologia doi:10.1007/s10750-007-9227-6. Hydrobiologia demonstrates that notable improve- Davies, B. R., 2005. Developing a Strategic Approach to the ments have been made these last ten years. For Protection of Aquatic Biodiversity. PhD thesis, Oxford effective conservation of pond biodiversity, this Brookes University. knowledge has now to be communicated to manag- De Bie, T., S. Declerck, K. Martens, L. De Meester & L. Brendonck, 2007. A comparative analysis of cladoceran ers, in order to be put into practice. This will be one communities from different water body types: patterns in of the priority tasks for the European Pond Conser- community composition and diversity. Hydrobiologia doi: vation Network, with an important stepping stone at 10.1007/s10750-007-9222-y. the third European Ponds Workshop, to be held in De Meester, L., S. Declerck, R. Stoks, G. Louette, F. Van de Meutter, T. De Bie, E. Michels & L. Brendonck, 2005. Valencia (Spain) in May 2008. Ponds and pools as model systems in conservation biol- ogy, ecology and evolutionary biology. Aquatic Acknowledgements We wish to thank the sponsors of the Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15: second European Pond Workshop (CNRS, University Paul 715–726. Sabatier, Laboratoire d’Ecologie des Hydrosyste`mes, Re´gion Declerck, S., T. De Bie, D. Ercken, H. Hampel, S. Schrijvers, J. Midi-Pyre´ne´es, Conseil Ge´ne´ral de la Haute-Garonne, French Van Wichelen, V. Gillard, R. Mandiki, B. Losson, D. Water Agency). Bauwens, S. Keijers, W. Vyverman, B. Goddeeris, L. De Meester, L. Brendonck & K. Martens, 2006. Ecological characteristics of small ponds: associations with land-use References practices at different spatial scales. Biological Conserva- tion 131: 523–532. Della Bella, V., M. Bazzanti, M. G. Dowgiallo & M. Iberite, Ange´libert, S., N. Indermuehle, D. Luchier, B. Oertli & J. 2007. Macrophyte diversity and physico-chemical char- Perfetta, J. 2007. Where hides the aquatic biodiversity in acteristics of Tyrrhenian coast ponds in central Italy: the Canton of Geneva (Switzerland)? Archives des Sci- implications for conservation. Hydrobiologia doi:10.1007/ ences (in press). s10750-007-9216-9. Becerra Jurado, G., M. Masterson, R. Harrington & M. Kelly- Gasco´n, S., D. Boix, J. Sala & D. Quintana, 2007. Relation Quinn, 2007. Evaluation of sampling methods for macr- between macroinvertebrate life strategies and habitat traits oinvertebrate biodiversity estimation in heavily vegetated in Mediterranean salt marsh ponds (Emporda` wetlands, ponds. Hydrobiologia doi:10.1007/s10750-007-9217-8. NE Iberian Peninsula). Hydrobiologia doi:10.1007/s Biggs, J., P. Williams, P. Whitfield, P. Nicolet & A. Weath- 10750-007-9215-x. erby, 2005. 15 years of pond assessment in Britain: results Jeffries, M., 2005. Local-scale turnover of pond insects: intra- and lessons learned from the work of Pond Conservation. pond habitat quality and inter-pond geometry are both Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosys- important. Hydrobiologia 543: 207–220. tems 15: 693–714. McAbendroth, L., A. Foggo, S. D. Rundle & D. T. Bilton, Blaustein, L. & S. S. Schwartz, 2001. Why study ecology in 2005. Unravelling nestedness and spatial pattern in pond temporary pools? Israel Journal of Zoology 47: 303–312. assemblages. Journal of Animal Ecology 74: 41–49. Boix, D., S. Gasco´n, J. Sala, A. Badosa, S. Brucet, R. Lo´pez- Menetrey, N., B. Oertli, M. Sartori, A. Wagner & J. B. Lac- Flores, M. Martinoy, J. Gifre & X. D. Quintana, 2007. havanne, 2007. Eutrophication: are mayflies Patterns of composition and species richness of crusta- (Ephemeroptera) good bioindicators for ponds? Hydrobi- ceans and aquatic insects along environmental gradients ologia doi:10.1007/s10750-007-9223-x. in mediterraean water bodies. Hydrobiologia doi: Oertli B., D. Auderset Joye, E. Castella, R. Juge, D. Cambin & 10.1007/s10750-007-9221-z. J. B. Lachavanne, 2002. Does size matter? The relation- Ce´re´ghino, R., A. Ruggiero, P. Marty & S. Ange´libert, 2007. ship between pond area and biodiversity. Biological Biodiversity and distribution patterns of freshwater Conservation 104: 59–70. invertebrates in farm ponds of a southwestern French Oertli, B., J. Biggs, R. Ce´re´ghino, P. Grillas, P. Joly & J. B. agricultural landscape. Hydrobiologia doi:10.1007/ Lachavanne, 2005. Conservation and monitoring of pond s10750-007-9219-6. biodiversity: introduction. Aquatic Conservation: Marine Chase, J. M. & W. A. Ryberg, 2004. Connectivity, scale- and Freshwater Ecosystems 15: 535–540. dependence, and the productivity–diversity relationship. Oertli, B., N. Indermuehle, S. Ange´libert, H. Hinden & A. Ecology Letters 7: 676–683. Stoll, 2007. Macroinvertebrate assemblages in 25 high Copp, G. H., S. Warrington & K. J. Wesley, 2007. Manage- alpine ponds of the Swiss National Park (Cirque of ment of an ornamental pond as a conservation site for a Macun) and relation to environmental variables. Hydro- threatened native fish species, crucian carp Carassius biologia doi:10.1007/s10750-007-9218-7. carassius. Hydrobiologia doi:10.1007/s10750-007- Pyke, C. R., 2005. Assessing suitability for conservation 9220-0. action: prioritizing interpond linkages for the California Davies, B. R., J. Biggs, P. J. Williams, J. T. Lee & S. tiger salamander. Conservation Biology 19: 492–503. Thompson, 2007. A Comparison of the catchment sizes of
Reprinted from the journal 5 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:1–6
Scheffer, M., G. J. van Geest, K. Zimmer, E. Jeppesen, M. Williams, P., M. Whitfield & J. Biggs, 2007. How can we make Sondergaard, M. G. Butler, M. A. Hanson, S. Declerck & new ponds biodiverse?—a case study monitored over L. De Meester, 2006. Small habitat size and isolation can 8 years. Hydrobiologia doi:10.1007/s10750-007-9224-9. promote species richness: second-order effects on biodi- Williams, P., J. Biggs, M. Whitfield, A. Thorne, S. Bryant, G. versity in shallow lakes and ponds. Oikos 112: 227–231. Fox & P. Nicolet, 1999. The Pond Book: A Guide to the Solimini, A. G., M. Bazzanti, A. Ruggiero & G. Carchini, Management and Creation of Ponds. Ponds Conservation 2007. Developing a multimetric index of ecological Trust, Oxford. integrity based on macroinvertebrates of mountain ponds Williams, P., M. Whitfield, J. Biggs, S. Bray, G. Fox, P. in central Italy. Hydrobiologia doi:10.1007/s10750- Nicolet & D. Sear, 2004. Comparative biodiversity of 007-9226-7. rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural Sondergaard, M., E. Jeppesen & J. P. Jensen, 2005. Pond or landscape in Southern England. Biological Conservation lake: does it make any difference? Archiv fur Hydrobi- 115: 329–341. ologie 162: 143–165. Warren, P. H. & M. Spencer, 1996. Community and food-web responses to the manipulation of energy input and dis- turbance in small ponds. Oikos 75: 407–418.
123 6 Reprinted from the journal Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:7–17 DOI 10.1007/s10750-007-9227-6
ECOLOGY OF EUROPEAN PONDS
A comparison of the catchment sizes of rivers, streams, ponds, ditches and lakes: implications for protecting aquatic biodiversity in an agricultural landscape
B. R. Davies Æ J. Biggs Æ P. J. Williams Æ J. T. Lee Æ S. Thompson
Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007
Abstract In this study we compared the biodiver- particular ponds, combined with their characteristi- sity of five waterbody types (ditches, lakes, ponds, cally small catchment areas, means that they are rivers and streams) within an agricultural study area amongst the most valuable, and potentially amongst in lowland England to assess their relative contribu- the easiest, of waterbody types to protect. Given the tion to the plant and macroinvertebrate species limited area of land that may be available for the richness and rarity of the region. We used a protection of aquatic biodiversity in agricultural Geographical Information System (GIS) to compare landscapes, the deintensification of such small catch- the catchment areas and landuse composition for each ments (which can be termed microcatchments) could of these waterbody types to assess the feasibility of be an important addition to the measures used to deintensifying land to levels identified in the litera- protect aquatic biodiversity, enabling ‘pockets’ of ture as acceptable for aquatic biota. Ponds supported high aquatic biodiversity to occur within working the highest number of species and had the highest agricultural landscapes. index of species rarity across the study area. Catch- ment areas associated with the different waterbody Keywords Watershed Á Microcatchment Á types differed significantly, with rivers having the Aquatic biodiversity Á Agri-environment schemes Á largest average catchment sizes and ponds the Diffuse pollution smallest. The important contribution made to regional aquatic biodiversity by small waterbodies and in Introduction
Guest editors: R. Ce´re´ghino, J. Biggs, B. Oertli & S. Declerck The ecology of European ponds: defining the characteristics of Pollution from agriculture is recognised as having a a neglected freshwater habitat significant negative impact on water quality and aquatic biota (Allan, 2004; Foley et al., 2005; Declerck B. R. Davies (&) Á J. Biggs Á P. J. Williams et al., 2006; Donald & Evans, 2006). These pollutants Pond Conservation c/o School of Life Sciences, Oxford include nutrients and other chemicals used to maximise Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, Headington, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK production on arable land; animal waste and animal e-mail: [email protected] health biproducts, e.g. antibiotics and sheep dip, from pastoral land; as well as sediment resulting from B. R. Davies Á J. T. Lee Á S. Thompson eroded soils. They affect aquatic ecosystems both by Spatial Ecology and Landuse Unit, School of Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, altering the physicochemical characteristics and qual- Headington, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK ity of a waterbody (e.g. eutrophication, changes to
Reprinted from the journal 7 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:7–17 sediment composition) and by direct toxicity impacts proportion of intensive landuse in a catchment as well on the organisms within it. Many of these pollutants are as the catchment’s size will influence the cost and diffuse in nature, and the broad areas from which they potential success of a waterbody’s protection from emanate and multiplicity of pathways by which they diffuse pollution. reach waterbodies, make such pollutants difficult to Catchment areas are generally perceived as large control and mitigate. and are usually described only in the context of rivers The quantity and concentration of diffuse pollutants or large lakes. For example, in the UK, small river reaching waterbodies can potentially be reduced by and stream catchments are generally termed ‘sub- two mechanisms: (i) source control through reduction catchments’. However, in reality all waterbodies, in chemical loads, better targeting in the timing of large or small, have a catchment area. The association chemical applications and the use of appropriate of catchment areas with larger rivers and lakes is farming techniques to reduce runoff, e.g. minimum likely to have resulted from the historic use of these tillage; and (ii) measures to prevent pollutants from waterbodies for navigation, drainage, food supply, reaching waterbodies through deintensifying areas of water supply, recreation and removal of wastes. This land, e.g. buffer zones. Although the source control considerable socio-economic value has resulted in a mechanisms go someway towards reducing pollution vested interest in the protection of these waterbodies (e.g. Yates et al., 2006) diffuse pollutants will not be and consequently, both scientific research and envi- completely eliminated by such means. Thus, methods ronmental protection has tended to be focused at of land management and pollutant interception are larger waterbodies. The more limited economic value likely to remain important in the effective long-term of small waterbodies has meant that until recently, protection of aquatic biota under current agricultural their biodiversity potential has tended to be over- systems. Typically such methods involve leaving areas looked with a general presumption that they are adjacent to waterbodies out of agricultural production, inferior versions of their larger equivalents. However, through whole field conversion or more commonly, the recent evidence has shown that small waterbodies creation of buffer strips. Although widely used and may in fact make a disproportionately large contri- much tested, this approach has shown mixed results in bution to aquatic biodiversity across landscapes in terms of pollution reduction, e.g. Schmitt et al. (1999), terms of both their species richness and their species Dosskey (2002), Borin et al. (2004, 2005), and recent rarity (Biggs et al., 2003, 2007; Williams et al., 2004; evidence (e.g. Wang et al., 1997; Quinn, 2000; Fitz- De Bie et al., 2008; Davies et al., in press), implying patrick et al., 2001; Donohue et al., 2006) implies that that they are likely to warrant a higher priority in where such methods have proved relatively ineffec- terms of conservation concern. The ease and success tive, this has often been because the deintensified area of their protection from diffuse agricultural pollution has not included a sufficient proportion of the catch- will depend to some extent, as for larger waterbodies, ment area of a waterbody. on the proportion of their catchment areas that can be The catchment of a waterbody is the area over which incorporated into protection strategies. water, and hence diffuse pollutants, will travel (both by This study investigates the aquatic biodiversity overland and subsurface movement) to enter the (species richness and rarity) of a suite of waterbody waterbody. Catchments have long been recognised as types across an area of UK lowland agricultural the key to understanding the ecology of freshwaters landscape in the context of their catchment sizes. The (Hynes, 1975; Allan et al., 1997; Allan, 2004) and results are used to explore the potential ease and although underlying geology and morphology are the success of the protection of different waterbody types fundamental determinants of water characteristics from diffuse agricultural pollution. (Host et al., 1997; Johnson et al., 2004; Wiley et al., 1997; McRae et al., 2004), in areas where landcover is Material and methods heavily modified, the landuse composition of the catchment will dominate (Hynes, 1975; Lund & The study area and its aquatic biodiversity Reynolds, 1982; Moss et al., 1996; Allan et al., 1997; Muir, 1999; Cresser et al., 2000; Johnson & A139 11 km study area of lowland agricultural Goedkoop, 2002; Tong & Chen, 2002). Thus, the landscape in Britain on the borders of Oxfordshire,
123 8 Reprinted from the journal Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:7–17
Wiltshire and Gloucestershire was selected. The et al. (2004). Each sample area was 75 m2 to enable study area contained three Department for Environ- direct comparison of data from different waterbody ment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) agricultural types with inherently different sizes. For linear landscape classes (Table 1) (Biggs et al., 2003) and waterbodies, this area comprised a rectangular sec- was considered typical of lowland agricultural land- tion of the waterbody, while for circular waterbodies, scapes (Brown et al., 2006). Arable cultivation the area comprised a triangular wedge with the base dominated the landcover (75%), with 9% under following the margin and the apex at the centre of the woodland, 7% improved grassland, 2% urban and waterbody. At each site, all wetland macrophytes the remaining 7% made up of water, semi-natural (marginal, emergent, submerged and floating-leaved grassland and bare rock (Fig. 1). Agricultural land plants) were recorded by walking and wading the was predominantly arable, comprised mainly of margin, using a grapnel thrown from the bank and cereals, permanent grass, oil-seed rape, potatoes peas sampling from a boat in the deeper lake sites. A and sugarbeet. There were 205 ha of surface water three-minute hand net sample was taken for macro- in the study area comprising 3 rivers, 97 streams, invertebrates using a standard 1 mm mesh net, with 236 ponds, 8 lakes and 340 ditches. The rivers the three minute sample time being divided equally included lengths of the Thames (c. 16.7 km), Cole between the mesohabitats in the 75 m2 area. Macro- (c. 16.8 km) and Coln (c. 4.3 km). invertebrate samples were exhaustively live-sorted in Data on the macrophyte and macroinvertebrate the lab and all individuals (except Diptera larvae and species present in the five dominant waterbody types Oligochaeta which were omitted from the analysis) in the study area (ditches, lakes, ponds, rivers and were identified to species level, except very abundant streams) were collected in two phases. In 2000, a taxa ([100 individuals) which were sub-sampled. stratified random sample of 20 sites was surveyed for The macrophyte and macroinvertebrate data pro- each of four waterbody types (ditches, ponds, rivers vided information on aquatic species richness and and streams), i.e. 80 sites in total (reported in rarity for each survey site in the ditches, lakes, ponds, Williams et al., 2004). During 2002–2003, compara- rivers and streams (100 sites in total). The species ble data were collected from a further 20 sites in a richness of a site was the total number of species fifth waterbody type, lakes. Due to the size division found at that site, whilst species rarity was calculated between a lake and a pond (Table 2; Biggs et al., using the Species Rarity Index (SRI). This rarity 2003; Williams et al., 2004), data were also collected index follows a process developed by Foster et al. for a pond to replace one from the existing dataset (1990) whereby each species is given a numerical which would have been categorised as a small lake value according to its rarity or threat within Britain, under Table 2. the total for each site is then summed and finally Within each waterbody, the sample area and divided by the number of species found at the site, survey methods followed those used by Williams resulting in an index which is not biased towards
Table 1 Defra agricultural landscape classes occurring within the study area Landscape Area-km2 (% of area) Description Associated agriculture
LC1—River floodplains 16.27 (11.5) Level to very gently sloping river Permanent grass, some cereals and oil- and low terraces floodplains and low terraces seed rape, probably more intensive on terraces LC6—Pre-quaternary clay 95.46 (67.1) Level to gently sloping vales. Permanent grass, cereals ([10–15%), landscapes Slowly permeable, clays (often leys, oil-seed rape maize and beans calcareous) and heavy loams. High base status (Eutrophic) LC7—Chalk and limestone 30.44 (21.4) Rolling ‘Wolds’ and plateaux with Cereals (and oil-seed rape, beans), sugar plateaux and coombe ‘dry’ valleys; shallow to beet, potatoes, peas valleys moderately deep loams over chalk and limestone
Reprinted from the journal 9 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:7–17
Fig. 1 The study area and its landuse composition
Table 2 Definitions of waterbodies used in this study Waterbody type Definition
Lakes Bodies of water, both natural and man-made, greater than 2 ha in area (Johnes et al., 1994). Includes reservoirs, gravel pits, meres and broads. Ponds A body of water, both natural and man-made, between 25 m2 and 2 ha in area, which may be permanent or seasonal (Collinson et al., 1995). Rivers Relatively large lotic waterbodies, created by natural processes. Marked as a double blue line on 1:25,000 OS maps and defined by the OS as greater than 8.25 m in width. Streams Relatively small lotic waterbodies, created by natural processes. Marked as a single blue line on 1:25,000 OS maps and defined by the OS as being less than 8.25 m in width. Streams differ from ditches by usually: (i) having a sinuous planform; (ii) not following field boundaries; and (iii) showing a relationship with natural landscape contours, usually by running down valleys. Ditches Man-made channels created primarily for agricultural purposes and which usually: (i) have a linear planform; (ii) follow linear field boundaries, often turning at right angles; and (iii) show little relationship with natural landscape contours.
