Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Transport and Works Act 1992 London Underground (Northern Line Extension) Order Environmental statement Non-technical summary MAYOR OF LONDON Transport for London Non Technical Summary for the Northern Line Extension Non Technical Summary for the Northern Line Extension i Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. PROJECT OVERVIEW 2 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE NORTHERN LINE EXTENSION 6 4. THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS 12 (ASSESSING THE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS) 5. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 13 Traffic and Transport 13 Socio-economics 14 Archaeology and Built Heritage 16 Noise and Vibration 17 Air Quality 19 Electromagnetic Compatibility 19 Surface Water Resources and Flood Risk 19 Land Quality and Groundwater 19 Ecology 23 Townscape and Visual Amenity 23 Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation 25 6. THE NEXT STEPS AND HOW TO GET MORE INFORMATION 30 ii Non Technical Summary for the Northern Line Extension 1.0 Introduction Figure 1: The Northern Line Extension 1.0 Introduction Non Technical Summary for the Northern Line Extension 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This document presents a Non-Technical homes and 20,000 to 25,000 new jobs. Summary (NTS) of the predicted impacts This will include the redevelopment of the on the environment of the proposed BPS site. This level of development cannot Northern Line Extension (NLE). Full details happen sustainably without the appropriate of those impacts are contained in the transport infrastructure. Environmental Statement (ES) that URS 1.5 The NLE is intended to meet a number of has prepared on behalf of Transport for the goals for transport in London set out London (TfL). The ES accompaniesTfL’s in the Mayor’s Transport Strategy (MTS, application to the Secretary of State for 2010), which include measures to: Transport for a Transport and Works Act Order (TWAO) for the proposed NLE. ■ Support economic development and population growth; 1.2 This NTS includes: ■ Enhance the quality of life for all ■ A brief account of the background to Londoners; the NLE project and how it relates to the Vauxhall Nine Elms Battersea ■ Improve safety and security for all Opportunity Area (VNEB OA); Londoners; ■ ■ A description of the NLE and the Improve transport opportunities for all alternatives that were considered by TfL; Londoners; and ■ ■ An outline of the Environmental Impact Reduce transport’s contribution to climate Assessment (EIA) process and a topic change and improve its resilience. by topic summary of the potential 1.6 The MTS makes specific reference to environmental effects and the measures the NLE, stating that the Mayor will seek proposed to minimise adverse effects longer-term enhancements and extensions and maximise potential benefits; and to the Underground network, including: ■ An outline of the TWAO process, including how interested parties can “A privately funded extension of the comment on the application. Northern line to Battersea to support regeneration of the Vauxhall/ Nine Elms/ 1.3 The project proposes to extend the Charing Battersea area”. Cross branch of the Northern line, from Kennington to Battersea, including an intermediate station at Nine Elms and a terminus at Battersea, close to Battersea Power Station (BPS) (see Figure 1). The extension will pass through the London boroughs of Lambeth, Southwark and Wandsworth. 1.4 The primary aim of the extension is to encourage economic growth through enabling the sustainable regeneration of the VNEB OA. The VNEB OA is expected to accommodate significant growth, with delivery of a high density mixed use development comprising 16,000 new 2 Non Technical Summary for the Northern Line Extension 2.0 Project Overview 2. PROJECT OVERVIEW 2.1 The proposed NLE is the result of an ■ Also best fit the overall public transport extensive examination of alternative network. transport solutions, alternative routes and alternative locations and designs for the Alternative Route and Station stations and shafts. Consultation with a Options wide range of stakeholders, such as the 2.4 The assessment of alternative transport London boroughs of Lambeth, Southwark solutions was followed by a consideration and Wandsworth, statutory consultees, and of alternative route alignments for the NLE major landowners and the public, has been and alternative station locations. Four important in this process. A summary of this routes were considered (see Figure 