DOCSLIB.ORG

'On the Way to Planetproof' for Plant Products in Southern Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'On the Way to Planetproof' for Plant Products in Southern Europe CERTIFICATION SCHEME ‘ON THE WAY TO PLANETPROOF’ FOR PLANT PRODUCTS IN SOUTHERN EUROPE Effective date: 1 July 2019 Valid until: 1 July 2020 Established by: SMK Code: PP.2-SE Certification based on this scheme is possible in countries of Southern Europa as defined by the EU classification, zone South. Publication of this scheme is subject to change. The most recent certification scheme and any ‘additional decrees’ are published at www.planetproof.eu. The ‘On the way to PlanetProof’ wordmark and logo are legally protected and registered with the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property under number 0998240. Sanctions will be imposed for wrongful use of the wordmark or logo. © Copyright SMK. All rights reserved Table of contents Note to the reader ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Goals ‘On the way to PlanetProof Plant Products’ by category .................................................................................................................... 8 Criteria On the way to PlanetProof Plant Products ...................................................................................................................................... 9 1. Energy and climate ....................................................................................................................................................................... 10 2. Crop protection ............................................................................................................................................................................. 16 3. Biodiversity and landscape ............................................................................................................................................................. 29 4. Soil fertility .................................................................................................................................................................................. 32 5. Fertilisation .................................................................................................................................................................................. 36 6. Water .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 40 7. Light emission .............................................................................................................................................................................. 44 8. Waste and cleaning ....................................................................................................................................................................... 45 9. Packaging .................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 10: General requirements .................................................................................................................................................................. 48 General requirements for certificate holder ........................................................................................................................................ 48 Track & trace ................................................................................................................................................................................. 55 Communication .............................................................................................................................................................................. 58 Supply chain management .............................................................................................................................................................. 60 Annexes .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 66 Annex 1 Crops to be certified and active substance limits ...................................................................................................................... 67 Annex 2 Crop protection .................................................................................................................................................................... 69 Annex 2a IPM Action Plan guideline .................................................................................................................................................. 69 Annex 2b List Green products, low-risk substances ............................................................................................................................ 71 Annex 2c Active substances subjected to additional conditions ............................................................................................................. 78 Annex 2d Crop protection contingency scheme .................................................................................................................................. 82 Annex 3 Residue analysis protocol ...................................................................................................................................................... 83 Annex 4 Soil based Open cultivation: Nitrogen and phosphorus application limits ...................................................................................... 85 Annex 5 Soil-based Protected cultivation: Nitrogen and phosphorus application limits ............................................................................... 86 Annex 6 Glossary .............................................................................................................................................................................. 