DOCSLIB.ORG

Cheylesmore Neighbourhood Forum Held on Tuesday 28 July 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cheylesmore Neighbourhood Forum Held on Tuesday 28 July 2015 Action Notes Cheylesmore Neighbourhood Forum Held on Tuesday 28 July 2015 Cheylesmore Community Centre Who was at the meeting? Residents Ball, Nick Makepeace, Nigel Bell, D Marchi, William Bell, Richard McDonnell, Keith Binks, Keith McDonnell, M Bristow, Robert McNicholas, John Butcher, Ralph Murland, Joan Cheema, Mr. Page, Lynne Cosser, Jenny Parbury, Ernest Cunliffe, Elisabeth Robins, Judith Davies, Mary Robinson, Ron Davies, Matthew Rowe, Jeffrey Edwards, Kath Rutter, Marie Fielding, Frances Rutter, Patrick George, P Sanderson, Christine Hartley, John Short, Charles Hartnett, Martin Smith, Jeffery Hill, Hazel Taylor, Mark Howey, Derek Thomas, Jeremy Jones, Christine Thorpe, Gordon Jones, Peter Williams, Alan Knight, Patricia Winter, G Makepeace, Janet Wood, Paul Number of residents: 44 signed in Officers and Partner Agencies Name Representing Councillor H Noonan Coventry City Council – Ward Councillor (Chair) Councillor R Bailey Coventry City Council – Ward Councillor Councillor R Brown Coventry City Council – Ward Councillor Simon Brake Coventry City Council – Senior Support Officer Vanessa Millar Coventry City Council – Support Officer www.coventry.gov.uk/neighbourhoodforums Action Notes Guest Speakers and other Officers/Partners Name Representing Alan Jones Galliford Try Colin Knight Coventry City Council – Place Directorate Sergeant Stuart Randall West Midlands Police 1. Welcomes and Introductions Cllr. Hazel Noonan welcomed everyone to the meeting and thanked everyone for their attendance. 2. Actions from previous meeting and matters arising An update was given on the allocation of 106 monies. A successful event had been held towards the end of March 2015, whereby residents came along to talk about Cheylesmore, consider the range of different activities in the area and think about how different ideas could fit together. In total, 16 bids had received 106 monies. Discussion: Queries were raised as to why parts of Cheylesmore had been excluded from this process and why residents/groups in Earlsdon had been able to bid for this funding. It was confirmed that ASDA, the developer in question, had drawn a half- mile circle from their site, as this was the area in which they wanted local residents to benefit. Furthermore, the criteria had been discussed at the Participatory Budget Planning Meeting. This meeting had been open to any resident from Cheylesmore to attend and vote. A point was raised by one individual that the number of residents in each of these meetings had been small and that they had been outnumbered by Council officers. It was felt in this particular instance that the session facilitators had already decided which template they were going to use and had asked for this point to be recorded. ACTION: None. www.coventry.gov.uk/neighbourhoodforums Action Notes 3. Combined Authorities – Simon Brake (Coventry City Council) Simon outlined to the group why Combined Authorities were being created and the Council’s intended approach. Combined Authorities were a way of devolving power, funding and decisions currently made in Whitehall to regions so Councils could work together to make decisions based on sub-regional, not national, priorities. The Council had agreed in principle to create a Combined Authority with a preferred option of Councils from Coventry and Warwickshire and Hinckley and Bosworth with Councils from Greater Birmingham and Black Country Local Enterprise Partnerships areas. This was only the beginning of a formal legal process that had been set out by Government. Discussion: A point was made that around 5 years ago the Government had scrapped Regional Development Agencies (felt to be a huge waste of money), then moved towards Local Enterprise Partnerships and were now exploring Combined Authorities. It was thought that Combined Authorities would last longer, but would not preclude a Government changing its mind in the future. Other Council areas were discussed and it was felt that it would be logical for Coventry to take the lead in Coventry and Warwickshire (C&W), rather than be subservient to Birmingham. However, it was outlined that the strength of C&W by itself would be too small and would not offer sufficient development