Semi-Annual Social Monitoring Report

Project number: 42486-016

Period: August 2018 – January 2019 Submission Date: April 2019

IND: Urban Services Improvement Program

This report was prepared by Project Management Consultants, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh for the Asian Development Bank. This document is made publicly available in accordance with ADB’s Access to Information Policy and does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB.

This social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. MADHYA PRADESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED

MADHYA PRADESH URBAN SERVICES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK LOAN ASSISTANCE (LOAN NO. 3528-IND)

SEMI ANNUAL SOCIAL MONITORING REPORT (SSMR) ON SOCIAL SAFEGUARDS (Phase 1)

Period: August 2018 to January 2019

Submitted by: PROJECT MANAGEMENT COUNSULTANTS, BHOPAL (TATA CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED J/V JPS ASSOCAITES PVT. LTD)

i

ABBREVIATION

ADB Asian Development Bank AH Affected Household AP Affected Person BPL Below Poverty Line CAPP Community Action and Participation Program CPR Common Property Resources EA Executing Agency GoI Government of GRC Grievance Redress Committee GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism IP Indigenous Peoples IR Income Restoration IR Involuntary Resettlement ISA Initial Social Assessment LA Land Acquisition LAA Land Acquisition Act LIG Lower Income Group M&E Monitoring and Evaluation PAF Project Affected Family PAH Project Affected Household PIU Project Implementation Unit PMU Project Management Unit MPUDCL Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited MPUSIP Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Project ROR Record of Rights RoW Right of Way RP Resettlement Plan R&R Resettlement and Rehabilitation SSMR Semi Annual Social Monitoring Report SC Scheduled Caste ST Scheduled Tribe TH Titleholder UDHD Urban Development and Housing Department WHH Women Headed Household

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 1 B. BACKGROUND OF REPORT AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...... 3 C. SCOPE OF SOCIAL SAFEGUARD IMPACTS ...... 5 D. COMPENSATION AND REHABILITATION ...... 35 E. CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION AND DISCLOUSRE ...... 36 F. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM (GRM) ...... 40 G. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ...... 46 H. MONITORING RESULTS/FINDING ...... 48 I. COMPLIANCE OF SAFEGUARD LOAN COVENANTS ...... 49 J. FOLLOW UP, ACTION, RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISCLOUSRE ...... 54

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: structure and process of GRM ...... 42

Figure 2: Map Showing Sub-Project Towns ...... 55

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Status of Involuntary Resettlement (IR) and Indigenous People (IP) Reports of Subprojects under Phase 1 ...... 7

Table 2: List of Awarded Packages and Name of DBO Contractor along with Progress of design Submitted (in %) ...... 12

Table 3: Safeguard issues and Mitigation Measures ...... 16

Table 4: Town-wise Progress of the Household Survey (up to January 2019) ...... 17

Table 5: Social Issues Town-wise & Package-wise ...... 19

Table 6: Details of APs and Status of compensation payment during reporting period (August 2017 to January 2018 ...... 35

Table 7: Record of Awareness Raising Events/Consultations ...... 38

Table 8: Status of GRC Formation ...... 42

Table 9: Detail of Grievances during the Reporting Period (Aug 2018 to Jan 2019) ...... 44

iii

Table 10: Deployment of Social Safeguards officials during Reporting Period (August 2018 – January 2019) ...... 47

Table 11: Status of Compliance of ADB’s Loan Covenants related to Safeguard Issues ...... 50

Table 12: Status of Compliance of Resettlement & Social Safeguard Issues ...... 54

LIST OF APPENDIX

Appendix 1:Package-wise and Town-wise Progress of Drawing Design and Physical Progress up to January 2019 ...... 56

Appendix 2: Photographs of Disclosure of IR & IP Report in Language at respective urban local body (ULBs) office ...... 67

Appendix 3:Copy of the Household Survey ...... 69

Appendix 4: Details of Consultations during Subproject Implementation (August 2018 to January 2019) ...... 71

Appendix 5: Office Order of EA to Establish GRC at subproject town level ...... 95

Appendix 6: List of the Towns Package-wise (Both Phase 1 and Phase 2) ...... 99

Appendix 7: Details about Land Ownership, Status of Land and Transfer of proposed land/site ...... 102

Appendix 8: Corrigendum Appendix...... 245

iv

A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. The Urban Development and Housing Department (UDHD) of Government of Madhya Pradesh launched Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Project (MPUSIP) with the loan assistance from Asian Development Bank (LOAN NO. 3528-IND). The Urban Development and Housing Department is an executing agency for the Project. Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited (MPUDC) is the nodal implementing agency (IA) through a central Project Management Unit (PMU) for implementation of the Project with further supported by Project Implementation Units (PIUs). The PMU has been assisted by Project Management Consultant (PMC) namely M/S TATA Consulting Engineers Limited in association with JPS Associates Private Limited, New Delhi. The Project intends to ensure: a) Continuous, pressurized, safe and sustainable drinking water through private household metered connections in 128 towns; and b) Sewage and storm water collection and treatment systems are proposed in 12 identified towns including national heritage towns Major Achievements Sanchi and & Rajnagar. • Compliance of the ADB observations on IR c) The Project also includes component DDR and IP DDR, of non -physical investment (GIS, MIS, • Summary of IR and IP reports in Hindi were M&E and Social Safeguards) for system prepared for 67 towns under 25 packages to strengthening. display at respective ULBs and PIUs, • All IR and IP reports were reviewed, 2. List of the towns is depicted in • Visited towns for land verifications and other Appendix 6. The entire project is planned social issues, to be implemented in three periods i.e (i) • RP was prepared for subproject towns preparatory and procurement; (ii) Khajuraho & Rajnagar under sewerage construction and (iii) operations and management plan. maintenance. Prior to implementation of • IR DDR and IP DDR were prepared for 4 the project, design Consultants were towns namely , , Sanavad and hired by IA to develop Detailed Project Saikheda under sewerage management Report (DPR) of each subproject town. plan, In regard to social safeguard, • Compensation paid to all five APs of WSS subprojects are classified as category ‘B’ town Sohagpur under Package 1C for involuntary resettlement (IR) and • Order issued for formation of GRC, indigenous peoples (IP) as per ADB nomination of CDO at ULB and Nomination of Safeguard Policy Statement (2009). GRC person in each town Each subproject has been screened to • Community Action and Participation Plan has assess the social impacts likely to be been developed, occurred due to project interventions. • Conducted consultations with ULBs and These projects come under either other stakeholders including local inhabitatnt ‘Category B’ or ‘Category C’. Although in particular indigenous people, Resettlement Plan (RP) is also prepared • State Gender Action Plan has been to address the negative impacts. A developed and facilitated to all awarded resettlement plan is developed using towns for development of town level Gender approved Resettlement Framework (RF) Action Plan. and Indigenous People Planning Framework (IPPF). It is presumed that a significant number of subprojects will not make any IR impact, so Involuntary Resettlement (IR) Due Diligence Report (DDR) has been prepared in avoiding resettlement impacts.

3. Project interventions have been managed by the Executing Agency (MPUDCL) with the technical support of PMC at Bhopal and PMC PIUs located at regional levels i.e. Bhopal,

1

Indore, Sagar, and . Apart from technical (engineering) and managerial (procurement and contract management) components, safeguard issues are also important component. It includes activities of (i) Resettlement, (ii) Environment and (iii) social and gender. The key experts/officials are deployed at PMC and PMC (PIU) to assist PMU and PIUs in compliance with the environment, social and gender requirements of the Project Safeguards System (PSS).

4. Semi-annual Social Monitoring Report (SSMR) on social safeguards is required to be submitted under Safeguard component of MPUSIP. This is the 3rd semi-annual social monitoring report (SSMR) which present progress of the subprojects of 69 towns of water supply scheme and 4 towns of sewerage under Phase 1 of MPUSIP from August 2018 to January 2019.

5. Social safeguard reports such as involuntary resettlement (IR) due diligence report (DDR) & Resettlement Plan (RP) and indigenous peoples (IP) DDR are prepared for the subproject towns under packages having nil or insignificant temporary IR and IP impacts. Altogether, 69 subproject towns of water supply scheme (WSS) and 4 subproject towns of sewerage under Phase 1 are considered under category ‘B’ because of insignificant involuntary resettlement impact. It is confirmed that none of the sub project is identified up to now, which will make the negative impact on Indigenous People (IP). Apart from WSS town Sohagpur under package 1C where private land has been acquired, for more details refer to para 37, no issue of private land acquisition emerged till date. Private lands have been obtained through land donation in 3 towns (Amla, and Mauganj), for which third party needs to be appointed and certification obtained.Temporary economic impacts are also being avoided through mitigation measures mentioned in the respective IR DDR of WSS towns. A Resettlement Plan (RP) is prepared for subproject water supply town i.e Khajuraho & Rajnagar, although significant impact is not expected. Land proposed for subproject components belongs to government and allotment of the identified land for subproject components is in progress, refer to Appendix 7.

6. Summary of IR and IP reports were prepared in vernacular language Hindi for disclosure at the notice board of respective urban local body (ULB)s and project implementation unit (PIU)s. Selected sub project towns were visited to identify the social risks and impacts due to subproject components and verified the status of land ownership from local revenue or ULB office. Resettlement Plan (RP) was prepared for the sub project towns Khajuraho and Rajnagar (Package 6A and 6E) while IR DDR and IP DDR were prepared for town Anjad (Package 2F), Barwaha (Package 2G), Sanavad (Package 2H) and Saikheda (Package 5G) under sewerage management component.

7. The overall project is classified as category ‘B’ in accordance with ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS). ADB's SPS covers both temporary and permanent impacts. One parcel of land for approach road to intake well had been acquired during the implementation period for WSS town Sohagpur under Package 1C. Altogether 5 affected persons (APs) were reported under land acquisition and all five APs had received compensation amount for the loss of their land. Although, land has also been donated voluntarily by private land owners for subproject components in WSS subproject town Amla under pkg 1C, Dhamnod under pkg 2C and Mauganj under pkg 7C. Social issues, in particular related to the land proposed for components under subproject towns are presented in Table 5 of Chapter C.

8. Significant number of consultative meeting were held in community about subproject and to address the compliance of grievance, if any, related social issues. The meeting covered issues of land as well as compensation and other related to project activities. The regular meeting with community are conducted throughout the implementation phase in continuous manner. For more details, refer to Appendix 4 under chapter E.

2

9. Grievance Redressal Mechanism (GRM): grievance redress committee has been established at awarded subproject towns on the basis of government order issued for formation of grievance redress committee at ULB, refer to Appendix 5. Grievance registers are placed at subproject town and grievances are registered and resolved. For more details, refer to table 9 under chapter F.

10. a) State level Gender Action Plan has been developed; b) Concept note for establishing Gender Budget Cell and conducting safety audit was submitted to PMU; c) Workshop are organized for project stakeholders to sensitize on gender issues and ULB officials were facilitated for developing Gender Action Plan; d) nomination of Community Development Officer at ULB level for overseeing implementation of gender and social activities and nomination of GRC person from contractors to all towns. Prerak and Sakhi are also identified at awarded towns.

11. In this SSMR, we have included an Corrigendum Appendix with list of error in the previous SSMRs and the actual status/correction, refer to Appendix 8.

B. BACKGROUND OF REPORT AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION

12. The Government of Madhya Pradesh (GoMP) has been implementing the Madhya Pradesh Urban Services Improvement Project (MPUSIP) with financial assistance (loan) of the Asian Development Bank (ADB), which is being effective from August 2017. The Project aims to improve urban services, particularly water supply in the 128 towns and wastewater management in the selected 12 towns of the state Madhya Pradesh (refer to Figure 1). The towns were selected based on certain criteria’s like having reliable water resource, sound engineering feasibility, available land and commitment for operations and maintenance (O&M). These selected towns are further divided into two phases. As per revised procurement plan, MPUSIP’s physical components include (a) improvements to water supply scheme in 69 subproject towns, and (b) sewage collection and treatment services proposed in four (4) identified towns namely Saikheda, , Anjad and Barwaha under Phase 1 while in Phase 2 – water supply scheme in 59 subproject towns and sewage collection and treatment services proposed in eight towns namely Sanchi, Dhamnod, , , Jabalpur (part- II), , Khajuraho & Rajnagar. List of the towns is attached as Appendix 6. The entire Project envisages to deliver: • Continuous, pressurized, safe and sustainable drinking water through private household metered connections in 69 and 59 towns under Phase 1 and Phase 2 respectively; • Sewage water collection and treatment systems are proposed in 4 and 8 identified towns under Phase 1 and Phase 2 respectively and; • Non-physical investments comprising of establishing GIS system, capacity building of participating urban local bodies in contract management, improving local operators’ capability through global partnership and building capacity of the implementing agency, urban local bodies and services utilities for ensuring long term sustainability of services.

13. The State’s Urban Development and Housing Department (UDHD) is the Executing Agency (EA) for the Project. The Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited (MPUDC) is the nodal implementing agency (IA) through a central Project Management Unit (PMU), who is mainly responsible for implementation of the Project with further supported by Project Implementation Units (PIUs). The PMU and PIUs both have been assisted by Project Management Consultant (PMC) namely M/s TATA Consulting Engineers Limited in

3

association with JPS Associates Private Limited, New Delhi for subproject towns under Phase 1. The PMC PIUs are located at regional levels i.e Bhopal, , Jabalpur, Sagar and Gwalior,. These regional PIUs are playing an important role in the supervision of execution, safeguard compliance, reporting and coordination.

14. The entire Project is planned to be implemented in three phases - (i) preparatory and procurement; (ii) construction and (iii) operations and maintenance (O&M). The project preparatory activities include preparation of design and procurement of consultants. Design Consultants were hired to prepare preliminary project report of each subproject town. Each component is being carefully addressed in terms of its involuntary resettlement (IR) and indigenous people (IP) impacts in the preliminary project report. Design, build and operate (DBO) model is adopted during construction and O&M phase and this will include (i) finalization of design of each subproject components (ii) construction of water supply facilities, using DBO model in all project towns the facilities will include raw water intakes, water treatment plants (WTP), overhead tanks (OHT), distribution networks including the metered household connections. After the construction (expected to be completed in 2 years), the DBO Contractors of the civil works packages will continue to operate and provide continuous water supply service for subproject towns for a period of 10 years. The DBO contractor will also ensure proper metering and volumetric billing, adequate water pressure is maintained at the consumer end and supplied water complies with national quality standards for drinking water.

15. All subprojects are classified as category ‘B’ under the MPUSIP for impact on involuntary resettlement (IR) and for indigenous peoples (IP) as per ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS), 2009. Social impacts of each subproject are being screened to assess the likely impacts on the project which are categorized as either ‘Category B’ or ‘Category C’. If required, a Resettlement Plan (RP) is prepared to address the negative impacts of proposed works as per approved Resettlement Framework (RF) and Indigenous People Planning Framework (IPPF). It is perceived that the significant number of subprojects would not make impact on any physical or economic displacement. Therefore, Involuntary Resettlement (IR) Due Diligence Report (DDR) is being prepared in absence of any private land acquisition and resettlement impact.

16. The Loan Agreement was signed between Government of Madhya Pradesh (GoMP) and ADB in the month of August 2017. As per the agreement, State FINANCIAL PLAN government is responsible for execution of the project works Total Estimated Project Cost and Financing Plan according to the budget line. Total estimated cost of the project is US$ Estimated Project Cost US $829 million 829 Million. Out of total estimated cost, US $399 Million is sectioned for Phase 1 and US $430 Million is Financing Plan: ADB share 70%; State Share 30% sectioned for Phase 2 of MPUSIP. (75% of the loan will be repaid by the state and remaining 25% by ULB) 17. Purpose of the Report - This semi-annual social monitoring report (SSMR) on social safeguards Phase ADB Loan State Share Total of subproject towns under Phase 1 aims to review and ensure project Phase 1 275 Million 124 Million 399 implementation in view of the objectives and ADBs Safeguard Policy Statement 2009. Before Phase 2 300 Million 130 Million 430 preparing this report compliance status of IR and IP reports were

4

reviewed against the total approved Involuntary Resettlement (IR) and IP documents such as Resettlement Plan (RP), Due Diligence Report (DDR) on involuntary resettlement and indigenous people (IP) screening.

18. PMU/PMC has the responsibility to oversee an implementation and monitoring of safeguards issues of each subproject towns. As required, this report covers involuntary resettlement and other social safeguard monitoring results to comply with the spirit of ADB policy in order to ‘enhance stakeholders trust’ and ability to engage with ADB, and thereby increase the development impact (of sub-projects) in which disclosure of safeguard monitoring is an important aspect. This Semi-annual Social Monitoring Report (SSMR) highlights MPUSIP progress of water supply and sewerage scheme towns under Phase 1 on Social Safeguard components from August 2018 to January 2019 in this report. The report is outlined on the basis of the structure presented in the project administration manual (PAM) and includes information on – the scope of impact, compensation, rehabilitations, public participation, consultations, grievance redress mechanism (GRM), institutional arrangement, monitoring results, compliance status, follow up actions, recommendations and disclosure etc.. C. SCOPE OF SOCIAL SAFEGUARD IMPACTS

19. ADB's classification system - Prior to civil works implementation, all the subprojects selected for implementation is to be screened and classified using ADB's classification system. The classification system is presented below for more understanding: ➢ Category A: Subprojects proposed for construction or development, will fall under this category, if, it caused a significant involuntary resettlement impacts with a physical displacement of 200 or more persons from their residences, or 200 or more persons lose 10% or more of their productive or income generating assets, or more persons or 200 or more persons experience a combination of both. ➢ Category B: Any proposed subproject that includes involuntary resettlement impacts but are not deemed significant considering loss of shelter/houses or productive or income generating assets will be considered for category B. ➢ Category C: A proposed subproject that has no involuntary resettlement impact.

20. Involuntary resettlement (IR) - This Project under MPUSIP is classified as category ‘B’ for its involuntary resettlement (IR) impacts and impacts on indigenous peoples (IP) residing in the sub-project area in considerations of the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement-2009 during preparation. However, none of the subproject towns which are selected for implementation are likely to have any adverse involuntary resettlement impact. Mostly, land identified for the subproject components for construction or interventions is owned by State government and its local government departments. The transmission/distribution line will be laid with in the right of way (RoW) of the existing roads. However, if any minor land acquisition and involuntary resettlement is involved in form of either temporarily physical or economic displacement, or temporary restrictions to land use that will be duly addressed with ADB policy on involuntary resettlement.

21. Indigenous people (IP) - According to ADB SPS, 2009, the indigenous people safeguard requirements triggered if a project directly or indirectly affects the dignity, human rights, livelihood system, or culture of IP or affects the territories, natural, or cultural resources that they own, use, occupy, or claim as their ancestral property. The requirements also apply to MPUSIP subprojects and its components. It also covers action conducted by the executing and implementing agencies in anticipation of ADB project. Under Phase 1 of MPUSIP, 11 subprojects towns (11 under WSS and 1 under sewerage) are reported under fifth Schedule as per Constitution of India, which deals with administration and control of scheduled areas

5

and scheduled tribes. These towns are reported under Package 2B, 2C, 2D, 2F and 7B. But It is important to mention here that none of the proposed subproject facilities are located on land belonging to scheduled tribes (ST) / indigenous people (IP). However, improvement of proposed water supply is not only important for the people living in the locality but also for Indigenous peoples living in the same locality. So, a significant number of IP households under subproject area would be benefitted. MPUSIP will ensure that these populations receive the whole benefits of the Project.

22. Social safeguard reports such as Involuntary Resettlement (IR) Due Diligence Report (DDR) & resettlement plan (RP) and indigenous peoples (IP) DDR are prepared for the subproject towns under packages having nil or insignificant temporary IR and IP impacts. Altogether, 69 subproject towns of water supply scheme (WSS) and 4 subproject towns of sewerage under Phase 1 are considered under category ‘B’ because of insignificant IR and IP impact. It is confirmed that none of the sub project is identified up to now, which will make the negative impact on IP community. No issue of private land acquisition emerged till date where the livelihood of the people would get impacted. A Resettlement Plan (RP) is prepared for subproject water supply town i.e Khajuraho & Rajnagar, although significant impact is not expected.

23. Status of each IR and IP report is duly illustrated in Table 1.

6

Table 1: Status of Involuntary Resettlement (IR) and Indigenous People (IP) Reports of Subprojects under Phase 1 Sl. Package Name of the District Social Safeguard Reports Remarks No. No. subproject town IR DDR IP DDR Subproject Water Supply Scheme 1 Boda Rajgarh Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 2 1A Kurawar Rajgarh Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 3 Kothri Sehore Approved by ADB No separate IP DDR is prepared 4 Amla Betul Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 5 1B Betul-Bazar Betul Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 6 Sarni Betul Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 7 Bankhedi Hoshangabad Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 1C 8 Sohagpur Hoshangabad Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 9 Indore Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB 10 2A Depalpur Indore Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 11 Gautampura Indore Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 12 Badwani Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 13 Rajpur Badwani Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 2B 14 Karhi Padliya Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 15 Khargone Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 16 Dhamnod Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 2C 17 Mandav Dhar Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 18 Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 19 2D Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 20 Jhabua Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 21 Kukdeshwar Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 22 Nayagoan Neemuch Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 23 3A Sarwaniya Neemuch Approval awaited from ADB Approved by ADB Subject to compliance of ADB Maharaj observations (in progress) 24 Nagri Mandsaur Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 25 Aagar Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 26 3B Pankhedi Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 27 Makdone Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 28 4A Alampur Approved by ADB IP DDR to be send to ADB

7

Sl. Package Name of the District Social Safeguard Reports Remarks No. No. subproject town IR DDR IP DDR 29 Bhind Approved by ADB IP DDR to be send to ADB 30 Bhind Approved by ADB IP DDR to be send to ADB 31 Bhind Approved by ADB IP DDR to be send to ADB 32 4B Bhind Bhind Approval awaited from ADB Approved by ADB 33 Karera Shivpuri Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 34 Bairad Shivpuri Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 35 Pichhore Shivpuri Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 4D 36 Isagarh Ashoknagar Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 37 Aron Guna Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 38 Vijaypur Shivpuri Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 39 Bhind Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB 40 4F Lahar Bhind Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB 41 Bhind Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB 42 Shadora Ashoknagar ADB observations are being Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB addressed (in progress) 4I 43 Raghogarh Guna Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB same as above 44 Badarwas Shivpuri Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB same as above 45 5A Barhi Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 46 Jabalpur 47 Jabalpur 48 Jabalpur 49 5B Jabalpur Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 50 Patan Jabalpur 51 Jabalpur 52 Tendukheda 53 Khajuraho 6A Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 54 Rajnagar Chhatarpur 55 Sagar Sagar Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 6B 56 Makroniya Sagar Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 57 6C Sagar Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 58 Chhatarpur Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 6D 59 Hatta Damoh Approved by ADB Approved by ADB

8

Sl. Package Name of the District Social Safeguard Reports Remarks No. No. subproject town IR DDR IP DDR 60 Panna Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 61 Chhatarpur Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB ADB observations are addressed and submitted on 24 09 2018. 6G 62 Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB ADB observations are 63 Chhatarpur addressed and submitted on 24 09 2018. 64 7A Mauganj Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 65 Jaithari Anuppur Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 66 7B Khand Shahdol Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 67 Chandia Umaria Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 68 Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB ADB observations are addressed and submitted in September 2018 7D 69 New Ram nagar Satna Approval awaited from ADB Approval awaited from ADB ADB observations are addressed and submitted in September 2018 Subproject Sewerage 70 2F Anjad Badwani Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 71 2G Barwaha Khargone Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 72 2H Sanawad Khargone Approved by ADB Approved by ADB 73 5G Saikheda Approved by ADB IP was covered in IR DDR.

