Cgi Supports White Paper, Says Implementation Will Spur Growth

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cgi Supports White Paper, Says Implementation Will Spur Growth PAGE 1 OF 6 Contact: PRESS RELEASE Coordinating Ministry of the Economy, R.I. · Mahendra Siregar (021) 380-8384 [email protected] Bank Indonesia, R.I. · Rizal A. Djaafara (021) 381-7311 [email protected] The World Bank · Mohamad Al-Arief (021) 5299-3084 [email protected] CGI SUPPORTS WHITE PAPER, SAYS IMPLEMENTATION WILL SPUR GROWTH Jakarta, December 11, 2003 – At the 13th annual Consultative Group on Indonesia (CGI) Meeting, donors voiced their strong support for the Government’s macroeconomic achievements and its commitments to the Indonesian people to improve the investment climate, to fundamentally reform the court system, and to develop a long-term vision for poverty reduction. Delegates recognized that effective implementation of these plans is now the key challenge. In the coming year, elections will offer both opportunities and risks for this ambitious agenda and donors urged the Government to maintain the momentum of reform. “Graduating from the IMF program, next year’s phasing out IBRA and moving towards a modern guarantee system will end the key crisis related programs and institutions in Indonesia, closing the book on this episode in Indonesian history,” said Dorodjatun Kuntjoro-Jakti, Coordinating Minister for Economic Affairs. “But the reform agenda remains challenging.” “All eyes are now on next year,” said Jemal-ud-din Kassum, Chairman of the CGI Meeting and World Bank Vice-President for East Asia and the Pacific Region. “If the Government delivers on the commitments it has made in such impressive documents as the White Paper and the Supreme Court blueprints, then growth in Indonesia is set to take off. But significant slippage, especially on improving the investment climate and governance, would put emerging gains in market confidence at risk.” Representatives of 30 bilateral donors and multilateral agencies met with a large number of Government Ministers and officials, and a range of observers from civil society and the private sector, to strengthen partnerships in meeting Indonesia’s development goals. The Government’s progress in achieving macroeconomic stability, in reducing the economy’s vulnerability, and in restoring external viability was widely praised. CGI members expressed comfort with the Government’s decision to graduate from the IMF- supported program since most macroeconomic indicators show that the economic and PAGE 2 OF 6 financial crisis is over. But concerns continue to be raised about the quality of governance and the investment climate. Donors pledged their ongoing financial support for the Government’s development efforts. For next year’s budget, total support will amount to US$ 2.8 billion, well within the range that the Government requested. Of this, around US$ 0.2 billion is in the form of grants, the rest in the form of concessionary loans. Disbursement on some US$ 1 billion of the amount pledged will depend on the Government’s progress on its policy agenda. In addition to the support through the budget, donors pledged technical assistance and other support in the amount of US$ 550 million through other channels, including NGOs and local governments. In his remarks to the CGI, Minister of Finance, Boediono summarized the Government’s economic achievements: “The macroeconomic picture is good and more importantly there is a solid foundation for future growth. The banking system is largely back in private hands ready to play its role along side expanded capital markets. Most importantly there is a homegrown Letter of Intent to the Indonesian people and we are already delivering on the commitments in it.” Though some donors and civil society observers expressed concern about the broad scope and short time frame of the Government’s Economic Policy Program (or White Paper), the plan received significant support from the CGI delegates, who highlighted the importance, now, of implementation. “While some additional prioritization might be helpful,” said David Nellor, Senior Resident Representative of the IMF, “the White Paper provides a sound policy framework that, if adhered to, would help bridge the potential “credibility gap” that could emerge as the Fund-supported program expires.” Several CGI participants noted that considerable risks remain in the macroeconomic situation and that financing needs will remain high due to the expiration of the Paris Club rescheduling. The CGI discussions placed particular emphasis on enhancing the investment climate. Yutaka Iimura, Ambassador of Japan, said, “Growth of 3-4 percent is not enough to absorb new entrants in the labor force and to reduce poverty. To achieve higher growth, Indonesia should shift its economy from consumption-led to investment-led growth, and for that, improving the investment climate is a matter of urgency.” Reflecting on the views of other delegates, Ambassador Iimura highlighted the importance of tackling corruption because it hinders the investment climate. Also, while welcoming the White Paper with its detailed 2003/04 timetable, participants noted the need for a medium-term roadmap to attract investment in infrastructure and other long-term projects. Private sector representatives, while welcoming the White Paper, noted that the current climate for investment remains difficult and continues to discourage many potential investors. They put legal certainty, contract enforceability, policy consistency, sound tax and customs administration, labor, and infrastructure at the top of their list of concerns. They called for a more consistent voice of support for private sector investment from the highest levels of the Indonesian Government and concerted action from the new PAGE 3 OF 6 Investment Team to address problems