Traffic Impact Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

AECOM Bulk Fuel Storage Terminal – State Significant Development - Environmental Impact E Statement Appendix E Traffic Impact Assessment Revision D – 08-Dec-2014 Prepared for – Stolthaven Australia Pty Ltd – ABN: 26 075 030 992 AECOM Bulk Fuel Storage Terminal – State Significant Development - Environmental Impact E-1 Statement Appendix E Traffic Impact Assessment Revision D – 08-Dec-2014 Prepared for – Stolthaven Australia Pty Ltd – ABN: 26 075 030 992 St olthaven Australia Pty Ltd 08-Dec-2014 Traffic Impact Assessment Stolthaven Mayfield Fuel Terminal - State Significant Development AECOM Traffic Impact Assessment Traffic Impact Assessment Stolthaven Mayfield Fuel Terminal - State Significant Development Client: Stolthaven Australia Pty Ltd ABN: 26 075 030 992 Prepared by AECOM Australia Pty Ltd Level 21, 420 George Street, Sydney NSW 2000, PO Box Q410, QVB Post Office NSW 1230, Australia T +61 2 8934 0000 F +61 2 8934 0001 www.aecom.com ABN 20 093 846 925 08-Dec-2014 Job No.: 60311678 AECOM in Australia and New Zealand is certified to the latest version of ISO9001, ISO14001, AS/NZS4801 and OHSAS18001. © AECOM Australia Pty Ltd (AECOM). All rights reserved. AECOM has prepared this document for the sole use of the Client and for a specific purpose, each as expressly stated in the document. No other party should rely on this document without the prior written consent of AECOM. AECOM undertakes no duty, nor accepts any responsibility, to any third party who may rely upon or use this document. This document has been prepared based on the Client’s description of its requirements and AECOM’s experience, having regard to assumptions that AECOM can reasonably be expected to make in accordance with sound professional principles. AECOM may also have relied upon information provided by the Client and other third parties to prepare this document, some of which may not have been verified. Subject to the above conditions, this document may be transmitted, reproduced or disseminated only in its entirety. Revision C – 08-Dec-2014 Prepared for – Stolthaven Australia Pty Ltd – ABN: 26 075 030 992 AECOM Traffic Impact Assessment Quality Information Document Traffic Impact Assessment 60311678 Ref \\auntl1fp001\projects\60311678_stolthaven_ph_2\6. draft docs\6.1 reports\ssd eis\appendix\app e - traffic\stolthaven - traffic impact assessment_rev b_20141021.docx Date 08-Dec-2014 Prepared by Eric Wu Reviewed by Nick Bernard Revision History Authorised Revision Revision Details Date Name/Position Signature A 9 Oct 2014 Draft for review Simon Murphy Project Manager B 21-Oct-2014 Draft for Adequacy Simon Murphy Project Manager C 08-Dec-2014 Final Simon Murphy Project Manager Revision C – 08-Dec-2014 Prepared for – Stolthaven Australia Pty Ltd – ABN: 26 075 030 992 AECOM Traffic Impact Assessment This page has been left blank intentionally. Revision C – 08-Dec-2014 Prepared for – Stolthaven Australia Pty Ltd – ABN: 26 075 030 992 AECOM Traffic Impact Assessment Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Background and Scope 1 1.2 Director-General Requirements 1 1.3 Standards and Guidelines 1 1.4 Structure of report 2 2.0 Existing Conditions 3 2.1 Existing Site 3 2.2 Existing Facility Operations 3 2.3 Surrounding Road Network 5 2.3.1 Strategic Road Network 5 2.3.2 Local Road Network 5 2.3.3 Daily Traffic Volumes 6 2.3.4 Peak hour Traffic Volumes 6 2.4 Existing Operational Performance 7 3.0 Future Year Base Case Traffic Conditions 9 3.1 Future Road Upgrades 9 3.2 Intersection Performance (without Project) 9 4.0 Proposed Project 11 4.1 Nature of Project 11 4.2 Construction Phase 11 4.2.1 Hours and Workforce 11 4.2.2 Trip Generation and Distribution 11 4.3 Operations Phase 12 4.3.1 Hours and Workforce 12 4.3.2 Trip Generation and Distribution 12 5.0 Impact of Proposed Development 15 5.1 Construction Phase 15 5.1.1 Traffic Movement 15 5.1.2 Impact of Construction Traffic 15 5.1.3 Parking During Construction Phase 15 5.2 Operations Phase 16 5.2.1 Traffic Movement 16 5.2.2 Impact of Operations Traffic 16 5.2.3 Impact of Future Operations Traffic 17 5.2.4 Parking During Operations 18 5.3 Mayfield Concept Plan Approval (09_0096) 19 5.3.1 Traffic Assessment Trigger Levels 19 5.3.2 Traffic Management Plan 19 6.0 Conclusions 21 Appendix A Base Year SIDRA Outputs – 2012 A Appendix B Future Year SIDRA Outputs without Project – 2015 B Appendix C Future Year SIDRA Outputs with Project - 2015 Construction C Appendix D Future Year SIDRA Outputs with Project – 2015 Operations D Appendix E Future Year SIDRA Outputs without Project - 2025 Operations E Appendix F Future Year SIDRA Outputs with Project - 2025 Operations F Revision C – 08-Dec-2014 Prepared for – Stolthaven Australia Pty Ltd – ABN: 26 075 030 992 AECOM Traffic Impact Assessment List of Tables Table 1 Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements applicable to the Traffic Impact Assessment 1 Table 2.1: Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) on Adjacent Road Network 6 Table 2.2: Performance Criteria