123 10 Reprinted from the journal Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:7–17 species-rich sites (see Williams et al., 2004 for by impermeable clay and so overland flow would further details). have been a dominant process, some throughflow and transport via field drains would have occurred but this was not modelled and is a limitation of the method. Catchment delineation and landcover ArcHydro Tools also had the underlying assumption that all water will flow to the edge of the DEM. This Ordnance Survey (OS) Landform Profile and Mas- ignores standing waterbodies which provide natural terMap data were used to create the underlying sinks that retain water within a landscape and so all Digital Elevation Model (DEM) upon which catch- ponds and lakes were ‘seeded’ with ‘no-data’ points ment delineation was based, for an area extending at their deepest locations or centre point, to ensure 8 km outside the study area, using the Geographical that water flowed towards these points. Information System (GIS) software, ArcGIS 8.2. River catchments that extended beyond the limit of MasterMap data include topographic information on the data held were estimated using published statis- every landscape feature, each with its own unique tics on catchment size from gauging stations present identifying code. Landform Profile data comprise in the study area (Environment Agency, 2006). height data at 10 m intervals in x and y and recorded Additional manipulation of one river catchment to the nearest 0.1 m in z, with a planimetric accuracy boundary was required by hand due to the very flat of ±1 m and a vertical accuracy of ±1.8 m. nature of the northwest corner of the study area, All waterbody polygons were extracted from the which meant that ArcHydro Tools was not able to MasterMap data. Misclassified features were accurately define the catchment boundary in this removed and polygons split by overlying features, instance. The landuse composition of the catchments such as bridges, were joined. Separate data layers was ascertained by intersecting each catchment with were created for ditches, lakes, ponds, rivers and Land Cover Map 2000 data (remotely sensed landuse streams according to the definitions in Table 2.A data in 25 m2 cells; copyright NERC). For the river new river or stream was defined at confluence sites catchments that extended beyond the limit of data and a new ditch was defined at both confluence sites available, the proportions of different landuse types and where it turned by approximately 90°. Results were taken as those modelled in the GIS for the area were visually compared with 1:25,000 OS maps, over which data was held. aerial photographs and site visits to ensure that the network of catchments and waterbodies generated from digital data were consistent with the real Results landscape. Each waterbody polygon was assigned a constant Of the total area of water (205 ha) within the study minimum height value from the OS Landform Profile area (13 9 11 km), lakes comprised the greatest data and the waterbodies layer converted to a 5 m proportion of the water area (38%), followed by grid. The 10 m Landform Profile raster data were also rivers (24%), ditches (20%), streams (14%) and converted to a 5 m grid using bilinear resampling, so ponds (4%) (Fig. 2). There was a broadly inverse that it could be combined with the waterbodies whilst relationship between surface water area and num- retaining their continuity. The waterbodies were ber of waterbodies, with rivers and lakes being ‘burnt’ into the DEM at their height value minus fewest in number but covering the largest surface 10 m to ensure that modelled runoff would flow into area and ponds being one of the most numerous the waterbodies and that they would be retained waterbody types but having the smallest total during the catchment delineation process. surface area. The catchments of each waterbody type were Across the study area, the pond sites supported the delineated separately using the DEM with the greatest number of both macrophyte and macroin- depressed waterbodies and the ArcGIS extension vertebrate species, followed by rivers, lakes, streams ArcHydro Tools (Version 1.1 Beta 2; ESRI, 2001). and lastly ditches, which contained no aquatic ArcHydro Tools only modelled surface water flow. (submerged or floating) plants (Fig. 3a). Overall, Although the study area was predominantly underlain the pond sites supported 238 species, river sites
Reprinted from the journal 11 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:7–17
Fig. 2 Surface water area of the different waterbody types within the study area
supported 201 species, lakes 186 species, streams 163 species and finally, ditch sites supported 120 species. The pond sites had the highest SRI for macro- phytes, followed by lakes, rivers, streams and lastly ditches which supported no rare plant species (Fig. 3 b). The ponds also had the highest macroinvertebrate SRI, followed by ditches, lakes, streams and lastly rivers (Fig. 3b). Catchment sizes were significantly different between waterbody types (Kruskall–Wallis, Fig. 3 Macrophyte and macroinvertebrate (a) species richness P \ 0.001). Rivers had the greatest average catch- and (b) species rarity across the study area ment areas (43,850 ha), followed by lakes (141 ha), streams (86 ha), ditches (29 ha) and lastly, ponds (18 ha) (Fig. 4). The total catchment areas followed a different pattern: overall, rivers had the greatest total catchment area (131,550 ha), followed by ditches (9,904 ha), streams (8,354 ha), ponds (4,237 ha) and lastly, lakes (1,124 ha) (Fig. 4). This difference arose because ditches had catchments that were small in size but numerous giving a large total catchment area, whilst lakes had large catchments but were few in number. Although river catchments were clearly the largest, there were too few in the sample for this to be confirmed with post hoc Mann–Whitney U tests. However, significant differences (P \ 0.001) in catchment size were seen between ponds and streams, Fig. 4 Average and total catchment areas of the different ponds and lakes, ditches and streams and ditches and waterbody types within the study area lakes, whilst no significant difference was observed between the size of pond and ditch catchments and catchments, whilst streams and lakes had similarly between stream and lake catchments. This showed larger catchments and rivers had the greatest catch- that ponds and ditches had similarly small ment sizes.
123 12 Reprinted from the journal Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:7–17
landuse composition and waterbody ecology. Practi- cally all of these studies have reinforced Hynes’ original comments. The extent of agriculture in the developed world is such that it is a dominant component of many waterbodies’ catchment areas, with its associated diffuse pollutants having well accepted and largely detrimental impacts on aquatic biodiversity. Recent research has investigated the importance of such widespread agriculture within catchments, typ- ically finding streams to remain in good condition until agriculture exceeds 30–50% of the catchment (Allan, 2004). For example, working in the US, Wang et al. (1997) found that habitat quality and scores of biotic integrity declined when agricultural landuse exceeded 50% of the catchment. Fitzpatrick et al. (2001) working in the same region, found declines in fish biotic indices above 30% agricultural land, whilst Quinn (2000), working in New Zealand, found 30% agricultural land to be a critical value for macro- Fig. 5 Proportion of landuses within the total catchment area invertebrates. More stringent levels were identified of each waterbody type by Donohue et al. (2006) who investigated the relationship between the ecological quality of aquatic The catchments of all waterbody types were networks and landcover, identifying thresholds at dominated by agricultural landuse, with river, stream, which ‘good’ ecological status could be attained in pond and ditch catchments all containing similar Ireland. They predicted that with more than 1.3% proportions of agricultural land (69–74%) together arable land in a catchment or 37.7% pastoral land, with similar proportions of woodland (7–10%), semi- ecological status would fall below ‘good’ levels. natural grassland (10–13%) and water (1–2%) Within the current study area, the average landuse (Fig. 5). Lake catchments differed, typically contain- composition of the catchments of all the waterbody ing less agricultural land (55%) and larger types exceeded these thresholds. The waterbody type proportions of semi-natural grassland (c. 4% more), with the least intensive catchment landuse composi- woodland (c. 9% more) and water (c. 6% more) than tion was lakes, which were, on average, associated those of the other waterbody types. The proportion of with 55% agricultural land. This implied that within urban land within catchments was similar for all the study area, lakes were already fairly well waterbody types (c. 5%). buffered, largely due to their frequent location on large private estates. This may not, of course, be the situation in other areas. Discussion Agriculture currently covers approximately half of the earth’s habitable surface (Clay, 2004) and in many Catchment sizes and the area needed for countries covers more than 70% of the land surface. This protection of aquatic biota implies that vast areas would need to be deintensified to reach the maximum thresholds of 30–50% identified as Hynes (1975), in his classic work on the ecology of important in the literature. Given the anticipated running waters, described rivers as, ‘‘a manifestation of doubling of food demand forecast for the next 50 years the landscapes that they drain’’. Since this pioneer- (Donald & Evans, 2006), this may be very difficult to ing work, many studies have sought to characterise achieve and impractical in landscapes where agricul- river,stream andsometimeslakecatchments,analysing tural production is needed. However, not all waterbodies relationships between factors such as catchment area, have large catchment areas and it may be possible to
Reprinted from the journal 13 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:7–17 deintensify those with ‘microcatchments’ to reach ditches supported few species but had a high the critical thresholds of 30–50%, or even to completely macroinvertebrate SRI. Studies comparing the aqua- deintensify them. The present study found that, as might tic biodiversity of different types of waterbody are be expected, larger waterbodies, (i.e. rivers and lakes), few and, as far as the authors are aware, none have had larger catchments than smaller ponds, streams compared the range of waterbody types undertaken and ditches. Using the study area as an example, rivers for this study. However, those studies that have would require a comparatively large amount of land to compared aquatic biodiversity for a more limited be deintensified to reach the thresholds of 30 and 50%, range of habitats have often found smaller waterbod- compared with the smallest waterbody type, ponds ies, particularly ponds and ditches, to make an (Table 3). To attain levels of no more than 50% important contribution (e.g. Painter, 1999; Armitage agricultural land in an average catchment, rivers et al., 2003; Biggs et al., 2007; Davies et al., in would require 10,086 ha to be deintensified, compared press). These small waterbody types have often been with just 4 ha for ponds. To reach 30% agricultural overlooked in biodiversity protection and rarely enjoy land, rivers would require 18,856 ha to be deintensified, the statutory protection afforded to larger waterbod- compared with just 7 ha for ponds. ies. The results of this study, supported by other work Therefore, if ponds and other waterbodies with on comparative biodiversity including smaller water- small catchments can be demonstrated to support body types (Davies, unpublished data; Davies et al., high levels of biodiversity they may play an impor- in press), suggest that this may be both a considerable tant part in a strategy for the protection of aquatic oversight and a missed opportunity. In particular, the biodiversity because they could be afforded very high valuable contribution of smaller waterbodies to levels of protection, e.g. complete deintensification, regional aquatic biodiversity means that they could for a comparatively low land area. have an important role in the strategic protection of aquatic biota.
