DOCSLIB.ORG

The Coming Battle Over 'Implicit Bias' in Employment Discrimination Cases

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Coming Battle Over 'Implicit Bias' in Employment Discrimination Cases LOS ANGELES & SAN FRANCISCO www.dailyjournal.com TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 2018 PERSPECTIVE The coming battle over ‘implicit bias’ in employment discrimination cases By Anthony J. Oncidi definitely does not belong — i.e., The Samaha court agreed (2011), the U.S. Supreme Court those requiring proof that illegal with the plaintiff that Dr. Green- expressly rejected the “social laintiffs in most employ- discrimination was a substantial wald’s testimony about implicit framework analysis” that was put ment discrimination cases motivating factor that resulted in bias was relevant to the proof of forth in the form of expert testi- Passert and seek to prove the challenged employment de- intentional discrimination and mony from a sociologist who tes- “disparate treatment” by the cision. See, e.g., Harris v. City could be “helpful to the jury” in tified that Wal-Mart had a “strong employer. Disparate treatment of Santa Monica, 56 Cal. 4th understanding how implicit bias corporate culture” that made it claims require proof of discrim- 203, 232 (2013) (“Requiring the functions in the employment set- vulnerable to gender bias. The inatory intent on the part of the plaintiff to show that discrimina- ting. The court further held that Court determined that the expert’s employer or management. How- tion was a substantial motivating it was satisfied that Dr. Green- testimony did nothing to advance ever, because direct evidence of factor, rather than simply a moti- wald’s opinions were sufficiently plaintiffs’ case: “Whether 0.5 per- discriminatory intent is rare, en- vating factor, more effectively en- “grounded in the methods and cent or 95 percent of the employ- terprising plaintiffs’ lawyers are sures that liability will not be im- procedures of science” (quoting ment decisions at Wal-Mart might increasingly trying to fill the gap posed based on evidence of mere the Daubert standard for admit- be determined by stereotyped by relying upon evidence of pur- thoughts or passing statements ting expert testimony). thinking is the essential question ported “implicit bias” to create an unrelated to the disputed employ- In another recent case, a fed- on which respondents’ theory of inference of discriminatory intent. ment decision”). eral district court allowed expert commonality depends. If [the ex- In 1998, Anthony Greenwald, Purported evidence of implicit testimony from an assistant law pert] admittedly has no answer Ph.D., a social psychologist and bias is precisely what the Cal- professor with a Ph.D. in social to that question, we can safely professor of psychology at the ifornia Supreme Court warned psychology concerning implicit disregard what he has to say.” Id. University of Washington, and his against and sought to exclude in bias in a race-discrimination case. Expert testimony regarding im- colleagues created the Implicit Harris. In fact, such “evidence” is Martin v. F.E. Moran, Inc., 2017 plicit bias is vulnerable to similar Association Test, which is readily even more ephemeral than “mere WL 1105388 (N.D. Ill. 2017). challenges. See, e.g., Pippen v. available on the internet (https:// thoughts” in that the Implicit As- The judge admitted the expert State of Iowa, 2012 WL 1388902 www. tolerance.org/profession- sociation Test ostensibly detects testimony about implicit bias in (D. Iowa 2012) (Dr. Greenwald’s al-development/ test-yourself-for- bias that the individual does not this case in part because it was a opinion was “conjecture, not hidden-bias). even know he or she possesses — bench trial, recognizing that “the proof of causation”). The Implicit Association Test i.e., “mere unconscious thoughts.” court can hear the testimony at In Jones v. YMCA of the USA, purports to measure implicit bias Nevertheless, some employees trial and determine the weight of 34 F. Supp. 3d 896, 901 (N.D. Ill. lurking in the test-taker’s uncon- already have succeeded in getting the evidence at trial without a fear 2014), the district court granted scious mind. There are different this type of testimony in front of of prejudicing the untrained ear of the employer’s motion to strike tests for a wide variety of purport- a factfinder. For example, in Sa- a juror.” Dr. Greenwald’s expert report ed implicit biases, including race, maha v. Washington State Dep’t Ultimately, however, the court and testimony concerning implic- religion, age, skin-tone, sexual of Transp., 2012 WL 11091843 determined that “Plaintiffs failed it bias in a Title VII class action orientation and disability. (E.D. Wash. 2012), a federal dis- to tie [the expert’s] opinions re- lawsuit. The plaintiffs blandly It is important to note that even trict court denied the employer’s garding implicit bias to the indi- asserted that Dr. Greenwald’s the proponents of implicit bias motion to exclude