9

24. MPUSIP has been implementing the subprojects since February 2017, as letter of award (LoA) has been issued to DBO Contractor since February 2017 aiming to improve the overall of water supply and wastewater systems in the selected subproject towns. Although, loan agreement with ADB under MPUSIP was signed in August 2017, which requires that Resettlement Framework (RF) documents be complied during the implementation of project in accordance with ADB's SPS 2009 and RF prepared for the project and agreed between the Borrower (MPUSIP) and ADB. Any subprojects that involve land acquisition and resettlement impacts to be prepared RPs and other safeguard reports as required under the scope of approved RP. No impact will be resulted by the construction activities under the project. Efforts have been continued to minimize environmental and social team in design the project activities. There will be no displacement of people, other than temporary relocation of hawkers and mobile vendors during construction. However, during the implementing phase there will be temporary inconveniences such as increased vehicle movements that affect the pedestrians of the immediate vicinity of the work. The social safeguard reports will be updated and submitted to ADB. The project activities don't displace to any persons and no indigenous people will be affected by the subproject components.

25. The Project (MPUSIP) interventions are expected to improve living conditions of people in the subproject towns after completion of the project. The expected outcome is envisaged as inclusive of gender-focused, pro poor and sustainable WSS in the towns. The sub-projects are in progress. The input provided during the reporting period is -establishment of PIUs, mobilization of experts/ human resources, development of checklist and guidelines to review IP and IR reports, develop understanding and Contract Agreement with design built and operate (DBO) Contractors on project requirements in relation to social safeguard through workshop and personal interactions, prepared summary of IP and IR reports in local Hindi language to disclose the project interventions at respective ULBs office. Under Phase 1, there are 73 WSS subproject towns covered under 24 packages while 4 sewerage towns are split into four packages. Input ensures the possibility to deliver intended results on time. Out of 24 Packages of WSS, 4 more packages are awarded during reporting period while out of four packages of sewerage, three packages are awarded ( August 2018 to January 2019). Total number of packages awarded are 25 (22 of WSS and 3 of sewerage management) as on 31st January 2019. During the reporting period, all the DBO Contractors were engaged in submission of the designs of structures, hydraulics and electro-mechanical of subproject components for approval and civil works was started accordingly. List of the awarded packages to DBO Contractors along with their submission of final design (in %) is as follows in the Table 2 while details about progress of drawing design and physical progress of each town package-wise is depicted as Appendix 1.

11

Table 2: List of Awarded Packages and Name of DBO Contractor along with Progress of design Submitted (in %) Sl. Package Name of the Date of Progress of Design Submitted by DBO Contractor Name of the DBO Contractor No. No. subproject town Award (from August 2018 to January 2019) in % Hydraulics Structure Electro-mechanical Subproject Water Supply Scheme 1 Boda 90 60 10 M/s Rean Watertech Pvt. Ltd and P C 2 1A Kurawar 04.08.2017 40 20 15 Snehal Const. Co. (JV), Kolkatta 3 Kothri 60 30 10 4 Amla 70 40 10 M/S Laxmi Civil Engineering Service Pvt. 5 1B Betul-Bazar 07.06.2017 100 70 20 Ltd., Kolhapur (Maharashtra) 6 Sarni 100 75 10 7 Bankhedi M/s Central India Engineering Private Ltd, 80 60 20 1C 27.04.2017 8 Sohagpur Nagpur (Maharashtra) 100 80 40 9 Betma 35 10 0 M/s Adroit Associates, Alpha Projects, 10 2A Gautampura 05.03.2018 30 10 0 Indore (Madhya Pradesh) 11 Depalpur 35 10 0 12 Pansemal 10 5 10 M/s Rean Watertech Pvt. Ltd and P C 13 Rajpur 70 30 10 2B 07.04.2017 Snehal Const. Co. (JV), Kolkatta (West 14 Karhi Padliya 70 40 10 Bengal) 15 Kasrawad 80 50 30 16 Dhamnod M/s Bansal Construction Company, 60 20 10 2C 18.09.2017 17 Mandav Gurugram (Haryana) 80 40 10 18 Bhavra 100 80 20 M/s P.C Snehal -REAN(JV), Ahmedabad 19 2D Meghnagar 18.09.2017 80 30 10 (Gujarat) 20 Petlawad 80 40 20 21 Kukdeshwar 40 20 10 22 Nayagaon 40 10 10 M/s Engineering Professional Co Pvt Ltd, 3A Sarwaniya 05.03.2018 23 Surat (Gujrat) 45 35 15 Maharaj 24 Nagri 40 20 10 25 Susner 80 60 10 M/s Multiurban Infra Services Pvt. Ltd., 26 3B Pankhedi 17.06.2017 60 40 10 Nagpur (Maharshtra) 27 Makdone 60 35 10 28 Alampur 0 0 0 M/s Kalyan Toll Infrastructure Ltd, Indore 29 4A Daboh 28.05.2018 0 0 0 (Madhya Pradesh) 30 Mehona 0 0 0

12

Sl. Package Name of the Date of Progress of Design Submitted by DBO Contractor Name of the DBO Contractor No. No. subproject town Award (from August 2018 to January 2019) in % Hydraulics Structure Electro-mechanical 31 Phuphkalan 0 0 0 32 4B Bhind 12.09.2018 M/s TATA Projects Ltd. 10 0 0 33 Karera 30 10 10 34 Bairad 90 20 10 35 Pichhore M/s Rean Watertech Pvt. Ltd and P C 0 0 0 4D 10.08.2017 36 Isagarh Snehal Const. Co. (JV), Kolkatta 80 50 20 37 Aron 30 10 10 38 Vijaypur 70 40 10 39 Lahar M/s Jayantisuper Construction Pvt. Ltd. 30 0 0 40 4F Mehgaon 15.09.2018 and M/s P. C Snehal Construction Pvt. 20 0 0 41 Gormi Ltd. (JV), Mehsana (Gujrat) 10 0 0 42 Raghogarh M/s Jayantisuper Construction Pvt. Ltd. 10 0 0 43 4I Badarwas 19.12.2018 and M/s P. C Snehal Construction Pvt. 0 0 0 44 Shadora Ltd. (JV), Mehsana (Gujrat) 0 0 0 M/s CMR Infrastructure Private Ltd, 45 5A Barhi 15.02.2017 100 70 40 Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) 46 Katangi 100 60 10 47 Bhedaghat 100 80 10 48 Majholi 0 0 0 The Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd., Bhopal 49 5B Panagar 04.09.2017 100 70 10 (Madhya Pradesh) 50 Patan 100 70 20 51 Sihora 80 50 10 52 Tendukheda 80 60 10 53 Khajuraho M/s Rean Watertech Pvt. Ltd and P C 6A 15.02.2017 Snehal Const. Co. (JV), Kolkatta (West 70 40 20 54 Rajnagar Bengal) 55 Sagar 23.08.2018 30 10 0 6B M/s TATA Projects Ltd. 56 Makroniya 90 NA 0 M/s Jay Varudi Construction Company & 57 6C Rahatgarh 21.03.2017 Ranjit Buildcon Ltd. (JV), Himmat Nagar 100 80 30 (Gujarat) 58 Buxwaha M/s Jay Varudi Construction Company & 40 50 15 59 6D Hatta 21.03.2017 Ranjit Buildcon Ltd. (JV), Himmat Nagar 70 40 10 60 Pawai (Gujarat) 100 80 20

13

Sl. Package Name of the Date of Progress of Design Submitted by DBO Contractor Name of the DBO Contractor No. No. subproject town Award (from August 2018 to January 2019) in % Hydraulics Structure Electro-mechanical M/s KNK projects Pvt. Ltd., Faridabad 61 7A Mauganj 15.02.2017 100 70 30 (Haryana) 62 Jaithari 30 10 5 M/s SMC Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd., Thane 63 7B Khand 22.01.2018 30 10 10 (Maharashtra) 64 Chandia 30 10 5 M/s Annu Infra Construct India Pvt. Ltd. 65 2F Anjad (SWG) 01.01.2019 and M/s Nobal Construction Company. 0 0 0 (JV), New Delhi M/s Annu Infra Construct India Pvt. Ltd. 66 2G Barwaha (SWG) 01.01.2019 and M/s Nobal Construction Company. 0 0 0 (JV), New Delhi M/s Engineering Professional Co Pvt Ltd, 67 5G Saikheda (SWG) 05.08.2018 30 0 0 Surat (Gujrat)

14

26. MPUSIP (Phase 1) subprojects are categorized under ‘B’ category as per ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS)-2009. All these subprojects may cause limited involuntary resettlement impact. The impact will mostly be temporary in nature during the civil works. There is no need to acquire private land as government land is available. Currently, majority of proposed subproject components are located on the existing facilities or government’s right of way (RoW). Therefore, it is pertinent to mention that no IR impacts are envisaged due to the proposed subprojects. Although, a Resettlement Framework (RF) has been developed for the MPUSIP in accordance with (i) the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013”; (ii) State laws and regulations; and (iii) ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement, 2009. The RF guides the screening and planning for all subprojects that have resettlement impacts, for more details about resettlement framework, please visit http://www.mpudc.co.in/mpusip-adb-funded.html. Accordingly, displaced persons (titleholders and non-titleholders) will be compensated at replacement cost and rates for different categories of losses and norms of special assistance are detailed in the RF. If there would be any IR impact reported during the implementation period, then people would be compensated as per the agreed Resettlement Framework (RF).

27. As mentioned earlier (refer to Table 1), MPUSIP has engaged DPR Consultant to prepare detailed project report including social and environment safeguard reports before the implementation of subprojects. Although, these reports will be reconfirmed again after completion of detailed design and detailed measurement surveys (DMS) which will be conducted by Design Build & Operate (DBO) Contractor before initiation of civil works during implementation1. Updation of the reports are under process during reporting period (August 2018 to January 2019) as final design for subproject is under progress during reporting period. No construction work will commence before the updated social safeguard document for the package is reviewed and approved by ADB and compensation to affected persons, if any. These final IR / IP reports of subproject towns will also be reviewed and disclosed on website of urban local body (ULB), IA and ADB. The IA is responsible to hand over the project lands/sites to the contractor which should be free from all encumbrances.

28. During the reporting period, IR and IP reports of all awarded packages were reviewed and ADB’s observations were also addressed of packages 4I and 7D under Phase 1 and 2E, 3D, 4C, 4H, 5E, 5F, 6H, 6J, 7C, 7F,7G and 1F under Phase 2. In addition, updation of social safeguard reports of package 5B and 6E under Phase 1 was carried out and submitted to ADB. Status of the land proposed for subproject components are verified and updated with the help from ULBs and revenue officials. Proposal for allotment of the land has been submitted to concerned District Collector/Tehsildar.

29. No involuntarily resettlement impact is resulted by the construction activities under the project during reporting period (August 2018 – January 2019). Efforts have been continued to minimize environmental and social team in design the project activities. The social parameters are regularly monitored during project construction activities. There will be no displacement of people, other than temporary relocation of hawkers and mobile vendors during construction. However, during the construction phase there will be temporary inconveniences such as

1 Detailed measurement survey will be jointly conducted by safeguards personnel of project implementation unit, consultants and contractors prior to implementation at each site/stretch of alignment. Report (IR DDR / RP for different sites/stretches will be prepared and submitted to ADB for approval; prior payment of compensation to permanent and/or temporarily impacted persons is mandatory before start of civil work at each site/alignment stretch. Social safeguards document for the package will be updated by PMC in coordination with DBO contractor.

15

increased vehicle movements that affect the pedestrians of the immediate vicinity of the work. The social safeguard reports (IR DDR and IP DDR) are likely to be updated periodically and submitted to ADB. The project activities don't displace to any persons and no indigenous people will be affected.

30. The following safeguard issues were identified and mitigation measures were undertaken: Table 3: Safeguard issues and Mitigation Measures Sl. No. Identified Safeguard Issues Mitigation Measures 1 Demarcation of the proposed land/site by Social Safeguard team of respective revenue official locally called Patwari PIUs and PMC (PIU) are directed to coordinate with respective ULB prior to start of any civil activities 2 Proposal sent to concerned District Collector Social Safeguard team of respective for allotment and transfer of the proposed PIUs and PMC (PIU) are directed to land/site in favour of respective urban local coordinate with the office of the body (ULB) respective CMOs/ULBs 3 Apply or obtain no objection certificate (NoC) Social Safeguard team of respective from Water Resource Department (WRD), PMU, PIU (PMU) and PIU (PMC) are Madhya Pradesh State Pollution Control directed to coordinate with respective Board, Forest Department, Archaeological ULBs to obtain NoC from other Survey of India (ASI), National Highways departments Authority of India (NHAI), Public Works Department (PWD), Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation (MPRDC), Indian Railways, irrigation department etc., if any 4 Disclosures of the summary of social Disclosed summary of social safeguard safeguard reports in vernacular language reports in vernacular language Hindi at Hindi respective ULB and PIU office after issuance of letter of award (LoA) 5 Grievances GRM has been developed and Grievance Redress Committee at town level has been formed to handle such case. 6 Change of the location of subproject Impact assessment including transect components walk and land ownership detail is required and being done. 7 Unanticipated Impacts: (i) on property or Such type of Impacts must be reported structure, (ii) on livelihood, (iii) any other to PIU/PMU/PMC and will be complied specify……… as per Resettlement Framework (RF) 8 Orientation of subproject components with Town level orientation regard to ADB Safeguard policy and its programme/meetings are conducted compliances to ULBs

31. Office of the urban local body (ULB) of each subproject town is in the process of transferring of the proposed land to its own name / ownership. Adverse effects due to involuntary resettlement as well as physical and economic displacement are not anticipated due to proposed subproject components at the time of approval of IP and IR reports.

32. Hence, Safeguard reports were reviewed, documented and submitted to PMU. During planning phase of the Project, detailed project report of the proposed subprojects along with

16

IEE, IR and IP reports were prepared by the DPR Consultant and submitted to ADB for approval whereas during implementation phase DBO Contractors will be responsible to validate the data. Apart from that, DBO Contractor has conducted household (HHs) survey of their subproject towns. In this regard, PMC has organized orientation program for the survey team. Household survey is verified by the field engineer, communication assistant and resettlement coordinator of PIU (PMC) and PIU (PMU) both. After completion of the household survey, DBO Contractors will prepare the data in excel and this data will be integrated with GIS Map along with topographic survey drawing (Auto Cad) with zero referencing and covering with complete network of road/lane & by lanes under the jurisdiction of the subproject town. During reporting period (August 2018 – January 2019), household survey of packages 1B (Sarni), 2A, 2F, 2G, 3A, 4A and 5B (town Katangi, Majholi, Patan, Sihora & Tendukheda) is completed during the reporting period while package no. 4B, 4D, 4F and 4I is in progress during reporting period. Copy of the household survey format is attached as Appendix 3 while progress of the HHs survey is as follows in Table 4. Table 4: Town-wise Progress of the Household Survey (up to January 2019) Sl. No. Package No. Name of the Town Status of Household survey 1 Boda Completed 2 1A Kurawar Completed 3 Kothri Completed 4 Amla Completed 5 1B Betul-Bazar Completed 6 Sarni Completed 7 Bankhedi Completed 1C 8 Sohagpur Completed 9 Betma Completed 10 2A Depalpur Completed 11 Gautampura Completed 12 Pansemal Completed 13 Rajpur Completed 2B 14 Karhi Padliya Completed 15 Kasrawad Completed 16 Dhamnod Completed 2C 17 Mandav Completed 18 Bhavra Completed 19 2D Meghnagar Completed 20 Petlawad Completed 21 Kukdeshwar Completed 22 Nayagaon Completed 3A 23 Sarwaniya Maharaj Completed 24 Nagri Completed 25 Susner Completed 26 3B Pankhedi Completed 27 Makdone Completed 28 Alampur Completed 29 Daboh Completed 4A 30 Mihona Completed 31 Phuphkalan Completed 32 4B Bhind In progress 33 Karera In Progress 34 Bairad In Progress 35 Pichhore In Progress 4D 36 Isagarh In Progress 37 Aron In Progress 38 Vijaypur In Progress 39 4F Lahar In Progress

17

Sl. No. Package No. Name of the Town Status of Household survey 40 Mehgaon In Progress 41 Gormi In Progress 42 Raghogarh In Progress 43 4I Badarwas In Progress 44 Shadora In Progress 45 5A Barhi Completed 46 Katangi Completed 47 Bhedaghat Competed 48 Majholi Completed 49 5B Panagar Completed 50 Patan Completed 51 Sihora Completed 52 Tendukheda Completed 53 Khajuraho Completed 6A 54 Rajnagar Completed 55 Sagar Completed 6B 56 Makronia Completed 57 6C Rahatgarh Completed 58 Buxwaha Completed 59 6D Hatta Completed 60 Pawai Completed 61 7A Mauganj Completed 62 Jaithari Completed 63 7B Khand Completed 64 Chandia Completed 65 2F Anjad (SWG) Completed 66 2G Barwaha (SWG) Completed 67 5G Saikheda (SWG) Completed

33. Generally, sites / land parcels proposed for subproject components are owned by revenue department under Government of Madhya Pradesh (GoM), or any other government department land for which the No Objection Certificate (NoC) is required from concerned department. Besides that, private land is also considered for subproject components in a few instances. But in this regard, either donation of the land is absolutely voluntary (without any coercion) or purchased through negotiated settlement or land acquisition act/procedures as per Resettlement Framework (RF). The subproject components such as Anicut, Intake well, water treatment plant (WTP) overhead tank (OHT) are proposed within the land owned by Government and the transmission / distribution network will be laid down within existing right- of-way (ROW) of the road network.

34. Social issues, in particular related to the land proposed for subproject components for subproject towns are depicted below in Table 5:

18

Table 5: Social Issues Town-wise & Package-wise Sl. Package Name of the Land related Issues No. No. Town No issues reported. NoC has been issued by District Collector-Rajgarh, refer to Appendix 7.1a 1 Boda

Raw water rising main (RWRM): DBO Contractor has explored new alignment of RWRM, because DPR Consultant had proposed RWRM alignment which passes through private agricultural land. WTP: Inadequate approach and insufficient size of land led to change the proposed location. New location/land has been provided by Nagar Parishad (NP)-Kurawar which is under possession of NP-Kurawar. Overhead Tank (OHT)-900 KL: As per DPR, proposed land/site belongs to Krishi Upaj Mandi (KUM) and KUM had 2 Kurawar refused to provide land. So, proposed OHT has been shifted at the premises of newly WTP site. OHT (250 KL): As per DPR, proposed site belongs to Police department. Later on, shifted to new location which is 1A also government land but under possession of NP-Kurawar. Note: Now, all proposed sites belong to government and under possession of Nagar Parishad-Kurawar. A certification and NoC has been issued by Chief Municipality Officer (CMO)-Kurawar, refer to Appendix 7.1b OHT (60 KL): Proposed site is government land and under possession of NP-Kothri, as per revenue record. OHT (400 KL): Proposed site is government land and under possession of NP-Kothri, as per revenue record. GLSR (150 KL): Location changed and shifted to another government land which is under possession of NP-Kothri, 3 Kothri as per revenue record. GLSR (200 KL): Proposed site is government land and under possession of NP-Kothri, as per revenue record. Note: No issue reported, refer to Appendix 7.1c Anicut: Anicut to be built on river Bel. Location changed and about 500m away from previous site towards downstream of the river. Private land may likely to be acquired to reach at site and increase of the length of structure (Anicut). About 7-8 private land owners may be affected. WTP (3.60 MLD): Proposed site is government land. Proposal has been sent to District Collector-Betul and Tehsildar- 4 Amla Amla to transfer the land. As per Tehsildar letter, proposed site belongs to forest area, therefore, forest permission is required. Refer to Appendix 7.2a 1B OHT (200 KL): Proposed land belongs to Krishi Upaj Mandi (KUM) and they have refused to provide land. Now, a private land owner has voluntarily donated land to NP-Amla. Sump Well: Proposed site of sump well comes under three departments and NoC has been issued by all three departments. Issue resolved. 5 Betul-Bazar WTP: Proposed site is government land and NoC has been obtained from District Collector-Betul. No issue reported. OHT (200 KL): Proposed site is government land. NoC has been obtained from District Collector-Betul. No issue reported, refer to Appendix 7.2b

19

Sl. Package Name of the Land related Issues No. No. Town All the proposed components such as WTP and OHTs (5 in no.) are located at land belongs to either Western Coalfield Limited (WCL) or Madhya Pradesh Power Generating Company Limited (MPGCL) and forest department. WTP (20 MLD): Location changed. Now, proposed site belongs to MPGCL near Satpura Reservoir. MPGCL has issued NoC to construct WTP but mentioned that it may take back the land, if required. This matter has been discussed at MPUDC, and it is in process of resolution. OHT (1500 KL): Proposed site belongs to WCL/forest department under ward no. 28 at Pathakheda. A permission is required from forest department. It has been applied in the first week of January 2018. Consent of 2/3rd households has been taken and submitted to Collector (tribal affair office). NoC has been issued. OHT (1500 KL): Proposed site belongs to MPGCL under ward no.7. NoC is required from forest department. Although, 6 Sarni MPGCL has issued NoC to construct OHT. OHT (1500 KL): Location changed and now proposed site belongs to NP-Sarni under ward no.35. OHT (1000 KL): Location changed and now proposed site belongs to WCL under ward no.22. But this site has already been allotted for Government Sanjay Nikunj Nursery. Officials from government nursery has issued verbal NoC to construct OHT. OHT (300 KL): Location changed. Because WCL had refused to provide land. Now, this OHT has been shifted to government college ground at Bagdona. NoC has been obtained from Office of the Government College, Bagdona Sarni.