87 On the way to PlanetProof Plant Products Southern Europe 1 July 2019 – 1 July 2020 Page 3 of 90 © Copyright SMK. All rights reserved. Note to the reader Certification for primary production companies and trading companies This certification scheme makes reference to the certificate holder, which could include a number of different companies: Primary production Growers and cultivators of plant products companies Trading companies Companies that trade in products and, in some cases, that package products but do not change the products. Trading companies also include retail companies. On the way to PlanetProof certification is mandatory for all companies that: • Produce certified products and sell them under On the way to PlanetProof. • Process and/or prepare certified products and sell them under On the way to PlanetProof. • Purchase certified non-prepackaged products and sell them under On the way to PlanetProof. On the way to PlanetProof certification is not mandatory for companies that: • Only purchase and sell prepackaged On the way to PlanetProof certified products. • Purchase non-prepackaged On the way to PlanetProof certified products and sell them as non-certified products. • Provide a service (e.g. packaging, invoicing) but are not the owner of the certified product. A prepackaged product is defined in this context as a product that is directly suited for preparation/use by the consumer and is packaged in such a manner that the product can only be reached by changing something on the packaging (e.g. damaging or breaking it). An exception applies to On the way to PlanetProof-certified eggs (and their packaging), because consumers must have the opportunity to inspect them before purchase. The requirements set out in the On the way to PlanetProof scheme ‘Prepared and Processed Products’ apply to preparers and processors. On the way to PlanetProof Plant Products Southern Europe 1 July 2019 – 1 July 2020 Page 4 of 90 © Copyright SMK. All rights reserved. Setup of certification scheme The certification scheme comprises requirements (mandatory) and optional measures divided into 10 different chapters. The table below indicates which chapters are applicable to primary production companies and trading companies: Relevant chapter(s) Applicable to: Primary Trading companies production companies General certification conditions (separate document) Yes Yes Chapter 1 to 8: criteria for production process Yes* No *The cultivation system to which the requirement applies is specified for each requirement. A distinction is drawn between open-field/protected and soil- based/substrate cultivation systems. This is indicated in the right-hand columns with crosses (X), in which the following abbreviations are used: • OC = open-field cultivation system • PC = protected cultivation system • SB = soil-based cultivation system • SS = substrate cultivation system For a description of the cultivation systems, see the Glossary (annex 6). Chapter 9: Packaging If the company If the company packages products packages products Chapter 9 applies to companies that package products. Chapter 10: General requirements Yes** Yes** (criteria 10.0 and **In chapter 10 (General requirements), it is specified for each requirement 10.8 to 10.23) whether or not the requirement applies to primary production companies and/or trading companies. This is indicated in the right-hand columns with crosses (X). On the way to PlanetProof Plant Products Southern Europe 1 July 2019 – 1 July 2020 Page 5 of 90 © Copyright SMK. All rights reserved. Requirement
Load more

Recommended publications
  • False Codling Moth Thaumatotibia Leucotreta
    Stone Fruit Commodity-Based Pest Survey False Codling Moth Thaumatotibia leucotreta Introduction False codling moth (Figure 1) is a significant pest because of its potential economic impact on many crops, including stone fruit, avocado, citrus, corn, cotton, and macadamia. It is not currently known to be present in the United States. Biology Depending on conditions, the false codling moth’s life cycle ranges from 30 to 174 days. It can produce from 2 to 10 generations each year, depending on multiple factors including temperature, food availability and quality, and humidity. To attract males, adult females release pheromones at FIGURE 1. Adult false codling moth (Thaumatotibia leucotreta). Photo courtesy of night. After the adults mate, the female deposits eggs on Pest and Diseases Image Library, Bugwood.org. host plants, either in batches or as single eggs. Later, the hatching larvae burrow into the rind of the host plant. Mature larvae spin cocoons and pupate before they emerge as adults. Symptoms False codling moth can attack stone fruit at any stage. Larvae can even develop in hard green fruit prior to application of control measures. Larvae burrow at the stem end into the fruit and cause damage by feeding around the stone. Damaged fruit can become vulnerable to secondary pests such as fungal organisms and scavengers. Peaches can be damaged by larvae beginning up to 6 weeks before harvest. False codling moth can also attack plants unsuitable for larvae development, such as avocado, causing lesions on fruit tissue and diminishing the marketability of fruit. Because false codling moth is an internal feeder, few symptoms are actually displayed by the larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Responses and Control of California Red Scale Aonidiella Aurantii (Maskell) (Hemiptera: Diaspididae)