opportunities. The physical geography of C&W may be greater, yet the population and economic powers were much smaller. A question was raised regarding who would make the final decision. It was confirmed that the decision in Coventry would be made by Full Council, by the 54 Elected Members. The final decision about whether or not a Combined Authority would occur at all would be made by the Secretary of State (Government). It was felt that a referendum should be held and this was discussed in great detail. The cost and timings involved would not make a proposal feasible. However, the process did allow for consultation to take place. The benefits of a Combined Authority were outlined, including an update on what was happening elsewhere. The West Midlands was not the only major urban area without a Combined Authority. However, it was recognized that even if Coventry did not join then things would change irrespectively. The importance of this decision was discussed and, overall, the local community felt that residents should make the decision and not the Council. A question was asked about whether there was any research on where Combined Authorities already existed and whether there was any information on the benefits that this partnership could bring. It was reported that there was some information available on how these places were progressing at the moment. The decision about whether a referendum should be held was mentioned again and one resident suggested that if other local residents did not like the decisions that were being taken then the residents should consider the annual democratic process, as residents had elected certain individuals to make decisions. It was felt that joining up with Warwickshire alone would bring Coventry down and that it made absolute sense to strive for growth and development opportunities for the whole region. It was realised that this was a major decision and that even today there was only a very small representative of Cheylesmore in attendance and that if it was felt that this was such a good idea then the Council should have the confidence to put it to the people and persuade the local population. Another question was raised regarding the barriers that would prevent a referendum in Coventry. Several issues were noted including the costs (could be as much as £500,000), the nature of the question to ask with no obvious binary choice and timings (with the delays this would bring). All things considered, the Council had decided that a referendum was not an appropriate route to follow. A question was raised regarding the leadership of the organization and why there was nobody present at this meeting. It was clarified that there were 3 Ward Councillors in attendance, representing different political parties. Timescales were discussed. Engagement would continue until 7th September. A Full Council debate would then be held and a decision taken on whether to proceed. In the Autumn, the Secretary of State would carry out further consultation in the West Midlands, including consultation with neighbouring Local Authorities, Coventry residents and key partners. A point was made that whether Coventry joined or not was a complex question and queried how many people fully understood the implications. It was suggested that local residents elected Councillors as a guide and pointed out that there would be a huge cost to the Council if a referendum was held. A question was posed about how many Councillors had actively sought the views of their constituents. It was known that each Ward held their own Forum meetings, with Cheylesmore being the most active in the city. The Cheylesmore Ward Councillors were contactable via telephone and email and were active in the area. Another resident queried the fact that it was mentioned that Combined Authorities were happening elsewhere and that if all of these other authorities were planning to combine with others in the same way then it would feel like the agenda had already been set and that the programme had already been made. Discussion ensued on whether this would make the country fragmented. The intention was that this approach would better support regions in making decision about their own futures. It was suggested that most people knew that a decision had already been made and that a decision would be imposed on local residents and that that was why more people weren’t present at the