Macrophyte and macroinvertebrate species richness and rarity across the study area The potential role for small waterbodies in protection strategies Ponds made a high contribution to both the aquatic macrophyte and macroinvertebrate biodiversity of the As identified above, waterbodies with larger catch- study area in terms of both species richness and ments require a much greater area to be deintensified species rarity. Results for the other waterbody types to reach the levels that are suggested as needed for were more mixed, with rivers supporting a relatively the sufficient protection of aquatic biota. In the study large number of species but low species rarity, whilst area, the largest catchments (associated with rivers) were on average 300 times larger than those of lakes (which had the second largest catchments) and almost 2,500 times larger than those of ponds, which had the smallest mean catchment sizes. Equally, in the area Table 3 Areas requiring deintensifying within the study area required to deintensify a single average-sized river to reach identified thresholds of 50% and 30% agricultural land catchment to 50% agricultural landuse, it would be Waterbody Average area (ha) requiring possible to fully deintensify more than 560 average- type deintensification to reach: sized pond catchments. Thus, the relatively small 50% Agricultural land 30% Agricultural land catchment sizes of smaller waterbodies, and in particular ponds, combined with their important Rivers 10085.5 18855.5 contribution to aquatic biodiversity, means that their Streams 20.6 37.8 inclusion amongst the measures used for biodiversity Lakes 7.1 35.3 protection from diffuse agricultural pollution is likely Ditches 6.7 12.8 to enhance the effectiveness and economic efficiency Ponds 3.6 7.2 of protection across whole landscapes.
123 14 Reprinted from the journal Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:7–17
The common perception, mentioned above, that the AES measures, as opposed to employing mea- catchment areas are associated with larger waterbod- sures for broader scale improvements where results ies and in particular rivers (and hence cover large are harder to observe at a site level. areas), may be one of the reasons that whole Supplementary to the deintensification of small catchment or large-scale deintensification are not catchments is the possibility of creating small water- generally proposed as protection measures. Instead, bodies. Ponds and ditches are relatively easy to create buffer strips (involving much smaller areas) are often and can be located so as to have small, completely employed. The disadvantage of such methods for unintensive catchments with good water quality, larger waterbodies is that, depending on the propor- providing the best possible chance of supporting tion of the catchment that they occupy, they are high levels of aquatic biodiversity, whilst involving unlikely to provide sufficient protection for the minimum amounts of land (Williams et al., 2008). aquatic biota of the waterbody. For example, under This is particularly important given evidence of the the English Agri-Environment Scheme, Environmen- time lag between landuse change and improved tal Stewardship, the maximum buffer width offered at ecological quality (Harding et al., 1998). the edge of a field to protect a river is six metres. Protection of the aquatic biodiversity of smaller Published data on the effectiveness of buffer zones at waterbodies through catchment deintensification and varying widths suggest that a six metre buffer is the creation of small waterbodies can be undertaken highly unlikely to result in reduced nutrient pollution relatively quickly. This means that such initiatives loads to rivers. Due to the large edge length of a river, could be employed immediately, providing benefits the agricultural land-take that would be involved in for aquatic biodiversity across a region much more even a limited buffer area would be considerable, quickly than could be achieved for larger waterbodies implying that large areas of agricultural land are through catchment deintensification, whose complex likely to be taken out of production to protect a river, implementation would take some time to execute. with very little chemical or ecological gain. Clearly, the protection of small waterbodies The mechanisms most likely to be used to protect through catchment deintensification and the creation aquatic biodiversity in agricultural landscapes in the of ponds cannot deliver the complete protection of UK, are agri-environment schemes (AESs) whose aquatic biota within agricultural landscapes (Davies, structure would facilitate small catchment deintensi- unpublished data). However, their inclusion amongst fication. These schemes remunerate farmers for measures for aquatic biodiversity protection should environmentally sensitive farming, including reduc- provide ‘pockets’ of high biodiversity in working ing chemical and nutrient inputs as well as land agricultural landscapes, making aquatic biodiversity management to reduce the impacts of diffuse pollu- protection more effective and more economically tion. The scheme is voluntary and is applied to by efficient. individual farmers and consequently, the measures offered are at a farm-scale. Such a scale and the potentially ad hoc uptake would favour microcatch- Conclusion ment deintensification over that of larger catchments which would require the efforts of many farmers to This study appears the first in the literature to be coordinated, increasing administrative costs and compare both the biodiversity and catchment size of the complexity of operation, as well as increasing the such a range of waterbody types. Small waterbodies, chances of failure because the lack of cooperation of and in particular ponds, were found to support a even a single landowner could jeopardise the success relatively high proportion of the aquatic biodiversity of a waterbody’s protection. In contrast, the micro- in the study location, which confirmed the results of catchment of a smaller waterbody may be wholly the few other studies that have made biodiversity encompassed by one land manager. Additionally, comparisons between a more limited range of water- microcatchment deintensification has the potential to body types. Smaller waterbodies were also found to provide farmers with locally visible, biodiversity have smaller catchment areas than larger waterbod- benefits. Such local returns are very important for ies, which was not a surprising result, but the improving satisfaction and a sense of ownership of implications that arise from it are important.
Reprinted from the journal 15 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:7–17
Calculation of the areas of agricultural land within from a cultivated field in North-East Italy. Agriculture, the catchments of the different waterbody types that Ecosystems and Environment 105: 101–114. Brown, C. D., N. Turner, J. Hollis, P. Bellamy, J. Biggs, P. would need to be deintensified to provide adequate Williams, D. Arnold, T. Pepper & S. Maund, 2006. protection, indicated that, for larger waterbodies, Morphological and physico-chemical properties of British such a method of deintensification would be inap- aquatic habitats potentially exposed to pesticides. Agri- propriate and uneconomic due to the scales that are culture, Ecosystems and Environment 113: 307–319. Clay, J., 2004. World Agriculture and the Environment: A likely to be involved. In contrast, complete catchment Commodity by Commodity Guide to Impacts and Prac- protection would be quite feasible for smaller water- tices. Island Press, Washington DC. bodies. Given that the smaller waterbodies supported Collinson, N., J. Biggs, A. Corfield, M. J. Hodson, D. Walker, higher levels of aquatic biodiversity, deintensification M. Whitfield & P. J. Williams, 1995. Temporary and permanent ponds: an assessment of the effects of drying of their relatively small catchments should afford out on the conservation value of aquatic macroinverte- effective protection from many pollutants, enabling brate communities. Biological Conservation 74: 125–134. pockets of high biodiversity to exist in a working Cresser, M. S., R. Smart, M. F. Billet, C. Soulsby, C. Neal, A. agricultural landscape. Combined with alternative Wade, S. Langan & A. C. Edwards, 2000. Modelling water chemistry for a major Scottish river from catchment methods to protect waterbodies with larger catch- attributes. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 171–184. ments, and the creation of strategically located new Davies, B. R., J. Biggs, P. Williams, M. Whitfield, P. Nicolet, ponds a landscape matrix should result which incor- D. Sear, S. Bray & S. Maund, in press. Comparative porates minimally impacted aquatic habitats whilst biodiversity of aquatic habitats in the European agricul- tural landscape. Agriculture, Ecosystems and still being economically and socially productive. Environment. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2007.10.006. De Bie, T., S. Declerck, L. De Meester, K. Martens & L. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Glen Brendonck, 2008. A comparative analysis of cladoceran Hart and the Ordnance Survey for provision of MasterMap and communities from different water body types: patterns in Landform Profile data and Geoff Smith and CEH Monks Wood community composition and diversity. Hydrobiologia. for provision of Land Cover Map 2000 data. We are also doi:10.1007/s10750-007-9222-y grateful to Steven Declerck and two anonymous referees for Declerck, S., T. De Bie, D. Ercken, H. Hampel, S. Schrijvers, J. very useful comments on an earlier draft of this text. Van Wichelen, V. Gillard, R. Mandiki, B. Losson, D. Bauwens, S. Keijers, W. Vyverman, B. Goddeeris, L. De Meester, L. Brendonck & K. Martens, 2006. Ecological characteristics of small farmland ponds: associations with References land use practices at multiple spatial scales. Biological Conservation 131: 523–532. Allan, J. D., 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of Donald, P. F. & A. D. Evans, 2006. Habitat connectivity and land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecol- matrix restoration: the wider implications of agri- ogy, Evolution and Systematics 35: 257–284. environment schemes. Journal of Applied Ecology 43: Allan, J. D., D. L Erickson & J. Fay, 1997. The influence of 209–218. catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple Donohue, I., M. L. McGarrigle & P. Mills, 2006. Linking spatial scales. Freshwater Biology 37: 149–161. catchment characteristics and water chemistry with the Armitage, P. D., K. Szoszkiewicz, J. H. Blackburn & I. Nesbitt, ecological status of Irish rivers. Water Research 40: 2003. Ditch communities: a major contributor to flood- 91–98. plain biodiversity. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Dosskey, M., 2002. Setting priorities for research on pollution Freshwater Ecosystems 13: 165–185. reduction functions of agricultural buffers. Environmental Biggs, J., P. Williams, M. Whitfield, P. Nicolet, C. Brown, J. Management 30: 641–650. Hollis, S. Maund, D. Arnold & T. Pepper, 2003. Aquatic Environment Agency, 2006. Concise Register of Gauging Sta- Ecosystems in the UK Agricultural Landscape. Report on tions. Retrieved March 29th 2006 from http://www.nwl. Project PN0931. Defra, London. ac.uk/ih/nrfa/station_summaries/op/EA-Thames2.html Biggs, J., P. Williams, M. Whitfield, P. Nicolet, C. Brown, J. ESRI, 2001. ESRI Support Centre: Hydro Data Model Hollis, D. Arnold & T. Pepper, 2007. The freshwater biota [available for download from the World Wide Web at: of British agricultural landscapes and their sensitivity to http://www.support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=downloads. pesticides. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 122: dataModels.filteredGateway&dmid=15] 137–148. Fitzpatrick, F. A., B. C. Scudder, B. N. Lenz & D. J. Sullivan, Borin, M., E. Bigon, G. Zanin & L. Fava, 2004. Performance of 2001. Effects of multi-scale environmental characteristics a narrow buffer strip in abating agricultural pollutants in on agricultural stream biota in eastern Wisconsin. Journal the shallow subsurface water flux. Environmental Pollu- of the American Water Resources Association 37: tion 131: 313–321. 1289–1507. Borin, M., M. Vianello, F. Morari & G. Zanin, 2005. Effec- Foley, J. A., R. DeFries, G. P. Asner, C. Barford, G. Bonan, S. tiveness of buffer strips in removing pollutants in runoff R. Carpenter, F. S. Chapin, M. T. Coe, G. C. Daily, H. K.