affecting investments. In response, the Government welcomed the in-depth dialogue with the private sector, and promised follow-up meetings on a regular basis. “We are looking forward to regular exchange of views with the private sector,” Coordinating Minister Dorodjatun Kuntjoro-Jakti said. Some delegates observed that donors could do their part to increase the pay-offs of Indonesia’s reforms by further liberalizing their own markets. “An open check book with closed markets is not helpful to Indonesia” said the Ambassador of New Zealand, Chris Elder. Throughout the discussions, issues of governance took center stage. “To restore public and investor confidence, of utmost urgency is the need to address the weak governance structures at different levels including political institutions, different levels of governments and administration as well as within the legal and judicial system,” said ADB Deputy Director General, Shamshad Akhtar. “Weak governance has acted as a major barrier to sound development in Indonesia nurturing corruption and rent seeking and weakening the impact and effectiveness of development projects.” Dr. Ursula Schaefer-Preuss, Head of the German delegation, encouraged the Government to embark on a civil service reform, she said: ”efforts towards good governance cannot be successful without a performance based, responsible and responsive civil service”. Prof. Dr. Bagir Manan, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Indonesia, outlined a comprehensive blueprint for reform of the Supreme Court as well as plans for shifting to a “one-roof” system of management of the entire judiciary under the Supreme Court. Donors expressed high hopes for this new reform momentum in such a critical area and pledged their financial and technical support. They also welcomed the Chief Justice’s presence at the meeting as an indication of strong commitment to judicial reform. Ruud J. Treffers, Ambassador of the Netherlands, said, "Policies to improve Indonesia’s investment climate will and can only be successfully implemented where they are supported by an effective, predictable, transparent and equitable justice sector.” Delegates also urged other key justice sector institutions where continued performance concerns have been raised to undertake similar efforts. Speaking on behalf of the European Union, Francesco Maria Greco, Ambassador of Italy, underlined, “Legal and judicial reform can succeed only on the basis of an unremitting commitment to implementing and enforcing the law. Hence all institutions within the legal and judicial process, including the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, the Attorney General’s Office and the Police need to become active party to this reform effort.” Donors welcomed recent progress in the long-awaited establishment of the Anti- Corruption Commission, whose members are now being considered by the Parliament. CGI members trust that public integrity will remain the key factor in the appointment of its members and are encouraged by the openness of the process to date. The new Commission also needs to be given the necessary resources and independence to allow it to fulfill its mandate effectively. PAGE 4 OF 6 But one governance challenge in which donors expressed concern about continued lack of progress is in forestry. Despite initial efforts to develop a collaborative approach to some of the problems in this sector, one of Indonesia’s most valuable natural resources – the forests – continues to be eroded at a devastating pace. “There is a sense of frustration among the donors since their support and commitments have yet to materialize into substantial results and there is a pressing need to demonstrate real progress,” said Aldo Dell’Ariccia, Deputy Head of Southeast Asia Unit, European Commission. Togu Manurung, representing Indonesia’s forestry NGO, one of the civil society observers
Recommended publications
  • Indonesia 2010 ORGANISATION for ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION and DEVELOPMENT
    OECD Investment Policy Reviews INDONESIA OECD Investment Policy Reviews Indonesia has undertaken a decade of political and economic reform, under very diffi cult circumstances. Democracy is now fi rmly established, and the economy is growing at a steady pace in spite of the global fi nancial crisis. Reforms over the past decade have done much to improve the resilience of the Indonesian economy, and the INDONESIA government has made substantial progress in creating a better climate for investment. New laws have been enacted in almost all sectors, and new institutions have been created to advise the government, implement and enforce laws, regulate newly liberalised sectors and settle disputes. Foreign investors have taken notice. Foreign direct investment in Indonesia in the past fi ve years has exceeded the earlier peak achieved in 1996, before the Asian fi nancial crisis in 1997-98 brought economic contraction and net outfl ows of foreign investment. This investment is also becoming increasingly diversifi ed by sector and by country of investor. OECD Investment Policy Reviews: Indonesia charts Indonesia’s progress in developing an effective policy framework to promote investment for development. It focuses INDONESIA Reviews Policy Investment OECD on policies towards investment, competition, infrastructure, fi nance and other areas of the business environment and suggests ways the climate for both domestic and foreign investment might be further improved. In the same series China Egypt India Morocco Peru Russian Federation I Viet Nam DN The full text of this book is available on line via this link: www.sourceoecd.org/finance/9789264087002 Those with access to all OECD books on line should use this link: www.sourceoecd.org/9789264087002 SourceOECD is the OECD online library of books, periodicals and statistical databases.