    Biological responses and control of California red scale Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell) (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) by Khalid Omairy Mohammed Submitted to Murdoch University in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education Murdoch University Perth, Western Australia March 2020 Declaration The work described in this thesis was undertaken while I was an enrolled student for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Murdoch University, Western Australia. I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. To the best of my knowledge, all work performed by others, published or unpublished, has been duly acknowledged. Khalid O. Mohammed Date: March 10, 2020 I Acknowledgements بِ ْس ِمِِاللَّ ِـه َِّالر ْح َم ٰـ ِن َِّالر ِح ِيمِ ُ َويَ ْسأَلُ َونَك َِع ِن ُِّالروحِِِۖقُ ِل ُِّالر ُوح ِِم ْنِأَ ْم ِر َِر ِب َيِو َماِأ ِوتيتُ ْم ِِم َن ِْال ِع ْل ِمِإِ ََّّل َِق ِل ايًلِ﴿٨٥﴾ The research for this thesis was undertaken in the School of Veterinary and Life Science, Murdoch University. I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to my supervisors Professor Yonglin Ren and Dr Manjree Agarwal “Postharvest Biosecurity and Food Safety Laboratory Murdoch” for their support with enthusiasm, constructive editing, and patience throughout the years of this wonderful project. I deeply appreciate their encouragement, assistance and for being so willing to take me on as a student. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to all those who helped me in completing this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • False Codling Moth on Chillies Thaumatotibia Leucotreta Prevention Monitoring Direct Control
    PEST MANAGEMENT DECISION GUIDE: GREEN LIST False codling moth on chillies Thaumatotibia leucotreta Prevention Monitoring Direct Control l Use mesh or net barriers to keep the l Start monitoring when the chilli fruits start developing as the larvae only attack l Control is difficult because the moth pest out of the crop when possible the fruits has many alternative hosts so l Insect: reinfestation is likely to occur l Eggs are less than 1 mm long, oval, flattened and difficult to see. They are l Hand pick the mature larvae from the laid singly or in group on the developing fruits crop Larva T. leucotreta (Tertia l Larvae are yellowish-white when young with dark spots. The full grown larva l If available, spray a mating disruption Grové, Institute for Tropical and is about 15 mm long, bright red or pink, with a yellow-brown head. The young pheromone into the crop to stop the Subtropical Crops, larvae mine fruit just beneath the surface, or bore into the skin causing males and females from mating Bugwood.org) premature ripening of the fruit l Destroy fruits that are infested and l The pupa (5-7 mm long) is contained within a tough silken cocoon and can be have fallen to the ground to reduce seen in the soil or amongst plant debris the build-up cycle and avoid carrying over the pest to the next season. Put l Adult moths are 15-16 mm (males) and 19-20 mm (female) in length. the fruits in plastic bags and expose Forewings have grey, brown, black and orange-brown markings.
    [Show full text]
  • Thaumatotibia Leucotreta
    Thaumatotibia leucotreta Scientific Name Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) Synonyms: Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Meyrick), Cryptophlebia roerigii Zacher Olethreutes leucotreta Meyrick Thaumatotibia roerigii Zacher Common Name(s) False codling moth, citrus codling moth, orange moth, and orange codling moth Type of Pest Moth Figure 1. Larva of Thaumatotibia leucotreta (T. Grove Taxonomic Position and W. Styn, bugwood.org). Class: Insecta, Order: Lepidoptera, Family: Tortricidae Reason for Inclusion CAPS Target: AHP Prioritized Pest List - 2003 through 2014 Pest Description Eggs: Eggs are flat, oval (0.77 mm long by 0.60 mm wide) shaped discs with a granulated surface. The eggs are white to cream colored when initially laid. They change to a reddish color before the black head capsule of the larvae becomes visible under the chorion prior to hatching (Daiber, 1979a). 1 Larvae: First instar (neonate) larvae approximately 1 to 1.2 mm (< /16 in) in length with dark pinacula giving a spotted appearance, fifth instar larvae are orangey-pink, 1 becoming more pale on sides and yellow in ventral region, 12 to 18 mm (approx. /2 to 11 /16 in) long, with a brown head capsule and prothoracic shield (Fig. 1). [Note this coloration is only present in live specimens.] The last abdominal segment bears an anal comb with two to ten “teeth.” The mean head capsule width for the first through fifth instar larvae has been recorded as: 0.22, 0.37, 0.61, 0.94 and 1.37 mm, respectively (Daiber, 1979b). Diagnostic characters would include the anal comb with two to ten teeth in addition to: L pinaculum on T1 enlarged and extending beneath and beyond (posterad of) the spiracle; spiracle on A8 displaced posterad of SD pinaculum; crochets unevenly triordinal, 36-42; L-group on A9 usually trisetose (all setae usually on same pinaulum) (Brown, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • False Codling Moth
    Fact sheet False codling moth What is the False codling moth? The False codling moth (Cryptophlebia leucotreta) is an internal fruit feeding moth that can be found throughout the year in warm climates and has been recorded as feeding on over 50 different plant species. This moth causes economic loss in a range of crops in sub-Saharan Africa. Losses during infestations can be between 20-30%. What does it look like? Adult moths are 15-16 mm (males) and 19-20 mm Citrus Research International, Bugwood.org J.H. Hofmeyr, (female) in length. Forewings have grey, brown, Eggs are oval shaped and almost 1 mm long black and orange-brown markings. A triangular marking on the outer part of the wing with a crescent shaped marking above it distinguishes the False codling moth from other species. Young larvae are yellowish-white with dark spots but bright red or pink when fully grown (15 mm), with a yellow-brown head. Pupae are contained within a tough silken cocoon amongst debris or in the soil. Female moths lay 100-400 eggs (oval, flattened and almost 1 mm in length) singly on the fruits at night. J.H. Hofmeyr, Citrus Research International, Bugwood.org J.H. Hofmeyr, What can it be confused with? False codling moth pupae False codling moth can look similar to other moths but can be distinguished by the triangular marking near the edges of the wings. What should I look for? The young larvae mine fruit just beneath the surface, or bore into the skin causing premature ripening of the fruit.