123 16 Reprinted from the journal Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:7–17
Gibbs, J. H. Helkowski, T. Holloway, E.A. Howard, C. J. freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in south-eastern Kucharik, C. Monfreda, J. A. Patz, C. Prentice, N. Ra- Michigan, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 49: 127–142. mankutty & P. K. Snyder, 2005. Global consequences of Moss, B., P. Johnes & G. Phillips, 1996. The monitoring of land use. Science 309: 570–574. ecological quality and the classification of standing waters Foster, G. N., A. P. Foster, M. D. Eyre & D. T. Bilton, 1990. in temperate regions: a review and proposal based on a Classification of water beetle assemblages in arable fen- worked scheme for British Waters. Biological Reviews land and ranking of sites in relation to conservation value. 71: 301–339. Freshwater Biology 22: 343–354. Muir, R., 1999. Approaches to Landscape. Macmillan, Harding, J. S., E. F. Benfield, P. V. Bolstad, G. S. Helfman & Basingstoke. E. B. D Jones, 1998. Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land Painter, D., 1999. Macroinvertebrate distributions and the use past. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sci- conservation value of aquatic Coleoptera, Mollusca and ences, USA 95: 14843–14847. Odonata in the ditches of traditionally managed and Host, G. E., C. Richards, L. B. Johnson & R. J. Haro, 1997. grazing fen at Wicken Fen, UK. Journal of Applied Catchment and reach-scale properties as indicators of Ecology 36: 33–48. macroinvertebrate species traits. Freshwater Biology 37: Schmitt, T. J., M. G. Dosskey & K. D. Hoagland, 1999. Filter 219–230. strip performance and processes for different vegetation, Hynes, H. B. N., 1975. The stream and its valley. Verhandl- widths and contaminants. Journal of Environmental ungen der Internationale Vereingigung Fur Limnology 19: Quality 28: 1479–1489. 1–15. Tong, S. T. Y. & W. Chen, 2002. Modelling the relationship Johnes, P., B. Moss & G. Phillips, 1994. Lakes – Classification between landuse and surface water quality. Journal of and Monitoring. Environment Agency R&D Note 253. Environmental Management 66: 377–393. Environment Agency, Bristol. Wang, L. Z., J. Lyons, P. Kanehl & R. Gatti, 1997. Influences Johnson, R. K. & W. Goedkoop, 2002. Littoral macroinverte- of watershed land use on habitat quality and biotic brate communities: spatial scale and ecological integrity in Wisconsin streams. Fisheries 22: 6–12. relationships. Freshwater Biology 47: 1840–1854. Wiley, M. J., S. L. Kohler & P. W. Seelbach, 1997. Recon- Johnson, R. K., W. Goedkoop & L. Sandin, 2004. Spatial scale ciling landscape and local views of aquatic communities; and ecological relationships between the macroinverte- lessons from Michigan trout streams. Freshwater Biology brate communities of stony habitats of streams and lakes. 37: 133–148. Freshwater Biology 49: 1179–1194. Williams, P., M. Whitfield, J. Biggs, S. Bray, G. Fox, P. Quinn, J. M., 2000. Effect of pastoral development. In Collier, Nicolet & D. Sear, 2004. Comparative biodiversity of K. J. & M. J. Winterbourn (eds), New Zealand Stream rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural Invertebrates: Ecology and Implications for Management. landscape in Southern England. Biological Conservation Caxton, Christchurch, New Zealand. 115: 329–341. Lund, J. W. G. & C. S. Reynolds, 1982. The development and Williams, P., M. Whitfield & J. Biggs, 2008. How can we make operation of large limnetic enclosures in Blenham Tarn, new ponds biodiverse? A case study monitored over seven English Lake District, and their contribution to phyto- years. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-007-9224-9 plankton ecology. Progress in Phycological Research 1: Yates, A. G., R. C. Bailey & J. A. Schwindt, 2006. No-till 2–65. cultivation improves stream ecosystem quality. Journal of McRae, S. E., J. D. Allan & J. B. Burch, 2004. Reach- and Soil and Water Conservation 61: 14–19. catchment-scale determinants of the distribution of
Reprinted from the journal 17 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:19–27 DOI 10.1007/s10750-007-9222-y
ECOLOGY OF EUROPEAN PONDS
A comparative analysis of cladoceran communities from different water body types: patterns in community composition and diversity
Tom De Bie Æ Steven Declerck Æ Koen Martens Æ Luc De Meester Æ Luc Brendonck
Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007
Abstract To develop strategies for the management landscape scale, our results point to the importance and protection of aquatic biodiversity in water bodies of maintaining a diversity of water body types of at the landscape scale, there is a need for information different size, permanence and flow regimes. on the spatial organization of diversity in different types of aquatic habitats. In this study, we compared Keywords Zooplankton Cladoceran the cladoceran composition and diversity between Ditch Pool Pond Lake Wheel track wheel tracks, pools, ponds, lakes, ditches, and Stream Species richness Biodiversity streams, in 18 different areas of Flanders (Belgium). Multivariate analysis revealed significant differences in the composition of cladoceran communities among Introduction the different water body types. Average local and total diversity tended to be highest for lakes and So far, most studies on biodiversity in aquatic lowest for streams. Despite the relatively high habitats have focused on rivers, streams and lakes, number of species supported by lakes, small water and little research has been done on smaller aquatic bodies seem to contribute considerably more to the systems. Small water bodies, such as ponds, pools, total cladoceran richness of an average landscape in ditches, and wheel tracks are, nevertheless, ubiqui- Flanders than lakes, because of their high abundance. tous features of the landscape and form no doubt the With respect to biodiversity conservation at the most common type of freshwater habitat in many areas of Europe. Despite their high abundance and the fact that they can support unique floral and faunal Guest editors: R. Ce´re´ghino, J. Biggs, B. Oertli & S. Declerck elements, these small ecosystems have only recently The ecology of European ponds: defining the characteristics of been recognized as important habitats for the main- a neglected freshwater habitat tenance of biodiversity (Armitage et al., 2003; Nicolet et al., 2004; Biggs et al., 2005; Oertli et al., & T. De Bie ( ) S. Declerck L. De Meester 2005). In many regions these small and hence L. Brendonck Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, vulnerable types of water bodies are highly threa- KULeuven, Ch. Deberiotstraat 32, 3000 Leuven, Belgium tened due to eutrophication, pollution or physical e-mail: [email protected] destruction (Boothby, 2003). Pools, ponds, and ditches differ from lakes and rivers in many aspects K. Martens Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat (Oertli et al., 2002; Søndergaard et al., 2005) and can 29, 1000 Brussels, Belgium therefore be expected to be affected by anthropogenic
Reprinted from the journal 19 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:19–27 stress in different ways and at different spatial scales Table 1 for the definitions of water body types used (Allan et al., 2004; Declerck et al., 2006). in this study). In each area, the water bodies were A good knowledge of patterns of species diversity chosen upon haphazard encounter in the field while within and among different types of aquatic habitat is walking in the surroundings of ponds and lakes. The necessary to direct strategies for the management and number of sampled water bodies in each of the areas protection of aquatic biodiversity at the landscape is presented in Table 2. Not all water body types were scale. However, there are only few studies that have equally represented in each of the sampled areas. In investigated aquatic biodiversity on a large catchment total, we sampled ten wheel tracks, 38 pools, 151 scale (Stendera & Johnson, 2005) or on a diverse set ponds, 13 lakes, 26 ditches, and nine streams. The of water body types (Williams et al., 2004). Williams water bodies had no surface connections with other et al. (2004) compared the diversity of macroinver- water bodies. tebrates and macrophytes between different water Land use in Flanders is dominated by intensive body types within an entire part of a river catchment. crop culture and pasture. Forest patches are scarce, They found that small water bodies contributed fragmented, and small. The 18 areas were part of a substantially to the regional biodiversity. This was larger survey that was carried out in the framework of to a large extent due to the high beta diversity of the pond project MANSCAPE (Declerck et al., 2006) these systems, especially of ponds. The aim of this and each area represented a wide range in land use article is to compare the community composition and intensity. species diversity of cladocerans of different water body types and to assess the contribution of each of these water body types to average landscape cladoc- Sample collection eran diversity. We sampled the zooplankton of the water bodies once during the period June–August 2003. Cladoc- Methods eran zooplankton samples were obtained with a conical plankton net (mesh size: 64 lm, diameter: Study area 26 cm). Each water body was sampled for a total of 2 min with the total sampling time equally divided We studied zooplankton communities in aquatic between the shore and the central zone of the water habitats from 18 different regions distributed over body. At both shore and central zone we sampled at the major part of Flanders (Belgium) (Fig. 1). In each four different spots equally distributed over the entire of the regions, we defined a circular area of 28 km2. surface area (wheel tracks, pools, ponds, and lakes), Within each of the areas, we sampled the zooplankton or along a stretch of at least 10 m (ditches and of on average 14 (range 10–21) water bodies streams). In very shallow habitats, water was col- belonging to six different water body types (see lected with a beaker (5 l) and filtered through the
Fig. 1 Geographic location of the 18 study areas on the map of Flanders (Belgium). KN, Knokke; U, Uitkerke; BL, Diksmuide; I, Ieper; P, Ploegsteert; L, Lede; T, Temse; Ka, Kalmthout; OT, Oud Turnhout; ZE, Zemst; BE, Begijnendijk; D, Diest; HAL, Halle; TW, Tielt- Winge; Z, Zoutleeuw; HAS, Hasselt; A, Alken; BI, Bilzen
123 20 Reprinted from the journal Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:19–27
Table 1 Summary of Water body type Definition definitions of aquatic habitats used in the survey Wheel track (W) Small shallow and elongated water bodies situated on sandy roads or (adapted from Williams tracks created by transport of vehicles. These aquatic habitats are et al., 2004) temporarily and can vary strongly over time. Pool (PL) Temporary water bodies smaller than 25 m2. Includes both man-made and natural water bodies. Pond (PN) Water bodies between 25 m2 and 2 ha in area which may be permanent or seasonal (Collinson et al., 1995). Includes both man-made and natural water bodies. Lake (L) Permanent water bodies larger than 2 ha in area. Includes reservoirs and gravel pits. Ditch (D) Man-made channels created primarily for agricultural purposes, and which usually: (i) have a linear plan form, (ii) follow linear boundaries, often turning at right angles, and (iii) show little relationship with natural landscape contours. Stream (S) Small lotic water bodies created mainly by natural processes. Streams differ from ditches in (i) usually having a sinuous plan form, (ii) not following field boundaries, or if they do, pre-dating boundary creation, and (iii) showing a relationship with natural landscape contours e.g., running down valleys. All selected streams were less deep than 1 m and less width than 5 m.
plankton net. Samples from deeper water were collected with a long-handled plankton net (64 lm, Table 2 Number of water body types sampled in each of the diameter: 26 cm). The zooplankton samples were 18 studied areas in Flanders preserved in formaldehyde (4%) saturated with Water body type sucrose. Cladocerans in the samples were analyzed Area Date W PL PN L D S up to species level following Flo¨ssner (2000). For each water body a subsample of at least 100 cladoc- Alken (A) 1/7/03 0 4 7 0 1 2 erans was identified. Water bodies of which samples Begijnendijk (BE) 12/7/03 1 6 7 0 1 1 contained less than 70 cladoceran specimens in total Bilzen (BI) 12/6/03 1 1 7 1 1 1 were excluded from further data analysis (four wheel Diest (D) 20/6/03 0 1 7 0 2 0 tracks, one pool, two ditches, and two streams). Diksmuide (BL) 2/7/03 1 1 10 2 3 0 Halle (HAL) 4/7/03 1 3 8 1 1 1 Hasselt (HAS) 12/6/03 1 1 17 1 3 0 Data analysis Ieper (I) 23/6/03 0 1 9 1 1 0 Kalmthout (KA) 15/7/03 2 1 7 2 1 0 Community composition Knokke (KN) 19/7/03 0 1 8 0 0 1 Lede (L) 14/7/03 0 2 9 0 1 0 We formally tested for differences among the zoo- Oud-Turnhout (OT) 6/8/03 1 3 5 2 2 1 plankton communities of the different water body Ploegsteert (P) 19/7/03 0 1 12 0 2 1 types by applying redundancy analysis (RDA) on Temse (T) 13/7/03 0 4 7 1 1 1 percentage abundance data (arcsine-transformed) and Tielt-Winge (TW) 12/7/03 0 4 9 0 1 0 canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) on species Uitkerke (U) 24/6/03 0 1 7 0 2 0 lists (presence/absence data) using the software CA- Zemst (ZE) 13/7/03 1 1 8 2 0 0 NOCO v5 (Lepsˇ and Sˇmilauer, 2003). In these Zoutleeuw (Z) 27/6/03 1 2 7 0 3 0 analyses, the different water body types were specified using dummy variables. We also specified the 18 Area, location of sampled area; date, time of sampling; W, wheel tracks; PL, pools; PN, ponds; L, lakes; D, ditches; S, studied areas as co-variables to avoid biases introduced streams by geographic patterns. We assessed the statistical
Reprinted from the journal 21 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:19–27 significance of differences among water body types programme R (version 2.4.0.) and algorithms were with random Monte Carlo permutations (n = 999). provided by C. X. Mao. These permutations were restricted to areas (areas ˇ specified as ‘blocks’; see Lepsˇ and Smilauer, 2003). Results
Community composition Species richness CCA and RDA revealed significant differences in Species richness of a water body (local species both species lists (F = 1.78; p \ 0.01) and propor- richness) was estimated as the total number of species tional species composition (F = 1.75; p \ 0.01) recorded in its sample upon rarefaction to a standard among the different water body types (Fig. 2). number of 100 individuals with the statistical Pairwise post-hoc RDA tests indicated significant program PRIMER-5 (Clarke & Gorley, 2001). For compositional differences between all possible pairs each of the studied regions, we calculated the average of water body types, except for the combinations of local species richness for each type of water body. wheel tracks with pools and ditches with streams. The We created species accumulation curves for each type of water body with the likelihood-based method developed by Mao et al. (2005). This method allowed an estimate to be made of the rate at which new species accumulate with an increasing number of samples. Through extrapolation of the available data the procedure also allowed, for each water body type, for a graphical evaluation to be made of whether the species accumulation curve approximates its asymp- tote and for an estimate to be made of total expected species richness with associated bootstrap confidence intervals. It should, however, be noted that extrapo- lations should be restricted to triple the number of samples available (Colwell et al., 2004). Since, low sample numbers prevented us from making reliable estimates of total expected species richness for each water body type with extrapolation methods, we compared total richness among water body types with standard estimates of total richness based on a fixed number of six water bodies. We chose Fig. 2 Results of a redundancy analysis (RDA) showing patterns of association between species and water body type. the number of six because this is equal to the total Regional differences were partialled out by defining the 18 number of systems of the least represented water body studied areas as co-variables. The water body types were type (wheel tracks). This procedure had the additional specified as nominal variables and are represented by centroids. advantage of obtaining independent replicate esti- The samples are represented by symbols indicating the water body type: j = ditches, h = streams, m = lakes, 4 = mates of total diversity for most of the water body ponds, d = pools and = wheel tracks. AloQua, Alona types (except wheel tracks and streams). Replicate quadrangularis; BosLon, Bosmina longirostris; ChySph, sets of six systems were randomly chosen within each Chydorus sphaericus; DapObt, Daphnia obtusa; DiaBra, of the water body categories without replacement. Diaphanosoma brachyurum; MegAur, Megafenestra aurita; MoiMac, Moina macrocopa; PleTri, Pleuroxus trigonellus; We tested for differences in diversity among water PolPed, Polyphemus pediculus; SimVet, Simocephalus vetulus; body types with ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc PleTru, Pleuroxus truncatus; AcaCur, Acantheloberis curvi- testing. All variables were log-transformed prior to rostris; PleDen, Pleuroxus denticulatus; AloGut, Alona analysis. ANOVA-analyses were performed with the guttata; DapCul, Daphnia cucullata; CerMeg, Ceriodaphnia megops; Cer pul, Ceriodaphnia puclhella; CerQua, Cerio- software package STATISTICA v6. The species daphnia quadrangula; SidCry, Sida crystallina; AcrHar, accumulation curves were computed with the Acroperus harpae
123 22 Reprinted from the journal Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:19–27 most important axis of variation in the RDA analysis (F(5) = 2.34; p = 0.04). Average local species rich- (Eigen value = 2.4) mainly represented the differ- ness was highest for lakes (5.7; range: 3–11.1) ence between lakes and other water body types, with (Fig. 3a). Average richness in ditches (4.1; range: 1– ponds taking an intermediate position. The second 10.8 species) and ponds (4.2; range: 1–12.4 species) axis (Eigen values = 0.8) mainly appeared to differ- was similar and tended to be slightly higher than in entiate between small temporary lentic water bodies pools; the difference was however not significant. (wheel tracks and pools) and the larger systems (in Results of the species accumulation curves (Fig. 4) terms of total surface area: lakes, ditches, and show a rapid increase in total species number with an streams). The relative abundance of Bosmina longi- increasing number of lakes compared to pools, rostris, Polyphemus pediculus, Moina macrocopa, whereas ponds and ditches take an intermediate and Diaphanosoma brachyurum was higher in lakes position. According to the curves, a total count of 20 than in the other water body types, while Daphnia species appears to correspond approximately with a obtusa was best represented in wheel tracks and pools total of six lakes, nine ditches, 11 ponds, or 18 pools. (Table 3). The relative share of Simocephalus vetulus The curves also show that lakes and, to a smaller of total clacoderan density was highest in streams and extent pools, do not approximate their asymptote ditches. Pleuroxus trigonella and Alona quadrangu- within the range of samples. In contrast, the curves laris had their highest relative abundances in streams for ponds and ditches tend to approximate much and ditches, respectively, whereas Chydorus sphae- better their asymptote. According to the likelihood- ricus was most abundant in wheel tracks. based extrapolation, total richness equals 49 species in pools (95% confidence interval: 46–51) and 40 species in ditches (95% confidence interval: 34–55). Species richness The accumulation curves of wheel tracks and streams could not be reliably characterized due to low number We detected a total of 53 cladoceran species in the of available samples. entire set of samples. Overall, local species richness Our standardized measure of total richness showed differed significantly between water body types a similar pattern as local species richness (Fig. 3b).