for Intersections 7 Table 2.3: SIDRA Results for 2012 8 Table 3.1: SIDRA Results for 2015 without Project 10 Table 4.1: Distribution of construction traffic 11 Table 4.2 Operational Traffic 12 Table 5.1: SIDRA Results including construction traffic – 2015 15 Table 5.2: SIDRA Results including operational traffic – 2015 16 Table 5.3: SIDRA Results for future year 2025 without Project 17 Table 5.4: SIDRA results including operational traffic – 2025 18 Table 6.1: Summary of SIDRA results for Industrial Drive/Ingall Street intersection 21 List of Figures Figure 2.1 Site context 4 Figure 2.2 2012 traffic volume at Industrial Drive/Ingall Street intersection Source: AECOM 6 Figure 2.3 Existing layout of Industrial Drive/Ingall Street intersection 8 Figure 3.1 2015 without Project traffic volume at Industrial Drive/Ingall Street intersection 10 Figure 4.1 Project access / egress 13 Figure 5.1 2015 traffic volumes including construction traffic at Industrial Drive/Ingall Street intersection 15 Figure 5.2 2015 traffic volumes including operational traffic at Industrial Drive/Ingall Street intersection 16 Figure 5.3 2025 without Project traffic volume at Industrial Drive/Ingall Street intersection 17 Figure 5.4 2025 with Project traffic volume at Industrial Drive/Ingall Street intersection 18 Revision C – 08-Dec-2014 Prepared for – Stolthaven Australia Pty Ltd – ABN: 26 075 030 992 AECOM Traffic Impact Assessment 1 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Background and Scope This report presents a Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) of a proposed development to the Bulk Liquid Fuels Storage Facility (the Facility) at Mayfield. The TIA has been prepared to support the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) being prepared for the project. The proposed development (the Project) would see an increase in the throughput of the Facility from the approved 500ML per annum up to 1,010ML per annum. This report provides an assessment of the impact on the surrounding road network during construction and at full capacity operation. The TIA includes: - An assessment of the existing and future road conditions, in particular at the Industrial Drive/Ingall Street intersection that provides access to the site; - An evaluation of potential impacts to the intersection, associated with the Project’s construction and full capacity operation; and - Consideration of measures to mitigate traffic impacts, if required. The TIA has only assessed impacts on the road network in the morning and evening peak hours of a typical weekday. No rail movements are proposed as part of the Project. Shipping movement impacts have not been assessed as part of this TIA. As the Facility is being developed as part of the Port Terminal Facilities Mayfield Concept Plan, consistency of the Project with the Concept Plan and its conditions of consent (with regard to traffic) have also been assessed. 1.2 Director-General Requirements In preparing this TIA, consideration has been given to the NSW Planning and Environment (P&E) Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs) issued for the Project (SSD-6664) on 19 September 2014. The key matters raised by the Secretary, and where this report addresses them, are outlined in Table 1. Table 1 Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements applicable to the Traffic Impact Assessment Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirement Section Addressed Accurate predictions of the traffic volumes likely to be Section 4 Proposed generated during construction and operation. project Section 5 Impact of A detailed traffic impact study of the development. proposed development Section 6 Conclusions Details of impacts or Traffic and Transport potential upgrades for Details of any upgrades to road or shipping infrastructure. shipping infrastructure are documented in a separate assessment and report. Details of a protocol that has been agreed with the port of Newcastle for the Provision of input into the Mayfield Section 5.3. Concept Plans Traffic Management Plan (Mp09_0096). 1.3 Standards and Guidelines In the preparation of this TIA, the Roads and Maritime Services’ Guide to Traffic Generating Developments (2002) and the Road Design Guide Supplements to Austroads Guides (2009), have been used. Revision C – 08-Dec-2014 Prepared for – Stolthaven Australia Pty Ltd – ABN: 26 075 030 992 AECOM Traffic Impact Assessment 2 1.4 Structure of report The remainder of the report has been structured as follows: - Section 2 summarises the existing traffic conditions in the area surrounding the site and the existing Facility operations. - Section 3 considers the likely future traffic conditions in the area without the Project. - Section 4 provides a description of the Project in terms of its construction, operation, trip generation and distribution. - Section 5 provides an assessment of the traffic impact associated with the Project on the local road network and parking arrangements.
Recommended publications
  • New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator’S Guide