meeting this evening. A vote was taken on those in favour of a Combined Authority with the West Midlands (15 votes), with Warwickshire (19 votes) and with nobody (0 votes). Another vote count was taken on those in favour of the Council holding a referendum (yes – 20 votes, no – 20 votes, others had abstained). Dates for drop-in sessions were also highlighted (from 13th to 26th August). www.coventry.gov.uk/neighbourhoodforums Action Notes 4. Policing Update – Sergeant Stuart Randall (West Midlands Police) Police Sergeant Stuart Randall provided an update on current staffing levels in the area, recent crime figures for 2015 and the police budget reductions. It was highlighted that total crime was down by 15% when compared to the previous year and that between March 2010 and March 2015 there had been a 19% reduction in police officer numbers, with a 16% reduction in police staff during the same period. Sergeant Randall suggested that neighbourhood policing would look quite different over the next few years. At the moment, in Coventry and across the West Midlands, each area had a local team of dedicated officers. However, in the future, resources would need to be focused on areas where demand was highest. Discussion: Questions were raised in relation to why the Police had reduced staffing levels (if there were any other reasons aside from budgetary reductions) and whether local residents were more or less safe as a result of these reductions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Coventry HLC Report
    COVENTRY HISTORIC LANDSCAPE CHARACTERISATION FINAL REPORT English Heritage Project Number 5927 First published by Coventry City Council 2013 Coventry City Council Place Directorate Development Management Civic Centre 4 Much Park Street Coventry CV1 2PY © Coventry City Council, 2013. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, including photocopying or recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without the permission in writing from the Publishers. DOI no. 10.5284/1021108 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Coventry Historic Landscape Characterisation study was funded by English Heritage as part of a national programme and was carried out by the Conservation and Archaeology Team of Coventry City Council. Eloise Markwick as Project Officer compiled the database and undertook work on the Character Area profiles before leaving the post. Anna Wilson and Chris Patrick carried out the subsequent analysis of the data, completed the Character Area profiles and compiled the final report. Thanks are due to Ian George and Roger M Thomas of English Heritage who commissioned the project and provided advice throughout. Front cover images: Extract of Board of Health Map showing Broadgate in 1851 Extract of Ordnance Survey map showing Broadgate in 1951 Extract of aerial photograph showing Broadgate in 2010 CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Location and Context 1 1.3 Coventry HLC: Aims, Objectives and Access to the Dataset 3 2. Coventry’s Prehistory and History 4 2.1 Prehistory 4 2.2 The Early Medieval/Saxon Period 5 2.3 The Medieval Period (1066-1539) 6 2.4 The Post Medieval Period (1540-1836) 8 2.5 Mid to Late 19th Century and Beginning of the 20th Century (1837-1905) 10 2.6 The First Half of the 20th Century (1906-1955) 12 2.7 Second Half of the 20th Century (1955-present) 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Problem-Orientated Policing in Cheylesmore
    TILLEY AWARD 2000 Submission Sounds from the POP beat - Problem-Orientated Policing in Cheylesmore PC 1112 METCALFE Stivichal] Sector, M2 OCU West Midlands Police Fletcharnstead Police Station Fletchamstead Highway Coventry CV4 7BB 024 76 454359 Sounds from the POP beat: Problem-Orientated Policing in Cheylesmore Abstract: The sectorisation of the West Midlands Police has allowed officers to work in a highly localised environment and develop a sound understanding of their constituent community. Supported by a management team that encourages innovation and fuelled by a sense of ownership, officers have begun to adopt problem solving techniques to address long term issues previously overlooked by traditional incident-led approaches. Such a strategy was introduced in the Stivichall Sector of Coventry in March 1999 as a result of escalating crime levels on one particular beat (beat 10). Analysis of crime records and command