the testimony vidual circumstances surrounding opinions were offered merely “to research concede that “[t]he link of an expert witness (Dr. Green- their employment … as required educate the factfinder on general between implicit bias and behav- wald himself) in a case in which to prove intentional discrimina- principles.” ior is fairly small [and] can vary the employer argued the expert tion actually occurred.” Martin However, the Jones court deter- quite greatly.” had not identified any particular v. F.E. Moran, Inc., 2018 WL mined that despite what they said, Not surprisingly, plaintiffs’ bias that related to the plaintiff’s 1565597 (N.D. Ill. 2018). plaintiffs actually were seeking to counsel in employment discrimi- race, color, national origin or use Dr. Greenwald’s opinions to nation cases are eager to inject ex- ethnicity nor had he determined The Case against Admissibility prove causation: “Dr. Greenwald pert opinion about the purported whether implicit bias played any of Implicit Bias Testimony maintains that it is ‘more likely ubiquity of implicit bias into cas- role in any particular employment In Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. than not’ that implicit discrimina- es where such “evidence” most decision made by the employer. Dukes, 564 U.S. 338, 354-55 tory bias accounts for any dispar- ity between the treatment of Af- ployment discrimination case) is accounting firms, insurance com- it to compensate for gaps in the rican Americans and other racial weak and that the test does not re- panies, large international law evidence, especially regarding groups.” After the court conclud- veal whether a person will tend to firms, and high-profile non-profit the employer’s alleged intent to ed that Dr. Greenwald’s report and act in a biased manner. See “Can organizations, among others. discriminate. But once that genie testimony were relevant neither to We Really Measure Implicit Bias? The pledge requires CEOs to is out of the bottle in front of the plaintiffs’ disparate treatment nor Maybe Not,” The Chronicle of commit “to implementing all of jury, it is very difficult for defense disparate impact race discrimina- Higher Education (Jan. 5, 2017) the elements within the Pledge,” counsel to contain it. Arguing tion claims, it struck them. (https://www. chronicle.com/arti- so there is no picking and choos- that there was no intent to dis- Still another court recently ex- cle/Can-We-Really- Measure-Im- ing which parts to adopt. Further, criminate by the employer after cluded expert testimony about im- plicit/238807). because the announcement is the jury hears detailed testimony plicit bias, including, once again, public, companies that commit from an expert witness about how testimony from Dr. Greenwald, The “CEO Action Pledge” themselves to the pledge should everyone in the world possesses on the ground that his opinion Despite the growing rejection anticipate that they will be held implicit or unconscious bias will “is not based on sufficient facts by courts of proffered evidence to the commitment and possibly be a Herculean task to say the or data. It is not the product of of implicit bias in employment will have it used against them if least. reliable methods. And it would discrimination cases, hundreds of they fail to implement any of the not assist the factfinder in resolv- CEOs recently signed the CEO elements. ing an issue in this case.” Karlo Action for Diversity & Inclusion One thing is for sure: It is easy Anthony J. Oncidi is a partner v. Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC, (https:// www.ceoaction.com/the- for a plaintiff’s lawyer to figure in and the chair of the West Coast 2015 WL 4232600 (W.D. Pa. pledge/). The pledge is a well-in- out which companies have signed Labor and Employment Depart- 2015), aff’d in pertinent part, 849 tentioned initiative designed to the pledge — the list of signato- ment of Proskauer Rose LLP in F.3d 61 (3d Cir. 2017) (Dr. Green- promote diversity in the work- ries is publicly available and eas- Los Angeles. You can reach him wald’s “population-wide statistics place. Notably, signatories pub- ily accessed on the web. It is well at (310) 284-5690 or aoncidi@ have only speculative application licly pledge, among other things, known that a number of leading proskauer.com. to [this particular defendant-em- to “Implement and expand uncon- plaintiffs’ lawyers are active- ployer] and its decision-makers”). scious bias education.” ly trolling the pledge website in Moreover, a recent study con- The number and pedigree of search of the names of employers ducted by researchers at the Uni- companies that have signed the who have signed it on the theory versity of Wisconsin, Harvard pledge is impressive. More than that it will be more difficult for University, and the University of 450 CEOs and presidents across those companies to successfully Virginia examined 499 studies 85 industries have signed on al- exclude purported evidence of over 20 years involving 80,859 ready.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gender Bias in Sexual Assault Response And