    New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator’S Guide

    New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator’s Guide Important: This Operator’s Guide is for three Notices separated by Part A, Part B and Part C. Please read sections carefully as separate conditions may apply. For enquiries about roads and restrictions listed in this document please contact Transport for NSW Road Access unit: [email protected] 27 October 2020 New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator’s Guide Contents Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Definitions ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 NSW Travel Zones .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Part A – NSW Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicles Notice ................................................................................................ 9 About the Notice ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 1: Travel Conditions ................................................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Pilot and Escort Requirements ..........................................................................................................................
  • – Growing with Our Region Community Information Sheet Issue No

    – Growing with Our Region Community Information Sheet Issue No

    TERMINAL4 FOUR COMMUNITY TEDITION 01 INFO SHEET T4 – Growing with our region Community Information Sheet Issue No. 1 May 2011 A NOTE FROM THE GENERAL MANAGER IntroductionWelcome to the first project information sheet for The Project will have to meet the requirements of a the Port Waratah Coal Services (PWCS) expansion stringent government approvals process. To ensure Welcome to the first Project bottlenecks that have hindered specialists, and Coakes Consulting project, known as the T4 Project. This information that environmental and social issues/impacts are Information Sheet for the Port the Hunter Valley coal chain over to undertake a social assessment for Waratah Coalsheet Services has been (PWCS) designed to providerecent an years. overview of the appropriatelythe project. considered Further in projectinformation planning sheets we have expansion Projectproject, and known some as thebackground on the studies being engaged willEMGA be developed Mitchell McLennan at key milestones to complete to an Over the past decade, demand for T4 Project. This information sheet provide updates on the outcomes of undertaken, and to outline opportunitiescoal through for theyou Port to be of Newcastleenvironmental has assessment, supported by a range has been designed to provide these assessments. grown by more than 32% and PWCS an overviewinvolved of the project, in project some planning. of technical specialists, and Coakes Consulting to capacity is predicted to be exceeded I welcome your feedback on our background on the studies being undertake a social assessment for the Project. PWCS has a legal obligation toin ensure around sufficient 2015. This predicted lack of first information sheet and look undertaken and to outline forward to your involvement in opportunitiesterminal for you capacity to be to meet the longcapacity, term needscoupled of with an increasingFurther information sheets will be developed at key overseas demand for energy and this important project.
  • Duplication of Tourle Street and Cormorant Road Kooragang

    Duplication of Tourle Street and Cormorant Road Kooragang

    Appendix E Community consultation documentation Appendix E1: Community submissions summary A summary of submissions received by stakeholders and how they have been considered in provided in Table E1 below. Table E1 Summary of community submissions received for the proposal Date Organisation Community submission Roads and Maritime response 17 Nov 2013 Kooragang Wetlands x Request for additional provision of cycle provisions - x Provisions for cyclists as part of the proposal Rehabilitation Project - cycle crossings in both directions to Industrial Drive and include on-road via widened shoulders. This Hunter Central Rivers access from both directions to the river road cycleway includes 3.0 m shoulders over both bridges and Catchment Management (Tourle Street Bridge to Ash Island Bridge). 2.5 m shoulders along Cormorant Road. The Authority provision of a cycle connection below the northern side of the new Tourle Street Bridge would be investigated further during detailed detail. 20 Nov 2013 Kooragang Open Cycle x Expressed support for the proposal of duplicating Tourle x Support for the proposal noted, particularly Club Street and Cormorant Road. support for proposed cyclist provisions. x The proposal provides a good sized shoulder for the cyclists that use these roads on a regular basis. x The inclusion of these shoulders will improve safety for not only cyclists making their way to and from Kooragang Island for weekend racing, but it will greatly improve safety for cycling commuters who use this road daily by providing greater clearance from the traffic. 22 Nov 2013 Hunter District Cycling x The HDCC committee has discussed the plans you x Support for the proposal noted, particularly Club (HDCC) provided for duplication of Tourle Street and Cormorant support for proposed cyclist provisions.
  • M1 Pacific Motorway Extension to Raymond Terrace