and control data identified a long-term crime trend that had previously been overlooked. Further analysis identified incidents of criminal damage and youth nuisance as a serious problem in one particular area. Increased interagency and public liaison helped to identify two targets who were believed to be behaving in a highly anti-social manner against their neighbours. Beat 10 required a focused approach to redress the rising crime trend. A traditional enforcement based strategy was developed with the intention of reducing crime and disorder in the beat 10 area. The SARA model gave structure to the project and facilitated a step by step approach: Scanning, Analysis, Response and Assessment. Although the targeting strategy initially appeared successful in reducing crime the assessment process demonstrated that youth disorder remained a problem local residents.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cheylesmore Surgery Newapproachcomprehensive
    The Cheylesmore Surgery Quality Report 51 Quinton Park Coventry CV3 5PZ Date of inspection visit: 8 September 2016, 15 Tel: 02476502255 September 2016 Website: www.cheylesmoresurgery.nhs.uk Date of publication: 12/01/2017 This report describes our judgement of the quality of care at this service. It is based on a combination of what we found when we inspected, information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and information given to us from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations. Ratings Overall rating for this service Inadequate ––– Are services safe? Inadequate ––– Are services effective? Inadequate ––– Are services caring? Requires improvement ––– Are services responsive to people’s needs? Requires improvement ––– Are services well-led? Inadequate ––– 1 The Cheylesmore Surgery Quality Report 12/01/2017 Summary of findings Contents Summary of this inspection Page Overall summary 2 The five questions we ask and what we found 5 The six population groups and what we found 9 What people who use the service say 13 Areas for improvement 13 Detailed findings from this inspection Our inspection team 15 Background to The Cheylesmore Surgery 15 Why we carried out this inspection 15 How we carried out this inspection 15 Detailed findings 17 Action we have told the provider to take 30 Overall summary Letter from the Chief Inspector of General • Patient feedback on CQC comment cards was Practice positive about interactions with staff and patients We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection said they were treated with compassion and dignity. at The Cheylesmore Surgery on 8 and 15 September 2016. Whilst the practice had a Patient Participation Group Overall the practice is rated as inadequate.
    [Show full text]
  • Contacting Us the CHEYLESMORE SURGERY
    Contacting us THE CHEYLESMORE SURGERY The Cheylesmore Surgery 51 Quinton Park A guide to our services Cheylesmore Coventry CV3 5PZ Tel: 024 7650 2255, Telephone lines open from 8:40am to 1pm and 2pm—6:30pm daily Website: http://www.cheylesmoresurgery.nhs.uk/ When We Are Closed: If you have an emergency outside of normal surgery hours, please call 111 for medical help. Walk-in Centre: Patients can also attend or telephone the walk-in centre on Stoney Stanton Road which is open 7 days a week 08:00 -22:00. Telephone number: 0300 200 0060 Out-of-hours services are generally busy so please think Telephone: 024 7650 2255 Fax: 024 7650 2325 carefully before asking to see a doctor and only do so if you Opening Hours: Monday to Friday 8:40am to 6:15pm— genuinely cannot wait until the surgery re-opens. Closed daily from 12:30pm to In a genuine emergency you should call 999. Chest pains 2pm. and / or shortness of breath constitute an emergency. This practice is within the NHS England (West Midlands) area. Welcome Our practice area The Cheylesmore Surgery serves the whole of Cheylesmore and parts of the surrounding areas, please see ‘Our Practice Area’ on the next page. Our team includes 3 GP’s, 1 Practice Nurse and 1 Health care assistant as well as 2 GP Registrar’s, Practice Manager and Reception Staff. We offer a full general practice service and run specialist clinics such as: Midwife Clinics, Phlebotomy, Asthma, Diabetes , COPD and Minor Surgery. At The Cheylesmore Surgery we aim to treat all our patients promptly, courteously and in complete confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Carthusian Road, Cheylesmore Sought After Location Kitchen/Diner with Bi Fold Doors Landscaped Rear Garden
