INDEX

Abhijat, – M. Monier-William’s views on, changing meaning of, ,  – negative assessments of,  Aboriginal groups,  Orientalist lineages of, ,  differentiation from ‘Aryan’ racial and sociological literati,  connotations, ,  exclusion of,  valour, ,  Academic Association,  valour, in regional context of Adivasis, , , , –, , – –,  virtual, ,  Hinduisation of,  Asiatic Society,  Aitihasik Chitra, and history-writing,  agenda of,  Atmiyata, and Indian history, – among unrelated individuals,  and ,  as welding people of the samaj, circulation,  ,  Anderson, Benedict, – Atmiya sajan,  and role of print-capitalism,  difference between role of print in Bagal, Jogeshchandra,  European nationalism and in Bandyopadhyay, Krishnamohan,  Bengal,  Bandyopadhyay, Sekhar, Anglo-vernacular schools,  and variations of caste rank in Aryan, Bengal,  as culture, ,  and ‘low’ caste protest as race,  movements,  as racial categories,  Bangiya Sahitya Parishat,  Bengali-Aryan connection, , Romeshchandra Datta as its first , , –,  chairman,  Bengali-Hindu connection, , Bar Bhuiyans, , – ,  Basanta Ray, ,  colonial disjunction of, from Kedar Ray, , ,  non-Aryan groups, ,  Pratapaditya, , , , , dharma,   differences from non-Aryan,  Barth, Frederik difference from non-Aryan in and ethnic boundaries,  Bengali discourse,  Basu, Nagendranath, , ,  early samaj, , ,  and fieldwork undertaken to equated with ‘Hindu’, ,  reconstruct samajik itihas,  idea,  emphasis on kulagranthas,  India, –, , , , – on caste,   index

on Dashinrarhiya exclusive regional identity,  Samaj,  ideas about a continuous and on Uttarrarhiya Kayastha Samaj, united Bengal, ,  ,  ideas about the cultural and reference to colonial sources,  political ‘independence’ of social roots and employment,  Bengal during Pathan rule, Basu Rajnarain,  adoption of Brahmo faith,  lack of unity among distinct and attitude to ‘lower orders’, , groups,   origins and physical boundaries, and patriotism,  –, , – and samajik uplift,  origins of nomenclature,  connections with Swadeshikatar political and cultural boundaries Sabha,  of, – ideas, – Bengali(s), lecture, on superiority of and their past racial qualities, Hinduism,  – on past and present samajs, Aryanisation of, – – as a mixed race/bahujati, , on ‘proper’ conduct and dharma, , –, –  as history-less people,  preoccupation with history and intelligentsia,  identity,  interrelations with other Indians supervision of Surabhi,  in conceptions of social viewpoints on English education harmony,  and incommensurate jobs,  language, and mixed elements, Basu, Ramram,  – association with the Fort William samaj,aspartofwiderentity, College,  Bhadralok, biography of Raja Pratapaditya, and elite, –  and literati, ,  Baumer, Rachel Van M., and ‘lower’ orders,  on reinterpretation of dharma, and madhyabitta,   and relation to elite/folk, ,  Bayly, C.A., Bharatbarsha, on precursors of Indian as desh,  nationalism,  as homeland of the Aryans,  patriotism,  as utopia including ‘lower’ orders, Bengal,  and jatiya uniqueness, – deification as Bharat Lakshmi,  and narrative of heroism,  origins and physical boundaries, Aryanisation of,  , – as a late-Aryanised land, – Bharati, ,  elite orientation,  as non-Aryan land,  publishing and printing of,  as the desh of the Muslim nawab, Bharati, Sebananda,  on Bengal as desh, 