    M1 Pacific Motorway Extension to Raymond Terrace

    M1 Pacific Motorway extension to Raymond Terrace Project update – Environmental Impact Statement July 2021 You are invited to make a submission on the M1 Pacific Motorway extension to Raymond Terrace Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The Australian and NSW governments have committed $2 billion to deliver the M1 Pacific Motorway extension to Raymond Terrace and Hexham Straight projects. The extension would boost the regional economy and improve connectivity, road transport eciency and safety for local and interstate motorists. The project addresses a key national motorway ‘missing link’ between Sydney and Brisbane as the existing M1 Pacific Motorway, New England Highway and Pacific Highway carry some of the highest trac volumes across the Hunter. Better movement of Once complete, the extension would remove up to 25,000 vehicles a day from key congestion and freight merge points along this corridor and would help keep freight, commuters and tourists moving. The project includes 15 kilometres of dual carriageway and provides motorway access from the existing road network from four new Saving motorists interchanges at Black Hill, Tarro, Tomago and up to Raymond Terrace. 9 minutes during peak time The project also includes a 2.6 kilometre viaduct over the Hunter River and floodplain, the Main North Rail Line, and the New England Highway. It would also provide new bridge crossings over Bypass up to local waterways at Tarro and Raymond Terrace, and an overpass for Masonite Road at Heatherbrae. 5 trac lights Key benefits On opening, the M1 Pacific Motorway extension to Raymond Terrace would save motorists between seven and nine minutes of travel time during peak periods, bypass up to five sets of trac lights and reduce trac demand on existing key routes across the road The key benefits of the proposed extension network.
  • Broke Fordwich from Above

    Broke Fordwich from Above

    Lin king the C o mmun ities o f B r o k e Ford w ich B u lga & M ilbro d ale October 2020 BROKE FORDWICH FROM ABOVE Lin king the C o mmun ities o f B r o k e Ford w ich B u lga & M ilbro d ale Broke Fordwich Wine and Tourism Association THIS ISSUE: GETTING HIGH IN BROKE FORDWICH WHICH WINEGRAPE VARIETIES ARE GROWN WHERE? 200-YEARS OF AUSTRALIAN- FRENCH WINEMAKING COOPERATION IMPROVED VISITOR EXPERIENCE AT LAKE ST CLAIR OUR WILDLIFE MAYOR DEMANDS BETTER THAN “SECOND-BEST” SINGLETON BYPASS OPTION 2 October 2020 FROM THE EDITOR 200 NOT OUT FOR BULGA—HOWEZAT!! All roads may lead to Rome, but please do not forget that on Saturday, October 17, when the good people of Bulga invite you to visit their own part of our national thor- oughfare system (Inlet Road, to be exact) for not one, but two momentous walks down memory lane. To begin with, it’s about 200 years since that remarkable figure of colonial exploration, John Howe, capped his opening of the Patrick Plains with the first (white) sighting of the idyllic paradise our First Peoples knew as Bulga. And never let us forget that, without the unique bushcraft and calm perseverance of the native Australians John Howe recruited for his squad, our beautiful patch may have waited much longer to become recognised on the map of pre-Federation New South Wales. The second stanza on the playlist for October is meant to be an equally whole- hearted tribute to our forebears—but perhaps a little more restrained and intro- spective than our Bulga commemoration: we’re remembering the dedication of that consecrated gateway to the fallen, the War Memorial Gates at the Recreation Ground.
  • Newcastle Council