    Extended Family Home Carthusian Road, Cheylesmore Sought After Location Kitchen/Diner with Bi Fold Doors Landscaped Rear Garden Coventry 024 7625 8421 Carthusian Road, Cheylesmore, CV3 6HA £290,000 Description Location This beautifully presented family home has been recently extended and fully This unique property is situated only a short distance from the city centre and refurbished by the current owners, and is located in one of Coventry's most Coventry Railway Station, from where trains run to London Euston in less than 1 desirable locations. hour, Birmingham International Airport and Birmingham New Street. The accommodation comprises of an entrance hall, lounge with bay window to The War Memorial Park, Earlsdon and Cheylesmore are all close by, plus local front and feature fireplace, an extended kitchen/diner with integrated appliances, conveniences can be found at the busy Daventry Rd shopping parade being less bi-fold doors and roof lantern, plus a ground floor wet room. To the first floor are than a mile away. Local schooling includes King Henry VIII, Stivichall Primary two double bedrooms both with fitted wardrobes, a single bedroom, a family and Finham Park Schools. bathroom and access to a fully boarded loft. Access out of Coventry is simple with the Ring Road and connecting A46 being Externally is a landscaped rear garden with patio area, summer house and rear just a couple of minutes drive, with Leamington, Kenilworth and Warwick all access. between a 15 to 20 minute drive away. www.loveitts.co.uk Contact 29 Warwick Row Coventry West Midlands CV1 1DY Important Notice: Every care has been taken with the preparation of these Sales Particulars but they are for general guidance only and complete accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheylesmore Neighbourhood Forum
    Action Notes Cheylesmore Neighbourhood Forum Held on Tuesday 16 September 2014 Who was at the meeting? Residents Adele Ball Karen Band D Bell Richard Bell Robert Bristow Ralph Butcher K Chamberlain Margaret Chown Susan Cole Phil Consadine Dan Corbould Jenny Cosser D Crunden Matthew Davies Peter Davies Mary Davies Jas Dosanjh Wendy Eades Kath Edwards Frances Fielding P George John Graham Stephanie Graham D Gupta John Hartley Derek Howey Michael Irvin A Johnson Paul Kneafsey Sheila Knight Colin Lacey Pauline Leng-Ward Nigel Makepeace Niall McChesney Keith McDonnell M McDonnell Andrew Meredith Hilary Meredith Mark Pay Lynne Page Judith Robbins Christine Sanderson Mary Sandwell Martin Sandwell J Scouller Molly Shortland Gary Shrapnell B Slaymaker Janet Spencer J Stevens Garry Stewart Alan Summerton Jean Takher Jeremy Thomas Paul Townsend Beatrice Upham P Venables JB Ward G Winter Paul Wood No of Residents: 60 Officers and Partner Agencies Name Representing Councillor R Bailey Coventry City Council – Ward Councillor (Chair) Councillor H Noonan Coventry City Council – Ward Councillor Councillor Brown Coventry City Council – Ward Councillor Simon Brake Coventry City Council – Senior Support Officer Claire Carding Coventry City Council – Support Officer Sgt C Harris West Midlands Police – Cheylesmore NPT Insp S Baker West Midlands Police – Cheylesmore NPT Andrew Jackman Deputy Head of Traffic and Transportation - CCC Nigel Bromage Community Development Officer – CCC www.coventry.gov.uk/neighbourhoodforums Action Notes Paul Boulton Head of Traffic and Transportation Jim Newton Acting Head of Planning – CCC 1. Welcomes and Introductions Councillor Bailey welcomed everyone to the meeting and thanked everyone for their attendance, and formally thanked Cllr Noonan for her efforts in being Chair of the forum previously.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage One Report Review of Trends and Patterns of Migration