OHT (150 KL).Location changed and now proposed at Andhyarbawdi. New proposed site is also government land. No issue reported. OHT (700 KL) + Sump well (70 KL): Both the components are proposed at government land which under possession of NP-Bankhedi at ward no 6. No issue reported. OHT (100 KL): Location changed and now proposed at Thaini on Manakwara Road which is also government land. 7 Bankhedi No issue reported OHT (200 KL) + sump well (20 KL): Both the components are proposed at Chhilod ward no.1. Proposed site is government land. No issue reported. 1C OHT (200 KL): at Dahalwara Kalan. Proposed site is government land. No issue reported Note: All the proposed sites are government (revenue) land. A letter has been written by CMO-Bankheri to District Collector-Hoshangabad for transfer of the land in the name of ULB, Refer to Appendix 7.3a

Jack Well cum Pump House at river Narmada: Private land needs to be acquired to construct approach road to reach at Jack Well cum Pump House. Five affected persons (APs) are reported. Compensation has been paid to all APs. WTP (5.5 MLD) and OHT (900 KL): Both the components are proposed in the same compound. Proposed site is under 8 Sohagpur possession of NP-Sohagpur, as per revenue record. OHT (600 KL): Proposed site is under possession of NP-Sohagpur, as per revenue record. OHT (250 KL): Proposed site is under possession of NP-Sohagpur, as per revenue record.

20

Sl. Package Name of the Land related Issues No. No. Town No issue reported, refer to Appendix 7.3b Source: river Gambir. No impact envisaged. Anicut & Intake well cum pump house: Anicut to be built on river Gambir. Proposed site is government land. No issue reported 9 Betma WTP: Proposed site is government land (survey no. 329-1/1/1/1) belongs to MP Aoudhogik Kendra Vikas Nigam (AKVN). Joint verification and demarcation is to be done in the presence of revenue officials, M.P. AKVN and ULB officials (in process). Although, verbal permission has been given by officials of AKVN. No issue reported, refer to Appendix 7.4a. Anicut & Intake well cum pump house: Anicut to be built on river Chambal. WTP: Proposed site is government land under possession of NP-Depalpur. A defunct WTP is reported at site. No issue 2A reported. 10 Depalpur OHT: Proposed site is government land under possession of NP-Depalpur. No issue reported. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.4b Anicut & Intake well cum pump house: Anicut to be built on river Chambal. WTP and OHT: Both the components are proposed at same location. Proposed site is government land. Verbal NoC 11 Gautampura has been given by district administration. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.4c. Source: Earlier it was river Gomai but now it has been shifted to Gomai dam which is about 10-12 Kms away from Pansemal town. NoC from WRD yet to be obtained. Local villagers have shown their reluctance to abstract water because proposed dam site is built for irrigation purpose only, as per villagers. Intake well cum pump house: Earlier proposed at Gomai river but now shifted to Gomai dam. Proposed site at Gomai dam is government land. No issue reported. WTP: Due to change of the Source, new site is identified which is government land (survey no. 11/1) which is located 12 2B Pansemal near Gomai dam. Proposal has been submitted to District collector- and land has been allotted to ULB- Pansemal. In this regard, transfer of the identified site for WTP in the name of ULB-Pansemal has been done. No issue reported. Refer to Appendix 7.5a OHT: Proposed site of OHT has been shifted to campus of existing OHT under ward no. 1. Refer to Appendix 7.5a Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.5a

21

Sl. Package Name of the Land related Issues No. No. Town Intake well cum pump house: Earlier proposed at river Narbhada but now clubbed with WSS Anjad. WTP: (1.50 MLD): Proposed site is government land which is under possession of NP-Rajpur. No issues reported. 13 Rajpur Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.5b. Source: River Narbhada Intake well cum pump house: Proposed site is government land. No issue reported. WTP: Proposed site is government land. Possession has been given and process of the transfer of land is in progress. 14 Karhi Padliya No issue reported. OHT: Proposed site is government land. No issue reported. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.5c Source: River Narbhada Intake well cum pump house: Proposed site is government land. Transfer of the land in the name of NP-Kasrawad is in progress. 15 Kasrawad OHT (115 KL): Proposed site is government land. Transfer of the land in the name of NP-Kasrawad is in progress. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.5d Intake well cum pump house: It has been decided that it will be merged with town Prithampura WS scheme, built by Urban Administration and Development Department (UADD). WTP: Proposed at existing WTP. Additional land is required and adjoining government land is available. Possession has been given but transfer of the land in the name of ULB-Dhamnod is in progress. OHT (360 KL): Another Khasra No. 9/2/2 under ward no. 10 at Muktanand parisar is identified which is private and 16 Dhamnod land owner has voluntarily donated the land to NP-Dhamnod. For Consent letter, refer to Appendix 7.6a OHT (700 KL): Another Khasra No. 200 under ward no. 4 is identified which is government land. RWRM: Small section of private land likely to be affected during laying. 2C Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.6a

OHT-1 (535 KL): Another land is identified with details are Khasra No. 820, Halka 155 Mandav, Area: 0.734ha belongs to revenue department and under possession of NP - Mandav. ASI monument namely Sarai Kothi is reported within 110 M. NoC from State ASI has been received, refer to Appendix 7.6b. 17 Mandav OHT-2 (200 KL): Another land is identified with details are Khasra No. 176 Halka 155 Area: 4.945 ha belongs to revenue department. Letter has been written to District collector-Dhar, refer to Appendix 7.6b IPS: Permission from Forest department has been obtained, refer to Appendix 7.6b.

22

Sl. Package Name of the Land related Issues No. No. Town

Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.6b. Intake well cum pump house: Proposed site is government land. Proposal has been sent to District Collector for NoC and transfer of the land in the name of NP-Bhavra. No issue reported. WTP (1.60 MLD) and Clear water sump (100 KL): Both are proposed at same compound. Proposed site is government 18 Bhavra land and under possession of NP-Bhavra. No issue reported. OHT (150 KL): Proposed site is government land and under possession of NP-Bhavra. No issues reported. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.7a. Weir (6 m height and 200m wide): During implementation, location of the proposed weir is changed due to some local issues. Now it is being constructed at downstream of the river Anas about 150 meter away from previous site. No issue reported. Intake well cum pump house: Proposed site is government land which belongs to WRD. No issue reported. 2D WTP (2.30 MLD): Proposed site is government land and under possession of NP-Meghnagar. During implementation 19 Meghnagar it come under notice that land belongs to forest department. NoC from forest department has been obtained. No issue reported. OHT (200 KL): Location changed and shifted to premises of WTP. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.7b Intake well cum pump house: WRD Land WTP (1.20 MLD) and OHT (120 KL): Another site for WTP along with clear water sump (100 KL) and OHT (120 KL) has been identified because proposed site is technically improper. New site is identified and this proposed site is 20 Petlawad government land. Land has been allotted to ULB-Petlawad. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.7c Kukdeshwar WTP (2.00 MLD): Proposed site is government land and under possession and in the name of ULB-Kukdeshwar, refer to Appendix 7.8a OHT (400 KL): Proposed site is government land and under possession of ULB-Kukdeshwar, refer to Appendix 7.8a. 21 3A Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.8a

23

Sl. Package Name of the Land related Issues No. No. Town Nayagoan Source: water filled at Limestone mine of CCI (Cement Corporation of India). WTP (1.50 MLD): Proposed site is government land and District Collector has issued order in the name of NP- Nayagaon, refer to Appendix 7.8b 22 OHT (200 KL): Earlier site was proposed at government land (survey no. 1547) but later on it has been shifted to the premises of WTP (survey no. 1756/8), refer to Appendix 7.8b. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.8b

Sarwaniya WTP (1.5 MLD): Proposed site is government land and under possession of NP-Meghnagar. District Collector has Maharaj issued order to transfer of the land, refer to Appendix 7.8c OHT (250 KL): Earlier It was proposed at survey no. 499 but later on It was decided to construct at survey no. 501/1 23 which is found adjacent to 499 and enough land is there which belongs to government. District Collector has issued order to transfer of the land, refer to Appendix 7.8c. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.8c Nagri Intake well: Proposed site is government land which belongs to WRD WTP (1.15 MLD): Proposed site is government land and under possession of NP-Nagri, refer to Appendix 7.8d 24 Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.8d Intake well: As per DPR, proposed site is government land (WRD). Later on, It has been decided that existing Intake Well on Keetkheri dam will be used for water supply. OHT (100 KL): As per DPR, proposed site is government land (survey no. 1865) at Janpad office, Later on construction of the OHT (100 KL) at this survey number is dropped and decided to increase the capacity of OHT proposed at survey no. 2004 WTP (2.00 MLD): As per DPR, proposed site is government land (survey no. 1220) at Police Ground. Later on a new 25 Susner Survey no. 2004 is identified which is government land and located near police ground. Secondly, It is decided that in place of construct two OHTs at different place, construct one OHT and increase the capacity (200 KL). Therefore, only 3B one OHT of 200KL is constructed within the premises of WTP. refer to Appendix 7.9a Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.9a

Source: Open well at Silodha Dam WTP (2.25 MLD) and OHT (100 KL): As per DPR, proposed site is government land (survey no. 560/2) Both the 26 Pankhedi components are proposed at same survey no..

24

Sl. Package Name of the Land related Issues No. No. Town OHT (350 KL): As per DPR, proposed site is government land (survey no. 372/6) at ward no. 15 but later on, shifted to another site which is also government land (survey no. 175/3 & 175/4) at ward no. 6 near veterinary hospital. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.9b Source: Tillar Dam/Pacheti Dam on Tiller River Intake well: Proposed site is government land which belongs to WRD. NoC has been given by WRD to construct Intake well at dam site, refer to Appendix 7.9c. WTP (2.00 MLD): Proposed site is government land. 27 Makdone OHT (400 KL): proposed to be constructed at the location of present 180KL OHT that to be dismantled. Proposal has been sent to District Collector-Ujjain for transfer of the proposed land and approved by District Collector- Ujjain, refer to Appendix 7.9c Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.9c Alampur Source: Sindh river near Ratagarh Mata Mandir and construction of the weir across the Sindh River, NoC obtained from WRD, refer to Appendix 7.10a Intake well cum pump house: Proposed site is government land which belongs to WRD. While alignment of proposed Intake approach bridge found under forest area, therefore, NoC to be obtained (in progress). CMO-Alampur has applied for NoC and allotment of the land to DFO-Datia, refer to Appendix 7.10a. 28 WTP: As per DPR, proposed site is government land (survey no. 85). Location of the proposed site is slightly changed and now identified land (survey no. 81/1) is also government land. OHT (220 KL): Government land which is under possession of NP-Alampur. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer 4A to Appendix 7.10a. No issue reported. Daboh Source: Pahuj river, Construction of weir across the Sindh River. During implementation, it has been decided to take clear water from WSS Alampur. Intake well cum pump house: near bridge at Samthar road. During implementation, it has been decided to take potable water from WSS Alampur. This proposed component is discarded now. 29 WTP (2.70 MLD): As per DPR, proposed site is government land located on Samthar road. During implementation, it has been decided to take potable water from WSS Alampur. This proposed component is discarded now OHT (220 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 1169). It may change No issues reported.

25

Sl. Package Name of the Land related Issues No. No. Town Mihona Source: Pahuj river, Construction of anicut across the Pahuj River at village Aehroli. NoC obtained from WRD, refer to Appendix 7.10c Intake well cum pump house: at village Aehroli . For Approach Bridge, survey no. 352 and land has been allotted by District Collector-Bhind, refer to Appendix 7.10c WTP (2.26 MLD): Proposed site is government land. District Collector-Bhind has issued order for allotment of the 30 proposed land, refer to Appendix 7.10c OHT (340 KL): Proposed site is government land. District Collector-Bhind has issued order for allotment of the proposed land, refer to Appendix 7.10c Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.10c. No issue reported. Phuphkalan Source of Intake of water is from 7 existing Tube wells across the town WTP and OHT-1 (325 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 60). District Collector-Bhind has issued order for allotment of the proposed land, refer to Appendix 7.10d 31 OHT-2 (325 KL): Enough land is available near existing OHT and Land is under possession of ULB-Phuphkalan. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.10d. No issue reported.

Bhind OHT-1 (600 KL): As per DPR, proposed location is survey no. 137 Green wood Academy, required size of the land was not there, therefore, it has been shifted to Mata deen ka pura at survey no. 181. ULB-Bhind has applied for NoC to Waqf board. OHT-2 (600 KL): As per DPR, proposed OHT location survey no. 753 Govind Nagar, required size of the land was not there, therefore, it has been shifted to Old Galla Mandi survey no. 851,852. Land has been under possession of ULB- Bhind. OHT-3 (2300 KL): As per DPR, proposed OHT location survey no. 1450 near Vinayak Dharam Kanta but it has been shifted to near Vinayak Dharam Kanta 17th Battalion SAF campus survey no. 1578, 1584, 1585, 1586. ULB-Bhind has applied for NoC to 17th Battalion SAF. 32 4B OHT-4 (2400 KL): As per DPR, proposed site belongs to Ganga Dham Trust, Bhim Nagar. ULB-Bhind has applied for NoC. OHT-5 (800 KL): Proposed OHT location survey no. 175 Veerendra Nagar, required size of the land was not there, therefore, it has been shifted to veterinary hospital survey no. 224, 225. Land is under possession of ULB-Bhind. OHT-6 (500 KL): As per DPR, proposed site is located at Shashtri Nagar survey no. 501. Land is under possession of ULB-Bhind. OHT-7 (1600 KL): As per DPR, location of the OHT is at Krishna Nagar survey no. 970. But approach to this site is found quite incontrollable, therefore, it has been shifted to Sundar Nagar survey no. 319, 335, 336. Land is under possession of ULB-Bhind.

26

Sl. Package Name of the Land related Issues No. No. Town

OHT-8 (1200 KL): As per DPR, proposed location is at Bharoli tiraha survey no. 530, required size of the land was not there, therefore, it has been shifted to New Gall Mandi survey no. 515 belongs to Mandi Board. ULB-Bhind has applied for NoC to Mandi Board. OHT-9 (1700 KL): As per DPR, proposed site location is Hazi Nagar survey no. 3996. But it has been shifted to 200 M away in front of Jamuna School survey no. 3483, 3484, 3485 belongs to Police Department. ULB-Bhind has been applied for NoC. OHT-10 (300 KL): As per DPR, proposed OHT location is at Yadunath Nagar survey no. 2986. But it has been shifted to nearby at survey no. 2979 belongs to Industrial department. ULB-Bhind has applied for NoC to Industrial department. OHT-11 (600 KL): As per DPR, proposed OHT site is located Near Bharat Petrol pump Lahar Road survey no. 3277 belongs to Industrial department. ULB-Bhind has applied for NoC. CWR-1 (1800 KL): As per DPR, proposed OHT location is at Chambal Colony Etawah Road survey no. 807. ULB- Bhind has applied for NoC. CWR-2 (2500 KL): As per DPR, proposed OHT location is at Government School No. 2 survey no. 111. But School Authority has refused to provide land for CWR, therefore, it has been shifted to Sundar Pura survey no. 319, 335, 336. Land is under possession of ULB-Bhind. CWR-3 (1600 KL): As per DPR, proposed OHT location is near stadium survey no. 2794. But, it has been shifted to MJS College Ground survey no. 2727. ULB-Bhind has been applied for NoC. Intake well cum pump house: Earlier, it was proposed at western bank of Samoha dam that comes under Son Chiraiya Bird Sanctuary. Therefore, new location on eastern bank side of Samoha Dam at village Khaira Modi under Panchayat Machhawali is identified. NoC obtained from WRD, refer to Appendix 7.11a WTP: As per DPR, proposed WTP site was located on western bank of river Mahuwar at town Karera. Some social issues are also come under notice that locals have encroached upon part of the proposed site and secondly an approach road (CC road) is there to access the temple located there. Keeping in view, it is decided to construct new WTP within the campus of existing WTP. OHT (1000 KL): As per DPR, proposed site is government land (survey no. 1521) at PWD rest house. Location 33 4D Karera changed and shifted to back side of the PWD rest house at another government land (survey no. 1537) near Mandi which is under possession of ULB-Karera OHT (700 KL): As per DPR, proposed site is government land (survey no. 1590/1) at Nagar Parishad campus. OHT (500 KL): As per DPR, proposed site is government land (survey no. 475) at Krishi Upaj Mandi. Location changed and shifted to another government land (survey no. 1882) near highway. Proposal has been submitted to District Collector-Shivpuri Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.11a. No issue reported.

27

Sl. Package Name of the Land related Issues No. No. Town Intake well and approach bridge: Proposed at Pachhipura dam. No issue reported WTP (2.54 MLD) at Ward No.15 at Pachhipura. Proposed site is government land (survey no. 398). District Collector has allotted the proposed land to ULB-Bairad, refer to Appendix 7.11b OHT-1 (300 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 444). District Collector has allotted the proposed land to ULB-Bairad, refer to Appendix 7.11b 34 Bairad OHT-2 (300 KL): As per DPR, proposed at Tehsil office but now it has been shifted to campus of the Nagar Parishad office. Land under possession of ULB-Bairad OHT-3 (225 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 398), within the campus of WTP Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.11b. No issue reported.

Source: As per DPR, Futiwar dam but it has been decided to get water from Futiwar and Nagdha dam, both in the rotation system. WTP: As per DPR, Khasra No. 1639/3 was proposed but another new location/land with Khasra No. 1653/1/3 near Hazira Pahari is identified. Transfer of land is required. 35 Pichhore OHT (200 KL): It is decided that in place of two GSR (250 KL each) at Hazira Pahari and Kali Mata Mandir Pahari, OHT (100 KL) is being proposed at Hazira Pahari within the campus of WTP because two OHTs had been constructed recently by Nagar parishad-Pichhore

Two sump wells 160 KL and 180 KL are proposed at the campus of existing OHTs which are already under possession 36 Isagarh of Nagar parishad-Isagarh. No issues reported

Source: river Sindh Intake well and approach bridge WTP (4.50 MLD): Proposed at government survey no. 950, 952, 954 and 955, located at Aron-Barod road. OHT (700 KL): Earlier Proposed at government survey no 1216 but later on shifted to another survey no. 643 due to insufficient 37 Aron land at 1216. But it may change Note: District Collector has issued order for above mentioned survey numbers, refer to Appendix 7.11e. No issue reported.

Source: river Kunwari Intake well cum pump house: Site for intake well cum pump house is being proposed at anicut constructed by WRD on river Kunwari. 38 Vijaypur WTP: Another government land with survey no. 11/1 is identified which is under possession of Nagar Parishad-Vijaypur for WTP and clear water sump. Earlier survey no. was 22/1.

28

Sl. Package Name of the Land related Issues No. No. Town OHT-1 (315 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 660) which is under possession of ULB-Vijaypur. District Collector has issued order for above mentioned survey numbers, refer to Appendix 7.11f. OHT-2 (240 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 57). District Collector has issued order for above mentioned survey numbers, refer to Appendix 7.11f. No issue reported.

Weir: on river Sindh near Madori village Intake well cum pump house: Sindh River WTP (8.50 MLD): in Madori village. Sump well: 235KL within WTP campus OHT (400 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 5424), near BSNL under ward no. 15. 39 Lahar OHT (450 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 5533), near MSGM Academy school under ward no. 14. OHT (350 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 2629/2), near Shivaji temple under ward no. 10. OHT (500 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 3238/1 & 3238/2), near Kali temple under ward no. 8. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.12a. No issue reported.

4F Source: Ground water, using 8 existing tube wells. WTP (3.10 MLD) with sump well (85 KL) and OHT (320 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 1295, 1296, 1297, 1308, 1309 and 1316), near Sulabh Complex under ward no. 6. 40 Mehgaon OHT (300 KL): Proposed site is government land (survey no. 162, 163 and 164), at Veterinary Hospital under ward no. 1

Source: It may change from surface water to ground water. WTP (2.65 MLD): Proposed at government survey no. 2870 & 2872. Due to change of the source proposed component 41 Gormi is discarded, earlier it was proposed near bridge on Kunwari River at Budhara village. OHT (300 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 3126 located at Man kapura, Ward No. 15 OHT (275 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 1419 located at Muktidham, Ward No. 2. Source: Gopikrishan Sagar dam Intake well and approach bridge: Gopikrishan Sagar dam WTP (17 MLD): reported under forest, NoC has been obtained from forest department. 42 4I Raghogarh OHT: About 5200 KL capacity is required in town. 21 OHTs (existing) are there in town and out of that 13 OHTs are taken into consideration while 12 new OHTs/GLSRs are proposed under WSS, Raghogarh. Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.13a. No issue reported.

29

Sl. Package Name of the Land related Issues No. No. Town Source: Ground water. Six number of Tube wells are proposed. 2 OHTs of capacity 300 KL each: (i) Proposed at government survey no. 172 at BRC ground and (ii) Proposed at 43 Badarwas government survey no. 614 near police station Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.13b. No issue reported. Source & Intake well and approach bridge: Piproda Keshraj Barrage Stop Dam on Sindh River at Siran Charoda WTP (1.10 MLD): Proposed at government survey no. 737/min 1. OHT (250 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 1060/1 44 Shadora OHT (100 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 1418 Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.13c. No issue reported. Intake well cum pump house: Proposed at government survey no. 1 which is located on right bank of River Mahanadi at Koniya Village near Kali ji Temple. WTP (3.5 MLD): Proposed at government survey no. 1193/1 in ward no. 4 for 3.5 MLD. 45 5A Barhi OHT (650 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 493/20 ka Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, refer to Appendix 7.14. No issue reported.

Note: Group water supply scheme for seven towns Katangi, Bhedaghat, Majholi, Panagar, Patan, Sihora and Tendukheda. Source, Intake well and WTP is common for all seven towns, proposed at Bhedaghat. 46 Katangi OHT (120 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 136/3 and 137/3. Proposal has been submitted to District collector- Jabalpur. No issues reported, refer to Appendix 7.15a

Source: Common Intake well cum pump house: Location changed and now shifted to Lamhetaghat. Common WTP (31 MLD): Location changed and now shifted to Lamhetaghat. Proposed at government survey no. 5B 171, 173, 175 and 176. No issue reported Note: As per DPR, proposed location has been changed now as ADB strongly objected on the proposed site of Intake and WTP, therefore, new site has been identified at another location on downstream side locally called Lamhetaghat 47 Bhedaghat on river Narmada. OHT (220 KL) at Bhedaghat: As per DPR, proposed at Khsara 153/1, it is typing error and actually it is 153/2. OHT (200 KL) at Bhedaghat: As per DPR, proposed at Khsara no. 72, it is typing error and actually it is 74 which comes under the corridor of impact (CoI) of ASI’s structure called Chousath Yogini Mandir. NoC has been obtained from ASI.