    [Show full text]
  • New Pest Response Guidelines False Codling Moth Thaumatotibia Leucotreta
    United States Department of New Pest Response Agriculture Marketing and Regulatory Guidelines Programs Animal and False Codling Moth Plant Health Inspection Service Thaumatotibia leucotreta Cooperating State Departments of Agriculture August 13, 2007 New Pest Response Guidelines False Codling Moth Thaumatotibia leucotreta August 13, 2007 New Pest Response Guidelines: False Codling Moth Thaumatotibia leucotreta was prepared by Jeffrey Stibick, USDA–APHIS–PPQ–Emergency and Domestic Programs and edited by Patricia S. Michalak, USDA–APHIS–PPQ–Manuals Unit. Cite this report as follows: Stibick, J. 2006. New Pest Response Guidelines: False Codling Moth Thaumatotibia leucotreta. USDA–APHIS–PPQ–Emergency and Domestic Programs, Riverdale, Maryland [http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ import_export/plants/ppq_manuals.shtml]. R. L. Dunkle May 3, 2007 Richard Dunkle, Deputy Administrator Date USDA–APHIS–PPQ Emergency and Domestic Programs Emergency Planning Joel Floyd, Team Leader 4700 River Road Unit 137 Riverdale, Maryland 20737 Telephone: 310/734-4396 [email protected] 1 Credits False Codling Moth Contributors Stephanie Bloem, U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)–Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)–Center for Plant Health Science and Technology (CPHST), Raleigh, North Carolina Jim E. Carpenter, USDA–Agricultural Research Service (ARS)–Crop Protection and Management Research, Tifton, Georgia Susan Ellis, USDA–APHIS–Plant Protection and Quarantine–Office of the Deputy Administrator, Riverdale, Maryland Todd Gilligan, Ohio State University, Museum of Biodiversity, Columbus, Ohio Jeffrey N. L. Stibick, USDA–APHIS–PPQ–Emergency and Domestic Programs, Riverdale, Maryland Shaharra J. Usnick, USDA–APHIS–PPQ–Plant Health Programs, Riverdale, Maryland Robert C. Venette, USDA–Forest Service, St. Paul, Minnesota Industry, State Regulatory Officers, Universities, and Governmental Agencies as credited in: September 1983.
    [Show full text]
  • False Codling Moth, Thaumatotibia (=Cryptophlebia) Leucotreta (Meyrick) [Lepidoptera: Tortricidae]
    Mini Risk Assessment False codling moth, Thaumatotibia (=Cryptophlebia) leucotreta (Meyrick) [Lepidoptera: Tortricidae] Robert C. Venette, Erica E. Davis, Michelle DaCosta, Holly Heisler, & Margaret Larson Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota St. Paul, MN 55108 September 21, 2003 Introduction Thaumatotibia leucotreta is a significant pest of fruit trees and field crops in portions of Africa (CIE 1976, Zhang 1994). Until recently, this pest had been most commonly known as Cryptophlebia leucotreta (Komai 1999). A detailed description of the rationale for the name change is included in this document. For the sake of scientific accuracy, we refer to the false codling moth as T. leucotreta throughout this report. We hope the change does not cause confusion. To our knowledge the risks posed by this pest for US agriculture and native ecosystems have not been evaluated previously in a formal pest risk assessment. Figure 1. Larva and adult of T. leucotreta. Images not to scale. [Larval image from http://www.arc.agric.za/institutes/ itsc/main/avocado/moth.htm; Adult image from Georg Goergen/IITA Insect Museum, Cotonou, Benin as published in (CAB 2000)] 1. Ecological Suitability. Rating: Medium. Thaumatotibia leucotreta is native to the Ethiopian zoogeographic province and presently occurs in much of Sub- Saharan Africa (CIE 1976, CAB 2000). Climates in the area occupied by this pest can be characterized as tropical, dry or temperate (CAB 2000). The currently reported global distribution of T. leucotreta suggests that the pest may be most closely associated with biomes that are generally classified as desert and xeric shrubland, tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas, and shrubland; and tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forest.