2). All work is presented in the following sections. four route options would be connected to Alternative Transport Solutions the existing Northern line at the Kennington Loop, a train turnaround facility on the 2.2 The decision to extend the Northern line Charing Cross branch. The four options was taken following a review of alternative considered were: transport solutions, including: ■ Option 1 - Direct from Kennington to ■ An extension to the Northern line, BPS; but from the Bank branch rather than ■ Option 2 - Kennington to BPS with an Charing Cross branch; intermediate station within the Nine Elms ■ New extensions from the Victoria, area; District/Circle, Bakerloo and Waterloo & ■ Option 3 - Kennington to BPS via City lines; interchange at Vauxhall; and ■ An automatic metro scheme between ■ Option 4 - Kennington to BPS with three BPS and Charing Cross via Victoria; potential alternative location before the ■ An extension to the Docklands Light intermediate stations. Railway from Bank station; 2.5 The route options were assessed against ■ A stand-alone light rapid transport a range of criteria including engineering scheme; feasibility and transport and environmental ■ A cross river tram from central to south considerations. The options were also London; subject to detailed public consultation. ■ A spur from Crossrail; This work concluded that Route Options 2 and 4 were most favourable due to the ■ Enhancement to existing National Rail provision of an intermediate station. It and London Overground services; and was considered that these options would ■ Improvements to bus, river transport and offer a greater improvement in air quality cycle services and facilities. due to a greater reduction in car and bus trips as a result of modal shift (i.e. people 2.3 This review concluded that an extension to choosing to travel on the Northern line the Charing Cross branch of the Northern rather than using car or bus transport) line would be the transport solution that than Route Options 1 and 3. Also, by would: creating new stations, Route Options 2 ■ Best meet the needs of the VNEB OA; and 4 would provide greater opportunity ■ Achieve the relevant goals of the MTS; and to enhance the townscape around the 2.0 Project Overview Non Technical Summary for the Northern Line Extension 3 R Figure 2: Route options d Buckingham Palace d R s Westminster li y Pier a Route Alignment Options 1-4 Lambeth B St. James's Park North L d o R nd © Crown copyright. All rights reserved (GLA) (100032379) 2013 St o n ce Ge 0 250 500 m Cartography by Steer Davies Gleave 2013 la or Road N et a ge Stre P 's ia M Roa Victor a ad d r Ro s h t h e Ne w a w b WESTMINSTER o m Lambeth SOUTHWARK R Ke m nt a L d a o r R S Elephant & Castle Victoria e t t s r e e k h e c t n d o a R b R l B n m e l l i a g o ra t h v M W e g g n a n i i e lw k c n c Millbank Pier n o la Road u e r a t B K h P A202 t S n t e oad G m R e k o n rg Park Rd o a lic e Kennington ' b im s A3 P Pimlico m E Dr Kennington ive A202 t r A23 e b Chelsea l A 3 B rid R g oa e d Vauxhall A3204 Gro svenor A3212 R e oad Lan s A3 lm River Thames E A202 Q u e e A203 e Nin 4 n s t Nine Elms ‘North’ o F Oval w e nti n m A3205 an 1 d S a o Road o u R t d h a Road C o h a Nine Elms ‘South’ t m R r b o 2 e Battersea k L rw ar w a e P s m ll d b a n d e e s a a r t e h New tt W o a R B Ro ad R Battersea Park n o o t a x d i r B ve Dri Clapham Road les A3205 A23 Wa Queenstown Road (Battersea) d Roa A3 k d LAMBETH Par A3216 a o R Stockwell th WANDSWORTH or Myatt's Fields Park w ds Proposed Station an W Wandsworth Road Route Alignment 1 Route Alignment 2 A203 Route Alignment 3 A3216 Clapham Road Loughborough Junction A3 Route Alignment 4 Clapham High Street Clapham North intermediate station, and especially at the 2.6 Although Route Option 4 resembles Route intermediate station proposed for Route Option 2 in some respects, by placing Option 2. More particularly, an intermediate the intermediate station in the northern station would significantly enhance the part of the VNEB OA, it fails to offer the accessibility and regenerative benefits of early benefits of the NLE to the existing the project by enabling the VNEB OA as a communities to the south and east of the whole to benefit from enhanced transport VNEB OA to the same degree as Route infrastructure. Option 2. Route Option 4 has a less accessible location for its intermediate 4 Non Technical Summary for the Northern Line Extension 2.0 Project Overview station, and has lower journey time savings 2.10 To develop a preferred alignment, a compared to Route Option 2.