    End Violence Against Women International (EVAWI) Gender Bias in Sexual Assault Response and Investigation Part 1: Implicit Gender Bias Heather Huhtanen Contributions by Kimberly A. Lonsway, PhD Sergeant Joanne Archambault (Ret.) November 2017 Updated October 2020 . This project is supported by Grant No. 2016-TA-AX-K010 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, US Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. Gender Bias in Sexual Assault Response and Investigation October Part 1: Implicit Gender Bias Huhtanen 2020 Public Domain Notice Unless something is excerpted directly from a copyrighted source, all the material in this document is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without specifically requesting permission from End Violence Against Women International (EVAWI) or the authors. Any direct quotes or excerpts should be properly cited, however. No one may reproduce or distribute this material for a fee without the specific, written authorization of End Violence Against Women International (EVAWI). Electronic Access The publication may be downloaded from End Violence Against Women International’s Resource Library. Recommended Citation Huhtanen, H. (2020). Gender Bias in Sexual Assault Response and Investigation. Part 1: Implicit Gender Bias. End Violence Against Women International. End Violence Against Women International 2 www.evawintl.org Gender Bias in Sexual Assault Response and Investigation October Part 1: Implicit Gender Bias Huhtanen 2020 Authors Heather Huhtanen is currently based in Geneva, Switzerland where she works to promote gender equality in the context of international development, security and justice reform and peace and transition processes.
    [Show full text]
  • •Understanding Bias: a Resource Guide
    Community Relations Services Toolkit for Policing Understanding Bias: A Resource Guide Bias Policing Overview and Resource Guide The Community Relations Service (CRS) is the U.S. Justice Department’s “peacemaker” agency, whose mission is to help resolve tensions in communities across the nation, arising from differences of race, color, national origin, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, and disability. CRS may be called to help a city or town resolve tensions that stem from community perceptions of bias or a lack of cultural competency among police officers. Bias and a lack of cultural competency are often cited interchangeably as challenges in police- community relationships. While bias and a lack of cultural competency may both be present in a given situation, these challenges and the strategies for addressing them differ appreciably. This resource guide will assist readers in understanding and addressing both of these issues. What is bias, and how is it different from cultural competency? The Science of Bias Bias is a human trait resulting from our tendency and need to classify individuals into categories as we strive to quickly process information and make sense of the world.1 To a large extent, these processes occur below the level of consciousness. This “unconscious” classification of people occurs through schemas, or “mental maps,” developed from life experiences to aid in “automatic processing.”2 Automatic processing occurs with tasks that are very well practiced; very few mental resources and little conscious thought are involved during automatic processing, allowing numerous tasks to be carried out simultaneously.3 These schemas become templates that we use when we are faced with 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexism at Work: How Can We Stop It? Handbook for the EU Institutions and Agencies Acknowledgements
    Sexism at work: how can we stop it? Handbook for the EU institutions and agencies Acknowledgements This handbook was developed by the European The personal stories were collected in person Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). It was or in writing during the drafting of the hand- adapted from JUMP’s handbook Libérez votre book. They include experiences from the EU entreprise du sexisme* by Dorothy Dalton, who institutions and agencies, as well as from bod- was contracted as an External Expert. EIGE co- ies that work closely with these organisations. ordinated the work and provided quality assur- Stories were collected by the External Expert ance (Veronica Collins, Valentina Canepa, Vasiliki during workshops and coaching sessions, as Saini). well as through conversations. All stories are On 20 September 2019, EIGE held an expert real, though some names have been changed meeting in Vilnius, Lithuania, to receive com- to protect identities. EIGE would like to thank ments on a draft of the handbook. The meeting the Directorate-General (DG) for Justice and was attended by EU institutions and agencies, Consumers and DG Human Resources and non-governmental organisations and the pri- Security of the European Commission for their vate sector. The final version of this handbook valuable input, as well as Dr Sonja Robnik, mem- reflects the input of these organisations. ber of EIGE’s Expert Forum. The European Institute for Gender Equality The European Institute for Gender Equality Email: [email protected] (EIGE) is an autonomous body of the European Union established to strengthen gender Tel. +370 52157444 equality across the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Bias, Employment Discrimination, and Black Women's Hair: Another Way Forward