Table 3 Summary of all significant differences (Tukey post-hoc tests) between the studied water body types for the relative abundances of the ten most dominant species Species Tukey post-hoc tests WPLPNLDS
Alona quadrangularis (O.F. Mu¨ller, 1776) D [[[ Bosmina longirostris (O.F. Mu¨ller, 1785) L [[ [ [[ PN [[ Chydorus sphaericus (O.F. Mu¨ller, 1785) W [[ Daphnia obtusa (Kurz, 1874) W [ PL [[[ Diaphanosoma brachyurum (Lie´vin, 1848) L [[ [ [[ Megafenestra aurita (S. Fischer, 1849) S [[ [ [[ Moina macrocopa (Straus, 1820) L [[ [ [[ Pleuroxus trigonellus (O.F. Mu¨ller, 1776) S [[ [ [[ Polyphemus pediculus (Linnaeus, 1761) L [[ [ [[ Simocephalus vetulus (O.F. Mu¨ller, 1776) PL [ D [[ S [[[ The symbol ‘[’ indicates that the relative abundance of a species is significantly higher in the water body type of the first column than in the corresponding water body type of the first row (see Table 1 for the abbreviations of the water body types)
Reprinted from the journal 23 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:19–27
Fig. 4 Species accumulation curves for the six water body types. Expected species richness values (dotted line) were computed using the likelihood-based estimator. Extrapolations for each water body type are limited to three times the number of available samples. For reasons of clarity, 95% bootstrap confidence intervals are only presented for the total number of samples available
types (wheel tracks, pools, ponds, lakes, ditches, and streams) in Flanders. Species composition differed considerably among the different types of systems and many species showed pronounced affinities with one or a few specific water body types. Pelagic zoo- plankton species, like B. longirostris, D. brachyura, Fig. 3 Differences between water body types with respect to: P. pediculus, and M. macrocopa were clearly more (a) average of the mean local zooplankton diversity observed in each of the selected regions. Error bars denote SE; (b) associated with lakes than with other water bodies. In average total diversity expressed as the total species richness contrast D. obtusa was mainly found in small observed in sets of six randomly selected systems. Error bars temporary systems, such as pools and wheel tracks. denote SE and reflect the variation among randomly chosen This species and C. sphaericus have been shown to sets of six systems within each water body category. Significant differences between water body types according be very rapid colonizers of newly created habitats to Tukey post-hoc tests are indicated by different characters. (Louette & De Meester, 2005) and have often been Abbreviations of the water body types are explained in Table 1 reported for temporary waters during spring (Forro´ et al., 2003). Ditches and streams were quite similar Lakes tended to have the highest total richness, but the in community composition and were dominated by difference was not significant with ponds and ditches. species like A. quadrangularis, P. trigonelus, M. Pools had significantly lower total richness than ponds, aurita, and S. vetulus. An important reason for the lakes, and ditches (Tukey post-hoc: p \ 0.05). Due to difference between the ditches and streams and the lack of replicate values, wheel tracks and streams other water body types is probably that they are lotic could not be incorporated in this analysis. systems. Water flow in lotic systems may act as an important source of disturbance for zooplankton communities. Cladoceran zooplankton tends to be Discussion underrepresented in flowing zones of lotic systems (Dole-Olivier et al., 2000) as complete washout of Community composition their populations can occur at water velocities higher than 3.2 cm s-1 (Richardson, 1992). Persistence of a Our survey revealed a high variation in cladoceran zooplankton population in a lotic system is also community composition among different water body strongly determined by the availability of flow
123 24 Reprinted from the journal Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:19–27 refugia and specific characteristics of the species in terms of their representation in the set of samples (e.g., strong swimming ability, use of benthic habitat compared to their abundance in the field. This and flow avoidance) (Robertson, 2000). The predom- hampers estimation of the contribution that is made inance of species of the genera Alona, Pleuroxus, and by each water body type to the total cladoceran Simocephalus in lotic systems may at least partly be diversity in regions or to total cladoceran species due to the fact that their species live in close richness in Flanders. The accumulation curve, nev- association with substrate or show a strong habitat ertheless, suggests that the total number of species selection in favour of well-structured littoral zones, that is supported by lakes is larger than in ponds, which may reduce their vulnerability to downstream pools, or ditches. Our standardized measure of total washout (Richardson, 1992). Based on the relatively diversity also tended to be higher for lakes than for low species richness, lotic systems are poor habitats the other water bodies, suggesting that the total for cladocerans. Nevertheless, they can be important number of species in a set of six lakes is likely to be for dispersal (Havel & Shurin, 2004). more species rich than a set of an equal number of other water bodies. Notwithstanding these observa- tions, the contribution made by small water bodies to Species richness cladoceran gamma species richness in the average landscape is probably considerably higher than that Average local species richness in lentic systems tended of lakes. In the framework of the pond project to increase from small and temporary systems to larger MANSCAPE, we have estimated the number and and permanent systems. Lakes consequently had the total cumulative surface area of ponds and lakes in 26 highest local richness. This is in accordance with the circular regions of 28 km2 scattered over Flanders literature (Fryer 1985; Collinson et al., 1995), (which include the 18 regions of this study). This was although it is not always clear whether the degree of done based on aerial pictures of the National permanence or the size of the habitat contributed most Geographic Institute (2000) through the application to the increase in species richness (Bilton et al., 2001). of the GIS software package ArcView GIS 3.2a The significant difference between the local species (ESRI, Inc.). According to these estimations each richness of lakes and ponds or pools and the lack of a region contains an average of 1.11 lakes and 80.03 difference between ponds and pools may, however, ponds with an average cumulative surface area of 0.9 indicate that mainly size and not the degree of and 3.9 ha, respectively. This means that, in one permanence is contributing most to species richness. region, there are approximately 70 times more ponds Similarly, lakes had the highest gamma diversity. than lakes and that the cumulative surface area of There may be several reasons why lakes are richer in ponds is 4.3 times as large as that of lakes. If both the species than smaller water bodies: (1) In comparison data on pond densities and the accumulation curve with ponds and pools, lakes are more heterogeneous are assumed to be representative for Flanders, this in space and are less susceptible to drying out. This means that for an average surface area of 28 km2 allows a potentially higher number of species to ponds contribute approximately 44 species to the successfully settle in these systems; (2) The degree of total cladoceran richness of that region, whereas lakes connectivity may also play an important role. Lakes only contribute five species. tend to have larger catchment areas than ponds (Davies It should be noted that this study is based on a et al., in press) and have therefore a higher chance of single sampling campaign. As a result, temporal being colonized from neighboring water bodies; (3) variation in cladoceran communities was not covered Local stress events (e.g., trampling by cattle, inflow of by our sampling. This may have lead to an underes- pesticides or nutrients) have a larger impact on small timation of species numbers, especially in systems water bodies than on larger-sized systems; (4) Fur- with high temporal dynamics and seasonal or annual thermore, lakes often contain large populations that are species turnover rates (Vandekerkhove et al., 2005a, more buffered against species loss. b). In addition, we may have missed rare species that Several categories of water bodies were underrep- typically have low population densities in habitats resented in our study, both in terms of absolute where they occur because we only investigated 100 numbers (wheel tracks, streams, and lakes) as well as specimens of cladocerans per sample.
Reprinted from the journal 25 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:19–27
In conclusion, we found a pronounced variation in Davies, B. R., J. Biggs, P. J. Williams, J. T. Lee & S. the species lists and percentage composition of Thompson, in press. A comparison of the catchment sizes of rivers, streams, ponds, ditches and lakes: implications cladoceran communities between different water for protecting aquatic biodiversity in an agricultural body types. With respect to conservation measures, landscape. Hydrobiologia doi:10.1007/s10750-007- these findings stress the importance of maintaining a 9227-6. diversity of water body types of different flow, size, Declerck, S., T. De Bie, D. Ercken, H. Hampel, S. Schrijvers, J. VanWichelen, V. Gillardin, R. Mandiki, B. Losson, and permanence regimes in the landscape. Species D. Bauwens, S. Keijers, W. Vyverman, B. Goddeeris, richness tended to be highest in lakes and lowest in L. De Meester, L. Brendonck & K. Martens, 2006. Eco- lotic systems. Despite the relatively high number of logical characteristics of small farmland ponds: species supported by lakes, small water bodies associations with land use practices at multiple spatial scales. Biological Conservation 131: 523–532. probably contribute considerably more to total cla- Dole-Olivier, M.-J., D. M. P. Galassi, P. Marmonier & doceran richness in the average landscape of Flanders M. Creuze´ des Chaˆteliers, 2000. The biology and ecology than lakes, because of their high relative abundance. of lotic microcrustaceans. Freshwater Biology 44: 63–91. Acknowledgments This study was financially supported by Flo¨ssner, D., 2000. Die Haplopoda und Cladocera (ohne Bos- the Belgian federal government in the framework of the PODO minidae) Mitteleuropas. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden. II-program, project MANSCAPE ‘‘Integrated Management Forro´, L., L. De Meester, K. Cottenie & H. J. Dumont, 2003. Tools for Water Bodies in Agricultural Landscapes’’ (EV/01/ An update on the inland cladoceran and copepod fauna of 29E) and by EU IP project ALARM (GOCE-CT-2003-506675). Belgium, with a note on the importance of temporary We thank C. X. Mao for providing the algorithms to calculate waters. Belgian Journal of Zoology 133: 31–36. the species accumulation curves. We are also grateful to Fryer, G., 1985. Crustacean diversity in relation to the size of J. Biggs and two anonymous referees for very useful comments water bodies: some facts and problems. Freshwater Biol- on an earlier version of this text. S. Declerck is a post-doctoral ogy 15: 347–361. fellow of the Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders. Havel, J. E. & J. B. Shurin, 2004. Mechanisms, effects, and scales of dispersal in freshwater zooplankton. Limnology and Oceanography 49: 1229–1238. Lepsˇ, J. & T. Sˇmilauer, 2003. Multivariate Analysis of Eco- References logical Data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Allan, J. D., 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of Louette, G. & L. De Meester, 2005. High dispersal capacity of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecol- cladoceran zooplankton in newly founded communities. ogy, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 257–284. Ecology 86: 353–359. Armitage, P. D., K. Szoszkiewicz, J. H. Blackburn & I. Nesbitt, Mao, C. X., R. K. Colwell & J. Chang, 2005. Estimating the 2003. Ditch communities: a major contributor to flood- species accumulation curve using mixtures. Biometrics plain biodiversity. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and 61: 433–441. Freshwater Ecosystems 13: 165–185. Nicolet, P., J. Biggs, G. Fox, M. J. Hodson, C. Reynolds, Biggs, J., P. Williams, M. Whitfield, P. Nicolet & A. Weath- M. Whitfield & P. Williams, 2004. The wetland plant and erby, 2005. 15 years of pond assessment in Britain: results macroinvertebrate assemblages of temporary ponds in and lessons learned from the work of Pond Conservation. England and Wales. Biological Conservation 120: 261– Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosys- 278. tems 15: 693–714. Oertli, B., D. A. Joye, E. Castella, R. Juge, D. Cambin & Bilton, D. T., A. Foggo & S. D. Rundle, 2001. Size, perma- J. B. Lachavanne, 2002. Does size matter? The relation- nence and the proportion of predators in ponds. Archiv fu¨r ship between pond area and biodiversity. Biological Hydrobiologie 151: 451–458. Conservation 104: 59–70. Boothby, J., 2003. Tackling degradation of a seminatural Oertli, B., J. Biggs, R. Ce´re´ghino, P. Grillas, P. Joly & landscape: options and evaluations. Land Degradation & J. B. Lachavanne, 2005. Conservation and monitoring of Development 14: 227–243. pond biodiversity: introduction. Aquatic Conservation: Clarke, K. R. & R. N. Gorley, 2001. PRIMER Version 5. User Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15: 535–540. Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK. Richardson, W. B., 1992. Microcrustaceae in flowing water: Collinson, N. H., J. Biggs, A. Corfield, M. J. Hodson, experimental analysis of washout times in a field test. D. Walker, M. Whitfield & P. J. Williams, 1995. Tem- Freshwater Biology 28: 217–230. porary and permanent ponds: an assessment of the effects Robertson, A. L., 2000. Lotic meiofaunal community dynam- of drying out on the conservation value of aquatic macr- ics: colonisation, resilience and persistence in a spatially oinvertebrate communities. Biological Conservation 74: and temporally heterogenous environment. Freshwater 125–133. Biology 135–147. Colwell, R. K., C. X. Mao & J. Chang, 2004. Interpolating, Søndergaard, M., E. Jeppesen & J. P. Jensen, 2005. Pond or extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species lake: does it make any difference? Archiv fu¨r Hydrobi- accumulation curves. Ecology 85: 2717–2727. ologie 162: 143–165.
123 26 Reprinted from the journal Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:19–27
Stendera, S. E. S. & R. K. Johnson, 2005. Additive partitioning Vandekerkhove, J., S. Declerck, E. Jeppesen, J. M. Conde of aquatic invertebrate species diversity across multiple Porcuna, L. Brendonck & L. De Meester, 2005b. Dormant scales. Freshwater Biology 50: 1360–1375. propagule banks integrate spatio-temporal heterogeneity Vandekerkhove, J., S. Declerck, L. Brendonck, J. M. Conde- in cladoceran communities. Oecologia 142: 109–116. Porcuna, E. Jeppesen, L. S. Johansson & L. De Meester, Williams, P., M. Whitfield, J. Biggs, S. Bray, G. Fox, 2005a. Uncovering hidden species: hatching diapaus- P. Nicolet & D. Sear, 2004. Comparative biodiversity of ing eggs for the analysis of cladoceran species rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural richness. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods 3: landscape in Southern England. Biological Conservation 399–407. 115: 329–341.
Reprinted from the journal 27 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:29–41 DOI 10.1007/s10750-007-9218-7
ECOLOGY OF EUROPEAN PONDS
Macroinvertebrate assemblages in 25 high alpine ponds of the Swiss National Park (Cirque of Macun) and relation to environmental variables
Beat Oertli Æ Nicola Indermuehle Æ Sandrine Ange´libert Æ He´le`ne Hinden Æ Aure´lien Stoll
Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007
Abstract High-altitude freshwater ecosystems and variables. Sampling was conducted in 25 ponds their biocoenosis are ideal sentinel systems to detect between 2002 and 2004. The number of taxa global change. In particular, pond communities are characterising the region (Macun cirque) was low, likely to be highly responsive to climate warming. represented by 47 lentic taxa. None of them was For this reason, the Swiss National Park has included endemic to the Alps, although several species were ponds as part of a long-term monitoring programme cold stenothermal. Average pond richness was low of the high-alpine Macun cirque. This cirque covers (11.3 taxa). Assemblages were dominated by Chiro- 3.6 km2, has a mean altitude of 2,660 m a.s.l., and nomidae (Diptera), and Coleoptera and Oligochaeta includes a hydrographic system composed of a stream were also relatively well represented. Other groups, network and more than 35 temporary and permanent which are frequent in lowland ponds, had particularly ponds. The first two steps in the programme were to poor species richness (Trichoptera, Heteroptera) or (i) make an inventory of the macroinvertebrates of were absent (Gastropoda, Odonata, Ephemeroptera). the waterbodies in the Macun cirque, and (ii) relate Macroinvertebrate assemblages (composition, rich- the assemblages to local or regional environmental ness) were only weakly influenced by local environmental variables. The main structuring pro- cesses were those operating at regional level and, namely, the connectivity between ponds, i.e. the Guest editors: R. Ce´re´ghino, J. Biggs, B. Oertli & S. Declerck presence of a physical connection (tributary) and/or The ecology of European ponds: defining the characteristics of small geographical distance between ponds. The a neglected freshwater habitat results suggest that during the long-term monitoring of the Macun ponds (started in 2005), two kinds of Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9088-1_4) contains sup- change will affect macroinvertebrate assemblages. plementary material, which is available to authorized users. The first change is related to the natural dynamics, with high local-scale turnover, involving the meta- & B. Oertli ( ) N. Indermuehle S. Ange´libert A. Stoll populations characterising the Macun cirque. The Department of Nature Management, University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland - EIL, 1254 second change is related to global warming, leading Jussy, Geneva, Switzerland to higher local and regional richness through an e-mail: [email protected] increase in the number of colonisation events result- ing from the upward shift of geographical ranges of H. Hinden Laboratoire d’Ecologie et de Biologie aquatique, species. At the same time the cold stenothermal University of Geneva, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland species from Macun will be subject to extinction.