    Understanding Migration: Building a cohesive strategy for the West Midlands Stage one report Review of trends and patterns of migration Table of Contents Contents I: Background and principal definitions of migration ......................................................... 1 II: Key findings .................................................................................................................. 2 III: Regional context .......................................................................................................... 4 IV: Latest trends in international migration ....................................................................... 7 V: Dispersal of asylum seekers .......................................................................................... 9 VI: Refugee resettlement ................................................................................................ 13 VII: EU migrants .............................................................................................................. 15 VIII: Non-EU migrants ..................................................................................................... 17 IX: Working migrants ...................................................................................................... 18 X: Health ........................................................................................................................ 25 XI: A discussion of the data sources ................................................................................ 27 I: Background
    [Show full text]
  • The Irish in Nineteenth Century
    THE IRISH IN NINETEENTH CENTURY COVENTRY Two Volumes Volume 1 Thomas Joseph Prendergast A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences Ulster University in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Arts & Humanities April 2019 I confirm that the word count of this thesis is less than 100,000 words 1 Contents Volume 1 Introduction: Aims and Coventry rationale P. 12 Chapter 1 Irish settlement: perspectives, population and evidence P. 32 Chapter 2 Character of Coventry P. 73 Chapter 3 Circumstances of the Irish in Coventry P. 97 Chapter 4 Identity P. 152 Chapter 5 Irish household structure, Irish community attributes and spatial expression in years of heightened arrival 1841-1861 P. 207 Chapter 6 Irish household structure, Irish community attributes and spatial expression in years of adjustment and settlement 1871-1901 P. 237 Chapter 7 Conclusion P. 258 Bibliography P. 299 2 Volume 2 Appendices 1. Families in Much Park Street in 1841; Irish weavers in Coventry P. 1 2. Persons of interest P. 5 3. Hill Street P. 37 4. Newspaper reports on Irish behaviour P. 42 5. Local and visiting preachers P. 70 6. Catholic activity P. 79 7. Workhouse, Barracks and other Institutions P. 96 8. Reports and Newspaper Articles P. 107 9. Later century Politics and Nationalism P. 114 10. Anti-Catholic ferment on national issues in Coventry P. 125 11. Convents, St. Mary’s Church, the Coventry School Board P. 131 12. Aspects of family life P. 140 13. Residential Differentiation; Staple Industries P. 148 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Coventry Cathedral Prayer Cycles
    Coventry Cathedral Prayer Cycles Please join us as we pray for our Cathedral, the life of the wider Diocese of Coventry, our partners in the Community of the Cross of Nails and our brothers and sisters across the world in the Anglican Communion. Sunday 18 April 2021 The Cathedral The Diocese and wider church; the Bishops and their staff; all those recently ordained or preparing for ordination The Diocese of Coventry Cheylesmore. Clergy: Arthur Woo. Readers: John Scattergood, Tony Price. We are thankful for good online engagement through the pandemic. Please pray we can restart youth ministries and services, and pray as we begin thinking about a large renovation project. The Community of the Cross of Nails South Africa: KLEIN DRAKENSTEIN, Church of the Ascension; South Africa: PIETERMARITZBURG, Cathedral of the Holy Nativity; South Africa: VOLMOED, Volmoed Christian Conference & Retreat Centre. The Anglican Cycle of Prayer The Church of Ireland Monday 19 April 2021 The Cathedral All visitors, pilgrims and tourists; the Tourism and Events team; those who work on our Welcome desk and in the shop The Diocese of Coventry We pray for all who work at the Diocesan Office under the leadership of the Diocesan Secretary, Ruth Marlow. We pray for God's guidance as they seek to serve and equip the whole of the Diocese of Coventry. The Community of the Cross of Nails Sudan: KHARTOUM, All Saints Cathedral; Switzerland: ST MAURICE, Fraternité Eucharistein (Eucharistic Community); Ukraine: ODESSA, St Paul's Congregation. The Anglican Cycle of Prayer Boga (Congo) Tuesday 20 April 2021 The Cathedral The sound team and events crew; all who help as volunteers The Diocese of Coventry Eastern Green.