30

Sl. Package Name of the Land related Issues No. No. Town Note: All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment, No issue reported, refer to Appendix 7.15b.

Sump well (35 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 401. 48 Majholi No issue reported, refer to Appendix 7.15c

OHTs (700 KL, 600 KL and 200 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 344/1 & 344/2, 1112 and 1421/2 Which are under possession of NP-Panagar Note: Application from ULB-Panagar has been submitted to District Collector to transfer of the proposed land/site. All 49 Panagar proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment. No issues reported, refer to Appendix 7.15d.

No issues reported 50 Patan

OHTs (4 in number): Proposed at government survey no. 197/2, 230/1, 1488 and 275/7. Due to insufficient area, another land is provided by NP-Sihora (Govt. khasra no. 1488/2 in front of PHED workshop) Clear Water Sump well: Proposed at government survey no.117/2. 51 Sihora Note: Application from ULB-Sihora has been submitted to District Collector to transfer of the proposed land/site. All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment. No issue reported , refer to Appendix 7.15f.

Sump Well: Proposed at government survey no. 80, BPT: Proposed at government survey no. 23/377 OHT (300 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 685/3 in ward no. 9 OHT (325 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 579/1 in ward no. 11 52 Tendukheda Note: Application from ULB-Tendukheda has been submitted to Tehsildar-Patan for sump well and Tehsildar- Tendukheda for BPT and OHTs for transfer of the proposed land/site. All proposed sites belongs to government land which are reported vacant and without any encroachment. No issue reported, refer to Appendix 7.15g.

53 Khajuraho Field monitoring visit revealed the need for fresh third party certification, consultations and consideration of the 6A nontitleholders for project construction work, as revealed during consultations. refer to Appendix 7.16 54 Rajnagar

No issues reported 55 6B Sagar

31

Sl. Package Name of the Land related Issues No. No. Town No issues reported 56 Makroniya

Weir: Weir is to be built on river Bina (length 130 M and height 3 M) Intake well cum pump house (7.0 MLD): at Bina river WTP (7.0 MLD): Proposed at government survey no. 19 near existing WTP. Proposed site comes under the CoI of ASI structure, fort locally called Qila. NoC from ASI has been obtained. Refer to Appendix 7.17a Clear Water sump of 2.51 Lakhs Litre capacity within campus of WTP 57 6C Rahatgarh OHT (1200 KL capacity for Zone-2A & 2B): Proposed at government survey no. 860 and 861/1 under ward no. 6 inside the campus of Nagar Parishad-Rahatgarh. OHT (600 KL for Zone-3): Proposed at government survey no. 76/1 under ward no. 3 Shamshan ghat There is no land issue reported at proposed components, refer to Appendix 7.18.

Intake well at Buxwaha tank (Bhad Bhada talab) for 2 MLD WTP (1.30 MLD) near Buxwaha tank/Bhad Bhada talab: Proposed at government survey no. 349/1. OHT (200 KL): As per DPR, proposed at government survey no. near police housing board colony but during Implementation, it is changed to Ashok Vatika in front of government hospital. Now, new identified proposed location 58 Buxwaha is at government survey no. 701/8. Note: CMO-Buxwaha issued a certificate which clearly states that proposed sites are government land and under possession of NP-Buxwaha, refer to Appendix 7.19A.

Location of Intake Well cum pump house: Intake well was proposed on the bank of Sonar river at village Harat. Sarpanch and local villagers of village Harat and other villages has objected the proposed location of Intake Well at Sonar river and alignment of RWRM pipeline. Therefore, shifted to another site which is located at downstream of Sonar river near WTP (proposed) at Gaddiya Hatta at government survey no. 44/1. 6D WTP (3.50 MLD): Proposed at government survey no. 44/1 59 Hatta OHT (1100 KL): within the campus of WTP Note: CMO-Hatta issued a certificate which clearly states that proposed sites are government land and transfer of the land is in process, refer to Appendix 7.19A. Now, there is no land issue reported at proposed components

Weir on Patne river (length 88 m and height 5m) Intake well for 3.92 MLD at Patne river WTP (3.9 MLD): about 800 m away from intake well 60 Pawai Clear Water sump for 3.5 Lakh litre capacity at WTP GSR of 350 KL capacity

32

Sl. Package Name of the Land related Issues No. No. Town GSR of 100 KL: shifted to new location Hanuman Bhata main gate about 200m away from previous site. Proposed at government survey no. 5814 near Hanuman Bhatta. NoC has been obtained for both the GSRs from forest department. Land proposed for subproject components belongs to government, a letter has been submitted to Tehsildar-Pawai for allotment, refer to Appendix 7.19C.

First River Ponding Structure: at River Nihayi near existing Intake Well. Proposed site is under possession of NP- Mauganj. Second River Ponding Structure: is proposed at right bank of Odda nala at Village Khatkari. Proposed intake well of 8.25 MLD Capacity on Odda nala right bank at Village Khatkari US side of Existing Stop dam. Although, government land is available on both the side of the river but some part of the private land is required to construct the Anicut and access to anicut. Two private land owner have voluntarily donated their land. No issue reported 61 7A Mauganj WTP ( 8.30 MLD): near Existing Intake well at river Nihayi. Clear Water sump for 4.00 Lac.Lit capacity proposed within campus of WTP. Proposed site is under possession of NP-Mauganj. OHT (1800 KL): Earlier dispute reported in between a local resident and Office of the CMO on the proposed land of OHT to get approach road for his land. No issue reported, refer to Appendix 7.20

Anicut: Anicut to be built on river Tipan. A small portion of proposed site/location comes under forest area, applied to forest department for NoC. Refer to Appendix 7.21a. Intake well cum pump house: Location is downside of bridge on right bank of river Tipan. Proposed at government survey no. 304 which comes under forest area. Applied to forest department for NoC. Refer to Appendix 7/21a, applied to DFO-Anuppur for NoC and allotment. Other survey no. 2077/1 which is government, small portion of the land is required as both the survey no. 2077/1 and 304 are located adjacent to each other. WTP: As per DPR, proposed at government survey no. 2077/1 at existing WTP. But during implementation, it came to notice that apart from survey no. 2077/1 another survey no. 304 which belongs to forest department is also required 62 Jaithari as both the survey no. 2077/1 and 304 are located adjacent to each other. Propose site/location comes under forest 7B area as well as revenue department. Applied to forest department and District Collector both for NoC and allotment. Refer to Appendix 7/21a. OHT (100 KL): As per DPR, proposed at government survey no. 209/4. But during implementation, new site is identified and proposed at government survey no. 289. No issue reported. Note: NoC is to be required from railway, PWD and MPRDC to lay the pipeline within the RoW. No issue reported, refer to Appendix 7.21a.

Source: Ban Sagar Dam 63 Khand GLSR (100 KL): Land belongs to forest department. Applied for NoC. Refer to Appendix 7.21b.

33

Sl. Package Name of the Land related Issues No. No. Town

RWRM: Total length of proposed alignment of RWRM is 6 Kms., about 4 kms (from source to GLSR-100 KL) and 2 Kms is from GLSR-100 KL to WTP. Proposed alignment passes through forest area, PMGSY road and irrigation department road. Applied for NoC to forest department while it is in process to apply for NoC to PMGSY and irrigation department. WTP (1.5 MLD): Proposed at government survey no. 91/1 at ward no. 15. Proposal has been submitted to District Collector for allotment, refer to Appendix 7.21b. GLSR (200 KL): As per DPR, proposed at government survey no. 209/4, proposed location of GLSR is far away from the town area. Actually identified location of the site is government survey no. 209/10/kha under ward no. 12. Refer to Appendix 7.21b written to District Collector for allotment. No issue reported.

Source: river Chhoti Mahanadi Anicut: During implementation, it came to notice that no approach road is there to proposed site/location of Anicut, therefore, another site is identified on the downstream of Chhoti Mahanadi. At new site, natural pooling of large quantity of water is always there throughout the year. Thus, Anicut is not required. Intake well cum pump house: Location of the site belongs to WRD under Jogia Irrigation Project. A letter has been written to WRD to obtain NoC, refer to Appendix 7.21c written to WRD. WTP (2 MLD): As per DPR, proposed at government survey no. 11/1/4. But during implementation, it came to notice 64 Chandia that no approach road to proposed site. Therefore, new site is identified in the town and proposed at government survey no. 1167/1 and 1439/1 near cremation ground. Proposal has been submitted to District Collector-Umariya for allotment, refer to Appendix 7.21c. OHT (170 KL): As per DPR, proposed at government survey no. 2459/1 OHT (350 KL): As per DPR, proposed at government survey no. 359 but during implementation it was shifted to new survey no. 2236. For both the OHTs, proposal has been submitted to Tehsildar-Chandia for allotment, refer to Appendix 7.21c.

No issue reported during reporting period. 65 2F Anjad (SWG)

Barwaha 66 2G No issue reported during reporting period. (SWG) Saikheda 67 5G No issue reported during reporting period. (SWG)

34

35. At WSS town Amla under package 1B, it came to notice that private land is to be acquired for Anicut. In this regard, identification of the land owners is in progress with the help of local revenue officials (patwari). While for another component (OHT-200 KL)of WSS town Amla, a private land owner has voluntarily donated his land to NP-Amla. In another package 2C and 7A, private land owner voluntarily donated their land for OHT-360 KL in WSS town Dhamnod and for Anicut in WSS town Mauganj respectively. Keeping in view, third party verification is required to address the ADB Policy. In WSS town Khajuraho & Rajnagar under package 6A, seven affected persons (APs) were identified in RP at proposed site of WTP near Kutni dam as this site is encroached by these APs from adjacent village. As per RP, these seven farmers had been cultivating crops in the encroached government land for their own consumption. But during implementation period, these APs had given a consent cum certificate letter which clearly states that they had willingly not grown any crop on the encroached land since 2016-17 because WTP has been proposed and significant number of households will get potable water supply from there. This is pious work and APs decided not to grow crops in the encroached land for public interest, refer to Appendix 7.16.

36. Apart from the above issues, NoC needs to be obtained from water resource department (WRD), archaeological survey of India (ASI), forest department, national highways authority of India (NHAI), public works department (PWD) etc., if required for subproject components. Based on the data collected and progress reported periodically, the physical progress of awarded packages under Phase I is depicted in Appendix 1.

D. COMPENSATION AND REHABILITATION

37. The overall project is classified as category ‘B’ in accordance with ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS). ADB's SPS covers both temporary and permanent impacts. As mentioned earlier, proposed site/land for subproject components belongs to government, but in one of the subprojects WSS town Sohagpur under Package 1C, small piece of land needs to acquire. As per DBO Contractor, after detailed measurement survey it was found that private land needs to be acquired to construct approach road to reach at Jack Well cum Pump House proposed at Narmada river. Five affected persons (APs) are reported and land acquisition is done through negotiated settlement under consent land purchase policy of government of Madhya Pradesh. Under this policy, department or undertakings will pay the value of the land after calculating prevalent collector guideline rates of lands plus value of available assets on the land (trees, well, house etc.) and will also pay an equal rehabilitation grant to land owner. Keeping in view of ADB policy, socio-economic profile of APs along with a third-party verification has been done and attached in the updated IR DDR of town Sohagpur by Client. All the five APs have received compensation amount, details are as follows: Table 6: Details of APs and Status of compensation payment during reporting period (August 2017 to January 2018 Sl. Name of the AP (Land Amount to be Other Total Remarks No. Owner) paid (in INR) Charges Amount including including rehabilitation stamp duty & grant registry charge 1 Vinay Kumar/Jiwan Singh 7,26,000 52,998 7,78,998 Amount disbursed 2 Neelam/Sunil Kumar 2,40,000 17,520 2,57,520 -do- 3 Kripal Singh/Roop Singh 96,000 7,008 1,03,008 -do- 4 Manoj Kumar/Ravishankar 4,83,000 35,259 5,18,259 -do- 5 Ram Bharose/Sarvan Singh 1,92,000 14,016 2,06,016 -do-

35

Sl. Name of the AP (Land Amount to be Other Total Remarks No. Owner) paid (in INR) Charges Amount including including rehabilitation stamp duty & grant registry charge Total 17,37,000 1,26,801 18,63,801

E. CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION AND DISCLOUSRE

38. During implementation of the subprojects, an extensive consultation program is carried out with different type of stakeholders such as respective ULBs, other line departments, general public, vendors and land owner etc., in line with the requirements pertaining to disseminate the project information, in particular agreed resettlement framework. General public, business owners mainly shopkeepers and likely to be affected people were informed about the possibility of disruption due to subproject. The consultation is focused on about subproject and on entitlement matrix of the project and compensation receiving procedure. The tools used for consultations were stakeholder workshops and meetings, interviews and focus group discussions (FGD). These consultations provided inputs for identification of the felt needs of the communities, and the relevant stakeholders. Meaningful consultations have been continued with local inhabitants which include all section of society particularly Vulnerable Groups1, IP community, affected people (APs), elected representative and other stakeholders to ensure their participation in all phases of subprojects i.e Design, implementation and monitoring. Meaningful consultation is defined as a process that (i) begins early in the project preparation stage and expected to carry out throughout the project cycle; (ii) provides timely disclosure of relevant and adequate information that is understandable and readily accessible to affected people (APs); (iii) is undertaken in an atmosphere free of intimidation or coercion; (iv) is gender inclusive and responsive, and tailored to the needs of vulnerable groups; and (v) enables the incorporation of all relevant views of APs and other stakeholders into decision making, such as project design, mitigation measures, the sharing of development benefits and opportunities, and implementation issues. Consultations is being carried out in a manner commensurate with the impacts on affected communities.

39. The consultation process and its results will be documented in the updated / revised Involuntary Resettlement / Indigenous Peoples Plan (IPP) Due Diligence Report of each subproject. The consultations with APs, local community particularly vulnerable groups were informed about the subproject components/activities to ensure that it adequately deal with their needs, priorities, and preferences. The outcome of the social assessment and mitigation measures were discussed with local inhabitants. The Executing Agency has made available the summary of Initial Environment Examination (IEE) and IR/IP reports of awarded subproject towns to the ULB, affected persons and local public. Subproject information was made available in a local language i.e Hindi. Summary of awarded subprojects was disclosed at notice board of the concerned Urban Local Body (ULB) / PIU (refer to Appendix 2). EA shall also post the documents and their summaries on its website. This will also be disclosed on ADB website.

1 vulnerable groups / households, defined as women-headed households(WHH) and households below the poverty line (BPL), scheduled caste (SC) / scheduled tribe (ST) households, disabled/elderly headed households.

36

40. A draft Community Action and Participation Plan (CAPP) was prepared and submitted to PMU. As involvement of the local community under the urban water supply sub-project is highly desirable, because of variations in community characteristics and degree of significance of the project need. Therefore, awareness and participation of the community are very much required to ensure widespread, ongoing, and meaningful participation of the key stakeholders with a focus on the poor and the vulnerable group. Awareness drive program are conducted and record of awareness raising events/consultations are as follows:

37

Table 7: Record of Awareness Raising Events/Consultations Sl. Reporting Period (Aug 2018 to Jan 2019) Total as on 31st January 2019 Town Package No. No of Total Male Female No of Total Male Female

consultations participants participants participants consultations participants participants participants 1 Boda 1A 3 26 20 6 3 26 20 6 2 Kurawar 1A 3 32 25 7 3 32 25 7 3 Sarni 1B 4 81 67 14 4 81 67 14 4 Amla 1B 2 60 20 40 2 60 20 40 5 Betul Bazar 1B 2 23 18 5 2 23 18 5 6 Bankhedi 1C 0 0 0 0 2 20 12 8 7 Sohagpur 1C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Betma 2A 1 10 6 4 10 175 67 108 9 Depalpur 2A 1 13 11 2 6 111 54 57 10 Gotampura 2A 0 0 0 0 6 112 52 60 Karhi 5 55 51 4 11 2B 0 0 0 0 Padliya 12 Kasrawad 2B 2 20 0 20 9 155 49 106 13 Pansemal 2B 0 0 0 0 6 61 56 5 14 Dhamnod 2C 2 20 5 15 24 260 136 124 15 Mandav 2C 1 14 14 10 18 296 114 182 16 Meghnagar 2D 1 7 4 3 2 17 10 7 17 Petlawad 2D 4 56 9 47 11 145 39 106 18 Bhavara 2D 0 0 0 0 2 22 8 14 19 Kukdeshwar 3A 1 22 11 11 1 22 11 11 20 Makdone 3B 0 0 0 0 3 37 24 13 21 Susner 3B 2 49 7 42 3 61 13 48 22 Pankhedi 3B 4 47 11 36 4 47 11 36 23 Alampur 4A 7 72 62 10 7 72 62 10 24 Daboh 4A 5 38 33 5 5 38 33 5 25 Mihona 4A 3 40 36 4 3 40 36 4 26 Phuphkalan 4A 5 64 49 5 5 64 49 5 27 Aron 4D 0 0 0 0 2 16 16 0 28 Bairad 4D 0 0 0 0 3 24 24 0 29 Karera 4D 0 0 0 0 3 28 28 0 30 Vijaypur 4D 0 0 0 0 2 18 18 0

38

Sl. Reporting Period (Aug 2018 to Jan 2019) Total as on 31st January 2019 Town Package No. No of Total Male Female No of Total Male Female

consultations participants participants participants consultations participants participants participants 31 Issagarh 4D 0 0 0 0 1 13 12 1 32 Barhi-Katni 5A 0 0 0 0 13 114 72 42 33 Katangi 5B 0 0 0 0 3 18 13 5 34 Tendukheda 5B 0 0 0 0 6 47 0 47 Bhedaghat- 5B 2 20 8 12 35 0 0 0 0 Jabalpur Majholi 5B 2 26 0 26 36 0 0 0 0 Jabalpur Sihora- 5B 2 14 8 6 37 0 0 0 0 Jabalpur Patan 5B 2 13 5 8 38 0 0 0 0 Jabalpur Panagar 5B 2 20 12 8 39 0 0 0 0 Jabalpur Khajuraho 6A 2 60 25 35 40 0 0 0 0 Rajnagar 41 Hatta 6D 0 0 0 0 1 29 29 0 42 Mauganj 7A 0 0 0 0 5 45 26 19 43 Chandia 7B 0 0 0 0 1 6 5 1 44 Khand 7B 0 0 0 0 1 6 5 1 Anjad 2F 12 153 80 73 45 0 0 0 0 (SWG) Barwaha 2G 12 156 70 86 46 0 0 0 0 (SWG) Sanawad 2H 14 205 83 122 47 0 0 0 0 (SWG) Saikheda 5G 3 36 22 14 48 0 0 0 0 (SWG) Total 53 694 408 286 240 3099 1598 1491

39

41. PMC’s PIUs level staff under guidance of PMU and PMC experts had conducted various consultations with the local populace of subproject towns to understand their views on existing water supply and proposed water supply scheme. At the same time, the communities were informed about the Resettlement Framework and GRM under MPUSIP in detailed along with proposed water supply infrastructure of the town. During consultations, community enquired about the tariff and perceived benefits of water supply scheme. During reporting period (August 2018 – January 2019), there has been consultations on project design, features, implementation procedures, sewerage scheme, health and sanitation, formation of GRC, land transfer, resettlement framework and rehabilitation of affected households, possible positive & negative impacts of the project and other social safeguard issues. There is great acceptance among community about Project as there is only positive impact on the daily life of community. The people mainly raised the issue of timing and supply hours of water supply, timely road restoration and completion of the project, traffic management during business hours at the time of civil activities, O&M procedures and community participation. Apart from that local inhabitant also asked about sanitation which will be resolved after availability of safe water. The summary of consultation is attached as Appendix 4.

F. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM (GRM)

42. A Project-specific grievance redress mechanism (GRM) has been established to receive, evaluate, and facilitate the resolution of AP’s concerns, complaints, and grievances about the social and environmental performance at the level of the project. The following GRM provides a time-bound and transparent mechanism to voice and resolve social and environmental concerns linked to the project. In this regard, a common GRM is in place for social, environmental, or any other grievances related to the Project. The GRM will provide an accessible and trusted platform for receiving and facilitating resolution of affected persons’ grievances related to the project. The multi-tier (three tier) GRM for the project is outlined below:

43. 1st tier (At Town Level) and Composition of the Grievance Redress Committee (GRC): • A representative of Chief Municipal Officer associated with Urban Local Body, Chairperson; • CDO of ULB designated/nominated by ULB. • Field Engineer of Project Management Consultants; • Focal person (GRC Person) of DBO contractor of respective town; • Field Engineer of concerned ULB designated by the respective PIU, Secretary;

44. Major Functions: The major functions of town level GRC is as follows: • Registration of Grievances by the Focal person (GRC Person) of DBO contractor of respective town Sorting of Grievances by Focal person (GRC Person) of DBO contractor of respective town and Chairperson; • Forwarding grievances to concerned authorities i.e Site Engineer for resolution; • Information to the complainant on the decision taken to address registered complaint and expected time to resolve issue; • Resolution of issues emerged due to construction; • Feedback to the complainant on action completed against registered complaint and • seeking complainant feedback on level of satisfaction; • Closure of grievances by CDO-ULB or forwarding of complaint to PIU GRC if grievance remains unresolved.

45. 2nd Tier (At PIU Level): Composition of the PIU level GRC:

40

• Project Manager, associated with Project Implementation Unit (PIU) of Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited - Chairperson • An elected member nominated by Mayor in Council/ President in Council of associated Urban Local Body (ULB). • A Social Worker nominated by Mayor in Council/ President in Council of associated Urban Local Body. • Commissioner of associated Urban Local Body/Chief Municipal Officer or Community Development Officer/Community Organizer of Urban Local Body. • Community Development Officer CDO-PIU - Secretary

46. Major Functions: The following functions will be performed by the PIU level GRC: • Registration of complaints by CDO-PIU from the 1st tier GRC and/or affected people; • Eligibility assessment of grievances by the GRC Chairperson; • Information to the complainant about eligibility of the complaint; • Grievance Redress Committee meetings to discuss grievances and action required; • Ensuring collection of detailed information about the eligible complaint; • Assessment of complaint, draw conclusion from discussions and make recommendations; • Develop action plan outlining activities required to implement the recommendations; • Ensuring implementation of recommendations by stakeholders or concerned authorities; • Monitoring actions of the recommendations in view of timeline; • Feedback to the complainant on action completed against registered complaint and • seeking complainant feedback on level of satisfaction; • Closure of grievances by CDO-PIU or forwarding of complaint to PMU GRC if grievance remains unresolved.