Reprinted from the journal 29 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:29–41
Keywords Zoobenthos Small waterbodies (Gaston & Spicer, 2004). As such, various abiotic Biodiversity Swiss Alps Biomonitoring and biotic investigations were conducted in the Macun cirque (starting in 2001), on all types of waterbodies (Matthaei, 2003; Hinden, 2004; Logue Introduction et al., 2004; Ruegg & Robinson, 2004; Stoll, 2005). The objectives partly followed GLOCHAMORE Ongoing and future global change threatens biodi- (Global Change and Mountain Regions) Research versity (Thomas et al., 2004) at local, regional and Strategy (Gurung, 2005), and aimed to assess the global scales. In this context, it is urgent to put into current biodiversity of the cirque, as a requisite action long-term programmes, to assess and monitor before trying to assess or to monitor biodiversity predicted changes. This type of monitoring has the change. ability to integrate sentinel ecosystems that can detect A synthesis of the investigations conducted on the signs of stress. Mountain biocoenoses are particularly ponds is presented here. The objectives of this article sensitive to global change (Thuillier et al., 2005), and are to (i) present the distribution patterns of the future climatic warming in Europe is predicted to be aquatic macroinvertebrates in a network of high- greatest in the arctic and alpine regions (Wathne & alpine ponds, with a special focus on the diversity Hansen, 1997). High-altitude aquatic ecosystems may (alpha and gamma) and the composition of the be especially sensitive to global change (Theurillat & taxonomic assemblages; and (ii) investigate whether Guisan, 2001), and particularly to climate warming observed patterns are determined by regional or local (Sommaruga-Wograth et al., 1997; Sommaruga et al. processes. As the scientific information collected is 1999; Gurung, 2005). With their small size and their intended to constitute a baseline for the long-term relatively simple community structure, ponds consti- monitoring of the Macun cirque, a set of questions tute ideal sentinel and early warning systems (De were addressed to build a coherent monitoring Meester et al., 2005). This is especially true in alpine programme. In particular, what taxonomic groups environments, where pond communities are species- are dominant (density and richness) in these high poor and simpler than in lowland environments altitude systems? What taxa can be used for moni- (Hinden et al., 2005). Therefore, high alpine ponds toring purposes? Can flagship groups be used for constitute ideal systems for long-term monitoring of monitoring, as is the case for lowland ponds (e.g. global changes. Odonata; Clausnitzer & Jo¨dicke, 2004)? As a high The Swiss National Park started in 2001 a long- level of endemism is expected (Va¨re et al., 2003), term monitoring programme at the high-altitude should there be any particular species of macroin- ‘‘Macun cirque’’, including the ponds. The Swiss vertebrates to monitor? National Park is one of the 28 selected UNESCO Mountain Biosphere Reserves (Scheurer, 2004). The Macun cirque covers 3.6 km2; it has a mean altitude Methods of 2,660 m a.s.l., and includes a large hydrographic system composed of a stream network and more than Study site 35 temporary and permanent ponds. Earlier scientific research in this area is limited, but includes informa- The Macun cirque was added to the Swiss National tion on diatom communities (Schanz, 1984). Park in 2000 and is currently designated for long- One of the preliminary steps towards monitoring term monitoring of Alpine waterbodies. This area is is to establish a large and solid baseline through situated in the high alpine zone of the Alps intense and comprehensive field investigations. ([2,600 m a.s.l.) in Graubu¨nden, Switzerland Indeed, understanding patterns of biodiversity dis- (46°440 N, 10°080 E). The climatic conditions are tribution is essential to conservation strategies extreme, with extended ice cover (9 month). The (Gaston, 2000), and resolving the relative contribu- temperature range is large (from\-15°C in winter to tions of local and regional processes might provide a [20°C in summer), and precipitation is low, around key to understanding global patterns of biodiversity 850 mm/year (Robinson & Kawecka, 2005).
123 30 Reprinted from the journal Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:29–41
Fig. 1 The hydrological system from Macun cirque (Swiss National Park) with the position of the 25 sampled ponds
Bedrock geology is crystalline rock. The cirque characteristics of the water (Robinson & Matthaei, covers 3.6 km2 and includes a hydrographic system 2007). The south basin had temperatures on average (Fig. 1) composed of a stream network, more than 35 4°C cooler and nitrate-N levels twice the amount small waterbodies (area: 24–18,000 m2), some of the found in the north basin. In contrast, the north basin smallest being temporary. All these waterbodies can had higher levels (2–4 times more) of particulate-P, be termed ‘‘ponds’’, according to definition in Oertli particulate-N, and particulate organic matter than the et al. (2005b): an area less than 2 ha and maximum south basin. depth less than 8 m (except one pond, with a 10-m The drainage area of each pond is characterized by a depth), offering water plants the potential to colonise mixture of two types of land cover, rock and alpine almost the entire pond area. Some of these ponds are grassland (typology following Delarze et al., 1998); interconnected by streams. The hydrographic system land cover was assessed through field survey and the has a natural origin with an age exceeding 4,000 year help of GIS (for the delimitation of the drainage area of (the date of the last glacial retreat). The origin of the each pond). From the 35 waterbodies, a subset of 25 water differs depending on location in the Macun was selected for sampling (Fig. 1). The choice cirque. Robinson & Kawecka (2005) differentiated a included all types of waterbodies: different size, north basin fed primarily by precipitation (mostly different duration (ponds with a low depth were snow) and groundwater and a south basin fed mostly temporary, dry in August), location in the North or by glacial melt from rock glaciers. The different South basin, and connected or not to streams. The pH of origin in each basin affects the physico-chemical the sampled ponds was acid or near neutral (5.5–7.5).
Table 1 Description of the Mean SD Median Minimum Maximum continuous environmental variables characterising the Altitude (m a.s.l.) 2641 49 2653 2480 2714 25 sampled ponds Pond area (m2) 1909 3139 607 24 12750 Mean depth (m) 0.99 1.08 0.60 0.05 4.50 Max depth (m) 2.2 2.7 1.3 0.1 10.0 Conductivity (ls/cm) 9.7 13.3 6.6 1.7 68.3 Alpine grassland in drainage area (%) 56 30 60 5 100 a Measured on a subset of a Total nitrogen (mg/l) 0.24 0.09 0.23 0.13 0.50 16 ponds
Reprinted from the journal 31 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:29–41
A description of pond morphometry and other selected whose presences were linked to drift from tributaries physico-chemical characteristics is presented in (e.g. Plecoptera and Diptera Simuliidae) were dis- Table 1. Substrate of the ponds was relatively homo- carded (see list in Electronic supplementary geneous (stone, gravel, sand, and occasionally material). Each analysis was conducted for both bryophytes) and the habitats available to macroinver- datasets; i.e. the 20 ponds where all macroinverte- tebrates not diverse. Five of the sampled ponds (M4, brates have been identified and the 25 ponds, where M5, M14, M16, M17) had fish (Salmo trutta fario, Oligochaeta and Chironomidae were excluded. Salvelinus namaycush, Phoxinus phoxinus), and were Tests were conducted to check inter- and intra-year last stocked in 1993. Information of fish presence was variability in the composition of the macroinverte- collected by net-fishing and visual observation (Rey & brate assemblage. Four ponds were sampled in both Pitsch, 2004). years (2002 and 2004), and one pond was sampled twice in 2004 (27 July and 2 August). Thereafter, all 30 macroinvertebrate assemblages (25 ponds, and 5 Macroinvertebrate sampling replicates) were submitted to a Ward clustering. This classification highlighted a very close grouping of the The 25 ponds were sampled, either in 2002 (16–22 different replicates and demonstrated that differences July) or in 2004 (27 July to 2 August). The standardised in assemblage were minor between years (2002–2004) procedure ‘‘PLOCH’’ (Oertli et al., 2005a) was used or within year (interval of 6 days). Therefore, for for sampling macroinvertebrates. They were collected further data analyses, the ponds sampled in 2002 were with a small-framed hand-net (rectangular frame added to those sampled in 2004 for constitution of a 14 9 10 cm, mesh size 0.5 mm). For each sample, unique dataset. the net was swept through the water intensively for The true regional diversity (gamma diversity, for 30 s. The number of samples taken ranged from 2 to 20, the Macun cirque) was estimated through the use of the depending on pond size. Sampling was stratified for the non-parametric estimator Jackknife-1 (Foggo et al., dominant habitats (from the land-water interface to a 2003; Magurran, 2003). This estimator is designed to depth of 2 m): stones, gravel, sand and bryophytes. In overcome sample-size inadequacies and to estimate all cases, the collected material was preserved in 5% how many species are actually present in sampled formaldehyde and then comprehensively sorted in the habitats (Rosenzweig et al., 2003). Calculations were laboratory. Specimens were identified to species level made with EstimateS software (Colwell, 2005). for most taxonomic groups and counted. Chironomi- Associations between seven environmental vari- dae and Oligochaeta were identified to species level for ables (mean and max depths, area, altitude, land a subset of 20 ponds. Pupae were generally not cover, conductivity and total nitrogen) and taxonomic considered; nevertheless some were identified when richness were tested by simple correlation analyses species level identification was impossible for larvae (Spearman correlation test). Three other variables are (see Electronic supplementary material). Collected described by class (presence of tributary connected to taxa were classified either as lentic or lotic (see another upstream pond, presence of fish, northern or Electronic supplementary material). This separation southern position in the cirque) and their relationships was first made on the basis of ecological information with taxonomic richness were assessed by a non- available (Tachet et al., 2000; and for Chironomidae, parametric Mann–Whitney test. B. Lods-Crozet personal communication). Neverthe- To test the influence of environmental variables on less, some taxa known as lotic were classified as lentic the distribution of species, we first performed a if they were observed in abundance in the isolated Correspondence Analysis (CA). This analysis was ponds (not connected to a tributary). realised on presence/absence data on the basis of the species list presented in Electronic supplementary material (but the rarest species, i.e. present in\5% of Data analysis sites, were removed). This procedure was conducted with the whole macroinvertebrate community Invertebrate data used for analysis included only the (20 ponds), as well as after removal of the Oligocha- lentic taxa from the 25 sampled ponds. Lotic taxa eta and Chironomidae (25 ponds).
123 32 Reprinted from the journal Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:29–41
Then we tested whether the environmental vari- richness gives a value of 57.7 taxa (±4.3), suggesting ables were significantly correlated to the first and/or that few taxa were missed (probably about 11) and second axis of the CA. To clarify the interpretation of indicating that the sampling procedure used was the CA, we performed a cluster analysis based on efficient for the estimation of regional diversity. Jaccard’s index. As the same patterns were observed The richest group was the Diptera (25 Chironom- in both cases, we will present here only the results idae taxa; five other families), followed by the for the 25-pond dataset. These analyses were done Oligochaeta (6 taxa) and the Coleoptera (six species). with the Vegan Package (available at http://www. Other represented groups were less diverse: Trichop- r-project.org), a contributed package for the R envi- tera (two species); and Heteroptera, Tricladida, and ronment. Ward’s clustering technique was used for Bivalvia (each with one species). In terms of identifying different types of assemblages based on abundance (number of individuals), four groups abundances transformed into classes (detailed in clearly dominated (Electronic supplementary mate- Electronic supplementary material). Both datasets (20 rial): Chironomidae, Coleoptera, Oligochaeta and and 25 ponds) were analysed separately. Trichoptera. This assemblage of 47 lentic taxa is species poor compared to lowland ponds (see taxa list compiled Results for Swiss lowland ponds by Oertli et al., 2000). For example Hydridae, Hirudinea, Crustacea, Gastrop- Biodiversity of the Macun ponds oda, Lepidoptera, Megaloptera, Ephemeroptera, Odonata and Hydracarina are missing. The sampling of the 25 Macun cirque ponds between In order to assess the magnitude of the Macun 2002 and 2004 yielded 57 taxa, most of which were cirque richness at a larger regional scale, the family identified to species level (Electronic supplementary Dytiscidae (Coleoptera) was chosen. This choice was material). Ten of these taxa are known as lotic motivated by the availability of relatively good (Electronic supplementary material) and were repre- knowledge of their geographical distribution in sented only in waterbodies connected to streams (i.e. Switzerland (data bank from the Swiss Centre for drift organisms). With the removal of these lotic taxa, Faunistic Cartography, and unpublished data from G. the regional richness (Macun cirque) was 47 lentic Carron) and in Europe (Illies, 1978). The observed taxa. Taxa accumulation reached an asymptote species richness for lentic Dytiscidae was five species (Fig. 2), indicating that this observed value is near for the Macun cirque, whereas the Jackknife-1 true the true value of richness to be expected for the richness estimator indicates six species (±1). On a cirque. Furthermore, the Jackknife-1 estimator of true regional scale, the species pool for the Swiss oriental Alps (area: about 8,000 km2) is 15 species (G. Carron, personal communication), while the pool for the whole Alps (area: about 100,000 km2)is22 species (data from Illies, 1978). Therefore, taking into account the small area of the Macun cirque (only 3.6 km2), the Dytiscidae community is relatively rich.