    [Show full text]
  • Welfare in Transition
    Welfare in Transition The Political Economy of Social Protection Reform in Indonesia Maryke van Diermen Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Anthropology and Development Studies School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts University of Adelaide December 2017 Declaration I certify that this work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in my name in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. In addition, I certify that no part of this work will, in the future, be used in a submission in my name for any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution without the prior approval of the University of Adelaide and where applicable, any partner institution responsible for the joint award of this degree. I give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University's digital research repository, the Library Search and also through web search engines, unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for a period of time. I acknowledge the support I have received for my research through the provision of an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. Signature of candidate: Date: 10/07/18 ii Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the support I have received from many people. I am thankful to them all but I wish to mention some in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Deputy Minister Position?
    Number 161 • July 2020 i 5th and 6th Floor, Constitutional Court Building Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 6 Jakarta Pusat ii Number 161 • July 2020 Number 161 • July 2020 DIRECTING BOARD: Anwar Usman • Aswanto • Arief Hidayat Editorial Greetings Enny Nurbaningsih • Wahiduddin Adams Suhartoyo • Manahan MP Sitompul Saldi Isra • Daniel Yusmic Pancastaki Foekh DIRECTOR: rials at the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (Mahkamah M. Guntur Hamzah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia or “MK RI”) continue to be conducted by EDITOR IN CHIEF: Timplementing health protocols related to Covid-19. The enthusiasm of the Heru Setiawan litigants remains high. Likewise, the Constitutional Court Justices remain active and enthusiastic in leading the trials. Many new cases are presented, while the DEPUTY EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: old cases are in the revision trials until it is time for the hearing by experts as well Fajar Laksono Suroso as the publication of statements from state institutions. MANAGING EDITOR: Towards the end of June 2020, the Constitutional Court has also held Mutia Fria Darsini oral sentence pronouncements for judicial reviews, such as for the Fiduciary EDITORIAL SECRETARY: Guarantee Law (UU Jaminan Fidusia), Traffic and Transportation Law (UU Lalu Lintas Tiara Agustina dan Angkutan Jalan or “UU LLAJ”), Position of Notary Law (UU Jabatan Notaris) and EDITOR: others. Meanwhile, the cases that are still on trial until mid-July 2020 and has Nur Rosihin Ana not yet been decided are the Corruption Eradication Commission Law (UU Komisi Nano Tresna Arfana • Lulu Anjarsari P Pemberantasan Korupsi or “UU KPK”), the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU Informasi dan T ransaksi Elektronik or “UU ITE”, the Criminal Code REPORTER: Procedures (Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana or “KUHAP”), and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Economic Relations with Kazakhstan, 2015 – 2017
    THE IMPLEMENTATION OF INDONESIA ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY: STRENGTHENING ECONOMIC RELATIONS WITH KAZAKHSTAN, 2015 – 2017 Nida Sabila Firdaus 016201505010 President University A Thesis presented to the Faculty of Humanities in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Bachelor Degree in International Relations Concentration in Diplomacy Studies 2019 ABSTRACT This thesis aims to discuss explicitly the economic interests of Indonesia to Kazakhstan. By focusing on foreign policy and economic diplomacy strategies carried out by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Indonesia in Kazakhstan in the period of 2015 to 2017. This research uses qualitative data analysis conducted deductively. The method used in research to collect data is by analyzing documents from primary sources and interview with the related sources. The theoritical framework of this study consists of Neo-Liberalism, Mutual Interdependence, Bilateral Relations, and Economic Diplomacy. The results of this study indicate that Indonesia by using its economic diplomacy can achieve the national interests in economic sector and can be keen to see the economic opportunities that exist in Kazakhstan. This is indicated by the positive results in the trade sector between Indonesia and Kazakhstan in 2018 which reached 6,822.9 USD. Meanwhile the trade data from 2015 to 2017 showed a deficit which amounted to -10,566.2 USD (2015), -7,769.9 USD (2016), -22,321.0 USD (2017). Keywords : Indonesia, Kazakhstan, foreign economic policy, bilateral relations, economic diplomacy iv ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membahas secara eksplisit tentang kepentingan ekonomi Indonesia dalam melihat peluang di negara Kazakhstan. Dengan berfokus pada kebijakan luar negeri dan strategi diplomasi ekonomi yang dilakukan oleh Kementerian Luar Negeri Indonesia dengan Kazakhstan di periode 2015 sampai 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Indonesia Needs to Drive Integration