47. 3rd Tier (At PMU-State Level): Composition of State Level GRC • Engineer in Chief, MPUDC – Chairperson • Deputy Project Director (T) • Deputy Project Director (A) (Secretary) • Project Officer • Community Development Officer CDO-PMU • PMC TL or representative Advisor

48. Major Functions: The state level GRC will be responsible to perform the following functions: • Registration of complaints received from GRC PIU and/or affected people; • Information to the complainant about eligibility of the complaint; • Eligibility assessment of grievances by the GRC PMU chairperson with support of the Secretary of state GRC- – whether grievance is eligible for consideration or not at the state level; • Ensuring collection of required information about the eligible complaint; • Assessment of complaint to draw conclusion from discussions and make recommendations; • Develop action plan outlining activities required to implement the recommendations; • Ensuring implementation of recommendations by stakeholders or concerned authorities; • Monitoring actions of the recommendations in view of timeline; • Closing complaint after all actions taken as per recommendations and feedback to the complainant.

41

• Advise to complainants about approach /appeal to the concerned department in case the complainant is not satisfied or complaint is beyond the scope of the GRC PMU.

49. The structure and process of GRM is presented below for detailed understanding in Figure 2: Figure 1: structure and process of GRM

50. The GRM is envisaged to provide a time bound and transparent mechanism to voice and resolve social and environmental concerns linked with the project. In this regard, MPUSIP had issued an official order along with the guideline to all PIUs and ULBs to establish grievance redress committee (GRC) at all awarded subproject towns. Copy of government order to establish GRC at each subproject town is enclosed as Appendix 5. Status of the formation of GRC at town level (awarded subproject towns) is as follows in the Table 8: Table 8: Status of GRC Formation Sl. No. Package No. Name of the Town Status of GRC Formation 1 Boda GRC formed on 22.01.2018 2 1A Kurawar GRC formed on 01.12.2017 3 Kothri GRC formed on 01.12.2017

42

Sl. No. Package No. Name of the Town Status of GRC Formation 4 Amla GRC formed on 11.12.2017 5 1B Betul-Bazar GRC formed on 24.11.2018) 6 Sarni GRC formed on 11.12.2017 7 Bankhedi GRC formed on 16.02.2018) 1C 8 Sohagpur GRC formed on 08.02.2018) 9 Betma GRC formed on 20.07.2018 10 2A Depalpur GRC formed on 28.06.2018 11 Gotampura GRC formed on 30.07.2018 12 Pansemal GRC formed on 23.01.2018 13 Rajpur GRC formed on 10.02.2018 2B 14 Karhi Padliya GRC formed on 01.09.2017 15 Kasrawad GRC formed on 12.10.2017 16 Dhamnod GRC formed on 21.02.2018 2C 17 Mandav GRC formed on 06.12.2017 Bhavra (Chander Shekhar 18 GRC formed on 06.12.2017. Azad Nagar) 2D 19 Meghnagar GRC formed on 17.01.2018 20 Petlawad GRC formed on 07.11.2017 21 Kukdeswar GRC formed on 17.04.2018 22 Nayagaon GRC formed on 08.01.2018 3A 23 Sarvaniya maharaj GRC formed on 08.02.2018 24 Nagri GRC formed on 24.07.2018 25 Susner GRC formed on 05.12.2017 26 3B Pankhedi GRC formed on 06.01.2018 27 Makdone GRC formed on 06.12.2017 28 Alampur GRC formed on 08.06.2018 29 Daboh GRC formed on 18.07.2018 4A 30 Mihona GRC formed on 08.06.2018 31 Phuphkalan GRC formed on 08.06.2018 32 4B Bhind GRC formed on 24.09.2018 33 Karera GRC formed on 20.11.2017 34 Bairad GRC formed on 03.10.2017 35 Pichhore GRC formed on 18.07.2017 4D 36 Isagarh GRC formed on 27.12.2017 37 Aron GRC formed on 06.12.2017 38 Vijaypur GRC formed on 27.10.2017 39 Lahar GRC formed on 04.10.2018 40 4F Mehgaon GRC formed on 18.10.2018 41 Gormi GRC formed on 27.09.2018 42 Raghogarh Formation of GRC in progress 43 4I Badarwas Formation of GRC in progress 44 Shadora Formation of GRC in progress 45 5A Barhi GRC formed on 29.07.2017 46 Katangi GRC formed on 11.10.2017 47 Bhedaghat GRC formed on 10.07.2017 48 Majholi GRC formed on 12.05.2017 49 5B Panagar GRC formed on 10.07.2017 50 Patan GRC formed on 30.11.2017 51 Sihora GRC formed on 24.11.2017 52 Tendukheda GRC formed on 12.06.2017 53 Khajuraho GRC formed on 12.12.2017 6A 54 Rajnagar GRC formed on 23.11.2017 55 Sagar Formation of GRC in progress 6B 56 Makroniya Formation of GRC in progress 57 6C Rahatgarh GRC formed on 22.09.2017 58 6D Buxwaha GRC formed on 23.11.2017

43

Sl. No. Package No. Name of the Town Status of GRC Formation 59 Hatta GRC formed on 22.09.2017 60 Pawai GRC formed on 22.09.2017 61 7A Mauganj GRC formed on 26.07.2017 62 Jaithari GRC formed on 12.06.2018 63 7B Khand GRC formed on 22.08.2018 64 Chandia GRC formed on 09.08.2018 65 2F Anajd (SWG) Formation of GRC in progress 66 2G Barwaha (SWG) Formation of GRC in progress 67 5G Saikheda (SWG) GRC formed on 02.01.2019

51. It is important to mention that most of the awarded subprojects towns have established GRC except towns namely Anjad (pkg 2F), Barwaha (2G), Sagar & Makroniya (pkg 6B) and Raghogarh, Badarwas and Shadora (pkg 4I). During reporting period (August 2018 – January 2019), GRC is formed at towns namely Betul Bazar (pkg 1B), Bhind (pkg 4B), Lahar, Mehgaon & Gormi (pkg 4F), Khand & Chandia (pkg 7B) and Saikheda (pkg 5G). Process of the formation of GRC at remaining towns are also in progress.

52. The GRM aims to provide a trusted way to voice and resolve concerns linked to the Project, and to be an effective way to address affected people’s concerns. 38 numbers of grievances are reported during this reporting period and all are resolved. These grievances are related to breakage of the existing pipeline, poor housekeeping during civil works and excavation of the road occurred by project activities. Other grievances reported during period are spreading around the dust due to civil works/excavation, excess excavation and removal of excavated material. As mentioned in the previous SSMR, resistance from the villagers (farming community) residing in and around of the Gomai dam is reported due to abstraction of water from Gomai dam for WSS town Pansemal. In this regard, consultations are being conducted with villagers by Nagar Parishad-Pansemal, District administration and MPUSIP officials.

53. Details of grievances reported during August 2018 to January 2019 are depicted below in Table no. 9. Table 9: Detail of Grievances during the Reporting Period (Aug 2018 to Jan 2019) Sl. Subproject Name of Person/Address Type of Grievance Status No. Town (Pkg No.) 1 Sarni (1B) Mr. Dhurvay Sir (Chief Regarding DI pipe Line Resolved Engg.) MPPGCL (10/11/2018) 2 Sarni (1B) Pradeep Kumar Ward No- Breakage of the old pipe line Resolved 31, (05/12/2018) (existing) during excavation works. 3 Sarni (1B) Saddam Husain Ward -33, Dust reported during backfilling of Resolved (08/12/2018) the tranches 4 Sarni (1B) Shoiel Khan, Old pipe Break Resolved (28/12/2018) 5 Sarni (1B) Gautam Kumar Sarni Breakage/Damage of the old GI pipe Resolved (10/01/2019) line (existing) during excavation works. 6 Sarni (1B) Raju Yadav Bagdona Delay in removing the excess Resolved (12/01/2019) material due to excavation 7 Karhi Padliya CMO, Nagar Parishad, Regarding soil filling in trench at Resolved (2B) Karhi Padliya ward no. 04 (06/10/2018)

44

Sl. Subproject Name of Person/Address Type of Grievance Status No. Town (Pkg No.) 8 Karhi Padliya CMO, Nagar Parishad, Timely completion of road Resolved (2B) Karhi Padliya restoration works near Krishi Mandi (10/10/2018) 9 Karhi Padliya CMO, Nagar Parishad, Breakdown of tap connection Resolved (2B) Karhi Padliya (Ward-04) (02/11/2018) 10 Karhi Padliya CMO, Nagar Parishad, Regarding soil filling in trench at Resolved (2B) Karhi Padliya ward no. 04 (17/11/2018) 12 Karhi Padliya CMO, Nagar Parishad, Regarding soil filling in trench at Resolved (2B) Karhi Padliya ward no. 10 (25/11/2018) 13 Karhi Padliya CMO, Nagar Parishad, Breakdown of tap connection Resolved (2B) Karhi Padliya (Ward-09) (30/12/2018) 14 Karhi Padliya CMO, Nagar Parishad, Breakdown of tap connection Resolved (2B) Karhi Padliya (Ward-15) (05/01/2019) 15 Karhi Padliya CMO, Nagar Parishad, Breakdown of tap connection and Resolved (2B) Karhi Padliya soil filling in trench (Ward-06) (10/01/2019) 16 Karhi Padliya CMO, Nagar Parishad, Regarding soil filling in trench Resolved (2B) Karhi Padliya i (Ward-15) (17/01/2019) 17 Karhi Padliya CMO, Nagar Parishad, Regarding soil filling in trench Resolved (2B) Karhi Padliya (Ward-13) (23/01/2019) 18 Kasrawad Manish Kanade, Ward no. Breakdown of tap connection Resolved (2B) 05, Mob. 9826319296 (09/08/2018) 19 Kasrawad Lalita Dabade, Ward 05, Breakdown of tap connection Resolved (2B) (08/12/2018) 20 Kasrawad Kishorlal and Babu Existing Tap connection damaged Resolved (2B) Kushwaha, Ward 11, and delay in soil filling of the tranche (20/12/2018) 21 Mandav (2C) Anita, Upayan, Mandav, Breakage of the old pipe line Resolved Mob. 9589501207 (existing) during excavation works. (16/12/2018) 22 Karera (4D) Smt. Usha Jain Breakage of the old pipe line Resolved (03/12/2018) (existing) during excavation works. 23 Barhi (5A) Suresh Mali, Near Dangi Old WS connection damaged during Resolved talab, ward-5 new household connection (22/12/2018) 24 Barhi (5A) Suresh Tamakar, Sarafa Old WS connection damaged Resolved Market Ward-08 during breaking of the CC road. (04/01/2019) 25 Barhi (5A) Saptmi Barman, Near Ram Damage of Sewage pipe of new Resolved Mandir house (11/01/2019) 26 Sihora (5B) Mr. Ramlal Mishra, Sihora – Dust, mud and sludge is reported at Resolved ward-04 the time of laying of CWRM-DI pipes (10/01/2019) 27 Tendukheda Jitendra Shrivastav, Ward- Road restoration Resolved (5B) 12,13,14 (Mob. 8319903432)

45

Sl. Subproject Name of Person/Address Type of Grievance Status No. Town (Pkg No.) (13/11/2018) 28 Katangi (5B) Ms. Chanda Agrawal, Trench hasn’t been backfilled Resolved Prem Nagar, Ward No 3. properly in front of house and poor Mob. No.- 7415311351 housekeeping by Contractor. (11/12/2018) 29 Katangi (5B) Mr. Imroj Khan, Mohammadi Trench hasn’t been backfilled Resolved Gate, Ward No. 11, properly in front of house and poor Mob-7987000063 housekeeping by Contractor. (30/12/2018) 30 Bhedaghat Somnath Yadav, Ward-03, House connection Breakage of the Resolved (5B) Mob,-8223010456 old pipe line (existing) during (23/01/2019) excavation works. 31 Bhedaghat Subham, Ward-03 Road restoration Resolved (5B) Mo-6261119291 (27/01/2019)

32 Panagar (5B) Kanti Bai, Village- Balkhadu Road restoration Resolved (23/11/2018) 33 Mauganj (7A) Chhedi Lal, Ward-5 Road restoration Resolved (03/01/2019) 34 Khajuraho Mr. Kalyan Singh (CDO) Breakage of Tap (nal), Dust and Resolved (6A) Nagar Parishad , mud on Road at the time of laying of mob.9425878217 CWRM-DI pipes (04/01/2019) 35 Rajnagar Mr. Murlidhar Shukla Breakage of Tap (nal), Dust and Resolved (6A) (CMO), mob 9406731179 mud on Road at the time of laying of (08/01/2019) CWRM-DI pipes 36 Rahatgarh Miss. Rajani Kori , ward no. Hand injury while collecting pieces Resolved (6C) 09, mob 9303238590 of rock stones as rock stones are (18/12/2018) reported in town during excavated materials. 37 Pawai (6D) Miss Jyoti Nagayach ward Breakage of Tap (nal), Resolved no.03 mob.999307738 (28/12/2018)

38 Buxwaha Miss Kushum Soni (Social Dust and mud on Road at the time of Resolved (6D) worker) ward no.05 laying of CWRM-DI pipes mob.9424345004 (20/12/2018)

G. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

54. The State’s Urban Development and Housing Department (UDHD) is the executing agency of the Project and Madhya Pradesh Urban Development Company Limited (MPUDC) is the Nodal implementing agency (IA). Both the agencies are also responsible to ensure compliance with safeguard requirements of the State Government, Government of India (GoI) and ADB and for day-to-day monitoring of project progress, including the implementation of resettlement provisions in the project and produce progress report on all aspects concerning to planning, implementation and monitoring of the land acquisition and resettlement issues. In this regard, the EA has already set up a state - level Project Management Unit (PMU) headed by the Managing Director. Implementing Agency has also set up 13 Project Implementation Units (PIUs) to manage implementation of subproject packages in their respective towns. The

46

PIUs are located at regional levels i.e Bhopal, Indore, Jabalpur, Sagar, Gwalior, Riwa, , Shahdol, Chhatarpur, , Ujjain, Khargone and Hoshangabad. Institutional arrangement and human resources are described below to ensure effective implementation of social safeguard issues: ➢ PMU: Social safeguard component is headed by the Technical Officer at PMU. The Technical Officer-Safeguards is being supported by one Environment Engineer, one Community Development Officer (CDO) and one Gender and Social Officer to plan, manage and supervise social activities under leadership of Managing Director and Engineer in Chief (EnC). ➢ PIU: Each PIU has a Project Manager (PM) who is overall responsible to plan and, manage technical as well as social components of their jurisdiction. Project Manager is supported by one Dy. Project Manager (DPM), one Assistant Project Manager (APM) and one Procurement Officer. In addition, a post of Civil Engineer for each package under PIU is also sanctioned and officials are in place. One Community Development Officer (CDO) is posted at each PIU to plan and manage social safeguard issues. ➢ PMC: PMC has a Social Safeguard Expert, an Environment Expert and a Gender and Communication Expert to plan and manage activities related to Social Safeguards. PMC experts are also responsible to provide technical assistance to PMU and PIUs during implementation of the project by conceptualisation of the activities, building their capacity for effective implementation and documentation. PMC also has positions of Resettlement Coordinator, Environmental Coordinator and Communication Assistant to support at each PIUs (One position for each PIU). Position of Resettlement Coordinator and Environment Coordinator are posted on intermittent basis. Communication Assistants are placed at Sagar, Bhopal, Indore and Jabalpur. ➢ Design Built Operate Contractor (DBOC): One Safeguard Expert (Environment and Social expert) may likely to be appointed by contractor for safeguard compliances and preparation/updation of DDR/RP and its implementation etc.

55. During the reporting period, safeguard officials at PMU and PIUs are positioned on regular basis while PMC has deployed their safeguard experts on intermittent basis. Deployment details of these Social Safeguard Officials is depicted below in the Table 10. Table 10: Deployment of Social Safeguards officials during Reporting Period (August 2018 – January 2019) Sl. Name of Position Designation Remarks No. Institution Filled In Technical Officer- 1 PMU Yes Safeguards Environment Yes -do- Engineer Community Yes -do- Development Officer Social and Gender -do- No Officer Community Yes Development 2 PIUs (PMU) Officer (5 in no., one at each PIU) Safeguard Expert- Yes 3 PMC In position since January 2017 Resettlement -do- Environment Expert Yes In position since April 2017

47

Sl. Name of Position Designation Remarks No. Institution Filled In Gender and Yes -do- Communication In position since May 2017 Expert PMC (PIU)-Sagar, Bhopal and Jabalpur: In position since March Resettlement 2018 Coordinators (5 in 4 PIU (PMC) Yes, all five PMC (PIU)-Gwalior: In position since no., one at each May 2018 PIU) PMC (PIU)-Indore: In position since June 2018 PMC (PIU)- Bhopal: In position since May 2017 Communication PMC (PIU)-Sagar, Jabalpur and -do- Assistant (5 in no., Yes, all five Indore: In position since September one at each PIU) 2017 PMC (PIU)- Gwalior: In position since October 2018 PMC (PIU)- Bhopal: In position since May 2018 Environment PMC (PIU)- Sagar: In position since Yes, three -do- Engineer (5 in no., August 2018 mobilized one at each PIU) PMC (PIU)- Jabalpur: In position since December 2018 Note: two CVs are submitted to Client

56. PMU, PMC and PIUs -all social safeguards are expected to work in close coordination. State level social safeguards are mainly responsible to conceptualize design/interventions, develop plan, manage and monitor interventions while PIU officials are responsible to ensure implementation of works with quality. PIUs has been established to assist PMU, facilitate day- to-day implementation and management of the Project. One CDO has been deployed at each PIU to look after the social safeguard issues. Although, the civil engineer is also deployed at the subproject (Package) wise as Nodal Safeguard Officer and working closely with the Urban Local Bodies, to expedite the safeguard compliance and payments of assistance to AHs, if any.

57. MPUSIP entrusted with the responsibilities for planning, design, and implementation of the Project and also responsible to ensure compliance with safeguard requirements of Asian development bank (ADB), Government and for day-to-day monitoring of project progress, including the implementation of resettlement provisions in the project and produce progress report on all aspects concerning to planning, implementation and monitoring of the land acquisition and resettlement issues. DBO Contractor for each package is responsible for detailed design and detailed measurement surveys (DMS). Therefore, IR and IP impacts will be reconfirmed again after completion of detailed design. The final IR and IP report will be reviewed and disclosed on website of urban local body (ULB), IA and ADB. No construction work will commence before the updated social safeguard document for the packages is reviewed and approved by ADB.

H. MONITORING RESULTS/FINDING

58. Up to the reporting period, the implementation of RP is continuing. The safeguard team has been working closely with technical design team so to avoid the adverse impact. The

48

grievances related to social safeguard is treated immediately within the project entitlement framework and the numbers of grievances related to social safeguard are minimal. The assessment, monitoring, evaluation and reporting of the resettlement activities will be undertaken by the Project. The monitoring and assessment / evaluation of the contractors’ resettlement activities has been carried out by using formats to each subproject and visiting the sites during working hours. The format presents the status of work, problems, mitigation measures adopted by the Contractors etc. Such information is expected in Consultant’s monthly report on Environmental and Social Safeguards. Resettlement Plans will be prepared/updated with the entitlements, assistance and benefits, institutional arrangements, tasks and responsibilities of each level of the agencies involved in resettlement planning for the project.

59. Social safeguards are being monitored through – physical verification in the field, seeking community feedback, monthly and quarterly progress report. PMU with the assistance of PMC safeguard experts has been consolidating reports/data and inputting into quarterly monitoring report. The same has been shared with the ADB. These reports have been stating the progress of the implementation of resettlement activities, compliance issues and corrective actions. PMC Safeguard Expert-Resettlement has visited few subproject towns namely, Alampur, Daboh, Mihona, Bhind, Khajuraho & Rajnagar etc. and interacted with ULB officials, community leaders, community of vulnerable groups, contractor’s staff to understand and resolve social issues, if any.

I. COMPLIANCE OF SAFEGUARD LOAN COVENANTS

60. The status of compliance of ADB’s Loan Covenants related to Safeguard issues is shown below:

49

Table 11: Status of Compliance of ADB’s Loan Covenants related to Safeguard Issues Item Loan Covenants Status Involuntary 13. The Borrower shall cause the State and MPUDC to ensure that Being Complied Resettlement all land and all set forth in the RP, and any corrective or IR DDR/Resettlement Plan (RP) of all packages under Phase 1 preventative actions rights-of-way required for a subproject are has been prepared and approved. Requirement of land has been made available to the Works contractor in accordance with the identified and verification of final requirement after detailed schedule agreed under the related Works contract and all land measurement survey (DMS) by DBO Contractor for fixing up is acquisition and resettlement activities are implemented in under process. compliance with (a) all applicable laws and regulations of the All acquisition process is complying with relevant State and Borrower relating to land acquisition and involuntary resettlement; National Laws, SPS (2009) of ADB and agreed Resettlement (b) the Involuntary Resettlement Safeguards; (c) the RF; and (d) all Framework (RF) for MPUSIP. measures and requirements set forth in the Safeguards Monitoring All measures and compliance requirements as mentioned in Report. resettlement plan (RP) / involuntary resettlement (IR) due diligence report (DDR) will be considered during implementation. Updation of reports as per service improvement plan (SIP) of each package under Phase 1, in case of any change impact on community in particular temporary loss of livelihood and land related aspects are being taken care as per all applicable laws and regulations. Corrective or preventive action plans which will be reflected in Safeguard monitoring report and project implementation authority will take care of the same.

14. Without limiting the application of the Involuntary Resettlement Being Complied Safeguards, RF or the RP, Borrower shall cause the State and As per RP and RF -before physical or economic displacement, MPUDC to ensure that no physical or economic displacement takes compensation needs to be paid to Affected Persons (AP) as per place in connection with the subprojects until: “Entitlement Matrix”. Verification of the APs has been done and (c) compensation and other entitlements have been provided to compensation amount paid. affected people in accordance with the RP; and

(d) a comprehensive income and livelihood restoration program Being Complied have been established in accordance with the RP. As per requirement, ILRP (Income and Livelihood Restoration Program) will be initiated as per prescribed guideline under RP and Gender Action Plan (GAP).