    Newcastle Council

    Newcastle Street cover Tree Masterplan photos September 2011 Production Street Tree Master Plan was prepared by The City of Newcastle Liveable City Group Enquiries For information about this document contact: The City of Newcastle Phone: 02 4974 2000 Published by The City of Newcastle 282 King Street, Newcastle Phone: 02 4974 2000 (main switchboard) Post: PO Box 489 Newcastle NSW 2300 Australia Fax: 02 4974 2222 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.newcastle.nsw.gov.au September 2011 © 2011 The City of Newcastle PART A: Introduction Council's Strategic Direction .......................................................................... 6 Part B: Design The Urban Landscape Context ..................................................................... 9 Design Considerations ...................................................................................10 High Profi le and Special Areas ...................................................................... 12 Part C: Deciding What to Plant The Approach to Species Selection ...............................................................15 The Selection Process ...................................................................................16 Part D: Planting our streets Where, When and What to Plant ....................................................................25 Implementation .............................................................................................. 26 Part E: Appendices 1 Snapshot of Newcastle's Trees 2010 .......................................................
  • EIS Section 3

    EIS Section 3

    The Ashton Coal Project CONTENTS 3.0 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENT .......................................................................... 1 3.1 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 1 3.2 Regional Setting.................................................................................................................. 1 3.3 Climate ................................................................................................................................2 3.3.1 Temperature and Humidity .................................................................................... 2 3.3.2 Rainfall................................................................................................................... 4 3.3.3 Wind....................................................................................................................... 4 3.3.4 Inversions ............................................................................................................... 5 3.4 Air Quality........................................................................................................................... 5 3.4.1 Existing Air Quality in Camberwell....................................................................... 5 3.5 Acoustic Environment......................................................................................................... 9 3.5.1 Ambient Noise Levels...........................................................................................
  • Progress Since 2012

    Progress Since 2012

    Progress Since 2012 Name Suburb Region/District Project Type Project Description Current Status 2nd Bulk Liquids Berth Port Botany Eastern City Freight Planning approval to develop a second Bulk Liquids Completed District Berth (BLB2) at Port Botany was received in 2008. On 31 May 2011, John Holland Pty Ltd was engaged to construct the BLB2. The berth became operational in December 2013. The main products handled at the BLB are refined fuels, gases and chemicals / other bulk liquids. BLB2 comprise a steel piled pier adjacent to the existing BLB1; associated infrastructure such as marine loading arms, fire fighting equipment, onshore support facilities and pipelines from existing user sites to the new berth. The open access, multi user berth operates on a 24 hour/ 7 day per week basis. BLB2 has been designed to accommodate 120,000 dead weight tonne vessels to a maximum of 270m length overall. Abbotsford Wharf - Abbotsford Eastern City Maritime The upgrade aims to provide easier access to the wharf, Planning Wharf Upgrade District better weather protection, additional seating, improved program safety, quicker and more efficient boarding and disembarking, increased capacity and more efficient interchange with other modes of transport. Acacia Avenue Lake Munmorah Central Coast Walking and Cycling Shared Path cycleway alongside Acacia Avenue Completed cycleway Name Suburb Region/District Project Type Project Description Current Status Additional Boating Castle Cove North Maritime Planning Access Points at Middle Harbour (Investigation), Willoughby Additional Boating Penrith West Maritime Investigation and concept designs for eight passive craft Planning Access Points on the access points to the Neapean River. Nepean River (Investigation) Airds Road cycleway Leumeah Western City Walking and Cycling Shared Path cycleway alongside Airds Road Completed District Airport East Precinct Mascot Eastern City Road Roads east of the airport will be upgraded and the In-Progress District General Holmes Drive rail level crossing will be removed by constructing a road underpass.
  • Prospects and Challenges for the Hunter Region a Strategic Economic Study

    Prospects and Challenges for the Hunter Region a Strategic Economic Study

    Prospects and challenges for the Hunter region A strategic economic study Regional Development Australia Hunter March 2013 Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. © 2013 Deloitte Access Economics Pty Ltd Prospects and challenges for the Hunter region Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Part I: The current and future shape of the Hunter economy .................................................... 3 2 The Hunter economy in 2012 .......................................................................................... 4 2.2 Population and demographics ........................................................................................... 5 2.3 Workforce and employment ............................................................................................. 8 2.4 Industrial composition .................................................................................................... 11 3 Longer term factors and implications ............................................................................ 13 3.1 New patterns in the global economy ............................................................................... 13 3.2 Demographic change ...................................................................................................... 19
  • Duplication of Tourle Street and Cormorant Road at Kooragang July 2017