    [Show full text]
  • EPPO PRA on Thaumatotibia
    EUROPEAN AND MEDITERRANEAN PLANT PROTECTION ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE ET MEDITERRANEENNE POUR LA PROTECTION DES PLANTES 13-19032 Pest Risk Analysis for Thaumatotibia leucotreta September 2013 EPPO 21 Boulevard Richard Lenoir 75011 Paris www.eppo.int [email protected] This risk assessment follows the EPPO Standard PM 5/3(5) Decision-support scheme for quarantine pests (available at http://archives.eppo.int/EPPOStandards/pra.htm) and uses the terminology defined in ISPM 5 Glossary of Phytosanitary Terms (available at https://www.ippc.int/index.php). This document was first elaborated by an Expert Working Group and then reviewed by core members and by the Panel on Phytosanitary Measures and if relevant other EPPO bodies. It was finally approved by the Council in September 2013. Cite this document as: EPPO (2013) Pest risk analysis for Thaumatotibia leucotreta. EPPO, Paris. Available at http://www.eppo.int/QUARANTINE/Pest_Risk_Analysis/PRA_intro.htm 1 Guideline on Pest Risk Analysis Decision-support scheme for quarantine pests Version N°5 13-19032 (13-18307, 12-18121) Pest Risk Analysis for Thaumatotibia leucotreta Fig. 1 Adult of T. leucotreta Fig. 2 Larvae of T. leucotreta (courtesy Ms van der Straten) (courtesy Ms van der Straten) Stage 2: Pest Risk Assessment Section A: Pest categorization Stage 2: Pest Risk Assessment Section B: Probability of entry of a pest Stage 2: Pest Risk Assessment Section B: Probability of establishment Stage 2: Pest Risk Assessment Section B: Conclusion of introduction Stage 2: Pest Risk Assessment Section B: Probability of spread Stage 2: Pest Risk Assessment Section B: Eradication, containment of the pest and transient populations Stage 2: Pest Risk Assessment Section B: Assessment of potential economic consequences Stage 2: Pest Risk Assessment Section B: Degree of uncertainty and Conclusion of the pest risk assessment Stage 3: Pest Risk Management Expert Working group for PRA for T.
    [Show full text]
  • Europhyt Interceptions 2018
    DG Health and Food Safety Europhyt Interceptions Annual Report 2018 Health and Food Safety Further information on the Health and Food Safety Directorate-General is available on the internet at: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_food-safety/index_en.htm Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of the following information. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 © European Union, 2018 Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EU copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. © Photos : http://www.istockphoto.com/, Health and Food Safety Directorate-General Print ISBN 978-92-79-61478-1 doi:10.2875/594988 EW-BC-16-067-EN-C PDF ISBN 978-92-79-61477-4 doi:10.2875/830026 EW-BC-16-067-EN-N Ref. Ares(2019)5031679 - 01/08/2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY Health and food audits and analysis DG(SANTE) 2019-6845 EUROPHYT-INTERCEPTIONS EUROPEAN UNION NOTIFICATION SYSTEM FOR PLANT HEALTH INTERCEPTIONS ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Executive summary EUROPHYT- Interceptions is the plant health interception, notification and rapid alert system for EU Member States (MSs) and Switzerland, managed by the European Commission. This report presents key statistics on non-EU country interceptions from 2018 and provides analysis of trends in interceptions based on annual figures for the period 2014- 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Presentation
    MIINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY PRESENTATION ON PHYTOSANITARY SYSTEM IN SIERRA LEONE BY Raymonda JOHNSON Head Crop Protection Unit During the IPPC High Level Symposium in CHINA Outline of presentation Background information on agriculture Organogram of Sierra Leone NPPO Phytosanitary legal framework Regulated pest list Overview of case surveillance – non – compliance and managing regulated pest list Emerging pest Opportunities Challenges Suggestion- international, regional and bilateral Background information on agriculture The Four priorities are: ◦ 1) Rice self-sufficiency, ◦ 2) Livestock development, ◦ 3), Crops diversification, ◦ 4)Sustainable forestry management and bio-diversity conservation. ◦ The enablers are: 1) Improved policy coherence, Joint and strategic planning, coordination, research and resource mobilization. 2) Make youth and women catylistis for agribusiness development, 3) Invest in catalytic technologies ie mechanism, irrigation, water management, remote sensing feeder roaders by government and private sector. Situated on the West African coast bordering Guinea and Liberia, Sierra Leone covers 71,740 square km with a population of around 7.7 million people. Sierra Leone is among the low human development countries (ranks 184 out of 189, according to 2018 UNDP Human Development Report). The climate is generally equatorial with distinct dry season (November – April), and wet season, (May-October). Sierra Leone has 5.4 million hectares of arable land of which about 2.0 million hectares is under cultivation . The arable land comprises of upland and more fertile lowland areas. The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) score normally ranges from 1 to 6 . The rating for Sierra Leone has improved from 2.5 in 2005 to 3.0 in 2014 and currently at 3.2 with no change from the previous year .