50

Item Loan Covenants Status Indigenous Peoples 15. The Borrower shall ensure and cause the State and MPUDC to Being Complied ensure that the preparation, design, construction, implementation Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework (IPPF) prepared for and operation of the Project, each subproject and all Project MPUDC. facilities comply with (a) all applicable laws and regulations of the As per social survey indigenous people are not affected from sub Borrower relating to indigenous peoples; (b) the Indigenous projects under Phase 1. Peoples Safeguards; (c) the IPPF; and (d) all measures and In subsequent program, social screening will be done to find out requirements set forth in the respective IPP, and any corrective or any impact on Indigenous People (IP) by complying all relevant preventative actions set forth in a Safeguards Monitoring Report. State and National Laws, SPS (2009) of ADB, IPPF. All measures and requirements if emerge in project in respect to IP impact will be addressed accordingly. Corrective or preventive action plans which reflected in safeguard monitoring report will be addressed by Project Implementation Agency. Human and Financial 16. The Borrower shall cause the State and MPUDC to make Being Complied Resources to available necessary budgetary and human resources to fully Budgetary provisions have been included in RPs. Implement implement the EMP, the IPP and the RP. Social and Gender Officer of Implementation Agency at PMU is Safeguards not in place but expected to be placed soon, but Community Requirements Development Officer (CDO) at PMU level is in position. At each PIU, CDOs are in position. Human resources (Safeguard Expert-Resettlement from PMC for implementation of RPs are in place at Bhopal for compliance. To assist the Safeguard Expert-Resettlement for implementation of RP and other social issues, Resettlement Coordinators at PIUs level are also in place.

Safeguards related 17. The Borrower shall cause the State and MPUDC to ensure that Being Complied Provisions in Bidding all bidding documents and contracts for Works contain provisions Approved RPs and IR/IP DDR are attached in Bidding Documents and that require contractors to: documents. Works Contracts (a) comply with the measures relevant to the contractor set forth in This will be followed for all the sub projects. In case of any the IEE, the EMP, the IPP and the RP (to the extent they concern change of scope, revised RPs / IR DDR will be prepared and impacts on affected people during construction), and any corrective submitted to ADB for approval and corrective measures will be or preventative actions set forth in a Safeguards Monitoring Report; disclosed to DBO Contractor and same will be reflected in the in subsequent Social Monitoring Report. (b) make available a budget for all such environmental and social Being Complied measures; Budget has been made available for each sub project. (c) provide the State and/or MPUDC with a written notice of any Being Complied unanticipated environmental, resettlement or indigenous peoples

51

Item Loan Covenants Status risks or impacts that arise during construction, implementation or With the development of sub projects and implementation, in operation of the Project that were not considered in the lEE, the case of additional impacts/risks due to change in scope/area, EMP, the IPP and the RP; that will be reflected in the revised RPs and Safeguard Monitoring Report and accordingly project Executing Agency will inform the DBO Contractor for taking relevant corrective measures. Regular monitoring at field level by safeguard team (both by PMU and PMC) is being done to address unanticipated impacts. (d) adequately record the condition of roads, agricultural land and Being properly taken care under EMP. other infrastructure prior to starting to transport materials and construction and (e) reinstate pathways, other local infrastructure, and agricultural Being Complied land to at least their pre-project condition upon the completion of Suitable provision has been made for this in Contract document. construction.

Safeguards 18. The Borrower shall cause the State and MPUDC to do the Being Complied. Monitoring and following: 1st SSMR (reporting period August 2017 to January 2018) and Reporting submit semiannual Safeguards Monitoring Reports (SSMR) to ADB 2nd SSMR (reporting period February 2018 to July 2018) has and disclose relevant information from such reports to affected been submitted to ADB and approved. This is 3rd Semi-annual persons promptly upon submission; Social Monitoring Report. Relevant information are disclosed to Affected Persons.

if any unanticipated environmental and/or social risks and impacts With the development of Project and implementation, in case of arise during construction, implementation or operation of the additional impacts/risks due to change in scope/area, will be Project that were not considered in the lEE, the EMP, the IPP and reflected in revised RPs and accordingly Executing Agency (EA) the RP, promptly inform ADB of the occurrence of such risks or will inform the ADB along with corrective action plan which will impacts, with detailed description of the event and proposed be reflected in Safeguard Monitoring Report. corrective action plan; and report any actual or potential breach of compliance with the measures and requirements set forth in the EMP, the lPP and the RP promptly after becoming aware of the breach. Prohibited List of 19. The Borrower, the State and MPUDC shall ensure that no Being Complied. Investments proceeds of the Loan are used to finance any activity included in the list of prohibited investment activities provided in Appendix 5 of the SPS.

52

Item Loan Covenants Status Gender 20. The Borrower shall cause the State and MPUDC to ensure that Being Complied (a) the GESI is implemented in accordance with its terms; (b) the Gender Action Plan covering all aspects have been prepared bidding documents and contracts include relevant provisions for and Implementation of Gender Action Plan as per approved GAP contractors to comply with the measures set forth in the GESI; (c) is being implemented. adequate resources are allocated for implementation of the GESI; and (d) progress on implementation of the GESI, including progress Action plan has been prepared as ADB indicators for gender and toward achieving key gender outcome and output targets, are social inclusion which includes participation of women, linkages regularly monitored and reported to ADB. with government schemes, development of women networks, community mobilization and awareness program like behavior change, health & hygiene and save water etc

53

61. Safeguard team at PMU/PIUs and the expert from PMC along with support staff at PIUs have been mobilized for the implementation of RP and monitoring of safeguard activities. Compliance related to resettlement safeguard up to the reporting period are listed in Table 12 below: Table 12: Status of Compliance of Resettlement & Social Safeguard Issues Safeguard Applicability Status of Compliance Project (MPUSIP) involves Social Safeguard Reports (IR DDR, IP DDR Being Complied and Resettlement Plan), have been prepared as per agreed Resettlement Framework (RF) and ADB's Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) Updation and revision of the Social Safeguard Reports (IR DDR, IP DDR The IR DDR/RP are and Resettlement Plan) prepared based on agreed RF and being updated and forwarded to ADB for approval, In progress Through public participation, affected persons are given adequate Being Complied opportunity to participate in the resettlement planning and implementation As per RF, RP will be disclosed to the affected persons, who are Being Complied compensated and assisted prior to displacement from their house, land and assets, before commencement of any works Implementation of the RP is monitored internally by the PMU and Complied in the SSMR reported to ADB semi-annually Formation of GRC at each subproject town Being Complied

J. FOLLOW UP, ACTION, RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISCLOUSRE

62. The monitoring of social safeguard activities and implementation will be continued during the project implementation. The project will involve in following action for the implementation of RP. • Facilitate Compensation distribution: The regular distribution of compensation payment will be facilitated from PID KUKL office. • Facilitate Grievance Management: It will be facilitated through GRC formed at each subproject town to address the claims, obstruction and grievances. Respective GRC will verify the case related to compensation claims and resettlement close collaboration with project affected families. • Organize GRC Meetings: The meeting will be organized as and when required. • Facilitate for Title Transfer: It will be facilitated to follow up activities to be carried out to collect Land Ownership details form revenue department that have been transferred to concerned ULBs. • Monitoring of Safeguard Compliance: The regular follow up and monitoring of safeguard compliance will be continued. The PMU safeguard team and PMC will be involved in monitoring and provide instructions to DBO Contractor for the compliance of safeguard issues and • Consultation and dissemination: It will be conducted regular consultative meeting with ULB, Local residents and APs to overcome the possible social problems and right information dissemination.

54

Figure 2: Map Showing Subproject Towns

55

Appendix 1:Package-wise and Town-wise Progress of Drawing Design and Physical Progress up to January 2019 Sl. Package Town Design & Drawing Progress Physical Progress and List No. of completed components as on 31st January 2019 1 1A Boda Detailed design in progress 37% (95%) No component completed Completed: - WTP - RWRM - CWRM - Distribution - Intake (50%) 2 Kurawar Detailed design in progress 16% (90%) No component completed Completed: - RWRM - WTP - CWRM - OHTs - Distribution Under Progress: - Intake - 50% 3 Kothri Detailed design in progress 12% (100%) No component completed Completed: - 60 KL OHT - 400 KL OHT - 200 KL Sump -150 KL Sump - Distribution Network 4 1B Amla Detailed design in progress 24 % (91%) Completed: No component completed - Intake well: G.A. Completed Structure 10% - Anicut - RWRM - WTP -CWRM - OHTs - Distribution network - Thrust Block 5 Betul Bazar Detailed design in progress 32% (100%) Completed: No component completed - Raw Water Main - WTP - Clear Water Main - OHT - Distribution Network. 6 Sarni Detailed design in progress 21% (100%) Completed: No component completed - Intake Well

56

Sl. Package Town Design & Drawing Progress Physical Progress and List No. of completed components as on 31st January 2019 - RWRM - WTP - CWRM - OHTs - Distribution Network

7 1C Sohagpur Detailed design in progress 43% (100%) Completed: No component completed - Intake well - Raw Water Rising Main - WTP - Clear Water Rising Main - OHTs - Distribution Network

8 Bankhedi Detailed design in progress 41% (92%) Completed: No component completed - CWRM. - Distribution Network. - OHT /GLSR: 71%

2A Detailed design in progress 6% (35%) Completed: No component completed 9 Betma - RWRM - CWRM - OHT: Existing to be used. - Distribution Network Detailed design in progress 11% (38%) Completed: No component completed 10 Depalpur - RWRM - CWRM - OHT

Detailed design in progress 5% (56%) Completed: No component completed - RWRM - CWRM 11 Gautampura - OHT 150 KL - Distribution Network - WTP: GAD Completed, Structure yet to submitted

2B Pansemal Detailed design in progress 07% (60%) Completed: No component completed - OHT 12 - Distribution - WTP: G.A. Completed, Structural drawing partially Completed

57

Sl. Package Town Design & Drawing Progress Physical Progress and List No. of completed components as on 31st January 2019 Rajpur Detailed design in progress 14% (100%) Completed: No component completed - Intake Well: Clubbed with Anjad Intake Well 13 - Raw Water Rising Main - WTP - CWRM - OHT: Existing to be used. - Distribution Network Karhi – Detailed design in progress 26% Padliya (100%) Completed: No component completed - Intake - RWRM 14 - WTP - CWRM - OHT 300 KL - Distribution Network

Kasrawad Detailed design in progress 27% (100%) Completed: No component completed - Intake 15 - RWRM - CWRM - OHT - Distribution

2C Dhamnod Detailed design in progress 29% (93%) Completed: No component completed - WTP: GAD Completed, Structural drawing Partially Completed 16 - CWRM - OHT - RWRM - Distribution system - Intake Well: Clubbed with Intake Well. Mandav Detailed design in progress 47% (100%) Completed: No component completed - RWRM 17 - CWRM - OHTs - Distribution Network

2D Meghnagar Detailed design in progress 14% (100%) Completed: No component completed 18 - Anicut - Intake Well - RWRM - WTP

58

Sl. Package Town Design & Drawing Progress Physical Progress and List No. of completed components as on 31st January 2019 - CWRM - 200 KL OHT - Distribution Network Bhavra Detailed design in progress 18% (90%) Completed: No component completed - OHT - Intake well 19 - RWRM - CWRM - Distribution Network - WTP: GAD Completed Structural Drawing Partially Cleared Petlawad Detailed design in progress 25% (100%) Completed: No component completed - Intake 20 - RWRM - WTP - CWRM - OHT - Distribution Network 3A Kukdeshwar Detailed design in progress 3% (58%) Completed: No component completed 21 - Distribution Network - OHT: GAD completed - WTP- GAD Completed Structure Partially Cleared Nayagaon Detailed design in progress 5% (66%) Completed: No component completed - RWRM 22 - CWRM - OHT - WTP- GAD Completed Structure Partially Cleared Sarwaniya Detailed design in progress 6% Maharaj (66%) Completed: No component completed - RWRM 23 - CWRM - Distribution Network - OHT GAD Completed - WTP- GAD Completed Structure Partially Cleared Detailed design in progress 3% (61%) Completed: No component completed - RWRM 24 Nagri - CWRM - Distribution Network - WTP: GAD Completed Structure Partially Cleared 3B Susner Detailed design in progress 44% 25 (88%)

59

Sl. Package Town Design & Drawing Progress Physical Progress and List No. of completed components as on 31st January 2019 Completed: No component completed - OHT - Raw Water Rising Main(RWRM) - Clear Water Rising Main CWRM) - Distribution network - WTP (2.25 MLD): GAD completed Structured Partially Completed Makdone Detailed design in progress 46% (100%) Completed: No component completed - Intake well - Raw Water Main 26 - Clear Water Main - Distribution network - OHT - WTP (2.0 MLD): GAD Completed Structure 90%

Pankhedi Detailed design in progress 29% (100%) Completed: No component completed - OHTs - WTP 27 - RWRM - CWRM - Distribution

4A Alampur Detailed design in progress 7% (61%) Completed: No component completed - RWRM - CWRM 28 - Distribution - Intake: GAD Completed - WTP: GAD. 60% Structured 5% - OHT- GAD Completed

Daboh Detailed design in progress 6% (52%) Completed: No component completed 29 - RWRM - CWRM - Distribution

Mihona Detailed design in progress 6% (49%) Completed: No component completed - RWRM 30 - CWRM - Distribution - Anicut: GAD Partially Completed - Intake: GAD Partially Completed

60

Sl. Package Town Design & Drawing Progress Physical Progress and List No. of completed components as on 31st January 2019 - WTP: GAD Partially Completed, Structured 5%

Phuphkalan Detailed design in progress 9% (60%) Completed: No component completed - RWRM 31 - CWRM - Distribution - Tube well- 10%

4B Bhind Detailed design in progress 0% (1%) 32 No component completed No component completed - CWRM (10%) 4D Bairad Detailed design in progress 10% (100%) Completed: No component completed - Intake - RWRM 33 -.WTP - CWRM - OHTs - Distribution

Karera Detailed design in progress 8% (92%) Completed: No component completed - Intake 34 - WTP - OHTs - Distribution

Vijaypur Detailed design in progress 5% (100%) Completed: No component completed. - Intake well - RWRM 35 - WTP - CWRM - OHTs - Distribution Network.

Pichore Detailed design in progress 5% (80%) Completed: No component completed - RWRM - CWRM 36 - OHT - Distribution - WTP: GAD Completed, Structured 65% - Intake- GAD 10%

61

Sl. Package Town Design & Drawing Progress Physical Progress and List No. of completed components as on 31st January 2019 Isagarh Detailed design in progress 20% (100%) No component completed 37 Completed: - Sump - Distribution network

Aron Detailed design in progress 5% (50%) Completed: No component completed - RWRM - OHT 38 - Distribution network: 50% - WTP: G.A.D Completed, Structure 45% - Intake: GAD 30 %, - Anicut: GAD 10%

4F Lahar Detailed design in progress 0% (14%) Completed: No component completed - CWRM - Distribution 39 - WTP: GAD 10% - RWRM: 10% - OHT (4): GAD 10% - Intake: 10%

Mehgaon Detailed design in progress 0% (14%) Completed: No component completed 40 - CWRM - Distribution

Gormi Detailed design in progress 0% (8%) No component completed No component completed

41 - CWRM: - 30% - RWRM: - 10% - Distribution: 30%

4I Raghogarh Detailed design in progress 0% (5%) No component completed No component completed

- OHT- (100 KL, 150 KL,250 KL): 42 GAD 90% & Structured 20% - GSR: 2 No.: GAD 10% & Structured 20%

Badarwas Detailed design in progress 0% (0%) 43 No component completed No component completed

62

Sl. Package Town Design & Drawing Progress Physical Progress and List No. of completed components as on 31st January 2019 Shadora Detailed design in progress 0% (0%) 44 No component completed No component completed

5A Barhi Detailed design in progress 90% (100%) Completed: OHT work completed - Intake - WTP 45 - Raw Water Main - Clear Water Main - OHT (650KL) - Distribution

5B Bhedaghat Detailed design in progress 16% (100%) Completed: No component completed - Intake well - RWRM 46 - WTP - CWFM - OHT 200 KL & 220KL - Distribution Network

Patan Detailed design in progress 49% (100%) 47 Completed: No component completed - Distribution Network - Clear water feeder main Katangi Detailed design in progress 23% (100%) Completed: No component completed 48 - Clear water feeder main - OHT 120 KL - Distribution Network

Panagar Detailed design in progress 28% (100%) No component completed 49 Completed: - Clear water feeder main - OHTs - Distribution Network Sihora Detailed design in progress 24% (100%) No component completed Completed: - OHTs (4 nos.) 50 - Distribution network - Clear water feeder main - Clear Water Sump- GAD Completed & Structural drawing pending Majholi Detailed design in progress 17% 51 (100%)

63

Sl. Package Town Design & Drawing Progress Physical Progress and List No. of completed components as on 31st January 2019 Completed: No component completed - Sump - Clear water feeder main - Distribution Network Tendukheda Detailed design in progress 20% (100%) No component completed Completed: 52 - OHT - Sump - BPT - Clear water feeder main. - Distribution 6A Khajuraho Detailed design in progress 30% (100%) No component completed Completed: 53 - CWFM - OHT - GLSR /Sump - Distribution System Rajnagar Detailed design in progress 30% (100%) Completed: No component completed - Intake - RWRM 54 - WTP - CWFM - OHT - GLSR Sump - Distribution System 6B Sagar Detailed design in progress 0% (18%) No component completed No component completed - WTP: GAD Complete Structure 55 (15%) - OHT (2 nos.): GAD 10%, Structure (5%) - CWRM : 90% - Distribution: 10% Makroniya Detailed design in progress 0% (100%) No component completed 56 Completed: - CWRM - Distribution

6C Rahatgarh Detailed design in progress 67% (100%) No component completed Completed: 57 - Existing Anicut - Anicut - Intake - Raw Water Main - Clear Water Main.

64

Sl. Package Town Design & Drawing Progress Physical Progress and List No. of completed components as on 31st January 2019 - WTP - OHT 1200 KL & 600 KL - Distribution System

6D Hatta Detailed design in progress 46% (100%) No component completed Completed: - Intake 58 - RWRM & Raw water pump - WTP (3.5 MLD) - Clear Water Main & CW Pump - OHT - Distribution Network Pawai Detailed design in progress 55.38% (100%) No component completed Completed: - Anicut - Intake well 59 - RWRM. - WTP - CWRM - GSLR 350 KL - 100 KL Sump - Distribution Network Baxwaha Detailed design in progress 56.23% (82%) No component completed Completed: - Intake 60 - RWRM - CWRM - 200 KL OHT - Distribution Network - WTP: GAD completed Structure (40%) 7A Mauganj Detailed design in progress 56% (100%) No component completed Completed - Anicut: at Nihayi River - Anicut at Odda Nallah 61 - Intake - Raw Water Main - WTP - Clear Water Main - OHT (1800 KL) - Distribution System 7B Jaithari Detailed design in progress 6% (55%) No component completed 62 Completed - CWRM - RWRM - Distribution

65

Sl. Package Town Design & Drawing Progress Physical Progress and List No. of completed components as on 31st January 2019 - WTP- GAD Completed Structure (67%) - Intake: GAD (30%), Structure yet to be submitted Khand Detailed design in progress 8% (81%) No component completed Completed: - RWRM 63 - CWRM - Distribution - GSR 100 KL & 200 KL - WTP: GAD Completed & Structure 93% Chandia Detailed design in progress 6% (47%) No component completed 64 Completed: - OHT (2 nos) - Distribution - Intake : GAD (10%) 2F Anjad Detailed design in progress 0% (SWG) (0%) 65 No component completed No component completed 2G Barwaha Detailed design in progress 0% (SWG) (0%) 66 No component completed No component completed 5G Saikheda Detailed design in progress 0% (SWG) (0%) 67 No component completed No component completed

66

Appendix 2: Photographs of Disclosure of IR & IP Report in Hindi Language at respective urban local body (ULBs) office

Page 1 of 2

At the notice board of ULB office of WSS town Lahar (Package 4F)

At the notice board of ULB office of WSS town Gormi (Package 4F)

67

Page 2 of 2

At the notice board of ULB office of WSS town Mehgaon (Package 4F)

At the notice board of ULB office of sewerage town Sanawad (Package 2H)

68

Appendix 3: Copy of the Household Survey

Page 1 of 2

69

Page 2 of 2

70

Appendix 4: Details of Consultations during Subproject Implementation (August 2018 to January 2019)

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion 1 1A Boda 18/12/2018 (l) Ward No.9 Total=26 Local Residents • Briefing on project • Facing water severe crisis and objectives requested to officials for speedy (ll) Ward No.11 (M= 20, F= ULB officials probable construction work. 21/12/2018 (lll) At ULB 06) implementation • Traffic management during office procedures business hours in the market • Potential positive area of the town. and negative • Timely road restoration after impacts due to excavation. project implementation • Operation and maintenance of the facilities developed under the project and community participation; 2 1A Kurawar 18/12/2018 (l)Ward No-11, Total=32 local inhabitants • Briefing on project • During excavation for dust and objectives traffic management assurance (ll)Ward No.14 (M=25, ULB officials, probable given to the Business 21/12/2018 (lll)At ULB F=07) and implementation community, People are facing office procedures severe water crisis. • Potential positive and negative impacts due to project implementation • Operation and maintenance of the facilities developed under the project and

71

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion community participation; 3 1B Sarni 10/01/2019 (l)At ULB office, Total= 81 ULB officials, • Briefing on project • There is a lot of water problem, objectives, people have to go very far for (ll)Ward No-32, (M-67,F- 14) and local activities, drinking water. (lll)Ward No-1, inhabitants implementation • Traffic management during (lV)Ward No-4, procedures, business hours in the market 5 benefits & possible area of the town. negative impacts • Timely road restoration after of the project. excavation. • Status of land transfer for proposed components. • Operation and maintenance of the facilities developed under the project and community participation 4 1B Amla 09/01/2019 (l)Ward No-3 Total=60 (M- Local Residents • Briefing on project • There is a lot of water problem, objectives, people have to go very far for (ll)Ward No 12 20, activities, drinking water. F-40) implementation • Traffic management during procedures, business hours in the market benefits & possible area of the town. negative impacts • Timely road restoration after of the project. excavation. • Status of land transfer for proposed components. • Operation and maintenance of

72

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion the facilities developed under the project and community participation 5 1B Betul Bazar 10/01/2019 (l)Ward No 1 Total=23 (M- Local Residents • Briefing on project • Facing water severe crisis and activities, requested to officials for speedy (ll)Ward No 5 18, implementation construction work. F-5) procedures and • Traffic management during relevant business hours in the market information and area of the town. benefits of the • Timely road restoration after project excavation. • Status of land transfer for proposed components • People were concerned about the monthly water tariff • Elected representative informed about poor water supply in the town in terms of quality of water as well as connectivity of water supply network 6 2A Betma 05-01-2019 ULB Office, Total=10 Elected • Present drinking • Explained the Elected water supply Representatives about the Betma M=06, F=04 representatives, source and its Scheme and time frame by Officials of condition

73

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion ULB,& GRC • Need of which the project will be improvement of completed. Members the present situation. • Briefing on project objectives probable implementation procedures • Potential positive and negative impacts due to project implementation 7 2A Depalpur 11-01-2019 ULB Office, Total=,13, Elected • Present drinking • Potential positive and negative water supply impacts due to project M=11, F=02 representatives, source and its implementation. Officials of condition • Land use and area to be ULB,& GRC • Need of covered under the project. Members improvement of • Traffic management during the present business hours in the market situation area of the town. • Briefing on • Timely road restoration after project excavation. objectives probable implementation procedures. 8 2B Kasrawad 11-09-2018 Ward No. 01 & Total=20, SC Community • Status of • The area has insufficient and existing drinking inadequate drinking water 05, M=00, F=20 members (Low water supply supply. Water from two tube income system; wells is presently supplied to the • Need for area/community.