    BYU Law Review Volume 2018 Issue 4 Article 7 Winter 2-28-2019 Bias, Employment Discrimination, and Black Women's Hair: Another Way Forward Crystal Powell Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Labor and Employment Law Commons Recommended Citation Crystal Powell, Bias, Employment Discrimination, and Black Women's Hair: Another Way Forward, 2018 BYU L. Rev. 933 (2019). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2018/iss4/7 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Brigham Young University Law Review at BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Law Review by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 004.POWELL_FIN2_NOHEADERS.DOCX (DO DELETE) 2/17/19 8:33 PM Bias, Employment Discrimination, and Black Women’s Hair: Another Way Forward CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 933 II. HISTORY OF BLACK HAIR, IMPLICIT BIAS, AND WORKPLACE GROOMING STANDARDS ..................................................................... 937 A. History of Black Hair Texture and Hairstyle: Centuries of Stereotyping ...................................................................................... 938 B. Clean, Neat, and Kept Versus Extreme, Eye-Catching, and Unprofessional: Workplace Grooming Policies Reflect Racial Stereotypes ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Implicit Racial Bias
    December 2018 Implicit Racial Bias Bailey Maryfield, M.S. Introduction sciously reject racism or other bias may unwittingly act in ways that result in discrimination because of implicit Implicit racial bias and its potential effects on criminal bias” (Police Executive Research Forum, 2016). justice decision making have become highly visible issues in recent years. Driven by a myriad of factors, The following gives a brief overview of implicit racial including the well-documented disparity in criminal bias as it relates to the various stages of the criminal justice involvement across racial groups and several justice system. Various mechanisms used to address high-profile events that have exposed rifts in the re- implicit racial bias are also briefly discussed along with lationships between local police and the communities what is known about their effectiveness. they serve, both discourse and research on the topic of implicit bias arguably has become more prominent What is Implicit Racial Bias than ever before. This fact sheet is intended to raise awareness about the concept of implicit racial bias, the It is important to distinguish implicit racial bias effect of implicit racial bias in the criminal justice sys- from racism or discrimination. Implicit biases are tem, and how the issue is being addressed to enhance associations made by individuals in the uncon- the fair and equitable administration of justice. scious state of mind. This means that the individ- ual is likely not aware of the biased association. Although implicit bias can manifest itself in many different forms, such as gender, racial or religious bias, Implicit racial bias can cause individuals to un- this fact sheet is focused specifically on implicit racial knowingly act in discriminatory ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Unconscious Bias
    Conscious and Unconscious Gender Bias Response to DACOWITS RFI 4 Prepared for the December 2018 DACOWITS Quarterly Business Meeting Authors Rachel Gaddes Zoe Jacobson Sidra Montgomery Courtney Moore Submitted to Submitted by DACOWITS Insight Policy Research, Inc. 4800 Mark Center Drive 1901 North Moore Street Suite 04J25-01 Suite 1100 Alexandria, VA 22350-9000 Arlington, VA 22209 Project Officer Project Director DACOWITS Executive Staff Rachel Gaddes Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1. Definitions of Bias ....................................................................................................................... 2 A. Defining Bias and Gender Bias ......................................................................................................... 3 B. Defining Conscious and Unconscious Bias ....................................................................................... 3 C. Conscious and Unconscious Gender Bias in the Workplace ............................................................ 4 D. Definitions of Gender-Neutral and Gender-Inclusive Wording ....................................................... 5 Chapter 2. Recent Media Coverage of Gender Bias ..................................................................................... 6 A. Recent News Articles ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dehumanization: Understanding the Paradox of Human Interaction Debra Keenahan University of Wollongong