    [Show full text]
  • QAAFI Annual Report 2019
    Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation Hub marks a new era in crop protection Annual Report 2019 A revolutionary alternative to chemical fungicides to protect CONTENTS Australia’s $5 trillion global food and agribusiness sector is being spearheaded by researchers at The University of Queensland. About QAAFI 4 Animal Science 22 Vice-Chancellor’s Message 6 Pig lung disease breakthrough 24 Led by Professor Neena Mitter, the $17.5 million Australian Research Council (ARC) QAAFI: Delivering Impact 7 Tick vaccine for Bos taurus 26 Industrial Transformational Research Hub for Sustainable Crop Protection builds upon 10 years of innovation 8 Bovine Respiratory Disease vaccine 28 UQ’s BioClay technology to create biological-based fungicides for Australian broadacre Message from the Minister 10 Tail hair testing for better nutrition 30 and horticultural crops. QAAFI in Queensland 11 The technology reduces chemical use, increases crop productivity, and improves sustainability across the supply chain. Director’s message 12 Crop Science 32 Research themes 13 Hy-Gain project to rewire plant reproduction 34 Read more on page 14. Research excellence 14 Gene editing to boost protein in sorghum 36 TropAg conference 2019 18 Controlling glyphosate0resistant weeds 37 Genetic remix for all-climate wheat 38 Computer simulations to manage LMA in wheat 40 Modern wheat varieties hardier 42 Pigeonpea takes flight 43 Horticultural Science 44 Macadamia cultivation and disease management 46 Avocado genome sequenced 48 Avocado stem cell propagation field trials 49 Tackling banana bunchy top disease 50 Nutrition and Food Sciences 52 Nourishing Australia 54 Australian signature flavour for pork 56 Naturally nutritious purple sweet corn 58 Keeping the crunch in low-fat chips 59 Ancient fruit ripe for modern plates 60 Science-based provenance for Australian food 62 Drone image of researchers investigating a green plum (Buchanania obovata) tree near the Gulkula nursery near Gove in East Arnhem Land.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology, Behaviour and Survival of Pupating False Codling Moth
    The biology, behaviour and survival of pupating false codling moth, Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), a citrus pest in South Africa A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE of RHODES UNIVERSITY by Claire Natalie Love February 2015 i ABSTRACT Control of the citrus pest, false codling moth (FCM), Thaumatotibia leucotreta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) is crucial for the South African citrus industry. The economic losses and phytosanitary status of this pest, coupled with increased consumer awareness and demands, has created a need for effective, IPM-compatible control measures for use against the soil-dwelling life stages of FCM. Promising developments in the field of microbial control through the use of entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) and entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) have highlighted the need for research regarding pupation biology, behaviour and survival of FCM, as a good understanding of biology of the target organism is an important component of any biological control programme. The aim of this study was to improve the current understanding of FCM pupation habits through the manipulation of soil texture class, ground cover, shading, soil compaction, air temperature, and soil moisture in the laboratory. These findings would then be used to aid the biological control programmes using EPF and EPNs against FCM in the soil. Three soil texture classes (sandy loam, silt loam and silty clay loam) were obtained from orchards for use in the study. FCM larvae were allowed to drop into the soil of their own accord and the pupation behaviour that followed was then captured on film with pupae formed in the soil being kept in order to measure adult eclosion.
    [Show full text]