Endemism of the Macun macroinvertebrates
Endemism of the macroinvertebrates collected in the Macun cirque was assessed for 30 lentic species Fig. 2 Accumulation curve for observed richness (S observed) based on their biogeographical distribution in Europe of lentic taxa of the Macun cirque ponds and estimation of true (Illies, 1978): none are endemic to the Alps (Fig. 3). richness (S true) with estimator Jackknife-1 (±standard deviation: SD). The 30 samples are composed of 25 ponds, Nevertheless, one species, the trichopteran Acrophy- three being sampled twice and one being sampled three times lax zerberus, is restricted to only four biogeographic
Reprinted from the journal 33 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:29–41
Fig. 4 Mean richness of lentic taxa per pond. Most taxa have been identified to species (see Electronic supplementary Fig. 3 Geographical distribution in Europe of 30 lentic material). n = 25 ponds; except for Chironomidae and Oligo- species collected in the ponds from the Macun cirque. The chaeta, where n = 20. Each box represents the interquartile number of biogeographical zones occupied by each species has range (IQR, 25–75%) with the horizontal lines indicating the been assessed through the information presented in Illies median (normal line) and the mean (bold line). Upper error (1978), completed through the expertise of different taxonomy bars indicate the non-outlier maximum. Lower error bars specialists (G. Carron, personal communication; B. Lods- indicate the non-outlier minimum. Plain circles indicate outliers Crozet, personal communication; V. Lubini, personal [39 IQR, empty circles indicate outliers \39 IQR communication) richness to pond richness illustrates the magnitude zones in Europe and can be considered as near- of the distribution of the species in a given pond. If endemic. Some other species, occupying several species are distributed over the whole pond area (and biogeographic zones (being neither endemic nor are found in all habitats), each sample will collect all near-endemic), are nevertheless restricted to the species. On the other hand, if species are restricted to coldest areas of these zones. This is the case for some habitats, a sample will collect only a subset of two Dytiscidae Hydroporus foveolatus and H. nivalis the whole pond community. The ratio of 0.4 in and two Chironomidae Micropsectra notescens and Macun (mean from across all ponds) indicates that it Pseudosmittia oxoniana. These species are cold is possible to catch about 40% of pond diversity with stenothermal. only one sample. Ratios observed elsewhere in Switzerland are usually much lower, and for all four altitudinal belts they were *0.15 (Fig. 5c). The high Taxa richness in ponds and in samples ratio for Macun indicates that the species have a homogeneous distribution inside each of the Macun Richness of lentic taxa was on average 11.3 taxa per ponds. pond (min: 6; max: 24). Chironomidae was the richest group (4.8 taxa per pond), followed by the Coleoptera (2.3) and the Oligochaeta (1.9) (Fig. 4). In Relation between taxonomic richness and the case of Coleoptera, mean species richness per environmental variables pond is in the range of what has been observed in ponds of the alpine belt in Switzerland (Fig. 5a). Most of the relationships between lentic taxa richness However Macun ponds appear species-poor com- in ponds and the environmental variables were not pared to ponds situated at a lower altitude, especially significant (at P = 0.05) (Table 2). Taxa richness is to the 59-richer ponds from the colline altitudinal related with neither pond area nor altitude. Further- belt. The mean richness per sample shows weaker more, temporality (expressed here by mean depth) differences. A sample (30 s sweeping with the also was not a significant variable. Nevertheless, two handnet) taken in a Macun pond gathers a mean significant relationships were found. The clearest Coleoptera richness of 0.93 species (±0.56), a value relationship shows that the presence of a tributary (in that is higher than data observed in alpine and even in connection with a pond situated upstream) signifi- subalpine ponds (Fig. 5b). The ratio of sample cantly enhances the number of lentic taxa in a pond,
123 34 Reprinted from the journal Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:29–41 0.49 0.67 = = ns P ns P 0.03 0.01 = = P P * +; ** +; 0.80 = Binomial variables Fish presence Tributarya North–South ns P b 0.68 0.23 = = * r ns r ), or for binomial variables by the significance of a Mann–Whitney test r 0.22 0.15 = = ns r ns r 0.43 0.18 = = ns r ns r 0.09 0.25 = =- ns r Fig. 5 Mean richness of aquatic Coleoptera per pond (a), per ns r sample (b), and ratio sample/pond (c). Bars with the same letters (a, b or c) are not significantly different (Mann– 0.28 Whitney, P [ 0.05). n = 82 ponds (data from Oertli et al., 0.003 = =
2000) spread throughout the four altitudinal zones of Switzer- r ns ns r land: colline (210–665 m a.s.l.; n = 34), montane (610–
1400 m a.s.l.; n = 26), subalpine (1410–1988 m a.s.l.; 0.05 or 0.01) B 0.34 n = 10) and alpine (1860–2650 m a.s.l.; n = 12) were sam- 0.04 P = pled with the same standardised procedure PLOCH (Oertli = ns r et al., 2005a) ns r 0.16 0.32 by about 50%. Mean richness increases from 9.5 =- =- Altitude Pond area Mean depth Max depth Conductivity Grassland in drainage area Total nitrogen Continuous variables ns r (±2.5) to 14.1 (±5.9) (P = 0.03) when a tributary is ns r present. When Oligochaeta and Chironomidae taxa are removed, the increase is from 3.6 (±1.4) to 5.6 Relationship between the main environmental variables and the taxonomic richness in Macun ponds (±2.4) (P = 0.01). When richness of active colonis- 20 ponds) ers is separated from richness of passive colonisers, 25 ponds) = = Tested with a subset of 13 ponds Relation not tested (too few ponds with fish) n n ns: non-significant relationship +: positive relationship * or **: significant relationship ( S total ( Table 2 a b S without OC ( the relationship with the presence of a tributary is S total, all lentic taxa;The S relation without is OC, represented without for Oligochaeta continuous and variables Chironomidae by Spearman correlation coefficient (
Reprinted from the journal 35 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:29–41 significant in the case of passive colonisers Ordination of sites on the CA plot can be (P = 0.01), and near significant with active colonis- interpreted by the presence of species in each ers (P = 0.06). For example, lentic Coleoptera assemblage. Among the most common species, both (active colonisers) present a higher richness Trichoptera species played a major role in the (2.8 ± 1.0) in ponds with a tributary than in those ordination of sites. Acrophylax zerberus (present in without a tributary (2.0 ± 1.0) (P = 0.03). 28% of ponds) and Limnephilus coenosus (present in The other significant relationship shows the 52% of ponds) were never found in the same pond. positive effect of total nitrogen on taxa richness. Ponds which supported A. zerberus (M4, M8t, M13, However, this relation is dominated by the Chiro- M14 and M16 to M18) are all located on the left side nomidae and Oligochaeta and no more significant of the CA plot, and ponds which supported L. coe- when these groups are removed. nosus were mostly located below in the right part of the CA plot (M6, M10 to M12, M15, M19 to M23, M97 and M99t). Relation of macroinvertebrate assemblages with The geographical distance between ponds seemed environmental variables to influence the distribution of fauna. For example, among the 12 ponds of group A (Fig. 6), seven (M7– At first a CA was performed to explore the distribu- M12 and M15) are situated very close to each other in tion of species among the ponds and to represent the south-western part of the cirque (see Fig. 1). In graphically the grouping of the 25 macroinvertebrate the same way, neighbour ponds M17–M16 and M13– assemblages (Fig. 6). The first three axes of the CA M14 had similar faunal compositions. Results explained 26%, 17% and 13% of the variance, obtained using the 20-pond data set (including respectively. No significant correlation was found Oligochaeta and Chironomidae) showed the same between the measured environmental variables and trend (not presented here). A strong similarity among the first two axes of the CA (P [ 0.05, after 1,000 M9, M10 and M11 was also found (Fig. 6). More- random permutations of the data). over, the similarity between M13 and M14, and M17 and M16, was stronger than in the 25-pond dataset. An additional analysis, still with the objective of identifying groups of pond assemblages, but this time taking into account the abundances of the species, was done (Ward’s clustering technique). The cluster- ing of the 25 ponds produced three groups (Fig. 7). Taxa driving this clustering were the two species of Trichoptera (Acrophylax zerberus, Limnephilus coe- nosus) and one species of Coleoptera (Agabus bipustulatus). A. zerberus was present and abundant in all 6 ponds from group A, absent in ponds from group B, and present only once in group C. L. co- enosus was absent from group A, present only once in group B, and present and abundant in almost all ponds from group C. A. bipustulatus was present in all ponds from group A but none of group B, and was present in 4 of 15 ponds from group C. None of the local environmental variables (list in Table 2) explained this clustering (Mann–Whitney tests Fig. 6 Correspondence Analysis plot of the macroinvertebrate between groups of values). Several ponds belonging assemblages (presence/absence data) of 25 ponds from the to the same cluster are situated geographically close Macun cirque. Results of clustering (using Jaccard’s index; to each other in the cirque; this is the case for: (i) M8, average linkage) is indicated with a dotted line. Species are represented by codes (see list in Electronic supplementary M9 and M10, (ii) M4, M16 and M17, (iii) M13 and material) M14.
123 36 Reprinted from the journal Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:29–41
Fig. 7 Ward’s Clustering of the macroinvertebrate assemblages (abundance data) of 25 ponds from the Macun cirque. These assemblages do not include Oligochaeta and Chironomidae
The clustering of the 20 ponds dataset (not Discussion presented) produced three groups. The same taxa are driving the clustering as described above. Among Biodiversity of the Macun cirque the environmental variables, the importance of pond morphology was highlighted, and two groups differed The number of macroinvertebrate taxa characterising with regard to pond area (P = 0.019) and mean depth local (pond) or regional (Macun cirque) diversity (P = 0.06). The other environmental variables did investigated in this high alpine pond network was not influence the clustering. low. This was particularly obvious in comparison to
Reprinted from the journal 37 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:29–41 lowland ponds: for example, alpine ponds hold five indicates that flying and non-flying invertebrates times fewer Coleoptera species. disperse with equal frequency. The magnitude of Low richness in Macun has, nevertheless, to be put the enrichment through a tributary was particularly into perspective. When compared with other alpine significant in the Macun ponds. ponds, Macun ponds have similar pond richness and Some local variables generally recognised as even higher sample richness. Furthermore, regional important driving factors of pond biodiversity were richness (for Macun cirque) was relatively high, not significant factors in the Macun ponds. This was including nearly half of the species pool of lentic the case for pond area, shown elsewhere as a major Dytiscidae from the Swiss oriental Alps. From this determinative factor (Oertli et al., 2002). However, point of view, Macun cirque can be considered as a Hinden et al. (2005) also did not find significant species rich area. This richness is perhaps related to correlations of area with species richness for a set of the old age of the Macun ponds ([4,000 years), alpine ponds spread throughout Switzerland. This enabling multiple colonisation events. This high absence of relation might be a characteristic of alpine regional richness for the Macun cirque is in agree- ponds. It can reflect a weak influence of local factors, ment with Ko¨rner (2001) who underlined the in particular biotic factors (such as competition and extensive biodiversity of the alpine ecosystems when predation). Water chemistry (conductivity and total related to the small surface area of the alpine zone. nitrogen) also was not a strong discriminating local Va¨re et al. (2003) stressed the high level of ende- variable, probably because the differences in the mism of plants in the Alpine life zone. From this chemical characteristics were relatively moderate viewpoint, the Macun macroinvertebrate community among the ponds. Nevertheless, chemical differences does not show the same trend, as no endemic species explain differences in the assemblages of lotic and were identified. Nevertheless, many species were lentic diatoms in the Macun network (Robinson & cold stenothermal. Indeed, even with a broad geo- Kawecka, 2005). graphical distribution in Europe, they are restricted to As the Macun ponds with a low depth are dry the coldest areas in each country. during some weeks in summer, water permanence could be expected to be a key variable explaining richness or species assemblage, as this was already Relation of macroinvertebrate assemblages with observed for Macun streams (Ruegg & Robinson, environmental variables 2004). This was not the case for pond taxa richness. Furthermore, these ponds with a low depth (tempo- The richness of lentic taxa from the Macun ponds rary ponds) did not have species assemblages which was correlated with only a few environmental were different to those in permanent ponds. At lower variables. A clear relationship was demonstrated only altitudes, below the tree-line but still in the mountain with the presence of a tributary (connected with an zone, duration of water permanence seems to be a upstream pond), relating to a regional process. The much stronger factor; e.g. in subalpine ponds in presence of a tributary greatly enhanced the lentic Colorado (Wissinger et al., 1999) or snowmelt ponds taxa richness of ponds, by about 50%. This enrich- in Wisconsin (Schneider, 1999). A clear negative ment involved active and passive colonisers, relationship was demonstrated with species richness, indicating that a tributary enhances the connectivity and hydroperiod length influenced community struc- for both types of colonisers. Most likely, a tributary ture. For lowland ponds, this strong structuring effect ensures a continuous supply by drift of individuals of hydroperiod duration has already clearly been living in the connected pond upstream. A tributary found (e.g. Wiggins et al., 1980; Williams, 1987; could also act as a corridor for migration of the adult Collinson et al., 1995). stages of insects. Migration of lotic invertebrates in Ponds situated at a small geographical distance streams has already been well documented (e.g. from one another tended to have similar macroinver- Soderstrom, 1987; Delucchi, 1989), and lotic dis- tebrate assemblages. Such positive spatial persal has also been demonstrated for lentic autocorrelation of community composition is fre- invertebrates (Van de Meutter et al., 2006). Our quently observed in pond networks, at small and large results are consistent with this last study which spatial scales (see Briers & Biggs, 2005). As the