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 1990 Dehumanization: understanding the paradox of human interaction Debra Keenahan University of Wollongong Recommended Citation Keenahan, Debra, Dehumanization: understanding the paradox of human interaction, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Wollongong, 1990. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/1656 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] DEHUMANIZATION UNDERSTANDING THE PARADOX OF HUMAN INTERACTION A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree Doctor of Philosophy from the University of Wollongong by Debra Keenahan, BA (Hons) Department of Psychology 1990 University of Wollongong Candidate's Certificate i certify that the thesis entitled Dehumanization: Understanding the Paradox of Human Interaction, and submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, is the result of my own research, except where otherwise acknowledged, and that this thesis (or any part of the same) has not been submitted for a higher degree to any other university or institution. Signed : Date : ./2:..<3.:..?9, TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements v i i i Dedication x Abstract x i INTRODUCTION 1 PART 1 : THE DYNAMICS OF DEHUMANIZATION CHAPTER ONE: DEFINING DEHUMANIZATION 8 What Does It Mean To Be A Human Being? 9 Limitations of Human Agency 1 0 People
    [Show full text]
  • Not Yet Human: Implicit Knowledge, Historical Dehumanization, and Contemporary Consequences
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Copyright 2008 by the American Psychological Association 2008, Vol. 94, No. 2, 292–306 0022-3514/08/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.292 Not Yet Human: Implicit Knowledge, Historical Dehumanization, and Contemporary Consequences Phillip Atiba Goff Jennifer L. Eberhardt The Pennsylvania State University Stanford University Melissa J. Williams Matthew Christian Jackson University of California, Berkeley The Pennsylvania State University Historical representations explicitly depicting Blacks as apelike have largely disappeared in the United States, yet a mental association between Blacks and apes remains. Here, the authors demonstrate that U.S. broadly. citizens implicitly associate Blacks and apes. In a series of laboratory studies, the authors reveal how this association influences study participants’ basic cognitive processes and significantly alters their judg- publishers. ments in criminal justice contexts. Specifically, this Black–ape association alters visual perception and attention, and it increases endorsement of violence against Black suspects. In an archival study of actual allied disseminated criminal cases, the authors show that news articles written about Blacks who are convicted of capital its be crimes are more likely to contain ape-relevant language than news articles written about White convicts. of to Moreover, those who are implicitly portrayed as more apelike in these articles are more likely to be one not executed by the state than those who are not. The authors argue that examining the subtle persistence of or is specific historical representations such as these may not only enhance contemporary research on dehumanization, stereotyping, and implicit processes but also highlight common forms of discrimination and that previously have gone unrecognized.
    [Show full text]
  • Hate & Bias-Motivated Crimes
    Hate & bias-motivated crimes Sexual violence & individuals who identify as lgbtq © National Sexual Violence Resource Center and Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape 2012. All rights reserved. This document was supported by Cooperative Agreement # 5VF1CE001751-03 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the CDC. This project is supported by Grant No. 2010-SW-AX-0019 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. The content of this publication may be reprinted with the following acknowledgement: This material was reprinted, with permission, from the National Sexual Violence Resource Center’s publication entitled Hate & bias-motivated crimes: Sexual violence & individuals who identify as LGBTQ. This guide is available by visiting www.nsvrc.org or use your smartphone to scan the QR Code (at left) for more information online. Hate & bias-motivated crimes Sexual violence & individuals who identify as lgbtq eople often commit violence against individuals they perceive to be challenging traditional sexual P and gender norms. In a study of 162 men who identified as gay, and 111 women who identified as lesbian, 52% of the participants reported at least one incident of sexual assault/coercion (Waldner-Haugrud & Gratch, 1997). In this same study, men who identified as gay reported 1.6 incidents per person on average and women who identify as lesbians reported 1.2 incidents per person.