    Duplication of Tourle Street and Cormorant Road at Kooragang July 2017

    Duplication of Tourle Street and Cormorant Road at Kooragang July 2017 The Australian and NSW governments have each committed funding to duplicate Tourle Street and Cormorant Road at Kooragang. Roads and Maritime Services is upgrading Tourle Construction update Street and Cormorant Road at Kooragang to improve traffic flow and cater for a future increase The new bridge is taking shape. In the past six in traffic. Development in Port Stephens, the months we have: expansion of Newcastle Airport and the growth of completed the installation of all four land- industrial development on Kooragang Island will based concrete bridge beams and decks contribute to increased traffic. completed piling for all six river-based piers, The upgrade includes duplicating 3.8 kilometres of and started construction of the concrete pier road between Industrial Drive at Mayfield West and columns using a large crane and barge in Egret Street at Kooragang to provide two lanes in the river. each direction. A second two lane bridge is also being built on the western side of the existing On the road we have: Tourle Street bridge, as part of this project. completed the relocation of about 2.9 kilo- Construction started in May 2016 and the upgrade metres of major underground and above- is expected to be completed by the end of 2018, ground water and sewer services weather permitting. completed construction of the new south- bound road pavement on the eastern side of Tourle Street, and on Cormorant Road between Egret Street and east of Long Pond shifted traffic onto the newly constructed pavement and started construction on the existing road.
  • Uralla Shire Council

    Uralla Shire Council

    Unique Uralla Shire Council Local Strategic Planning Statement November 2019 Acknowledgement of Country Uralla Shire Council acknowledges the traditional custodians of the land, and pays respect to Elders past, present and future. This Plan acknowledges a strong belief amongst Aboriginal people that if we care for Country, it will care for us. This is supported by the knowledge that the health of a people and their community is reliant on a strong physical and emotional connection to place. Conserving Aboriginal heritage and respecting the Aboriginal community’s right to determine how it is identified and managed, will preserve some of the world’s longest standing spiritual, historical, social and educational values. To that end, all our work seeks to uphold the idea that if we care for Country, it will care for us. Uralla Shire Council Local Strategic Planning Statement Contents 1. About this Statement 1 2. Context 6 3. Local Strategic Planning Vision 16 4. Directions and Planning Priorities 17 5. Productivity 18 5.1 Support and manage rural landscapes 19 5.2 Support new industries on employment lands 22 5.3 Grow creative and artisan industries 25 5.4 Support the visitor economy 28 6. Liveability 30 6.1 The land of our first people 31 6.2 Places and CBD designed for people 33 6.3 Celebrate the Shire’s heritage assets 35 6.4 Living in the Uralla Shire Local Government Area (LGA) 37 7. Sustainability 38 7.1 Protect and restore natural habitats 39 7.2 Adapt to a changing climate 40 8. Infrastructure 43 8.1 Protect and enhance freight and transport infrastructure 44 8.2 Managing infrastructure provision 45 8.3 Creating a pedestrian friendly Uralla Shire 46 9.
  • ASIC 36A/06, Monday, 18 September 2006 Published by ASIC ASIC Gazette

    ASIC 36A/06, Monday, 18 September 2006 Published by ASIC ASIC Gazette

    Commonwealth of Australia Commonwealth of Australia Gazette No. ASIC 36A/06, Monday, 18 September 2006 Published by ASIC ASIC Gazette Contents Banking Act Unclaimed Money as at 31 December 2005 Specific disclaimer for Special Gazette relating to Banking Unclaimed Monies The information in this Gazette is provided by Authorised Deposit-taking Institutions to ASIC pursuant to the Banking Act (Commonwealth) 1959. The information is published by ASIC as supplied by the relevant Authorised Deposit- taking Institution and ASIC does not add to the information. ASIC does not verify or accept responsibility in respect of the accuracy, currency or completeness of the information, and, if there are any queries or enquiries, these should be made direct to the Authorised Deposit-taking Institution. RIGHTS OF REVIEW Persons affected by certain decisions made by ASIC under the Corporations Act and the other legislation administered by ASIC may have rights of review. ASIC has published Practice Note 57 [PN57] Notification of rights of review and Information Sheet [INFO 1100] ASIC decisions – your rights to assist you to determine whether you have a right of review. You can obtain a copy of these documents from the ASIC Digest, the ASIC website at www.asic.gov.au or from the Administrative Law Co-ordinator in the ASIC office with which you have been dealing. ISSN 1445-6060 (Online version) Available from www.asic.gov.au ISSN 1445-6079 (CD-ROM version) Email [email protected] © Commonwealth of Australia, 2006 This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all rights are reserved.