123 38 Reprinted from the journal Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:29–41 tested local variables were of relatively weak impor- such species can potentially give fingerprints of tance for driving the species richness or the species global change. Other particular attention should be assemblage, with probably also little pressure from given to flagship species or groups. The Odonata, predation or competition, then regional processes and often included in monitoring of lowland waterbodies, particularly colonisation events should have a high are missing in Macun. Even with rapid global chance of success, therefore playing a major role to warming, this group will stay species-poor for many explain the distribution of fauna. Furthermore, chance more years, as relatively a few species comprise the events (Jeffries, 1988) are perhaps an influential alpine species pool (Maibach & Meier, 1987). As factor in these Macun ponds. such, Coleoptera could constitute an alternative In conclusion, assemblages from ponds (composi- flagship group for alpine ponds. This group is well tion, richness) are only weakly influenced by local diversified in Macun, has a relatively well-known environmental variables in the Macun cirque, and the species distribution in Switzerland and is of some main structuring processes are regional and namely general interest to people. the connectivity between ponds (physical connection through tributaries and/or small geographical dis- tances among ponds). The situation is undoubtedly Expected temporal changes of the species different from the lowlands: even in highly intercon- assemblages in the Macun ponds nected ponds, local environmental constraints can be strong enough to structure local communities (Cotte- As the ponds from Macun have low species richness, nie et al., 2003). and as chance events are possibly the most influential structuring factor, each pond is the subject of colonization events that will be frequently successful. Monitoring macroinvertebrates in the Macun Many populations of lentic taxa from Macun vary in ponds time and space in terms of size, and may be subject to local extinction. Therefore, they should be considered Information collected during the sampling of the 25 as metapopulations (see Bohonak & Jenkins, 2003)in Macun ponds gave some useful practical recommen- this connected network of ponds. This would mean dations for the long-term monitoring of the area that species turnover is high in each Macun pond, and (Hinden et al., 2005; Stoll, 2005). As proposed by is consistent with Jeffries (2005) who suggests that these authors, the PLOCH sampling methodology considerable invertebrate dynamics occur in space (Oertli et al., 2005a) must be adapted for this and time, a phenomenon not adequately addressed by particular species-poor environment. First, the pro- extensive single-year surveys. posed sampling must be more intense for each pond, Besides these natural changes due to metapopula- with a longer duration for each individual sample tion dynamics in the Macun area, other biological (double time of sweeping with handnet, from 30 to changes are expected to occur in the future and are 60 s). Second, sorting of the macroinvertebrates must related to global warming. Trends predict an upward separate all taxonomic groups (not only Gastropoda shift of geographical ranges of species (Hodkinson & and Coleoptera). In particular Oligochaeta and Chi- Jackson, 2005), resulting in colonisation events in the ronomidae, often neglected, are species-rich if Macun ponds from species present at lower altitudes compared with other invertebrate groups. At 26 (i.e. actually present under tree-line). Many of these species, the Chironomidae represent more than half colonisation events will be successful in these of the taxonomic richness of the lentic macroinver- species-poor systems, and will increase regional and tebrates of the Macun cirque. During monitoring and local richness. Figure 5a can be used as a prediction in particular the data analyses, particular attention of the magnitude of the resulting changes expected at should be given to the cold stenothermal species, for the local scale. The alpine system will, in the future, example Dytiscidae Hydroporus foveolatus and resemble the subalpine system more and more. The H. nivalis, Chironomidae Micropsectra notescens remaining uncertainty in this prediction is the time and Pseudosmittia oxoniana and Trichoptera Acro- needed to reach such a situation. Colonisation events phylax zerberus. The dynamics of the populations of take time, and global change involves not only
Reprinted from the journal 39 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:29–41 changes in temperature, but also changes in duration drying out on the conservation value of aquatic macro- of ice cover and hydrological functioning, that are invertebrate communities. Biological Conservation 74: 125–133. much more difficult to predict and model than Colwell, R. K., 2005. EstimateS: statistical estimation of spe- temperature change. Besides this increase in richness, cies richness and shared species from samples. Version extinction events will also occur in Macun, and the 7.5. User’s Guide and application published at: http://purl. first victims will probably be the cold stenothermal oclc.org/estimates. Cottenie, K., E. Michels, N. Nuytten & L. De Meester, 2003. species. Zooplankton metacommunity structure: regional vs. local In conclusion, during the long-term monitoring of processes in highly interconnected ponds. Ecology 84: the Macun ponds (started in 2005), two types of 991–1000. change will affect the macroinvertebrate species De Meester, L., S. Declerck, R. Stoks, G. Louette, F. Van de Meutter, T. De Bie, E. Michels & L. Brendonck, 2005. assemblages. The first type of change is related to Ponds and pools as model systems in conservation biology, the natural dynamics occurring in these species-poor ecology and evolutionary biology. Aquatic Conservation: systems, with important local-scale turnover, involv- Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15: 715–725. ing the species pool characterising the Macun cirque. Delarze, R., Y. Gonseth & P. Galland, 1998. Guide des milieux naturels de Suisse. Delachaux et Niestle´, Lausanne. The second type of change is related to global Delucchi, C. M., 1989. Movement patterns of invertebrates in warming and will lead to higher local and regional temporary and permanent streams. Oecologia 78: 199–207. richness, but also to extinction of cold stenothermal Foggo, A., S. D. Rundle & D. T. Bilton, 2003. The net result: species. One of the challenges of monitoring will be evaluating species richness extrapolation techniques for littoral pond invertebrates. Freshwater Biology 48: 1756– to identify these changes and their relationship with 1764. natural dynamics and global warming. Gaston, K. J., 2000. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405: 220–227. Acknowledgements This work was partly supported by the Gaston, K. J. & J. I. Spicer, 2004. Biodiversity. An Introduc- Research Committee from the Swiss National Park. Thanks to tion, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science Ltd, Malden, Oxford, Thomas Scheurer and Flurin Filli for logistic support and to Victoria. everyone who helped in the field—Nathalie Menetrey, Lionel Gurung A. B. (ed.), 2005. GLOCHAMORE Global Change Sager, Zoe´ Fleury and Marianna Massa. Special thanks to Chris and Mountain Regions. Research Strategy. Mountain Robinson for his helpful collaboration and also for his Research Initiative, Bern. constructive review of the manuscript. A large part of the Hinden, H., 2004. La biodiversite´ des petits plans d’eau alpins chemical analyses were realised by the Swiss Federal Institute de Suisse. MS these, University of Geneva, Geneva. of Aquatic Science and Technology. We are very grateful to Hinden, H., B. Oertli, N. Menetrey, L. Sager & J.-B. Lachav- the CSCF for access to the Swiss databanks on fauna. Help in anne, 2005. Alpine pond biodiversity: what are the related identification was provided by Gilles Carron (Coleoptera), environmental variables? Aquatic Conservation: Marine Brigitte Lods-Crozet (Chironomidae), Narcisse Giani and Freshwater Ecosystems 15: 613–624. (Oligochaeta), Verena Lubini (Trichoptera) and Nigel Thew Hodkinson, I. D. & J. K. Jackson, 2005. Terrestrial and aquatic (Sphaeriidae). Also, Jane O’Rourke and Mericia Whitfield are invertebrates as bioindicators for environmental monitor- thanked for improving the English style. The constructive ing, with particular reference to mountain ecosystems. comments of two anonymous referees improved the paper. Environmental Management 355: 649–666. Illies, J., 1978. Limnofauna Europaea, 2nd edn. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart. Jeffries, M., 1988. Measuring talling element of chance in pond References populations. Freshwater Biology 20: 383–393. Jeffries, M., 2005. Small ponds and big landscapes: the chal- Bohonak, A. J. & D. G. Jenkins, 2003. Ecological and evolu- lenge of invertebrate spatial and temporal dynamics for tionary significance of dispersal by freshwater European pond conservation. Aquatic Conservation: invertebrates. Ecology Letters 6: 783–796. Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15: 541–548. Briers, R. A. & J. Biggs, 2005. Spatial patterns in pond Ko¨rner, C., 2001. Alpine ecosystems. In Levin, S. A. (ed.), invertebrate communities: separating environmental and Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Academic Press, San distance effects. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Diego, 133–144. Freshwater Ecosystems 15: 549–558. Logue, J. B., C. T. Robinson, C. Meier & J. R. Van der Meer, Clausnitzer, V. & R. Jo¨dicke (eds), 2004. Guardians of the 2004. Relationship between sediment organic matter, bac- watershed. Global status of dragonflies: critical species, teria composition, and the ecosystem metabolism of alpine threat and conservation. International Journal of Odona- streams. Limnology and Oceanography 49: 2001–2010. tology 7: 1–430. Magurran, A. E., 2003. Measuring Biological Diversity. Collinson, N. H., J. Biggs, A. Corfield, M. J. Hodson, D. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. Walker, M. Whitfield & P. J. Williams, 1995. Temporary Maibach, A. & C. Meier, 1987. Atlas de distribution des li- and permanent ponds: an assessment of the effects of bellules de Suisse (Odonata). Centre Suisse de
123 40 Reprinted from the journal Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:29–41
Cartographie de la Faune, Ligue suisse pour la protection Sommaruga, R., R. Psenner, E. Schafferer, K. A. Koinig & S. de la nature, Neuchaˆtel. Sommaruga-Wograth, 1999. Dissolved organic carbon Matthaei, S., 2003. Expansion contraction cycle of a stream/ concentration and phytoplankton biomass in high-moun- lake network in a high alpine floodplain. Diploma thesis, tain lakes of the Austrian Alps: potential effect of climatic Swiss Federal Institute of Environmental Science and warming an UV underwater attenuation. Arctic Antarctic Technology, Du¨bendorf, Switzerland. and Alpine Research 31: 247–253. Oertli, B., D. Auderset Joye, E. Castella, R. Juge & J-B. Sommaruga-Wograth, S., K. A. Koinig, R. Schmidt, R. Som- Lachavanne, 2000. Diversite´ biologique et typologie maruga, R. Tessadri & R. Psenner, 1997. Temperature e´cologique des e´tangs et petits lacs de Suisse. Rapport effects on the acidity of remote alpine lakes. Nature 387: final. OFEFP et Universite´ de Gene`ve. 64–67. Oertli, B., D. Auderset Joye, E. Castella, R. Juge, D. Cambin & Stoll, A., 2005. Mise en place d’un monitoring de la biodiv- J.-B. Lachavanne, 2002. Does size matter? The relation- ersite´ des e´tangs de Macun (Parc National Suisse, GR). ship between pond area and biodiversity. Biological Travail de diploˆme. University of Applied Sciences of Conservation 104: 59–70. Western Switzerland, EIL, Lullier. Oertli, B., D. Auderset Joye, E. Castella, R. Juge, A. Lehmann Tachet, H., P. Richoux, M. Bournaud & P. Usseglio-Polatera, & J.-B. Lachavanne, 2005a. PLOCH: a standardised 2000. Inverte´bre´s d’eaux douces. Syste´matique, biologie, method for sampling and assessing the biodiversity in e´cologie. CNRS Editions, Paris. ponds. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Theurillat, J. P. & A. Guisan, 2001. Potential impact of climate Ecosystems 15: 665–679. change on vegetation in the European Alps: a review. Oertli, B., J. Biggs, R. Ce´re´ghino, P. Grillas, P. Joly & J.-B. Climatic Change 50: 77–109. Lachavanne, 2005b. Conservation and monitoring of pond Thomas, C. D., A. Cameron, R. E. Green, M. Bakkenes, L. J. biodiversity: introduction. Aquatic Conservation: Marine Beaumont, Y. C. Collingham, B. F. N. Erasmus, M. F. de and Freshwater Ecosystems 15: 535–540. Siqueira, A. Grainger, L. Hannah, L. Hughes, B. Huntley, Rey, P. & P. Pitsch, 2004. Die Entdeckung der Bescheidenheit: A. S. van Jaarsveld, G. F. Midgley, L. Miles, M. A. erste Einblicke in das Leben der Fische auf Macun. Ortega-Huerta, A. T. Peterson, O. L. Phillips & S. E. Cratschla 2: 23. Williams, 2004. Extinction risk from climate change. Robinson, C. T. & B. Kawecka, 2005. Benthic diatoms of an Nature 427: 145–148. Alpine stream/lake network in Switzerland. Aquatic Sci- Thuillier, W., S. Lavorel, M. B. Arau´jo, M. T. Sykes & I. C. ences 67: 492–506. Prentice, 2005. Climate change threats to plant diversity Robinson, C. T. & S. Matthaei, 2007. Hydrological heteroge- in Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- neity of an Alpine stream/lake network in Switzerland. ences of the United States of America 102: 8245–8250. Hydrological Processes 21: 3146–3154. Van de Meutter, F., R. Stoks & L. De Meester, 2006. Lotic Rosenzweig, M. L., W. R. Turner, J. G. Cox & T. H. Ricketts, dispersal of lentic macroinvertebrates. Ecography 29: 2003. Estimating diversity in unsampled habitats of a 223–230. biogeographical province. Conservation Biology 17: 864– Va¨re, H., R. Lampinen, C. Humphries & P. Williams, 2003. 874. Taxonomic diversity of vascular plants in the European Ruegg, J. & C. T. Robinson, 2004. Comparison of macroin- alpine areas. In Nagy, L., G. Grabherr, C. Ko¨rner & D. B. vertebrate assemblages of permanent and temporary A. Thompson (eds), Alpine Biodiversity in Europe—A streams in an Alpine flood plain, Switzerland. Archiv fu¨r Europe-wide Assessment of Biological Richness and Hydrobiologie 161: 489–510. Change. Springer, 133–148. Schanz, F., 1984. Chemical and algological characteristics of Wathne, B. M. & H. H. Hansen, 1997. MOLAR. Measuring five high mountain lakes near the Swiss National Park. and modelling the dynamic response of remote mountain Verhandlungen Internationale Vereinigung fu¨r theoreti- lake ecosystem to environmental change: a program of sche und angewandte Limnologie 22: 1066–1070. Mountain lake Research. MOLAR Project Manual. NIVA Scheurer, T., 2004. Global change research in mountain bio- Report 0-96061, Oslo. sphere reserves: Swiss National Park biosphere reserve. In Wiggins, G. B., R. J. Mackay & I. M. Smith, 1980. Evolu- Lee, C. & T. Schaaf (eds), Global Change Research in tionary and ecological strategies of animals in annual Mountain Biosphere Reserves. Proceedings of the Inter- temporary pools. Archiv fu¨r Hydrobiologie Supplement national Launching Workshop, Entlebuch Biosphere 58: 97–206. Reserve, Switzerland, 10–13 November 2003. UNESCO, Williams, D. D., 1987. The Ecology of Temporary Waters. Paris, 85–92. Croom Helm, London & Sydney. Schneider, D. W., 1999. Influence of hydroperiod on inverte- Wissinger, S. A., A. J. Bohonak, H. H. Whiteman & W. S. brate community structure. In Batzer, D. P., R. R. Rader & Brown, 1999. Subalpine wetlands in central Colorado: S. A. Wissinger (eds), Invertebrates in Freshwater Wet- habitat permanence, salamander predation, and inverte- lands of North America: Ecology and Management. brate communities. In Batzer, D. P., R. R. Rader & S. A. Wiley, New York, 299–318. Wissinger (eds), Invertebrates in freshwater wetlands of Soderstrom, O., 1987. Upstream movements of invertebrates in North America: ecology and management. Wiley, New running waters—a review. Archiv fu¨r Hydrobiologie 111: York, 757–790. 197–208.
Reprinted from the journal 41 123 Hydrobiologia (2008) 597:43–51 DOI 10.1007/s10750-007-9219-6
ECOLOGY OF EUROPEAN PONDS
Biodiversity and distribution patterns of freshwater invertebrates in farm ponds of a south-western French agricultural landscape
R. Ce´re´ghino Æ A. Ruggiero Æ P. Marty Æ S. Ange´libert