    EASTEcoNOMics, POLitics AND PUBASIALic POLicy IN East Asia ANDFORUM THE PaciFic Vol.5 No.4 October-December 2013 $9.50 Quarterly Indonesia’s choices Mahendra Siregar and others Seizing the infrastructure opportunity Hugh White Old-world assumptions in Australian relations Dewi Fortuna Anwar Reinvention in Indonesia’s foreign policy strategy Djisman Simandjuntak Towards ‘escape velocity’ Edward Aspinall Change of pace ahead after the SBY stasis and more . AsEaN institutional investors, and others, by co-financing and/or underwriting Why Indonesia projects in innovative ways. If Indonesia, and perhaps Asia Pacific and some other G20 needs to governments, make early decisions to be stakeholders in the new AIIB, the stage will be set for cooperation drive integration between, as well as healthy competition among, all development banks. This could help to rekindle DIONISIUS NARJOKO foundation of a fully integrated global economic recovery by filling and equitable ASEAN are yet to be some of the yawning gaps in global S THE biggest country in achieved. With 2015 now just the year economic infrastructure. A Southeast Asia, Indonesia after next, time is running out, and Indonesia must lead by example. is a natural leader of ASEAN. For the need to address the challenges and It will benefit from these regional decades since the association was obstacles to realising the AEC was and global initiatives if it puts its own established in 1967, Indonesia has acknowlegded by ASEAN leaders at house in order, including improving played an important role maintaining their 2012 Phnom Penh meeting. domestic connectivity. Regional and geopolitical stability in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Bapak Mahendra
    25 August 2020 His Excellency Mr Mahendra Siregar Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Ministry of Foreign Affairs Jl Taman Pejambon 6 Jakarta 10110 Dear Bapak Mahendra, Thank you for meeting me yesterday. I found the discussion insightful and valuable; it highlighted for me the breadth of the positive agenda on which the UK and Indonesia are engaged, from bilateral trade through to key global security issues we are addressing together at the UN Security Council. As we discussed during the call, I am writing to you with more information on how we would like to take forward close and transparent consultation with Indonesia on proposed UK legislation on due diligence in agricultural commodity supply chains. As I noted during our meeting, in July 2019, the Global Resource Initiative Taskforce – an independent group of senior business, finance, government and civil society leaders – was convened by the UK Government to recommend actions to support sustainable supply chains, livelihoods and growth. In March 2020, the group made several recommendations, including that the UK introduce a requirement on businesses trading in the UK to undertake due diligence on their agricultural supply chains in relation to deforestation risk. The UK Government has now considered this recommendation and is proposing to take an approach to agricultural commodity due diligence legislation which is based on ensuring that all relevant products meet the legal requirements in their country of origin. We would like to consult on this “legality-based” approach and develop this policy together with the Government of Indonesia, other international governments, businesses, industry bodies and civil society organisations, to ensure it is designed with mutual respect for existing processes, and to the mutual benefit of our joint goals on trade, growth and sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Policy Triad of Jokowi