    [Show full text]
  • Coventry and Warwickshire City Deal
    UNCLASSIFIED Coventry and Warwickshire City Deal UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Executive Summary Coventry and Warwickshire is an integral part of the Midlands and a key engine of growth for the United Kingdom. As a functional economic area Coventry and Warwickshire is home to 863,000 residents and some 35,000 businesses. The area also provides employment for 443,000 people and in 2011 generated economic output of around £16.3bn in 2011. A key part of Coventry and Warwickshire’s success is the advanced manufacturing and engineering sector, including the automotive sector. Further growth in this sector can be enhanced by: • Providing the right type of business advice, guidance and support programmes to grow both small and medium enterprises and companies within the advanced manufacturing and engineering sector. • Establishing tailored skills programmes for the advanced manufacturing sector. • Maximising the potential of the advanced manufacturing and engineering, including the auto sector, by supporting more small and medium enterprises to secure business in the supply chain. • Enhancing auto sector testing and research and development facilities. The areas growth strategy recognises both the advanced manufacturing and engineering strengths of this area and the issues discussed above. This City Deal therefore seeks to tackle these key issues and over its lifetime the Coventry and Warwickshire Local Enterprise Partnership predict this deal will deliver: • Over 15,000 jobs within the wider economy, of which over 8,800 will be in the advanced manufacturing and engineering sector. • A range of innovative business support programmes that will support further growth in the advanced manufacturing and engineering sector. • A new flagship “Clearing House” centre, where key business support agencies are co-located in one building.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Excavations on Parkside, Coventry, in 2010 Report
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS ON PARKSIDE, COVENTRY, IN 2010 A tale (possibly) of John Garton, Pinner, and his neighbour in Coventry in the 1520s EXPERTISE WHERE YOU NEED IT Archaeology Warwickshire Report No 2005 MAY 2020 A Tale (possibly) of John Garton, Pinner and his Neighbour in Coventry in the 1520s ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS ON PARKSIDE, COVENTRY, IN 2010 May 2020 Commissioned by: Archaeology Warwickshire Site Code: PC10 Planning Reference: 21449/G Project Manager: Stuart Palmer MCIfA Author: Iain Soden with Trista Clifford, Emily Johnson Illustrations: Candy Stevens Edited by: Stuart Palmer MCIfA Checked by: Caroline Rann MCIfA Approved by: Stuart Palmer MCIfA Date: May 2020 Report reference: Soden, I, 2020 Archaeological Excavations on Parkside, Coventry, in 2010: A Tale (possibly) of John Garton, Pinner and his Neighbour in Coventry in the 1520s, Archaeology Warwickshire Report 2005 Please note that this document has been prepared for the commissioning client or agent for a specific purpose and is time limited. It should not be relied upon by any other party for any other purpose at any other time. Please address enquiries to: Stuart C Palmer MCIfA Principal Archaeologist & Business Manager Archaeology Warwickshire UNIT 9 Montague Road Warwick CV34 5LW 01926 412278 [email protected] www.warwickshire.gov.uk/archaeology tw.@archaeologyW A Tale (possibly) of John Garton, Pinner and his Neighbour in Coventry in the 1520s ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS ON PARKSIDE, COVENTRY, IN 2010 May 2020 CONTENTS Page Summary 1 1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Proposals for New Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in the West Midlands Contents
    Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the West Midlands Contents Summary 3 1 What is the Boundary Commission for England? 5 2 Background to the 2018 Review 7 3 Initial proposals for the West Midlands 11 Initial proposals for the Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent 12 sub-region Initial proposals for the Herefordshire, Shropshire, 13 Telford and Wrekin, Warwickshire, West Midlands, and Worcestershire sub-region 4 How to have your say 19 Annex A: Initial proposals for constituencies, 23 including wards and electorates Glossary 37 Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the West Midlands 1 Summary Who we are and what we do What is changing in the West Midlands? The Boundary Commission for England is an independent and impartial The West Midlands has been allocated non-departmental public body which is 53 constituencies – a reduction of six from responsible for reviewing Parliamentary the current number. constituency boundaries in England. Our proposals leave seven of the 59 The 2018 Review existing constituencies unchanged. We have the task of periodically reviewing As it has not always been possible to the boundaries of all the Parliamentary allocate whole numbers of constituencies constituencies in England. We are currently to individual counties, we have grouped conducting a review on the basis of rules some county and local authority areas set by Parliament in 2011. The rules tell into sub-regions. The number of us that we must make recommendations constituencies allocated to each sub-region for new Parliamentary constituency is determined by the electorate of the boundaries in September 2018.
    [Show full text]