74

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion group and the improvements • The area faces severe water to present crisis during the summer women are system; season when the ground water housewives) • Relevant level drops. information of the upcoming project and benefits of the project. • Potential positive and negative impacts due to project implementation • Ensuring no income loss 9 2C Dhamnod 24-08-2018 ward-04, OHT Total=08, Slumdwellers • Briefing on • None of the people knew about project the proposed project. On Site, M=05, F=03 objectives learning about the project, they probable expressed that they were happy implementation that the entire community would procedures be benefited from the upgraded • Potential water supply. positive and negative impacts due to project implementation 10 2C Dhamnod 31-08-2018 Contractor Total=12, Local • Experiences • Slum dwellers showed sharing on willingness to take water Office, M=00, F=12 Community – livelihood connections but demanded activities, relaxation in user charges. Resettlement and

75

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion Rehabilitation, • People were briefed about the women complaint redressal empowerment, mechanism. tribal development, health, education, convergence with existing government social security scheme etc. • Grievance Redressal procedures 11 2C Mandav 04-08-2018 Ward No. 05, Total=14, Local • Experiences • Slum dwellers showed sharing on willingness to take water M=04, F=10 Community – livelihood connections but demanded activities, relaxation in user charges. Resettlement • People were briefed about the and complaint redressal Rehabilitation, mechanism. women • Traffic management during empowerment, business hours in the market tribal area of the town. development, • Timely road restoration after health, excavation. education, convergence with existing government social security schemes etc. • Grievance Redressal

76

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion procedures 12 2D Meghnagar 17-10-2018 ULB Office, Total=07 Chief Municipal • Present drinking • Explained the Elected water supply Representatives about the M=04, F=03 Officer and source and its Scheme and time frame by Officials condition which the project will be • Need of completed. improvement of • The prime concern and the present apprehension of the ULB situation Chairman regarding the project • Briefing on was whether it will be project completed. objectives probable implementation procedures. • Potential positive and negative impacts due to project implementation • Land use and area to be covered under the project 13 2D Petlavad 08-08-2018 Ward No. 02 & Total=36, Community • Briefing on • The community welcomed the project project and expressed need for 13, M=03, F=33 Members objectives it. However, they were probable apprehensive that their implementation economic condition would procedures. prevent them from paying water • Experiences user charges. sharing on – • Possibility of exempting the livelihood poor and vulnerable from user activities, charge payment.

77

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion Resettlement and Rehabilitation, women empowerment, tribal development, health, education, convergence with existing government social security schemes etc. • Grievance Redressal procedures 14 2D Petlavad 08-08-2018 Ward No. 03 & Total=20, Slumdwellers • Present drinking • Most of the participants don’t water supply know about the proposed 08 M=06, F=14 source and its project. On learning about the condition project, they expressed that • Need of they were happy that the entire improvement of community would be benefited the present from the proposed water supply. situation • Traffic management during • Briefing on business hours in the market project area of the town. objectives • Timely road restoration after probable excavation. implementation procedures. • Potential positive and negative impacts due to

78

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion project implementation • Land use and area to be covered under the project 15 3A Kukdeshwar 04-12-2018 ward 14, Total=22 Local residents • Knowledge of • Women had heard about the project proposed project and welcomed M=11, F=11, • Present water it as women are facing many supply situation: problem in fetching water for only half an hours. hours of supply alternate day • Drinking water user charge 16 3B Susner 03-10-2018 At Parishad Total=,49, Elected • Present drinking • Potential positive and negative water supply impacts due to project hall, M=07, F=42 representatives, source and its implementation. 20-11-2018 Officials of ULB, condition • Land use and area to be SHG Members • Need of covered under the project improvement of the present situation • 17 3B Pankhedi 01-10-2018 Ward No. 01 & Total=36, Slumdwellers, • Status of • The area has insufficient and existing drinking inadequate drinking water Anganwadi M=03, F=33 WCD Workers water supply supply. Water from two tube Kendra, system; wells is presently supplied to the • Need for area/community. improvements to present system; • Relevant information of

79

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion the upcoming project and benefits of the project. • Potential positive and negative impacts due to project implementation 18 3B Pankhedi 21-09-2018 Ward No. 01, Total=11, Community • Briefing on • Possibility of exempting the project poor and vulnerable from user WTP Site M=08, F=03 Members objectives charge payment. probable • Potential positive and negative implementation impacts due to project procedures implementation. • Experiences • Land use and area to be sharing on - covered under the project. women empowerment, tribal development, health, education, convergence with existing government social security schemes etc. 19 4A Alampur 03-08-2018, ULB Office and Total=72, ULB officials • Project • Issue of door to door survey, 10-08-2018 ward no. 01, Male=62, and Local information WTP land issue 14-09-2018 02, 05, 08, 09 Female=10 Community 22-10-2018 and 13 23-10-2018 24-10-2018

80

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion 06-11-2018 20-12-2018 20 4A Daboh 16-08-2018 ULB Office and Total=38, ULB officials • Project • Issue of door to door survey 11-09-2018 ward no. 4, 14 Male=33, and Local information Female-05 Community 21 4A Mihona 26-10-2018, ULB Office and Total=40, ULB officials • Project • Issue of door to door survey and 31-10-2018 ward no. 15 Male=36, and Local information Land demarcation issue 14-11-2018 Female-04 Community 22 4A Phuphkalan 12-09-2018 At ward no. 04, Total= 54, Local • Project • Issue of door to door survey 13-08-2018 06, 09, 10 and Male-49, Community information 24-08-2018 13 Female-05 12-09-2018 17-10-2018 23 4B Bhind 11-12-2018 ULB office Total=37, ULB officials • Project • Land issue 13-12-2018 Male=33, information 24-12-2018 Female=04 28-12-2018 24 4D Aron 14-09-2018 ULB office and Total=17, ULB officials • Project • Regarding OHT Land issue 22-11-2018 ward no. 03 Male-17, and Local information Female-0 Community 25 4D Karera 20-08-2018 ULB Office and Total=25, ULB officials • Project • Forest issue at intake well 22-12-2018 ward no. 12 Male=16 and Local information Female=09 Community 26 4D Bairad 17-10-2018 At ward no. 10 Total-07 Local • Project • Water problem, people have to Male-06, Community information go very far for drinking water Female-01 27 4F Gormi 18.12.18 Ward No. 11 & Total=40, Local • About Project • Issue of door to door survey 12 Male-21, Community and potential Female-19 positive impact 28 4F Lahar 18.12.18 Ward no. 14 Total=13, Local • Project • Water problem, people have to Male=13, Community information go very far for drinking water Female- 0 29 5A Barhi 10-01-2019, Ward-01, Total-87 At ULB official • Quality of • People were concerned about existing drinking the monthly water tariff. 11-01-2019 Local Residents water supply.

81

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion Ward-03 Ward- Male-45 • Briefing on • Community is ready to pay project activities water tariff. 04 Ward-09, Female-42 probable • Community people showed ward-15 implementation their willingness to take water procedure. connections agree to pay user • Community charges an amount of Rs. 50 to participation in 150/- per month. project • Discussion with Nal connection. implementation. • Need for improvements to present system. 30 5 B Bhedaghat 10-12-2018 Ward-13, Total-30 Local Residents • Status of • None of the people knew about existing the proposed project. On Ward-15 Male-09 drinking water learning about the project, they Female-21 supply system; expressed that they were happy • Quality of that the entire community would existing drinking be benefited from the upgraded water supply. water supply. • Briefing on • Community was glad to hear project activities about the new water supply probable scheme. implementation • Assured full support during procedure. construction phase. • Community participation in project implementation. • Need for improvements to present system. • Potential positive and

82

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion negative impacts due to project implementation. 31 5 B Katangi 09-12-2018 Ward-1, Ward- Total-36 Local Residents • Status of • None of the people knew about existing the proposed project. On 5 Male-07 drinking water learning about the project, they Female-29 supply system; expressed that they were happy • Quality of that the entire community would existing drinking be benefited from the upgraded water supply. water supply. • Briefing on • Community was glad to hear project activities about the new water supply probable scheme. implementation • Assured full support during procedure. construction phase. • Community • People were concerned about participation in the monthly water tariff. project • Traffic management during implementation. business hours in the market • Need for area of the town. improvements • Timely road restoration after to present excavation. system. • Potential positive and negative impacts due to project implementation. 32 5 B Majholi 08-12-2018 Ward-1, Ward- Total-30 Local Residents • Status of • None of the people knew about existing the proposed project. On 5 Male-13 drinking water learning about the project, they Female-17 supply system; expressed that they were happy • Quality of that the entire community would

83

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion existing drinking be benefited from the upgraded water supply. water supply. • Briefing on • project activities probable implementation procedure. • Community participation in project implementation. 33 5B Panagar 09-12-2018, Ward-06, Total-103 At ULB office, • Status of • None of the people knew about existing the proposed project. On 19-12-2018, Ward-4, Male-12 Local Residents drinking water learning about the project, they 13-02-2019 Ward-05 Female-91 supply system; expressed that they were happy • Quality of that the entire community would existing drinking be benefited from the upgraded water supply. water supply. • Briefing on • Community was glad to hear project activities about the new water supply probable scheme. implementation • Assured full support during procedure. construction phase. • Community • People were concerned about participation in the monthly water tariff. project implementation. • Need for improvements to present system. • Potential positive and negative impacts due to

84

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion project implementation. 34 5 B Patan 09-12-2018, Ward-02, Total-27 Local Residents • Quality of • People were concerned about existing drinking the monthly water tariff. Ward-04, Male-12 water supply. • Community is ready to pay Female-15 • Briefing on water tariff. project activities • Community people showed probable their willingness to take water implementation connections agree to pay user procedure. charges. • Community participation in project implementation. • Need for improvements to present system. • 35 5 B Sihora 07-12-2018, Ward-09, Total-33 Local Residents • Quality of • People were concerned about existing drinking the monthly water tariff. Ward-13, Male-06 water supply. • Community is ready to pay Female-27 • Briefing on water tariff. project activities • Community people showed probable their willingness to take water implementation connections agree to pay user procedure. charges an amount of Rs. 50 to • Community 150/- per month. participation in project implementation. • Need for improvements to present system.

85

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion • 36 5 B Tendukheda 07-12-2018, Ward-05, Total-35 At ULB official • Status of • None of the people knew about existing the proposed project. On Ward-09, Male-09 Local Residents drinking water learning about the project, they Female-26 supply system; expressed that they were happy • Quality of that the entire community would existing drinking be benefited from the upgraded water supply. water supply. • Briefing on • Community was glad to hear project activities about the new water supply probable scheme. implementation • Assured full support during procedure. construction phase. • Community • People were concerned about participation in the monthly water tariff. project implementation. • Need for improvements to present system. • Potential positive and negative impacts due to project implementation. 37 5G Saikheda 25-09-2018 Ward-04, Total-229 At ULB official & • Status of • None of the people knew about existing the proposed project. On 15-02-2019 Ward-13 Male-83 NGO, Satya drinking water learning about the project, they 14-02-2019 Ward-14 Female-146 Sai Samiti, supply system; expressed that they were happy Ward-15 Local Residents • Quality of that the entire community would Ward-11 to, existing drinking be benefited from the upgraded water supply. water supply. Ward-05 • Briefing on

86

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion Ward-06 Ward- project activities • Community was glad to hear probable about the new water supply 08, implementation scheme. Ward-10 procedure. • Assured full support during • Community construction phase. participation in • People were concerned about project the monthly water tariff. implementation. • Community is ready to pay • Need for water tariff. improvements to present system. • Potential positive and negative impacts due to project implementation. 38 6A Khajuraho 01.10.2018 (l) At Children Total=11 Local labour, • Labor were • Facing water severe crisis and concerned about requested to officials for speedy Park Site (M= 11, F= EHS Supervisor their Safety during construction work 00) & Contractor the Construction staff work & Safety tolls. • Payment of Labors. • Insurance of Labour. • Operation and maintenance of the facilities developed under the project and community participation;

87

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion 39 6A Khajuraho 04/01/2019 (l) At ward no Total=64 ST/SC • Briefing on project • Facing water severe crisis and objectives requested to officials for speedy 02 (M= 19, F= Community& probable construction work (ll)At Ward No- 45) Ward Parshads, implementation • Traffic management during 02,04 EHS & procedures business hours in the market (lll)At Ward No Contractor staff • •Operation and area of the town. maintenance of • Timely road restoration after -01,02 the facilities excavation. developed under the project and community participation; • 40 6A Rajnagar 02.10.2018 OHT Site, Total=156 Preraks, • Briefing on project • During excavation for dust and objectives traffic management assurance to village Sakhies SC/ST probable given to the Business 05.10.2018 Khajuva, WTP (M=83,F=73) Ward, EHS & implementation community, People are facing Site, Contractor staff procedures severe water crisis ULB office Local • Operation and maintenance of FoujdarMuhalla Residents, ULB the facilities ward.no.04 officials developed under the project and community participation; • Potential positive and negative impacts due to project implementation 41 6A Rajnagar 03.01.2019 (i)At Nagar Total=50 Preraks, • Briefing on project • During excavation for dust and objectives, traffic management assurance to Parishad office Sakhies SC/ST activities, given to the Business 05.01.2019 (M=19,F=31) Ward, EHS & implementation community, People are facing Contractor staff procedures, severe water crisis

88

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion (ii)At Fouj dar Local benefits & possible • There is a lot of water problem, negative impacts people have to go very far for Mohalla Residents, ULB of the project. drinking water ward.no.04 officials • Status of land transfer for proposed components. • Operation and maintenance of the facilities developed under the project and community participation 42 6C Rahatgarh 16.08.2018 (i)At Nagar Total = 35 Preraks • Discussion on • Facing water severe crisis and resolved to local requested to officials for speedy Parishad office (M-05,F- 30) ,Sakhies community issues construction work. • Social & Gender • There is a lot of water problem, activities people have to go very far for drinking water 43 6C Rahatgarh 18.12.2018 (i)At Nagar Total = 28 SC/ST • Discussion on • Facing water severe crisis and resolved to local requested to officials for speedy Parishad office (M-06,F- 22) Community, community issues construction work. (ii) At Site 1200 Parshads, EHS • Social & Gender • There is a lot of water problem, KL OHT & Contractor activities people have to go very far for staff ,SHG’s drinking water • Traffic management during Members business hours in the market area of the town. • Timely road restoration after excavation. 44 6D Baxwaha 20/08/2018 (i)At Nagar Total = 31 Preraks, • Discussion on • There is a lot of water problem, resolved to local people have to go very far for Parishad office (M-06,F- 25) Sakhies EHS & community issues drinking water Contractor

89

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion • Social & Gender activities 45 6D Baxwaha 20/12/2018 (l) At Azard Total = 124 SC/ST Ward • Briefing on project • During excavation for dust and objectives, traffic management assurance to ward no 03, (M-55,F- 69) EHS& activities, given to the Business 22.12.2018 ll) At Ambedkar Contractor and implementation community, People are facing Ward No-14, Local Residents procedures, severe water crisis (lll)Ambedkar Preraks, benefits & possible • There is a lot of water problem, negative impacts people have to go very far for 46 Ward No-14 Sakhies SHG’s of the project. drinking water • Operation and maintenance of the facilities developed under the project and community participation • Discussion on resolved to local community issues • Social & Gender 45 6D Hatta 21.08.2018to (i)At Nagar Total = 50 Preraks • Discussion on • Facing water severe crisis and resolved to local requested to officials for speedy 22.08.2018 Parishad office (M-25,F- 25) ,Sakhies Local community issues construction work. (ii)At WTP Site labour, EHS & • Social & Gender • There is a lot of water problem, Contractor staff activities people have to go very far for • Labor were drinking water concerned about their Safety during the Construction work & Safety tolls. • Payment of Labors. • Insurance of Labour

90

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion 46 6D Hatta 21.12.2018 l) At Gouri Total = 16 SHG’s • Discussion on • There is a lot of water problem, resolved to local people have to go very far for Shankar ward (M-02,F- 14) Members EHS& community issues drinking water no 01 Contractor staff • Social & Gender activities • 47 6D Pawai 23/08/2018 (i)At Nagar Total = 12 Preraks, • Discussion on • There is a lot of water problem, resolved to local people have to go very far for Parishad office (M-01,F- 11) Sakhies EHS & community issues drinking water Contractor staff • Social & Gender • Traffic management during , activities business hours in the market area of the town. • Timely road restoration after excavtion 48 6D Pawai 29/12/2018 (i)At Nagar Total = 56 SC/ST Ward • Briefing on project • During excavation for dust and objectives, traffic management assurance Parishad office (M-32,F- 24) Parshads, activities, given to the Business (ii)AHIRWAR Preraks, implementation community, People are facing Basti ward Sakhies EHS procedures, severe water crisis no.05 Supervisor & benefits & possible • There is a lot of water problem, negative impacts people have to go very far for (iii)At Contractor staff of the project. drinking water NayaKhera , • Operation and ward no.06 maintenance of the facilities developed under the project and community participation • Discussion on resolved to local community issues • Social & Gender

91

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion 49 7A Mauganj 03-01-2019, Ward-03, Total-59 Local Residents • Quality of existing • People were concerned about drinking water the monthly water tariff. Ward-08, Male-16 supply. • Community is ready to pay ward-13, Female-43 • Briefing on project water tariff. ward-14 activities probable • Community people showed implementation their willingness to take water procedure. connections agree to pay user • Community charges. participation in • Traffic management during project business hours in the market implementation. area of the town. • Need for • Timely road restoration after improvements to excavtion present system. 50 7 B Chandia 05-01-2019, Ward-04, Total-61 Local Residents • Status of existing • None of the people knew about drinking water the proposed project. On Ward-07 Ward- Male-23 supply system; learning about the project, they 10 Female-38 • Quality of existing expressed that they were happy drinking water that the entire community would supply. be benefited from the upgraded • Briefing on project water supply. activities probable • Community was glad to hear implementation about the new water supply procedure. scheme. • Community • Assured full support during participation in construction project implementation. • Need for improvements to present system. • Potential positive and negative impacts

92

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion 51 7 B Khand 05-01-2019, Ward-05, Total-39 At ULB official • Status of existing • None of the people knew about drinking water the proposed project. On Ward-07 Male-20 Local Residents supply system; learning about the project, they Female-19 • Quality of existing expressed that they were happy drinking water that the entire community would supply. be benefited from the upgraded • Briefing on project water supply. activities probable • Community was glad to hear implementation about the new water supply procedure. scheme. • Community • Assured full support during participation in construction phase. project • People were concerned about implementation. the monthly water tariff. • Need for • Community is ready to pay improvements to water tariff. present system. • Potential positive and negative impacts due to project implementation. 52 7 B Jaithari 27-01-2019 Ward-04, Total-80 At ULB official • Status of existing • None of the people knew about drinking water the proposed project. On Ward-05 Male-43 Local Residents supply system; learning about the project, they 28-01-2019 Ward-10 Female-37 • Quality of existing expressed that they were happy Ward-11 drinking water that the entire community would supply. be benefited from the upgraded • Briefing on project water supply. activities probable • Community was glad to hear implementation about the new water supply procedure. scheme. • Community • Assured full support during participation in construction phase.

93

Sl. Package Name of Date Place No of Nature of Details of Issue raised No. No. town Participants participants discussion project • People were concerned about implementation. the monthly water tariff. • Need for • Community is ready to pay improvements to water tariff. present system. • Traffic management during • Potential positive business hours in the market and negative area of the town. impacts due to • Timely road restoration after project excavtion implementation.