    INDONESIAN DIPLOMACY GURJIT SINGH Ambassador The Foreign Policy Triad of Jokowi President Jokowi appears to be focusing his foreign policy on a troika of engagements—with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, archipelagic geopolitics including the Indo-Pacific, and China. hen President Joko Widodo was elected President in 2014, his W simplicity, humility and ability to run cities was manifest. The freshness that he brought to politics was welcomed all around with immense hope. The one area that he was found to be lacking experience was in foreign policy. Here too he chose to run a new path. He started by removing the professional team of Marty Natalegawa and Dinopati Djalal. Both were career diplomats who were perceived close to the former president, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, best known as SBY, but both had years to retirement. He brought in new career diplomats who were surprises to the establishment but have served him well. Ibu Retno Marsudi and Pak Abdurrahman Mohammad Fachir led the ministry in the Jokowi I term. Fachir was replaced by SBYs G20 Sherpa Mahendra Siregar in the Jokowi II Cabinet. These choices meant that Joko Widodo, also known as Jokowi, wanted a firm grip on the foreign policy establishment. When Indonesia became independent its RISING ASIA JOURNAL. VOLUME 1, ISSUE 1 (WINTER/SPRING) JANUARY TO APRIL 2021. © RISING ASIA FOUNDATION 2021. D D Foreign Policy Triad of Jokowi 35 founding fathers saw it as a means. Their slogan was “A sovereign, independent, just and prosperous Indonesia.”1 These foreign policy initiatives were new for the reticent yet perceptive Jokowi.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesian Technocracy in Transition: a Preliminary Analysis*
    Indonesian Technocracy in Transition: A Preliminary Analysis* Shiraishi Takashi** Indonesia underwent enormous political and institutional changes in the wake of the 1997–98 economic crisis and the collapse of Soeharto’s authoritarian regime. Yet something curious happened under President Yudhoyono: a politics of economic growth has returned in post-crisis decentralized, democratic Indonesia. The politics of economic growth is politics that transforms political issues of redistribution into problems of output and attempts to neutralize social conflict in favor of a consensus on growth. Under Soeharto, this politics provided ideological legitimation to his authoritarian regime. The new politics of economic growth in post-Soeharto Indo- nesia works differently. Decentralized democracy created a new set of conditions for doing politics: social divisions along ethnic and religious lines are no longer suppressed but are contained locally. A new institutional framework was also cre- ated for the economic policy-making. The 1999 Central Bank Law guarantees the independence of the Bank Indonesia (BI) from the government. The Law on State Finance requires the government to keep the annual budget deficit below 3% of the GDP while also expanding the powers of the Ministry of Finance (MOF) at the expense of National Development Planning Agency. No longer insulated in a state of political demobilization as under Soeharto, Indonesian technocracy depends for its performance on who runs these institutions and the complex political processes that inform their decisions and operations. Keywords: Indonesia, technocrats, technocracy, decentralization, democratization, central bank, Ministry of Finance, National Development Planning Agency At a time when Indonesia is seen as a success story, with its economy growing at 5.9% on average in the post-global financial crisis years of 2009 to 2012 and performing better * I would like to thank Caroline Sy Hau for her insightful comments and suggestions for this article.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Indonesia in the G-20: Background, Role and Objectives of Indonesia’S Membership
    G-20 Research Project: The Role of Indonesia in the G-20: Background, Role and Objectives of Indonesia’s Membership G-20 Research Team Yulius P Hermawan (Coordinator) Wulani Sriyuliani Getruida H Hardjowijono Sylvie Tanaga Published by G-20 Research Project The Role of Indonesia in the G-20: Background, Role and Objectives of Indonesia’s Membership Yulius P Hermawan G-20 Research Team Published by Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Indonesia Office in cooperation with Department of International Relations, Parahyangan University Design & Layout: Malhaf Budiharto Komunitas Pejaten First editions, May 2011 ISBN: 978-602-8866-03-3 Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Indonesia Office Jl. Kemang Selatan II No. 2A Jakarta Selatan 12730 DKI Jakarta - Indonesia Tel. +62 (0)21 7193 711 Fax +62 (0)21 7179 1358 E-mail:[email protected]. Preface The G-20 has commenced its activities since the inception in 1999 in Germany. However the international community only began to recognize its importance after the United States hosted the first G-20 Summit in 2008 in Washington. This first summit signaled the change of the G-20 from ministerial to summit level. The G-20 became a high profiled forum after the group’s leaders agreed to hold G-20 Summits twice a year and argued for the need to pursue urgently an agenda for rescuing the world economy from malaise. They accepted that unless they work together in close coordination and cooperation, the world economy would continue to decline. The profile of G-20 has been rocketing highly since the G-20 leaders agreed that G-20 should become the premier forum for their economic cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Appointment of Member of the Board of Commissioners Jakarta, July 1