    [Show full text]
  • Examination of the Role of Dehumanization As a Potential Mechanism Underlying the Racial Disparities in School Disciplinary Measures
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2018 Examination of the Role of Dehumanization as a Potential Mechanism Underlying the Racial Disparities in School Disciplinary Measures. Ebony A. Lambert Virginia Commonwealth University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Other Education Commons, and the Social Psychology Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/5656 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXAMINATION OF THE ROLE OF DEHUMANIZATION AS A POTENTIAL MECHANISM UNDERLYING THE RACIAL DISPARITIES IN SCHOOL DISCIPLINARY MEASURES A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at Virginia Commonwealth University By: Ebony A. Lambert B.A., College of William & Mary, May 2016 Director: Nao Hagiwara, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Psychology Department of Psychology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia November 2018 © Ebony A. Lambert 2018 All Rights Reserved Acknowledgments Thank you to my committee members, Drs. Zewelanji Serpell and Jacqueline McDonnough, for their insight and expertise. I would also like to extend a special note of gratitude to my advisor, Dr. Nao Hagiwara, for her support and guidance. I am grateful also to Kayla Sanon, Randl Dent, and Zoe Smith for their grace and encouragement during the course of my graduate career. My deepest gratitude to my parents, Kathy and Clifford Lambert Sr., for their unconditional support and care throughout my life and academic career.
    [Show full text]
  • Implicit Bias and Prejudice in Mediation
    SMU Law Review Volume 70 Issue 3 ADR Symposium, Part 1 of 2 Article 5 2017 Implicit Bias and Prejudice in Mediation Carol Izumi University of California Hastings College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons Recommended Citation Carol Izumi, Implicit Bias and Prejudice in Mediation, 70 SMU L. REV. 681 (2017) https://scholar.smu.edu/smulr/vol70/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in SMU Law Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. IMPLICIT BIAS AND PREJUDICE IN MEDIATION Carol Izumi* ABSTRACT Mediators aspire and endeavor to meet their ethical duty of “neutrality” in mediation. Yet their ability to actually conduct mediations without bias, prejudice, or favoritism toward any party is extraordinarily difficult, if not impossible. Research shows that unconscious mental processes involving stereotypes and attitudes affect our judgments, perceptions, and behavior toward others. Implicit bias, the automatic association of stereotypes and attitudes with social groups, may produce discriminatory responses toward parties despite a mediator’s best efforts at creating an outwardly even- handed process. Even the most well-intentioned and egalitarian mediators must actively engage in bias reduction strategies to mitigate prejudice in mediation. I. INTRODUCTION ........................................ 681 II. MEDIATOR NEUTRALITY ............................. 683 III. IMPLICIT BIAS IN MEDIATION ....................... 685 IV. BIAS REDUCTION STRATEGIES ...................... 690 I. INTRODUCTION1 IRST, I want to thank Michael Green, Richard Delgado, the sym- posium organizers, the SMU Dedman School of Law community, Fand other panelists.
    [Show full text]
  • Unconscious Bias
    Unconscious bias Adapted by Professor Uta Frith DBE FBA FMedSci FRS from guidance issued to recruitment panels by the Scottish Government Introduction All panels and committees for selection and appointments The Royal Society provides research funding to at The Royal Society should be carried out objectively individuals to support high quality scientific research, and professionally. with the expectation that these individuals are able to reach their full potential. The Royal Society therefore The Society is committed to making funding or award expects all organisations hosting Royal Society Research decisions purely on the basis of the quality of the Fellows and Research Professorships to provide supportive proposed science and merit of the individual. No funding workplace structures to ensure equality and diversity applicant or nominee for awards, Fellowship, Foreign within the scientific workforce. Evidence of a commitment Membership, election to a post or appointment to a to improving the culture in this area, such as Athena Swan committee should receive less favourable treatment on accreditation, may be taken into account in making awards. the grounds of: gender, marital status, sexual orientation, gender re-assignment, race, colour, nationality, ethnicity This short briefing is meant to alert you to potential or national origins, religion or similar philosophical belief, difficulties around unconscious bias and prompt you spent criminal conviction, age or disability. to consciously revisit them before making a decision. Think of them as the safety instructions that you are Equally, all proposals or nominations must be assessed given every time you are on an airplane. You may think on equal terms, regardless of the sex, age and/or ethnicity you know them already, but it is good to rehearse them of the applicant.
    [Show full text]