94

Appendix 5: Office Order of EA to Establish GRC at subproject town level

(Page 1 of 4)

95

(Page 2 of 4)

96

(Page 3 of 4)

97

(Page 4 of 4)

98

Appendix 6: List of the Towns Package-wise (Both Phase 1 and Phase 2) Sl. No. Package No. Name of the subproject town District Subproject Water Supply Scheme under Phase 1 1 1A Boda Rajgarh 2 Kurawar Rajgarh 3 Kothri Sehore 4 1B Amla Betul 5 Betul-Bazar Betul 6 Sarni Betul 7 1C Bankhedi Hoshangabad 8 Sohagpur Hoshangabad 9 2A Betma Indore 10 Depalpur Indore 11 Gautampura Indore 12 2B Pansemal Badwani 13 Rajpur Badwani 14 Karhi Padliya Khargone 15 Kasrawad Khargone 16 2C Dhamnod Dhar 17 Mandav Dhar 18 2D Bhavra Alirajpur 19 Meghnagar Jhabua 20 Petlawad Jhabua 21 3A Kukdeshwar Neemuch 22 Nayagoan Neemuch 23 Sarwaniya Maharaj Neemuch 24 Nagri Mandsaur 25 3B Susner Aagar 26 Pankhedi Shajapur 27 Makdone Ujjain 28 4A Alampur Bhind 29 Daboh Bhind 30 Mihona Bhind 31 Phuphkalan Bhind 32 4B Bhind Bhind 33 4D Karera Shivpuri 34 Bairad Shivpuri 35 Pichhore Shivpuri 36 Isagarh Ashoknagar 37 Aron Guna 38 Vijaypur Shivpuri 39 4F Gormi Bhind 40 Lahar Bhind 41 Mehgaon Bhind 42 4I Shadora Ashoknagar 43 Raghogarh Guna 44 Badarwas Shivpuri 45 5A Barhi Katni 46 5B Katangi Jabalpur 47 Bhedaghat Jabalpur 48 Majholi Jabalpur 49 Panagar Jabalpur 50 Patan Jabalpur 51 Sihora Jabalpur 52 Tendukheda Damoh 53 6A Khajuraho Chhatarpur

99

Sl. No. Package No. Name of the subproject town District 54 Rajnagar Chhatarpur 55 6B Sagar Sagar 56 Makroniya Sagar 57 6C Rahatgarh Sagar 58 6D Buxwaha Chhatarpur 59 Hatta Damoh 60 Pawai Panna 61 6G Harpalpur Chhatarpur 62 Badagaon Tikamgarh 63 Ghuwara Chhatarpur 64 7A Mauganj Rewa 65 7B Jaithari Anuppur 66 Khand Shahdol 67 Chandia Umaria 68 7D Amarpatan Satna 69 New Ram nagar Satna Subproject Sewerage under Phase 1 1 2F Anjad Badwani 2 2G Barwaha Khargone 3 2H Sanawad Khargone 4 5G Saikheda Narsinghpur Subproject Water Supply Scheme under Phase 2 1 1D Jawar Sehore 2 1E Pachore Rajgarh 3 Sanchi ( C ) Raisen 4 2E Shahpur 5 6 2J Burhanpur 7 3C Shajapur 8 Bagli 9 Dewas 10 3D Dewas 11 Dewas 12 Dewas 13 Dewas 14 3E Dhamnod 15 3F Athana Neemach 16 4C Bhind 17 4E Antari Gwalior 18 Bilaua Gwalior 19 Pichhore Gwalior 20 4G Morena 21 Morena 22 Jaura Morena 23 4H 24 4J Bhind 25 5C Chand Chhindwara 26 5D Katni 27 Katni 28 5E Jabalpur 29 Bamhanibanjar 30 Niwas Mandla 31 5F Chichali Narsinghpur 32 Saikheda Narsinghpur 33 Salichauka Narsinghpur (Babai Kalan)

100

Sl. No. Package No. Name of the subproject town District 34 5H Malaj khand 35 Balaghat 36 6F Chhatarpur 37 Chhatarpur 38 Maharajpur Chhatarpur 39 Gadimalhara Chhatarpur 40 Panna 41 Panna 42 6H Tikamgarh 43 Kari Tikamgarh 44 Lidhora Khas Tikamgarh 45 6I Shahpur 46 6J Chhatarpur 47 Chhatarpur 48 Tikamgarh 49 Tikamgarh 50 6L Patera Damoh 51 6K Bada Malhara Chhatarpur 52 7C Kotar Satna 53 Satna 54 Satna 55 Kothi Satna 56 7E Rewa 57 58 7G Maihar Satna 59 7H Pasan Anuppur Subproject Sewerage under Phase 2 1 1F Sanchi Raisen 2 2I Dhamnod Dhar 3 3G Mandsaur Mandsaur 4 3H Nagda Ujjain 5 5I Jabalpur (Part II) Jabalpur 6 6E Khajuraho Chhatarpur 7 Rajnagar Chhatarpur 8 7F Maihar Satna

101

Appendix 7: Details about Land Ownership, Status of Land and Transfer of proposed land/site

Appendix 7.1a WSS town Boda (Khasra No. 1251/2 of WTP for WSS Town Boda under Pkg 1A)

102

Appendix 7.1b WSS town Kurawar

(Khasra No. 1058/2 of WTP and OHT (900 KL) for WSS Town Kurawar under Pkg 1A) Certification of Possession about Proposed Site/Land and NoC Issued by CMO- Kurawar

103

Appendix 7.1b WSS town Kurawar

(Khasra No. 658/3 of OHT (250 KL) for WSS Town Kurawar under Pkg 1A) Certification of Possession about Proposed Site/Land and NoC Issued by CMO- Kurawar

104

Appendix 7.1c WSS town Kotri

(Khasra No. 100 for OHT (60 KL) for WSS Town Kotri under Pkg 1A)

(Khasra No. 600 for OHT (400 KL) for WSS Town Kotri under Pkg 1A)

105

Appendix 7.1c WSS town Kotri (Khasra No. 1177 of GLSR (150 KL) for WSS Town Kotri under Pkg 1A)

(Khasra No. 600 of GLSR (200 KL) for WSS Town Kotri under Pkg 1A)

106

Appendix 7.2a WSS town Amla

(Khasra No. 250 of WTP for WSS Town Amla under Pkg 1B) Letter written to District Collector and Tehsildar (Page 1 of 3)

107

(Page 2 of 3)

108

(Page 3 of 3)

109

Appendix 7.2b WSS town Betul Bazar

(Khasra No. 84/1 of WTP and 475 of OHT for WSS Town Betul Bazar under Pkg 1B) No Objection Certificate and Order of Upper Collector-Betul Transfer of the Proposed Land

(Page 1 of 3)

110

(Khasra No. 84/1 of WTP and 475 of OHT for WSS Town Betul Bazar under Pkg 1B) No Objection Certificate and Order of Upper Collector-Betul Transfer of the Proposed Land

(Page 2 of 3)

111

(Khasra No. 84/1 of WTP and 475 of OHT for WSS Town Betul Bazar under Pkg 1B) No Objection Certificate and Order of Upper Collector-Betul Transfer of the Proposed Land

(Page 3 of 3)

112

Appendix 7.2b WSS town Betul Bazar NoC Issued by PWD and Letter Written to Tehsildar for Demarkation of the Proposed Site of Sump Well

113

Appendix 7.3a WSS town Bankheri (Khasra No. 71, 233, 23 and 87/1 of OHTs 200 KL, 200 KL, 100 KL and 150 KL respectively for WSS Town Bankheri under Pkg 1C) Letter Sent to District Collector-Hoshangabad by CMO-Bankheri for transfer of the Proposed Land in the name of ULB-Bankheri

114

Appendix 7.3a WSS town Bankheri A Certificate Issued by CMO-Bankheri on the Status of Land Prop[osed for Subproject Component

115

Appendix 7.3b WSS town Sohagpur (Khasra No. 24 B Plot No. 132 & 134 of WTP and OHT-900KL, Khasra No. 412/2 of OHT (250 KL) and Khasra No. 16B plot No. 2 of OHT (600 KL) for WSS Town Sohagpur under Pkg 1C

116

117

Appendix 7.4a WSS town Betma Letter written to District Collector-Indore to allot the land for Anicut and Intake well (town Betma Pkg 2A)

Page 1 of 2

118

Page 2 of 2

119

Appendix 7.4a WSS town Betma Letter written to MD, M.P. Aoudhogik Kendra Vikas Nigam, Indore to allot the land for WTP (town Betma Pkg 2A) Page 1 of 2

120

Page 2 of 2

121

Appendix 7.4b WSS town Depalpur A Certificate Issued by CMO-Depalpur about land proposed for subproject components (town Depalpur Pkg 2A) Page No. 1 of 3

122

Khasra No. 121/1 and 121/2 for WTP

Page No. 2 of 3

123

Khasra No. 652 for OHT

Page No. 3 of 3

124

Appendix 7.4c WSS town Gautampura Letter written to SDO (revenue) to allot the land for WTP & OHT (town Gautampura Pkg 2A)

125

Appendix 7.5a WSS town Pansemal Order of the District Collector-Barwani to allot the land for WTP (town Pansemal Pkg 2B)

Page 1 of 2

126

Page 2 of 2

127

Appendix 7.5a WSS town Pansemal Letter written to Commissioner, UADD, Directorate-Bhopal about order of the District collector-Barwani to allot the land to ULB-Pansemal (town Pansemal Pkg 2B)

Page 1 of 2

128

Page 2 of 2

129

Appendix 7.5b WSS town Rajpur Identified Land for WTP is Khasra No. 110, Government land for WSS town Rajpur

130

Appendix 7.5c WSS town Karhi Padliya Order of the Collector-Khargone to allot the land for subproject WSS components (survey no. 251 for Intake well, Survey no. 6/2 for WTP and Survey no. 202/1/2/3/4/2 for OHT) for WSS town Karhi Padliya

131

Appendix 7.5c WSS town Karhi Padliya Letter of Tehsildar written to CMO-Karhi Padliya about allotment of the land (survey no. 251) proposed for Intake well cum pump house (town Karhi Padliya Pkg 2B)

132

Appendix 7.5d WSS town Kasrawad Order of the Upper Collector to Tehsildar-Kasrawad about the proposal of WSS town kasrawad submitted by ULB-Kasrawad

133

Appendix 7.5d WSS town Kasrawad Order of the court of Tehsildar to provide details of proposed identified land for WSS Kesrawad

134

Appendix 7.5d WSS town Kasrawad CMO-Kasrawad submitted details of identified land for proposed components to office of Tehsildar

135

Appendix 7.6a WSS town Dhamnod Office of the CMO-Dhamnod sent Proposal to District Collector about identified land proposed for WSS components (WSS town Dhamnod pkg 2C)

136

Appendix 7.6a WSS town Dhamnod Consent Letter of Private Land Owner on the donation of the land for OHT (WSS town Dhamnod pkg 2C)

137

Appendix 7.6b WSS town Mandav Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Mandav (WSS town Mandav pkg 2C)

138

Appendix 7.6b WSS town Mandav Letter written to District Collector-Dhar to allot the land for OHT 200KL (WSS town Mandav pkg 2C)

139

Appendix 7.6b WSS town Mandav NoC Issued by Forest department to build IPS (WSS town Mandav pkg 2C)

140

Appendix 7.6b WSS town Mandav NoC Issued by Directorate, Archeological Survey of India-Bhopal (WSS town Mandav pkg 2C)

141

Appendix 7.7a WSS town Bhavra

Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Bhavra (Chander Shekhar Azad Nagar) for WSS Town Bhavra

142

Appendix 7.7a WSS town Bhavra Letter Written to District Collector-Dhar to Allot the Identified land for Intake Well cum pump house by CMO-Bhavra (Chander Shekhar Azad Nagar) for WSS Town Bhavra

143

Appendix 7.7b WSS town Meghnagar Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Meghnagar for proposed components under WSS Town Meghnagar

144

Appendix 7.7b WSS town Meghnagar Letter written to District Collector-Jhabua to allot the land for Intake well at Gram Kachhla by CMO-Meghnagar for proposed components under WSS Town Meghnagar

145

Appendix 7.7b WSS town Meghnagar Letter written to District Collector-Jhabua to allot the land for WTP/OHT by CMO- Meghnagar for proposed components under WSS Town Meghnagar

146

Appendix 7.7c WSS town Petlawad Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Petlawad for proposed components under WSS Town Petlawad

147

Appendix 7.7c WSS town Petlawad Letter written to District Collector-Jhabua to allot the land for WTP/OHT by CMO- Petlawad for proposed components under WSS Town Petlawad

148

Appendix 7.7c WSS town Petlawad Order of the Madhya Pradesh Government (revenue department) to allotment of the Proposed Land to ULB -Petlawad for proposed components under WSS Town Petlawad Page 1 of 3

149

Page 2 of 3

150

Page 3 of 3

151

Appendix 7.8a WSS town Kukdeshwar Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Kukdeshwar for proposed components under WSS Town Kukdeshwar

152

Appendix 7.8a WSS town Kukdeshwar Letter Written by CMO-Kukdeshwar to MD, MPUSI about Land Status of proposed components under WSS Town Kukdeshwar

153

Appendix 7.8b WSS town Nayagaon Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Nayagaon for proposed components under WSS Town Nayagaon

154

Appendix 7.8b WSS town Nayagaon Order of the District Collector-Nimach to allotment of the Proposed Land to ULB - Nayagaon for proposed components under WSS Town Nayagaon

Page 1 of 3

155

Page 2 of 3

156

Page 3 of 3

157

Appendix 7.8c WSS town Sarwaniya Maharaj Order of the District Collector-Nimach to allotment of the Proposed Land to ULB - Sarwaniya Maharaj for proposed components under WSS Town Sarwaniya Maharaj Page 1 of 2

158

Page 2 of 2

159

Appendix 7.8d WSS town Nagri Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Nagri for proposed components under WSS Town Nagri

160

Appendix 7.8d WSS town Nagri Revenue record of Survey No. 1825/1

161

Appendix 7.9a WSS town Susner Order of the District Collector-Agar to allotment of the Proposed Land to ULB - Susner for proposed components under WSS Town Susner

Page 1 of 2

162

Page 1 of 2

163

Appendix 7.9b WSS town Pankhedi Letter written to Tehsildar-Pankhedi (Kalapipal) to allot the land for WTP/OHTs by CMO-Pankhedi for proposed components under WSS Town Pankhedi

164

Appendix 7.9b WSS town Pankhedi Panchnama (collection of evidence from site) prepared by revenue officials along with other government officials on identified government land proposed for subproject components under WSS Town Pankhedi Page 1 of 2

165

Page 2 of 2

166

Appendix 7.9c WSS town Makdon NoC issued by WRD to construct Intake well at dam site Page 1 of 2

167

Page 2 of 2

168

Appendix 7.9c WSS town Makdon Letter written to Collector-Ujjain to allot the land for WTP and OHT by CMO-Makdone for proposed components under WSS Town Makdone

169

Appendix 7.9c WSS town Makdon Land Status Certificate Issued by by CMO-Makdone for proposed components under WSS Town Makdone

170

Appendix 7.9c WSS town Makdon Letter of The District Collector-Ujjain to Commisioner-Ujjain about recommendation of the land proposed for subproject components under WSS Makdone

171

Appendix 7.10a WSS town Alampur NoC Issued by WRD

Page 1 of 2

172

Page 2 of 2

173

Appendix 7.10a WSS town Alampur Letter written to DFO-Datia to allot the land for Approach Bridge from Intake well by CMO-Alampur under WSS Town Alampur

174

Appendix 7.10a WSS town Alampur Letter written to Collector-Datia to allot the land for WTP by CMO-Alampur for proposed components under WSS Town Alampur

175

Appendix 7.10a WSS town Alampur Letter written by Collector-Datia to SDO-Sewda to allot the land for WTP for proposed components under WSS Town Alampur

176

Appendix 7.10c WSS town Mihona NoC Issued by WRD Page 1 of 2

177

Page 2 of 2

178

Appendix 7.10c WSS town Mihona Order of Collector-Bhind to allotment of the land proposed for WTP and OHT under WSS Town Mihona

179

Appendix 7.10c WSS town Mihona Order of Collector-Bhind to allotment of the land Approach Bridge with Intake Well under WSS Town Mihona Page 1 of 2

180

Page 2 of 2

181

Appendix 7.10d WSS town Phuphkalan Certificate Issued by CMO-Phuph about Identified site proposed for subproject components under WSS-Phuphkalan

182

183

Appendix 7.10d WSS town Phuphkalan Order of Collector-Bhind to allotment of the land proposed for WTP, OHT-1 (325 KL) under WSS Town Mihona

184

185

Appendix 7.11a WSS town Karera NoC Issued by WRD

186

187

Appendix 7.11a WSS town Karera Letter written to Tehsildar-Karera to allot the land for OHT (500 KL) by CMO-Karera for proposed components under WSS Town Karera

188

Appendix 7.11a WSS town Karera Land Status Certificate Issued by by CMO-Karera for all proposed components under WSS Town Karera

189

Appendix 7.11b WSS town Bairad NoC Issued by WRD

Page 1 of 2

190

Page 2 of 2

191

Appendix 7.11b WSS town Bairad Order of Collector-Shivpuri to allotment of the land proposed for WTP and OHT under WSS Town Bairad

Page 1 of 2

192

Page 2 of 2

193

Appendix 7.11e WSS town Aron Order of Collector-Guna to allotment of the land proposed for WTP and OHT under WSS Town Aron

Page 1 of 2

194

Page 2 of 2

195

Appendix 7.11f WSS town Vijaypur Order of Collector-Sheopur to allotment of the land proposed for WTP under WSS Town Vijaypur

196

Appendix 7.11f WSS town Vijaypur Order of Collector-Sheopur to allotment of the land proposed for OHT under WSS Town Vijaypur

197

Appendix 7.12a WSS town Lahar Land Status Certificate Issued by by CMO-Lahar for proposed components under WSS Town Lahar

198

Appendix 7.12b WSS town Mehgaon Land Status Certificate Issued by by CMO-Mehgaon for proposed components under WSS Town Mehgaon

199

Appendix 7.13a WSS town Raghavgarh NoC issued by WRD

200

Appendix 7.13a WSS town Raghavgarh NoC issued by Forest department

201

Appendix 7.13a WSS town Raghavgarh Land Status Certificate Issued by by CMO-Raghogarh for proposed components under WSS Town Raghogarh

202

203

Appendix 7.13b WSS town Badarwas Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Badarwas for proposed components under WSS Town Badarwas

204

Appendix 7.13c WSS town Shadora Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Shadora for proposed components under WSS Town Shadora

205

Appendix 7.14 WSS town Barhi Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Barhi for proposed components under WSS Town Barhi

206

Appendix 7.15a WSS town Katangi Letter written to District Collector-Jabalpur to Allotment the Identified Land for Subproject Component OHT

207

Appendix 7.15b WSS town Bhedaghat Letter written to District Collector-Jabalpur to Allotment the Identified Land for Subproject Components

208

Appendix 7.15b WSS town Bhedaghat NoC Issued by ASI

209

210

Appendix 7.15c WSS town Majholi Letter written to District Collector-Jabalpur to Allotment the Identified Land for Subproject Components

211

Appendix 7.15d WSS town Panagar Letter to District Collector-Jabalpur from Nagar Parishad-Panagar for allotment of the land proposed for Subproject Components OHTs under WSS

212

Appendix 7.15f WSS town Sihora Letter to District Collector-Jabalpur from Nagar Parishad-Sihora for allotment of the land proposed for Subproject Components OHTs and clear water sump well under WSS

213

Appendix 7.15g WSS town Tendukheda Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Tendukheda for proposed components under WSS Town Tendukheda

214

Appendix 7.15g WSS town Tendukheda Letter to Tehsildar-Patan from Nagar Parishad-Tendukheda for allotment of the land proposed for Subproject Component Sump well under WSS

215

Appendix 7.15g WSS town Tendukheda Letter to Tehsildar-Tendukheda from Nagar Parishad-Tendukheda for allotment of the land proposed for Subproject Components BPT and OHTs under WSS

216

Appendix 7.16 WSS town Khajuraho & Rajnagar Consent cum Certificate Given By Affected Persons that They had not been grown crops on the land voluntarily since 2016-17.

217

Appendix 7.16 WSS town Khajuraho & Rajnagar

Office Order of the District Collector-Chhatarpur for allotment of the land proposed for Subproject Components Page 1 of 2

218

Page 2 of 2

219

Appendix 7.16 WSS town Khajuraho & Rajnagar NoC Issued by ASI Page 1 of 2

220

Page 2 of 2

221

Appendix 7.16 WSS town Khajuraho & Rajnagar NoC Issued by ASI

222

Appendix 7.18 WSS town Rahatgarh Letter to Tehsildar-Rahatgarh from Nagar Parishad-Rahatgarh for allotment of the land proposed for Subproject Components under WSS

223

Appendix 7.19A WSS town Buxwaha Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Buxwaha

224

Appendix 7.19B WSS town Hatta Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Hatta

225

Appendix 7.19C WSS town Pawai Letter to Tehsildar-Pawai from Nagar Parishad-Pawai for allotment of the land proposed for Subproject Components under WSS

226

Appendix 7.20 WSS town Mauganj Order of District Collector for Land allotment to Nagar parishad

227

Appendix 7.20 WSS town Mauganj Consent letter given by two private land owner Page 1 of 4

228

Page 2 of 4

229

Page 3 of 4

230

Page 4 of 4

231

Appendix 7.21a WSS town Jaithari Letter to DFO-Anuppur from CMO, Nagar Parishad-Jaithari to issue NoC for construction of WSS Components in forest area under WSS

232

Appendix 7.21a WSS town Jaithari Letter to DFO-Anuppur from CMO, Nagar Parishad-Jaithari for allotment of the identified site/land for construction of WSS Components in forest area under WSS

233

Appendix 7.21a WSS town Jaithari Submission of the Proposal On-line for NoC and Allotment of the Forest land

234

Appendix 7.21a WSS town Jaithari Letter to Collector-Anuppur from CMO, Nagar Parishad-Jaithari for allotment of the identified site/land for construction of WSS Components under WSS

235

Appendix 7.21a WSS town Jaithari Applied for NoC to PWD-Anippur for pipe lying

236

Appendix 7.21b WSS town Khand Letter to Collector-Shahdol from Nagar Parishad-Khand for allotment of the land proposed for Subproject Components WTP and sumpwell under WSS

237

Appendix 7.21b WSS town Khand Letter to DFO-Shahdol from Nagar Parishad-Khand to issue NoC for construction of Sumpwell (GSR) and lying of the pipeline in forest area under WSS

238

Appendix 7.21b WSS town Khand Letter from Revenue Officer (Nazul Adhikari) to CMO, Nagar Parishad-Khand to provide three copies of side plan and map of identified survey no. 91/1 for WTP and 209/10/kha for sumpwell (200 KL) for allotment of the land under WSS

239

Appendix 7.21b WSS town Khand Letter written to Tehsildar-Baiohari from CMO, Nagar Parishad-Khand to provide three copies of side plan and map of identified survey no. 91/1 for WTP and 209/10/kha for sumpwell (200 KL) as demanded by Collector office (Nazul) for allotment of the land under WSS

240

Appendix 7.21c WSS town Chandia Letter Written to Executive Engineer, WRD to obtain NoC for Construction of Intake well cum pump house

241

Appendix 7.21c WSS town Chandia Letter to Collector-Umariya from Nagar Parishad-Chandia for allotment of the land proposed for Subproject Components WTP and OHT under WSS

242

Appendix 7.21c WSS town Chandia Letter to Tehsildar-Chandia from Nagar Parishad-Chandia for allotment of the land proposed for Subproject Components OHTs under WSS

243

Appendix 7.21c WSS town Chandia Land Status Certificate Issued by CMO-Chandia

244

Appendix 8: Corrigendum Appendix

Corrigendum to the SSMRs submitted for August 2017 - January 2018 and February 2018 - July 2018

Table 5 of SSMR (August 2017 - January 2018) with heading ‘Town-wise Land Related Issues’ – refer to its serial number 27 of Table-5 under package 5A town Barhi and under Table 5 of SSMR (February 2018 - July 2018) with heading ‘Town-wise Land Related Issues’ – refer to serial number 45 of Table-5 under package 5A town Barhi, Statement in the table which reads as;

OHT (1800 KL): A dispute reported between a local resident and Office of the CMO on a proposed land for OHT (1800 KL) to get approach road to his land. Although, land is under possession of Nagar Parishad-Barhi.

Should be read as;

OHT (650 KL): Proposed at government survey no. 493/20 ka. Proposed site belongs to government land which is reported vacant and without any encroachment.

245