    Appointment of member of the Board of Commissioners Jakarta, July 1, 2016 – At today’s Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders, the shareholders of PT Vale Indonesia Tbk (“PT Vale” or the “Company”, IDX Ticker: INCO) approved the appointment of Mr Mahendra Siregar as Independent Commissioner of the Company to fill in the vacant position. Based on the foregoing, the current composition of the Board of Commissioners of the Company is as follow: President Commissioner : Jennifer Anne Maki Vice-President Commissioner : Mark James Travers Commissioner : Stuart Alan Harshaw Commissioner : Nobuhiro Matsumoto Commissioner : Andrea Marques de Almeida Commissioner : Robert Alan Morris Commissioner : Akira Nozaki Independent Commissioner : Irwandy Arif Independent Commissioner : Idrus Paturusi Independent Commissioner : Mahendra Siregar We will comply with any regulatory requirements applicable relating to the changes of the Board of Commissioners of the Company. Brief biography of the newly appointed member of the Board of Commissioners of the Company: Mr Mahendra Siregar started his career as an employee of the Department of Foreign Affairs in 1986 and joined the Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs in 2001. He served several key governmental positions including Expert Staff of the Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs from 2001 to 2004, the Deputy of the International Economic Affairs of the Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs from 2004 to 2009, the Chairman/CEO of Indonesia Eximbank in 2009, the Vice Minister of the Trade Ministry from 2009 to 2011, the Vice Minister of the Finance Ministry from 2011 to 2013 and the Chairman of the Investment Coordinating Board from 2013 to 2014. He served as Commissioner of PT Aneka Tambang Tbk from 2008 to 2009 and the President Commissioner of PT Rajawali Nusantara Indonesia in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Responses to U.S.-China Competition in the Indo-Pacific: Indonesia
    Regional Responses to U.S.-China Competition in the Indo-Pacific Indonesia Jonah Blank C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4412z3 For more information on this series, visit www.rand.org/US-PRC-influence Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0558-6 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2021 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: globe: jcrosemann/GettyImages; flags: luzitanija/Adobe Stock Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The U.S. Department of Defense’s (DoD’s) 2018 National Defense Strategy highlights the important role that U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia's Politically Driven Anti-Corruption Agenda and the Post-Election Future
    Volume 7 | Issue 15 | Number 2 | Article ID 3117 | Apr 12, 2009 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Indonesia's Politically Driven Anti-corruption Agenda and the Post-Election Future Gerry van Klinken Indonesia's Politically Driven Anti- corruption Agenda and the Post- Election Future Gerry van Klinken Introduction Despite the apparent appeal of Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono's record of fighting corruption foreigners would be wise not to jump to simple conclusions about the Yudhoyono and Megawati centrality of the anti-corruption agenda in this year’s presidential contest. Not every group of Most polls are predicting that Indonesians will voters views the corruption issue the same way. re-elect President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono After a detailed review of recent anti- (SBY) in July this year. Many commentators add corruption activities and a strong counter- that they will do so mainly because of his reaction, van Klinken concludes that the strong record of fighting corruption. “Graft- contest between Yudhoyono and Megawati Busting Yudhoyono To Keep Reins In Jakarta”, could bring to light differences over the read a headline in The Age, 2 January 2009. direction in which Indonesia as a whole should Australian foreign policymakers from the prime be going. Class is making its presence felt in minister down are reportedly hoping quietly subtle ways. An essentially negative anti-graft SBY will win (AAP, 5 March 2009). The polls program by itself is not enough to transform predicting an SBY win are certainly strong, and Indonesian governance. Anti-corruption talk, there is widespread agreement in Indonesia and the increasingly verbalised resistance to it, that corruption is a bad thing.
    [Show full text]